Connect with us

Entertainment

Say Goodbye to the ‘Chicago Fire’ You Thought You Knew

Published

on

Joe Miñoso as Joe Cruz Chicago Fire Season 13 Episode 10

For almost 14 years, Chicago Fire has kept its promise, as anyone who enters Firehouse 51 will find the house welcoming as home. However, that promise is becoming harder to keep. As NBC‘s series approaches its 15th season, it faces a new wave of cast exits, a new showrunner, and a firehouse very different from what viewers saw in 2012.

Joe Miñoso, who portrays firefighter Joe Cruz, will leave the series after a few episodes of the 15th season. Dermot Mulroney is also on his way out as Battalion Chief Dom Pascal, returning for one episode to wrap up his character’s story. Behind the camera, Andrea Newman is stepping down as showrunner, with executive producer Victor Teran taking over. After years of losing familiar faces, 51 is once again preparing to welcome a new crop of firefighters.

Advertisement

Joe Cruz’s ‘Chicago Fire’ Exit Is the End of an Era

Joe Miñoso as Joe Cruz Chicago Fire Season 13 Episode 10
Joe Miñoso as Joe Cruz Chicago Fire Season 13 Episode 10
Image via NBC

Miñoso’s departure will probably hit longtime viewers hardest. Cruz is one of the last remaining links to the show’s earliest days. He has been part of 51 since the beginning, evolving from a firefighter who spent much of the early series worrying about his younger brother into a veteran member of Squad 3, a husband, and eventually a father.

His Season 15 exit is especially significant. Cruz was among the firefighters caught in the terrifying Season 14 finale cliffhanger, when members of Truck 81, Engine 51, and Squad 3 found themselves trapped in and around a burning building. Because Miñoso is leaving shortly after that cliffhanger, the obvious question is whether Cruz survives — and, if he does, what could possibly convince him to walk away from the firehouse.

The series doesn’t necessarily need to kill him off. Chicago Fire has a long history of sending characters elsewhere when their stories have run their course. Still, Cruz’s departure will leave a sizable hole in 51; viewers can’t simply forget him, and he helped define what the firehouse became.

Advertisement

Dermot Mulroney Is Saying Goodbye to Dom Pascal, Too

Dermot Mulroney's Pascal in the Season 13 finale of Chicago Fire, with other firefighters behind him
Dermot Mulroney’s Pascal in the Season 13 finale of Chicago Fire
Image via NBC

Mulroney’s exit is considerably newer, but Pascal’s departure adds another layer to the Season 15 reset. The actor joined Chicago Fire in Season 13 as the replacement for Eamonn Walker’s Wallace Boden, taking over as battalion chief of Firehouse 51. Pascal was never supposed to be Boden 2.0; his leadership style was harsher, his personality more guarded, and his history with the CFD gave him plenty of baggage to work through. Yet over two seasons, he became part of the show’s increasingly familiar ecosystem.

Mulroney confirmed at a Chicago fan convention that Pascal is being written out and that he will return for only one Season 15 episode. He described the character’s storyline as “incredible” and admitted he was sad to leave, especially because Chicago Fire has become so meaningfulto first responders and their families.

Advertisement

His exit also leaves Severide in an interesting position. By the end of Season 14, Kelly Kinney’s Kelly Severide had been offered a major leadership opportunity after Pascal’s departure, potentially putting one of the show’s longest-standing characters in an entirely different role.

Season 15 Is Bringing New Blood to Firehouse 51

Novak (Jocelyn Hudon) assesses a patient on the scene in Chicago Fire episode "The Bad Guy."
Novak (Jocelyn Hudon) assesses a patient on the scene in Chicago Fire episode “The Bad Guy.”
Image via NBC

For all the talk about who is leaving, Chicago Fire is also making room for people who could become the next generation of 51. Among them is Da’Vinchi’s Marcus Burke, a new firefighter candidate described as funny, roguish, and somewhat defiant. Lyla Novak actress Jocelyn Hudon has also teased the arrival of multiple new probies, suggesting that Season 15 will have several new personalities competing for a place in the firehouse.

Advertisement

Chicago Fire has always used its newest firefighters to refresh the ensemble. The show has done it with Gallo, Carver, Ritter, and countless others over the years. Some became central pieces of the series; others lasted only a few seasons. Cruz’s exit follows recent departures including Daniel Kyri’s Darren Ritter, Jake Lockett’s Sam Carver and Michael Bradway’s Jack Damon. Even Pascal, who was brought in specifically to help fill the enormous leadership vacuum left by Boden, is already moving on.

The original Chicago Fire cast once included Jesse Spencer’s Matt Casey, Monica Raymund’s Gabriela Dawson, Lauren German’s Leslie Shay, Charlie Barnett’s Peter Mills, and Walker’s Boden, alongside Kinney, David Eigenberg, and Miñoso. Most of them are now gone. Even beloved supporting characters such as Otis, Sylvie Brett, Blake Gallo and Darren Ritter have moved on.

Taylor Kinney’s Severide and Eigenberg’s Herrmann remain, while Mouch and Stella Kidd (Miranda Rae Mayo) are still part of the core ensemble. Yet the emotional architecture around them has changed dramatically. The people they worked beside in the early seasons are largely memories now. With Cruz leaving, Pascal departing, and Teran taking over behind the scenes, Chicago Fire is entering its 15th season with fewer familiar faces and plenty of room for new ones.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Entertainment

8 Psychological Thriller Movies Without Any Flaws

Published

on

A wounded man leaning on another one in The Wages of Fear

Throughout history, one of the genres that has offered the largest number of tremendous masterpieces has been the psychological thriller genre. These stories, all about suspense driven by the internal emotional and psychological states of its characters, have unsurprisingly given us several of the greatest films the big screen has ever seen. From the birth of cinema as a storytelling medium until the present, this is a genre that has remained one of audiences’ favorites around the world.

From foundational classics like the French masterpiece The Wages of Fear to cornerstones of 21st-century cinema like Mulholland Drive, there may have been many an exceptional psychological thriller over the years, but only a handful of them can be said to be truly perfect. Indeed, there are eight particular movies that have gone down in history not only as some of the genre’s greatest outings, but as some of the most flawless motion pictures the world has ever been treated to.

Advertisement

8

‘The Wages of Fear’ (1953)

A wounded man leaning on another one in The Wages of Fear Image via Cinédis

French cinema has given the world several of the greatest films of all time, including a few incredible psychological thrillers. Before auteurs like Jean-Luc Godard and François Truffaut rebelled against the classical school of French filmmaking and thus gave birth to the French New Wave, came the many old-school masterpieces whose foundations they wanted to subvert. The peak of pre-New Wave French cinema is arguably Henri-Georges Clouzot‘s The Wages of Fear, one of the best movie classics from 1953.

Exceptional though its 1977 Hollywood remake Sorcerer may be, Wages of Fear is a masterpiece without equal. By tying the physical elements of its high-octane, airtight plot to existential dread, the fragility of the human psyche, and pure human desperation, Clouzot crafted a psychological thriller that was far ahead of its time. Watching Wages of Fear today, it still feels about as modern as any psychological thriller tour-de-force being made nowadays.

Advertisement

7

‘Woman in the Dunes’ (1964)

A couple embracing in Woman in the Dunes.
Kyōko Kishida in Woman in the Dunes.
Image via Toho

One of the most effective and historied forms of psychological thrillers is the erotic thriller, and as far as those go, it doesn’t get much better than Hiroshi Teshigahara‘s Woman in the Dunes. This cornerstone of 20th-century Japanese cinema was based on screenwriter Kōbō Abe‘s own novel of the same name, and after its remarkable critical and commercial success internationally back in 1964, it has stood the test of time as one of the greatest films ever to have come out of the Japanese New Wave movement.

Though Woman in the Dunes may be called one of the most amazing yet forgotten Japanese movies in history, that only means that it’s one of the most underrated dramas and psychological thrillers out there. It’s a sweaty, sandy, psychologically engrossing erotic thriller that’s both fascinatingly existential and visually gorgeous. Watching it, there is virtually nothing at all to complain about to this day.

Advertisement

6

‘Cure’ (1997)

Two men showing a photo to a third in Cure-1997 Image via Daiei Film

Directed by Kiyoshi Kurosawa (no relation to Akira Kurosawa), Cure is still widely remembered as one of the greatest international horror movies perhaps not just of the ’90s, but of all time. This psychological horror thriller is one of those thrillers that are an absolute masterclass in suspense; a perfectly directed, perfectly written, and perfectly performed piece of J-Horror that has since been praised as one of the most influential horror gems ever to have come out of the Japanese scene.

People who prefer more lighthearted horror movies or psychological thrillers are definitely better off looking elsewhere, because Cure is purely cruel and gleefully so. It’s the type of horror film that operates not through jump scares or overt supernatural threats, but through the pure psychological horror of the very real evil that has plagued humanity since times immemorial. It’s atmospheric, it’s potently slow-burning, and it’s a must-see for fans of any of its genres.

Advertisement

5

‘Vertigo’ (1958)

Kim Novak and James Stewart as Madeline and John pressed close together in Vertigo
Kim Novak and James Stewart as Madeline and John pressed close together in Vertigo
Image via Paramount Pictures

Alfred Hitchcock is still known as the Master of Suspense, and that’s for good reason. He laid many of the foundations that the modern thriller genre still continues to build on top of to this day, and continues to be one of the most massively influential filmmakers in history. As such, it’s no shocker that he directed many of the greatest thrillers in film history, including a few exceptional psychological thrillers—the most perfect of which is arguably Vertigo.

Everyone may point to a different Hitchcock outing as his most flawless psychological thriller, and that’s okay; but throughout history, Vertigo has remained one of the most universally acclaimed movies of Hollywood’s Golden Age. It’s one of the most genius mystery movies of all time, a visually striking and brilliantly meta study on themes of romantic delusion and psychological obsession. No self-proclaimed fan of the genre can be a true fan if they haven’t watched Vertigo at least once.











Advertisement









Collider Exclusive · 8 Questions · 2 Minutes
Which Coen Brothers Movie Would You Thrive In?
Lebowski · O Brother · Fargo · No Country
Advertisement

Nobody writes people like the Coen brothers. The decent ones. The talkers. The ones who stopped trying years ago. And the ones who can already see how bad this is going to get. Four films, four completely different ways of handling trouble. Eight questions decide which one you would actually walk out of.

🎳Lebowski(1998)

🎸O Brother(2000)

❄️Fargo(1996)

🪙No Country(2007)

Advertisement

01

Advertisement

A bag of money lands in your lap. What happens next?
Every Coen film starts roughly here. It never goes smoothly.




02

Advertisement

Somebody is being completely unreasonable with you. How does it go?
Coen dialogue is mostly people failing to understand each other.




03

Advertisement

What is your actual relationship with work?
Everyone in these films is either working far too hard or not at all.




04

Advertisement

Long drive, bad weather, nobody else on the road. How are you?
There is always a drive in these films. It is never a good drive.




05

Advertisement

You are offered a shortcut that is not quite legal.
This is the moment where the Coens find out who you really are.




06

Advertisement

The plan has fallen apart completely. What is your move?
In a Coen film the plan always falls apart. That is the genre.




07

Advertisement

Which of these sounds most like something you would say?
Nobody writes a line quite like the Coens. Which one is yours?




08

Advertisement

How does your film end?
Eight questions in, this is the one that decides your movie.




The Verdict Is In
Your Coen Film Is…
Advertisement

Four films, four completely different ways of handling money, trouble
and other people. This is the one you would survive, why it suits you, and what it would cost you to
be there.


The Big Lebowski · 1998

Advertisement
The Big Lebowski

You have quietly arranged your life so that very little can get
to you, and a surprising number of people find that infuriating. You would be completely at
home here.

  • The Dude is the only person in the film with no ambition, and the only one who comes out
    the other side undamaged. That is not an accident.
  • You do not chase things. You let situations arrive and you deal with them at your own
    pace, which is a genuine skill however lazy it looks.
  • This is a full crime plot happening around a man who mostly wants his rug back, and that
    is exactly the energy you would bring to it.
  • Everything goes wrong. You abide. The film ends.


O Brother, Where Art Thou? · 2000

Advertisement
O Brother

You talk your way through life and it works far more often than
it should. Give you a bad situation and an audience and you will find a way out of both at
once.

  • Everett never has a plan that survives contact with reality. He has something better,
    which is the ability to keep talking until a new one turns up.
  • You are the optimist in the group, the one who makes a ridiculous idea sound reasonable
    at two in the morning.
  • This is the warmest film the Coens have made. It is a chase, a comedy and a musical at
    once, and nobody in it is quite beyond saving.
  • You would end up famous entirely by accident, and act like you planned it all along.


Fargo · 1996

Advertisement
Fargo

You would survive Fargo because you are the only kind of person
who does: patient, decent, and completely unimpressed by anybody trying to be clever.

  • Marge Gunderson solves the whole case by being polite, thorough and unhurried while
    everybody around her panics. That is the entire argument of the film.
  • You do the boring parts of the job, which is precisely why you would notice the thing
    everyone else walked straight past.
  • Fargo is about ordinary greed causing enormous damage, and about one person who simply
    refuses to be corrupted by any of it.
  • You would go home at the end of it, have dinner, and sleep perfectly well.


No Country for Old Men · 2007

Advertisement
No Country

You do not expect the world to be fair and you stopped being
surprised about it a long time ago. That clear-eyed quality is exactly what this film asks
for.

  • No Country is the Coens at their coldest: a film where being smart, fast and careful
    might still not be anywhere near enough.
  • You plan for the worst, you keep your own counsel, and some part of you is already
    working out the exit.
  • Llewelyn Moss is competent, prepared and resourceful, and the film is honest about
    whether any of that is ever sufficient.
  • You would see it coming. Whether that helps is the one question the film refuses to
    answer.

Advertisement

4

‘Memento’ (2000)

Today, he’s widely seen as one of the undisputed kings of the box office and one of the leading voices in modern Hollywood filmmaking, but back in the day, Christopher Nolan was an up-and-coming indie filmmaker like any other. It was the massive success of his sophomore directorial effort, Memento, that earned him international acclaim and put his name on the map. To this day, many would confidently say that it’s still his magnum opus.

Brilliantly structured in reverse chronological order in a way that invites multiple re-watches, but is never hard enough to follow to make the film frustrating, Memento is easily one of the best mystery movies released since 2000. Anchored by Guy Pearce‘s exceptionally underrated lead performance and what’s far and away the boldest, most daring script in Nolan’s whole filmography, it’s one of the most timeless psychological thrillers of the 2000s.

Advertisement

3

‘Mulholland Drive’ (2001)

Naomi Watts and Laura Harring looking upward in Mulholland Drive.
Naomi Watts and Laura Harring looking upward in Mulholland Drive.
Image via Universal Pictures

Throughout the latter decades of the 20th century, David Lynch kept further cementing himself not just as one of the most fascinating arthouse filmmakers of his generation, but as one of the most important and influential surrealist auteurs in the history of cinema. However, not even his biggest fans could have predicted the level of quality of what would soon come to be hailed as the crown jewel of his filmography: Mulholland Drive, one of the most beloved thrillers of the 21st century.

An absolute head-scratcher through and through, Mulholland Drive is perhaps not the most accessible introduction to surrealist cinema for those unfamiliar; but for those who enjoy mind-bending extravaganzas like this, it should prove to be a hell of an unforgettable trip. Simultaneously a powerful critique of the dark side of the Hollywood Dream and a deeply humanist study of identity, duality, and sexuality, it’s a must-see gem for those who prefer their psychological thrillers thought-provoking.

Advertisement

2

‘The Silence of the Lambs’ (1991)

Anthony Hopkins in 'The Silence of the Lambs' Image via Orion Pictures

Jonathan Demme‘s The Silence of the Lambs is a psychological thriller so terrifyingly bleak and violent that it’s typically also labeled as psychological horror; and with that, it’s the only horror film ever to have won Best Picture at the Academy Awards. Based on the book by Thomas Harris, it introduced the big screen to Anthony Hopkins‘ Hannibal Lecter, far and away one of the best movie villains of all time.

On top of Hopkins and Jodie Foster‘s career-defining and Oscar-winning performances, The Silence of the Lambs continues to shine over three decades after its release as one of the scariest, most suspenseful, and most impeccably made thrillers in film history. Rarely have cat-and-mouse games been this psychologically intense on the big screen, and rarely will a psychological thriller ever reach this level of incredible quality.

Advertisement

1

‘Se7en’ (1995)

Brad Pitt looking pensive in Se7en Image via New Line Cinema

David Fincher has repeatedly established himself as one of the greatest thriller filmmakers working today, one of the directors most deserving of carrying Hitchcock’s torch as today’s Masters of Suspense. However, after the failure that was his directing debut, Alien 3, he desperately needed a hit to show the world what he was capable of. In came his sophomore effort, Se7en, still remembered as one of the most suspenseful mystery movies of all time.

Never has a darker, crueler, or more nihilistic Hollywood film ever made over $300 million dollars at the box office internationally. It’s precisely that bleak tone that makes Se7en so special, though, serving as the scaffolding for its hard-hitting sense of oppressive moral decay and existential helplessness. It’s the closest that a psychological thriller has ever come to true flawlessness, with some of the greatest directing, best performances, tightest writing, and most impeccably production values that the genre has ever seen or will ever see.


Advertisement
01336708_poster_w780.jpg


Se7en
Advertisement


Release Date

September 22, 1995

Advertisement

Runtime

127 minutes

Writers
Advertisement

Andrew Kevin Walker


Advertisement

Advertisement


Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Prime Video’s 93% RT ‘Reacher’ Spin-Off Officially Introduces Alan Ritchson’s Replacement

Published

on

Alan Ritchson as Jack Reacher walking with Maria Sten as Frances Neagley at her father's funeral in Neagley

Editor’s note: The following contains spoilers for Neagley Season 1

Reacher‘s first-ever spin-off, Neagley, hit Prime Video this month, marking a new era for the franchise. The new series breaks from Reacher‘s established formula, with Frances Neagley (Maria Sten) putting down roots in her hometown of Chicago and launching a new private investigation firm. Most notably, the first season also wraps up with Neagley building her very own team of allies, including a character who serves as a narrative replacement for Jack Reacher (Alan Ritchson) and carries huge implications for Prime Video’s entire saga.

Advertisement

Neagley Builds a New Team in ‘Reacher’s First-Ever Spin-Off

A major part of each season of Reacher involves the eponymous hero establishing a tight-knit group of allies as the plot progresses. Neagley herself served as an integral member of Reacher’s teams throughout the first three seasons of the flagship series. However, Reacher leaving town at the end of each storyline requires a reset of the show’s supporting cast. By the end of Neagley‘s first season, the titular lead has recruited her own team — not just to help her unravel a greater conspiracy, but to investigate new mysteries.

Since Neagley isn’t a nomad who constantly prefers to travel the country as Reacher does, she opts to stay in Chicago, becoming the boss of her own detective agency. While Reacher parts ways with his allies once a season is complete, there’s a stronger sense of stability and consistency within Neagley’s team. Her new employees consist of Gerry York’s (Joel Keller) former assistant, Renee Birdwhistle (Adeline Rudolph), and the street hustler with a heart of gold, Keno (Jasper Jones), both of whom play a crucial role in bringing down Echo Canyon Farm. Detective Hudson Riley (Greyston Holt) also proves to be a loyal sidekick, saving Neagley’s life after she is drugged in Episode 5, “Trip,” but Season 1 suggests that Riley could become something more than an ally and investigative partner.

Neagley Has a New Relationship Outside of Jack Reacher

Neagley’s previous appearances in Reacher have established her haphephobia, or fear of being touched, and in Season 2, she tells Karla Dixon (Serinda Swan) that she’s “not attracted to anybody.” Neagley’s spin-off reveals that her haphephobia is the result of a traumatic event in her childhood, when she witnessed her father killing a man, and has prevented her from ever having a meaningful romantic relationship. At one point, Neagley tearfully confesses to her father, Calvin (Tyrone Benskin), “I’ve never danced with anyone. I’ve never had a first kiss with anyone. A guy reached toward me last night — a guy I really like, and I screamed at him!”

Advertisement

Unveiling the root cause of Neagley’s haphephobia — as well as her romantic interest in Riley — is a major development both for the character and the entire Reacher saga, as author Lee Child previously avoided divulging her backstory in his novels. Before Neagley, it always seemed like romance was never on the table, but it’s exciting that the writers are tackling this subplot head-on. Although Reacher and Neagley have always been close, their relationship is strictly platonic, and Riley and Neagley’s relationship offers a unique dynamic now that the character is leading her own series.

Will Neagley and Riley Get Together in Season 2?

Greyston Holt as Hudson Riley standing next to Maria Sten as Frances Neagley at a counter in Neagley
Greyston Holt as Hudson Riley standing next to Maria Sten as Frances Neagley at a counter in Neagley
Image via Prime Video

The Season 1 finale, “Touched,” reveals that Riley reciprocates Neagley’s feelings, even asking at one point if it would be okay to kiss her when they’re alone. Unfortunately, Neagley isn’t ready for that, as she’s still processing her haphephobia and the trauma of her childhood. Yet the season’s final scene does show Neagley meeting with a therapist, and it looks like she’s finally taking steps to deal with her long-standing phobia.

Advertisement

Riley is no Jack Reacher, but he proves himself as a man of integrity and an equal to Neagley, and their potential romance raises the emotional stakes for next season. Sten and Holt have remarkable onscreen chemistry that will benefit the series if their characters’ relationship continues to develop in the future. It will be interesting to see whether Neagley and Riley’s mutual attraction develops into a full-blown relationship, which would be a monumental event that allows Reacher fans to finally have someone they can romantically ship Neagley with.

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Roseanne Barr Unloads On TV Son In Profanity-Filled Tirade

Published

on

Roseanne Barr Lists Hawaii Farm Once Tied to Legal Disputes

Roseanne Barr has unleashed on her former television son Michael Fishman after he renewed his support for ABC’s decision to cancel the “Roseanne” revival in 2018. The comedian attacked Fishman during an appearance on the “Can’t Be Censored” podcast, calling him several names and warning him to stop publicly discussing her.

Roseanne Barr Launches Profanity-Filled Attack On Michael Fishman

Roseanne Barr Lists Hawaii Farm Once Tied to Legal Disputes
Tim Wright / MEGA

Barr did not hold back when the podcast host raised Fishman’s recent comments about the controversy that ended the “Roseanne” revival. According to TMZ, Barr called her former co-star a “bigot,” an “ignoramus,” and a “little f-cking worm.”

She then told him to “go and f-ck yourself and stay f-cked till the day you die.” Barr also claimed Fishman has “no f-cking idea” what she was discussing in the 2018 post and accused him of having “no geopolitical context whatsoever.”

Fishman played D.J. Conner, the son of Barr’s character, throughout the original sitcom and its 2018 revival. During her podcast appearance, Barr claimed Fishman returned for the revival only because she fought to be included. She alleged that producers originally wanted to remove him from the project.

Advertisement

Barr finished her message to Fishman with another blunt warning: “Don’t f-cking put my name in your f-cking mouth.”

Michael Fishman Said The Revival Was ‘Rightfully Canceled’

Roseanne Barr out on the town
©1996 RAMEY PHOTO/ MEGA

Barr’s outburst came after Fishman addressed years of criticism surrounding his response to the controversy. In an Instagram video, the former child actor said he continued receiving “ignorant and inaccurate” comments claiming Barr was unfairly targeted for being an edgy comedian.

“So, I guess the world failed to learn the lesson,” Fishman said. “So I’m going to point out. We are perpetuating a lie, and people are using a political smokescreen to justify the indefensible.”

Fishman argued that dehumanizing rhetoric can carry real-world consequences beyond the original statement. “Those justifications, they’re leading to real consequences. Real crimes,” he said.

The actor ultimately defended ABC’s response, declaring, “Dehumanizing people is never a joke. In this case, there was no joke. And the show was rightfully canceled.”

Advertisement

Despite his criticism, Fishman also said he still loves Barr and believes good people can make mistakes. He maintained that caring about his former co-star did not require him to defend her conduct.

ABC Canceled ‘Roseanne’ Hours After The Controversial Post

Roseanne Barr Lists Hawaii Farm Once Tied to Legal Disputes
Tim Wright / MEGA

The controversy began in May 2018 when Barr posted a since-deleted message comparing Valerie Jarrett, a former senior adviser to President Barack Obama, to the Muslim Brotherhood and “Planet of the Apes.”

Barr deleted the post and apologized, but ABC canceled the highly rated revival within hours. The network said the statement was inconsistent with its values. Other platforms and television channels also removed reruns of the original series from their schedules.

Barr later argued the post was political rather than racial. During a 2018 interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity, she said the message was “about asking for accountability from the previous administration about the Iran deal, which Valerie Jarrett is the author of, and that was what was in my head.”

She also said her reaction to the backlash “was shock that they were saying it was racial, when it was political.” Fishman has rejected the argument that political context made the post defensible.

Advertisement

Roseanne Barr’s Son Previously Accused The Cast Of ‘Selling’ Her Out

Roseanne Barr at Kimmel
RB/Bauergriffin.com/MEGA

Before Barr’s latest attack, her son, Jake Pentland, publicly criticized Fishman for supporting the cancellation. Pentland acknowledged that his mother’s post caused harm, but argued that other cast members continued benefiting from a franchise she created after she was removed from it. He claimed members of the cast took the post out of context and “conspired” to take the revival away from Barr without first asking her “what she meant.”

Pentland also alleged that the cast “prevented her from publicly defending herself.” “I wish him good luck in finding work one day. Hopefully selling the woman responsible for his career out was worth it for him,” Pentland told TMZ.

His frustration centered heavily on the creation of “The Conners,” which allowed much of the cast and crew to continue working without Barr.

Following the cancellation, ABC launched the spinoff with John Goodman, Laurie Metcalf, Sara Gilbert, Lecy Goranson and Fishman reprising their roles. Barr’s character was killed off before the new show began.

‘The Conners’ Continued Without Roseanne Barr For Seven Seasons

Roseanne Barr at the 75th Annual Golden Globe Awards
MEGA

Fishman remained with “The Conners” for its first four seasons before confirming in 2022 that he would not return as a regular for Season 5. Reports at the time said the door remained open for a possible future appearance. The sitcom continued for another three seasons without him and concluded in April 2025 after more than 100 episodes.

Executive producers said the team chose to end the series while it remained ABC’s most-watched comedy, rather than extending it beyond what they believed was the appropriate ending point. The six-episode final season focused on providing closure for the Conner family after decades on television.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Gremlins 3 First Teaser Reveals Gizmo and 2028 Release Date

Published

on

Gremlins 3 First Teaser Reveals Gizmo and 2028 Release Date

Gizmo is officially back! Warner Bros. has released the first teaser for Gremlins 3, offering fans an early glimpse of the beloved Mogwai while announcing that the long-awaited sequel has been delayed nearly a year.

The brief 11-second teaser features Gizmo peeking out of a bag, accompanied by the familiar sounds of mischievous creatures nearby. Although the footage reveals little about the upcoming film, it marks the first official look at the franchise’s return to the big screen after more than three decades.

Originally scheduled to arrive on November 19, 2027, Gremlins 3 will now hit theaters on October 6, 2028, positioning the film for a Halloween-season release. Warner Bros. has not provided a specific reason for the delay.

Chris Columbus, who wrote the original 1984 film, is returning to the franchise as director and producer. The screenplay has also involved Final Destination Bloodlines filmmakers Zach Lipovsky and Adam Stein, with Hannah Marks working on the latest draft. Steven Spielberg, who helped bring the original film to life, is returning as executive producer.

The original Gremlins, directed by Joe Dante, followed Billy Peltzer after he received an unusual Christmas gift: a lovable Mogwai named Gizmo. However, three important rules accompanied his new pet, and breaking them unleashed a wave of mischievous and dangerous creatures upon the quiet town of Kingston Falls.

The film became a box-office success and spawned the 1990 sequel Gremlins 2: The New Batch, which took the franchise in a more comedic direction. The upcoming third installment will mark the series’ first theatrical release in 38 years.

While the new teaser confirms the return of Gizmo, Warner Bros. has yet to reveal the film’s full cast or plot details.

Advertisement

For now, fans will have to wait a little longer before the Gremlins return to theaters.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Paige DeSorbo on Past Experience With Domestic Violence

Published

on

Paige DeSorbo at Vanity Fair Oscar Party 2025

“Summer House” alum Paige DeSorbo has had a whirlwind time since announcing her exit from the show in June 2025, including making a brief appearance in “The Devil Wears Prada 2.” However, the former Bravo star recently opened up about experiences from her 20s with domestic abuse, revealing she felt like a fraud for not speaking out before.

Paige DeSorbo Says She Didn’t Talk About Her Domestic Abuse Experience

Paige DeSorbo at Vanity Fair Oscar Party 2025
OConnor-Arroyo / AFF-USA.com / MEGA

Variety interviewed DeSorbo in July 2026 and released the interview months later, in September. In it, she spoke about her life after “Summer House” and reflected on being honored by the Purina Purple Leash Project, a charity that creates pet-friendly shelters for domestic abuse survivors.

Regarding her experience with domestic abuse, DeSorbo stated that she “didn’t talk about it ever, to anyone, except maybe a couple close friends and then family” due to embarrassment.

She continued, “I felt like, ‘How could I let this happen to me?’ I didn’t want them to think less of me. I thought that way for the rest of my 20s, and I just really never brought it up.”

Advertisement

The ‘Summer House’ Alum Says She Felt ‘Fraudulent’ For Not Speaking Out

Paige DeSorbo at The Daily Front Row's 8th Annual Fashion Los Angeles Awards
CraSH/imageSPACE / MEGA

DeSorbo continued by reflecting on being a public figure who has experienced domestic abuse in the past. She said she felt she was “doing a disservice” by not discussing that difficult period of her life, especially since many of her fans are young women.

The former “Summer House” star said, “I think my ‘character’ on ‘Summer House’ was strong and confident, and the No. 1 thing about domestic violence is it can truly happen to anyone.”

The 33-year-old continued, “I felt like I was a good example of, ‘She doesn’t take sh-t from anyone she’s dating.’ I felt almost a little fraudulent not saying that I had been through this, because it shaped a lot of how I did date in my late 20s.”

Regarding her being honored by the Purina Purple Leash Project, DeSorbo stated, “There’s no other time than a situation like domestic violence where you need someone to have your back. And I feel like a pet having a pet with you could make a difference.”

She Previously Opened Up About Being With An ‘Abusive Man’ In 2024

Paige DeSorbo at Andy's Legends Ball Red Carpet at BravoCon
MEGA

DeSorbo took to her “Giggly Squad” podcast in late 2024 to open up about a relationship with a man that had become physically and emotionally abusive. According to her, “I probably got my most insecure when I was 19 or 20. I dated a really physically and mentally abusive man, and it changed my whole course of dating in my 20s.”

She continued, “I don’t even know if I’ve ever even said that on the pod, that I was in an abusive relationship before, but I feel like if I’m going to say it, this is the episode I would say it because I know for a fact, a ton of other girls have been in them too.”

Advertisement

She then called that experience “a very weird time” of her life before stating that she had been “fully brainwashed” by the unnamed man. DeSorbo added, “I was 19, I was 20 years old, I couldn’t even legally drink. It really did change a lot of how I looked at relationships. I’d never been exposed to that ever. I never thought that that could be me.”

Paige Also Shared What She Misses About ‘Summer House’

Paige DeSorbo and Craig Conover at 2022 MTV Movie And TV Awards: UNSCRIPTED
MEGA

Elsewhere in the Variety interview, DeSorbo also discussed her post-“Summer House” life, saying she felt a bit unsure of herself at first without having to film the show.

She explained, “Last summer came at me too fast. I was like, ‘Wait, what do people do in the summer?” However, DeSorbo has now settled into her new schedule, saying, “I’ve relaxed. I think everyone needs a break from being perceived.”

Regarding what she misses about filming the show each July, she admitted, “I would justify all my purchases because I had to film. ‘I need this outfit.’ Now when I’m shopping, I’m like, ‘Well, I don’t need an arrival outfit for Friday afternoon.’ So that part is a little bit sad.”

Paige And Her Podcast Co-Host Hannah Berner Recently Signed A New Deal

DeSorbo launched the “Giggly Squad” alongside fellow “Summer House” star Hannah Berner in March 2020, starting with Instagram Live sessions before it became an official podcast. Most recently, in September 2026, it was announced that the co-hosts and close friends had signed a new four-year deal with SiriusXM.

The new deal makes SiriusXM the exclusive distributor of the top-rated podcast and expands the brand with “new exclusive programming.” This comes after the pair launched the successful “Giggly Squad” tour in September 2024 and published the New York Times bestseller “How To Giggle” in April 2024.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Kirk Franklin Shocks Fans After Teasing Gospel Track With GloRilla

Published

on

Church Got Turnt! Kirk Franklin Sets Social Media OFF After Teasing New Gospel Track With GloRilla (VIDEO)

Roomies, Kirk Franklin has the innanet talking once again after making an unexpected move with his upcoming music! The gospel icon has folks weighing in on just how far artists can go when blending faith with hip-hop, especially after revealing that his new track samples the late Shawty Lo.

RELATED: Watch Yo Mouth! Tammy Franklin Reacts After Husband Kirk Franklin Confronts Man Who Shaded Her (VIDEO)

Kirk Franklin Said, “Y’all Gotta Hear This Beat!”

Kirk Franklin is gearing up to drop ‘This Time,’ a new track featuring GloRilla that samples the late Shawty Lo’s ‘Dey Know’ record. He recently previewed the song on ‘Joe and Jada,; sparking reactions online as fans debate whether the singer is pushing gospel in a new direction or simply finding fresh ways to bring listeners into praise and worship.

Roomies Had Plenty To Say In The Comments

Fans quickly ran to The Shade Room’s Instagram comment section with their reactions to his latest move. While some declared that Kirk is really HIM, several other commenters admitted the collaboration was completely unexpected.

Advertisement

The Instagram user @cthagod commented, Kirk Franklin aka Holy Lo Featuring Hallelujah Woods.”

This Instagram user @abovethenote said, lol Kirk said I need the beat to knock alittle bit more.. In Jesus Name!!💯😂😂😂”

And, Instagram user @socialnatrosha added, As a former ATLien, it’s 🔥😂”

Meanwhile, Instagram user @lifew.shawna shared, Remind yall, he’s not the only gospel artist to remix a secular music beat.. yall just don’t like him 😂”

Advertisement

While Instagram user @mrcoolbeardguy wrote, Kirk was definitely stomping in the studio when he made this 😂💯”

Lastly, Instagram user @aa.laidbackaplomb claimed, The only Kirk I acknowledge is Franklin”

X Had Plenty To Say About Kirk’s New Track

X didn’t miss either, Roomies! Folks ran over there to share their thoughts on Kirk Franklin’s unexpected move, and the reactions are all up and down the timeline. Some X users even joked that Kirk might just be the gospel version of DJ Khaled, because when he drops a record it’s definitely taking OVER!

 

RELATED: Too Soon? Kirk Franklin Has Social Media Hollerin’ After Clowning Marvin Sapp’s $40K Donation Request (PHOTO)

What Do You Think Roomies?

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

‘Primetime’s Robert Pattinson Has Remade the Movie Star Formula

Published

on

Robert Pattinson as Antinous in 'The Odyssey'

Between Anne Hathaway, Zendaya, and Tom Holland, 2026 has been a marquee year for many of Hollywood’s biggest names, with each star landing multiple totemic movies in the same calendar year. What connects them, besides fame and acclaim? Sharing screentime with Robert Pattinson, who is having perhaps the most stellar 2026 of all. Despite having already starred in and excelled in The Drama and The Odyssey, the actor still has two wildly anticipated films on this year’s schedule: he is set to appear in the end-of-year’s most seismic cinematic event, Dune: Part Three, and at the end of September, Pattinson will officially make his case for an Academy Award for his buzzy performance as Chris Hansen in Lance Oppenheim‘s Primetime. We are watching the perfect blueprint of how to be a movie star in 2026 unroll in front of our eyes, and his success in parlaying his earlier mainstream success to elevate smaller projects should be the formula for future stars.

Robert Pattinson Cashed In on His ‘Twilight’ Fame

Robert Pattinson as Antinous in 'The Odyssey'
Robert Pattinson in ‘The Odyssey’
Image via Universal Pictures
Advertisement

Hollywood’s inability to produce new movie stars, especially ones 40 years old and under, is frequently discussed by audiences and talking heads alike. Average viewers are drawn more to comic book characters and pre-established IP, and the Tom Cruises and Sandra Bullocks of the world are rare commodities. Frankly, one of the many factors driving this trend is the refusal by many household names to use their A-list status to prop up and greenlight small, independent films with challenging and unique material. This critique is often thrown at stars like Ryan Reynolds and Chris Evans, who have resigned themselves to churning out indistinguishable action blockbusters.

Stepping away from that pattern is Robert Pattinson, who starred in both an A24 and a Christopher Nolan movie in 2026, and who has broken the rigid confines of 40-and-under actors by becoming a movie star with genuine artistic integrity. The roots of his current viability as a star and dramatic actor go back over a decade, following the conclusion of his five-movie run as Edward Cullen in the wildly popular Twilight series. Since being minted as the ultimate big-screen heartthrob from 2008 to 2012, Pattinson has rejected his screen persona as a swooning “pretty boy” by playing sheer scoundrels in provocative and bold auteur-driven films. He set the tone for his post-Twilight career instantly by working with the probing and experimental David Cronenberg twice. Pattinson has helped elevate the mainstream status of today’s best working filmmakers, including Josh and Benny Safdie, Claire Denis, Robert Eggers, Lynn Ramsey, Kristoffer Borgli, and now Lance Oppenheim, a documentarian making his foray into narrative filmmaking with Primetime.

Robert Pattinson Consistently Plays Daring and Unglamorous Roles

Male stars designated as matinée idols often make themselves appear ugly, both physically and emotionally, to prove they are serious dramatic actors who don’t skate by on their good looks. Throughout the years, these transformations have been met with mixed results, but no one in recent memory has made one’s deconstruction of their movie star sheen look easier than Robert Pattinson. In 2026 alone, he has played paranoid, envious, and slithering characters in The Drama and The Odyssey, in roles not designed to garner sympathy from the audience. Pattinson’s revelatory turns in Good Time and The Lighthouse showcased his mastery of playing self-destructive men on the brink of total collapse. Even with his most “heroic” characters, such as the set of clones rebelling against totalitarianism in Bong Joon-ho‘s Mickey 17, he is a bumbling, vulnerable presence with a peculiar voice and oddball energy.

Advertisement

Granted, unless you’re Leonardo DiCaprio, if you want to be an A-lister in 2026, you have to play ball with Hollywood. Pattinson can’t be described as much of an anti-establishment artist, as he is indeed the current iteration of Bruce Wayne, last seen in Matt ReevesThe Batman, which has finally begun filming its sequel. Luckily, despite donning a cape and wearing a mask throughout most of the runtime, he’s not been asked to partake in any expanded universe (at least for now). The standalone and auteurist nature of The Batman is tailor-made for Pattinson’s career approach. Working with Christopher Nolan, arguably the most viable name in Hollywood, has also helped make Pattinson a household name. Nolan, who makes blockbusters that are nothing like the standard blockbuster, lets Pattinson run wild with his conniving and off-putting characters, and his performance as Antinous in The Odyssey has drawn much enthusiasm.

When even your “one for them” projects are creatively liberating, you know you’re in a vaunted class. Robert Pattinson, whose work in Primetime has placed him firmly in the Oscar conversation, is just getting started, and we may be witnessing the prime of our brightest star in Hollywood.


lmrulvlbmaejtix1yamxo1oghh1.jpg
Advertisement


Primetime

Advertisement


Release Date

September 25, 2026

Runtime
Advertisement

110 minutes

Director

Lance Oppenheim

Advertisement

Writers

Ajon Singh

Advertisement


Advertisement


Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

MTV Video Vanguard Winners Through the Years

Published

on

Everything to Know About RHOSLC Alum Jen Shah's Legal Drama

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

This Bold Spy Thriller Proves We’ve Had the Perfect James Bond Replacement the Entire Time

Published

on

This Bold Spy Thriller Proves We've Had the Perfect James Bond Replacement the Entire Time

With the rumors that the next Bond has already been cast (with no word on who it might be), everyone’s got a name that they’re throwing into the hat. Whether it’s Jack Lowden, Callum Turner, or Jacob Elordi — the current frontrunners — we can rest assured that the Bond 26 casting announcement will make as many waves as Daniel Craig‘s casting did back in 2005. Although he might not be as young as the other candidates, Peacock’s The Day of the Jackal proves that Eddie Redmayne deserves a spot on the list as a potential underdog for the role. It’s not the classic James Bond, nor the classic Jackal of the book, but Redmayne brings a sleek brutality to the role that still invokes echoes of the 007 agent.

Eddie Redmayne’s Jackal Feels Incredibly Similar to James Bond

The Day of the Jackal showcases Redmayne’s cerebral and brutal sides, as he murders people with the precision and style of a 007 agent. The initial assassination of a right-wing German politician displays the Jackal’s precision and lack of remorse for his victims. He takes his time to set up his weapon, which is a sniper rifle so ingeniously disguised as a suitcase it could literally be Ben Whishaw‘s Q himself that built it. The bullet through the German’s head is so bluntly portrayed, smacking through the exit wound and spraying blood on the ground in an instant, yet Redmayne’s Jackal still holds to his code, not killing unnecessarily, as he doesn’t pull the trigger when presented with the opportunity of eliminating the politician’s bodyguard.

Advertisement



















Advertisement
Collider Exclusive · James Bond Personality Quiz
Which James Bond Actor Are You Most Like?
Connery · Moore · Dalton · Brosnan · Lazenby · Craig

Six actors. Six completely different visions of the same man — dangerous, charming, complicated, and almost certainly wearing a very good suit. Only one of them shares your particular way of moving through the world. Eight questions will figure out which Bond you really are.

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿Connery

😄Moore

🎭Dalton

Advertisement

Brosnan

🤵Lazenby

💠Craig

Advertisement

01

How do you carry yourself when you walk into a room?
Bond is always the most interesting person in the room. The question is how he makes you feel it.






Advertisement

02

How do you handle a dangerous situation?
Every Bond faces it differently. What does your version look like?






Advertisement

03

How do you charm someone you need on your side?
Bond always gets what he needs. The method varies considerably.






Advertisement

04

How do you handle your emotions on the job?
Every Bond deals with this differently. Most of them not particularly well.






Advertisement

05

How would your colleagues describe your working style?
MI6 has opinions about all of its 00s. What are theirs about you?






Advertisement

06

How do you feel about operating within the rules?
The licence to kill comes with terms and conditions. Not everyone reads them.






Advertisement

07

What is your relationship with love?
Every Bond has a different answer. None of them have found it easy.






Advertisement

08

When the mission is over, how do you want to be remembered?
The name is Bond. The rest is entirely up to the man behind it.






Advertisement

The Name Has Been Determined
Your Bond Is…

Six actors. One role. Your answers point to the Bond who shares your presence, your method, and your particular way of carrying the weight of being the most dangerous person in the room.

Advertisement


Dr. No — You Only Live Twice · 1962–1967

Sean Connery
Advertisement

You are the original — and you carry that fact without needing to announce it. There is an authority in the way you occupy a room that others spend careers trying to replicate.

  • You don’t explain yourself, justify yourself, or soften yourself for anyone’s comfort. The confidence is structural, not performed.
  • Connery’s Bond established everything — the tone, the danger, the cool — because Connery himself had the innate presence to make something that had never existed feel inevitable.
  • You share that quality: the sense that you were always going to end up exactly here, doing exactly this.
  • The name is Bond. In your case, it always was.


Live and Let Die — A View to a Kill · 1973–1985

Roger Moore
Advertisement

You understand something that more serious people miss: that wit is its own form of intelligence, and that making people laugh is not a retreat from danger but a way of mastering it.

  • Moore’s Bond is underrated precisely because the effortlessness looks easy — and effortlessness is the hardest thing to manufacture.
  • You have the same quality: a lightness that disarms people before they realise how sharp you actually are.
  • The raised eyebrow, the perfectly timed quip, the refusal to be rattled — these are not affectations. They are a philosophy about how to move through a world that would like to take itself too seriously.
  • You have never let it.


The Living Daylights · Licence to Kill · 1987–1989

Timothy Dalton
Advertisement

You took the role seriously when everyone wanted you to coast — and that refusal to take the easy version of anything is the most defining thing about you.

  • Dalton’s Bond has genuine moral weight: he feels the cost of what he does, he has lines he won’t cross, and he is not interested in the version of himself that pretends otherwise.
  • You share that intensity. You push harder than the situation technically requires, because you have a standard and you hold yourself to it.
  • He was ahead of his time — the Bond the franchise wasn’t quite ready for yet, arriving exactly when he was meant to.
  • You know what that feels like.


GoldenEye — Die Another Day · 1995–2002

Pierce Brosnan
Advertisement

You are the complete package — and you know it, which is part of what makes you so effective and occasionally so infuriating to the people around you.

  • Brosnan arrived at the role looking exactly like Bond was supposed to look, and he delivered on that expectation with a professionalism that made it seem effortless.
  • You have the same quality: a smooth competence, a charm that operates like a precision instrument, and the ability to make even difficult things look like they weren’t.
  • His era was the most commercially successful in the franchise’s history. There is a reason for that.
  • The reason is that some people simply fit their moment perfectly. You are one of those people.


On Her Majesty’s Secret Service · 1969

George Lazenby
Advertisement

You stepped into something enormous with less preparation than anyone around you thought was sufficient — and you delivered something genuine anyway, which is the more impressive achievement.

  • Lazenby’s single outing is, by many measures, one of the finest Bond films ever made — and he is not a small part of why.
  • You share his quality of raw authenticity: less polished than the alternatives, more honest for it, capable of something real that technique alone can’t produce.
  • He was underestimated, and then he wasn’t, and then history caught up with him.
  • You are the kind of person history catches up with. Give it time.


Casino Royale — No Time to Die · 2006–2021

Daniel Craig
Advertisement

You stripped everything back and found what was underneath — and what was underneath was harder, more honest, and more human than anyone expected.

  • Craig’s Bond is the franchise’s most psychologically complete: a man doing a brutal job, carrying its costs imperfectly, capable of love and loss in ways that can’t be dismissed.
  • You share that depth. You don’t hide behind the role or the charm or the suit — you let the work show what it actually costs.
  • He was controversial from the moment he was announced and definitive by the time he was finished. The sceptics became the believers.
  • That arc — of being underestimated and then undeniable — is one you know intimately.

Advertisement

Furthermore, Redmayne’s physicality is brilliant in the role, as a master of disguise, being able to both be handsome and yet blend into a crowd when needed. There’s a reason why Redmayne’s performance as the Jackal earned him a Golden Globe nomination for Best Actor. Throughout nearly every persona he takes on, there is a politeness to the Jackal. He’s a businessman, though his remark that he couldn’t care less why his employees want someone dead displays the coldness hidden beneath the veneer of chivalry.

‘The Day of the Jackal’s Romance Gives an Even Greater James Bond Feel to Eddie Redmayne’s Performance

Something that The Day of the Jackal stands out in — compared to previous adaptations — is its romantic elements. The book rarely includes anything like this, yet the 10-part series depicts the Jackal’s home life with his wife Nuria (Úrsula Corberó) and son in Cádiz, displaying a far more sympathetic side than the book or 1973 Edward Fox-led film ever really offered. This addition gives us far more complexity to the character, and many scenes between a coy Jackal and his wife feel eerily similar to the chemistry between Daniel Craig and Eva Green’s in Casino Royale. Nuria sees through the Jackal’s lies surrounding his line of work, wanting him to be completely present at home, and Redmayne shines in these scenes. There is a softness to the character that you can tell he has with nobody else, yet it is clear he is always focused on the next job, even though he wants to be at home more often.

The Day of the Jackal is already a thrilling adventure on its own, with danger around every turn, and Eddie Redmayne’s performance highlights this. He serves as the gravity well around which everything revolves. Not only do we get to see the cold-blooded assassin side of the Jackal, but his relationship at home portrays the inner conflict continually occurring within the character. It’s not James Bond exactly, but Redmayne’s performance is what makes The Day of the Jackal so watchable. And if we end up disappointed by the Bond casting announcement, at least we know that there’s another season of The Day of the Jackal waiting in the wings for us in 2027.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Patrick Clancy’s Treatment That Helped Most After Murders

Published

on

Lindsay Clancy Ex-Husband Emotionally Described Their 3 Kids in Her Murder Trial

Patrick Clancy opened up about how he dealt with trauma after his ex-wife, Lindsay Clancy, killed their three kids in January 2023, revealing that one “miracle” treatment helped him “the most.”

In an extended clip from his Sunday, September 20, interview on 60 Minutes, Patrick, 36, said that he used EMDR to face the murder of his kids “head on.”

EMDR, which stands for Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing, is a psychotherapy treatment designed to help people heal from the emotional distress and symptoms from traumatic events.

“It’s unpleasant but they get you used to dealing with that,” Patrick said. “And, eventually, you’re better at processing it … After I did it — all of those sessions — the waking up screaming, the horrible dreams, they mostly stopped. I mean, it was like a miracle.”

Advertisement

Patrick went on to say that the “traumatic” memories from the event were “overwhelming.”

“I think the thing that helped the most was EMDR,” he said. “It’s a little unusual. They put you right back in that place that you’ve been trying to avoid for years and you face it head-on.”

The interview marked the first time Patrick has publicly spoken about the murders after Lindsay’s case was declared a mistrial on September 4. She was on trial for nearly seven weeks after she killed their kids Cora, 5. Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, at their Duxbury, Massachusetts, home on January 24, 2023.

While Lindsay, 36, never denied killing her kids, her defense team argued that she should not be held criminally responsible for the murders due to her struggles with postpartum psychosis. Meanwhile, the prosecution argued she was aware of what she was doing when she killed her kids.

Advertisement

Following extensive testimony from psychologists and investigators, the jury deadlocked 11-1 when they were unable to come to a unanimous verdict. The prosecution has not yet announced whether they plan to bring the case back to trial.

Patrick shared many details about the harrowing experience on 60 Minutes, including the wish he made shortly after Lindsay strangled their kids.

“So, I didn’t have all the details of Callan’s condition,” Patrick said of the former couple’s youngest child, who survived for a few days after the attacks. “I just knew that they got a heartbeat back. So I remember … that night, I … really thought there was a chance that Callan would live. And I remember just thinking, ‘Just gimme one. Just gimme one kid, and I would raise him as best I could, and I would give him the best life I possibly could. I’d tell him about his brother and sister.’”

Advertisement
Lindsay Clancy Ex-Husband Emotionally Described Their 3 Kids in Her Murder Trial


Related: Lindsay Clancy’s Ex-Husband Choked Up While Describing Their 3 Kids in Court

Lindsay Clancy’s ex-husband, Patrick Clancy, got emotional while describing their three children during his ex-wife’s murder trial after she killed them in January 2023. Lindsay, 35, was arrested on January 26, 2023, and charged with the murders of their children Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. Three years later, Patrick, 38, took the […]

Patrick added that he was “holdin’ out hope” that Callan would survive. “And then when I got to the hospital, I saw the doctor,” he recalled. “I saw the look on her face, and … I knew that it … it wasn’t gonna be … a good prognosis.”

The 60 Minutes sit-down segment also included updates about his life today, including insight into his relationship with his wife, Rachel Danis, and their plans to start a family together.

Interviewer Ross Douthat later confirmed “they are having a child” on CBS Mornings.

If you or someone you know is pregnant or just had a baby and is in crisis, help is available. Call or text the National Maternal Mental Health Hotline for free, confidential support 24/7 in English and Spanish at 1-833-TLC-MAMA (1-833-852-6262).

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025