Source link

Solana (SOL) price trades near $79.30 on April 3, up 0.6% over the past 24 hours after its spot ETF recorded the first positive net inflow in six trading days.

The $932,850 inflow on April 2 broke a streak of zero and negative activity stretching back to late March. A bullish RSI divergence on the daily chart adds to the bounce case.

However, exchange data shows that participants are already selling into the early strength, a pattern that historically weakened prior rallies. The question is whether institutional flows through the ETF can overpower the selling pressure building on exchanges.

Solana ETF Comeback Meets a Familiar Divergence

Solana ETF flows turned positive on April 2 with $932,850 in net inflows, ending a six-day stretch that included three outflow days totaling roughly $15 million and three days of zero activity. The return of institutional interest, even at a modest level, provides a potential tailwind for the bounce that the daily chart is signaling.

Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.

On the daily chart, between January 31 and April 2, Solana price made a lower low while the Relative Strength Index (RSI), a momentum oscillator, made a higher low. That standard bullish divergence signals weakening selling momentum.

This exact pattern has appeared twice before with different outcomes tied directly to ETF activity. The first divergence, confirmed around March 8, preceded a 21.5% rally between March 8 and March 16.

During that period, SOL ETF inflows were consistently positive, with daily flows of $1.66 million, $3.92 million, $7.60 million, and $2.82 million. The institutional tailwind helped the divergence convert into a sustained move.

The second divergence, confirmed around March 29, produced only a 10% bounce. Between March 29 and April 1, ETF flows were either flat or negative, offering no institutional support. The divergence technically worked, but lacked the fuel to sustain itself.

The current divergence, confirmed on April 2, now has its first day of positive flow. Whether the ETF streak continues will likely determine if this Solana bounce resembles the 21% rally or something weaker.

Exchange Sellers Are Already Moving

While the Solana ETF sent its first positive signal in nearly a week, on-chain exchange data tells a contrasting story. The exchange net position change, a Glassnode metric that tracks the net flow of tokens into and out of exchange wallets, turned sharply positive on April 2. The reading surged from 160,431 SOL on April 1 to 860,995 SOL on April 2, a more than fivefold increase in a single day.

A positive net position change means more SOL is flowing onto exchanges than leaving, which typically signals selling intent. The timing matters because this spike coincides with the early stages of the RSI divergence bounce.

A similar dynamic played out during the March 8 to 16 rally. Throughout that entire 21% move, the exchange net position change remained in green, meaning sellers were active the whole time.

Despite that selling pressure, the ETF tailwind was strong enough to absorb it and push prices higher. When the rally ended and prices began correcting, the exchange metric flipped negative as participants started buying, effectively buying the top.

The current pattern suggests that exchange participants are once again selling into a bounce rather than accumulating ahead of it. This could also mean selling into strength to minimize losses.

If ETF inflows remain modest, this selling pressure may be enough to cap the move early. However, if institutional flows accelerate as they did in mid-March, the selling could be absorbed.

Solana Price and the $79 Floor

The daily chart frames every critical Solana price level from here. SOL currently trades at $79.30, sitting directly on the 0.618 Fib at $79.06. This level has historically acted as a strong support zone across multiple asset classes, and for Solana, it represents the most important floor in the current structure.

A daily close below $79 would weaken the bounce thesis and open the path toward $73.99, the 0.786 Fib. Below that, $67.53 becomes the next major support.

For the divergence to convert into a meaningful rally, Solana price needs to reclaim $82.62, the 0.5 Fib, followed by $86.18 at the 0.382 level. A move above $86 would confirm that the ETF tailwind is outweighing exchange selling and could target $90, representing approximately 14% upside from current levels. A push toward $97.71 would bring back the March 16 high.

The divergence provides the technical signal, the ETF provides the institutional catalyst, and the exchange selling provides the headwind. The March precedent shows that when ETF flows are strong enough, the bounce survives despite active selling. When they are not, the bounce fades quickly.

A daily close below $79 separates a divergence-driven bounce from a deeper correction toward $73.99, while reclaiming $82.62 with sustained ETF inflows would confirm the rally has institutional backing.

