JPMorgan (JPM) said the proposed U.S. crypto market structure bill, known as the Clarity Act, may have only a limited window for passage this year as the congressional calendar tightens ahead of the midterm elections and debate over stablecoin yield remains unresolved.

“With the U.S. midterms approaching, the legislative window for passage of the Market Structure Bill has narrowed, which could postpone progress on
crypto market-structure reform this year,” wrote analysts led by Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou in the Wednesday report.

The bill cleared the Senate Banking Committee on May 14, but must still secure 60 votes in the full Senate, be reconciled with House legislation and receive the president’s signature. Those remaining steps, coupled with growing pushback from the banking industry, have lowered expectations that the measure will be enacted this year, the analysts said.

Timing could also prove significant. A compromise reached before the midterms could look materially different from one negotiated after the elections, when political incentives may shift.

The Clarity Act is widely viewed as the crypto industry’s most important legislative priority because it would establish the first comprehensive federal framework governing digital assets in the U.S.

Supporters say the bill would resolve long-running uncertainty over whether cryptocurrencies fall under the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), replacing years of regulation-by-enforcement with clearer rules for issuers, exchanges and investors.

Industry advocates argue that greater regulatory certainty could unlock institutional participation, encourage investment and innovation, and help keep crypto businesses and capital in the U.S. rather than overseas markets with more developed digital-asset regimes.

A central point of contention is the treatment of stablecoin yield. The bank’s analysts said the legislation is intended to prohibit “passive” yield, effectively interest paid on stablecoin balances, while allowing rewards tied to activity such as payments, transactions, loyalty programs and trading incentives. However, the bill’s current language is less explicit about banning interest on balances than policymakers have suggested.

The distinction is critical because it determines whether stablecoins can function as substitutes for bank deposits, according to the report. The carveout is designed to preserve stablecoins’ role in payments and settlement while preventing them from evolving into lightly regulated savings products.

Banks have pushed for tighter restrictions, arguing that stablecoin issuers do not face the same insurance, supervisory and prudential requirements as regulated depository institutions. Crypto firms, meanwhile, have sought greater flexibility to offer yield-bearing products. JPMorgan said the dispute has become a major obstacle to advancing the legislation and remains politically sensitive.

Should lawmakers ultimately impose effective limits on passive stablecoin yield, the bank expects the trend of idle crypto capital flowing into tokenized Treasuries, digital money-market funds and tokenized deposits to accelerate.

While that outcome may disappoint crypto-native firms that have advocated for yield-bearing stablecoins, the bill would still preserve some activity-based rewards. The report also emphasized that the current legislative text leaves room for interpretation because it does not explicitly prohibit interest on balances.

Read more: Clarity Act could spark a boom in crypto ‘yield-as-a-service’

• BONK coin price is down 11% in a week despite new PartyBet and BONKUJI developments.
• BONKUJI has relaunched with a 90% card-value buyback feature.
• Traders should closely watch the support at $0.00000470.

Despite ranking as the most trending cryptocurrency on various platforms, the price of BONK coin has been on a rather bearish trend.

The BONK memecoin has struggled to gain momentum even as the project continues to expand its ecosystem through new products and partnerships.

While recent developments, including a sports prediction and casino gaming partnership with PartyBet and updates to the BONKUJI platform, have generated attention within the Solana ecosystem, those developments have not translated into a meaningful recovery in the BONK price.

At press time, BONK coin was trading at approximately $0.00000485 after falling 5.5% over the previous 24 hours.

Notably, the decline extends losses recorded over longer timeframes, with BONK down 11% over seven days, 20.7% over 14 days, 23.3% over the past month, and more than 71% over the last year.

BONK’s partnership with PartyBet

One of the most notable developments for the project came when BONK announced a partnership with PartyBet, a platform focused on Telegram-based sports prediction markets and casino-style games.

The deal expands the utility of BONK beyond its role as a memecoin by introducing another avenue for community participation.

Sports prediction markets have gained traction across the crypto industry as users look for alternative ways to engage with digital assets beyond simple trading.

