By Robert Scucci
| Published 41 seconds ago

I don’t know about you, but when I think of Milla Jovovich, I think of the first Resident Evil (2002), which I quite liked, and then the rest of the Resident Evil movies, which … yeah. The point is that I never paid much attention to her career outside of that franchise and maybe a couple of other bangers like The Fifth Element. She just wasn’t on my radar, so I probably missed out on a bunch of great films, like 2007’s .45, a straight-up crime thriller centered on a domestic abuse-fueled revenge arc carried out by Jovovich’s character.

It’s a lean thriller that has a lot going for it, but it isn’t without issues when it comes to structure and characterization. The chemistry between Milla Jovovich and Angus Macfadyen is reason enough to check this one out, but I’d be lying if I said the third act wasn’t frustrating as hell, which I’ll get into soon.

Couples That Sell Guns Together, Don’t Have Fun Together

.45 is the story of Kat’s (Milla Jovovich) volatile relationship with her small-time criminal boyfriend, Big Al (Angus Macfadyen). Big Al likes to think he calls all the shots, but Kat isn’t innocent in her willingness to move guns and other stolen wholesale items out of their New York City apartment. Always coming and going is Vic (Sara Strange), Kat’s ex-girlfriend, who never sticks around for long because Big Al is a loose cannon, and because she still has feelings for Kat that she’s trying to work through. One of Big Al’s frequent collaborators, Reilly (Stephen Dorff), is also in love with Kat and only continues to work with him so he can stay close to her.

Vic and Reilly both keep tabs on Kat and Big Al’s relationship because Big Al is incredibly territorial and abusive, both physically and emotionally, and they want to make sure she’s safe. It’s demonstrated pretty quickly that Kat isn’t safe at all after Big Al sees her interacting with Jose (Vincent Laresca), a rival criminal she’s secretly selling guns to on the side. Though Big Al doesn’t know about Kat’s side hustle, he completely flies off the handle when he sees her lighting Jose’s cigarette becuase he interprets it as her flirting with the man. The scenes that follow are not for the faint of heart, as they contain some brutally effective depictions of domestic abuse.

Trapped in an abusive relationship she’s afraid to leave out of fear for her life, Kat is approached by Liz (Aisha Tyler), a representative from a local battered women’s support group who also develops feelings for her. Clearly in distress over her living situation, Kat is afraid to make the changes she needs to make, prompting Vic, Reilly, and Liz to help her come up with a plan that will remove Big Al from her life once and for all.

The Most Difficult Parts To Watch Are The Best Performed

The real meat and potatoes of .45 is the dynamic between Big Al and Kat. Their relationship is beyond toxic, and neither of them are innocent. While they’re both criminals, Big Al is more often than not in the wrong, which becomes obvious through the way he treats his girlfriend. Kat loves to push buttons and antagonize people, especially Big Al, when she feels it’s warranted, but nobody deserves to have hands laid on them the way she does once Big Al starts to spiral. Everybody sees it but her. She’s so locked into this lifestyle that she has no idea what her next steps should be.

The abuse sequences are difficult to watch, to say the least, but they’re acted superbly. Kat is a strong woman struggling to break the cycle of abuse, and when things hit critical mass, you can see every conflicting emotion written across her face. She can either stick with the devil she knows or take her chances elsewhere, which could put her in even more danger if Big Al actually follows through on some of his more unhinged threats. Angus Macfadyen is also the perfect loose cannon, doing a superb job channeling that small-ball, “If another guy even looks at you, I’m going to kill you both” kind of energy.

Where .45 loses points, however, is its quasi-mockumentary setup, which strips the film of much of its suspense. Throughout the movie, we get testimonials told in hindsight from Kat, Reilly, Vic, Liz, and even Big Al’s mother, all discussing the relationship dynamic. This is almost always a bad move in a thriller, especially when half the tension comes from wondering whether somebody is going to get killed. Since they’re all talking about these events after the fact, it’s reasonable to assume they’ve already made it out of the situation that drives the central conflict.

Another aspect that rubbed me the wrong way is how fixated everybody is on Kat. They’re all crushing on her hard, talking about how much they love her and how badly they want to be with her. There is eventually a payoff to all of this, but the whole thing reminded me of that Frasier episode where Frasier’s ex-fiancée Diane, who left him at the altar during her Cheers days, shows up in Seattle after writing a play about their relationship in which every single character talks about how amazing she is. The supporting characters here often feel too one-dimensional to fully support an otherwise complex story about the toxic relationship connecting them all.

