Crypto World
The DAO’s second act focuses on security with $150M endowment
In the summer of 2016, the Decentralized Autonomous Organization, known as the DAO, became the defining crisis of Ethereum’s early years. A smart contract exploit siphoned millions of dollars’ worth of ether (ETH) from that initial project, and the community’s response — a contentious hard fork to recover those funds, splintered the original chain from the current one, leaving the old chain behind, known as Ethereum Classic.
The DAO was once the largest crowdfunding effort in crypto’s history, but faded into a cautionary tale of governance, security, and the limits of “code is law.”
Now, nearly a decade later, that story has taken an unexpected turn. What was lost, or rather, left untouched, is being repurposed as a ~$150 million (at today’s prices) security endowment for the Ethereum ecosystem.
The endowment, known now as the DAO Security Fund, will stake some of the 75,000 dormant ether (ETH) and deploy the yield through community-driven funding rounds to support Ethereum security research, tooling and rapid-response efforts, while keeping claims open for any remaining eligible token holders.
At the center of this story is Griff Green, one of the original DAO curators and a veteran of Ethereum decentralized governance.
“When the DAO hack happened [in 2016], obviously, I jumped into action and basically led everything but the hard fork,” Green said of assembling the white hat group that rescued funds on the original Ethereum chain. “We hacked all these hackers. It was straight up DAO wars”.
That effort, alongside others, helped salvage funds that might otherwise have been lost forever.
At the time, the hard fork restored roughly 97% of the DAO’s funds to token holders, but left a small fraction, roughly 3%, in limbo. These “edge case” funds came from quirks of the original smart contracts: people who paid more than expected, those who burned tokens to form sub-DAOs, and other anomalies that didn’t cleanly map back.
Over time, that leftover balance, once only worth a few million, ballooned into something far more significant due to ether’s [ETH] appreciation. “The value of the funds we control has grown dramatically… well over 75,000 ETH,” a blog post for the new DAO fund states.
Green and his fellow curators have spent the last decade quietly helping people recover funds and managing these residual balances. But as he tells it, the landscape has shifted. “Six volunteers were securing $300 million with decade keys. It didn’t make sense,” he told CoinDesk in an interview. “With all these AI hacks and stuff, we just got kind of scared.” Their old security model simply is no longer fit to guard nine-figure sums, Green shared.
Rather than let these funds sit idle in perpetuity, the team has decided to stake the ETH and use the yield to fund Ethereum security initiatives, honor claims indefinitely, and professionalize governance and key management. “We can stake these funds, keep claims open forever, and use the staking rewards to fund Ethereum security projects,” Green explained.
The fund will distribute capital through decentralized mechanisms such as quadratic funding, retroactive public goods funding, and ranked-choice voting for proposals.
‘Financial backbone of the world’
For Green, the revival is also personal.
The DAO hack was Ethereum’s first existential test, exposing how experimental the ecosystem still was. Nearly a decade later, he argues, the industry remains vulnerable in different ways.
“MetaMask, hot wallet keys, just any kind of private keys on your daily driver computer is probably the main fuel for a whole cyber crime industry,” Green said. “The fact that we have hot keys with billions of dollars sitting on like 10,000 laptops spread out throughout the world has an industry of cybercrime.”
The persistence of hacks, phishing schemes and smart contract exploits frustrates him. “Not only amazes me, it disappoints me and frustrates me,” he said, describing the state of Ethereum security today.
That urgency is shaping how the new fund will operate. Unlike the Ethereum Foundation’s more top-down grantmaking process, the DAO Security Fund is designed as a bottom-up experiment, allowing participants in the DAO to decide how to distribute funds. Round operators will apply to distribute funds, security experts will help set eligibility standards, and staking rewards will provide a renewable pool of capital.
If Ethereum is to become what many believe it is, the core infrastructure for global finance, Green says security must come first.
“Ethereum is at the cusp of being the financial backbone of the world, if it fixes security,” he said.
The DAO Security Fund, in Green’s view, is therefore both a continuation of unfinished work and a forward-looking vehicle for safeguarding Ethereum as it scales.
Read more: Ethereum OGs revive the DAO with $220 million security fund, Unchained reports
ETHZilla Corp (ETHZ) shares faced intense pressure in pre-market trading this Wednesday following news that billionaire investor Peter Thiel and his venture firm, Founders Fund, have completely liquidated their position.
Summary
- An SEC filing revealed that Peter Thiel and Founders Fund have completely liquidated their 7.5% stake in Ethzilla (ETHZ), triggering a 5.13% pre-market drop to $3.33.
- Originally a biotech firm (180 Life Sciences), Ethzilla’s high-leverage pivot to a “corporate Ethereum treasury” model has faltered, with the stock currently down 97% from its 2025 highs.
- Amidst heavy debt and market volatility, the company is attempting to stabilize by pivoting again, this time toward tokenizing jet engines and home loans, though investor confidence remains shaken.
The Thiel exodus: Founders Fund liquidates stake in ETHZilla
The stock, which has already plummeted over 97% from its 2025 highs, hit a pre-market low of $3.33, representing a 5.13% drop from its previous close.