The partnership also highlights BONK’s continued push to build products within the Solana ecosystem.

Over the past year, the project has evolved from being viewed primarily as a speculative token into a broader ecosystem that includes trading tools, gaming initiatives, and community-driven applications.

Despite the positive headlines, the BONK memecoin price has remained under pressure.

Trading volume stood at approximately $42.7 million during the latest 24-hour period, reflecting relatively muted market participation compared to periods of stronger investor demand.

BONKUJI relaunch also fails to lift BONK coin

Another recent development involved BONKUJI, one of the latest products associated with the BONK ecosystem.

On June 3, the official BONK account announced that BONKUJI had returned following maintenance work.

The team stated that feedback from waitlist participants helped improve the platform and make it more user-friendly.

The update also introduced a buyback mechanism valued at 90% of a listed card’s value while reopening access to the waitlist.

While the announcement attracted attention within the BONK community and represented another step in the project’s efforts to increase engagement among users, the price remained subdued.

Broader crypto market weakness weighs on BONK

The recent price action suggests that BONK has been moving largely in line with the wider cryptocurrency market.

Bitcoin, the leading cryptocurrency, has declined by roughly 5% today as the broader crypto market also recorded significant declines, reflecting a risk-off environment that has pressured higher-risk assets.

Memecoins have been among the hardest-hit segments of the market during recent weeks.

As investor appetite for speculative assets weakened, many traders shifted capital toward larger and more established cryptocurrencies.

That trend appears to have affected BONK as well, with market data showing declining trading activity alongside falling prices, a combination that often points to reduced buying demand.

BONK coin price forecast

Amid the bearish market conditions, technical analysts continue to focus on several key levels that could determine the next major move for BONK coin.

SpearTrades recently highlighted a long-term descending support trendline that BONK had respected for more than two years.

According to the analyst, the token recently slipped below that structure, creating uncertainty about its longer-term direction.

The analyst identified $0.00000614 as an important upside level. A successful move above that area would provide stronger confirmation that buyers are regaining control.

Beyond that, the next major resistance level sits near $0.00001048.

Another market analyst, Sjuul of AltCryptoGems, pointed to a potential bullish “Power of Three” formation developing on the BONK chart.

According to Sjuul of AltCryptoGems’ analysis, a break above a key support-resistance area could trigger a stronger expansion phase.

Ok, time for some bull posting!$BONK is starting to look promising here, trying to form a bullish power of three.

All we need now is to break above that support level, and we can have a nice expansion! pic.twitter.com/nz5pZMvyRp

— Sjuul | AltCryptoGems (@AltCryptoGems) June 3, 2026

On the downside, traders should watch the $0.00000470 area closely.

A break below that level could expose BONK to additional weakness and increase the possibility of a retest of the $0.00000450 zone.

Nine Democratic lawmakers in the U.S. House of Representatives have urged the Federal Trade Commission to open an inquiry into how prediction-market platforms market themselves to consumers versus how they present their activities to regulators. In a letter released this week, Representatives Kevin Mullin and Gabe Vasquez contend that online prediction markets describe themselves as gambling platforms in marketing materials while telling regulators they are financial tools offering investment products. They call for the FTC to investigate whether the advertising and public messaging mislead consumers about the applicable rules and protections.

The request arrives amid ongoing congressional scrutiny of Kalshi and Polymarket following insider-trading concerns on those platforms. Congress launched a probe in May into the two companies’ responses to insider-trading incidents, underscoring regulators’ heightened attention to how these markets operate and how they are regulated. The lawmakers’ letter seeks detailed information by June 29 on whether the FTC plans to take investigative or enforcement action against prediction-market platforms for potential deceptive practices, and whether the agency has received consumer complaints or considers public perception and legal filings when evaluating such conduct.

Prediction markets, which allow traders to place contracts on the outcomes of future events, have grown into a notable real-world use case for blockchain technologies. Some platforms settle transactions using crypto rails and stablecoins, a factor that has attracted institutional attention and regulatory interest. March data showed a surge in prediction-market activity as investors and the public engaged with contracts around political and geopolitical events, reflecting broader accessibility and a shifting regulatory posture for the industry.

