Connect with us

NewsBeat

BRYONY GORDON: Brad Pitt is a sad old man and I pity him. Here’s why

Published

on

Brad Pitt is a self-described problem drinker, but says he can now have 'a few glasses' of wine if he is 'professional about it'. Bryony Gordon warns, 'Once an alcoholic, always an alcoholic'...

As a middle-aged woman with a pulse, it’s not often I look at Brad Pitt and experience a crushing sense of disappointment.

But this week, I encountered this curious sensation as I read the interview he did with Esquire magazine, in which he revealed that after seven years of sobriety, he has started drinking again.

‘I got back off the wagon,’ he told the magazine. ‘In a more restrained manner. I got overconfident a couple of times went, Yep, nope, not good for me. Not in big quantities.’

The journalist then asked the single most dangerous question you can pose to someone who’s had to quit drinking because of a problematic relationship with alcohol: can you now have a glass of wine?

Advertisement

Oh, sure, it might seem totally innocent if you’re the kind of human who can pour a small amount of rosé out of a bottle then put it back in the fridge door for the rest of the week. But Pitt is clearly not that, admitting that he attended Alcoholics Anonymous meetings, his divorce from Angelina Jolie prompting him to quit the booze in late 2016.

Pitt is, by his own admission, a problem drinker, and asking a problem drinker if they can have the odd glass of wine is a bit like asking someone with a nut allergy if they can occasionally treat themselves to a Snickers bar.

Brad Pitt is a self-described problem drinker, but says he can now have ‘a few glasses’ of wine if he is ‘professional about it’. Bryony Gordon warns, ‘Once an alcoholic, always an alcoholic’…

Advertisement

But to be fair to the interviewer, Pitt also seems to have misunderstood the nature of sobriety and alcoholism.

‘Well … I can have a few [glasses of wine],’ he told the interviewer. ‘But I can’t have a lot. I have to be professional about it.’

And in just a few deluded sentences, I went from fancying Brad Pitt to pitying him. Because in my experience, once an alcoholic, always an alcoholic. Being able to abstain from booze for long periods of time doesn’t prove you can drink responsibly, or ‘professionally’, as Pitt refers to it – it just proves that you can’t drink. And in saying otherwise, Pitt is doing some of the most terrible acting of his career.

Perhaps I’m being uncharitable. Maybe Pitt really has pulled off the almost impossible, and taught himself to moderate his alcohol intake after finding himself in a situation where things got so bad, he was forced to remove his ‘drinking privileges’ (his own words).

Advertisement

But in my nine years of sobriety, I’ve not yet met anyone who’s succeeded in doing this.

However, I have seen plenty of people who have relapsed, and tried to convince themselves (and everyone around them) that they’ve got things under control, but they usually crawl back to sobriety with their tail between their legs some time later – if they’re very lucky. Many never make it back, living out their lives in alcoholic misery and squalor.

And this is why I’m so disappointed by 62-year-old Pitt’s public pronouncement. Because he must know, deep down in his soul, how unhelpful such declarations are to a community where denial and delusion aren’t just pitiful – in many cases, they can be deadly.

I know too many alcoholics who have lost everything in their attempts to drink like a normal person. I imagine that, given Pitt has been to a few AA meetings, he has encountered these people too. What message is he now sending out to a world which already misunderstands addiction and alcoholism?

Advertisement
Angelina Jolie filed a lawsuit in which she claimed Pitt threw alcohol over her and their children while on a private jet. Reports say she ¿is not surprised¿ her ex-husband is drinking again

Angelina Jolie filed a lawsuit in which she claimed Pitt threw alcohol over her and their children while on a private jet. Reports say she ‘is not surprised’ her ex-husband is drinking again

When I was in active addiction, I used to see those ‘drink responsibly’ signs on the back of wine bottles and wonder what was wrong with me. I was an alcoholic, of course, but the shame attached to that word was so big I went out of my way to prove it didn’t apply to me. It was only after a series of increasingly dangerous scrapes that I realised it was going to be much easier to simply accept I was one and that I was lucky to be alive by this point.

One of the things you learn, when you finally come to terms with your alcoholism, is that drinking nothing is genuinely easier than trying to only have one or two. Alcohol lights me up like a Christmas tree – once I start, I don’t stop.

There is a truth we all learn, in recovery: that for us, one drink is too many, a thousand is never enough. And this is why I don’t believe a word that Pitt said in his Esquire interview.

Advertisement

After their break-up, Angelina Jolie filed a lawsuit in which she claimed Pitt threw alcohol over her and their children while on a private jet. Though the actor vehemently denies these claims, not a single one of their six children is said to speak to Pitt now, with several of them recently filing to legally remove his surname from theirs.

Reports say Jolie ‘is not surprised’ her ex-husband is drinking again, and suddenly you realise this is not some superficial drama, but a situation involving children that is kind of tragic. Because take away the Hollywood gloss and the magazine covers, and the truth is that Brad Pitt isn’t actually anyone special. He’s just a sad old man in the grip of a relapse.

When perimenopause meets pregnancy… 

The world is so unused to seeing women’s bodies that when Anne Hathaway shows off her pregnancy bump, social media starts saying it’s fake. 

Anne Hathaway, 43, looked stunning as she showed off her baby bump in Los Angeles this week

Anne Hathaway, 43, looked stunning as she showed off her baby bump in Los Angeles this week

Advertisement

I personally love that the 43-year-old actress is displaying her ‘geriatric’ pregnancy for all to see. She clearly couldn’t give a damn what anyone thinks – which is exactly what you’d expect when perimenopause meets pregnancy!

Time you quit social media, Jan

Jan Leeming has got into a spot of bother again after criticising the presenting skills of ITV News’ Charlene White. ‘She has such a condescending style,’ wrote Leeming on X, apparently without irony. 

Her remarks come just months after she used the social media site to complain about children being allowed in restaurants. In fact, she seems to spend most of her time online whingeing. 

Jane Leeming has now quit X, after receiving abuse for comments she made about ITV News presenter Charlene White

Jane Leeming has now quit X, after receiving abuse for comments she made about ITV News presenter Charlene White

Advertisement

She’s now quit X for a few days due to ‘vile abuse’ she’s received after her Charlene comments. Maybe stay off it for good, Jan. As the old adage goes: if you don’t have anything nice to say, don’t say anything at all.

Why I’m glad I never vaped

Angela Rayner has admitted she can’t quit vaping, as she launches a crackdown on e-cigarette shops. I’m glad I got off cigarettes cold turkey, instead of vaping. Every time I see someone sucking on a piece of bright pink plastic, I realise I narrowly escaped swapping one nasty habit for an even more addictive – not to mention embarrassing – one.

loved watching the eclipse on holiday with friends in Cornwall, where there was almost 95 per cent coverage. We adults were enchanted, the children less so – they complained it took too long and didn’t look as good as it did in the clips they’d watched on YouTube. Honestly: the youth of today!

No wonder Cornwall hates all these tourists 

I wasn’t surprised to read about the couple who caused almost £5,000 worth of damage breaking the safety barriers of a Cornish campsite. 