The sell-off was triggered by a late Tuesday SEC filing revealing that Thiel’s entities now hold zero shares in the company. This marks a dramatic reversal from August 2025, when the fund disclosed a significant 7.5% stake.
At the time, Thiel’s entry was seen as a massive vote of confidence for ETHZilla’s pivot from biotechnology to a corporate Ethereum (ETH) treasury model.
The massive sell-off marks a dramatic fall from grace for the firm, which rebranded from 180 Life Sciences last year to become a high-leverage Ethereum treasury. While the initial pivot drew over $425 million in institutional backing, the recent liquidation of its ETH holdings has left investors questioning the sustainability of its ‘crypto-first’ balance sheet.
Crisis in the ETH treasury model
The full exit by Founders Fund underscores the growing skepticism surrounding companies that use high-leverage strategies to accumulate Ethereum. While similar “Bitcoin treasury” plays have remained popular, Ether-focused firms like ETHZilla have struggled under the weight of market volatility and debt obligations.
ETHZilla has recently attempted to diversify its business to stabilize its balance sheet. Recent moves include:
- Asset Tokenization: Launching “ETHZilla Aerospace” to tokenize leased jet engines.
- Debt Repayment: Liquidating over 24,000 ETH in late 2025 to settle convertible bond obligations.
- Real Estate: Acquiring modular home loan portfolios for on-chain yields.
Despite these efforts to pivot toward Real World Assets (RWA), the market appears focused on the loss of its most prominent institutional backer. For many investors, Thiel’s departure signals that the “Saylor-style” accumulation strategy for Ethereum may be facing a structural breakdown.
The divergence between Bitcoin and tech stocks is a warning sign of a potential artificial intelligence-driven credit crisis that could lead to more central bank money printing, says Arthur Hayes.
“Bitcoin is the global fiat liquidity fire alarm. It is the most responsive freely traded asset to the fiat credit supply,” said the crypto entrepreneur in his latest blog post on Wednesday.
Hayes went on to caution that the recent divergence between Bitcoin (BTC) and the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 Index “sounds the alarm that a massive credit destruction event is nigh.”
When these two previously correlated asset classes diverge, “it warrants further investigation into any trigger that could cause a destruction of fiat” — mostly dollars and credit, which is also known as deflation, he said.
Hayes believes that job losses due to AI adoption will have a major impact on consumer credit and mortgage debt “because of the inability of white-collar knowledge worker debt donkeys to meet their monthly payments.”
“That’s a bold statement to call for a financial crisis because of job losses caused by AI adoption.”
AI job losses could trigger another banking crisis
In 2025, companies cited AI when announcing 55,000 job cuts, more than 12 times the number of layoffs attributed to AI just two years earlier, reported CBS News in early February.
“This AI financial crisis will restart the money printing machine for realz,” said Hayes.
His loose model suggests that a 20% reduction in the 72 million “knowledge workers” in the US could produce around $557 billion in consumer credit and mortgage losses, representing a 13% write-down of US commercial bank equity.
Hayes speculates that weaker regional banks would buckle first, depositors would flee, and credit markets would seize. The Federal Reserve would eventually panic and start printing money.
“While the Fed is fighting windmills, AI-related job losses will destroy the balance sheets of American banks,” he said.
“Finally, the monetary mandarins panic and press that Brrrr button harder than I shred pow the morning after a one-meter dump.”
Related: 1 in 4 CEOs expect to sack staff due to AI this year
Hayes predicted that this surge in fiat credit creation would “pump Bitcoin decisively off its lows,” and that the future expectation of increased fiat creation to save the banking system would “propel Bitcoin to a new all-time high.”
In addition to Bitcoin, Hayes said there are two altcoins that his company, Maelstrom, will “deploy excess stables into once the Fed blinks.” Those coins are Zcash (ZEC) and Hyperliquid (HYPE).
More money-printing theories abound
However, this is not the first radical money-printing thesis Hayes has proposed.
In January, he said that the Federal Reserve would print money to alleviate the Japanese bond crisis.
In December 2025, he predicted that BTC would surge to $200,000 by March due to money printing through a new Fed liquidity tool called Reserve Management Purchases, which resembles quantitative easing.
Magazine: Chinese New Year boosts interest, TradFi buying crypto exchanges: Asia Express
Lawmakers, Wall Street executives, and cryptocurrency leaders will meet at US President Donald Trump’s private Mar-a-Lago club for a crypto “forum” organized by World Liberty Financial, the company backed by Trump and his sons.
Ahead of the event, the price of World Liberty’s WLFI token surged by more than 23%, to about $0.12 from $0.10. Trading volume in the past 24 hours topped $466 million.
On Wednesday, the president’s sons, Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. — also the co-founders of World Liberty Financial — along with Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, BitGo co-founder and CEO Mike Belshe, CFTC Chair Michael Selig and others will gather to discuss crypto-related policy issues at Trump’s Florida property.
