Related: Taylor Swift’s Red-Accent Buckle Sandals Will Be Summer’s ‘It’ Shoe Style
Advertisement
By Joshua Tyler
| Published

The fantasy genre is too often overlooked, and it’s time that changed. Some of the best movies ever made have involved swords, magic, and wild creatures crossing lands beyond imagination.
Fantasy is a big tent, so for this list we’re going to focus on the sword and sorcery of it all. That means no vampires, no magical nannies, and no steampunk zeppelins. To qualify for this ranking, a movie must have two things: magic and swords.
These are the twenty-four best sword & sorcery fantasy movies of all time.

Krull was the butt of everyone’s jokes for years, but it’s filled with wild creativity and charm. Enough to deserve a place on this list. Besides, it has the glaive, one of the coolest weapons ever created for any movie.
Prince Colwyn races to rescue his bride from an alien fortress that literally moves across the landscape, backed by a band of outlaws and guided by a blind seer played by Freddie Jones. Along the way, you get cyclops, fire mares, shape-shifting enemies, and the iconic glaive. Everybody loves the glaive!
It’s messy, ambitious, and completely sincere. A movie where the sheer volume of ideas being thrown at the screen becomes the point.

Ladyhawke is a medieval fantasy that skips the usual bombast and instead builds something more romantic and enduring. Rutger Hauer and Michelle Pfeiffer play cursed lovers. He’s a wolf by night, she’s a hawk by day, and they’re kept tragically out of sync by a vengeful bishop. They’re aided by Matthew Broderick as a quick-talking thief pulled into their orbit.
The movie looks dark and gritty, but it’s actually fun and optimistic in its own way. Ladyhawke never quite got the reception it deserved when it was released in 1985. Reviews were mixed, and box office results were solid but not spectacular. Over time, it gained legitimate cult status, and it’s now celebrated as one of the best things about the 80s.

Dreamlike and unapologetically mythic, 1985’s Legend is Ridley Scott at his most visually indulgent, building a fairy-tale world that feels less like a setting and more like a living painting. Tom Cruise plays the forest-dwelling hero Jack, pulled into a battle to save light itself after darkness, embodied by the greatness of Tim Curry in a towering, iconic performance as the Lord of Darkness.
Future Ferris Bueller star Mia Sara adds a fragile, otherworldly presence as the princess whose choices set everything in motion, but the real power of the film lies in its atmosphere, shaped by practical sets, elaborate creature design, and a sense of fantasy that feels ancient.

A sequel that goes broader and more openly mythic, Conan the Destroyer (1984) trades some of the raw edge of its predecessor (a movie that might show up higher on this list) for a colorful, quest-driven adventure. Arnold Schwarzenegger returns as Conan, this time leading a ragtag party, including a thief, a wizard, and a reluctant princess, on a mission that quickly spirals into gods, monsters, and double-crosses.
Grace Jones brings a striking, physical presence as the warrior Zula, while Wilt Chamberlain adds sheer size to the lineup. It works as a fast-moving fantasy ride, packed with practical creatures, oversized sets, and the kind of unapologetic sword-and-sorcery energy that defined the genre’s peak era.

Long before CGI flattened everything into the same glossy blur, Clash of the Titans (1981) arrived as a handcrafted spectacle, directed by Desmond Davis and powered by the unmistakable work of effects legend Ray Harryhausen.
The story tracks Perseus, played by Harry Hamlin, as he’s pushed through a gauntlet of gods and monsters (Medusa, the Kraken, and everything in between), while Laurence Olivier looms over it all as Zeus and Maggie Smith sharpens the edges as Thetis.
Every creature feels built, every moment staged like myth carved into stone. It’s simple hero’s-journey storytelling, but delivered with enough visual imagination and analog charm that it still feels bigger than most modern attempts to do the same.

2008’s The Forbidden Kingdom is a glossy East-meets-West martial arts fantasy directed by Rob Minkoff that exists mostly as an excuse to finally put Jackie Chan and Jet Li in the same movie. The story follows an American teenager who gets magically transported to ancient China, where he teams up with Chan’s drunken warrior and Li’s stoic monk to return a mystical staff and free the Monkey King.
Along the way, the film leans hard into fun martial-arts movie tropes like wire-fu fights, mythic villains, and a lot of destiny talk. It does that while staying accessible to Western audiences with a familiar fish-out-of-water structure. Instead of getting bogged down, the film leans into what works: fluid, inventive fight choreography, colorful world-building, and a sense of adventure that keeps things moving.

Dragonheart is a 1996 medieval fantasy built around Dennis Quaid as Bowen, a knight turned dragon-slayer who’s given up on ideals after a dragon saves a future tyrant. That dragon, Draco, is voiced perfectly by Sean Connery, playing him as witty, tired, and more human than anyone else on screen. They team up to run a scam, faking fake dragon hunts for money. That works until the king, played by David Thewlis, proves too brutal to ignore.
Draco was one of the first fully CG lead characters that actually felt present in scenes, built by Industrial Light & Magic using then-cutting-edge CGI and motion reference from Sean Connery’s performance. At the time, it was a major leap in making a digital creature carry real emotion and screen time, and for audiences, the first time they’d seen a dragon on screen that actually felt alive.

Four kids walk through a wardrobe and accidentally trigger a regime change in the 2005 Andrew Adamson adaptation of author C.S. Lewis’s The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe.
The Pevensie siblings land in a frozen fantasy world stuck under the White Witch’s control, where winter never ends, and dissent gets turned to stone. Suddenly, these outsiders are central to a war they barely understand, and there’s a lion, who seems to act a lot like Jesus.
It’s a heavily structured, deliberate fantasy that did justice to the books, even if it doesn’t hold up quite as well now as it did back in the early 2000s.

Based on the popular role-playing game it gets its name from, Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves picks up after the adventuring party of Edvin the Bard, Holga the Barbarian, Simon the Sorcerer, Doric the Druid, and Forge the Thief were betrayed by the obviously evil wizard Sofina.
Out for revenge, Evin and Holga get the band back together, go into an actual dungeon complete with a dragon, and pull off a fantastical heist. It failed at the box office thanks to a fan boycott centered on the company that owns the IP and had nothing to do with the movie itself.
That’s a shame because Honor Among Thieves is great sword-and-sorcery fantasy. Whether you play the tabletop game or not, the comedy beats all and makes it a fun fantasy adventure everyone must see.

Despite its 1963 release, Jason and the Argonauts is a visual feast thanks to the brilliant, groundbreaking stop-motion effects of Ray Harryhausen. The film follows Jason as he assembles a crew of heroes and sails into dangerous territory to claim the Golden Fleece, encountering a series of episodic threats along the way. He faces down harpies, a living bronze giant, crashing cliffs, and the famous skeleton army.
The plot is a delivery system for Harryhausen’s amazing set pieces, each designed to top the last, with gods quietly manipulating events in the background.

Released in 1988, Willow is a fantasy adventure built by director Ron Howard and producer George Lucas as a more traditional fairy-tale quest than the darker ’80s fantasy around it. The story follows Willow, a reluctant farmer and aspiring sorcerer, who gets pulled into protecting a prophesied baby destined to overthrow an evil queen.
He ends up paired with a rogue swordsman, Madmartigan (played by Val Kilmer), and the movie runs them through a familiar structure: travel, ambushes, magic encounters, and escalating confrontations with the queen’s forces. It leans on practical effects, creature work, and straightforward stakes, with Willow’s arc built around stepping up rather than discovering something hidden. It’s an accessible hero’s journey, but one with enough of a darker edge to keep it from feeling like pure kids’ fantasy.

