Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Entertainment

Young and the Restless Early Spoilers Mar 30-Apr 3: Cane Discovers Disturbing Truth & Audra Falls Hard for Someone New!

Published

on

Young and the Restless Spoilers: Cane Ashby (Billy Flynn) - Audra Charles (Zuleyka Silver)

Young and the Restless early weekly spoilers for March 30th through April 3rd expose Cane Ashby (Billy Flynn) horrified and Audra Charles (Zuleyka Silver) completely smitten.

As we always do on early edition day, we start with what is coming the rest of this week. Then we dive into what’s ahead for next week. So, let’s get to it.

Young and the Restless Spoilers Wednesday, March 25th: Cane Demands to Meet Victor

So, on Wednesday, March 25th, we’ve got Cane demanding that Victor Newman (Eric Braeden) meet him. He leaves a message because Victor is not taking his calls. He’s dodging him. Billy Abbott (Jason Thompson) tells Cane that he deserves this pain, but also agrees that Victor is a maniac. Billy assumes that Lily Winters (Christel Khalil) is just fine and she’s free, but is avoiding Cane to spite him for all the things that he’s done. And he tells Billy that Lily wouldn’t do that to him. Boy, does Cane have a rude awakening coming.

Billy says that Cane caused all of this turmoil by creating the AI, and Billy advises Cane just leave and go back to France. But he tells Billy that he’s going to ruin the new lease on his life he’s got with Sally Spectra (Courtney Hope) because Billy always ruins everything. And he tells Cane that Sally wants him to reconcile with Jill Abbott (Jess Walton). And Cane reminds Billy that he also told him to do that.

Advertisement

Y&R Spoilers: Billy’s Made a Decision

So, Cane and Billy are discussing what they feel is the coming karmic slap that’s going to knock Phyllis Summers (Michelle Stafford) off her high horse and it’s going to be her downfall. Billy asks how Cane is going to atone for what he’s done, but he won’t talk about it with Billy. And then Cane walks out and Billy calls Sally to meet him and says he wants to tell her what he decided.

Audra runs into Holden Novak (Nathan Owens) and he prods her about the plan to seduce Kyle Abbott (Michael Mealor) since Audra’s been ignoring him recently. She says she’s busy with her new job. Claire Grace Newman (Hayley Erin) doesn’t want him and is not Holden’s forever person. And Audra also does not want Kyle and says, “You know, Claire’s eventually going to find out what they did in LA.”

Noah Newman (Lucas Adams) walks in and Audra checks him out and Holden takes notice. Audra says they have a messy past that was from long ago and refuses to talk to Holden about it. Noah comes over and Audra says she was not part of the Newman Media theft. Then Holden and Noah make their own introductions to each other. And Holden says that he’s looking good after being in the hospital. Noah thanks Holden for being a good friend to Claire. And then Holden exits.

Young and the Restless Spoilers: Audra Admits She Missed Out on Noah

Noah asks Audra about the guy and about their past in LA because Claire was asking Sienna Bacall (Tamara Braun) about it. And Audra says there’s nothing to it. Then Noah keeps prodding asking how well she knew Sienna and Matt Clark (Roger Howarth). Audra says she didn’t know either of them well, but Noah keeps pressing. And Audra finally admits that now and then she talked to Matt about music and that they would give her free drinks sometimes. But that was mostly because Holden was tending bar for them and would sneak her drinks.

Advertisement

So, Noah is prodding for any information or nuggets about Matt. And Audra says that she’s very sorry that he hurt Noah. And he says that Matt’s on the loose and there’s still danger there. Audra says maybe Noah should just leave Genoa City. And he says the family needs him. Then Audra says that he deserves something special. And she hopes he finds it with Sienna. Then Audra says she missed out on her own someone special. Noah asks who it was and Audra says it was you. So wow, smitten still.

Young and the Restless Spoilers: Nikki’s Had It with Victor

Nikki Newman (Melody Thomas Scott) tells Claire that Phyllis gave Chancellor back to Victor, but Nikki doesn’t think she’s going to go back to it. Plus, Claire is stunned that Victor did actually kidnap Jack Abbott (Peter Bergman). She didn’t want to believe it. And Nikki says Victor won’t stop until he gets everything back and that there’s never any consequences for his crimes or shady actions.

And Nikki says she’s not going to live with Victor anytime soon. But Claire thinks Nikki should get the house. Bottom line, she’s had it with Victor. She’s seen too much over all these years. And this kind of upsets Claire. But Nikki says that any relationship can break apart and tells Claire, “It is not your problem.” Nikki then turns the tables and asks Claire about Kyle.

And she says they’re basically friends and she blames herself for Nikki’s drinking that Jack then saved her from. Claire also talks about losing her job and then, you know, family being messed up. Things are spinning out and she feels like being wild. And Nikki says, “You’re young. Go do it.” And then Holden walks by, says, “Hi,” and keeps going. So, he may be the wild thing that Claire wants to go back to doing.

Advertisement

Nikki Reveals the Truth About Lily to Cane on Y&R

Cane rushes up and asks why Victor is still holding Lily since Victor got Chancellor back and Nikki drops the bombshell that Lily conspired with Victor. She was his partner. There was never any danger.

Thursday, March 26, Kyle is determined to look out for his mom, Diane Jenkins (Susan Walters). He’s definitely taking her side. And in an effort to help Jack, we’re going to see Nikki making a risky decision. She may get in Patty Williams’ (Stacy Haiduk) face.

She may beg Diane to go back with him, or Nikki may try and sabotage Victor in order to help Jack or stop Victor from continuing to go after him. That same day, Victor reveals he’s got a secret weapon he’s been sitting on. So, we’ll see which of his enemies he’s going to be targeting.

Young and the Restless Spoilers: Cane Ashby (Billy Flynn) - Audra Charles (Zuleyka Silver)Young and the Restless Spoilers: Cane Ashby (Billy Flynn) - Audra Charles (Zuleyka Silver)
Young and the Restless Spoilers: Cane Ashby – Audra Charles

Friday, March 27th: Adam Sees a Different Side of Nick on Young and the Restless

Friday, March 27th, Adam Newman (Mark Grossman) is going to see a different side of Nick Newman (Joshua Morrow). And I’m sure it’s a side that Adam’s not going to like because Nick is spiraling on drugs and losing control, being more hotheaded than ever. So, Adam may figure out that Nick is hooked.

Billy decides not to patch things up with Jill and tells Sally, but I bet she’s still going to press Billy to reconsider. Very soon, Diane is going to unleash her fury on Patty. Lily’s due back soon. Cane’s going to be upset about what he found out. And he remains on Victor’s revenge list. And the mustache is going to pivot in his approach to punishing Cane by Friday on Young and the Restless.

Advertisement

Week of March 30th-April 3rd Spoilers

Then March 30th through April 3rd, we’ve got Patty remaining a wildcard with her still around. Anything can happen, even though we haven’t seen her since the yacht incident. Audra no longer wants anything to do with Holden’s scheme, but I think he’s going to circle back around and press Audra some more.

Cane is blindsided by Victor, who of course also continues to plot against Jack and Phyllis as well. And this secret weapon could be aimed at any of those three. All of those three, two of the three. Plus, Jack absolutely refuses to give up on Diane and their marriage. And Jack’s going to continue to try and make it up.

Convince her that he was a victim. Convince her that this is all Victor and Patty’s fault. I mean, at this point, I think we can all agree that Jack was sexually assaulted. And I don’t know why soaps want to do sexual assault stories. They’re not remotely sexy at all. This show actually right now is just so low on romance. It’s really frustrating.

Young and the Restless Spoilers: Matt’s Reign of Terror Continues

Matt is back soon to wreak havoc. While Nick is rapidly heading toward rock bottom and he and Adam may be in the wrong place because Matt may make a move back in Genoa City when they are over in Las Vegas dealing with Riza Thompson (Tina Casciani) who may have been told by Matt to just provide a distraction.

Advertisement

Plus, Victor and Nikki’s estrangement grows, and his continued revenge plans could end any hope of a reconciliation. But at this point, neither of them wants a reconciliation. So, this could be the end of them, at least for now.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Entertainment

Kylie Kelce Addresses Rumor Jason Doesn’t Watch Their Kids

Published

on

kylie-kelce-family

Kylie Kelce says critics are taking her past comments about hiring babysitters when her husband, Jason Kelce, is at home out of context.

