There is a wide variety of sitcoms available on streaming, but nothing is quite like New Girl. Starring Zooey Deschanel, the series began in 2011, but 15 years later, it is just as incredible as it was when it originally aired. The concept is simple: Jess (Deschanel) moves into a new apartment with Nick (Jake Johnson), Schmidt (Max Greenfield), and Winston (Lamorne Morris). However, it’s that simplicity that’s key, as it easily sustained the sitcom for seven seasons.

Many shows become stale as they go on, but the Fox series avoided that fate with many memorable episodes in the later seasons, particularly New Girl‘s ending. Its relatable story and lovable characters truly make the show a classic, placing this series in rare company. Even while many comedies age poorly, New Girl remains as hilarious as ever.

‘New Girl’s Characters Get Better Each Season

New Girl begins by creating an unlikely group of friends as Jess moves into apartment 4D. Contrasting personalities provide many conflicts and keep the story moving, offering moments for each resident to take center stage. From Nick and Schmitt’s argument about showing affection that leads to Nick’s cookie-related breakdown to Winston’s reaction to Jess believing she’s hiding meth during his police background check, the conflicts among them are unpredictable and endless, but never cross the line into toxic friendships.

Not only are Jess, Nick, Schmidt, and Winston a unique blend of personalities, but the strong friendships that develop among them are unbeatable. Nick and Schmidt are one of the best TV duos, but Winston and Jess are never left out, nor is Coach (Damon Wayans Jr.) when he lives with them, or even Cece (Hannah Simone). In fact, Winston and Cece become an unlikely duo of their own, providing “Classic Winston-and-Cece mess arounds” throughout the series. Because each friendship offers a distinct dynamic, different combinations keep the story fresh even as the series goes on.

Related

‘New Girl’ Proved It Was Better Than ‘Friends’ With Just One Episode

Sorry not sorry.

Advertisement

Another way the series prevents itself from getting repetitive is by letting the characters evolve. Schmidt goes from a womanizer in need of the “douchebag jar” to a loving husband and father. Nick slowly gets his life together, chasing his passion by publishing his novel. Even if the concepts are repetitive, like Jess and Nick’s on-and-off relationship, the characters’ growth makes each iteration different, which keeps the audience engaged.

‘New Girl’ Deserves Its Continued Success 8 Years After It Ended

The series may have wrapped up in 2018, but it remains popular to this day, finding considerable success on streaming. Max Greenfield acknowledged the show’s popularity, saying, “It’s the perfect binge show.” Now that the show is easily accessible, new fans seem to be latching onto it all the time, proving that the show has aged well.

New Girl remains so funny because it is relatable, even years after its run. The characters are not only quirky, but they face problems that most adults have experienced both in their personal and professional lives. They struggle to find the right careers, and Winston, in particular, tries many things before he realizes his passion. Jess has storylines about asking for a promotion and starting a job in a drastically different environment. In their personal lives, each character has failed relationships, which provide a myriad of romantic problems people can easily see themselves in. More broadly, the characters are constantly learning to deal with conflict and communicate with difficult people, which often includes each other. New Girl deserves every bit of attention it has received, both during and after its seven-season run.

Advertisement

Release Date

Advertisement

2011 – 2018

Network

FOX

Advertisement

Showrunner

Elizabeth Meriwether

Advertisement

Directors

Trent O’Donnell, Jay Chandrasekhar, Max Winkler, Fred Goss, Jesse Peretz, Steve Welch, Lynn Shelton, Josh Greenbaum, Russ T. Alsobrook, Bill Purple, Christine Gernon, Lorene Scafaria, Michael Schultz, Peyton Reed, Tristram Shapeero, Eric Appel, Alec Berg, Jason Winer, Michael Spiller, Steve Pink, Alex Hardcastle, Andrew Fleming, Craig Zisk, Daniel Attias

Writers

Advertisement

Berkley Johnson, Kim Rosenstock, Rob Rosell, Matt Fusfeld, Alex Cuthbertson, David Feeney, Nina Pedrad, Rebecca Addelman, Kay Cannon, Sarah Tapscott, Joe Wengert, Ethan Sandler, Adrian Wenner, David Iserson, Nick Adams, David Walpert, Lamar Woods, Veronica McCarthy, David Quandt, Joni Lefkowitz, Lamorne Morris, Rachel Axler, Christian Magalhaes, Robert Snow

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Fitness influencer Stephanie Buttermore tragically died in March 2026 at the age of 36.