There are too many Harry Potter movies to put them all in one spot, and also I don’t want this list to be nothing but Harry Potter. Plus, it’s borderline whether Harry Potter really qualifies for a Sword & Sorcery fantasy list. But it’s such a juggernaut that I felt it deserved at least a mention.
So for this entry, I’m focusing on my favorite Potter movie, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. It may be the best-written of all the films, and it developed the visual palette used in the subsequent films, despite being the third entry in the series.
The movie shifts the tone darker and more controlled, following Harry as he returns to Hogwarts under the threat of escaped prisoner Sirius Black, who’s believed to be coming for him. What starts as a manhunt turns into a reveal-heavy mystery, flipping assumptions about who’s actually dangerous and why.
It doesn’t really matter which Potter movie is your favorite; if you’re talking fantasy movies of any kind, even the more sword-focused ones, it deserves a place.

Turning a Disney amusement park ride into a movie shouldn’t have worked, but in 2003 director Gore Verbinski pulled it off with a once-in-a-lifetime performance from Johnny Depp as Captain Jack Sparrow and a willingness to embrace the inherent darkness of a proper pirate tale.
The story follows blacksmith Will Turner, played by Orlando Bloom (the only actor to be in two entries on this list), teaming up with the unpredictable pirate Jack Sparrow to rescue Elizabeth Swann from Captain Barbossa and his crew. The twist is that Barbossa and his men aren’t just pirates; they’re cursed undead who can’t feel anything and can’t die.

For many, 1981’s Excalibur is the ultimate movie version of the King Arthur legend. Director John Boorman leans all the way into the idea that this story is less history and more a fever dream. It tracks the rise and fall of King Arthur, from pulling the sword from the stone to building Camelot, and then watching it rot from within amid betrayal, lust, and power struggles.
The genius of Excalibur lies in the way it creates mood, prioritizing it over realism. The full Arthur cycle is compressed into one operatic, stylized film about how idealism creates its own downfall.

The NeverEnding Story begins in the real world, with Bastian, a lonely kid, being bullied and looking for an escape. Director Wolfgang Petersen’s 1984 movie only becomes a fantasy film as Bastian reads.
He becomes tied to the fate of a collapsing fantasy world called Fantasia, inside which a young warrior named Atreyu is sent on a quest to stop a spreading force known as the Nothing, which is literally erasing existence. The story keeps folding back on the reader, blurring the line between fiction and reality, until Bastian himself becomes part of the narrative.
It’s part adventure, part a story about imagination, and it leans hard on practical effects and big emotional swings to sell the idea that stories only survive if someone believes in them. After it’s over, you’ll be ready to say: I believe.

While it’s based on the work of Neil Gaiman, director Matthew Vaughn’s 2007 adaptation of Stardust avoids the infamous writer’s more macabre instincts to create a fantasy tale of wonder and nobler adventure.
The story starts in a quiet English village where a wall separates the real world from a magical one. A young man, Tristan Thorn, promises to retrieve a fallen star to win a woman who barely cares about him. When he crosses the wall, he finds the star isn’t an object but a woman, Yvaine (played by Claire Danes), and suddenly everyone wants her.
Witches need her heart to stay young. Princes hunt her to claim a throne. Tristan just wants to drag her home as proof he can deliver. What starts as a transaction turns into a chase across a world that keeps escalating in danger and scale.

The Hobbit trilogy was a project Lord of the Rings director Peter Jackson didn’t want to make. When he learned Hollywood was making it with him or without him, he jumped in to save the legacy he’d built with The Lord of the Rings and gave it everything he had left in the tank.
It faced criticism because it’s not as good as The Lord of the Rings. But then nothing is as good as Lord of the Rings (more on that in a minute), and everything seems lacking in comparison.
It’s still a deeply beautiful, complex, and interesting sword-fighting fantasy tale. The dwarves sing a mournful song in Bilbo’s Hobbit hole, and it carries them on a journey across Middle-earth to face a dragon and an army. It’s not as good as it should have been, but The Hobbit is better than it has any right to be, and it’s better than most things that don’t take place in Middle-earth.

Highlander is a 1986 fantasy in which immortals roam history, locked into ritual combat where the only way to win is beheading. In modern New York and across centuries of flashbacks, Connor MacLeod slowly learns the rules of a secret war that’s been going on forever, all building toward “there can be only one.”
The movie is famous for its style, Queen on the soundtrack, MTV editing, and an iconic villain performance from Clancy Brown. Despite its R rating and frequent head decapitating, Highlander feels more dangerous than it actually is. That’s part of its charm and also why it has endured.

Monty Python and the Holy Grail is one of the funniest movies of all time, and it’s barely a movie at all. It’s the pinnacle of the iconic comedy troupe Monty Python’s style, and there’s never been anything like it before or since.
It begins when King Arthur is sent by God to find the Holy Grail in medieval England. It ends with King Arthur being arrested by modern-day British police, even though no time travel is involved. That arrest sequence, by the way, actually happened; the police showed up on the scene and arrested them for filming without a permit. So they threw it in the movie and used it as their ending.
Holy Grail is a fantasy movie built on refusing to behave like a normal story, and I wouldn’t have it any other way. Ni!

Hook begins with the story of Peter Banning, a man who is everything Peter Pan was never supposed to become: a corporate lawyer, glued to his phone, too busy to notice his own kids slipping away. When his kids are snatched out of their beds and dragged to Neverland by Captain Hook, Peter Banning follows, but the problem is that he’s forgotten he was ever Peter Pan.
The Lost Boys don’t buy him; their current leader, Rufio, flat-out rejects him, and Hook toys with him like a washed-up relic. What should have been a rescue mission turns into a midlife crisis with swords, as a man grapples with what really matters to him in the world. To save his kids, Peter has to relearn imagination, rediscover joy, and essentially undo adulthood long enough to become the thing he abandoned.
Taking place on massive, lovingly crafted sets filmed with all the magic peak Steven Spielberg can muster, it’s a perfect story for every adult facing down the stress of middle age, while also a family story filled with all the magic and wonder kids need to fire up their own imaginations.

L. Frank Baum’s iconic Oz books were once revered in the same way the books of Tolkien and C.S. Lewis are. Over the years, that’s somehow been overshadowed by the 1939 film adaptation of his work, even though Baum’s books are better than the movie.
Yet the movie itself is one of the best fantasy stories ever told, using what by modern-day standards would be viewed as only very rudimentary techniques. Despite the unkind rigors of aging, it’s still fun to watch.
Released near the end of the Great Depression, the film takes a black-and-white Kansas defined by exhaustion and hardship and explodes it into the impossible color of Oz, creating one of the most famous transitions in movie history. The story follows Dorothy, a lonely farm girl swept into a fantasy world where every strange encounter reflects fears and desires pulled from her real life back home. It defined what big-screen fantasy could feel like.

The Princess Bride begins with a grandfather reading a story to his sick grandson, then unfolds into a fantasy adventure filled with sword fights, revenge plots, kidnappings, monsters, and true love. What makes the film totally unique is the way it’s delivered, with a heavy layer of dry self-awareness that never turns cynical.
Westley’s quest to reunite with Buttercup is intentionally simple, allowing the movie to focus on its characters rather than complicated lore. Every supporting player feels iconic because the film gives them instantly memorable personalities and dialogue, from Inigo Montoya’s obsession with vengeance to Vizzini’s constant claims of “inconceivable.”
Instead of trying to make fantasy feel realistic, The Princess Bride embraces the artificiality of storybook adventure and turns that sincerity into meaning.

