WASHINGTON (AP) — Congress is set to take up the reauthorization of a divisive program that lets U.S. spy agencies pore over foreigners’ calls, texts and emails, with supporters like President Donald Trump saying it has saved lives while critics point to longstanding concerns about warrantless surveillance of Americans.

A key provision of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act permits the CIA, National Security Agency, FBI and other agencies to collect and analyze vast amounts of overseas communications without a warrant. It incidentally sweeps up the conversations of any Americans who interact with those foreigners targeted for surveillance.

The program expires Monday, and critics want changes, including a requirement for warrants before authorities can access the emails, phone calls or text messages of Americans. They also want limits on the government’s use of internet data brokers, who sell large volumes of personal information gleaned online, offering the government what critics say amounts to an end-run around the Constitution.

Despite bipartisan criticism, the chances of significant reforms dropped when Trump announced his support for the program’s renewal, saying it had proven its worth in supplying information vital to recent U.S. actions in Venezuela and Iran.

“The fact is, whether you like FISA or not, it is extremely important to our military,” Trump said on social media Tuesday.

Trump calls for another extension of the program

U.S. authorities say the program, known as Section 702 of the law, is vital to national security and has saved lives by uncovering terror plots. Critics question what they call a dangerous infringement on civil liberties and privacy.

In a Truth Social post, Trump said a different FISA provision was used to spy on his 2016 campaign but that he supported Section 702’s renewal despite misgivings that political adversaries could use parts of the law against him in the future. He called on lawmakers to extend the foreign surveillance program for another 18 months.

“My administration has worked tirelessly to ensure these FISA reforms are being aggressively executed at every level of the Executive Branch to keep Americans safe, while protecting our sacred Civil Liberties guaranteed by our Great Constitution,” Trump wrote.

Trump is a longtime critic of the nation’s intelligence services and was once opposed to Section 702 before he reversed himself. “KILL FISA” Trump posted on social media in 2024, when the provision was last reauthorized.

Trump isn’t the only one-time critic to change their mind: Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard sponsored legislation to repeal Section 702 as a Hawaii congresswoman but now supports it after being tapped to coordinate the nation’s 18 intelligence agencies.

Gabbard says new protections added since her time in Congress helped change her mind.

In addition to a requirement for a warrant to access Americans’ data, critics also want greater protections on how the FBI or other agencies can search communications and how that is reported to the public.

“Journalists, foreign aid workers, people with family overseas, all could have their communications swept up in this surveillance merely because they talked to someone outside of this country,” said Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore. The longtime critic of the law is pushing for changes that he said will ensure the government isn’t violating civil rights in secret.

Several Republicans also have suggested changes, such as the warrant requirement.

“National security and civil liberties are not mutually exclusive,” said Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz. “We can give our intelligence professionals the tools they need to target foreign threats while ensuring that Americans are not subjected to unconstitutional surveillance.”

Gabbard’s office releases an annual report showing the number of foreign surveillance targets and number of searches likely to identify an American.

For 2025, the number of foreign surveillance targets increased to nearly 350,000 from almost 292,000 in 2024. Searches using terms likely to identify an American decreased slightly to 7,724 from 7,845 in 2024.

The totals are incomplete because agencies like the FBI have found ways to access the data without reporting the searches publicly, said Elizabeth Goitein, senior director of the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University.

FBI officials repeatedly violated their own standards when searching for intelligence related to the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the U.S. Capitol and racial justice protests in 2020, according to a 2024 court order.

“It’s reminiscent of J. Edgar Hoover’s tenure at the FBI,” Goitein said, referring to the FBI’s founding director who used illegal surveillance to harass and spy on Americans. “They can pretty much target anyone.”

There’s little time to make changes to the law

Despite bipartisan concerns about the law and its implications for civil liberties, time is running out for Congress to make any changes before Monday’s expiration.

Trump’s support also reduces the odds that enough Republicans will break ranks and join Democrats to push for reforms.

Wyden said Section 702 votes are routinely delayed until the last minute, then lawmakers are told that national security demands they vote yes. Lawmakers are told, he said, that “if they vote for any amendments, the program will die and terrible things will happen and it will be all their fault.”

The best chance for inserting changes likely is the House, where a large number of lawmakers from both parties have expressed concerns.

But Rep. Rick Crawford, an Arkansas Republican who chairs the House Intelligence Committee, is backing Trump’s call for an 18-month renewal.

Crawford has taken aim in the past at what he calls the weaponization of intelligence but said last month that he believes the government can empower spy agencies while also holding them accountable.

“We can walk and chew gum at the same time,” Crawford said.

Donald Trump is to host King Charles and Queen Camilla later this month.

Donald Trump has revealed what he really thinks about King Charles in a bombshell phone call, during which he spoke warmly about the monarch ahead of his upcoming trip to America. Speaking to Sky News, the US President described the King as “a great gentleman”, “a great friend of mine” and “a fantastic person”. Trump made the remarks in a conversation that took place just an hour after Buckingham Palace announced details of the King and Queen Camilla’s historic four-day visit to the United States.

The King and Queen are due to start their trip in Washington to meet the US President before travelling to New York and Virginia. In a call to presenter Mark Stone’s personal mobile, Trump appeared enthusiastic about the visit and made clear his admiration for the monarch. However, despite his warm words for the King, the President also launched into criticism of Sir Keir Starmer and the UK Government. During the exchange, he hit out at Britain’s current immigration and energy policies, highlighting a sharp contrast between his views on the monarchy and the administration, reports Express.

Asked whether his repeated criticism of the Prime Minister risked making things awkward for the King during the visit, Trump insisted that would not be the case.

He said: “No, not at all. I like Starmer.” But he then went on to attack what he described as the “tragic mistakes” made by Sir Keir and his Government.

Stone said that when he first asked Trump about the UK and US’ special relationship, the presenter said: “At one point, he didn’t appear to even know what I was talking about when I asked him about the special relationship, which one he said.

“His assessment of the British government, of Kier Starmer, of Britain’s policies, when it comes to immigration, when it comes to energy, we’re really quite surprising.

” I mean, we know he’s talked about this sort of stuff before, but I felt his tone was different. He seemed really, well, ‘sad’, as you say, was how he described the special relationship.

“But then, you know, almost in the same sentence, he was saying how much he loved the king, how much he loved the royal family, how much he was looking forward to the state, visit the details of which we had only been revealed by Buckingham Palace an hour before we spoke.”

Trump was also reported to have given a ‘veiled threat to the UK’ in regard to the two countries relationship.

Stone reported: “He said to me: ‘Well, it’s been better, but it’s sad, and we gave them a good trade deal, better than I had to, which can always be changed.”

“I think that is very interesting. There was a threat there – barely veiled – from the President that he could potentially change the trade deal Britain has done with the United States.

“Remember, the UK was the envy of much of the world when it secured this preferential trade arrangement with the US.

“He is now suggesting that, because of the state of the special relationship, because he does not think Britain was supportive enough of his stance on Iran, and because he disagrees with UK Government policies, the deal could be revisited.

“The sense I got was that he believes Britain is heading in the wrong direction.”

Speaking more broadly about the relationship between the two countries and UK policy, he said: “I love your country.

“I would love to see it succeed, but if you have bad immigration policies and bad energy policies, you have the worst of both. You can’t succeed. Not possible.”

Trump was desrcibed as ‘completeley differentiating’ the King, the Royals and the pomp from the politics.

Stone pointed out that the King’s visit to Washington was taking place at the request of the UK Government, to which Trump was reportedlysurprised by that and did not seem to realise that Royal visits are arranged in that way.

Stone added: ” I think he thought almost as if the king was coming here because he wanted to come here. So an interesting point there.”

The Chorley Old Road Methodist Hall and Sunday School, dating back to 1892, forms part of a retrospective planning application submitted on April 9, 2026.

The building, rub by charity organisation Qasr-e-Sajjad AS, has been operating as a community centre and madrassah since November 4, 2024.

The Grade II listed former Methodist hall in Bolton (Image: Bolton Council)

The application was submitted by Shabaz Hussain on behalf of Qasr-e-Sajjad AS, with the scheme prepared by RA Design & Project Management Ltd.

The centre is intended to serve the Shia Muslim community, described as a “relatively small and underrepresented group in Bolton.”

Chorley Old Road Methodist Hall, which could be formally approved as a Shia community centre and prayer room. (Image: Bolton Council)

The charity aims to advance the Islamic faith, promote mutual understanding between different faiths, and provide a base for worship, religious education, and cultural activities for the Shi’ite community in Bolton and Manchester.

The planning documents state the site would not be used for congregational Friday prayers but will function as a community facility with an ancillary prayer room.

Madrassah classes for up to 50 children are expected to run between 5pm and 7pm on weekdays.

The building is intended to serve Bolton’s Shia Muslim community as a centre for worship and education. (Image: Bolton Council)

The proposed opening hours are listed as 9am to 11pm, Monday to Sunday.

The plans indicate only minor internal changes, including the removal of a small internal wall in the ladies’ area to create a larger hall.

No significant external changes are planned, although the proposal seeks to retain a flagpole at the front of the site.

A heritage statement concluded the reuse would not harm the character or significance of the listed building, arguing the new use aligns with its historic role as a religious and community space.

Bolton Council will now review the application.

Married at First Sight Australia’s annual couples retreat was far from relaxing as Bec Zacharia ended up upsetting Rachel Gilmore by sharing intimate details with the group

Advertisement

Bec Zacharia has apologised to Rachel Gilmore for the “vulgar” comment she made during the Married at First Sight Australia couples retreat.

Jaws were left on the floor when Bec took it upon herself to share with the group that Rachel and her husband Steven Danyluk had progressed in their intimacy after recent struggles to connect in the bedroom.

Some of the group already knew of their progress but were shocked when Bec announced it to everyone else.

It has since been revealed that an unaired conversation between Bec and Steven happened before her “disrespectful” speech.

Although there is now more context to the situation, Bec has apologised for how the evening unfolded and the decisions she made.

Advertisement

Appearing on the After The Dinner Party show together, Rachel, Steven, and Bec all spoke about the eventful trip with all the brides and grooms.

Rachel admitted she would have “squashed” it earlier with Bec if she had known about the conversation between Bec and Steven prior to her speech.

She explained: “Genuinely, like, it kind of gives context because then I would have gone out of my way then to approach Bec and like, ‘I get why you’ve said it now’, I could have squashed it. I was overreacting.”

Bec interrupted and disagreed saying: “No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, you’re not overreacting, because what you feel is what you feel and you are allowed to feel what you feel.

“What I said was completely politically incorrect. I have the most vulgar sense of humour.”

Bec added that she wouldn’t allow Rachel to “blame” herself for the situation as she was the one who made the comment.

In the unaired conversation, Steven can been seen sitting and chatting with Bec and Alissa Fay.

Before Bec says to him, “I’m so glad you got…stuck a finger in babes…” Steven questioned her, saying: “How do you know it’s even one finger?”

Bec immediately responded, “I guessing it’s two”, before adding that she was “so happy” for the couple.

After watching the conversation unfold, Rachel admitted at the time she thought Steve had “supported” her. However, he essentially created an environment in which jokes could be openly made.

She told Mamamia: “In private, Steven was telling me how crude Bec is and how she was ‘bang out of line’… Well, you said it too, sweetie. He never owned it. He let Bec take the fall.”

In the same interview she said that while Bec apologised, she didn’t believe she was “sorry for the impact” of her comment.

Rachel said: “She was sorry for the intent — the joke — but she wasn’t sorry for the impact. The impact was that I felt humiliated and shamed.

“A joke at my expense — especially one that is extremely sexual and puts my body on display — is not okay.”

Married at First Sight Australia airs Monday to Thursday on E4 at 7.30pm

The figures, released by Darlington Borough Council through a freedom of information request, reveal that only three fixed penalty notices were issued in 2025, all by the council’s dedicated dog warden. Civic enforcement officers issued none.

A concerned Darlington resident told The Northern Echo: “We’ve lived in the area for almost five years now and have two dogs, and over the last year or so I have noticed an increase in dog fouling on the streets in our area.

“It is more noticeable on the footpaths than it is down Cemetery Lane or Stanhope Park for example – particularly on Abbey Road – where there are multiple public bins for people to dispose of the mess.

“There are a few occasions where there have been full poo bags left on walls of residential properties by parents on the school run – again despite there being bins on Abbey Road.”

The data also showed that 188 stray dogs were found in 2025, with 40 of them unchipped.

College ward representative Cllr Matthew Snedker said he “absolutely understands” the anger of residents who do not see poo being picked up.

Cllr Matthew Snedker with a dog poo bin. (Image: SARAH CALDECOTT)

“This is a huge issue, it is unacceptable for people not to pick up after their dogs,” he said

“I have been out with the dog warden and when people see them out and about, they pick up the mess, or are warned.”

He explained that issuing fines is challenging, unless there is direct evidence.

Cllr Snedker said: “I speak with the dog warden and council officers regularly, they are doing a difficult job.”

Darlington Borough Council said the problem, while caused by a minority, affects the whole community.

A spokesperson said: “We know that the vast majority of pet owners are responsible and the actions of a few inconsiderate people can cause misery.

“We take dog fouling very seriously.

“In order to issue a fixed penalty notice, we have to catch a dog owner failing to pick up after their pet.

“We therefore rely on information from the public so we can build up a picture of when and where it is happening to catch people in the act.”

One of the I’m A Celebrity… South Africa stars will be leaving camp ‘for good’ as the eliminations are set to begin

Ant McPartlin and Dec Donnelly have confirmed one of the I’m A Celebrity… South Africa stars will be leaving camp ‘for good’ as the eliminations are set to begin.

The second series of the I’m A Celebrity… Get Me Out of Here spin-off got underway last week with the hosts welcoming back 12 former campmates as they agreed to return for more Bushtucker Trials in a bid to be crowned a “legend” of the ITV reality show.

This week, Harry Redknapp and Jimmy Bullard finally joined their ten campmates – including Adam Thomas, Sir Mo Farah, Gemma Collins and David Haye – for the remainder of the series.

Click here to get the biggest stories straight to your inbox in our Daily Newsletter

But unlike the Australian main series which is broadcast live each night with an 11-hour time difference, the South African series was pre-recorded last year, thought to be in September.

That means that instead of the public voting to eliminate the celebrities, the campmates themselves will choose who to bid farewell to after various tough challenges are completed. But in a twist to the first series of I’m A Celeb South Africa, there will be a live final on April 24 where viewers will get to choose their winner.

And after fans recently started to question when the eliminations would begin, it was at the end of Tuesday (April 14) night’s episode that Ant and Dec announced that the next edition of the programme would see the first exit from camp.

“It is time for the first celebrity to leave the camp for good,” the hosts informed the campmates during a teaser for that is to come in Wednesday’s (April 15) episode, whilst it was also revealed that Scarlett Moffatt and Gemma Collins will face the next Bushtucker Trial.

As a new week got underway in South Africa, the campmates were surprised as they were joined by two new celebrities. Heading to the trial clearing, The Royal Express arrived at the platform, with the campmates eager to see which new faces will be joining them.

It was then revealed that Harry Redknapp and Jimmy Bullard were entering the camp. Taking their place on the thrones, the pair were introduced as the Lion King (Harry) and the Rhino King (Jimmy), with them taking it in turns to create their new teams.

With the new teams chosen, it was up to Adam and Craig Charles to fight for glory on behalf of Jimmy, as Ashley Roberts and David worked hard for Harry. As the stars were tied to bungee ropes, they dug through mud to find golden nuggets.

It was then revealed that Adam and Craig had collected more than their opposition, and therefore won. Upon returning back to their respective camps, tensions ran high as the Rhinos cheered loudly as they celebrated. With only a tall screen separating them, the Lion camp couldn’t hide their disappointment.

The East West Railway Company has released an updated proposal for a new rail line connecting Oxford, Milton Keynes, Bedford and Cambridge

Advertisement

Cambridgeshire Live readers have voiced their opinions on proposals for a new rail line in the county, with many sharing strong views. Comments centred on whether the route is necessary, how it will be operated, and whether it is suited to future travel needs.

East West Railway Company (EWR Co) has released an updated proposal for a new railway line in Cambridgeshire. The new route would connect Oxford, Milton Keynes, Bedford, and Cambridge, with up to five trains per hour planned.

The revised proposals now factor in the new Universal Resort near Bedford and the heightened passenger demand anticipated as a result of the development. A station at Stewartby has been earmarked to serve the theme park.

Some readers questioned whether the demand exists to justify the line. Camssurvivor writes: “Five trains an hour? Brilliant. Over the past 60 years, freight transport on the railways has fallen by 63 per cent. If you look at cross-country passenger trains, there aren’t many passengers on them. Only the London commuter lines are busy.”

Alydavid comments: “We wait at our local level crossing every day, watching empty trains hurtle by. The actual plan is to build many more houses and further strain the overstretched poor infrastructure.”

Marlesherbes feels: “EWR has but a single problem. The Unions; there are still no trains between Bedford & Oxford as the unions refuse to allow trains unless there’s both a driver and a guard, the latter to operate the doors, which are automatic anyway!”

Creda1 adds: “Perhaps closer to Cambridge City centre would be a good idea and not nearly 2 miles out.”

Feelgood66 comments: “So five trains an hour plus the trains from Kings Cross coming in from Royston direction, plus the trains coming up from Stansted direction. All funnelling into Shelford. Wouldn’t want to live near that junction, it’s bad enough living next to the Kings Cross line as I do, right next to the area the lines will meet near Harston.”

Drdpy says: “With small trains running four times an hour, that is 231,840 people a week. The population of Cambridge is 157,697, and Oxford is about 165,000. Is it possible that there are insufficient trains running between the two cities? Is there sufficient parking for cars and bicycles if everyone in the city actually used the train? Is that why the new stations, South Cambridge and the proposed East Cambridge, have no car parks?

“There is no available land on which to build mass transport. That is why the newly proposed busway from Cambourne to Cambridge through Coton Orchard is stopping a mile outside the city. The University does not agree that the city needs better transport and has stopped development for decades. The new stations will have bike racks, but not enough for the number of passengers proposed. The city will need new pedestrian ways to cope with the numbers.”

Is there a need for this route? Comment below or HERE to join in the conversation.

Two AA-owned driving schools have been ordered by the UK competition watchdog to refund more than 80,000 customers and have been fined £4.2 million over drip-pricing.

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said the AA Driving School and BSM Driving School did not include a mandatory £3 booking fee in upfront prices.

This is an illegal practice known as drip-pricing.

The amount repaid to individuals will vary depending on how many lesson packages they bought, with the average being about £9.

This will total more than £760,000.

The refunds and fine combined will almost be £5 million.

This is the first financial penalty the CMA has imposed for breach of consumer law since it was handed new enforcement powers.

CMA chief executive Sarah Cardell said: “If a fee is mandatory, the law is clear: it must be included in the price from the very start – not added at checkout – so consumers always know what they need to pay.

“At a time when people are watching every pound, dripped fees can tip the balance. And when it comes to something as important – and costly – as learning to drive, people deserve clarity.

“With our new powers, it will never pay to break the law or treat consumers unfairly. Where the rules are ignored, we’ll step in to put things right.”

A spokesperson for AA driving schools said: “Although the £3 booking fee was made clear to customers prior to their purchase, we acknowledge it should have also been displayed at the start of the online booking journey.

“Having listened to the regulator, we made immediate changes to our website to make the £3 booking fee more prominent.

“We are now refunding all relevant customers. Whilst we are disappointed with the outcome of the investigation, we have fully co-operated with the CMA throughout and would emphasise that protecting consumer rights has been central to our business for more than 120 years.”

Affected customers do not need to take any action, the CMA said.

The AA Driving School or BSM Driving School will write to them stating that the money will be automatically refunded onto the card they used to pay for their lessons.

If that is not possible, they will be sent a cheque.

In 2023, the Department for Business and Trade found nearly half of online businesses used dripped fees, with consumers spending up to £3.5 billion per year as a result.

From 6 April, payments increased to £27.05 a week for the eldest or only child and £17.90 a week for each additional child, giving families up to £1,406 a year for their first child.

HM Revenue and Customs has confirmed that more than 6.9 million families receiving Child Benefit are now being paid at the new higher rates. Most payments arrive in bank accounts on a Monday or Tuesday.

With payments typically made every four weeks, many parents should now start to notice the increase in their latest or upcoming payment, depending on their payment cycle.

However, officials are warning that thousands of families could still be missing out entirely. Latest figures show only 72% of parents claim Child Benefit within their baby’s first year.

Because claims can only be backdated for three months, delaying an application could mean losing out on hundreds of pounds.

Myrtle Lloyd, HMRC’s chief customer officer, said: “Looking after a child can be expensive, especially a newborn. It takes a few minutes to claim Child Benefit via the app and doing so as soon as you can after your baby is born will ensure you don’t miss out on vital financial support.”

Earning over £60k? 💷

Check if you need to pay the High Income Child Benefit Charge.

Advertisement

✅ Use the new digital service to pay through your salary if you’re not in Self Assessment. 
✅ It’s quick and easy with the HMRC app or online. 📲

Find out more here 👉… pic.twitter.com/QhrOrCBogX

— HM Revenue & Customs (@HMRCgovuk) April 12, 2026

Parents are being urged to check their bank accounts now to make sure they are receiving the correct amount, and to act quickly if they have not yet made a claim.

Most applications are now completed online or through the HMRC app, with around 85% of claims submitted digitally.

Experts at Money and Pensions Service also recommend checking eligibility using online tools, as some families may not realise they qualify.

Anna Sharkey from the Money and Pensions Service, said: “Use MoneyHelper’s free Benefits Calculator if you think you, or someone you know, might be eligible for Child Benefit. The calculator will show you all the benefits you’re eligible for.

“Other MoneyHelper tools for new parents include the Baby Cost Calculator to help you budget when having a baby, and the Baby Money Timeline which gives you key dates to help you plan your finances.

“Visit MoneyHelper.org.uk for free and impartial money guidance for everyday money management.”

Recommended reading:

Payments are made directly into bank accounts and can be managed or updated easily.

Parents should also be aware of the High Income Child Benefit Charge if one partner earns over £60,000, although claiming can still protect National Insurance credits even if payments are repaid.

Officials say families who previously opted out can quickly restart payments, ensuring they benefit from the higher rates now in place.

Owner Anna Redfern said that she made the tough decision to close the cinema as the ‘conditions to sustain’ an independent business are ‘becoming impossible’

Another business in Swansea has announced that they will be closing their doors later this year. In the last couple of months, the news broke that locations like Marks and Spencer, Turtle Bay and Gin and Juice would all be shutting down.

The indie film house, Cinema & Co. will be joining that list following an announcement on Facebook on Monday, April 13. Owner Anna Redfern said she made the tough decision to close the cinema, live venue and gallery space based in the centre of Swansea as the “conditions to sustain” an independent business are “becoming impossible”.

Ms Redfern said: “‘Every story has an ending. After 10 years I’ve made the decision not to renew the lease at Cinema & Co. This hasn’t been an easy decision but it’s been a necessary one.

“I’ve spent years trying to run this space in a way that felt right— not just financially but ethically and personally too. And the truth is that’s becoming harder and harder to do.

“Running an independent space today means wearing every hat, holding everything together, and constantly fighting to keep something special alive. And over time that takes its toll. Not just on the business but on the person behind it.”

She said sustaining a small independent business is now becoming “impossible”. “I know we’re not the only ones. You’re seeing it everywhere,” she added.

“Independent spaces are disappearing — not because people don’t care but because the conditions to sustain them are becoming impossible. So this is me choosing to end it on my terms rather than lose what made it what it was.

“We’ve got a few months left. If Cinema & Co has ever meant something to you come and be part of it while you still can. Don’t cry because it’s over, smile because it happened.” Never miss a Swansea story by signing up to our newsletter here

Many locals flooded the comments with support for the business and their disappointment over the news that they would be closing later this year.

One person said: “It’s gonna be quite weird not to see Cinema & Co on Swansea central high street, will definitely miss this venue.”

Another added: “What a shame, you are an inspiration to many – best of luck in whatever is next.”

However, others believe that closure of the establishment was inevitable following financial difficulties in the wake of their legal dispute over breaching coronavirus regulations during the pandemic.

One person said: “She made a few decisions that in the end put people off going there.”

Ms Redfern received fines amounting to £15,000 in December 2021 after admitting to violating Covid public health regulations. She was additionally ordered to pay £8,940 in prosecution costs, while the company itself was handed a £5,000 fine.

She also received a suspended prison sentence after pleading guilty to contempt of court for opening the cinema despite a court order, though in an unusual development she was later permitted to vacate that plea – effectively withdrawing it – and the matter was dropped.

In an interview which was published in 2022, Ms Redfern stated that given the opportunity to turn back the clock, she would make the same decision again.

She said: “I was sick of pretending to comply through fear of losing my livelihood which I guess is quite ironic because it looks like that is going to happen anyway.

“I stood in my truth and it was a matter of principle. We’ve got to be vocal because we are having our freedoms and our rights stripped away from us.”