A group of nine Democratic lawmakers is calling on the FTC to launch a probe into prediction markets. Source: Kevin Mullin

In the letter, Mullin stated: “These prediction market companies are presenting themselves differently to regulators than they are to the public, and that kind of contradictory messaging can mislead consumers about what rules and protections actually apply. We are urging the FTC to investigate these practices and ensure consumers are protected from this potentially deceptive activity.”

Among the signatories are Representatives Jared Huffman, Raul Ruiz, Salud Carbajal, Mike Levin, Dina Titus, Paul Tonko, and Valerie Foushee, in addition to Mullin and Vasquez. The lawmakers are seeking clarity on how the FTC interprets and enforces consumer-protection standards in relation to platforms that operate at the intersection of gambling labels, financial instruments, and crypto-based settlement rails.

As coverage of the evolving regulatory landscape notes, the case against prediction markets sits at the nexus of consumer protection, financial-market supervision, and digital-asset oversight. Kalshi’s and Polymarket’s experiences have already drawn attention from lawmakers concerned about insider trading and platform governance. Kalshi, in particular, has faced scrutiny over election-betting activity and related restrictions, which have fed into broader debates about market integrity and disclosure requirements.

Key takeaways

• The FTC is being urged to investigate whether prediction-market platforms misrepresent themselves to consumers by advertising as gambling venues while describing their services to regulators as financial tools offering investment exposure.
• The lawmakers request a formal update from the FTC by June 29 on whether enforcement action is planned for potential deceptive practices and whether complaints have been received.
• The push follows a congressional probe into Kalshi and Polymarket over insider-trading incidents, highlighting ongoing regulatory interest in governance and market integrity.
• Prediction markets have grown as a real-world blockchain use case, with settlements increasingly leveraging crypto rails and stablecoins; March transaction volumes reached record levels amid rising interest in political and geopolitical event contracts.
• The letter is signed by nine lawmakers, indicating sustained congressional attention to the regulatory and compliance dimensions of prediction-market platforms.

Regulatory framing and enforcement risk

The core question raised by the lawmakers concerns how platforms classify and communicate their business model. If a platform markets itself as a sports-betting-like product while presenting itself to regulators as a financial tool or investment product, questions arise about the consistency of disclosures, consumer protections, and licensing obligations. The potential for misalignment between public-facing advertising and regulatory filings could implicate a range of enforcement authorities, including state gambling regulators, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and the Federal Trade Commission’s consumer-protection remit.

From a legal and compliance perspective, the discrepancy matters because it shapes which rules apply to user interactions, marketing disclosures, know-your-customer and anti-money-laundering controls, and the scope of permissible marketing claims. If regulators determine that platforms employ misleading or deceptive practices, consequences could extend beyond remedial disclosures to penalties, corrective advertising requirements, or restrictions on specific product features. The discussion also intersects with broader regulatory developments for digital assets, including how stablecoins and crypto settlement rails are treated under consumer-protection and financial-market rules.

The debate sits within a larger policy environment that is increasingly attentive to how digital markets intersect with traditional framework considerations. While the EU’s MiCA framework aims to harmonize crypto-asset regulation, U.S. agencies—such as the FTC, the SEC, and the CFTC—continue to refine an enforcement and oversight posture for platforms that blend gambling-like marketing with financial-instrument claims. For platforms operating across borders, this creates a heightened need for clear, consistent disclosures and robust compliance programs to manage cross-jurisdictional differences.

Political scrutiny and ongoing probes

The letter’s timing aligns with ongoing congressional scrutiny of prediction-market platforms, particularly in light of insider-trading concerns that have prompted formal inquiries. The May probe into Polymarket and Kalshi highlighted regulators’ focus on how these platforms handle information, market integrity, and user protections. Lawmakers have sought to understand responses to incidents on these platforms and how governance, disclosures, and enforcement actions would address potential conflicts of interest and market manipulation risks.

