We’ve all been in this situation before. You curl up on the coach, teeing up your favorite streaming service for a night of binging one of the classic crime shows from a bygone era. You settle in, popcorn and wine on deck, and press play, ready for a night of reliving nostalgia. Then, 30 minutes into the series, you begin to realize that the protagonist of your “classic” crime show is basically a walking HR nightmare, and you go searching for something that will be easier to watch.

This is the unfortunate fate of some of the shows that were once destined to become classics. Shows that once felt edgy and gritty now feel dated and problematic, according to today’s standards. Whether it’s the glorification of “cowboy” policing, or true-crime documentaries that feel more exploitative than groundbreaking, these crime shows didn’t age like a fine wine from Napa, but more like sour milk that sat on the porch for a week with the sun beaming down on it. So, let’s look at the shows that prove that “law and order” can sometimes become stale.

’24’ (2001–2014)

Image via FOX

In the 2000s, Jack Bauer (Kiefer Sutherland) was the man that protected America from the terrorists. Created by Joel Surnow and Robert Cochran, 24 premiered two months after the terrorist attacks of September 11th, and the show ushered in a new age for crime shows as it moved away from the “crime-of-the-week” formula in exchange for high-concept television that was high-stakes, and provided high-drama. Each season of 24 focused on a single day in which Bauer and the FBI must investigate and stop a terrorist attack on the homeland. Back in the 2000s, this was an exciting and genre-bending premise; however, the veneer of 24 has dulled greatly in recent years.

For starters, while 24 focused on terrorism as its central plot, it was often accused of glorifying torture and illegal government surveillance, the latter of which became an issue in real life with the public as the War on Terror dragged on. 24 is also not fondly looked on for the way it portrayed Muslim characters, often stereotyping them as terrorists, along with the fact that the series ran too long. After the fifth season, the quality of the show dropped substantially as its terrorist-heavy, post-9/11 themes began to grow stale among an audience that was clamoring for something fresher. While older viewers may still look at 24 as a groundbreaking series, to those who grew up after its peak, and even those who were around during its original run, its themes and tropes have certainly aged like curdled milk.

‘Cops’ (1989–Present)

Image via FOX

After the murder of George Floyd in the Summer of 2020, Americans began to re-think what they thought of law enforcement, both in how they interact with the public, and how they’re portrayed on television. This reckoning is what led to the cancellation of Cops, a longtime fixture of Saturday nights on Fox that was the vanguard of the reality TV genre. Born out of the writer’s strike of 1989, Cops became a hit among audiences with its portrayal of cops as they busted the bad guys and served their communities. The show blew open the notion that Saturday nights was a “death spot” in the TV lineup, and the action on the screen was often exciting.

But looking at the show from a modern lens, Cops was a very problematic show in which its high ratings help hide its poorly aged concepts. A large portion of the people profiled on the show were often people of color, who were highlighted as criminals who were the scourge of society. Cops also normalized police brutality, as the show framed violent arrests and the harsh treatment of suspects as justified, a thinking that changed dramatically after the death of numerous African American individuals at the hands of the police. While Cops was truly groundbreaking, kicking off the reality TV format that would only grow in subsequent years, Cops is nothing more than police propaganda in the face of other reality shows such as On Patrol Live, a similar show that shows police in real-time and gives a more honest look at policing.

‘Walker, Texas Ranger’ (1993–2001)

Image via CBS

This one hurts, as this author is a huge fan of Walker, Texas Ranger, and remains so to this day. However, while I’m still a huge fan of this crime procedural, even I can’t help but notice how poorly the show has aged. Inspired by the 1983 film Lone Wolf McQuade, the crime drama stars Chuck Norris as Cordell Walker, a member of the Texas Ranger who, along with his partner, James “Jimmy” Trivette (Clarence Gilyard), help solve crimes and bring criminals to justice in the Rangers’ Dallas-Fort Worth division. Airing in syndication, Walker, Texas Ranger became a hit among viewers during its initial run, and has maintained its popularity in the years after it left first-run status in 2001.

