The train crash outside Bedford appears to have been a “relatively slow speed collision”, a rail expert has said.

Tony Miles told Sky News the damage to the trains looked “fairly minimal”.

He said: “Obviously it’s a rear end collision, they were going in the same direction, so one of them, the rear one was going faster than the one it’s caught up with, for some reason. That’s not a complicated assumption.

“So, the question has to be how has that train that’s in the rear got into contact with the train that it was following, and obviously it’s either gone past the signal that was telling it it should stop, or the signal was faulty, or the driver’s made a mistake in some way, or didn’t read the signal, or something.

“Over the years, all of those different scenarios have happened, and it’s now a question of finding out why did one train catch up with the train that was in front of it, that was obviously going more slowly. Whether it was stopped. I don’t know, but I say from the collision damage it looked like a relatively low speed collision.

“So either the train in the rear was already slowing down or they were both going fairly slowly, and something’s happened, but it’s not a high speed crash, certainly from the damage.”

He added: “Even if you’re going 40 miles an hour and you come to a halt in a few meters, you’ve got the energy of a 40-mile-an-hour body in you, and you’re going to move until you hit something, unfortunately. So, even relatively low speed collisions can be dangerous for people that are on board.”

Few people on EastEnders are scarier right now than the unnervingly unhinged Bea Pollard (Ronni Ancona). Fortunately, Phil Mitchell is one of them.

I’m very disappointed in Phil.

Since the beginning of this year, the bonkers bunny-boiler has been worming her way into her way intoBilly Mitchell’s (Perry Fenwick) house,thanks to her constant manipulation of Billy’s sweet but native wife Honey Mitchell  (Emma Barton).

Why hasn’t Phil marched across the square to throw the demented Fatal Attraction tribute act out on her ear?

Where was Phil when Bea sabotaged Billy’s ladder in revenge for kicking her out, which led to Honey getting severely injured?

Where was Phil when Bea applied for a credit card in Honey’s name and ran up a mountain of debt?

Where was Phil when Bea trashed McClunky’s and lied she was attacked, just to gaslight Will (Freddie Phillips) into into guilt-tripping Honey and Billy into letting her continue staying at the house? Where was Phil?

Well… caring for his old friend Nigel Bates (Paul Bradley),  as he finally lost his heart-breaking battle with dementia, of course.And of course, dealing with the return of his brother Grant (Ross Kemp) and the chaos he brings to the Mitchell door.

Okay, so maybe we can give Phil a pass.

Still, Big P lives his life by one cardinal rule – don’t mess with the Mitchells (unless you are a Mitchell). Billy might be nothing more than his runt-of-the-litter second cousin in Phil’s eyes, but he’s still family. Be afraid, Bea. Be very afraid.

However, Billy’s been doing a pretty bang-up job of kicking his missus’ crazed bestie to the kerb all by himself lately, after he refused to let Bea move back in even though Honey needed major surgery.

Don’t miss a Soaps scoop! Add us as a Preferred Source

As a loyal Metro Soaps reader, we want to make sure you never miss our articles when searching for stories. We have all the latest soaps news, spoilers, videos, and interviews, with a vibrant community of highly engaged readers.

Click the button below and tick Metro.co.uk to ensure you see stories from us first in Google Search.

Add us as a Preferred Source

Advertisement

However, the Single White Female of Walford isn’t finished with Honey yet.

Yesterday’s trip to the Square saw Bea use a recording of Billy’s voice to create a fake dating profile of him – hoping to frame him for cheating.

Honey is too nice and sweet not to be taken in by Bea, so Billy’s about to find himself in a tough spot indeed. Bea’s an arch manipulator, a delusional fantasist who can mislead anyone into swallowing her bizarre narrative.

Phil Mitchel however, has a resume that makes her look like a girlscout.

We’re talking about a man with a record of arson, abuse and the attempted murder of Ian Beale (Adam Woodyatt), among others. He might have gentled down (a little) since those days, but he’s still a force to be reckoned with.

So needless to say, when the Incredible Sulk gets involved in the Bea situation for his cousin Billy, EastEnders fans will be punching the air. In upcoming episodes, Mister Potato Head himself rolls up his sleeves and promises to ‘deal with Bea’ for Billy. Eep.

It’s tense between Honey and Billy after their failed date but elsewhere, Bea is upset that no one in Walford has remembered her birthday. Con’t let her anywhere near the candles…

Late, she misreads a situation in The Vic when she assumes Kat’s (Jessie Wallace)birthday surprise for Lily (Lillia Turner) is for her. Bea flees to the café with sympathetic Honey in tow. But when Honey asks her not to tell Billy that they saw each other. Bea leaps on her chance to paint Billy as controlling. Suddenly, Billy stumbles on the pair, and with Bea’s words on her mind, Honey is firm that she will see who she likes.

Phil spies a worried Billy and upon discovering his plight with Bea, he decides to take matters into his own hands and give Bea what she wants most – cash. Big P hands gives Bea an envelope of money to leave Walford. Will it work?

Not likely. Later in The Vic, Bea exposes Billy and Phil’s actions, but just when Billy is about to win Honey round, Bea spins the mother of all lies — Billy tried to sleep with her!

Honey and onlookers are stunned as Billy protests his innocence. Honey flees with Billy and Bea in tow, and the trio argue back at No.18 before Honey asks everyone to leave.

Billy heads to see Phil, who insists he’ll sort it.

‘Sort it’ how exactly, Phil?

Chris Saunders, best known for his TV and film trivia channel ‘Screen and Beyond’ which has gained more than 270,000 followers, will help choose the winners of a cosplay contest as part of this year’s Fan Fest.

Fan Fest will take place on Saturday, June 27, and Sunday, June 28, returning to the centre for its third summer.

The event has been described by previous attendees as a “mini Comic Con.”

The event’s Star Wars zone will include a five-metre-high AT-ST, a replica Snowspeeder, and Jabba the Hutt’s lair complete with his Throne Room.

@screenandbeyond Growing up with Star Wars and He-Man shaped my childhood, the toys, cartoons, action figures and movies were EVERYTHING. Now with The Mandalorian & Grogu and Masters of the Universe both hitting the big screen, it feels like the 80s and 90s are back all over again. Seeing lightsabers, Skeletor and He-Man figures back in toy shops is pure nostalgia. Early reactions are already building massive hype for both movies, but could He-Man actually become the surprise hit of 2026? I think so Team Star Wars or Team He-Man? Which movie are you more excited for? #whattowatch #movienews #starwars #mastersoftheuniverse #newreleases @Star Wars @mastersmovie ♬ original sound – Chris – Screen and Beyond

Other themed areas will feature Castle Grayskull from Masters of the Universe, as well as characters from Marvel and DC, Transformers, and Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.

Visitors are encouraged to take part in the cosplay competition by photographing their costumes at the event and posting them on Instagram before 4pm, tagging Metrocentre and using the hashtag #FanFestMetrocentre for a bonus entry.

In a statement, the Metrocentre’s marketing manager, Helen Atkinson, said: “Lifelong enthusiast or relatively new to pop culture, with each edition of Fan Fest we continue to add more and more attractions to appeal to every age and interest.

“With this being Metrocentre’s 40th year, festivalgoers can also look forward to some special 1980s nostalgia: from costumed characters and displays to retro vehicles.”

Food venues will be joining in the fun, with Pizza Express offering perks for cosplayers and several other restaurants including Nando’s, Bella Italia, Thaikhun, and Fattoush Lounge running ‘Kids Eat Free’ promotions throughout the weekend.

A full event guide and competition details will be available at themetrocentre.co.uk in the days leading up to the event.

Whatever your politics or profession, leaders who dominate our collective memory are rarely the quiet, methodical ones. They are the ones who stepped on stage or screen and made people believe in a vision, a company, a movement or a future. They all had charisma.

Think of leaders who have captivated the public imagination: Martin Luther King Jr, Steve Jobs, Margaret Thatcher. Not universally liked, but they all had something.

In contrast, the UK’s “deeply unpopular” prime minister, Keir Starmer, has suffered for his widely perceived lack of charisma.

So what, exactly, is this seemingly magical quality? And why of all the characteristics we might prize in a leader – competence, integrity, careful judgment, ethical courage – do we so consistently fall for it?

The word “charisma” comes from the Greek khárisma, meaning a divine gift or grace. The German sociologist Max Weber first applied it systematically to leadership in the early 20th century. He described charismatic authority as a form of influence rooted not in any formal rules, but in a leader’s extraordinary personal qualities.

Today, psychologists recognise charisma as a cluster of characteristics and behaviour that signal authenticity, emotional competence, persuasiveness, passion and enthusiasm – and which together mobilise followers towards a shared goal or activity.

