Crypto World
Why the price keeps falling
Spot Solana ETFs crossed $1.06 billion in total assets under management as of mid-May 2026. Goldman Sachs is a confirmed holder.
Summary
- Solana ETFs crossed $1.06B in AUM, but SOL remains 77% below its January 2025 all-time high.
- ETF inflows are being absorbed by venture unlock supply, limiting the price impact of institutional buying.
- BSOL’s staking structure gives institutions yield while they wait for Solana’s major catalysts to mature.
- Western Union’s USDPT launch may be Solana’s biggest institutional signal if payment volume scales.
Fidelity runs its own validator. Morgan Stanley’s Solana Trust filing adds a third institutional channel. Forward Industries (NASDAQ: FORD) holds 6.9 million SOL on its corporate treasury. The catalyst stack is the cleanest of any top-five major: $1B+ in institutional AUM, Firedancer hitting 1M TPS in load tests, the Alpenglow upgrade coming in Q2 2026, 700+ days of continuous network uptime. And yet SOL is down 77 percent from its January 2025 high of $295. Daily active users have dropped from 6.4 million to 2.8 million.
Bank of America trimmed its Solana ETF exposure on May 23, 2026. The institutional money is flowing in. The price keeps falling. This is the paradox most coverage refuses to engage with honestly.
The numbers that should be moving the price
The institutional story for Solana in 2026 is, on paper, as strong as any altcoin has ever produced.
Spot Solana ETFs from Bitwise (BSOL), Fidelity (FSOL), and Grayscale launched in late 2025 and have accumulated $1.06 billion in combined assets under management by mid-May 2026. The Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) leads with approximately $861 million, representing 81 percent of the total inflows. Fidelity’s FSOL has captured roughly $160 million. The remaining capital is spread across smaller products including Grayscale’s converted Solana Trust.
The pace of accumulation has been notable. BSOL crossed $500 million in AUM within its first 18 days of trading, which is faster than most prior altcoin ETF launches. The May 12, 2026 weekly inflow print of $39.23 million was the strongest since February, suggesting the institutional appetite is not just real but still building. Goldman Sachs has been confirmed as a holder. Fidelity has gone beyond passive exposure to actively run a Solana validator node, signaling deeper institutional commitment than most ETF issuers show.
Beyond ETFs, the corporate treasury adoption story is also significant. Forward Industries (NASDAQ: FORD) has transitioned into a Solana-focused treasury company, holding over 6.9 million SOL valued at roughly $1 billion. The firm launched a $1 billion share repurchase program and runs its own Solana validator. This is the kind of corporate treasury adoption that, with Bitcoin specifically, produced substantial price appreciation through the Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) accumulation playbook.
The infrastructure story matches. Firedancer, the independent Solana validator client built by Jump Crypto, has recorded over 1 million transactions per second in public load tests. This is the first time any Layer-1 blockchain has matched centralized exchange throughput in a verified environment. The Alpenglow consensus upgrade arriving in Q2 2026 will cut block finality from 12 seconds to roughly 150 milliseconds. Solana now has over 700 days of continuous network uptime, addressing the historical outage concerns that previously hurt institutional confidence.
The regulatory environment is also favorable. Kevin Warsh was sworn in as Federal Reserve Chair on May 23, 2026. Warsh personally holds SOL, which while not a direct policy signal is at least an indication the highest levels of US monetary leadership are personally familiar with the asset. The broader regulatory shift under the current administration has made altcoin ETFs commercially viable in a way they were not under the Gensler-era SEC.
Standard Chartered’s year-end SOL price target is $250. Doo Prime’s upside case is $336. Other models from Changelly project $140 base case. The institutional research consensus is broadly bullish on SOL based on the catalyst stack.
And yet SOL trades at $82 to $96, depending on the day. The token is 77 percent below its January 2025 all-time high of $295. The price has been range-bound for six months between $118 and $165 on the weekly chart, then broke down to the lower trading range in 2026. The institutional buying has not translated into the kind of price appreciation the catalyst stack would predict.
This is the paradox. The fundamentals say one thing. The price says another. Most coverage either celebrates the fundamentals while ignoring the price, or dismisses the fundamentals because the price is weak. The honest analysis requires engaging with both.
The supply absorption problem
The single most important factor most coverage fails to engage with properly is the venture token unlock schedule running through Q3 2026.
When Solana launched in 2020, a substantial portion of the initial token supply was allocated to venture investors, the Solana Labs team, and the Solana Foundation. These allocations vest gradually over multi-year schedules. The vesting cliffs and gradual unlocks create persistent supply pressure as locked tokens enter circulation and venture investors take profits on their early-stage positions.
The unlocks have been ongoing for years, but the pace through 2026 is particularly heavy. Multiple major unlock events scheduled through Q3 2026 will release substantial new SOL supply to the market. A representative example: deBridge’s $8.88 million SOL release was one of several venture unlock events in April 2026. Larger unlocks from the Solana Labs allocation, the Solana Foundation reserve, and various early venture investors continue throughout the year.
The math of supply absorption matters. If the ETF inflows are running at, say, $40 million per week (the May 12 weekly print), and the venture unlocks are releasing $50 to $100 million per week in new supply that vested holders are selling, the ETF buying is being absorbed by the unlock supply rather than producing net upward price pressure. The institutional money is real. It just is not enough yet to overwhelm the structural sell pressure.
This is why Bitcoin’s path is the relevant comparison. Bitcoin’s spot ETFs accumulated approximately $4.6 billion in AUM before BTC broke its previous all-time high. Solana’s ETFs at $1.06 billion are roughly 23 percent of the threshold that produced the Bitcoin breakthrough. The absolute amount of institutional money flowing into SOL is not yet sufficient to absorb the venture unlock pressure AND drive net price appreciation. Both are required for the price to move materially upward, and only one is happening right now.
The timing matters for when this could change. The venture unlock schedule winds down through Q3 2026. As the unlock supply tapers, the same ETF inflow rate would translate into more net buying pressure. If ETF inflows scale up at the same time the unlock supply winds down, the dynamic could flip favorably and produce the price appreciation the catalyst stack would predict. This is the path Standard Chartered’s $250 year-end target implicitly assumes.
The alternative outcome is ETF inflows stall or reverse before the unlock supply clears. If institutional appetite slows (as the May 23 Bank of America move suggests is possible), the supply pressure keeps going without the offsetting institutional demand. In that scenario, SOL could stay range-bound or break lower toward the $72 to $80 support levels that several technical analysts have identified.
Either outcome is plausible. The variable that determines which way the market goes is the interaction between ETF inflows and unlock supply through Q3 2026. This is the analytical work most coverage skips.
What BSOL’s structure actually does
One specific feature of the BSOL ETF deserves more attention than it gets in most coverage. BSOL is not a pure spot Solana ETF. It is a staking ETF, which means the assets held by the fund are staked on the Solana network and earn staking rewards on behalf of fund holders.
