I will soon turn 47 and have been gaming since I was in single digits. I was green with envy playing Combat on my friend’s Atari 2600. Seaside and caravan site arcade machines occupied a huge space in my childhood mind. I remember being devastated after spending hours typing in game code from a magazine into my Spectrum 128K, only for the resulting game to be broken and unplayable. Amiga 1200, Nintendo, PlayStation, all have delivered untold hours of enjoyment.
Gaming has been a cornerstone entertainment throughout my life. Something I’d look forward to and would occupy me even when not playing. I’d spend as much time reading about gaming as playing. Particularly through Digitiser on Teletext and then GameCentral’s Metro pages.
Advertisement
But I’m now a husband and father to two boys aged two years four months and 11 months. As a father, I’ve realised my gaming life is unsustainable. Time is simply against me. Nobody made enough of it. The maths doesn’t add up. It might be time to hang up the controllers.
Since my eldest was born I’ve tried to game as usual. By the time we’ve put the kids to bed and eaten it’s usually 8 to 8.30. We’ll watch an episode of a series together for an hour. My wife has no interest in gaming, so I’ve been waiting until she’s gone to bed around 9.30pm to stay up and enjoy a little of my own entertainment most nights.
Expert, exclusive gaming analysis
Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning.
Advertisement
However, with kids waking up at around 5am or earlier, and some terrible four month long sleep regressions, this strategy has often led to me being absolutely knackered during the day, due to burning the candle at both ends. Something I used to be able to do with ease. Now that’s completely unacceptable, when you find yourself driving during the weekend with two kids in the back of the car and struggling to stay awake during the drive then something has to give and changes need to be made.
In addition, fatherhood has changed me. I no longer have patience for things I used to enjoy. Long novels, long movies, epic games. I no longer have tolerance for anything that doesn’t respect my time. I’m stretched way too thin and my concentration and patience reserves are severely limited. In the tiny amount of time I have to entertain myself I need something that is satisfying and fulfilling in a self-contained hour or two. In that limited time gaming has to compete with other things I enjoy like watching movies, TV, and reading.
Advertisement
My gaming history in the past two years shows attempts to start dozens of games and I’ve crawled to bed way too late on numerous occasions, feeling dissatisfied, unfulfilled, and questioning whether gaming is something I even enjoy anymore. But an examination of those games also shows that I’ve been attempting to play the wrong kinds of games.
All of these games and dozens of others were started and abandoned, and all share in common that they demand a significant chunk of your time. Some enjoyment was had initially but ultimately ended in frustration and I’d often find myself wondering ‘Just how much longer am I going to have to play this for?’
Metroid was great nostalgia, but I quickly grew angry at the amount of ground I had to retread and replay if I died during a boss fight. Tears Of The Kingdom I played for several frustrated evenings and did not even make it out of the first tutorial area. Both abandoned.
Advertisement
Since becoming a father I have managed to complete some games. Firewatch, Uncharted: The Lost Legacy, Spider-Man: Miles Morales, Abzû, Luigi’s Mansion 3, and Virginia. I’ve played quite a bit of Mario Kart World.
What these games have in common is being short or you’re able to play them in shorter, self-contained bursts. But even with the shortest of these games, I often didn’t enjoy my time as I was rushing them and didn’t know how long they would take. Opening the map in Spider-Man: Miles Morales filled me with anxiety at the sight of all the symbols, as did traversing the open world filled with things I simply didn’t have the time to explore. Abzû took me a couple of evenings but for all I knew it was eight hours long. So I rushed it.
It is a bizarre feature of gaming that games differ massively in length but don’t advertise how long they will take you to play. So, you embark on these experiences with no concept of the commitment you’re making. Games attempt to deceive you and obscure their contract with you. Games are often judged on the value of the content and bloat they offer, and gamers in general tend to hold short games in contempt.
Advertisement
To do that you have to have the luxury of time. Something I no longer have. As a result long games are glorified and short experiences are hidden, padded and advertised as something that they’re not. I now understand games like Zelda, Grand Theft Auto 6, Mass Effect, Red Dead Redemption 2 are no longer things my life can realistically accommodate.
I’ve used the website How Long to Beat before but only really consulted it when already in the middle of a game. Wondering how long I had left to play and trying to decide whether to give up or plough on. Usually at that point it was because I was already frustrated and struggling to find enjoyment.
But I recently had a revelation. A YouTube search for short games recommended a game called A Short Hike that piqued my interest. I quickly purchased and played the game and thoroughly enjoyed myself. I went into the game knowing it could be played in a couple of hours, I was secure in the knowledge that I would get maximum bang for my buck in just one evening. With no anxiety that this experience would become a slog. The game is a delight and one of my favourite gaming experiences of recent years.
Advertisement
I began to research and put together a list of short games I could complete in an evening or two. Then it occurred to me I should combine this search with the elephant in the room: the dreaded backlog.
As a PlayStation Plus subscriber since the launch of the PlayStation 3, and a frequent wine-fuelled late night peruser of gaming sales and impulse buyer I have amassed a huge catalogue of almost 600 games on PlayStation alone. Within those I reasoned I must already own many short and sweet gaming experiences, hidden amongst the 30, 40, and 60 hour long epics.
