Crypto World
Telegram Mini Apps Development on TON Network
Telegram is quietly transforming from a messaging app into a distribution platform for lightweight applications, games, and digital services. For enterprises watching user acquisition costs rise and app store competition intensify, Telegram mini apps represent a structural shift in how products reach audiences. The best part is that:
There are no installs
No app-store approvals
No onboarding friction
Therefore, users can conveniently access mini apps directly inside chats, often in one tap.
When combined with the TON blockchain, Telegram mini apps development can readily support payments, tokenized incentives, and ownership models, all inside a familiar interface. This is exactly the reason why these apps are no longer considered as experimental. They are becoming a serious growth channel.
To understand why, let’s examine some of the Telegram mini apps leading the TON ecosystem and what makes them successful from a business perspective.
Check Out TON Ecosystem’s Top 7 Telegram Mini Apps
1) Notcoin
Notcoin became one of the fastest-growing Telegram-native experiences by reducing gameplay to the simplest possible action that is just tapping. However, its success is not just about simplicity. Notcoin leveraged:
- Viral referral loops
- Social bragging rights
- Progress-based incentives
- Low cognitive load gameplay
It aligned perfectly with Telegram’s quick-interaction behavior. For businesses, the lesson is clear: Complex mechanics reduce adoption inside chat ecosystems.
2) Hamster Kombat
Hamster Kombat added humor, storytelling, and crypto rewards. It built a narrative-driven engagement model instead of just pure mechanics. It demonstrates that:
- Branding matters even in mini apps
- Identity-driven communities retain better
- Humor and culture drive sharing
For enterprises, this is a very clear indication that Telegram mini apps development can build brand affinity, not just usage. In this regard, if enterprises have a stricter time frame, they can launch a Hamster Combat clone script in just 7 days with the help of experts.
3) Catizen
Catizen combines community engagement with recurring reward cycles. It readily encourages habitual interaction. It proves that retention comes from:
- Community alignment
- Predictable reward schedules
- Social belonging
Hence, it is clear that Telegram mini apps can act as social ecosystems, not just tools. However, it is also possible to build a game like Catizen from scratch in 15 days when you seek the help of professional Telegram game developers.
4) Yescoin
Yescoin uses swipe-based interactions that feel natural in messaging contexts. Designing for Telegram means:
- One-handed interactions
- Short session times
- Instant feedback loops
This is worth noting here that it is UX strategy and not just design.
5) TapSwap
TapSwap introduced gamified token accumulation tied to user activity. Players respond strongly to visible progress and accumulation psychology. However, sustainability requires careful tokenomics, which happens to be a key lesson for enterprises planning to explore the field.
6) Tonkeeper Mini App Integrations
Wallet integrations like Tonkeeper show mini apps can deliver real financial utility. Utility apps build long-term value because they solve actual problems. It needs to be kept in mind that not every Telegram mini app needs to be a game. Financial tools and service apps are equally viable.
7) Fragment
Fragment enables buying and selling Telegram usernames and collectibles on TON. This shows Telegram mini apps can power real marketplaces with:
- Verified ownership
- Scarcity mechanics
- On-chain transactions
This is where mini apps cross into digital commerce infrastructure and opens up opportunities for businesses.
What Businesses Should Notice
The real takeaway for businesses is not the apps themselves. However, it is essential to note the patterns:
✔ Frictionless onboarding
✔ Native distribution
✔ Social virality
✔ Micro-session engagement
✔ Incentivized retention
✔ Integrated payments
Telegram mini apps succeed because they align with user behavior, not because they are Web3.
Want to Build Telegram Mini Apps in the TON Ecosystem?
Telegram Mini Apps & TON Ecosystem — By the Numbers
900M+ Monthly Active Users on Telegram
Telegram’s massive global user base gives mini-apps instant distribution without app-store dependency.
30%+ of Mobile Engagement Happens in Messaging Apps
Messaging platforms are now primary digital environments, making in-chat apps highly discoverable and frequently used.
120%+ Year-Over-Year Growth in TON Transactions
TON’s transaction growth reflects rising adoption and real economic activity across mini-apps and wallets.
Why TON Makes Telegram Mini Apps Viable
TON is not just a blockchain attached to Telegram; it is a purpose-built infrastructure designed to support high-frequency, low-friction digital interactions at scale.
For enterprises evaluating Telegram mini apps as business channels, the viability of the underlying blockchain is critical. Slow, expensive, or congested networks kill user experience quickly.
However, TON addresses this in several ways:
1. High Throughput for Micro-Transactions
Telegram mini apps often rely on small, frequent user actions, like reward claims, token distributions, in-app purchases, and micro-payments. TON’s architecture supports high transaction volumes with minimal latency, making it practical for real-time mini app interactions. For businesses, this ensures smoother user journeys and fewer drop-offs due to delays.
2. Low Transaction Costs
User-facing apps cannot survive on high gas fees. TON’s low-cost transaction model enables sustainable reward systems and micro-economies.
This is especially important for:
- Tap-to-earn models
- Reward distribution
- In-app asset transfers
- Marketplace transactions
Low fees allow businesses to experiment without burning capital on infrastructure costs.
3. Native Telegram Integration
TON is tightly aligned with Telegram’s ecosystem. Wallets, usernames, and mini app interactions can be linked seamlessly. This, in turn, reduces onboarding friction, which happens to be one of the biggest barriers in Web3 adoption. Here users do not feel like they are “entering crypto.” They simply feel like they are using a feature. For enterprises, this means faster adoption and lower user education costs.
4. Scalable Architecture
TON’s sharding design enables horizontal scalability. As user demand grows, the network can handle more load without congestion spikes. This matters because Telegram mini apps can scale rapidly overnight. A viral app can jump from thousands to millions of users quickly. Infrastructure that cannot scale becomes a liability.
5. Built-In Asset Logic
TON supports token creation, NFTs, and digital asset management natively. This allows businesses to design reward systems and ownership layers without building custom infrastructure from scratch. This shortens Telegram mini app development timelines and reduces technical risk.
Business Benefits for Early Movers
Timing plays a major role in emerging ecosystems. Telegram mini apps are still in a growth phase, which creates strategic advantages for early entrants.
1. Lower Competition for Attention
As the ecosystem matures, user attention becomes expensive. Early movers benefit from less crowded discovery environments and higher visibility.
This translates to:
- Faster user acquisition
- Lower marketing spend
- Higher organic reach
2. First Access to Community Loyalty
Users who adopt early platforms often develop stronger loyalty. They associate their early experiences with the brand or ecosystem that introduced them.