Having said that, there are a number of issues that have made this show age poorly. For starters, Walker, Texas Ranger feels very predictable, thanks to its “attack first, ask questions later” format that it followed with religion, with Cordell being portrayed as a “Super Ranger” with near impossible immunity to physical harm, even though he inflicted a lot of harm on criminals. Then there’s the production quality, which looked a bit campy even during its original run, but it’s even more obvious today. In many of the action scenes, you can clearly see Norris’ stunt double, and the many mistakes that are made, such as clearly-damaged cars repairing themselves in between scenes. While many longtime viewers could possibly get past those examples, what modern viewers can’t get past is how the show clearly justifies excessive policing, to the point that some viewers now view Walker, Texas Ranger as a “conservative law enforcement fantasy” that has aged the show quite poorly according to today’s standards.

‘CSI: Crime Scene Investigation’ (2000–2015)

Image via CBS

Back at the turn of the millennium, TV viewers were becoming increasingly interested in forensic science, especially when it came to solving cases. This was thanks to CBS’ highly stylistic crime procedural CSI: Crime Scene Investigation, a show that would go on to launch an entire franchise that would become the bedrock of the network’s crime procedural programming. The original CSI premiered in 2000, and took a different take on the typical crime series, focusing on a team of crime scene investigators who use physical evidence and forensic science to solve murders in Las Vegas. The science the CSI team used was high-tech and looked cool to viewers, with the show having an outsized effect on the real world use of forensic evidence.

The downside, now, is that a lot of what was portrayed in the original CSI was very inaccurate. The show drastically exaggerated the capabilities of forensic technicians, making them look like detectives when, in reality, they’re not. As aforementioned, the “CSI Effect” wound up having a negative impact on the judicial system in real life, with juries often demanding excessive forensic evidence for convictions, which was impossible to do. This was corrected in later versions of the franchise, but they couldn’t fix the tone and style of the original CSI, with its highly stylized nature aging the show rapidly in subsequent years.

‘Worst Roommate Ever’ (2022–Present)

Image via Netflix

Advertisement

For a show that premiered in 2022, Netflix’s true-crime documentary Worst Roommate Ever has surely aged poorly in its short stint on the streaming service. Directed by Domini Hofmann and Cynthia Childs, the series tells stories of roommates who turned the lives of their unsuspecting victims upside down. This is a show that would make one think twice about taking in a roommate, but it’s also garnered a lot of criticism for the way it tells its horror stories. While the show’s originally aim was to highlight how some people can hide their malevolent tendencies, Worst Roommate Ever feels less like a cautionary tale, and more like a show that uses the “bad roommate” dynamic for entertainment purposes.

When you watch an episode of Worst Roommate Ever, the first thing that stands out is how sensationalist the series feels, almost like the story an episode is telling is “hyped up” for shock and entertainment value. Using a sensational tone has rubbed some viewers the wrong way, with the tone being inappropriate given the nature of the crimes committed, which often ends in death and long-lasting trauma for the victims who endured it. Also, some feel as though the show’s title itself is misleading. While most people see a “bad roommate” as someone who doesn’t pay their fair share of bills on-time, or leaves their living space a mess, the people portrayed in Worst Roommate Ever are actual criminals that go beyond the “bad roommate” label. You don’t get a deeper understanding of how America’s legal system allows these situations to happen; instead, you get a crime documentary that’s focusing on “scaring” the viewer and nothing else, ensuring that Worst Roommate Ever will surely age like spoiled milk.

‘Hill Street Blues’ (1981–1987)

Image via NBC

Advertisement

There is zero doubt that the NBC police drama Hill Street Blues is a groundbreaking show that changed how crime shows were made. Created by Steven Bocho and Michael Kozoll, the series created the template for the modern prestige drama, with serialized storylines and overlapping dialogue now becoming a staple of modern day crime shows. However, as revolutionary as the series is, it hasn’t escaped the ravages of times, and there are a combination of things that have made Hill Street Blues age poorly when looked at from today’s cultural lens.

While TV culture was different in the 1980s, the way Hill Street Blues portrayed race and gender is very outdated, as people of color were often seen as criminals or the poor underclass, and casual sexism was the norm. Hill Street Blues also falls under the “Seinfeld is unfunny” phenomenon, in which the techniques that the series popularized have been refined and made better by other shows. Because of this, the show feels chaotic, derivative, and more of a product of its time instead of being the genre-changing series that it is. While it’s OK to still look at Hill Street Blues as a trailblazing crime series, its flaws have certainly made the series age more poorly than most people realize.