The embedded staking yield is approximately 7 percent annually. This is a meaningful number for institutional holders. A pension fund holding $50 million in BSOL is earning $3.5 million per year in staking yield while waiting for the price to move. The carry is real cash flow that exists independent of whether the price appreciates or declines.
This changes the institutional calculus around BSOL holdings in important ways. Pure spot ETFs like the Bitcoin products require price appreciation to generate returns for holders. BSOL produces returns from both potential price appreciation AND ongoing staking yield. This makes the position more defensible during periods of price weakness, because the holder is still earning carry.
The implication is BSOL holders are more likely to keep positions through unlock-driven price weakness than pure spot ETF holders would. They are not waiting for an immediate price catalyst. They are earning yield while waiting. This patience matters for the supply absorption dynamic. If BSOL holders do not panic-sell when price weakness persists, the institutional capital stays in the system and gradually compounds through the staking rewards.
The 7 percent staking yield also reframes the discussion about Solana’s “inflation” problem that bearish commentary often raises. Solana’s current annual issuance rate is approximately 4.7 percent, declining gradually toward a terminal rate around 1.5 percent. For staked SOL holders, the staking rewards more than offset the inflation rate. For non-staked holders, the inflation dilutes their position. BSOL automatically stakes its holdings, so the inflation concern does not apply to ETF holders in the same way it applies to holders who keep SOL on exchanges or in self-custody wallets without staking.
This is the technical detail most retail-focused coverage misses entirely. BSOL is structurally different from spot Bitcoin ETFs in ways that make institutional patience more rational. The fund is generating real yield while waiting for the price recovery the catalyst stack would predict.
The Western Union signal nobody is properly weighting
The most consequential institutional development for Solana in 2026 may not be the ETFs at all. It may be Western Union’s USDPT launch on the Solana network on May 4, 2026.
Western Union is 175 years old. The company processes more than 100 million customer transactions across over 200 countries and territories through a network of 360,000+ agent locations. The remittance market it serves is approximately $700 billion globally. The company chose Solana as the blockchain infrastructure for its USDPT stablecoin and broader Digital Asset Network strategy.
The choice of Solana over Ethereum, Tron (the dominant USDT network for cross-border transfers), or other Layer-1 alternatives is significant. Western Union is not a crypto-native company looking to ride a speculative wave. The company is a regulated financial institution selecting blockchain infrastructure for production payment rails serving 100 million users. The choice reflects a technical and operational assessment about which network can actually support that scale of activity.
USDPT is issued by Anchorage Digital Bank, the only federally chartered crypto bank in the United States that has reached fully operational status (most others, including Ripple, are still in the conditional approval phase). The combination of Anchorage as issuer and Solana as the underlying blockchain creates an institutional-grade stablecoin stack that competes directly with USDC, USDT, and RLUSD.
The product rollout extends beyond the initial settlement use case. Stable by Western Union, a consumer-facing spending product, is launching in over 40 countries in 2026. The USD Stable Card targets high-inflation regions where people need access to dollar-denominated payment infrastructure. The Digital Asset Network connects external crypto wallets to Western Union’s 360,000-agent cash-out network, enabling crypto-to-cash transactions through existing physical infrastructure.
What this means for SOL specifically is Solana is being positioned as the underlying blockchain infrastructure for one of the largest payment networks in the world. The transaction volume that flows through USDPT will generate SOL fees, support validator economics, and create persistent demand for SOL as a gas token. This is fundamentally different from the speculative trading volume that has driven much of Solana’s historical fee generation.
The Western Union story has not been adequately reflected in SOL’s price. The launch was treated as a routine product announcement by most coverage. The structural implication is one of the largest financial institutions in the world has bet on Solana as its blockchain infrastructure for a global payments product. If USDPT achieves even modest adoption (say, 10 percent of Western Union’s existing transaction volume migrating to the stablecoin rail), the impact on SOL fee generation and demand would be material.
The market has not priced this in. The opportunity, if you believe the Western Union deployment will succeed, is in the gap between the structural significance and the current price.
The memecoin question that nobody wants to address
A complete analysis of Solana’s situation has to engage with the question that sophisticated observers are asking quietly but that most public coverage avoids.
Solana’s transaction volume is heavily dominated by memecoin trading and speculative activity. The network’s daily active user count has dropped from 6.4 million at peak to approximately 2.8 million currently. dApp revenue has declined materially as the 2024-2025 memecoin trading cycle has cooled. The DAU drop is real, the dApp revenue compression is real, and the question is whether Solana’s underlying transaction economics are sustainable if the speculative activity keeps unwinding.
The honest answer is mixed. On one hand, memecoin-driven transaction volume is genuinely speculative and could decline substantially if the broader memecoin cycle reverses. If that happens, Solana’s fee generation, validator economics, and network revenue would all face pressure. The bears who point to “Solana is a casino” framing are not entirely wrong. A meaningful portion of historical Solana activity has been speculative.
On the other hand, the institutional adoption pipeline (Western Union, Anchorage, Forward Industries, the ETF complex, AAVE’s recent deployment) represents a structurally different category of activity. If this pipeline scales, it replaces speculative transaction volume with utility-driven transaction volume, which would be more sustainable and less correlated with crypto market sentiment cycles.
The transition is the variable. If the institutional pipeline scales faster than the speculative volume declines, Solana’s network economics improve over time and the price eventually reflects the structural improvement. If the speculative volume declines faster than the institutional pipeline scales, Solana faces a period of weak network economics and continued price pressure.
Neither outcome is guaranteed. The realistic case is probably somewhere between: gradual institutional adoption, gradual speculative volume decline, and a period of network economic transition that takes 18 to 36 months to fully play out. The current price weakness may reflect the market pricing in this transition uncertainty rather than rejecting Solana’s long-term positioning.
This is the analysis crypto media generally avoids because it requires holding two contradictory truths simultaneously. Solana’s institutional adoption is genuinely speeding up. Solana’s speculative transaction volume is genuinely declining. Both are happening at the same time. The net effect depends on how the transition plays out, and reasonable analysts can disagree about the trajectory.
What the recent ETF flow patterns actually show
Looking at the ETF flow data more carefully reveals patterns that complicate the simple “institutional buying” narrative.
The cumulative inflow story is unambiguously positive. $1.06 billion in AUM across spot Solana ETFs by mid-May 2026. BSOL leading with $861 million. Consistent net inflows during most weeks. The directional trajectory is clearly upward.
But the week-to-week pattern shows the institutional flow is not uniform. The April 1, 2026 trading session recorded net inflows of zero across spot Solana ETFs. The April flows totaled approximately $222.49 million, which is meaningful but not the kind of sustained momentum that would absorb venture unlock supply. The May 12 weekly print of $39.23 million was the strongest since February, but it represented a recovery rather than a continuation of an established trend.