The post A 6-Day Solana ETF Drought Just Ended, but Price Bounce Faces an Immediate Problem appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Source link

The crypto market traded $20.57 trillion in Q1 2026, but declining volumes and concentrated liquidity told a story of cautious recovery, not euphoria.

A new quarterly research report from CoinGlass breaks down how capital, trading activity, and market depth shifted among exchanges during the first three months of the year. The findings paint a picture of a market still digesting the aftershocks of late 2025.

A Market Still Healing From Q4’s Crash

Q1 2026 unfolded against a difficult backdrop. The October 2025 tariff shock triggered $19 billion in liquidations within 24 hours, the largest single-day deleveraging event in crypto history.

Bitcoin (BTC) declined roughly 35% from its all-time high above $126,000, and open interest across exchanges dropped more than 40%.

By January, signs of stabilization had appeared. Total market volume for the quarter reached approximately $20.57 trillion, split between $1.94 trillion in spot and $18.63 trillion in derivatives.

However, each successive month saw lower totals. January posted the highest activity, and March fell to the quarterly low.

The derivatives-to-spot ratio held at roughly 9.6x throughout the quarter, slightly above the 2025 full-year average.

That ratio suggests traders preferred hedging and short-term positioning through futures rather than making directional spot bets.

Binance’s Lead Extends Across Every Metric

The CoinGlass report measured exchanges across four dimensions, including trading volume, open interest (OI), order book depth, and user asset reserves. Binance ranked first in all of them.

In derivatives, Binance posted approximately $4.90 trillion in cumulative volume, a 34.9% share among the top 10 exchanges.

That figure exceeded the combined totals of OKX ($2.19 trillion) and Bybit ($1.49 trillion). In open interest, Binance averaged $23.9 billion daily, roughly 2.2 times second-ranked Bybit.

Liquidity depth told a similar story. In BTC futures, Binance’s average two-sided depth within 1% of the mid-price was approximately $284 million.

OKX followed at $160 million and Bybit at $76.55 million. The pattern repeated across BTC spot, ETH futures, and ETH spot markets. No single competitor matched Binance across all four sub-markets simultaneously.

The starkest gap appeared in user asset reserves. Binance held approximately $152.9 billion in custodial assets, accounting for 73.5% among the top 10 exchanges. OKX was a distant second at $15.9 billion. Gate, Bitget, and Bybit all fell within the $5 to $7 billion range.

That concentration far exceeds Binance’s share in trading volume or open interest. The CoinGlass report noted that asset retention reflects brand trust, product ecosystem breadth, and on/off-ramp convenience, making it a stronger indicator of long-term competitive position.

Hyperliquid Enters the Mainstream Conversation

One of the quarter’s most notable developments was the rise of Hyperliquid (HYPE), a decentralized derivatives protocol that posted approximately $492.7 billion in Q1 trading volume.

That placed it inside the top ten.

Its average daily open interest of roughly $6.0 billion, with a peak of $9.7 billion, drew close to that of centralized competitors like Bitget.

The growth validated what CoinGlass’s 2025 annual report had predicted, that decentralized derivatives were transitioning from proof-of-concept to actual market share competition.

JPMorgan flagged Hyperliquid in a March report, noting that demand for round-the-clock access to traditional assets was driving decentralized exchange growth and taking share from mid-tier centralized platforms.

Grayscale also filed an S-1 for a HYPE ETF in March, seeking a Nasdaq listing.

For now, Hyperliquid’s scale remains significantly below the leading centralized exchanges.

However, its entry into the competitive arena adds pressure to second-tier platforms competing for derivatives market share.

What Comes Next

The CoinGlass report identified several variables to watch heading into Q2. These include:

• The Federal Reserve’s monetary policy path,
• Changes in BTC spot ETF fund flows, and
• The progress of regulatory framework implementation across major jurisdictions.

Q1 was not about a return to all-time highs. It was about recovery, concentration, and a shifting market structure that is drawing clearer lines between the platforms that attract capital and those that risk falling behind.

The post New Report Finds Where All the Money Went in Crypto’s Brutal Q1 appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

NEAR Protocol (NEAR) gained 5.8% and Avalanche (AVAX) climbed 3.6%.