‘Law & Order’ (1990–Present)

As mentioned earlier, the cultural perception of law enforcement has changed significantly since the death of George Floyd in 2020, which wasn’t regulated to real world policing, but also to how it was portrayed on television. Suddenly, shows like the iconic Law & Order, created by the legendary Dick Wolf, weren’t looked at as a trailblazing crime series, but one with problematic elements that modern viewers simply can’t dismiss. Just to be clear, Law & Order helped advance the modern prestige crime drama Hill Street Blues brought into vogue in 1981. It was a series that focused on the totality of the justice system, from the detectives who investigate and arrest criminals, to the prosecutors who bring cases to trial, and it helped make Law & Order a powerhouse franchise for NBC.

But with the shifting cultural landscape policing, the cases looked at in Law & Order, which were pulled from existing headlines, don’t feel quite as satisfying as it once did. This is also thanks to how the show portrays the police, as the series is staunchly “pro police,” and portrays the detectives within the series as heroes, making the show feel less like entertainment and more like propaganda. This is not to say that Law & Order is a bad show, far from it; but being a fan also means pointing out its flaws, and the fact of the matter is that this is a show that certainly had flaws that have made it age less like wine and more like milk.

Advertisement

Law & Order

Advertisement

Release Date

September 13, 1990

Showrunner

Rick Eid

Advertisement

Directors

Constantine Makris, Edwin Sherin, Jace Alexander, David Platt, Matthew Penn, Martha Mitchell, Don Scardino, Christopher Misiano, Jean de Segonzac, Michael Pressman, Daniel Sackheim, Alex Chapple, Fred Berner, Fred Gerber, Gloria Muzio, James Frawley, Jim McKay, Vincent Misiano, Michael W. Watkins, Vern Gillum, Alex Hall, Dann Florek, Darnell Martin, David Grossman

Advertisement

• 
• 

  S. Epatha Merkerson

  Advertisement

  Lieutenant Anita Van Buren

Advertisement

Advertisement

Former “Real Housewives of New York” star Bethenny Frankel has broken her silence on the controversy surrounding Taylor Frankie Paul, “The Bachelorette,” and “The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives.“

In a new video, Frankel, who has never been one to bite her tongue, seemed to slam Paul and her ex-boyfriend, Dakota Mortensen, for putting their minor children through a “toxic” cycle.

In her video, Frankel also praised ABC for cancelling Taylor Frankie Paul’s season of “The Bachelorette,” saying that other networks would love to have one of their stars embroiled in a scandal such as this.

Bethenny Frankel Breaks Her Silence On Taylor Frankie Paul Drama

In her video, Frankel, who spent years on reality TV, said there are two villains in the Paul and Mortensen situation and one victim: their minor child, Ever.

“The couple, who are in a toxic, self-fulfilling spiral, have subjected the child to this environment,” she said.

Advertisement

Frankel went on to say that she could understand if someone working four jobs chose to stay in a problematic relationship.

“But in any other situation, there is absolutely no excuse,” she added.

Frankel Comments On ABC Cancelling Taylor Frankie Paul’s Season Of ‘The Bachelorette’

Frankel then spoke about ABC’s decision to cancel the upcoming season of “The Bachelorette,” in which Paul was scheduled to star.

“In light of the newly released video just surfaced today, we have made the decision to not move forward with the new season of The Bachelorette at this time, and our focus is on supporting the family,” the statement said, per The Blast.

Frankel said that ABC did “the right thing” by pulling the show, despite knowing the company could lose over $10 million in revenue.

Advertisement

The “Skinny Girl” founder said in her video that Paul’s situation would be “reality gold” on other networks. “This is reality gold,” she added before saying, “In fact, people are probably contemplating how to get her on their show.”

“So, don’t hate the player, hate the game,” she finished.

Taylor Frankie Paul Appears To Strike, Choke, And Throw Chairs At Her Ex-Boyfriend In Shocking Video

ABC’s decision to cancel Paul’s season of “The Bachelorette” came after a video of her appearing to assault her ex, Mortensen, was shared online.

The clip shows Paul striking Mortensen, pulling his hair, and even throwing two metal chairs at him, one of which hit her daughter.

“This is called physical abuse. This is all you do,” Mortensen said in the video. “It’s the only thing you know how to do is hurt me. You think this is OK? It’s not OK. Holy sh-t.”

Advertisement

Mortensen And Paul Speak Out Following Heavy Week

Through her representative, Paul broke her silence on the situation and thanked ABC for their support.

