‘It is far too soon for him to try to redeem himself’

Huw Edwards has been criticised after he revealed he entered a competition at Wales’ largest cultural festival. Writing on his Substack, the disgraced BBC newsreader said he had entered a poem at the National Eisteddfod centred on his relationship with his father.

Actress and survivor of child sexual abuse Sera Cracroft said it would have been “catastrophic” if he had won. Mr Edwards’ attempt fell far short of winning the competition, with his poem placed in the third rank of entries, according to Newyddion S4C.

Mr Edwards claimed he knew there was “no way” he was going to win the competition, and described the poem as a “tribute” to his father, intended to correct the “poisonous narrative encouraged by the press” about their relationship.

In 2024 Mr Edwards pleaded guilty to three counts of making indecent images of children. Some of the images Mr Edwards accessed were the most serious category A type, depicting children as young as seven to nine.

He was given a six-month prison sentence, suspended for two years, and placed on the sex offenders’ register for seven years.

On Sunday Mr Edwards published a post on his Substack blog stating he had “attempted to write a poem” for the first time in his life having “drawn inspiration” from the National Eisteddfod.

BBC-produced Newyddion S4C said had it received confirmation that Mr Edwards’ poem, written under the pseudonym Y Gelyn (The Enemy), had been officially entered.

The National Eisteddfod said it has a process in place which ensures nobody, including the judges, knows beforehand who has competed.

Actress Ms Cracroft, best-known for her role in long-running Welsh soap opera Pobol y Cwm, was highly critical of the former newsreader’s latest publication.

“Had he won, the image of him being crowned in front of the nation is hurtful to survivors,” she said. “Huw has said he is receiving mental health support and to be completely honest, I don’t think it’s working for him.

“I’m very, very disappointed that he’s done that so soon after being convicted of creating paedophilia online. Some of the images were in the worst category possible.” She added it was “far too soon for him to try and redeem himself.”

In June Mr Edwards said he had returned to journalism by launching his own Substack. In the opening paragraph of his introduction to the platform the 64-year-old said he would be “tentatively” offering some commentary and analysis on events.

The former newsreader said he knew there would be some people who wouldn’t want to read his work but said he was “attempting to rebuild some kind of worthwhile life”.

In one of his most recent posts, titled ‘On Hatred’, he spoke about the hate he receives. He said he felt “abhorrence” towards the offences he committed and admitted to, and stated he was “not a child rapist”. He said his “crime was to click on files sent to me by someone else”.

In response to S4C and the BBC’s request for comment, the National Eisteddfod said: “We have a process in place which ensures nobody, including the judges, knows beforehand who has competed. After each Eisteddfod we have a period of appraisal to ensure our processes are appropriate – this year will be no exception.”

Mr Edwards said: “The poem was a tribute to my father. Nothing more or less than that. There was no way on earth I was going to win the competition and I knew that. The poisonous narrative encouraged by the press two years ago needed correcting.”

Addressing Cracroft’s criticisms, he added: “This wasn’t a poem for the sickeningly self-righteous Welsh speakers – Sera amongst them – who take advantage of every opportunity to speak unthinkingly on every subject under the sun.

“She and her type are far too willing to ignore the damaging effects of mental ill health. In that, they are loyal to the heritage of London’s tabloid papers.”

Get daily breaking news updates on your phone by joining our WhatsApp community here. We occasionally treat members to special offers, promotions and ads from us and our partners. See our Privacy Notice

A top Cabinet minister today defended Andy Burnham for taking a holiday after just two weeks as Prime Minister.

Mr Burnham, who only entered office on 20 July, is taking a break from his day-to-day duties to travel abroad with his family for a long-planned trip.

He is not expected to appear publicly this week, but Downing Street insisted he will still be working and is prepared to travel back to the UK if required.

Reform UK has accused Mr Burnham of ‘bunking off’ while even Labour insiders questioned the PM’s decision to go away.

But Alex Norris, the Justice Secretary, this morning backed Mr Burnham over his choice to take a holiday and insisted the PM would be ‘in constant contact’ with his office.

‘The Prime Minister is having a few days away with his family,’ he told Sky News. ‘You know, he will be in constant contact with his office.’

‘I mean, I might gently say that I’ve spoken to him virtually every day since I joined the Cabinet, and I suspect that won’t change.

