Connect with us

NewsBeat

How to bet on the World Cup 2026 | The Standard

Published

on

How to bet on the World Cup 2026 | The Standard

All eyes are on North America for the 2026 World Cup, with excitement levels building. Football fans will be glued to their screens.

If you’re interested in placing a bet on the World Cup, The Standard has you covered. We’ve taken a look at the most popular match markets and tournament-long outright markets on betting sites, as well as highlighting the offers that can enhance both.

Here’s all you need to learn about types of football bets and World Cup betting markets.

Advertisement

World Cup betting markets explained

The World Cup is the biggest sporting event on the calendar, so it is no surprise that there are tons of markets on World Cup betting sites. If you’re new to betting, that might be slightly intimidating or confusing, so we’ve unpacked the most common types of betting markets:

This is the bread and butter of football betting markets, with three outcomes: home win, draw, and away win. Sometimes displayed as 1X2 – 1 for a home win, X for a draw, and 2 for an away win – this market is settled at full time, 90 minutes plus any additional time. Any bets on this market do not cover the outcome after extra time and/or penalties in the World Cup.

Double chance takes the match result market and allows punters to combine any two of the three match result outcomes into one bet. For example, betting on ‘Scotland or draw’ in this market for Haiti v Scotland covers anything other than a win for Haiti.

Advertisement

This does mean the odds are lower than betting on a single outcome in match result market, but the chances of a winning bet is greater. Double chance is a useful World Cup betting market for backing an underdog without fearing the draw.

Another variation of match betting with a little bit of protection. Here you back a team to win, but if the match ends in a draw, your stake will be refunded.

Effectively, you are hedging against the stalemate, which provides a middle ground between match result and double chance. You’ll have shorter odds than the match result win price, but the odds are longer than with double chance.

Both teams to score (BTTS)

Advertisement

Both teams to score, commonly abbreviated to BTTS, is a simple yes/no market. Picture it as being asked if you think both teams will score in a specific game – bet yes if you think they will, or bet no if you think they won’t.

For example, if you bet on both teams to score in Canada v Bosnia & Herzegovina and the final result is 2-1, you win. It doesn’t matter how many goals either side scores, so long as they both find the net.

BTTS is popular for high-scoring fixtures and a staple of bet builders. This market settles on 90 minutes.

With total goals, you are betting whether the total goals in the match will go over or under a set number – typically 2.5 goals. Lines at 1.5, 3.5 and 4.5 are also widely available.

Advertisement

The addition of the 0.5 to the number removes the chance of a dead heat – if the market was over or under two goals and the game finished 2-0, it would be a dead heat – leaving bettors with two options, backing the over or under.

So if you looked at a game and thought there might be three or more goals in the fixture, you’d bet over 2.5 goals. It doesn’t matter how many goals are scored in the fixture, so long as there’s a minimum of three.

Simply pick a player to score at any point in the match. This is the most popular individual-player market.

Closely related to this market is first goalscorer and last goalscorer. As it is more difficult to predict who will open the scoring and who will grab the last goal, the odds for those markets are higher than the anytime option.

Advertisement

The Asian handicap gives one team a virtual goal start (or deficit) to level the playing field in potentially one-sided World Cup fixtures.

For favourite backers, it improves their World Cup odds, as they must now win by a certain amount, while for underdog backers, they can wager on them and make a profit so long as their chosen team covers the handicap.

There’s a great variety in numbers available for Asian handicap, with quarter and half goals helping to eliminate the draw as a possibility.

Take the example of Brazil vs Haiti, if you were to back Brazil -1.5 on the Asian handicap, you would need Brazil to win by two goals for the bet to hit.

Advertisement

Another over or under market, based on total corners across the match. Common lines are 9.5, 10.5, 11.5. This market is settled on 90 minutes.

Again, an over/under market on a specific player’s number of shots. There are two variants: total shots and shots on target. Make sure to check which market you are betting on – shots on target bets will have higher odds, but hits at a lower rate.

This market is a two-way yes or no market on whether a named player will be shown a yellow or red card. Cards shown after the final whistle don’t count.

World Cup outright betting markets

Advertisement

World Cup outrights are tournament-long bets settled at the end of a certain stage or the conclusion of the competition.

Placing an outright bet before the tournament starts usually secures the best odds in that market, but you can also wager on outrights during the competition.

Betting during the tournament can mean you have a clearer idea of who will win the tournament or an award, but the odds will be lower.

This is the headline outright market – predicting the World Cup winner. Bettors can place a win-only or each-way bet on this market.

Advertisement

You might not have heard of each-way before – essentially, you place half the stake on your selection winning, and half on a place. Standard World Cup terms are typically 1/2 odds on the top two – i.e half the win odds if your team reaches the final.

Some bookmakers boost this to the top three or top four. Make sure to check before betting.

Whilst offering some insurance, each-way only really makes sense at longer odds.

Top goalscorer (Golden Boot)

Advertisement

This market asks you to predict the tournament’s leading scorer. Most UK bookmakers also offer each-way terms on this bet too, typically paying out on the top four in the top scorer standings at 1/4 the starting odds.

Group winner and qualification

These are two related markets – which team will top the group, and which teams will qualify.

A group winner bet will only be marked as a winner if the team finishes top of the section, while a to qualify wager will be successful so long as they reach the round of 32.

Advertisement

It is important to note that the revamped World Cup format will see the eight best third-placed teams progress to the Round of 32, so to qualify covers that too at most sportsbooks.

This market asks when you think a chosen side will exit the tournament. Bookmakers will price each round at which a team could be knocked out – group stage, Round of 32, Round of 16, quarter-finals, semi-finals, the final or winner. Bets on each stage are mutually exclusive.