“After years of silently suffering extensive mental and physical abuse as well as threats of retaliation, Taylor is finally gaining the strength to face her accuser and taking steps to ensure that she and her children are protected from any further harm,” the rep said.

Mortensen called the situation “deeply upsetting” in a statement to PEOPLE. “I am, unfortunately, used to these baseless claims about me and our relationship, which I categorically deny. I am focusing on our son and his safety, and hope that Taylor will do the same,” he continued.

‘Bachelorette’ Conestants Told Contracts Would Remain In Place For A Year

According to a previous report from The Blast, ABC met with the majority of the men who filmed Paul’s season of “The Bachelorette” to inform them that their contracts would remain in place for at least a year.

Advertisement

“All of the men were on the call with Warner Bros. except for the winner,” a source close to the show said. “The lawyers told them all their contracts will be in place for a year.”

The source shared that while the men’s season will not air on television, they will still be considered for future opportunities with the show and network, including “Bachelor in Paradise.”

TMZ recently reported that some of the contestants are considering a lawsuit against the network over its sudden decision to pull the show.

An insider told the outlet that some of the men uprooted their lives to film with the hope of gaining notoriety. Additionally, the source claimed some of the men believe ABC and Warner Bros placed them in harm’s way by filming with Paul, who has been arrested and charged with felony assault in the past.

Advertisement

Keith Urban has seemingly lost more than just his marriage over the past year. After nearly two decades with Nicole Kidman, the pair split in September over irreconcilable differences.

According to reports, his daughters, Sunday Rose and Faith, whom he shares with Nicole Kidman, have allegedly cut him off.

As part of their divorce agreement, Nicole Kidman was granted primary custody, with orders that the children spend over 300 days a year with her.

Keith Urban’s Kids Have Essentially Cut Him Off, Source Reveals

Since splitting from Nicole Kidman, Keith Urban has kept busy with his ongoing tour and appears to be coping well with the end of his marriage on the outside.

However, behind the scenes, he is said to be facing a difficult time with regard to his relationship with his daughters, Sunday Rose and Faith, whom he shares with the actress.

Earlier reports claimed there was a growing distance between him and his daughters, and the situation is now said to have worsened in recent weeks.

“The kids have essentially cut off contact with Keith,” a source told Rob Shuter’s #ShutterScoop. “This isn’t just about a quote — it’s been building for a while.”

Urban’s relationship with his daughters became strained following his split from Kidman, and while he has tried to remain patient for things to improve, he is now reportedly losing hope that they will.

“He’s putting on a brave face,” the source says. “But privately, he feels like he’s lost his daughters.”

The Singer Was ‘Really Hurt’ By His Daughter Not Acknowledging Him In A Recent Interview

While Keith Urban has been touring, his daughters have remained with Nicole Kidman, who has primary custody under their divorce agreement.

In recent weeks, the actress has appeared with them at events, highlighting the close bond they share.

This became even more apparent when Sunday Rose called Kidman her “biggest inspiration” and credited her as a “key part of everything” she does in a recent interview with an Australia-based outlet.

Despite Urban being a creative himself, there was little to no mention of him in the remarks from the 17-year-old, which, according to insiders, deeply stung the singer.

“Seeing it in black and white like that really hurt,” said a source, adding that Urban “feels erased.”

As for his relationship with his daughters, Urban is said to be uncomfortable with the current status quo but feels powerless as he “doesn’t know how to fix it.”

Sources Claim Nicole Kidman Didn’t Turn Her Kids Against Their Father

Previous speculation suggested that Kidman had turned the children against their father, but sources have refuted this, noting that the couple’s daughters are old enough to form their own understanding of the situation.

“Nicole hasn’t turned the kids on him; they’ve made their own choices about their dad,” an insider remarked, per the Daily Mail. “She isn’t like that. Keith hasn’t tried much to make things better in their eyes. The girls have always been very close with their mother. They are her everything.”

Meanwhile, regarding why the children appear upset with their father, it is believed to be linked to allegations that he played a role in inspiring the divorce.

“The girls are definitely Team Nicole – they’re in her corner, they’re hurt and angry on her behalf,” the insider claimed. “There’s some resentment against Keith. If they are blaming someone, it’s him, not her.”

Keith Urban Was Left Feeling ‘Betrayed’ By Nicole Kidman’s Closeness With Male Co-Star

Since their split, neither Kidman nor Urban has publicly debuted a new relationship.

