Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Entertainment

Paramount’s Warner Bros. Merger Is Officially in Serious Trouble

Published

on

From left to right: "The Emoji Movie," "The Last Airbender," & "Green Lantern"

For the last decade or two, fans have watched the changing landscape of Hollywood with more interest than usual. Not only has the streaming era thrown the entire business for a loop, it has pushed companies into mergers, acquisitions, and re-brands that would have seemed unthinkable in the past. Fans have seen firsthand how these deals can affect their favorite TV shows and movies, yet it has begun to seem inevitable that every merger will be approved. Paramount‘s impending merger with Warner Bros. was no exception, but this week, federal Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin gave us real hope that the two companies might be kept apart.

Martinez-Olguin is a judge in the U.S. District Court for Northern District of California in Oakland. On Friday, she heard arguments from a coalition of 12 states arguing that the Paramount-Warner Bros. merger would be a violation of federal anti-trust laws, and would be detrimental to the film industry — and the economy as a whole. According to a report by Variety, Paramount and Warner Bros. had previously agreed not to close their deal before July 22. With that deadline fast approaching, Martinez-Olguin approved a 14-day temporary restraining order, putting it off at least a little longer.

Two weeks may not sound like a lot — especially for a deal this big with so much momentum behind it — but it is the first ray of hope we’ve seen in a case like this for years now. After Disney absorbed both LucasFilm and Marvel Studios, it seemed hard to imagine any other giant mergers coming into question, but this time might be different. If the court finds serious fault with this merger, it could represent a whole new era for Hollywood.

Advertisement

The Paramount-Warner Bros. Merger Will Make Movies Worse

From left to right: "The Emoji Movie," "The Last Airbender," & "Green Lantern" Images via Sony, Paramount Pictures, & Warner Bros.

The coalition of states opposing this merger is led by California, and the state’s attorney general, Rob Bonta issued a celebratory statement on after Martinez-Olguin’s order. Bonta said that this “megamerger” would lead to “fewer opportunities for more people,” and “worse products and services for all people.” It’s a sentiment that many critics have shared over the last few years, yet usually with an air of defeat. Here, it seems like the case against the merger might actually have a chance now.

As we’ve seen before, a merger between two massive companies like this typically starts off with mass layoffs. The newly-formed corporation no longer needs two people doing each job now that they’re one entity, and protecting the employment rate is a major part of the state’s case. However, anti-trust laws are meant to protect the economy from “anticompetitive” behavior, meaning that companies can collude to set fixed prices on their goods and services. Under a monopoly, consumers have nowhere else to go, so they’re forced to accept the quality and prices offered.

Advertisement

This could be a real concern in today’s day and age, as consumers have watched streaming take over the entertainment industry only to fluctuate wildly in price. However, a spokesperson for Paramount was confident that they could overcome the anticompetitive argument in particular. They told Variety that these claims do not reflect “modern market realities,” adding: “This merger is lawful, pro-competitive, and will benefit consumers, creators, workers, and the entertainment industry.”

Judging by other massive mergers in Hollywood, public sentiment seems to be against these deals in general. There are hardly any Star Wars discussions these days without mention of the drop in quality since Disney took over, and the same is said of Marvel. Warner Bros. already suffered a major blow to its prestigious branding when it combined with Discovery several years ago, putting reality TV titles alongside some of the most esteemed films ever made on HBO Max. These deals have definitely detracted from the quality of entertainment in some cases, and more importantly, critics and fans have their eyes out for it to happen again in any future mergers.

Canceling The Paramount-Warner Bros. Merger Would Have Consequences

The Hollywood sign
The Hollywood sign
Via Smithsonian Magazine
Advertisement

With all that said, the battle against this merger is hardly over, and there is too much money on the line for the corporations themselves to give up easily. If Martinez-Olguin did rule that the merger violated anti-trust laws, Paramount and Warner Bros. might need to pay up to $7 billion in breakup fees. On top of that, all the plans for the merger would need to be scrapped, taking with it all the plans both companies have been making as they’ve assumed this deal would go through.

The next move in this case will likely be to determine how much longer the merger can be stalled. Martinez-Olguin’s restraining order could reportedly be extended as long as 28 days in total, during which time she will need to decide on the coalition’s request for a preliminary injunction to hold off the merger indefinitely while their lawsuit takes its course. Historically, injunctions like this have worked to unravel merger deals before they can be finalized, regardless of the outcome of the lawsuits themselves.

Meanwhile, Paramount’s lawyers argue that the entertainment industry would be less competitive if this deal falls through, claiming that neither Paramount nor Warner Bros. alone can rival Netflix, Amazon, and other players on that level. If they merge, the two companies believe they can put up more of a fight. Whatever the outcome is, it will likely be decided by the end of September, and the future of Hollywood will be a bit easier to predict.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Entertainment

Brand New Day’ Director Teases a Darker MCU Story Thanks to The Punisher

Published

on

Peter Parker (Tom Holland) in 'Spider-Man: Brand New Day'

Summary

  • Collider’s Steven Weintraub talks with director Destin Daniel Cretton for Spider-Man: Brand New Day.
  • Cretton breaks down parkour and wingsuit-inspired Spider-Man shots, working with Jon Watts, and the movie’s deleted scenes.
  • He also discusses balancing Spider-Man’s quippy energy with the movie’s darker storyline, and how Jon Berthal’s Punisher fits into this PG-13 world.