The event, described as a crypto-aligned “forum” by World Liberty, comes as US lawmakers consider a comprehensive digital asset market structure bill amid concerns about how to address stablecoin yield. Selig is scheduled to speak with New York Stock Exchange President Lynn Martin on the bill.
Although aligned with crypto policy and including lawmakers like Ohio Senator Bernie Moreno and Florida Senator Ashley Moody, the President was not slated to appear at the event as of Wednesday morning.
Meanwhile, many Democratic senators are still pushing for the market structure bill to include provisions addressing conflicts of interest for US lawmakers and elected officials profiting from the crypto industry while in office.
Related: CFTC chair doubles down on defending prediction markets from state lawsuits
Media outlets have reported that Trump and his family have generated more than $1 billion from crypto projects since he took office in January 2025. In contrast to the president’s second term, Trump in 2019 said he was “not a fan” of Bitcoin (BTC) and other cryptocurrencies, while referring to the coin as a “scam” after leaving office in 2021.
US market structure bill is under scrutiny
Passed as the CLARITY Act in the US House of Representatives in July, the market structure bill under consideration in the Senate is expected to provide clarification on oversight of digital assets by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington’s two main financial markets regulators.
In January, the Senate Agriculture Committee, which has CFTC oversight, advanced its version of the bill along partisan lines, with no Democrats voting for the legislation. The Senate Banking Committee postponed its markup of the bill in January after the Coinbase CEO said he could not support the legislation as written, citing concerns about tokenized equities and decentralized finance.
Magazine: Brandt says Bitcoin yet to bottom, Polymarket sees hope: Trade Secrets
Telegram use in Russia faces rising blocks and slowdown as regulators tighten controls.
Summary
- Telegram blocked 238.8k channels on Feb 15 and 187.3k on Feb 16, taking total blocked groups and channels to over 7.463m since Jan 1.
- Russia fully blocked WhatsApp and removed its domains from DNS, steering users toward the state-backed Max messenger amid broader social-media restrictions.
- Despite throttling and potential April 1 blocking, Russian users increasingly rely on VPNs and alternative apps like imo to keep messaging access.
Telegram has begun blocking illegal content and has sufficient time to meet Russian regulatory requirements, according to a senior parliamentary committee member overseeing the matter.
Andrey Svintsov, deputy chairman of the Committee on Information Policy at the State Duma, told state news agency TASS that the messaging platform has started actively complying with Russian Federation requirements. “Over the past week, Telegram has blocked more than 230,000 channels and pieces of content that violated current legislation,” Svintsov stated. “This indicates that Durov’s company has begun to interact more actively.”
Russian authorities slowed traffic to the messenger earlier this month, citing non-compliance with national regulations. Media reports emerged this week suggesting the platform could be fully blocked on April 1, though Russian officials have neither confirmed nor denied the reports.
Svintsov said Telegram could fulfill Roskomnadzor’s requirements within one to two months and continue operating in Russia. “In my opinion, Telegram will not be blocked before April 1,” he stated, referring to messenger founder and CEO Pavel Durov.
Roskomnadzor, the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media, serves as Russia’s telecommunications regulator and media oversight body. According to Svintsov, the requirements include opening a legal entity, storing data on Russian territory, paying taxes and blocking prohibited content. “Opening a legal entity takes a week at most. Moving personal data processing takes another two or three weeks,” the deputy said.
Last summer, reports that Telegram was preparing to establish an office in Russia under the country’s “landing law” were denied by Durov, either directly or indirectly, according to previous media accounts.
Yulia Dolgova, president of the Russian Association of Bloggers and Agencies, told TASS that determining whether Telegram will be fully blocked remains difficult at this stage. She noted that unlike WhatsApp, Telegram is actively taking measures to maintain service functionality. Roskomnadzor completely removed Meta’s WhatsApp domain from its DNS servers last week, effectively blocking access from Russia. Dolgova also noted widespread VPN usage among Russian users to bypass such restrictions.
Telegram, the government and crypto
The Telegram channel Baza, citing government sources, reported that Roskomnadzor is preparing to “begin a total blocking of the messenger” on April 1. In response to media inquiries, Roskomnadzor said it had “nothing to add” to previous statements threatening “sequential restrictions.”
TASS reported this week that Telegram’s administration blocked 238,800 channels and groups on February 15 and 187,300 channels and groups worldwide on February 16, according to updated statistics on the messenger’s website. As of February 17, more than 7.463 million groups and channels have been blocked on Telegram since the beginning of the year, the agency reported.
Telegram ranks as the second most popular messaging application in Russia with 93.6 million users, trailing WhatsApp, which had 94.5 million monthly users before being blocked. As Russia implements restrictive measures against both platforms while promoting the state-backed Max messenger, Russian citizens have increasingly turned to imo, a U.S.-made messaging alternative, according to reports.
US lawmakers may face a narrowing window to pass long-awaited crypto legislation. Speaking at the World Liberty Forum, Senator Bernie Moreno said a comprehensive market structure bill could pass “hopefully by the end of April.”
The Ohio Senator stressed that Congress must act within the next 90 days to maintain momentum.
