It was one of the most influential games of the PlayStation 1 era but how does Metal Gear Solid stand up almost three decades later? A reader is surprised to find out.

Alaska – Bering Sea. A submarine cuts through the murky ocean depths. Tonally and in terms of production values the score that plays infers that you’re watching a scene from a Hollywood action movie. But this isn’t a movie, although in many respects you get the impression that it wants to be. What I’ve described is the opening cut scene of Metal Gear Solid, a game that I adored many years ago. Since I still have my original twin disc copy of the game I thought I’d replay it from start to finish on a PlayStation 2 [presumably via The Essential Collection – GC]. Would this much revered classic be as good as I remembered?

You are Solid Snake. Your mission: infiltrate a terrorist stronghold, free a couple of hostages and investigate a possible nuclear threat. Do this with the clothes on your back, a CODEC receiver/transmitter, a scope, and a packet of cigarettes. For this mission weapons and equipment are OSP – on-site procurement. In terms of real-world logic our hero’s initial loadout is ludicrous. However, starting out with close to no items in your inventory does turn the game into a big treasure hunt. And in this case that treasure is military hardware: thermal goggles, chaff grenades, C4 explosive, Stinger missiles…

Replaying Metal Gear Solid it took me a while to adjust to the top-down view that it uses, which when compared to the presentation of modern big budget games seems basic and regressive, but provided that you make use of the radar in the top right corner of the screen the gameplay of Metal Gear Solid still works perfectly. Nearly three decades have passed and yet Shadow Moses Island prevails as a wonderous gaming world to immerse yourself in. Who cares about blocky graphics when the interactive picture those graphics paint is so atmospheric and nuanced?

While you sneak around the overrun military base, patrolling enemies yawn, stretch, fall asleep, and follow any footprints in the snow that Snake makes. The warmth of an enemy’s breath shows up as mist. Make a guard suspicious and a question mark appears above their head. Alert a guard and their heightened awareness is indicated by the now iconic exclamation mark.

On this playthrough I surprised some mice in an air vent. Little exclamation marks appeared above the rodents’ heads when they saw me and scurried off. Half the fun of Metal Gear Solid, and the franchise overall, is discovering these quirky and innovative details.

This time around I had problems defeating each and every boss in this game, I expect due to a substantial lack of practise. But the rogue elements of Foxhound are so atypical and entertaining that even when they kill you it’s hard to resent them. The game certainly wouldn’t be the same without their presence.

For instance, Cyborg Ninja still made an impression on me, or rather his introduction did. Walking down a corridor littered with bleeding corpses flung this way and that you feel like you’ve mistakenly strayed into a survival horror game. This part of Snake’s mission flags up another recognisable trait of the Metal Gear franchise, for better or for worse: tonal inconsistency.

Those melodramatic cries on the cool-looking Game Over screen. SNAAAAKE! Are those outbursts meant to be funny? They made me laugh every time I heard them.

Then you’ll get characters that appear to fall in love over the space of an hour or so, having never met. Otacon and Sniper Wolf. This entirely one-sided romance is so phoney, and yet the game tries to tug on our emotional heart strings when one of them dies.

Snake himself seems like a decent bloke. A moral, modest underdog and so it’s easy to side with him. And then the expert operative tells Meryl that she’s got a great butt. Wow. With chat up lines like that Snake how can any woman resist you?

Predictably, since I haven’t attempted this sneaking mission for at least a couple of decades, I had trouble beating Metal Gear Rex near the end of the game. This boss battle has two phases. In-between the first phase and the second phase there’s a cut scene that you’re forced to watch again and again if you keep losing the fight. I couldn’t skip this moment, which made it seem like a sadistic punishment for dying.

After finishing Metal Gear Solid I wanted to play through the game again. To me that’s clear evidence of its quality. The good parts of Solid Snake’s PlayStation debut certainly outweigh what’s bad. But what’s bad about the game is bad with a capital B or rather misjudged to an extent that these flaws clearly stand out.

Saying that, even after recently experiencing them I can tolerate Metal Gear Solid’s annoyances because they’re counteracted with flashes of genius. The location of Meryl’s CODEC frequency. Homing in on your target in first person view with a Nikita remote-controlled missile. Psycho Mantis breaking down the fourth wall and messing with your game console. Cooling down and heating up the PAL card. What other game allows you to sneak around and fast travel inside a cardboard box?