After three superb Spider-Man films, director Jon Watts stepped away from the Marvel machine ahead of Spider-Man: Brand New Day. Without a captain to steer this ship, the studio enlisted trusted filmmaker Destin Daniel Cretton, who cut his superhero teeth on 2021’s action-packed Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings. Now, with less than two weeks until its theatrical release, Cretton talks with Collider’s Steven Weintraub about spinning his own web in the MCU’s ever-expanding lore.

In Brand New Day, we pick up with a Peter Parker (Tom Holland) who’s hit rock bottom since his ultimate sacrifice in Spider-Man: No Way Home. He’s still fighting crime full-time, but he no longer has the support of Stark Industries and his superpowered allies, and no one, including his best friend Ned (Jacob Batalon) and partner MJ (Zendaya), even remembers who Peter Parker is. This isolation not only leads to a surprising team-up with Frank Castle/Punisher (Jon Bernthal) but also to an uncontrollable mutation in his Spider-Man transformation that may prove useful against an invisible new villain — if he can learn to harness it. Brand New Day also stars Stranger ThingsSadie Sink in her MCU debut and Avengers: Endgame’s Mark Ruffalo as Bruce Banner/The Hulk.

During his conversation with Collider’s editor-in-chief, Cretton discusses taking on Spider-Man’s fourth feature in the MCU, from editing room hurdles to the surprising lack of deleted scenes, and how they found the balance of Peter Parker’s darkest storyline yet with the fun Spider-Man fans love. The director also breaks down the innovative new Spider-Man shots in the movie, how they put audiences in the suit, and discusses bringing a character as brutal and complex as Berthal’s Frank Castle into Spider-Man’s world.

Advertisement

Destin Daniel Cretton on the Unique Cinematography of ‘Spider-Man: Brand New Day’

The Marvel veteran also gives a brief update on ‘Wonder Man’ Season 2.

COLLIDER: I was a huge, huge fan of Wonder Man. What’s the status of Season 2? Do you think you’ll be filming this year?

DESTIN DANIEL CRETTON: I hope so. We’ll leave it at that. [Laughs]

Okay, I’ll leave it there. One of the things I saw in the first 30 minutes of Brand New Day, and one of the things that so impressed me, was that you have shots of Spider-Man swinging through the city that have never been done before in a previous Spider-Man film, and I loved it. Can you talk about coming up with those new types of shots, like him inside the mask?

CRETTON: It was really important for us to try to find ways to remind people that Peter Parker is in that suit. So, finding a way to get the camera in a place that you could believe you are sitting inside that mask with him. We also looked quite a lot at different videos online of parkour videos and wingsuit videos, and where the camera’s placed and what types of lenses they’re using to create the most sense of vertigo, all to try to give the audience a new experience of what it feels like to really be in that suit, being that high and going that fast.

Advertisement

I loved those shots, and fans are going to love them. Did you speak to any of the previous Spider-Man directors before helming this to ask them what not to do?

CRETTON: The only director I spoke with was Jon Watts, who was very gracious in sharing some wise words. But I was mainly very positive about the people I was going to work with and the experience I was going to have.

‘Spider-Man: Brand New Day’ Has Very Few Deleted Scenes

“It wasn’t ever a battle of trying to keep things in the movie that I wanted.”

Peter Parker (Tom Holland) in 'Spider-Man: Brand New Day'
Peter Parker (Tom Holland) in ‘Spider-Man: Brand New Day’
Image via Sony Pictures Releasing
Advertisement

I’m fascinated by the editing process. I think the movie’s around two hours and 24 minutes with credits. Did you ever have a longer cut of it? Did you have those battles in the editing room?

CRETTON: Yeah, that’s always a part of the process. I think the first cut of this movie was a little closer to three hours, maybe two hours and 50 minutes or something, but that’s not the length that I wanted it to be. It wasn’t ever a battle of trying to keep things in the movie that I wanted. I think the movie is the right length that it should be right now.

When you say that length, do you mean that’s an assembly cut or a cut you’re actually happy with?

CRETTON: That’s more of an assembly cut.

Advertisement

Totally. I don’t want people thinking there are all these deleted scenes.

CRETTON: There actually aren’t that many deleted scenes in this movie, surprisingly.

How The Punisher Fits Into ‘Spider-Man: Brand New Day’s Darker Tone

“He’s a bit older, he’s in his 20s, and he is dealing with real life.”

Spider-Man-Brand-New-Day-Jon-Bernthal
Spider-Man: Brand New Day teaser trailer Stills
Images via Sony Pictures Releasing
Advertisement

One of the things that really impressed me about the opening 30 minutes is that it really feels like a completely new Spider-Man movie compared to the last trilogy because of what Spider-Man is dealing with emotionally. Can you talk about balancing the emotions of what he’s going through with the fun Peter Parker Spider-Man that audiences are used to?

CRETTON: That was front of mind. We’re still doing a Spider-Man movie. We’re not doing a depressing drama. It’s a fun, fun movie. It’s exhilarating, the action’s fun, and Spider-Man is still quippy Spider-Man. But he’s a bit older, he’s in his 20s, and he is dealing with real life, and real life is hard. So, I do think the subject matter of his emotional arc does go deeper and does get quite real, but that’s the fun of movies like this, is being able to find that balance between drama and comedy. Nobody does it better than Tom Holland.

I completely agree. I was so surprised when Punisher ended up in this movie, because he’s a famously R-rated character and Spider-Man is a PG-13 universe. Can you talk about figuring out, “Where can I go with Punisher? How hard can I go?” and the philosophical debate between the two characters, because Spider-Man is not about killing, and Punisher is a whole different story.