However, the actress’s seemingly close relationship with her Scarpetta co-star, Simon Baker, has left Urban feeling “betrayed,” per Woman’s Day.

A source added that the singer is hoping the duo is “just hamming it up for headlines,” given their recent collaboration.

“Even then, it feels to him like it’s a betrayal because both Nicole and Simon know how much even the hint of a romance between them will hurt him.”

The Singer’s ‘Worst Nightmare’ Has Come True

The source also noted that Urban had long been aware of the growing bond between Kidman and Baker since filming.

The closeness, which has seemingly deepened since Kidman’s split from Urban, has reportedly left the singer feeling quite unhappy.

“He already suspected they were getting close while filming. This is his worst nightmare come true,” the insider noted.

They added, “He hates that they’re giving interviews about how close they are.”

In the wake of Taylor Sheridan‘s new neo-Western drama The Madison and his work producing the Yellowstone sequel series Marshals, there’s no better time to revisit his greatest installment in the Dutton saga. In case you were still under the impression that the Kevin Costner series is the best that Sheridan has to offer, let us redirect you to the first Yellowstone origin story: 1883. The 10-part Western miniseries is everything you could hope for in a gritty, Sheridan-style westward adventure — and it effortlessly rides laps around the other franchise installments.

‘1883’ Is a Brutal Western Miniseries That Pulls No Punches

From the opening shot, 1883 pulls no punches. This prequel isn’t some sugar-coated, mythic retelling of the American West, but rather a downright brutal depiction of what made the wild frontier so dangerous. The drama itself follows James (Tim McGraw) and Margaret Dutton (Faith Hill) as the pair aim to move their family, including daughter Elsa (Isabel May) and young son John (Audie Rick), to the northwest paradise of Oregon. Of course, they never quite make it that far, settling instead in the Montana lands that would become the permanent home for the Dutton family for generations. Chronicling the wagon train’s departure from Fort Worth, Texas, until it reaches Big Sky Country, 1883 is a masterclass in how to tell a sprawling Western tale with style and substance throughout.

The show’s impressive cast is part of why audiences continue to flock to the miniseries. Married duo and musicians Tim McGraw and Faith Hill are surprisingly effective as James and Margaret Dutton. 1883 emphasizes their acting ability to the max as their respective characters are put to the test again and again on this perilous journey to “a better life.” Joining them is Union Captain Shea Brennan, played by the genre staple Sam Elliott, and boy, does he deliver. While the three of them carry much of the miniseries, the rest of the ensemble, which includes Isabel May, LaMonica Garrett, Marc Rissmann, and Gratiela Brancusi, help add further weight and emotional attachment to these characters. Guest stars like Graham Greene, Rita Wilson, and Tom Hanks also elevate the material with their simple presence.

As far as the historical side of things goes, 1883 does its best to be as period-accurate as possible, though it isn’t afraid to trade minor details for more thrilling results. Case in point is Billy Bob Thornton‘s inclusion as Marshal Jim Courtright. Long before Thornton would headline Sheridan’s Landman, Courtright was the perfect role for the actor, though it’s a small departure from Courtright’s actual life experience in 1883. The same could be said for Hank’s General George Meade, who, though a real Civil War general, didn’t yet hold the rank that 1883 presents him with. Minor deviations aside, 1883 excels at bringing these historical figures to life with class — even Sheridan himself shows up as real-life historical rancher Charlie Goodnight.

Taylor Sheridan’s Original ‘Yellowstone’ Prequel Is His Television Triumph

If there’s one thing that’s clear about this Yellowstone prequel, it’s that 1883 works so marvelously because of its self-contained nature. Compared to Sheridan’s other television contributions, 1883 is a one-and-done event that effortlessly snapshots a moment in U.S. history. The Duttons we meet here don’t feel like extensions of the characters we know from Yellowstone, nor do the events of the series feel as if they need to continue beyond the 10 episodes we’re given. In many respects, it feels as if Sheridan had gone back to his American Frontier trilogy roots to tell a single tale that doesn’t spend time on recycled drama, dialogue, and overall thematic material. Like other Western miniseries epics such as Lonesome Dove or Into the West, 1883 is perfect as is, and can be enjoyed completely divorced from Yellowstone.