Still, .45 is an effective thriller about a criminal couple who can barely hold it together while everybody on the sidelines waits for one of them to get thrown in jail or killed. The strong chemistry and characterization between its two leads are reason enough to tune in, but don’t say I didn’t warn you about some of the supporting characters knocking the film down a couple of pegs.

As of this writing, you can stream .45 for free on Tubi.

Karmelo Anthony’s case continues to spark conversation online. Now, videos circulating on social media show members of his family reacting to his 35-year prison sentence. One viral clip follows his grandmother, Toni Hayes, after she left the Texas courthouse, while another shows Karmelo’s mother, Kayla Hayes, continuing to defend him and push for justice.

RELATED: Karmelo Anthony Supporter Reportedly Arrest For Unlawfully Carrying A Weapon Following Viral Protest Confrontation (WATCH) 

Karmelo Anthony’s Grandmother Speaks Out Following His 35-Year Sentence

A now-viral video featuring Karmelo Anthony’s grandmother, Toni Hayes, has sparked conversation across social media. In the footage, Toni heads toward a vehicle and chants, “Prejudice!” “Racist!” and “Biased!” as supporters and protestors gathered outside the Collin County Courthouse in Texas. Many of Karmelo’s supporters quickly joined in and repeated Toni’s chants. Before leaving in the vehicle, Toni said, “They sent that message that they can do whatever the f*** they want to do.” While supporters shouted, “We love Karmelo! We love him!” 

Karmelo’s Mother Continues To Defend Him After His Verdict

Along with the viral video of Karmelo’s grandmother, clips from his parents’ interview with CBS News have also gained traction across social media following his prison sentence. During the interview, Kayla Hayes said she knows her son isn’t a murderer and insisted that he would never hurt anyone. “I know my son. My son is no murderer.” Kayla continued, “My son didn’t intend to hurt anyone. My son was defending himself and that’s what hurts so bad.” She also said that her family and Karmelo’s loved ones will keep fighting for justice on his behalf. “We’ve just been praying and keeping the faith.” 

Karmelo’s Attorney’s Formally File Notice Of Appeal Following 35-Year Prison Sentence

Shortly after receiving his 35-year prison sentence, officials transferred Karmelo Anthony to a Texas state prison. A new mugshot shows Karmelo with a noticeably different appearance, including a shaved head and what appears to be a sleeveless prison-issued tunic. Officials moved Karmelo from county jail to state prison on Wednesday, June 10, where he will begin serving his 35-year sentence in the death of Austin Metcalf.

Meanwhile, Karmelo and his legal team have continued to challenge the outcome of his case. His attorneys filed a notice of appeal, and a lawyer Mike Howard said in a statement that the defense believes the court must consider additional issues moving forward.

“After the conclusion of the trial yesterday, we gave the court our official notice that Karmelo Anthony is filing an appeal. We believe there are several important issues for the appellate courts to consider. An appeal is the next part of the legal process and a right afforded every American,”

RELATED: UPDATE: Karmelo Anthony’s NEW Appearance Has Social Media In Shock Amid State Prison Transfer (PHOTO) 

By Robert Scucci
| Published 28 seconds ago

It’s easy to forget that post-apocalyptic thrillers existed before 1979’s Mad Max because George Miller not only perfected the formula, but successfully built out decades of wasteland folklore that most modern counterparts don’t hold a candle to. There are some gems out there, however, like 1975’s A Boy and His Dog, as well as some rough concepts that are great on paper but fumble the execution, like 1978’s Deathsport.

Deathsport has all the trappings of a solid, low-budget, post-apocalyptic sci-fi thriller, but it doesn’t quite have that x-factor that George Miller’s vision proved itself to have. It’s got laser-equipped dirt bikes known as Death Machines and clear power structures at play, but it’s lacking that “every man for himself” vibe portrayed so well in the Mad Max films. But for something made with a $150,000 production budget, Deathsport isn’t without its charm, and there are plenty of bright orange, accelerant-fueled practical explosions to fill the barren scenery with some pretty solid action spectacle.