1982’s Conan the Barbarian tells the origin of a warrior forged by loss, slavery, and violence, moving through a brutal fantasy world ruled by cults, warlords, and gods that don’t care. Director John Milius presents Conan’s story as destiny rather than spectacle.
The plot is classic pulp: revenge, survival, and power taken through strength. It believes, fully, in all the values it espouses. As such, despite its brutality, no film on this list feels more pure, innocent, and untouched.
The movie follows Conan, past a child enslaved after his parents are murdered by a snake cult led by Thulsa Doom. He grows into a massive warrior shaped entirely by pain, survival, and violence.
Arnold Schwarzenegger barely speaks for long stretches because the movie understands his presence is the point. Conan is s a human weapon trying to carve meaning out of revenge. The result is a fantasy movie that feels heavy, dangerous, and strangely mythic in a way most modern fantasy never does.

There’s an argument to be made that The Lord of the Rings may be Hollywood’s peak. That everything the filmmaking art form had been building towards led to this one moment in cinema, and that since The Return of the King, everything in the world of moving pictures has been on a slow, steady downward slide.
Whether you believe that or not, the notion that this is a serious discussion large numbers of people in the world are having is a solid indicator of just how good The Lord of the Rings trilogy is. More than just the best fantasy movies of all time, director Peter Jackson’s three movies are among the greatest things ever put to film, extended editions and all.
It’s the greatest ever application of special effects techniques, appearing at the exact moment when CGI had progressed to the point to give us a character like Gollum, while at the same time practical effects and hard work were still frequently used enough to create the incredible, hand-built artistry of Tolkien’s Middle-earth as an actual place the film’s actors could walk around in.

The story is based on one of the greatest ever works of fiction, and the story which basically invented the entire modern fantasy genre. Without Tolkien’s work, most of the other fantasy movies on this list wouldn’t even have existed. Jackson kept the heart of Tolkien’s story, while adapting it for screen in a feat most thought impossible before he pulled it off.
The cast is one of the greatest ensembles ever assembled, and they, along with everyone working on the film, were as much fans of Tolkien’s world as the rest of us. The entire production was locked away for years in an isolated location, doing nothing but living and breathing Tolkien. Nothing like this, nothing on this scale, or with this much passion, has ever been made before, and it almost certainly never will be again.
All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us. If you’ve any sense, you’ll spend a lot of it watching and rewatching all three movies in The Lord of the Rings. Extended Editions, of course.
Us Weekly has affiliate partnerships. We receive compensation when you click on a link and make a purchase. Learn more!
Whether Taylor Swift is sitting courtside at a Knicks game or grabbing dinner with fiancé Travis Kelce, the singer is always dressed to the nines. She has a way of mixing together effortless, cool-girl style with timeless pieces, making her outfits feel actually attainable. That statement even rings true when it comes to her latest wedding guest ensemble that made Us want to book a trip to the coast — and it all has to do with her heeled sandals from Reformation.
Wedding guest dresses are usually the most eye-catching part of any look, but Swift proves that your shoes can sometimes make a bigger statement. While attending a wedding in Greece for George Karlaftis and Kaia Harris, the singer wore straight-up designer items that would cost you a pretty penny. The exception? These Reformation heeled sandals that totally embody coastal-chic style, and they’re still in stock in her exact color (for now).
Get the Waldena Block Heeled Mules for $268 at Reformation! Please note, prices are accurate as of the publishing date but are subject to change.
The Reformation Waldena Block Heeled Mules are so on trend for the summer, giving complete oceanic vibes with the shell ‘strap’ design and sandy beige hue. The sandals paired perfectly with Swift’s Zimmerman midi dress, Steven Battelle coin pendant and dangly De Beers earrings. And although all those high-end pieces are out of our budget, we’d happily invest in the star’s exact heeled sandals that look like a luxury designer find, but are listed at a fraction of the price.
In addition to the elegant seashell design, we love the slender silhouette, peep-toe opening and low heel that’s ideal for dancing the night away. Psst, the block heel is just 2 inches high! The sandals also have a heel cushion that provides a comfortable feel while at the ceremony and during the reception thereafter. Read: There’s no reason to walk around barefoot while stunning in these sandals.
You can choose between shades like elegant black and cute light blue, but if you want to truly channel The Life of a Showgirl singer, go with the beachy cream puff option. The neutral color goes with everything from casual mini dresses, satin maxi skirts, wide-leg trousers or wedding guest dresses à la Swift. Honestly, you could probably wear a burlap bag and still get tons of compliments when you slip on these Reformation sandals.
Now’s your chance to get the same exact heeled Reformation sandals that have Swift’s stamp of approval. The only issue is grabbing a pair before they’re gone. If we’ve learned anything, it’s that once the singer wears something, the item won’t be in stock for long.
Get the Waldena Block Heeled Mules for $268 at Reformation! Please note, prices are accurate as of the publishing date but are subject to change.
Looking for something else? Explore more Reformation shoes here!
If there’s one weekend this summer you need to spend all your time at home, it’s this one.
Major streamers like Netflix, Prime Video and more have just dropped some of the season’s can’t-miss shows, which is why Watch With Us had to cancel our wedding yet again to make time to watch all of them.
Dramatic weddings? That sounds like Sweet Magnolias to us, and the rumors are true – the hit Netflix series is back for season 5.
There’s also a slew of new shows that will make you beg for more seasons, like Prime Video’s hit YA adaptation Every Year After and HBO Max’s queer coming-of-age tale, Proud.

The Magnolias are back, and this season, they’re ditching the Deep South for the Big Apple. Well, kinda – bride-to-be Helen (Heather Headley) needs a fancy wedding dress, and only Fifth Avenue can satisfy her cravings for haute couture bridal gowns. Meanwhile, Maddie’s (JoAnna Garcia Swisher) dream job at a Manhattan publisher turns into a nightmare, and she is soon booking a return trip home.
Relax, fans – Sweet Magnolias is still largely set in Serenity, that cozy, too-good-to-be-real small town that makes Stars Hollow seem like San Francisco. Helen’s upcoming nuptials provide some of the drama, as does Dana Sue’s (Brooke Elliott) increasingly troubled marriage to hubby Ronnie (Brandon Quinn). Yet no matter what life serves them, the Magnolia ladies can rely on each other to weather any storm – and disappointing men – that cross their paths.

It’s a new month, which means there’s another Prime Video adaptation of a massively popular YA novel to bingewatch. After last month’s hit hockey romance Off Campus, the streamer dropped the puck-less Canadian love story Every Year After, based on Carley Fortune’s bestselling novel, Every Summer After. It’s just as addictive as Off Campus, except it’s a little more serious than its YA peer.
Barry’s Bay is a picture-perfect small town, so why has Percy (Sadie Soverall) been away for almost a decade? Something drove her away, and it has to do with childhood crush Sam (Matt Cornett). When her mother, Sue (Elisha Cuthbert), dies, Percy has no choice but to go back to her hometown and face some demons from her past. Will she see Sam again? Does she even want to?
Live fast, party hard – if Filip (Ignacy Liss), the main character in the new Polish-language series Proud, had a motto, that would be it. He’s young, he’s good-looking and all the guys he encounters either want to be him or hook up with him. But Filip’s hedonistic lifestyle grinds to a halt when his sister dies, leaving him to take care of her infant child. Filip’s never taken care of anyone before, not even himself, so he has his work cut out for him as a de facto dad with no stable income and a lifetime of making bad choices.
Can Filip be responsible? That’s the main question Proud asks, and it answers it by giving an honest portrait of an immature boy who slowly – slowly – matures into a man. It’s not an easy, straightforward path, though, and Filip realizes he has to rely on others for help. Proud consists of eight episodes at approximately 32 minutes each, and it’s just the right length to watch one of summer’s most surprising – and rewarding – dramas.
Look! Up in the sky! It’s a bird! It’s a plane! It’s … an overused pun connecting a certain all-American comic book character to season 3 of an animated TV show. Yes, My Adventures with Superman is back on HBO Max with a new batch of episodes starting on June 14.
This scene brings back Supes (voiced by Jack Quaid), Lois Lane (Alice Lee) and Jimmy Olsen (Ishmel Sahid) as they hang with new friends like Superboy (Darren Criss) and battle new villains like Cyborg Superman. One of the main plots this time around is The Reign of the Supermen, an adaptation of a very famous ‘90s storyline which sees several successors to Superman’s role as Metropolis’ primary defender.
Claire’s (Rebecca Hall) life is pretty ordinary until she hears a distant humming noise that completely disrupts her routine. No one else close to her can hear it – not her husband, daughter or her fellow teachers – except for Kyle (Ollie West), a student in her class who is also mystified about the noise. Both wonder where it comes from and why they can only hear it, but as they investigate the source of their disturbance, their initial curiosity gives way to an all-consuming obsession.
With its slow, steady pacing and emphasis on liminal space to conjure a strange, vaguely menacing mood, The Listeners is like an A24 movie stretched across four episodes. That might dissuade people from watching it, but those who enjoyed the recent horror hit Backrooms and the 1995 Julianne Moore film Safe should like this series. As the noise-plagued protagonist, Hall once again shows she’s one of the most underrated actors working today. She’s fantastic, especially in the scenes when her character is slowly losing her grip on her sanity.
After eight long years, director Steven Spielberg is back with a new sci-fi movie, Disclosure Day. While he has proven himself to be a master at virtually every genre in existence, there’s something about a new Spielberg sci-fi film that simply can’t be replicated. The new movie finds the legendary filmmaker revisiting themes and ideas he explored decades ago, in movies such as Close Encounters of the Third Kind and E.T. the Extraterrestrial, although this one shares more in common with two of Spielberg’s underrated sci-fi films — A.I. Artificial Intelligence and Minority Report. The movie is exceeding expectations at the box office in its opening weekend, on the strength of massive audience interest and positive reviews.
The box office has been on a hot streak for the past several weeks, with hits such as Obsession, Backrooms, and the Scary Movie reboot driving business. Before that, Project Hail Mary deployed Spielbergian tactics to deliver more than $680 million at the worldwide box office. Disclosure Day received positive early reactions, and is now sitting at a “Certified Fresh” 81% score on the aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes. The site’s consensus reads, “A humanistic variation on one of Steven Spielberg’s most revisited themes, Disclosure Day‘s breathless pursuit of optimism in an age of conspiracy gets its biggest boost from career-highlight work by Emily Blunt.”
Besides Blunt, the movie also features Josh O’Connor, Eve Hewson, Colman Domingo, Wyatt Russell, and Colin Firth. In his review, Collider’s Nate Richard described Disclosure Day as “a summer blockbuster made for cinephiles, with no IP attachment and no overreliance on obvious Easter eggs.” The movie grossed more than $18 million at the domestic box office on opening day, which includes revenue from Thursday previews. It’s on track to gross around $45 million in its first weekend, which would put it $10 million ahead of the opening weekend haul of J.J. Abrams‘ Spielberg homage, Super 8. The Jaws director served as a producer on Super 8, which ultimately made around $260 million worldwide against a reported budget of $50 million. Disclosure Day comes with a reported production budget of $115 million, and is projected to gross more than $70 million in its global debut. Stay tuned to Collider for more updates.
June 12, 2026
145 Minutes
It has been more than 15 years since the release of “The Social Network,” the biographical drama centered on the creation of Facebook, and screenwriter Aaron Sorkin is back for its standalone sequel, “The Social Recoking.” Sorkin, who directed the sequel, wanted Jesse Eisenberg to reprise his role as Facebook’s co-founder, Mark Zuckerberg, but the actor refused. The role went to Jeremy Strong, who was eager to step into the role.
In an exclusive interview with Vanity Fair, Aaron Sorkin discussed his upcoming movie, “The Social Reckoning,” the follow-up to 2010’s Academy Award-winning movie, “The Social Network,” written by Sorkin and directed by David Fincher.
Initially, Sorkin said he would only do the project with Fincher as the director. However, the director was busy with other projects, which led Sorkin to take on the role. He did, however, reveal that Fincher was the first person to read the script and also offered help in any way he could.
Talking about the premise of the movie, Sorkin said, “‘The Social Network’ was about how Facebook was invented, and ‘The Social Recoking is what it’s become.”

According to Sorkin, his first instinct was to approach Jesse Eisenberg to reprise his role as Mark Zuckerberg. “I felt like it belonged to him, and he was certainly battle-tested,” he said. Eisenberg was nominated for Best Actor at the Academy Awards, Golden Globe Awards, and BAFTA Awards for his portrayal of the Facebook founder.
In an interview in 2011, Eisenberg said while playing the role, he “developed an even greater affection” for the character. “So even if the character is acting in a way that hurts other characters, you still have to understand and ultimately sympathize with all of that behavior,” he said.
For the sequel, however, Sorkin said he tried to convince the actor for three days to come back, to no avail. “He simply did not want to be conflated with Mark Zuckerberg anymore, that he has his problems with the guy,” the director explained.