CRETTON: That, to me, is the point of having Punisher in this movie, is so the two can have that debate. I think this movie is still a Spider-Man movie, and Punisher is in his world. That doesn’t mean that the Punisher is somehow suddenly a different character. He’s the same Punisher, but we’re not showing the things that a PG-13 movie can’t show.

Advertisement

But to me, the point of the Punisher being in this movie is to be a little bit of a warning sign for Spidey, and the journey that he could go down if he’s not careful.

Spider-Man: Brand New Day swings into theaters on July 31.


spider-man-brand-new-day-official-poster.jpg
Advertisement


Advertisement

Release Date

July 31, 2026

Runtime

145 Minutes

Advertisement

Director

Destin Daniel Cretton

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement


Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Chadwick Boseman’s Family Locked In Bitter Estate Fight

Published

on

Chadwick Boseman, has died at age 43

Chadwick Boseman’s family has become embroiled in a bitter legal dispute nearly six years after the “Black Panther” star’s death.

The late actor’s brothers, Kevin and Derrick Boseman, are asking a Los Angeles court to remove his widow, Taylor Simone Ledward Boseman, as administrator of his estate. They accuse her of withholding information, delaying court-ordered distributions, and maintaining exclusive control over valuable assets tied to Chadwick’s finances and legacy.

However, the allegations have not yet been proven in court.

Chadwick Boseman, has died at age 43
Broadimage-Mega/MEGA

Kevin and Derrick filed legal documents on Friday outlining several reasons they believe Taylor should no longer control their brother’s estate, according to TMZ, which obtained the filing. The brothers allege that Taylor has kept their family in the dark about the estate’s status despite a 2022 court order dividing its assets between her and Chadwick’s parents, Leroy and Carolyn Boseman.

Under that agreement, Taylor was entitled to 50% of the estate, while Leroy and Carolyn were to share the remaining half. Previous court filings valued the distributable estate at approximately $2.3 million after expenses, although its total inventoried value had reportedly reached more than $3.8 million.

Advertisement

Nearly four years after that arrangement was approved, Kevin and Derrick claim the administration remains unfinished and that their parents still have not received everything to which they are entitled. They allege the unresolved estate includes more than $3 million held across various bank accounts, along with film residuals, royalties, investments, insurance policies, intellectual property rights, personal property, and income connected to Chadwick’s name and image.

Taylor has not publicly responded to the allegations.

The Brothers Want A Full Accounting Within 30 Days

Chadwick Boseman, has died at age 43
Broadimage-Mega/MEGA

The filing reportedly identifies several tasks the brothers believe remain incomplete. Kevin and Derrick claim Taylor has not transferred a long-term care insurance policy to their mother, properly closed and distributed funds from Chadwick’s bank accounts, or fully accounted for SAG-AFTRA residual payments generated after his death. They also allege that she has failed to collect and distribute unclaimed property belonging to the actor.

Residual payments can continue arriving years after a performer’s death through television broadcasts, streaming, home entertainment, and other uses of past work. In Chadwick’s case, that could involve projects throughout his career, including his appearances in the Marvel Cinematic Universe and his acclaimed final performances.

The brothers are asking the court to order Taylor to provide a complete accounting and distribute the remaining estate assets within 30 days. They also want her held in contempt for allegedly failing to comply with the 2022 order.

Advertisement

Under California’s probate process, an estate administrator is responsible for identifying and collecting assets, resolving debts and taxes, maintaining financial records, and distributing the remaining property to the legally recognized beneficiaries. An accounting would document the money received, expenses paid, assets retained, and distributions made during the administration.

Kevin And Derrick Boseman Want A New Administrator Appointed

Chadwick Boseman, has died at age 43
Broadimage-Mega/MEGA

Kevin and Derrick are not merely asking the court to impose a deadline. They want Taylor permanently removed from her position and attorney Jason Rubin appointed to oversee the remaining work.

California courts can remove a personal representative when legally recognized grounds exist, including mismanagement, failure to perform required duties, or conduct that places an estate’s property at risk. Filing a removal petition does not automatically establish that any misconduct occurred; the brothers will still need to support their allegations before the court decides whether intervention is warranted.

They are also asking the judge to prevent Taylor from signing major contracts involving Chadwick’s estate without the family’s approval and require her to provide copies of existing estate-related agreements.

According to the filing, the alleged delays have left Chadwick’s parents without money and insurance benefits they were awarded. His brothers further claim the family has been unable to pursue certain business opportunities involving his legacy while Taylor continues to profit from his name and likeness.

Advertisement

Kevin and Derrick say they made numerous attempts to resolve the matter directly before turning to the court. They now want Taylor ordered to cover the family’s attorney’s fees and other legal expenses.

Chadwick Boseman Died Without Leaving A Will

Chadwick Boseman, has died at age 43
Broadimage-Mega/MEGA

The ongoing conflict is rooted partly in the fact that Chadwick died intestate, meaning he did not leave a legally enforceable will directing how his probate assets should be handled.

Taylor petitioned to become administrator shortly after his death and was appointed as the estate’s personal representative with limited authority in November 2020. At the time, the estate was initially estimated to contain approximately $938,500 in assets. Later filings revealed additional funds, including residual payments, that substantially increased its reported value.

Because Chadwick had no children and left no will, California succession laws determined who could inherit the probate property. However, not everything associated with a deceased celebrity necessarily falls into a single probate estate. Insurance proceeds with named beneficiaries, jointly owned accounts, trusts, corporate assets, and certain contractual rights can be governed separately.