In parallel, the industry has emphasized the practical uses of prediction markets for forecasting and hedging, aided by technological rails that leverage blockchain infrastructure. The regulatory conversation thus far has centered on whether such markets should be treated as gambling products, financial instruments, or a hybrid with distinct regulatory obligations. The June deadline for the FTC to outline potential enforcement actions underscores the degree to which federal regulators may shape the operational boundaries for prediction-market operators in the near term.

Public reporting on Kalshi’s actions—such as incidents involving political betting—has contributed to a broader conversation about how platforms guard against misuse and how they communicate risk and compliance standards to users. As the sector evolves, the alignment of marketing, product design, and regulatory disclosures remains a focal point for policymakers and industry participants alike.

Operational implications for platforms and market structure

Prediction markets’ growing adoption has been supported by the use of crypto rails for settlement and payments, as well as the reliability of stablecoins to facilitate cross-border transactions and liquidity management. This operational model raises specific compliance considerations, including AML/KYC controls, sanctions screening, and the need for transparent disclosures about the nature of the instruments being traded and the protections users can expect. If enforcement actions materialize, platforms may face new licensing requirements or restrictions that affect market access, product features, or advertising practices.

From an institutional standpoint, the regulatory lens on prediction markets could influence how exchanges and financial intermediaries interact with these platforms. Banks and custodians evaluating participation in crypto-asset ecosystems may take cues from the FTC’s actions and related regulatory signals when assessing risk, client disclosures, and the suitability of offering or supporting prediction-market services within a regulated framework. The evolving policy environment also shapes how cross-border collaboration and data-sharing arrangements could support or constrain enforcement and vigilance efforts.

Looking ahead, the outcome of the FTC inquiry—along with continued congressional oversight—could recalibrate the balance between innovation and protection in the prediction-market space. As platforms optimize governance, disclosure, and compliance to meet stricter expectations, the industry may see clearer delineations of permissible advertising versus regulatory classifications, with potential implications for licensing trajectories and investor protections.

Related developments continue to unfold, including case studies of platform governance and enforcement risk. For instance, coverage of Kalshi’s and Polymarket’s experiences highlights that market integrity, transparency, and consistent messaging are central to regulatory confidence. These considerations are likely to inform ongoing policy deliberations and the practical design choices of prediction-market operators as they navigate a rapidly evolving, cross-jurisdictional landscape.

Closing perspective: As the FTC weighs a formal stance, stakeholders should monitor not only the agency’s forthcoming action but also complementary regulatory signals from state authorities and other federal agencies. The convergence of consumer protection, financial-market oversight, and digital-asset regulation in this space will shape the governance, licensing, and operational thresholds for prediction markets in the months ahead.

Key Takeaways

• Athletic apparel company Lululemon releases fiscal Q1 FY26 results after today’s closing bell on June 4, with analysts projecting earnings of $1.68 per share — representing a 35.3% decline from last year’s quarter
• Analysts forecast revenue growth of approximately 2.5%, reaching $2.43 billion
• Shares have tumbled more than 39% since the start of the year amid heightened competition, tariff headwinds, and weakening consumer demand
• The options market suggests traders are anticipating approximately a 10% swing in the stock following the earnings release
• Analyst consensus stands at Hold, with a mean price target of $169.53 — representing potential upside of roughly 34.5% from current trading levels

Athletic apparel retailer Lululemon Athletica (LULU) is scheduled to unveil its fiscal first quarter FY26 financial results following market close today, June 4. Currently trading near $126, shares have plunged more than 39% year-to-date, with Wall Street maintaining tempered expectations for the quarterly release.

Lululemon Athletica Inc., LULU

Wall Street forecasts earnings per share of $1.68 — marking a steep 35.3% decline compared to the year-ago period. On the top line, analysts anticipate revenue of $2.43 billion, translating to modest year-over-year growth of 2.5%.

The bearish profit forecast stems from mounting challenges including tariff-induced cost pressures and sluggish demand across U.S. markets. Discretionary consumer spending has faced headwinds, and Lululemon has not escaped these market dynamics.

Ahead of the earnings announcement, the company eliminated a potential distraction by resolving its proxy battle with founder Chip Wilson through an agreement on two board nominations. This settlement clears away some uncertainty surrounding the release.