While Sorkin didn’t reveal many details about his conversation with Eisenberg, he further added, “he doesn’t like kids coming up to him in airports with business cards that say ‘I’m CEO, b-tch’ for him to sign.”
In 2025, Eisenberg said he no longer wanted to be associated with Zuckerberg, saying that the CEO “evolved into somebody obsessed with avarice and power.”
He also shared that he disagreed with Zuckerberg’s political views, stating, “These people have billions upon billions of dollars, more money than any human person has ever amassed. And what are they doing with it? Oh, they’re doing it to curry favor with somebody who’s preaching hateful things.”
Sorkin revealed that he first mentioned “The Social Reckoning” to Eisenberg at the 2025 Vanity Fair Oscar Party. At that same event, he ran into Jeremy Strong, and they got to talking. When the screenwriter mentioned that he was working on a sequel to “The Social Network,” the actor said that he would be interested in the role of Zuckerberg if Eisenberg passed on the opportunity.
Strong told Variety in 2025 that he would approach the role just like any other, “with empathy, with objectivity, with care.” He agreed to take on the project, as he was fascinated by the material and thought it was one of the greatest scripts he’s ever read.
When asked whether he’d reach out to Zuckerberg, Strong replied, “no comment,” adding that he did not have a social media presence.
“He showed up on his first day, and when he said ‘good morning’ to me, he was already talking like Mark,” Sorkin said about Strong.
“The Social Reckoning” will focus on the 2021 Facebook leak by whistleblower Frances Haugen. Documents showed Facebook knew the platform had harmful societal effects, including political polarization, misinformation, and negative effects on mental health, but failed to take sufficient action as they conflicted with the business’ interests.
According to Sorkin, one of the challenges was writing Zuckerberg like any other character and disregarding his personal views about him. “I can’t judge Mark Zuckerberg while I’m writing it. You’ve got to write the character like they’re making their case to God why they should be allowed into heaven,” he explained.
“The Social Reckoning” hits theaters on October 9, 2026.
Postmodernism is a term that’s a little hard to define, and the word can mean different things depending on what medium you’re talking about, but postmodernist literature is what’s being stuck to here. It is indeed (and unsurprisingly) a movement that came about after modernism, with postmodernism being a bit more abstract and willing to tackle confounding things in life to an even greater extent than modernist works might’ve.
There’s also some really interesting language used throughout most great postmodernist novels, and it’s therefore not too surprising that some rank among the very best – and most important – books of the second half of the 20th century. Postmodernism, as a literary genre, really came about in the 1950s, and was probably at its peak in the subsequent two decades, with many (but not all) of the following novels, which can be considered among the best postmodern books ever written, being from that time.
There is probably a Thomas Pynchon book you’re expecting to see here, even if you’ve not read it, because it’s kind of infamous (one that got a shout-out in Knives Out, of all places). And it will be here, a little later. For now, though, here’s another Pynchon novel: Mason & Dixon. This one’s challenging, but not so much because of its disturbing content, as other Pynchon novels are more confronting, as well as probably more confounding when it comes to things like narrative.
The story in Mason & Dixon is almost straightforward, at least by Pynchon’s standards, being a story within a story about Charles Mason and Jeremiah Dixon, who, in the 18th century, surveyed parts of North America together and established the Mason-Dixon line. The perplexing part of Mason & Dixon is the language used, as it’s done in a way that does some combination of homaging and parodying the literature of the time in which it’s set, but once you get used to that style, it’s a compelling read. Hell, it’s compelling in a weird way even if you don’t 100% get used to that style.
Just to show that a book doesn’t have to be grim, confusing, and aimed at an adult audience to technically be postmodern, here’s The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time. Sure, it’s not as “important” or “classic” as some of the other books mentioned here, but it could work as a great introduction to unconventional literature, for younger readers. It’s postmodernism, but with the postmodernist training wheels still on (postmodernist wheels are like, triangles, or something, and there are two and a half wheels per set, because **** you, that’s why).
The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time is about a teenage boy who observes the world in a unique way, and what happens when he becomes fixated on solving the murder of a neighbor’s dog. The first-person narration here is really what carries the whole book, and makes it stand out, as does the use of maps and other images used throughout; they help make this somewhat postmodernist, and also, they help elevate what’s an already solid mystery novel into something of a modern classic.
The idea of the “Great American Novel” has been a thing for so long, and the search for it has been so built up, it might well never be a thing. There might well never be a definitive “Great American Novel.” That doesn’t stop there from being contenders, though, with Underworld by Don DeLillo being at least worth considering… and it was even linked to the idea of the “Great American Novel” as early as the year it was first published.
What Underworld does narratively might not sound too wild, since it’s about the baseball that was hit by Bobby Thomson in 1951: the one in the so-called Shot Heard ‘Round the World. It’s about that baseball over the years, and the different people who obtained it at some point, but after the prologue dealing with the New York Giants vs. Brooklyn Dodgers match, Underworld jumps forward to the 1990s, and then each part of the book goes back 10 or so years, until things are back in the 1950s. That structure is very postmodernist, as is DeLillo’s general style, not to mention the sprawl and different tangents of Underworld. It’s huge, strange, overwhelming, and almost always very impressive, as a novel.
You probably know what Lolita is about, and it is, but it’s also very different, in practice, than how some people like to describe it. On one hand, Lolita is easier to read than you might expect a book with such subject matter to have, as it is equal parts witty and poetic. But then it is somehow darker and more uncomfortable than you might be prepared for, and you’re already going to be prepared for something dark and uncomfortable.
It might be the fact that Lolita is funny and horrifying without it feeling like two different books clashing that makes it such a harrowing read. You’re always yanked around, and you feel like you’re being tormented, toyed with, and sometimes controlled by the book’s narrator… a man who infamously exerts control over the young girl he calls Lolita, all while attempting to manipulate other characters alongside those he’s telling his story to, too. The effect is dizzying, impressive, and hard to read, but persevering through this particular book is ultimately worth it.
Of course The Unbearable Lightness of Being is postmodernist, with a title like “The Unbearable Lightness of Being” and all. This is a book about a womanizer and the two women who have had the biggest impact on him, though he does have many more women in his life, and he’s far from a likable protagonist (it doesn’t feel like he’s supposed to be, either, but this still might be a turnoff for some readers).
Well, actually, that synopsis applies to the movie adaptation of The Unbearable Lightness of Being. The book is also somewhat about those things, but is a lot more poetic and kind of dreamlike, de-emphasizing what narrative there is here while often being more concerned with philosophical ideas and other musings on life and love (or a lack thereof) more generally. It’s better – and more readable – than all that might make it sound, promise.
Slaughterhouse-Five tackles so many genres at once, which is impressive, considering it’s not a long book, by any means. The first edition came in at under 200 pages, but in that time, Slaughterhouse-Five is about World War II, time travel, and trauma, being a satirical book, a work of science fiction, and a war novel (plus some other things, probably) all at once.
It’s the novel for which Kurt Vonnegut is best known, and it’s also up there among the greatest books of the 20th century, however you might be willing to define it; whatever category it gets slotted into. While The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time might be more approachable, Slaughterhouse-Five is also a good novel to read if you want a (relatively) gentle introduction to postmodern literature, mostly just because it’s quite punchy and a good deal shorter than some of the other books mentioned here. Speaking of longer books being mentioned here…
…Infinite Jest. Hoo boy. This could be the final boss of postmodernist literature, in the sense that it’s unlikely anyone will write something simultaneously as long, unwaveringly ambitious/strange, postmodernist, and genuinely good in the foreseeable future. For starters, there are so many footnotes throughout Infinite Jest that if you exclusively read those footnotes, it still might take quite a bit longer than some full-length novels (based on the uncut audiobook of Infinite Jest being eight hours longer than the audiobook that only features the main novel, with the footnotes not being read).
And you might think that’s well and good and all, “But what is Infinite Jest actually about?,” you might be asking. Whatever you want it to be; whatever you end up thinking it’s about is what it’s about. It is as postmodernist as things get, while still being actually readable and often surprisingly entertaining. It’s a classic that feels like it has to be read, and yet it also feels very hard to actually recommend. Jest, so confusing.
One of the things that gets brought up quite often, when talking about Gravity’s Rainbow, is how it broke the Pulitzer Prize jury the year it came out. Now, it’s not the only time there was some kind of dispute, and the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction was not given out for a certain year, but it’s still interesting. Sorry if it’s something you already knew, but hey, it is a good way to summarize and succinctly explain the notion of Gravity’s Rainbow being challenging and very much not for everyone.
It’s a wild novel that manages to be incredibly long (more than 750 pages, and closer to 900, sometimes, depending on an edition’s formatting) and also remarkably dense, with plenty of sentences you’ll feel tempted to read again and again to make sense of them. If sense is even something that can be made here. And then there’s the matter of trying all those sentences, pages, and wildly different episodes together. It is postmodernism squared, and then some, but very much worth tackling whenever you find yourself with quite a bit of free time on your hands.
The style of House of Leaves is often the story, even more than a book where a distinctive style is used to tell the story. House of Leaves tackles psychological horror in a unique way, and in a manner that could only really be done as a book. If you want a movie that scratches the same itch as some of House of Leaves, there is always Backrooms, and also a rather famous mod for Doom II called MyHouse.wad is almost like a video game adaptation of parts of House of Leaves.
But even with these, it’s mostly just parts of the novel that are represented in these works from different mediums. There are different sorts of horror in House of Leaves, long tangents, supplemental material that helps the overall book (even if such parts aren’t always 100% necessary to read in their entirety), and countless smaller stories told through footnotes. You’ve also got the wild formatting that has to be seen to be believed, and it’s bonkers enough in that department that you probably couldn’t even do an audiobook version of House of Leaves, let alone make it into some kind of movie.
It was hard limiting this whole ranking to only featuring two Don DeLillo novels, a little like how it was also hard including “only” two Thomas Pynchon ones. They’re not necessarily the grandfathers of postmodernism, but they’ve both been active for decades, and they’re also living legends in the sense that both have had works published in the 2020s (even if those books haven’t quite been as great as either author’s best works).
With DeLillo, White Noise deserves an honorable mention, but it’s Libra that’s his greatest novel overall. Even if it’s not as aggressively postmodern as Underworld, nor as sprawling, it is DeLillo’s most compelling novel, alongside being the hardest to stop thinking about, once you’ve read it. It’s the best story concerning the John F. Kennedy assassination (and there have been quite a few), and also one of the most paranoia-inducing novels of, potentially, all time. Sorry if that sounds a bit hyperbolic, but it really is something (very) special.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/YouTube-free-docs-060326-3eca70ae4c9d406d8c9961213f17b957.jpg)
These in-depth movies explore nature, outer space, basketball, “Star Wars,” and much more.
David Beckham was awarded a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame, the first soccer player to receive the honor. He was surrounded by family and close friends, including his wife Victoria, and three of his four children. Notably absent was his firstborn, Brooklyn Beckham, amid reports of a rift within the family.
Brooklyn cut off all contact with the Beckhams several months ago, but not before releasing a lengthy statement accusing his parents of controlling his life. David and Victoria have since attempted to reconcile with their son to no avail.

On June 12, David Beckham received the 2,849th star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame under the Sports Entertainment category. It was a momentous occasion for David, who joined other athletes honored by the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce in the past, including Shaquille O’Neal, Billie Jean King, Muhammad Ali, and Magic Johnson. David, however, was the first soccer player to receive a star.
Speaking during the ceremony, David said the moment felt “surreal.” “I’ve always been a dreamer, but I could never have imagined that an honor like this would come to a working class English soccer player like me,” he said.
David is widely regarded as one of the most iconic soccer players of his generation, playing for top clubs such as Manchester United and Real Madrid. He retired from the sport in 2013 and is the co-owner of the U.S. Major League Soccer team Inter Miami CF.

Tom Cruise was in attendance to honor David, and in his speech said, “His is a Hollywood story: a boy who believed in something bigger than himself, had to work for every opportunity he received, and went on to influence his sport, shape culture around the world, and create opportunities for generations who followed.”
Other celebrities present included Eva Longoria and James Corden. David’s family, including his wife Victoria and children Cruz, Romeo, and Harper, were also there to support him. Brooklyn, however, was nowhere in sight.
In January, the eldest Beckham child posted a lengthy note on Instagram Stories, accusing his parents of being controlling and undermining his relationship with his wife, Nicola Peltz, as The Blast previously reported. Before ending his message, he wrote, “I do not want to reconcile with my family.”
According to Page Six, Harper was seen arriving in an SUV outside Brooklyn’s L.A. home shortly after David’s Hollywood Walk of Fame ceremony concluded. She was wearing the same pink dress she wore at the event.
An insider, however, said that Brooklyn and Nicola were out of town, and Harper left shortly thereafter. The youngest Beckham sibling’s visit may have been another attempt at reaching out to her brother.
In February, Harper also mentioned Brooklyn in a Valentine’s Day post honoring her three brothers. She posted a black-and-white photo of her younger self alongside Brooklyn, Romeo, and Cruz, adding the text, “I love you all so much, words can’t describe it,” and tagging all three.

In an interview with Variety, David talked about his Hollywood star, his career, soccer, and his relationship with Victoria. When asked how they keep their relationship solid despite being constantly scrutinized by tabloids, the former athlete said that although they have busy schedules, their relationship and their family always come first.
“That’s our priority, and that’s what makes it work when you’ve been together for so long. Our priority will always be our family,” David explained.
When the topic went to the reported rift in the family, David was quick to say that he didn’t want to address it. “I’m sorry to stop you there, but that’s a private matter. That’s one thing that I don’t want to talk about,” David said.

According to reports, Brooklyn blocked his parents on social media in December 2025 and stated that any future communication should be conducted only through his lawyers. He also asked them to stop tagging him on social media posts.
In March, on Brooklyn’s 27th birthday, both David and Victoria took to social media to share birthday greetings for their son. The husband and wife posted on their respective Instagram Stories, sharing photos of themselves during happier times with Brooklyn and greeting him a happy birthday. “I love you so much,” Victoria wrote.
In an interview with WSJ in April, Victoria touched on the topic, but didn’t go into specifics. “We’ve been in the public eye for more than 30 years right now, and all we’ve ever tried to do is protect our children and love our children. And you know, that’s all I really want to say about it,” she said.
For a long time, I thought vampire movies had a serious repetition problem. Somebody gets bitten, somebody spends half the film staring sadly out a window, almost everytime somebody (a vampire) falls in love with the wrong person (a human), and eventually somebody ends up dead. After a while, a lot of them started blending together in my memory.
The films on this list broke that pattern. These ten films represent some of the most visually striking, ambitious, and unforgettable examples the genre has ever produced, which is exactly why they still feel so alive decades after many of their contemporaries disappeared.
Adam (Tom Hiddleston) and Eve (Tilda Swinton) have been together for centuries, and by the time the film begins, they are already exhausted by most of modern life. Adam spends his nights recording music in Detroit and avoiding people whenever possible, while Eve arrives from Tangier carrying books, stories, and enough curiosity to make the world seem interesting again. Their relationship is unusually quiet for a vampire film. They are not chasing victims or fighting enemies. Most of the time they are simply talking, listening to music, driving through empty streets, and trying to find meaning in another century of existence.
What stays with me is how much attention the film gives to small things. Adam can spend several minutes discussing a scientist he admires, and Eve can become excited over a stack of old books. Even the cities matter because Detroit and Tangier feel worn down and beautiful in completely different ways. The vampire story almost becomes secondary to two immortal people trying to hold onto the things they still love.
Everything changes for Caleb Colton (Adrian Pasdar) after one night with Mae (Jenny Wright), a drifter who bites him before disappearing into the darkness. By sunrise, Caleb can no longer stand daylight, and he is forced into a nomadic vampire group that travels across the American Southwest. The gang includes Jesse Hooker (Lance Henriksen), Diamondback (Jenette Goldstein), and Severen (Bill Paxton), whose idea of passing time usually involves violence, intimidation, and leaving bodies behind.
A lot of vampire films surround their creatures with castles, ancient legends, or aristocratic manners. Near Dark drops them into motels, highways, and roadside bars instead. One of the most memorable scenes takes place inside a crowded bar where Severen spends the evening terrorizing strangers simply because he enjoys it. Caleb never fully fits into that lifestyle, which gives the story its tension. While the rest of the group accepts endless killing as normal, he keeps looking for a way back to the life he had before Mae found him.
Jonathan Harker (Keanu Reeves) travels to Transylvania expecting a routine legal assignment and quickly realizes Count Dracula (Gary Oldman) is nothing like the wealthy client he imagined. The castle feels isolated from the rest of the world, strange things happen at night, and Dracula becomes increasingly interested in Mina Murray (Winona Ryder) after seeing her photograph. Long before the story reaches London, the film already feels dreamlike, as though reality itself is starting to bend around the Count.
Much of the film revolves around Dracula’s obsession with Mina and his belief that she is connected to a love he lost centuries earlier. That idea gives the story a sadness that many vampire films never attempt. At the same time, Francis Ford Coppola fills almost every scene with elaborate costumes, shadows, candles, and practical effects that look handmade. Even people who dislike parts of the adaptation often remember individual images years later because there is so much visual imagination packed into nearly every sequence.
Bad City looks like a place people forgot to leave. Oil pumps move endlessly in the distance, streets stay empty for long stretches, and most of the people still living there seem lonely in one way or another. Among them is Arash (Arash Marandi), a young man struggling with his father’s debts and increasingly difficult life. Somewhere else in the city, a vampire known simply as The Girl (Sheila Vand) spends her nights wandering the streets in a black chador, watching the people around her.
The Girl is not interested in random victims. Drug dealers, abusers, and men who prey on others often attract her attention first. One scene involving a skateboard and an empty street somehow becomes as memorable as the horror moments because the film spends so much time creating a mood unlike anything else in the genre. It moves at its own pace and trusts silence far more than dialogue.
Everything begins when Jesús Gris (Federico Luppi), an elderly antiques dealer, discovers a strange mechanical device hidden inside a statue. The object, known as the Cronos device, was created centuries earlier by an alchemist searching for eternal life. When Jesús accidentally activates it, a metal needle pierces his skin and starts changing him in ways he does not immediately understand. His health improves, his energy returns, and he begins craving things that once meant nothing to him.
The film becomes increasingly sad because Jesús is not somebody chasing immortality. He already has a family, a granddaughter who adores him, and a quiet life he seems perfectly happy with. Dieter de la Guardia (Claudio Brook) desperately wants the device for himself, while his nephew Angel (Ron Perlman) spends much of the story carrying out his orders with growing frustration. As Jesús changes, the film keeps returning to his relationship with his granddaughter Aurora (Tamara Shanath), and those scenes give the story far more emotional weight than a traditional monster movie.
Martin (John Amplas) arrives in a small Pennsylvania town to live with his elderly cousin Cuda (Lincoln Maazel), who is convinced the young man is a vampire. Martin insists that he is completely ordinary, though his behavior makes that difficult to believe. He stalks women, breaks into homes, and uses syringes to sedate his victims before drinking their blood. Unlike most vampire films, there are no fangs, supernatural powers, or ancient curses here. Everything Martin does could be explained through reality.
That uncertainty hangs over the entire film. Martin tells stories about another life that may or may not have happened, while Cuda treats him as a genuine monster sent from centuries ago. George A. Romero never rushes to answer who Martin really is. Instead, the film becomes a portrait of loneliness, obsession, and a young man who seems completely disconnected from the people around him. Even decades later, very few vampire movies feel this unsettling or this difficult to categorize.
Oskar (Kåre Hedebrant) spends most of his time alone. He is bullied at school, struggles to connect with other children, and often retreats into his own imagination. Then Eli (Lina Leandersson) moves into the apartment next door. She only appears outside at night, rarely seems bothered by the freezing weather, and immediately feels different from everybody else around her. Their friendship develops slowly through conversations, small moments of trust, and shared loneliness.
At the same time, a series of killings begins attracting attention throughout the area. Eli’s connection to those murders becomes increasingly difficult to ignore, though the film never treats her as a simple villain. She remains a child in many ways, despite carrying burdens that nobody her age should understand. The swimming pool sequence near the end has become famous for good reason because it says almost everything about their relationship without showing very much directly. The film is violent when it needs to be, though most of its power comes from watching two isolated children find comfort in each other.
During the production of Nosferatu in 1922, director F.W. Murnau (John Malkovich) becomes obsessed with creating the most realistic vampire film ever made. His solution is simple and completely insane: he hires a real vampire to play Count Orlok. Max Schreck (Willem Dafoe) joins the production, and at first the cast assumes he is merely an eccentric method actor. Before long, however, strange disappearances and unsettling behavior begin making that explanation harder to accept.
One of the film’s greatest strengths is how seriously everyone treats the filmmaking process. Murnau remains so focused on finishing his movie that he keeps ignoring increasingly obvious danger around him. Meanwhile, Schreck often seems more interested in understanding ordinary human behavior than hiding what he is. Watching Dafoe move through scenes with equal parts curiosity, hunger, and confusion becomes one of the film’s biggest pleasures. Instead of telling a vampire story directly, the film turns the making of a vampire movie into the horror story itself.
When Jonathan Harker (Bruno Ganz) travels to meet Count Dracula (Klaus Kinski), the journey already feels wrong long before they meet. Villagers warn him not to continue, the landscape grows increasingly empty, and Dracula’s castle appears almost abandoned by the rest of the world. Kinski plays Dracula as a deeply lonely figure rather than a powerful seducer. From his first scenes onward, he seems trapped inside centuries of isolation.
The relationship between Dracula and Lucy Harker (Isabelle Adjani) gradually becomes the center of the story. Dracula’s attraction to her carries genuine sadness because he understands that immortality has left him completely cut off from normal human life. Werner Herzog spends a great deal of time on images that have little to do with plot and everything to do with atmosphere. Empty streets, silent rooms, and entire towns overtaken by plague give the film a strange feeling that never leaves. It is a vampire story, though it often feels closer to a meditation on loneliness and decay.
More than a century later, Nosferatu still contains images that instantly come to mind when people think about vampires. Count Orlok (Max Schreck) emerging from the darkness, standing rigid in a doorway, or moving through empty spaces remains unsettling because the character looks unlike almost every vampire that followed. He does not charm people, blend into society, or hide behind elegance. He looks sickly, animalistic, and genuinely disturbing.
The story itself follows Thomas Hutter (Gustav von Wangenheim) as he travels to Orlok’s castle and unknowingly helps bring the creature back to his hometown. Once Orlok arrives, disease begins spreading through the city, and fear quickly follows. Many modern vampire films focus heavily on romance, action, or mythology. Nosferatu strips things down to something much simpler and more primal. It is built around dread. Even with silent-film limitations, shadows, movement, and composition do so much work that many scenes remain more memorable than sequences from horror films made a hundred years later.
February 16, 1922
95 Minutes
F. W. Murnau
Henrik Galeen
With 2019’s The Irishman, director Martin Scorsese and star Robert De Niro reunited for another movie dealing with the history of organized crime in America. This was a seismic event, as the two artists were perhaps most associated with the mob movie, and their last collaboration had been 1995’s Casino, another sprawling mob epic based on real events. Even more encouraging was the return of De Niro’s Casino, Goodfellas, and Raging Bull costar Joe Pesci, and even better than that, Al Pacino would be working with Scorsese for the first time. The movie arguably became the defining mobster film of the 21st century, and the central trio made it even more meaningful, with one caveat: their age.
The Irishman technically spans from the mid-1940s to the 1990s, and De Niro is in nearly every scene throughout the film. The actor was 74 at the time of production, leading to the adoption of controversial “de-aging” technology, which could clean up wrinkles, age spots, and anything else that might make you think you’re looking at a 74-year-old man. But the realities of age and the inconsistency of the visual effects led to an early scene that damaged the movie’s credibility to many: an allegedly middle-aged De Niro kicking a grocer on the sidewalk. We see all of De Niro’s body, including some elderly fragility and leg-shaking, and the scene’s failure to hit its necessary effect might have weakened the impact of the whole film.
The Irishman begins at the end, with union truck driver and mafia hit man Frank Sheeran (De Niro) stuttering through the details of a 1970s road trip and then going back even further through multiple layers of flashbacks. Like a lot of Martin Scorsese mob epics, it’s a long movie, but it lacks the trademark snappy, jagged energy of something like Goodfellas or Casino. Instead, it’s a haunting story of an old man looking back, telling half-true stories and recalling his divided loyalties between Teamsters leader Jimmy Hoffa (Al Pacino) and mafioso Russell Bufalino (Joe Pesci, playing a real-life character as he did in Casino). Unlike, say, The Godfather Part II (which also starred Pacino and De Niro), The Irishman didn’t recast for the younger versions of its characters. One unintentionally funny bit has Pesci calling a visibly elderly De Niro “kid.”
Because Scorsese and De Niro’s history of collaboration goes back to 1973’s scrappy gangster classic Mean Streets, the passage of time is visible in their work. In Mean Streets, De Niro played Johnny Boy, a wildly energetic screw-up whose recklessness drags Charlie (Harvey Keitel) and others into a spiral of unpaid bills and violence. And movies like Taxi Driver, Raging Bull, and Cape Fear took their partnership to new and deeper levels, with De Niro finding new modes and often disturbing personalities (Frank, who frames his murders as regular old contract work, may be the most disturbing). Viewers who’ve seen Scorsese’s other movies know what young Robert De Niro looked like – and it’s not how the de-aging effects make him look in The Irishman. There’s a disconnect, and it’s not helped by scenes like him attacking the grocer.
The grocer scene in The Irishman is actually a trope in Scorsese’s mob movies: the explosion of violence in a mundane setting to show how organized crime coexists with polite society. Specifically, it’s echoing a scene from Goodfellas, in which Henry Hill (Ray Liotta) beats down a man who has assaulted his girlfriend. In the Goodfellas scene, the camera pans to follow Henry walking up to the man, and then stands still for about thirty horrific seconds as he attacks him with a pistol. Cinematographer Michael Ballhaus called it the most violent scene he’d ever filmed, according to Glenn Kenny’s making-of book Made Men.
In The Irishman, Frank (who by this point has been welcomed into the Bufalino crime family) is driven to violence by finding out his daughter Peggy (Lucy Gallina) has been harassed by a local grocer. Like Goodfellas, this scene takes place in broad daylight, with a simple wide shot that lets the violence play out in sickening detail. But a 70-something De Niro is going to have a different physicality than young Ray Liotta, and as he pushes his victim through a glass door and kicks him on the sidewalk, the effect isn’t exactly horrifying. The camera stands still on De Niro shuffling, without a lot of drive. While his performance in most of the movie is able to be threatening because of his dull affect and use of guns, this scene comes off more sad and pathetic—which might have been the point.
The focus of the scene is not just on Frank’s ability to act violently in the public eye, but on Peggy’s recognition of the man her father truly is. We see Peggy eventually grow into a young woman (Anna Paquin), whose suspicion and fear of her father becomes the moral engine of the movie. And the final note of the beat down, in which Frank steps on the grocer’s fingers, is only heard as the movie cuts to Peggy’s reaction, which sells the horror of the moment (even if De Niro’s leg wobbles a bit beforehand).
While critics of the movie suggest Martin Scorsese could have filmed the scene in a different manner to accommodate De Niro’s age, that would have gone against the intention of the scene. Same with using a stunt double and plopping De Niro’s face on it. Believability wasn’t the goal of The Irishman. It was to spend a lifetime with De Niro as Frank Sheeran, to show the ravages of age and the regrets of a life of violence, as well as the malleability of memory, effectively summing up Scorsese’s career. Casting others to play the middle-aged versions of him or other characters would have diminished the effectiveness of the theme, even if it made scenes like the grocer beating more believable.
Kansas City Chiefs coach Andy Reid shut down the speculation that Travis Kelce is distracted by his upcoming wedding to Taylor Swift amid NFL training camp.
“Listen, he has been here most of the offseason if not the whole offseason. He’s been around. It is good to have him here,” the longtime coach, 68, said of Kelce, 36, in a press conference on Friday, June 12. “He did the mandatory camp and [did] a nice job there. It’s good to have him back in and rolling.
Reid added that Kelce is “very excited” for the upcoming football season and is doing his part to get ready for it amid the plans of his and Swift’s nuptials. (Swift, 36 and Kelce announced their engagement in August 2025 and are expected to wed this summer.)
“You see no distractions with that and the wedding,” Reid explained. “It’s like when I got married my wife did everything, so I just kinda followed her lead on it.”
Andy joked that he just “showed up” to his wedding to wife Tammy Reid adding maybe that Kelce is “doing more” than him.
“But he looks like he is pretty focused on this job,” he said.
When asked if he was going to Swift and Kelce’s wedding Andy joked that he “can’t talk about it.”
One day before the Chiefs coach’s remarks, Kelce made a surprise appearance at Swift’s induction to the Songwriters Hall of Fame. Kelce was not expected to attend the event as the Chiefs are currently in the middle of mandatory minicamp which ended on Thursday, June 11.
While Swift walked the red carpet solo, Kelce joined his fiancée inside the ceremony Marriott Marquis Hotel in New York City on Thursday. In addition to the football player, the pop star was joined by parents Andrea and Scott Swift, brother Austin Swift and Travis’ mom Donna Kelce.
Taylor was being honored alongside Gene Simmons and Paul Stanley of Kiss, Kenny Loggins, Alanis Morissette, Christopher “Tricky” Stewart and more. She was the youngest-ever female inductee, beaten only by Stevie Wonder, who was inducted at age 32.
During her speech, the “I Knew It, I Knew You” singer thanked her family for their support all these years.
“It was easy to choose songwriting over everything else in my life, but it couldn’t have been easy for my parents and my brother to just pick up and move our entire family from Pennsylvania to relocate to Nashville so that I could hone my craft in the songwriting capital of the world,” she said, per Variety. “But after making obvious that this was not even remotely a temporary phase their teen daughter was going through, they uprooted their entire lives to move me to Music City. And even though words are supposed to kind of be my thing, I will never be able to express my gratitude to you guys for doing that for me. You’re the reason I’m here tonight.”
Alexander Zverev wins the French Open to finally earn a 1st Grand Slam title
The Best Mystery Series of All Time Is Surging on Streaming 30 Years After It Ended
Anatomy of the June crypto crash: Fed, Iran, Saylor
Oppenheimer backs SpaceX as $70 billion retail frenzy builds
Markets Rally as SpaceX IPO Looms Amid Iran Tensions and Inflation Surge
Senator Cynthia Lummis Calls CLARITY Act the Most Consequential Financial Legislation of This Generation
Alexander Zverev conquers demons and outlasts Flavio Cobolli to win French Open for first major title
Microsoft unveils seven homegrown AI models in new bid for ‘long term self-sufficiency’
High Stakes for Wembanyama as New York Pushes for 3-0 Lead
Notion restores access to Anthropic after service disruption
The Pain Points Taking a Fragile Tech Rally Down a Notch
Eli Lilly (LLY) Stock Surges 4% Following Breakthrough Sleep Apnea Trial Results
The investment to transform historic St Helen’s ground in Swansea
Trump’s AI Ownership Plan Could Benefit Anthropic at OpenAI’s Expense
Bangladesh beat Australia after 20 years in ODIs, register only their second win over six-time world champions | Cricket News
NanoClaw integrates JFrog registries to secure AI agent downloads
Bitget enters Argentina’s regulated crypto market through PSAV registration
This Week In Security: Microsoft On Microsoft, Register Your Domains, Linux On ARM, And FreeBSD Joins The File Cache Club
Politics Home | Healey Resignation Is “Colossal Failure Of Government”, Says Former Labour Defence Secretary
First Time Since 1971: Australia Register Historic Low In ODI Cricket
You must be logged in to post a comment Login