That distinction may become important as the court examines the brothers’ claims regarding insurance, intellectual property, royalties, and contracts connected to Chadwick’s image.

Advertisement

The dispute also highlights why the administration of a celebrity estate can continue long after an initial distribution order. Unlike a single bank balance, residuals and licensing income may keep arriving, while the commercial use of a performer’s name and likeness can create continuing financial and approval questions.

Chadwick Boseman, has died at age 43
Broadimage-Mega/MEGA

The court fight presents a stark contrast to the united image Chadwick’s loved ones displayed only months ago. In November 2025, Taylor, Kevin, and Derrick attended the actor’s posthumous Hollywood Walk of Fame ceremony. Taylor accepted the honor on her husband’s behalf, while his brothers joined fellow stars and collaborators in celebrating his legacy.

Chadwick died on August 28, 2020, at age 43 after privately battling colon cancer for four years. He continued filming projects such as “Black Panther,” “Da 5 Bloods,” and “Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom” while undergoing surgeries and chemotherapy.

“A true fighter, Chadwick persevered through it all and brought you many of the films you have come to love so much,” his family said while announcing his death, per BBC. “It was the honor of his career to bring King T’Challa to life in ‘Black Panther.’”

Now, the court must determine whether Taylor has failed to complete her legal responsibilities or whether she can adequately account for the estate’s remaining assets. Until the judge rules, Kevin and Derrick’s claims remain allegations, and Taylor continues to serve as administrator.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

I’d Stream That For A Dollar: New RoboCop Show Headed To Prime Video

Published

on

I’d Stream That For A Dollar: New RoboCop Show Headed To Prime Video

By Chris Snellgrove
| Published

In some ways, it’s fair to call RoboCop the most universally appealing hero of the ‘80s. Despite the movie’s R-rated and obscene amounts of violence, the film was a hit with children who enjoyed how the main character merged two of their favorite heroes: cop and robot. Meanwhile, adults appreciated the film for being an absolutely brutal satire of capitalism. Of course, children and adults alike enjoyed how the heavy messages of the movie are wrapped in unforgettable fight scenes and ridiculously quotable dialogue. As films go, RoboCop is truly one of a kind. Unfortunately, that proved to be a problem when it came to growing the franchise.

You see, RoboCop is a bit like Highlander: each franchise has one good movie followed by worsening films and mediocre TV shows. After RoboCop 2 and 3, we got two crappy television series (RoboCop and RoboCop: Prime Directives) followed by the abysmal 2014 reboot. Those failed projects frustrated fans and creators alike because RoboCop is one of the coolest characters ever created; how hard can it be to give him a good story? We’re about to find out. After announcing development of the series three years ago, Amazon has officially given the green light to a new Robocop TV show.

Somehow, Robert Cop Returned

robocop

The premise of the first RoboCop movie is that after one of Detroit’s top cops is killed, he is brought back to life with the help of a cyborg body. This proves to be both a blessing and a curse: while his transformation has made him the most dangerous creature to ever walk the streets, RoboCop struggles with the humanity he has lost. Fortunately, he is kept emotionally grounded by his old partner. Together, they fight crime ranging from petty criminals to the corrupt corporate stooges who are busy running the city into the ground.

Now, RoboCop is getting a new show on Prime Video. The first season will have eight episodes, and the series is being produced by Blumhouse Atomic Monster. The showrunner for Robocop is Peter Ocko (best known for Lodge 49). Ed Neumeier and Michael Miner will serve as executive producers, which is notable because they are the co-creators and co-writers of the original RoboCop movie. Other executive producers include Rob Hackett, Michael Clear, and genre legend James Wan, who described this project “a dream” in a written statement. He called the original movie “decades ahead of its time” and said “its questions about technology, identity, and who corporations really serve have only grown more urgent. “

All Cops Are Bots

Wan is confident that the new Robocop show will be able “to honor what made the original iconic and highlight its relevancy in this modern, tech-driven world, while building something unmistakably new for a global audience.” Amazon’s Head of Global Television, Peter Friedlander, is similarly optimistic, saying, “Peter Ocko has crafted a vision that honors the soul of what made the original so enduring while building something entirely fresh and urgent for today.“ According to the official description, the show will explore topics such as “humanity versus technology and the consequences of unchecked corporate power feel more relevant today than ever, making it the ideal property to reimagine for a new era of television.” 

Much like Wan, I’ve been a huge nerd for RoboCop for most of my life. But if I’m being honest, the franchise has felt like Alex Murphy’s final moments. It’s wounded, bleeding out, and teetering right on the edge of death. However, Prime Video is about to do for this franchise what OCP did for RoboCop, taking the spark of what’s left and putting it in a newer, stronger body. If the new show is great, fans can joyously shout “I’d buy that for a dollar!” If the new season sucks, though, we can tell all the episodes what Boddicker told all those ladies: “bitches leave!”

Advertisement


Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Comedian slams former “View” cohost Star Jones, calls panelist’s ex-husband gay slur: ‘Energy there was hard’

Published

on


Actress Jessica Kirson, who is a lesbian, made several appearances on the talk show, including during the “Joy’s Comedy Corner” segment with Joy Behar.