The Bank of America move on May 23, 2026 is the most concerning recent signal. The bank increased its Bitcoin ETF stake while cutting Solana-linked holdings, signaling measured institutional risk appetite. This is the kind of selective rebalancing that suggests some institutions are concluding that the SOL ETF pipeline is not delivering returns at the pace they expected.
The honest read on the flow patterns is the institutional commitment is real but not yet sustained at a level that overwhelms the structural sell pressure. The capital is flowing in. It is also flowing out, periodically, when institutions reassess their allocations. The net inflow is positive but the volatility is meaningful.
For the price to move materially upward, the flow pattern needs to shift from the current “inflows with occasional outflows” to “sustained inflows with rising momentum.” That shift requires either a clear positive catalyst (Firedancer mainnet, Alpenglow launch, Western Union scaling) or the broader crypto market entering a risk-on environment that pulls altcoin ETFs along with it.
Neither is guaranteed in the near term. The base case is probably more weeks of $20-40 million in net inflows, partially offset by unlock supply, with the price oscillating in the $80-100 range until either the unlock schedule clears or a new catalyst emerges.
What could change the dynamic
Three specific catalysts could shift Solana’s price trajectory upward in the next 6-12 months, and each is worth understanding.
The first is Firedancer mainnet deployment reaching meaningful adoption. The validator client currently runs on 207 validators in production. If Firedancer adoption scales to 30 to 50 percent of total stake, the network’s throughput and reliability improve substantially, which strengthens the institutional case for Solana as settlement infrastructure. The full mainnet rollout is scheduled for H2 2026. If it ships on schedule and adoption follows, this is one of the strongest potential price catalysts.
The second is the Alpenglow consensus upgrade. Cutting block finality from 12 seconds to 150 milliseconds is genuinely transformative for institutional settlement applications. The 150ms finality matches what traditional finance infrastructure delivers, which removes one of the main technical objections institutional buyers have raised about crypto settlement. Anatoly Yakovenko called Alpenglow “the missing piece for institutional settlement.” The Q2 2026 launch window is the next major catalyst on the calendar.
The third is Western Union scaling USDPT volume. If Stable by Western Union launches in the 40+ countries on schedule and captures even modest adoption, the resulting transaction volume on Solana would be material. The 100 million existing Western Union users represent a customer base larger than most crypto platforms have. Even 5 to 10 percent adoption of USDPT for existing Western Union flows would produce SOL transaction volume that exceeds most current DeFi protocols on the network.
If all three catalysts deliver in the second half of 2026 and the venture unlock schedule winds down on the expected timeline, the conditions exist for Standard Chartered’s $250 year-end target to be achievable. If one or more catalysts disappoint or delay, the price could stay in the current consolidation range or move lower.
The risk-adjusted case is probably one or two of the catalysts deliver while the third disappoints or delays. In that scenario, SOL likely moves into the $120-180 range, which would represent meaningful appreciation from current levels without reaching the bullish case targets.
What this means for SOL holders right now
For readers holding SOL or considering positions, the practical implications of the paradox analysis are straightforward.
The institutional adoption story is real and keeps developing. ETFs are accumulating. Western Union is deploying. Firedancer is shipping. The structural improvements in Solana’s positioning are not narrative fluff. They are operational realities that will, over time, support SOL’s price if the catalysts deliver and the unlock supply clears.
The price weakness is also real and reflects specific structural factors (venture unlock supply absorption) not yet fully resolved. The current $82-96 trading range is not random. It reflects the balance between institutional demand and unlock-driven selling pressure. Until that balance shifts, the price has limited room to move materially upward.
For long-term holders, this is consistent with the kind of accumulation phase that has preceded major crypto bull runs historically. Bitcoin spent extended periods range-bound while ETF inflows accumulated before breaking out. Ethereum had similar patterns. Solana’s current consolidation could follow a similar trajectory if the catalysts deliver and ETF flows keep coming.
For traders, the technical levels matter. The $72-80 support has held through multiple retests, and a break below that level would suggest the supply pressure is overwhelming the institutional demand. The $92-96 resistance has been the immediate test for upside momentum. A clean break above $96 with rising ETF flows would suggest the dynamic is shifting in SOL’s favor. A break below $72 would suggest the bears are right that institutional demand cannot absorb the supply pressure.
For institutional investors specifically, BSOL’s 7 percent staking yield provides ongoing carry while waiting for the price recovery. This is structurally more attractive than holding pure spot Bitcoin or Ethereum positions during similar consolidation periods, because the yield generates returns independent of price action.
The bottom line
Solana’s situation in mid-2026 is genuinely complicated and most coverage simplifies it in ways that are not useful.
The bullish narrative is real. $1.06 billion in spot ETF AUM. Goldman Sachs as a confirmed BSOL holder. Fidelity running its own validator. Forward Industries holding $1 billion in SOL on corporate treasury. Western Union launching USDPT on Solana with 100 million users. Firedancer hitting 1M TPS. Alpenglow arriving in Q2 2026 with 150ms finality. 700+ days of continuous uptime. The catalyst stack is the cleanest of any top-five major cryptocurrency.
The bearish reality is also real. 77 percent drawdown from the January 2025 all-time high. Range-bound between $80 and $100 for months. Daily active users down from 6.4 million to 2.8 million. dApp revenue declining as speculative volume cools. Venture token unlock supply absorbing institutional demand. Bank of America trimming SOL ETF exposure on May 23, 2026.
Both can be true at the same time. The structural improvements are happening. The supply absorption problem is also happening. The net effect depends on which dynamic wins over the next 12 to 18 months.
The honest read is SOL is in an accumulation phase where institutional capital is gradually flowing in while structural supply pressure keeps the price range-bound. If the catalysts deliver (Firedancer, Alpenglow, Western Union scaling), the supply pressure clears (Q3 2026 unlock schedule), and ETF inflows keep scaling, the conditions exist for the price to move materially upward toward the $140-250 range that institutional research targets.
If any of those conditions fail to materialize, SOL could stay range-bound for an extended period or move lower toward the $72 support level. The bearish case is not unreasonable. The bullish case is not unreasonable. The honest case is uncertainty, with the resolution likely coming over the next 12 months.
For SOL holders, the paradox analysis suggests patience rather than panic. The fundamentals are improving. The price is reflecting structural sell pressure that has a defined timeline. The institutional adoption pipeline is real. The question is whether the timeline of institutional buying meets or exceeds the timeline of unlock-driven selling.
For SOL skeptics, the paradox analysis suggests caution rather than dismissal. The institutional adoption is not fake. The catalyst stack is real. The price weakness reflects specific structural factors rather than fundamental rejection of the network. Dismissing Solana because the price is weak ignores the institutional pipeline genuinely developing.