Let The Games Begin!

Deathsport takes place “a thousand years from tomorrow” after the Neutron Wars have turned the world into a Mad Max-style wasteland. The story follows legendary and curmudgeonly Range Guide Kaz Oshay (David Carradine), a wandering warrior who gets captured by the city-state of Helix and thrown into the brutal spectacle known as Deathsport, which basically involves riding around on dirt bikes with lasers that go “pew pew.” While participating in the game, he teams up with fellow Range Guide Deneer (Claudia Jennings), who has been captured while escorting a group of refugees across the desert away from Lord Zirpola’s (David McLean) deadly regime. The two quickly form an alliance after learning that a young girl named Tara has been taken by mutant cannibals during Deneer’s capture.

After surviving torture, prison, and a rigged Deathsport match filled with unsanctioned landmines, Oshay and Deneer escape Helix and head into the wasteland. Along the way, they rescue Tara, evading pursuing Death Machine riders every step of the way. Meanwhile, Oshay is driven by a personal vendetta against Ankar Moor (Richard Lynch), the man responsible for his mother’s death.

Ultimately, Deathsport is a pretty straightforward tale of two badass drifters escaping an oppressive city-state, rescuing a kidnapped child, and settling an old score in the process.

Proves A Concept George Miller Perfected

While George Miller is far from the first person to explore the wasteland with the Mad Max films, it’s clear to me after watching Deathsport that he’s the one who changed the post-apocalyptic subgenre forever. Deathsport’s fatal flaw is that it throws us into a state of disrepair and then tries to cram a thousand years of societal breakdown into an 82-minute runtime, while Mad Max shows us the beginning of the end and builds out the lore from there. It’s a brilliant way to set up a franchise, whether Miller knew it at the time or not.

It’s worth noting, however, that David Carradine couldn’t have been a more perfect pick for the lead role, as he had already starred in 1975’s Death Race 2000, a brilliant satire that centers around similar gameplay. For my money, Death Race 2000 is the superior film because it’s so tongue-in-cheek that it has you smiling wryly at the fact that everybody thinks it’s socially acceptable to commit vehicular manslaughter so long as it’s gamified in an arena setting.

Deathsport is definitely rough around the edges and plays like a more stripped-down, proto-version of Mad Max, but it’s also a neat look at cinematic history from this era. Economic recession and fuel rationing had a lot of progressive filmmakers worrying about the then-current state of the world, which resulted in an influx of this type of movie over a very short amount of time, with Mad Max leading the charge once it unexpectedly burst onto the scene in 1979.

If you’re looking for a familiar spin on the by-now very popular cinematic setup that the Mad Max universe has dominated for decades, you can stream Deathsport for free on Tubi as of this writing and enjoy a very similar story from a wholly different angle.

By Chris Snellgrove
| Published 22 seconds ago

It’s hard to imagine Dakota Fanning in the Star Trek universe (although we’d kill to have her get a cameo in Strange New Worlds). However, we got the next best thing in 2017 with the Fanning-starring dramedy Please Stand By. It’s the kind of movie that will make you laugh and cry (sometimes at the same time), and you can now stream this ambitious indie film for free on Tubi, YouTube, and Pluto TV.

A True Star Trek Fixation

What’s the premise of the movie? Dakota Fanning plays a young autistic woman who brightens up her days living in a San Francisco group home by fixating on Star Trek, her one true passion. Eventually, Paramount holds a screenwriting contest, and Fanning’s character gets ready to mail in her mammoth 450-page Trek script in the hopes of winning the $100,000 prize.

When she misses her chance to mail it, she decides to deliver the script herself, resulting in a Quixotic quest that we do not doubt Mr. Spock would have deemed “fascinating.”

Please Stand By is a dramedy in the truest sense of the word, and most of what will make you alternate between laughing and crying comes from Dakota Fanning’s powerhouse performance. As a young autistic woman, she is particularly vulnerable to scams and swindles, and the movie offers an unflinching look at the many dangers she faces once she steps outside of the familiar environment of the group home.

But the movie finds a lot of comedy in her character’s love of Star Trek, leading to occasional broad comedy scenes (our favorite involves a police officer who wins her trust by speaking to her in Klingon).