This is a two-way market, asking a yes/no question on whether you think a team will reach the final. Sometimes this is packaged as ‘to reach the semi-final’ or ‘to reach the quarter-final’ too.

Overall, this is a simpler version of the stage of elimination market – useful for punters who just want a binary call.

Advertisement

How to place a bet on the World Cup

  • Choose a UK-licensed bookmaker. You can compare bookmakers and welcome offers with The Standard’s best World Cup betting sites article
  • Sign up and verify your ID – you must be a UK resident aged over 18+ to register for a betting account
  • Make a qualifying deposit using a permitted payment method
  • Find a World Cup bet
  • Add your selection to the bet slip and choose your stake
  • Remember to stake responsibly, check the market rules thoroughly, and confirm

Betting offers that enhance World Cup markets

Bookmakers produce a range of World Cup betting offers for every tournament. Here are some promotions that can help you make the most of FIFA World Cup 2026 betting markets.

Place a wager on the match result and if the team you backed goes two goals ahead at any point, your bet is paid out as a winner regardless of the final score. This is a common promo available at most betting sites.

If your World Cup accumulator is let down by one leg, get your stake back, typically in free bets. Available at Betfred, Ladbrokes and BOYLE Sports, among others. Acca insurance is a useful safety net, but usually requires an acca to have at least 5 legs.

Advertisement

Get more from your accas with boosted payouts. The boost percentage scales with the number of legs, with some bookmakers offering enhanced payouts on doubles (a multiple feature two legs), going all the way up to a 200 per cent boost for accumulators with 20 or more selections.

Selected daily markets where the bookmaker has enhanced the standard price. Most brands run a daily ‘enhanced markets’ or ‘price boosts’ section – meaning it is worth a quick scan across sites before placing any World Cup bet.

Bet365 and William Hill are known for doing huge odds boosts, but with restrictions on how much can be wagered on those selections.

Any bet on a player-specific market is carried over to their replacement if they are taken off during a match. For example, with Bet365’s Sub on Play On, if you bet on Harry Kane to score and he’s replaced by Ollie Watkins, who goes on to score in that same match, the bet is marked as a winner.

Advertisement

Free bets and ongoing offers

On top of any welcome offers and sign-up free bets, there are ongoing free bet offers like Sky Bet’s Free Bet Club or Paddy’s Rewards, which reward bettors for placing a certain number of bets within a specified time frame.

If you’re new to gambling, it can be easy getting caught up in all the excitement. With the non-stop football the expanded World Cup brings, emotions can lead you. It is important to remember to gamble responsibly on betting sites. Gambling should never be treated as a source of income.

Remember to never bet more than you can afford, and use deposit and time limits to help keep in touch with your gambling.

Advertisement

World Cup betting markets – frequently asked questions

What are the most common World Cup betting markets?

The most popular World Cup betting markets is the match result market, with plenty of bettors likely to wager on the outcome of a game. The World Cup also attracts strong betting interest in their outright markets before the tournament kick-offs, with tournament winner and top goalscorer markets available on all UK betting sites.

What is each-way betting on the World Cup?

Advertisement

Each-way are effectively two bets in one – half the stake on the win, and half on a place finish. Different World Cup markets will have different each-way rules, with each-way bets on the World Cup winner traditionally offering 1/2 odds if the team you selected reaches the final.

However, for Golden Boot bets, an each-way wager in that market will show a return with a top four finish, but at 1/4 the starting odds.

Can you bet on the World Cup before the tournament starts?

Yes – you can bet on the outright winner, top goalscorer, group betting and stage of elimination markets are all open well before kick-off. Match result markets are also available well in advance, but player-specific markets only get priced up in the days before a game.

Advertisement

Pre-tournament prices often offer better value than in-play, particularly on outsiders.

We aim to offer every online gambler and reader of The Standard a safe and fair platform through unbiased reviews and offers from the UK’s best online gambling companies.

Gambling can be addictive, always play responsibly and only bet what you can afford to lose. Gambling sites have a number of tools to assist you to stay in control, including deposit limits and time outs. If you think you have a problem, advice and support is available for you now from BeGambleAware or Gamcare.

Any offers or odds listed in this article are correct at the time of publication but are subject to change. Terms & Conditions apply to all offers.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

NewsBeat

Woman died after gruesome accident saw her boiled alive in national park

Published

on

Daily Record

WARNING: DISTRESSING CONTENT Three friends were making their way home when a misstep caused them to fall into a pit of boiling water

An ordinary evening of fun took a dark twist as it became one of the most tragic accidents in Yellowstone National Park’s history.

Advertisement

Sara Hulpers, 20, and her two 18-year-old friends, Lance Buchi and Tyler Montague, were working as seasonal staff at the park in the summer of 2000 and were walking back home from swimming in the Firehole River with other friends that fateful day.

As they journeyed along their familiar route home, cutting through the Lower Geyser Basin and following a worn path used by locals with no official signage, they jumped into the small streams known to be safe.

Until the three of them misjudged one of the bodies of water. The friends believed they were jumping into a shallow freshet but instead plunged into the crust surrounding Cavern Springs, an off-limits feature known to reach temperatures as high as 87 degrees Celsius.

Lance and Tyler managed to keep their heads out of the water following the fall, and crawled out of the water on their own, while Sara had to be helped by the group of friends that was walking ahead of the trio, who had all returned after hearing their agonising cries.

Advertisement

In later reports, Lance’s family said he remembered feeling the ground beneath them was solid before he fell a second time while trying to escape the boiling water.

The damage was already catastrophic – the young woman had suffered third-degree burns all over her body, and heartbreakingly died the next day in a Salt Lake City burn unit.