The honest framing is Solana is in a transition period where the old speculative model (memecoin-driven transaction volume) is partially giving way to a new institutional model (ETFs, Western Union, corporate treasuries, regulated stablecoins). The transition is not yet complete. The price reflects the uncertainty about how it resolves.
That is the paradox. $1 billion in ETF AUM. 77 percent drawdown. Real institutional adoption. Real structural sell pressure. Two genuine truths producing one frustrating price chart.
The resolution will come. The question is when, and which side wins when it does.
This article is for informational purposes and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency markets evolve quickly; the figures and milestones described reflect reporting available as of late May 2026. Always do your own research.
Crypto World
Ripple-linked token drops 5% even as bullish signals pile up
XRP keeps finding bullish narratives underneath the surface, but price keeps ignoring them. Exchange balances are shrinking, ETF money is still coming into crypto, and Binance inflows have slowed sharply.
None of that stopped XRP from losing another support level this week, which is usually a sign that technical selling is overwhelming longer-term accumulation.
News Background
• More than 25 million XRP left exchanges in recent days, reducing the amount of readily available supply for sale.
• Binance inflows fell to their lowest levels of 2026, a trend that would normally be supportive for prices over longer timeframes.
• Crypto investment products continued attracting fresh capital, with roughly $1.42 billion flowing into spot ETFs during the period.
Price Action Summary
• XRP dropped from $1.2712 to $1.2026 during the 24-hour session, losing more than 5%.
• The decisive move came during the June 2 14:00 UTC session, when volume surged to 205.7 million and pushed price through support at $1.25.
• XRP later fell as low as $1.1858 before recovering modestly and stabilizing near the $1.20 area into the close.
Technical Analysis
• The key story is that XRP is no longer reacting positively to bullish supply data. That’s often what happens late in downtrends, when traders focus more on price action than fundamentals.
• The breakdown below $1.25 shifted that level from support into resistance, meaning any recovery attempt now faces overhead selling pressure.
• The bounce from below $1.19 showed signs of short-term seller exhaustion, but follow-through buying remained weak.
• XRP remains trapped inside a broader descending structure, with lower highs continuing to define the trend.
What traders should watch
• $1.20-$1.21 is now the most important support zone on the chart. Losing it would expose the $1.13-$1.15 area.
• $1.25 becomes the first recovery level bulls need to reclaim before sentiment can improve.
• The market is now caught between weakening supply on exchanges and deteriorating price action. Until one of those signals wins out, traders are likely to remain cautious.
Crypto World
Blockchain Association-Backed Clarity Act Gains Support From 160 Former Security Officials
TLDR:
- 160 former security and intelligence officials publicly backed the Clarity Act before Senate review.
- The proposal expands AML, sanctions, and compliance duties across key crypto market participants.
- Treasury would lead a new information-sharing program targeting digital asset crime risks.
- Supporters say the bill increases enforcement tools without limiting existing criminal authorities.
A group of 160 former national security, intelligence, and law enforcement officials has urged the U.S. Senate to advance the Clarity Act. The push adds national security backing to one of the most closely watched crypto market structure bills in Washington.
Supporters argue the proposal would strengthen oversight while expanding enforcement tools across digital asset markets. The letter targets Senate leadership as lawmakers continue debating the future of crypto regulation in the United States.
Clarity Act Support Centers on Crypto Oversight and Enforcement
The officials outlined their position in a letter released through the Blockchain Association on June 3. They addressed the document to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer.
According to the letter, digital asset activity continues to expand globally and increasingly crosses multiple jurisdictions. The signatories argued that the United States should keep that activity under domestic regulatory oversight rather than allowing it to move offshore.
They said a federal framework could improve visibility for investigators and strengthen enforcement efforts against financial crime. The group also stated that regulatory clarity would help law enforcement agencies track illicit activity more effectively.
The letter highlighted several provisions included in the Clarity Act. Among them are expanded Bank Secrecy Act and sanctions compliance obligations for digital commodity brokers, dealers, and exchanges.
The proposal would also create a Treasury-led information-sharing pilot program involving agencies such as the Department of Justice, FBI, and DEA. The initiative would focus on illicit finance threats and emerging risks tied to digital assets.
Clarity Act Provisions Expand AML and National Security Measures
The signatories pointed to additional measures designed to strengthen anti-money laundering controls. These include broader suspicious activity reporting requirements and customer due diligence obligations for certain non-decentralized finance trading protocols.
The legislation would establish a permanent interagency working group involving Treasury, DOJ, DHS, FBI, DEA, IRS, and the Secret Service. That group would develop future anti-money laundering and counter-illicit finance proposals for digital assets.
Other provisions address digital asset kiosks through transaction monitoring requirements, reporting obligations, transaction limits, and law enforcement contact procedures. The bill also seeks to clarify sanctions compliance expectations for distributed ledger messaging systems through Treasury guidance.
According to the letter, the Clarity Act would extend Section 311 special measures authorities to digital asset activity and allow temporary holds on suspicious transactions. It would also require law enforcement notification in specific circumstances and reinforce compliance with lawful court orders.
The officials stressed that the legislation does not reduce enforcement authority. They argued that existing powers covering fraud, money laundering, sanctions evasion, terrorism financing, trafficking, and other crimes would remain unchanged under the proposed framework.
Blockchain Association shared the letter publicly, describing the Clarity Act as a framework that could strengthen coordination, compliance, and accountability across crypto markets while keeping oversight within U.S. jurisdiction.
Crypto World
Ripple Opens D.C. Office to Drive U.S. Crypto Policy Agenda Today
Ripple Expands Its Washington Policy Presence
Ripple has expanded its presence in Washington, D.C., as U.S. crypto policy enters a decisive stage. The company opened a larger downtown office to support deeper engagement with policymakers and regulators. The move also strengthens Ripple’s push for clear rules around digital assets, payments, and blockchain finance.
Ripple said the new office will serve as a central base for its U.S. policy work. The company plans to use the space for meetings with lawmakers, regulators, and industry groups. Therefore, the expansion gives Ripple a stronger position inside the country’s main policy center.
The office opening comes as Congress reviews major crypto legislation. Lawmakers continue to debate market structure rules, stablecoin oversight, and payment modernization. These debates could define how digital asset firms operate across the United States.
Ripple has spent years calling for clear and workable crypto regulation. The company argues that policy should protect consumers and support responsible innovation. However, it also says unclear rules can push blockchain activity outside the United States.
The company’s legal history gives the move added weight. Ripple fought a long case with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission over XRP sales. As a result, the firm became one of the most visible crypto companies in U.S. regulatory debates.
Ripple’s chief legal officer, Stuart Alderoty, has often supported direct engagement with public officials. The company now wants to build policy with regulators rather than work around them. That approach fits its wider effort to shape rules through formal channels.
The Washington office also supports Ripple’s broader business strategy. The company develops blockchain products for cross-border payments, custody, and liquidity services. Therefore, U.S. regulatory clarity could affect both its domestic plans and global partnerships.