“It is with profound sorrow that we share the sudden passing of Jeff’s fiancée and partner of 10 years, Stephanie,” a social media statement from a spokesperson for Buttermore’s fiancé, Jeff Nippard, read. “As many of you know, Stephanie meant the world to Jeff.”

The statement continued, “She will be remembered for her warmth and compassion, her love for her family and her Ph.D research on ovarian cancer. We kindly ask for privacy as we navigate this tragic loss. Thank you for your understanding and support during this difficult time.”

A cause of death was not immediately revealed for Buttermore, who got engaged to bodybuilder Nippard in 2022 after six years of dating.

Related: Fitness Influencer Stephanie Buttermore Dead at 36, Fiance Confirms

Fitness influencer Stephanie Buttermore has died. She was 36. “It is with profound sorrow that we share the sudden passing of Jeff’s fiancée and partner of 10 years, Stephanie,” a Friday, March 6, Instagram statement from bodybuilder Jeff Nippard’s team read. “As many of you know, Stephanie meant the world to Jeff.” The statement continued, […]

Keep scrolling to learn more about Buttermore’s life and legacy:

Stephanie Buttermore Was a Fitness Educator and Social Media Star

Stephanie Buttermore was an influencer with more than 528,000 Instagram followers and 1 million YouTube subscribers at the time of her death. She shared content about fitness training, nutrition, beauty and other lifestyle subjects.

Stephanie Buttermore Researched Ovarian Cancer

Long before Stephanie Buttermore started posting on social media, she received her Ph. D and worked as a cancer scientist.

“I obtained my Ph.D. in pathology and cell biology with a focus on the molecular mechanisms that drive ovarian cancer progression,” a biography on her YouTube page reads. “I mix science and fitness into all facets of life. I currently do cancer research but LOVE to workout and eat good food.”

Stephanie Buttermore Was a Proud Advocate of Body Positivity 

Stephanie Buttermore was always proud of her body — no matter her size.

“I heard every fat-phobic slur under the sun when I gained weight,” Buttermore wrote via Instagram in March 2023, alongside a handful of swimsuit photos. “But, you know what, I look back at these pictures like DAMNNN … I was HAWWWT 🔥.”

She added, “The sentiment of ‘F the haters’ never personally worked for me. I mean, I wish it did, it would make life so much easier. I prefer to just focus on me, my goals and giving my energy to those who deserve it.”

Months later, Buttermore proclaimed via social media that she felt “super happy and comfortable” in her skin.

“I can live my life eating intuitively and my body feels naturally settled here,” she captioned a May 2023 upload.

Stephanie Buttermore and Jeff Nippard Were Together for 10 Years Before Her Death

Stephanie Buttermore started dating bodybuilder Jeff Nippard in 2016 after he slid into her DMs. After six years of dating, Nippard proposed in October 2022.

“We got along like best friends right away because we established a foundation of shared interests and values from the beginning,” Nippard gushed via Instagram at the time. “We grew together as we learned from each other, travelled the world together, always supported each other, and used the power couple equation to build each other up in so many different ways.”

Stephanie Buttermore Took a Social Media Hiatus Ahead of Her Death

Stephanie Buttermore took a step back from posting content on Instagram in the years preceding her death.

“My mental health has been the best it’s ever been,” Buttermore noted in a May 2024 Instagram post about her online hiatus. “I no longer struggle with anxiety. At all. It was almost crippling a few years ago to the point I felt I couldn’t breathe or leave my house. Now I really don’t have to care whether people liked what I posted or if they are saying negative things about me.”

Leaving Instagram behind also allowed Buttermore to focus on her relationships.

“When I’m with my family or Jeff, I’m much more immersed in the moment,” she said. “I take photos for the sake of saving memories and not because I’m going to post it on my story. I never get caught not listening to someone because I’m checking comments, and I’m in a better mood because I’m not anxious. Family time is family time.”