All of that gaming gold is probably worth having to read your way through line after line of CODEC exposition. And sweet as she is, I wish Mei Ling would learn the value of concise verbal exchanges during an active mission. Yes, Mei Ling, I want to save. That’s kind of why I called you. No, please don’t tell me another Chinese proverb, unless it’s one about the benefits of radio silence.

By reader Michael Veal (@msv858)

The reader’s features do not necessarily represent the views of GameCentral or Metro.

You can submit your own 500 to 600-word reader feature at any time, which if used will be published in the next appropriate weekend slot.

Just contact us at gamecentral@metro.co.uk or use our Submit Stuff page and you won’t need to send an email.

MORE: The 40th anniversary of Legend Of Zelda reminds me how much I love the series – Reader’s Feature

MORE: A Game About Digging A Hole reader review – Reader’s Feature

MORE: God Of War Trilogy Remake is a bad idea and makes me worry for the franchise – Reader’s Feature

Town Hall leaders plan to make £13.5 million worth of cuts over the next four years, including £3 million in 2026/27 through back office efficiencies and energy savings, to balance the budget. 

Darlington Borough Council said the increase of 2.99%, plus a social care precept of 2% will help fund rising demands in adult and children’s care services. 

Steve Harker, Labour council leader, said: “When we campaigned to win the 2023 elections we said we would tackle the £7.5 million annual overspend left by the Tories. 

“This budget does just that, balanced over the whole four years. 

“It brings to an end the Tory era of massive overspending every single year. It is still challenging, but a significant moment nonetheless.”

Darlington currently has the second-lowest tax rate in the North East, the council said. 

Changes to the government’s local authority funding formula mean Darlington will receive a 14 per cent spending increase over the next four years. 

Yet, despite the latest boost, councillors were told of the need to increase bills as the council’s financial planning remains in a “fragile position”, with forecasted cost pressures of around £27 million over the next four years.

More than £59 million is currently spent on adult social care by the council, with the additional precept raising a further £1.422 million, which the council said is “crucial to meet the overall costs and pressure faced in this service area”. 

Cllr Harker added: “These savings have ensured that we have been able to protect services – services already decimated during the first 10 years of Tory Government.

“We were clear in our election campaign of the need to seek to address the inequalities that had grown during the 14 years of Tory Government. Stabilising the Council budget has been a crucial task to increase our ability to address inequality.

An alternative council tax rise of 4.49 per cent suggested by the Green Party was backed by opposition councillors. 

Jonathan Dulston, leader of the Conservatives, called the latest financial plan a ”lazy budget”. “There is no innovation and all of the issues that this council faces are put to the taxpayer,” he added.  

Cllr Matthew Snedker, leader of the Green group, said: “This amendment shows that we, as a council, are ready to act. It might be a small amount off their bills but it is a sign that we are working for our residents. 

“Our finances are stretched, yes, but many residents are stretched beyond breaking point – and this indicates our willingness to be responsive, reactive and share a little bit of that return onto their bills now. 

“I am aware of the strains on every department in this council, and I really hope that national government is able to improve the settlement in years to come, and we are able to start rebuilding services and roads, giving people the town that they love back to a stronger position.”

But the Labour and Liberal Democrat administration voted against the last-minute bill change. 

Cllr Harker said: “It would be foolhardy of us to entertain a reduction in council tax because to do so would give us less chance to ensure we have adequate funding going forward over the next few years.” 

A Conservative motion, urging the council to introduce a lane rental scheme to minimise road disruption, improve public satisfaction and generate additional income, was also voted down.

The man sent more than 8,000 pages of inappropriate messages to a teenage girl, and took part in sexual activity with her

A church volunteer who groomed a teenage girl he knew from a church in Cambridge has been jailed. Nam Vu, 28, sent more than 8,000 pages of inappropriate messages to a teenage girl, and took part in sexual activity with her.

The teenager’s parents became suspicious and discovered deleted screenshots on her phone of a sexually explicit nature.

The girl, who was under 16, denied any hint of a sexual relationship and said she was just friends with Vu. However more evidence was found including a handwritten note from the girl found in a book, which detailed sexual activity between them.

The girl then confided in police about what had happened to her, saying that Vu had made sexual remarks to her in the messages and encouraged her to take part in sexual activity, as well as touched her inappropriately.

Vu, of Linclare Place, Eaton Ford, St Neots was arrested and interviewed but answered no comment to all questions asked by officers.