Sponsored
A Compressed Timeline for Crypto Rules
The remarks, delivered at an event hosted by World Liberty Financial at Mar-a-Lago on February 18, highlighted both urgency and persistent friction between the banking sector and the digital asset industry.
According to live reporting, Bernie Moreno acknowledged the difficulty of negotiations, saying the process had “taken years off my life,” while reiterating that lawmakers “have to get it done in the next 90 days.”
Moreno has been one of the most vocal advocates for federal crypto legislation, particularly measures tied to frameworks such as the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, which aims to define whether digital tokens fall under securities or commodities law and to establish clearer oversight of trading platforms and stablecoins.
Although elements of crypto legislation have already passed the House, Senate progress has slowed in recent months amid lobbying, technical disagreements, and partisan divisions.
Moreno’s timeline suggests lawmakers are attempting to push negotiations toward a decisive phase before the legislative calendar tightens further.
Sponsored
Stablecoin Yield Debate Remains a Sticking Point
One of the most contentious issues remains whether stablecoin issuers should be allowed to offer yield or rewards to users.
Banks have argued that yield-bearing stablecoins could draw deposits away from the TradFi system. Meanwhile, crypto firms maintain that such features are essential to innovation and competition.
At the forum, Moreno drew applause after vowing not to allow banks to reopen provisions already settled in the GENIUS Act.
“We’re not going to go back and revisit legislation that’s already passed,” Moreno said, adding that he would not permit changes in the digital asset space that could undermine prior agreements.
Sponsored
Sources familiar with negotiations indicated that talks between banks and crypto stakeholders have made little progress in recent weeks. This strengthens concerns that the legislative timetable could slip further.
Political Signals and Industry Pressure
Standing alongside Moreno, Ashley Moody injected a note of humor into the discussion, drawing laughter from the audience.
She also highlighted the intense scrutiny facing lawmakers as they attempt to finalize the bill.
Sponsored
“He’s in Banking. If they don’t get it done, we can blame Bernie,” she quipped.
Meanwhile, a potential White House meeting to advance negotiations may be postponed. One invitee reportedly described the planned gathering as likely to be “just for show,” suggesting that insufficient progress has been made to justify another high-level session.
The World Liberty Forum itself drew roughly 300 to 400 leaders from finance, technology, policy, and media.
This suggests growing institutional interest in how stablecoins, DeFi, and blockchain infrastructure could shape the future of the US dollar and global markets.
Moreno’s 90-day deadline serves less as a guarantee than a signal. After years of debate, the window for decisive US crypto regulation may finally be narrowing.
Christine Lagarde might not stick around until 2027. Reports suggest the ECB president is weighing an early exit.
If that happens, it is not just a personnel change. It could scramble the timeline for the digital euro and stablecoin oversight right as MiCA rules start taking effect.
A leadership shakeup at this stage would inject fresh uncertainty into Europe crypto roadmap.
Key Takeaways
- Early Departure: Lagarde is reportedly weighing an exit before October 2027 to align with French presidential elections.
- Succession Race: Top contenders include Dutch central bank chief Klaas Knot and Spain’s Pablo Hernández de Cos.
- Project Risk: A change in leadership threatens the continuity of the digital euro project and euro-stablecoin oversight.
Why Is The Timing Critical for Crypto?
Lagarde has been the driving force behind the ECB digital push. Since 2019, she moved the digital euro from theory into formal investigation. Now, just as MiCA stablecoin rules are being finalized, her potential exit lands at a sensitive moment.
Without her leading the charge, the sovereign payment narrative weakens. There are also political layers here. Aligning her departure with the April 2027 French election could give President Macron influence over who steps in next.
The bigger concern is policy drift. A new ECB chief could shift focus back to traditional tightening and slow down digital euro efforts. That would leave more room for private stablecoins to fill the gap.
Who Could Take The Reins?
Publicly, the ECB says she is fully focused on her job. But the timing being floated suggests this is more than random chatter. The idea is to step aside before political shifts in France and Germany complicate the process.
Names are already circulating. Spain’s Pablo Hernández de Cos. Dutch central bank chief Klaas Knot. Even Bundesbank head Joachim Nagel is in the conversation.
Officially, nothing is confirmed. ECB executive Piero Cipollone says he has no knowledge of an early exit plan. Still, markets tend to price political risk before headlines become formal announcements.
With 21 eurozone nations needing to approve a successor, whoever takes over could significantly shape Europe’s stance on crypto and the digital euro.
What Happens to the Digital Euro?
A leadership vacuum would leave the digital euro in a fragile spot. The project already faces pushback from banks and privacy advocates. Without Lagarde driving it forward, momentum could fade fast.
And this is happening while stablecoin liquidity is shifting quickly. If the ECB hesitates on building a serious euro alternative to US dollar tokens, private players will not wait.
At the same time, the US and other major economies are accelerating their crypto frameworks. Europe cannot really afford a slowdown. Leadership uncertainty rarely supports long term institutional projects.
Discover: Here are the crypto likely to explode!
The post Lagarde Exit Report Raises Questions Over Digital Euro Timeline and Stablecoin Policy appeared first on Cryptonews.