XRP and RLUSD Remain Central to Ripple’s Strategy
XRP remains closely linked to Ripple’s payment and liquidity operations. The token supports parts of Ripple’s broader network for faster value transfer. However, Ripple continues to separate its enterprise services from wider market speculation around XRP.
The company also promotes RLUSD as part of its stablecoin push. RLUSD gives Ripple another product for settlement, payments, and digital dollar transactions. Moreover, stablecoins have become a major focus in U.S. policy discussions.
Ripple’s mention of RLUSD highlights its move beyond XRP-related services. The company now competes in a market where stablecoins connect crypto platforms with traditional finance. This makes regulation more important for its next phase of growth.
The launch of RLUSD in Turkey adds a global angle to the Washington announcement. Ripple continues to expand in overseas markets while increasing its U.S. policy presence. That balance shows how the firm wants both regulatory access and international reach.
Stablecoin rules remain one of the most active areas in Washington. Lawmakers want stronger standards for reserves, disclosures, issuers, and redemption rights. Ripple’s expanded office could help it participate directly in those discussions.
The company also sees blockchain as part of payments modernization. Faster settlement, lower transfer costs, and stronger infrastructure remain key industry goals. As a result, Ripple wants policymakers to treat blockchain as financial infrastructure, not only speculation.
Crypto Regulation Takes Center Stage in Washington
The broader crypto sector faces a major policy year in the United States. Congress has advanced discussions around the CLARITY Act and other digital asset measures. These proposals aim to define agency roles and reduce legal uncertainty.
Ripple’s expansion signals that major crypto firms expect more direct rulemaking ahead. Companies want clearer guidance before launching more products across payments and capital markets. Meanwhile, regulators continue to assess risks tied to consumer protection and market integrity.
The new office gives Ripple a stronger platform during these talks. It also shows that the company wants a lasting role in U.S. crypto policy. Therefore, the Washington expansion places Ripple closer to the rules shaping digital finance.
Crypto World
Humanoid Robots Remain Years Away From Replacing Human Workers
Modern artificial intelligence-powered robots are impressive in their capabilities, but are still years away from replacing humans as they can’t yet adapt to changing conditions, researchers say.
Last month, AI robotics company Figure showcased its humanoid robots performing basic tasks, such as cleaning a room, but a series of robots working for nine days straight sorting packages sparked conversation about how soon robots could replace jobs.
Oliver Obst, an associate professor of robotics at the Australia based University of New South Wales, told Cointelegraph that repetitive jobs such as physical work in structured environments are currently most at risk of being replaced by robots, while administrative and document-processing tasks could be replaced by AI.
There has been growing concern that AI and robots will replace people in jobs as technology advances. A report in May from workforce consulting firm Challenger, Gray and Christmas found that US companies have laid off an estimated 49,135 people in 2026 due to AI.

A group of Figure’s robots worked for nine days straight sorting packages. Source: Figure
However, Obst said that humanoid robots are unlikely to see a mass rollout soon because they don’t appear to be more efficient or less error-prone than current robotic manufacturing methods.
“Even in relatively structured settings, they still face problems with reliability, speed, safety, cost, and recovery from unexpected situations,” he said. “The harder the environment is to control, the harder the robotics problem becomes. Most human jobs involve more variation and more judgment than the package-sorting demonstration.”
“I would not say we are at the point of mass replacement by humanoid robots. We are much closer to the selective automation of some tasks. AI software is moving faster and is already affecting some forms of information work, but physical robots still have a much harder problem to solve.”
In another video in May, a human worker managed to sort more packages compared to a team of Figure’s robots, which swapped out when needing a recharge. Figure CEO Brett Adock said it would be the last time “a human will ever win.”

Source: Brett Adock
People still better than bots in some areas
Markus Levin, co-founder of decentralized data network XYO, said AI models and automation software can perform repetitive tasks with far greater consistency and endurance than humans; however, robots still require charging, maintenance and supervision.
A report in September from the International Federation of Robotics found that global demand for factory robots has doubled over the last decade, with warehouses and logistics among the fastest-growing areas of adoption.
“I believe broad human replacement is still likely years away,” Levin added, “Reliability, safety, regulation, infrastructure costs, and trust remain major barriers to full-scale deployment across society. The challenge is no longer simply making machines capable of acting but ensuring they can operate safely and reliably as they take on greater autonomy.”
Dr Francisco Cruz Naranjo, a senior lecturer at the University of New South Wales with a PhD in robotics, said the efficiency of robots compared to people depends heavily on the activity and the environment.
Related: ‘Developed ecosystem’ based on crypto has sprung up for AI agents: Report
“Robots are much better at repetitive tasks without the need for constant pauses, as showcased in the Figure livestream. However, in highly dynamic environments, robots still struggle to quickly adapt to changing conditions,” he said.
“Humans, in this case, are much better. This is precisely why robots at the moment are highly efficient in controlled environments, such as factories, but they have not yet succeeded widely in home settings.”
Naranjo said repetitive jobs performed in a less static setting are at risk of being replaced by robots, but it will depend on how quickly research advances and how quickly society adapts in areas like making spaces robot-friendly, which is likely years away.
Robots in society could be beneficial
Naranjo and Obst said that a mass rollout of robots in the workforce could be of some benefit, such as improving work-life balance, increasing the workforce in areas with shortages, and addressing dangerous environments that are too risky for humans.
“The social question is harder. If robots make dangerous work cheaper in human terms, that can be good. But it can also have unintended consequences. For example, keeping humans out of harm’s way in military operations may save lives, but it could also lower the perceived cost of conflict,” Obst said.
“Hypothetically, if we became very successful at automating almost all work, then society would need to rethink economies that are currently built around individual wages and employment.”
Magazine: Korea’s first memecoin rug-pull case, China’s crypto rules review: Asia Express
Crypto World
TapTools winds down after five Cardano execs depart
TapTools, a real-time analytics platform focused on Cardano, is winding down after a wave of leadership changes, underscoring the fragility of niche tooling in a bear‑market ecosystem.
In a post on X, TapTools said it would begin winding down over the next two weeks after its fifth top-level executive departure. The company previously confirmed the exits of two co-founders, the chief operating officer and the chief technology officer earlier this year. The platform’s backend developer—who had been elevated to CTO to shepherd a shift toward more sustainable product delivery—also left, leaving a critical repository of knowledge that cannot be replaced overnight.
Launched in 2022, TapTools grew to become one of Cardano’s most widely used tools for tracking token prices, DeFi activity, and discovering new projects. Its closure comes as JPG.Store, a Cardano-based NFT marketplace, permanently shut down on May 23. The wind-down also intersects with governance and funding frictions within Cardano’s ecosystem, including the Cardano Foundation’s decision to cancel its annual conference after a revised funding proposal to use treasury tokens was rejected. TapTools cited the economics of running the platform as a core factor, saying infrastructure, development, and support costs are real and operate at scale.