For businesses, this creates:
- Long-term retention
- Stronger community identity
- Higher lifetime value per user
3. Data & Learning Advantage
Early projects gain valuable behavioral data, such as what works, what retains users, what monetizes. Late entrants must rely on assumptions. Early movers rely on insights. This data advantage compounds over time.
4. Partnership & Ecosystem Opportunities
Early builders often secure stronger partnerships within the ecosystem, like wallets, marketplaces, other mini apps, and cross-promotions. Once the space matures, these partnerships become harder to secure.
5. Category Leadership Positioning
Brands that enter early often become synonymous with the category itself. This positioning is hard to replicate later. Being “one of the first” often leads to being “one of the biggest.”
Wish to Explore the Benefits of Launching Telegram Mini Apps in the TON Ecosystem?
The Hidden Complexity
From the outside, Telegram mini apps appear lightweight. However, building scalable, secure, and sustainable mini apps requires serious engineering. This is where a number of projects tend to fail.
1. Backend Infrastructure
Mini apps still require reliable servers, databases, and APIs. Handling spikes in user activity requires cloud architecture that can auto-scale. Without this, apps crash during viral growth.
2. TON Smart Contract Design
Smart contracts must be secure and efficient. Poorly designed contracts can lead to exploits, fund loss, or frozen assets. Auditing and optimization are critical.
3. Tokenomics & Reward Logic
Designing reward systems that retain users without inflating value is complex. Many mini apps fail because their token economies collapse. Economic modeling is not optional, it’s foundational.
4. Anti-Bot & Anti-Exploit Systems
Tap-to-earn and reward-based systems attract bots. Without anti-abuse mechanisms, economies break quickly. Enterprises must invest in fraud detection and behavioral monitoring.
5. UX Simplicity with Technical Depth
Mini apps must feel simple while hiding complex infrastructure. Balancing UX and blockchain logic during Telegram mini apps development is a design challenge. Users expect instant responses and zero friction.
6. Security & Compliance
Handling wallets and digital assets introduces security responsibilities. Enterprises must consider:
- Smart contract audits
- Secure wallet flows
- Regulatory awareness
Security lapses destroy trust very quickly.
Strategic Takeaway
Telegram mini apps might look easy to build. However, they are not easy to scale or sustain. The difference between a viral hit and a short-lived experiment often lies in architecture, economy design, and security readiness. This is exactly the reason why experienced Telegram mini app developers matter.
Why the Right Development Partner Matters
Successful Telegram mini apps blend:
- UX design
- Game psychology
- Blockchain logic
- Infrastructure scalability
- Economic modeling
This is multidisciplinary and a capable Telegram game development company rightly understands how these layers interact.
Antier works with startups and enterprises to build Telegram mini apps and TON-powered games that are designed for real adoption. This includes:
- Mini game design
- TON smart contract development
- Token and reward systems
- Scalable architecture
- Security-first development
It is to be kept in mind that in Telegram ecosystems, scale can happen overnight and only well-architected systems survive rapid growth.
Final Thoughts
Telegram mini apps are evolving into a major distribution channel where gaming, finance, and community intersect. They reduce friction, shorten adoption cycles, and enable creative monetization. The opportunity is real. However, success depends on execution. Businesses entering the field now are not chasing trends. Their focus is on positioning themselves in a new app ecosystem forming inside Telegram. Antier, with its sheer level of expertise as a Telegram game development company, helps businesses build scalable mini apps that not only sustain but also deliver the intended results.
Frequently Asked Questions
01. What are Telegram mini apps and how do they differ from traditional apps?
Telegram mini apps are lightweight applications that can be accessed directly within chats without the need for installations, app-store approvals, or onboarding friction, making them more convenient for users.
02. How do Telegram mini apps leverage the TON blockchain?
Telegram mini apps can utilize the TON blockchain to support payments, tokenized incentives, and ownership models, all within the familiar Telegram interface, enhancing user engagement and monetization.
03. What are some key factors that contribute to the success of Telegram mini apps?
Successful Telegram mini apps often incorporate elements like simplicity in gameplay, community engagement, branding, humor, and predictable reward systems, which align with user behavior and enhance retention.
The XRP price rebounded more than 30% after bouncing from its early February low near $1.12. The move revived hopes of a recovery and briefly pushed the token toward the $1.50 zone. On the surface, the rally looked constructive. Momentum indicators improved. A breakout pattern began to form. Traders started discussing a possible trend reversal.
But blockchain data tells a different story. Instead of showing strong accumulation, on-chain metrics suggest that many holders used the rebound to exit losing positions. Selling at a loss remains dominant. Several groups are still reducing exposure. This raises a key question: was the bounce genuine demand, or simply exit liquidity for trapped sellers?
Technical Setup Shows Bounce Potential, But It Needs Confirmation
On the 12-hour chart, XRP is trading inside a falling wedge pattern, with a 56% breakout potential above the upper trendline.
Sponsored
Sponsored
For this pattern to activate, XRP needs to first reclaim its short-term moving average, the 20-period exponential moving average (EMA), which gives more weight to recent prices. This level acts as dynamic resistance in downtrends. In early January, a clean break above this EMA triggered a rally of nearly 30%.
Momentum is also showing early improvement.
Between January 31 and February 9, XRP printed a lower low in price. At the same time, the Relative Strength Index (RSI), a momentum indicator that measures buying and selling pressure, formed a higher low. This bullish divergence suggests that sellers are losing strength.
Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.
On its own, this setup points to a possible bounce.
But technical patterns only work when holders are willing to stay invested. To understand whether this bounce has real support, we need to look at how investors are behaving on-chain.
SOPR Shows Holders Are Still Selling at Losses Despite the Bounce
One of the clearest warning signals comes from the Spent Output Profit Ratio, or SOPR. SOPR measures whether coins being moved on-chain are sold in profit or at a loss. When it stays above 1, it shows profit-taking. When it remains below 1, it shows loss-selling.
Since late January, XRP’s SOPR has remained below 1 for more than ten consecutive days.
Sponsored
Sponsored
This is unusual. After a 30%+ rebound, short-term traders are normally sitting in profit. That usually pushes SOPR higher. But in XRP’s case, profitability never returned. Loss selling continued even as the price recovered. This means many holders are still exiting underwater positions.
In simple terms, the market is not seeing confident profit-taking. It is seeing stress-driven exits. To understand who is responsible, we need to look at holder cohorts.
Holder Data Confirms the XRP Bounce Is Being Used to Exit, Not Accumulate
HODL Waves group XRP wallets based on how long they have held their coins. This helps identify which investor groups are buying or selling.
The most striking shift appeared in the 24-hour holder cohort.
On February 6, this group controlled about 1% of XRP’s circulating supply. Within days, that share collapsed to roughly 0.09%. That represents a decline of more than 90%.
Sponsored
Sponsored
These were highly reactive traders who entered during volatility and rushed to exit during the rebound.
Selling was not limited to this group.
The 1-month to 3-month cohort, which accumulated heavily in January when XRP traded near $2.07, has also been reducing exposure. Their share of supply fell from around 14.48% in mid-January to about 9.48% recently. That is a decline of roughly 35%.
These holders remain underwater. Instead of waiting for a full recovery, they are using rallies to minimize losses. Together, these two cohorts explain why SOPR has remained depressed for a long time now.
Short-term traders are exiting failed trades. Medium-term holders are cutting losing positions.
This behavior is typical of distribution phases, not early bull markets. And it directly impacts price structure.
Sponsored
Sponsored
Cost Basis Data Shows Why $1.44–$1.54 Is a Wall for the XRP Price
Cost basis heat maps show where large groups of investors bought their coins. These zones often become resistance when the price returns to them.
For XRP, the strongest near-term cluster sits between $1.42 and $1.44. More than 660 million XRP were accumulated in this range. This creates a powerful sell zone.
When the price approaches this area, many holders reach break-even. After weeks of losses, they chose to exit.
Above this cluster lies the $1.54 level, which aligns with EMA resistance. Together, these zones form a barrier that XRP has repeatedly failed to clear. Each time the XRP price rallies into this region, selling intensifies. This is consistent with the distribution seen in SOPR and HODL Waves.
If XRP fails again near $1.44, downside risk increases. A rejection could send the price back toward $1.23 and possibly $1.12, the recent low. That would represent a decline of more than 20% from current levels.
Only a sustained break above $1.54, supported by improving profitability and reduced selling, would change this XRP price structure.
Federal Reserve Governor Chris Waller says the crypto hype that came with US President Donald Trump’s election victory has begun to wane as the market has become more entangled with traditional finance.
“I think some of the euphoria that came into the crypto world with the current administration, some of that’s kind of fading,” Waller said at a conference on Monday.
“A lot of it has been brought into the mainstream finance,” Waller said. “Then, you know, things have to happen there, so I think there was a lot of sell-off just because firms that got into it from mainstream finance had to adjust their risk positions.”
More traditional finance players have started to increase their exposure to crypto under the Trump administration, which has helped to elevate the market, but Waller argued that Congress’ failure to quickly pass the crypto market structure bill had also “put people off” as it leaves much uncertainty about how the products are regulated.
He also brushed off the recent market drop as “part of the game” with crypto. “You get in, you make some money, you might lose some money — that’s the nature of the beast.”
“Look, prices go up, prices go down — it’s just the nature of the business,” Waller said. “If you don’t like it, don’t get in it, that’s my advice to everybody.”
Bitcoin (BTC) has fallen 45% from its peak of $125,000 in October and is currently trading around $69,500 after a brief crash to under $60,000 on Friday.
Fed “skinny master accounts” to come this year: Waller
Waller said that the Fed would roll out its proposed “payment accounts” this year, which aims to give fintech and crypto firms limited access to the central banking system.
The Fed fielded feedback on the accounts, dubbed “skinny master accounts,” up until Friday, with crypto companies backing the plan while banking associations urged caution over the proposal.
Related: Bessent suggests Warsh nomination hearings alongside Powell probe
“We got a ton of stuff, and we’ll have to kind of work through that,” Waller said. “If we can get that done reasonably well, I’d like to try to have this done by the end of the year, if possible.”
The Fed’s proposal would see payment accounts given fewer privileges compared to master accounts commonly owned by major banks, such as removing the ability to earn interest and imposing balance limits.
Waller has previously said that payment accounts would “support innovation while keeping the payments system safe” and are necessary due to “rapid developments” in payments technology.
Magazine: How crypto laws changed in 2025 — and how they’ll change in 2026
TLDR
- Vitalik Buterin proposes Ethereum as a key tool for privacy-preserving AI interactions and trust-minimized AI systems.
- He advocates for local AI models and cryptographic tools to protect users’ identities in AI interactions.
- Ethereum can serve as an economic layer for AI-to-AI interactions, supporting decentralized coordination and an AI reputation mechanism.
- Buterin envisions AI scaling human judgment to improve prediction markets and decentralized governance.
- Ethereum’s involvement in AI could decentralize power and shift control from corporations to more distributed systems.
Vitalik Buterin, the co-founder of Ethereum, shared his updated vision on the intersection of Ethereum and Artificial Intelligence (AI). In his statement, Buterin emphasized avoiding “accelerationist AGI” and instead focusing on human empowerment, privacy, and safety. He proposed that Ethereum could play a key role in building trust-minimized tools for secure AI interactions and integrating these technologies with crypto.
Building Privacy-Preserving AI Tools
Buterin advocates for the development of tools that prioritize privacy and trust in AI systems. He highlighted the importance of creating local AI models (LLMs) that allow users to interact without revealing their identities.
“ZK-payment for API calls” was also mentioned as a way to prevent linking users’ identities during transactions with remote models. Moreover, Buterin stressed the significance of cryptographic advancements that could improve AI privacy.
These technologies could include client-side verification of cryptographic proofs and trusted execution environments (TEEs). By implementing these tools, Ethereum could help ensure the safe interaction between AI systems and their users.
Ethereum as an Economic Layer for AI Interactions
Buterin envisions Ethereum becoming the backbone for economic transactions in AI ecosystems. He sees Ethereum facilitating AI-to-AI interactions, such as bots hiring bots and securing deposits for AI services.
By incorporating mechanisms like ERC-8004 for AI reputation, Ethereum can support decentralized coordination between AI systems. This setup would reduce the dependency on centralized organizations controlling AI models.
Ethereum could allow these systems to function economically, empowering more decentralized architectures. By doing so, Ethereum would help shift the power dynamic in AI from large corporations to a more distributed and transparent framework.
Decentralizing Governance and Expanding Human Judgment
In his vision, Buterin believes that AI could help overcome the limits of human decision-making. He emphasized how large language models (LLMs) can scale human judgment, making prediction markets and decentralized governance more efficient.
LLMs could help in areas like quadratic voting, combinatorial auctions, and universal barter economies. Buterin’s focus is on using AI to create better markets and governance structures that were previously limited by human attention.
With AI support, these systems could function more effectively, enabling more accurate decision-making at scale. Ethereum’s role in facilitating these interactions would strengthen the foundation of decentralized cooperation and improve future defense mechanisms.
Backpack Exchange, the crypto trading platform founded by former FTX and Alameda leaders, is reportedly in talks to raise around $50 million in new financing at a pre-money valuation above $1 billion.
Summary
- Backpack Exchange is reportedly in discussions to raise around $50 million at a valuation exceeding $1 billion, potentially elevating it to unicorn status.
- CEO Armani Ferrante outlined a tokenomics structure aimed at preventing early insider sell-offs and aligning incentives with long-term product growth.
- The company has also revealed plans for a 1 billion token supply, with 25% allocated at the token generation event, including community rewards.
If completed, the round would cement Backpack’s position in the crypto sector and potentially elevate it into unicorn status, a milestone for a firm still emerging from the post-FTX landscape.
The discussions come amid increased investor interest in fintech and crypto startups, and Backpack could parlay the fresh capital into expanding its exchange, wallet, and regulatory footprint globally.
The $50 million figure is a baseline, and reports suggest the eventual round size could grow larger.
Backpack CEO outlines tokenomics strategy
Meanwhile, Backpack CEO Armani Ferrante took to X to flesh out the company’s tokenomics framework ahead of a future token generation event.
Ferrante emphasized that the structure is designed to prevent early insiders from “dumping” tokens on retail investors, with no founders, executives, or venture backers receiving unlockable tokens until the product reaches significant traction, a concept he described as product “escape velocity.”
He also highlighted Backpack’s long-term goal of eventually going public in the U.S., signaling ambition beyond private fundraising and into regulated capital markets.
According to Ferrante, aligning token incentives with users, not short-term speculation, lays a foundation for sustainable growth and broader global adoption.
In a related post on the official Backpack account, the team confirmed elements of its upcoming token issuance plans. This includes a 1 billion token supply at launch and the allocation of 25 % of tokens at the Token Generation Event (TGE), with a portion earmarked for active community participants and points holders.
Bitmine Immersion Technologies has pushed its Ethereum treasury to new highs, with total ETH holdings now standing at 4.326 million tokens, as the firm continued aggressive accumulation despite ongoing volatility in the crypto market.
Summary
- Bitmine Immersion Technologies’ Ethereum holdings have reached 4.326 million ETH, representing about 3.6% of ETH’s circulating supply.
- On-chain data shows the firm bought 40,000 ETH worth roughly $83.4 million in a single day, including a $42.3 million purchase from BitGo.
- Nearly 2.9 million ETH are staked, underscoring Bitmine’s long-term strategy despite ongoing market volatility.
The Tom Lee–chaired company disclosed in a recent press release that its Ethereum stash now represents around 3.6% of ETH’s total circulating supply, cementing Bitmine’s position as the largest known corporate holder of the asset.
Combined with Bitcoin and cash reserves, Bitmine’s total crypto and cash holdings are valued at approximately $10 billion.
Fresh $83M ETH buy signals continued accumulation
On-chain data flagged by Lookonchain shows that Bitmine added significantly to its position on Monday.
According to the analytics account, the firm purchased 20,000 ETH worth about $42.3 million from BitGo, following an earlier buy of the same size.
“Bitmine has been steadily buying Ethereum, as we view this pullback as attractive, given the strengthening fundamentals. In our view, the price of ETH is not reflective of the high utility of ETH and its role as the future of finance,” said Tom Lee, Executive Chairman of Bitmine.
Staking strategy anchors long-term bet on Ethereum
Bitmine said nearly 2.9 million ETH of its total holdings are currently staked, generating yield through its expanding Ethereum infrastructure operations. The company added that its ETH-focused strategy is aimed at long-term value creation rather than short-term price movements.
Chairman Tom Lee described recent price weakness as an opportunity, citing Ethereum’s history of sharp recoveries following deep drawdowns and pointing to staking yields as an additional source of return.
Ethereum has struggled to regain upside momentum amid broader risk-off sentiment across crypto markets. Still, Bitmine’s continued buying underscores growing interest among institutional players in Ethereum as a treasury asset, even as near-term price action remains uncertain.
Tokenization has rapidly evolved from a niche blockchain experiment into a strategic enabler for enterprises seeking greater liquidity, operational efficiency, and transparency across asset classes. However, as enterprises move beyond proof-of-concept initiatives, it has become increasingly clear that early, fully on-chain tokenization models are not designed to meet real-world enterprise requirements.
Enterprises operate within complex ecosystems defined by regulatory oversight, data privacy mandates, legacy infrastructure, and multi-jurisdictional compliance obligations. While public blockchain networks offer decentralization and transparency, they often lack the governance controls enterprises require. Conversely, fully private systems limit interoperability and long-term scalability.
This gap is being decisively filled by hybrid tokenization, a pragmatic and future-ready framework that blends blockchain innovation with enterprise-grade control. Hybrid models are emerging as the preferred foundation for enterprise asset tokenization, enabling organizations to unlock tokenized value without compromising compliance, privacy, or operational stability.
What Is Enterprise Asset Tokenization and Why Are Enterprises Re-Evaluating Tokenization Models in 2026?
Enterprise asset tokenization is the practice of using tokens built on blockchain technology to digitally represent ownership, rights and economic value of an enterprise’s asset[s] while embedding the governance, compliance, and operational controls that large organizations require.
Assets that can be tokenized include but are not limited to financial securities; portfolios of real estate; interests in private equity; commodities; infrastructure-related assets; intellectual property; and instruments for sharing revenue.
Numerous large structural shifts are influencing how organizations view and approach the tokenization of their assets:
- The regulatory landscape has matured. As such, regulators are now requiring that asset tokenization projects be auditable and provide investor protection through jurisdictional enforcement rather than being experimental efforts.
- Institutional participation has increased in the tokenization of assets. Institutional investors are establishing higher standards for how organizations should protect the confidentiality of their data, accurately report their results and mitigate risk.
- There has been an expansion of operational scale; enterprises have progressed from conducting small pilots of tokenizing their assets to developing and implementing broad-based strategies for tokenizing multiple types of assets in multiple markets.
- Enterprises can no longer avoid integrating their legacy systems and other operational platforms into their tokenization platforms. Tokenizing assets and developing tokenized asset-based products will require seamless integration between the tokenization platform and legacy ERP systems, the provider of custodial services, banks, and systems for complying with regulations.
These developments are causing organizations to rethink their evaluation of enterprise tokenization models by prioritizing those models that align with how they operate on a day-to-day basis rather than those that require organizations to alter their methods of operation.
Evaluate whether Hybrid Tokenization fits your Enterprise Roadmap
What Is a Hybrid Tokenization Model?
A hybrid tokenization model is an architectural approach that strategically distributes tokenization functions across blockchain networks and off-chain enterprise systems. Instead of forcing all processes onto a decentralized ledger, hybrid models apply blockchain selectively—where it delivers the greatest value—while retaining centralized control where required.
The following three components are integral to the hybrid tokenization architectural:
- A blockchain layer for token issuance, ownership tracking, and transaction immutability
- An off-chain enterprise layer for compliance, identity management, legal documentation, and sensitive data
- Middleware that synchronizes on-chain events with off-chain business logic and enterprise workflows
The Hybrid Tokenization Models provide a method for Enterprises to maximize the use of Blockchain technology while minimizing their exposure to regulatory and operational risks.
How Hybrid Tokenization Architecture Combines On-Chain and Off-Chain Tokenization
The success of tokenization of hybrid assets is dependent upon how well the on-chain and off-chain tokenization functions are coordinated. Each layer has been specifically designed to carry out the operations that will work most effectively in that environment.
1. On-chain Tokenization Layer
The on-chain tokenization layer has responsibility for activities that can be carried out in a decentralized, immutable, and automated manner:
- Issuing Tokens and Managing Their Life Cycle
Tokens will be generated on chain as a method of providing a cryptographic proof of ownership of the asset they represent. When life cycle events occur (minting, burning, freezing, or unlocking tokens), they are executed in an open and transparent manner to ensure that the integrity of the asset is maintained.
- Records of Transfer of Ownership
All transfers of the token from one holder to another will be recorded on the blockchain, resulting in an unalterable record of who owns an asset. The result is a reliable record for enterprises, investors & regulators to rely upon to establish provenance of the asset and validate any corresponding transactions.
Smart contracts provide an automated means of enforcing all contractual obligations (e.g., transfer restrictions, vesting schedules, dividend distributions, redemption of asset rights). As a result of using smart contract execution, manual interventions can be reduced, reducing the likelihood of operational errors. All contractual obligations will be consistently enforced.
Auditability in real time is possible due to the recordkeeping of the blockchain. Regulators and internal compliance departments can verify the validity of transactions with no reliance on reconciled reports, thereby creating far greater trust and transparency with all parties involved.
2. Off-chain enterprise layer
The off-chain layer provides functionality that requires privacy, flexibility, and regulatory discretion.
- KYC/AML Verification & Investor Accreditation
Identity verification in different jurisdictions has different processes and is continuously changing. By managing these workflows off-chain, businesses can quickly adapt their compliance logic to accommodate changing regulations and apply eligibility checks before participating on-chain.
- Legal Agreements & Contractual Governance
Ownership of assets is determined by legal documentation (prospectuses, shareholder agreements, and regulatory filings). Off-chain storage of these documents provides the ability to keep them updated and still be cryptographically linked to the on-chain token.
- Asset Valuation, Reporting, and Metadata Management
Many types of assets will need to be valued periodically, sometimes using third-party data feeds or human intervention. An off-chain system can facilitate accurate financial reporting and mitigate the risk of unnecessary oracle dependency.
- Integration to Enterprise Systems
Hybrid architectures facilitate the integration of ERP systems, accounting packages, custodial services and banking infrastructure. This enables tokenization to build on existing operations and not disrupt them.
Tokenization Models Comparison: Public, Private, and Hybrid Enterprise Tokenization Models
A comprehensive tokenization models comparison highlights why hybrid approaches are increasingly favored by enterprises.
Public tokenization models
Public models operate entirely on open blockchains, offering transparency and composability. However, they present challenges such as:
- Exposure of sensitive transaction data
- Limited jurisdictional enforcement capabilities
- Unpredictable transaction costs and network congestion
- Governance dependency on public network consensus
While suitable for open ecosystems, public-only models struggle to meet enterprise governance and compliance standards.
Private tokenization models
Private models emphasize control and confidentiality but introduce other limitations:
- Restricted interoperability and liquidity
- Heavy reliance on centralized administrators
- Limited external auditability
- Reduced long-term flexibility
These constraints can hinder scalability and investor confidence.
Hybrid enterprise tokenization models
Hybrid models combine the strengths of both approaches:
- Selective transparency with controlled access
- Built-in compliance and governance mechanisms
- Scalable participation across markets and asset classes
- Future adaptability to regulatory and technological change
For enterprises pursuing long-term digital asset strategies, hybrid models offer the most resilient foundation.
Why Hybrid Tokenization Will Define Enterprise Asset Strategies
As enterprises consider tokenization as long-term infrastructure, decision-makers are increasingly prioritizing frameworks that align with governance, compliance, and scalability. In this shift, the hybrid tokenization model is emerging as the most practical and future-ready choice for enterprise asset tokenization.
Key factors contributing to the adoption of hybrid tokenization by enterprises:
- Hybrid tokenization architecture balances decentralization with enterprise governance
Unlike fully public systems, hybrid tokenization architecture allows enterprises to use blockchain for immutable ownership and auditability while retaining off-chain control over compliance, identity, and legal enforcement—an essential requirement for regulated enterprise environments.
- Supports regulatory-ready enterprise tokenization models
Enterprise tokenization models will enable the enterprise to manage compliance regulations, jurisdictional limitations, and reporting procedures off-chain, therefore enabling the enterprise to update its compliance regulations more easily and with fewer disruptions than if using a fully decentralized architecture.
- Optimized use of on-chain and off-chain tokenization layers
A hybrid implementation allows an enterprise to maximize the benefits of implementing on-chain and off-chain tokenization while providing transparency, as appropriate, and confidentiality as needed on its blockchain infrastructure.
- Delivers superior results in tokenization models comparison
In any realistic tokenization models comparison, hybrid tokenization approaches often surpass completely public and completely private tokenization approaches by delivering selective transparency, controlled access, and long-term scalability—critical factors in determining whether enterprises will adopt tokenized assets.
- Enables scalable hybrid asset tokenization across multiple asset classes
With hybrid asset tokenization, enterprises can tokenize a variety of assets (e.g., securities, funds, real estate, RWAs) over a single shared blockchain layer while applying customized off-chain governance, valuation, and compliance workflows for each asset type.
- Reduces cost volatility and operational risk at scale
Enterprises using fully public or private on-chain systems experience significant volatility in fees due to fluctuating network congestion and stable fees. In contrast, hybrid tokenization models move the majority of high-volume and compliance-centric processes off-chain and deliver a more predictable level of performance and cost savings as a result of this approach.
- Strengthens institutional trust and accelerates market participation
Institutional investors require a high level of trust based upon the governance and enforceability of how assets are tokenized. Hybrid frameworks provide on-chain transparency coupled with off-chain legal and compliance controls to create a more credible and investable enterprise asset tokenization.
- Best implemented with an experienced asset tokenization development company
In order to implement hybrid tokenization solutions, it is important to partner with an experienced asset tokenization development company with expertise in blockchain, compliance, and enterprise integration so that the architecture supports legislative and operational realities.
Explore Enterprise-Ready Hybrid Tokenization
A Strategic Enterprise Outlook
With more organizations starting to implement their tokenization initiatives instead of merely experimenting with these new technologies as they come to market, hybrid tokenization models are clearly proving to be one of the leading approaches for enterprise asset tokenization due to their ability to combine on-chain and off-chain tokenization in a manner that ensures transparency, governance, and flexibility to operate in various asset classes and jurisdictions.
Of all the various tokenization models being evaluated today, hybrid tokenization models stand out because they achieve a proper balance between innovation and control; thus, providing enterprises with the means to execute their long-term tokenization strategy through 2026.
Organizations cannot achieve hybrid tokenization at scale without deep technical and regulatory knowledge. As an established and reliable asset tokenization development company, Antier is able to assist these enterprises by not only providing the asset tokenization development services and expertise needed to design and deploy compliant hybrid tokenization architectures but also by providing the blockchain, Web3, and enterprise integration capabilities necessary to create tokenization platforms that will meet future regulatory requirements in an efficient and secure manner.
Jump Trading, a Chicago-based quantitative trading company, is reportedly set to acquire minority stakes in prediction market platforms Polymarket and Kalshi, underscoring growing institutional interest in the rapidly expanding sector.
The equity stakes would be obtained in exchange for providing trading liquidity on both platforms, Bloomberg reported Monday, citing people familiar with the discussions.
While the report did not disclose specific ownership percentages, Bloomberg said Jump’s stake in Polymarket would scale based on the liquidity the company ultimately provides.
Founded more than two decades ago, Jump Trading has long been a major player in proprietary financial trading and has expanded aggressively into digital assets. It has been active as both a market maker and venture investor in crypto, backing blockchain infrastructure projects and exchanges through its affiliated investment arms.
Polymarket and Kalshi are the two largest prediction market platforms, each commanding multibillion-dollar valuations following recent funding rounds.
As previously reported by Cointelegraph, Polymarket raised $2 billion from NYSE parent Intercontinental Exchange, valuing the company at $9 billion. In early December, Kalshi secured $1 billion in funding at an $11 billion valuation.
While both platforms allow users to trade on the outcomes of real-world events, they operate under different models. Polymarket is a decentralized platform built on the Polygon blockchain that enables onchain settlement of prediction contracts, whereas Kalshi operates as a centralized, federally regulated exchange in the United States.
Related: Trump Jr. joins Polymarket board as prediction market eyes US comeback
Prediction markets gain traction, but still face regulatory hurdles
Prediction markets gained mainstream attention after Polymarket’s event contracts accurately forecast the outcome of the 2024 US presidential election, highlighting the sector’s potential as a real-time information and risk-pricing tool. Industry analysts now estimate that prediction markets may generate trillions of dollars in annual trading volume by the end of the decade.
Eilers & Krejcik Gaming, a research and consulting company specializing in the global gambling and gaming industry, has identified sports-related contracts as a major driver of that growth. Speaking to CNBC in December, Eilers & Krejcik partner emeritus Chris Grove said sports betting could account for nearly half of the sector’s projected expansion.
Despite the growth potential, Grove cautioned that legal and regulatory challenges could slow adoption.
Kalshi, which operates as a federally regulated prediction market, has received approval from the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission to run as a Designated Contract Market. However, the platform is facing pushback at the state level. Regulators in Nevada, Maryland, New Jersey and Ohio have challenged Kalshi’s offerings, triggering ongoing litigation and cease-and-desist actions.
Related: Polymarket wins regulatory approval to operate US trading platform
Ripple said on Monday it has expanded its institutional custody platform through new integrations with Securosys and Figment.
The company said it is adding hardware security modules to enable banks and custodians to deploy custody services and offer staking without necessarily operating their own validator or key-management infrastructure.
Building on Ripple’s recent acquisition of Palisade and the integration of Chainalysis compliance tools, the custody upgrades allow regulated institutions to manage cryptographic keys using on-premises or cloud-based HSMs and to offer staking on networks such as Ethereum (ETH) and Solana (SOL), with compliance checks embedded directly into transaction workflows.
Ripple said the integrations are intended to reduce deployment complexity and support faster rollout of custody services for institutional clients. Ripple has been pushing further into institutional infrastructure activity as it expands beyond payments with custody, treasury and post-trade services for regulated companies.
Ripple is a US-based blockchain infrastructure company that provides payment and custody technology to financial institutions and is the issuer of the XRP (XRP) token and the dollar-pegged stablecoin RLUSD, which it launched in December 2024.
The update comes weeks after the company launched a corporate treasury platform that integrates traditional cash management systems with digital asset infrastructure.
Related: Institutional staking and yield products gain traction
Institutional staking and yield products gain traction
Institutional interest in staking has grown as proof-of-stake networks mature and regulatory expectations continue to evolve.
In October, Figment expanded its integration with Coinbase, enabling Coinbase Custody and Prime clients to stake additional proof-of-stake (POS) assets beyond Ether. The update gave institutional customers access to staking on networks including Solana (SOL), Sui (SUI), Aptos (APT) and Avalanche (AVAX) through Figment’s infrastructure.
In November, Anchorage Digital added staking support for the Hyperliquid ecosystem, enabling HYPE (HYPE) staking alongside its existing custody services. The bank said the offering would be available through Anchorage Digital Bank, its Singapore entity, and its self-custody wallet Porto, with validator operations supported by Figment.
While staking enables institutions to earn rewards on proof-of-stake networks, parallel efforts have also emerged to generate yield from Bitcoin, which does not support staking.
Earlier this month, Fireblocks said it will integrate Stacks, enabling institutional clients to access Bitcoin-based lending and yield products. The integration uses Stacks’ roughly five-second block times while settling transactions to the Bitcoin ledger for finality, addressing latency constraints that have limited institutional use of BTC-based decentralized finance.
Magazine: A ‘tsunami’ of wealth is headed for crypto: Nansen’s Alex Svanevik
Chainlink co-founder Sergey Nazarov argues the recent crypto market downturn is unlike any previous bear market — there have been no major FTX-style collapses, and tokenized real-world asset (RWA) growth remains substantial.
Market cycles are normal, “but what is important is what those cycles reveal about how far the industry has progressed,” said Nazarov on X on Tuesday.
Crypto market capitalization has fallen 44% from its October all-time high of $4.4 trillion, with almost $2 trillion exiting the space in just four months.
Nazarov, however, did not appear concerned, highlighting two primary factors that separate this current bear market from previous ones.
Unlike previous cycles, such as the FTX and crypto-lending failures in 2022, there haven’t been major institutional collapses during this drawdown, indicating the industry can now handle volatility more reliably, he said.
“There have been no large risk management failures leading to large institutional failures or widespread systemic risks.”
RWA growth will drive institutions and infrastructure
Secondly, RWA tokenization and on-chain perpetual contracts for traditional commodities continue accelerating regardless of crypto prices, proving this innovation has standalone value beyond speculation.
Tokenized RWA onchain value has increased 300% over the past 12 months, according to RWA.xyz.
This signals that having real-world assets on-chain “is not tightly coupled to cryptocurrency prices but provides its own unique value that can grow irrespective of market pricing of Bitcoin or other crypto assets,” he said.
The surge hasn’t been reflected in the price of Chainlink (LINK), however, with the blockchain oracle and RWA-centric asset tanking 67% since its October peak and down 83% since its 2021 all-time high, trading at a bear-market low below $9 at the time of writing.
Related: Crypto VC Funding Doubled in 2025 as RWA Tokenization Took the Lead
Nazarov also sees other converging trends reshaping the future of crypto.
On-chain perps and tokenization offer unique value, such as 24/7 markets, on-chain collateral, and real-time data, which is growing steadily. Institutional adoption will be driven by this fundamental utility, and infrastructure demand will surge as complex RWAs require more sophisticated on-chain systems, the Chainlink co-founder said.
“If these trends continue, I believe what I have been saying for years will happen; on-chain RWAs will surpass cryptocurrency in the total value in our industry, and what our industry is about will fundamentally change.”
Not all bear markets are equal
Bernstein analyst Gautam Chhugani echoed the sentiment in a note on Monday, writing that we are experiencing “the weakest Bitcoin bear case in its history.”
“The current Bitcoin price action is a mere crisis of confidence. Nothing broke, no skeletons will show up,” analysts led by Chhugani said.
Jeff Mei, chief operating officer at the BTSE exchange, told Cointelegraph that this sell-off is different “in that it was caused largely by non-crypto catalysts.”
Those include fears that a faltering AI tech boom could cause stocks to crash, “compounded by the appointment of Kevin Warsh to Fed chair, who many believe will reduce liquidity in the financial system,” he said.
Magazine: Bitcoin difficulty plunges, Buterin sells off Ethereum: Hodler’s Digest
Chainlink (CRYPTO: LINK) co-founder Sergey Nazarov argues that the current crypto downturn is not a replay of previous bear markets. Speaking on X on Tuesday, Nazarov noted that there have been no FTX-style collapses this time and pointed to a persistent wave of tokenized real-world assets that continues to grow despite price declines. Crypto market capitalization has fallen about 44% from its October all-time high of $4.4 trillion, with roughly $2 trillion leaving the space in just four months. He frames the cycle as a test of the industry’s progress: cycles reveal how far the ecosystem has advanced, and this downturn is exposing both resilience and a real-world asset narrative that could outlast speculative pricing.
Key takeaways
- The downturn lacks a single systemic event comparable to FTX-era collapses, suggesting improved risk management across institutions.
- Tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) are expanding on-chain, signaling a use case beyond mere price speculation.
- On-chain perpetuals and asset tokenization offer 24/7 markets, on-chain collateral, and real-time data that could drive institutional adoption.
- Chainlink’s credibility as a backbone for on-chain RWAs remains intact even as the broader market experiences weakness.
- Analysts and industry observers see a bifurcation between crypto prices and the growth trajectory of on-chain RWAs, potentially reshaping the industry’s value proposition.
Tickers mentioned: $BTC, $ETH, $LINK
Sentiment: Neutral
Price impact: Negative. A broad sell-off and outflows have pressured prices and market capitalization, even as on-chain RWA activity trends higher.
Market context: The current cycle unfolds amid a shifting risk environment, macro uncertainty, and ongoing debates about liquidity and regulation that influence both crypto assets and tokenized RWAs.
Why it matters
The argument that the bear market is not a monolithic crash but a spectrum of dynamics matters because it reframes what investors should watch. Nazarov emphasizes that the absence of large, systemic failures this cycle points to improved risk controls and more mature market infrastructure. In practical terms, this could translate into steadier liquidity provision, fewer cascading liquidations, and greater confidence in deploying capital through on-chain channels rather than off-ramp exits.
Central to this narrative is the acceleration of RWA tokenization. According to RWA.xyz, tokenized RWAs on-chain have surged by about 300% over the past 12 months, underscoring a use case that can prosper irrespective of crypto price cycles. The implication is clear: real-world assets—ranging from securitized notes to commodity-linked contracts—are becoming meaningful, on-chain stores of value and collateral concepts, not merely speculative bets. This trend could feed into broader institutional demand, as on-chain mechanisms offer transparency, auditability, and cross-border settlement capabilities that traditional markets take days or weeks to deliver.
Yet the market’s performance remains tethered to macro and sector-specific catalysts. LINK, the token associated with pricing data and oracle services, has faced sustained weakness, trading in bear-market territory after peaking earlier in the cycle. The dynamic illustrates a decoupling: while RWAs push forward in practical utility, the crypto market, including major assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum, can diverge for periods where macro sentiment dominates. In this context, on-chain RWAs could gradually displace some narrative weight away from pure price action toward real-world utility and risk-adjusted capital formation.
