Michelin star chef Tommy Banks will be making a special appearance on stage at York Theatre Royal for one night only on Friday, July 17.

In his show, Tommy Banks Spinning Plates: LIVE!, the award-winning chef and TV star chef will be sharing his story – one of a lifetime of ambition, vulnerability, risk and pressure revealing the highs and lows of a life in hospitality.

Tommy Banks, who owns Roots in York, opens up on pressures at York Theatre (Image: Newsquest)

Recommended reads:

Classic car lovers to flock to North Yorkshire attraction this weekend

York’s chart-topping band gets ‘incredible response’ to winter tour announcement

How live music made this North Yorkshire ‘ghost town’ a must-visit destination

It will be told across three intersecting timelines – the last 25 years, the defining 12 months, and the one day of opening night for his latest pub – with each moment teetering on a knife-edge.

Tommy will expose the harsh reality of operating in a turbulent industry where soaring business rates and crushing VAT force three pubs to close every week.

Tommy will also be talking about the incredible community of talent he has built in the once-sleepy village of Oldstead that is rooted in camaraderie, resilience, and true Yorkshire grit.

The show will use live storytelling and immersive cinema as the chef lifts the lid on hospitality service at its most intense, revealing the pressures of leadership and what it really takes to pursue excellence.

The 37-year-old who grew up in Oldstead owns Michelin-starred The Black Swan at Oldstead, Roots in Marygate, York, and The Abbey Inn at Byland as well as The General Tarleton at Ferrensby in a joint venture called Jeopardy Hospitality (JH), with business partner Matthew Lockwood, brother James Banks and businessman, Neil Armstrong.

Chris Wakelin, the 13th seed, made it 12 out of 12 seeded players to advance, sealing a 10-6 victory over 20-year-old English qualifer Liam Pullen.

Wakelin had led 5-4 overnight but Pullen, the world number 86 who battled through four qualifying rounds to qualify, made it 5-5 – only for Wakelin to win five frames in a row.

“I’m gutted for Liam as he is a really good friend of mine – we practice a lot and he is an incredible player,” said 34-year-old Wakelin.

“A few years ago we first practiced together and he stuffed me and I thought ‘what a talent’. It’s a shame he didn’t fully show what he is capable of but he did really well and made a good account of himself.

“I’m really proud that he has been here for the first time and every single person in that arena wanted him to win, me included. But I’m here to win and sometimes you have to be ruthless.

“I watched the draw and I didn’t want to draw Stan [Moody] or Liam as they are my friends and I want them to win.”

Pullen, who lost his World Snooker Tour place last May, then regained it a few weeks later at Q School, said he loved his first Crucible match.

“I really enjoyed every moment,” said Pullen. “I felt at times I held my own and I thought it was a very tight 10-6. I loved it. You have got to have fun and I felt close to doing something but it didn’t quite click.”

In the afternoon session, O’Sullivan will be looking for a quick finish as he leads 7-2 against another debutant, China’s He Guoqiang, while Si Jiahui begins his match with Iran’s Hossein Vafaei.

Three men and a woman were reported to have been fighting outside the town hall around 6.40pm on Tuesday (April 7).

After the fracas, one of the women was thought to have suffered serious injuries.

The trio were arrested on suspicion of affray on Sunday (April 19), with one of the women found hiding in woodland behind the police station.

All three have been released under investigation.

A spokesperson from Durham Police said: “Following extensive enquiries, officers from the Spennymoor Neighbourhood Team identified and arrested a man and two women in connection with the incident.

“All have since been released under investigation, but enquiries remain ongoing.”

Anyone with information is asked to call 101 quoting crime reference number CRI00674512 or contact hayley.outterson@durham.police.uk.

Travelers are increasingly worried about the cost and availability of flights for spring and summer trips as the U.S. and Israel’s war with Iran squeezes global oil supplies.

The head of the International Energy Agency warned last week that European countries could run low on jet fuel within weeks, forcing the continent’s airlines and carriers that fly to Europe to significantly reduce flights.

Many airlines have already raised checked bag fees or added fuel surcharges as the global price of jet fuel increased from about $99 per barrel at the end of February to as high as $209 a barrel at the beginning of April.

In a sign of the conflict’s ongoing repercussions for travel, Air Canada said Friday that it will suspend service to New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport from June 1 until Oct. 25 to lower its fuel costs.

Other airlines, ranging from U.S. carriers like United and Delta to Air France-KLM, SAS, Philippine Airlines and and Cathay Pacific in Europe and Asia, have reduced routes and either increased ticket prices or said they would hike them if the war keeps oil from passing through the Strait of Hormuz.

“It’s very hard for the airlines to make predictions in this environment, so they’re going to be conservative, and that’s why it’s likely that their prices will remain elevated for some time until things really stabilize,” said Shye Gilad, a former airline captain who now teaches at Georgetown University’s business school.

With airfares and fees on the rise, consumers still can make choices that determine how much of their travel budgets will get taken up by paying to get to and from their destinations.