The two surviving friends were airlifted to Idaho Falls and then to the University of Utah’s burn centre, both with burns ranging from 95% of their bodies. Their survival rate was low, but not impossible, said doctors, who estimated they had a 30-40% chance of making it through treatment, given the risks of infection since the boys had little uninjured skin left for grafting.

Advertisement

Tyler’s grandfather and former local weatherman, Bob Welti, was at the hospital at the early stages of treatment and called the situation the “saddest” he’d ever witnessed.

Both young men endured months of surgery and skin grafts before eventually being discharged, Tyler in November and Lance in December – the latter having lost 51 pounds during his hospital stay.

Hundreds gathered in Oroville, Washington, to mourn the loss of Sara, an exemplary student at Western Washington University, weeks away from a new scholarship award.

Advertisement

Friends who were by her side in the last days of her life spoke of her dedication while she was alive. Yuvia Storm, 21, was one of her friends from her time at Yellowstone, said: ”She was so happy. She told me I had to be the one to spread the word that she was excited about death. Tell them I had a wonderful life – no regrets.”

During the funeral service, her father sang songs he’d written about her, and friends and family decorated the auditorium with sunflowers.

Investigations followed, but found no evidence of alcohol as a leading factor in the tragedy, and officials added that it was the first Yellowstone hot spring fatality since 1988 – although since the time of this accident (in the year 2000), two further accidents took the lives of a 23-year-old in 2016 and a 70-year-old in 2022.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Australian watchdog accuses Telegram of failing to block extremist videos

Published

on

Australian watchdog accuses Telegram of failing to block extremist videos

MELBOURNE, Australia (AP) — Australia’s online safety watchdog has filed legal action against messaging app Telegram, saying the platform failed to remove extremist content including videos of white supremacist mass shootings in Buffalo, New York, and the New Zealand city of Christchurch as well as Islamic State group beheadings.

The United Arab Emirates-based app, which reports having 1 billion users worldwide, faces a fine of up to 54.6 million Australian dollars ($38 million) if convicted in the Australian Federal Court for “alleged failure to detect and remove pro-terror material,” eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said Thursday.

The civil action is a test of Australia’s 2021 law requiring tech platforms to work to keep illegal and pro-terrorism material off their networks.

Telegram denied the claims. “We reject these allegations and will contest them in court,” a spokesperson said in a written statement sent on Telegram.

Advertisement

Regulator says app must take responsibility

The platform is one of the world’s most popular messaging apps. The Australian regulator is taking issue with what’s shared in group chats of up to 200 people and channels with unlimited reach.

“This case concerns content linked to some of the most notorious acts of known extremist violence in recent history, including material associated with the Christchurch and Buffalo terror attacks,” Inman Grant said in a statement.

“We allege that this content remained accessible on the service long after Telegram had been put on notice,” she said.

Advertisement

The crimes cited by Inman Grant were ideologically-driven massacres performed for online audiences. Years later, digital artifacts of the massacres are still confounding regulators, who fear the power of videos and so-called manifestos to radicalize others.

In Buffalo in 2022, an American white supremacist livestreamed on Twitch part of a shooting at a supermarket in which he killed 10 Black people. He cited among his motivations the crimes of an Australian white supremacist who in 2019 livestreamed on Facebook a shooting at two Christchurch mosques, where he murdered 51 Muslim worshippers.

Telegram channels established after these and other hate-fueled crimes were populated by users who endorsed the killers and shared videos and other content from the massacres. The Australian watchdog’s claim, filed to the federal court Wednesday, said the unlimited broadcast size of Telegram channels meant the app must take responsibility for culling harmful material.

Telegram says it blocks ‘terrorist-related communities’

The messaging app’s statement said that the platform’s “extensive anti-terrorism efforts are well-documented,” adding a link to its published figures recording blocked content and channels. More than 150,000 “terrorist-related communities” have been blocked from the platform this year, according to the figures.

Advertisement

Inman Grant said eSafety began urging Telegram to comply with its own policies in March 2024, but the platform had been “non-responsive” for months.

The Australian official said that changed after France arrested Telegram’s Russian billionaire founder and CEO Pavel Durov in August 2024 over allegations that his platform was being used for illegal activity, including drug trafficking and the distribution of images of child sexual abuse. He was released after four days of questioning on bail of 5 million euros ($5.7 million).

Advertisement

Telegram had “become more compliant initially with us and with other regulators after France took action against the company,” Inman Grant said.

“They’ve still kept a permissive hosting environment for terrorist content,” she added.

The Australian court case also related to IS beheadings and other “horrific material used for propaganda and for radicalization,” she said.

“When platforms are alerted to terrorist content, they must act,” Inman Grant said.

Advertisement

On Wednesday, Russia’s Federal Security Service accused Durov of aiding what it called terrorist activities. The service also said it was adding Durov’s name to international wanted lists.

Telegram said in its statement supplied to The Associated Press on Thursday that it is committed to protecting user privacy and human rights such as freedom of speech and assembly. It said it had played a prominent role in pro-democracy movements around the world, including in Iran, Russia, Belarus, Myanmar and Hong Kong.

___

Graham-McLay reported from Wellington, New Zealand.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Is Netanyahu’s star waning in Washington? His latest meeting with Trump suggests it may be

Published

on

Is Netanyahu’s star waning in Washington? His latest meeting with Trump suggests it may be

Appearing increasingly isolated and weakened, Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu travelled to Washington this week, where he had a face-to-face meeting with Donald Trump – his eighth of the US president’s second term. Netanyahu is desperate to revive his image as the closest ally of the most powerful man in the world, but his star has fallen dramatically in Washington since his last trip.

The US president has problems of his own, so he clearly had little appetite for a photo opportunity with a deeply unpopular Israeli leader widely blamed for convincing him to launch an unwinnable war against a state few Americans saw as a serious threat.

The war has already cost at least US$37.5 billion (£28.2) billion, a 15-25% increase in gasoline prices, persistent inflation, and the deaths of 18 American servicemen.

After months seeking an invitation, Netanyahu got his opportunity while in Washington for the funeral of Senator Lindsey Graham, one of Israel’s staunchest supporters in Congress.

Advertisement

But even before the Israeli entourage departed for Washington, Trump was plainly irritated by Israeli briefings that Netanyahu intended to present him with intelligence concerning Iran’s deeply buried “Pickaxe Mountain” nuclear facility. In an interview with Fox News, Trump dismissed the idea that Netanyahu could tell him anything new and appeared to lend credence to the view that Israel was trying to push him towards a prolonged campaign in Iran.

Trump also brushed aside Israeli concerns about his intention to sell F-35 fighter jets to Turkey, warning Netanyahu not to try to influence his decision. He then lavished praise on Turkish president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and – in a dig at Netanyahu’s international isolation – added that “Turkey’s not a big fan of Israel, not a great fan of Bibi. But they’ve been great for me.”

The lack of fanfare surrounding this meeting underscores Trump’s frustration that he cannot extricate himself from their disastrous joint military enterprise in Iran. After being quietly ushered into the White House through a side entrance, there was no question-and-answer session with journalists – unlike many previous Trump-Netanyahu meetings. Only minimal information has been released by the White House, and Trump has been conspicuously discreet about what was discussed.

Netanyahu under pressure

With an election looming at the end of October, Netanyahu is trailing in the polls behind rival contender, Daid Eisenkot. So his immediate attempt to put a positive spin on the meeting suggested how desperate he is for Trump’s political endorsement.

Advertisement

Shortly after the talks concluded, Netanyahu released a video message declaring, without explanation, that: “This was one of the best conversations I have had with our friend, US President Donald Trump.”

Trump and his war may be unpopular in America, but the opposite is true in Israel. Trump remains extremely popular there. So Netanyahu’s association with him, and the sense of protection this symbolises in Israel, is a significant political asset.

The war is unpopular in the US because few Americans see Iran as a serious threat. Consequently, few care how the war ends so long as a ceasefire or peace deal brings prices down. In contrast, the criticism Netanyahu faces from his own voters is that Israel has not finished the job and that he been forced to agree to a ceasefire which his critics argue has only emboldened Iran.

Iran has become increasingly assertive in recent weeks.
EPA/Abedin Taherkenareh

As recently as last week, Netanyahu’s team would have been buoyed that Trump appeared to be on the cusp of resuming major military operations against Iran. But the day before the meeting, Trump abruptly decided to halt military operations.

Advertisement

He appears to have done so for three reasons. Omani-mediated talks over the Strait of Hormuz, have reportedly been making progress. Meanwhile senior US military commanders have warned the US president that the bombing campaign had reached the limits of its effectiveness and America’s stock of air defence interceptors were becoming dangerously depleted. And the expansion of the conflict into the Red Sea, where attacks from Iran-backed Houthi rebels on Saudi shipping pushed oil prices back above US$100 (£75) a barrel.

Israel’s wishlist

Before he had even arrived at the White House, therefore, Netanyahu had been warned against trying to push Trump towards resuming major operations in Iran. But the Israeli prime minister still has other items on his wishlist. This includes persuading Trump to support Israel’s refusal to withdraw its troops from Lebanon until Hezbollah’s military infrastructure has been completely dismantled.

But the leaked recording of Trump’s expletive-laden rebuke of Netanyahu at the beginning of June for refusing to heed his advice to de-escalate Israeli operations in Lebanon, suggests that this might also be a tough sell for the Israeli leader.

Netanyahu was once able to exploit Trump’s unpredictability and appeal to his instincts for self-aggrandisement. Now, he is a much-diminished figure in Washington, and his political interests seem to best served by actions that Trump has identified as threats to his own.

Advertisement

He is now the one buffeted by Trump’s erratic decision-making and tendency to blame anyone but himself for failure. Shutting Israel out of negotiations with Iran, selling F-35s to Turkey and raising the prospect of a nuclear deal with Saudi Arabia all run counter to Israeli interests.

But Iran’s increasing boldness may yet play in Netanyahu’s favour. Tehran’s has rejected Oman’s proposal to share management of the Strait of Hormuz. It then launched strikes against a US military base in Jordan, despite Trump’s decision to halt military operations. The US and Saudi Arabia responded by attacking Iran-based militias in Iraq.

Iran’s refusal to abandon its core strategic objectives, and its apparent interpretation of Trump’s restraint as weakness, may ultimately give Netanyahu the renewed US involvement in the conflict he has been seeking.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Sainsbury’s shoppers told of major change to Nectar rewards

Published

on

Sainsbury’s shoppers told of major change to Nectar rewards

The new loyalty scheme gives customers more ways to collect points when shopping for groceries for delivery, but Sainsbury’s is reminding users that they must enter their full Nectar card number at checkout.

Customers can now collect one Nectar point for every £1 spent on eligible Sainsbury’s products ordered via the Uber Eats app or website.

Katie Hunter, Uber Eats general manager for grocery and retail in the UK, said: “We know how much Uber Eats customers love Nectar, so bringing points directly to their Sainsbury’s orders was a no-brainer.

Advertisement

“Now, they can collect Nectar points on all their Sainsbury’s essentials as well as spending them across the entire Uber app.

