Castle Howard’s dedicated Jellycat shop in its Stable Courtyard, featuring the summer collection of the playful and highly collectable soft toys only runs for another month.

Located in Castle Howard’s free-to-enter Stable Courtyard, the shop is open until Monday, August 31.

Adam Barber, head of retail at Castle Howard, said: “We’re absolutely delighted to host a Jellycat shop.

“Their jolly ranges make for beautiful gifts and souvenirs from a day out exploring the House and Gardens.

“We’re excited to continue to surprise visitors with top-quality shopping experiences in the Stable Courtyard, which permanently houses our Farm Shop and Gift Shop, and Garden Centre nearby.

“We hope Jellycat fans old and new will pay us a visit and add something lovely to their collection.”

The shop features popular Jellycat characters along with some items that were sold out on the official Jellycat website at the time of release.

Opening hours may vary and are available at www.castlehoward.co.uk.

“And obviously, the steps that have been taken by President Trump to apply tariffs on other areas of activity are not helpful for our economy, but on the issue of Scotch whisky, I’m glad that we were successful in persuading President Trump to remove the tariffs because they were resulting in a loss of jobs and opportunity here in Scotland.”

Two girls, aged 14 and 12, targeted a woman riding her bike on the cycle path beneath Melrosegate at around 2pm on Saturday (July 11).

The youths were caught throwing sticks at the woman from the bridge and when challenged by the victim, they were reported to have laughed at her, making her feel “intimidated”.

Recommended reading:

The York woman said she could have suffered a serious head injury had she not been wearing a cycle helmet.

But she said that when she stopped to tell the girls how dangerous their actions had been, they just laughed.

And when she said she was going to call the police, they responded: “Go ahead, they won’t come and they won’t do anything.

“We can do whatever we want to do, they won’t stop us.”

The woman, who does not want to be identified, said she riding to an appointment and felt something heavy falling on her head.  

She said: “I felt very confused and pressed on my brakes.

“My first thought was that a branch had fallen off a tree as I saw it lying on the ground; I thought I was just slightly unlucky.

“However, I suddenly remembered reading on Facebook about a female cyclist being targeted under a bridge and went back to look up.

“Two girls were sitting on the bridge.

“I noticed that they had more sticks and branches with them. I cycled on to the other side of the bridge and started to call the police.

“The police were on the phone with me for 17 minutes and told me to share my location as they were going to dispatch a local unit.

“They told me there had been three reports of teenage girls throwing things.

“They asked me to describe what happened and what the girls looked like.

“In the meantime, I kept warning passers-by, especially cyclists.”

The woman said she was called back by another police officer, who asked whether she wanted to press a criminal charge.

“He mentioned that because the offenders were underage, even if that happened, the law was lenient on them. He said they were well known to police and repeat incidents had been reported already.”

She said she told him she didn’t want to press a criminal charge in this case because of the stress involved, having had a very bad experience in the past with another force when she was a victim of a more serious crime and had spent hours reliving the nightmare with various officers, but nothing had come of it.

“He then asked me what did I want them to do?”

I said in a bit of disbelief: “Stop them! They could hurt someone seriously next, as if I wasn’t wearing a helmet, I would’ve been hurt.

“He reassured me that a unit was in the area and told me I could go home.”

She said that from looking on Facebook, it was clear that multiple people had been targeted and the situation had escalated quickly, “starting with water and flour, even moving through tampons, and now sticks and branches”.

The woman added: “My confidence has really dropped down and I don’t think I’ll venture out like that again.

“I’m planning to talk to the councillors for the area and York Cycling Campaign to escalate this.”

Speaking about this, a North Yorkshire Police spokesperson said: “Officers attended and the located the girls who are aged 14 and 12.

“They challenged them about their behaviour and explained the potential consequences of their actions.

“If you are a witness or a victim of this type of behaviour, please do not hesitate to report it on 101 or 999 if an emergency response is required.”

And off-road bikers are being warned their bikes will be seized if they are being ridden illegally or they are causing a nuisance.

Operation Hurricane is currently underway in Bolton with more than half-a-dozen bikes seized so far.

Six were confiscated in the space of just one day.

Greater Manchester Police’s specialist motorcycle unit has been on the road to identify those responsible for using bikes anti-socially and to commit crime.

One bike was seized after the rider failed to stop for police on Chorley New Road.

A spokesman for Bolton GMP said: ” The rider abandoned the bike and ran off.”

Officers are calling on members of the public to get in touch with information as part of the crackdown.