An Exercise In Earnestness

Star Trek infuses the entire film in ways both subtle and obvious, and it’s difficult not to view Dakota Fanning’s self-appointed mission as her own Away Team trip to unfamiliar lands. Much like Kirk or Picard before her, she must leave an area where she is safe and knows everyone around her and venture into a strange new world full of exotic characters and bizarre situations.

She’s not literally going where “no one has gone before,” of course, but she’s going where she hasn’t gone before, and the film offers a very wholesome theme that this kind of inner journey is just as valid as external ones.

And speaking as huge Star Trek nerds, we were pleasantly surprised by what a love letter this movie ended up being to the franchise started by Gene Roddenberry. In the hands of a different writer, Dakota Fanning’s character could have been a mean-spirited satire of Star Trek fans as awkward nerds who don’t really understand anything outside their favorite fictional world.

Fortunately, she comes across as someone who is both earnest and guileless, and we are left with the impression that it’s better to be a pure-hearted fan that doesn’t understand the world than to be like the honorless petaQs who take advantage of her.

A High-Water Mark For Dakota Fanning

In the hands of director Ben Lewin and screenwriter Michael Golamco, Please Stand By delivers the kind of heartwarming story that makes us smile through our tears.

Critics didn’t fully know what to think of it: on Rotten Tomatoes, the movie currently has a 58 percent rating from critics, who collectively deemed that Dakota Fanning gives it enough of a Star Trek focus to put a new spin on familiar coming-of-age beats. Audiences, meanwhile, gave the film a 70 percent rating, and that number is likely to go up now that more fans can stream the movie from multiple touchpoints.

Interestingly, the movie has a fairly explicit connection to Star Trek: Dakota Fanning is joined by Alice Eve, who plays her sister. As you may remember (though if you blocked it out, we wouldn’t blame you), Eve played Carol Marcus in the J.J. Abrams film Star Trek Into Darkness. Actor and Comedian Patton Oswalt is also in the film, and five years after this movie was released, he played a minor Trek role by lending his voice to an episode of Picard.

Long story, not very short, Please Stand By is a great film filled with wonderful actors and headlined by what may be a career-best performance from Dakota Fanning. It’s simultaneously heartbreaking and heartwarming, and it has enough of a geek focus to keep even the most jaded Star Trek fans entertained. And if you’d like to experience it yourself, no transporter is necessary.

As of this writing, Please Stand By is streaming for free on Tubi, Pluto TV, YouTube, and Fandango at Home.

By Sean Thiessen
| Published 27 seconds ago

Tom Cruise’s name is nearly synonymous with stunts. These days, he is best known for his high-flying antics in Top Gun: Maverick and for his long-running role in the Mission: Impossible franchise. But in films like the 1993 thriller The Firm, Tom Cruise flexes not his muscles but his dramatic chops, and his gripping performance is streaming now on Paramount+.

It Took A While, But A Dream Team Was Assembled

Based on author John Grisham’s novel of the same name, The Firm is a taut legal thriller packed with riveting twists and moral dilemmas that make the genre so compelling. Tom Cruise stars as Mitch McDeere, a fresh-faced Harvard Law School graduate who takes a cushy position at a prestigious law firm. The pay and perks come at the cost of grueling hours, which Mitch spends discovering that the firm is not as interested in upholding the law as it is bending it. When the shady dealings of Mitch’s new employer yields a body count, the FBI approaches Mitch to help take the firm down.

Tom Cruise anchors The Firm, joined by Gene Hackman, Holly Hunter, Ed Harris, Jeanne Tripplehorn, Hal Holbrook, David Strathairn, and Gary Busey. The shimmering ensemble turns in a set of powerhouse performances under the direction of legendary filmmaker Sydney Pollack.

However, the cast of the film almost looked very different. Charlie Sheen and Jason Patric were early contenders for the role of Mitch, but producers Scott Rudin and John Davis wanted to go bigger. As the budget nearly tripled from $15 million to $42 million, Rudin and Davis asked Tom Cruise to lead The Firm.

Saturday Night Fever director John Badham and Die Hard director John McTiernan were both in the running to helm The Firm, with Tom Cruise even expressing interest in sitting in the director’s chair. Politics and personalities turned the situation into a mess, and Paramount Communications president Stanley Jaffe handpicked Sydney Pollack to direct.