Infrastructure costs are real. Development costs are real. Support costs are real. Operating a platform that serves the ecosystem at scale is expensive.
TapTools said it remains open to acquisition or external funding as a possible route to continue operations, but the immediate plan is to wind down.
Key takeaways
- TapTools will wind down over the next two weeks after its fifth top-level executive departure, adding to leadership instability within Cardano-focused tooling.
- The exodus includes two co-founders, the chief operating officer, and the chief technology officer; the backend developer who became CTO also exited, leaving a critical knowledge gap.
- The company cites the real costs of infrastructure, development, and support as a core reason for the wind-down, arguing that operating at scale is expensive.
- The decision comes amid broader ecosystem shifts, including JPG.Store’s shutdown and the Cardano Foundation’s conference cancellation following governance decisions on treasury funding.
Wind-down and ecosystem context
In its statement, TapTools framed the move as a consequence of ongoing leadership churn and the difficulty of preserving critical institutional knowledge required to run a Cardano analytics service responsibly. The platform described the departures as part of a broader pattern where institutions servicing Cardano’s ecosystem can struggle to maintain continuity without stable leadership and sustained funding.
The episode sits alongside other signals in Cardano’s ecosystem. The NFT marketplace JPG.Store shut down on May 23, echoing a trend of leaner operations in Cardano-native ventures. On governance, the Cardano Foundation announced the cancellation of its annual conference after governance decided against funding the event with treasury tokens, underscoring the friction between ambition and available funding mechanisms in the ecosystem.
TapTools’ leadership transition and wind-down are framed as a cost equation as much as a strategic pivot. The company emphasized that maintaining an analytics platform that serves the ecosystem at scale entails continuing investments in infrastructure, product development, and user support—costs that become hard to justify if revenue or funding is uncertain.
Broader reflections from Cardano’s founder and what readers should monitor
Cardano’s founder, Charles Hoskinson, weighed in via X, saying he anticipated that many protocols could fail under the current bear market and that he once proposed an index to help bail out struggling projects. The plan, he said, did not move forward, and he suggested governance could have helped some projects but chose not to act. These remarks frame TapTools’ wind-down as part of a wider question about how the Cardano ecosystem deploys funding and governance tools to support builders during downturns.
For investors and builders, the episode reinforces that even widely used, respected tools are susceptible to leadership gaps and funding constraints in a bear market. It also highlights the importance of robust, adaptable funding mechanisms and governance processes that can help prevent meaningful platforms from collapsing when cycles turn negative.
Looking forward, watchers should track whether TapTools and other Cardano-native services emerge from wind-downs through acquisitions, new funding rounds, or partnerships, and how governance policy evolves to support ongoing, sustainable operations in the ecosystem.
As the Cardano ecosystem recalibrates, all eyes will be on whether governance reforms and funding mechanisms can better shield essential tooling from bear-market cycles and leadership turnover, shaping which projects endure and which recede.
Crypto World
Palo Alto Beats Q3 Estimates as AI Threats Drive Demand
TLDR
- Palo Alto Networks shares rose 10% after the company beat fiscal third-quarter estimates.
- Revenue reached $3.00 billion, above Wall Street’s $2.94 billion expectation.
- Adjusted earnings came in at 85 cents per share, beating the 80-cent estimate.
- Palo Alto raised its fourth-quarter and full-year revenue guidance after the earnings beat.
- The company’s AI-focused acquisitions support its push into enterprise and agent security.
Palo Alto Networks shares rose 10% after the company beat Wall Street’s fiscal third-quarter estimates. The cybersecurity firm reported stronger revenue and adjusted earnings as AI-related threats lifted demand for security tools. The company also issued a stronger fourth-quarter outlook and raised its full-year revenue forecast.
Palo Alto Beats Wall Street Estimates
Palo Alto reported adjusted earnings of 85 cents per share for the fiscal third quarter. Analysts tracked by LSEG had expected adjusted earnings of 80 cents per share. Revenue reached $3.00 billion, topping the $2.94 billion estimate. The company recorded 31% revenue growth from the same period last year.
The quarter included $388 million from the CyberArk and Chronosphere acquisitions. These additions helped expand Palo Alto’s reported revenue base during the period. Palo Alto also reported a net loss of $177 million. That compares with the net income of $262 million in the year-earlier quarter.
The loss came to 22 cents per share under standard accounting. A year earlier, Palo Alto earned 37 cents per share. Shares rose 10% after the report as investors reacted to the earnings beat. The move followed weaker guidance in February that had lowered expectations.
Stronger Outlook Follows Rising AI Security Demand
Palo Alto issued fourth-quarter revenue guidance above Wall Street expectations. The company expects revenue between $3.35 billion and $3.36 billion. Analysts had expected fourth-quarter revenue of $3.28 billion. Palo Alto also lifted its full-year revenue forecast after the third-quarter beat.
The company now expects full-year revenue between $11.42 billion and $11.43 billion. The updated range came as AI-related security needs continued to support demand. CEO Nikesh Arora linked the demand environment to new AI threats. “The latest advancements at the AI frontier have increased the level of urgency around cybersecurity,” Arora stated.
He added that AI had reshaped the cybersecurity industry’s direction for the coming years. The company has also leaned into acquisitions to strengthen its product suite. Palo Alto shares have climbed more than 60% this year. The stock has gained over 80% during the current quarter.
Acquisitions Expand Palo Alto’s AI Security Push
As it was reported by Blockonomi, analysts project quarterly sales of $2.9 billion. They also expect adjusted earnings of 80 cents per share. Those projections reflect acquisition expenses and dilution from the CyberArk transaction. The final results came above those estimates on both revenue and adjusted earnings.
Palo Alto holds a market capitalization near $245 billion. Its 50-day moving average stands at $195.20, while its 200-day average stands at $184.31. The company has completed five AI-focused acquisitions over the past twelve months. The largest deal involved CyberArk, an identity security specialist, bought for about $25 billion.
CyberArk supports Palo Alto’s push into protecting AI agents inside company networks. These agents need permissions across email, documents, browsers, and other enterprise systems. Those permissions can create access risks without strong identity controls. Prompt injection attacks can also target AI systems connected to workplace tools.
Palo Alto also acquired KOI Security, Chronosphere, and Protect AI. The company also joined Anthropic’s Project Glasswing cybersecurity initiative. Anthropic opened its Mythos model testing program to 150 more partners on Tuesday. Palo Alto joined Project Glasswing as an early participant.
Crypto World
Debt crisis fears put Bitcoin undervaluation back in focus
Bitcoin has drawn a new valuation argument from Bitwise, as rising sovereign debt pressures keep bond markets under strain and strengthen the case for BTC as a macro hedge.