Source link

Key Highlights

• ServiceNow (NOW) shares have declined approximately 32% year-to-date amid widespread SaaS sector pressure from AI disruption concerns
• CEO Bill McDermott reports that half of new business revenue originates from non-seat-based pricing models, including AI token consumption
• Benchmark launched coverage with a Buy recommendation and $125 price target, characterizing the decline as “unwarranted”
• McDermott demonstrated confidence by purchasing $3 million in NOW shares during February, describing it as an optimal entry opportunity
• Management projects 21% GAAP subscriber revenue expansion and identifies a $600 billion total addressable market opportunity

---

The shares of ServiceNow have experienced significant turbulence throughout 2026. With a decline of roughly 32% since the year began, the enterprise software provider has been swept up in a widespread retreat from SaaS investments that gained momentum in late 2025.

ServiceNow, Inc., NOW

What sparked the exodus? Rapid advancements in AI capabilities from companies such as Anthropic and OpenAI exceeded market expectations, triggering investor anxiety that AI laboratories might erode traditional enterprise software demand.

CEO Bill McDermott challenges this interpretation. He maintains that ServiceNow differs fundamentally from conventional SaaS providers and is proactively pivoting toward AI integration rather than retreating from the technological shift.

“We’re not a feature company and we’re not a function company, we’re a platform company,” McDermott explained. He highlighted the company’s AI Control Tower solution, which orchestrates and oversees AI agents, models, and operational workflows throughout enterprise infrastructures.

Among McDermott’s most significant revelations: half of ServiceNow’s incoming business revenue derives from pricing structures unrelated to user seats. This marks the company’s first public disclosure of this metric.

Transitioning Beyond Per-Seat Licensing

The conventional software revenue model — billing based on individual user licenses — faces mounting challenges as artificial intelligence diminishes dependency on workforce expansion. ServiceNow is adopting a blended approach where clients pay for both user licenses and consumption-based AI tokens.

Advertisement

The strategy is clear: as the platform executes more autonomous functions, organizations purchase additional tokens. This decouples revenue expansion from employee headcount metrics.

Goldman Sachs analyst Gabriela Borges maintains a 12-month price target of $216 for NOW. She anticipates upward revisions to organic growth projections throughout the year as clients exhaust complimentary AI token allocations and transition to paid consumption after validating business value.

“Those packages are going to start getting burnt through, such that customers are now going to come back to ServiceNow and say, ‘Hey, we proved the value of this particular product. We are now ready to pay for it,’” Borges explained.

McDermott reinforced his optimism through action. During February, he acquired $3 million in NOW shares using personal funds.

Strategic Acquisitions and Market Expansion

ServiceNow has maintained an aggressive acquisition strategy recently. Last December, the company revealed plans for a $7.75 billion acquisition of cybersecurity provider Armis. Additional purchases included AI identity security specialist Veza and a $2.85 billion investment in Moveworks, a platform focused on AI assistance and reasoning agents.

Advertisement

During the Q4 earnings discussion, McDermott directly confronted shareholder concerns regarding acquisition velocity, emphasizing that purchases target innovation capabilities rather than revenue supplementation.

These strategic moves position ServiceNow more prominently within cybersecurity and customer relationship management sectors. McDermott asserts these expansions elevate the addressable market opportunity to at least $600 billion, a substantial increase from the $90 billion estimate when he assumed leadership in 2019.

On April 1, Benchmark launched coverage featuring a Buy rating alongside a $125 price target. Analyst Yi Fu Lee characterized the sell-off motivated by AI displacement concerns as “unwarranted” and positioned NOW as a primary beneficiary of the “Agentic AI super cycle.”

Wall Street consensus maintains a Buy recommendation for the company. ServiceNow’s price-to-earnings multiple registered approximately 61 times trailing 12-month earnings as of Thursday’s trading session.

Advertisement

Source link

Solana price managed to hold above the $70 support on Thursday as bulls stepped in to defend the psychological level.

Summary

• Solana price dropped nearly 9% after a $270 million exploit on Drift and a sharp decline in network TVL.
• Broader risk-off sentiment driven by escalating Middle East tensions and rising oil prices added pressure on the token.
• Technical indicators show weakening momentum despite a potential falling wedge breakout, with bears still dominating trend strength.

According to data from crypto.news, Solana (SOL) price fell nearly 9% from an intraday high of $85.1 on Wednesday to an intraday low of $77.6 on Tuesday before stabilizing at $80 at press time.

Solana price fell following a $285 million exploit that occurred yesterday on Drift Protocol, a trading venue native to the Solana blockchain. Following the breach, the total value locked on Solana has shrunk by nearly $1 billion since the incident, per DeFiLlama.

Advertisement

The token also fell amid tensions in the Middle East that continued to drive investor sentiment away from risk assets. Notably, Iranian officials noted they would be targeting retaliatory measures against 18 U.S. military assets, including strategic bases in the region. On the other hand, the U.S. struck several key targets, including a critical supply bridge and logistics hubs.

The resulting conflict has fueled expectations that the Strait of Hormuz would continue to remain closed as the U.S. focuses its attention on bringing the regional threat to a standstill over the coming 2 to 3 weeks. Oil prices rose back above $110 amid fears of runaway inflation and supply chain disruptions.

On the daily chart, Solana price is close to breaking out of a multi-month falling wedge pattern formed of two descending and converging trendlines. A breakout from a falling wedge pattern often signals a powerful bullish reversal as selling pressure finally exhausts itself.

Advertisement

For Solana, a confirmed breakout from such a pattern could fling the price all the way to $111, which aligns with the 23.6% Fibonacci retracement level. Reaching this target would represent a significant recovery from recent lows and could reignite broader investor interest in the ecosystem.

However, current technical data suggests some caution on the way. Notably, the Chaikin Money Flow index showed a negative reading of -0.05. A negative reading on the indicator suggests that there is still a lack of strong buying pressure and that some capital is still flowing out of the asset.

At the same time, the Aroon Down stood at 92.86% while the Aroon Up was at 35.71%, which means the bears still hold the upper hand in terms of trend strength. This disparity indicates that while a breakout is possible, the downward momentum has not yet been fully broken by the bulls.

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

Advertisement

Source link

Coinbase and the Linux Foundation launched the X402 Foundation on April 2, 2026, a non-profit tasked with stewarding an open-source protocol that finally puts the 30-year-dormant HTTP 402 status code to work as the web’s native payment layer.

The founding coalition includes Stripe, Cloudflare, AWS, Google, Microsoft, Visa, and Mastercard, which means this is not a crypto-native experiment – it is a bid to rewire how the entire internet handles money.

Discover: The best crypto to diversify your portfolio during market turbulence

What X402 Actually Does – and Why HTTP 402 Sat Unused for Three Decades

HTTP 402 was reserved in 1995 as a placeholder for future payment systems that never arrived. The reason it never arrived is structural: the internet had no native settlement layer.

Every payment required routing through a third-party processor, a bank, or a proprietary API – none of which a web server could negotiate with autonomously at the protocol level.

X402 changes the handshake. When a server requires payment, it issues a standardized X402 response containing the price, accepted tokens, and payment terms. The client – whether a browser, an application, or an AI agent – reads those terms, constructs a signed payment payload in the X-PAYMENT HTTP header, and submits it. A payment facilitator (currently the Coinbase X402 Facilitator) verifies the signed payload before the server returns an X-PAYMENT-RESPONSE confirmation. The entire flow is atomic and requires no account creation, no API key provisioning, no manual authentication step.

The protocol supports all ERC-20 tokens – not just stablecoins, and is designed to be blockchain-agnostic, though its early infrastructure runs on Base, Coinbase’s Layer-2 network. Cloudflare has already shipped a withX402Client wrapper for its Agents SDK that lets developers toggle between human-confirmation and fully autonomous execution modes. The technical specification and codebase are publicly available at x402.org under LF Projects, LLC.

Linux Foundation CEO Jim Zemlin described the foundation as the “neutral home” for the protocol – language that signals deliberate insulation from the kind of corporate capture that killed earlier micropayments standards.

That governance decision is what separates X402 from Coinbase’s previous developer initiatives: this is not a product. It is an attempt to establish a standard.