Gene Hackman did not join The Firm until the film was already deep into shooting. Meryl Streep was considered for Hackman’s role, but John Grisham fought the gender swap, delaying casting.

A Transitional Period For Tom Cruise

The Firm eventually made its case in theaters on June 30, 1993. Fueled by the star power of Tom Cruise and the rest of the film’s ensemble, The Firm surged to a $270 million gross, the highest for an R-rated film all year. The Firm also became the highest-grossing adaptation of a John Grisham novel ever made.

During The Firm’s opening week, John Grisham and Michael Crichton accounted for the top six books on the New York Times paperback bestseller list. In 1993, Crichton also saw the biggest adaptation success of his career with the release of Steven Spielberg’s Jurassic Park.

The writers were not the only ones having banner years in ‘93. The Firm was nominated for two Academy Awards. Holly Hunter was up for Best Supporting Actress, and composer David Grusin was nominated for Best Original Score. Tom Cruise had previously been nominated as an actor for 1990’s Born on the Fourth of July, and would later be recognized for Jerry Maguire and Magnolia.

Performances from the cast of The Firm were, to many critics, the best component of the movie. Tom Cruise and Holly Hunter were particularly celebrated, but the film’s screenplay left many critics and audiences wanting more.

Adapted by David Rabe and Robert Towne, the screenplay for The Firm takes a bit of the stink off of the protagonist that Grisham crafted in his novel. Though Tom Cruise still delivers a compelling performance, some argued that polishing the film’s main character zapped energy, suspense, and ethical conundrum from the story.

The Firm was one of the last movies Tom Cruise made before Mission: Impossible; only Interview With the Vampire separates them. The Firm is arguably the end of an era in Cruise’s career, delivering the final performance of Cruise as a young man and paving the way for his image as a more adult actor.

The Firm may not be the most famous Tom Cruise movie, but it is a gripping entry in his vast and varied filmography. His career looks different than it did in 1993, but his commitment to great movies has never changed. Action star Tom Cruise is awesome, but we will also have a soft spot in our hearts for the Tom Cruise of movies like The Firm, and we can visit him anytime on Paramount+.

Bold and the Beautiful explodes as Hope Logan (Annika Noelle) is feeling so good about her launch over at Logan. But there is trouble coming and it might be down to Steffy Forrester (Jacqueline MacInnes Wood) and a huge legal issue that could stop Katie Logan (Heather Tom) and Bill Spencer (Don Diamont) right in their tracks and kill Hope’s collection for good.

So, we’re going to follow some red flags that Bold and the Beautiful has been waving about what could go wrong that could derail Hope’s big launch and it could actually ruin Katie’s fashion house when she has nowhere left to turn.

Bold and the Beautiful: Red Flags and Contractual Issues

All right, let’s talk about red flags. So, one big one popped up in late April when Hope and Steffy were talking about Forrester Creations putting her line on hold. Hope was upset. But Steffy said they had to prioritize Eric Forrester’s (John McCook) new couture collection to try and erase his collection for Logan from everybody’s minds.

And Hope pushed back and she reminded Steffy that she has a contract with them and that promises were made to her. But she pushed back on Hope and then Steffy was saying that the contract allows Forrester Creations the right to adjust and make business decisions. And she insisted to Hope that this is just good business. But she told Steffy that it felt personal.

Hope’s Rocky Road at FC on B&B

I cannot recall one time ever over the years that Hope brought up having a contract with them. And yes, that makes sense in the business world. But not the soap world necessarily. Because Steffy has cancelled Hope’s line or put it on hold many times in the past.

And Steffy even fired her before and you know, Ridge Forrester (Thorsten Kaye) made her do that walk of shame. But never once in all that time did Hope mention having a contract with Steffy and Ridge’s company. But I think there’s a reason for it to come up when Hope was talking to Steffy before Liam Spencer (Scott Clifton). And Katie started pitching Hope to come to Logan and work where she’s wanted.

Then once Liam and Katie convinced her to join them, Hope told Brooke Logan (Katherine Kelly Lang) that she was going to take a leave of absence. And Hope, Steffy, and Ridge all have worn out the phrase leave of absence. And it sure seemed bizarre for Hope to even take a leave rather than just quit.