“It got so aggressively taken out of context that I was pissed about it for, like, months,” Kylie, 34, said during the Wednesday, March 25, episode of the “Conversations With Cam” podcast. “Because there comes a time where you can set the record straight. But then at what point are you just continuously [doing it]? And like, ‘I don’t need to.’ This is the same thing of, like, if I’m going to talk about it, I’ll talk about it. If I’m not, I’m not.”

Back in December 2024, Kylie caused a stir when she revealed that she would schedule a babysitter even when Jason, 38, is scheduled to be home with their kids. (The couple shares daughters Wyatt, 5, Elliotte, 4, Bennett, 3, and Finn, who turns 1 year old on Monday, March 30.)

“How do I say this nicely? No,” Kylie said during the debut episode of her “Not Gonna Lie” podcast. “When I have to do something — coaching, something for Eagles Autism Foundation, something for my podcast, a doctor’s appointment even — I will schedule childcare. My husband could tell me 72 times that he is going to be in the house during the time when I have to leave it, [and] I will still schedule childcare.”

Advertisement

Kylie added that their schedule is unpredictable now that Jason is retired from the NFL, so it’s hard to know when he will be able to watch the kids.

After the episode aired, critics online slammed Kylie for seemingly not allowing Jason to watch their children.

“Tell me you don’t trust your husband, without telling him you don’t trust him,” an Instagram user commented on a clip of the podcast at the time.

Another person added, “That’s really sad a guy can’t parent his own kids.”

Advertisement
kylie-kelce-family
Kylie Kelce/Instagram

Addressing the criticism on Wednesday, Kylie continued, “It got so taken out of context because people were like, ‘You won’t let Jason watch your kids.’ And I’m like, ‘What do you mean, let him watch the kids? They’re his kids.’ I’m not letting him do anything. They’re f***ing his.”

Kylie then reiterated her original explanation for hiring a babysitter.

“When I first started the podcast and we addressed this, which is when I said it, Jason was in football season for ESPN,” she said. “He had multiple other things going on where his schedule was, and still is, chaotic, but not nearly as much. There was like no structure happening.”

Kylie Kelce Has the Perfect Clapback for Haters


Related: Kylie Kelce Has the Perfect Clapback for Haters Who Are ‘Tired’ of Her

  Kylie Kelce is not here for the haters weighing in on her life or her new podcast venture. “My producer, Queen Emma, has pulled a couple of the comments that we’ve gotten over the last couple weeks,” Kelce, 32, said during the Thursday, January 2, episode of her “Not Gonna Lie” podcast. “One of […]

Kylie added, “And there were times where he would be sitting, and he’d be like, ‘Oh, I don’t have anything for the rest of the day.’ And then someone would call him, and he’d be like, ‘Oh, I actually have to take this.’ And then he would end up on a call for like 45 minutes to an hour. And like, it’s, they’re not calls where you can have little voices in the background.”

Advertisement

The podcaster also argued that she had a “sarcastic” tone when she made the original remarks.

“It’s always how someone wants to twist it,” she noted.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

The 10 Greatest Movies From Countries That No Longer Exist

Published

on

Two young men in 'I Was Nineteen'

If there’s anything that history proves, it’s that nothing is permanent—not even nations. There have been several countries throughout the years that have disappeared, dissolved, or transformed into something entirely different. That certainly includes a few throughout cinema’s existence in the 20th century, which means that there are many movies out there whose home has vanished since their release.

Many such movies have either been forgotten by time or disappeared altogether, but there are a few masterpieces from countries that no longer exist that are widely counted among the greatest films ever made. From Yugoslav gems like pretty much Emir Kusturica‘s entire filmography to legendary Soviet movies like I Am Cuba, these are cornerstones of movie history that cinephiles should never allow themselves to forget.

Advertisement

‘I Was Nineteen’ (1968) From East Germany

Two young men in 'I Was Nineteen' Image via DEFA

Right before the end of World War II, the Allied powers agreed on the division of defeated Nazi Germany into occupation zones. The Soviet occupation zone turned into East Germany, officially the German Democratic Republic, a communist state whose economy soon became the most successful in the Eastern European Bloc. East Germany’s state-owned film studio was called DEFA, and the best movie that it ever produced is undoubtedly Konrad Wolf‘s I Was Nineteen. It’s a fictionalization of Wolf’s experiences, where a young boy who fled Germany with his parents returns as a lieutenant in the Red Army.

I Was Nineteen is easily the best-made and most thought-provoking East German masterpiece.

Advertisement

Due to its emphasis on subjective experience rather than propagandistic clarity, the DEFA disliked I Was Nineteen and tried to get Wolf to revise the screenplay in several ways. Yet, despite their interference, it is easily the best-made and most thought-provoking East German masterpiece. Though episodic, the film feels like a deeply intimate recollection of a man’s recollection of his tumultuous youth. It’s a stunning cinematic autobiography.

‘The Nightingale’s Prayer’ (1959) From the United Arab Republic

Women carrying water above their heads in 'The Nightingale's Prayer' Image via Arab Film Distribution
Advertisement

In 1958, a political union between Egypt and Syria formed the United Arab Republic. Just three years later, Syria seceded from the union following a coup d’état, but Egypt continued to be known officially as the United Arab Republic until it was formally dissolved in 1971. During these (roughly) 13 years, the United Arab Republic produced several of what have gone down in history as the greatest African movies of all time. The most noteworthy of these is Henry Barakat‘s The Nightingale’s Prayer, a romance drama that follows a woman’s revenge plot against the engineer who destroyed her family’s honor.

It’s an immensely powerful social melodrama that’s surprisingly bleak and anti-patriarchy for its era. The Nightingale’s Prayer, which looks and feels delectably similar to the best of noirs being produced in Hollywood at the time, hasn’t aged perfectly in every department, but it still feels as well-performed, well-written, and well-directed today as it surely must have been back in the 1959 United Arab Republic.

‘Time of the Gypsies’ (1988) From Yugoslavia

A group of people in Time of the Gypsies Image via Ljubavny Film
Advertisement

Yugoslavia came into existence following World War I, being the first union of South Slavic peoples as a sovereign state in history. Due to a wide variety of factors and after a violent multi-stage process, the country broke up between 1991 and 1992. But during its existence, it was the source of some of the greatest European films and filmmakers of its time, chief among which is the great Emir Kusturica. One of Kusturica’s best movies is the Yugoslav-Italian co-production Time of the Gypsies, a coming-of-age fantasy crime drama about a young Roma boy with telekinetic powers who is seduced by the world of petty crime.

It’s one of those ’80s movie masterpieces that most people have forgotten about, which won Kusturica the Best Director Award at the 1989 Cannes Film Festival. Tragicomical, deeply moving, and unexpectedly dense (with a runtime of nearly two and a half hours), Time of the Gypsies is a beautifully chaotic epic that’s definitely a must-watch for history buffs and cinephiles alike.

‘Marketa Lazarová’ (1967) From Czechoslovakia

A young woman lying down in Marketa Lazarova Image via Criterion
Advertisement

In 1918, Czechoslovakia was created after declaring its independence from Austria-Hungary. In 1992, it split peacefully into Czechia and Slovakia. Throughout those 74 years, Czechoslovakia was the home of some of the greatest and most groundbreaking European films of the 20th century. During the ’60s in particular, filmmakers like František Vláčil led theCzechoslovak New Wave, one of the most notorious European film movements of the era.This movement birthed the country’s greatest cinematic masterpiece: Marketa Lazarová, an epic period drama about a young girl promised to God who is kidnapped and raped by a marauder.

It’s an unsettling and absolutely brutal masterpiece, but a masterpiece nonetheless. Clocking in at nearly three hours long and sprinkling surreal moments into the mix to enhance its psychologically intense atmosphere, it’s a dreamlike, poetic, and utterly mesmerizing work of art. Its score of 100% on Rotten Tomatoes is well deserved, since this is one of the most unforgettable period pieces in the history of cinema.

‘The Cranes Are Flying’ (1957) From the Soviet Union

A man and a woman walking together in The Cranes Are Flying Image via Mosfilm
Advertisement

From 1922 until its dissolution in 1991, the Soviet Union was the world’s flagship communist state. The nation’s film industry was fully regulated by the central government in Moscow and, thus, often prone to censorship. Still, such a tremendously large number of cinematic masterpieces came out of that system that one can point to innumerable Soviet movies which could be counted among the greatest of the 20th century. One such movie is The Cranes Are Flying, a war drama about two lovers planning a rendezvous at the bank of a river, only for the man to be drafted into WWII shortly after.