The European Central Bank is edging closer to a full-fledged digital euro pilot, signaling a shift from exploratory talks to concrete testing. In remarks delivered after an executive committee meeting of the Italian Banking Association, ECB Executive Board member Piero Cipollone outlined a staged timetable that prioritizes the selection of payment service providers (PSPs) in early 2026 and a 12-month pilot during the second half of 2027. The plan envisions a small group of PSPs, merchants and Eurosystem staff participating in the initial phase, with broader involvement contingent on legislative and technical readiness. The remarks underscore the bank’s aim to validate a central bank digital currency in practical settings while preserving the integrity of European card schemes and keeping banks at the core of the payments ecosystem. held
Cipollone stressed that the digital euro would be designed to protect European card schemes and preserve banks’ central role in Europe’s payments system, a framing that aligns with Reuters’ coverage of the central bank’s approach. The pilot is intended to be modest in scope at the outset, focusing on a limited number of PSPs, merchants and Eurosystem staff to test onboarding, settlement and liquidity management in a real-world environment. This phased approach is positioned to give participating PSPs an early-readiness edge should a broader rollout follow, while generating practical data on infrastructure, compliance and staffing costs for planning purposes.
Key takeaways
- PSP selection for the digital euro pilot is scheduled to begin in the first quarter of 2026, setting the stage for a 12-month trial in the latter half of 2027.
- The pilot will involve a limited cohort of PSPs, merchants and Eurosystem staff, enabling hands-on testing of onboarding, settlement and liquidity management within a controlled environment.
- European authorities emphasize that the digital euro is intended to shield domestic payment ecosystems and card schemes, rather than displace them, with a focus on preserving the role of banks in payments.
- Governance and cost visibility are key aims of the pilot, offering participating players clearer insights into future infrastructure, compliance and staffing needs.
- Industry expectations are shaped by a longer-term roadmap that includes potential broader rollout and a 2029 launch target, contingent on legislative progress in 2026 and subsequent regulatory steps.
Market context: The push for a digital euro sits within a broader European effort to modernize payments, reduce dependence on international card networks, and ensure a stable, centrally governed digital currency option for residents and businesses. The central bank’s framing of the pilot as a way to protect domestic systems while engaging with private sector participants mirrors ongoing debates around stablecoins and private payment solutions that could otherwise erode the traditional banking role in payments.
Why it matters
The ECB’s move toward a structured pilot signals a careful balance between innovation and incumbency. By enabling a controlled test environment that includes EU-licensed PSPs and direct Eurosystem involvement, the central bank aims to gather actionable data on how a digital euro could function in real commerce. This includes practical issues around onboarding new users, ensuring seamless settlement between participants, and managing liquidity—areas that have historically proven complex for central bank digital currency platforms to operationalize at scale.
From a banking perspective, the digital euro is envisioned not as a threat to banks, but as a mechanism to preserve their centrality in a payments landscape that increasingly incorporates digital solutions. Cipollone highlighted that the project would aim to protect domestic payment rails and card schemes while offering a more cost-efficient option for merchants. The stated goal is to place a cap on merchant fees for the digital euro network that would be lower than the charges typical of international card networks, yet higher than those charged by domestic schemes. This pricing dynamic is designed to keep EU-based payment ecosystems competitive while ensuring that the digital euro remains attractive to merchants and consumers alike.
European policymakers are also mindful of broader industry shifts. The plan explicitly notes the European Bancomat and Bizum-type networks as areas where the digital euro could help preserve domestic alternatives against private, cross-border payment rails. In this context, the pilot is less about displacing existing networks and more about integrating a central bank digital currency in a way that complements, rather than competes with, established infrastructures. This approach aligns with the broader aim of safeguarding financial stability and ensuring that Europe maintains strategic control over its payments architecture as new digital forms of money emerge.
What to watch next
- First-quarter 2026: Official PSP selection process begins, narrowing the field for the pilot.
- Second half of 2027: Primary 12-month digital euro pilot period commences with participating PSPs and merchants.
- 2026–2027: Legislation and regulatory steps to enable or adjust digital euro deployment, shaping the timeline for broader rollout.
- 2029: Potential full-scale launch if legislative and technical milestones are met and stakeholders achieve sufficient readiness.
- Ongoing infrastructure planning: ECB and Eurosystem continue to map future ecosystem costs, staffing needs and compliance requirements tied to the digital euro’s operation.
Sources & verification
- ECB press release and accompanying document outlining the PSP selection and pilot plans (Sp260218) and related materials.
- Reuters coverage detailing Cipollone’s remarks and the digital euro design goals to protect European banks’ card schemes.
- Cointelegraph reporting on the digital euro trajectory, including references to the 2029 launch plan and next-phase progression.
- Historical reporting on the ECB’s progression toward a digital euro, including discussions around legislation timelines in 2026.