This is where the 1883 sequel (and Yellowstone‘s second prequel), 1923, falls somewhat short by comparison. Although it does well to highlight another generation of Duttons at a distinct period in Montana’s history, it struggles to hold interest on occasion as Sheridan unnecessarily prolongs the drama and repurposes tired Yellowstone-style land-grabbing plots into the main narrative, effectively erasing much of what made that two-season adventure unique compared to the flagship series. 1883 doesn’t fall into this trap. Its perfect length, rich characters, and clear Western plot make for a combination that is so easily bingeable that we can fully understand how (and why) it continues to dominate the charts.

1883 is available for streaming on Paramount+.

Zendaya can easily count Tom Holland to be her No. 1 cheerleader — as rumors about their marital status only intensify.

“I honestly couldn’t be more excited for you to see this movie,” Holland, 29, wrote via Instagram on Saturday, March 21, along with a promotional image for the film featuring Zendaya, also 29, posing as a bride alongside costar Robert Pattinson. “Believe me when I say it’s gonna floor you. Get your tickets now!”

Zendaya stars opposite Pattinson, 39, in The Drama, an A24 film about a couple’s wedding day and all the antics that subsequently ensue.

In real life, Zendaya and Holland have been together since 2021 after playing love interests in Marvel’s Spider-Man franchise. They subtly debuted their engagement at the 2025 Golden Globes, when Zendaya walked the red carpet solo with a giant engagement ring on her finger.

Related: Zendaya Jokes About Keeping ‘Secrets’ Amid Tom Holland Wedding Rumors

Zendaya played off wedding rumors in the chillest way. Zendaya, 29, kept a tight lip when asked about any “secrets” she’s keeping during The Drama premiere in Los Angeles on Tuesday, March 17. While talking to Extra, Zendaya teased the secret her character, Emma Harwood, is keeping from her fiancé, Charlie Thompson, played by Robert […]

“Tom figured the holidays were the best time to propose in a very low-key way,” a source exclusively told Us Weekly in January 2025. “She didn’t want anything over the top.”

According to the insider, Holland and Zendaya were eager to start their next chapter together.

“Tom wanted to propose because he feels he is at the right time in his life and feels ready to settle down,” the insider told Us last year. “They had many conversations over the years, but there was never any pressure. Zendaya is giddy and excited. She knew it might have been coming but never put pressure on it.”

Holland and the Euphoria actress remained relatively quiet about their wedding plans until her longtime stylist, Law Roach, proclaimed earlier this month that the couple were already married.

“The wedding has already happened,” Roach, 47, told Access Hollywood at the Actor Awards in March. “You missed it. It’s very true.”

Weeks later, Roach stated at the 2026 Oscars that he “said what [he] said” and stood by his viral comments about Zendaya’s potential nuptials.

Neither Zendaya nor Holland publicly clarified whether they are indeed husband and wife already. Us Weekly reached out to reps for both actors for comment.

Related: Zendaya’s Mom Cryptically Reacts to Tom Holland Marriage Rumors

Zendaya’s mom, Claire Stoermer, cryptically reacted to stylist Law Roach’s recent claim that the Euphoria actress has already married longtime beau Tom Holland. Roach, 47, set the rumor mill into overdrive on Sunday, March 1, during a red carpet interview with Entertainment Tonight at SAG’s 2026 Actor Awards. Zendaya’s stylist teased that the long-awaited nuptials […]

Advertisement

Zendaya, however, has seen the online chatter about her marital status and the AI-generated pictures from a potential wedding.

“Many people have been fooled by them while I was just out and about in real life,” Zendaya said on Jimmy Kimmel Live! on Monday, March 16, when asked about the fake ceremony portraits circulating on social media. “People are like, ‘Oh, my God, your wedding photos are gorgeous!’ I was like, ‘Babe, they’re AI! They’re not real!’”

Attempting to clarify the speculation, the actress brought a video that ended up to be a scene from The Drama with Holland’s head superimposed over Pattinson’s body.

“It was a beautiful day. That was real footage,” she joked on Monday. “That was real. I was there.”

The Drama hits theaters Friday, April 3.

Roommates, Todd Tucker ruffled some feathers with the message he dropped for Kandi Burruss ahead of her one-woman show. The internet isn’t too happy about his choice of words. Now, folks are questioning whether he threw shade or just made a joke that didn’t hit!