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

King Of The Hill’s Newest Season Is Dadcore Perfection

Published

on

King Of The Hill’s Newest Season Is Dadcore Perfection

By Chris Snellgrove
| Published

Growing up, I wasn’t a huge fan of King of the Hill. Sure, I found it enjoyable enough, but I never went out of my way to regularly watch it. To my teenage sensibilities, Mike Judge’s other major cartoon, Beavis and Butt-Head, was more endearing. Fast forward more than a decade later, though, and I discovered just how brilliant this show was. It helped that I had become a father, raising my own son in a tiny Southern town full of colorful personalities. Hank Hill was no longer a character I couldn’t understand; rather, he was someone I knew a little bit better every time I looked into the mirror.

That kinship with Hank is a big part of why I loved King of the Hill’s triumphant return on Hulu. Much of the revival’s first season focused on the relationship between Hank and Bobby, one which had changed since Bobby (much like my own son in the intervening years) had become his own man. Once more, Hank felt like my own reflection: someone trying to find his place in a world where everything changed but him. That consistency is at the heart of the newest season, which uses top-notch characterization to give us the best storytelling in this show’s history.

Bobby Loves Connie

To me, the most exciting thing about the King of the Hill revival was seeing the kind of man young Bobby had grown into. Making him a chef and restaurant owner was a stroke of genius because it highlighted the character’s passion and strengths while also underscoring that he still has more than a few things to learn. Bobby grew over that season in several ways, but none more so than finally beginning a relationship with his childhood crush, Connie Souphanousinphone. These two hooking up was the emotional climax of the previous season, and this season explores how their relationship has evolved.

As usual, the King of the Hill revival approached their changed dynamic with humor and bemusement, like when they wrestled with the decision to give their relationship a hard launch or a soft launch. They faced some predictable relationship woes, including arguments over exes and flirtatious women. All of this felt very real, but the show never resorted to cheap tricks by making us think they are going to break up. They always work things out and always lift each other up. Just as Hank constantly models good fathering, Bobby and Connie model a healthy relationship, and it is just infinitely rewarding to watch this couple do its thing. 

Never Too Old For An Arc

If the King of the Hill revival’s first season had one weakness, it was that it arguably focused a bit too much on Hank and Bobby. While these two are still front and center in most stories, many of the newer episodes focused on other older characters, with a special emphasis on how they have changed over time. For example, we see Nancy finally decide to work on her relationship with Dale rather than constantly cucking her husband with John Redcorn. We also see more of the fallout of Kahn and Minh’s divorce. Heck, even Bill gets major development, both as Kahn’s roommate and as a man suffering from crippling depression.

Giving the older characters these major arcs infuses the new season with a special power. After all, these are characters most fans grew up with, and seeing their evolution is a keen reminder that it’s never too late for any of us to change. Plus, the resolution to these arcs is often emotionally rewarding. My favorite was seeing Hank go all out to help Peggy with her menopause; overwhelmed, she asked him to be the one thing that never changes. It’s a beautiful moment because Peggy’s praise reinforces Hank’s idea of himself. As for Hank, we see his biggest secret: that he’s willing to make major changes to help the ones he loves.

Advertisement

As an avowed wife guy, moments like this are absolutely beautiful. Fair warning: you may want to keep some manly tissues handy because it’s hard not to tear up at the sheer sweetness of these characters.

He Walks The Line

The last thing I wanted to highlight about the King of the Hill revival’s latest season is how well it walks the scariest tightrope of them all: politics. Hank is a conservative character living in a very conservative area, but he is defined more by a personal moral compass than a political compass. The show often emphasizes this by showing how reasonable and moderate Hank is, especially in the face of weird extremism. The mildest example of this is when some Comic-Con nerds mock Hank for being old and out-of-touch; he ultimately bonds with them by watching their favorite nerd show and crafting a hero-quality prop of their favorite fantasy weapon.

The most extreme example involves a hen becoming a rooster, something that is rare but scientifically possible. When Hank innocuously mentions how this is neat, some parents start screaming at him about teaching false gender ideology and how he must support trans kids playing sports. Hank doesn’t pop off a speech about trans rights; instead, he calmly reminds his accusers that they were talking about something entirely different and trying to twist his words. The whole plot is a perfect satire of trans panic, keeping Hank Hill in character while highlighting that the loudest voices on any political issue are more interested in being heard than actually having a discussion.

Time To Grab Some Brews With The Boys

A stinging satire of culture war bullsh*t that doesn’t get preachy and merely points out how stupid extremist positions are? Simply put, there is no other modern comedy (cartoon or otherwise) firing on all cylinders like King of the Hill.

If you were waiting for my TL; DR review, here it is: the new King of the Hill season is television at its finest. You should really drop whatever you’re doing and go stream it on Hulu. And here’s a little recommendation: while you’re up, get in some comfy clothes and grab your favorite drink and coziest blanket. All the episodes are out now, and trust me: you’ll want to binge this bad boy all night long!

KING OF THE HILL REVIEW SCORE

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Jennifer Garner Recalls Scary Paparazzi Incidents With Kids

Published

on

Ben-Affleck-and-Jennifer-Garner-coparenting

Jennifer Garner is opening up about the lengths the paparazzi would go to for pictures of her and Ben Affleck’s children.

“If I went through a yellow light, 15 cars would go through the red [light] behind me. They would drive up onto people’s lawns, even on a hillside,” Garner, 54, recalled in an interview on the Tuesday, July 21, episode of the “Shut Up Evan” podcast.

Garner and Affleck, 53, were married from 2005 to 2018 after costarring in 2003’s Daredevil. They share three children: Violet, 20, Seraphina, 17, and Samuel, 12.

“We were trying to have our little one play soccer, and the association asked us to stop because there were 20 cars coming,” the Five-Star Weekend actress remembered. “It wasn’t just about us, it was just an industry that had gotten out of control.”

Advertisement
Ben-Affleck-and-Jennifer-Garner-coparenting


Related: Everything Ben Affleck and Jennifer Garner Have Said About Their Divorce

Ben Affleck and Jennifer Garner have been coparenting pros since their 2015 split. The exes became parents with the birth of their daughter Violet in December 2005, followed by Seraphina in January 2009 and Samuel in February 2012. Affleck and Garner announced they were separating after 10 years of marriage in June 2015 via a […]

“If you show up and you’re trying to get into the pediatrician and you have a sick kid on your shoulder and you’re scared, and you can’t get into the door because you’re blocked by photographers, there’s something wrong with that,” Garner said. “And the kids are paying the price.”

Advertisement

“Kids were getting knocked over coming out of preschool by photographers who were so hungry to get to me or to Ben, trying to get to our kids,” she added.

According to Garner, photographers were particularly interested in snapping pictures of her and her children despite “more famous” people living nearby.

“It just got silly,” she said. “I mean, I lived on the street with a lot of much more famous and successful people than I, but they followed me because I had the kids.”

Jennifer Garner Says Paparazzi 'Knocked Over' Kids for Photos of Her Children
ROBYN BECK/AFP via Getty Images

Garner continued, “They wouldn’t follow Ben, they wouldn’t follow Matt Damon … they were like, ‘There’s the chick with the kids.’”

The Alias alum said she is still followed by at least two photographers and has developed something of a rapport with one of them.

Advertisement

“I have two [photographers] every day who’ve been assigned to me for 20-plus years, 25 years,” Garner said. “I have a very interesting relationship with my main guy. I’ve done anything to ask him to leave, and at the same time, we have an odd respect for each other.”

Advertisement
Ben Affleck and Jennifer Garner


Related: Jennifer Garner Shares Insight Into Coparenting Dynamic With Ben Affleck

Jennifer Garner offered a glimpse into her coparenting dynamic with ex-husband Ben Affleck. “There is a time in your life where you do get caught in all of that. And that’s OK,” Garner, 54, told Entertainment Weekly in an interview published Thursday, July 16, while reflecting on finding the balance between a successful career and […]

“We’ve had some really real-life moments together,” the actress explained. “I was followed by someone who, for whatever reason, I thought was gonna hurt me, and I ran to him because I knew him and trusted him, and I knew he and I would be OK.”

Garner added, “There’s kind of a Stockholm syndrome thing and at the same time, I’ve called the cops on him a million times and been like, ‘Can you please just give me a walk around the block with my kids and my dog?’”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

17 Summer Sandal Deals in Macy’s Black Friday in July Sale

Published

on

Us Weekly has affiliate partnerships. We receive compensation when you click on a link and make a purchase. Learn more!

If you’ve been looking for an excuse to refresh your shoe collection, there’s never been a better time than right now. Macy’s brought Black Friday-level deals to July, and the sale is overflowing with summer sandals, like flip-flops, kitten heels, slides and more. Oh, and the steep deals start at as low as $15.

Macy’s summer Black Friday sale runs from today through July 26th, which means you have five full days to save up to 60% off. The catch? The chicest summer sandals are selling out as we type, including pairs from Steve Madden, Marc Fisher, Michael Kors and Dolce Vita. Snag your favorites for this season (and the next) below!

Advertisement

17 Summer Sandals Deals at Macy’s — From $15

1. Shiny Chic: These gold Michael Kors sandals make any outfit look expensive, thanks to the low profile and minimal ‘M’ logo — was $100, now $50!

2. Total Classic: Everyone needs staple ankle-strap sandals, and these Steve Madden wonders are ones to consider — was $99, now $59!

3. Cute Kitten: Kitten heels are everywhere this summer. Nail the look with this colorful version — was $89, now $45!

4. Super Comfy: You can’t go wrong with these jewel-adorned FitFlop sandals, which combine comfort and style in one — was $140, now $70!

Advertisement

5. Hamptons Vibes: With a woven strap and a faux leather base, these slip-on slides radiate old money energy — was $79, now $47!

6. Pretty Platforms: Or should we say, ‘flatforms.’ These espadrille sandals are available in solid hues and a logo print that adds even more polish — was $100, now $50!

7. Sassy Slip-ons: When you’re running out the door, you’ll be glad you have these easy Marc Fisher slip-ons — was $89, now $45!

8. Wedding Guest: Instead of stilettos, opt for these classy, understated sandals that let the rest of your outfit shine — was $69, now $41!

Advertisement

9. Center of Attention: These pearly heels are the main event, so don’t even worry about your dress. The 1.75-inch heel ensures they’re walkable, too — was $129, now $77!

10. Year-Round Pick: Dolce Vita’s sleek blade-heel sandals come in a rich toffee color that transitions seamlessly from summer to fall — was $69, now $41!

11. Elevated Flip-Flops: Flip-flops can totally be sophisticated, and these cushiony wonders prove it — was $60, now $36!

12. Rustic Appeal: With a real leather strap, low block heel and studded detailing, these Naturalizer slides give off major boutique energy — was $138, now $83!

Advertisement

13. Cork, Yes: Nothing says ‘cool girl’ like these double-strap cork sandals. Every color is marked down — was $55, now $33!

14. Mesh Maven: Toe-loop styles don’t always feel secure, but these mesh sandals stay put while padding your foot — was $50, now $20!

15. Seriously Wealthy: Chunky thongs can downgrade an outfit, but these luxe-looking flip-flops have the opposite effect — was $79, now $40!