Bold and the Beautiful: Hope’s LoA is Huge Flag

Why wouldn’t she just tell Steffy she’s tired of all the broken promises and just say, “I quit.” and walk out. So, that’s the second red flag. This is all very deliberate. If Hope had quit, then it would draw a legal line in the sand. Because she would no longer be an employee of Steffy and Ridge’s anymore. But as it stands now, Hope is still very much an employee of Forrester Creations and she’s now sneaking around with her brother Deke Sharpe (Harrison Cone) and going in the back door of Spencer Tower to work on that collection.

And Brad Bell rarely pulls off surprises as a writer and he usually drops really heavy-handed hints. If you’ve been watching Bold and the Beautiful for a while, I’m sure you already know this. And since they’ve beaten it to death that Hope is on a leave of absence, that’s got to be important.

Bold and the Beautiful: The “Hope” Wordplay and Foreshadowing

By the end of this week, Steffy is demanding answers from Katie. However, it may not be about Hope. I’m not sure that Steffy figures it out by then. It feels too fast. Unless, of course, she drops by Brooke’s house to talk to Hope, who should be relaxing and enjoying her leave from Forrester Creations. But she’s not been at Brooke’s place much. Hope has been non-stop over at Logan collaborating with Deke. Because they are racing to get that launch ready to go.

And the last time that Steffy was over there talking to Hope, that was when another red flag cropped up that I want to mention. It’s them using the word hope as a noun, not a name. It happened again when Katie was talking to Brooke. She was grilling Katie about her next designer and what is ahead for Logan.

And this was when Brooke was basically saying that Katie’s doomed to fail since the Eric thing was a one-off. Then Katie said she wasn’t going to fail and said, quote, “I have hope.” And she meant it literally, as in, “Hey, Brooke, I have your daughter Hope. That’s why I won’t fail.”

And that was the second time it happened like that. So the first time was in a chat between Steffy and Hope over at Brooke’s place. That’s when Steffy was trash-talking Logan and then Hope asked Steffy if she really thought that Katie was doomed to fail and that her fashion house wouldn’t last. So, Steffy said she didn’t see any hope for Logan at all.

Bold and the Beautiful: Legal Ramifications and Contract Breaches

So, with those red flags, I feel like the Bold and the Beautiful writers are heavily foreshadowing a rough road ahead for Katie as she tries to rush out the Hope Collection and get it launched before Brooke, Ridge and Steffy find out. But here’s the thing. Even if Katie and Bill get the launch released and they blindside them, even if Wyatt Spencer (Darin Brooks) finds the real big blue diamond and it’s around Hope’s neck when she and Deke walk the runway at Logan. And even if they get applause and accolades from the fashion press, it can all still blow up in their faces.

I think Steffy is going to be the one who gets suspicious and follows up. But no matter whenever she and Ridge find out that Hope went behind their backs and was creeping around with Katie and the Logan bunch and the Spencer bunch, there’s going to be H E double hockey sticks to pay. And Steffy might pursue a legal remedy. Because they keep flogging the words leave of absence over and over. I think it’s about more than just Hope lying to her mom Brooke. It might be about how Logan is going to go down in flames.

Bold and the Beautiful: Hope Looks Doomed

Even if Hope’s collection goes ahead and makes its official debut, even if it’s a hit with the press, even if it sells a ton, none of that may matter. And here’s why. Steffy and Ridge are still Hope’s employers, she is still an official Forrester Creations employee. And as she mentioned, she is under contract. And under California law, that could give Steffy and Ridge a whole lot of room to do something legal to ruin Katie’s fashion house and it may actually destroy it.

In California, a creative contract like Hope would have would include clauses. One would be exclusivity, meaning she can’t work for another company while she is still a Forrester Creations employee. There may also be a clause about no moonlighting. That’s common.

That means Hope has to be loyal only to Forrester Creations while an employee. So, she can’t go work for anybody else for any reason. and sneaking around with Deacon to make a new collection for Katie would put Hope in breach of contract. So, it’s very possible that Steffy could push Carter Walton (Lawrence Saint-Victor) and tell him to file an injunction to stop Hope’s collection at Logan and that could wreak havoc on Katie and Bill.

Bold and the Beautiful: Things Look So Bad for Logan

So, even if the collection launched and sales come in for Hope’s line, an injunction would bring that all to a screeching halt. They wouldn’t be able to fulfill the orders. Bill might actually have to refund all the sales. Steffy and Ridge could also sue for damages in addition to getting an injunction blocking the launch.

And if the launch still happens before any legal action is taken, the court could just say fine, Katie can’t fulfill the sales orders. So, Carter might be able to sue for Forrester Creations ownership of those designs. By the way, also if Deke had sketched any of them while he was still at Forrester Creations, even if they were rejected for the Hope for the Future collection. Because they would have been done on Forrester Creations time and with their sketch pads and all that kind of stuff.

So, Steffy might actually take down Logan because Hope lied and took a leave of absence instead of just quitting. However, if it goes that way, I’m going to go ahead and call it sloppy. Because Bill’s a businessman who knows contracts and he would have insisted that Hope quit. Because her signing a contract with them at Logan isn’t enough while she’s still active under her Forrester Creations contract. So, we’ll see how it goes.

Nicole Kidman may not have been sitting courtside at Madison Square Garden on Wednesday night, but she still found herself part of the action. The Oscar winner had an adorable reaction after Taylor Swift and sisters Este and Alana Haim honored her with custom Knicks-themed T-shirts during Game 4 of the NBA Finals. The trio’s pun-filled fashion choices quickly went viral as the New York Knicks mounted a historic comeback against the San Antonio Spurs.

Swift and the Haim sisters leaned fully into wordplay for the star-studded matchup, wearing DIY tribute shirts inspired by celebrities and the Knicks.

Swift rocked a shirt reading “Stevie Knicks,” a nod to Fleetwood Mac legend Stevie Nicks, while Este Haim sported “Knickole Kidman” and Alana Haim wore a shirt reading “Knickleback,” referencing the rock band Nickelback.

The group’s courtside look instantly caught attention online as fans praised the playful fashion moment. Mariska Hargitay even joined in on the fun, later changing into her own “Stevie Knicks” shirt after arriving at Madison Square Garden in a simple black top.

Advertisement

Nicole Kidman Had The Sweetest Response

Kidman clearly appreciated the shoutout. After clips of Swift and the Haim sisters showing off their custom shirts spread online, the “Big Little Lies” actress reposted a video of the trio to her Instagram Stories. “Right there with you girls!” Kidman wrote, adding basketball and heart emojis.

She later reshared a Reel by the Haim sisters that featured the group’s pun-heavy fashion moment. “My girls! I just wanna have fun!” Kidman captioned the upload.

So far, neither Stevie Nicks nor Nickelback has publicly reacted to the now-viral tribute shirts.

Taylor Swift’s Love Of Puns Is Nothing New

For longtime Swift fans, the playful shirt choice felt very on brand. The Grammy winner has become known for leaning into puns and wordplay, especially in recent years.

Swift famously sparked a wave of viral fan reactions after revealing she spends a surprising amount of time thinking about sourdough bread, even gifting homemade loaves to friends and decorating bread bags with handwritten puns inspired by her music.

Advertisement

Fans have since created countless Taylor-inspired baking jokes online, from “Are You Bready For It?” to “You Knead To Calm Down” and “It’s A Loaf Story, Baby Just Say Yeast.”

Madison Square Garden Was Packed With Celebrities

The Knicks’ dramatic 107-106 comeback win, the largest in NBA Finals history after erasing a 29-point deficit, brought out plenty of famous faces.

Alongside Swift, the Haim sisters, and Hargitay, stars including Timothée Chalamet, Kylie Jenner, Ben Stiller, Tracy Morgan, Jimmy Fallon, Chris Rock, Spike Lee, and Sydney Sweeney all packed Madison Square Garden for the unforgettable Game 4 thriller.

Swift and Jenner were later seen sharing a friendly courtside hug following the Knicks’ dramatic win, a moment that caught fans’ attention given Swift’s complicated history with Jenner’s sister, Kim Kardashian.

Taylor Swift’s Courtside Appearance Comes Amid Wedding Buzz

Swift’s headline-making night at Madison Square Garden also comes as she prepares for her next major chapter with fiancé Travis Kelce. The Grammy winner and the Kansas City Chiefs star announced their engagement in August 2025 after nearly two years of dating, quickly becoming one of entertainment’s most talked-about couples.