Plenty of war films out there depict the horror and devastation of armed conflict in all manner of thought-provoking ways, as well as somewhat problematic war films that make war seem like an exciting prospect. But movies about the tedium of war, about how slow, boring, and existentially dreadful it can be? There aren’t nearly enough of those in existence, but Georgian-Soviet filmmaker Mikhail Kalatozov made this one, which is great enough to make up for the scarcity of such movies. It’s a timeless cinematic miracle; poetic, visually splendid, and deeply human.

‘I Am Cuba’ (1964) From the Soviet Union

An aerial shot of Havana's streets full of people in the movie 'I Am Cuba' Image via Mosfilm
Advertisement

A co-production between the Soviet Union and Cuba, I Am Cuba is proof that propaganda cinema isn’t inherently bad. In fact, it is widely recognized by cinephiles and film historians as one of the greatest films of the 1960s,an anthology film and political drama with some of the most revolutionary cinematography in the history of the art form. Also directed by Mikhail Kalatozov, it follows four vignettes about the lives of the Cuban people during the pre-revolutionary era.

The film was almost completely forgotten until it was rediscovered by American filmmakers in the ’90s, and Martin Scorsese and Francis Ford Coppola were actually instrumental in its restoration and re-release in 1995. Politically radical, full of jaw-dropping visuals, and so ideologically profound that film scholars will probably continue to study it deeply for the rest of history, I Am Cuba is a must-see for all those who would say they love cinema.

‘Stalker’ (1979) From the Soviet Union

Andrei Tarkovsky was perhaps the greatest of all Soviet filmmakers, a poet with a camera who loved to work on his own terms. So much so, in fact, that he exiled himself from the Soviet Union in the early ’80s due to the unrelenting censorship and artistic interference from the government. The last film he made in the USSR was Stalker, one of the best and most beautiful arthouse sci-fi masterpieces of all time, full of the same kind of poetic pacing and philosophical depth that makes Tarkovsky timeless.Aside from being one of the sci-fi films with the strongest acting ever, the most gorgeous visuals ever, and the best dialogue ever, Stalker is a thought-provoking exploration of themes of faith, societal decay, and spiritual redemption. Its production was notoriously difficult (and led to Tarkovsky’s untimely death from cancer at 54 years old, since they shot in highly toxic locations), but the result is one of the most transcendental works of art in film history.

Advertisement

‘Underground’ (1995) From Yugoslavia

A man standing with a cross while the background is in flames in Underground (1995)
A man standing with a cross while the background is in flames in Underground (1995)
Image via Ciby 2000

The biggest masterpiece that Emir Kusturica ever directed was the satirical epic war film Underground, about two underground black marketeers who sell weapons to the Communist resistance in wartime Belgrade. Admirably genre-bending and enthralling throughout its nearly three hours of runtime, the film earned Kusturica his second Cannes Palme d’Or victory (after 1985’s When Father Was Away on Business), making him one of only ten directors in history to have won the award more than once.

It was a well-deserved victory, too, since Underground is an exhilarating masterpiece that offers an insightful look at life in Communist Eastern Europe. Hugely ambitious, disorienting, energetic, and carnivalesque, it’s movie magic in its purest form. Funny though it may be, Underground is also epically operatic and emotionally enthralling, making it one of history’s greatest cinematic masterpieces.

Advertisement

‘Come and See’ (1985) From the Soviet Union

Alexei Kravchenko in 'Come and See'
Alexei Kravchenko in ‘Come and See’
Image via Sovexportfilm

Yet another Soviet masterpiece, the anti-war thriller coming-of-age Come and See is not only the highest-rated European film on Letterboxd, but the 4th-highest-rated movie on the platform in general. It’s a horrific, absolutely harrowing epic where, after finding an old rifle, a young boy joins the Soviet resistance movement against German forces during WWII. Plenty of movies make war seem like hell, but none nearly as effectively and potently as this one.

Directed by Elem Klimov and starring Aleksei Kravchenko, who delivers the most transformative and emotionally devastating child acting performance in film history, Come and See is not for the faint of heart. But daunting though it may be, it’s obligatory viewing for movie fans. It’s an unforgiving waking nightmare that you simply can’t forget, visually striking and full of hard-hitting scenes. Soviet cinema was rarely ever this good.

Advertisement

‘Andrei Rublev’ (1966) From the Soviet Union

Andrei next to mysterious man in a ruined room in the film Andrei Rublev Image via Janus Films

Actually, Soviet cinema was only ever slightly better than Klimov’s Come and See once, and that was when Andrei Tarkovsky made his magnum opus, Andrei Rublev, arguably the greatest movie of the last 100 years. It’s a three-hour-long arthouse biopic about the life, times, and afflictions of the titular Medieval Russian icon painter, though the movie is far more focused on Medieval Russian history than on Rublev’s life in terms of historical accuracy. However, Tarkovsky is even more interested in the thematic depth of this thought-provoking film about art, religion, spirituality, and where those things intersect.

Andrei Rublev will be an obnoxious bore for those who hate slow-burning cinema, but for people who love arthouse films that take their time and aren’t afraid to slow down and let the narrative breathe, it will be an unforgettable experience. The acting is phenomenal, Tarkovsky’s direction is so transcendentally powerful that it almost doesn’t feel human, and the long runtime doesn’t have a single second where it’s not absolutely fascinating. The Soviet Union may not exist anymore, but Tarkovsky’s work will prove eternal.

Advertisement


0128533_poster_w780.jpg

Advertisement

Andrei Rublev


Release Date
Advertisement

December 16, 1966

Runtime

183 minutes

Advertisement

Director

Andrei Tarkovsky

Advertisement



Advertisement


Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

General Hospital Early Spoilers Mar 30-Apr 3: Lucas Receives Crushing News & Lulu Gripped by Fear!

Published

on

General Hospital Spoilers: Lucas Jones (Van Hansis) - Lulu Spencer (Alexa Havins Bruening)

General Hospital early weekly spoilers for March 30th through April 3rd stun as Lucas Jones (Van Hansis) is going to be absolutely devastated and Lulu Spencer (Alexa Havins Bruening) terrified.

As we always do on early edition day, we start with what is coming the rest of this week and then talk about what is ahead for next week.

General Hospital Spoilers Wednesday, March 25th: Something’s Not Right in Surgery

So, on Wednesday, March 25th, we have in surgery Dr. Isaiah Gannon (Sawandi Wilson) telling Elizabeth Webber (Rebecca Herbst) that something is not right. So, this does not sound good for Marco Rios (Adrian Anchondo) at all because the two of them are working on him. But I honestly expect him to pull through. I hope he does. Fingers crossed. We should find out on Wednesday, Thursday at the latest.

And Elizabeth has to break bad news on Wednesday. And again, nurses don’t tell people that patients died. That’s a doctor’s job. But that’s kind of part of why I feel like Marco survives. And this may be Elizabeth telling Lucas once he’s out of Ross Cullum’s (Andrew Hawkes) surgery that his boyfriend Marco is in the hospital, just got out of surgery and has been stabbed. And Lucas is having his own little crisis in surgery saying, “Come on, Cullum.”

Advertisement

So, it looks like they might be losing him. I mean, good riddance to bad rubbish. But honestly, he’s so awful. I don’t think he’s going to die either. Even though I’d be cheering for it, you know, when GH brings on somebody that fans hate, they just don’t up and get rid of them like we would like them to. You know, Peter August (Wes Ramsey) lived way too long. Cyrus Renault (Jeff Kober) lived way too long. So, I don’t know if Cullum’s going to be pushing up daisies quite yet.

GH Spoilers: Lulu Begs Rocco to Keep Quiet

And Lulu gives Rocco Falconeri (Finn Carr) a warning. And Lulu’s telling Rocco, “Promise me you won’t tell anybody.” So, at this point, I think she’s going to have found out that he shot Cullum, who may die. And Lulu doesn’t want him to go down for it. And I think this is going to leapfrog her and Nathan West’s (Ryan Paevey) relationship forward while he’s protecting her son.

Danny Morgan (Asher Antonyzyn) tells Carly Corinthos Spencer (Laura Wright) and Charlotte Cassadine (Blusey Burke) that his dad Jason Morgan‘s (Steve Burton) in danger and Valentin Cassadine (James Patrick Stuart) is the only one who can help. So obviously, you know, they’re over at Carly’s house and somehow thinking that he can work a miracle.