I needed a way to cross reference my game catalogue with How Long to Beat and find out definitively how long each game I already own would take me to play, so that when I begin a game I can do so fully cognisant of the contract I’m entering into.
There are more short games than you might realise (thewearehere)
A quick ChatGPT discussion led me to the solution. I could allow the website Infinite Backlog to access my PSN profile and create a list of all my games that could be exported to a spreadsheet. Then ChatGPT wrote a Python code that would combine the list with How Long to Beat. An hour or so later I had a list. Unfortunately, at around 300 games, it was only half complete. PSN only shares the games you have previously opened or obtained a trophy in.
So all the games I’d purchased and never touched I had to add myself. But I ultimately arrived at a complete list. My next task was to create folders in my PlayStation library marked ‘1-2 hours’, ‘3-4 hours’, ‘5-6 hours’, etc. all the way up to ‘40+ hours’. I then methodically went through the entire catalogue of 600 games and organised them by length. This whole process took all my spare time over a week or two, so was no small undertaking.
Advertisement
What I found was sometimes surprising. I had no idea Resident Evil 3 is just six hours long and as a result I’m now keen to play it. I would have dismissed Power Wash Simulator as a novelty indie game but there’s 40 hours of game there. Portal can be beat in just three hours, Metroid: Zero Mission in only 4.5 hours. Half-Life 2 clocks in at 13 hours, double a typical Call of Duty campaign. Whereas Hollow Knight is a 27 hour commitment. I cannot believe a game like Nioh requires a commitment of 40+ hours. Ironically, most of Sony’s sad dad simulators are probably too long to be played by most dads.
The point is, it’s hard to judge a book by its cover and it’s frankly shocking that games aren’t clearly marked with their length. [We feel you’re underplaying the usefulness of How Long To Beat in your situation, especially as you can search for games that can be completed under a certain length of time, filtered by format. Publishers would be opening themselves up to litigation if they promised a game was X number of hours long and someone could prove they beat it more quickly – GC]
What I did find was that there is an embarrassment of riches in games that can be completed in under eight hours. I now have a new strategy. Most nights I now go to bed at the same time as my wife. We’re both in bed by 10 and should get a decent amount of sleep before the kids wake between 5 and 6am and be fresh and fully equipped to handle the day. But Wednesday and Sunday are now my nights to stay up late until midnight and do something for my own entertainment. Forearmed with the knowledge of what I’m undertaking.
Advertisement
So far, I have played A Short Hike, which was wonderful. Thank Goodness You’re Here! which I thoroughly enjoyed. The Stanley Parable, this was a misstep as I was completely unaware of the open-ended nature of it and ended up very annoyed at 1am wondering when it was going to end. Quake 2 on N64 – this one was great fun at first but quickly ramped up the difficulty and I’ll have to return to it again on the easiest mode. Finally, I’ve spent two nights playing Carrion and have enjoyed every single visceral, bone-crunching second of it, secure in the knowledge it will take me no more than three evenings to complete. All of these are games I never would have chosen to play by my old metrics.
I know that games clocking in at under six hours are an easy decision to make. Anything 10 hours or over is a much bigger ask and something I may only do a handful of times a year. And I am unlikely to choose to play a game lasting 20 hours or more knowing that’s a decision that will see me playing the same game for months.
Games should wear their length on their sleeve, as a badge of pride. Being short is not a failing, nor is being long a guarantee of enjoyment. As gamers we should all be liberated from false starts, frustrated abandonments and disrespected time. It should not be this hard to identify what we want to play, in the time that we have available to play it. For those faced with similar dilemmas I cannot recommend enough investing a bit of time to organise your game library this way.
Advertisement
All of this means my gaming landscape has narrowed, but that’s fine. I’m now enjoying gaming again in a way I haven’t been able to for a few years. And I’m handling those weekend car drives much better.
By reader thewearehere (PSN ID)
Not everyone has time for 40+ hour epics (thewearehere)
The reader’s features do not necessarily represent the views of GameCentral or Metro.
You can submit your own 500 to 600-word reader feature at any time, which if used will be published in the next appropriate weekend slot.
You’ve probably never thought too hard about it. As you board a plane, a flight attendant stands at the aircraft door, smiles, says “welcome,” maybe glances at your boarding pass. It feels like basic hospitality, like the aviation equivalent of a host greeting you at a restaurant.
But that brief interaction is doing a lot more than it seems.
“The smile and greeting you get at an airplane door is probably one of the most judgmental welcomes you’ll ever receive,” Jay Robert, a senior flight attendant and the founder of A Fly Guy Travels, told HuffPost. “We’re judging a lot in those few seconds, and believe it or not, that judgment is part of our job.”
It’s not for the sake of judgment, however. The purpose is actually safety.
Advertisement
“Greeting passengers at the door is our first line of defense in identifying threats that could be brought onto the aircraft,” Robert explained. “Whether it’s illness, intoxication or someone carrying prohibited dangerous goods, we’re constantly scanning for anything that could disrupt the flight or pose a safety risk.”
Of course, there is a customer service and hospitality element to the greeting as well.
“It’s the first opportunity to welcome passengers onboard and set a positive tone for the flight,” said Yuvraj Datta, the chief supply and revenue officer at the travel tech company Fareportal. “It’s also an important observational moment for the cabin crew. Flight attendants are making initial safety and operational assessments that can help identify potential issues before departure.”