Success influences perceptions of charisma, of course. Perhaps more worryingly, how someone looks is also important, and we form those judgments in an instant.

Ratings of charisma based on five-second silent video clips were found to correctly predict how some people judge leaders over much longer periods, using richer observations. In other words, we often decide very quickly whether someone “looks like a charismatic leader”.

Charisma is teachable

However, not everyone agrees that charisma is so superficial. Others, like the British sociologist Max Atkinson, believe it is primarily a social skill that can be taught. Perhaps, even to those who don’t have the requisite looks.

Indeed, few experts have done more to strip the mystique from charisma than Atkinson. His work focused largely on the content and delivery of political speeches – another key determinant of how people view a leader’s charisma.

In his 1984 book Our Masters’ Voices, Atkinson used systematic analyses of political speeches to demonstrate that what audiences experience as charisma in oratory is, to a considerable degree, the product of identifiable rhetorical techniques that reliably trigger applause and emotional engagement.

Atkinson identified a small number of structures that generate spontaneous applause in political speeches. These include two-part contrasts (“not this, but that”), three-part lists (“government of the people, by the people, for the people”), and the packaging of praise or attack in ways that signal to the audience when to respond in an immediate, unified way.

Such techniques have an immediate impact on judgments of charisma. They are not, however, accidents of natural talent. They are rhetorical devices at least as old as Cicero, and as teachable as any other communication skill.

Atkinson put this to a striking test in a 1984 Granada TV programme. He coached a speaker with no prior public speaking experience to deliver a conference address to the Social Democratic Party’s annual conference.

The coached speaker won multiple rounds of applause and a standing ovation. BBC commentator Sir Robin Day called it “the most refreshing speech we’ve heard so far”. The audience had no idea they were responding to a method.

This anticipated what researchers such as John Antonakis would later confirm: charismatic leadership involves specific, teachable behaviour. He identified both verbal features (including use of metaphor, storytelling, and rhetorical questions) and nonverbal ones (animated voice, open gestures, facial expressiveness).

Speeches that used more of these features received significantly higher ratings for trust, competence and leadership potential from independent raters. This work points to the same uncomfortable conclusion: much of what we experience as a leader’s natural magnetism is, in fact, a performance based on specific features that can be deliberately scripted.

Evolved strategy

Why, then, are we so susceptible to these signals? One answer comes from evolutionary psychology. Charismatic leadership is thought to be an evolved strategy for group coordination.

Our brains evolved in small-group environments where following an inspiring, confident individual in times of threat may have helped us survive because we acted together.

This may help explain why we are more susceptible to charismatic leaders in times of crisis. When things feel uncertain or dangerous, people might reach for the visionary. Yet the very leaders we feel most drawn to in those moments – the boldly confident, the certain, the inspiring – may not always be well-suited to navigating such complexity, if they resist the open-minded, ambiguity-tolerant thinking that difficult problems require.

There is another important consideration. The qualities that make someone appear charismatic overlap with some less flattering personality profiles. Studies have revealed positive correlations between charisma in leaders and narcissism.

While narcissism may help leaders rise to positions of power, it does not predict effectiveness once in those roles. Indeed, an inverted U-shaped relationship between charismatic personality and leader effectiveness has been found.

Charisma is clearly not without value. The ability to communicate a compelling vision, build trust and mobilise people towards a common goal is very important, as is the resultant hope.

But the modern obsession with charisma as a primary criterion for leadership can be distorting. We can end up giving too much weight to charisma in selection decisions, and too little to qualities like integrity, intellectual humility, and the willingness to say “I don’t know”.

The task of a sophisticated follower, whether in a boardroom, a ballot box or a town hall meeting, is surely to slow down, look past the performance, and ask harder questions. Remember, first impressions are not always right, but they are incredibly sticky.

England saw New Zealand take a stranglehold on the second Rothesay Test, with missed chances by James Rew and Emilio Gay adding to the home side’s error count.

By the end of day three at the Kia Oval the tourists were leading by 352 runs with seven wickets still in hand.

An inexperienced bowling attack struggled to come up with answers as centurion Henry Nicholls and Rachin Ravindra stacked up a killer stand of 161 – almost doubling the best partnership of the series thus far.

