Stake.com and Bet365 represent two sides of online betting that rarely overlap. Stake.com has built a strong following in the crypto space, while Bet365 sits at the top of the long-established fiat-based market. Each operates with a different audience, a different banking approach, and a different regulatory profile. Around both of them, though, a new wave of crypto-first operators is starting to make a real mark. ZunaBet — live since 2026 — is one of the names raising its profile in that emerging group.

What follows looks at how Stake.com and Bet365 hold up today, and where ZunaBet’s setup is starting to attract notice.

---

Two Brands Defining Different Sides

Stake.com launched in 2017 and quickly became one of the most familiar names in crypto gambling. Built around crypto from day one, the platform supports a wide range of currencies and pairs its casino with a full sportsbook. Sponsorships across UFC and football have brought it mainstream visibility, though it doesn’t operate inside the regulated US market.

Bet365 has been running since 2000, growing from a UK base into one of the largest privately owned betting companies in the world. Sportsbook, casino, poker, and bingo all sit under one account. Banking runs through cards, bank transfers, and e-wallets, with active licensing in every region the operator serves.

Advertisement

Both brands lead in their own areas. Stake.com is at the front of the crypto side; Bet365 leads on the fiat side. Both also carry their own constraints. Bet365 is tied to fiat payments and region-by-region rules. Stake.com is restricted in certain markets and now faces growing competition from newer crypto-first operators.

---

How ZunaBet Joins the Picture

ZunaBet launched in 2026 under Strathvale Group Ltd with an Anjouan gaming license. The clearest separator from the older brands is the design starting point. Crypto sits at the foundation of ZunaBet rather than being added later, and the platform is positioning itself as a fresh take on the crypto-first model with appeal across player types.

The casino library covers more than 11,000 titles from over 60 providers, including Pragmatic Play, Hacksaw Gaming, Yggdrasil, BGaming, and Evolution. That places it among the larger crypto-focused libraries on the market today, and well beyond what Bet365 stocks in most of its licensed regions. Slots, table games, and live dealer streams all run from one account.

The sportsbook completes the platform. Football, basketball, tennis, NHL, and other major sports cover the standard ground, while CS2, Dota 2, League of Legends, and Valorant sit on the esports side. Virtual sports and combat sports fill out the menu. ZunaBet’s hybrid structure lines up with both Stake.com and Bet365.

---

The Banking Divide

The biggest gap between these brands shows up in payments. Bet365 operates mainly on fiat, which brings processing windows, possible holds, and withdrawal speeds shaped by which method the player picked. That works for players who value the familiarity of regulated, banking-based platforms — but speed isn’t its strong suit.

Stake.com and ZunaBet both run on crypto. ZunaBet supports more than 20 currencies, with Bitcoin, Ethereum, USDT on multiple chains, Solana, Dogecoin, Cardano, and XRP all in the lineup. No platform fees apply, and withdrawals settle quickly. For players already comfortable with crypto, the workflow removes the friction tied to bank-driven payments.

Advertisement

Geographic reach is the other factor. Crypto-first operators aren’t bound by the region-by-region licensing model fiat brands operate within. ZunaBet’s full platform is accessible in regions Bet365 can’t legally serve. For players already moving in digital, crypto-friendly contexts, that aligns with what they expect from a modern platform.

---

Welcome Offers Side by Side

Bet365 builds welcome offers around region-specific deposit matches or new-player bonuses, with wagering rules that often need close reading. Stake.com runs promotions too, but its welcome offer is lighter than what some crypto-first competitors push — more of the weight sits in reload bonuses and rakeback for active play.

ZunaBet’s welcome package totals up to $5,000 plus 75 free spins across three deposits. The first matches 100% up to $2,000 plus 25 spins. The second adds 50% up to $1,500 plus 25 spins. The third closes with 100% up to $1,500 plus 25 more spins. Marketed as a 250% bonus across three deposits, the structure gives new players more depth and time to explore the platform than a single-deposit format does.

---

Loyalty Programs Compared

Bet365 keeps loyalty quiet, with personalised offers reaching player accounts based on activity rather than a structured tier system. Stake.com runs a strong VIP program built around rakeback, reloads, and milestone bonuses — a setup that’s helped it retain long-term players. Both work, but Bet365 follows the conventional loyalty card layout while Stake.com leans heavily on rakeback as the main hook.

ZunaBet takes a different approach by combining rakeback with gamified progression. The program runs on a dragon evolution theme, with a mascot named Zuno guiding players through six tiers. Squire opens at 1% rakeback, then Warden at 2%, Champion at 4%, Divine at 5%, Knight at 10%, and Ultimate at the top with 20% rakeback.

Tier movement unlocks more than rakeback. Free spins scale with tier — reaching 1,000 spins at the highest level — alongside VIP club access and double wheel spins through the climb. The format reads more like in-game progression than chasing flat rakeback or accumulating points. For players drawn to that kind of mechanic, the system shifts how regular play feels relative to either a standard VIP program or a plain rakeback model.

---

Why ZunaBet’s Profile Keeps Growing

Bet365 remains a solid choice for players who value the security of a long-running, well-regulated brand. Stake.com continues to hold its place as a leading name in crypto casinos. Both have earned their positions. But the expectations players bring to these platforms keep climbing. Quick payments, deep libraries, and engaging loyalty mechanics are turning into starting features rather than premium upgrades.

Advertisement

ZunaBet was designed around those starting features from day one. The crypto-first core delivers fast settlement and minimal fees. The library reaches beyond what most established brands carry. The sportsbook covers traditional sports and esports together. The dragon loyalty program brings direction and progression to regular play.

For players who want speed, variety, and a more current feel, ZunaBet ranks among the more compelling platforms in the market right now. The brand is still in its early growth phase, but the direction is clear. A new generation of players treats crypto support, gamified rewards, and global access as defaults rather than features to ask for.

Stake.com and Bet365 built the online betting world that exists today. ZunaBet is one of the platforms working on what comes next — and the players paying attention now are catching that change early.

Source link

India’s central bank wants lawmakers to wall off the banking sector from crypto. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) told a parliamentary panel that digital assets should not serve as payment instruments.

The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance heard the testimony for its study on virtual digital assets. Lawmakers plan to table the report during the monsoon session.

Central Bank Pitches Crypto Containment in India

Committee members said the RBI argued for a containment strategy, not a conventional rulebook. The central bank believes formal regulation could legitimize speculative assets. It warned that clear rules might give retail investors a false perception of safety.

Officials repeated long-standing concerns about illicit finance. They cited risks tied to drug trafficking and terror funding. Similar central bank warnings have appeared in other emerging markets this year.

The stance revives a fight the RBI lost in 2020, when the Supreme Court struck down its banking ban. This time, the central bank wants Parliament to write the separation into law.

No Payments and No Direct Bank Exposure

The RBI advised lawmakers to prohibit crypto for payments and settlements. The bank wants tight limits on direct banking-sector exposure to digital assets. The advice mirrors the caution found in several global regulatory frameworks, although most jurisdictions now prefer licensing over isolation. Washington set its own boundary in June, when senators passed a US CBDC ban lasting through 2030.

Committee members pushed back during the hearing. They questioned how India can ignore capital flight while Indonesia, Hong Kong, and the UAE regulate the sector. India ranked first in the 2025 Global Crypto Adoption Index, ahead of the US and Pakistan.

However, the officials offered a blunt reply.

“Not having a policy is also a policy,” RBI officials said, according to a committee member quoted by Business Standard.

Meanwhile, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) earlier signaled it could regulate tokens classified as securities. The RBI declined to answer that question and promised a written response.

Tokenized Bonds Stay on a Separate Track

The proposal draws a line between cryptocurrencies and tokenized government securities. Growing tokenized bond markets would keep room to develop on a regulated infrastructure. The restriction targets speculation, not blockchain technology itself.

