I love breakfast. I’m a creature of habit in general and I like to reduce the number of decisions that need to be made, especially since starting my own business, which has made daily life all about decisions, decisions, decisions. So with breakfast, I start by having a glass of water and a black coffee, then I’ll have Greek yoghurt mixed with our New Road 30 high-fibre, prebiotic blend and some kind of fresh fruit and nuts.

Dave Llewellyn, a BBC radio presenter known for his traffic and travel updates and distinctive on-air voice, has died at the age of 57 following a short illness, with his daughter leading tributes describing him as “incredibly modest and generous”.

A BBC radio star has has died at the age of 57 following a short illness, his family has confirmed.

BBC Radio Tees presenter Dave Llewellyn, known for his trademark red hair and warm personality, spent more than two decades delivering traffic and travel updates across the North East, reports the Mirror.

The popular broadcaster first began his career as the “eye in the sky”, reporting from a light aircraft flying above Teesside.

Originally from Fishburn in County Durham, Dave later settled in Yarm with his wife Ange and daughter Amy. Away from radio, he was deeply passionate about music and spent years performing and producing.

Paying tribute online, his daughter Amy described him as an “incredibly modest and generous” man who always had time for others.

She said: “Outside of his work he loved his family and his music. His true talent shone through while he was playing his keyboards, synthesisers and bass.

“He was the most loving father and husband, always going out of his way to make us happy. He will be sadly missed by everyone who knew him, especially our beloved dog Cupid who always saw a taste of his generosity, usually in the form of a shared sausage sandwich.”

Alongside presenting travel bulletins, Dave worked as a producer at BBC Radio Tees for the past six years and most recently contributed to Gary Philipson’s daytime show. His voice became familiar to listeners across the region through regular traffic reports broadcast from the BBC studios in Middlesbrough.

He also co-hosted a Sunday morning gardening programme with Brigid Press.

BBC Radio Tees colleagues paid emotional tributes during Friday’s broadcasts. Presenter Amy Oakden said the station would “never ever forget his iconic voice”, adding: “He was just so kind and lovely. He was a legend.”

Producer Sarah Robinson remembered him as a cheerful presence in the office, joking about his “terrible shirts” and “awful coffee” before adding that he was “relentlessly cheerful and positive”.

Listeners also shared tributes, with many describing Dave as friendly, funny and kind-hearted.

One wrote: “Every time you rang in he was great craic — what a lovely guy.”

Volunteer organisation Bloodrun EVS, which transports blood supplies between hospitals, also paid tribute, describing him as “a comforting voice to many”.

In a statement, the group said: “Thank you for your service. RIP Dave. Our condolences and thoughts are with Dave’s family and colleagues at this difficult time.”

Get more Daily Record exclusives by signing up for free to Google’s preferred sources. Click HERE

What’s the link between the global economy and the climate? Consumption drives extraction and carbon emissions. But there is more.

The inequalities of the global economy don’t just shape what goes into the atmosphere. They affect our understanding of the climate and our perspectives when it comes to possible solutions. The lenses through which we see the world reflect the inequalities within it. The greater the centralisation of power, the greater the control over our knowledge about it.

This was a conclusion that the writer and revolutionary Antonio Gramsci reached, while languishing in prison after a failed revolution against the fascist Italian dictator Benito Mussolini. Unable to understand why ordinary people didn’t rise up against the dictator, despite their clear economic interest in doing so, he coined the term “hegemony”: the conflation of power and knowledge, whereby the views and interests of a political economic elite are adopted by the rest of society as common sense.

This perspective explains a lot about our seeming inability to escape the environmental status quo.

Successive polls indicate overwhelming public support for resolving excessive carbon emissions and the problems this excessive use of fossil fuels is creating for communities around the world.

In the UK, 60% of people support net zero. In Germany, 81% of the population want to expand renewable energy, while 55% cite it as “very important to them”. In Italy, 80% of people support a renewables only energy policy. Even in the US, 57% want the government to do more to address climate change.

With the exception of the US, this majority is greater than that which has elected any political party since the turn of the 20th century. So with a super-majority in favour of decarbonisation, how does the world remain stuck on such a steep upwards trajectory of carbon emissions?

Almost every country has a stated commitment to decarbonisation. Wind and solar energy are the cheapest forms of energy in history.

Yet a record quantity of carbon was pumped into the atmosphere last year. And record amounts of coal, oil and gas are still being extracted from the Earth.

Statistics like this can make even thinking about climate change a demoralising business. This is precisely the problem. Our overwhelming political will is sapped by being locked into a system that obscures the most effective pathways (phasing out fossil fuels, for example), while continually moving us towards less effective ones.

If you’re worried that global garment production is on course to triple in size by 2050, common narratives suggest that simply choosing the “greenest” brand will help fix the problem. Worried about the carbon cost of flying? Never fear: a budget airline’s apocryphal claims to be sustainable can assuage that nagging guilt.

Feeling the heat?

But the politics of climate change isn’t just about what we buy. It’s a full-body experience.

Take heat stress. According to the UN’s International Labour Organization, 70% of workers experience heat stress throughout the year. That figure falls to 29% in Europe and rises to 93% in sub-Saharan Africa.

These two continents have big differences in temperature, but temperature is in fact only a small part of the problem.

The largest determinant on whether a person becomes heat stressed (the point at which their body is pushed beyond its normal thermal limits) is the work that a person does. People working in construction, agriculture and other high-intensity roles – the kind that dominate in developing countries – are at the highest risk. Sedentary service sectors, or office jobs to you and me, are the safest in terms of heat stress.

When it comes to the environment, what you feel depends on what you do.

My new book, Climate Hegemony, highlights how a farmer is almost twice as likely as a garment worker to experience changing rainfall patterns, because everybody’s experience of the environment is filtered through how they spend their life.

That’s the problem. The populations of the developed world, consumers of most fossil fuels globally, may favour climate action. But as long as they continue to benefit from a global economy that reduces their risk through air conditioning and wealth, tackling climate change will remain alongside world peace and eliminating global hunger: moral aspirations, rather than tangible policy.

It is a testament to the persuasive powers of the fossil fuel industry that this hegemony is sustained – even in the face of precipitously falling renewable energy prices. Campaigns outflank arguments for renewable energy through widespread political lobbying and by support for conservative thinktanks and social movements, such as the campaign against net zero.

Individually, these activities might seem nefarious, but together they present as common sense, just as Gramsci complained from his cell in 1929.

As Gramsci found out, it is not easy to change minds. Yet by challenging the deeply embedded norms and assumptions of our current environmental impasse, it is possible to access something many environmentalists have felt starved of in recent years: hope.

The changing climate acts not only through emissions, but through everything we do, make and think. With different assumptions about which climate actions are possible, we arrive at different politics and different outcomes.

So, however much it might feel like it, the climate impasse is far from insurmountable. A world of ways to reshape our relationship to the environment are waiting, if only we can learn to see them.

Potholes are a safety risk, source of vehicle damage and recurring annoyance in the UK. They gain special visibility at times of local elections, given that the vast majority of roads are maintained by local authorities. A survey conducted in April found that road condition was the top local issue for voters throughout Britain ahead of the May 7 elections.

The Asphalt Industry Alliance’s (AIA) 2025 report indicates that 17% of the local road network in England and Wales is in poor condition. It estimates that the backlog of repairs would take a staggering 12 years to clear, costing £16.81 billion.

While it’s easy for politicians to point to numbers of potholes filled as a way to gain votes from frustrated drivers, this does nothing to solve the problem in the long run.

Where do potholes come from?

Potholes are not isolated road surface defects, but rather the end-product of a hidden road deterioration process. In typical asphalt roads, bitumen ages, stiffens and becomes brittle over time. Traffic passage causes the road surface to crack.

Once cracks form, water enters the road structure. The weight of vehicles and freeze-thaw cycles over winter cause these cracks to expand and widen, eventually resulting in a pothole. By the time it appears on the road surface, the structural integrity of the subsurface is already compromised.

In the wake of climate change, the UK’s increasingly wet winters accelerate this process, especially on roads that have reached the end of their structural life.

The UK’s approach to repairing potholes is largely reactive: a short-term, localised patch job after the road has failed. Experimental studies show that while this approach is relatively inexpensive per intervention, it suffers from severe underperformance.

These repair jobs often last for just weeks or months in wet or winter conditions before needing to be done again. This “patch and repeat” cycle leads to escalating costs, network disruption and inconsistent road quality.

A much better approach would be preventative maintenance – intervening before failure occurs. Preventative treatments, including surface dressing and crack sealing, yield superior cost-effectiveness because they substantially reduce the frequency of patch failure and replacement.

It’s important to note that filling potholes, in itself, does not add life to roads, apart from temporarily keeping them safe. It is the construction equivalent of throwing good money after bad.

More ambitious would be to establish a predictive and proactive road management system that spans the road’s entire lifecycle. This includes designing and constructing resilient road structures, conducting frequent monitoring, and applying targeted, timely preventive maintenance.

Emerging technology such as advances in data analytics, AI, automation, digital twins and non-destructive testing may make this approach increasingly feasible.

Economics of potholes

Evidence suggests that preventative maintenance would be longer lasting, and significantly more cost-efficient. Spending £1 today on preventative maintenance leads to £4.20 saved within 10 years.

This payback reflects the current poor condition of the local road network in Britain. More sustainable road maintenance would have a rapid effect.

Similar evidence exists for the climate impact. Traditionally, potholes are fixed again and again using cold-mix or hot-mix asphalt – a mixture of stones and petroleum-based bitumen derived from crude oil. This makes the process incredibly carbon-intensive.

Preventative maintenance reduces the long-term carbon costs because roads stay in good condition for longer. As extreme weather such as floods or heatwaves becomes more frequent, the risk of damage to road surfaces increases, making resilience a crucial factor in highway maintenance.

Put another way, preventative road maintenance could be a key part of local authority’s net zero ambitions – whereas the current approach is a liability to this goal.

The electoral focus on fixing potholes therefore seems odd, since the medium- to long-term solution (from a cost, road quality and carbon perspective) is more preventative maintenance.

Why are Britain’s roads so pothole-plagued?

The simple reason that local authorities can’t fix potholes permanently is a lack of funding. However, like many political issues, it is more nuanced.

Our work with the National Highways & Transport Network has found that the public’s satisfaction with roads is substantially driven by the condition of roads within a one-kilometre radius of where they live.

Politically, potholes are obviously visible – they are also classed as safety defects, so there are legal requirements for local authorities to “fix” them in a timely manner. But underlying road condition, while crucial to the emergence of potholes, is more hidden and does not get as much political bandwidth.

Local authorities receive various funding pots for road maintenance, but this funding can sometimes be reallocated to other authority services, such as adult social care. This seriously constrains funding that is spent on road maintenance, although the UK government has recently announced new rules to stop councils from diverting road maintenance funds.

Taken together, this means that preventative maintenance is crowded out by limited funds and the need to repeatedly fix holes that result from a lack of preventative maintenance.

A review of current local road maintenance budget allocations reveals that reactive maintenance consumes 25% of budgets. But the pothole problem is getting worse, which suggests this figure will rise over time.

The relatively recent extra money for road maintenance (£0.5 billion annually) allocated could help, but it won’t go very far unless put into preventative treatments.

Changing to a longer-term solution requires different approaches to government funding and policymaking. But this demands political will at all levels of government, at a time when local authority budgets are already very constrained.

In Abbey, Green Cllr Matthew Howard is not standing for re-election with Maria Margaret Cleminson up for the party instead. Labour councillors are standing for re-election in Castle, Cherry Hinton, Coleridge, King’s Hedges and West Chesterton.

Leader Cllr Cameron Holloway is standing in Petersfield instead of his current seat in Newnham. Labour are hoping candidate Sabina Harris-Hercules will win there instead. Their current councillors in Arbury, East Chesterton and Romsey are not standing for re-election.

Liberal Democrat councillors Katie Porrer and Olaf Hauk are hoping to be re-elected in Market and Trumpington respectively – a second seat in Trumpington is currently vacant but was formerly held by the Lib Dems.

Daniel Lee is not standing for re-election in Queen Edith’s, but Amanda Joan Taylor is standing to keep the seat Lib Dem.

Royal Artillery Bombardier Nadine Askew, 31, from Sunderland, was found dead in her room at Larkhill Garrison in Wiltshire on July 22, 2021, after an altercation with a junior soldier the night before.

An inquest at Wiltshire and Swindon Coroner’s Court heard the Royal Artillery soldier had been involved in a fight with a gunner during a party at the accommodation block, and feared it could put her forthcoming promotion to sergeant at risk.

(Image: PA)

Recording a conclusion of suicide, assistant coroner Ian Singleton said: “I am satisfied that more likely than not she intended to take her own life.

“I find this was against the background of being involved in an altercation earlier that evening that Nadine would have known would, in all probability, have an adverse effect on the promotion that she was so keen to achieve.

“I find that her actions were a response to the realisation of that fact.”

Bmdr Askew had served tours of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan with the Royal Artillery.

Lucy Clark, a fellow bombardier, told the inquest: “She knew that getting into a fight and essentially hitting a gunner was going to have repercussions on her career.

“A lot of the time the repercussion for fighting is a demotion, and she wasn’t wearing sergeant yet, so the fear was a demotion in general, but she would have potentially been busted back down to lance bombardier.”

The inquest heard a group of soldiers had been socialising at a nearby pub before returning to the garrison and continuing the evening at a party.

The fight started after the gunner approached Bmdr Askew to apologise for something she had done earlier in the day.

Witnesses said Bmdr Askew punched and headbutted the gunner before being restrained by another soldier.

The court heard that she had a history of self-harm and had previously been placed on the Vulnerability Risk Management (VRM) register and given mental health support.

Just ten days before her death, senior officers had removed her from the register and approved her for deployment.

Her parents told the inquest that they were unaware of her previous self-harm or mental health struggles.

Mr Singleton said: “It would be speculation to say what difference it would have made if Nadine had been on the VRM or if measures had been put in place.

“No-one had concerns how Nadine presented after the incident on the evening of July 21 to 22, 2021.”

He found no evidence her earlier mental health issues contributed to her death, citing improvements noted by a psychiatrist and a lack of recent concerning behaviour.

The care she received was described by medical experts as of a “good standard,” and the coroner said her death did not reflect a failure in previous care.

(Image: PA)

Following the inquest, Bmdr Askew’s mother Amanda paid tribute to her daughter.

Ms Askew said: “It’s impossible to put into words how devastating it is to hear from multiple second-hand sources that your child was battling mental health struggles that you were unaware of.

“It’s been devastating to sit through all that evidence and be confronted with that fact.

“We endured this process as we hoped that by shining a light on the circumstances leading up to her death, we might spare other Army families from enduring the same irreparable pain.

“Nadine was a kind, caring woman with an infectious smile.

“After she died, we received over 300 cards from people all over the world and 27 condolence bouquets.

Read more:

“We also learnt that some of her friends have named their children after her.

“It is clear she touched so many people’s lives, which brings us some comfort.”

If you are in need of support you can contact the following:

– Samaritans are here to listen – day or night, 365 days a year. You can call them for free on 116 123 or visit samaritans.org.

– If U Care Share on 0191 387 5661 or text IUCS to 85258

– SANE on 07984 967 708, Calm on 0800 58 58 58

Crews from Kirkbymoorside and Thirsk were called to an electric pole which had ignited at 5.32pm last night (Thursday) in Eastgate, Helmsley.

The fire had spread to a perimeter hedge of two properties.

A spokesperson for North Yorkshire Fire and Rescue said: “A firefighter wearing breathing apparatus equipment for comfort began extinguishing the fire.

“The power board were requested to inspect the charred, overhead power lines.

“The guttering and facade to two properties had been affected by the hedge fire and crews isolated mains gas to both properties as a precaution.

“No signs of fire inside the properties were evident. A fire investigation will be conducted during daylight hours to determine a cause. Crews used a triple exterior ladder, one breathing apparatus, hose reel jets and a thermal imaging camera.”

Barrie Drewitt-Barlow, known as one of ‘Britain’s first gay dads’, and his husband Scott have been charged with alleged rape, sexual assault and human trafficking for sexual exploitation

Advertisement

A reality television personality and his husband are facing a raft of serious criminal charges, including rape and human trafficking for sexual exploitation.

Barrie Drewitt-Barlow, who rose to prominence as one of ‘Britain’s first gay dads’ and was set to feature in ITV reality programme Up The Jammers, was detained alongside his husband Scott following a police raid on their Essex property.

Essex Police confirmed that officers from their Serious Crime Directorate conducted searches across several properties belonging to the couple throughout the county on May 6.

In the wake of those searches, Essex Police stated: “We can now confirm that 57-year-old Barrie Drewitt-Barlow and 32-year-old Scott Drewitt-Barlow, both of Southwood Chase, Danbury, have both been charged with multiple offences including rape, sexual assault, and modern slavery trafficking for sexual exploitation.”

In an official statement, Christian Meikle of the Crown Prosecution Service said: “The Crown Prosecution Service has decided to charge Barrie Drewitt-Barlow and Scott Drewitt-Barlow following a police investigation into alleged human trafficking for sexual exploitation and rape.

“Barrie Drewitt-Barlow and Scott Drewitt-Barlow have each been charged with arranging or facilitating travel of another person with a view to exploitation, as well as other sexual offences, including rape. We have worked closely with Essex Police as it carried out its investigation.”

The pair are scheduled to appear at Chelmsford Magistrates’ Court today (May 8) following questioning by detectives. Detective Inspector Lydia George was leading the investigation, reports the Mirror.

She stated: “If anyone has any information they feel ready to share with us, I would ask them to contact us via the Major Incident Public Portal (MIPP) and the investigation team will provide you with any specialist support required.”

Drewitt-Barlow initially gained recognition as one of Britain’s first gay fathers when he and his former partner Tony welcomed twins Saffron and Aspen in 1999. The pair made history by having both same-sex parents listed on the birth certificates as ‘Parent One’ and ‘Parent Two’ instead of ‘mother and father’.

Each man is the biological father of one twin, though they’ve never disclosed which child belongs to whom. Drewitt-Barlow has featured on numerous daytime TV programmes discussing his experience.

He was also scheduled to feature in the forthcoming ITV reality series Up The Jammers. The programme was meant to chronicle the millionaire’s involvement with non-league football club Maldon and Tiptree, with broadcast anticipated for next week. However, the show has been axed following the police investigation.

ITV4 has substituted the documentary with a wrestling programme in its place.

An ITV Spokesperson told The Mirror: “ITV has decided to remove Up The Jammers from the upcoming schedule. It will no longer be shown on ITV4 or ITVX as previously advertised.”

Drewitt-Barlow and his ex-husband parted ways in 2019, following revelations that Drewitt-Barlow had developed romantic feelings for Scott Hutchinson, the former partner of his daughter Scarlett.

Ensure our latest stories always appear at the top of your Google Search by making us a Preferred Source. Click here to activate or add us as your Preferred Source in your Google search settings.

Spurs start the weekend with their Premier League future back in their own hands following back-to-back away wins at Wolves and Aston Villa.

With three matches remaining, last season’s Europa League winners are 17th on 37 points – one more than 18th-placed West Ham.

If Arsenal and Spurs both win, West Ham will be four points from safety with two games left, while Mikel Arteta’s Gunners – if nearest rivals Manchester City beat Brentford at Etihad Stadium on Saturday (17:30 BST kick-off) – will require a maximum five points from two games to win the league.

So, who do other Tottenham supporters want to win at London Stadium?

Unlike fellow fan Speechly, Bardi, from The Extra Inch, external Spurs podcast, says he can live with an Arsenal win.

“Right now, survival has to come first,” he says. “This is our priority.

“Safety is more important than banter, but you won’t see me crying if they draw 5-5 with Jarrod Bowen scoring twice in added time.”

For many people interested in health and wellbeing, the idea of ultra-processed food, or UPF, has become more than a technical term in nutrition research. In public debate, it often serves as shorthand for wider concerns about modern, industrially produced food.

Those concerns are not baseless. A large body of research has found associations between high UPF intake and poorer health outcomes. But the evidence is not always easy to interpret. Many studies rely on self-reported diets and struggle to separate the effects of processing from nutrient quality, eating patterns and wider social factors. The evidence points to the need for more careful use of the term.

In the US, the Food and Drug Administration and the Department of Agriculture began a formal process in 2025 to develop a uniform federal definition of ultra-processed foods, arguing that no single authoritative definition exists for the US food supply. The central question is: what exactly makes a food “ultra-processed”? Is it the ingredients it contains, the way it is made, the extent to which it has been altered from its original structure, or some combination of these?

This helps explain why the topic has become so divisive. Within nutrition research, there is no consensus on how far the UPF category should guide policy or individual dietary advice. Some researchers see it as an important way of identifying harmful patterns in modern diets. Others argue that it is too broad to serve as a sound basis for dietary guidance on its own.

That distinction is important. A category can be useful for tracking population diets while still being too blunt to tell someone whether a particular product belongs in their shopping basket, especially when it tries to capture ingredients, industrial processes, product formulation, marketing, palatability and dietary patterns within one category.

There are also valid concerns about the role of large food companies in shaping diets and public health. Many highly processed products are designed to be cheap, convenient, heavily marketed and easy to overconsume. But the political and commercial problems of the food system are not identical to the scientific problem of classification.

A better approach would distinguish more clearly between products that are ultra-processed and nutritionally poor, products that are ultra-processed but may still have a useful place in the diet, and minimally processed foods that people are encouraged to eat more of. This might include some fortified foods, high-fibre breads or medical nutrition products, depending on their composition and use.

One way to balance warnings about UPFs is to give more attention to positive dietary guidance. In the EAT-UP framework, I propose the term “unrefined plant foods”, or UPs, to describe plant foods whose natural structure remains largely intact. These include whole fruits, vegetables, beans and grains that have not been heavily broken down or reconstituted.

This is not a replacement for the UPF framework. Its main value may be communicative: it balances advice about what to limit with clearer guidance on what to add. Many dietary guidelines already encourage people to eat more fruit, vegetables, legumes and whole grains. Naming these foods more precisely may help make that advice clearer.

Like any food category, unrefined plant foods would need careful definition. The phrase “largely intact” is not self-explanatory, and different researchers, policymakers and consumers may draw the boundary differently. But the value of the concept lies in shifting part of the public health message from avoidance to addition.

Advice based only on avoidance can easily become confusing or punitive. Evidence that higher intakes of whole plant foods are linked with better health also has limitations, including food diaries, self-reporting, cohort studies and the difficulty of separating diet from wider lifestyle factors. Even so, fruit, vegetables, legumes and whole grains are consistently supported across dietary guidelines, public health research and long-standing evidence on diet quality.

These debates also shape how people understand food in everyday life. Dietary advice should avoid creating unnecessary fear around food. When processing is treated as inherently dangerous, the result can be confusion, guilt and anxiety rather than healthier behaviour. In some cases, highly moralised food messaging may even encourage disordered eating patterns, including an unhealthy fixation on foods perceived to be perfectly pure or healthy.

This is also why language needs care. Phrases such as “real food” are often used to mean foods that are minimally processed or close to their original form. But the phrase can also carry assumptions about what counts as proper eating and who is getting it wrong. Public health messages need to take account of differences in income, time, access and daily constraints.

À lire aussi :
Why stigmatising ultra-processed food could be doing more harm than good

Improving diets requires more than labelling a broad category of foods as harmful. It requires careful consideration of evidence, behaviour and context. The challenge is to produce advice that is scientifically sound, practical to follow and responsive to the real conditions in which people make food choices.

The UPF debate has rightly placed industrial diets and food quality at the centre of public health discussion. The next step is not to abandon the framework, but to improve it: to define categories more clearly, distinguish between different kinds of processing, and combine warnings about harmful products with practical advice about the foods people can eat more of. In practice, that means combining processing-based classifications with evidence about nutrient profile, fibre content, additives, marketing and the role a food plays in the overall diet.