‘These last couple of weeks I’m really proud of the work we’ve been doing on the cost of living, on social care, on homelessness, on defence. And that work is happening at pace and will continue to do so.’

Alex Norris, the Justice Secretary, backed Mr Burnham over his decision to take a holiday and insisted the PM would be ‘in constant contact’ with his office

In Mr Burnham’s absence, Mr Norris was left to field questions about the Government’s decision to still allow the killers of PC Andrew Harper to be eligible for early release from jail.

The Justice Secretary acknowledged that the decision had ‘created harm’ but said the alternative was seeing prisons cease to function.

Some 5,000 people are expected to be released early under sentencing changes, down from 6,000 after the PM exempted rapists and child sex offenders as part of the scheme to tackle overcrowding in jails.

But two of PC Harper’s killers, Jessie Cole and Albert Bowers, remain eligible for early release after their 2020 convictions for manslaughter despite an outcry from the officer’s family that prompted a review of the early release plans.

PC Harper sustained fatal injuries while responding to a quad bike theft in Sulhamstead, Berkshire, in August 2019.

Until recently, both close friends and staff of Mr Burnham claimed the PM had cancelled plans to join his family on holiday, with this replaced by a tour of Britain to meet voters towards the end of August.

As recently as July 25, Downing Street told the Mail that Mr Burnham would not be heading off for a break after becoming Prime Minister.

But on Monday No10 confirmed he would be travelling abroad to spend time with his family, after making a blizzard of spending pledges on bus fares and energy bills that could cost up to £96billion during his first two weeks in charge.

Downing Street published an official portrait of Mr Burnham on Tuesday as he took a holiday from No10

Advertisement

Mr Burnham, who only entered No10 on 20 July, is taking a break from his day-to-day duties to travel abroad for a long-planned trip

While Mr Burnham is on holiday, his de-facto deputy Louise Haigh, the First Secretary of State and Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, will be the most senior minister in Westminster

Reform UK chairman Lee Anderson said: ‘Two weeks into the job and Andy Burnham has already had enough.’

‘After dropping a number of unfunded commitments and overseeing over 2,000 illegal migrants breaking into our country he’s bunked off for a jolly abroad.

‘This isn’t a PM that’s serious about leading.’

And a Labour source told the Mail: ‘Talk about easy mode. A week’s holiday? Because he’s had a difficult summer? Because he had to fight a by-election?’

The source said that Keir Starmer ‘barely went on holiday’, adding that when he did ‘he would just sit there with a bottle of rosé and talk through work over the phone. It was inspiring.’

The former PM cancelled a planned holiday in August 2024 – about six weeks after entering No10 – due to the riots that erupted after three young girls were murdered in Southport. He eventually went on a family holiday in Madeira at the end of December 2024.

When Sir Keir was away, Downing Street insisted that he remained in charge, rather than handing over power to the then deputy prime minister, Angela Rayner.

While Mr Burnham is on holiday, his de-facto deputy Louise Haigh, the First Secretary of State and Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, will be the most senior minister in Westminster.

It is understood that convicted fraudster Ms Haigh will be working this week as normal, however, No 10 insisted that she will not be taking day-to-day decisions in Mr Burnham’s absence.

The PM’s spokesman said: ‘The Government continues to operate as normal with [the] PM remaining in contact with officials, holding meetings and receiving regular updates on government business.’

There were no further details on where Mr Burnham will go on holiday as prime ministerial holiday destinations are not usually confirmed by Downing Street.

The summer window continues to hot up as Arsenal work on a huge double deal for Bruno Guimaraes and Vinicius Junior, while the likes of Manchester United, Chelsea, Liverpool and Tottenham continue talks to bolster their squads. The Gunners have seen a first official bid for the Newcastle captain rejected, and are said to have agreed personal terms on a club-record contract for the Real Madrid star.

Dave, a retired dockworker, has smoked since his teens. When he develops a persistent cough, he dismisses it as “just a smoker’s cough”.

Then he loses weight, develops fevers and wakes at night drenched in sweat. After several courses of antibiotics, he continues to deteriorate and is admitted to hospital.

Doctors find emphysema, a smoking-related condition in which damaged air sacs make breathing difficult. A chest X-ray also shows a white patch in his lung, raising concerns about cancer. A sample of sputum, the mucus coughed up from the lungs, is sent for further testing.

Dave dies before the laboratory identifies tuberculosis (TB).

Dave is fictional, but his story shows how easily TB can be missed when its symptoms resemble those of other illnesses. In a 2026 study, colleagues and I found that 574 people in England were diagnosed with TB only after death between 2010 and 2022. That is almost one person every week.

The people who died represented 0.8% of all TB diagnoses, but nearly one in five deaths recorded among people with TB. The data could not establish whether TB caused or contributed to each death.

TB is the world’s leading cause of death

TB is a bacterial infection that usually affects the lungs and spreads through the air. It remains the world’s leading cause of death from a single infectious organism. In 2024, an estimated 10.7 million people developed TB and 1.23 million died. Global progress has recovered from setbacks during the COVID pandemic, but remains too slow.

England cannot eliminate TB without international progress. In 2024, more than four in five people diagnosed in England were born outside the UK. This is sometimes presented simply as a migration issue. It instead reflects global inequalities in prevention, diagnosis and treatment.

TB also affects UK-born people and remains closely associated with poverty. Rates in England’s most deprived areas are more than five times those in its least deprived.

Homelessness, imprisonment, smoking and harmful alcohol or drug use can increase exposure, weaken the body’s defences or make healthcare harder to access. These factors all contribute to active TB disease.

England is close to losing its status as a low-incidence country, defined by the World Health Organization as fewer than ten cases per 100,000 people. Its rate reached 9.4 per 100,000 in 2024, following the largest annual increase since 1971.

Early diagnosis is vital. Globally, about one in five people who develop TB are not diagnosed, officially reported or treated. Many of these “missed millions” die. In England, the median interval between symptoms beginning and diagnosis of lung TB was 72 days in 2024.

During that delay, an infectious person may transmit TB while their illness worsens. Delays can also disrupt family and working life and create avoidable, sometimes catastrophic costs for people with TB, their households and health services.

The most extreme delay

A national study examined the most extreme delay: TB confirmed only after death. This meant a sample had been collected while the person was alive, but the result arrived later.

TB bacteria grow slowly, so traditional laboratory cultures can take several weeks. Rapid molecular tests, which detect the bacteria’s genetic material, can sometimes provide results much sooner, but doctors must first suspect TB.

The likelihood of diagnosis after death rose sharply with age. It was also higher among men, UK-born people, people with recorded harmful drug or alcohol use, those with TB outside the lungs and those diagnosed outside London.

Older UK-born people may have encountered TB during childhood, when infection was more common. The immune system can contain the bacteria for decades without symptoms. This is called latent TB infection. It can later become active, particularly when immunity weakens because of age, illness or medicines.

Smoking damages the lungs’ defences and increases TB risk. An older man with a cough and weight loss may therefore be investigated for cancer or chronic lung disease before TB is considered. Previous BCG vaccination – the childhood vaccine that was once routinely offered in the UK to protect against tuberculosis – does not rule it out. The vaccine protects young children against severe disease, but does not reliably prevent TB in adults.

TB outside the lungs can affect the lymph nodes, bones, bowel, kidneys, brain or other organs. Diagnosis may require scans or tissue samples. It is generally much less infectious than lung or throat TB, although people can have both forms.

People outside London were more likely to receive a diagnosis after death. Doctors in London may encounter TB more often and have better access to specialist services. Differences in reporting may also contribute. Our findings probably underestimate the problem because some people may die without being tested.

A diagnosis made only after death should be treated as an important patient-safety warning. TB deaths are not currently defined as a formal NHS “never event”, a term reserved for a small number of wholly preventable incidents. Based on our study findings, we recommend that each post-mortem TB diagnosis should prompt a review of symptoms, tests and referral decisions.

Public awareness also matters. A persistent cough, fever, drenching night sweats or unexplained weight loss deserves medical attention, regardless of age or birthplace. Healthcare professionals must consider TB even when cancer, pneumonia or chronic lung disease initially appears more likely.

Prevention must extend beyond detecting active TB disease. England offers some recent migrants testing for latent TB, but only 17% of those eligible were tested in 2024. Strategies should also consider historical exposure among older UK-born people.