The spokesman added: “If you know who is riding an off-road bike illegally, where bikes are being stored, or have information about riders causing anti-social behaviour, please report it to us. Even small pieces of information can help us build intelligence and take action.

You can report it to us by: Calling our non-emergency number 101 or using live chat via our website or you can contact CrimeStoppers, anonymously, on 0800 555 111.”

The Ebola outbreak in Congo has claimed over 1,000 lives, reaching this tragic milestone at an unprecedented pace, nearly three times faster than the devastating 2014-2016 epidemic, which was previously considered the worst on record.

Official figures from Congo’s Ministry of Health confirm 2,536 cases and 1,033 fatalities as of Tuesday, since the outbreak was declared on 15 May.

The previous major outbreak, which recorded more than 28,000 cases and 11,000 deaths, took eight months to reach 1,000 fatalities from its first recorded case. In stark contrast, the current crisis has reached this grim total in just over two months, making it the fastest-spreading Ebola outbreak ever.

The ongoing outbreak has also recorded 2,500 cases almost three times quicker than that of 2014-2016.

Different viruses are behind the two outbreaks

According to the World Health Organization, Ebola is caused by a group of viruses, of which three are known to cause large outbreaks: Ebola virus, Sudan virus and Bundibugyo virus.

This year’s outbreak is caused by Bundibugyo virus, a rare variant which has no approved vaccines or treatments.

Meanwhile, the Ebola virus, which is the most common out of the three, induced the 2014-2016 outbreak, considered the deadliest in Congo’s history.

The current outbreak is mostly confined to Congo

The Bundibugyo outbreak is largely restricted to Congo except for a few countries, including Uganda. And in Congo, it’s limited to five provinces in the eastern region, which is close to the border with Uganda.

The 2014-2016 Ebola outbreak had spread widely in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone and spilled over into nearby nations. A small number of cases were also reported in the United States and Europe, linked to West Africa.

The case fatality rate of the two outbreaks

This year’s outbreak has so far had a case fatality rate of 40%, and officials blame most of the deaths on patients reporting symptoms late.

The 2014-2016 outbreak, however, had a fatality rate of 66%, overwhelming health systems across multiple countries.

According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, the Ebola virus is the deadliest of the viruses known to have caused large Ebola outbreaks and up to 90% of cases caused by it are fatal if they receive no treatment.

Officials say the peak of the current outbreak could still be ahead because the patient zero has not been confirmed and the majority of new cases are coming from outside the contacts being monitored, as well as delays in identifying the variant behind the virus when cases started being reported.

The 2014-2016 outbreak lasted about three years. The first case was recorded in December 2013, but it was not until March 2014 that the outbreak was detected and officially declared in June 2016.

San Francisco‘s Californios has achieved a historic milestone, securing a coveted third Michelin star after an eight-year pursuit.

This makes chef and co-owner Val Cantú’s establishment the first Mexican restaurant anywhere in the world to reach such an esteemed culinary height, a recognition that has brought a palpable sense of pride to his 40-person team.

“It’s been just really rewarding to see the team kind of like, carry a little bit more confidence in their step,” Cantú told The Associated Press. “Maybe I’ve got some new confidence too.”

This latest accolade culminates a remarkable journey for Californios, which earned its first star upon opening in 2015, followed by a second in 2018. Cantú, accompanied by his wife Carolyn, formally received the third star and a crisp white Michelin chef’s jacket at a June ceremony in San Diego.

Beyond the restaurant itself, this achievement serves as a powerful validation for the concept of elevated Mexican cuisine, both within Mexico and across its global diaspora. Mexican American restaurants, much like fine dining Chinese establishments, have frequently faced undue criticism for daring to charge premium prices or offer tasting menus – a scrutiny rarely applied to their French or Japanese counterparts with similar offerings.

Shoot for the Michelin stars

The Michelin Guide, started in 1889 by French brothers Andre and Edouard Michelin, created a star-ranking system in the 1920s. Today, the guide has ratings for over 40,000 restaurants. To evaluate a restaurant, Michelin sends undercover inspectors posing as regular diners. The inspectors said Californios ascended the ranks because it has never been “afraid to cross borders” on the plate, according to Michelin’s website.

From the first bite, Californios patrons experience the Texas-born Cantú’s blend of Mexican culture with California ingredients. He starts a meal with a sope, a small hand-formed masa cake made with white corn and beans from a farm in nearby Santa Rosa. Then, with a spatula, caviar made in partnership with a Sacramento sturgeon farm is carefully placed on top.

“It’s just really, really delicious and kind of feels like a warm hug,” Cantú said. “It feels comforting.”

Michelin inspectors agreed.

Californios deserved a three-star promotion, one of five inspectors said on Michelin’s website, for dishes consistently “executed with such precision, refinement and clarity without losing the Mexican identity — things like kombu or the matsukasa yaki fish taco.”

Sometimes Cantú and his team would try to guess if a diner could be an inspector. That turned out to be a good reminder that “every guest gets the same quality of presentation and hospitality,” the chef said.

Mexican food’s growing recognition comes as immigration enforcement gets harsher

In the past few years, Michelin has starred a number of Mexican restaurants including a 10-by-10 foot (3-by-3 meter) taco stand in Mexico City. The growing recognition comes at a precarious time for immigration enforcement policies and the treatment of immigrants — even those in the U.S. legally.

Not someone who seeks to inject politics into food, Cantú could not ignore constant headlines about federal immigration operations — some of which have resulted in deaths including a Mexican man in Houston and a Colombian man in Maine earlier this month. Immigrants are “the backbone of all these dish pits and kitchens,” Cantú said. He has shown support through gestures. In March, he collaborated on an “anti-ICE” fundraising dinner.

“The culinary world is like a huge supporter of immigrants and the need for immigrants and the need to treat people with respect,” Cantú said. “It’s hard for me to say much more.”

Being in a blue state, Cantú is certain most of Californios’ diners share that sentiment.

Gustavo Arellano, a food writer and journalist who’s also Mexican American, believes the cuisine’s popularity really helps humanize the immigration debate.

“You see this especially like in small Southern towns where the rhetoric is ‘I’m against illegal immigrants. I don’t want too many Mexicans,’” Arellano said. “But, then they look at the Mexican restaurant in town and they’re like ‘Well, not them.’”

Californios shows Mexican food is just as worthy of fine dining

Growing up, Cantú watched his father and uncle in Texas run a Mexican restaurant and tortillería. As a chef working at high-end establishments in Austin and San Francisco, he found himself asking, “Why is no one doing Mexican cuisine and treating it with like extreme care?”

Inspired by the Bay Area, he settled on the name Californios. It’s a nod to descendants of Spanish and Mexican settlers who settled in the 1700s and 1800s in what would become California.

Californios started with a $57 four-course tasting menu. The pushback was immediate.

“There was a ton of like, ‘This is not Mexican cuisine,’” Cantú said. “Even from our families, you know, trying to explain a contemporary cuisine to a lot of people is totally foreign because people kind of think that cuisine exists in a cookbook and that it doesn’t change.”

Californios is at the forefront of what some call “alta California” cuisine, where the children of Mexican immigrants or immigrants themselves use classical chef training with Mexican flavors. The term refers to the former Spanish province north of Baja California; Arellano describes it as an “ideology” that originated in California and has spread across the U.S.

Raised flavor profiles and prices ultimately raise skepticism. Arellano argues people think this way partly because they’re trying to keep Mexican food in a box.

“There’s always going to be a knee-jerk reaction,” Arellano said. “It goes to this myth that Mexican food should be cheap because Mexicans, all of us are supposedly working class that cannot afford higher-end stuff. That’s classist.”

Cantú plans to keep bringing attention to his Mexican-California brand of fine dining. A cookbook is in the works.

“Mexican cuisine is one of the most diverse and complex cuisines in the world,” Cantú said, “and there’s countless Mexican immigrants in the United States and Latin immigrants who have their own ideas and concepts of what things can be.”

A man working at a prison in south Wales bit his partner and poured a bottle of milk over her to humiliate her, a court has heard.

After Jordan Roberts was charged with the assault, his older brother Corey sent threatening and intimidatory text messages to a member of the complainant’s family in a bid to stop her giving evidence against his sibling.

The texts worried the victim so much that she reconsidered whether she should go ahead with the case and the trial of the younger brother had to be abandoned.

A judge at Swansea Crown Court told Jordan Roberts that biting was something toddlers did, not grown men, and told Corey Roberts that he had no doubt that when he sent the messages in question he had intended they should deter the complainant from giving evidence.

Regan Walters, prosecuting, told the court that Jordan Roberts and the complainant in the case had been in a relationship for some three years when, in September 2023, she went to the defendant’s home to confront him about being unfaithful.

The prosecutor said the defendant became aggressive towards the complainant and bit her on the forearm before grabbing a bottle of milk and pouring it over her in an act of “gratuitous degradation”.

The court heard Roberts then called his victim’s mother and told her to come and collect her daughter. When the mum arrived at the Croeserw property she found her daughter sitting on the floor crying and with “dripping wet hair”.

The complainant was subsequently taken to the Princess of Wales Hospital where medics found circular bruising on her right forearm.

The prosecutor said Roberts was arrested and in interview claimed the victim had attacked him, and said he had been acting in self-defence. For the latest court stories sign up to our crime newsletter

Roberts was subsequently charged and pleaded not guilty, and on the day the trial was due to start the complainant disclosed that the defendant’s brother Corey had been intimidating her by sending text messages to her sister-in-law abusing her and her family.

She said the messages had caused her to be afraid and to reconsider whether she wanted to go ahead with the prosecution.

The court heard those disclosures meant the trial was abandoned and police began to investigate Corey Roberts.

Jordan Roberts, 30, of Penhydd Road, Croeserw, Cymmer, had previously pleaded guilty on the day of trial to assault occasioning actual bodily harm when he appeared in the dock for sentencing. He has no previous convictions.

Corey Roberts, 31, of Alma Street, Treherbert, Treorchy, had previously pleaded guilty to witness intimidation when he appeared in the dock alongside his sibling. He has three previous convictions for nine offences.

In June 2022 Corey Roberts was given a 33-week suspended sentence for battery, criminal damage, and dangerous driving, and was subject to this suspended sentence when he sent the threatening text messages.

In August 2025 Corey Roberts was given a 13-month suspended sentence for possession of an offensive weapon, possession of a bladed article, possession of an imitation firearm, possession of a prohibited weapon, and possession of a offensive weapon in a private place.

Joseph Hocquard, for Jordan Roberts, said the defendant had lost his job – a non-uniformed support role – at HMP Parc as a result of the conviction but had subsequently found alternative work with Dyfed Steels in Port Talbot docks. He said his client was remorseful for his behaviour and accepts there was no excuse for what he did on the day in question.

Matt Murphy, for Corey Roberts, said the defendant accepted that drug misuse was a factor in his life which needed addressing. He said his client realises he should not have behaved in the way he did, and he said Roberts’ life had changed since the offending before the court and his focus was now on working as a mechanic for a national company and providing for his partner and children so he could improve their lives.

Judge Paul Thomas KC told Jordan Roberts that he had carried out a “cowardly, bullying attack” on his partner and told him biting was something which toddlers did, not grown men.

With a 10% discount for his guilty plea Roberts was sentenced to 12 months in prison suspended for 18 months and was ordered to complete a rehabilitation course and do 200 hours of unpaid work in the community.

Judge Thomas told Corey Roberts that he had no doubt that when the defendant had sent the threatening messages he had intended they should deter the complainant from giving evidence against his brother.

He said at the time of the offence Roberts was subject to a suspended sentence, and said following the offence he had been handed another suspended sentence for “concerning” weapons matters.

The judge said the defendant had shown little genuine remorse, and said any idea of rehabilitation at the present time was “fanciful”.

With a 10% discount for his guilty plea Corey Roberts was sentenced to 14 months in prison, and the judge activated 20 weeks of the suspended sentence which he was in breach of to run concurrently.

Roberts will serve 40% of the sentence in custody before being released on licence to serve the remainder in the community.

Love Island contestant Priya Jaswal’s ‘job-shaming’ comments about her co-star Elicia Bailey’s role at National Rail have been the talk of the show this week – and now ticket sales operator Trainline have had their say.

The remarks made about Elicia’s £30,000 per year job upset viewers who branded Priya ‘cruel’ for her personal attack on the dumped Islander, who left the villa last week and then appeared on AfterSun on Sunday.

During her appearance on the spin-off show, Elicia was asked who she believes the ‘biggest game player’ left on the show is and named Priya, which was then shown to her back in the villa during a game.

Reacting to Elicia’s claim during a discussion the following morning, Priya said: ‘I don’t care what Elicia says. I don’t care. It’s cringy. Go back to the National Rail. Elicia, you work for the National Rail, why are you f***ing sitting in Aftersun? … But just go back there and save your breath.’

Priya’s comments did not go down well with viewers, who branded her ‘vile, classist and tone deaf’, as they demanded for her to be removed from the show.

Viewers took to X with outraged responses, with one fan writing: ”Go back to the national rail’ may seriously be one of the most disgusting things said on love island, get priya off now #loveislanduk #loveisland’.

The remarks made about Elicia’s £30,000 per year job upset viewers who branded Priya ‘cruel’ for her personal attack on the dumped Islander, who left the villa last week and then appeared on AfterSun on Sunday (pictured Elicia)

Trainline have now had their say on the matter, telling Priya ‘come for Elicia, come for us all’, in a tongue in cheek TikTok video shared on Wednesday.

In a clip which used Priya’s remarks as the voiceover, showed a member of the social media team holding up a selection of train merchandise.

In the text of the video, it said: ‘It’s an honest job, Priya’. 

During Priya’s rant, Aidan’s brother Kavan interjected by saying: ‘There’s nothing wrong with working for National Rail, alright?’ yet fellow Islanders Jasmine Müller and Mica Harris giggled at the remarks – leading to further backlash. 

Reaction from various X users read: ‘Priya job shaming people and their jobs? What’s wrong with working on a railway?? What does Priya even do???… There’s absolutely nothing wrong with working on the railway…

‘Every honest job deserves respect, and judging someone’s career says more about the person doing the judging than the person earning a living…

‘Your profession doesn’t determine your worth… Damn she just messed up any potential brand deals with that comment… Railway workers literally keep Britain running and Priya’s job shaming them?? Girl what do YOU do Get a grip…

Priya’s comments did not go down well with viewers, who branded her ‘vile, classist and tone deaf’, as they demanded for her to be removed from the show (pictured Priya and Aidan)

‘She’s so f***ed up for saying that… This is so out of pocket. Hardworking people are the backbone of society. Acting like a railway job is ‘cringy’ just shows how shallow Priya’s mindset is. No job that puts food on the table deserves disrespect!’ 

After her insult, Elicia branded Priya ‘bitter’ following her ‘personal attack’, when she appeared on the Debrief podcast with hosts and former Islanders Shakira Khan, Toni Laites and Yasmin Pettet.

She said: ‘The comments that she made tonight, she said that I attacked her character, but I was asked a question on Aftersun.

‘I didn’t call them like begging them to get me on. Everybody goes on Aftersun.

‘I was asked a question, it wasn’t an attack on anyone’s personality, anyone’s character but the comments she made was a personal attack, like where I work.

‘That’s crazy, I’m the target. She also obviously hasn’t seen other interviews of other people saying the exact same thing, I’m the easy target tonight because I was there.

‘I’m really surprised by the bitter and jealous comment because her reacting the way she did seemed quite bitter – I called out what everyone else was thinking,’ Elicia divulged.’

This wasn’t the only drama for Priya this week as the fallout from Not Another Podcast continued to ripple through the villa on Friday.

The episode will see Priya and Aidan reflect on what they’ve heard and where it leaves their connection.

This wasn’t the only drama for Priya this week as the fallout from Not Another Podcast continued to ripple through the villa on Friday

But the conversation soon turns to Aidan’s admission during the podcast, as Priya asks him directly about his lingering feelings for Yasmin (pictured Yasmin and Priya)

Advertisement

Taking on board the public’s opinions, Priya admits she can understand why their relationship featured in so many categories, telling Aidan, ‘I’m not sure I even back us,’ before acknowledging, ‘We’re in a bit of a sticky situation right now.’

But the conversation soon turns to Aidan’s admission during the podcast, as Priya asks him directly about his lingering feelings for Yasmin. 

She tells him, ‘Had she not been with Tommy right now, you would be with Yas.’

Aidan admits, ‘I would potentially look to explore it…’ leaving Priya questioning whether his feelings for Yasmin have ever really gone away.

She tells him, ‘I don’t think you’re over it, your heart is elsewhere.’

ROME (AP) — Archaeologists in Pompeii, the ancient city buried by the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in AD 79, have unveiled the partially reconstructed frescoed ceiling vault of a banquet hall featuring detailed images of Greek mythology.

The curved vault was presented late Thursday at the end of an international workshop on new discoveries and restorations in the excavations of Pompeii, a UNESCO World Heritage Site that is one of Italy’s most visited tourist attractions.

The archaeological park said Friday that it used an innovative method to reconstruct the ceiling, which is believed to have been from a banquet hall on the upper floor of a house with an adjoining bakery.

Experts created a curved support structure to place the fragments in the design that replicates the original shape of the vault. As new fragments of frescoes are found and restored, they can be added to the scene, the park said in a statement.

Archaeologists determined that the main theme of the work was of Dionysus and Ariadne, whose union is one of the best-known Greek myths.

A chimpanzee digging for water in a dried-up Senegalese riverbed. A colony of 40,000 flamingos scattered by a hurricane. A polar bear hunting on ice that is disappearing beneath its feet. These are not scenes from some distant climate-altered future. They are happening right now. And this year they are coming to Sunday night television.

Extreme weather is often told as a human story. A new ITV documentary series, Force of Nature reminds us that it is an ecological story too.

Between us, we have spent decades studying the atmosphere and the extremes it produces. One of us flies through it onboard a research aircraft, measuring dust, smoke and pollution plumes. And two of us have spent our careers unpicking how a warming climate is supercharging rainfall, floods and heatwaves, and how societies can better prepare for weather extremes.

So when ITV announced Force of Nature, a new six-part wildlife series narrated by actor Andrew Lincoln that puts extreme weather at the heart of the story, we all paid attention. For scientists like us who study the atmosphere for a living, this is the series we have been waiting for.

Three years in the making by Plimsoll Productions, the team behind some of the most-watched natural history on television, Force of Nature follows animals around the world as they face hurricanes, floods, droughts and wildfires. Executive producer, Mark Brownlow, who previously produced Blue Planet II, calls this “the most important story of our time”. Watching the series, it is hard to disagree.

Scientists can now measure a changing climate with extraordinary precision. The UK exceeded 40°C for the first time in July 2022. Scientists have found that, if the legendary summer of 1976 happened again in today’s climate, it would peak at 38 or 39°C.

Evidence shows that the short, intense bursts of rainfall that drive flash flooding are becoming more severe in a warming climate. Valencia-style flooding, which killed more than 200 people in 2024, is perfectly possible here in Britain.

Wildfire smoke can travel can travel thousands of miles with Canadian wildfires turning UK skies vivid hues in summer 2023. This summer, smoke from Canadian wildfires shrouded the Statue of Liberty in New York, US, raising concerns about delays at the World Cup final.

Scientists can trace soot and dust across continents, even to Greenland, where they feed microbes that darken the ice sheet and accelerate melt. Yet knowledge alone rarely changes behaviour.

As authors Dan and Chip Heath wrote in their 2007 book Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die, “people may need statistics, but they believe stories”. Climate scientists often hope that more evidence will change minds. In reality, people only act on risks they can imagine. And that is exactly what Force of Nature does.

People struggle to act on risks they cannot picture. A warning of 40mm of rain in three hours means little until you have watched water pour through someone’s front door.

Force of Nature takes the same extreme weather that fills our scientific journals and shows what it means for creatures that have no forecasts, no warnings and no insurance.

Weather does not distinguish between us and them. The drought that ruins a harvest is the same drought pushing chimpanzees to the edge of their ingenuity. The storm surge that floods a coastal town is the same surge that scours a flamingo nesting ground. The smoke that turns skies orange is rolling over forests and everything living in them. Watching animals confront these events strips away the abstraction. It makes the risk tangible, and tangible is what climate communication desperately needs.

Advertisement

What makes the series particularly effective is its focus on resilience. These animals are not presented as passive victims of a changing climate. They adapt, improvise and survive against the odds. That matters, because fatalism is almost as dangerous as denial. If people believe nothing can be done, they are less likely to act.

The UK is built for a climate that no longer exists. The word unprecedented is increasingly used with abandon to describe extreme weather. Hope, grounded in an honest understanding of the risks ahead, is what is needed to drive action to make homes more resilient, to strengthen flood defences and early warning systems, and to rapidly reduce fossil fuel emissions.

Television has changed public attitudes before. In 2017, the BBC series Blue Planet II turned plastic pollution from a niche environmental concern into a kitchen-table conversation almost overnight.

Force of Nature, made by some of the same hands and backed by ITV’s climate content pledge, has the potential to do the same for extreme weather.

Millions of people who would never open a scientific paper will watch a sea otter ride out a marine heatwave. That reach matters.

But a television series will not stop the storms from coming. We need to cut fossil fuel emissions rapidly, adapt our infrastructure and prepare for weather extremes that are already becoming more common.

Societies rarely prepare for risks they cannot imagine. For too long, extreme weather has existed at the edge of our collective imagination: something that happens elsewhere, or sometime in the future. Force of Nature shows that it is here now, shaping the lives of animals and people alike.

Showing the immediacy of the need to act may be the programme’s most important achievement.