“It’s all about delivering flexibility, convenience and value for customers right alongside their favourite groceries.”

The scheme is available at more than 1,300 Sainsbury’s stores across the UK that are signed up to Uber Eats.

It covers orders for fresh food, household items, and other eligible products.

Advertisement

A minimum spend of £1 is required to earn points, and customers must enter their full Nectar card number at checkout.

Points cannot be added retrospectively.

Nectar points earned through Uber Eats grocery orders will be credited to customer accounts within 28 days.

Some items are excluded from the scheme, including gift vouchers, baby milk, lottery tickets, tobacco, vapes, nicotine products, proprietary medicines, spirits, and liqueurs.

Advertisement

Additional restrictions apply to alcohol orders in Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland.

The move builds on the existing partnership between Nectar and Uber, which currently allows Nectar members to redeem points for vouchers covering Uber journeys and Uber Eats orders.

Customers can now earn points on Sainsbury’s orders placed via Uber Eats and later use those points for Uber or Uber Eats vouchers.

Mark Given, Sainsbury’s chief technology, marketing and data officer, said: “Nectar members can already turn their points into Uber rides or Uber Eats treats – and now they can collect points when ordering Sainsbury’s groceries through Uber Eats too.

Advertisement

“It’s another way we’re helping customers get more from Nectar, whether they’re stocking up on essentials, planning dinner or making everyday life that little bit easier.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Fears over Light Valley Solar Scheme between York and Selby

Published

on

Fears over Light Valley Solar Scheme between York and Selby

Objectors today (Wednesday, July 29) gave evidence at a public hearing held by the Planning Inspectorate, which will decide whether to allow the 500MW Light Valley Solar Scheme.

Island Green Power UK Ltd is seeking a development consent order application for a network of seven solar farms on 1,020 hectares of land between the villages of Escrick, Monk Fryston, Hambleton, Chapel Haddlesey and South Milford, between York and Selby.

A local plan for the proposed solar scheme. Image: Light Valley Solar. A local plan for the proposed solar scheme. Image: Light Valley Solar.

A 500MW battery energy storage system (BESS) is proposed as part of the development, as well as underground cabling to connect the sites to the national grid at Monk Fryston substation.

Hearings are taking place at The Parsonage Hotel and Spa, at Escrick, this week as the Planning Inspectorate’s examination of the plans gets underway.

Advertisement

The panel of three planning inspectors heard from some of the residents, parish councils and campaign groups which have raised concerns about the scheme.

Councillor Ceri Carter, from South Milford Parish Council, who also represented 13 other parish councils, told the hearing: “While we support the transition to renewable energy and understand the need for the country’s energy security, we ask the examining authority to recognise the disproportionate burden this scheme places on our communities.”

Describing the design of the scheme as “fragmented”, Cllr Carter added: “It is our opinion that this project could have been better designed to significantly reduce the amount of land sacrificed, thereby lessening the impact on communities.”

Councillor Shaun Hughes, from Monk Fryston Parish Council, said: “The primary objection for us is that it’s such a large, encompassing installation that almost every view into and out from the parish will be affected by this proposed development.

Advertisement

“This proposal, when combined with other consented schemes, will significantly alter the character and the landscape that surrounds our settlement such that it can no longer be regarded as a rural location.”

Resident Clare Hodgekiss said her home would be completely surrounded by the development.

She said: “At what cost to my physical and mental health is my family home surrounded by solar panels on all sides?

“Whatever I see from my house — the back, the middle, the front — I will just see solar panels and nothing else. This will have a monumental impact on the rest of my life if it goes ahead. How can surrounding a property on all sides be considered proportional, just and fair?”

Advertisement

Louise Billingham, from the campaign group Rooftops Not Countryside, told the panel that the scheme “would industrialise the area for generations to come”.

Louise Billingham, from Rooftops Not Countryside, speaks at the hearing.Louise Billingham, from Rooftops Not Countryside, speaks at the hearing.

She added: “The benefits of the development are presented at a national level, but the harms are concentrated locally: increased construction traffic on rural roads and country lanes, permanent changes to the character of our rural villages and countryside, loss of open green space and tranquillity, disruption to walking, cycling and riding routes, and the psychological impact of living beside, or within, large-scale electrical infrastructure.”

Matthew Fox, from law firm Pinsent Masons, spoke on behalf of the applicant.

He said they recognised the strength of feeling from local residents, adding: ” I want to just emphasise that there were points made around the applicant making sure they consider the human impact.

Advertisement

“I know views differ on this, but I wanted to emphasise that the applicant has thought to consider those aspects.”

The proposed solar scheme will provide enough renewable electricity to power the equivalent of approximately 115,000 homes annually, the applicants say.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Ben Affleck lands rare $1million prize during guest appearance on Who Wants To Be A Millionaire

Published

on

Ben Affleck, 53, landed the rare $1,000,000 prize during his celebrity guest appearance on Who Wants To Be A Millionaire

Ben Affleck landed the rare $1,000,000 prize during his celebrity guest appearance on Who Wants To Be A Millionaire this week.  

The 53-year-old Oscar winner, whose mother Chris Anne recently passed away after a battle with pancreatic cancer, joined forces with Jeopardy! champion Jamie Ding to take home the big winnings for charity. 

The money will go to the Hollywood actor’s Eastern Congo Initiative which he co-founded back in 2010. 

Affleck and Ding faced the final $1 million question during Wednesday’s episode of the ABC game show, with Jimmy Kimmel hosting. 

Advertisement

The duo were given the question which read, ‘In an annual Thanksgiving tradition, all but which of these have been the names of turkeys pardoned by a U.S. president?’ 