England can learn from countries with much greater TB burdens. Lessons include reaching people at higher risk of being missed, such as the homeless, the poor and the socially excluded; reducing stigma; and making services easier to access.

Dave’s fictional laboratory result arrived too late. The next person with an overlooked cough should receive theirs while treatment can still help.

If your neighbour is building an extension too close to your property boundary, you have specific legal rights

Home extensions are a popular choice for homeowners looking to expand their living space. Yet these projects can frequently spark disagreements with neighbours, especially over how close the new build can be to the property line.

Under UK law, a neighbour has the right to construct right up to the boundary of your property, but they’re prohibited from crossing it, building over it, or allowing roof features such as guttering to overhang it. If an extension appears too near, your entitlements will hinge on boundary restrictions, planning rules, and party wall legislation.

There’s no universal minimum distance requirement for every property for a neighbour’s extension work. The requirements differ based on the extension type, its height, the effect on neighbouring properties, and whether it qualifies under permitted development or needs planning approval.

What are the rules on building near boundaries?

With Permitted Development Rights or Planning Permission, construction can take place as close as 50mm from your neighbour’s boundary, typically at no additional expense. However, if you wish to build directly on the boundary itself, a Party Wall Agreement becomes necessary, which usually demands your neighbour’s approval and may also require a surveyor’s involvement, particularly if your proposals impact any shared walls or structures, reports Wales Online.

Under permitted development regulations (which remain largely uniform across England and Wales for these particular measurements), an extension may be built near a boundary. However, if any part of it lies within two metres of the boundary line, the highest point of the eaves must not exceed three metres.

A single-storey rear extension has a maximum height restriction of four metres. Property owners typically have the right to build up to their property boundary. Under the Party Wall Act 1996, a neighbour may extend their structure right up to the boundary or even upon it, provided they adhere to the correct legal procedures. This usually involves serving a Party Wall Notice on the adjacent property owner at least two months prior to commencing any works.

If the extension involves excavation within three to six metres of your property, depending on the depth of the new foundations, you must receive notification. Should you object to the notice, both parties must appoint a surveyor to produce a “Party Wall Award,” which sets out how the works should proceed to reduce damage and disruption.

When constructing an extension, many homeowners seek to build as near to the edge as feasible to maximise space. Nevertheless, building regulations and local planning requirements usually establish a minimum setback distance.

In many locations, regulations stipulate a minimum distance of one metre between an extension’s edge and the boundary line. This requirement is primarily designed for fire prevention, stopping flames from spreading easily between properties, while also ensuring access for ongoing maintenance work.

What protections exist for light and privacy?

Among the most important legal safeguards for neighbours is the “Right to Light.” Should a new extension substantially diminish the natural light coming through your windows (particularly if you’ve benefited from that light for two decades or longer), you could have legitimate grounds for legal action.

This represents a civil issue distinct from planning consent. Even when a neighbour has secured council approval, they cannot lawfully breach your established right to light.

Privacy represents another key consideration. Planning authorities typically guard against “overlooking” by limiting windows on side walls or mandating the installation of obscured glazing. Should you believe an extension would compromise your privacy or cast excessive shadow over your garden, these concerns should be voiced during the planning submission stage.

When is professional guidance necessary?

If you’re worried about a neighbour’s construction proposals, the initial approach should be a direct conversation with them. Should that prove unproductive, seeking advice from a Party Wall surveyor or a solicitor who specialises in property law would be sensible.

Taking action promptly is vital. It’s far simpler to modify plans before building work commences than to pursue an injunction or compensation once the brickwork is already in place.

Footage shows several workers being approached by an individual who attacks them before leaving them on the ground.

Delivery drivers are being pushed off their bikes in sickening clips shared on TikTok. Multiple incidents, which appear to be in Glasgow, show delivery drivers being shoved off their bikes while innocently trying doing their jobs.

Footage shows a number of workers being approached by an individual who attacks them before leaving them on the ground. Glasgow Live reports the clips, filmed in various locations across the city, have been going viral.

The comments section is also flooded with vile remarks, including “more please” and “good man”. However the motivation for the ongoing attacks has not yet been made clear.

The clips emerge after our sister title told of Muhammad Jawad Yaqoob’s heartbreaking story. The delivery driver was attacked by a racist mob following an anti-immigration protest on Saturday, July 25.

The delivery driver has lived and legally worked in Glasgow for three years since moving from Kashmir. After arriving looking for a better future with his wife Hajra, they are now “scared to go outside”.

Advertisement

He told Glasgow Live: “They abused and harassed me, and you can see in the video they hit me with a traffic cone… I went home, and then I saw the video is viral on different pages, and I was very scared.

“I’m very upset, I’m not going outside. Some people are not good in Scotland.

“I’ve lived here for three years, I know Scottish people are very nice people, but this happening insulted me. I am Asian. My [skin] colour is brown. But we are human beings. I paid my visa fee.”

Police Scotland has been approached for comment.

Get more Daily Record exclusives by signing up for free to Google’s preferred sources. Click HERE

Police have confirmed some details about the person who died

Police have provided an update after a fatal house fire. Emergency services were called to a house fire in Eagles Lane, Little Downham, at around 6pm on Friday (July 31).

A person was confirmed dead at the scene. Cambridgeshire Police have confirmed the casualty was a woman aged in her 60s.

A police spokesperson said: “There have been no arrests and the fire is believed to be non-suspicious.”

A Cambridgeshire Fire and Rescue Service spokesperson added: “Wearing breathing apparatus, firefighters used a hose reel to extinguish the fire and cleared the smoke using a positive pressure ventilation fan.

“Sadly, a casualty died at the scene. Crews returned to their stations by 8.15pm. The cause of the fire was accidental.”

Do you want more of the latest Cambridgeshire news as it comes in from across the county? Sign up to our dedicated newsletter to make sure you never miss a big story from Cambridge or anywhere else in the county. You can also sign up to our dedicated Traffic and Crime newsletters for the latest updates on the topics you are most interested in.

A banner attached to the campervan towed through Lauder said it offered “eye tests” while another joked the vehicle had been “parked round the side”.

Nicola Sturgeon and Peter Murrell have been mocked by a campervan float at an historic Scots festival.

A motorhome was towed through Lauder last week as part of the Borders town’s annual Common Riding, complete with two locals dressed as the former first minister and her estranged husband.

A banner attached to the vehicle joked: “New campervan eye test here – approved alternative to the Barnard Castle eye test“, while another sign quipped the vehicle had previously been “parked round the side”.

The local dressed as Murrell was pictured showing off watches on his wrist, while two other participants on the float posed as police officers.

But despite the cheeky float grabbing attention from the gathered crowds and pictures being shared widely on social media, it only claimed third prize in the vehicle category of the festival’s annual fancy dress competition.

One of the organisers told the Record the float was “just a bit of fun to make people laugh” and insisted it was not meant as a political statement.

A campervan purchased by Murrell was one of the central pieces of evidence against the disgraced former SNP chief executive, who was jailed for five years after pleading guilty to embezzlement in May.

It followed a lengthy police investigation – Operation Branchform – into SNP finances.

The luxury motorhome was was bought by Murrell using £124,000 of cash he stole from the Nationalists.

Murrell, 61, pled guilty at the High Court in Edinburgh to embezzling more than £400,000 from his employers. He used the ill-gotten cash to buy a string of luxury goods, including cars, cosmetics, jewellery, gardening equipment and fountain pens.

The best-known of Murrell’s many purchases was the Niesmann and Bischoff motorhome in October 2020. It was bought in Dunfermline and later sat outside Murrell’s mother’s home in the Fife town.

The Record first reported how the campervan was supposedly earmarked for the SNP Holyrood election campaign in 2021 but was never deployed after Covid restrictions were lifted.

But the prosecution cast doubt on that explanation and said there was no evidence the vehicle was ever intended for political purposes.

Sturgeon has repeatedly denied all knowledge of her estranged husband’s offending. She claimed she was first made aware of the motorhome’s existence in 2023 after the home she shared with Murrell was searched by police.

Officers also searched the Fife home of Sturgeon’s mother-in-law and impounded the campervan on the same day.

The former SNP leader previously claimed in an interview she had never “consciously” saw the campervan as it was parked “round the side” of her mother-in-law’s house.

The fancy dress competition is one of several events that take place in a week of festivities in Lauderdale each year, the climax being a band of horse riders making a circuit of the boundaries of the Borders town.