But Charlotte is let down according to spoilers for Wednesday and I suspect if Valentin does talk to them, he just says there’s nothing he can do. He doesn’t have any power to help. Danny, of course, will be upset. Charlotte may be upset too because she’s the one who suggested this. So the residual question is would Danny rat out Valentin? If he goes to talk to Jason, he’ll probably tell him just zip it. Don’t tell anybody that he’s there or Carly’s going to go to prison.

Advertisement

General Hospital Spoilers: Jason & Nathan Scheme to Protect Rocco

Nathan is telling Jason while Dante Falconeri’s (Dominic Zamprogna) there in the interrogation room that Jason needs to make his next decision carefully, but wink wink nudge nudge. Nathan and Jason are conspiring behind Dante’s back. Britt Westbourne (Kelly Thiebaud) is in a race against time and she wants to see Jason before he’s sent to Steinmauer or wherever.

And we’ll see if the warrant at the WSB takes precedence over the PCPD arrest for shooting Cullum and if he survives, of course not. And Britt is frantically saying one way or another she is going to see Jason. She’s at the hospital getting checked out this week, but may force them to let her leave.

And Harrison Chase (Josh Swickard) walks in on a close moment. There’s a couple of things he could see. He could walk in on Nathan and Jason conspiring over Rocco. He could walk in on Jason kissing Britt in the interrogation room bc Jason’s obvi gonna be gone for a while.

And over at Wyndemere, by the way, with their faces only inches apart on Wednesday, we’re going to see on Ava Jerome (Maura West) telling Jenz Sidwell (Carlo Rota) she enjoys a challenge. And he says, “So does he.” So this could be Chase coming in to interrupt them to notify Sidwell about Marco’s attack.

Advertisement

GH Spoilers Thursday, March 26th: Nathan Makes a Promise

Then on Thursday, March 26th, Nathan makes a promise. And it may be to Jason to protect Rocco. I mean, Britt was conked out. So, she doesn’t know about Rocco, but Jason, you know, was saying say that I shot him, and that’s pretty easy to figure out. And Rocco may even talk to her about it.

Meanwhile, Sonny Corinthos (Maurice Benard) tells Ric Lansing (Rick Hearst) that he needs help. So, Sonny may be questioned in Marco’s stabbing, whether he lives or dies. And Carly gives somebody advice they didn’t ask for. So it could be Charlotte or Danny who showed up at her house or it could be Valentin.

And Sidwell opens up to Ava. So, if they’re together when he gets the news about Marco, I’m sure Ava’s going to come to General Hospital with Sidwell. And of course, he’s very concerned about his beloved son. Josslyn Jacks (Eden McCoy) makes a connection and with both Cullum and Marco injured, she may do the math on that. We’ll see.

General Hospital Spoilers: Lucas Jones (Van Hansis) - Lulu Spencer (Alexa Havins Bruening)General Hospital Spoilers: Lucas Jones (Van Hansis) - Lulu Spencer (Alexa Havins Bruening)
General Hospital Spoilers: Lucas Jones – Lulu Spencer

Friday, March 27th on General Hospital: Sonny Demands Answers

Friday, March 27th, we’re going to end this week with Sonny getting a visit from DA Justine Turner (Nazneen Contractor). He and his little doggy, Fizz, are happy to see her. Things may heat up again, but she may also be prodding Sonny to see if he was somehow involved in the attack on Marco, which he didn’t have a role in that.

Michael Corinthos (Rory  Gibson) is cautious and it could be about Jacinda Bracken (Paige Herschell) because of Tracy Quartermaine’s (Jane Elliot) comments that Michael was disrespecting her or it could be something to do with this latest attack. Gio Palmieri (Giovanni Mazza) pays Dante a visit

Advertisement

And Gio may be looking for some father-son bonding time and we know Dante would love that. Joss has an offer for somebody and it could be Lucas or it could be Valentin about Carly. Also, Lulu is investigating, so she may start digging into Cullum based on what Rocco tells her about the things he overheard Britt and Cullum saying.

And Lulu already hated the guy for showing up at her house and wanting to see her kids. Plus, Sonny demands answers on Friday. And it could be about Jason. And we’ll see if Sonny’s going to get to see Jason before he is shipped off.

Week of March 30th-April 3rd GH Spoilers

The week of March 30th through April 3rd, we’re going to have massive fallout from Jason’s arrest and his exit. And we’ll see if he is sent straight to Steinmauer or maybe they’re going to send him to Pentonville and he goes missing along the way.

Plus, Sidwell is going to want to avenge the attack on Marco. He may suspect Sonny since Sidwell was leveraging him. And if Marco is in a coma or he’s dead or he’s scared to tell his dad the truth that it was Cullum, you know, then Sonny would continue to be the top suspect.

Advertisement

And Marco honestly would probably be okay with that if he’s too scared to tattle on Cullum. Like if Cullum is dead, which I don’t think he will be, but I hope so. Then I think he would tell his dad the truth. But if Cullum survives, Marco may be terrified and may be fine with Sonny going down for this.

General Hospital Spoilers: Britt Terrified & Joss Determined

Plus, Josslyn tries to protect Carly from Valentin. Britt is terrified because Cullum broke her medicine vials. And you know, we’ve got Marco stabbed, maybe dead, hope not, which means that takes away her hope to get hold of more meds to reverse engineer.

Even if Cullum dies, and we’ll know soon if he does, Sidwell will still be cracking the whip about this project. Nathan and Lulu are determined to protect Rocco and go all out to make it happen. Lulu is intently digging for answers. Sonny and Justine try to keep each other in the friend zone. And Lucas is absolutely distraught by this attack on Marco.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

The Wild Comedy That Makes A Solid Case For Actually Joining A Cult

Published

on

The Wild Comedy That Makes A Solid Case For Actually Joining A Cult

By Robert Scucci
| Published

2022’s Squirrel doesn’t have a single squirrel in it, but it’s about a cult full of a bunch of nuts, so maybe that’s the connection writer-director Matt Glass was going for with the title. However, the nuts depicted in Squirrel aren’t so bad, and once you get to know them, they’re basically harmless. Sure, they might try to indoctrinate you, and they’re probably more than willing to make human sacrifices for honey, a fate Nicolas Cage is all too familiar with. They’re not making anybody drink any weird Kool-Aid, though, and they actually serve what looks like real food to their guests instead of gruel.

Not quite a horror movie, and not quite a comedy, Squirrel succeeds in subverting every expectation you have going in, and makes for a great watch if you’re looking for something a little left of center.

It’s All About That Red Honey

It may seem at first like there’s not much going on in Squirrel, as it’s your typical “couple in the woods gets taken in by a cult” setup. When we meet Charlotte (Tara Perry) and Casey (Alex Hyner), they’re on a camping trip where the latter tries to prove his manliness by building the worst looking fire you’ve ever seen. After a series of strange events, culminating in Charlotte seriously injuring her leg, the couple has a run-in with Tommy (Thomas Hobson) and Anderson (Tom DeTrinis), who take them into their compound.

Casey, who wanted Charlotte to break out of her comfort zone in the first place, is immediately suspicious of Tommy and Anderson, suspecting foul play. Charlotte, who’s grateful for the food and shelter, is more open to their hospitality. It’s quickly revealed that the two men belong to a cult that harvests a special red varietal of maple syrup with healing properties, and that their compound has been in trouble for quite some time.

Even worse, it’s alluded to, but never explicitly stated, that the cult, led by the charismatic and magnanimous Wilder (Curtis Anderson), may be looking for a human sacrifice to ensure a better honey yield. Charlotte is rightfully suspicious, but can’t argue with the results. Her leg injury rendered her immobile, Tommy rubbed some red honey on the wound, and she was walking in no time.

Casey, who becomes increasingly and disproportionately angry and unpredictable as the film moves through its first and second acts, may be more closely connected to the cult than he realizes, but he’s too blinded by his own paranoia to ever make the connection. This combination of personality and miscommunication is what really sells Squirrel, because there’s no real conflict here outside of each character’s assumptions about the people they’re interacting with.

Advertisement

The Third Act Payoff Is Worth The Wait

While you may find yourself wondering what’s so special about Squirrel early on, your patience will be rewarded. It has the kind of twist you’ll never see coming, and I’m saying that as somebody who almost exclusively watches psychological thrillers. Everybody seems like they’re up to something, and in most cases they are, but that “something” they’re up to is never quite what you expect, making the whole thing play out like a fever dream.

Squirrel, in all of its squirrelless glory, is currently streaming for free on Tubi.


Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Matt Damon’s Greatest Achievement Is In A Freaky, R-Rated Sci-Fi

Published

on

Matt Damon's Greatest Achievement Is In A Freaky, R-Rated Sci-Fi

It all adds up to something wonderful.

By Nick Venable
| Updated

Back in 1983, Terry Gilliam and his Monty Python cohorts took on the Meaning of Life, never quite defining it other than demonstrating that our lives are the sum of our experiences. Gilliam’s 2014 candy-colored mind-bender, The Zero Theorem, is a film about a man who is also looking for a deeper context to this thing called existence.

Narrowing his scope to one character in The Zero Theorem, more or less, Gilliam is able to tackle vastly large ideas without having to pretend that he has all the answers. There is always meaning if you look for it. And if you don’t, well, that sure is some pretty scenery, isn’t it?

Christoph Waltz
“Be vewy, vewy quiet. We’re hunting entities.”

In The Zero Theorem, a hairless Christoph Waltz plays Qohen Leth, a computer programmer (for lack of a better job description) whose list of phobias, ticks, and eccentricities could fill a medical text. He lives the bulk of his solitude in a converted church where rats and birds are his unofficial roommates, only traveling outside to go to work for a company called Mancom that deals in crunching entities and liquid memory and other buzzwords that aren’t the point.

Qohen’s main goals in The Zero Theorem involve working from home and staying around his telephone. He’s waiting for a magical call that will reveal all of life’s mysteries.

Advertisement

Qohen is good at his unintelligible career, and that’s recognized by Mancom’s head honcho, Management (Matt Damon). Damon’s character is a Big Brother-ish personification of a demigod seeking an answer to the titular Zero Theorem.

Matt Damon’s Zero Theorem Wardrobe Is One Of Film’s Greatest Achievements

Though Damon is only on screen for a few minutes, the Management character is a constant presence throughout the film, always watching and manipulating things behind the scenes. Plus, his wardrobe is one of the film’s greatest achievements.

Though Qohen would rather live his life alone in front of his computer, a string of other characters enter his personal space, all seemingly trying to help him reach one breakthrough or another. There’s his supervisor Joby (David Thewlis), a genial chap who generally wishes to keep Qohen on the path to salvation despite never bothering to remember his correct name. Mélanie Thierry is excellent as Bainsley, a semi-femme fatale who opens Qohen’s eyes to a world of emotion that he hadn’t necessarily been looking for.

Also in The Zero Theorem, Bob (Lucas Hedges) is a teen computer genius who finds potential in Qohen and attempts to crack his third-person manner of living. Finally, Tilda Swinton appears via computer screen as Dr. Shrink-Rom, Qohen’s mandated and ever-present therapist.

Other The Zero Theorem bit parts are played by an itchy Peter Stormare, Sanjeev Bhaskar, and Ben Whishaw. Pay attention to the commercials playing on the endless digital screens lining the city streets, as you’ll see Rupert Friend, Robin Williams, Gwendoline Christie, and more.

A Huge Movie Filled With Big Things

To describe The Zero Theorem as anything other than “a Terry Gilliam movie” would be a disservice to the passion that went into it. Whether on a technical or storytelling level, this is a huge movie, filled with high-ceiling sets, retro-technical props, brilliant color schemes, dazzling costumes, depressing existentialism, and big performances.

Stop The Zero Theorem at any point, and the image on the screen could probably stand alone as a work of art, given Gilliam’s penchant for askew angles and fish-eye lenses. Plus, the entire production is a testament to the director’s efficiency in squeezing every iota of worth from the dollar, as this flick was made for around $8.5 million despite looking like it cost 10 times that much.

Zero Theorem Isn’t Brazil

Many people have compared The Zero Theorem to Gilliam’s classic Brazil, but it felt completely different to me, as it was more about the cog’s own inner mechanics rather than the outer machine swallowing everything up.

Advertisement

There’s a recurring image of an all-encompassing black hole that serves as either Qohen’s dream life or his worst nightmare, and it’s as good an example as any of Gilliam’s constant balance between the macro and the micro, taking big steps in small places. It won’t, or can’t, resonate with everyone, because not everyone is equipped to obsess over their station in life in such a way.

For me, though, The Zero Theorem was a singular treat from beginning to end, largely because Gilliam isn’t playing this as a deeply heady drama. There is darkness, to be sure, but it’s all wallpapered over with comedic surreality.

Zero Theorem Will Make You Ready For The Whims Of Eternal Nothingness

Maybe we’re not supposed to find humor in Qohen having to get dressed up in a complicated virtual reality suit in order to feel a sexual connection with someone, but I can’t assume Gilliam would want it any other way. To me, the film’s tone is fully expressed in Qohen’s stance that just because he wants to be alone doesn’t mean he’s lonely. We aren’t meant to feel sorry for Qohen, despite Waltz’s sympathetic performance.

Walking away from The Zero Theorem, I don’t feel that I know any more about myself or about the commercialized world around me, but I suddenly want to run out and get to know as many people as possible. Not only because my personal beliefs about life are tethered to connectivity and friendships, but because I’m hoping to run into a Bainsley or two before I succumb to the whims of eternal nothingness.


Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

7 Spy Movies That Are Better Than ‘The Night Agent’

Published

on

Two men walking, one in a suit and the other in casual wear, in Kingsman: The Secret Service

Returning for its third season last month, The Night Agent has cemented its place as one of Netflix’s best action thrillers with yet another batch of unmissable episodes. The Gabriel Basso spy series first made a splash on the streamer in 2023 and quickly became a favorite of millions. Accumulating over 812 million hours viewed in its first few months, there was no denying the show’s franchise potential.

Season 2 also proved popular, and, although the most recent third installment faced a 39.6% drop in viewership, it is still taking its rightful place among the upper echelons of the streaming charts. “With The Night Agent Season 3, Ryan and his creative team deliver a thriller that feels both entertaining and purposeful,” wrote Jen Vestuto in her review for Collider. “By tightening its storytelling, deepening its characters, and delivering deliberate, hard-hitting action sequences, The Night Agent has officially delivered its strongest season yet,” she added.

If you’ve finished your binge of Season 3 and are looking for what to watch next, here’s a handy guide to seven spy movies that are better than The Night Agent.

Advertisement

7

‘Kingsman: The Secret Service’ (2014)

Two men walking, one in a suit and the other in casual wear, in Kingsman: The Secret Service
Colin Firth and Taron Egerton in ‘Kingsman: The Secret Service’
Image via 20th Century Studios

Its subsequent prequel and sequel might not prove as successful, but the first installment in the Kingsman franchise perfectly captures an exciting era for spy stories. By using slow-motion action sequences and iconic rock songs — before this became a frustratingly overused trope — Kingsman brought the spy genre into the modern day after some in the audience had become tired.

Directed by Matthew Vaughn and based on the comic he devised with artist Mark Millar and Dave Gibbons, the movie follows Harry Hart (Colin Firth) who must help fashion stubborn new recruit Eggsy (Taron Egerton) into an agent to help take down the world-threatening eco-terrorist Richmond Valentine (Samuel L. Jackson). Fast-paced, vibrant, and a winner of two Empire Awards, Kingsman is a perfect follow-up to The Night Agent.

Advertisement

6

‘Black Bag’ (2025)

Michael Fassbender as George Woodhouse outside in sunglasses looking over his right shoulder in Black Bag
Michael Fassbender as George Woodhouse outside in sunglasses looking over his right shoulder in Black Bag
Image via Focus Features

The most recent entry on this list is one of the most underrated movies of 2025. In fact, Black Bag might well be the best sleeper hit from a mixed crop of modern-day spy movies. The film stars the brilliant duo of Cate Blanchett and Michael Fassbender as intelligence officers George Woodhouse and Kathryn St. Jean, whose relationship is put to the test when one is convinced the other is a traitor.

Directed by Steven Soderbergh and written by David Koepp, this slick, compact spy thriller trims the fat of a potentially bloated narrative and delivers a lean, 94-minute gem. Gripping from start to finish and boasting a wicked sense of humor, Black Bag wouldn’t be the same without its expertly assembled cast, which includes the aforementioned Blanchett and Fassbender alongside Marisa Abela, Tom Burke, Naomie Harris, Regé-Jean Page, and Pierce Brosnan.