In recent weeks, speculation surrounding the pair’s wedding plans has intensified, with rumors swirling that Madison Square Garden itself could play a role in the celebration later this summer. While neither Swift nor Kelce has publicly confirmed the details, reports suggest the couple is planning a highly private, tightly controlled event.

Advertisement

A report further claimed the venue could accommodate thousands of guests, fueling fan speculation that Swifties might be included in the festivities or surrounding celebrations.

Why Pulling Off A Taylor Swift-Travis Kelce Wedding Could Be A Major Challenge

If reports surrounding Swift and Kelce’s rumored wedding plans are true, keeping the event private may prove to be one of the biggest hurdles.

Luxury wedding planner Colin Cowie, who is not involved in the couple’s alleged plans but has organized weddings for celebrity pairs including Jennifer Lopez and Ben Affleck, as well as Don Henley and Sharon Summerall, recently weighed in on the unique challenge a Swift-Kelce wedding would present.

“Everyone’s going to want to know what it would be like to be a front row attendee at this wedding,” Cowie said, also suggesting that maintaining privacy for an event of that scale would require extensive planning and security. “It’s going to be a massive undertaking to keep this under locks.”

For a couple with Swift and Kelce’s level of fame, and one of the most dedicated fanbases in pop culture, keeping wedding details from leaking could prove nearly impossible.

Advertisement

PlaqueboyMax has the internet talking once again. The popular streamer recently unveiled a new tattoo that reads “DIVA,” sparking plenty of reactions across social media. While some fans questioned the meaning behind the ink, Max later addressed the chatter during a livestream, explaining why he decided to get it.

Related: New Look? Social Media Reacts As PlaqueboyMax Debuts Facial Dermal Piercings (PHOTO)

Streamer PlaqueboyMax Reveals New Tattoo

On Tuesday, June 9, PlaqueboyMax took to social media to give fans a first look at his latest tattoo. The streamer shared a shirtless mirror selfie on social media, showing off the fresh ink placed along his ribcage. The tattoo features the word “DIVA” written in all capital letters. Max later followed up with a TikTok video, giving viewers a closer look at the tattoo and putting the new addition on full display. The reveal quickly made its rounds online, with fans and critics alike sharing their thoughts on the unexpected choice.

PlaqueboyMax Explains What “DIVA” Means To Him

The new tattoo arrives shortly after PlaqueboyMax made headlines for his diamond face piercings, which also sparked debate across social media. During a recent livestream, Max addressed some of the backlash surrounding his latest body art while showing off the tattoo to a friend. As they discussed the online reactions, the friend first questioned whether the tattoo was real before asking what the word “DIVA” meant to him.

In response, Max explained that the tattoo symbolizes confidence and his unapologetic self.

“I’m a bad b****. I’m going to do whatever I want on some fly sh**,” he said. “Bad b****** are the most confident people in the world.”

Max went on to suggest that some people have been trying to label him or question his masculinity because of the tattoo. However, he made it clear that the ink reflects his confidence and willingness to do what he wants, regardless of outside opinions.

Social Media Reacts

Social media users chimed in on The Shade Room Teens’ comment section with reactions to Max’s explanation.

Instagram user @the_next_king10 wrote, “These 🥷🏽s don’t let the girls have 💩 no more 🤦🏽‍♂️‼️”

Another Instagram user @officialmagicgod wrote, “He thinks he Beyoncé”

While Instagram user @itsmealiajah wrote, “I only like him cause he doesn’t care to be in a box meaning don’t care for labels like yall let a lot of things stop yall cause it’s consider gay”

Instagram user @jade.arie wrote, “He’s definitely not beating those allegations now 🤣 💀💀”

Another Instagram user @iwocwitalean wrote, “Diva was the only word to make him feel confident?”

While Instagram user @banksbig4 wrote, “Diva definiton – a female version of a hustler 🤨”

Instagram user @ibdattprettymf wrote, “I really hope DIVA is his mother name 🤣”

Another Instagram user @jatoyriarchive wrote, “This is too far with the trolling…”

While Instagram user @charity.deniise wrote, “Be who you areeeee”

RELATED: Yikes! Social Media Pops Off After NBA YoungBoy Calls Out PlaqueBoyMax Over Music Critique