RELATED: Todd Tucker Has Social Media Cuttin’ UP With Reactions After Unveiling His Fresh New Look (VIDEOS)

Todd Tucker Raises Eyebrows After Dropping Message For Kandi Burruss

Todd Tucker sent words Kandi Burruss’ way as she gears up for her one-woman show, ‘I Do, I Did, I’m… DONE.’ The father of three shared a post on Instagram that gave more than a simple “good luck” or “break a leg” — he added a lil’ play on words telling his former wife:

“Yo a** aint done lol just kidding! Go Support your girl Kandi!!!! @citywineryatl on April 27th.” 

Even though it seemed to be a lil’ jokey joke, fans weren’t here for it one bit! Some folks said he took it too far, while others said they love that Todd and Kandi can still joke around after finalizing their divorce.

The Internet Thinks Todd Is “Doin’ TOO Much”

After the Roommates peeped Todd’s message for Kandi, TSR’s comment section was flooded with reactions. Some folks said Todd cracked jokes because he allegedly got paid after their divorce, while others felt he was just playing in Burruss’ face.

Instagram user @lisonup wrote, “Todd said, 🎶 I’m staying, I’m staying, and youuuu, and youuu, and youuu, you’re gonna loovee meeeeeeeeee🎶” 

Instagram user @iamkingsamuel wrote, “Man just happy about that 2M payout 😂😂😂😂😂😂” 

While Instagram user @rob_lane_edits wrote, “It was a scheme.” 

Then Instagram user @london.llaflare wrote, “I would too if I was getting 2M.” 

Another Instagram user @mogulk___ wrote, “He not tryna get kicked out the back yard 😭” 

Instagram user @theshaysims wrote, “He’s playing in her face i don’t like that.” 

Then another Instagram user @_thelittlethick1 wrote, “He Got His Money, He Wanna Play Now 😂”

While another Instagram user @toychele81 wrote, “U know.. Life is better on good terms! Not everything has to include drama! Love to see it!” 

Finally, Instagram user @cheryl.fleming.7902 wrote, “I really think they still love each other ❤️❤️” 

Todd & Kandi Finally Call It Quits FOR REAL

Folks online appear to be up in arms about Todd’s post because his message comes after TMZ confirmed that he and Burruss officially finalized their divorce. Exact deets on their settlement still aren’t public, but for now they are both going their separate ways and will co-parent accordingly. According to court docs, the former husband and wife had until March 11 to break down their settlement and submit paperwork. The docs are reportedly set to include a parenting plan for their two kids, nine-year-old Ace and their six-year-old daughter Blaze.

RELATED: Issa Wrap! Kandi Burruss & Todd Tucker Reportedly Finalize Their Divorce (UPDATE)

Roommates, the Disney Channel debates are getting real spicy and the timeline is not letting up anytime soon. And now, Macaulay Culkin has entered the chat, dropping his own take while putting some respect on Brenda Song’s name. Clearly, everybody’s got opinions—and they’re not holding back.

RELATED: She Said, Who? Raven-Symoné Reveals Her Disney Mount Rushmore And Fans Are Debating (VIDEO)

Macaulay Culkin Backs Brenda Song Amid Disney Debate

On Friday, Macaulay took to Instagram to share a photo of Brenda in her iconic London Tipton era from ‘The Suite Life of Zack & Cody’ and ‘The Suite Life on Deck,’ rocking a sparkly fuchsia top. Alongside the pic, he wrote, “Not that anyone asked, but I’m throwing my hat into the debate. THIS is my Disney Channel Mount Rushmore.” His post comes right after Raven-Symoné sparked major reactions online for sharing her own Disney Channel Mount Rushmore—one that had plenty of fans disagreeing and sounding off across social media.

TSR Comments Go OFF Over Brenda Song

Fans and fellow celebs alike ran straight to The Shade Room’s Instagram comment section to throw in their two cents. Some couldn’t get over how sweet it was to see Macaulay Culkin ride so hard for Brenda Song, while others kept it simple, saying she’s literally that girl. And of course, plenty of folks added that she’s easily on their Disney Channel Mount Rushmore, calling her run straight-up iconic.