Advertisement

5

‘Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy’ (2011)

Tom Hardy as Ricki Tarr in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy 
Tom Hardy as Ricki Tarr in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy 
Image via Focus Features

As fans of the Apple TV series Slow Horses will confirm, a spy story led by Gary Oldman is sure to be a hit. In 2011’s Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, based on John le Carré‘s 1974 novel, Oldman plays George Smiley, an agent of the British Intelligence Agency a.k.a The Circus. After his boss, Control (Sir John Hurt), is ousted from his position and eventually dies, Smiley is left with the task of returning from forced retirement to solve the mystery around his death.

A slow-burner that is as intelligent as it is gripping, Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy features a bevy of famous British faces, from Oldman and Hurt to Benedict Cumberbatch and Colin Firth, all working in talented tandem thanks to a smart Bridget O’Connor and Peter Straughan script. The movie earned a trio of Academy Award nominations, including a nod for Oldman in Best Actor, although it sadly missed out in all three categories.

Advertisement

4

‘The Bourne Identity’ (2002)

Matt Damon as Jason Bourne in The Bourne Identity 
Matt Damon as Jason Bourne in The Bourne Identity
Image via Universal Studios

This spy story changed the game. The first entry in the Bourne series stars Matt Damon as the now-iconic Jason Bourne, a man salvaged from near-death who, despite suffering from amnesia, is extraordinarily talented in the skillset of a spy. Desperate to learn of his past, Bourne sets out on a deadly mission, chased by malevolent assassins.

During a stale period for the genre, The Bourne Identity arrived and sacrificed CGI-heavy, unbelievable action with gritty, hand-to-hand combat, accentuated by the use of so-called “shaky-cam” to illustrate authenticity. True, this itself quickly became the tired norm for spy movies, but it’s impossible not to recognize The Bourne Identity‘s innovation.

Advertisement

3

‘Mission: Impossible – Fallout’ (2018)

Tom Cruise in Mission Impossible Fallout
Tom Cruise in Mission Impossible Fallout
Image via Paramount Pictures

Last year, in his Final Reckoning, Tom Cruise‘s Ethan Hunt rode off into the sunset, happy that every Impossible Mission had been made possible. But of these missions, which was his best? That would be Mission: Impossible – Fallout, the sixth installment in the franchise, which saw Hunt and his team face an unknown evil and a terrorist-for-hire group known as Apostles.

Packed with some of the most breathless, exhilarating action set pieces in recent memory, Fallout is by quite some distance the most innovative and stunt-heavy entry into the franchise. Focusing on practical effects and capturing Cruise at the peak of his “I do all my own stunts” powers, Fallout delivers a cinematic spectacle difficult to replicate.

Advertisement

2

‘Casino Royale’ (2006)

Daniel Craig with a gun looking down in Casino Royale.
Daniel Craig in ‘Casino Royale’ (2006)
Image via Sony Pictures Releasing

A list of great spy movies would be incomplete without the most famous of all: James Bond. For my money, the best of Bond has happened in this century, courtesy of the suave Daniel Craig, and there is no better option from his impressive catalog than the very first, Casino Royale.

As we edge closer to the final act of Casino Royale, Bond comes face to face with poker player and private banker Le Chiffre (Mads Mikkelsen) in a game of Texas Hold ’em, with the climactic hand on the final night of the game simply some of the best spy cinema in modern movies. Add to that a cast stacked with talent and a fresh-faced Craig breathing new life into the role, and a recipe for success is born.

Advertisement

1

‘North by Northwest’ (1959)

Cary Grant and Eve Marie Saint as Roger and Eve in a train aisle, staring towards the camera
Cary Grant and Eve Marie Saint as Roger and Eve in a train aisle, staring towards the camera
Image via MGM

In the hands of the Master of Suspense himself, Alfred Hitchcock, the spy genre is able to blossom into its full potential. This is best on display in North by Northwest, the 1959 tale of New York City ad executive Roger O. Thornhill (Cary Grant) as he is mistaken for a government agent by spy Phillip Vandamm (James Mason) and ruthlessly pursued.

From its first to its last moments, North by Northwest is a thrilling masterclass in creating tension, as a late-era Hitchcock utilized all his extensive knowledge of cinema to create. Not only is the movie a perfect example of spy storytelling, but it’s also visually iconic, with cinematographer Robert Burks at the peak of his powers. Truly, there is nothing else quite like North by Northwest, and it is the most obvious choice for films that are better than The Night Agent.

Advertisement































































Advertisement
Collider Exclusive · Oscar Best Picture Quiz
Which Oscar Best Picture
Is Your Perfect Movie?

Parasite · Everything Everywhere · Oppenheimer · Birdman · No Country

Five Oscar Best Picture winners. Five completely different visions of what cinema can be — and what it can do to you. One of them is the film that was made for the way your mind works. Ten questions will figure out which one.

🪜Parasite

🌀Everything Everywhere

☢️Oppenheimer

Advertisement

🐦Birdman

🪙No Country for Old Men

Advertisement

01

What kind of film experience do you actually want?
The best movies don’t just entertain — they leave something behind.





Advertisement

02

Which idea grabs you most in a film?
Great films are driven by a central obsession. What’s yours?





Advertisement

03

How do you like your story told?
Form is content. The way a story is shaped changes what it means.





Advertisement

04

What makes a truly great antagonist?
The opposition defines the protagonist. What kind of opposition fascinates you?





Advertisement

05

What do you want from a film’s ending?
The final note is the one that lingers. What do you want it to sound like?





Advertisement

06

Which setting pulls you in most?
Where a film takes place shapes everything — mood, stakes, what’s even possible.





Advertisement

07

What cinematic craft impresses you most?
Every great film has a signature — a technical or artistic element that makes it unmistakable.





Advertisement

08

What kind of main character do you root for?
The protagonist is the lens. Who you choose to follow says something about you.





Advertisement

09

How do you feel about a film that takes its time?
Pace is a choice. Some films sprint; others let tension accumulate slowly, deliberately.





Advertisement

10

What do you want to feel walking out of the cinema?
The best films leave a mark. What kind of mark do you want?





Advertisement

The Academy Has Decided
Your Perfect Film Is…

Your answers have pointed to one Oscar Best Picture winner above all others. This is the film that was made for the way your mind works.

Advertisement

Parasite

You are drawn to films that operate on multiple levels simultaneously — that begin in one genre and quietly, brilliantly migrate into another. Bong Joon-ho’s Parasite is a film about class, desire, and the architecture of inequality that manages to be darkly funny, deeply suspenseful, and genuinely shocking across a single extraordinary running time. Your instinct is for cinema that hides its true intentions until the moment it’s ready to reveal them. Parasite is exactly that — a film that rewards close attention and punishes assumptions, right up to its devastating final image.

Advertisement

Everything Everywhere All at Once

You want it all — and this film gives you all of it. The Daniels’ Everything Everywhere All at Once is one of the most maximalist films ever made: action comedy, multiverse sci-fi, family drama, existential crisis, and a genuinely earned emotional core that sneaks up on you amid the chaos. You are someone who responds to ambition, who doesn’t want cinema to choose between being entertaining and being meaningful. This film refuses that choice entirely. It is overwhelming by design, and its overwhelming nature is precisely the point — because the feeling of being crushed by infinite possibility is exactly what it’s about.

Advertisement

Oppenheimer

You are drawn to cinema on a grand scale — films that understand history not as a backdrop but as a force, and that place their characters inside that force and watch what happens. Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer is a film about the terrifying gap between what we can do and what we should do, told with the full weight of one of the most consequential moments in human history behind it. You want your films to feel important without feeling self-important — to earn their ambition through sheer craft and the gravity of their subject. Oppenheimer does exactly that. It is enormous, complicated, and refuses easy comfort.

Advertisement

Birdman

You are drawn to films that foreground their own construction — that make the how of the filmmaking part of the what it’s about. Alejandro González Iñárritu’s Birdman, shot to appear as a single continuous take, is cinema examining itself through the cracked mirror of a fading actor’s ego. You respond to formal daring, to the feeling that a film is doing something that probably shouldn’t be possible. Michael Keaton’s performance and Emmanuel Lubezki’s restless camera create something genuinely unlike anything else — a film that is simultaneously about creativity, relevance, self-destruction, and the impossibility of ever truly knowing if your work means anything at all.

Advertisement

No Country for Old Men

You are drawn to cinema that trusts silence, that refuses to explain itself, and that treats dread as a form of meaning. The Coen Brothers’ No Country for Old Men is a film about the arrival of a new kind of evil — implacable, arbitrary, and utterly indifferent to the moral frameworks we use to make sense of the world. It is one of the most formally controlled films ever made, and its controlled restraint is what makes it so terrifying. You want your films to haunt you, not comfort you. You are not interested in resolution if resolution would be dishonest. No Country for Old Men is honest in a way that most cinema never dares to be.

Advertisement


Advertisement
north-by-northwest-movie-poster.jpg

Advertisement


Release Date

September 8, 1959

Runtime
Advertisement

136 minutes

Writers

Ernest Lehman

Advertisement

Advertisement

  • instar49420371.jpg
  • Cast Placeholder Image

Advertisement


Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Melania Trump Video With AI Robot Draws Viral Reactions

Published

on

The internet is buzzing about Melania Trump walking alongside an AI robot at the White House.

According to a video shared by CSPAN via X, the first lady was accompanied by the Figure 3 robot while hosting a summit at the White House on Wednesday, March 25. The device was created by robotics company Figure and is powered by AI.

Trump wore a white suit as she walked down the hallway alongside the black-and-white humanoid robot, which matched her pace on its own two legs. Once getting to the end of the hallway, Trump stopped and let the robot proceed to the discussion area, where it addressed the audience.

“Thank you first lady Melania Trump for inviting me to the White House. It is an honor to be at Foster the Future Together’s global coalition inaugural meeting,” the bot said. “I’m Figure 3, a humanoid built in the United States of America. I am grateful to be part of this historic movement to empower children with technology and education.”

Advertisement

The robot then waved as it greeted the crowd in multiple languages before leaving the room.

Social media users wasted no time sharing their thoughts on the introduction after the video was shared.

“We all know how this ends. But it’s fine. I’m sure it’s fine,” one user joked, including a GIF from the Terminator movies. (In the iconic franchise, a cybernetic assassin is sent back in time to kill Sarah Connor, whose son saves humanity from a hostile AI entity.)

Another person tweeted, “Oh it’s real, I thought it was an AI generated video 🤯.”

Advertisement

Others poked fun at how the robot walked, comparing its stride to actual humans.

“Which one is the robot? 👀,” one user wrote, while another retorted, “It walks just like Joe Biden.”

Melania returned to the White House alongside her husband, President Donald Trump, after he won the 2024 election, defeating former vice president Kamala Harris.

Melania Trump Dress at State Banquet Sparks Debate Over One Style Detail Pink or Purple


Related: Melania Trump‘s Dress at Banquet Sparks Debate: Pink or Purple Belt?

Is it pink or purple? Melania Trump’s belted dress has the internet doing a double take. The first lady, 55, attended a state banquet hosted by the British royal family at Windsor Castle on Wednesday, September 17, wearing a Carolina Herrera design that has since sparked an online debate. At first glance, her off-the-shoulder, floor-length […]

Advertisement

Wednesday’s summit was held to promote the development of safe, effective educational technologies for children. According to Figure’s website, the new humanoid robot can handle “household tasks like laundry, cleaning and doing dishes, all autonomously.”

While celebrating the “distinct honor” of being joined by group leaders for the Fostering the Future Together summit, Melania poked fun at her new robot companion.

“It’s fair to state you are my first American-made humanoid guest in the White House,” she teased.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

“Titanic” star got James Cameron on top of conference room table during strange audition that won her key role

Published

on


Frances Fisher’s unusual approach to an in-person test with Cameron led to to her playing Ruth DeWitt Bukater, the mother of Kate Winslet’s Rose.

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

’Mormon Wives’ Jessi Draper Says Ex Emotionally Abused Her

Published

on

Jessi Draper

Jessi Draper is hurling serious accusations at her soon-to-be ex-husband, Jordan Ngatikaura, via a recent interview, indicating that the couple’s divorce will be a messy one.

The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives” star dropped a series of bombshells regarding her marriage to Ngatikaura, the most serious of which is alleging that he emotionally abused her.

‘Mormon Wives’ Star Jessi Draper Dropped Bombshell Claim She Was Victim Of ‘Emotional Abuse’ By Ex Jordan Ngatikaura 

Jessi Draper
River / MEGA

During her March 25 “Call Her Daddy” appearance, “Secret Lives of Mormon Wives” star Jessi Draper opened up about a variety of current issues with the show’s cast, but her most dramatic comments involve her soon-to-be ex-husband Jordan Ngatikaura.

In the interview, which comes a week after Ngatikaura filed for divorce on March 19, Draper recalled how a visit to an energy healer made her realize that during her marriage, she suffered “emotional abuse.”

Advertisement

“I told her everything, and it was the first time I said it out loud, and that was like, the moment also that I was like, ‘I have to leave him,’” she said. “She goes, ‘Jessi, this is emotional abuse,’ and … it didn’t click to me until in that moment.”

Draper also shared that when discussing her marital issues with those close to her, they previously determined that she was in an emotionally abusive relationship.

“They were like, ‘Jessi, this isn’t normal.’ It felt like the glass had shattered,” she recalled to podcast host Alex Cooper.

Draper Called Out Ngatikaura’s Motive For Filing For Divorce First Despite Her Previously Ending Their Relationship

Jordan Ngatikaura
MEGA

The JZ Styles founder said that she and Ngatikaura discussed telling their children privately together, but he “blindsided” her by filing for divorce first, which she finds suspicious.

“He was definitely trying to get ahead of something, which is ironic ’cause I’m the one who ended it,” Draper revealed. “I told him on Friday the 13th, so not that long ago, and I just said I want a divorce. He definitely didn’t want it, and now he’s the one rushing to do it, which is a little strange.”

Advertisement

She also accused Ngatikaura of blackmail due to threatening to release information about her emotional affair with “Vanderpump Villa” star Marciano Brunette. The details of the affair were heavily documented in the third season of “Mormon Wives.”

“It got to a point where he was blackmailing me with Marciano texts, and he had them on a draft on his phone on TikTok, and anytime he was mad at me, he was like, ‘I’m going to post them. I’m going to ruin your life,’” Draper alleged.

Elsewhere in the sit-down interview, Draper said Ngatikaura was involved in his own cheating situations. 

“Do you want to talk about the escorts? Do you want to talk about the orgies? I’m ready to tell the whole story because I have nothing to hide,” she said.

Advertisement

Jessi Draper Also Spoke About The Domestic Violence Allegations Against Taylor Frankie Paul

Taylor Frankie Paul
MEGA

“I don’t like to judge someone in their darkest moment. I don’t want to judge the person, I’ll judge the mistake,” Draper told Cooper. “Taylor really has made a lot of changes, and that’s what’s so hard for me. This is my real friend, and she does have a really good heart, and I love her so much.”

Draper noted that Paul has been dealing with a lot of pain behind the scenes, which she said is not necessarily indicative of who she is.

“Seeing that video is so hard, because there’s so much pain underneath the surface for Taylor,” she said during the interview, visibly holding back tears. “It’s not who Taylor is. She got caught in a really bad cycle.”

Jordan Ngatikaura Recently Filed A Restraining Order Against Jessi Draper, Which She Immediately Disputed

Jessi Draper
ZUMAPRESS.com / MEGA

On March 20, one day after he filed for divorce, court documents show that Jordan Ngatikauara filed a temporary restraining order in connection with the divorce proceedings.

However, Jessi Draper immediately opposed it mere hours after it was submitted.

Per Page Six, on Wednesday, March 25, Ngatikaura’s temporary restraining order request was denied by a judge.

Advertisement

The Former Couple’s Marriage Was A Major Focus On The Current Season Of ‘Mormon Wives’

Mormon Wives
River / MEGA

The timing of the divorce comes just after the release of Season 4 of “Mormon Wives,” which was released on March 12. 

In the latest season, viewers watched Jessi Draper and Jordan Ngatikaura trying to work through their marital issues, but it was clear that things were not going well.

The couple had several heated arguments on camera throughout the season, giving fans a front-row seat to the strain in their marriage. 

In one tense exchange, Draper Jessi told Ngatikaura that she decided to use her maiden name, a move Ngatikaura labeled as “selfish.” 

Members of #MomTok also shared their concern when they discovered Draper was repeatedly spending nights away from home, staying at a hotel when she and Ngatikaura would argue.

Advertisement

Towards the end of the season, Draper tearfully reveals her discovery that her prenuptial agreement may not hold up legally, after realizing it was never signed by a witness. She told #MomTok that because of the oversight, divorcing Ngatikaura could cost her “millions.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Bold and Beautiful Early Spoilers Mar 30-Apr 3: Ivy Crosses the Line & Deacon Desperately Covers His Tracks!

Published

on

Bold and the Beautiful Spoilers: Ivy Forrester (Ashleigh Brewer) - and Deacon Sharpe (Sean Kanan)

Bold and the Beautiful early weekly spoilers for March 30th through April 3rd divulge Ivy Forrester (Ashleigh Brewer) going way, way too far and Deacon Sharpe (Sean Kanan) forced to scramble.

As we always do on early edition day, we start with what’s coming the rest of this week, then dive into what is ahead next week.

Wednesday, March 25th on Bold and the Beautiful: Taylor Sneaks Deacon Over

So, on Wednesday, March 25th, we’ve got Steffy Forrester (Jacqueline MacInnes Wood) and Finn (Tanner Novlan) super excited. They are taking the kiddos, Hayes Finnegan (Bryan Garlick) and Kelly Spencer (Sophia Paras McKinlay), for a night away as a family.

Of course, this leaves Taylor Hayes (Rebecca Budig) with the house all to herself. And since Steffy won’t be around, Taylor’s going to sneak a boy over like a teenager. And of course, that boy is Deacon. And I’m curious to see if Taylor calls Deacon immediately and excitedly invites him over to get frisky.

Advertisement

RJ Forrester (Brayan Nicoletti) and Electra Forrester (Laneya Grace) continue their dinner and lemon bars at the Forrester mansion as RJ keeps slowly making his move while listening to Electra gripe and yap and moan, blaming a poor homeless girl for ruining her privileged, wonderful life. Later, they’re going to change into bathing suits and RJ and Electra are all smiles while taking selfies together.

B&B Spoilers: Ivy Still Being a Creepy Creeper

And of course, Ivy didn’t leave like she said. She is lurking, watching, and grinning like some freakish serial killer and then is going to post a photo of Electra and RJ on social media. And of course, you know that Ivy’s doing this because Will Spencer (Crew Morrow) will inevitably see it and decide, okay, Electra is moving on from him, which leaves him no reason to not move on himself.

RJ is telling Electra how amazing she looks and she’s returning the compliment. They’re all smiles and despite her heartbreak, you know, looks like Ivy’s pressuring her is working. We’ll also see if Will taps the brakes with Dylan (Sydney Bullock) after she drops the L-bomb. I think he may, but after he sees this social media photo, maybe he’ll change his mind.

Thursday, March 26th: Hope Covers for Deacon on Bold

Thursday, March 26th, we’ve got Hope Logan (Annika Noelle) telling Liam Spencer that she’s really worried about Deacon’s marriage. She wants his marriage to Sheila Carter (Kimberlin Brown) to end. This is not the happily ever after she wants for her dad. And Hope may come clean and tell Liam that Deacon is in love with Taylor, but Sheila’s an issue because she’s psycho.

Advertisement

And Steffy’s an issue because she knows Sheila’s psycho. I think Liam may get where Steffy’s coming from and agree that it’s dangerous. You know, Liam may advise Hope to just stay out of it. But of course, she won’t. And if Liam doesn’t side with her on this, Hope might not like it, especially if he’s aligning himself with Steffy’s opinion.

Bold and Beautiful Spoilers: Deacon Lies to Sheila

Deacon spins a story to Sheila about going to have dinner with Hope, but it’s a lie. Deacon is really planning to be with Taylor over at Steffy’s place. And Hope is the best alibi because Sheila knows she’s not welcome at Hope’s house or at the Logan estate. So, Sheila can’t turn up there looking for him. She’d be kicked to the curb and they’d probably call the cops.

Deacon call Hope when Sheila’s back is turned and he has this hush hush phone call with Hope asking her to cover for him and is going to tell her that he told Sheila they’re going to have dinner. You know, he’s going to tell Hope, “I already told her.” And of course, Hope is assuming this is so Deacon can sneak out to see Taylor. And I’m sure Hope is happy to help, not only for her dad’s sake, but also to stick it to Steffy, because Hope’s pretty steamed about her attitude.

Bold and Beautiful Spoilers: Li Returns for Sheila

Li Finnegan (Naomi Matsuda) is back on screen and she’s up at Il Giardino talking with Sheila. And that’s when Li tells Sheila that Steffy, Finn, and the kids are going out of town, but Taylor is staying home. Now, I wonder about the order of events because if Deacon hears that, he may be the one to call Taylor and say, “Hey, I heard you were home alone.”

Advertisement

And either way, with Deacon then making plans to be away and Sheila looking intrigued at this info, you know, we could see her Spidey senses tingling about the timing of Deacon’s dinner with Hope and Taylor happening to be home alone.

Friday, March 27th: Taylor and Deacon Make Love on B&B

Then on Friday, March 27th, we’ve got Deke Sharpe (Harrison Cone) asking his sister Hope for advice. And this could be about career related stuff for Deke, of course, who has been hoping to get a shot at Logan, but he hasn’t heard from Katie Logan (Heather Tom). And this is after his Forrester Creations firing.

If so, Hope may tell him that Logan may not survive because of Eric Forrester (John McCook) stepping back in the war with her mom and Ridge Forrester (Thorsten Kaye). Hopefully, Hope isn’t asking her about Remy Pryce?(Christian Weissman). I don’t want him to give the guy another shot. And hopefully Remy will stay away and Deke won’t even have to consider it on Bold and the Beautiful.

Liam and Hope get cozy with wine and kisses. Taylor and Deacon are finally going to make love on Friday. Hopefully, it is not ruined by Sheila barging in. You know, Deacon’s going to show up over there, creep in the back door where nobody can see him, and they are making out on the sofa, but then they head upstairs to the bedroom to get frisky.

Advertisement

Bold and Beautiful Spoilers: Sheila Sneaks into Steffy’s?

So, presumably Sheila believes that Deacon is over at Hope’s and she shows up over at Steffy’s house to visit Taylor and she’s got flowers and Sheila’s knocking on Steffy’s door and calling out, “Is anybody home?” She’s looking in the side window by the front door. By this point, we should have Deacon getting Taylor half naked up on her bed.

They’re making out and he tells Taylor that nothing will keep them apart and they did try to stay away. And this is the same day we have a spoiler of Sheila decides to take action. So, is she going to sneak into Steffy’s house to see what’s going on? Maybe she intends to just leave the flowers, but then hears giggling, hears Deacon’s voice. We’ll see. I think we might get a pretty good cliffhanger on Friday.

Bold and the Beautiful Spoilers: Ivy Forrester (Ashleigh Brewer) - and Deacon Sharpe (Sean Kanan)Bold and the Beautiful Spoilers: Ivy Forrester (Ashleigh Brewer) - and Deacon Sharpe (Sean Kanan)
Bold and the Beautiful Spoilers: Ivy Forrester – and Deacon Sharpe

Week of March 30th-April 3rd Spoilers on Bold and the Beautiful

Then, the week of March 30th through April 3rd, we’re going to have Will absolutely devastated and upset about the photos of Electra with RJ that were posted online. And it would be ironic since Electra and Ivy were yapping about Dylan parading her body around, flaunting herself in a bikini. When you saw Dylan’s suit, it was very modest.

And Electra’s in a modest suit, too. But to me, it’s an equivalency, but they won’t detect the hypocrisy there. I’m still waiting on Will to tell Electra he saw her kissing RJ. Their communication is awful. Meanwhile, Will’s going to get closer with Dylan, and maybe he won’t mind her saying she loves him.

You know, Will might need some love and reassurance because his heart has been ripped out. He thinks by Electra, but it’s really all by Ivy. You know, the lies about what she saw at the house. She just blew everything way out of proportion. The whole necklace and letter thing and now posting on social media after setting up this dinner. So, really, Ivy’s the one who’s breaking both Electra and Will’s hearts.

Advertisement

Sheila’s Incredibly Close to Learning the Truth on B&B

Sheila is getting dangerously close to the truth about Deacon and Taylor. We know an explosion is coming soon, maybe this week, but it would be smarter for Bold to save it for May sweeps, which kicks off on April 23rd. There is a chance that Sheila sees them and doesn’t say anything. You know, maybe she’s so devastated and in shock that she leaves.

Then, she goes to talk to Li and she doesn’t blow up on the spot. You know, she may quietly plot revenge, which is actually a little more terrifying. Brooke Logan (Katherine Kelly Lang) and Katie’s war intensifies. RJ gets closer to Electra trying to win her heart. And Taylor and Deacon are blissfully happy. But that bubble is about to burst.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025