Still, India’s crypto investors face a 30% tax and a 1% levy on every trade. Industry voices keep lobbying for a softer line, including a domestic Bitcoin mining push as an alternative to gold imports.

The panel meets the Department of Economic Affairs on July 15 before it finalizes recommendations. The coming weeks should reveal whether Parliament backs isolation or an EU-style framework such as MiCA.

The post Why India’s Central Bank Wants Crypto Out of the Banking System? appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Tokenized stocks are gaining attention as one of the few areas still attracting capital, with financial services provider BIT arguing in a July 3 report on X that the sector is becoming a rare bright spot as traditional altcoin narratives continue to weaken.

The view reflects a wider change across crypto markets, where investors are paying closer attention to projects tied to real-world assets instead of speculative tokens that are facing heavy selling pressure.

Tokenized Equity Projects Gain Attention as Altcoins Struggle

According to the analyst behind the BIT report, the crypto market is going through a structural change after years of relying on meme coins and DeFi tokens as well as new narratives to attract capital.

More than $111 billion worth of token unlocks have entered the market in the last two years, averaging around $700 million every week, and per the report, that persistent supply overhang has suppressed retail participation and put pressure on prices.

This pressure worsened by the changing nature of crypto rallies, with the average uptrend in a coin in 2024 lasting about 61 days, while the same in 2025 dropped to just 19 days. And that’s not all. Institutional players with ETF flows and corporate reserves have largely channeled their capital into proven assets like Bitcoin (BTC), leaving the market’s long tail of speculative tokens high and dry.

Since spot Bitcoin ETFs launched, BTC has returned almost 260% for the average crypto hedge fund, with BIT arguing that the old altcoin playbook is no longer producing the same results. For context, the Altcoin Season Index is currently at around 54 out of 100, well short of the 75 that is usually considered the signal for a genuine altseason.

Against this backdrop, exchanges have been looking for new growth engines, with BIT’s independent analyst believing that tokenized stocks are creating a new area of demand. They highlighted Solana as the leading blockchain for tokenized equities, as it accounts for 95% of global trading volume in the category.

According to the post, projects like Jupiter and Jito are potential beneficiaries as they sit across different parts of the tokenized equity infrastructure. Others include Ondo, Hyperliquid, Backpack, and Pyth, with Ondo alone surpassing $1 billion in total value locked (TVL) in less than 8 months. Meanwhile, Hyperliquid’s perpetual stock products now account for more than 35% of trading activity on its platform.

RWAs Are Attracting Exchange Investment

Looking at recent industry announcements, you can see that crypto exchanges are piling in on tokenized equities. For instance, Coinbase said in June that it would launch tokenized trading for non-US customers, backed 1:1 by the underlying asset with full shareholder rights, including dividends, while Binance introduced bStocks on the BNB Chain. Other players, such as Kraken and Bybit, already list dozens of xStocks for spot trading.

Recall also that earlier this year, Jupiter and Ondo Finance announced plans to bring more than 200 tokenized US stocks and ETFs to Solana through Ondo Global Markets, and such developments support BIT’s take that tokenized equities are becoming one of the few sectors in crypto still building new products while much of the altcoin market is struggling with weak demand and persistent selling pressure.

The post Tokenized Stocks Emerge as Altcoin Lifeline Amid Crypto Market Reset appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Source link

Key Takeaways

• Rocket Lab has evolved from a launch provider into a comprehensive space systems company, with the Neutron vehicle representing its next major milestone
• AST SpaceMobile is developing direct-to-smartphone satellite connectivity, partnering with major carriers like AT&T and Verizon
• Planet Labs operates an extensive Earth imaging satellite constellation, monetizing through data subscriptions to enterprise and government clients
• These three firms represent distinct investment theses: launch infrastructure, wireless connectivity, and geospatial intelligence
• Government defense budgets and commercial satellite adoption continue driving sector growth

---

The commercial space industry continues expanding in July 2026, with Rocket Lab, AST SpaceMobile, and Planet Labs emerging as three particularly noteworthy stocks for investor consideration.

Rocket Lab: Vertically Integrated Space Systems Provider

Rocket Lab has successfully transformed from a niche launch provider into a vertically integrated space systems enterprise. Today’s revenue streams span orbital insertion services, satellite production, spacecraft subsystems, mission control software, and defense contracts.

Rocket Lab USA, Inc., RKLB

Strong relationships with NASA and the Department of Defense provide reliable contract flow. The company’s upcoming Neutron launch vehicle represents a strategic expansion into medium-lift reusable rockets, targeting both commercial constellation deployments and national security payloads.

Successful Neutron deployment would significantly expand the company’s addressable market. While share price volatility persists, the diversified business structure provides resilience against individual program delays.

Rocket Lab stands out among publicly traded space companies for its operational breadth and consistent delivery track record.

Advertisement

AST SpaceMobile: Revolutionary Mobile Connectivity Venture

AST SpaceMobile pursues an ambitious vision: creating the first space-based cellular broadband network accessible to ordinary mobile phones without modifications.

AST SpaceMobile, Inc., ASTS

The objective involves eliminating terrestrial coverage gaps globally. Agreements with telecommunications giants including AT&T, Verizon, and Vodafone validate market demand for this capability.

Commercial operations remain in early stages. Deploying a functioning global satellite constellation requires substantial capital investment, complex regulatory navigation, and flawless technical performance.

Significant execution risk exists, but the opportunity is equally substantial. Successful deployment could fundamentally alter global mobile communications access.

Advertisement

Planet Labs: Geospatial Intelligence at Scale

Planet Labs pursues a fundamentally different space business model focused on information rather than connectivity or transportation.

Planet Labs PBC, PL

The company maintains one of Earth’s largest commercial Earth observation satellite networks, generating daily global imagery. This data feeds subscription-based services sold to government agencies, defense organizations, insurance companies, agricultural enterprises, and environmental monitoring groups.

Subscription-based revenue provides greater predictability compared to transactional launch businesses. Satellite imagery demand continues expanding as organizations increasingly rely on geospatial intelligence for strategic decision-making.

While revenue expansion has proceeded more gradually than some analysts anticipated, the growing customer roster and recurring revenue structure establish solid long-term fundamentals.

Advertisement

Investment Perspective

These three companies represent distinct segments within the broader space economy. Rocket Lab provides launch capabilities and space infrastructure. AST SpaceMobile targets global wireless connectivity gaps. Planet Labs monetizes Earth observation intelligence.

The commercial space sector benefits from increasing government expenditure, defense modernization priorities, and expanding commercial satellite applications. All three securities carry elevated risk profiles relative to traditional equity investments, but each provides unique exposure to an industry experiencing exceptional growth momentum.

Source link

Belgian authorities arrested a 19-year-old suspected of being a key figure in a European phishing and money-laundering network that stole more than 500,000 euros ($572,000) using fake government emails and phone calls to trick victims into installing remote-access software.

Authorities detained the suspect in an Airbnb in Antwerp, where a second suspect was also found. The Federal Judicial Police launched the investigation in March 2026, when phishing attacks became a priority in the region, according to a Thursday police report.

The main suspect was brought before an investigating judge, who issued an arrest warrant. The gang used money mules and cash carriers and laundered the proceeds through cryptocurrencies.

The investigation shows that crypto can play multiple roles in phishing operations, including as a means of laundering illicit proceeds.

Advertisement

Phishing dominates crypto security losses

Phishing is also a major threat to cryptocurrency investors, accounting for the majority of the $482 million lost in the first quarter of 2026. Phishing and social engineering attacks accounted for $306 million of those losses, according to Hacken.

Phishing attacks and social engineering scams are a long-standing hurdle for the crypto industry, as attackers exploit human behavior rather than the code of a protocol.

On May 25, onchain analyst “b-block” warned that scammers used Google to deploy malicious phishing ads impersonating decentralized exchange Uniswap, reportedly stealing more than $400,000 from victims.

Data aggregator DeFiLlama said that “fake ads on Google are a common source of phishing attacks.” Crypto cybersecurity group Security Alliance also reported in April that there was a “significant uptick” in phishing activity on Google Search in March.

Advertisement

Related: Phantom Chat under scrutiny after $264K address poisoning loss

Blockchain security company CertiK’s Skynet report also highlighted phishing and social engineering as leading attack vectors for North Korea-linked malicious actors.

DPRK hacking playbook. Source: CertiK

CertiK attributed the 2022 Ronin Bridge exploit that stole $600 million to a spearphishing campaign involving a fake LinkedIn recruiter and a malware-laden PDF.

Advertisement

Magazine: Meet the onchain crypto detectives fighting crime better than the cops

Source link

The National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives (NOBLE) has become the first major law enforcement organization to publicly endorse the Clarity Act, sending a letter directly to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer backing the crypto regulation framework ahead of a critical August legislative window.

The move directly undercuts the dominant opposition narrative and could provide political cover for soft-no Democrats whose holdout hinges on unresolved enforcement concerns.

In their letter, NOBLE argued that the bill’s provisions “provide law enforcement with meaningful new capabilities while preserving longstanding criminal enforcement authorities”, a direct rebuttal to claims that the legislation creates dangerous enforcement gaps.

The organization specifically flagged enhanced tools against money laundering, digital asset kiosk crime, and unlicensed money transmitting businesses as concrete gains for investigators.

The endorsement matters structurally because it splits the law enforcement community at a moment when Democratic senators, including Angela Alsobrooks, are conditioning their votes on the resolution of those exact LE objections.

NOBLE alone does not guarantee the 60 Senate votes needed for passage, but it weakens the bipartisan cover that opposition groups provided and strengthens the pro-bill side in final-language negotiations.

Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio

Clarity ACT: The Law Enforcement Split and the DeFi Safe-Harbor Fight

Four major law enforcement organizations, the National Sheriffs’ Association, the International Association of Chiefs of Police, the National District Attorneys Association, and the National Association of Assistant United States Attorneys, remain formally opposed.

Their core objection targets Section 604 of the bill, which incorporates the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA) and creates regulatory safe harbors for non-custodial blockchain developers and DeFi infrastructure providers.

Don’t Miss Out on Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop on ByBit

Critics argue these carve-outs could place certain actors beyond the reach of Bank Secrecy Act obligations and money-transmitter laws, creating blind spots for narcotics trafficking, sanctions evasion, and terrorist financing.

NOBLE’s counter-argument is that the Clarity Act classifies digital-asset intermediaries as financial institutions for AML purposes, requiring customer identification, due diligence, and suspicious-activity reporting, and that the bill “does not alter the longstanding federal criminal authorities that investigators and prosecutors rely upon every day,” as stated in their Senate letter.

The most likely resolution path is targeted amendments narrowing the BRCA safe-harbor language to satisfy prosecutors and police associations without gutting the regulatory certainty the industry is lobbying for.

The bill’s market-structure core is also significant beyond the enforcement debate: the Senate version explicitly classifies Bitcoin and Ethereum as digital commodities under CFTC jurisdiction, ending the SEC-CFTC turf war that has defined regulatory uncertainty for the last several years. That designation is what major banks and asset managers are waiting on to advance tokenization of equities and real-world assets at scale.

Senators Cynthia Lummis and Tim Scott, chair of the Senate Banking Committee, are driving toward a floor vote before the chamber’s long recess begins on August 10. Scott stated that “the Clarity Act provides clear rules of the road for digital assets, protecting consumers and helping keep the future of finance in America.”

Lummis has publicly criticized Elizabeth Warren for opposing the bill’s progress in the wake of President Trump disclosing $1.4 billion in crypto income, a disclosure that has added political friction to an already contested ethics title in the legislation.

Negotiators returned from the July recess on July 13, and the House Financial Services Committee held a hearing on July 17 focused on the bill’s innovation framework.

The remaining work requires reconciling the Senate Banking and Agriculture Committee versions into a single package, locking down the DeFi enforcement language, and finalizing ethics provisions that would restrict senior officials and members of Congress from operating crypto enterprises they regulate, a provision some Republicans are also wary of.

With passage odds tightening against the August deadline, NOBLE’s endorsement shifts negotiating leverage toward the bill’s supporters without resolving the substantive amendments still required.

Whether the Senate can reconcile outstanding provisions before the recess remains the central variable for what Bloomberg Intelligence rates as a 60% probability event this month, and what crypto bill 2026 watchers on Polymarket are pricing at 40% for the full year.

Discover: The Best Token Presales

The post The First Major Law Enforcement Group Just Endorsed the CLARITY Act, And It Could Flip the Senate Vote appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link

Samsung Electronics and several major Korean financial companies deny formal ties to Open USD, the dollar-pegged stablecoin that launched this week with a claimed alliance of more than 140 corporate partners.

The pushback, first reported by Chosun Biz on July 3, tests the credibility of one of the largest partner rosters ever assembled in the stablecoin sector.

Korean Partners Say They Never Signed On

Open Standard announced Open USD (OUSD) on June 30, promising members fee-free minting and a share of reserve income. Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, BlackRock, and Coinbase headline the roster.

The list also names 13 Korean entities, including Samsung Electronics, Dunamu, Shinhan Financial Group, K Bank, and seven card issuers. Within days, at least four of them distanced themselves.

“There were no official consultations, and we do not even know what role we would play (in the consortium),” local media Chosun Biz reported, citing a Samsung Electronics official.

Meanwhile, Shinhan, Dunamu, and KBank said Open Standard had simply floated the idea of joining. They replied that they would review it, yet their names appeared as members.

An official at another listed firm described a similar experience to the outlet.

“We learned that we were included as members of the OUSD consortium through domestic news… We are perplexed to be included as members.”

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

Open USD Faces Credibility Test Before Launch

The case echoes a costly precedent. Facebook’s Libra consortium debuted in 2019 with 28 founding members, including Visa, Mastercard, and Stripe. All three quit within four months, and the renamed Diem sold its assets in 2022.

The stakes are high because the debut dragged Circle stock down 17% on launch day. Tether (USDT) and USD Coin (USDC) control over 80% of a market worth some $311 billion, per DefiLlama data.

OUSD’s revenue sharing could also pressure USDC yields in decentralized finance (DeFi).

Some commitments look firm, however. Stripe Technology President Will Gaybrick confirmed OUSD will become the default stablecoin for businesses on its platform.

That pledge follows Stripe’s $1.1 billion purchase of Bridge, the stablecoin firm founded by Open Standard chief Zach Abrams.

Circle, for its part, continues to deepen its bank distribution, with Standard Chartered expanding institutional USDC access in Dubai.

For the Korean firms, caution has context. The debate over stablecoins backed by the South Korean won remains unresolved at home, and listed companies already face tightening domestic crypto rules.

Open Standard has yet to address the Korean accounts or define what partnership means publicly. They have also not immediately responded to BeInCrypto’s request for comment.

The post Open USD Stablecoin Hype Backfires as Samsung Denies Partnership Claims appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Source link

Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta AI predicts and stacks 4 numbered catalysts behind its Bitcoin price prediction that puts $120,000 to $150,000 on the table by December. That range represents a doubling from where price sits today, and the model is not shy about the thesis behind the predicts.

The bull case runs on structure rather than vibes. Bitcoin trades near $61,700 right now, and the base case has the next major leg beginning around November as macro liquidity improves, Fed policy softens, and investors rotate back into risk assets.

Catalyst 1 is the CLARITY Act, which would give banks, asset managers, and exchanges the legal certainty they have been waiting for, shifting crypto oversight to the CFTC and unlocking institutional demand across custody, staking, and tokenized securities in a way that is currently legally murky.

Catalyst 2 is an ETF infrastructure that is already working, with nine consecutive days of bitcoin ETF inflows hitting $2.1 billion while spot ETFs keep absorbing supply, and pension funds and wealth managers increase allocations.

Catalyst 3 is macro and store of value demand, with government debt, deficits, and fiat debasement driving portfolio shifts toward bitcoin as a hedge, a dynamic Grayscale frames as the biggest driver into 2026.

Catalyst 4 is corporate and treasury adoption continuing to compound, with Strategy and others still accumulating and Wall Street banks like Morgan Stanley and Charles Schwab launching their own crypto products.

External price anchors add credibility too, with Citi setting a base case at $143,000 and a bull case at $189,000, and Fundstrat’s Tom Lee calling for $250,000 on institutional and government tailwinds.

The bear case is framed explicitly as a delay rather than a collapse. If the CLARITY Act stalls past the August recess, if the Fed keeps rates tighter for longer, or if ETF inflows underwhelm, the model sees the rally capping near $80,000 to $100,000 instead.

Citi’s recession scenario sits at $58,000, and regulatory uncertainty keeping institutions sidelined would push to the lower end of that range. The net read is still asymmetric risk-reward skewed to the upside, just with a slower fuse.

Bitcoin (BTC)

24h7d30d1yAll time

Discover: The Best Token Presales

Bitcoin Price Prediction: BTC Sits One Catalyst Away From Deciding Its Entire Second Half

The daily chart shows Bitcoin at $61,663 after a long, grinding decline from highs near $127,000 set back in October. That slide included a notable relief rally into May that topped out just above $83,000 before sellers took back control and pushed price into a fresh stretch of weakness through June.

Price has stabilized over the past several sessions in the low $60,000s, showing small green candles and modest upside momentum for the first time in weeks.

That kind of quiet stabilization near a major level after an extended downtrend is often the precursor to either a real reversal or one more leg lower before the actual bottom forms.

Resistance sits first near $64,000, a level that capped multiple bounces throughout June, then a much more meaningful ceiling near $76,000 where the May rally ultimately ran out of buyers. Support holds near $58,000, directly aligned with Citi’s recession case level and the most recent series of lows.

The broader structure remains a downtrend defined by lower highs stretching back to October, though the pace of selling has clearly slowed over the past two weeks compared to the sharp drops seen in May and June.

Momentum on the daily candles looks like it is attempting to stabilize rather than trend hard in either direction right now.

Given how precisely the CLARITY Act timeline and the November seasonality call line up with the catalyst stack in this prediction, the next decisive break above $64,000 or below $58,000 will likely signal which half of this prediction Bitcoin is actually building toward.

Don’t Miss Out on Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop on ByBit

You Might Like What Meta AI Predicts About LiquidChain

The rotation is already underway. Most people will recognize it after it has already happened.

Meta AI predicts that large caps are not broken. They are capped. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP have been pressing against the same bands for weeks with nothing breaking through. The macro tailwinds keep getting rescheduled. The institutional inflows keep getting pushed back another quarter. Waiting on catalysts outside your control is not positioning. It is just waiting.

A capital that has navigated enough cycles does not sit at resistance. It moves before the destination has a name.

Early-stage infrastructure operates on different math. A small enough market cap means a modest rotation produces dramatic movement. The returns come from the gap between what something is genuinely worth and what the market has priced it at. That gap only exists while the project stays undiscovered.

Multi-chain fragmentation bleeds DeFi every single day. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana run completely isolated systems with no native way to connect them. Every user crossing those boundaries pays in fees, slippage, and failed transactions. Every single time.

LiquidChain collapses all 3 into a single execution layer. One deployment. Full ecosystem access. No cross-chain tax anywhere.

The market has not found this yet. That is the entire point.

The presale is at $0.01454 with just over $890,000 raised. Ground floor is a description, not a pitch.

Execution is unproven. Adoption is unknown. Established assets offer a smoother ride toward a ceiling that is already visible. LiquidChain is an earlier seat at a table that has not been set yet.

Explore the LiquidChain Presale

The post Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta AI Predicts Unbelievable Bitcoin Price by the End of 2026 appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link

The European Union’s cryptocurrency industry has entered a new enforcement phase as the transition period under the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation came to an end.

The end of the transition means crypto companies without MiCA authorization can no longer legally serve EU clients and are expected to wind down operations or face multimillion-euro fines and other enforcement action.

Industry executives and lawyers told Cointelegraph the next challenge is ensuring national regulators apply the bloc’s single rulebook consistently, even as supervisory approaches are expected to vary across member states.

The transition marks MiCA’s first major enforcement test as regulators begin applying the EU’s crypto rulebook.

Advertisement

MiCA compliance costs versus fines

Although complying with MiCA can cost hundreds of thousands or, in some cases, millions of euros, experts say operating without authorization carries far greater financial and regulatory risks.

Nicola Massella, partner at Legal & Resilience, estimated MiCA implementation costs for many cryptocurrency companies at 350,000 euros ($400,000) to 600,000 euros ($690,000), while Brickken CEO Edwin Mata said costs can reach 2 million euros ($2.3 million) depending on a company’s size, services and compliance readiness.

On penalties, Eckehard Stolz, managing director of Amina EU, said MiCA penalties start at 5 million euros or 5% of annual turnover for some violations.

Source: EBA

Advertisement

Massella added that the European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed on June 26 increasing penalties under certain regulatory regimes, including as much as 12.5% of annual turnover for some stablecoin-related breaches.

Who enforces MiCA?

While MiCA creates a single EU rulebook, day-to-day supervision is handled by national competent authorities (NCAs), which authorize, supervise and enforce the rules for crypto companies.

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) coordinates supervision across member states and maintains the public register of authorized crypto-asset service providers, and the EBA directly oversees significant stablecoin issuers.

Source: ESMA

Advertisement

“At the EU level, ESMA plays an important coordination and supervisory-convergence role, especially to avoid regulatory arbitrage between member states,” Ivo Grlica, founder of GrlicaLaw and G LAB Advisors, told Cointelegraph.

“National regulators are only the first line of MiCA enforcement, but the legal consequences can spread into national courts and criminal-law systems if the underlying conduct causes harm,” he added.

Enforcement unlikely to be uniform at first

MiCA enforcement is unlikely to be uniform in its early stages because NCAs differ in resources, experience and supervisory priorities.

“ESMA made clear it expects NCAs to act against unauthorized providers from July 1,” Stolz said, adding that how aggressively each regulator moves “will depend on local resourcing and priorities.”

Advertisement

Peter Bidewell, vice president of institutional product adoption at Parfin, said differing supervisory approaches could create opportunities for regulatory arbitrage despite MiCA’s goal of harmonizing crypto rules across the EU.

Related: StanChart joins ESMA’s first MiCA register update since deadline

Grlica said he expects enforcement to become more systematic over time as regulators identify unauthorized providers and share information across member states, making it increasingly difficult for companies with a history of non-compliance to obtain MiCA authorization later.

Several EU regulators, including authorities in the Czech Republic, Bulgaria, Luxembourg and Italy, have issued notices reminding crypto companies that the MiCA transition period has ended and urging providers without authorization to wind down their operations.

Advertisement

The Czech National Bank told Cointelegraph that the country’s Financial Market Digitization Act gives it the authority to impose sanctions for MiCA-related violations, including operating without authorization, unlawful token offerings and failing to cooperate with supervisors. The law allows the central bank to fine companies providing crypto services without authorization up to 118.5 million Czech koruna (about $5.6 million), 5% of annual turnover if higher, or twice the unlawful benefit obtained, whichever is greater.

Cointelegraph contacted France’s Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), the Netherlands’ Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) and Germany’s Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) to ask how they plan to enforce MiCA following the transition deadline. None had responded by publication.

Magazine: How crypto laws changed in 2025 — and how they’ll change in 2026

Source link