Analyst Sentiment and Key Focus Areas

Evercore analyst Michael Binetti lowered his price objective from $175 to $130 while maintaining a Hold rating. His primary concern centers on the possibility of a “significant reset” to full-year FY26 projections, though he acknowledged the stock’s valuation has become increasingly compelling.

Rick Patel from Raymond James also maintains a Hold rating. His analysis suggests Q1 performance should exceed the company’s conservative internal projections, citing sequential improvements in both physical store traffic and online visitor metrics. However, his research uncovered mixed signals — notably, mobile application monthly active users demonstrated deceleration.

Patel’s attention focuses on whether fresh product introductions can spark renewed customer interest. The Get Low collection launched in January failed to resonate with the customer base. On a more positive note, his field research indicates stronger reception for the Unrestricted Power and ShowZero product lines. While cautiously hopeful, he remains unconvinced these represent transformative catalysts.

“Net, we see potential for estimates to increase but believe it’ll take more time for LULU to earn confidence that this is the beginning of a durable turnaround,” Patel said.

Valuation Metrics and Corporate Insider Moves

LULU currently trades at a P/E multiple of 9.37x, significantly compressed compared to historical norms. The forward-looking P/E of 10.13 indicates market expectations for continued subdued expansion.

The company’s GF Score registers at 77/100, with both profitability and growth metrics achieving top marks of 10/10. Financial strength earns a 6/10 rating, while momentum receives an F grade — mirroring the stock’s dismal year-to-date performance.

Corporate insiders have demonstrated buying activity, with two separate purchases during the previous three months totaling 9,365 shares. These transactions may indicate internal optimism despite external challenges.

The options market is pricing in approximately a 10% post-earnings movement in either direction. For perspective, LULU’s historical average absolute post-earnings move across the last four quarters has been 12.95%.

The Street consensus stands at Hold, derived from 20 Hold recommendations and one Buy rating. The mean analyst price target of $169.53 suggests potential appreciation of approximately 34.5% from present levels.

Production of NVIDIA processors is concentrated in Taiwan via TSMC, making the company sensitive to US trade policy. In the first quarter of fiscal 2026, NVIDIA recorded a $4.5bn write-down due to restrictions on H20 chip exports to China. At the same time, the revenue structure remains resilient — around 69% of revenue comes from the US domestic market, where hyperscalers continue to increase purchases of accelerators for data centres.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026, revenue reached $68.1bn, representing a 73% year-on-year increase, while full-year revenue totalled $215.9bn (+65%). In late March, the company announced an expansion of its strategic partnership with Marvell Technology, including a $2bn investment and integration via the NVLink Fusion ecosystem, further extending its presence in the Physical AI and robotics segment. However, the overall macroeconomic backdrop remains subdued.

Technical picture

After reaching an all-time high near 210 in November 2025, the stock entered a corrective phase. The low of this correction was marked at 165 on 30 March 2026. A rebound followed from this level; however, the price remains around 177, without showing a convincing recovery. The horizontal volume profile provides further clarity.

The highest concentration of trading activity over the period under review is located in the 181–183 zone, where the point of control (POC) is situated. This area reflects the most active trading over several months, making it a key reference zone for market participants. Above current levels, the volume profile remains dense up to 189, which coincides with the local highs from the second half of 2025 and acts as the nearest resistance level.

The RSI stands at 49.37 and remains in neutral territory, offering no clear directional advantage. The latest session’s volume reached 107.11 million shares, indicating sustained market participation. However, it should be noted that the most pronounced spikes in volume and volatility have historically occurred ahead of and following quarterly earnings releases. As a result, the stock may continue to consolidate within the current range until new fundamental catalysts emerge.

Key takeaways

NVIDIA remains in a prolonged consolidation phase, supported by strong operational performance but a muted macroeconomic backdrop. The volume profile shows a significant supply overhang above current price levels, while the RSI does not favour either side. Market participants continue to assess incoming signals without committing to a sustained directional bias.