Act quickly

While consumers may be tempted to see if the war ends before buying airline tickets, the “wait-and-see” approach to booking flights is riskier this year, travel experts say, especially the longer the war goes on and the closer to summer and other peak travel periods it gets.

“Presuming there is a lasting ceasefire — or better yet, peace agreement — it will take a few months for normal levels of jet fuel production and delivery to resume,” airline industry analyst Henry Harteveldt, president of Atmosphere Research Group, said.

The conflict in the Strait of Hormuz and President Donald Trump’s insistence on maintaining a U.S. blockade of Iranian ports illustrated the shakiness of prospects for oil flowing reliably again from the Persian Gulf and with it, an easing of the price pressure on airlines and their customers.

“My advice to travelers is this: If you find a flight whose schedule fits yours, with a fare you can afford, and on an airline you can at least tolerate, book it,” Harteveldt said. “But — and I cannot emphasize this enough —do not book a Basic Economy fare,” the cheapest but also the most restrictive airline ticket class.

Along with charging for checked bags and seat selection, most North American airlines do not give refunds or travel credits to passengers with Basic Economy tickets if they don’t cancel their trips within 24 hours of purchase. Policies may vary, but spending more for a Standard Economy ticket provides more flexibility, according to Harteveldt.

Paying more up-front for a refundable ticket also proves advantageous because “if the prices start to dramatically change, you can cancel and rebook for the better price,” Gilad said.

Travel experts say that for now, longstanding booking guidance offers a baseline for how early to reserve a flight to get the lowest airfare: international flights are typically the cheapest about two to five months in advance, and domestic trips about three to six weeks out.

Last-minute bookings and other situations that typically command higher prices are likely to keep climbing, Gilad said.

“Remember, especially if you’re traveling on the major airlines, they’re going to have more ability to adjust fares. If you book too close to your travel date, you’re going to pay more,” he said. “The farther out you can book, the better.”

Keep an open mind

Travelers who don’t want or need to reach a specific place at a specific time can find it easier to save on airfare. Shifting departure or return dates by a day or two — especially from peak weekends and holidays to midweek — often yields big price differences.

Choosing a different destination also may pay off. A flight from the U.S. may be significantly cheaper to one European city than another. Since budget airlines and trains connect much of Europe, and trains, an airport it cost less to get to can still provide easy access to a lot of other places.

Consumers not set on a certain arrival destination can try tools like Skyscanner’s “Explore Everywhere” feature to look for less-expensive options.

Looking beyond the closest airport for departures also can make a meaningful difference. Major hubs tend to offer more flights and lower fares than smaller regional airports.

In some cases, booking a separate short flight or train to a hub will unlock a cheaper long-haul airfare — think Milwaukee versus Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport.

Travel light

Sticking to a carry-on bag, when possible, can help avoid the higher fees for checking luggage that many major U.S. airlines introduced recently, including Delta, American, United, Southwest and JetBlue.

If packing light is not an option, plan ahead because airlines typically charge more to add bags closer to departure, especially within 24 hours of a flight.

Redeem your points

While fares are going up, the number of airline points needed for many flights has not increased at the same pace, said Adam Morvitz, CEO of points.me, a loyalty rewards redemption search platform.

Airlines still need to fill seats, Morvitz said, and offering more of them for fewer points is one way to do it.

Customers without enough frequent-flyer miles or credit card points for a round-trip ticket still can redeem their travel rewards for one leg of a journey and free up cash for other travel expenses.

Many travelers redeem points directly through their credit card’s booking portal, where they’re typically worth about 1 cent each, Morvitz said. Transferring points to airline loyalty programs often unlocks significantly better value because most major credit card issuers partner with a range of airlines.

Take American Express, whose points can be transferred to Air France’s Flying Blue program. Travelers who don’t want to book with Air France still can use those points with the airline’s partner carriers, such as Delta, Morvitz said.

“Points are a form of wealth, and consumers should recognize that those points increase spending power,” he said.

Explore travel credit cards

For those new to travel credit cards, sign-up bonuses may yield benefits that can be put to use as soon as this summer. Some bonuses are large enough to cover a flight after meeting a minimum spending requirement.

“Even if you were to travel the entire year, taking one trip per month, you would still earn more points simply by signing up for the card than actually sitting on a seat and flying,” Morvitz said.

Points and rewards can add up through everyday spending on groceries, dining and gas. Some cards include perks like free or discounted checked bags.

As airlines grapple with an ongoing jet fuel crisis, passengers are being hit from both sides: more cancelled flights and higher travel costs.

Carriers around the world are cutting routes and introducing extra charges in an effort to manage soaring fuel prices driven by ongoing conflict in the Middle East.

The Strait of Hormuz, which has effectively been blocked by Iran since February, carries up to 75% of plane fuel exports from the Gulf to Europe.

However, with this route disrupted and supplies running low, costs have skyrocketed from around $85 to $90 (£63 to £67) to as much as $200 (£148) per barrel over the past few weeks.

Last week, head of the International Energy Agency (IEA), Fatih Birol, said Europe has ‘maybe six weeks or so [of] jet fuel left,’ warning passengers to expect cancellations into the summer months.

