Connect with us

Crypto World

TEXITcoin founder on Texas mining growth, merge mining and regulatory battle

Published

on

The CLARITY Act sparks an XRP-led rally across major altcoins, enabling investors earn $6,500 through SHRMiner cloud mining

In an interview with crypto.news, Selva Ozelli speaks with TEXITcoin founder Richard W. Wisher about the Proof-of-Work network, its Texas mining operations and how merge mining allows TXC to be mined alongside Litecoin and Dogecoin.

Summary

  • TEXITcoin operates a Texas based Proof of Work network and uses merge mining alongside Litecoin and Dogecoin.
  • The project has invested $5.5 million to expand mining sites in McKinney, Mansfield and Conroe.
  • TEXITcoin is contesting a Texas State Securities Board case alleging unregistered investment offerings and misleading statements.
  • Founder Richard W. Wisher argues that TXC mining involves a Proof of Work commodity rather than a security.

The discussion also covers regulation and the Texas State Securities Board case against TEXITcoin, MineTXC, Blockchain Mint and Wisher. The founder disputes the regulator’s allegations and argues that mining a Proof-of-Work commodity does not constitute a securities offering.

Tell us about your journey to establishing TEXITcoin (TXC)

I began minting coins in 2008, the same year Satoshi introduced Bitcoin. My goal was to provide money that no government can print. While gold and silver served this purpose for centuries, I wanted to bring that same security to the digital age. In 2012, I even testified before Congress to advocate for these alternative currencies. By 2017, I started laser-etching private keys onto physical coins to bridge the gap between digital assets and tangible wealth. This journey led to TEXITcoin. We built it as a Texas-rooted, Proof-of-Work network with no pre-mine and no special favors for the team. Honest money isn’t a slogan, it’s just money that has to be earned the same way for everybody who touches it, and that is the only kind of money I have ever wanted to build.

Advertisement

Which platforms does TXC trade on?

TXC trades on MEXC, XT.COM, BitMart, and Pionex, with wrapped TXC also available on Ethereum. We’re in discussions with a number of other exchanges right now, so this list is likely to change and grow as new partnerships come together.

Why does Texas rank at the top for crypto mining?

Texas offers a competitive energy market and a massive network of wind and solar power. You will find plenty of land here and a state government that welcomes your business. This environment allows us to build real, physical infrastructure. We mine TXC in the open, using verifiable hardware and actual electricity. Plus, you can power down quickly when the grid is busy, which helps everyone.

Of course, the process is not always easy. Miners face long waits to connect to the grid and unpredictable power prices. You will also deal with transmission limits and more oversight from officials. Despite these hurdles, Texas remains the strongest place to build.

TXC is described as using multi-level marketing to sell mining packages. What are the challenges and growth concerns for crypto mining in Texas?

TEXITcoin is a Layer 1 crypto network, meaning it operates as its own currency, much like Bitcoin. We crowdsourced our mining infrastructure, which fostered a community where people actively participate rather than just watch from the sidelines. If you value collaboration and building real connections, this project is for you. We have created something fundamentally different from traditional network marketing and the scams common in the space.

Advertisement

However, scaling in Texas comes with real challenges. Companies must navigate long grid wait times, volatile power prices, and high startup costs. We also address complex factors like curtailment economics, local noise concerns, and the need for complete transparency when offering products to the public. We are building a sustainable model that accounts for these realities head-on.

How does TXC rank among major crypto-mining companies operating large facilities across Texas?

Comparing TXC to public Bitcoin-mining companies is misleading. We are a Layer 1 network, not a massive mining corporation. We operate on a different scale, so measuring us by megawatts or market cap ignores our true purpose.

We focus on building real infrastructure. We recently invested $5.5 million to expand our mining sites in McKinney, Mansfield, and Conroe. That money bought hardware that performs actual work rather than chasing a leaderboard. I have no interest in claiming a rank that we have not earned. My priority is the growth, security, and utility of the TXC network. That is the only scoreboard that matters.

Advertisement

How do TXC merge mining and energy use work?

TXC uses Scrypt, just like Litecoin and Dogecoin. Because they share the same algorithm, one machine can secure all three networks at the same time. This is called merge mining. It is highly efficient because you do not waste computing power on redundant tasks.

However, it is important to be clear that merge mining does not make mining free. Your machines still consume real electricity. You must manage them carefully to stay profitable. Merge mining simply makes every watt of energy go further rather than make the energy costs disappear.

How is merge mining regulated at state and federal level?

Merge mining does not trigger its own specific set of regulations. Regulators are less worried about the technical labels you use, but instead are focused on your actual activities. You must still follow the rules that apply to any business. This includes things like local environmental permits, electricity market standards, and building codes. If your operations involve financial products or transactions, you must also comply with anti-money laundering, consumer protection, and other applicable laws. Ultimately, authorities judge you by what you do, not by the technology you choose to use.

How is merge mining taxed at federal and state level?

Federal law views mined digital assets as taxable income. You must report their value the moment they become usable. If you sell these assets later, any change in price results in a separate capital gain or loss.

Advertisement

If, like us, you mine as a business, you face additional self-employment or corporate taxes. Texas offers an advantage by having no state income tax, but your business is not exempt from other costs. You must still pay franchise, sales, property, and local taxes. Additionally, the IRS taxes rewards from every network you secure, regardless of your mining efficiency. Because tax laws are complex, please consult a professional regarding your specific business needs.

How could the Texas PUC v. Attorney General public-records case affect the mining industry?

This legal case is not about mining regulations. It is about whether the state must release private data on facility locations and power use. People often confuse these two issues, but they are separate.

If the court chooses confidentiality, it protects mining companies from security risks. This is the position held by the Public Utility Commission. However, if the court mandates disclosure, the public gains vital clarity about the demands these companies place on the Texas power grid.

It is important to note that this case does not excuse companies from complying with the rules. They must still report their data to regulators. The core disagreement is simply about who has the right to see that data. This decision is one small part of a larger debate about how Texas manages its energy grid and the public’s right to know how its power is being used.

Advertisement

How did the Texas Blockchain Council/EIA survey case affect the mining industry?

The 2024 EIA case demonstrates that agencies must follow the law when collecting data. The agency tried to force Bitcoin miners to complete an emergency survey without using the standard notice and comment process. A federal court stopped them with a restraining order, ultimately forcing the EIA to delete the data they had already collected.

That’s the real lesson here, government agencies cannot bypass rules to demand private information. They must follow the Paperwork Reduction Act and allow for public feedback. This decision does not mean the EIA cannot request energy data in the future. It also does not excuse miners from standard reporting requirements. Instead, it ensures that agencies follow the law instead of taking shortcuts.

TXC is a fork of Litecoin, which is a fork of Bitcoin. How does that affect TXC’s classification under Texas securities law and the SEC/CFTC interpretation issued March 17, 2026?

This is the regulatory clarity we have been waiting for. On March 17, the SEC and CFTC officially classified Litecoin as a commodity. TXC uses the exact same Proof-of-Work structure, issuance logic, and mechanics as Litecoin. The only difference is that TXC is built and mined in Texas. 

Regulators have now confirmed that protocol mining does not turn an asset into a security. Miners contribute their own computing power, which is an administrative task rather than reliance on someone else’s management. Because TXC is a permissionless network built on this established foundation, its status as a commodity is clear. Our structure matches the model that regulators just validated, proving that TXC is a commodity from the ground up.

Advertisement

Tell us about the TSSB case, your counterarguments and its possible industry impact.

In February 2026, the Texas State Securities Board issued an order against TEXITcoin, MineTXC, Blockchain Mint, and me. They allege that we offered unregistered investments and made misleading statements. It is important to remember that these are unproven allegations, not facts determined by a hearing.

We retained Quinn Emanuel to represent us. We have requested a formal hearing to present our defense through the proper legal channels instead of the press.

Our position remains that we believe mining a Proof-of-Work commodity is not a security. Furthermore, our mining activity and equipment are real and fully verifiable. We look forward to proving this during the legal process. Because this case is ongoing, I will not speculate on the outcome or its impact on the industry. I prefer to let the facts of the legal record speak for themselves.

Can state regulators act independently even where a token is not treated as a security federally?

States do have their own security laws and regulators. Federal rules do not automatically replace them. However, these systems are deeply connected. Texas uses the same “Howey test” as the SEC and CFTC to define a security. When federal regulators decide an asset is not a security, that logic remains relevant at the state level. It does not simply disappear at the state border.

Advertisement

States should certainly protect consumers and stop fraud under their own authority. But that is different from labeling a legitimate Proof-of-Work asset a “security” just because it crossed a state line.

What are your views on the CLARITY Act and promises of daily passive mining returns?

The CLARITY Act is essential for fixing market structure. It draws clear lines between the SEC and the CFTC so builders know exactly which regulator oversees their work. This transparency rewards those who follow the rules. 

In regard to the timeline, the process remains lengthy. We face a cloture vote on September 15, which requires 60 votes just to begin debate. After that, we have to navigate floor debates, amendments, and a final vote. Anyone suggesting this bill is already law is jumping to conclusions. I prefer to be honest about our progress rather than promise a result that is not yet guaranteed.

Anything else you would like to add?

Just that I’m excited for what’s ahead. We’re building real momentum right now, we’re investing in expanding our mining network, we’re pushing crypto payment adoption forward across Texas, and every day we get to bring the idea of honest money to more people who’ve never really had it explained to them properly before. That’s the work, and I’m genuinely excited to keep doing it.

Advertisement

How can people reach you?

You can visit our website at Texitcoin.org and keep up to date with everything we’re doing on X https://x.com/TEXITcoin.

About the Author:
Selva Ozelli Esq, CPA, is an international digital asset legal expert and author of Sustainably Investing in Digital Assets Globally and an award winning artist.  Her writings are translated into 45 languages and republished in over 200 global publications.  She is recognized as an expert media/TV commentator on global AI,  digital asset regulation, tax, and technology matters.

Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

South Korea moves to block Polymarket over gambling concerns

Published

on

South Korea moves to block Polymarket over gambling concerns

South Korea moves to block Polymarket over gambling concerns

The Korea Media and Communications Commission said Polymarket’s structure and operations amount to illegal gambling despite its noncustodial design and smart contracts.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Visa looking for new stablecoin settlement partner after BVNK sale to Mastercard

Published

on

Stablecoin trading volume is on track to smash records in 2026

Visa is looking for a new stablecoin settlement partner with licensing capabilities across multiple regions, according to documents seen by CoinDesk. This would fill the role previously held by BVNK, the stablecoin firm acquired by Mastercard earlier this year.

Visa’s request for product (RFP) talks about the ability to swap and support a range of stablecoins, as well as handle settlement for the newly introduced Open USD stablecoin project, fronted by Stripe, Visa and Mastercard, which plans to support multiple stablecoins.

The need for a stablecoin partner licensed in all major markets means the scope of potential partners has narrowed somewhat, Visa said. The payments giant said it is looking at one settlement and an over-the-counter (OTC) partner in particular, with cryptocurrency exchange licenses in the U.S., Canada, the UK and Singapore.

The stablecoin race hasn’t slowed down despite a flat bearish market persisting across the rest of the crypto industry. As such, stablecoins have become a focal point for the large card networks and payments players. The total stablecoin market cap is about $300 billion, according to CoinGecko data.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Ethereum price trapped below $1,920, is $2,000 next?

Published

on

Ethereum daily chart shows ETH near $1,905 inside a tightening symmetrical triangle, with weak Aroon momentum and slightly negative CMF.

Ethereum price traded near $1,905 on Aug. 18 as tightening daily and 4-hour ranges placed the $1,920 resistance level at the center of its next major move.

Summary

  • Ethereum price has formed a symmetrical triangle between roughly $1,850 and $1,930.
  • A 4-hour close above $1,909 could expose the stronger $1,920 resistance level.
  • Liquidation clusters are concentrated near $1,925–$1,930 and below $1,890.
  • Analysts see $2,000 as the next target if Ether breaks its current range.

Ethereum price tightens inside a symmetrical triangle

According to data from crypto.news, Ethereum (ETH) price was trading at $1,904.89 after moving between an intraday low of $1,885.78 and a high of $1,914.38. The price was down about 0.5% on the day but remained inside the narrow range established since late July.

Ether’s recent lower highs and higher lows have created a symmetrical triangle on the daily chart. The upper trendline has fallen from near $1,980 toward $1,920, while the lower boundary has risen from around $1,800 toward $1,880.

Advertisement
Ethereum daily chart shows ETH near $1,905 inside a tightening symmetrical triangle, with weak Aroon momentum and slightly negative CMF.
Ethereum price daily chart — Aug. 18 | Source: crypto.news

Price has now moved close to the triangle’s apex, where shrinking space between the two boundaries typically precedes a wider move. The formation remains neutral until ETH closes outside either trendline, meaning confirmation matters more than intraday movement within the pattern.

Momentum readings have not yet provided a clear directional signal. The daily Aroon readings were weak, with one line at 21.43% and the other at 0%, reflecting a lack of a strong recent high or low.

Chaikin Money Flow stood at -0.03, slightly below the neutral line. The reading shows that selling pressure has a small advantage, but the figure is not low enough to confirm strong capital flight.

Ether’s inability to break higher comes as large holders reportedly sold around $3 billion in ETH since Aug. 10. Decentralized exchange trading volume has also contracted by about 42% over recent months, while a negative Coinbase Premium Index has pointed to weak demand from US-based buyers.

Advertisement

4-hour chart puts $1,909 and $1,870 in focus

The 4-hour chart shows a more immediate battle between Supertrend resistance at $1,908.59 and support at $1,869.92. Ether briefly traded above $1,905 but had not secured a candle close over the upper Supertrend level at the time of the chart.

Ethereum 4-hour chart shows ETH testing Supertrend resistance at $1,909, with support near $1,870 and cooling Stochastic RSI momentum.
Ethereum price 4-hour chart — Aug. 18 | Source: crypto.news

A confirmed move above $1,909 would weaken the short-term bearish signal and bring $1,920 into view. ETH has repeatedly struggled between $1,915 and $1,930, making that area the first meaningful test for buyers.

The Stochastic RSI has also turned lower after approaching overbought territory. Its two lines stood at 46.26 and 57.38, with the faster line below the slower one. The crossover shows that short-term momentum cooled during the latest push toward resistance.

However, the oscillator remains near the center of its range rather than in oversold territory. Bulls could regain momentum without requiring a deeper reset if ETH holds above $1,890 and breaks through $1,909.

Failure to clear the Supertrend barrier would keep the price exposed to $1,890, followed by the $1,870 support line. A 4-hour close below $1,870 would weaken the sequence of higher lows and shift attention toward $1,850.

Advertisement

Ethereum liquidation map points to $1,925

CoinGlass’ three-day liquidation heatmap shows the largest nearby concentration of leveraged positions above the market between roughly $1,925 and $1,930. Additional liquidity appears around $1,940–$1,950 and close to $1,980.

Ethereum three-day liquidation heatmap shows major liquidity clusters around $1,925–$1,930 above price and $1,870–$1,890 below.
Ethereum liquidation heatmap | Source: CoinGlass

A move through $1,920 could force short positions to close around the first cluster. Such liquidations may add market buying and help ETH accelerate toward the $1,940–$1,950 region.

The downside also contains several active liquidity zones. The closest cluster sits around $1,885–$1,890, followed by stronger concentrations near $1,870 and $1,860.

Price briefly moved into the $1,885 region earlier on Aug. 18 before recovering above $1,900. The rebound suggests buyers remain active near the lower liquidation band, although repeated tests could weaken that defense.

A sweep below $1,885 could therefore pull ETH toward $1,870, which aligns with the 4-hour Supertrend support. The overlap between technical support and liquidation liquidity makes $1,870 the main short-term invalidation level for the bullish setup.

Advertisement

Analysts target $2,000 after a $1,920 breakout

Analyst Michaël van de Poppe said Ethereum remained stuck in a range and had not matched Bitcoin’s larger move. He identified $1,920 as the resistance level that could unlock a stronger advance.

“However, once it cracks through the resistance at $1,920 I would assume we’re going to see a big move happening towards $2,000 here.”

His target matches the daily chart, where the psychological $2,000 level sits above the triangle and recent swing highs. ETH would first need to clear the supply zone between $1,920 and $1,950 before testing that target.

Analyst Ted Pillows presented a longer-term threshold, arguing that a weekly close above $2,500 would confirm that Ethereum’s bear market had ended. Such a close would allow ETH to reclaim its 200-week simple and exponential moving averages, according to his chart.

The $2,500 condition remains well above the current market and does not affect the immediate range. It instead shows that even a break above $2,000 would represent an early recovery step rather than confirmation of a full long-term trend reversal.

US flows remain a barrier for Ethereum

US-listed spot Ethereum exchange-traded funds recently recorded $2.26 million in net outflows, interrupting a multi-week inflow streak. The negative Coinbase premium also shows that US demand has not yet provided enough support to drive ETH through its current resistance.

Advertisement

Investors are waiting for the upcoming Federal Reserve minutes after annual US inflation slowed to 3.4%. Any signal that policymakers are moving closer to lower interest rates could affect demand for risk assets, including Ether.

For now, Ethereum remains compressed between nearby liquidity on both sides of the market. A sustained break above $1,920 would favor a move toward $1,950 and $2,000, while rejection followed by a loss of $1,870 would expose $1,850 and potentially $1,800.

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Hyperliquid (HYPE) Leads the Top 10 in August, Yet Smart Money is Short

Published

on

August Month-To-Date Performance of the Top 10 Crypto Assets Excluding Stablecoins

Hyperliquid (HYPE) price has gained 13.99% in August, making it the strongest performer among the top 10 crypto assets this month. 

However, exchange-traded fund flows, large holder activity, and derivatives positioning now point in different directions.

HYPE Outpaces Bitcoin and Ethereum as ETF Demand Slows

CryptoRank data show HYPE up 13.99% for the month. This runs roughly 3.3 times Solana’s (SOL) 4.26% gain and 6.8 times Bitcoin’s (BTC) 2.07% uptick.

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

Advertisement
August Month-To-Date Performance of the Top 10 Crypto Assets Excluding Stablecoins
August Month-To-Date Performance of the Top 10 Crypto Assets Excluding Stablecoins. Source: BeInCrypto/CryptoRank

XRP (XRP) is the only major asset in the red, down 5.98%. It has spent the month trailing its major peers while large holders kept buying.

The latest gain comes after a period of decline. HYPE fell 21.94% from its record high until early August, before rebounding. A 13.99% gain off a 21.94% drawdown still leaves the token short of its prior mark.

Meanwhile, institutional demand has yet to return in any sustained form. SoSoValue data shows that HYPE ETFs saw three consecutive weeks of outflows through July 31. 

Flows turned positive in the first two weeks of August. The recovery has since stalled, with no new inflows recorded since August 10.

Holders Show Mixed Behavior

Large holders moved in both directions this month. On-chain trackers recorded several wallets buying while others sold.

Advertisement

A wallet linked to Maven11 Capital withdrew 202,705 HYPE from OKX last week. Monetalis-linked wallets sold 3.72 million Uniswap (UNI) via Cumberland and bought 171,543 HYPE, worth $9.56 million, over the weekend.

Selling ran in parallel. One whale sold 923,743 HYPE worth $53.02 million last week. 

“HyperLabs unlocked another 433,025 HYPE ($23.46M) and has been gradually depositing the tokens into exchanges, including Flowdesk and OKX, likely to sell,” Lookonchain reported in early August.

Sophisticated Traders Lean Short 

Derivatives positioning leans the other way. Nansen data show whales, smart traders, and public figures all net short. Funding stands at 0.00125% per hour, near 10.95% annualized, so longs currently pay shorts. 

Advertisement

Spot flows offer no tiebreaker. Nansen recorded $5.7 million in HYPE leaving exchanges over seven days, alongside heavy accumulation on centralized exchanges and over-the-counter across 30 days. 

Each dataset answers a different question, and none confirms the others. Renewed ETF creations would show institutional buyers returning. A shift in the whale cohort to net long would signal the same from derivatives. Neither has happened yet.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights

The post Hyperliquid (HYPE) Leads the Top 10 in August, Yet Smart Money is Short appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Chainlink pauses near $9.56 as ETF inflows support breakout hopes

Published

on

Chainlink pauses near $9.56 as ETF inflows support breakout hopes

Key takeaways

  • Chainlink trades around $9.42 after gaining more than 14% last week.
  • A long-to-short ratio of 0.76 and negative funding point to weakening derivatives sentiment.
  • Spot LINK ETFs attracted $2.07 million on Monday, their largest daily inflow since July 22.
  • Losing support at $9.39 could trigger a pullback toward $8.94 and the $8.60–$8.50 region.

Chainlink (LINK) is struggling to overcome resistance near $9.56 on Tuesday, pausing after rallying more than 14% during the previous week.

Weakening derivatives indicators suggest that bullish momentum may be losing strength. However, renewed institutional demand through spot LINK exchange-traded funds could support another attempt to move higher.

Derivatives traders adopt a bearish stance

CoinGlass data shows early signs of weakening sentiment in Chainlink’s derivatives market.

LINK’s long-to-short ratio stands at 0.90 on Tuesday, close to its lowest level in a month. A reading below one indicates that short positions outnumber long positions, suggesting more traders expect the price to decline.

Advertisement

Chainlink’s funding rate also turned negative, falling to minus 0.0050%. Negative funding means short-position holders are paying traders with long exposure, reflecting a bearish imbalance in the perpetual futures market.

Together, the indicators suggest that derivatives traders are becoming more cautious after LINK’s double-digit weekly rally.

However, heavily bearish positioning could also increase the possibility of a short squeeze if Chainlink breaks through its nearby resistance levels.

Institutional demand showed improvement at the beginning of the week. Data from SoSoValue shows that spot Chainlink ETFs recorded $2.07 million in net inflows on Monday. This represented the products’ largest single-day inflow since July 22.

Advertisement

The increase suggests that institutional investors are rebuilding exposure to LINK following its recent recovery.

Continued ETF inflows could help absorb profit-taking and provide the demand needed for Chainlink to overcome the 200-day Exponential Moving Average. However, a single day of positive flows is insufficient to establish a lasting trend.

A sustained series of inflows throughout the week would provide stronger confirmation of renewed institutional interest.

Chainlink price outlook: LINK tests the 200-day EMA

Chainlink trades around $9.42 on Tuesday and remains above its 50-day and 100-day EMAs, positioned at $8.50 and $8.60, respectively.

Advertisement

Holding above these moving averages supports a mildly bullish medium-term outlook. However, LINK remains below the 200-day EMA at $9.56, which is limiting the current recovery.

The token has reclaimed the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement at $9.39, establishing this level as immediate support.

Momentum indicators remain constructive but show that LINK may be approaching stretched conditions. The Relative Strength Index is near 67, just below the overbought threshold of 70, while the Moving Average Convergence Divergence indicator remains positive.

These readings suggest that buyers retain control but may encounter increasing resistance following last week’s sharp rally.

Advertisement

A decisive daily close above the 200-day EMA at $9.56 would strengthen Chainlink’s bullish outlook and bring the horizontal resistance at $9.92 into focus.

LINK/USD 4H Chart

Clearing both barriers could allow LINK to test the 78.6% Fibonacci retracement at $10.04. Beyond that, the cycle-high region around $10.87 represents the next major bullish objective.

On the downside, the 61.8% Fibonacci level at $9.39 provides the first line of support. A break below this area could trigger a pullback toward the 50% retracement at $8.94.

Stronger support is concentrated between the 100-day EMA at $8.60 and the 50-day EMA at $8.50. Holding this zone would preserve the medium-term recovery structure, while a decisive breakdown could return control to sellers.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

How TIME and Statista Determined America’s Top Venture Capital Firms of 2026

Published

on

How TIME and Statista Determined America's Top Venture Capital Firms of 2026

To be considered, a firm must be headquartered in the United States and, as a core part of its business model, raise third-party capital and deploy it as direct venture capital funding to companies and startups across various venture stages and sectors. Firms whose investment activities are exclusively or predominantly focused on growth equity, private equity, fund-of-funds, venture debt, or similar non-VC-focused strategies are not eligible.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin $64.5K Rally Shows Low-Volume Liquidity Trap, Analysis Says

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Bitcoin’s rally above $64,000 on Monday was accompanied by a sharp spike in derivative-driven risk events, with short liquidations reaching their highest level in nearly a month. The move pushed BTC to around $64,550 on Bitstamp, according to market charting referenced by Crypto news coverage.

On-chain analytics firm CryptoQuant linked the upswing to crowded short positioning and uneven funding rates across major exchanges—conditions that can force shorts to close rapidly and accelerate upward price moves. Even so, CryptoQuant and related reporting emphasized that weaker spot demand remains a key limitation for how long the rebound can last, especially after a week of net ETF outflows.

Key takeaways

  • CryptoQuant attributes Monday’s jump toward $64,500 to a short squeeze fueled by illiquid market conditions and funding-rate imbalances.
  • Total Bitcoin short liquidations amounted to 637 BTC on Monday, the largest single-day figure since July 21, per CryptoQuant data.
  • Funding rates shifted downward over 24 hours (from roughly 0.006% to 0.003%), which CryptoQuant says could enable additional squeezes if short exposure grows.
  • Despite the rally, both CryptoQuant’s commentary and earlier market coverage point to limited spot demand and ongoing ETF outflows as potential constraints.
  • Short-term holders appear to be defending resistance, with their cost basis cited around $68,700, based on UTXO age metrics referenced in related analysis.

Short liquidations surge as funding rates reset

After a weekly close that helped set up the rebound, BTC climbed roughly 3% on Monday, topping out near $64,550 on Bitstamp, with prices previously hovering around $62,750. CryptoQuant’s analysis focused on what it described as a “low-volume liquidity trap,” where thin liquidity can magnify the impact of derivative positioning.

CryptoQuant reported that, around $62,750, funding-rate dynamics began to diverge between exchanges. It highlighted that shorts dominated on several major venues, including Binance, Bybit, OKX, and Deribit, while HTX saw a brief spike in funding rates to 0.05%. Funding rates represent periodic payments between long and short positions in Bitcoin derivatives markets; the direction of the aggregate rate indicates whether longs are generally paying shorts or vice versa.

In CryptoQuant’s framing, this setup created the primary catalyst for Monday’s move: a crowded short book that became vulnerable as price rose and forced traders to unwind positions. The result was a liquidation event—short positions were closed at market prices, helping drive BTC higher.

Advertisement

CryptoQuant data put total short liquidations at 637 BTC for Monday, described by the firm as the largest single-day total since July 21. That level of liquidations indicates that the rebound was not only a mild drift upward, but a fast repricing event concentrated in leveraged markets.

Why the next squeeze may depend on funding-rate direction

While Monday’s liquidation spike was notable, CryptoQuant cautioned that the broader pattern of funding-rate resets could still set the stage for more upside—though not necessarily in a smooth way. The firm pointed to a downward reset in funding rates over roughly 24 hours, from about 0.006% to 0.003%.

CryptoQuant suggested this kind of shift can coincide with traders increasing short exposure again, which—paired with thin liquidity—may create conditions where additional short squeezes occur if price continues to rise. In other words, the analysis implies the market is capable of repeating the same mechanism, but the trigger would still be whether leveraged positioning remains crowded and whether liquidity stays shallow.

For traders, this means the funding-rate trajectory matters as much as spot price levels. If funding rates continue to move lower while short exposure builds, the risk of another squeeze increases; if funding stabilizes or flips as shorts reduce, the upside momentum driven by liquidations may fade.

Advertisement

Spot demand still lags, raising questions about durability

Even with derivatives-driven buying pressure, CryptoQuant underscored a central issue: the lack of sustained spot demand. In related analysis discussed earlier, Cointelegraph reported that futures activity has been outweighing spot participation in the current trading range, with spot traders showing relatively muted interest.

In its own Monday update, CryptoQuant described spot demand as the primary hurdle to a more durable recovery. It also pointed to the absence of inflows to US spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs), reinforcing the notion that institutional-style spot accumulation has not yet supported the move.

CryptoQuant’s concern was explicitly framed around downside risk if spot weakness reasserts itself: it commented that a break below $60,000, especially alongside rising exchange inflows, would weaken market structure and increase the risk of a move toward $50,000. The firm also stated that while selling pressure appears to be cooling, demand still needs to return to justify follow-through.

This tension—strong liquidation-driven rebounds but soft spot participation—has practical implications. When price advances primarily through leveraged short covering, the market can become vulnerable to reversal if spot buyers do not step in at higher levels.

Advertisement

Resistance may be anchored by short-term holder cost basis

Beyond derivatives and spot inflows, the rebound’s ceiling may also reflect where existing holders have been accumulating. CryptoQuant referenced analysis tied to short-term holders—wallets with a UTXO age of less than 155 days—showing cost basis around $68,700. That level, according to the cited view, can become resistance as underwater or marginal holders choose to sell on strength.

Additionally, earlier coverage noted that shorter-term investor behavior has been keeping BTC pinned below that resistance zone. Taken together, the data points suggest that Monday’s move may have been less about broad spot conviction and more about leveraged positioning unwinding—an environment where resistance levels tied to holder profitability can quickly limit upside.

For investors and active traders, watching how BTC behaves near the cited $68,700 area—and whether spot activity improves as funding rates evolve—may be more informative than tracking liquidation headlines alone.

Going forward, readers should watch whether funding-rate dynamics continue to support another short-covering burst and whether spot demand—along with US spot ETF inflows—shows signs of returning. Without that support, the market may remain prone to sharp, liquidity-driven swings rather than sustained trend expansion.

Advertisement

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

BitBox Issues Urgent Fix for Severe Wallet Vulnerabilities

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

BitBox, the Swiss maker of self-custody hardware wallets, has released a firmware update to address two security issues it describes as “severe.” The company says the fixes reduce the risk of malicious firmware installation and prevent scenarios involving its Silent Payments feature that could cause Bitcoin to be locked to an unintended address.

BitBox reported that it has not received any information indicating either vulnerability has been exploited in the wild or that users have lost funds as a result. Still, the disclosure lands amid a broader run of hardware-wallet-related security concerns, including a Coldcard flaw that was later linked to losses exceeding $112 million, according to Galaxy Research.

Key takeaways

  • BitBox’s latest firmware update targets two vulnerabilities it labels “severe,” including a memory corruption issue that could allow arbitrary code execution in unconfigured wallet states.
  • The update also addresses a Silent Payments weakness that could enable Bitcoin to be locked to an unintended address, creating a potential ransom-type leverage scenario.
  • BitBox says it has seen no reports of exploitation or user fund loss tied to either issue.
  • The release arrives after high-profile incidents spanning hardware wallet devices and the services around them, including a Coldcard issue tied to large BTC theft totals.

What BitBox says the firmware flaws could enable

In a security disclosure released on Monday, BitBox said one of the vulnerabilities stems from memory corruption affecting “Multi editions of BitBox02 and BitBox02 Nova” when those devices have not been configured with a wallet.

BitBox explained that, under certain conditions, a malicious host could exploit the bug to execute arbitrary code and potentially install malicious firmware. If successful, that chain of events could expose user funds by altering how the device signs transactions or operates.

The second issue relates to BitBox’s Silent Payments implementation. BitBox said the vulnerability could allow a malicious host to lock Bitcoin to an unintended address. While the company stated that the flaw does not enable direct theft in the way some vulnerabilities do, it argued an attacker could still use the situation to demand a ransom in exchange for cooperation on recovering the coins.

Advertisement

Why the update matters for self-custody users

Hardware wallets are designed to minimize the amount of trust users must place in online systems. Even so, the BitBox disclosure highlights an important nuance: the device is not only responsible for protecting private keys, but also for maintaining a secure operating environment under all possible states—including those that occur before a wallet is configured.

For users, this is a practical reminder to keep firmware current, especially when device behavior can be influenced by connected hosts during setup or ongoing interactions. BitBox’s emphasis on “unconfigured” wallets suggests there is risk concentrated in specific device states rather than a universal exposure across all usage patterns. Still, the company’s decision to classify both bugs as severe indicates the potential outcomes are serious enough to warrant immediate action.

The timing: hardware-wallet incidents beyond device code

BitBox’s update arrives at a moment when the hardware wallet narrative has been dominated not only by device-level flaws, but also by problems in surrounding ecosystems—such as shipment and order-management systems.

Earlier, Cointelegraph reported on a Coldcard flaw that was traced to a March 2021 firmware change and reportedly remained undetected for more than five years. That vulnerability affected wallet-seed randomness. According to Galaxy Research, that defect enabled attackers to brute-force impacted wallet seeds and derive private keys without physical access. Galaxy Research said Coldcard-related losses exceeded $112 million, and reported approximately 1,778.6 BTC swept from more than 8,600 addresses.

Advertisement

More recently, separate data breaches involving Trezor and SafePal exposed customer and order information for more than 53,000 customers. Cointelegraph coverage noted that Trezor attributed exposure affecting 13,689 customers’ data to shipping provider ShipMonk. SafePal, meanwhile, said an authorization flaw in an order-tracking plug-in exposed details tied to 39,798 customers. In both cases, Cointelegraph reported that the incidents did not compromise device private keys or recovery phrases, but both companies warned the information could be used for targeted phishing and impersonation attempts.

These episodes underline a broader reality: self-custody security is shaped by a chain of components—device firmware, host-side software interactions, and operational services that handle customers and transactions. Even when devices themselves remain uncompromised, attackers may still exploit human and process-level weaknesses to increase the odds of successful fraud.

What investors and builders should watch next

BitBox says there are no reports of exploitation tied to either vulnerability, but the company’s disclosure nonetheless reinforces the need for disciplined update practices across the hardware wallet stack. The next signal to monitor is whether BitBox’s patch becomes the new baseline for Multi editions of BitBox02 and BitBox02 Nova users, and whether Silent Payments-related guidance triggers further clarification from the company about conditions under which users could be exposed.

For the industry, the broader question is how quickly manufacturers respond after audits or research uncover weaknesses—and how effectively they communicate practical mitigation steps to users who may not follow security advisories closely.

Advertisement

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Kraken Launches US Stock Trading Across European Economic Area

Published

on

Kraken Launches US Stock Trading Across European Economic Area

Kraken has launched trading in more than 7,000 US-listed stocks for customers in the European Economic Area (EEA), expanding its traditional finance offering alongside cryptocurrencies and tokenized equities.

The crypto exchange said Tuesday that eligible EEA customers can trade US stocks through Kraken Pro and its mobile app under the company’s Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II authorization.

The shares are available alongside more than 600 crypto assets and over 700 xStocks, which are tokenized versions of publicly listed equities.

The setup allows customers to hold conventional shares and tokenized representations of the same assets within a single platform.

Advertisement

The service is provided by Payward Europe Digital Solutions, Kraken’s Cyprus-based investment firm. Kraken said eligible customers can trade US-listed stocks commission-free, subject to applicable conditions. Kraken said it plans to extend its integrated equities offering to additional markets in the coming months.

Kraken launched xStocks in 2025, offering tokenized exposure to US equities and exchange-traded funds. The company said xStocks has since generated more than $38 billion in total transaction volume.

As of Monday, xStocks is the second-largest tokenized stock issuer by market capitalization, with about $609 million, behind Ondo Finance, with about $974 million, according to Token Terminal data. Binance’s bStocks is currently the third-largest issuer, with about $544 million.

Related: Kraken adds S&P 500 to funded trading program, commodities to follow

Advertisement
Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

South Korea joins more than 30 jurisdictions restricting Polymarket access

Published

on

South Korea plans to tax crypto gains over $1,740 as political battle moves to parliament

South Korea ordered domestic access to popular prediction market Polymarket blocked, becoming the latest of more than 30 jurisdictions to restrict the platform over gambling concerns.

The Korea Media and Communications Standards Commission approved the move after finding that Polymarket facilitates gambling and the operation of gambling venues under the country’s Criminal Act along with similar categories under the National Sports Promotion Act, according to local reports.

Polymarket lets users trade yes-or-no contracts tied to the outcomes of real-world events including elections, sports, economic data and the weather. It’s one of the largest prediction markets along with Kalshi.

The commission said that these markets’ structure encourages speculative behavior because users’ gains and losses depend on events beyond their control.

Advertisement

Polymarket, according to local media, said that it had removed Korean-language services, does not support payments in the country’s won fiat currency, and uses non-custodial peer-to-peer transactions and smart contracts.

The company did not immediately respond to CoinDesk’s request for further comment.

The regulator rejected the defense, saying Polymarket’s operator still manages market creation and trading rules while providing crypto deposit, withdrawal and settlement systems and charging fees.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025