He added that flight attendants begin assessing the cabin environment the moment they get on board.
Advertisement
“The greeting is actually a behavioural assessment,” said AirAdvisor founder and CEO Anton Radchenko. “The social framing is deliberate – passengers engage more naturally when they believe they’re being welcomed. Crew are trained to read each individual during that interaction – orientation, steadiness and anything that could become a liability in an enclosed environment at altitude with no exit available.”
In an era of increasing reports of unruly passenger behaviour and even abuse of flight attendants, airline crews are more vigilant than ever. And many of those incidents involve alcohol.
“Generally, flight attendants assess passengers during boarding for sobriety,” said Henry Harteveldt, president and airline industry analyst at Atmosphere Research Group. “If they notice a passenger who appears to be overtly drunk or high, they may ask to see their boarding pass, under the premise of directing them to their seat, but also to alert the crew who may be working where that passenger is sitting to monitor her or his alcohol intake on board.”
Robert echoed that intoxication is one of the biggest things flight attendants are checking for during that greeting process.
Advertisement
“It’s much easier to stop someone at the aircraft door than it is to remove them once they’re seated and settled in,” he said. “During boarding, we constantly communicate with each other. I’ll often call the crew at the back and ask them to keep an eye on a passenger I’ve noticed or get a second opinion before we decide whether someone is fit to fly.”
Flying with an intoxicated passenger can be a serious matter. Dan Bubb – a former airline pilot and professor in residence in the honors college at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas – explained why catching these situations early matters so much.
“You don’t want to be at altitude and have somebody who’s drunk and belligerent, and now you’ve got a problem,” he said. “You have to divert the plane. That’s going to cost money and time. So it’s better to try to catch those possible problems at the door before it closes.”
Mongkol Chuewong via Getty Images
Advertisement
There are legal implications to getting it wrong as well.
“Boarding an impaired passenger creates significant legal and operational exposure,” Radchenko said. “By the time a passenger reaches the cabin door, gate agents have already conducted an initial screen. If you’re flagged at the door, you’ve already passed one assessment, which means the carrier has two separate documented grounds to work with if a denial gets challenged.”
For passengers, the legal calculus runs in the other direction.
“If you’re denied boarding after that interaction, aviation law starts from the assumption that the crew was right,” Radchenko said. “The discretionary authority aircrews hold on safety grounds is wide by design. To challenge it, a passenger has to demonstrate the decision was arbitrary, not just uncomfortable or inconvenient.”
Advertisement
He advised anyone who believes they are unjustly denied boarding to ask for a written reason before leaving the gate. “That document is the starting point for any claim worth filing,” he said.
Flight attendants are also trained to pick up on physical cues that passengers might be trying to hide.
“I’m looking for signs of illness, such as clammy or pale skin, excessive sweating or even visible contagious skin conditions that may require us to offload a passenger before the aircraft door closes,” Robert said.
“Passengers often try to hide the fact they’re unwell, so we have to use all the clues the body gives us to quickly determine whether someone is fit to make the journey by air.”
Advertisement
He’s also paying attention to the way passengers respond to his greetings.
“Slurred speech, confusion, difficulty maintaining balance or the smell of alcohol can all indicate intoxication or impairment,” Robert said. “Once passengers move into the cabin, the other flight attendants continue the assessment, watching for the same signs and making their own observations.”
Scent is part of these assessments for multiple reasons.
“We’re checking for the smell of alcohol but also for offensive body odour,” Robert said. “Both can result in you being denied boarding, as BO is a no-go. Many people don’t realise that excessive body odour can significantly affect the comfort and wellbeing of everyone else on the flight, and airlines have the right to refuse carriage if it becomes an issue.”
Advertisement
Flight attendants also keep an eye on people’s luggage to ensure carry-ons meet the airline’s size and quantity requirements and to identify bags that need to be gate-checked. Robert added that they look out for anything that could be considered a dangerous item as well.
“In recent years, we’ve also added another important responsibility during boarding – looking for potential signs of human trafficking,” he said. “Cabin crew around the world now receive training to recognise indicators that someone may be a victim and know how to discreetly report their concerns.”
These assessments can be wide-ranging, but the practice becomes second-nature over time. And it’s a subtle but important function.
“Airlines often position their most experienced cabin crew at the aircraft door because we’ve developed the ability to rapidly identify potential issues,” Robert said. “As a purser, or cabin manager, while I’m making a good first impression and welcoming guests onboard, I’m also continuously assessing whether each passenger is fit to travel.”
Advertisement
Beyond looking for potential issues, flight attendants are also quietly scanning for potential assets.
“We’re also identifying passengers who may be able to assist in an emergency if they’re seated in an exit row,” said Paula S. Adams, a former crew member for Etihad Airways who now works as a private flight attendant and aviation and business trainer.
Indeed, the boarding process is when crew members identify what they call able-bodied passengers or ABPs.
“These are the passengers we’re most likely to ask for assistance if we ever have an emergency,” Robert said. “I naturally take note of people who appear physically capable, law enforcement officers, military personnel, firefighters, medical professionals or simply someone who looks strong and confident enough to help if a passenger becomes disruptive or assistance is needed during an evacuation.”
Advertisement
Harteveldt noted that another pre-flight step contributes to this process.