The answers included: Peanut Butter & Jelly, Tater & Tot, Mac & Cheese, and Spaghetti & Meatball. 

Ben Affleck, 53, landed the rare $1,000,000 prize during his celebrity guest appearance on Who Wants To Be A Millionaire

Advertisement
The Oscar winner joined forces with Jeopardy! champion Jamie Ding to take home the big winnings for charity

The Oscar winner joined forces with Jeopardy! champion Jamie Ding to take home the big winnings for charity

Affleck and Ding decided to use the Phone-A-Friend lifeline to call Ding’s longtime trivia partner Stephen Morrison. 

Kimmel explained to the duo that they also still had the Ask-The-Host lifeline, which prompted the actor to jokingly say to ring up Ding’s pal. 

‘No. We might as well have Jimmy help,’ the Hollywood star then expressed. 

Advertisement

The late night talk show host playfully quipped, ‘Alright, I don’t have to give you any of my f***ing thoughts, if you don’t want.’

But Affleck replied, ‘Actually, you’re very good with cooking and food, current events, too. Actually, you might know this.’ 

Kimmel eventually suggested that the answer could be D: Spaghetti & Meatball. 

‘I could see me adding a big bowl in Donald Trump’s hands and him slurping up the spaghetti and meatballs,’ he then joked, before adding, ‘That one sounds like it wasn’t the one to me.’

Advertisement

Affleck shared that the host was ‘probably the best person in the world to ask this question to.’

Affleck and Ding faced the final $1 million question during Wednesday's episode of the ABC game show, with Jimmy Kimmel hosting

Affleck and Ding faced the final $1 million question during Wednesday’s episode of the ABC game show, with Jimmy Kimmel hosting

Kimmel explained to the duo that they still had Ask-The-Host lifeline, which prompted the actor to jokingly say to ring up Ding's pal

Kimmel explained to the duo that they still had Ask-The-Host lifeline, which prompted the actor to jokingly say to ring up Ding’s pal

Affleck and Ding decided to trust Kimmel's guess and also locked in with Spaghetti & Meatball

Affleck and Ding decided to trust Kimmel’s guess and also locked in with Spaghetti & Meatball

Advertisement
After a few lingering seconds, it was revealed that the pair had guessed correctly and won the $1 million prize

After a few lingering seconds, it was revealed that the pair had guessed correctly and won the $1 million prize

‘If I’m wrong, I’m so sorry,’ Kimmel said before locking in Spaghetti & Meatball as his own final answer. 

To be extra safe, Affleck and Ding decided to still call up Morrison.

‘Jimmy, you might like this friend of mine. I mean, Harvard-educated, father, we’re two years apart,’ Ding began. 

Advertisement

‘But we’ve been through a lot of trials and tribulations together. Just like Ben and Matt.’ 

With a deadpan expression, Kimmel then joked, ‘Are you looking for trouble?’ 

Ding then quickly fired back to go along with the joke by asking, ‘Are you looking for trouble?’ which caused the live audience to laugh. 

After calling Morrison, however, he was unable to guess the correct answer. 

Advertisement

‘But listen, you know what? He’s smart because if you don’t know it, you don’t know it, right?’ Kimmel said of Morrison. 

The money will be donated to Affleck's Eastern Congo Initiative which he co-founded with Whitney Williams in 2010; seen in May in Beverly Hills

The money will be donated to Affleck’s Eastern Congo Initiative which he co-founded with Whitney Williams in 2010; seen in May in Beverly Hills 

Affleck and Ding decided to trust Kimmel’s guess and also locked in with Spaghetti & Meatball. 

After a few lingering seconds, it was revealed that the pair had guessed correctly and won the $1 million prize. 

Advertisement

The pair jumped to their feet and excitedly hugged each other as confetti fell down onto the stage. 

Daily Mail has reached out to reps for Affleck for comment, but has yet to hear back.  

The money will be donated to Affleck’s Eastern Congo Initiative which he co-founded with Whitney Williams in 2010. 

The nonprofit organization helps ‘support locally led organizations to expand access to essential services, strengthen economic opportunities, and promote justice. 

Advertisement

‘Our work is designed to create scalable, sustainable impact across eastern Congo,’ per the official website. 

The year prior, Affleck's close friend and collaborator Matt Damon also scored the same million-dollar prize on the game show; seen in April in San Francisco

The year prior, Affleck’s close friend and collaborator Matt Damon also scored the same million-dollar prize on the game show; seen in April in San Francisco 

'But when I told him, he seemed surprised and delighted. I think he was prepared to do it on his own. He's very smart, that Ben Affleck,' Kimmel said of Affleck

‘But when I told him, he seemed surprised and delighted. I think he was prepared to do it on his own. He’s very smart, that Ben Affleck,’ Kimmel said of Affleck

The year prior, Affleck’s close friend and collaborator Matt Damon also scored the same million-dollar prize on the game show. 

Advertisement

At the time, The Odyssey star had been paired with Ken Jennings. The winnings went to Damon’s clean-water nonprofit Water.org. 

‘I’m not sure Ben knew that he was paired with a champion when he agreed to do the show,’ Kimmel told Variety earlier this month. 

‘But when I told him, he seemed surprised and delighted. I think he was prepared to do it on his own. He’s very smart, that Ben Affleck.’

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

I’m Calling It: The ‘Terrible Twos’ Deserve A Rebrand

Published

on

I'm Calling It: The 'Terrible Twos' Deserve A Rebrand

Most parents have heard a variation on the phrase “Oooh, terrible twos!” uttered with eyebrows raised and a knowing look at their toddler.