His phone was seized and analysed where it was discovered that in six weeks during 2024, there were more than 8,000 messages between Vu and the teenager. Most of these were sexual in nature.

The messages highlighted how Vu began grooming the girl, offered to buy her clothes and complimented her.

On multiple occasions throughout the chat Vu acknowledged the girl was under 16, added that she could ‘ruin him’, said how he could go to jail and how he was ‘putting his entire life on the line’.

Vu continued to deny any wrongdoing however, at Cambridge Crown Court in December, eventually pleaded guilty to six offences. These included engaging in sexual communication with a child, four counts of engaging in non-penetrative sexual activity with a girl under 13-15, and inciting a girl aged 13 to 15 to engage in sexual activity.

Vu was sentenced to three years and four months in prison at Peterborough Crown Court on Thursday (February 19).

He was ordered to sign the Sex Offenders Register indefinitely and given a Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO), with strict conditions to monitor any future offending and contact with children. Vu was also given a restraining order, to run indefinitely, preventing him from contacting his victim in any way.

Detective Constable Lara Wycherley, of the force’s Child Abuse Investigations and Safeguarding Unit (CAISU), said: “Vu engaged in highly sexualised communication with the victim in this case, whilst acknowledging her age and that he was in a position of trust.

“He groomed a vulnerable child for his own gain and his behaviour was utterly disgusting. I would like to praise the parents in this case who realised something wasn’t quite right, and urge other parents and carers to speak to their children about exactly who they are communicating with. The magnitude of the effect of Vu’s behaviour cannot be underestimated.

“In a victim impact statement given to the judge, the teenager told how the persistent nature of the abuse meant she was never able to truly see the danger she was in. She added that Vu repeatedly told her to keep quiet and conditioned her to believe that his crimes were her fault.

“Also of importance, she told how the abuse had made her lose all trust in men, changed her perspective on people in a direction that isn’t pleasant, stripped her from her childhood innocence and left an irreparable scar.

“We will do everything in our power to protect children from predators like Vu and, as this case demonstrates, bring them to justice for their actions.”

With its grand medieval castle, elegant stone cottages, and centuries‑old church, it’s often hailed as one of County Durham’s most prestigious and picturesque places to live.

Quietly exclusive yet steeped in heritage, Brancepeth is the kind of place where history, elegance, and rural serenity blend seamlessly. For those in the know, it’s considered one of the poshest villages in the region — a title reaffirmed by The Telegraph, which named it among the UK’s poshest places to live in both 2023 and 2024.

A castle with centuries of power and prestige

At the village’s heart stands Brancepeth Castle, a sprawling medieval fortress that has dominated the landscape for nearly a thousand years. Once the seat of the influential Neville family — one of England’s most powerful dynasties — the castle played a pivotal role in the region’s history.

Now privately owned, it opens only occasionally for public tours, giving it a mysterious allure that sets it apart from more commercialised heritage sites. Those lucky enough to step inside describe it as “a fascinating piece of history,” with impressive restoration work underway.

One visitor wrote: “The family that owns it is working hard to restore it and is very welcoming to those who visit. If you are interested in history, this is a fantastic place to see.”

Its limited public access only adds to the intrigue — a historic gem that remains unmistakably authentic and deeply atmospheric.

St. Brandon’s Church – resilience and beauty

A short stroll from the castle stands St. Brandon’s Church, another link to Brancepeth’s storied past. Dating back to the 12th century, the church was almost lost to a catastrophic fire in 1998 but has since been meticulously restored.

Inside, the craftsmanship is breathtaking — stained‑glass windows pour light onto delicate woodwork, creating a space that feels both sacred and timeless. For residents, it’s more than a place of worship; it’s a symbol of endurance and community pride.

The village today – quiet affluence and refined living

Brancepeth’s history may draw visitors, but it’s the village’s enduring elegance that makes it so desirable. Its stone‑built homes, tree‑lined lanes, and serene setting exude understated luxury. Property here rarely comes to market, and when it does, it commands a premium.

The village attracts professionals, retirees, and high‑net‑worth homeowners who value privacy and rural tranquillity but still want proximity to Durham’s fine dining, boutique shopping, and cultural venues.

And for those who enjoy a touch of grandeur, nearby landmarks such as Auckland Castle, Raby Castle, and The Bowes Museum provide cultural outings befitting Brancepeth’s refined reputation.

History, heritage, and high society

Visitors who explore Brancepeth often remark on its distinctive atmosphere — “full of history and grandeur,” as one reviewer put it — and its sense of quiet exclusivity. Another said: “It’s a castle with a difference — still lived in and full of stories, not just another tourist attraction.”

Brancepeth may be small, but its legacy and elegance loom large. Combining heritage, prestige, and rural beauty, it stands as a symbol of County Durham’s most refined side — a place where history meets high society and the past continues to shape a truly luxurious way of life.

The latest figures from the Ligue de Protection des Oiseaux (LPO), France’s main bird protection charity, show 15,000 birds have washed up in France so far this year, 4,400 in Spain and 1,200 in Portugal. Most are puffins with significant numbers of common guillemots and little auks.

The “evil” owner of a rogue rescue centre where 41 dogs were found dead has been caged for five years.

Advertisement

A court sentenced a man to five years after a barbaric animal abuse case in which the bodies of multiple dogs and a cat were left to rot.

Oaveed Rahmam, 26, told victims that he was looking after the animals at a centre called Save A Paw in Crays Hill, Billericay, Essex. However, the truth was he left the animals to suffer and die without food or water in small pens or crates.

The police found 37 dead dogs when they first searched the rehoming centre, where dogs were left to roam among the dead bodies. Another four dead dogs were found when a shed was demolished later on.

A vet who accompanied police last May 13 said that she could smell rotting flesh as soon as she got out of her vehicle where it was 40 meters from Rahman’s property, reported the Mirror.

The sentencing judge said that remains of dogs were found in bins throughout the site with some “piled up like rubbish.” Basildon Crown Court heard from veterinary Surgeon, Amy Cooper who described seeing masses of bodies moving with maggots and rats.

There were 21 dogs alive on the property, but kept in pens or confined to small spaces. Tom Godfrey said that Ms Cooper reported in her statement: “I can honestly say what I smelt and saw was the most horrific thing I have ever seen. It was clear just from a general initial inspection that these animals were all suffering.”

Judge Richard Conley sentenced Rahman to five years in prison. He said that the fraud was “an act of betrayal of epic proportions that has devastated many lives”.

He added that Rahman had fooled decent and well-meaning pet owners by encouraging them to entrust their beloved animals into his care. “In fact many animals taken in by you… were subjected to prolonged barbaric mistreatment, cruelty and neglect. Some of them died directly as a result.”

Many of the dogs were severely underweight but did not have access to food with faeces piled up inside dirty pens or cages. Ms Cooper highlighted that the dogs kept in pens would have faced “mental turmoil” as there were open bags of food on the property that they couldn’t access.

Victims whose dogs were “rehomed” by Rahman and their supporters sobbed as Mr Godfrey told of the condition the animals were found in. After Rahman was sentenced, a victim in the court shouted at him through the video link: “F****** b*****d, I hope you rot in there you dirty b*****d.”

Three of the dogs were so sick they had to be put down and a poodle, later went blind. Rahman pleaded guilty earlier to cruelty against 21 dogs and a cat, and 11 counts of fraud by false representation.

Emma Thompson said she feels “extremely traumatised” by what happened to her dog. She planned to rehome him after the dalmatian pointer cross had shown signs of aggression, and she was pregnant.

“I often think about how confused, scared and sad Lennon must’ve felt being taken from the family he loved, transported to Essex and taken to a stranger,” she said in a victim impact statement read to the court by Mr Godfrey. “He would’ve smelt the death of other dogs at the property.”

Ms Thompson paid Rahman a £300 “surrender fee” and a further £200 as a charitable donation. Lennon was one of the dogs found dead during the first raid.

Tina Davis, another of Rahman’s victims, took her dog Chad, a pocket bully, to Save A Paw to be rehomed after he had a fight with her other dog. Chad is still among the missing dogs.

In her victim impact statement, she said: “I was devastated at the prospect of giving up my dog but knew it was required for Chad to have the best possible life. I torture myself, wondering how much he suffered.

He must’ve thought I didn’t love him to leave him at that wretched place… I question if I will ever forgive myself.”

Some of Rahman’s victims contacted him on his Facebook page for Save A Paw, which had good reviews, the court heard. He was occasionally paid a “surrender fee” and accepted “donations” to his organisation, which he told victims was a charity – despite this application for charitable status being refused.

Rahman took around £4,800 from his 11 victims, telling them it would be used to rehome dogs, provide a new kennel block or train dogs to behave around children and other animals.

He promised to keep in touch with people about how their dogs were doing. However, he often became difficult to contact and in some cases blocked the people who had taken their dogs to him.

“We’ll never truly know the extent of how far maybe offending or this behaviour has gone,” said Superintendent Leigh Norris of Essex Police.

He sentenced Rahman to five years’ imprisonment, with 38 months of that for animal cruelty. The animal cruelty sentence will run consecutively to the fraud counts, for which he was sentenced to 22 months for each count, to all run concurrently.

He was sentenced to three months’ imprisonment, to run concurrently, for owning the banned XL bully, and was banned from owning dogs and cats for life.

Rahman can apply for the ban to be lifted after 15 years. He was also sentenced to a deprivation order, meaning the dogs found at his property can be taken. Costs will be dealt with at a later date.

These are eight of the best‑reviewed restaurants on the travel website, according to users.​

8 – Zest Of India Bispham

Zest Of India in Bispham serves classic South Asian dishes, tandoori grills and vegetarian options in a modern, relaxed setting just north of the town centre.

Diners praise the rich, flavourful curries, fluffy naan breads and welcoming staff, calling it a “lovely curry” spot for both sit‑in meals and takeaways.​

Food was amazing and staff were very attentive would highly recommend to anyone looking for amazing Indian food to visit here

7 – The Bank Bar & Grill

The Bank Bar & Grill is an independent town‑centre bar and grill serving steaks, ribs, burgers and modern British dishes alongside cocktails and wines.

TripAdvisor users highlight its cosy atmosphere, extensive menu and top‑notch service, frequently calling it “one of the best restaurants in Blackpool” and recommending booking in advance.

We booked last minute and what a great find! Friendly staff, excellent menu. The food is outstanding and plentiful. Reasonably priced for such a high standard of venue, service and food.

6 – Zest of India

Zest Of India in South Shore is a Travellers’ Choice‑rated Indian and Asian restaurant in Squires Gate Lane, serving curries, grills and a popular all‑you‑can‑eat buffet.

Diners praise the fresh, richly flavoured dishes, generous portions and warm welcome from chef‑owner Abir, often calling it one of the best curry houses on the Fylde coast for family meals and celebrations.

Well pricee, beautiful food, friendly atmosphere and staff were lovely, even the chef came to speak to us 👌

5 – Stefani’s Pizzeria

Stefani’s Pizzeria is a cosy, independent spot specialising in wood‑fired, Neapolitan‑style pizzas with a choice of traditional and vegan toppings.

Reviewers highlight the light, chewy bases and fresh ingredients, saying it is a must‑visit for pizza lovers looking for something more authentic than the usual high‑street chains.

amazing as always came to see the new reno and its just gorgeous!!!! such a staple in blackpool we’ve been coming here for years

4 – Yorkshire Fisheries

Yorkshire Fisheries, a historic fish and chip restaurant tucked near the North Pier, has become a Blackpool institution.

It earns some of the highest ratings in the resort, with visitors repeatedly describing it as the best fish and chips in Blackpool, citing crisp, light batter, proper chip‑shop chips and friendly, efficient staff as reasons they return year after year.

Easy to find, good location, very friendly and helpful staff, fish and chips where the best I have tasted in a long time. Prices are brilliant, will definitely go back

3 – Eat Italian

A family‑run neighbourhood trattoria in Marton Drive, specialising in authentic southern Italian cooking with recipes rooted in Naples.

Travellers’ Choice‑rated and ranked among Blackpool’s best restaurants, it serves homemade pizza, fresh pasta and classic dishes such as carbonara, seafood marinara and lobster ravioli, alongside Italian wines and limoncello.

Reviewers describe the restaurant as small, cosy and genuinely welcoming, with many singling out the friendly front‑of‑house team for creating a relaxed, family atmosphere.

Lovely little Italian restaurant. Food was beautiful, staff very friendly. Would highly recommend. We would definitely go back when next in Blackpool.

2 – Le Sorelle Restaurant

Le Sorelle is a family‑run Italian restaurant where pizza, pasta and classic mains are served in a warm, neighbourhood setting.

Customers rate it highly for its generous portions, good value and friendly service, with many regulars returning again and again on the strength of its Tripadvisor reputation.

Lovely little restaurant, friendly staff, fabulous food, excellent value for money. Highly recommend, will definitely be back!

1 – 31 Queen Street

31 Queen Street has quickly become one of Blackpool town centre’s most talked‑about spots, pairing sommelier‑selected wines with charcuterie boards and inventive small plates in a smart, dimly lit dining room.

Travellers’ Choice‑rated and described by reviewers as a “hidden gem” and “culinary delight”, it specialises in European and Spanish‑inspired dishes with Asian twists, alongside classic cocktails, bottomless brunches and grazing boards ideal for sharing.

Atmosphere was brilliant and the staff could not help enough, so friendly and polite, the food was amazing too, would definitely come back again.

Are any gems not included in the list? Let us know in the comments!

President Donald Trump lashed out at Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Neil Gorsuch after they ruled against his sweeping tariff plan.

In the 6–3 opinion released on Friday morning, the justices ruled that Trump’s tariffs were not authorized under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which permits the president to regulate trade in “unusual and extraordinary” circumstances when a national emergency is declared.

In a Friday evening Truth Social post, Trump wrote: “What happened today with the two United States Supreme Court Justices that I appointed against great opposition, Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, whether people like it or not, never seems to happen with Democrats.”

“The new TARIFFS, totally tested and accepted as Law, are on their way,” he added.

The post came an hour after Trump announced that he signed off on a temporary 10 percent global tariff, which will “be effective almost immediately.”

Meanwhile, Illinois Governor JB Pritzker has demanded that Trump issue an $8.6 billion refund to the state’s residents after his tariffs “wreaked havoc on farmers, enraged our allies, and sent grocery prices through the roof.”

When asked about Pritzker’s letter, White House spokesperson Kush Desai told The Independent: “The immense weight of Illinois’s sky-high taxes and regulations is matched only by JB Pritzker’s own personal bloat.”

“If this slob really cared about delivering economic relief for Illinois, he’d start with his own state government instead of chasing another stupid headline,” he added.

ICYMI: Here’s what Trump said in his press conference about the Supreme Court’s tariff ruling

During a White House press conference on Friday, Trump lashed out at the Supreme Court over its landmark 6-3 decision to strike down his sweeping tariffs.

Here are some of the key moments:

• Trump said he is “ashamed” of the six justices who ruled against him, a group that includes Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett. He went on to call the justices a “disgrace to our nation” and “fools and lapdogs.”
• In contrast, he praised the three conservative members of the court who dissented, singling out Justice Brett Kavanaugh for his “great ability.”
• He also took issue with the court’s timing. “They could have made this decision a long time ago,” he said.
• Trump listed three acts that he says justify his sweeping levies: the Trade Expansion of Act 1962, the Trade Act of 1974 and the Tariff Act of 1930.
• When asked if the justices who ruled against him would still be invited to the State of the Union, Trump said they would just “barely” be invited.
• Afterward, Trump signed an executive order imposing a global 10 percent tariff, he announced Friday evening.

Read more

Brendan Rascius20 February 2026 19:34

Advertisement

White House shares ‘Keep Calm and Tariff On’ image

The White House shared an image that reads, “Keep Calm and Tariff On,” just hours after the Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs.

Katie Hawkinson21 February 2026 02:10

Trump lashes out at Supreme Court justices who ruled against him

President Donald Trump lashed out at Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett after they ruled against his sweeping tariffs.

Advertisement

Trump appointed both justices during his first term.

“What happened today with the two United States Supreme Court Justices that I appointed against great opposition, Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, whether people like it or not, never seems to happen with Democrats,” he wrote on Truth Social.

“They vote against the Republicans, and never against themselves, almost every single time, no matter how good a case we have. At least I didn’t appoint Roberts, who led the effort to allow Foreign Countries that have been ripping us off for years to continue to do so — But we won’t let it happen,” he added.

In a separate post, Trump said the Supreme Court justices who ruled against his tariffs “should be ashamed of themselves.”

Advertisement

Katie Hawkinson21 February 2026 01:56

Analysis: Trump learns that plenty of conservatives don’t like his tariffs

President Donald Trump suffered one of the biggest blows to his domestic agenda on Friday when the Supreme Court struck down his power to levy tariffs. It was a massive body blow given how much Trump regularly talks about how tariffs are “my favorite word.”

Eric Garcia21 February 2026 01:40

Advertisement

Senate majority leader says lawmakers will ‘continue working’ with Trump administration

Senate Majority Leader John Thune said Friday Republican lawmakers will “continue working” with the Trump administration following the Supreme Court’s ruling.”

“Tariffs can be an important and effective tool to address unfair trade practices and help level the playing field with foreign competitors,” Thune wrote on X.

“Senate Republicans will continue working with the administration and our colleagues in the House to advance our shared goal to strengthen rural America, including South Dakota’s farm and ranch communities, and the broader U.S. economy,” he added.

Advertisement

Katie Hawkinson21 February 2026 01:20

Analysis: Trump just lost his global tariff sword. Will his boasts of being the ‘world’s greatest dealmaker’ now be put to the test?

The Supreme Court’s decision to gut President Donald Trump’s ability to impose unlimited tariffs on imports from any country will force him to revert to a traditional set of diplomatic tools that he has largely ignored since returning to power.

Andrew Feinberg21 February 2026 01:00

Advertisement

The Supreme Court struck down Trump’s tariffs – here’s what it means for your wallet

The Supreme Court ruled that President Donald Trump was not authorized to impose global tariffs, challenging what has been a cornerstone policy in the president’s economic agenda.

Now, with the court’s decision, the average consumer might wonder what’s ahead for their wallets. Will tariffs end, and would it lead to lower prices on consumer goods and services?

Here’s what we know so far:

Advertisement

J.R. Duren21 February 2026 00:40

Trump signs off on global 10% tariff

President Donald Trump signed off on a 10 percent global tariff, he announced Friday evening.

“It is my Great Honor to have just signed, from the Oval Office, a Global 10% Tariff on all Countries, which will be effective almost immediately,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

Advertisement

Earlier Friday, the Supreme Court struck down his sweeping tariffs in a 6-3 decision. Soon afterward, Trump vowed to implement the new 10 percent global tariff, authorized by a law that restricts it to 150 days.

Katie Hawkinson21 February 2026 00:03

Lindsey Graham says Trump has ‘many options’ to keep existing tariffs

Republican Senator Lindsey Graham said in a lengthy statement on X that he believes President Donald Trump has “many options” to keep his existing tariffs despite the Supreme Court’s ruling.

Advertisement

“While I accept the Court’s ruling, I believe that @POTUS does have many options regarding keeping existing tariffs in place under authorities beyond the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA),” Graham wrote.

“I support President Trump’s decision to fight refunds. I did not think they are necessary or appropriate, and I’m sure that they will be subject to much litigation,” he added.

Katie Hawkinson20 February 2026 23:40

Chuck Schumer responds to treasury secretary

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has responded to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who commented Friday on potential tariff refunds following the Supreme Court’s ruling.

Advertisement

When asked about potential refunds at an Economic Club of Dallas event on Friday, Bessent said he has “a feeling the American people won’t see it,” according to Bloomberg.

Schumer responded: “Trump illegally taxed American families and small businesses, and he’s not giving them their money back. Even his Treasury Secretary admits it.”

Katie Hawkinson20 February 2026 23:40

Hello and welcome to our coverage of England u20s vs Ireland u20s in the Junior Six Nations. England, unlike their senior counterparts, are still on the hunt for a Grand Slam following victories against Wales and Scotland. Ireland’s form, however, is much more aligned to Andy Farrell’s setup, having lost heavily to an ominously good-looking France before scraping past Italy by 30-27.

The Irish similarities don’t end there, they suffered a drop in form last year (earning them a wooden spoon), after first and second placed finishes in the years prior. They’ll be desperate to prove that Ireland’s existential concerns around player development are reactionary but in England face an opponent with an equal desire to prove a point. After their grand slam win in 2021 the English youth setup, masterminded by Mark Mapletoft and now Andy Titterrell, has excelled with consistently high Six Nations finishes (a grand slam denied dramatically by Wales in 2024) and a World Cup win in 2024. Most notable about their success, however, has been the steady line of Premiership, and in some cases, international ready players. That seems to be no different this year.

Noah Calouri, the 19-year-old winger who trained with England seniors in the Autumn, played in England’s 19-16 comeback win vs Wales in the opening round but has been rested since by Titterell as a result of the high volume of minutes he’s picking up for Saracens. In his place is Tyler Offiah, son of rugby league international Martin, with Leicester Tigers’ George Pearson on the other wing – he scored a superb individual try against Stormers in the Champions Cup this season.