Explore: The best pre-launch token sales with asymmetric upside potential

Who Benefits – and What X402 Needs to Actually Win

The immediate winners are developers building on Base and anyone deploying autonomous AI agents that need to purchase data, call premium APIs, or access metered content at scale.

Traditional payment infrastructure, built around two-factor authentication and fixed per-transaction fees – is structurally incompatible with high-frequency, low-value machine-to-machine payments. X402 is purpose-built for exactly that environment.

Coinbase benefits disproportionately in the near term. Base is the reference network, the Coinbase X402 Facilitator is the default payment verifier, and USDC, Circle’s stablecoin with deep Coinbase ties, is the primary settlement asset.

The open governance structure prevents lock-in on paper, but network effects will concentrate volume on whatever infrastructure ships first. That is currently Base. The broader regulatory groundwork Coinbase has laid through FIT21 advocacy compounds this structural advantage – a company that shapes both the legal framework and the technical standard occupies a uniquely durable position.

The adoption risk is browser integration. X402 can function today at the application and API layer without any browser changes, but mainstream consumer adoption requires Chrome, Safari, and Firefox to natively parse X402 responses.

Google and Microsoft are founding members of the X402 Foundation, which is the strongest signal available that browser-level support is on the roadmap, but roadmaps are not shipping products. The protocol wins if the SDKs land before a competing standard gains traction. It stalls if the major browser vendors treat this as a low-priority governance commitment rather than an active engineering project.

The verdict: X402 is the most credible attempt to build a native payment layer into the web since the original HTTP spec reserved that status code. Execution is the only variable left.

The post Coinbase & Linux Foundation Debut X402: HTTP-Native Crypto Payment Standard appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link

Arkham Intelligence published a comprehensive breakdown of the largest Ethereum (ETH) holders in 2026, revealing that staking contracts, exchanges, and financial institutions now control most of the supply.

The report draws on on-chain data from the Arkham Intel Platform and covers entities ranging from centralized exchanges to individual pre-sale investors.

Staking and Exchanges Control Most ETH

The ETH2 Beacon Deposit Contract sits at the top of the list with over 82 million ETH, valued at approximately $169 billion.

That figure represents roughly 66% of the total ETH supply, locked by validators securing the network.

Among exchanges, Coinbase leads with 4.2 million ETH ($8.6 billion), followed by Binance with 3.6 million ETH ($7.3 billion).

South Korean exchange Upbit ranks third at 1.7 million ETH. These holdings are custodial, held on behalf of users for trading, withdrawals, and staking services.

On the financial institution side, BlackRock holds over 3 million ETH ($6 billion) through its iShares Ethereum Trust ETF.

Treasury company Bitmine has declared 4.7 million ETH in total, though only 914,000 ETH has been verified on-chain by Arkham.

Bitmine aims to accumulate 5% of the total ETH supply.

Individual Holders and Lost Fortunes

Among individuals, Estonian pre-sale investor Rain Lohmus technically owns the most ETH at 250,000 tokens worth $530 million.

However, he lost access to his private keys after purchasing them for $75,000 during the 2014 presale.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin is the largest individual holder with accessible funds, holding 224,000 ETH ($480 million).

Ethereum Foundation Shifts From Selling to Staking

Separately, Arkham reported the Ethereum Foundation staked an additional $46.64 million in ETH, its largest single-day deployment.

That brings the Foundation’s total staked amount to approximately $96.59 million.

The move is part of a broader plan announced in February to stake 70,000 ETH from its treasury. Staking rewards will fund research, ecosystem grants, and protocol development.

The Foundation previously relied on periodic ETH sales, which drew community criticism for creating sell pressure.

With institutions, exchanges, and now the Ethereum Foundation itself locking supply into validators, the distribution of ETH increasingly favors long-term holders over liquid markets.

The post Who Really Owns All the Ethereum? On-Chain Study Reveals Surprising Names appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

World Liberty Financial (WLFI) crypto is structured to funnel 75% of net revenues to DT Marks DEFI LLC, a Delaware entity tied directly to Donald Trump and his family, while insulating them from any legal or financial liability for the project’s operations.

House Democrats published a staff report on November 24 describing WLFI as the centerpiece of what it calls presidential self-dealing on an unprecedented scale, with Representative Jamie Raskin stating that Trump has “turned the Oval Office into the world’s most corrupt crypto startup operation.”

The conflict-of-interest mechanism is direct and unambiguous. Donald Trump simultaneously controls crypto policy from the White House and holds a dominant financial stake in a DeFi project whose commercial value depends on the regulatory environment he shapes. That is not a perception problem – it is a structural one.

Discover: Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio

What WLFI’s Revenue Structure Actually Means – and Why Ethics Experts Are Alarmed

The mechanics of World Liberty Financial’s compensation structure are what drive the ethics concerns, not the politics surrounding them.

Under the project’s Gold Paper, DT Marks DEFI LLC – the Trump family’s designated revenue vehicle – receives 75% of net revenues generated by the DeFi platform, while the legal wrapper around that entity specifically protects the Trump family from operational liability. The distinction matters because it creates a one-way financial relationship: profit flows to the Trumps, risk does not.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) and other watchdog organizations have flagged this arrangement as without precedent in the relationship between a sitting president and an active commercial enterprise.

The Trump family has extracted at least $890 million in revenues from WLFI while holding tokens currently valued at approximately $3.8 billion – with no documented personal capital investment at inception. That is not a founder’s equity stake built through risk-taking. It is a revenue claim backed by name recognition and political positioning.

The foreign investment dimension compounds the structural problem significantly. Justin Sun, charged by the SEC for fraud and market manipulation, invested $75 million in WLFI tokens. His multibillion-dollar SEC case was subsequently dropped.

The UAE-based Aqua 1 Foundation, linked by analysts to entities with ties to China’s state-owned CNPC, wired $100 million in stablecoins to the project in summer 2025 – with Reuters reporting that the origins and expectations attached to that transfer remain opaque. A 60 Minutes report on November 17, 2025 further connected a $2 billion Binance-MGX deal settled in WLFI’s USD1 stablecoin to Binance founder Changpeng Zhao’s Trump pardon.

Crypto insiders have described WLFI as a mechanism for global influence-buying dressed as a DeFi project. Some institutional players, approached with what sources describe as “mutual investment” pitches, declined after concluding the arrangement crossed ethical lines.

The absence of institutional whales in WLFI’s order books – with retail participants dominating token purchases – suggests sophisticated capital has reached a similar conclusion.

Discover: The Best Crypto to Buy Right Now

Can a President Profit From Crypto Policy? The Conflict WLFI Can’t Shake

Trump’s administration has moved aggressively on crypto-friendly policy reform since January 2025, and each legislative win that benefits the broader industry also directly benefits World Liberty Financial.

The GENIUS Act, which Trump endorsed to establish a stablecoin regulatory framework, creates legitimacy infrastructure for USD1 – WLFI’s own stablecoin – at exactly the moment the project needed it.

The FIT21 regulatory framework, which restructures SEC and CFTC jurisdiction over crypto assets, would materially ease the compliance burden on DeFi platforms like WLFI.

The SEC’s dramatically softened enforcement posture under the Trump administration is not a coincidence critics are willing to overlook, particularly given the Sun case. A president whose family holds $3.8 billion in tokens tied to a DeFi project has quantifiable financial incentives to reduce regulatory friction on DeFi.

The White House maintains that Trump’s assets are held in a trust managed by his children and that no conflicts exist. That framing is deliberate: a trust managed by the president’s children, in a project co-founded by those same children, is not a meaningful separation under any conventional ethics standard.

The evolving legal frameworks for DeFi entities make WLFI’s structural opacity harder to dismiss as a technicality. WLFI’s January 2026 OCC application for a national trust bank charter – listing Zach Witkoff as proposed president – would, if approved, extend the project’s reach into federally regulated banking infrastructure. The political and financial interests at stake are not abstract. They are denominated in billions and written into legislation.

Discover: The Best Crypto Presales Live Right Now

The post World Liberty Financial Under Ethics Fire: Can WLFI Crypto Survive Corruption Allegations? appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link