Summary
- Bitwise said rising sovereign debt pressure could strengthen Bitcoin’s role as a hedge against macroeconomic risk.
- The OECD expects governments and companies to borrow about $29 trillion in 2026, as refinancing needs continue to rise.
- Bitwise cited Greg Foss’s model, which puts Bitcoin’s theoretical fair value at around $224,000 if adoption expands.
Bitwise said in a new report that deeper investor concern over government debt could widen Bitcoin’s perceived undervaluation. The asset manager linked the argument to stress in global bond markets, where governments and companies face a much heavier borrowing calendar in 2026.
Bitwise links Bitcoin case to debt pressure
According to Bitwise, the OECD expects public and corporate borrowers to raise about $29 trillion in 2026. The estimate is 17% higher than 2024 levels and nearly twice the amount raised a decade earlier.
The report added that about 78% of OECD governments’ borrowing will go toward refinancing existing debt rather than funding new spending. Bitwise said this refinancing burden may raise investor concerns about sovereign balance sheets if yields remain elevated.
In that setting, Bitwise said Bitcoin could attract more attention from investors looking for assets outside government credit systems. The firm did not present the view as a direct price forecast, but it said the macro setup could improve Bitcoin’s hedge narrative.
Japan remains a key bond market test
Japan received special attention in the Bitwise report because of its high debt load and rising bond yields. Bitwise noted that Japan’s public debt stands at nearly 230% of GDP, placing it among the highest debt burdens of major economies.
The firm said Japan’s 10-year government bond yield recently climbed to 2.78%, while its 30-year yield reached a record high. By Tuesday, Bitwise noted that the 10-year Japanese yield stood at 2.66%.
At the same time, Japanese investors hold around $1.2 trillion in US Treasurys, according to the report. Bitwise said higher yields at home now make foreign bonds less attractive after currency hedging costs.
The firm compared Japan’s 10-year yield of 2.66% with the 2.19% yield available on yen-hedged 10-year US Treasurys. Bitwise said this gap could encourage Japanese capital to return to domestic bonds.
US yields add to sovereign risk concerns
The report said the pressure is not limited to Japan. Bitwise noted that US 30-year Treasury yields reached 5.11% on May 11, the highest level since 2007.
Bitwise also cited sovereign risk premiums measured through 10-year swap spreads. The firm said those premiums have risen to their highest levels since the European debt crisis of 2011 and 2012.
While Bitwise said tighter financial conditions may weigh on Bitcoin in the short run, it also said a serious disruption in the bond market could force central banks to provide liquidity. Under that scenario, the firm said Bitcoin could benefit if investors expect fiat liquidity to rise again.
Bitcoin fair value model reaches $224,000
Bitwise cited investor Greg Foss’s sovereign default risk model, which values Bitcoin near $224,000 if it gains wider use as a hedge against government credit risk. The firm stressed that this figure is theoretical and not a formal price target.
The report also said Bitcoin’s path will depend partly on real interest rates, which Bitwise calculated as the Fed Funds rate minus US CPI inflation. Bitwise said Bitcoin performed well during the 2021 bull market as real rates fell, while the 2022 bear market coincided with rising real rates amid aggressive Federal Reserve tightening.
Meanwhile, Bitcoin researcher Sminston said BTC could trade between $90,000 and $255,000 by the end of 2026. Sminston based the estimate on the Bitcoin Decay Channel, a logarithmic model that tracks past cycle tops and bottoms.
Crypto World
What next as Bitcoin falls below $66,000
The crypto sell-off is worsening as stock markets continue to inch higher every day.
Bitcoin plunged to a low of $65,708 in Asian morning trading on Wednesday, down 6.4% in 24 hours and 12.3% on the week, as a broad crypto market sell-off accelerated overnight against the sharpest possible backdrop of global equity strength.
Ether (ETH) broke below $1,900 to $1,839, marking a 7.9% drop in 24 hours and lifting the second-largest cryptocurrency’s weekly decline to 11.1%. Solana’s SOL fell 9.0% to $73.25, BNB lost 7.8% to $636, slid 8.3% to $0.0921 and Tron’s TRX shed 3.4% to $0.3297, per CoinDesk data.
BTC traded near $66,280 by Wednesday morning after touching the $65,708 24-hour low, with the range stretching $5,200 from the $70,907 high.
Global stocks set fresh all-time highs as the AI trade intensified, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index rallying almost 6% to a record on Tuesday and Tokyo Electron and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing both reaching new peaks, Bloomberg reported.
The MSCI All Country World Index set a fresh all-time high on the AI rally that has dominated stocks all year.
SpaceX was reported to be seeking $135 a share for a $75 billion initial public offering, while S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 futures held little changed near record levels. South Korean markets were closed for a holiday.
The crypto sell-off compounds a week of bearish news, starting with Strategy’s (MSTR) first publicized bitcoin sale on Monday, an ongoing record spot bitcoin ETF outflow streak through Tuesday that has crossed $3.2 billion, Mt. Gox’s $739 million transfer to a new wallet on Tuesday, and stalled U.S.-Iran ceasefire negotiations that have kept Brent crude rising for a third straight day on fresh Middle East fighting.
Hyperliquid’s HYPE remained the lone green outlier in the top 10 by market value, holding a 19.9% weekly gain at $71.98 despite a 3.1% decline in the past 24 hours.
BTC’s $65,000 level is the immediate technical anchor. A break below brings $60,000 into focus, while a hold opens the door to a relief bounce as overleveraged positioning gets flushed.
Crypto World
EU AI Data Center Project Faces Delays as Funding Gaps Grow
TLDR
- The EU pushed bidding for its AI gigafactory project from May to July.
- The plan targets five AI data centers, each with one gigawatt of capacity.
- Early interest has dropped from about 70 companies to roughly 10 expected bidders.
- Only two of the five planned centers can receive funding before 2028.
- SoftBank’s France data center plan is larger than the full EU gigafactory program.
Europe’s plan to build large AI data centers has run into delays before bidding begins. The project aims to create five gigafactory sites with major chip capacity across the bloc. However, funding gaps and delayed rules have reduced early interest from potential bidders.
Bidding Delay Shrinks Early Interest in EU AI Sites
According to a report by Bloomberg, the European Union originally planned to open bidding for the AI gigafactory project in May. Officials have now pushed the process to July after repeated delays. The planned facilities would each carry one gigawatt of power capacity. Each site would also use about 100,000 advanced chips for AI workloads.
The European Commission has also delayed the publication of selection criteria several times. That delay has made planning harder for groups preparing bids. The project first attracted interest from about 70 companies across Europe. That field has now narrowed to roughly 10 groups expected to submit proposals.
The plan also limits submissions to a maximum of one bid per country. Several groups now face questions over timing, scale, and available subsidies. Maria Nowicka, a Brussels-based researcher at Interface, pointed to repeated delays. “I think I’ve lost count,” she said, referring to the shifting timeline.