ECB advances digital euro pilot as PSP selection begins in 2026
The European Central Bank is advancing toward a tangible digital euro pilot, signaling a transition from theoretical exploration to real-world testing. The plan, presented in the wake of a meeting with the Italian Banking Association’s executive committee, centers on naming payment service providers (PSPs) in early 2026 and launching a 12-month trial in the second half of 2027. The pilot’s initial footprint will be deliberately modest: a limited cadre of PSPs, a handful of merchants and Eurosystem staff will participate to validate core operational flows, including onboarding, settlement and liquidity management. This approach aims to deliver measurable insights while preserving the primacy of existing European card schemes and banks within the payments system.
In explaining the design philosophy, Cipollone stressed that the digital euro should bolster domestic payment networks rather than replace them. By anchoring the rollout in EU-licensed PSPs, the ECB seeks to ensure merchant access, interoperable settlements and a governance structure that keeps banks at the center of the payments ecosystem. The broader objective is to strike a balance between innovation and stability—allowing the digital euro to co-exist with established rails while mitigating the risk of private, non-government-controlled systems displacing traditional players.
A key element of the planned approach is the potential to test and refine future infrastructure, compliance and staffing costs. The pilot’s visibility into these cost dimensions could inform investment decisions for PSPs and banks, helping them plan capital deployment with greater certainty. Direct Eurosystem involvement is intended to yield practical feedback from participants, shaping both product design and governance arrangements as the project evolves.
Beyond the technical and financial considerations, the ECB’s digital euro initiative is framed as a strategic safeguard for Europe’s payments sovereignty. The project explicitly envisions protecting local networks, such as Italy’s Bancomat and Spain’s Bizum, from losing ground to private, cross-border platforms. In Cipollone’s view, the digital euro should offer an affordable alternative for merchants—pricing that is lower than the typical charges on international networks but higher than the minimums charged by domestic schemes. This pricing nuance reflects a deliberate effort to maintain domestic competitive advantages while embracing the efficiencies associated with central bank money in digital form.
As policymakers weigh the next steps, observers will be watching how the proposed timeline aligns with legislative developments in 2026 and how the pilot’s findings influence the path toward a broader rollout. The ECB’s timeline currently contemplates a 2029 launch under favorable regulatory and technical conditions, with a potential early start to the pilot if legislation is enacted in 2026. This braided timetable underscores the delicate balance the central bank must strike between experimentation, market readiness and fiscal prudence in a rapidly evolving digital payments landscape.
TLDR
- Canary Capital launched the Canary Stake SUI ETF on Nasdaq, offering exposure to the SUI token and staking rewards.
- Grayscale converted its SUI trust into an ETF, providing investors with direct access to the SUI token through NYSE Arca.
- The new SUI ETFs allow both institutional and retail investors to participate in the growing SUI blockchain ecosystem.
- SUI is a Layer 1 blockchain developed by Mysten Labs, with its token used for transaction fees and smart contract execution.
- The SUI ETFs enable investors to earn rewards through SUI’s proof-of-stake mechanism while tracking the spot price of the token.
Two new exchange-traded funds (ETFs) linked to SUI token launched on Wednesday, offering investors direct exposure to SUI’s price. Canary Capital debuted the Canary Stake SUI ETF on Nasdaq, while Grayscale converted its SUI trust into an ETF on NYSE Arca. Both funds will track SUI’s price, with the added benefit of enabling investors to earn staking rewards.
Canary Capital’s SUI ETF: Canary Stake SUI ETF (SUIS)
Canary Capital launched its Canary Stake SUI ETF, trading under the ticker symbol SUIS on Nasdaq. This new fund tracks the spot price of SUI and allows investors to benefit from staking rewards. SUI operates on a proof-of-stake mechanism, which the ETF integrates into its structure, allowing investors to earn net staking rewards.
Steven McClurg, CEO of Canary Capital, emphasized the importance of this fund, saying, “The Canary Staked SUI spot ETF (SUIS) brings exposure to SUI in a registered, exchange-traded structure, while also enabling investors to benefit from net staking rewards generated through SUI’s proof-of-stake mechanism.” The ETF provides a regulated way for investors to engage with the SUI ecosystem and benefit from staking.
Grayscale Launches SUI Fund as an ETF
Grayscale followed suit, launching its own SUI fund on the same day. The company converted its SUI trust into an ETF, trading under the ticker GSUI on NYSE Arca. This ETF will provide investors with exposure to the SUI token, offering another way to participate in the growing blockchain ecosystem.
Grayscale’s decision to turn its SUI trust into an ETF aims to provide easier access for institutional and retail investors. By offering direct exposure to the SUI token, the fund offers an alternative to buying the token directly on cryptocurrency exchanges.
SUI’s Growing Ecosystem
SUI, developed by Mysten Labs, is a Layer 1 blockchain used to power decentralized applications and smart contracts. The SUI token plays a vital role in the blockchain, serving as a means to pay for transaction fees and support various other network functions. SUI is currently ranked 31st by market capitalization, valued at approximately $3.7 billion.
The launch of these SUI ETFs marks an important milestone for the blockchain’s adoption. It allows a broader range of investors to gain exposure to the SUI ecosystem in a regulated, traditional investment format. The ETFs make it easier for individuals to invest in the blockchain’s native token while also earning rewards through its proof-of-stake mechanism.