Some airlines have already reduced schedules due to the shortage, while others are increasing fares or hiking baggage fees.

How major airlines operating in the UK have responded

Aegean Airlines

The Greek airline said this week it would raise ticket prices as a result of the spike, although hikes would be limited to around 7% to 8%.

The change will impact new bookings, but the 3.6 million passengers already scheduled to fly over the coming months, and those who hold an Aegean Pass and have bought early-bird packages, will be unaffected.

Like many other carriers, the company has also suspended flights to affected regions until the end of April, including Iraq, Israel, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE.

Aer Lingus

Over 500 flights have been dropped from Aer Lingus’s schedule, although it claims this is due to ‘mandatory maintenance’ on aircraft rather than the fuel crisis.

Air France-KLM

The airline group said it has made ‘price adjustments’ to long-haul ticket prices to address surging costs, with return fares rising by €50 euros (£44) per round trip, while short and medium-haul round trips in economy increasing by €10 (£9).

Last week, the group’s Dutch arm KLM also said it would cancel 160 flights in Europe over the coming month as a result of the fuel shortages.

Air India

In March, the Indian carrier began a phased expansion of a fuel surcharge on its domestic and international routes ‘necessitated by the steep rise in jet fuel prices arising from the geopolitical situation in the Gulf.’

All new bookings for flights to and from Europe now incur a $125 (£92) fee, up from $100 (£74) before the conflict began. However, the company noted it will be reviewing surcharges periodically, and may ‘make appropriate adjustments’ as required.

Alaska Airlines

The US airline, which is due to launch its first UK service between Heathrow and Seattle in May, increased checked bag fees for most customers earlier this month.

As of April 11, charges went up by $5 (£3.70) for the first bag and by $10 (£7.40) for the second, while a third piece of luggage will now cost $200 (£148), up from the previous $50 (£37).

American Airlines

Although checked baggage fees have been hiked up to $150 (£111) per bag — meaning the first costs $50 (£37), the second $60 (£44), and the third $200 (£148) — these increased charges only apply to domestic and short-haul international flights, so won’t impact travellers to or from the UK.

British Airways

British Airways owner IAG said in March it did not plan to increase ticket prices in the short to medium-term, as it was well hedged for upcoming shortages, but warned it was still ‘not immune’ to the fuel crisis.

British Airways specifically, however, has made changes to its schedule due to the ‘continuing uncertainty’, and is ‘directly in touch with affected customers to offer them a range of options’.

Cathay Pacific

The Hong Kong airline plans to cut about 2% of its scheduled passenger flights from mid-May to late June, while its budget subsidiary HK Express is dropping around 6% of flights.

However, more flights were actually added to London, Paris, and Zurich in March, as airspace closures led to an ‘upsurge’ in demand as passengers ‘prioritised alternative routings’.

In terms of pricing, the carrier said it would hike fuel surcharge by 34% across routes from April 1 and review them every two weeks.

China Eastern Airlines

While the Chinese airline, which offers multiple daily flights between London and Shanghai, has raised fuel surcharges, these currently only apply for domestic trips.

Passengers travelling within China currently face a 60 yuan fee (£6.50) for journeys under 800km, or 120 yuan (£13) for those over 800km.

Delta Air Lines

Delta said at the start of April it would cut capacity by around 3.5% from its original plan, although this would be targeted on red-eye and mid-week flights to ‘reduce unprofitable flying’.

Fees for checked luggage also increased by $10 (£7.40) for first and second bags and a $50 (£37) for the third, with bosses reported to be looking at increasing airfares in the months ahead.

EasyJet

In a recent statement, EasyJet boss Kenton Jarvis said the airline had ‘no concerns’, as it has ‘visibility to the middle of May’ in terms of fuel supply.

But with £25 million in extra fuel costs in March, the CEO added that European consumers should expect higher ticket prices around summer, when existing fuel hedges come to an end.

Emirates

Capacity was slashed by Emirates in late February, following widespread regional airspace restrictions impacting its Dubai hub.

The world’s largest long-haul airline and the largest in the Middle East, normally operates more than 3,600 flights per week, but is currently operating to ‘more than 100 destinations’ on a skeleton timetable — roughly 70% of its normal capacity.

Bosses have said it will only ramp up operations when over-flight corridors over Iraq and Iran are reliably reopened, and will ‘develop [its] operational schedule accordingly’.

Fare prices have reportedly gone up too, with a $226 (£167) economy class surcharge added to European trips from April 1, and $623 (£461)for premium cabins

IndiGo

India’s biggest airline — which flies from London and Manchester to destinations across India — introduced new fuel charges on domestic and international flights from March 14.

These fees initially ranged from 425 rupees (£3.35) for domestic flights to 2,300 rupees (£18) for flights to Europe, but have since been pushed up to as much as 10,000 rupees (£79).

IndiGo bosses claimed these surcharges would be monitored and adjusted where necessary, but it aimed to limit the impact on passengers where possible.