Funding Structure Limits Early Rollout
The EU plan carries a total expected cost of €20 billion. Less than half of that amount would come from public funding. The European Union would provide €4.1 billion in direct subsidies. Host member states would match that amount under the proposed funding model.
Private investors would cover the remaining cost for the five planned centers. However, the funding schedule has created a problem for near-term delivery. Only two of the five centers can receive funding before 2028. The remaining sites depend on the EU’s next budget cycle.
Some partners are reconsidering bids if the project shrinks from its original design. People familiar with the matter said at least two groups may step back. The delayed funding structure places pressure on the program’s launch schedule. It also raises questions about how fast Europe can add AI infrastructure.
Global Data Center Spending Outpaces EU Plan
The EU program faces a large spending gap when compared with private AI infrastructure deals. SoftBank recently announced up to €75 billion for data centers in France. That France’s plan alone exceeds the full EU gigafactory program by more than three times. It also shows the scale of private capital entering AI infrastructure.
Meta is also raising $13 billion for one data center in Texas. That single project stands close to the EU’s total direct subsidy plan. US utilities plan to spend $1.4 trillion on grid infrastructure for AI by 2030. American hyperscalers are also investing hundreds of billions of dollars annually in data centers.
The EU’s €4.1 billion subsidy would spread across five countries. That makes each site dependent on national support and private capital. The Commission has not yet published final bidding criteria for the gigafactory sites. The delayed criteria remain the next factual step before formal bids begin.
Crypto World
Major Ripple (XRP) Announcement Affecting Turkish Users: Details
Ripple inked strategic deals with three Turkey-based crypto platforms, aiming to boost adoption and usage of its stablecoin RLUSD.
Additionally, the company picked Istanbul Technical University (ITU) as its latest partner in its global University Blockchain Research Initiative (UBRI).
Expansion to Turkey
The company behind the popular cryptocurrency XRP revealed that its USD-pegged stablecoin is now available to institutions in Turkey via partnerships with BiLira, Bitexen, and Bitlo. Jack McDonald (SVP of Stablecoins at Ripple) said the country sits “at the crossroads of traditional financial and digital economy” and has one of the highest rates of crypto adoption globally.
“By providing a stable, USD-backed asset that is both transparent and fully regulated, we are empowering Turkish businesses to access global liquidity,” he added.
Alphan Göğüş, CEO at Bitexen MENA, also spoke on the matter. He described the collaboration as “the first step in a broader rollout” across the Bitexen Global platform.
“Supporting RLUSD aligns with our strategy to provide trusted, USD-denominated instruments within a compliant and scalable framework,” he said.
For his part, Sinan Koç, Co-Founder of BiLira, argued that the stablecoin is “uniquely equipped” to accelerate blockchain adoption in the country. As a matter of fact, Turkey has already emerged as a dominant player in the crypto world, and according to a 2025 Chainalysis report, it facilitates roughly $200 billion in annual transaction volume, outpacing its rivals in the MENA region.
Mustafa Aplay, CEO of Bitlo, said the partnership with Ripple offers the Turkish crypto ecosystem a direct, secure gateway to global financial markets.
“By integrating a regulated, enterprise-grade stablecoin like RLUSD, we’re providing our customers with the highest standard of digital dollars for enterprise needs,” he concluded.
Ripple’s stablecoin officially saw the light of day toward the end of 2024, and since then, it has experienced impressive advancement. Some heavyweights that have so far embraced it include crypto exchanges Binance and OKX, as well as America’s oldest bank, BNY Mellon. Its market capitalization has been rising lately and currently stands at around $1.81 billion, making RLUSD the 48th-largest digital asset.
Another Partnership
In addition to collaborating with BiLira, Bitexen, and Bitlo, Ripple also shook hands with Istanbul Technical University (ITU). The partnership, funded via RLUSD, will support advanced research initiatives and graduate fellowships while establishing an XRP Ledger (XRPL) validator directly on the Istanbul Technical University ITU campus.
“By integrating academic research with hands-on decentralized infrastructure, Ripple and ITU are ensuring the next generation of Turkish researchers and students are at the forefront of blockchain innovation,” the official announcement reads.
The post Major Ripple (XRP) Announcement Affecting Turkish Users: Details appeared first on CryptoPotato.
-
NewsBeat7 days agoIsrael says it has killed new Hamas military leader in Gaza City airstrikes
-
Tech7 days agoNASA taps Blue Origin to deliver lunar rovers for Moon Base initiative
-
News Videos5 days agoThis is BROKEN! INSANE 5x MONEY CAR WASH WEEK! The NEW GTA Online UPDATE Today! (GTA5 New Update)
-
Tech5 days agoWaymo dominates autonomous vehicle registrations as Tesla trails behind
-
Tech4 days agoSpaceX just won a second Golden Dome contract. This one is $4.16 billion.
-
News Videos4 days agoSHE IS KILLING XRP!!! WATCH URGENT AND ACT FAST
-
NewsBeat4 days agoFIRST NIGHT REVIEW: Take That bring the Circus back to life in spectacular sun-soaked style
-
Business1 day agoJade Biosciences, Inc. (JBIO) Discusses Positive Interim Results From JADE101 Phase I Healthy Volunteer Study and Development Plans Transcript
-
Tech7 days agoThe Samsung pay deal is the moment Korean unions changed register
-
Crypto World4 days agoCFTC Has Approved the First Regulated Bitcoin Perpetual Contract in the U.S.
-
Crypto World7 days agoSpaceX’s $2 Trillion IPO: Why Tech Giants Nvidia (NVDA), Apple (AAPL), and Microsoft (MSFT) May Face Pressure
-
Entertainment7 days agoThe Most Misunderstood Sci-Fi Horror Movie of the Last 10 Years Just Took Over Netflix
-
Business4 days agoIs the Spurs Phenom Already Better Than Prime Diesel?
-
NewsBeat4 days ago
Novak Djokovic v Joao Fonseca LIVE: French Open latest scores and results after Jannik Sinner’s shocking collapse
-
Crypto World5 days ago
Snowflake (SNOW) Stock Rallies on Strong Q1 Results and AI Product Growth
-
Entertainment4 days agoWeak ‘Supergirl’ Box Office Tracking Amid Milly Alcock Backlash
-
Business4 days agoDemand Conditions Improve In Chemicals Sector In April 2026
-
Crypto World4 days agoMicroStrategy Moves $30 Million in BTC to Coinbase Prime: Is the Bitcoin Sell-Off Already Here?
-
Politics4 days agoThe House | Inside Andy Burnham’s Makerfield Campaign: “Nobody Thinks This Is In The Bag”
-
NewsBeat7 days agoEnergy price cap set for major rise from July as millions face higher bills


You must be logged in to post a comment Login