Connect with us

NewsBeat

I Started Dating Again In My 50s. I Didn’t Expect The Reaction I Got From Younger Men

Published

on

I Started Dating Again In My 50s. I Didn’t Expect The Reaction I Got From Younger Men

After my divorce settled, and following years spent raising my children and caring for my mother in her final chapter, I began to dip my toe back into the dating pool at 51.

Even though I felt ready to open up to the possibility of romance, I was also very aware of my emotional capacity – what I had the bandwidth to hold and what I didn’t.

I wasn’t looking for a soulmate, nor was I interested in future-tripping, making long-term promises or auditioning for a major role in a partner’s established life.

Before my marriage, my natural inclination had always been toward older men – men with established footholds, refined perspectives and the gravitational pull of maturity. But after a long marriage and years of caregiving, my needs had shifted. I simply did not have the emotional reserve to play a significant role in a partner’s existing domestic ecosystem.

Advertisement

Given that, and at the behest of my curious married friends who urged me to “take one for the team”, I manually adjusted my age preferences on the apps, sliding the scale far enough left that it could be framed as a cultural statement.

I widened those parameters not as a hunt but as an experiment in lowering the stakes. I assumed I was simply opening a doorway to casual conversation. What I didn’t expect was the immediate, enthusiastic response from men 10, 15 and 20 years my junior.

Unlike men in my own demographic, who often carried the weight of past domestic entanglements or rigid expectations, these younger suitors approached dating with refreshing candor, often addressing the age gap upfront with curiosity rather than hesitation, viewing it not as an obstacle but as a primary attraction.

I quickly realised this wasn’t an anomaly; I had stumbled onto a quiet, deliberate movement of young men actively seeking out older women.

Advertisement

Of course, it’s impossible to address this cultural wave without confronting the hyper-sexualised “cougar” or “MILF” tropes that are pervasive in the media. As a result, a not-insignificant portion of the messages in my inbox was inevitably fuelled purely by a fantasy that reduced an older woman to an erotic milestone rather than a person. Distinguishing genuine intrigue from fetishisation was the primary task of navigating this pool.

Still, a substantial segment of these younger men started surprisingly earnest conversations, and one young professional immediately stood out. He was 36 to my 51, but far more mature than his peers, intensely focused on his career, yet looking for adult female companionship.

What began as a series of engaging dinners turned into a meaningful, purposeful connection for both of us. For him, it offered a space to laugh, share and connect, entirely free from the biological clock and domestic pressure cooker of peer-group dating. For me, it served as a gentle, low-stakes step back into a dating landscape I hadn’t navigated in nearly two decades.

Our relationship spanned roughly 18 months – a fluid, unhurried arrangement anchored in complete transparency, mutual discretion and shared pleasure, deliberately unburdened by demands for formal exclusivity or traditional milestones. We remain friends today, and while he still occasionally gives a quiet wink asking to return to that season, we mostly laugh about our time together.

Advertisement

Recently, on a getaway to an upscale Southern California suburb, I overheard a hotel concierge advising guests on a few local restaurants – playfully referred to as “cougar bars” – where younger men gather specifically in hopes of meeting women their senior. Who would have thought? What I quietly discovered on the fringes of dating app filters had spilled into everyday public life.

For generations, the older-man-younger-woman dynamic wasn’t just tolerated; it was the default social blueprint. When high-profile men married partners decades their junior, culture treated it as a standard perk of status and wealth. Society rarely questioned their motives or demanded they defend their choices.

Meanwhile, when the gender roles were reversed, we coined the term “cougar” to paint older women as predatory or desperate, and the younger men who dated them as novelties or “boy toys”. High-profile exceptions, like Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher, were usually treated as tabloid anomalies or public spectacles.

Gregg DeGuire via Getty Images

Advertisement
Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher, who started dating in 2003, have roughly a 15-year age difference.

Today, that archaic framework is fracturing, largely driven by the cold mechanics of modern dating technology. According to Pew Research, 63% of men under 30 report being single, compared to just 34% of women in the same age bracket. Furthermore, 64% of men report feeling insecure due to a staggering lack of incoming messages on apps. On platforms like Tinder, where the average match rate for men sits at a dismal 5%, young men face a brutal numbers game.