In fact, such is the bad rap two-year-olds have that before my eldest had even reached her toddler years, I was extremely nervous about what the age would hold for us. I genuinely thought she was going to morph into some nightmarish, uber-emotional hellbat on her second birthday.

But, two kids later (and having met my fair share of two-year-olds in the process), I have to say: two is perhaps my favourite age.

So, I’m here to bang the drum for a rebrand of ‘terrible twos’ to ‘terrific twos’.

Advertisement

Why are they called the ‘terrible twos’, anyway?

The ‘terrible twos’ descriptor largely stems from the fact previously-compliant babies grow up and become louder, more mobile and in need of independence – but they’re obviously still very little, so can’t have full autonomy over every little thing.

“Around this age, children are beginning to realise they are their own person with their own thoughts, preferences and opinions,” Dr Sasha Hall, a senior educational and child psychologist, told me. “It becomes the ‘me do it’ stage. They want to put on their own shoes, choose their own clothes and do things for themselves.

“That growing autonomy is exactly what we want to see, but it often arrives before they have the emotional regulation skills to cope when things do not go to plan.”

Advertisement

Yes, two is when the pushback begins. You might hear more of the word ‘no’. You might also be on the receiving end of some pretty irrational requests. And Dr Hall noted these moments often happen at moments of high stress, like when you’re trying to get out of the door in the morning – “they’re insisting their sandals are on the right feet when they are not, or they want to wear wellies in the middle of a heatwave,” she said. “Those everyday moments can really test our own patience and emotional regulation.”

If they can’t make their own choices, or feel like the choice has been taken out of their tiny hands, this can certainly spark a big old tantrum – hitting, kicking, biting, screeching – as they still don’t have the ability to manage their emotions very well. (They’re only two after all – most adults I know still haven’t quite mastered that either, but nobody’s going around calling them ‘terrible’.)

Why two is actually a brilliant age

I want to share a bit of reassurance for other parents approaching the toddler years that, aside from the meltdowns, which can obviously be tough to handle (especially in public), two is a marvellous age.

Advertisement

You see, your child is learning so much – songs, stories, words, how to navigate relationships with others. There’s nothing like having an unhinged dinnertime conversation with a two-year-old or trying to decode what they’re saying (the other day my youngest said we were going “to the zoom, then the flaps, then the books”). Another time she abruptly told me “no, you can’t” but didn’t quite pronounce the last word correctly. (I’ll let you determine how that actually came out.)

Two is the age of them not quite nailing long words, like blupperply (butterfly) and squealing with excitement when an ant runs past. It’s a time of potty training pride (“look Mummy, my got pants on!”), phallic art work, and being extra-willing to help you with any household chore. (Ask a toddler to help you hang up washing on a clothes horse, or empty the dishwasher, and it’s like you’ve just promised them a lifetime supply of ice cream.)

There’s mischief and mayhem, for sure, but there are also so many exciting firsts, and their personality begins to really shine through. You begin to see yourself – or your partner – reflected back in the mannerisms of a tiny person, or watch as they develop their own interests. Right now we’re loving cooking and playing in the pretend kitchen – and nothing brings my toddler joy quite like making me a ‘coffee and a croissant’ or simply a plate of ‘couscous’.

Perhaps the most wonderful thing about two-year-olds, though, is the sheer amount of love they have to give those around them.

Advertisement

There is something so special about going into my two-year-old’s room each morning and seeing her beaming at me from her cot. I’ll pick her up and she’ll lean in close for a cuddle, like she’s not seen me for weeks on end. She’ll gently tell me she loves me and has figured out how to make a heart shape with her fingers. Honestly, there’s nothing cuter.

If I’m not well (I was recently bedridden with a horrendous stomach bug) she’ll come and lie with me, wide-eyed but still sucking her thumb, asking “you OK, mummy?” before tenderly stroking my face. Then she’ll rush off somewhere in a hurry, shouting back: “I get you teddy.” Granted that teddy might end up bouncing off my face in the next 30 seconds, but it’s the thought that counts.

I guess all of this is to say: if you’re a new parent, or your child’s approaching toddlerhood, and someone warns you about the “terrible twos”, let it wash over you like water off a duck’s back.

Because yes, there will be meltdowns. But there will also be laughter until your stomach hurts, fierce cuddles, endless curiosity and the privilege of watching a tiny person discover who they are.

Advertisement

And if you ask me, that’s far from terrible.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Met Office names Northern Ireland towns set for rain as parts of UK enjoy heatwave

Published

on

Belfast Live

There might be warm weather elsewhere, but Northern Ireland looks set to have a damp Thursday

Northern Ireland is set for a wet Thursday while other parts of the UK enjoy a high-20 degree heatwave.

Yellow rain cells have been forecast by the Met Office, which could bring 4-8mm of rain in an hour, early in the morning near Enniskillen.

Advertisement

It’s also likely to rain in Derry/Londonderry and Newry, weather maps show.

“A band of thicker cloud will continue to sink south on Thursday, introducing fresher conditions for all. However, outbreaks of rain, locally heavy at times, will affect northern Scotland,” forecasters said on Wednesday evening.

While rain is also forecast to hit north-east and south-west England, and Scotland, some will bask in a heatwave. South-east England will enjoy a high-20-degree heatwave, with London at 26C and Rochester, Kent, reaching 28C.

That is likely to to worsen the drought which was declared for millions of people in England. On Wednesday, the government said half of England is now living in a drought.

Helen Wakeham, Director of Water at the Environment Agency and Chair of the National Drought Group, said: “The hot and dry weather means we are currently using water faster than nature can replenish it.

“A second consecutive summer drought is an exceptionally serious situation and one that will have long-lasting impacts on our environment, wildlife, and the economy.

“We want everyone to stay safe and hydrated during the hot weather but every drop we can save is a drop more for nature and agriculture.”

Advertisement

The seven drought regions include East Anglia, Hertfordshire and the whole of London, Thames Valley, Hampshire & the Isle of Wight, Devon and Cornwall, West Midlands, and Wessex (covering Dorset, Somerset, Wiltshire, and south Gloucestershire).

Drought is not expected to come to Northern Ireland this summer, as it is not categorised in ‘prolong dry weather’ by the Environment Agency. That is the phase required before drought can be declared.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

David Miliband said no when asked to be Education Secretary… and Lucy Powell’s angry at Deputy PM snub

Published

on

David Miliband (pictured on May 20, 2020) was offered the post of Education Secretary in Andy Burnham's reshuffle

Advertisement

David Miliband was offered the post of Education Secretary in Andy Burnham‘s reshuffle, the Daily Mail can reveal.

The brother of Ed Miliband was widely tipped to return to British politics once Mr Burnham entered No 10.

In the run-up to the new PM’s reshuffle last week, he was touted as a potential Foreign Secretary, having previously served in the role under Gordon Brown from 2007 to 2010.

The job ended up being given to his brother – and arch political rival – Ed, a major promotion from his previous position as Energy and Net Zero Secretary.

Advertisement

A Labour source has now told the Daily Mail that David was offered the more junior job of Education Secretary, before it was given to Labour and Greater Manchester MP Lucy Powell – a close ally of Mr Burnham.

It is claimed that Mr Miliband declined the job because it was more junior to the role offered to his brother and because he is friends with the then-incumbent Bridget Phillipson and did not want to humiliate her. 

Mr Miliband, who has served as president of the International Rescue Committee since 2013 on a salary of more than £1 million a year, appeared in a number of photos and videos backing Ms Phillipson during the 2019 general election.

While he failed to make a return to British politics last week, it is now rumoured he is eyeing up Sir Keir Starmer’s London constituency should the ousted prime minister quit Parliament and spark a by-election.

Advertisement

David Miliband (pictured on May 20, 2020) was offered the post of Education Secretary in Andy Burnham’s reshuffle

Ed Miliband's brother was touted as a potential Foreign Secretary in the run-up of Burnham's (pictured on July 29, 2026) reshuffle last week

Ed Miliband’s brother was touted as a potential Foreign Secretary in the run-up of Burnham’s (pictured on July 29, 2026) reshuffle last week 

Ms Phillipson was demoted by Mr Burnham to Equalities Secretary, though she was given the additional job of Labour Party chair following outrage among Labour MPs at her reduced role.

Advertisement

It is understood that Ms Powell is furious at Mr Burnham over her new role as Education Secretary, as she was publicly snubbed when he denied her the title of Deputy Prime Minister, as had been expected ahead of the reshuffle.

Ms Powell fought hard to secure Mr Burnham’s return to Parliament and bring about the eventual coup against Sir Keir. Yesterday, a source close to Ms Powell said she was ‘hurt and angry’ after the new Prime Minister declined to give her the title.

Allies of Ms Powell revealed ‘she thought she was getting Deputy Prime Minister until she walked in the [No 10] door’, adding that Mr Burnham’s team had been ‘briefing it all weekend’.

Instead, Mr Burnham has declined to use the Deputy Prime Minister position at all, with the responsibilities landing with Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Louise Haigh, who received the added title of First Secretary of State.

Advertisement

Sources claimed Ms Powell lost out in an internal power battle with the new Chief Whip Anneliese Midgley, who ‘hates’ her.

A party source branded Ms Haigh and Ms Midgley ‘political thugs’ who had behaved like ‘factional Mafioso’ with a ‘punishment beating’ reshuffle.

Downing Street and David Miliband were approached for comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

The Scotland areas set for heavy rain on Thursday as parts of UK enjoy heatwave

Published

on

Daily Record

Up to 32mm of rain – more than an inch – could fall in one remote part of the country

Scotland will be soaked by heavy rain on Thursday while parts of the UK enjoy a high-20 degree heatwave.

The Met Office has forecast some red rain cells, which could bring 16-32mm of rain in an hour, to hit the Orkney Islands in the mid-afternoon.

Mainland Scotland will also see heavy rain, as orange cells, bringing 8-16mm of rain in an hour, are forecast to deluge the Highlands near Loch Glascarnoch around the same time. It will also pour down in Glasgow, Aberdeen, and Fort William later in the afternoon.

Advertisement

Eastern Scotland will have the better weather, with Edinburgh and Dundee looking likely to stay dry. Top temperatures will be in the mid-to-high teens, at 17C in Edinburgh, 18C in Dundee, 19C in Aberdeen, and 16C in Glasgow

“A band of thicker cloud will continue to sink south on Thursday, introducing fresher conditions for all. However, outbreaks of rain, locally heavy at times, will affect northern Scotland,” forecasters said on Wednesday evening.

While rain is also forecast to hit north-east and south-west England, and Northern Ireland, Scots are predicted to see the heaviest rain in the UK.

Advertisement

The forecast comes a day after millions of Brits were told they are now living in a drought, as the Environment Agency declared half of England is in drought.

The seven drought regions include East Anglia, Hertfordshire and the whole of London, Thames Valley, Hampshire & the Isle of Wight, Devon and Cornwall, West Midlands, and Wessex (covering Dorset, Somerset, Wiltshire, and south Gloucestershire).

Drought will continue in those areas on Thursday, as south-east England will enjoy a high-20-degree heatwave, with London at 26C and Rochester, Kent, reaching 28C.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025