Advertisement

The pair were trying to leave in their VW van at 2am to pick up their teenage children from a nearby festival, despite campsite rules explicitly stating the accommodation would be locked just before midnight to keep campers safe. 

Sadly, their entitled behaviour is par for the course down here. In the past few days, I’ve seen families playing loud music and having giant barbecues on the beach, as well as people refusing to clean up after their dogs. No wonder the locals are sick of tourists.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

NewsBeat

Top A-level grades fall in Bolton despite national rise

Published

on

Top A-level grades fall in Bolton despite national rise

Figures show that of all A-level entries in the borough Bolton 20.6 per cent received an A or A* compared to 23.8 per cent last year.

Bolton is ranked 194th out of 291 authorities listed.

Bolton performed better than neighbouring Bury where Bury 20.4 per cent of entries got the top result, in line with the year before.

Advertisement

In Salford those figures were 13.6% and 15.4%.

Nationally the proportion of A-level entries awarded top grades rose for the third year in a row, likely driven by the popularity of maths and students scoring highly in it.

Despite the overall picture, many schools and colleges celebrated exceptional individual results.

Guildford in Surrey has topped the list for the local area of England with the largest percentage of A-level entries receiving the highest grades.

Advertisement

Some 50.0 per cent of exam entries within the local authority this year were awarded A or A*, up from 48.8 per cent in 2025, according to data published by Ofqual.

In second place was Richmond upon Thames in London, where 48.7 per cent of entries received A or above, followed by Cheltenham in Gloucestershire (47.7%), Tonbridge & Malling in Kent (46.4%) and Hertsmere in Hertfordshire (46.2%).

Only one of the top 10 areas is outside southern England – Trafford in Greater Manchester, which is joint seventh on the list with 45.1 per cent.

The area with the lowest proportion of A-level entries getting an A or above this year is Harlow in Essex, on 7.0%, followed by Test Valley in Hampshire (9.9%), Hartlepool (10.5%) and Castle Point in Essex (11.8%).

Advertisement

Maths remained the most popular subject at A-level this year – the 13th year in a row it has topped the table.

More than one in eight of all A-level entries (12.7%) were for the subject, the latest figures showed.

Speaking about England only, the head of exams regulator Ofqual, Sir Ian Bauckham, told the Press Association the rise in top grades is “largely driven” by the “growing popularity of maths and the high achievements that we’re seeing in maths”.

There is a clear gender divide, with more boys choosing the subject than girls.

Advertisement

There were 72,619 boys’ entries for A-level maths this year across England, Wales and Northern Ireland, making up 63% of entries, compared with 42,761 for girls’ (37%).

Overall, boys outperformed girls in terms of top grades again, after doing so for the first time in seven years last year.

Here is a full list by local area of the proportion of A-level entries awarded A or A*.

The list is ordered by percentage, starting with the highest, and reads from left to right: name of local authority; proportion of entries receiving A or A* in 2026; proportion (in brackets) receiving A or A* in 2025.

Advertisement

Guildford 50.0% (48.8%)

Richmond upon Thames 48.7% (49.5%)

Cheltenham 47.7% (49.2%)

Tonbridge & Malling 46.4% (46.7%)

Advertisement

Hertsmere 46.2% (46.3%)

Kingston upon Thames 45.3% (46.4%)

Mole Valley 45.1% (41.3%)

Trafford 45.1% (43.9%)

Advertisement

Sutton 44.5% (44.4%)

Epsom & Ewell 44.4% (42.0%)

Southwark 43.8% (44.4%)

Newham 43.2% (40.8%)

Advertisement

Haringey 43.1% (39.8%)

Hammersmith & Fulham 43.0% (41.0%)

East Hampshire 42.8% (38.4%)

Westminster 42.7% (39.9%)

Advertisement

Reading 41.9% (37.8%)

Cambridge 41.5% (41.0%)

Vale of White Horse 41.1% (39.7%)

Oxford 40.8% (44.7%)

Advertisement

Merton 40.7% (37.1%)

Rutland 39.8% (41.2%)

Brighton & Hove 39.6% (39.5%)

Three Rivers 39.6% (34.0%)

Advertisement

Buckinghamshire 39.3% (40.0%)

Barnet 38.6% (37.3%)

Tandridge 38.4% (36.4%)

Winchester 37.5% (35.2%)

Advertisement

Cheshire West & Chester 37.2% (36.9%)

St Albans 37.0% (36.8%)

Chelmsford 36.8% (38.1)%

East Devon 36.5% (32.1%)

Advertisement

Gloucester 36.2% (34.4%)

Waverley 36.2% (37.6%)

Harrow 36.0% (34.5%)

Stratford-on-Avon 35.1% (36.5%)

Advertisement

Windsor & Maidenhead 34.8% (34.7%)

Tunbridge Wells 34.4% (34.2%)

Lancaster 34.3% (33.2%)

Kensington & Chelsea 34.0% (31.9%)

Advertisement

Bath & North East Somerset 33.9% (31.9%)

Reigate & Banstead 33.9% (32.0%)

Preston 33.8% (32.1%)

Watford 33.8% (34.9%)

Advertisement

Stockport 33.7% (29.7%)

Mid Sussex 33.6% (32.1%)

Rugby 33.6% (36.0%)

Wokingham 33.5% (33.9%)

Advertisement

Elmbridge 33.3% (33.0%)

Rushmoor 33.2% (37.2%)

Wandsworth 33.1% (32.6%)

Harborough 32.9% (29.3%)

Advertisement

Brent 32.4% (32.9%)

Exeter 32.4% (31.1%)

Norwich 32.0% (31.4%)

South Kesteven 31.9% (31.6%)

Advertisement

Warwick 31.9% (32.7%)

East Cambridgeshire 31.7% (35.6%)

Slough 31.7% (30.6%)

Stroud 31.6% (30.0%)

Advertisement

Rushcliffe 31.4% (31.9%)

Ealing 31.3% (30.2%)

Southend-on-Sea 31.3% (32.6%)

Runnymede 31.2% (31.2%)

Advertisement

Bracknell Forest 31.1% (27.3%)

Mid Devon 30.8% (27.2%)

East Hertfordshire 30.7% (30.3%)

Eastleigh 30.7% (27.3%)

Advertisement

Camden 30.5% (32.1%)

Manchester 30.4% (31.1%)

Adur 30.3% (34.6%)

Horsham 29.9% (30.4%)

Advertisement

Wiltshire 29.8% (29.7%)

Bromley 29.6% (29.8%)

East Lindsey 29.5% (25.1%)

Wakefield 28.9% (26.6%)

Advertisement

West Oxfordshire 28.9% (25.8%)

Dacorum 28.8% (27.0%)

Surrey Heath 28.7% (31.4%)

Oadby & Wigston 28.6% (28.7%)

Advertisement

Ribble Valley 28.6% (33.9%)

Sheffield 28.6% (27.4%)

Durham 28.5% (26.9%)

Newcastle-under-Lyme 28.5% (25.2%)

Advertisement

St. Helens 28.5% (26.5%)