Science fiction is often at its best when it’s a mirror of our own world, and there is no shortage of great books, films, and series that prove it — but what if, instead of a mirror, we could see what could have been? That’s what Apple TV’s best sci-fi series, For All Mankind, is all about.

With Season 5 premiering later this month and a spin-off set to bow in May, For All Mankind has arguably the single best premise in modern sci-fi: what if the space race never ended? The simple answer is that the world would look different, but the series goes beyond, looking at possible ramifications and providing a much-needed optimistic outlook on the potential our own world still has.

What Is ‘For All Mankind’ About?

It’s June 1969, and everyone is glued to their TV screens watching Soviet cosmonaut Alexei Leonov. The USSR has beaten the United States to the moon by a full month, planting its flag on the surface and irrevocably taking the lead in the space race. This simple historical twist turns For All Mankind‘s alternate history upside down, since, in reality, the Soviets never reached the moon, and the space race ended six years after the Apollo 11 mission.

However, For All Mankind rewrites history; with the Soviets in the lead, the pressure is now on the U.S. not just to catch up, but actually to overtake them, since they missed all the important “firsts,” and being the runner-up essentially equals second place in the Cold War. So, the U.S. government begin to consider NASA’s space program a priority, determined to beat the USSR to other milestones in space. In other words, this defeat ultimately has a positive effect, as it drives American scientists and astronauts to go beyond what the Soviets have already achieved.

Related

The 30 Best Apple TV+ Original Series, Ranked

The best of the bunch.

Advertisement

Each season of For All Mankind takes place in a different decade, tweaking some important historical milestones and adding others. It’s impossible for the series to skip a few key moments in the space race, such as Neil Armstrong’s moon landing, but they end up being very different from how they historically happened. Other projects, like the Sea Dragon, do see the light of day in the series, serving as a reminder of everything that could have been accomplished, but ultimately wasn’t.

In ‘For All Mankind,’ the Whole World Benefits From Space Exploration

With so much funding and attention being directed to NASA and space exploration, technology is developed not only at a much faster pace, but also in completely different directions in For All Mankind compared to what has happened historically. One mission is quickly followed by another, forcing engineers to get creative and find alternatives that eventually find their way into day-to-day life. In that sense, the series’s alternate world looks closer to what science fiction writers imagined the future would look like decades ago.

Another major difference is how important and easily widespread green energy has become. Cars are mostly electric in For All Mankind, thanks in no small part to improvements made through space exploration. Mining missions have also made this process much cheaper and easier down on Earth, with access to alternative energy sources becoming a financial and political issue. The space race takes place simultaneously with the consolidation of the nuclear age, and that plays a major role in decisions concerning the whole world, especially those at the bottom of the societal chain.

Progress Isn’t Limited to Space and Technology in ‘For All Mankind’

Image via Apple TV+

One of the best parts of every new installment of For All Mankind is the quick reel that plays at the beginning of the premiere, showing what has happened in the world between seasons. It situates the audience in the series’ current time period, but also offers a sense of just how much has changed thanks to everything that happened previously. As one can imagine, reaching the moon first has a profound impact on Soviet politics, renewing their strength and turning them into a much more powerful global player.

However, U.S. politics arguably change the most. The Soviets know all about their rivals’ civil rights and equality struggles at the dawn of the space age, and take advantage of that by adding more “firsts” to their accomplishments. Again, this forces the U.S. to catch up and reshuffle its departments on pretty much every level to address representation. Women achieve leadership positions that, in our world, hardly ever go beyond speculation, and civil rights quickly become as important an issue in space as they are on Earth.

With For All Mankind‘s space race reaching well beyond its real-life limits, the series also incorporates contemporary aspects of space exploration, like the role of corporate players. Important as it is, NASA is still a government agency, and, just like in the real world, the private sector takes an interest in space, becoming a contender in itself as the race continues. All that makes For All Mankind the best modern work in the alt-history subgenre of sci-fi, as well as inspiring and honest about the possibilities in our own future.

Disaster movies have always thrived on one simple promise: Go big, then somehow get even bigger. Few filmmakers understand that formula better than Roland Emmerich, the director behind end-of-the-world spectacles like Independence Day and The Day After Tomorrow. By the time Moonfall arrived in 2022, though, Emmerich wasn’t just trying to top himself — he was practically trying to launch himself into orbit.

That’s exactly why Moonfall has become such a strange kind of modern favorite. Four years later, the movie’s sheer commitment to chaos, nonsense, and go-for-broke sci-fi insanity has helped it earn the kind of reputation most polished blockbusters can only dream of. Now, that beautifully unhinged experience is even easier to revisit, because Moonfall is now streaming free on Fawesome.

The film stars Halle Berry as former astronaut and NASA executive Jo Fowler, Patrick Wilson as disgraced astronaut Brian Harper, and John Bradley as conspiracy theorist K.C. Houseman, whose oddball theories turn out to be a little more useful than anyone expected. The supporting cast includes Michael Peña as Tom Lopez, Charlie Plummer as Sonny Harper, Kelly Yu as Michelle, Donald Sutherland as Holdenfield, Eme Ikwuakor as Doug Davidson, and Carolina Bartczak as Brenda Lopez.

Related

Daylight Saving Time — The Collider Movie Quiz!

Daylight Saving Time starts this weekend. Before we lose an hour of sleep, here’s a quiz about movie titles that contain Daylight, Saving, or Time.

So, How Bad Is ‘Moonfall’?

Image via Lionsgate / Courtesy Everett Collection

Collider’s review stated that Moonfall sees director Roland Emmerich once again leaning into the global destruction spectacle that has defined much of his career — but this time the formula feels tired, repetitive, and far less impressive than his previous disaster epics. Ross Bonaime adds that the premise is as ridiculous as it sounds, and to the film’s credit, Emmerich seems aware of that absurdity. As the moon drifts closer, it looms ominously over the planet like a slow-moving horror villain. Its shifting orbit causes massive disasters — tidal waves, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions — creating the familiar sense that global catastrophe is imminent.

“But even compared to Emmerich’s previous apocalyptic action films, Moonfall is more rinky-dink and on a smaller scale than we’ve seen from him. Films like Independence Day and 2012 had a massive scope to them, and even a film like White House Down showed that Emmerich could make an enthralling action film with a smaller focus. Yet Moonfall is the type of film that requires that sort of insane, over-the-top production, and it never quite reaches that point.

Moonfall, unfortunately, becomes a mixture of Emmerich’s usual clichés that are starting to show their age, a script that only occasionally embraces the insanity of this idea (even though the third act goes all-in on getting mind-numbingly stupid), and a scope that doesn’t do this story justice. Maybe it’s just time for Emmerich to finally leave the world alone.”

Moonfall is streaming now on Fawesome.

Advertisement

Release Date

February 4, 2022

Advertisement

Runtime

120 minutes

Director

Advertisement

Roland Emmerich

Writers

Harald Kloser, Spenser Cohen, Roland Emmerich

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Before Jason Statham fully settled into his modern action-star groove, he led a different kind of crime movie — one with less brute-force chaos and more old-school heist tension. It had the swagger you’d expect from a Statham vehicle, but it also came with a messier web of corruption, secrets, and double-crosses than a standard smash-and-grab thriller.

That movie was The Bank Job, and it’s now found a new streaming life. Eighteen years after its 2008 release, the film is currently streaming free on Fawesome, which lists it in the platform’s crime lineup. Directed by Roger Donaldson and written by Dick Clement and Ian La Frenais, The Bank Job is based on the real-life 1971 Baker Street robbery, with the film framing the heist around not just money, but compromising secrets tucked away in a London bank’s safety deposit boxes. It was made on a reported $20 million budget and grossed about $66.1 million worldwide, making it a solid performer for a mid-budget thriller.

The cast is led by Statham as Terry Leather (sensational name, that one), with Saffron Burrows as Martine Love, Stephen Campbell Moore as Kevin Swain, Daniel Mays as Dave Shilling, and James Faulkner as Guy Singer. The film also stars David Suchet as Lew Vogel, Keeley Hawes as Wendy Leather, Richard Lintern as Tim Everett, Peter Bowles as Miles Urquhart, Alistair Petrie as Philip Lisle, Colin Salmon as Hakim Jamal, and Peter De Jersey as Michael X.

Related

Daylight Saving Time — The Collider Movie Quiz!

Daylight Saving Time starts this weekend. Before we lose an hour of sleep, here’s a quiz about movie titles that contain Daylight, Saving, or Time.

Is ‘The Bank Job’ Worth Watching?

Image via Lionsgate

Jim Emerson, writing for RogerEbert.com, stated that The Bank Job is a perfectly serviceable B-grade heist thriller that delivers a familiar mix of crime, conspiracy, and double-crossing, but ultimately struggles to rise above the many caper films it clearly draws inspiration from. However, despite the sensational elements of royal scandal, espionage, gangsters, blackmail, and corruption, the film rarely feels as thrilling as its premise suggests. Director Roger Donaldson moves the story along efficiently, but the execution often feels routine compared to classic heist films that explore similar territory.

“One semi-redeeming element is that the film was inspired by true events. The shocking 1971 Lloyds Bank robbery was a big story, until four days later when it suddenly wasn’t. The whole thing abruptly and mysteriously vanished from the papers, radio and television, reportedly due to a ‘D-Notice’ issued by the highest authorities banning all press coverage. And it’s such a good story. What a shame it isn’t more memorably told. The director is the bewilderingly uneven Roger Donaldson (Smash Palace, No Way Out, Cadillac Man, Cocktail). The cast are fine (as British grammar would have it). Sorry there isn’t more to report.”

The Bank Job is streaming on Fawesome.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Release Date

March 7, 2008

Runtime

Advertisement

112 Minutes

Director

Roger Donaldson

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

National Cereal Day
Cereal-ously Delicious!

Published
March 7, 2026
4:00 PM PST

BLACKPINK’s LISA
Monkeying Around with Punch!!!

Published
March 7, 2026
4:55 PM PST

Before Bradley Cooper became one of Hollywood’s most reliable big-screen stars, he headlined a sci-fi thriller built on one killer question: What if you could suddenly access every corner of your brain? It was pulpy, fast-moving, and just clever enough to make its wish-fulfillment fantasy hit harder than a standard thriller.

That movie was Limitless. Now, 15 years later, the film has landed in a perfect streaming spot, because Limitless is currently streaming free on Fawesome. Directed by Neil Burger, Limitless follows struggling writer Eddie Morra, whose life changes overnight when he gets access to NZT-48, a mysterious drug that supercharges his brain function. The film was released in 2011, runs 105 minutes, and is loosely based on Alan Glynn’s novel The Dark Fields. It went on to become a box office success, grossing roughly $161.8 million worldwide against a reported $27 million budget.

The film stars Bradley Cooper as Eddie Morra, Abbie Cornish as Lindy, and Robert De Niro as powerful businessman Carl Van Loon. The supporting cast also includes Anna Friel as Melissa, Andrew Howard as Gennady, Johnny Whitworth as Vernon, Robert John Burke as Pierce, Darren Goldstein as Kevin Doyle, Ned Eisenberg as Morris Brandt, and T.V. Carpio as Valerie.

Related

Daylight Saving Time — The Collider Movie Quiz!

Daylight Saving Time starts this weekend. Before we lose an hour of sleep, here’s a quiz about movie titles that contain Daylight, Saving, or Time.

Is ‘Limitless’ Worth Watching?

Image via Relativity Media

Collider’s review stated that Limitless tries to present the story of a man whose mind becomes superhumanly intelligent, but the film itself never quite manages to feel as smart as its premise suggests. While the premise offers plenty of intriguing possibilities, the film never fully explores them. There are hints of deeper ideas throughout the story, including commentary on society’s reliance on quick fixes and prescription drugs or the possibility of framing Eddie’s journey as a metaphor for addiction.

“The inanity of the plot is made worse by the vapidity of Morra’s character. While Cooper once nailed the everyman role on Alias, it’s a part that no longer suits him. He’s simply too handsome and his charm is more smarmy than good-natured. He’s not helped by the fact that Eddie is a selfish jerk who rarely seems bothered by the collateral damage NZT has caused and that all of his success is unearned. There’s also no help from the supporting cast. If you needed more proof that Robert De Niro (who plays a high-powered businessman who hires Morra) just doesn’t care anymore, you can add his performance in Limitless to the evidence locker.”

Limitless is streaming now on Fawesome.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Release Date

March 18, 2011

Runtime

Advertisement

105 minutes

Director

Neil Burger

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement