Crypto World
Strategy limits BTC sales to defined scenarios, says Phong Le
Strategy, the Bitcoin treasury company led by CEO Phong Le, signaled it may sell a portion of its Bitcoin holdings to fund the dividend on its Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock (STRC), which carries an 11.5% yield for holders. In an interview, Le outlined a decision framework that prioritizes financial math and shareholder value: the firm would choose to dispose of BTC if the sale is accretive to Bitcoin per share and benefits common shareholders, rather than defaulting to equity sales to cover the dividend. He stressed that any BTC sales would be undertaken only if they improve the fundamental metric for Strategy’s investors.
Le’s stance crystallizes a broader debate within Strategy’s ranks, where co-founder Michael Saylor has floated the possibility of selling BTC periodically to support dividend payments. That prospect has fed concerns among Bitcoin investors about potential selling pressure from one of the market’s largest corporate treasury holders. In a recent earnings discussion, Saylor framed the matter in a way that suggested strategic timing and market signaling could play as much a role as the financial mechanics of the sale. He indicated that Strategy could “inoculate the market” by selling BTC to fund the yield and send a clear message that the company is capable of sustaining its rewards to investors even in adverse conditions. He also said that if Bitcoin appreciates by more than roughly 2.3% per year, Strategy might fund its dividends indefinitely without diluting shareholders by selling Strategy’s stock.
Strategy currently sits atop the Bitcoin treasury sector by size. The company holds 818,334 BTC, a stash valued at more than $66 billion at the time of writing, making it the largest publicly traded BTC treasury according to BitcoinTreasuries data. That scale is precisely what has heightened scrutiny and debate about how such holdings, and the sales tied to them, might influence Bitcoin’s market dynamics in the medium term. The tension is not solely about the amount sold today, but about the signaling effects and the potential for repeated, scheduled, or opportunistic sales to support corporate returns.
In weighing the potential impact of Strategy’s actions, Le argued that Bitcoin’s daily trading volume, estimated around $60 billion, affords substantial liquidity to absorb more than a $1 billion annual commitment in BTC sales tied to STRC dividends. He contends that the market’s depth should prevent a material drag on prices simply from the regular execution of the corporate yield strategy. Still, the possibility of large, episodic sales remains a focal point for investors who worry about price impact during periods of volatility or thinner liquidity windows.
Earlier coverage from Cointelegraph highlighted a conflicting thread within the same narrative: some market observers feared that Strategy’s sales could undermine BTC’s price, even if well-structured and well-timed. In response, supporters argue that the very existence of a durable, revenue-generating instrument like STRC helps attract institutional interest in Bitcoin-backed securities, potentially offering a new path for long-term capital to participate in crypto markets. The topic has also attracted commentary from other industry figures, including those who have defended Strategy’s approach to balancing treasury management with market stability. For additional context, see reporting surrounding Samson Mow’s defense of Strategy’s selling decisions and the broader discourse on corporate BTC reserves.
Strategy’s framework: when BTC sales make sense
At the core of Le’s remarks is a practical, numbers-driven criterion: any BTC sale must be accretive to Strategy’s key metric—Bitcoin per share—and must improve outcomes for common shareholders. In other words, the company would prefer to convert a portion of its BTC into cash or equity space if that conversion increases theBTC per share ratio or otherwise strengthens the overall value proposition for investors, rather than disproportionately diluting or depressing equity through other means. Le’s framing is deliberately disciplined, signaling a willingness to use Bitcoin sales as a tool to sustain dividend obligations only when it enhances long-term value, not as a reflexive cash-out to meet near-term financial targets.
What constitutes “accretive” in this setting is a central question for analysts. Strategy has built its corporate narrative around a steady, dividend-backed yield derived from its BTC holdings, rather than relying solely on equity finance or debt instruments. Le’s insistence on accretion implies a trade-off analysis: comparisons between selling BTC to fund the STRC dividend, versus selling Strategy’s stock or using other balance-sheet mechanisms. The decision, he asserts, will be guided by what preserves or improves BTC per share over time, a measure that directly ties BTC holdings to shareholder value and policy credibility.
Saylor’s posture: market signaling and potential constraints
Michael Saylor’s public commentary adds a complementary, if cautionary, layer to Strategy’s strategic calculus. He has suggested that the company could routinely sell portions of its BTC to support dividend payments, arguing that periodic activity can normalize the process for the market and demonstrate the corporation’s commitment to its yield model. The logic, according to Saylor, is that measured sales can ensure the dividend remains funded even as Bitcoin’s price moves. He framed this as a form of market inoculation—an intentional signaling move rather than an indiscriminate liquidation drive.
In the same breath, Saylor described a potentially capital-efficient path: if Bitcoin can grow in value at or above a certain pace, Strategy might fund dividends without issuing more stock. He has claimed that the company could “stop selling MSTR common stock right now” if BTC-driven proceeds prove sufficient to cover dividends, implying a ceiling on equity dilution should BTC performance be favorable. Whether this is a practical, repeatable reality—given market cycles and macro conditions—remains a core point of debate among investors tracking Strategy’s governance and the long-term implications for BTC’s price formation.
Market dynamics: can Strategy’s scale be absorbed without skews?
Strategy’s vast Bitcoin reserve has amplified discussions about liquidity, signaling, and price impact. BitcoinTreasuries data positioning Strategy as the largest publicly traded BTC treasury underscores the potential magnitude of any sustained sale. Critics warn that even well-timed, gradual disposals by a single sovereign-entity treasury could introduce selling pressure, particularly if large blocks are unlocked during episodes of heightened volatility or thin liquidity windows. Supporters counter that the market’s daily turnover and deep liquidity should be able to accommodate ongoing BTC-backed dividends without derailing price discovery or creating sustained downward pressure.
From a practical standpoint, the arithmetic of Strategy’s dividend obligation matters. If the STRC instrument carries 11.5% yield, the annual dividend obligation can exceed $1 billion, depending on BTC’s price and the levels of BTC retained within the treasury. Le’s assertion that the market’s liquidity is sufficient to absorb such a flow hinges on continuous, orderly execution and the absence of panic-driven liquidity squeezes. The debate touches on a broader question: how do large corporate BTC reserves influence price formation, and what are the implications for risk management when a crown jewel of the crypto treasury sector contemplates periodic sales?
Broader implications for corporate BTC treasuries
What Strategy is exploring is more than a one-off liquidity strategy; it represents a test case for how corporate treasuries can evolve in a crypto-native economy. The idea of using BTC sales to fund dividends raises important questions for investors, regulators, and the broader market about governance, transparency, and the durability of revenue streams backed by digital assets. As more institutions weigh BTC reserve strategies, the industry will closely watch how such corporate actions align with risk management practices, tax considerations, and the timing of transactions in relation to Bitcoin’s price cycles.
For readers following the sector, the next chapters will likely center on concrete sale timing, the actual impact on BTC per share, and the resonance of STRC’s yield with other crypto-linked yields. Market participants will also want clarity on whether Strategy’s appetite for BTC sales remains consistent across varying market conditions or becomes more tempered during periods of downside risk or regulatory shifts. The ongoing conversation around Strategy’s approach dovetails with broader coverage of how notable treasury holders manage large Bitcoin positions in relation to dividends, equity strategy, and the quest for stable, long-term value creation in crypto markets.
Looking ahead, investors will want to monitor whether Strategy proceeds with BTC liquidations to fund STRC dividends, how those moves are staggered over time, and what signals emerge about the company’s long-term posture toward its Bitcoin holdings. The evolving dynamic between BTC price action, dividend commitments, and the market’s capacity to absorb new BTC supply will remain a focal point for risk managers and traders tracking the mainstreaming of Bitcoin-backed corporate finance.
Sources and context: Strategy’s statements and the STRC yield framework were discussed in a CNBC interview and related coverage. The company’s BTC holdings and scale are tracked by BitcoinTreasuries, which lists Strategy as holding 818,334 BTC valued at over $66 billion at the time of reporting. For additional perspective on Strategy’s public market stance and commentary from other industry figures, see prior coverage on Strategy’s discussions around selling portions of its BTC treasury.
Readers should stay attentive to official disclosures and earnings calls from Strategy for any updates on potential BTC sales, dividend funding plans, and changes to the STRC program, as these developments will shape Bitcoin market dynamics and investor sentiment in the months ahead.
Crypto World
Bitfinex ETH Shorts Double as Whale Moves Signal Major Ethereum Move Ahead
TLDR:
- Bitfinex ETH shorts surged sharply in 72 hours, signaling aggressive whale bearish positioning.
- Ethereum remained above key support despite rising short exposure from large market participants.
- Historical Bitfinex short spikes have often preceded strong volatility and short squeeze events.
- ETH gained 0.84% daily and 0.28% weekly, showing resilience amid growing bearish sentiment.
Bitfinex ETH shorts remain a major talking point after whale traders doubled bearish exposure within 72 hours, raising expectations of a volatility-driven move.
Meanwhile, Ethereum traded higher with a 0.84% daily gain and a 0.28% weekly increase, showing resilience despite growing short pressure and keeping both breakdown and short squeeze scenarios firmly in play.
Whale Positioning Sparks Fresh Ethereum Uncertainty
Bitfinex ETH shorts surged aggressively over the last 72 hours, capturing the attention of traders tracking institutional flows.
The move reflects a rapid increase in bearish exposure, with whale-sized traders appearing to position ahead of a potential volatility event.
Bitfinex has historically attracted sophisticated market participants, including large funds, arbitrage desks, and high-net-worth traders.
Because of this, unusual changes in Bitfinex ETH shorts are rarely ignored. Market watchers often treat such positioning as an early signal of directional conviction or strategic hedging.
Recent data showed shorts rising almost vertically, creating a sharp contrast with Ethereum’s relatively stable price action. ETH continues consolidating between $2,280 and $2,400, showing no decisive breakdown despite the growing short interest.
That contradiction has fueled market debate. If whale traders truly expect a sharp correction, many would anticipate heavier spot selling and broader downside expansion. Instead, Ethereum has remained resilient, with buyers repeatedly defending lower levels.
The sudden rise in Bitfinex ETH shorts could indicate traders preparing for macro-driven volatility. However, the visible short exposure alone does not confirm outright bearish conviction.
Institutional traders often use exchange shorts to hedge spot holdings, manage options risk, or capture basis opportunities. As a result, the reported positions may represent part of a broader market-neutral strategy.
Short Squeeze Risk Keeps Bulls Engaged
While the increase in Bitfinex ETH shorts appears bearish, historical market behavior offers a different perspective. Similar spikes in whale short positioning have previously created the conditions for powerful short squeezes.
Large short positions function as future buy orders under pressure. If Ethereum pushes above resistance near $2,420, forced liquidations could trigger rapid upside momentum.
That process typically unfolds quickly. Short sellers rush to close positions, momentum traders enter breakout setups, and algorithmic systems amplify directional movement.
Ethereum’s current technical structure supports this possibility. Price remains compressed within a narrow range, while repeated dips toward $2,300 continue attracting buyers.
Momentum indicators also suggest the bearish trend may be losing strength. MACD is beginning to recover, and RSI has climbed toward neutral territory after cooling from recent weakness.
This leaves Ethereum in a pressure zone where either side could gain control rapidly. A breakdown below support may validate the whale positioning and accelerate selling.
However, a clean breakout above resistance could turn Bitfinex ETH shorts into liquidity for a sharp upside move.
For now, Bitfinex ETH shorts remain the market’s primary volatility signal. Ethereum is holding steady, but positioning suggests that price compression may not last much longer.
Crypto World
Tom Lee Projects $62,500 ETH Price Target Backed by Tokenization and Agentic AI Thesis
TLDR:
- Tom Lee forecasts a 25x move for Ethereum, driven by tokenization and agentic AI infrastructure demand
- ETH outperformed the S&P 500 by nearly 20 points and beat gold and energy stocks since the Middle East conflict
- Lee’s $62,500 target places Ethereum at one-quarter of Bitcoin’s projected $250,000 fair value using ratio models
- JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon’s shift on crypto supports Lee’s view that blockchain rails are reshaping global finance
Fundstrat’s Tom Lee has laid out a bold price target for Ethereum, citing macro conditions, tokenization trends, and the rise of agentic AI. His analysis points to a potential 25x move for ETH from current levels.
The forecast draws on historical consolidation patterns, Bitcoin ratio comparisons, and structural shifts in global finance. Lee believes Ethereum is better positioned today than at any prior cycle peak.
Tom Lee’s Case for a Massive Ethereum Move
Ethereum has shown notable resilience against traditional assets in recent market cycles. According to Lee, since the Middle East conflict began, ETH outperformed energy stocks and beat the S&P 500 by nearly 20 percentage points.
It also outperformed gold and silver over the same period. These figures form part of the foundation for his bullish long-term outlook.
Lee also references Ethereum’s decade-long chart to support his thesis. He identifies three major consolidation phases in ETH’s history. The first, in 2016, preceded a 227x price increase. The second, spanning 2018 to 2019, led to a 54x rally.
He stated, “I think there is a massive move coming in Ethereum, driven by a couple of things: tokenization and agentic AI.” Lee argues Ethereum is now deep in its third consolidation, setting up for a similarly large move ahead.
Two main catalysts drive Lee’s forecast: tokenization and agentic AI. On tokenization, he draws a comparison to the U.S. leaving the gold standard in 1971.
That transition unleashed a wave of financial innovation, from money market funds to currency futures to indexed products.
Lee explained, “Tokenization is making almost every asset synthetic, and it follows a roadmap that happened when the US went off the gold standard in 1971.” He sees a similar wave unfolding today as financial assets become digital.
He points to a notable shift in sentiment from JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon, once one of crypto’s loudest critics. Dimon has since stated that “crypto is better than the current financial system.”
For Lee, this reflects a broader institutional acknowledgment that blockchain infrastructure is becoming central to modern finance.
Ethereum’s Price Ratio to Bitcoin Drives the $62,500 Target
Lee builds his price target using Ethereum’s historical ratio against Bitcoin. The 8-year average ETH/BTC ratio sits at 0.0479, while the 2021 peak reached 0.087.
Using a Bitcoin fair value estimate of $250,000, a return to the average ratio puts ETH at $12,000. A return to the 2021 high would bring it to $22,000.
However, Lee argues Ethereum’s positioning today exceeds its 2021 setup. He introduces what he calls the “payment rails” thesis, placing ETH at roughly one-quarter of Bitcoin’s total value.
He noted, “That gets you to $62,500, and that’s kind of following the previous historical price cycles.” That ratio produces the price target he now puts forward publicly.
Agentic AI also plays a role in this outlook. Lee notes that AI agents will need identity and payment infrastructure. He argued, “Agents almost certainly won’t want to use PayPal or Visa or MasterCard to do micropayments.” Crypto rails, particularly Ethereum, are better suited for that function going forward.
Lee sees a bull market potentially running through 2028, provided macro conditions stabilize. He noted, “If we clear this Middle East problem and the US economy holds up through higher oil, I think we’re looking at a bull market that could run through 2028.”
If equity markets move higher and oil pressures ease, Ethereum could be among the biggest beneficiaries of the next major cycle.
Crypto World
Bitcoin Dominance Drops: Is Altseason Finally Here as Capital Rotation Begins?
TLDR:
-
- Bitcoin dominance neared 60% in early 2026, driven by ETF inflows and institutional accumulation across the market.
- CryptoOnchain’s Altcoin Volume Trend signal shows 30-day averages crossing above 365-day averages on CEX data.
- SOL and SUI posted double-digit gains recently, suggesting early capital rotation beyond Bitcoin is already underway.
- MVRV and Profit/Loss Margin remain below cycle peaks, indicating the current bull market may have room to grow.
- Bitcoin dominance neared 60% in early 2026, driven by ETF inflows and institutional accumulation across the market.
Bitcoin dominance has begun losing momentum following a prolonged uptrend, drawing fresh attention from analysts and traders.
A bearish MACD crossover on the BTC dominance chart has triggered wide speculation. Many market observers now believe capital is starting to rotate into altcoins.
Throughout the first half of 2026, Bitcoin led the crypto market almost entirely on its own. Whether this shift marks a temporary pullback or the start of a broader altseason remains the central question.
On-Chain Data Points to Early Rotation Signals
For most of early 2026, Bitcoin absorbed the majority of crypto market inflows. Spot BTC ETF demand, institutional buying, and macro uncertainty pushed BTC dominance close to 60%. During this period, most altcoins struggled to keep pace with Bitcoin’s performance.
However, conditions appear to be changing beneath the surface. Crypto Quant analyst CryptoOnchain recently pointed to a key metric called the “Altcoin Volume Increasing Trend.”
Source: Cryptoquant
This signal appears when the 30-day average altcoin trading volume crosses above the 365-day average. It measures the CEX Volume Ratio between Others and the Top 5 assets.
Historically, this pattern has appeared before major altcoin rallies. During the 2021 cycle, similar signals preceded strong runs in ETH and smaller-cap tokens. That context has given analysts reason to take the current reading seriously.
Price action is beginning to reflect early rotation as well. While ETH has held relatively steady, SOL and SUI have posted notable double-digit gains recently. These moves suggest capital may already be moving beyond Bitcoin into the broader market.
Cycle Metrics Suggest Bull Run Has Room to Grow
Beyond volume data, on-chain metrics are painting a broader picture. Indicators such as Profit/Loss Margin and MVRV remain well below previous cycle peaks. This suggests the current bull market has not yet reached the levels of excess seen in prior tops.
Long-term holders are also showing limited selling behavior at this stage. Historically, sustained distribution from long-term holders has preceded major market tops. The current restraint from this group points to continued confidence in further upside.
Looking back at the long-term BTC Market Cap Dominance chart adds further context. Both the 2017 and 2021 cycles saw dominance decline sharply before altcoins rallied hard. Capital rotated from BTC into ETH first, then spread into smaller assets, triggering broader market gains.
The pattern forming today shares structural similarities with those prior cycles. That said, past performance does not guarantee future outcomes.
Traders are now watching closely to see whether BTC dominance recovers or continues its decline into a confirmed altseason.
Crypto World
Major Bitcoin Mining Pools Join Stratum V2 Collaborative Organization
Seven major Bitcoin mining pools have joined the Stratum V2 working group to develop an industry-wide open standard protocol used by mining pool operators to communicate with individual miners in their pools.
AntPool, Block Inc, F2Pool, Foundry, MARA Foundation, SpiderPool, and DMND all joined the working group to collaborate on the mining pool communication standard, which could reduce the time it takes pools to successfully mine blocks, according to an announcement from Stratum V2.
“Bitcoin mining is competitive and fragmented by design. It is a race for efficiency where a millisecond can determine whether a miner wins a block or loses to a competitor,” the announcement said.
Foundry and AntPool are the two largest Bitcoin mining pools by hashrate, the total amount of computing power deployed by miners to secure the Bitcoin network.
Foundry controls nearly 30% of the global mining pool hashrate, and AntPool controls about 17.7%, according to data from Hashrate Index.

Mining pools broken down by the share of global Bitcoin mining hashrate they control. Source: Hashrate Index
Developing an open standard for Bitcoin mining pools that is not controlled by any one mining pool operator helps decentralize the mining industry, which has become increasingly centralized, while also giving miners greater flexibility in choosing block templates.
Related: Tether launches open-source mining framework to unify Bitcoin infrastructure
Bitcoin mining difficulty is set to rise in the next difficulty adjustment, while energy costs soar
The Bitcoin mining difficulty, the relative challenge of adding new blocks to the ledger, is projected to rise again in the next difficulty adjustment in May.
“The next Bitcoin difficulty adjustment is estimated to take place on May 15, 2026, 5:58 PM UTC, increasing the Bitcoin mining difficulty from 132.47 T to 135.64 T,” according to CoinWarz.

Bitcoin mining difficulty continues to increase over the long term. Source: CoinWarz
Rising network difficulty and increasing energy costs are placing additional pressure on the already competitive Bitcoin mining industry.
Up to 20% of Bitcoin miners are unprofitable under current crypto market and economic conditions, according to asset manager CoinShares.
Hashprice, a critical metric for miner profitability, fell to levels between hit $36 and $38/Petahash-seconds per day, which is at near or at breakeven profit levels for some miners, CoinShares said.
Magazine: Bitcoin may take 7 years to upgrade to post-quantum: BIP-360 co-author
Crypto World
The $2 Trillion Private Credit Threat Hiding Behind the AI Boom
TLDR:
- Private credit funds have grown outstanding AI loans from near zero to over $200 billion in just years.
- The FSB found banks hold up to $500 billion in direct exposure to private credit funds globally.
- Around 10% of private credit borrowers lack the cash flow needed to meet their interest obligations.
- Retail investor participation in private credit surged from near zero to 13% over the past decade.
Private credit has grown into a $2 trillion industry financing some of the largest AI infrastructure projects globally. Regulators and financial watchdogs are now raising alarms about its opacity.
The Financial Stability Board recently released a 49-page report on the sector. Its conclusions were stark. The industry has never been tested during a real economic downturn at its current size. Meanwhile, markets hover near all-time highs, and few investors appear to notice.
AI Infrastructure Boom Fuels Private Credit Expansion
Morgan Stanley estimates global data center construction will reach $2.9 trillion through 2028. About $1.5 trillion of that is expected to come from private credit funds.
Firms like Blackstone, Apollo, Blue Owl, and BlackRock are leading this lending surge. Outstanding loans to AI companies from these funds have now surpassed $200 billion.
The borrowers are mostly mid-sized companies with debt at five to seven times their earnings. Around 10% of them cannot generate enough cash flow to cover interest payments. Furthermore, default rates are rising. None of this, however, shows up in any public market data.
The sector operates entirely in private, without standardized reporting requirements. Valuations are only updated quarterly, with heavy management discretion applied.
There are no public credit ratings for most of these loans. That lack of transparency makes meaningful risk assessment nearly impossible.
As BullTheoryio noted on X, private credit “has never been tested in a real economic downturn at its current size.” The FSB’s report reflected that same concern.
Policymakers admitted they cannot properly monitor the sector. The admission has since drawn renewed scrutiny from financial observers globally.
Bank Exposure and Retail Investor Risk Add to Systemic Concerns
Banks carry far more exposure to private credit than public figures typically suggest. The FSB estimates direct bank exposure to these funds at between $270 billion and $500 billion.
Moreover, roughly half of all private credit borrowers also hold revolving credit lines at traditional banks. A wave of defaults could therefore hit both private funds and banks simultaneously.
Retail investors have quietly entered this space in growing numbers. Their share of the market rose from virtually zero to 13% over the past decade.
Many may not realize their money is locked in illiquid loans to highly leveraged companies. These loans cannot be easily valued or sold during a market crisis.
Several AI data center deals involve off-balance-sheet financing, GPU-backed collateral, and complex leasing structures.
One analyst warned the situation mirrors past cycles of financial opacity. “There is almost no transparency about the financing structures, the scale is astronomical,” the analyst noted.
The S&P 500 currently trades at 23 times forward earnings, with five companies accounting for 30% of the index. AI investment now drives nearly half of U.S. GDP growth. If the boom falters, these losses may not surface in public markets until it is already too late.
Crypto World
Inside Ondo Finance: How OUSG and USDY Tokenize US Treasuries Through Distinct Legal Frameworks
TLDR:
- OUSG operates as a Delaware limited partnership investing through BlackRock’s BUIDL fund into US Treasuries.
- USDY holders are secured creditors of a special purpose vehicle backed by US Treasuries and bank deposits.
- OUSG is restricted to Qualified Purchasers, while USDY targets non-US investors under Regulation S.
- Both products are audited, FinCEN-registered, and built on compliance frameworks institutional teams accept.
Ondo Finance has built two tokenised products on US Treasuries, each carrying a separate legal structure. OUSG targets institutional capital through a Delaware private fund, while USDY serves non-US investors as a secured debt instrument.
Both products have passed compliance checks from major institutional partners. Understanding the legal design behind each product matters more than tracking the ONDO token price alone.
OUSG Brings Institutional-Grade Access to Tokenised Treasuries
OUSG is a tokenised limited partnership interest in a private fund. The fund invests primarily in BlackRock’s USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund.
That fund holds short-term US Treasuries backed by the US government. Investors in OUSG become limited partners in a Delaware-structured vehicle managed by Ondo Capital Management LLC.
The custody chain follows a clear and regulated path. Investor USDC converts to USD through Coinbase or Circle. That USD then flows into BlackRock’s BUIDL fund. Fidelity, Franklin Templeton, and WisdomTree also participate alongside BlackRock in that fund.
The legal wrapper is equally structured. OUSG operates under a Section 3(c)(7) private fund structure. It relies on Rule 506(c) of Regulation D for its offering. Every investor passes KYC, AML, and sanctions screening administered by the General Partner.
As crypto analyst @2xnmore noted, “OUSG is only available to Qualified Purchasers and verified Accredited Investors.
This is not a product trying to appear institutional. It is a product that is legally and structurally institutional in every dimension.”
USDY Functions as a Secured Debt Instrument for Non-US Investors
USDY operates through Ondo USDY LLC, a special purpose vehicle. The LLC borrows funds from lenders and issues USDY tokens as evidence of its debt obligation.
Those proceeds then go into US Treasuries and US bank demand deposits. A perfected security interest protects those underlying assets.
Holders of USDY are secured creditors, not equity holders or token speculators. They hold a legal claim on the underlying assets of the special purpose vehicle.
This structure is offered under Regulation S, making it available to non-US persons. Both retail and institutional investors outside the US can access it.
Ondo USDY LLC is registered as a money services business with FinCEN. FinCEN is the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network under the US Treasury Department.
Every USDY holder goes through AML and Bank Secrecy Act compliance screening. This registration adds another layer of regulatory credibility to the product.
Smart contracts for both products have been audited by leading firms. Both entities also undergo regular financial and information security audits.
The two products serve different investor profiles but share the same underlying asset conviction. Tokenised US Treasuries remain the core financial primitive behind both structures.
Crypto World
Strategy CEO Outlines Criteria for Bitcoin Sales
Phong Le, the CEO of Bitcoin treasury company Strategy, outlined conditions during an interview on Friday, under which the company would sell some of its Bitcoin holdings.
The company will sell Bitcoin to pay the dividend on its Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock (STRC), a corporate credit instrument that pays an 11.5% dividend to holders, and to defer or offset taxes, Le told CNBC. He added:
“I believe in math over ideology, and at the point where selling Bitcoin versus selling equity to pay a dividend is better for our Bitcoin per share, and for our common shareholders, we will do it.”
Le added that the company would only sell BTC to pay for the yield owed to holders of its credit instruments if the sales are “accretive” to Strategy’s shareholders, meaning the company increases the BTC per share metric.

Source: Phong Le
The comments came after Strategy co-founder Michael Saylor said that the company might sell portions of its BTC periodically, stoking fears among BTC investors about the potential impacts of Strategy’s sales on Bitcoin’s market price.
Related: Samson Mow defends Strategy selling portions of its Bitcoin treasury
Saylor says Strategy may sell BTC, but Le says it won’t impact asset prices significantly
“We’ll probably sell some Bitcoin to fund a dividend, just to inoculate the market, just to send the message that we did it,” Saylor said in an earnings call on Tuesday.
Saylor added that if BTC appreciates by more than 2.3% annually, Strategy could fund its dividend payments “forever” without selling Strategy’s stock and diluting shareholders.

The annual yield on Strategy’s BTC treasury. Source: Strategy
“We could stop selling MSTR common stock right now,” Saylor said, adding, “We can fund the dividends with Bitcoin sales.”
The company holds 818,334 BTC, valued at more than $66 billion at the time of this writing, making it the largest publicly traded BTC treasury company, according to data from BitcoinTreasuries.
Treasury companies offloading their BTC may create selling pressure that negatively impacts Bitcoin’s price; however, Le said that BTC’s daily trading volume of about $60 billion is enough to absorb the more than $1 billion in annual dividends that Strategy owes.
Magazine: Big questions: Should you sell your Bitcoin for nickels for a 43% profit?
Crypto World
Crypto News Today Shows CLARITY Act Nearing Finish Line While Pepeto’s Listing Could Trigger the Biggest Meme Coin Returns of 2026
The biggest crypto news today is the CLARITY Act reaching its final stage before a Senate Banking Committee vote, with the White House pushing Congress to pass it by July 4. Bitcoin crossed $80,000 on the news and held above $81,000 for three straight sessions, Circle stock jumped 20%, and the market shifted from fear to conviction in under a week.
Pepeto ($PEPETO) crossed $9.8 million in presale funding as the Binance listing draws near, and holders who entered days ahead of everyone else on coins like Dogecoin turned $500 into six figures because they moved while others were still reading the crypto news today headlines.
CLARITY Act Stablecoin Compromise Clears Senate Path as White House Targets July 4
Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks released compromise text on stablecoin yield rules in the CLARITY Act, removing the final block that stalled the bill for three months, according to CoinDesk.
The crypto news today cycle shifted when CNBC reported Circle shares surged 20% and Coinbase jumped 7% as the market priced in regulatory clarity.
Senate Banking chairman Tim Scott said the committee could mark up the bill in May with a floor vote by June or July, and the White House added pressure by setting July 4 as the target.
Pepeto, BNB, and Dogecoin After the CLARITY Breakthrough
Pepeto
Regulatory clarity sends capital flooding into crypto, but the biggest returns never come from the coins already priced for the news, and that is why Pepeto sitting outside the spotlight with past $9.8 million in funding and a Binance listing ahead matters more than any large cap bounce this week.
The crypto news today headlines confirm the cycle, but the cross-chain bridge on the Pepeto platform moves tokens between networks without charging a cent so money shifts wherever opportunity appears without fees eating the gains, and PepetoSwap handles fee-free swaps on top of that, keeping every dollar whole instead of splitting it across gas and charges.
The architect of the original Pepe token and a veteran from the Binance team lead the project, SolidProof cleared every contract on the network, and capital past $9.8 million arriving before the CLARITY rally proves these wallets priced in the result early.
Analysts project 100x to 300x from the presale price of $0.0000001868, passive staking at 175% APY strengthens wallets between now and listing day, and the entry that exists today closes when the Binance listing arrives, so every hour between now and that moment is the window where crypto news today readers can still get in at the price the earliest wallets paid.
BNB
CoinMarketCap shows BNB at $638 on Thursday, up 3.19% in the last 30 days, and the CLARITY Act gives Binance’s ecosystem a direct regulatory boost.
From $638 with a $86 billion market cap, BNB reaching $1,000 is a 62% gain that requires the entire exchange to grow at a pace it has not matched since 2021.
Dogecoin
Per CoinMarketCap, DOGE sits at $0.1078 on May 8, 2026, gained 1.7% this week but sits 97% below its all-time high of $0.73.
Early DOGE holders turned small positions into fortunes, but from $0.1078 the math points to slow recovery measured in years, not the overnight returns that presale listings create.
Conclusion
The crypto news today confirms the cycle is here: CLARITY is clearing, ETFs are buying, and Bitcoin holds above $81,000. But BNB from $638 and DOGE from $0.1078 offer percentage gains that took years to build the last time, and the difference between those returns and what a presale listing delivers is where fortunes are made.
Early DOGE holders who entered one day ahead of the pack turned $500 into six figures because they were hours ahead, and the Pepeto presale at $9.8 million raised with under $300,000 to go is that same window right now, except a Binance listing sits ahead and the close could come any day.
The listing goes live the moment the presale fills, and at this pace that moment arrives before the end of May. Acting through the Pepeto official website while the presale window remains is how returns get captured, and the cost of hesitation is watching the highest-return presale event of 2026 reprice the token you could have bought today at a fraction of what the market charges tomorrow.
Click To Visit Pepeto Website To Enter The Presale
FAQs:
What is the biggest crypto news today driving the market in May 2026?
The biggest crypto news today is the CLARITY Act stablecoin compromise clearing the Senate’s final block while Bitcoin holds above $81,000 on $2.7 billion in ETF inflows. Circle stock jumped 20% and Coinbase gained 7% as the market priced in regulatory clarity at the fastest pace since 2021.
Why are analysts calling Pepeto the best presale entry before the Binance listing?
Analysts point to Pepeto because it raised past $9.8 million at $0.0000001868 with under $300,000 left before the presale closes and the Binance listing goes live. The same developer behind the original Pepe coin’s $11 billion run leads the project with a SolidProof audit and 175% APY staking active today.
Disclaimer: This is a Press Release provided by a third party who is responsible for the content. Please conduct your own research before taking any action based on the content.
Crypto World
CLARITY Act Could Bring Crypto Firms Back to the U.S.
A regulatory breakthrough for the U.S. crypto industry could be on the horizon if the CLARITY Act of 2025 clears Congress. Advocates say the bill would formalize rules and end years of regulatory uncertainty, potentially spurring onshore development and investment in the American market.
Bill Hughes, senior counsel and director of global regulatory matters at Consensys, argues that passing CLARITY would signal a clear, workable framework for crypto projects and markets operating in the United States. “The U.S. dollar is the world’s largest fiat on-ramp for cryptocurrency, accounting for over $2.4 trillion in volume between July 2024 and June 2025,” Hughes noted. Yet a vast portion of crypto trading remains anchored outside the United States, underscoring the industry’s opportunity for onshore growth if regulatory clarity arrives.
Recent data illustrate the global landscape: Binance alone accounted for more than 38% of centralized exchange trading volume in December 2025, highlighting how much activity still flows through non-U.S. venues. In contrast, CoinGecko’s 2025 market-share study shows Coinbase as the sole U.S.-based exchange among the top 10 centralized platforms, with a 6.1% slice of total volume.
Advocates say CLARITY would codify clear rules for the crypto industry in the United States, ending years of regulatory ambiguity and potentially drawing more projects to build domestically. Yet industry executives warn that timing is tight, and momentum could stall as the midterm election cycle intensifies.
The legislative clock is a key factor. The Senate Banking Committee has scheduled a markup for the bill in the week after this article’s publication, while the August recess looms and lawmakers pivot toward campaigning. If the current window closes without a vote, the likelihood of achieving a comprehensive U.S. crypto framework before 2030 could diminish, according to participants familiar with the process.
At Consensus 2026 in Miami, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse cautioned that passage into law is far from guaranteed, even as support for streamlining crypto regulation grows among policymakers and industry players.
A public pulse check on CLARITY’s prospects comes from HarrisX. A May poll found that 52% of the 2,028 registered U.S. voters surveyed supported passing the CLARITY Act, with broad bipartisan resonance reported in the data. This sentiment suggests a level of public backing that could influence congressional attention, even as midterm dynamics complicate the legislative timetable.
Looking ahead, the practical implications of CLARITY extend beyond mere headlines. If a clear, workable framework emerges, startups and established exchanges could reassess where they locate teams, liquidity, and strategic operations—potentially shifting the balance of crypto development back toward the United States. For investors and builders alike, the key questions revolve around what specific rules would govern registration, product design, and market surveillance, and how these rules would interact with DeFi, custodial arrangements, and cross-border activity.
Key takeaways
- Regulatory clarity on the horizon. Support for CLARITY centers on establishing formal rules and reducing regulatory guesswork, which could incentivize U.S.-based construction and funding for crypto projects.
- U.S. trading share remains modest versus global platforms. Binance reportedly captured over 38% of centralized exchange trading volume in December 2025, while Coinbase held 6.1% as the lone U.S.-based top-10 exchange.
- Time is tightening ahead of midterms. Legislative momentum hinges on a favorable calendar, with a Senate markup planned soon and the August recess approaching; a stalled effort could push meaningful regulation past the current cycle.
- Public support appears measurable but divided by timing. A HarrisX poll indicated majority interest in passing CLARITY, though electoral dynamics complicate near-term passage.
- Industry voices urge urgency while weighing reality. While progress is noted, leaders in the sector caution that securing a binding law remains uncertain in the current political climate.
The regulatory push and market contours
The CLARITY Act represents a concerted effort to codify the status of several crypto activities in the United States, from token classifications and registration to market structure oversight. Proponents say a formal framework would reduce ambiguity for developers, exchanges, and custodians, potentially making the U.S. a more attractive ground for innovation. Critics, however, warn that any legislation must strike a balance between investor protection and innovation, a challenge that has long characterized U.S. crypto policy debates.
Beyond the policy debate, the market structure data underscore a broader trend: the U.S. share of global on-chain and centralized exchange activity remains a fraction of the global liquidity pool. This has led some industry participants to view regulatory clarity as a possible magnet for capital, talent, and projects that have historically relocated to friendlier jurisdictions. The question is whether CLARITY would deliver the predictability needed to reverse that trend or whether other factors—such as tax treatment, banking access, and cross-border compliance—will continue to shape where business moves occur.
Industry executives also watch for how the law would interface with DeFi and non-custodial protocols. Opinions vary on whether a broad regulatory regime would stifle innovation or unlock it by providing legitimate pathways for growth and investor protection. The consensus among many observers is that a well-defined framework could reduce the friction of operating in an uncertain environment, but any surprises in the bill’s drafting could shift incentives quickly.
What to watch next
The immediate focal point remains the Senate markup and the broader political calendar. With midterm campaigns intensifying, lawmakers face pressure to advance or derail the bill before the calendar turns. The ripple effects—ranging from onshoring incentives for startups to leverage for U.S.-based exchanges seeking to compete with global platforms—will unfold as policy details crystallize.
For investors and builders, the coming weeks will reveal how much regulatory clarity translates into practical decision-making. The question remains whether the current framework can be enacted swiftly enough to alter the geographic and strategic calculus of crypto development in the United States.
Readers should watch the legislative trajectory of CLARITY, any revisions to the text, and the timing of pivotal votes in Congress, as lawmakers assess how best to align innovation with safeguards in the rapidly evolving crypto landscape.
For further context and the bill text, see CLARITY Act resources and related market analyses linked to this coverage.
Crypto World
Trump-Backed American Bitcoin Posts $82M Loss Despite Record BTC Mining Output
American Bitcoin (ABTC), the Trump family-backed BTC company, released its Q1 2026 financial results earlier in the week, and they showed a nearly $82 million net loss for the period.
This was despite the firm mining a record 817 BTC.
Mining Output Goes Up, But BTC Price Drop Hits Earnings
Per documents it filed with the SEC, apart from the 817 BTC it mined, American Bitcoin also bought another 803 BTC, which took its strategic reserve to 7,021 BTC by March 31.
However, at the time of writing, the stash had grown to about 7,300 BTC after the firm purchased an additional 300 units, which saw it climb the ranks of publicly traded companies holding Bitcoin to number 16.
Mining revenues declined to $62.1 million from $78.3 million, due to lower prices per Bitcoin mined of $76,000 compared to the previous quarter’s about $100,000. Still, the company posted a gross margin over 50% and cut its cost to mine by 23% to $36,200 per Bitcoin, down from $46,900 or so in Q4 2025.
Satoshis per share, the firm’s preferred measure of value creation, rose by about 20% quarter-over-quarter to about 663.
“Strip out the non-cash mark-to-market adjustment on our Bitcoin required by FASB, and the underlying business was profitable, and we did not sell a single coin,” CEO Mike Ho said in the earnings release.
President Matthew Prusak framed the cost improvement as the key operational story, saying:
“We produced Bitcoin at 52% gross margin despite a 22% decline in Bitcoin price, reflecting meaningful cost improvements that partially offset the price headwind. Every share of American Bitcoin owns more Bitcoin today than it did three months ago.”
ABTC shares fell 8.4% to around $1.15 following the earnings release, keeping the stock far below its 52-week high of $14.65.
Expansion Strategy Mirrors Wider Bitcoin Treasury Trend
The production gains were partly the result of a hardware acquisition completed in early March 2026, when American Bitcoin took delivery of 11,298 next-generation miners from Bitmain.
As was reported at the time, that deal added about 3.05 EH/s of capacity at an efficiency of 13.5 joules per terahash, deployed at Hut 8’s Drumheller site in Alberta, Canada.
The company’s total owned fleet now stands at approximately 89,242 miners with 28.1 EH/s of capacity, though its operational fleet delivering active output is 58,999 miners at around 25.0 EH/s, still roughly half the scale of the largest publicly listed Bitcoin miners.
American Bitcoin is not alone in reporting large headline losses driven by Bitcoin’s poor run at the beginning of the year, as Strategy, the largest corporate owner of the flagship cryptocurrency, earlier in the week reported that it had incurred a net loss of $12.54 billion in Q1 2026.
The post Trump-Backed American Bitcoin Posts $82M Loss Despite Record BTC Mining Output appeared first on CryptoPotato.
-
Crypto World2 days agoHarrisX Poll Found 52% of Registered Voters Support the CLARITY Act
-
NewsBeat6 days agoChannel 5 – All Creatures Great and Small series 7 new post
-
Crypto World3 days agoUpbit adds B3 Korean won pair as Base token gains Korea access
-
Tech5 days agoImage AI models now drive app growth, beating chatbot upgrades
-
News Videos7 days agoAP Dhillon – Old Money (Official Audio)
-
Fashion1 day agoWeekend Open Thread: Marianne Dress
-
NewsBeat3 days agoNCP car park operator enters administration putting 340 UK sites at risk of closure
-
Entertainment7 days ago
Anna Nicole Smith’s Daughter Attends 2026 Kentucky Derby
-
Crypto World7 days agoBitcoin mining equities rise in 2026 as BTC lags behind
-
Sports7 days agoFive killed in Texas plane crash identified as Amarillo pickleball players
-
Entertainment7 days agoMelissa Joan Hart and More Stars Attend 2026 Kentucky Derby
-
Entertainment7 days agoVenus Williams’ Best Met Gala Looks Over the Years
-
Business11 hours agoIgnore market noise, India’s long-term story intact, say D-Street bulls Ramesh Damani and Sunil Singhania
-
Business6 days agoWinning Numbers Drawn as Jackpot Resets to $20 Million
-
Business7 days agoLuka Doncic Injury Update: Doncic’s Hamstring Recovery Slows Lakers’ Hopes Against Thunder: Can He Run Yet?
-
Sports7 days agoIs Man United v Liverpool on TV? Channel, streaming and how to watch Premier League fixture
-
Entertainment7 days ago
“Storage Wars” star Darrell Sheets' ex-wife breaks silence on his death
-
Politics17 hours agoPolitics Home Article | Starmer Enters The Danger Zone
-
Entertainment7 days agoTaron Egerton and Charlize Theron Thrill In Netflix’s ‘Apex’
-
Entertainment7 days ago
Jane Fonda clarifies her Barbra Streisand shade about Robert Redford's Oscars tribute: 'I thought I was being funny'



You must be logged in to post a comment Login