To survive the feed, younger men have learned to game the system. On Bumble and Hinge, a 26-year-old man has to manually slide his age preferences upward to appear in a 50-something or 60-something woman’s queue. Widening his age bracket may partly be a numerical calculation to expand his reach, but it is also a deliberate tactical shift. Rather than chasing low response rates among his peers, he may recognise that mature women operate with far greater clarity, efficiency and directness, making an interaction not only more statistically probable but also of higher baseline quality.

Bumble’s global data shows that nearly 60% of women are open to dating younger men. Meanwhile, Hinge Labs reports that 65% of young men want deep emotional intimacy early on, yet nearly half hold back, perhaps for fear of failing to meet the intense life-stage expectations of women their own age.

This brings us to the core of the dynamic. As The New York Times recently highlighted in its exploration of why younger men are seeking out mature women, featuring commentary from writer Emily Leibert and psychoanalyst Jamieson Webster, this phenomenon sits at the intersection of female liberation and male risk-aversion.

Advertisement

A mature, established woman may act as an oasis for a younger man, offering high-value connection, emotional composure and engaging conversation without demanding that he immediately step into the role of provider, husband or father.

In a culture where young men are overwhelmed by economic instability and shifting relationship expectations, seeking out an older woman may function as a shortcut to low-pressure connection. If she has her own financial stability, her own home and her own identity, she probably isn’t asking him to build a life with her. Her life is already built.

Yet that’s where the friction lies.

Some younger men are drawn to an older woman under the naive assumption that her self-sufficiency will make her “low maintenance”. Younger men may mistake an established woman’s independence for a lack of standards, assuming that because she doesn’t need his financial support or a traditional commitment, she requires minimal effort.

Advertisement

The reality, of course, is the exact opposite. True self-sufficiency comes with firm boundaries, high standards and zero tolerance for playing a supporting role in someone else’s unwritten script. An older woman who has raised children, built a career or cared for ageing parents knows the exact value of her time and emotional investment.

Today, at 62, I look back on that chapter of my life with gratitude, but also with clarity. As a single woman now, my desires have shifted once again, and so has my capacity.

While I still open dating apps occasionally, mostly while travelling, my criteria have evolved. I’ve reopened my bracket to men in their early 50s and beyond, seeking the sharp, intellectually vibrant partners I’ve always aligned with best. I am no longer seeking the low-bandwidth, transitional space that post-divorce life required. Now I’m looking for someone ready for 30-plus years of shared curiosity and real depth.

While Kinsey Institute survey data shows that older women report higher levels of relationship satisfaction and commitment when dating younger men, I believe that satisfaction relies entirely on mutual transparency.

Advertisement

Hilary Rubin is an essayist and model examining performance, physical autonomy, and modern cultural dynamics. You can follow her work on Instagram @hilaryrubin or at hilaryrubin.com.

Do you have a compelling personal story you’d like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we’re looking for here and send us a pitch at pitch@huffpost.com.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

NewsBeat

No. 9 Texas A&M loses at home to Kentucky, meaning SEC will have two top-10 teams tumble

Published

on

No. 9 Texas A&M loses at home to Kentucky, meaning SEC will have two top-10 teams tumble

The powerhouse Southeastern Conference will have at least two top-10 teams lose in Week 3.

It could be three if No. 10 Alabama doesn’t beat pesky Florida State.

Kentucky stunned No. 9 Texas A&M on the road Saturday, winning 31-21 behind three transfers: quarterback Kenny Minchey, running back CJ Baxter and safety Jordan Castell.

Minchey, a Notre Dame transfer, completed 14 of 18 passes for 252 yards and two touchdowns. He connected on his final 11 throws. Baxter, a former Texas standout, ran for 87 yards and two scores. Castell, a three-year starter at Florida, finished with a team-high 13 tackles and an interception.

Advertisement

“I’m not shocked,” first-year coach Will Stein said on the field afterward. “This is how these guys practiced every single day. This is what Kentucky football is supposed to look like. So proud of our guys coming on the road, the eye of the storm. How freaking cool is this? Let’s go!”

Stein, 36, replaced longtime Kentucky coach Mark Stoops in December and became the third first-year Wildcats coach to beat a top-10 team — first since Joker Phillips in 2010.

“We knew it was going to be a bar fight, a fistfight, old school,” Stein said. “We were the tougher team tonight. That’s how we won the game.

“This is what we wanted, BBN. Let’s freaking go!”

Advertisement

No. 7 LSU and eighth-ranked Ole Miss will finish later Saturday and provide another top-10 loss.

Alabama led Florida State 26-21 at halftime, rallying after trailing 21-6 early in the second quarter. It was an eye-popping deficit for a Crimson Tide team that shockingly lost at home to the Seminoles to open last season.

LSU-Ole Miss game is the one to watch

Lane Kiffin was wildly booed long before he arrived at Vaught-Hemingway Stadium on Saturday for the LSU-Ole Miss game.

Advertisement

Kiffin appeared remotely on ESPN’s “College GameDay,” and Mississippi fans still angry about how he left the Rebels for LSU late last season greeted him with a chorus of expletive-laced chants. It was a clear sign of what Kiffin and the Tigers should expect when they play at Ole Miss later Saturday.

“I really appreciate you guys gaslighting them with this,” Kiffin said from the team hotel.

It was the latest in a growing buildup for the first top-10 matchup between No. 7 LSU and eight-ranked Ole Miss since 1962.

It started when Kiffin left the Rebels to take the LSU job and a $91 million contract just as the team he had coached for six years was days away from its first appearance in the College Football Playoff. Kiffin wanted to stay through the playoff, but Ole Miss moved on to coach Pete Golding and advanced to the CFP semifinals. LSU finished 7-6, capped by a loss in the Texas Bowl.

Advertisement

The off-field storylines haven’t stopped since. Kiffin’s comments about whether Black players could be recruited to Ole Miss, lawsuits alleging Ole Miss transfers owe big money for reneging on their NIL deals and LSU’s now-abandoned defiance of rules against rostering former pro players have only brightened the spotlight for this one.

LSU threw another wrinkle into the mix by saying midweek that quarterback Sam Leavitt was “doubtful” to play, sparking immediate fan accusations of gamesmanship. He’s been upgraded since and is expected to start.

Kiffin himself acknowledged there could be “hatred” in the stands Saturday. Security has been dramatically increased as authorities expect 100,000 people in Oxford, a town whose school-year population of about 25,000 is virtually all students.

The winner improves to 3-0 on the season — and gets savory bragging rights.

Advertisement

The undercard

There is a good one in the ACC: No. 16 SMU at No. 23 Louisville, the league leaders in total offense featuring SMU’s Kevin Jennings (402.5 yard per game) and Louisville’s Lincoln Kienholz (375.0).

Both are eager to keep pace with No. 5 Miami, which beat Wake Forest 33-20 on Friday night as Darian Mensah completed 30 of 34 passes, including his first 24 attempts, for 220 yards and three touchdowns.

In the Big 12, two of the favorites opened league play with a terrific game Friday night in Lubbock, where No. 13 Texas Tech held on for a 28-26 win over No. 22 Houston. Cougars QB Conner Weigman came up just short of a 2-point conversion in the final minute, a play that went to the Big 12 replay review room — the broadcast audience was able to watch and listen to the analysis — before it was upheld.

Advertisement

Best of the rest

There also are several intriguing matchups pitting 2-0 teams that can be best viewed as measuring stick games, including Virginia Tech at Maryland, Mississippi State at South Carolina and these:

— Florida at Auburn. Gators QB Aaron Philo, who will make his first road start, has completed 76% of his passes with five touchdowns. Byrum Brown, who has been new Auburn coach Alex Golesh’s starting QB for all or part of four seasons, was a 1,000-yard rusher last year.

— No. 25 Virginia vs. West Virginia in Charlotte, North Carolina. The Mountaineers, 2-0 for the first time since 2018, are playing their border-state rival for the first time since 2002.

Advertisement

___

Sign up for Top 25 poll alerts here, visit the Top 25 here and see AP’s full college football coverage here

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Triple lock to boost pensions by 3.9pc as Reynolds refuses to rule out tax raid

Published

on

Triple lock to boost pensions by 3.9pc as Reynolds refuses to rule out tax raid

The Business Secretary refused four times to rule out retirees paying tax on the state pension from next year.

Jonathan Reynolds declined to reassure pensioners that they would not pay income tax on the benefit for the first time, saying it was a question for the Chancellor.

The comments on Tuesday raised concern for millions of retired people expecting to see their state pension surpass £13,000 from April, forcing them to pay income tax.

Advertisement

However, pensions minister Torsten Bell later insisted Labour would not put up taxes on people who rely on the state pension.

It is still unclear how this will be implemented given the complexity of separating the tax arrangements of different groups of pensioners.

The rise under the triple lock guarantee would drag many pensioners into paying income tax for the first time because their state income would surpass the personal allowance of £12,570.

Rachel Reeves, the former chancellor, said last year that people solely reliant on the state pension would not have to pay the tax.

Advertisement

However, Mr Reynolds was repeatedly asked on BBC Breakfast whether Labour would honour this commitment after the next increase in the state pension in April. He declined to answer four times.

He said: “I’m sorry, that is for the Chancellor and for a Budget.

“The majority of pensioners in this country don’t just rely on the state pensions. Some do, I accept that, but the majority don’t.

“Sometimes when this is looked at, we’re focusing just on the state pension side of this. You’ve got to consider the full range of income retired people in the UK have.”

Advertisement

However Mr Bell, the pensions minister, walked back from Mr Reynolds comments.

He said: “In line with the commitment made at Budget 2025, pensioners who only just exceed the personal allowance will not have the administrative burden of paying small amounts of tax in this Parliament.

“The Chancellor will set out further details on how that commitment will be delivered at the Budget.”

Former pensions minister Sir Steve Webb said only one in 16 pensioners would benefit from this policy.

Advertisement

He said: “Those on the new state pension can expect to see an increase of nearly £500 per year next April.

“But the sting in the tail is that this will take the standard rate of the new state pension above the tax threshold.”

The comments came after official figures on Tuesday indicated the triple lock will rise by 3.9pc from April.

Under the triple lock, the state pension rises each April in line with inflation, average wages or 2.5pc, whichever is highest.

Advertisement

Total pay, including bonuses, rose by 3.9pc in the three months to July, down from 4.2pc in the three months to June.

Pensioners may yet receive a bigger increase if September’s inflation figure is higher than 3.9pc. That will be revealed next month but a higher figure is thought to be unlikely.

Read the latest updates below.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Missing dachshund Stanley still not found after one month

Published

on

Missing dachshund Stanley still not found after one month

The black and tan dog was last seen near Pets at Home at Middlebrook at around 9.45am on Wednesday, August 19.

His owner Emily Cunliffe previously told The Bolton News that Stanley was “like our baby” and appealed for anyone who spotted him to get in touch.

There have been reports of Stanley being seen around Middlebrook and Horwich, but the family has still not had a confirmed sighting since the early stages of the search.

(Image: Emily Cunliffe)

Emily said via social media: “Stanley is still missing.

Advertisement

“Thanks for all the messages about all the missing dachshunds, just unfortunately Stanley hasn’t been found or returned.

“Please can people only call if you have found him or sighted him.”

The family does not know how far Stanley could have travelled after he ran towards Parklands.

They fear he could be hiding somewhere nearby, particularly as there are numerous fields, wooded areas, gardens and other places where a frightened dog could shelter.

Advertisement

Emily also previously raised the possibility that somebody may have found Stanley and taken him in without realising his family was searching for him.

(Image: Emily Cunliffe)

She previously said: “We don’t know if someone’s got him and taken him in and not returned him.”

Stanley has distinctive grey markings across his body which could help identify him.

Emily previously described him as a black and tan sausage dog with grey patches all over.

Advertisement

The family has received support from people online, while a lost dog service has also helped with the search.

Drones have been used to search areas where Stanley could be hiding, but they have so far failed to locate him.

(Image: Emily Cunliffe)

The family is now asking people in the area to check places including gardens, garages, sheds and outbuildings.

They have also asked people not to chase Stanley if they see him, as he may be frightened after being away from home for so long.

Advertisement

Emily said Stanley is normally playful, friendly and cheeky, but believes the experience could have changed his behaviour.

She previously added: “If you’ve got a sausage dog, you just know how stubborn they can be, and cheeky and so playful and funny, but he’s really, really friendly.

“But I think he’d be really anxious right now if he’s lost.”

Anyone with information about Stanley is asked to contact Emily on 07546 544150.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Monkgate Yard in York to close for water mains works

Published

on

Monkgate Yard in York to close for water mains works

City of York Council has announced that Monkgate Yard will be shut between its junction with Monkgate to the south-western boundary of property No. 1.

The closure is necessary for water mains works and will start at 8am on Monday, September 21, and is expected to end at 5pm on Thursday, October 22.

The road will be closed to vehicles, with parking and waiting also prohibited.

Access for residents and emergency vehicles is not expected to be maintained during this period.

Advertisement

Alternative routes for diverted vehicles will not be signed.

The council has stated that traffic signs and barriers will indicate the extent of the closure.

The order does allow for emergency access and access to premises if it is not blocked by the works.

The road will reopen earlier if works are completed sooner.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Full list of 60 HMOs in Leigh, Tyldesley and Atherton

Published

on

Full list of 60 HMOs in Leigh, Tyldesley and Atherton

The council’s register lists 60 licensed HMOs across the three towns.

There are 39 in Leigh, 12 in Tyldesley and nine in Atherton.

Taken together, the properties have a combined maximum permitted occupancy of 368 people, according to the figures in the council’s register.

The register shows that many of the properties are licensed for five or six people, although several larger HMOs can accommodate considerably more.

Advertisement

There are 60 licenced HMOs across Leigh, Atherton and Tyldesley (Image: Google Maps)

It is important to note that the maximum occupancy figures are licensing limits and do not mean the properties are necessarily occupied by that number of people.

Here is the full list:

Leigh – 39 licensed HMOs

  • 117 Railway Road, WN7 4AJ – maximum six people
  • 127 Railway Road, WN7 4AJ – maximum five people
  • 155 Wigan Road, WN7 5DE – maximum five people
  • 186 Chapel Street, WN7 2DW – maximum five people
  • 19 Jaffrey Street, WN7 1XX – maximum five people
  • 193 Chapel Street, WN7 2AN – maximum five people
  • 2 Endsleigh Gardens, WN7 1LR – maximum six people
  • 227 Chapel Street, WN7 2AP – maximum six people
  • 231 Chapel Street, WN7 2AP – maximum six people
  • 24 Railway Road, WN7 4AU – maximum five people
  • 243 Twist Lane, WN7 4EH – maximum five people
  • 28 Twist Lane, WN7 4DA – maximum five people
  • 287 Twist Lane, WN7 4EH – maximum five people
  • 30 Brewery Lane, WN7 2RJ – maximum five people
  • 31 Findlay Street, WN7 4EQ – maximum six people
  • 33 Church Street, WN7 1AY – maximum five people
  • 34 Westleigh Lane, WN7 5JE – maximum five people
  • 36 Butts Street, WN7 3AE – maximum five people
  • 36 Railway Road, WN7 4AU – maximum eight people
  • 45 Bond Street, WN7 1BT – maximum six people
  • 46 Twist Lane, WN7 4DA – maximum five people
  • 5 Charles Street, WN7 1DB – maximum eight people
  • 52 Railway Road, WN7 4AT – maximum five people
  • 52 Twist Lane, WN7 4DA – maximum five people
  • 53 Church Street, WN7 1AY – maximum 12 people
  • 54 Railway Road, WN7 4AT – maximum six people
  • 58 Railway Road, WN7 4AT – maximum seven people
  • 6 Wilkinson Street, WN7 4DQ – maximum five people
  • 64 Railway Road, WN7 4AT – maximum eight people
  • 66 Railway Road, WN7 4AT – maximum eight people
  • 67 The Avenue, WN7 1EY – maximum nine people
  • 79 King Street, WN7 4LJ – maximum 12 people
  • 86 Railway Road, WN7 4AN – maximum seven people
  • 88 Railway Road, WN7 4AN – maximum nine people
  • 88 Wigan Road, WN7 5AY – maximum five people
  • 89 Westleigh Lane, WN7 5JR – maximum five people
  • 93 Church Street, WN7 1AZ – maximum six people
  • Bank Chambers, 1st and 2nd Floor, 7-9 Market Street, WN7 1EE – maximum 12 people
  • Liz’s Place, 55 Church Street, WN7 1AY – maximum nine people

Tyldesley – 12 licensed HMOs

  • 126 Manchester Road, M29 8RN – maximum five people
  • 139a Elliott Street, M29 8FL – maximum 10 people
  • 159 Shuttle Street, M29 8BS – maximum six people
  • 16 Darlington Street, M29 8DH – maximum five people
  • 178 Mosley Common Road, M28 1AF – maximum seven people
  • 22 Prospect Street, M29 8SU – maximum five people
  • 248 Elliott Street, M29 8DS – maximum five people
  • 49 Upper George Street, M29 8HQ – maximum six people
  • 5 Johnson Street, M29 8BT – maximum five people
  • 59 Johnson Street, M29 8HP – maximum five people
  • 6 Upper George Street, M29 8HR – maximum six people
  • 69 Johnson Street, M29 8HP – maximum five people

Atherton – nine licensed HMOs

  • 112 Factory Road West, M46 0EF – maximum five people
  • 141 Bolton Road, M46 9LD – maximum five people
  • 15 Stanley Street, M46 0AB – maximum five people
  • 167 Bolton Road, M46 9LD – maximum six people
  • 24 Flapper Fold Lane, M46 0FA – maximum five people
  • 32 Hamilton Street, M46 0AT – maximum five people
  • 353 Leigh Road, M46 0PW – maximum five people
  • 43 Flapper Fold Lane, M46 0FA – maximum five people
  • 94 and 94a Mealhouse Lane, M46 0DF – maximum five people

Do you think there’s too many HMOs in your area? Let us know in the comments.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Newspaper headlines: ‘Gaslit by the King’ and ‘McCann suspect’s book plot’

Published

on

"It's not every day you get gaslit by the King" reads the headline on the front page of the Mail on Sunday.

There is “fury” over plans for a suspect in the disappearance of Madeline McCann to write a tell-all book, according to the Sunday Mirror. Convicted rapist Christian Brueckner, who was released from prison in Germany last year after serving an unrelated sentence, “wants to cash in on the mystery with his side of the story”, the paper says.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

In pictures: Millwall and West Ham fans watch derby amid tight police presence

Published

on

In pictures: Millwall and West Ham fans watch derby amid tight police presence

A Met Police spokesman said: “Thank you to our officers on the ground, as well as partners at Millwall and West Ham football clubs, who worked to ensure the Dockers Derby took place without significant disruption across south east London – allowing attending fans to enjoy the match safely.”

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

UFC 331 LIVE: Joshua Van vs Alexandre Pantoja 2 start time, undercard, fight updates and results tonight

Published

on

UFC 331 LIVE: Joshua Van vs Alexandre Pantoja 2 start time, undercard, fight updates and results tonight

More thoughts on Van vs Pantoja 1

Just 26 seconds into their showdown in Las Vegas, flyweight king Pantoja had suffered a ‘freak’ injury, leaving him clutching his arm while laying on the canvas and wagging his finger at Van – standing above the Brazilian – as the referee waved off the fight.

And after being escorted out of the cage, Pantoja was immediately treated, with backstage reporter Megan Olivi revealing a left-shoulder dislocation.

When Van caught a head kick from Pantoja and shoved him to the canvas, he was showing sharp defence after surviving a few early, chaotic exchanges – the type that Pantoja loves so dearly.

Advertisement

Was Van trying to injure Pantoja’s arm, when he shoved him away? No. Can he take credit for hurting Pantoja enough that the latter could not continue? Yes. Was it as definitive an ending as fans wanted? No. Was it a fair way for Van to win, in a sport as frantic and perilous as MMA? Yes.

Alex Pattle20 September 2026 00:45

Featherweight action next

Thre prelims continue with a 145lb tilt between Michael Aswell Jr and Joosang Yoo.

Advertisement

Some of you may remember Aswell Jr from his loss to Liverpool’s Luke Riley at UFC London this March.

Following that points loss, he was also outpointed in his last fight – against Gaston Bolanos.

Alex Pattle20 September 2026 00:41

Advertisement

The strange grudge driving Pantoja to revenge against Van

An ecstatic Joshua Van scaled the Octagon wall in a mad scramble. Although an athlete with impeccable control over his body, here he was a young man incapable of suppressing the grin that was stretching his fresh face. At only 24 years old, he had just become the youngest active champion in the UFC – the second-youngest in history, in fact, a matter of months behind the ‘great’ Jon Jones.

It was because Van hadn’t actually beaten Pantoja, people said.

This is the story of Van vs Pantoja 1:

Alex Pattle20 September 2026 00:33

Advertisement

Big KO in first regular prelim of the night!

Ryan Gandra def. Ozzy Diaz via first-round knockout (punches, 2:04)

In the first regular prelim of the night, we just saw Gandra stop Diaz by swarming him with wild hooks, leading Diaz to drop against the fence and turtle up.

They weren’t the most-technical strikes from Gandra, but they overwhelmed Diaz, and the ref stepped in with Diaz defenceless on the mat.

Advertisement

Alex Pattle20 September 2026 00:23

Key odds from UFC 331 tonight

Van – 8/11; Pantoja – 11/10

Tsarukyan – 1/3; Ruffy – 9/4

Advertisement
Last time out, Mauricio Ruffy stopped Michael Chandler in round one at the White House (AFP/Getty)

The Independent vets betting sites for usability, security and responsible gambling tools. You can claim free bets here to use across a range of sports. Please read the terms.

Alex Pattle20 September 2026 00:20

How to watch UFC 331 tonight

In the UK, the card will air live on TNT Sports and is also accessible via HBO Max, EE TV, Virgin Media, Amazon Prime Video, and Sky Sports. In the US, Paramount+ will stream the action, with CBS showing a segment of the card.

Advertisement

Alex Pattle20 September 2026 00:16

UFC 331 LIVE: Rest of tonight’s fights

Joshua Van (C) vs Alexandre Pantoja 2 (flyweight title)

Arman Tsarukyan vs Mauricio Ruffy (lightweight)

Advertisement

Patricio Pitbull vs Dooho Choi (featherweight)

Gable Steveson vs Sean Sharaf (heavyweight)

Alonzo Menifield vs Iwo Baraniewski (light-heavyweight)

Marlon Vera vs Charles Jourdain (bantamweight)

Advertisement

Tai Tuivasa vs Robelis Despaigne (heavyweight)

Michael Aswell Jr vs Joosang Yoo (featherweight)

Ryan Gandra vs Ozzy Diaz (middleweight)

Arman Tsarukyan (pictured) faces Mauricio Ruffy in the co-main event
Arman Tsarukyan (pictured) faces Mauricio Ruffy in the co-main event (Getty)

Alex Pattle20 September 2026 00:12

Advertisement

UFC 331 early-prelim results

Edmen Shahbazyan def. Brunno Ferreira via unanimous decision (29-28, 29-28, 30-27)

Casey O’Neill def. Eduarda Moura via submission (first-round armbar, 3:22)

Joanderson Brito def. Giga Chikadze via first-round KO (ground and pound, 1:56)

Alex Pattle20 September 2026 00:08

Advertisement

UFC 331 timings tonight

The early prelims just wrapped up, with the regular prelims about to begin at any moment. We’ve then got the main card at 2am BST (6pm PT / 8pm CT / 9pm ET).

We’ll give you the early prelim results in just a few moments!

Alex Pattle20 September 2026 00:04

Advertisement

UFC 331 LIVE: Welcome!

Pantoja, 36, has not fought since then, while Van, 24, retained the gold against Tatsuro Taira in May. In the eyes of many fans, the Myanmar native legitimised his title reign with that win, surviving great adversity to ultimately stop Taira in a fight of the year contender.

Follow live updates and results from UFC 331, right here.

Alexandre Pantoja (right) and Joshua Van during their first fight
Alexandre Pantoja (right) and Joshua Van during their first fight (Getty)

Alex Pattle20 September 2026 00:00

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

MAIL ON SUNDAY COMMENT: Yes, Sir Jim, we are on the slide. Now the Right must toil to save us…

Published

on

Billionaire Manchester United co-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe, says the UK is 'on the slide' and criticised the country's tax regime after moving to Monaco

Advertisement

The billionaire Sir Jim Ratcliffe, co-owner of Manchester United, says that Britain is ‘on the slide’.

He has a point.

Sir Jim, who moved to Monaco to escape the UK’s ferocious tax regime, says: ‘We had the greatest empire in the world. We were a great people. We won two world wars. 

‘We’re good, honest folk. But unfortunately, at the moment, I think the UK is on the slide. It’s quite difficult to see how we arrest it.’