“The FAA requires flight attendants to give a verbal briefing to passengers sitting in exit rows and by exit doors about the requirements to operate the doors in an emergency, if so directed by cabin crew, and to receive a verbal confirmation from each passenger sitting in those seats that they understand and agree to the safety-related requirements they are expected to fulfill,” he said. “The flight attendants also use this briefing to determine that the passengers meet the safety requirements and, again, are not impaired by alcohol or other substances before take-off.”
The boarding process is also a time when flight attendants identify travelers who might need additional assistance during the flight due to disability, for example.
“It helps crew members build situational awareness about who is on the aircraft. In an emergency, knowing which passengers may need extra help, or which travelers appear particularly capable of assisting others, can be valuable,” Datta said, adding, ”The few seconds spent greeting each passenger can help crew members identify potential issues before the aircraft ever leaves the gate.”
Advertisement
For all the safety assessment happening at that door, flight attendants also genuinely enjoy greeting travellers.
“While we’re scanning the cabin, we’re also looking for passengers we genuinely want to connect with,” Robert said. “Contrary to popular belief, many flight attendants actually like people. We enjoy chatting with our guests, hearing their stories and helping make their flight memorable.”
“That brief greeting is often our first opportunity to build rapport with passengers,” Adams said. “A friendly interaction at the door helps set a positive tone for the entire flight while allowing us to quietly assess the cabin before departure.”
Robert noted that he’s usually spotted his “in-flight friends” during boarding.
Advertisement
“And if you want a little galley gossip, flight attendants also tend to spot the ‘BOB’ during boarding,” Robert added. “That’s the ‘Best On Board,’ otherwise known as the passenger who catches our eye. It’s usually harmless fun, and you’ll often hear a little discussion in the galley about who we think is the most attractive passenger in our section.”
Now and then, these kinds of connections turn into something more as well.
“I know several cabin crew who met their husbands or wives because of a spark that started during boarding,” Robert said. “So you never know. That warm smile and eye contact at the aircraft door could one day lead to you enjoying one of the best perks of dating a flight attendant. As we often joke in the industry, ‘Marry me and fly for free.’”
Marriage prospects aside, there’s something to be said for simply being kind to the crew.
Advertisement
“If you can just greet the flight attendant, say hi or ask how their day is going, believe it or not, those little comments go a long way with flight crews because they have very long days,” Bubb said. “Before I go on a trip, I even buy a small stack of $5 Starbucks gift cards, and I give them out to the flight crew. It really brightens people’s days. One time I did that, the captain actually came back, shook my hand and gave me a handwritten note. It’s all about little things.”
Rangers take on West Ham in their final pre-season friendly before the new season. Here’s how to watch the match live and all the key details
Rangers play their final pre-season fixture this weekend when they welcome West Ham to Ibrox ahead of the start of the new Scottish Premiership campaign.
Advertisement
Derek McInnes’ side will be looking to end their summer schedule on a positive note before travelling to Dundee United for their league opener next Friday, while the Hammers continue their preparations for the Championship season following relegation from the Premier League.
Here is everything you need to know.
What TV channel is Rangers v West Ham on?
The match will not be shown live on television in the UK.
Can I live stream Rangers v West Ham?
Yes. The game will be available to watch live on Rangers TV.
Advertisement
Supporters can purchase a pay-per-view match pass for £8.99.
What time is kick-off?
Rangers take on West Ham on Sunday, July 26.
Kick-off at Ibrox is 4pm (BST).
Why is the game important?
The friendly represents Rangers’ final opportunity to sharpen up before competitive football returns, with McInnes set to make his final assessments ahead of the Scottish Premiership opener.
Advertisement
With places still up for grabs and the transfer window remaining open, several players will be aiming to impress before the season gets underway.
West Ham, meanwhile, will be hoping to build momentum as they prepare for life back in the Championship after last season’s relegation.
Charlie Brooks is rumoured to be reprising her role as Janine Butcher for a brief but “explosive” storyline on the long-running BBC soap.
The plot could be linked to the show’s Christmas Day episode, according to reports.
EastEnders star Charlie Brooks ‘returning’ as Janine Butcher
“The bosses have several huge stories planned for this autumn, which will all start building towards Christmas,” an EastEnders insider told The Sun.
“Although Charlie is only reprising her role as Janine for a couple of episodes this time around, her involvement is bound to cause plenty of drama.
“The plans are being kept top secret as they are really keen fans don’t have the storylines spoilt for them.”
Advertisement
The source added: “But no doubt they are going to love seeing Janine back to cause chaos.”
The BBC did not comment when approached by Newsquest.
Brooks, who joined the soap in 1999, recently teased a possible return by suggesting that Janine’s release from prison was drawing near.
In a recent appearance on Good Morning Britain, the actress was asked whether she might “get out earlier” by entertainment editor Richard Arnold.
Advertisement
She replied: “We’ll have to see!”
Charlie Brooks last appeared in EastEnders in 2022 (Image: BBC/Jack Barnes/Kieron McCarron)
After a further prompt from Susanna Reid, Brooks added: “I mean, look, I get asked this question all the time.
“I love Janine, I love playing her.
“She’s a wonderful character.
Advertisement
“I always get blessed with such great storylines.”
“So, who knows?
“It’s always a home from home, EastEnders, you know.”
Janine’s long history on the Square includes the murder of her husband Barry Evans in 2004.
Advertisement
She helped to stab to death her fourth husband, Michael Moon, in 2013.
The character was arrested in 2022 after her fifth husband Mick Carter (Danny Dyer) supposedly drowned in the Channel.
Janine was sentenced to five years in jail for perverting the course of justice by framing Mick’s ex-wife Linda Carter for a drink-driving crash.
EastEnders star axed from BBC soap
In other EastEnders news, soap legend Michelle Ryan has been axed from the BBC show, just one year after her comeback.
Advertisement
Ryan returned to Albert Square last year after her character, Zoe Slater, had a 20-year absence.
The star originally appeared on EastEnders from 2000 to 2005, and Zoe’s return saw the character reconnect with her estranged mother, Kat Moon, played by Jessie Wallace.
But now Zoe is set to leave the BBC soap for good, with reports that scriptwriters have chosen to kill off the character.
Zoe’s exit reportedly has already been filmed, with EastEnders viewers able to watch the scenes later this year.
Advertisement
Discussing the characters depature, a source told The Sun, “Michelle’s long-awaited return has been somewhat flat and lacklustre.
“There’s been a backlash about her comeback, leaving some fans disappointed with her on-screen presence.
A white van was rammed into the two cops in the town yesterday afternoon.
A van driver is being hunted after attempting to murder two police officers in Lanark. A white Renault Traffic was rammed into the officers as they carried out enquiries at a property on Glen Avenue on Saturday at around 2:10pm.
Advertisement
Two male officers, aged 41 and 43, were rushed to hospital for treatment to serious injuries. The 41-year-old has since been released and the 43-year-old remains in hospital in a stable condition. There were no reports of any other injuries as a result of the incident.
The van was later recovered in Kirkstyle Place, Glassford, and police are treating the incident as attempted murder and desperately trying to trace the driver. He is described as a white male, 6ft tall, wearing dark shorts, a grey jumper and a beige baseball cap.
Detective Inspector Gary Smillie said: “This was a deliberate and despicable attack on two officers who were simply carrying out their duties.
“Extensive enquiries are ongoing and I am appealing for anyone who was in the area around the time and witnessed the incident to contact us.
Advertisement
“I would also appeal to anyone in the area who may have dash cam footage or private CCTV which could assist to get in touch. Any information, no matter how insignificant it may seem, could assist with the investigation.”
Chief Inspector Paul Doyle said: “Violence is not part of the job for police officers – it is not acceptable and will not be tolerated.
“I would like to reassure the community that we are working to trace the person responsible and will continue to carry out enquiries in the local area.
“We are speaking to members of the public and there will be additional patrols in the area, and would encourage anyone with any information or concerns to speak to officers.
Advertisement
“Our thoughts are with the officers, their families and colleagues at this time. We will continue to offer them all the necessary support.
“Anyone with any information should contact 101 quoting reference 1652 of 25 July, 2026. Information can also be given to Crimestoppers anonymously by calling 0800 555 111. “
Get more Daily Record exclusives by signing up for free to Google’s preferred sources. Click HERE.
A North Yorkshire Police spokesperson said: “This is a rural location, but we’re keen to hear from anyone who was in the area and may have seen anything unusual. Did you notice any suspicious vehicles, people, or activity around Ruddings Farm during this period?”
Advertisement
Police are also asking people to check any CCTV, doorbell, or dashcam footage from those dates.
Anyone with information is asked to contact North Yorkshire Police on 101, quoting incident number NYP-24072026-0230.
NEW YORK (AP) — The Trump administration has imposed double-digit tariffs on more than 60 countries, using a legal justification that permits the president to levy import taxes and other sanctions against countries found to engage in “unjustifiable,” “unreasonable” or “discriminatory” trade practices.
The new tariffs announced in recent days take effect just as temporary 10% worldwide tariffs expired, and critics say they are less about cracking down on forced labor than they are a way to replace those tariffs. The expired tariffs were themselves a temporary replacement for worldwide tariffs the Supreme Court struck down in February.
The tariffs were levied on countries that the U.S. says either don’t have or don’t effectively enforce a forced-labor import ban. The affected countries, which account for 99% of U.S. imports, were quick to protest, calling the Trump administration’s claims unfounded and arbitrary, as nations with vastly different records on forced labor received the same tariff level. The U.S. spent four months investigating but gave few details on how it arrived at the tariff rates, which are either 10% or 12.5%.
Sidestepping Congress
The tariffs were levied under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 on countries that the U.S. determined had failed “to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor.”
Advertisement
During President Donald Trump ‘s first term, he cited Section 301 to impose sweeping tariffs on Chinese imports amid a dispute over the sharp-elbowed tactics Beijing was using to challenge America’s technological dominance. The U.S. is also using 301 powers to counter what it calls unfair Chinese practices in the shipbuilding industry.
“The 301s allow a permanent tariff without going to Congress to settle the dispute,” said Barry Appleton, a law professor and co-director of New York Law School’s Center for International Law. “That’s what all of this is about. The president doesn’t want to knock on the front door of Congress, so he’s trying every side door and every unlatched window to get in.”
Little evidence that countries failed to enforce import bans
The office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) said it consulted with all 60 economies under investigation and held two rounds of public hearings, elicited more than 2,100 public comments, and had “engagement” with its trading partners about what they were doing to combat forced labor bans.
It didn’t detail its talks with the countries, saying those were confidential. Experts say it is fairly straightforward to investigate whether a country has a ban or not, but it is difficult to determine the government’s exact rationale for each country’s failure to enforce import bans.
Advertisement
“There’s not a lot of hard evidence there,” said Scott Lincicome, vice president for general economics and trade policy at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank. “It’s pretty laughable on its face to think that a country like the ones in Europe or in Norway or Switzerland aren’t doing enough to police forced labor.”
And even if countries do enact and enforce the forced-labor import bans the U.S. wants, they would still need to prove that they’re enforcing them to Washington’s satisfaction before the tariffs would be removed, said lawyer Patrick Childress, a partner at Holland & Knight and a former U.S. trade official.
“This suggests that no short-term path for countrywide relief from the new Section 301 tariffs will be available,” he said.
Advertisement
Sign up for Morning Wire:
Our flagship newsletter breaks down the biggest headlines of the day.
Advertisement
Countries and industries reject the forced labor argument
Many countries have pushed back against the Trump administration’s findings.
Brazil, which faces a 12.5% forced-labor tariff, called the U.S. move “arbitrary and unjustified.” The U.S. “chose to manipulate an issue of great importance to human rights and the struggles of workers worldwide in order to accuse 59 countries and the European Union of unfair practices,” it said in a statement.
Australia also questioned the justification for its 12.5% tariff.
Advertisement
“We believe that amongst all of the countries in the world, Australia does take the issue of slavery, modern slavery, seriously, and will continue to do that,” Trade Minister Don Farrell told reporters in Adelaide.
Carve-outs have riled some industries. The National Council of Textile Organizations (NCTO), which describes itself as the voice of the American textile industry, protested a mechanism that exempts the Section 301 tariffs for textile and apparel imports from Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia, and Malaysia based on those countries’ imports of U.S. cotton and textiles.
“No other industry has been more disadvantaged by forced labor than the U.S. textile industry, which employs 453,000 workers and has lost 41 plants over the past two plus years,” NCTO chief executive Kim Glas said in a statement. “We remain strongly concerned that USTR’s textile mechanism will harm the very domestic manufacturers the administration seeks to help.”
US forced-labor bans don’t always work
The U.S. has two major pieces of legislation related to forced-labor import bans. The Tariff Act of 1930 gave Customs and Border Protection the authority to seize shipments where forced labor was suspected and to block further imports. But it had a big carve-out: If there was “consumptive demand,” meaning there wasn’t sufficient supply to meet domestic demand, imports were allowed regardless of how they were produced. The Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act that took effect in 2016 eliminated that loophole.
But goods made with forced labor can still make it into the U.S. In 2015, an Associated Press investigation found that slave labor was used in the fishing industry in Southeast Asia. The seafood they caught made its way to supermarkets and pet food providers across the U.S.
An investigation by The Associated Press in 2020 into the $65 billion palm oil industry found labor abuses among an invisible workforce consisting of millions of men, women and children in Asia. The fruit they harvested made its way into the supply chains of major companies, including Unilever, L’Oreal, Nestle and Procter & Gamble.
Calls for a more comprehensive approach to combat forced labor
During hearings on the tariffs this month, National Retail Federation vice president Jonathan Gold, who was representing the business coalition the Joint Association Forced Labor Working Group at the hearing, said that in order for the import bans to work, they would have to be much more extensive.
Advertisement
He said there need to be “clear, measurable benchmarks” tied to tariffs for countries to hit, and that the U.S. should help countries build enforcement programs.
Kenya Davis, a partner at the Boies Schiller Flexner law firm, said an effective ban needs a “comprehensive approach” that provides transparency about what the investigations consisted of, along with programs that provide countries aid in enforcing bans.
MOSCOW (AP) — A U.S.-Russian space crew landed safely in the steppes of Kazakhstan on Sunday after an eight-month stint on the International Space Station.
NASA astronaut Chris Williams and Russian crewmates Sergei Kud-Sverchkov and Sergei Mikaev touched down in their Soyuz MS-28 that landed smoothly by parachute in a designated area southeast of Dzhezkazgan.
Their 241-day stint on the orbiting outpost was the first space mission for Williams and Mikaev and the second for Kud‑Sverchkov.
The crew will be flown by helicopter to Karaganda, where Williams will board a plane to return to NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, while Kud‑Sverchkov and Mikaev will take a flight to their training base in Star City, just outside Moscow.
Advertisement
Once bitter rivals in the space race during the Cold War, Russia and the U.S. cooperate on the space station and other projects. That relationship was marred by tensions after Moscow sent troops into Ukraine in 2022, but Washington and Moscow have continued to work together, with U.S. and Russian crews flying to the orbiting outpost on each country’s spacecraft.
On July 14, the crew of NASA astronaut Anil Menon and Roscosmos cosmonauts Pyotr Dubrov and Anna Kikina arrived at the International Space Station for an eight-month mission after launching from the Russia-leased Baikonur cosmodrome in Kazakhstan on July 14.
NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman attended the launch, the first visit to Baikonur by a NASA chief in eight years.
The newly arrived trio have joined NASA astronauts Jessica Meir and Jack Hathaway, European Space Agency astronaut Sophie Adenot and Roscosmos cosmonaut Andrei Fedyaev as part of Expedition 75.
Simon Jordan airs Anthony Joshua conspiracy theory after boxer knocked out rival despite hitting the canvas TWICE to set up money-spinning Tyson Fury fight: ‘Something not quite right’
Simon Jordan has questioned the nature of Anthony Joshua‘s victory over Kristian Prenga as he recovered from two knockdowns to set up a lucrative showdown with Tyson Fury.
Joshua, who had been returning to the ring after seven months of inactivity, appeared on the brink of defeat in the opening round against Prenga.
The Albanian heavyweight knocked Joshua down just 20 seconds into the contest with an uppercut.
Joshua then survived another knockdown later in the round, with fans fearing the long-awaited showdown with Fury was at risk.
Advertisement
The second round proved dramatically different as Joshua unleashed a series of heavy blows to force Prenga towards the ropes, before delivering a knockout blow.
Joshua’s stunning turnaround, coupled with Fury’s victory over Mariusz Wach just 24 hours earlier, cleared the path for the two British heavyweights to finally meet in one of the most lucrative fights in boxing.
Anthony Joshua survived two knock downs in the first round against Kristian Prenga
Advertisement
Joshua responded in the second by delivering a second round knockout of the Albanian
Simon Jordan questioned the nature of Joshua’s victory given the difference between the two rounds
talkSPORT presenter Simon Jordan controversially questioned the dramatic difference in the rounds between Joshua and Prenga.
Jordan declared ‘something not quite right’ as he appeared to reference the sums on offer for Joshua’s fight with Fury.
Advertisement
‘Not having that… #anthonyjoshua fight,’ Jordan posted.
‘Dropped twice and sets the tempo, how’s that ? … Prenga totally different in 2nd
‘Something not quite right, all designed to rinse maximum amount of money…’
Punch stats for the fight revealed the stunning difference between the two rounds, with Joshua landing just five of his 22 attempted punches in the first, while Prenga connected with 15 of his 32.
Advertisement
The second round swung with Joshua landing with 13 of his 46 punches, as Prenga dramatically dropped off by landing three of 17 attempted.
Despite Jordan’s comments on social media, Joshua insisted that ‘champions rise’ in a post-fight interview after coming through the test.
Prenga had stunned Joshua in the opening round and landed 13 of his 32 attempted punches
He landed just three of 17 punches in the second round as Joshua became the aggressor
Advertisement
Prenga was sent to the canvas by a brutal blow from Joshua, who later declared ‘champions rise’ when asked about the dramatic turnaround
‘He [Prenga] gave me a good test but this is what champions do, we rise,’ Joshua said.
‘We get knocked down and stand up. That is life, that is life’s motto.
‘I want to give a massive thank you to Prenga and his team for putting up a good fight. It means a lot to them and it means a lot to me and that is why you see what you see in the ring.
Advertisement
‘I want to give thanks to God. It was more than me in that situation, it can’t just be me in them type of situations. There is a higher power that is calling.
‘He’s a strong guy and I think Eddie [Hearn] wants to sign him now! He is going to do well and he has a bright future.
‘Maybe with a bit more experience, he [Prenga] will be up there with the rest of us. He is strong and durable.’
Looking ahead to the showdown with Fury, with contracts having already been signed, Joshua said in the ring: ‘Have we got Tyson Fury in the room? Is he here or not?
Advertisement
‘I am the meanest, most vicious champion. Nobody can stop me. He is no Oleksandr [Usyk].
‘All jokes aside, there are two sides. One is the fighter and the other is respect. I respect everything he has done and everything that he has achieved, but as a fighting person, we’re here now.
‘I hope the fans will be in for a lovely treat.’
Joshua had paid tribute to his two close friends, who were killed in a car crash in December.
Advertisement
Joshua will finally face Tyson Fury in a money-spinning contest with his rival having beaten Mariussz Wach a day earlier
Joshua paid tribute to his close friends Sina Ghami and Latif ‘Latz’ Ayodele, who died in a car crash in December
Sina Ghami and Latif ‘Latz’ Ayodele died while the car they were travelling in struck a truck on a road near Lagos in December. The pair were on holiday with Joshua after he beat Jake Paul in Miami.
Fighting in honour of Ghami and Ayodele, Joshua paid tribute to his friends by having their names printed on his military camouflage trunks.
He also walked to the ring wearing a military-style jacket to match his camo shorts. The jacket featured a medal bar displaying the IBF, IBO, WBA, and WBO titles – which he previously held – alongside pennants bearing Ghami and Ayodele’s names.
Meanwhile, ‘Latz x Sina, My Brother’s Keeper, MBK’ was printed on the canvas in his corner.
Asked about how he has been coping after beating Prenga, Joshua said: ‘It’s been tough,’ before becoming emotional. ‘That’s my brothers. I don’t want to talk about that.’
Advertisement
Speaking on DAZN, Matchroom Boxing chief Eddie Hearn admitted he feared the heavyweight had returned to the ring too soon after witnessing his struggles in the opening round.
‘Nobody can imagine what he’s been through in that last seven months. In that first round, I thought we’d come back too soon,’ Hearn said.
‘Boxing got him through. To even be in the ring tonight is astonishing. You don’t know what he’s been through. He had to go to the depths one more time to get up, like he has done the last seven months.’
In February, Joshua memorialised Ghami and Ayodele by having their names tattooed on his arm.
Photographers were spoiled for choice as Whitby’s streets and the pavilion filled with corsets, goggles and top hats, with many of the most eye-catching outfits captured on camera by The Press Camera Club’s talented members Garry Hornby and Simon McCabe throughout the weekend.
We’ve created this gallery of Whitby Steampunk Weekend 2026: 31 photos of amazing outfits to showcase all the fabulous photos – and to give the participants the audience their outfits deserve!
The three-day event, held at Whitby Pavilion from Friday, July 24 to today, Sunday, July 26, is widely regarded as one of the largest free steampunk gatherings in the UK, attracting crowds from across the country.
Whitby Steampunk Weekend 2026. (Image: Simon McCabe Photography)
Organisers said the family-friendly festival, first launched in 2017, once again transformed the seaside venue into a hub of “fanciful extravagance”, with around 70 traders offering clothing, accessories, and handmade curiosities.
Whitby Steampunk Weekend 2026. (Image: Simon McCabe Photography)
Alongside the retail emporium, visitors are being treated to a packed programme of talks, workshops, and live entertainment.
Highlights have included presentations on Whitby’s ghosts and legends, Vikings and vampires, Viking mythology, the town’s links to Bram Stoker, and the history of Victorian funeral customs.
Advertisement
Whitby Steampunk Weekend 2026. (Image: Simon McCabe Photography)
Experts and guest speakers have included author and parapsychologist Paul Fitz-George, funeral director Emma Sparre-Newman covering how and why Victorian social conditions gave rise to the modern day funeral director and shaped so many funeral customs, and curators from Whitby Museum showcasing unusual artefacts from their collections.
Entertainment extended beyond the pavilion over the weekend, with performances from Ravens Morris from East Yorkshire, and sea shanty group Whitby Tillermen Friends drawing crowds outdoors.
Whitby Steampunk Weekend 2026. (Image: Simon McCabe Photography)
Evening events included a charity quiz and a tribute concert at the Whitby Pavilion Theatre featuring the Duran Duran Experience and Ant Trouble – Adam & The Ants Tribute.
Organiser Andy from WSW Events encouraged visitors to attend, saying: “Don’t wait for all the pictures to appear on social media and wish you’d come—make the effort and enjoy a day to remember.”
Advertisement
The event, which offers free daytime entry, is held every February and July.
Were you in Whitby for the Steampunk Weekend? Share your photos in the comments below – or join The Press Camera Club here.
Ruby Rae’s Country Bar is to open its doors on Thursday. August 6 in the former Jalou nightclub on Bridge Street.
Dean Saunders, co- founder of the Newcastle-based company, says he has ‘loved’ York for years.
He told the Press: “I have been coming down to York for years. I used toi come when the church contained Jalou. When I knew the building was available, an opening in York was a no brainer.”
RECOMMENDED READING:
Advertisement
Dan Cooke, Twinnie-Lee Moore and Dean Saunders open up the former Jalou. (Image: Jake Usman)
Dean says he has been working on developing the York site since February, which will be inspired by the world-famous Ryman stage in Nashville.
Clive Johnson Horsemanship and the team. (Image: Jake Usman)
Dean continued: “A lot of people who come to our Newcastle venue, they say they love the atmosphere. It’s a predominately female crowd, a about 65 per cent. People love the idea of dancing and dressing up. They might not initially be into country music but they might get converted.”
Advertisement
In the renovations of the former church, all the floors have been changed. Much LVT flooring has been used, which Dean says is great for line dancing.
Ruby Rae singers Ashleigh Bell and Harriet (Image: Jake Usman)
He said: “We have sanded some of the original flooring. We have removed the lighting to reveal a lot of the original features of the church. We have taken off the curtains to expose the brickwork. We have changed the bar to make it look more like Nashville.
“It’s all about the music. We are making the stage the main feature. It will have a deejay booth. Behind is a Ruby Rae’s York sign that will be epic.”
Furthermore, to add character will be plates reflecting the region, ‘dollar walls’, flags, lots of vinyls and ‘lots of neon signs everywhere.’
Advertisement
Singer Ashleigh Bell (Image: Jake Usman)
“It will be very Nashville,” Dean explained, adding lots of seats will be added.
“We want it to be somewhere where people can come in for hours and chill out. We have tried to expose as many of the original features of the church as it is such an epic building.”
Singe Ste Wilson (Image: Jake Usman)
And whilst the work has been underway, Ruby Rae received a boost with a visit from York-born country and western performer Twinnie-Lee Moore. The 39 year-old has appeared on the stage, as well as soaps including Hollyoaks and more recently Emmerdale as boxing promoter Jade.
Though based in Nashville, she regularly visits home and showed her support for Ruby Rae’s by turning up on a horse and with Ruby Rae singers Ashley Bell and Harriet.
Advertisement
Dean added that Twinnie-Lee will perform at Ruby Rae’s York one day.
What do you think of Country and Western music? Will you be going to Ruby Rae’s York?
You must be logged in to post a comment Login