There are four proposals that could shape the future of local government in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough
The future of Cambridgeshire’s councils hangs in the balance as the latest proposals for local government reorganisation have highlighted divisions between councils. Authorities in the final areas invited to submit their preferences for new structures have been confirmed, with a consultation launched on 52 proposals across 14 geographical footprints.
The Government has pledged to end the two-tier local government system in areas which incorporate both district councils and larger authorities with responsibilities for services such as social care. A consultation allowing people to have their say on the proposals will run for seven weeks until March 25, 2026.
Cllr Lucy Nethsingha, Leader of Cambridgeshire County Council, said: “This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to shape what works best for Cambridgeshire and Peterborough. LGR is emotive and views differ – this really matters – so we need as many people and organisations as possible to respond.”
The Government argues that the two-tier system “slows down local decisions, sees local economies fragmented with different councils responsible for different priorities, and means outdated boundaries stop our towns and cities from growing”.
But councils are split on how areas should be organised to improve efficiency and promote growth. Across the 14 areas which submitted proposals on November 28, five areas submitted five different proposals. These areas are Derby and Derbyshire; Devon, Plymouth and Torbay; Kent and Medway; Lancashire, Blackburn with Darwen and Blackpool; and Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent.
Councils in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough joined those in Lincolnshire, North Lincolnshire, and North East Lincolnshire in submitting four proposals. There were three separate proposals in five of the areas, and two proposals in two other areas.
The proposals from councils in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough are as follows:
- Cambridgeshire County Council submitted a proposal for two unitary councils.
- Cambridge City Council, East Cambridgeshire District Council and South Cambridgeshire District Council submitted a proposal for two unitary councils.
- Fenland District Council and Peterborough City Council submitted a proposal for three unitary councils.
- Huntingdonshire District Council submitted a proposal for three unitary councils.
Launching the consultation, local government minister Alison McGovern said: “As set out in the invitation, these proposals include the areas of existing neighbouring small unitary councils. Some proposals were accompanied by requests for boundary change; whereby existing districts would be split. These will require careful consideration.”
Responding to the latest proposals, chair of the County Councils Network Matthew Hicks described the announcement as “an important milestone” and urged residents and stakeholders to engage with the consultation. “County councils have worked hard to put forward ambitious, evidence-based proposals that will improve services and deliver fewer, leaner councils: fully in line with the Government’s stated criteria,” Mr Hicks said.
“Conversely, some of the competing proposals put out to consultation risk splitting high-performing care services into smaller councils – well below the stated criteria. At the same time, they promise hundreds of millions in savings to adult and children’s services with little supporting evidence.”
Mr Hicks added that it was vital for the Government to “closely scrutinise and rigorously evaluate all proposals against their own statutory criteria”. Decisions on the proposals for areas in the devolution priority programme, which includes Essex, Hampshire, Norfolk, Suffolk, and Cheshire, are due next month.
“The decisions will shape local areas for years to come, so it is vital they ensure any new councils are able deliver savings to reinvest in frontline services, safeguard care to the most vulnerable and foster the economic growth this country desperately needs,” Mr Hicks said.