Bournemouth, Christchurch & Poole 28.4% (28.8%)

Fylde 28.4% (27.5%)

York 28.4% (33.3%)

Advertisement

Malvern Hills 28.3% (24.0%)

Shropshire 28.2% (29.2%)

Bristol 28.0% (29.9%)

Uttlesford 27.9% (25.8%)

Advertisement

North Tyneside 27.7% (24.5%)

Sevenoaks 27.6% (25.3%)

Solihull 27.6% (25.8%)

Wealden 27.6% (30.2%)

Advertisement

West Berkshire 27.6% (29.7%)

West Lindsey 27.6% (28.4%)

Colchester 27.5% (28.0%)

Leeds 27.5% (27.0%)

Advertisement

Herefordshire 27.4% (22.8%)

Hackney 27.3% (26.2%)

South Derbyshire 27.3% (28.0%)

South Hams 27.2% (24.5%)

Advertisement

Arun 27.1% (21.9%)

Lewisham 27.1% (26.3%)

Somerset 27.0% (25.2%)

Newcastle upon Tyne 26.9% (26.6%)

Advertisement

Eastbourne 26.8% (30.6%)

South Norfolk 26.8% (24.6%)

Kirklees 26.7% (26.2%)

North Yorkshire 26.7% (28.8%)

Advertisement

Worcester 26.7% (29.1%)

Ipswich 26.6% (28.0%)

Spelthorne 26.5% (21.0%)

Epping Forest 26.3% (25.6%)

Advertisement

Canterbury 26.2% (26.8%)

North Hertfordshire 26.2% (27.5%)

Telford & Wrekin 26.2% (32.1%)

Croydon 26.1% (26.4%)

Advertisement

West Devon 25.9% (20.3%)

Woking 25.7% (25.4%)

Bradford 25.6% (23.0%)

Birmingham 25.5% (25.6%)

Advertisement

Kingston upon Hull 25.4% (25.4%)

Rochdale 25.4% (27.0%)

Wigan 25.4% (26.9%)

Lambeth 25.3% (25.5%)

Advertisement

Brentwood 25.1% (24.2%)

Bromsgrove 25.1% (25.3%)

North Northamptonshire 25.0% (24.7%)

Hyndburn 24.8% (17.3%)

Advertisement

Blackburn with Darwen 24.4% (22.7%)

Derbyshire Dales 24.4% (26.2%)

Portsmouth 24.3% (27.7%)

Bedford 24.2% (23.5%)

Advertisement

Lichfield 24.2% (18.0%)

Wyre 24.2% (36.4%)

Bexley 24.1% (23.2%)

Maidstone 24.1% (24.9%)

Advertisement

Gateshead 23.9% (23.6%)

Gosport 23.9% (19.7%)

Cornwall 23.8% (24.6%)

Greenwich 23.6% (22.5%)

Advertisement

Doncaster 23.5% (20.9%)

South Oxfordshire 23.5% (21.6%)

Ashford 23.4% (24.1%)

Redbridge 23.4% (23.5%)

Advertisement

Coventry 23.3% (24.2%)

Enfield 23.3% (23.7%)

Charnwood 23.2% (24.8%)

Liverpool 23.2% (24.5%)

Advertisement

South Cambridgeshire 23.1% (26.0%)

Southampton 23.1% (20.7%)

Stockton-on-Tees 23.1% (24.1%)

Welwyn Hatfield 23.1% (27.0%)

Advertisement

Darlington 23.0% (21.9%)

Wirral 23.0% (24.4%)

Nottingham 22.8% (23.7%)

Amber Valley 22.7% (21.1%)

Advertisement

Chesterfield 22.7% (20.7%)

East Riding of Yorkshire 22.7% (20.3%)

Warrington 22.7% (22.8%)

Dorset 22.6% (21.0%)

Advertisement

Erewash 22.6% (20.9%)

Hinckley & Bosworth 22.6% (23.8%)

West Suffolk 22.6% (18.1%)

Thanet 22.5% (23.8%)

Advertisement

Cheshire East 22.4% (23.3%)

Swale 22.4% (18.2%)

Hart 22.3% (32.7%)

Torbay 22.3% (28.7%)

Advertisement

Hillingdon 22.2% (22.5%)

Stevenage 22.2% (22.5%)

East Suffolk 22.1% (22.4%)

North Devon 22.1% (23.2%)

Advertisement

Ashfield 22.0% (21.8%)

Halton 22.0% (20.6%)

Huntingdonshire 22.0% (23.0%)

Dover 21.9% (18.6%)

Advertisement

Waltham Forest 21.9% (22.7%)

East Staffordshire 21.8% (21.0%)

Walsall 21.7% (22.7%)

Hounslow 21.5% (20.8%)

Advertisement

Medway 21.5% (21.0%)

North Somerset 21.5% (20.8%)

South Ribble 21.4% (22.6%)

Cherwell 21.3% (20.3%)

Advertisement

Torridge 21.2% (29.0%)

West Northamptonshire 21.2% (22.2%)

Calderdale 20.9% (20.3%)

Plymouth 20.8% (22.4%)

Advertisement

Broxtowe 20.7% (23.0%)

Bolton 20.6% (23.8%)

Gedling 20.6% (20.9%)

North Norfolk 20.5% (22.0%)

Advertisement

Bury 20.4% (20.6%)

Peterborough 20.4% (19.8%)

Rother 20.3% (22.5%)

Melton 20.2% (20.6%)

Advertisement

Rossendale 20.2% (26.1%)

Mid Suffolk 20.1% (17.9%)

Westmorland & Furness 20.1% (20.7%)

Dartford 20.0% (19.7%)

Advertisement

Dudley 20.0% (17.6%)

Isle of Wight 20.0% (17.5%)

West Lancashire 19.9% (14.0%)

Derby 19.8% (22.1%)

Advertisement

Stafford 19.8% (18.6%)

Lincoln 19.7% (15.2%)

Oldham 19.7% (20.1%)

North Kesteven 19.5% (21.7%)

Advertisement

Blackpool 19.4% (18.8%)

Newark & Sherwood 19.4% (21.3%)

Stoke-on-Trent 19.4% (19.4%)

North East Derbyshire 19.3% (19.7%)

Advertisement

Northumberland 19.3% (23.3%)

Barking & Dagenham 19.1% (20.0%)

Islington 19.1% (19.6%)

Basildon 18.9% (17.9%)

Advertisement

Lewes 18.9% (18.1%)

Rotherham 18.8% (18.9%)

Wolverhampton 18.8% (21.0%)

Burnley 18.7% (20.1%)

Advertisement

Broxbourne 18.6% (18.4%)

Leicester 18.6% (20.3%)

Maldon 18.6% (13.5%)

Basingstoke & Deane 18.5% (21.8%)

Advertisement

Cumberland 18.5% (19.5%)

Folkestone & Hythe 18.5% (18.8%)

South Holland 18.5% (21.6%)

Pendle 18.4% (22.2%)

Advertisement

Cotswold 18.3% (19.5%)

Barnsley 18.0% (19.1%)