Ravindra finally fell for 76 but Nicholls, rising admirably to the challenge of replacing the retired Kiwi great Kane Williamson at No 3, guided his side to 252 for three with an outstanding 119 not out.

And when opportunity did knock for England, their fielders failed to answer. Josh Tongue could have left the Black Caps 48 for three when he snared the outside edge, but debutant Rew dived one-handed at a catch that looked to be more comfortable than he made it appear and dropped Ravindra on just seven.

The 22-year-old came under further scrutiny later on: Nicholls was on 42 when he gloved Jofra Archer’s hostile bouncer for four, clearing Rew when he seemed to have a chance to cling on.

Interim captain Joe Root, who returned to lead at short notice after Ben Stokes’s exclusion, began losing patience with a young team, and his mood cannot have improved when Ravindra popped Jacob Bethell’s unpredictable left-arm spin towards short-leg. However, Gay was unable to get in position, throwing out an arm and getting no more than a fingertip graze.

The list of mistakes was mounting on a hastily rearranged side showing five changes from the one that went 1-0 up at Lord’s, Ben Duckett involved in a costly drop of his own on day two as well as being carelessly run out by Gay. They also conceded a staggering 53 in extras in the first innings, compared to New Zealand’s nine.

Friday’s play started with another painful passage, losing three wickets for three runs as Matt Henry’s unerring seamers removed Jordan Cox, Archer and Tongue – excellent catches by Tom Latham, Tom Blundell and Nathan Smith putting England’s later efforts in perspective.

The completion of a classy five-wicket haul for Henry left England 238 for nine, adrift by 153, before a show of steel from Matt Fisher and last man Sonny Baker.

Neither had scored an international run before – Fisher having faced just five balls on his previous Test outing four years ago and Baker on debut – but the pair defied expectations to put on 53.

Fisher hit an unbeaten 50, just his third in first-class cricket, while Baker fended off 36 deliveries in a 17-over rearguard before falling to Kyle Jamieson.

England’s 291 left them exactly 100 behind, but Archer had Latham caught behind with an early tester and Tongue’s first delivery was too good for Devon Conway.

Had Tongue added Ravindra, the momentum may have shifted, but Rew’s fumble proved a turning point. England waited 33 overs before getting their man, lbw for 76 sweeping Bethell, with their unproven attack showing its limitations.

Fisher generated little threat, Baker and Tongue struggled for consistency, and Archer cut a frustrated figure. Nicholls outmatched them all on his way to an 11th Test hundred, a high-class innings containing 16 fours.

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — A labor union behind a controversial tax on California billionaires significantly scaled back its proposal a day after it qualified for the November ballot, but the offer Thursday wasn’t enough to get the governor on board.

The proposal from the Service Employees International Union Healthcare Workers West to impose a one-time, 5% tax on individuals whose net worth exceeds $1 billion faces staunch pushback from a wide swath of critics, including Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom. The union said Thursday that it would abandon the 5% tax proposal if Newsom would join them in supporting a 2% levy. The updated proposal would instead have to be passed by the Legislature, given a June 25 deadline for the measure to qualify for the ballot.

Tara Gallegos, a spokesperson for Newsom, said scaling it back doesn’t change its “fundamental flaws that harm working Californians.”

“The Governor supports making the wealthiest Americans pay their fair share, but this poorly designed state-only measure will defund teachers, schools, clinics, and public safety,” she said in a statement.

The tax, to be paid by those living in the state as of Jan. 1, 2026, is meant to generate $100 billion in revenue, mainly to counter federal cuts to healthcare for low-income people with some money going to food assistance and education programs.

“A 2% one-time tax on that accumulated wealth is modest by any objective measure especially if it means keeping emergency rooms open and saving patient lives,” backers wrote in a letter to Newsom.

Secretary of State Shirley Weber, a Democrat, said Wednesday night that petitioners collected more than the roughly 875,000 signatures needed to place the original proposal before voters.

States have been debating how to respond to the major tax breaks and spending cuts legislation President Donald Trump signed last year. The proposal has already divided Democrats and major labor unions and triggered an expensive campaign to defeat it. The proposed tax is backed by prominent progressives including Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.

Silicon Valley tech moguls have spent millions to defeat it, and prominent players in Sacramento have opposed it. They include the California Medical Association and California School Boards Association, which helped launch a committee this week urging voters to reject it if it ends up on the ballot in November. Newsom also opposed a ballot measure in 2022 to increase taxes on the wealthy, which would have funded programs that help people buy electric cars or install more chargers. Voters rejected it.