Advertisement

Sir Jim is by no means the only wealthy person to look at these conditions and leave.

The ever-growing tax rates are self-defeating in practice. The wealthy simply will not stay around to be used as cash machines by the Chancellor of the Exchequer. 

Some other country ends up benefiting from their wealth and their enterprise, at a more intelligent rate of tax.

The pro-Labour Left, mostly composed of public-sector workers on generous salaries and sitting on fat tax-funded pensions, will of course denounce Sir Jim’s words, so confirming his point.

Advertisement

Billionaire Manchester United co-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe, says the UK is ‘on the slide’ and criticised the country’s tax regime after moving to Monaco

A large part of this country’s political class has for many years been committed to high taxes on the productive and the enterprising, to pay for generous conditions for people who are neither productive nor enterprising themselves.

Of course some spending is necessary. The old and the sick must be cared for.

Advertisement

Those thrown out of work through no fault of their own need support. Good public services are essential for a functioning economy and society.

The high-tax faction will always speechify about the NHS, because who does not want a good NHS? But high spending does not solve all problems. It is not a magic ointment. 

The NHS itself is far from perfect. And there are so many other areas of the government sector where the public experiences poor service, delay, arrogance, incompetence and failure.

And then there is the swelling part of the economy where people are paid generous sums on the basis of supposed sickness that may – let us put this politely – be questionable.

Advertisement

And it is not just billionaire business leaders who are hurt by the British tax system’s greed for other people’s money. 

Right at the other end of the wealth spectrum, hundreds of thousands of young men and women struggle to find work because the Labour government has placed a punitive tax on employment by increasing employers’ National Insurance rates.

And so we are indeed on the slide. Any serious patriotic political leader must know the country needs to reduce its tax burden, and its borrowing, if it is to stay solvent and efficient.

As we report today, the Treasury is close to meltdown as it tries to raise money to sustain its huge commitments and pay the colossal interest on our existing borrowing.

Advertisement

It is no good cutting one tax and raising another, or indulging in short-term tax reductions that cannot be sustained. 

If we want to arrest the slide we must all, Left and Right, rich and poor, grasp that we must relearn the ancient rules of thrift and prudence.

Andy Burnham, teetering on the edge of an election, dare not do this.

The parties of the Right must therefore tackle it, and soon.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Sleeping for nine hours a night can lead to an early death… and has a higher mortality rate than getting less than six hours of shut eye, study finds

Published

on

A study has found that sleeping for more than nine hours a night is associated with a higher risk of death, while seven to eight hours was linked to the lowest mortality rate (stock image)

Advertisement

After getting through the day there is nothing better than turning off the lights and curling up under the duvet.

But such a simple pleasure may cost you the ultimate price – with a study finding that sleeping for nine hours a night brings an increased risk of early death.

While getting seven to eight hours of shut-eye is the sweet spot for overall health, spending longer in bed is associated with a 17 per cent higher chance of dying from any cause.

The precise reasons for this are not well understood.

Advertisement

Yet those who sleep for longer are more likely to have high blood pressure, which plays a role in heart disease and strokes, and they may suffer from more inflammation than most.

Too much sleep can also interfere with the body’s internal clock, hormonal regulation and the immune system.

Researchers tracked the sleeping habits of more than 3,000 people for 30 years.

The mortality rate was lowest for those who slept seven to eight hours a night, with 10.57 deaths for every 1,000 people over the three decades.

Advertisement

A study has found that sleeping for more than nine hours a night is associated with a higher risk of death, while seven to eight hours was linked to the lowest mortality rate (stock image)

But sleeping fewer than six hours had a mortality rate which was slightly higher, at 10.97. And for those getting more than nine hours, the rate was higher again at 11.27.

The Taiwanese researchers who carried out the study say sleep should be measured by medics in order to identify people at risk of premature death.

Advertisement

In the Journal of Sleep Research, they wrote: ‘We found that long sleep duration was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality, and blood pressure accounted for a modest proportion of this association.

‘These findings may have implications for identifying individuals at increased health risk – sleep duration assessment may be incorporated into routine health check-ups to help identify individuals at potentially increased health risk.’

Too much sleep has long been linked to issues such as heart problems and type 2 diabetes, obesity, poorer memory and brain health.

Adults are advised to get between seven and nine hours of sleep every night.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025