Chichester 18.0% (17.1%)

Gravesham 17.9% (18.5%)

Advertisement

South Tyneside 17.9% (13.7%)

Milton Keynes 17.8% (15.9%)

Sefton 17.8% (15.5%)

Central Bedfordshire 17.7% (19.2%)

Advertisement

Chorley 17.6% (12.4%)

South Gloucestershire 17.6% (17.0%)

Broadland 17.5% (20.9%)

Great Yarmouth 17.5% (19.8%)

Advertisement

Havering 17.5% (14.9%)

King’s Lynn & West Norfolk 17.5% (15.9%)

Babergh 17.3% (19.0%)

Tower Hamlets 17.1% (17.0%)

Advertisement

Worthing 17.1% (15.6%)

Crawley 17.0% (18.1%)

Tameside 17.0% (17.0%)

Bassetlaw 16.9% (18.2%)

Advertisement

Fenland 16.8% (19.3%)

South Staffordshire 16.8% (20.1%)

Redcar & Cleveland 16.6% (15.7%)

Tamworth 16.5% (20.8%)

Advertisement

Wychavon 16.4% (16.9%)

Braintree 16.3% (11.4%)

High Peak 16.3% (21.1%)

Tewkesbury 16.0% (13.9%)

Advertisement

Middlesbrough 15.9% (15.9%)

Nuneaton & Bedworth 15.8% (14.1%)

New Forest 15.7% (18.3%)

North East Lincolnshire 15.4% (12.5%)

Advertisement

North Lincolnshire 15.4% (14.1%)

Forest of Dean 15.2% (17.9%)

North West Leicestershire 15.0% (19.3%)

Blaby 14.9% (18.6%)

Advertisement

Hastings 14.9% (12.0%)

Staffordshire Moorlands 14.8% (18.4%)

North Warwickshire 14.6% (12.8%)

Cannock Chase 14.4% (16.8%)

Advertisement

Havant 14.3% (16.7%)

Rochford 14.2% (19.5%)

Thurrock 14.1% (13.8%)

Teignbridge 14.0% (14.2%)

Advertisement

Redditch 13.9% (8.7%)

Wyre Forest 13.9% (11.7%)

Breckland 13.8% (20.3%)

Salford 13.6% (15.4%)

Advertisement

Swindon 13.6% (12.9%)

Sunderland 13.2% (15.0%)

Mansfield 13.1% (14.2%)

Sandwell 12.8% (13.1%)

Advertisement

Boston 12.5% (15.0%)

Luton 12.5% (15.3%)

Tendring 12.5% (10.4%)

Castle Point 11.8% (14.9%)

Advertisement

Hartlepool 10.5% (15.0%)

Test Valley 9.9% (14.6%)

Harlow 7.0% (4.4%)

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

High infant formula milk prices are putting babies at risk

Published

on

High infant formula milk prices are putting babies at risk

We have all seen an increase in the cost of our food shop over the last few years. In March 2023, food price inflation in the UK hit a record peak of 19.1%. But price rises for infant formula milk have been steeper still.

Infant formula, which was already expensive, rose by an average of 22% between 2021 and 2023, and several brands have increased prices since. From May 2025 to May 2026, the average price of an 800g tin of formula increased by 46p to £12.45.

And although it’s possible to forego some of the more expensive items in our shopping baskets to save money, this isn’t possible for infant formula. It’s an essential product for babies who are not breastfed. This is placing significant financial pressure on families.

Our new research explored the experiences of 281 parents who were struggling to afford infant formula for their baby. Almost all described that this was having a detrimental impact upon their mental and physical health, relationships and emotional wellbeing. They felt anxious, guilty and very alone. Some mothers linked high costs and a lack of action from the government to change the situation to causing postnatal depression.

Advertisement

Lots of mothers in our research had wanted to breastfeed but had been unable to get the support they needed to do so. This left them feeling that they had been let down twice when they then struggled to afford the formula their baby needed. Others had tried to carry on breastfeeding through considerable pain to avoid having to pay for infant formula. One mother said:

I cry all the time now. I’m meant to be the one who looks after her and protects her and I’m failing her all because I couldn’t get feeding right and now can’t afford her milk properly.

To afford milk parents described restricting their own food or heating, getting into debt and returning from maternity leave very early. Some had taken milk from a shop without paying as a last resort.

Others coped by adopting behaviour that might put babies at risk of not getting enough nutrients, such as watering down feeds. Some used left over milk for a later feed, which can put babies at risk of gastrointestinal infection. Others asked for unused tubs of formula on local social media marketplaces which had sometimes already been opened. Using opened products can increase the risk of contamination and make babies unwell. Parents were often aware that these decisions were risky and felt distressed over doing them. One said:

I’ve had to use less powder just to be able to, you know, get to a new week, so that I can plan for a new one… The only thing I’ve done during difficult times is I try to use less powder […] which is really bad.

Parents often tried to hide how they were feeling from others. Some were afraid to speak to health professionals in case they thought they could not look after their baby properly. Many hid it from friends and family because they felt ashamed and that they were failing as parents.

Advertisement
Prices of infant formula have been affected by the rising cost of living.
Pixel-Shot/Shutterstock

Many of the parents in our study were working but were either on a low income or had unreliable hours. For others, maternity leave coupled with considerable recent increases in housing, utilities and childcare costs meant they had little money left over to purchase essentials, including feeding their baby. Despite this, these parents typically earned too much to access support schemes such as Healthy Start and felt that they had been overlooked and let down by the government during what should be a happy time.

Cost of brands

Part of the issue is that misleading marketing strategies lead parents to worry that they need to buy more expensive milks or their baby will miss out. One mother said:

I wanted to breastfeed and when I couldn’t I wanted to buy the best milk on offer but couldn’t afford that and can barely scrape enough together for the cheap ones. This has had a devastating effect on my mental health.

There is a difference in cost of around £11 between the highest and lowest cost infant formula milks. This variation is despite all infant formula being tightly regulated and having very similar nutritional content regardless of price, with no evidence that different products have any superior impacts upon infant health or development.

Infant formula milk does not need to be so expensive. A report by the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority estimated that formula manufacturers’ variable gross profit margins were between 50% and 75% in the period from 2019 to 2024, and retail gross profit margins between 18% and 22%.

Advertisement

One intervention could be for the government to set a mandatory price cap or profit limit, as implemented in Greece. A price cap is supported by organisations such as the Unicef UK Baby Friendly Initiative.

A clear strategy for further intervention to protect our smallest and most vulnerable members of society is urgently needed. This should include reliable pathways for parents to access formula milk when in financial crisis, increased investment in breastfeeding support so that fewer women who want to breastfeed end up needing to afford infant formula, and a living wage that means that working parents can afford to care for their baby.

If you are a parent experiencing financial crisis and are unable to purchase formula milk for your baby, please do speak to your health visitor or another health professional.

If you receive benefits you may qualify for the Healthy Start scheme in England and Wales, or the Best Start scheme in Scotland, which can be used to buy infant formula milk. The Independent Food Aid Network can also offer help and support to maximise your income.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Taylor Swift debuts new wife look as she steps out solo after Travis broke silence on ‘crazy’ wedding… and insiders spot ‘major clue’ about what’s REALLY going on

Published

on

Taylor Swift debuted a newlywed haircut when she surfaced in London this week

Taylor Swift debuted a newlywed haircut when she stepped out in London this week, marking her first solo sighting as a married woman.

The pop superstar is surely still recovering from her 1,000-guest mega-wedding to NFL tight end Travis Kelce, held at New York City‘s Madison Square Garden arena on July 3.

Just a week later, Swift and Kelce, both 36, broke cover from newlywed bliss to attend the California wedding of his former Kansas City Chiefs teammate JuJu Smith-Schuster.

For that celebration, Swift wore a long pink gown with shimmering floral embroidery – a look that bears a distinct similarity to the shorter dress she wore this week as she emerged from Annabel’s, the private members’ club in London’s Mayfair beloved by A-listers, aristocrats and British royals.

Advertisement

Pictured shortly before midnight local time this week, the singer also flashed her giant diamond engagement ring, thought to be a whopping 10-carats, and revealed a revamped hairdo, trimming her dirty-blonde locks to shoulder length.

But still, the question on everyone’s lips is: Where are the wedding photos?

Taylor Swift debuted a newlywed haircut when she surfaced in London this week

Advertisement
The singer also flashed her giant diamond engagement ring, thought to be a whopping 10-carats

The singer also flashed her giant diamond engagement ring, thought to be a whopping 10-carats

Swift and Travis Kelce first broke cover after their wedding last month to attend the California nuptials of JuJu Smith-Schuster. Swift wore a long pink gown with floral embroidery

Swift and Travis Kelce first broke cover after their wedding last month to attend the California nuptials of JuJu Smith-Schuster. Swift wore a long pink gown with floral embroidery

Despite marrying in America’s most famous arena, in the world’s most famous city, not a single snap of the happy couple has been released from inside the concrete confines of MSG.

The Daily Mail did exclusively share footage showing the impressive setting – the soulless concert/sport venue transformed into an enchanted garden of towering trees, emerald drapery and soaring archways. But six weeks on, and there’s still no sign of the bride and groom, who reportedly both wore white.

Advertisement

Now, a well-placed insider has shared a ‘major clue’ about what could really be going on.

‘A big hint that Taylor is going to release her very own project about the wedding is that she has yet to share one single image from the night,’ the source said.

‘By now most celebrities would have posted a wedding look on Instagram or given photos to Vogue. But Taylor has done neither. She is holding all the images for her own project, no doubt. She released images from her engagement to Instagram, why won’t she release images from her wedding? So that is a major clue.’

Camera equipment was notably spotted being unloaded outside MSG in the lead up to Swift’s two-day wedding. Rumors abounded that a documentary could be in the works.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, ahead of the celebrations, a source told the Daily Mail that Swift had been recording new music, with the suggestion that a special ‘love song’ had been written for the singer to serenade her new husband.

‘There has even been talk that she will record an entire wedding album,’ the source said.

In the days after the MSG bash, the Daily Mail also revealed that Swift and Kelce had been hiding out that the Yellowstone Club in Big Sky, Montana.

The super-exclusive club – which requires members to own property on-site, an initial joining fee of around $500,000 and annual dues of $78,000 – is said to be the one place the couple feel they can be afforded ‘complete privacy’.

Advertisement

Then, following a brief return to reality for the Smith-Schuster wedding in Orange County on July 10, there were whispers that Swift and Kelce were set to enjoy an island-hopping honeymoon around Greece and wider Europe, though anyone with knowledge has remained tight-lipped.

Swift revealed a revamped hairdo this week, trimming her dirty-blonde locks to shoulder length

Swift revealed a revamped hairdo this week, trimming her dirty-blonde locks to shoulder length

Her short dress bore a distinct similarity to the longer frock she had worn last month to the wedding of Kelce's former teammate JuJu Smith-Schuster

Her short dress bore a distinct similarity to the longer frock she had worn last month to the wedding of Kelce’s former teammate JuJu Smith-Schuster

Kelce reported to Kansas City Chiefs training on July 29, ahead of the new NFL season next month, and this week broke his silence on the wedding.

Advertisement

‘It was a fun offseason, man, wedding was the best night of my life and I appreciate everyone who came out and celebrated and had fun with us,’ Kelce said. 

‘That’s about all I really got from that night. It was a crazy night. It was full of a lot of celebration. But it’s football, baby.’

Swift and Kelce welcomed a cavalcade of Hollywood royalty to Madison Square Garden. The ceremony itself was officiated by comedian Adam Sandler, with the afterparty featuring musical performances from Paul McCartneyStevie Nicks and the bride.

Gigi Hadid and Bradley Cooper, Selena Gomez, Lena Dunham, Hugh Grant, Steven Spielberg, Jay-Z and Beyonce, Tom Brady, Jessica Chastain, Ed Sheeran, Chris Rock, Jessica Alba and Gracie Abrams were just some of the big names who joined several of Kelce’s Chiefs teammates, including quarterback Patrick Mahomes.

Advertisement

The Daily Mail has contacted Swift’s representative for comment. 

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Lanarkshire Business Excellence Awards Dinner tickets now on sale

Published

on

Daily Record

The awards are hosted by North and South Lanarkshire councils and, this year, sponsored by Airdrie potato giants Albert Bartlett.

Tickets are now on sale for this year’s Lanarkshire Business Excellence Awards Dinner, which takes place on October 30.

Advertisement

One of the longest running business awards, they celebrate the success and achievements of Lanarkshire businesses and organisations.

The awards are hosted by North and South Lanarkshire councils and, this year, sponsored by Airdrie potato giants Albert Bartlett.

Rebecca Letham, marketing manager at Albert Bartlett, said: “Albert Bartlett are delighted to be back supporting the awards again this year as they celebrate and showcase some of the great companies and talent within the Lanarkshire business community.

“Good luck to all the entrants.”

Advertisement

The gala dinner attracts over 300 guests from Lanarkshire’s business community and public sector.

This year’s event is hosted by presenters and broadcasters Jennifer Reoch and David Farrell.

Applications are now closed for the 2026 awards and scoring is underway. This year’s categories are:

  • Lanarkshire’s Best Business (0- 25 employees), sponsored by Red Tree Business Suites @ Clyde Gateway.
  • Lanarkshire’s Best Business (26 employees or more) sponsored by UKSE.
  • Lanarkshire Community Impact Award sponsored by Commsworld.
  • Lanarkshire’s Most Innovative Business Award, sponsored by Fusion Assets.
  • Lanarkshire’s Employer of the Year, sponsored by North Lanarkshire’s Working and South Lanarkshire Works.
  • Excellence in Customer Service, sponsored by Mears.
  • Excellence in Marketing & Engagement sponsored by Business Gateway.
  • Lanarkshire’s Green Business Award, sponsored by Invest North Lanarkshire and Invest South Lanarkshire.

The winners of each of the eight awards categories will be announced at the dinner on Friday, October 30. at The Radstone Hotel.

For more details, and to book tickets, visit www.lanarkshirebusinessawards.co.uk

Advertisement

*Don’t miss the latest headlines from around Lanarkshire. Sign up to our newsletters here.

And did you know Lanarkshire Live had its own app? Download yours for free here.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Nickelodeon star Christy Knowings dies aged 46 after asthma attack causes brain damage

Published

on

Nickelodeon star Christy Knowings dies aged 46 after asthma attack causes brain damage
Christy Knowings has died at the age of 46 after an asthma attack (Picture: Frederick M. Brown for Daily Mai)

Nickelodeon star Christy Knowings has died at the age of 46 after suffering an asthma attack which reportedly left her with brain damage.

The actor and comedian, best known for starring in the iconic children’s sketch show All That, died in Los Angeles on Tuesday after being taken to hospital days earlier.

According to TMZ, Knowings suffered an asthma attack on Friday and was subsequently placed on life support after sustaining brain damage.

Her family ultimately made the devastating decision to remove her from life support on Tuesday night, the publication reported.

Advertisement

Her aunt, Tyleah Joseph, announced her death on Facebook the following day.

Knowings’ manager, Al Hill, remembered the performer as a woman of many talents who remained dedicated to her craft throughout her career.

ALL THAT, Nick Cannon, Kel Mitchell, Amanda Bynes, Kenan Thompson, 1995-2005. ? Tollin/Robbins Prod. / Courtesy: Everett Collection
Knowings was a part of an iconic cast of young comedians on All That (Picture: Everett Collection / Everett Collection)

‘Christy was a multi-talented lady,’ he told Variety in a statement. ‘Whether it was singing, acting, dancing, she was always creating. Always professional and dedicated to her work.’

Knowings became a familiar face to a generation of Nickelodeon viewers after joining All That in 1997.

She was a main cast member for three seasons between 1997 and 2001, joining the programme alongside Leon Frierson and Danny Tamborelli for its fourth season.

Advertisement
LOS ANGELES, CA - OCTOBER 15: Actress Christy Knowings attends Halloween Hotness 4: Heating Up For The Cure held at American Legion Hall on October 15, 2017 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Albert L. Ortega/Getty Images)
She was on the show from 1997 to 2001 (Picture: Albert L. Ortega/Getty Images)

Knowings had previously been discovered through the pilot of And Now This, a sketch comedy project produced by Rosie O’Donnell.

Her arrival on All That put her alongside some of the biggest young comedy stars of the era, including Amanda Bynes, Kenan Thompson, Kel Mitchell, Lori Beth Denberg and Josh Server.

Nick Cannon and Gabriel Iglesias were among the other future stars who would later join the programme.

Knowings eventually returned to All That as a guest star during its 10th season.

Often described as a Saturday Night Live for children, All That first premiered on Nickelodeon in 1994 and became one of the network’s defining shows.

Advertisement
Kianna Underwood ''All That'' Sketch
All That star Kianna Underwood also died this year after a hit-and-run (Picture: Nickelodeon)

The sketch series launched or helped establish the careers of a remarkable number of stars, with its sprawling cast over the years also including Jamie Lynn Spears.

Knowings also worked alongside her twin brother, Chris Knowings, during her career, with the siblings appearing together in three episodes of Sesame Street.

Her death marks the second tragedy to hit the All That family this year.

Former cast member Kianna Underwood died aged 33 at the beginning of 2026 after being struck in a hit-and-run crash.

Underwood appeared on the Nickelodeon series during its later years and also worked as a child actor on other television projects.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Andy Burnham Urged To Call Election Before Its Too Late

Published

on

Andy Burnham Urged To Call Election Before Its Too Late

Andy Burnham should call an early general election before his popularity inevitably begins to decline, according to a former Labour adviser.

Liz Bates, who served in Keir Starmer’s government, said the prime minister should go to the polls because “it’s probably not going to get better than this” for him.

Labour has enjoyed a bounce in the polls since Burnham replaced Starmer in No.10 last month, leading to speculation that the new PM may be tempted to call an election to secure his own five-year mandate.

However, he appeared to rule out such a move last month, saying: “I don’t think people want it.”

Advertisement

Nevertheless, Bates – who was a special adviser to former housing secretary Steve Reed before he was sacked by Burnham – insisted he should keep the option on the table.

Speaking to HuffPost UK’s Commons People podcast, she said: “Whilst he is popular, and people like him and he’s brand new, and we have the Burnham bounce and he’s shiny and different, everything seems ok.

“When the pressure starts to come on, and you have to make difficult decisions and you go through tough periods – and there will be tough periods, there always is in British politics – then these questions of mandate really start to fester.

“The pressure to have an election starts to come on and it gets pretty intense.”

Advertisement

Bates added: “I would be tempted, if I was him, to go for it because you get the new manager bounce, Farage is looking bonkers to be honest … the Greens seem to be in a bit of a tricky spot as well.

“It’s probably not going to get better than this [for Burnham]. They will think it’s going to get better than this because it feels like ‘we’re great, we’re better than Keir, look at us’.

“When things get tough and the pressure comes on to have a general election, if you’re down in the polls at that point, all your options narrow. I would do it when things feel sunny and positive.”

Her comments echo those of former Theresa May pollster James Johnson, who this week said an election by next spring is Burnham’s best chance of securing his own Commons majority, defeating Reform and all-but destroying the Tories.

Advertisement

Elsewhere in the podcast, Bates – who is also a former Channel 4 and Sky News journalist – fights back tears as she recalls the day she and other government advisers were told in No.10 that Starmer was resigning.

She also reveals that supporters of the former PM were told to wear sunglasses and stand at the back of the crowd if they thought they would cry when he gave his farewell speech in Downing Street.

You can listen to the full interview below, or just download it from wherever you get your podcasts.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Trump’s cloak-and-dagger decoy flight exploits were the right thing to do, ex-Secret Service agents say

Published

on

Trump’s cloak-and-dagger decoy flight exploits were the right thing to do, ex-Secret Service agents say

Security experts are defending last month’s controversial Air Force One decoy flight — while also noting that it’s just the latest ruse to protect an American president from harm.

An Iranian assassination threat led President Donald Trump to be sneaked off Air Force One in a catering container and flown to the U.K. in a military jet following the recent Nato summit in Turkey, The Washington Post reported Monday.

Journalists and some White House staffers made the July 8 trip on the presidential plane without knowing Trump was no longer aboard, according to the Post.

Former Secret Service agent Bobby McDonald told The Independent that the “threat level” against Trump was “very high, and has been high for a while.”

Advertisement

“It’s been a very long two years of both domestic — and now international — potential assassination attempts,” McDonald said Tuesday. “You’ve got to be creative. You’ve got to be nimble. You’ve got to make things happen.”

Former Secret Service agents say sneaking President Donald Trump off Air Force One and onto a military jet was the right response to an Iranian assassination threat
Former Secret Service agents say sneaking President Donald Trump off Air Force One and onto a military jet was the right response to an Iranian assassination threat (Getty)

McDonald, now an assistant professor of criminal justice and criminology at New Haven University, said the Secret Service has a long history of using “dummy motorcades” and other techniques to conceal the movements of American presidents.

Former Secret Service agent Bill Gage, who led the agency’s elite Counter Assault Team, also told The Independent that the details of presidential travel can be kept so hush-hush that he once got chewed out by a supervisor for leaving CAT members at the White House after President Barack Obama secretly left on a 2009 trip to Iraq.

“I had to ask him, what are you even talking about? And he’s like, didn’t you see the news? Obama wasn’t even here,” Gage recalled. “And I had to convince him that I didn’t know.”

Gage, now director of executive protection at the SafeHaven Security Group, also said he stood guard at President George W. Bush’s Texas ranch in 2003 without knowing that Bush had been whisked off under cover of darkness to celebrate Thanksgiving with U.S. troops in Iraq.

Advertisement

“The amount of people that know in the Secret Service when they do these fake-outs is so limited,” he said. ”You’re probably talking the president, maybe one or two of his closest advisers and probably the director of the Secret Service and the SAC [special agent in charge] of the detail.”

Former Secret Service agent Bill Gage recalls standing guard at President George W. Bush’s Texas ranch without knowing Bush had secretly left to celebrate Thanksgiving with U.S. troops in Iraq
Former Secret Service agent Bill Gage recalls standing guard at President George W. Bush’s Texas ranch without knowing Bush had secretly left to celebrate Thanksgiving with U.S. troops in Iraq (AFP/Getty)

The journalists who boarded Air Force One in Ankara, Turkey, were instructed to lower the plane’s window shades, with Trump later telling them, “Because you’re probably on a dangerous flight.”

The former Secret Service agents differed on the likely reason why the shades were ordered pulled down.

“You want to hide the ability for anyone to see that there’s a plane going overhead,” McDonald said. “The Iranians, from the reports, don’t have much radar, don’t have much of an air force. So, allowing light to come out of the plane makes it — potentially makes it visible, and makes it a target.”

Gage, however, called the move “kind of a silly precaution” to prevent anyone from looking out and wondering why a loading truck was pulling up alongside the plane.

Advertisement

“I don’t want to speculate because I’m not an air safety specialist, but I would say it was just so that they couldn’t see anything that was going on,” he said.

Whatever the motive, McDonald said he was confident there were “other assets that were up in the air” to protect Air Force One. He called moving Trump onto the military jet “just an added layer of a security apparatus that’s put into place.”

Trump speaks to reporters on Air Force One while heading to Washington after his secret flight from Turkey to the UK on a military jet
Trump speaks to reporters on Air Force One while heading to Washington after his secret flight from Turkey to the UK on a military jet (Getty)

“There’s no way in the world there was no care and concern for those other people on that plane,” he said.

In 2000, President Bill Clinton used a similar maneuver to travel to Pakistan, where he arrived in an unmarked Grumman Gulfstream C-20 executive jet about 10 minutes after a similar plane labeled “USA” and painted red, white and blue had landed and departed, UPI reported at the time.

Trump traveled to Turkey on a newer model Air Force One that’s a retrofitted Boeing 747-8 gifted to him by Qatar, and he was initially advised to leave on an older one because the new plane lacked advanced anti-missile capabilities, The New York Times reported last month.

Advertisement

At the time, Trump claimed he was going to fly on the older plane “for old time’s sake,” and so U.S. troops in the U.K. and their families could tour the new Air Force One and check out its $400 million in upgrades.

Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut called Monday for a congressional briefing on the matter.

“I want to know what precautions were taken to make sure that all of the passengers on that Air Force One, which was judged too dangerous for the president to fly on, what precautions were taken to keep the staff and reporters on that plane safe,” he told CNN.

Former Obama senior adviser David Axelrod also told CNN that it’s “kind of stunning” that Air Force One passengers “were sort of a decoy there and were not told that the president wasn’t on board, and that the deception was continued even after he safely returned to Washington.”

Advertisement
Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut is calling for a congressional briefing on the Air Force One decoy flight
Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut is calling for a congressional briefing on the Air Force One decoy flight (Getty)

Ned Price, a former Department of State spokesperson during the Biden administration, said on social media that “subterfuge is sometimes a necessary safeguard” to protect a president.

“But misleading reporters in the moment and, worse yet, continuing to lie to the American people weeks later is never acceptable. As far as I know, it’s unique to this White House,” he wrote.

Other Trump critics were even more outspoken, with podcaster Tommy Vietor saying the incident “makes Trump look like both a liar and a scared little bitch.”

“The mental image of Trump hiding from Iran in a catering cart is devastating. A weak, stupid old man hiding from the consequences of his own decision while endangering others,” the former Obama National Security Council staffer said on X.

Huffington Post White House correspondent S.V. Dáte also said those aboard Air Force One were “considered expendable,” adding, “Donald Trump was ready to let you die while he secretly made his escape.”

Advertisement

The White House didn’t immediately respond to an inquiry from The Independent.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Gabrielle’s ice cream parlour Redcar with Dubai chocolate treats

Published

on

Gabrielle's ice cream parlour Redcar with Dubai chocolate treats

At first glance, Gabrielle’s Ice Cream on the Redcar promenade looks like a traditional seaside parlour.

But while customers still flock there for the classic Redcar lemon tops and strawberry tops, the business has grown into much more than a place to grab an ice cream on a sunny day.

Located on Redcar seafront, Gabrielle’s offers a wide range of food, drinks and family entertainment all under one roof – making it a destination in its own right for visitors of all ages.

Pistachio and matcha sundaes on offer at Gabrielle’s. (Image: Gabrielle’s Ice Cream)

Sweet treats remain at the heart of the business, with ice cream flavours including chocolate fudge brownie and Mars Bar gelato proving popular with customers.

Advertisement

The parlour has also embraced food trends, serving Dubai chocolate sundaes inspired by the viral craze which has swept social media over the past year.

Matcha-flavoured drinks and sundaes have become another customer favourite, joining a menu packed with indulgent desserts.

Dubai sundae. (Image: Gabrielle’s Ice Cream)

Visitors can also enjoy chocolate-covered strawberries, available in milk or white chocolate, alongside cakes and sweet treats in flavours including forest fruits and Bakewell tart.

For those with dietary requirements, there is also a range of vegan and dairy-free ice cream to choose from.

Advertisement

But not everyone who visits only comes for the ice cream.

Gabrielle’s also plates up smash burgers, fries, chicken tenders and milkshakes, giving families plenty of choice whether they are looking for lunch, an afternoon treat or something to enjoy after a walk along the seafront.

One of the venue’s more unique features is Planet Kidz -a giant indoor soft play area designed to keep children entertained while parents relax.

The venue has a dedicated ‘Tiny Town’ toddler area, a sensory zone, a giant drop slide, a huge spider-web climbing frame and interactive dance floor games.

Combining food, drinks, desserts and soft play in one venue, Gabrielle’s has become a popular choice for families whatever the weather.

Advertisement

The parlours famous smash burger is just one savoury option visitors can enjoy before choosing a sweet treat. (Image: Gabrielle’s Ice Cream)


Seasonal specials also keep customers coming back throughout the seasons, with limited-edition creations such as Cadbury Easter Egg sundaes popping up throughout the year.

Away from the parlour itself, the business is also known for supporting the local community, regularly taking ice creams to lifeguards on Redcar beach as a thank-you for helping to keep beachgoers safe.

Whether it’s a traditional lemon top by the sea, a viral Dubai chocolate sundae, a smash burger or an afternoon in soft play, Gabrielle’s has built its reputation on offering something for everyone.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Former Nickelodeon child star Christy Knowings dies aged 46

Published

on

Former Nickelodeon child star Christy Knowings dies aged 46

Former Nickelodeon star Christy Knowings has died at 46.

Knowings was hospitalized after an asthma attack that reportedly left her with brain damage. She was placed on life support and died Tuesday, as TMZ first reported.

She joined All That in late 1997 along with Leon Frierson and Danny Tamberelli. They starred in a cast that included Saturday Night Live’s Kenan Thompson, Kel Mitchell, and Nickelodeon breakout star Amanda Bynes.

Knowings’ standout characters during her time on the sketch comedy show included news anchor Brenda Stone whose lucky pen had been stolen and Jessica the valley girl whose catchphrase was “whateverrr.”

Advertisement

Her other Nickelodeon appearances included the Rosie O’Donnell sketch comedy pilot And Now This! and the game show Figure It Out.

Christy Knowings has died aged 46
Christy Knowings has died aged 46 (Instagram)

Knowings also appeared in three episodes of Sesame Street alongside her brother Chris Knowings, singing a duet about what it’s like to be a twin.

As a singer, she released her song “To the World” in 2020, calling it a “hauntingly gritty folk single” in a post shared on X.

In 2022, Knowings voiced her support for Bynes amid her fight to end her conservatorship.

“Awesome! I was able to push my schedule around, and I WILL be joining my fellow @AllThatOfficial cast member @leeboytv tomorrow! We will be there in support of our All That fam, @amandabynes as she takes this head on,” she wrote in a post on X.

Advertisement

Just weeks before her death, Knowings shared on Instagram that she was to be honored by Black Beat Magazine.

Knowings became known for several sketch characters during her time on ‘All That’
Knowings became known for several sketch characters during her time on ‘All That’ (Nickelodeon)

“Honored to be featured as a Special Guest during the Black Beat Magazine Relaunch & BET Weekend Celebration. Looking forward to celebrating culture, music, and entertainment. See you June 28!” she wrote in the caption.

Apple TV+ logo

Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 day

New subscribers only. £9.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled.

Try for free

ADVERTISEMENT. If you sign up to this service we will earn commission. This revenue helps to fund journalism across The Independent.

Advertisement

That post is now filled with condolences from fans.

“You made lasting memories for many of our childhoods. Appreciate the laughs when I was young. God bless your family,” one fan commented while another wrote, “R.I.P. Thank you for being apart of my childhood!!”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Rapid-fire earthquakes strike ‘America’s most dangerous fault line’ in California

Published

on

Four minor earthquakes have struck the California Bay Area on August 13

California has been struck by a series of rapid earthquakes erupting right along what experts call ‘America’s most dangerous’ fault line.

The first earthquake struck right in the heart of California’s Bay Area at 11.30am ET (8.30am local).

The US Geological Survey (USGS) initially measured it as a magnitude 4.1 earthquake just 14 miles from San Francisco. That measurement was quickly downgraded to a magnitude 3.8 tremor.

That quake was followed by three more tremors less than an hour later, striking in rapid succession between 12.07 and 12.38pm ET.

Advertisement

Those aftershocks were measured at magnitude 3.0, 2.8 and 1.7, respectively.

The San Francisco-Bay Area is home to nearly eight million people. Thousands of people reported feeling the initial earthquake, with some reports coming in from as far away as Sacramento, roughly 75 miles east of San Francisco.

The earthquake swarm took place right along one of California’s most concerning seismic regions – the Hayward Fault.

The Hayward is a 74-mile-long fault line that is part of the massive San Andreas fault system. Like the more famous San Andreas, the Hayward is capable of producing a devastating earthquake stronger than 7.0 in magnitude and is considered extremely overdue for a major seismic event.

Advertisement

Four minor earthquakes have struck the California Bay Area on August 13

USGS scientists have previously warned that an earthquake stronger than magnitude 6.7 has a 95 percent chance of striking near the Bay Area (Pictured) by 2043

USGS scientists have previously warned that an earthquake stronger than magnitude 6.7 has a 95 percent chance of striking near the Bay Area (Pictured) by 2043 

Thursday’s earthquakes produced relatively light shaking throughout the Bay Area, according to USGS.

Advertisement

However, Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) train service in the area was stopped during the event and is now running with delays of up to 20 minutes throughout the rail system. No injuries have been reported.

The last time a major earthquake erupted along the Hayward was 158 years ago in 1868, but scientists have calculated that this fault typically ruptures every 95 to 183 years.

A team from California’s Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory said in a statement: ‘The fault is overdue for an earthquake that could cause extensive damage to such a dense population zone.’

An analysis by the University of California, Berkeley determined the Hayward fault has a 33 percent chance of rupturing and producing a major magnitude 6.7 earthquake or greater by 2043.

Advertisement

Researchers at USGS have previously warned that there was a 72 percent chance of such a disaster striking the Bay Area in the next two decades, along the Hayward or another major fault in the area.

In recent days, however, geophysicist Stefan Burns has predicted that a major seismic event that devastates parts of California may be only months away.

Burns said during a YouTube livestream that the US West Coast was now firmly ‘in the crosshairs’ after multiple magnitude 7.0 earthquakes in Venezuela and Colombia this summer.

The first, a magnitude 3.8 quake, was reported by thousands of residents from Sacramento to San Francisco

The first, a magnitude 3.8 quake, was reported by thousands of residents from Sacramento to San Francisco

Advertisement

The scientist explained that energy released during the magnitude 7.4 earthquake in Colombia’s San Jose Del Palmar earthquake on August 10 would not stay local.

Those seismic waves and stress changes travel through the Earth and can ‘load’ geological faults thousands of miles away with more pressure that will eventually cause more earthquakes.

Burns warned that the next six to 12 months would be a critical time, especially in California, as many mega earthquakes throughout recent history have occurred within months of each other.

‘It’s that six [month] to one year time frame that we’re worried about and if we get kind of past that then maybe we can start to breathe a bit of a sigh of relief,’ Burns said on Monday.

Advertisement

‘But because we’ve been seeing so much activity in Northern California, it’s hard to rule out Northern California. So really all of California is problematic right now.’

According to ABC7, Thursday’s initial quake struck right under the Oakland Zoo, which sent chimps and parrots in a frenzy.

The zoo’s CEO, Nik Dehejia, said animals often feel low-frequency vibrations, such as minor earthquakes, even when humans do not.

This causes them to ‘vocalize,’ meaning the animals send out warnings of potential danger through sound.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025