Critics say the original measure would decrease state revenue over time by pushing the ultrawealthy to leave, taking the money they would contribute in income taxes with them. That would deal a huge blow to a state that relies on its top 1% of earners for nearly half its personal income tax revenue.

“This flawed measure is the wrong approach for California’s small businesses and working families,” said Roger Salazar, a spokesperson for Golden State Promise, a political committee fighting the tax.

The nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office estimates that the 5% tax would generate tens of billions of dollars in the first few years, but that income tax revenues could subsequently decline by hundreds of millions of dollars annually.

Since the proposal was announced in October, Google co-founder Sergey Brin has donated $82 million to a political committee called Building a Better California that backs a variety of initiatives designed to blunt the billionaire tax proposal. It has raised more than $118 million, counting Brin’s contributions, from fewer than a dozen donors.

State lawmakers passed budget bills this week that aim to raise revenue in other ways, including by extending a tax on healthcare providers. Newsom and legislative leaders agree to this approach, Senate President pro Tempore Monique Limón said.

“The budget, as approved by the Legislature and now being negotiated with the Governor, does not include the billionaire’s tax,” the Democrat said in a statement. “Instead, it reflects additional revenues to address our long-term structural deficit.”

‘We believe all relevant agencies must learn to recognise warning signs for domestic homicide long before they reach such a tragic stage’

The family of a woman killed by her son before he took his own life, issued a statement hoping that “lessons will be learned” following the inquest into his death.

Kenneth McClean-Flanagan died after he killed his mum, Karen McClean- Flanagan, and girlfriend, Stacey Knell, on March 20, 2021.

A inquest into the 26-year-old’s death heard that he had been at his grandfather’s house in Newtownabbey, where he stayed in an out-building, with his girlfriend when he left and drove to his mum’s property.

There he barged past her partner, locked himself in her flat with her and stabbed her. The inquest heard that her partner attempted to enter the flat and witnessed part of the attack.

Advertisement

After this, Kenneth left the property and drove back to his grandfather’s house. He was later found dead by armed police officers who attended the house. During a search of the property, officers discovered the body of Stacey Knell.

The inquest heard from a number of witnesses including Dr Doran, a general practitioner at the practice Kenneth was registered to. She submitted call logs from the five years prior to his death that showed complaints of addiction and mental health issues.

Dr Doran said there were times Kenneth, who had a history of cocaine and heroin use, had expressed suicidal thoughts to mental health teams when under the influence but retracted this when he sobered up.

She also said that Kenneth could not get dual support for his mental health complaints due to his addiction problems and was never formally diagnosed with a mental health condition other than depression and anxiety. The GP said she was frustrated that community mental health teams would not see Kenneth until he was able to address his addictions.

A toxicology report showed that Kenneth may have been under the influence of cocaine at the time of his death.

A statement from a representative of the McClean-Flanagan family following the hearing said: “As a family, on Karen’s behalf we hope that the coroner’s findings will ensure that all relevant agencies learn the lessons that were so painfully missed, out of respect for our family and the Knell family.

“We found the inquest process to be especially difficult without legal representation, but are thankful to those who have helped us get through it this week. We believe it is important that a spotlight continues to be shone on these failures, and that it will drive meaningful change.

“We believe that all relevant agencies must learn to recognise warning signs for domestic homicide long before they reach such a tragic stage, to prevent any other families from suffering losses as devastating as ours and the Knell family’s.”

For all the latest news, visit the Belfast Live homepage here and sign up to our daily newsletter here.

Dave Calfe, general secretary of Aslef, the train drivers’ union, said: “We are deeply concerned by reports of a collision between two trains near Bedford. Our thoughts at this moment are with all the staff and passengers on board. Thank you to the emergency services for their ongoing work responding to this incident.”

Griddled boneless chicken thighs are simple (and the thigh is the juiciest bit) and always more satisfying than you think they’ll be. You want a hot sandwich? Griddle a chicken thigh, pressing it down to get some char marks on the flesh, and stuff it into a roll with mayo (to which you’ve added gochujang, the Korean chilli paste) and some cold lettuce and cucumber. Pour a beer. You’ll be happy. 

Here, griddled thighs are dressed with shallots softened in white balsamic vinegar, oil and lemon juice.

Requires marinating time