Jet2

Following the IEA announcement about impending fuel shortage disruption, a number of Jet2 passengers reached out to the airline for clarity ahead of their bookings.

In response, representatives confirmed ‘all flights are planned to go ahead as normal’, and customers would be contacted directly should this change. To be on the safe side, passengers are advised to check their flight status via the Jet2 website at least 12 hours before departure for the latest updates.

JetBlue Airways

Citing ‘rising operating ⁠costs’, the US-based carrier recently hiked baggage prices by between $4 (£3) and $59 (£44) depending on the type of flight and number of checked items.

While JetBlue hasn’t made a statement regarding fare increases, analysis by Deutsche Bank revealed its ticket prices jumped 16% in one week at the start of the month, potentially due to ‘panic buying’ for summer ahead of a predicted surge.

Lufthansa

Earlier this week, Lufthansa released a statement saying 20,000 short-haul flights were being cut from its schedule this summer, blaming the move on the jet fuel crisis and ongoing labour disputes.

The majority of this would be from the airline group’s loss-making short-haul CityLine subsidiary fleet, which was already due to be grounded later in the year.

Lufthansa will also withdraw four older Airbus A340-600 long-haul aircraft at the end of the summer, and reduce short and medium-haul offerings by five aircraft this coming winter, with the cuts representing 1% of the German carrier’s ‘available seat kilometres’ yet saving 40,000 tonnes of fuel between now and October.

Norse Atlantic UK

Low-cost Norwegian airline Norse Atlantic axes its flight route between London Gatwick and Los Angeles this week, citing the ‘global fuel crisis’.

‘We are truly sorry for the inconvenience, and apologise to passengers who have [had] their travel plans changed,’ a spokesperson commented. ‘We will assist disrupted passengers as best we can.’

Qantas

Despite cutting domestic flights, strong interest in Europe-bound travel led the Australian airline to redeploy capacity to hotspots like Paris and Rome.

Ticket prices have also increased in recent weeks, and it warned it may need to take ‘further action’ as the situation unfolds.

Ryanair

At the start of April, a spokesperson for the budget carrier told Metro it could ‘guarantee supply to mid-end May’, although if the conflict continues beyond this date, disruption due to fuel shortages couldn’t be ruled out.

This bolsters previous claims from Ryanair boss Michael O’Leary, who stated the company would likely be forced to cancel between 5% to 10% of its scheduled flights through May, June, and July.

With the airline operateing over 3,600 flights per day, this means approximately 360 daily trips could be impacted if the fuel crisis doesn’t resolve itself.

Scandinavian Airlines (SAS)

At least 1,000 flights are expected to have been cancelled by SAS in April, up from a ‘few hundred’ in March.

The majority of journeys affected are domestic routes within Norway however, with CEO Anko van der Werff highlighting that given the airline runs over 800 flights per day, cuts are limited in scale.

SAS, which had already increased flight prices, said that even if it tried to absorb the rising fuel costs, the surge was still ‘a shock that directly hits the airline industry’.

TAP Portugal

Last week, the CEO of the Portuguese Airlines Association (RENA), António Moura Portugal, said the country’s flag carrier, TAP, may ‘need to reduce operations and, eventually, raise prices’.

While analysis claims TAP only has 40% fuel coverage for 2026 (compared to between 62% and 84% for other major airlines) Portugal stressed that it was continuing to monitor the conflict, and is yet to make any ‘definitive statements’.

TUI

TUI Airways — the world’s largest charter airline, flies to over 100 destinations from 17 bases across the UK and Ireland —  said it is ‘monitoring’ jet fuel shortages, but is ‘not anticipating any immediate disruption to flight schedules or holiday programmes’ at present.

Turkish Airlines-SunExpress

SunExpress, a joint venture between Turkish Airlines and Lufthansa, is set to impose a temporary fuel surcharge of €10 (£8.69) per passenger.

This will apply to booking for flights between Turkey and Europe, made on or after April 1. for departures on or after May 1

United Airlines

In March, United Airlines’ CEO Scott Kirby said the firm would begin ‘tactically pruning flying that’s temporarily unprofitable in the face of high oil prices’.

The 5% capacity reduction will be focused on less-popular timings like overnight, Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Saturdays, and is expected to extend through at least the second and third quarters of 2026.

United also increased first and second checked bag fees by $10 (£7.40) for customers travelling in the US, Mexico and Canada and Latin America, but international flights are believed to be unaffected.

Virgin Atlantic

The airline is adding fuel surcharges to fares but will still struggle to return to profitability this year, its CEO Corneel ‌Koster told the Financial Times.

Virgin Atlantic has raised ticket prices by as much as £360 as the war on Iran makes jet fuel scarce, Metro confirmed earlier this month.

Sir Richard Branson’s airline added a fuel surcharge of £50 to economy class tickets, with premium economy increasing by £180 and business class by £360.

‘If the fuel price goes much higher, I think the surcharges may go higher,’ commented CEO Corneel ‌Koster. ‘If they go up in a week and you book in two weeks’ time, you’ll be paying higher.’

The company also recently scrapped flights from London to Riyadh, just a year after the route was launched, citing ‘the latest intelligence, regulatory guidance, demand and operating costs’.

WestJet

In a series of ‘near-team measures’, the Canadian airline this week added a C$60 ($32.50) fuel surcharge to some bookings, and will be consolidating flights on lower-demand routes as well as ‘adjusting the travel period for seasonal offerings’.

A statement on Westjet’s website said capacity was expected to reduce by 1% April, 3% in May and 5.5%t in June, and impacted customers would be provided with reaccommodation options, most within the same day as their original departure.   

Wizz Air

Hungarian carrier Wizz Air reported issues due to shortages in three airports in Italy last week, but chief Jozsef Varadi claimed these were ‘all resolved within a day and in some cases within hours.’

A spokesperson for the company, the third-largest European budget airline (after Ryanair and easyJet), stated it was ‘actively monitoring fuel supply,’ and ‘will work with its suppliers to secure the jet fuel available in line with its needs’, keeping customers informed and providing updates as needed.

What to do if your flights are cancelled or disrupted

Chris Harrington, managing director of travel firm hoppa, says the first port of call if your flight is cancelled is to contact the airline.

‘If you are already at the airport, head for the airline’s customer service desk to speak to a member of staff,’ he tells Metro.

‘Acting quickly is essential, as available seats on alternative flights may be limited and only available for a short time. However, other people will be in the same position as you, so if you’re met with long queues, try using the airline’s app or ring the customer service team to find out next steps.’

In most cases, the airline will have to make an alternative plan for you, so ask them to rebook you on a later flight, and let them know if there’s an alternative route (or flight using another airline) that works.

Chris also highlights the importance of buying travel insurance as soon as you book, to ‘protect yourself from circumstances such as cancelled flights’.

Some policies will cover the cost of hotels, airport transfers, alternative flights, and food, which is essential since cancellations due to external factors, such as fuel shortages, are typically classed as ‘extraordinary circumstances’, meaning airlines don’t necessarily have to reimburse directly.

‘If the flight cancellation is due to the actions of the airline, then it’s likely you’ll be entitled to compensation as per ABTA guidelines,’ Chris continues, noting that this amounts to £220 for journeys of 1,500;m or less, and up to £520 for anything over this distance.

‘However, in this case, because the cancellation is caused by extraordinary circumstances outside of the airline’s control, compensation is unlikely to apply.’

Do you have a story to share?

Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@Metro.co.uk.

MORE: Ryanair introduces new check-in rule — you’ll need to get to the airport even earlier

MORE: Busy Spanish airport set to close tomorrow for 5 weeks of major renovations

MORE: Belt grinding is the ‘inconsiderate’ airport habit others travellers judge you for

Residents of Barton and Winton will head to the polls today to vote in a new councillor following the death of England’s longest serving councillor David Lancaster. T

hen, in less than two weeks time, Barton and Winton residents will head to the polls for a second time to take part in the May 7 local elections.

Usually, when a councillor position becomes vacant less than six months before a planned election, the vote is rolled into the same day to avoid extra costs. But a ‘niche rule’ from 1972 means if two electors request an earlier polling day, the wish has to be honoured by the local authority within 35 days.

In this case, the person to call the election was Lewis Croden, who is standing as a Reform UK candidate for Little Hulton, and his relative.

Croden and his relative made the request less than two weeks after Lancaster’s passing, and shortly before Croden was confirmed as a council candidate.

The move has been slammed as a ‘waste of taxpayer’s money’ by Labour sources.

A spokesperson said: “The decision by Salford Reform UK to trigger an unnecessary early by‑election in Barton & Winton was entirely indefensible.

“The financial implications of this decision are significant. A stand‑alone by‑election costs the council over £20,000, when it could have been seamlessly incorporated into the citywide elections in May. In addition, the extension of the pre‑election period has disrupted other workstreams across the authority, potentially at a cost of tens of thousands of pounds.

“That a duly nominated Salford Reform UK candidate chose to trigger this by‑election before the late Councillor David Lancaster (the longest‑serving councillor in the country, who served the people of Salford with distinction for over 60 years) had even been laid to rest demonstrates a complete lack of decorum and respect.”

Responding to these allegations, Lewis Croden hit back: “Salford has been taken for granted by Labour for years. Public money is being wasted on a loss making stadium, £668 million in high interest PFI debt, and over £100 million wasted on a failed clean air charge zone. Time we fix our roads and fund essential services.”

There are six candidates standing in the Barton and Winton byelection: Kirsty Anne Downie (IND); Antony Ian Duke (LIB DEM); Micael James Felse (REFORM); Catherine Goodyer (LAB); Jack Groom (GREEN); and Holly Ann Muldoon (CON).

When we asked men to react to the news that just 11% of young women hold a ‘very positive’ view of them, for the most part, it gave us hope.

Guys like father-of-two, Jay, and 35-year-old Jaskaran, stood in solidarity with women, acknowledging that there’s a lot to be concerned by.

So, we cast the net even wider, posting the statistic on social media.

Keen to weigh in, many commenters understood why women might feel this way. On the other side of the coin though, there were accusations of misandry, as well as some pretty clear contempt for women.

Here’s what Metro readers had to say about it all — and if you’ve got more thoughts to share, leave a comment below.

‘Our hearts bleed’

Sadly, many commenters were unwilling to understand the female perspective.

‘Our hearts bleed,’ said Jamie Gibson, sarcastically. ‘They can keep that view, just stay over there with it and us men will be fine.’

Reader Marcos Ferreira has been with his partner for nearly 20 years, but claimed that, with women viewing men the way they do, if he broke up with his partner he’d rather be alone.

Advertisement

‘I’d rather stay single than to even bother with another woman in today’s world,’ he said. ‘They can keep the bear, I keep my sanity and the money.’

Marcos is referencing the viral TikTok debate of 2024, where some women felt it would be safer to be trapped alone in a forest with a bear, rather than a man.

Another reader, Craig Barnes, suspects a similar amount of men view women negatively too, commenting: ‘There aren’t many decent women around now, especially ones with morals. The decent ones are usually taken… younger ones are worse. So many are utterly toxic.’

However, there were many who took time to advocate for women.

‘Plenty of men on [this comment section] crying about “toxic feminism“‘, Jack Whiting said. ‘But if it’s evidence backed, it’s just factual. I don’t feel my wife is safe walking home but I don’t think it’s because of women at all.’

Advertisement

Reader Thimas Chung felt similarly, saying: ‘Some men feel threatened by calling out their toxic masculine trait, simply because toxic masculinity forms part of their identity, and that ought to come to an end.’

Another, Jack Andrew, was astounded by the many accusations of men-hating in the comments.

‘It’s staggering how many men have shown up in this comments section essentially just to say “No, it’s just misandry“‘, he wrote. ‘Guys, did you even read the article? Do you honestly not see how these comments can only make the problem worse?’

Tim Inn added: ‘Her views, her body, her choice! Not that hard to understand. Do better and be an ally, not be so toxic!’

Advertisement

‘Accept the facts’

Understandably, many women felt discouraged by the abundance of negative views under Metro‘s story, to which Shane Williams wrote: ‘Judging by the comments already, women are right to mistrust and hate men.’

Eider Gomez took a more balanced approach, saying: ‘From experience of being surrounded by a few good men, none of them get offended by such statistics cause they understand the circumstances around it. Only the other type of men do.’

Reader Serena pleaded with men to ‘accept the facts mentioned in the article’ because ‘everyone’s lives will be better’.

‘I’m sick and tired of men moaning about any piece of information that might slightly threaten their manliness,’ she added.

Some women could understand how reading something like this as a man could be upsetting.

Advertisement

‘I completely understand why some decent men are frustrated by this poll and want to say “not all men”,’ Lesley Christie said. ‘Unfortunately there is no way for women to know which men and if we make a mistake, we may not be alive to learn from it.

‘When the consequences of a decision may be sexual assault or death, you tend to be over cautious. That’s a completely normal response to a situation women don’t want and didn’t choose. Any human would do the same.’

Ultimately, reader Hannah offered a simple solution: ‘If men want to be viewed positively, they need to work to distance themselves from the herd and actively work to end violence against women. Otherwise their silence makes them just as bad.’

Do you have a story to share?

Advertisement

Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@Metro.co.uk.

MORE: This is how many times a week men should get morning erections, according to age

MORE: The maternity pay loophole all new mums need to know about

MORE: One phone call after I came out as a lesbian changed everything

Advertisement

Comments


Add as preferred source

It comes as the wider arts community in Northern Ireland continues to deal with historic levels of underfunding

The Arts Council NI has withdrawn funding from the Grand Opera House for the first time in over 30 years, it has been revealed. The iconic Belfast city centre theatre did not receive funding from the Arts Council’s 26-27 Annual Funding Programme.

The renowned Victorian theatre first opened its doors to the public in December 1895, and was designed by architect Frank Matcham. Over the years, it has survived bombings and threats of demolition, and in 2021 went through a major refurbishment. The venue remains a top venue for musicals, opera, and drama, attracting performers from around the world.

It comes as the wider arts community in Northern Ireland continues to deal with historic levels of underfunding, including the lowest per-capita arts spend in the UK and Ireland. At £5.07 per head, it is half of the investment seen in Scotland.

READ MORE: Over 50 events announced for Bangor’s Open House Festival 2026 READ MORE: The Northern Ireland model railway enthusiasts creating impressive displays

In news first reported by The Stage, the removal of funding contrasts with the Arts Council’s role in supporting the theatre over the years. The organisation played a role in saving the venue from the threat of demolition in the 1970s, and also contributed to its £12.2 million refurbishment in 2021.

Funding for the Grand Opera House from the Arts Council has fallen sharply in recent years, from a high of £675,000 a year over a decade ago, to £156,880 in 2025.

Despite ceasing support for the theatre’s performance programme three years ago, the Arts Council maintained funding for some operational costs of the historic building, anhd the venue’s creative learning programme which last year engaged with over 5,000 people.

The popular theatre, which marked its 130th anniversary last year, reported attendances in the last financial year of nearly 335,000 for 355 performances and a record average attendance of 90% capacity.

Advertisement

In a statement, a spokesperson for the Arts Council Northern Ireland said: “The Grand Opera House did not receive funding from the Arts Council’s 26-27 Annual Funding Programme. The Arts Council is proud of its historical funding of the commercially successful and iconic Grand Opera House for over 30 years now, including key support for the building’s extension and refurbishment.

“The Grand Opera House will have other opportunities to apply for ACNI funding which the GOH Trust may be eligible for, and we are happy to provide any information and guidance when and if requested.”

The Grand Opera House Trust said as guardians of the theatre, it will continue to invest in the building, spending £1 million in the next sixteen months on projects including cleaning and protecting decorative features of the auditorium, redecorating the external façade, and improving the technical infrastructure of their 123-seat Studio space.

In a statement, a spokesperson for the Grand Opera House Trust added: “The Arts Council of Northern Ireland’s decision not to fund the Grand Opera House Trust through its 2026/2027 Annual Funding Programme ends over 30 years of support to the Trust since it was formed and took over the management of the Theatre in 1994.

“As the Grand Opera House celebrates its 130th year, the Arts Council’s decision not to support the Theatre through its annual funding programme affords independence for the Grand Opera House Trust, its Chief Executive, and our dedicated and brilliant staff to continue to present a programme aimed at all tastes, ages and pockets, and which attracts people from diverse backgrounds and all communities.

“The Grand Opera House Trust and its Chief Executive look forward to engaging with the Arts Council of Northern Ireland in the months ahead to consider ways as to how it and Northern Ireland’s largest arts organisation can work together in the future.”

For all the latest news, visit the Belfast Live homepage here and sign up to our daily newsletter here.

The incidents allegedly happened during school rugby trip

Advertisement

A PE teacher has resigned after facing multiple allegations of inappropriate behaviour on a school trip.

Claims heard at a hearing include how she ignored concussion protocol, showed pupils her underwear and allowed them to come to her hotel room.

Lowri Williams was also a rugby coach at Llandovery College in Carmarthenshire. She is currently facing a week-long EWC disciplinary hearing over her conduct at a sevens tournament at Rosslyn Park in London.

It is alleged that during the tournament Ms Williams allowed pupils to continue playing rugby despite hitting their heads. WalesOnline reports she did not follow WRU concussion protocol and did not maintain professional boundaries.

Ms Williams is also alleged to have encouraged a pupil to lie to their housemistress about having taken another pupil to a match, discussed personal relationships with pupils, discussed and showed pupils what underwear she was wearing the next day, allowed them to come into her hotel room, answered her hotel room door to a pupil when not fully dressed, asked pupils if they were seeing anyone, talked to pupils about her weekend, and showed pupils videos of her on nights out.

The teacher, who used to be a semi-professional player, has nine allegations against her at the hearing due to end on Friday. As well as the London tournament, the allegations also relate to alleged conduct at a match at the Principality Stadium in Cardiff and a netball game at Christ College Brecon.

All events happened between September 2023 and March 2024. The EWC panel heard how the school’s under-16s side travelled to London on March 17 to take part in the Rosslyn Park tournament.

They stayed overnight in a hotel and played in the tournament on March 18 before returning to the school late that evening. Both Ms Williams and Sophie Witt (now Sophie Hands), former head of girls’ sport, were on the trip.

Simon Bodley, former medical centre manager at the school, told the panel that with such away games the usual protocol would be that he would receive a message or email from physios telling him about any injuries. However he said that hadn’t happened and yet he said five girls presented to him as injured after the tournament including with head injuries.

The panel has heard how one pupil, referred to as pupil F, had told him she’d been kicked in the head during the game. Mr Bodley recalled the girl had felt she “had almost been made to play on”.

He said she should’ve come off the pitch and been assessed but that during his check-ins with her she said, after she’d been encouraged by other girls, she had been told by Ms Williams not to tell anyone about her injury and to keep playing. He said she was one of the best players and he was “furious”.

But it was also heard from Andrew Faux, representing Ms Williams at the hearing, how pupil F had said herself that she wasn’t injured from the kick to the head but had come off “to make sure I was okay”.

Mr Faux also raised that Mr Bodley’s recollection of dates couldn’t have been accurate, to which Mr Bodley agreed and said emails actually indicated he saw pupil F on Thursday, March 21, rather than the morning after the tournament.

Johanna Edwards, the former deputy head at Llandovery, told the EWC she started an internal investigation about injuries having allegedly not being correctly reported. The EWC heard that during that investigation Ms Williams resigned from her role at Llandovery.

Ms Hands, who was also at the tournament, said Ms Williams “cared deeply about her role and was passionate about girls’ rugby”. “I’m shocked that any allegations has been brought to be here. I hear nothing but praise for her and as far as I’m concerned I’m at a loss as to how this has escalated to this point,” she told the panel.

During the games at the sevens tournament in London Ms Hands said she was only aware of a head injury to pupil B and she said she had been properly brought off despite her parents wanting her to play on.

She said that at the time the college didn’t have their own concussion protocol but followed the WRU one which Ms Williams was familiar with.

Ms Hands explained how all the girls seemed in high spirits on the minibus home and were singing all the way. The panel were shown a video of them singing on the minibus and Ms Hands said they didn’t behave like that if they were injured.

The next day she said she saw some girls sat outside the medical centre complaining they were tired and had headaches. It was the first she knew about them having any problems and she said she believed they were just tired from the trip.

Ms Hands recalled how on March 19 she was told Ms Williams wouldn’t be coming on the trip back to the Rosslyn Park tournament where the under-18s were playing on March 20. She said she didn’t want to go without her.

She said Ms Williams had “good relationships with pupils”. “She did everything I asked and more and would put the girls first. Formed her role with good humour and dedication,” she added.

The panel heard evidence from a pupil who was referred to as pupil E. Pupil E recalled how the evening before the tournament her and two other girls went into Ms Williams’ hotel room for around 15 minutes to talk about the tournament because they were nervous and didn’t know what to expect.

Pupil E said as they walked in Ms Williams was wearing a t-shirt and shorts and they sat on a sofa in the room. She said while they were there Ms Williams was folding clothes she was going to wear the next day on her bed, including her underwear.

Pupil E said another pupil said the underwear was “nice” and there being a discussion about their relationship statuses. She said Ms Williams told them she was speaking to someone but didn’t go into anymore detail.

Pupil E said: “I don’t believe she liked me and was randomly nice to me. She was fine as a teacher but many of the girls felt she didn’t like us and we felt like we didn’t want to play rugby anymore.”

She said she was disappointed she hadn’t played more at the tournament because she had paid £300 for the trip, but said Ms Williams would rather pick other players over her.

Ms Hands said during the overnight stay in London her and Ms Williams both had their own hotel rooms on a different floor to the pupils. She said their rooms were opposite each other and she was not aware of any pupils going into her room or her wearing anything other than a college tracksuit.

The hearing also heard from a former Llandovery College pupil who attended the tournament. She said Ms Williams had a “banterful relationship” with the pupils and she felt as though Ms Williams saw the year 13s as her mates and wanted to get on with them.

She recalled how during the tournament she’d suffered a head clash in the game with someone on her side but the former pupil said it was just part of the game to have those knocks and that Ms Williams was persistent in checking her and the others were okay. “If someone mentioned they weren’t feeling too well she would check up on them specifically, as well as the whole team,” she added.

She said during the game pupil F, one of the best players and the captain, “caught a stud” and she recalled Ms Williams asked her if she was okay. After she said she was okay to continue, the pupil said Ms Williams replied “good” and told her to “carry on”.

The pupil said she felt the substitutes were less experienced and that sports teachers, like Ms Williams, didn’t want to be embarrassed and therefore didn’t want pupil F to come off.

The day after the tournament she told the panel she had gone to the medical centre with a friend because she felt sore with muscle tension. She admitted she had held a grudge with Ms Williams since a match at the Principality Stadium when a player she thought was worse then her started instead.

The hearing continues.

A woman on holiday in Naples was killed after being struck in the head with a heavy statuette thrown from a balcony.

Chiara Jaconis, 30, was walking with her boyfriend through the Spanish Quarters of Naples on September 15, 2024, when she was killed.

CCTV footage from a nearby cafe caught the moment Chiara collapsed, as her partner Livio screamed for help.

According to investigators, the boy threw a black statuette weighing around 4.4 pounds from a third-floor balcony, striking Chiara as she walked below.

She was rushed to the hospital with severe head injuries, but died just hours later despite emergency surgery.

Now, the parents of the 13-year-old boy accused of her death have rejected blame for the boy’s behaviour and are demanding that, even though he is too young to be charged, he also be officially cleared of wrongdoing.

Italian prosecutors have requested that the boy’s mother and father be charged with negligent manslaughter, arguing the tragedy could have been prevented if they had kept a closer watch on their son.

The teenager has already been cleared by a juvenile court because he is under the age of 14 and cannot be held criminally responsible under Italian law.

A preliminary hearing to decide whether the case will go to trial is scheduled for 26th June.

Prosecutors say the parents bear responsibility because they did not supervise their son, who is believed to have carried out similar dangerous acts in the past.

However, the couple, both professionals in Naples, aged 65 and 54, have strongly denied any wrongdoing.

Through their lawyers, they insist they had no involvement in the incident and claim the statuette did not belong to them.

They have also bizarrely appealed the court’s decision to clear their son because of his age, arguing he should be acquitted based on the facts of the case rather than simply because of his age.

The case has drawn widespread attention in Italy, raising questions about parental responsibility and safety in densely populated urban areas.

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.

For more stories like this, check our news page.

MORE: Police uncover £1m prostitution ring involving 70 footballers and an F1 driver

MORE: The ‘Santorini of Italy’ with £15 April flights and close links to Greece

MORE: Shroud of Turin mystery deepens after it’s found to be covered in carrot