Buy and sell stocks of the world’s biggest publicly-listed companies with CFDs on FXOpen’s trading platform. Open your FXOpen account now or learn more about trading share CFDs with FXOpen.

This article represents the opinion of the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand only. It is not to be construed as an offer, solicitation, or recommendation with respect to products and services provided by the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand, nor is it to be considered financial advice.

• Bitcoin ETF outflows remain negative for 11 straight days, pressuring BTC.
• $749 million in liquidations have accelerated the Bitcoin price drop.
• RSI below 18 shows oversold conditions, but trend stays bearish.

Bitcoin (BTC) has been under sustained pressure, trading around the $63,548 level after a sharp multi-week decline that has erased a large portion of its recent recovery.

Notably, the BTC price decline reflects a combination of institutional selling, forced liquidations, and weakening market structure that continues to dominate short-term price action.

Even though technical indicators now show deeply oversold conditions, the broader flow of capital suggests that downside risk remains active.

The current setup places Bitcoin in a zone where short-term relief rallies are possible, but sustained recovery has yet to form.

Bitcoin ETF outflows weigh heavily on the BTC price

One of the most consistent pressures on Bitcoin has been the ongoing withdrawal of capital from US spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds.

Data shows a stretch of 11 consecutive days of net outflows, including a single-day redemption of roughly $519 million on June 2.

Over the past ten days from May 25, 2026 to June 3, 2026, Bitcoin ETFs have witnessed over 3 billion worth of outflows according to CoinGlass data.

This pattern has effectively removed a major source of steady institutional demand.

According to Citi analysts, ETF flows account for about 45% of weekly return variation, highlighting how strongly prices now respond to institutional positioning.

With flows turning negative for nearly two weeks, Bitcoin has been left without its primary demand driver at a time when selling pressure is already elevated.

This shift is important because ETFs were previously absorbing large amounts of Bitcoin supply during the recovery phase.

The current reversal means that instead of acting as a stabilizing force, ETFs are now contributing to downside momentum.

Without a clear return of net inflows, price stability above the mid-$60,000 range has remained difficult to sustain.

Liquidations and macro pressure amplify the decline

Alongside ETF outflows, leveraged positions in the derivatives market have added fuel to the downturn.

More than $749.982 million in leveraged long positions have been liquidated within a 24-hour window during the sell-off, according to market data.

These forced closures have accelerated price movement lower rather than allowing gradual adjustment.

Bitcoin’s drop below key technical zones has triggered additional selling, reinforcing a cascading effect where falling prices lead to further liquidation pressure.

At the same time, macroeconomic conditions have reduced the overall appetite for risk assets.

Strong US employment data has pushed expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts further into the future, reinforcing a “higher-for-longer” interest rate environment.

This has reduced liquidity flowing into speculative markets, including crypto.

In addition, geopolitical tensions, particularly renewed instability involving Iran and broader global risk concerns, have also contributed to defensive positioning across financial markets.

In this environment, Bitcoin has continued to trade in line with high-risk assets rather than acting independently.

Technical structure shows oversold conditions but no confirmed reversal

From a technical perspective, Bitcoin is showing some of the most extreme oversold readings in recent months.

The 14-day Relative Strength Index has dropped to around 17.7–18, a level that typically reflects heavy selling exhaustion.

Historically, readings this low have often preceded short-term relief rallies.

However, other technical indicators present a more cautious picture.

Bitcoin is currently trading below all major exponential moving averages, including the 10-day, 20-day, 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day EMAs. This alignment signals a strong bearish trend across multiple timeframes.

Looking at the short-term Bitcoin price projections, the immediate support zone sits near $62,964, while a broader structural floor is located around the $60,000 region, which also aligns with long-term trend indicators.

A breakdown below $62,964 would increase the likelihood of a move toward lower liquidity zones near $60,000 and potentially $55,000.

On the upside, Bitcoin would need to close above $69,124 to shift short-term momentum. If that level is reclaimed, the next resistance zone is positioned near $71,589, which would signal early signs of structural recovery.

But until then, the trend remains heavily influenced by downside momentum rather than reversal signals.