Institutional involvement is widely anticipated to hinge on the utility of these on-chain structures. Nazarov argues that the combination of perpetual markets, tokenized assets, and robust on-chain collateral is creating a more resilient foundation for institutions to experiment with crypto-enabled finance. The broader ecosystem benefits from infrastructure upgrades that enable risk management, settlement, and governance in a transparent, programmable environment. The takeaway is not that crypto prices must explode to prove value, but that the underlying systems—the oracles, the data streams, and the contractual primitives—are becoming indispensable to professional finance.
As markets digest these developments, some observers emphasize that the current sell-off is driven by factors outside the crypto sector. Analysts have framed the move as a wider market concern about AI equities, liquidity expectations under a potentially tighter policy regime, and shifts in liquidity leadership. While these external pressures complicate the price narrative, the on-chain RWA ecosystem appears to be advancing on its own trajectory, aligned with broader fintech adoption and cross-chain interoperability goals.
“If these trends continue, I believe what I have been saying for years will happen; on-chain RWAs will surpass cryptocurrency in the total value in our industry, and what our industry is about will fundamentally change.”
Not all bear markets are equal
Industry observers have framed this downturn as potentially less damaging to the core ecosystem than prior cycles. Bernstein analyst Gautam Chhugani described the Bitcoin bear case as historically weak, suggesting that the price action reflects a crisis of confidence rather than a structural breakdown. “The current Bitcoin price action is a mere crisis of confidence. Nothing broke, no skeletons will show up,” the note said. The takeaway is that the macro environment, not just isolated crypto incidents, is weighing on sentiment.
Other voices emphasize a more nuanced picture. For instance, market participants note that macro catalysts—ranging from interest-rate expectations to tech-sector dynamics—have a disproportionate influence on crypto pricing versus on-chain activity. The sell-off has been described as being driven more by non-crypto catalysts than by internal systemic failures within the crypto space, a distinction that could support a faster reacceleration should risk appetite improve and liquidity return.
Market context
Against the backdrop of a 44% drawdown in crypto market cap from the October peak and substantial outflows, the story of RWAs on-chain remains a central pillar of longer-term value propositions in crypto. The dynamic underscores a broader trend toward tokenization and on-chain finance as mainstream infrastructure projects mature. If on-chain RWAs continue to gain traction, the sector could reorient investor attention toward scalable, real-world use cases, rather than relying solely on volatility-driven appetite for purely digital assets.
Why it matters
For builders, the message is clear: investing in robust on-chain infrastructure for RWAs—oracle reliability, settlement speed, and secure collateral mechanisms—could yield enduring demand. For investors, RWAs offer a potential hedge against crypto-price cycles by anchoring value in tangible, off-chain assets. For the market, the continued growth of RWAs may redefine what constitutes “crypto value,” expanding the spectrum of investable instruments and potentially attracting traditional finance players to participate in a more regulated, verifiable on-chain ecosystem.
What to watch next
- Updates from RWA.xyz on on-chain RWAs growth metrics and new asset classes tokenized on-chain.
- Institutional pilots adopting on-chain perpetuals and RWA-backed collateral frameworks.
- Regulatory developments affecting tokenized real-world assets and oracle data provisioning.
- Cross-chain integrations that improve liquidity, settling quickly, and governance for RWAs.
Sources & verification
- Sergey Nazarov’s X post discussing bear-market dynamics and RWAs growth.
- RWA.xyz data showing on-chain RWA value growth (about 300% YoY).
- LINK price/index coverage referenced in market commentary.
- Bernstein note on Bitcoin bear-case context.
- Wemade KRW stablecoin alliance with Chainlink coverage.
RWA momentum and a reshaping crypto market
Chainlink’s foundational role in powering on-chain RWAs remains a consistent thread as the sector charts its next phase. The on-chain RWA narrative is supported by observable growth metrics and a steady flow of products that enable real-world assets to exist, trade, and collateralize on-chain. While price action can swing with global liquidity and risk sentiment, the underlying technology stack—secure oracles, robust data feeds, and programmable contracts—continues to attract the interest of developers, institutions, and asset issuers alike. The broader question is whether on-chain RWAs will eventually carry a larger share of industry value than speculative crypto assets, a shift Nazarov has been vocal about predicting for years.
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
XRP Price Analysis Reveals Why the 30% Bounce Failed
Lady Gaga Thanks Bad Bunny for Super Bowl 2026 Halftime Show Guest Spot
Steve Adams: Championing decent Conservative values in Camden
-
Tech6 days agoWikipedia volunteers spent years cataloging AI tells. Now there’s a plugin to avoid them.
-
Politics2 days agoWhy Israel is blocking foreign journalists from entering
-
NewsBeat10 hours agoMia Brookes misses out on Winter Olympics medal in snowboard big air
-
Sports3 days agoJD Vance booed as Team USA enters Winter Olympics opening ceremony
-
Tech3 days agoFirst multi-coronavirus vaccine enters human testing, built on UW Medicine technology
-
NewsBeat1 day agoWinter Olympics 2026: Team GB’s Mia Brookes through to snowboard big air final, and curling pair beat Italy
-
NewsBeat7 days agoUS-brokered Russia-Ukraine talks are resuming this week
-
Business2 days agoLLP registrations cross 10,000 mark for first time in Jan
-
Sports1 day agoBenjamin Karl strips clothes celebrating snowboard gold medal at Olympics
-
Sports3 days ago
Former Viking Enters Hall of Fame
-
Politics2 days agoThe Health Dangers Of Browning Your Food
-
Sports4 days ago
New and Huge Defender Enter Vikings’ Mock Draft Orbit
-
Business2 days agoJulius Baer CEO calls for Swiss public register of rogue bankers to protect reputation
-
NewsBeat4 days agoSavannah Guthrie’s mother’s blood was found on porch of home, police confirm as search enters sixth day: Live
-
Business5 days agoQuiz enters administration for third time
-
NewsBeat21 hours agoResidents say city high street with ‘boarded up’ shops ‘could be better’
-
Sports9 hours ago
Kirk Cousins Officially Enters the Vikings’ Offseason Puzzle
-
NewsBeat5 days agoStill time to enter Bolton News’ Best Hairdresser 2026 competition
-
NewsBeat3 days agoDriving instructor urges all learners to do 1 check before entering roundabout
-
Crypto World6 days agoRussia’s Largest Bitcoin Miner BitRiver Enters Bankruptcy Proceedings: Report