One Instagram user @kennyjknox said, “Rightfully so I still say prindl and I for sure still be passing the plate“

This Instagram user @pinupdollashleymarie shared, “Ahhh! STOOOOPPPP!! I love you two together so much I can’t handle 😭”

And, Instagram user @aminebenrejeb22 joked, “London Tipton’s really great Really great, really great
London Tipton’s really great And deserves the opposite of hate (Which is love!)“

Meanwhile, Instagram user @pinklilypadsss commented, “i love how much you love being her man.“

While Instagram user @livvifantasy claimed, “Excellent Choice! She carried my childhood🔥”

Finally, Instagram user @tin.zo added, “her playing baddie after baddie really did something for my confidence“

RELATED: Yup, That’s Me?! Social Media Is Crackin’ Up After Raven-Symoné Couldn’t Recognize Her Own Song During Podcast Game (WATCH)

In the era of peak TV, it’s harder than ever for a series to stand out as truly flawless. Even the most acclaimed dramas tend to have a weak season, a divisive storyline, or at least a handful of episodes that don’t quite measure up. That’s what makes Succession such a rarity. Across four tightly constructed seasons, the HBO drama never once dips in quality, delivering a run of television that feels remarkably consistent from beginning to end.

Created by Jesse Armstrong, Succession built its reputation on sharp writing, exceptional character work, and a tone that balances biting satire with genuine emotional weight. What truly sets it apart, though, is its consistency. Whether it’s a quiet character moment or a high-stakes spectacle, the series never loses momentum, consistently delivering at an elite level and earning its reputation as one of the best modern dramas.

What Is HBO’s ‘Succession’ About?

First airing on HBO in 2018, Succession follows the Roy family, the ultra-wealthy owners of the global media conglomerate Waystar Royco. Patriarch Logan Roy, played by Brian Cox, is a ruthless and aging CEO whose looming retirement sparks a power struggle among his children, Kendall (Jeremy Strong), Shiv (Sarah Snook), and Roman (Kieran Culkin), each of whom believes they are the rightful heir to the empire, even as they repeatedly prove just how unprepared they are for the role.

What unfolds over four seasons is less a traditional corporate drama and more a deeply dysfunctional family saga. Characters like Tom Wambsgans (Matthew Macfadyen), Shiv’s opportunistic husband desperate to climb the corporate ladder, Cousin Greg (Nicholas Braun), eager to secure his place within the family, and Connor Roy (Alan Ruck), the eldest sibling with political ambitions but little interest in the business, add to the show’s rich ensemble. As the series progresses, the performances only grow stronger, with standout guest appearances and increasingly complex characters who may not be easy to love but are impossible to look away from.

Related

The 35 Best TV Shows About Dysfunctional Families, Ranked

For messy family drama.

Advertisement

Despite its focus on billionaires, Succession remains grounded in recognizable human behavior. Whether the characters are on a luxury yacht, a private jet, or halfway across the world, they are still, at their core, insecure and deeply flawed people whose need for validation feels painfully real. That combination of heightened stakes, exceptional performances, and razor-sharp writing is what allows the series to thrive and evolve with each season. It’s also a big part of why the show remained so compelling from episode to episode and earned widespread critical acclaim, including three Primetime Emmy Awards for Outstanding Drama Series.

‘Succession’ Doesn’t Have a Single Weak Episode

Across four seasons, the series never relies on filler or narrative detours like so many other shows — even great ones — often do. Every episode serves a purpose, and even those that feel smaller in scale are carefully constructed to build tension, often setting up explosive moments later in the season. A big part of that comes from the ever-shifting dynamic between Kendall, Shiv, and Roman, whose relationships constantly evolve between alliance and rivalry. Their often hilarious, biting barbs contrast with the rare moments of genuine vulnerability between siblings who have always been searching for love and validation. It’s a dynamic that never feels repetitive, no matter how many times they circle the same question of who should take over. That level of precision is rare, especially for a show operating on such a large scale and under immense pressure and expectations.

That consistency is also driven by the show’s exceptional writing. Jesse Armstrong and his team built the series on an incredibly strong foundation, creating characters that feel fully realized from the very beginning. The cast elevates that material even further, delivering performances that make even the Roys’ most despicable moments strangely compelling. The show also isn’t afraid to take big narrative swings — and when it does, they pay off in a major way. By the time it reaches a major death, the series delivers one of its most poignant episodes, and arguably one of the best hours of modern television.

Very few dramas manage to sustain that kind of quality from beginning to end. It’s a series where there are no weak links, and no episodes that feel skippable. It’s that consistency, more than anything else, that cements its status as one of the best modern dramas and a true 10/10 achievement.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Release Date

2018 – 2023

Network

Advertisement

HBO Max

Showrunner

Jesse Armstrong

Advertisement

Directors

Mark Mylod

Advertisement

Writers

Jesse Armstrong

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement