Supriya Ganesh is getting candid about leaving The Pitt — and the online reaction that followed.

“I tried to take a step away, because it’s just been so surreal,” Ganesh, 28, told Variety in an interview published on Sunday, May 10, of the reaction. “The day that news broke, I saw my name was trending on Twitter, and I was like, ‘Gotta put the phone down and go outside.’ So, I haven’t really been keeping track of it, to be honest, but I’ve been getting such sweet, lovely messages from people, and I’ve honestly just been surprised at how much people love the character and saw so much of themselves in her, and that’s what I’m going to miss.”

Ganesh, who couldn’t confirm any future projects yet, shared that there are a “couple of things in the pipeline.”

News broke in April that Ganesh’s character, Dr. Samira Mohan, would be written off after the emotional season 2 finale. At the time, it was reported that Ganesh’s exit was a “story-driven” choice, since the show is set in a teaching hospital.

While speaking with JoySauce later that month, Ganesh was asked where Mohan might end up in the future.

Thank You!

You have successfully subscribed.

“I hope [Samira] goes somewhere where she has an attending that thinks she’s fit to be in the ER,” Ganesh said at the time, suggesting that Mohan be paired up with Sepideh Moafi’s character. “Maybe if Dr. Al-Hashimi takes over. It’s been really interesting thinking about how different her experience of the ER might have been if she had a different attending.”

That same month, Ganesh spoke out about experiencing “discrimination” as an actor and opened up about gender dysphoria in an essay with Vulture. Now, Ganesh shared that the piece led to people reaching out and has resulted in a “validating” experience.

“It’s definitely a scary thing to put out there, because it’s such a complex experience and something that’s so personal that I remember when I was writing it, I like, ‘I don’t know if anyone’s going to get this. But that’s OK, because even if one person gets it, like, I’m writing for that person,’” Ganesh told Variety on Sunday. “I get DMs from people being like, ‘I’m taking your essay to my queer theory class and discussing it in class tomorrow.’ That’s just so surreal to me, because I remember being in women’s and gender studies classes, and discussing and debating ideas. It’s just great that it’s part of the conversation.”

Netflix offers many options, but one that’s hard to turn off is The Umbrella Academy, adapted from the comic book series of the same name by Gerard Way and Gabriel Bá. With superhero titles becoming increasingly popular on streaming, there’s no shortage of shows to choose from, but there aren’t any like The Umbrella Academy, which combines zany humor, complex family dynamics, and exaggerated action. In addition to focusing on a group of superpowered siblings, the series explores sci-fi topics such as time travel and alternate timelines, building a complex and fascinating story.

What Is ‘The Umbrella Academy’ About?

There’s never a dull moment on The Umbrella Academy. From the very first sequence that explores the mysterious and simultaneous birth of 43 children to mothers who weren’t pregnant, the story takes some unexpected turns. After the event, seven of those children are adopted by the eccentric billionaire, Reginald Hargreeves (Colm Feore), who trains them to become superheroes. Luther (Tom Hopper), Diego (David Castañeda), Allison (Emmy Raver-Lampman), Ben (Justin H. Min), Five (Aidan Gallagher), and Klaus (Robert Sheehan) all have unique abilities thanks to their nontraditional origins; however, the seventh child, Viktor (Elliot Page), is isolated from the rest. Though flashbacks are common, The Umbrella Academy follows these estranged siblings as adults when Hargreeves’ death forces them all back together, dredging up their resentments and lingering trauma.

The surviving Hargreeves children’s lives are complicated by Five returning after being missing for 17 years, despite being no older than the day he left. Claiming to have time-traveled to the future and insisting that an apocalypse is looming, Five asks for his siblings’ help in saving the world. With brutal time-traveling assassins from the secret organization known as the Commission after him, no knowledge of what happens to end the world, and a firm deadline, Five’s mission is near impossible. However, it also forces the siblings to uncover the truth about their past and come together despite their differences. Each season brings the characters a new challenge as they travel through time and even alternate timelines to try to stop the apocalypse before it happens.

Wild Sci-Fi Adventure and Humor Set ‘The Umbrella Academy’ Apart

In a world full of superhero shows, The Umbrella Academy stands out for its unapologetically wild humor. Between a 13-year-old boy who has the memories of an old man, a man whose body is part gorilla, and a lovestruck time-traveling assassin, nothing is too out there for this show. Though the series has incredibly violent moments, it never loses sight of the comedy. With its high stakes, The Umbrella Academy isn’t light-hearted by any means, but it is hilarious.

The Umbrella Academy also never slows down. Between the looming apocalypse, the Hargreeves family’s never-ending drama, and their powerful enemies at the Commission, the series is full of intriguing storylines. However, the siblings’ unexpected reunion provides an emotional center that’s equally significant to the story, especially as each member of the Umbrella Academy evolves and develops their powers over time. All of these events are enhanced by highly amusing needle-drops thrown into the mix, with songs ranging from “I Think We’re Alone Now” to “Istanbul (Not Constantinople)” to catch the audience’s attention. Thanks to its excellent combination of superhero tropes and sci-fi elements, The Umbrella Academy is a show that was practically made to be binged over its four seasons.

Advertisement

Release Date

Advertisement

2019 – 2024-00-00

Directors

Jeremy Webb

Advertisement

Franchise(s)

The Umbrella Academy

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Cinema in the 20th century was defined by a litany of genres, from the screwball comedies of the ’30s and early ’40s to the Westerns of the ’50s and ’60s, the intense realism of the ’70s, and the action bombast of the ’80s. However, few genres, styles, or stories experienced the evergreen audience approval, ceaseless critical acclaim, and ferocious cultural staying power of crime drama across the century.

Through groundbreaking direction, daring storytelling, thematic intensity, and a confronting appetite for grit and violence, crime has established itself as one of cinema’s most absorbing and challenging genres through a plethora of perfect pictures that showcase the allure and awe of such stories. From pioneering noir masterpieces of the ’30s and ’40s to cerebral psychological thrillers of the ’90s, these crime movies are completely without fault, and their iconic status and universal adoration are a testament to their quality.

‘Heat’ (1995)

Image via Warner Bros. Pictures

At 170 minutes, Heat is a monumental epic that sees Michael Mann marry the innate character drama and complex moral focus of crime cinema with some of the most arresting action sequences the medium has ever seen. A picture with little interest in the ethical line of the law, it treats both cops and criminals as deeply flawed people driven by an obsessive professionalism, creating a richly compelling dichotomy of principles, philosophies, and sacrifices as it follows bank robber Neil McCauley (Robert De Niro) and the cop who hunts him, Lt. Vincent Hanna (Al Pacino).

Simply casting De Niro and Pacino in the same movie made Heat an instant icon. Even beyond that bit of star power, the film’s qualities of grandiose spectacle, scintillating realism, and absorbing drama have remained enrapturing. Mann’s command of the story is immaculate, with the high-octane tension of the famous shootout scene and the quiet, dialogue-driven intensity of McCauley and Hanna’s diner meet-up both standing as two of the most masterful and mesmerizing sequences in crime cinema. It is a perfect crime-action film as well as one of the most ageless triumphs of ’90s cinema.

‘The Maltese Falcon’ (1941)

Image via Warner Bros.

The Maltese Falcon is the spark that ignited the flurry of film noir classics that took Hollywood by storm through the ’40s, and while it has had many imitators, it remains unsurpassed in terms of both spectacle and style. Its aesthetic is of shadow and cynicism, with its finely-dressed figures all hiding dirty secrets as they try to outwit each other, or exploit one another for self-gain.

Based on Dashiell Hammett’s novel of the same name, it follows San Franciscan private eye Sam Spade (Humphrey Bogart) as the murder of his partner embroils him in a web of deceit and duplicity surrounding the criminal underworld’s search for the invaluable statuette, the Maltese Falcon. A tale of greed and desperation propped up by enthralling performances, compelling visuals, and wonderfully confounding plotting, The Maltese Falcon is one of Hollywood’s most iconic classics and is a pioneer of crime cinema mystique. It is quite astonishing to think it was John Huston’s directorial debut.

‘Pulp Fiction’ (1994)

Image via Miramax Films

The quintessential Quentin Tarantino movie, Pulp Fiction is an infectious combination of iconic dialogue that is as rhythmic as it is hysterical and outbursts of ultra-violence that define the irreverence and dare of the ’90s’ indie counterculture movement. Absurdly entertaining, the sprawling non-linear narrative follows several criminals in L.A. as their chaotic lives overlap through a series of wild and often deadly chance encounters.

Its impact on pop culture and cinematic trends is apparent, making it one of the most important and defining movies of its decade. Today, Pulp Fiction is still considered one of the most entertaining movies ever made, a magnetic procession of great lines, unforgettable scenes, perfect characters, and outstanding music. It fills every second of its 149-minute runtime with compelling drama, intensity, and comedy. Pulp Fiction is the epitome of style and excess in crime cinema, Tarantino’s magnum opus, and a triumphant touchstone of ’90s film.

‘Se7en’ (1995)

Image via New Line Cinema

It is so often the case that palpable atmospheric intensity proves to be the greatest asset to crime mystery thrillers; Se7en is a stunning, albeit harrowing, example. Directed by David Fincher, the film is a masterclass in technical excellence, using every tool at its disposal—the rain-soaked setting, the muted color palette of greens and shadows, even the towering urban environment that feels as though it pushes down on the main characters—to conjure a sense of moral decay and visceral griminess.

The story itself is no lean feat either: Andrew Kevin Walker’s tightly constructed screenplay follows two detectives as they investigate a serial killer using the seven deadly sins as inspiration for his murders. Using traditional neo-noir elements while also incorporating ideas from horror, Se7en simmers throughout its runtime, tension burning in a pressure-cooker that engulfs viewers right up until its unforgettable finale. Disturbing and dark, it represents crime cinema at its unflinching and scarring best, and it stands as one of the genre’s most notorious and iconic titles because of it.

‘M’ (1931)

Image via Paramount Pictures

A German film that was decades ahead of its time, M is one of the earliest classics in crime cinema, a foundational masterpiece that pioneered new ways of using sound as a storytelling device that are still used to this day. It conjures a haunting atmosphere with its use of expressionistic visuals and the implementation of Edvard Grieg’s “In the Hall of the Mountain King” as an eerie leitmotif that heralds the central villain, the child-murdering serial killer Hans Beckert (Peter Lorre).

The movie uses the villain’s reign of terror as a catalyst to examine morality and necessity on both sides of the law. With the public in panic over the at-large killer, police begin to flood the streets, hoping to break the case open. As the police presence thwarts the operations of organized crime, mobsters set out to apprehend the murderer themselves so they can resume their illegal activities. It is a timelessly fascinating examination of responsibility and self-interest, and at the heart of it all is Lorre’s captivating and oddly sympathetic antagonist.

‘Double Indemnity’ (1944)

Image via Paramount Pictures

Double Indemnity was crucial to highlighting the timeless allure of ’40s noir cinema and establishing the moody subgenre as a major influence on crime cinema going forward. Co-written and directed by Billy Wilder, it follows an insurance clerk seduced into a devilish scheme by a married woman who wants to kill her husband and cash the life insurance. Despite their extensive plotting, the duo finds themselves under pressure when an insurance investigator becomes interested in the case.

Reveling in noir cinema’s rich complexity with its story of greed, lust, and murder, Double Indemnity remains utterly transfixing to this day. Its macabre suspense and the way it places viewers on the side of the scheming killers make for wonderfully wicked entertainment. It’s all supported by three stellar performances and a screenplay full of twists, tension, and the brand of acidic wit that the best Old Hollywood movies tended to master.

‘High and Low’ (1963)

Image via Toho Company

Throughout his illustrious career, there is hardly a genre Akira Kurosawa didn’t master. While many know him best for his epic samurai films, the Japanese filmmaker also had a distinct penchant for crime cinema, with 1963’s High and Low being his finest accomplishment in the genre. A pressing tale of morality and social inequality, it transpires as a business executive with designs on buying a shoe company finds himself at the center of a hostage negotiation when his driver’s son is kidnapped and the criminals responsible demand a huge ransom in exchange for his life.

This ceaselessly compelling story of responsibility and reason receives tremendous weight from Kurosawa’s technical prowess. Theatrical shot compositions divide people based on class, the rigid structure and meticulous design of the framing reflecting the inescapable order of the society that Toshiro Mifune’s businessman lives above and routinely ignores. When chaos erupts, Kurosawa switches to handheld to capture the frenzied intensity of the situation. Like so many of the best movies the genre has seen, High and Low uses its crime story to illuminate cultural issues, becoming both timelessly perfect and perfectly timeless.

‘Chinatown’ (1974)

Image via Paramount Pictures

Considered by many to be the greatest screenplay ever written, Chinatown is a masterclass in elaborate mystery suspense that truly takes flight with its stunning performances, atmospheric intensity, and ability to blend traditional noir elements with a renewed social cynicism that was commonplace in the ’70s. Jack Nicholson stars as Jake Gittes, a private investigator in 1930s L.A. who is entangled in a web of political corruption and murder conspiracy after being hired by an impostor to tail the chief engineer of the Department of Water and Power.

With not a second of screentime being wasted or misused, Chinatown is a masterclass in smart and efficient storytelling. It uses visual cues and an air of imposing, sinister dread to not only bolster the intensity of the narrative but also enrich its central themes of power, corruption, and greed. It remains the definitive example of neo-noir cinema, combining its absorbing and complex mystery with a sense of realistic tragedy to strike a brutally mature tone regarding real-world evil and the immunity of the wealthy.

‘Goodfellas’ (1990)

Image via Warner Bros.

“As far as I can remember, I always wanted to be a gangster.” The opening line of Goodfellas is both a relatable yearning for prestige and power and a cold caution of the tale of violence that follows. The biographical masterpiece sees Martin Scorsese operating at his absolute best as it explores the life story of Henry Hill (Ray Liotta), an impressionable youth who starts working for the mob and, along with his two friends, does anything required to rise up the ranks of the organized crime syndicate.

A masterclass in fast-paced storytelling courtesy of Scorsese’s direction and Thelma Schoonmaker’s editing, Goodfellas is both relentless and utterly transfixing from its opening moments. Its sense of style, buoyed by its sublime soundtrack and technical brilliance, feels inviting, almost dangerously so, as if the audience is being seduced by the allure of a life of crime as Hill is. However, Scorsese never seeks to glamorize such a lifestyle, with the movie soon descending into a ferocious frenzy of self-saving paranoia that turns Hill’s luxurious life into a waking nightmare. Goodfellas is a masterpiece of crime cinema, a propulsive thriller that grounds the viewer in Hill’s rise and harrowing fall.

‘The Godfather’ (1972) & ‘The Godfather Part II’ (1974)

Image via Paramount Pictures

Not only the pinnacle of crime cinema, but arguably the two greatest movies ever made, The Godfather and The Godfather Part II, are the height of filmmaking perfection. Everything from their cinematography and direction to the performances and sense of Shakespearean tragedy defines the movies’ splendor. The first film follows a tumultuous transition of power in the Corleone crime family as the aging Vito (Marlon Brando) hopes to hand over power to his reluctant son, Michael (Al Pacino). The second film, split across two separate stories, documents Michael’s efforts to expand his criminal empire and a young Vito’s rise to power in 1920s New York.

It is impossible to revere one film without acknowledging the greatness of the other, with both movies standing as medium-defining epics tackling issues of power, corruption, and the violent greed of the American dream with profound depth and artistry. The brilliance of both films is enduring. Over 50 years have passed since they were released, and yet they remain two of the most discussed and analyzed movies of the modern day. Additionally, they helped pioneer a new dawn of confronting realism and thematic depth in Hollywood cinema, making them essential cultural touchstones of filmmaking excellence as well as ageless masterpieces of crime drama.

Justin Theroux is paying tribute to his wife, Nicole Brydon Bloom, on her first Mother’s Day after the birth of their baby boy.

“‘The loveliest masterpiece of the heart of God is the heart of a mother,’” Theroux, 54, wrote via Instagram on Sunday, May 10, quoting Thérèse of Lisieux. “Happy first Mother’s Day Nicole … you are such a gift to both of us. ❤️.”

Alongside the upload, Theroux shared an image of him cradling Bloom’s stomach before sharing several snaps with their newborn.

Theroux and Bloom, 32, were first linked in February 2023. The couple got engaged the following year when he proposed while they were in Italy for the 2024 Venice Film Festival. In March 2025, Theroux and Bloom tied the knot in Mexico.

Related: Justin Theroux’s Heart Opened ‘In a Beautiful Way’ After Welcoming 1st Baby

Justin Theroux can’t help but marvel over his 3-week-old baby. “It’s so hard to sum [fatherhood] up,” Theroux, 54, said on the Thursday, April 23, broadcast of Today. “I just love looking into his eyeballs. It’s just a wonderful thing. We’re in that period now where it’s a lot of quiet tip-toeing around the house […]

News broke in December 2025 that the couple were expecting their first baby several months after their wedding. Bloom confirmed her pregnancy that same month while debuting her baby bump at the season 2 premiere of Fallout in Los Angeles.

Later that month, Theroux and Bloom shared a glimpse of their babymoon getaway in Mexico.

“So much fun to revisit our favorite place with a little one on the way 🕊️👶🏼,” she captioned an Instagram post at the time.

In February, Bloom gushed that she’s “always wanted to be a mom.”

Advertisement

Related: Jennifer Aniston Reacts After Ex Justin Theroux Welcomes His 1st Baby

Jennifer Aniston subtly offered her congratulations to  ex-husband Justin Theroux and his wife, Nicole Brydon Bloom, after they welcomed their first baby. “He’s here 🕊️We are so in love,” Theroux, 54, and Bloom, 32, captioned a joint Instagram post on Saturday, April 18, alongside a snap of the actor holding his newborn son. Aniston, 57, […]

“I love kids. I’ve always been looking forward to this chapter in my life, and certainly Justin has been, too,” Bloom told The Hollywood Reporter at the time, noting that she was excited about the pair’s new chapter. “It’ll have its challenges with going back to work and everything, but I’m just thrilled, very happy.”

Theroux and Bloom shared in April that they had welcomed their first baby, a boy. “He’s here 🕊️ we are so in love,” the pair wrote in a joint Instagram post at the time.

Thank You!

You have successfully subscribed.

The couple received several supportive messages from celebs and a subtle reaction from Theroux’s ex-wife, Jennifer Aniston, who “liked” the announcement. (Aniston and Theroux tied the knot in 2015 and divorced three years later. She is now dating hypnotist Jim Curtis.)

Days later, Theroux and Bloom walked the red carpet while attending the world premiere of The Devil Wears Prada 2 in New York City. Theroux, for his part, portrays Emily Blunt’s on-screen boyfriend in the sequel film.

At the event, Theroux told People that the best part of fatherhood so far has been “being able to pour all the love that I have into my son.”

Some shows deserve far more attention than they get. HBO has long built its reputation on a stacked lineup of award-winning hits, from the epic fantasy that is Game of Thrones to the gold standard of crime dramas, The Sopranos. But HBO has got a lot more right up its sleeves. Over the years, the network has quietly released several hidden gems that often slip through the cracks.

They may not have the same level of hype or marketing power to dominate the charts, but these shows more than make up for it with substance, storytelling, and staying power. With that in mind, here are the forgotten HBO shows that have aged like fine wine.

‘Years and Years’ (2019)

Image via HBO

Some apocalypses don’t happen overnight — they can also take years. Set between 2019 and 2034, Years and Years follows the Lyons family, a group of ordinary Britons who live life under the creeping political and economic collapse, as well as the rapid advancement of technology. As each crisis stacks on top of the others, it seems hapless to do anything about it.

The Lyons are neither heroes nor revolutionaries. They’re just working-class individuals trying to get by whatever comes their way. As society frays, technology becomes both escape and crutch. Meanwhile, those who actually possess power and influence take advantage of it to weaponize fear. The scariest part of the show is that these phenomena feel very true to real life.

‘The Night Of’ (2016)

Image via HBO

Wild, spontaneous nights take a murderous turn in The Night Of. Pakistani-American college student Nasir “Naz” Khan (Riz Ahmed) is about to attend a Manhattan party after taking his father’s cab without permission. However, things become a little blurry when he encounters a mysterious woman named Andrea. After a night of sex and bad decisions, Nasir wakes up to find Andrea brutally murdered.

The next few episodes are a bit of a doozy. Nasir has absolutely no idea what happened. However, when his intoxicated self becomes involved with the police, he quickly becomes the prime suspect in the case. It’s a sticky situation where, despite the debauchery of the night before, Nasir isn’t necessarily responsible for the murder — yet the system continues to wrong him due to a lack of clear evidence. The Night Of proves that the legal system doesn’t guarantee anyone justice despite the truth being out in the open, and no matter how “objective” it claims to be, perception takes greater precedence.

‘Vice Principals’ (2016)

Image via HBO

It’s the battle of VPs in this dark comedy — not Vice Presidents, but Vice Principals. At North Jackson High School, Neal Gamby (Danny McBride), the no-nonsense vice principal in charge of discipline, is sure that he’ll succeed as principal. However, his arrogance is taken down a notch when Lee Russell (Walton Goggins), the manipulative vice principal of curriculum, also has his sights set on the post. To the two’s surprise, the principal trusts neither of them.

What the two vice principals don’t realize is that the school hires an outsider to take over instead. Gamby and Russell aren’t having any of it, and the two team up to veto the decision, which seems nearly impossible since the incoming principal has been making a good impression. But Vice Principals‘ charm is simple: the insane chemistry between McBride and Goggins as two nitpicking, insult-trading, overgrown adults is comedy gold. Think of it as Abbott Elementary, but without the wholeheartedness and packed with inappropriate vulgarity in the hallways.

‘I May Destroy You’ (2020)

Image via HBO

Recognized as one of television’s greatest masterpieces, I May Destroy You is an essential watch during a time when sexual consent has become a bigger, more open discourse. Arabella (Michaela Coel) is a London-based writer with a huge social media following, currently under pressure to finish the follow-up to her successful second book. To let off some steam, Arabella spends the night with her friends at a local bar, only to wake up disoriented and sexually assaulted.

I May Destroy You doesn’t center solely on the assault itself, but rather on Arabella’s attempt to process the trauma. As is often the case with such experiences, her memories are fragmented, and she struggles to piece together what really happened that night. At the same time, the world keeps moving, forcing her to expedite her recovery in an environment that doesn’t pause for her pain. Arabella’s healing is anything but linear. She becomes a walking contradiction, trying to make sense of something she sometimes doubts was even real. At the same time, she channels her trauma into various outlets, some more successful than others.

‘Perry Mason’ (2020–2023)

Image via HBO

Advertisement

Decades before the likes of Mickey Haller from The Lincoln Lawyer, there was defense attorney Perry Mason (Matthew Rhys). Set in 1932 Los Angeles, Perry Mason follows the flawed attorney-slash-private investigator as he works in the aftermath of the Great Depression and the rise of Hollywood. The combination of the two makes the perfect setting for corruption to slip through, whether it’s by criminals or the political system.

However, Mason isn’t perfect either. Still grappling with the trauma of World War I, he lacks any sense of stability in his personal life. A struggling alcoholic, his marriage is on the rocks, and he’s barely getting by with what little he has. Though he becomes the face of the courtroom, Mason isn’t above taking shady deals or bending the rules to crack a case. Don’t expect clear-cut victories. He’s often choosing the lesser evil, all while trying to keep himself from falling apart.

‘Animals.’ (2016–2018)

Image via HBO

Advertisement

New York City is home to 8.48 million people, but they’re not the only inhabitants of the Big Apple. As the title suggests, Animals. features a special group of characters: living, breathing, talking animals. It’s not just house cats in apartments or puppies playing in dog parks — the series also follows moths intoxicated by midnight neon lights and the horses often used in tourist carriages. Through separate episodes, these animals question life’s conundrums, but from an anthropomorphic point of view.

These animals go through distinctly human experiences, ranging from the ordinary — like dating — to the experimental, such as drug use, and even the philosophical, like existential dread. However, don’t expect any major revelations. Much of the show’s commentary leans toward observation, with Animals. focusing more on capturing the senseless absurdity of everyday life — an absurdity that mirrors the city itself. The use of animals is simply an added quirk, allowing viewers to see human behavior from a non-human perspective.

‘The Leftovers’ (2014–2017)

The Leftovers imagines an apocalypse where people give up on finding the truth. The series begins in the aftermath of the “Sudden Departure,” when 2% of the world’s population vanishes without warning or explanation. Instead of searching for answers, many of those left behind remain confused, fractured, and in denial. The cast includes Justin Theroux, Carrie Coon, Margaret Qualley, and Liv Tyler.

It isn’t the easiest show to watch, but it lingers with you. In a world stripped of meaning, the survivors struggle to create new purpose for themselves. The show follows ordinary people as they confront the impossible yet undeniable truth that their loved ones can vanish instantly without explanation. On top of that, they try to figure out what’s left to hold on to when everything else feels gone.

Advertisement

The Leftovers

Advertisement

Release Date

2014 – 2017-00-00

Showrunner

Advertisement

Damon Lindelof

Writers

Damon Lindelof, Tom Perrotta

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

The worst remakes of beloved ’70s movies usually commit the same fatal sin: they inherit a premise that already had pressure built into it, then flatten that pressure into product. The ’70s were messy, nervous, suspicious, and often spiritually bruised. Even the populist hits from that decade had grit in the joints. The violence felt uglier. Institutions felt less trustworthy. Men looked weaker, angrier, more confused, or more morally compromised. Women in genre films were often trapped inside systems that looked normal from the outside and rotten from within. The atmosphere mattered because the culture’s nerves were already exposed.

That is exactly why so many remakes of ’70s movies feel weirdly bloodless even when they are louder, slicker, and more expensive. They remember the thing you can put on a poster. They forget the social panic, the grime, the moral trap, the class resentment, the suburban dread, the humiliating vulnerability. A good remake has to understand what hurt in the original. These movies mostly just remember what sold.

10

‘Halloween’ (2007)

Image via Dimension Films 

Rob Zombie’s Halloween is not empty in the way some of the others are. It has intention. It has grime. It has a filmmaker’s fingerprint all over it. That is part of what makes the failure so interesting. This is not a cynical Xerox. It is a sincere misunderstanding. John Carpenter’s original is terrifying because Michael Myers (Nick Castle) is less a person than an intrusion. He is blankness with a knife. He drifts through suburbia and makes ordinary space feel spiritually unsafe. Hedges, sidewalks, afternoon light, babysitting, all of it starts to feel cursed because Michael is barely legible in human terms.

Zombie hates that kind of abstraction. He wants filth, abuse, broken homes, humiliations, ugly social roots. So he stuffs Michael’s childhood with explanation. The trouble is, explanation is not depth here. It is reduction. Michael becomes less mythic, less impossible, less like evil moving through space and more like a case file screaming for attention. That would already be a problem, but Zombie’s other weakness piles on top of it: everybody in the movie lives at the same shrill, vulgar register. Laurie Strode (Scout Taylor-Compton) and Dr. Loomis (Malcolm McDowell) are trapped inside a world that is degraded from frame one. And horror like Halloween needs contrast. It needs clean air before the poison. This version starts poisoned, which sounds “darker” until you realize fear has nowhere left to spread.

9

‘The Longest Yard’ (2005)

Image via Paramount Pictures

The original The Longest Yard is one of those deceptively loose ’70s movies that actually knows exactly what it is doing. On the surface, it’s just convicts playing football. But when you peel a layer, it is actually anti-authoritarian sports comedy built on humiliation, macho ruin, institutional sadism, and the weird dignity that can emerge in a rigged system when losers decide they would still rather hit back than behave. Paul Crewe (Burt Reynolds) in the original is already disgraced, already morally compromised, already spiritually beaten down in that perfect ’70s antihero way.

The remake turns a lot of that into broader, more crowd-pleasing underdog entertainment. That is not a crime in itself. A remake can shift the register. But the writing keeps softening the bitterness that made the original bite. Paul Crewe (Adam Sandler) is more digestible, less corroded, more built for eventual likability. The prison becomes a comedy venue more than a pressure system. Even when the movie has fun, and it sometimes does, it feels safer than it should. A prison-football movie should still have some meanness in its bloodstream. This one is too eager to entertain cleanly.

8

‘Death Wish’ (2018)

Image via MGM

The ugly beauty of the original Death Wish is that it never really lets Paul Kersey (Charles Bronson) off the hook. The movie knows the revenge fantasy is seductive, but it also understands that seduction as moral damage. Bronson’s Kersey does not become some triumphant action icon in any spiritually healthy sense. He hardens. He narrows. The city’s violence enters him and rearranges what he is willing to be. That discomfort is the point. Vigilantism is not just empowerment there. It is infection.

The remake keeps the bones and throws away too much of the infection. Paul Kersey (Bruce Willis) should feel like a man crossing into a state he cannot come back from, but the writing keeps smoothing that descent into more familiar action-revenge mechanics. Once that happens, you lose the queasiness that made the original worth arguing about. Revenge movies are easy. Morally ugly revenge movies that implicate the audience in the pleasure are harder. The remake wants the gunfire and the outrage while avoiding too much of the rot. And that is exactly what this story should never avoid.

7

‘Straw Dogs’ (2011)

Image via Screen Gems

This is one of the most difficult remakes on the list because Sam Peckinpah’s original Straw Dogs is simply about humiliation, sexual tension, masculine weakness, social performance, class resentment, intellectual fragility, and the horrifying way violence can awaken things a man would rather believe are not in him. David Sumner (Dustin Hoffman) in the original is not a sturdy hero pushed too far either but a man who does not know what force lives inside him until the siege demands an answer, and the answer is not cleansing. It is sickening.

The remake translates too much of that unease into more standard Southern-hostility thriller energy. David Sumner (James Marsden) is less spiritually baffling than the role needs to be, and the whole conflict becomes more legible in ways that weaken it. The locals are hostile, the marriage is tense, the old boyfriend energy is bad, the house becomes a battleground, all the plot machinery is there. But Straw Dogs should feel morally dangerous. You should be watching a man become competent at violence and feel no comfort in it at all. The remake does not fully trust that discomfort. It starts behaving more like a siege thriller and less like a nightmare about civilization cracking open to reveal how thin it was.

6

‘The Taking of Pelham 123’ (2009)

Image via Columbia Pictures

The original The Taking of Pelham 123 is a great urban pressure-cooker thriller because it understands that systems are dramatic. A hijacked subway train, city bureaucracy, labor tensions, criminal intelligence, civic personality, procedural improvisation, all of it clicks because every human being feels positioned inside a larger machine that is overheating. The threat is not just the gunmen. The threat is that New York itself has to respond as a living, burdened organism.

The remake keeps the basic skeleton and inflates the personalities. That sounds fun in theory. Walter Garber (Denzel Washington) and Ryder (John Travolta) should be electric on paper. But the film keeps pushing everything outward, toward bigger acting, bigger score cues, bigger emotional emphasis, and in doing so it loses the elegant procedural tension of the original. Ryder becomes more performative and less unnerving. Garber gets bulked up into a more explicitly guilty, redemptive protagonist. The result is not terrible scene to scene, but the story loses the civic tightness that made the original feel so alive. The machine has been replaced by star wattage.

5

‘Rollerball’ (2002)

Image via Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Pictures

The original Rollerball is one of the coolest examples of science fiction and action working together without either side getting dumbed down for the other. The sport matters because the politics matter. Corporate power wants spectacle without individual transcendence. The public gets addicted to violence. The player becomes a problem the second he starts looking too singular, too legendary, too human inside the machine. Jonathan E. (James Caan) is compelling because his very persistence begins threatening the logic of the system. That is a real idea. That is not just a setup.

The remake seems to have looked at the title and concluded that rollerblading violence, MTV editing, metallic chaos, and nihilist sports energy would be enough. But without the social idea, it is just noise. Jonathan Cross (Chris Klein) never becomes symbolically dangerous to the world around him. He is merely present inside it. And that is devastating for a story like this. Rollerball should make mass entertainment feel politically sinister. The remake behaves like mass entertainment already won and nobody writing it was smart enough to notice.

4

‘Get Carter’ (2000)

Image via Warner Bros. Pictures

The original Get Carter is one of the meanest, most clear-eyed revenge films ever made. Jack Carter (Michael Caine) returns home as a dangerous man already shaped by vice, crime, and emotional hardening (not as a romantic Avenger). The film works because the investigation into his brother’s death becomes a guided tour through a city’s rot, and Carter is not morally above any of it. He belongs to the same darkness he is moving through. That is what gives the revenge its foul taste.

The remake keeps trying to make Jack Carter more sympathetic in a way that weakens the whole enterprise. Jack Carter (Sylvester Stallone) becomes more mournful, more recognizably bruised, more conventionally redeemable. But Get Carter is not supposed to redeem its avenger. It is supposed to let him cut through filth like somebody who already carries the same stain. The more accessible the hero becomes, the less poisonous the story is. And once the poison is gone, you are left with a revenge movie that has style residue and very little soul.

3

‘The Stepford Wives’ (2004)

Image via Paramount

This one is especially infuriating because the original is such a razor-sharp genre concept. It is not “men turn wives into robots” in some goofy high-concept vacuum. It is suburban misogyny rendered as science-fiction horror. It is the male fantasy of frictionless domesticity turned into annihilation. Women do not merely become obedient. They are emptied out, polished, displayed, and stripped of real personhood so their husbands never again have to cope with female will, mess, thought, contradiction, or independence. The chill in the original comes from how recognizable the desire underneath the horror is.

The remake turns that into upscale camp. Not clever poison. Not destabilizing satire. Camp. That decision kills almost everything. Joanna Eberhart (Nicole Kidman) should feel like a woman watching the language of perfect home life turn mechanically predatory around her. Instead the film keeps tipping toward broadness, reassurance, and audience-safe joke rhythms. It is too charmed by its own decorative world. The Stepford premise only bites when the film is willing to say something ugly and specific about how patriarchy dreams of femininity. This version mostly wants to be glossy and cute in a story that absolutely should not be cute.

2

‘The Omen’ (2006)

Image via 20th Century Fox

This is the most frustratingly faithful failure on the list. You can feel the movie trying to assure horror fans that it remembers all the right stations: Damien’s eerie presence, the nanny, the priest warnings, the church panic, the family dread, the accidental revelation that your child may be a vessel for apocalypse. All the pieces are there. And that is exactly why the weakness becomes so obvious. It proves, scene by scene, that remembering the beats is not the same as carrying the dread.

The original The Omen was so loved because it treats its premise with terrifying seriousness. Robert Thorn (Gregory Peck) slowly realizes that modern privilege, diplomacy, fatherhood, and rationality may all be useless against a biblical evil already growing inside his own house. The remake copies the map and misses the conviction. Robert Thorn (Liev Schreiber) and Katherine Thorn (Julia Stiles) move through the same broad ordeal, but the movie never makes you feel the full spiritual indecency of what is happening. The Antichrist should not feel like a franchise concept but reality itself curdling.

1

‘The Wicker Man’ (2006)

Image Via Warner Bros.

This had to be number one because it is the clearest example here of a remake not merely failing, but failing to comprehend its original on the level of worldview. The Wicker Man is not about a weird island and pagans. It is about ideological collision. It is about a devout, sexually repressed, morally rigid Christian policeman walking into a culture whose rituals, eroticism, and social harmony are all structured around a completely different understanding of life, sacrifice, fertility, and order. The horror comes from the fact that he thinks he is investigating them when really they have already read him perfectly. The ending, therefore, becomes not just shocking but cosmological. His belief system is not enough to save him from theirs.

The remake throws almost all of that away. It swaps in paternal guilt, louder conspiracy-thriller mechanics, and a more generalized “creepy isolated community” approach that completely misses the original’s spiritual trap. Edward Malus (Nicolas Cage) is not undone by the limitations of his own moral certainty in the same way Sergeant Howie (Edward Woodward) was. He is just dragged through increasingly bizarre set pieces until the movie bursts into camp notoriety. The memes do not even annoy me as much as the misunderstanding does. The original burns because every ritual, every smile, every song, every sensual provocation has been tightening the same noose. The remake just flails. And that is why it sits at the bottom. It does not know what kind of story it is desecrating.

Paramount+ had a very revealing U.S. chart on May 8, 2026, because the top of the TV list was not controlled by one of the platform’s newer prestige plays. South Park held No. 1, but the more interesting movement came directly beneath it: a long-running CBS police procedural landed at No. 2, while Taylor Sheridan’s Marshals dropped to No. 4. This is interesting because Sheridan’s TV universe has been one of Paramount’s strongest identity engines, yet the movement shows older broadcast muscle still competing hard inside the same streaming ecosystem.

The daily pattern makes the result sharper. Earlier in the week, Marshals had topped Paramount+’s U.S. TV chart on May 5, while South Park led on May 4, May 6, May 8, and May 9. The CBS procedural also briefly took the top TV spot on May 7, proving its No. 2 placement the next day had substance instead of being a mere library bump. The Amazon Channels overall chart gives Sheridan some balance, since Marshals still ranked No. 1 there, but on Paramount+’s main U.S. TV chart, the procedural clearly outranked it.

That procedural is NCIS, which sat at No. 2 on Paramount+ in the United States on May 8, ahead of Survivor at No. 3 and Marshals at No. 4. The win is especially impressive because NCIS is not a shiny new launch but a long-running CBS institution with hundreds of episodes, familiar case-of-the-week comfort, and built-in rewatch value. Against a newer Taylor Sheridan title, that kind of durability is exactly the story: Paramount+ still runs on franchise heat, but CBS procedurals remain its streaming backbone.

What Else Is Currently Trending on Paramount+?

Image via CBS

Beyond NCIS and Marshals, Paramount+’s May 8 U.S. chart has a mix of legacy comfort, action rewatch titles, and surprise catalog movement. Top Gun: Maverick is leading the movie chart at No. 1, followed by Gasoline Alley, The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie, Primate, and The Mechanic. But the deeper movie list is where the fun is: 13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi at No. 7, Jack Reacher sits at No. 9, and Harold & Kumar Go to White Castle is at #8, which is an extremely niche, interesting title to be trending in 2026.

Both NCIS and Marshals are available to stream on Paramount+. Stay tuned to Collider for more updates.

Advertisement

Release Date

September 23, 2003

Advertisement

Showrunner

Donald P. Bellisario

Directors

Advertisement

Dennis Smith, Terrence O’Hara, Tony Wharmby, James Whitmore Jr., Thomas J. Wright, Michael Zinberg, Arvin Brown, Rocky Carroll, Diana Valentine, Leslie Libman, Tawnia McKiernan, Colin Bucksey, William Webb, Bethany Rooney, Alrick Riley, Jeff Woolnough, Alan J. Levi, Lionel Coleman, Martha Mitchell, Peter Ellis, Michael Weatherly, Edward Ornelas, Stephen Cragg, Tom Wright

Writers

George Schenck, Frank Cardea, Jesse Stern, John C. Kelley, Jennifer Corbett, Christopher Silber, Reed Steiner, Nicole Mirante-Matthews, Jack Bernstein, Scott J. Jarrett, Matthew R. Jarrett, Kimberly-Rose Wolter, Don McGill, Gil Grant, Frank Military, Nell Scovell, Steven Kriozere, Brian Dietzen, Kate Torgovnick May, Jeff Vlaming, Sydney Mitchel, Katie White, Richard C. Arthur, Laurence Walsh

Advertisement

Advertisement

• 

  Sean Murray

  Timothy McGee

  Advertisement
• 

  david mccallum

  Dr. Donald ‘Ducky’ Mallard

Advertisement

Advertisement

Netflix has a new crime drama breaking out globally, and its early chart movement is already wider than the usual “British show doing well at home” story. The six-part series launched on May 7, and by May 9, it is already inside Netflix’s Top 10 in 39 countries, currently sitting at No. 10 globally, as per FlixPatrol.

The most important detail is how evenly it’s traveling. The show’s chart come-up is strongest in its natural home market, ranking No. 3 in the United Kingdom, but the spread is much bigger than that: No. 4 in Ireland and Canada, No. 7 in Australia, and No. 8 in the United States. Across Europe, it is also holding steady in the middle of the Top 10, including No. 5 in Hungary, Poland, Czech Republic, Serbia, and Sweden, plus No. 6 placements across countries like Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Romania, Slovenia, and Ukraine. That tells you the hook is landing internationally: ’90s Britain, drugs flooding the streets, and state workers forced into the criminal underworld.

The title of the show is Legends, starring Tom Burke, Steve Coogan, Tom Hughes, Aml Ameen, Jasmine Blackborow, Hayley Squires, Douglas Hodge, Johnny Harris, and Charlotte Ritchie. The show plays like Narcos and Peaky Blinders had a baby, combining the drug-war machinery of the former with the period British crime texture of the latter.

‘Legends’ IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes Scores Make It Look Like a Strong Watch

Image via Netflix

Legends looks genuinely worth trying, but its current ratings point to a specific kind of appeal. IMDb currently has it at 7.8/10 from 334 ratings, while over at Rotten Tomatoes, Legends Season 1 has a 92% critics’ score, and the Popcornmeter is still too early. Nonetheless, those two figures are already convincing enough to try it out. The hook, too, is sharp, and since the show is spread over six episodes, it is a strong binge-watch for viewers who like controlled, adult crime thrillers.

Legends is currently available to stream on Netflix. Stay tuned to Collider for more updates.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Release Date

May 7, 2026

Network

Advertisement

Netflix

Directors

Brady Hood, Julian Holmes

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

While Pete Davidson and Elsie Hewitt figure out their next steps as a couple, they are especially glad to be parents to daughter Scottie Rose.

“We’re all here because of a mother’s sacrifice to make herself your first home,” Hewitt, 30, captioned throwback photos from her pregnancy via Instagram on Sunday, May 10. “I got to be Scottie’s❣️. [It is the] greatest honor of my life. Happy Mother’s Day.”

Davidson, 32, and Hewitt welcomed their first child in December 2025, naming Scottie after the comedian’s late father. (Davidson’s dad, Scott, was a firefighter who died in the line of duty while responding to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in New York City.)

“The best thing I’ve been telling people is [that Scottie is] the biggest gift,” Davidson exclusively told Us Weekly one month after Scottie’s birth. “Nothing else matters as much or intensely, like career, activities, hanging out with people [or] what do people think of me, that sort of s***. I still want to do cool stuff, but it’s like, ‘Well, how long do I have to be away?’ Or ‘Is this worth being away?’”

Related: Pete Davidson and Elsie Hewitt Are ‘Figuring Out’ Their Future After Baby

Pete Davidson and Elise Hewitt are “figuring out what they want” in their relationship months after welcoming daughter Scottie. “They are working things out,” a source with knowledge of the couple tells Us Weekly exclusively. “They are on their own timeframe and it’s up to them to make a decision about their future.” The insider […]

Davidson also told Us that it was “f***ing awesome” watch Hewitt be a mom.

“The whole time I was very sure and knew that she would be great at being a mom. She’s very caring and, almost to a fault, puts everybody else’s needs first,” the Saturday Night Live alum gushed at the time. “It’s really just sweet to see how on top of things she is, and … if [Scottie is] crying, [Elsie] knows exactly what to do. She has, like, little tricks that get her to relax or calm down, and all that stuff is really f***ing cool to watch and see.”

Davidson continued, “She definitely will wake up every three, four hours just to check the Nanit [baby monitor], like, no matter what, the Nanit app is open on Elsie’s phone. She’s always making sure that the baby’s all set. … She genuinely enjoys it, which is great, and we both do.”

Thank You!

You have successfully subscribed.

Nearly four months later, a source told Us that Davidson and Hewitt were “figuring out what they want” in their relationship.

“They are working things out,” the insider shared earlier this month. “They are on their own timeframe and it’s up to them to make a decision about their future.”

Davidson and Hewitt have been romantically linked since March 2025. Neither star has  publicly addressed their current relationship status.

Tieghan Gerard rose to online fame after capturing readers’ attention with her Half Baked Harvest recipes.

“One day, when I was 16, my mom and I were hiking together,” she wrote on her website, going on to explain how she decided on the name. “She was encouraging me to start a food blog since all I did in my free time was cook! She came up with the ‘half baked’ part of our name – because my family is very ‘half baked.’ And by that I mean we’re a little all over the place and crazy! I’ve just always loved the word harvest, so Half Baked Harvest it was!”

While publishing several cookbooks, Gerard has continued to share her love of cooking to her more than 5.4 million Instagram followers. In 2026, however, Gerard revealed she had decided to take a step back from social media after dealing with “haters.”

Scroll down to learn more about Gerard:

Tieghan Gerard Grew Up in Ohio

Gerard shared on her Half Baked Harvest website that she spent the first 14 years of her life in Cleveland, Ohio, before her family relocated to “the very snowy mountains of Colorado.”

“I now live in a converted horse barn and work out of a studio barn that we built next door. It is a special place that I was able to design entirely around my lifestyle,” she wrote. “It’s where I shot my third cookbook, and where I spend my days experimenting with new recipes, photographing my creations, feeding my family, and making one giant mess in the process. My hope is to inspire a love for food in others, as well as the courage to try something new!”

Tieghan Gerard Has 7 Siblings

Gerard is one of seven siblings. “I have 7 siblings…6 brothers and 1 sister. Here we are in order: Creighton, Trevor, Brendan, Tieghan, Malachi, Red, Asher, and Oslo,” she shared on her website. Gerard noted that her younger brother Oslo was adopted at birth.

Tieghan Gerard Went to Fashion School

At the age of 18, Gerard attended fashion school in Los Angeles for design and merchandising. Gerard, however, moved back home after giving it a go.

“My entire life I had big plans to live in LA and be a fashion stylist. I moved to LA and was all set to attend school at the Fashion Institute of Design and Merchandising when I decided that living in LA wasn’t for me. I was young and totally homesick, so I moved my butt back home,” she told All Sorts Of. “It was my mom who encouraged me to finally start HBH. Once I started writing, cooking and photographing I never looked back, and have been working on it ever since.”

Tieghan Gerard Has Been the Recipient of Several Awards

After starting her blog in 2012, Gerard went on to be featured on Food Network, HGTV and more outlets. Half Baked Harvest was named Readers’ Choice Favorite Food Blog by Better Homes and Gardens in 2014 and 2016, and Gerard also received the Saveur Magazine’s 2016 Award for Most Inspired Weeknight Dinners and the 2016 Bloglovin’ Best Food Blog Award, according to her website.

Tieghan Gerard Took a Step Back From Social Media

In 2026, Gerard took to her Instagram Story to explain that she had taken a bit of a step back from social media after dealing with “haters.”

“I just had to take a step back, but I’m back, you guys,” she said at the time. “I feel so excited, I feel so good. I am here in Miami right now, just soaking up the sunshine, I’m working [and] all things. Everything is so, so good, and at the end of the day, I am just here to share beautiful things with you guys. I’m here to share my beautiful recipes with you guys [and] beautiful ways to present those recipes.”

While Gerard’s posts have sparked controversy online regarding claims of cultural appropriation, intellectual property, privilege and body shaming, she denied any intentional harm. Gerard shared that she wanted to be able to “share [her] life” with her followers.

“It’s so special to me, and you know I love it so much,” she added, offering a life update since her online hiatus. “I’m in Miami. I’m renting here for a year. I needed to get away from the cold, I needed to get away from Colorado, be in a very big, warm, sunshine place. You know I love it here.”

Thank You!

You have successfully subscribed.

Advertisement

Gerard continued, “I love being able to work here and actually being able to see my family so much more. It’s been so special, and I’m so excited to spend some time here and share it with you guys because I have so much to share. We’re working on so many things behind the scenes.”

While Gerard has been “proud” of her upcoming Half Baked Harvest launches, she said she felt “sad” that she couldn’t express much on social media.

“Finally today, I was like, ‘You know what? I don’t want to do that anymore,’” she quipped. “I don’t want to be quiet. You can take it, you can leave it, you can criticize me all you want, but I love doing this. I’m only here to share a little bit of good and happiness, and that’s all I really care about at the end of the day.”