The European Union, often criticized for prioritizing rulemaking over innovation, is pointing to the European Blockchain Sandbox as an example of how regulation can boost innovation.
After three cohorts of confidential dialogues, the initiative has produced a 230-page best practices report and drawn in nearly 125 regulators and authorities.
The European Commission tapped law firm Bird & Bird and its consortium partners to lead the initiative, which matches blockchain use cases with regulators for confidential dialogues aimed at clearing legal challenges.
Marjolein Geus, a partner at Bird & Bird, told Cointelegraph that the process has shown compliance need not be a deterrent.
“For use case owners, it helps them better understand the relevant regulations and how those rules apply to their projects,” she said. “It allows regulators and authorities to deepen their understanding of how those technologies interact with the regulatory frameworks within their areas of competence.”
In the latest cohort, “mature” use cases were increasingly operational and embedded in sectors such as energy, healthcare and artificial intelligence, bringing along more complex compliance discussions.
How MiCA became a test of regulatory timing for blockchain
When the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) was adopted, observers warned that strict obligations would raise barriers for startups. Stablecoin rules drew particular scrutiny as Tether — issuer of the world’s largest stablecoin — ultimately decided against seeking MiCA authorization for USDt (USDT).
The brain drain narrative predates crypto. European founders have often incorporated in jurisdictions perceived as having a lighter touch.
Similar fears surfaced when the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) took effect in 2018. Businesses complained of interpretive confusion and administrative burden. Some foreign firms scaled back EU exposure. However, the GDPR has since become a global reference point, with many multinationals aligning operations to its standards.
The criticism that Europe “regulates first and innovates later” rests on the idea that legal certainty follows market development. MiCA was adopted before the crypto sector reached institutional maturity. In theory, that sequencing risks locking rapidly developing tech into rigid categories too early.
But the sandbox advanced a counterpoint, suggesting that early legislation combined with regulatory dialogue can enhance clarity and accelerate compliance. In the third cohort, 77% of respondents described the sandbox as having a crucial or valuable impact on innovation and regulation, and none reported no impact.
While the EU opted for early codification and dialogue, the world’s largest economy, the US, lacks a comprehensive federal framework for digital assets despite presidential pledges to become a global hub. Its proposed Digital Asset Market Clarity Act has stalled after key industry figures withdrew support over provisions, including restrictions on stablecoin yield.
Related: When will crypto’s CLARITY Act framework pass in the US Senate?
Smart contracts and the limits of decentralization
While the best practices report spans over 20 chapters across multiple regulatory domains, its sections on smart contracts and decentralization focus on how blockchain systems are structured at the code and governance level.
“Virtually all blockchain DLT use cases use smart contracts. They are subject to regulation, with security requirements often relevant, as well as obligations under the GDPR,” Geus said.
The dialogues examined how those contracts interact with existing EU frameworks, not just MiCA. Depending on their function and the degree of control retained by identifiable actors, smart contracts may trigger obligations ranging from cybersecurity source code reviews to operational resilience testing and conformity declarations.
“The question then becomes how to ensure those smart contracts are secure and GDPR compliant and how to test whether they meet the applicable regulatory frameworks. That is an area where further clarification, harmonization and standardization are needed,” Geus said.
Another focal point of the third cohort report is the qualification of services provided “in a fully decentralized manner without any intermediary” under MiCA.
MiCA references the term “fully decentralized” but doesn’t define it.
Like smart contracts, determining full decentralization in Europe requires further clarification. The report did attempt to lay out a checklist within the limits of how MiCA and the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive are structured.
Among those are identifiable fee recipients or entities capable of modifying the protocol, which may suggest the existence of an intermediary. Where such influence exists, MiCA is likely to apply, and authorization as a crypto service provider may be required.
Related: Crypto’s decentralization promise breaks at interoperability
Crypto in Europe’s legal architecture
The European Blockchain Regulatory Sandbox’s participation neither implies legal endorsement or regulatory approval nor does it grant derogations from applicable law.
By the third cohort, dialogues increasingly engaged horizontal legislation such as the GDPR and the Data Act. Projects were assessed not as isolated crypto experiments, but as embedded digital systems interacting with financial, cybersecurity and data governance frameworks.
Johannes Wirtz, partner at Bird & Bird’s finance regulation group, observed that regulators involved in the dialogues demonstrated deeper familiarity with crypto than expected.
“This was actually something which surprised me in certain regards because you always had this assumption that they are more or less bound to the old world, but they have their innovation departments, which are really good at identifying the issues,” Wirtz said.
If the early criticism of European policy assumed that law would constrain experimentation, Bird & Bird representatives claimed that structured dialogue clarifies how that perimeter applies in practice.
Magazine: Is China hoarding gold so yuan becomes global reserve instead of USD?
Cointelegraph Features and Cointelegraph Magazine publish long-form journalism, analysis and narrative reporting produced by Cointelegraph’s in-house editorial team and selected external contributors with subject-matter expertise. All articles are edited and reviewed by Cointelegraph editors in line with our editorial standards. Contributions from external writers are commissioned for their experience, research or perspective and do not reflect the views of Cointelegraph as a company unless explicitly stated. Content published in Features and Magazine does not constitute financial, legal or investment advice. Readers should conduct their own research and consult qualified professionals where appropriate. Cointelegraph maintains full editorial independence. The selection, commissioning and publication of Features and Magazine content are not influenced by advertisers, partners or commercial relationships.
Modern Treasury, a payments operations software provider that helps companies manage and reconcile money movement, has introduced an integrated payment service provider (PSP) that supports both traditional fiat rails and stablecoins.
On Wednesday, the company announced that it has added stablecoin settlement to the same infrastructure that businesses already use for ACH transfers, wire payments and real-time payment networks. At launch, the platform supports Global Dollar (USDG), Pax Dollar (USDP) and USDC (USDC), with USDt (USDT) expected to be added in the future.
Modern Treasure acquired stablecoin and fiat payment platform Beam in October.
The company has partnered with Paxos to integrate regulated stablecoins and settlement capabilities into its platform and has joined the Global Dollar Network. San Francisco-based Modern Treasury also participates in Circle’s Alliance Program, a partner network that supports the broader use of the USDC stablecoin in payments and financial services.
With the move, stablecoins are incorporated into a single compliance framework alongside traditional banking rails. Companies using Modern Treasury no longer need separate vendors or technical integrations to process crypto-based and fiat payments.
The update effectively makes stablecoins another settlement option within a conventional payment flow, potentially lowering the operational barrier for businesses seeking to integrate blockchain-based payment rails.
Related: Crypto’s 2026 investment playbook: Bitcoin, stablecoin infrastructure, tokenized assets
Stablecoins move deeper into mainstream financial infrastructure
Modern Treasury’s latest integration comes as stablecoins see broader uptake across the payments industry, particularly following the passage of the US GENIUS Act last July, which established a federal framework for dollar-backed stablecoins.
The total value of stablecoins in circulation grew by nearly 50% last year, surpassing $300 billion for the first time. Growth has slowed in recent months, with supply hovering around that level amid tighter liquidity conditions and a cooling crypto market.
Still, issuance remains near record highs, reflecting sustained demand for dollar-pegged digital assets in trading, cross-border transfers and settlement.
America’s largest banks have also signaled interest in stablecoins and related technology. JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup and Wells Fargo have been reported to be in early discussions about a jointly operated stablecoin initiative, though the plans are still at a conceptual stage.
Last month, Fidelity Investments announced plans to issue a new stablecoin called the Fidelity Digital Dollar. Fidelity Digital Assets president Mike O’Reilly described stablecoins as “foundational payment and settlement services.”
Related: How TradFi banks are advancing new stablecoin models
Dutch Speed Skating Star Captures Olympic Gold
ETHZilla struggles to find footing as Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund exits
Quinton Aaron’s Brother Gets Restraining Order Against Quinton’s ‘Spiritual Wife’
-
Sports7 days agoBig Tech enters cricket ecosystem as ICC partners Google ahead of T20 WC | T20 World Cup 2026
-
Video2 days agoBitcoin: We’re Entering The Most Dangerous Phase
-
Tech4 days agoLuxman Enters Its Second Century with the D-100 SACD Player and L-100 Integrated Amplifier
-
Video5 days agoThe Final Warning: XRP Is Entering The Chaos Zone
-
Tech2 days agoThe Music Industry Enters Its Less-Is-More Era
-
Sports2 days agoGB's semi-final hopes hang by thread after loss to Switzerland
-
Crypto World1 day agoCan XRP Price Successfully Register a 33% Breakout Past $2?
-
Business17 hours agoInfosys Limited (INFY) Discusses Tech Transitions and the Unique Aspects of the AI Era Transcript
-
Video1 day agoFinancial Statement Analysis | Complete Chapter Revision in 10 Minutes | Class 12 Board exam 2026
-
Entertainment4 hours agoKunal Nayyar’s Secret Acts Of Kindness Sparks Online Discussion
-
Crypto World5 days agoBhutan’s Bitcoin sales enter third straight week with $6.7M BTC offload
-
Tech8 hours agoRetro Rover: LT6502 Laptop Packs 8-Bit Power On The Go
-
Crypto World7 days agoPippin (PIPPIN) Enters Crypto’s Top 100 Club After Soaring 30% in a Day: More Room for Growth?
-
Video7 days agoPrepare: We Are Entering Phase 3 Of The Investing Cycle
-
NewsBeat3 days agoThe strange Cambridgeshire cemetery that forbade church rectors from entering
-
Business6 days agoBarbeques Galore Enters Voluntary Administration
-
Business10 hours agoTesla avoids California suspension after ending ‘autopilot’ marketing
-
Crypto World6 days agoEthereum Price Struggles Below $2,000 Despite Entering Buy Zone
-
NewsBeat3 days agoMan dies after entering floodwater during police pursuit
-
Crypto World5 days agoKalshi enters $9B sports insurance market with new brokerage deal