16. Block Heel: Low and luxurious, these triple-strap sandals work for brunches, work events and even weddings — was $40, now $15!

Advertisement

17. Designer Vibes: This logo-adorned style should costs hundreds, but it’s only $25 right now. Nobody will know the difference — was $69, now $25!

UsNow Summer Sale Alert: These Chic Fashion Finds are over 30% off – Plus Free Shipping

Welcome to summer with our biggest sale of the year. This summer’s chicest dresses, tops and swimsuits Swimsuits Under $25)” data-tag-index=”1″ data-tag-occurrence=”1″ data-tag-variant-id=”swimsuits-1″ data-tag-variant-mode=”random” data-tag-variant-name=”Swimsuits Sale” data-tag-variant-index=”0″ data-add-to=”first” data-tb-shoptags-tracking-bound=”true” data-tb-tracking-bound=”true” data-tb-tagrender-tracked=”true” data-tb-core-handler=”true” data-tracked-events=”click,mouseover,mouseout”>(Shopping Cart IconSwimsuits Under $25) are all over 30% + free shipping. Inventory is limited so hurry before they’re gone.

Shop the UsNow Summer Sale –>

Advertisement
sandals


Related: These 13 Comfy-Chic Sandals Can Instantly Elevate Jeans — From $10

If you find yourself stuck in a tee-jeans-and-sneakers rut, we hear you. But you don’t have to give up your staple outfit to look chic. By swapping sneakers with luxe-looking sandals, you elevate your aesthetic without even trying. These 13 stylish pairs make it easy, comfy and shockingly affordable — we’re talking picks from only […]

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Maria Sten and “Neagley” showrunners preview audacious first season of “Reacher ”spinoff (exclusive)

Published

on


The star joins showrunners Nick Wootton and Nick Santora in previewing the action-packed spinoff ahead of San Diego Comic-Con.

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Christopher Nolan’s Strange Set Rule Finally Explained

Published

on

Christopher Nolan at the 77th Annual Directors Guild of America Awards

Christopher Nolan‘s latest filmmaking rule has become one of the most talked-about details from the set of “The Odyssey,” and it has nothing to do with cameras or special effects.

Instead, the Oscar-winning director has drawn attention for banning one surprisingly ordinary fashion item, a decision he says helps actors remain fully immersed while bringing Homer’s legendary epic to life.

The conversation began when Anne Hathaway appeared on Brittany Broski’s “Royal Court,” where she was asked about Christopher Nolan’s famously disciplined productions.

Advertisement

Rather than discussing the scale of “The Odyssey,” Hathaway revealed one of the director’s more unexpected “commandments.”

“Thou shalt not wear Uggs,” Hathaway said, prompting laughter during the interview.

Her co-star Matt Damon followed with another claim about working with Nolan.

“Thou shalt not sit down. There are no chairs on set,” Damon joked. The actor expanded on Nolan’s dislike for Uggs, noting, “Oh yeah, that’s a good one. He hates Uggs. I think they just symbolize leisure in a way that he’s not comfortable with.”

Advertisement

Those remarks quickly spread online, fueling renewed interest in the filmmaker’s unconventional production style. However, the “no chairs” claim has long been disputed.

In 2020, a representative for Nolan responded to similar stories by saying the only items officially prohibited on his sets are cell phones and smoking, not chairs.

Still, Hathaway’s comment opened the door for Nolan himself to explain why something as simple as a pair of boots matters so much.

Nolan Says Modern Items Break The Illusion

Christopher Nolan at the 77th Annual Directors Guild of America Awards
Lumeimages / MEGA

During an appearance on “CBS Mornings,” Christopher Nolan was asked directly about Anne Hathaway’s revelation.

Rather than dismissing it, the filmmaker explained that modern objects can interrupt the atmosphere actors need while performing period stories.

Advertisement

“The funny thing is you can be on set where you’ve got, you know, a guy holding a microphone. You’ve got a giant camera, you’ve got crew everywhere, but something like [UGGs] can actually weirdly take you out of the reality,” Nolan said per Entertainment Weekly.

He explained that the issue extends beyond footwear, noting, “There are just certain things that remind you you’re in the real world as opposed to the world we’re trying to create for the actors. I want to stay in the moment, we want the actors to stay in the moment.”

The comments fit neatly into a philosophy Nolan has embraced throughout his career.

The British filmmaker has never owned a smartphone and has repeatedly said he prefers not to use email, believing constant digital communication can become a distraction.

Advertisement

His productions have similarly developed a reputation for minimizing interruptions, allowing cast and crew to focus almost entirely on the work in front of them.

Christopher Nolan’s Demanding Sets Go Beyond Dress Codes

Christopher Nolan at Oscars
MEGA

The rules on “The Odyssey” extend far beyond wardrobe.

Earlier this year, GQ documented one of the production’s most physically demanding locations while profiling stars Matt Damon, Tom Holland, and Robert Pattinson.

Filming at Sicily’s Castello di Santa Caterina required actors and crew to climb roughly 900 feet to reach the set because construction crews had been unable to build an access road before production began.

Pattinson later recalled making the trek wearing sandals that matched his costume. When asked about the story on “CBS Mornings,” Nolan confirmed it was accurate.

Advertisement

He said per the Daily Mail, “When [Pattinson] started on the film, we were shooting at the top of a mountain a thousand feet in the air and we hadn’t been able to get any kind of road built up or anything.”

He added, “But yeah, we’re starting with this tremendous hike and then absolutely exhausted you [before starting] your day’s work.”

The difficult climb reflected another hallmark of Nolan’s productions, a willingness to work in real environments whenever possible instead of recreating locations on soundstages.

Christopher Nolan Has Built A Career On Authentic Filmmaking

Christopher Nolan Reveals He Would Not Direct A Superhero Film Again After 'Dark Knight' Trilogy
MEGA

The same philosophy behind the UGG rule has shaped many of Nolan’s biggest films.

Rather than relying heavily on computer-generated imagery, he has consistently favored practical filmmaking.

Advertisement

“The Dark Knight” famously featured a real truck flip, “Tenet” included the destruction of an actual Boeing 747, and “Oppenheimer” relied extensively on practical effects to depict the Trinity nuclear test instead of using CGI.

Those creative decisions have become part of Nolan’s reputation, helping distinguish his work from many modern blockbusters.

“The Odyssey,” adapted from Homer’s ancient Greek poem, continues that tradition. Universal Pictures assembled one of the director’s most impressive ensembles for the movie, including Matt Damon, Tom Holland, Anne Hathaway, Zendaya, Robert Pattinson, Charlize Theron, Lupita Nyong’o, Jon Bernthal, and Mia Goth.

Nolan’s Methods Have Earned Praise From Longtime Collaborators

Christopher Nolan at 49th Cesar Film Awards at L'Olympia
MEGA

Christopher Nolan’s demanding approach has become a recurring theme among actors who return to work with him.

Matt Damon, who previously collaborated with the filmmaker on “Interstellar” and “Oppenheimer,” signed on for “The Odyssey” after publicly praising Nolan’s preparation and the confidence he gives performers once production begins.

Advertisement

Anne Hathaway has also become one of Nolan’s most frequent collaborators, with “The Odyssey” marking their third film together after “The Dark Knight Rises,” and “Interstellar.”

She has repeatedly spoken about the trust she places in the director, while Robert Pattinson returned following his acclaimed performance in “Tenet.”

That growing list of returning stars suggests Nolan’s strict rules are rarely viewed as obstacles by the people working alongside him.

Instead, many of Hollywood’s biggest names continue to embrace the immersive environment he creates, even if it means leaving modern comforts and UGG boots behind while the cameras are rolling.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Rebecca Hall Mourns Godzilla vs. Kong Costar Kaylee Hottle

Published

on

Celebrity Deaths of 2026

Godzilla vs. Kong star Rebecca Hall shared an emotional tribute to her onscreen adopted daughter, Kaylee Hottle, following the teenager’s death at age 18.

“Devastated to hear this news. My heart goes out to your family. You will be missed, Kaylee,” Hall, 44, captioned a series of photos of herself and Hottle on the set of 2021’s Godzilla vs. Kong and its 2024 sequel, Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire, posted to her Instagram account on Tuesday, July 21.

Hottle played Jia, a deaf youngster who is adopted by Hall’s Dr. Ilene Andrews, in the fantasy films. Her character communicated with King Kong via sign language.

Hottle’s father, Joshua Hottle, told TMZ that the actress died following a car accident in Maryland in the early hours of Tuesday. He also confirmed the news to his followers on Facebook in a livestream, stating that he was flying from Texas to claim her body.

Advertisement
Celebrity Deaths of 2026


Related: Celeb Deaths of 2026: Godzilla vs. Kong’s Kaylee Hottle and More Stars

Hollywood mourned the deaths of some of its most legendary stars in 2026. The year started off with Broadway performer and influencer Bret Hanna-Shuford’s death at age 46. At the end of the month, comedy acting icon Catherine O’Hara died at age 71. In February, Dawson’s Creek actor James Van Der Beek died at age […]

The Frederick County Sheriff’s Office confirmed that authorities responded to a fatal single-vehicle collision in Ijamsville, Maryland, at 2:52 a.m. on Tuesday.

Advertisement

“The preliminary investigation revealed that a 1995 Honda Accord, operated by a 19-year-old Frederick man, traveled off the right side of the two-lane roadway and struck a culvert,” a press release said. “Excessive speed is believed to be a contributing factor in the collision.”

The police department said that two passengers were in the car as well as the driver. The driver was taken to a local hospital with what are believed to be non-life-threatening injuries, while the other passenger declined medical assistance at the scene.

“The second passenger was identified as Kaylee Hottle, 18, of Kyle, TX,” the release said. “Hottle was transported from the scene to an area trauma center, where she was later pronounced deceased.”

Hottle was born in Atlanta and comes from a multi-generational deaf family. She was raised in Austin, Texas, and attended the Texas School for the Deaf.

Advertisement

As well as the Godzilla vs. Kong films, she appeared in a 2021 episode of CBS’ Magnum P.I. playing a character called Joon.

In 2021, Hottle’s Godzilla vs. Kong costar Alexander Skarsgård revealed that he learned American Sign Language (ASL) in order to communicate with the young actress on set.

Advertisement
Rebecca Hall Mourns 'Godzilla vs. Kong' Costar Kaylee Hottle, Dead at 18
HBO Max / Courtesy Everett Collection

“It’s her first movie. It’s fascinating how comfortable she is in front of the camera and how quickly she takes notes from the director Adam [Wingard],” he told Junkee. “He’ll explain something and she’ll be like, ‘Got it, got it.’ Then she’ll just do it and everyone’s like, ‘The f*** … how did she?’”

“She’s so professional,” the actor added. “There’s so much going on on her face, her expression, and the subtleties of that is fascinating to watch.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025