Jesse Van Rootselaar, 18, is believed to be behind the deadly attack

The first pictures have emerged of the suspected school shooter in one of Canada’s deadliest mass shootings.

Jesse Van Rootselaar, 18, is suspected of fatally shooting six people and wounding 25 others at Tumbler Ridge Secondary School in British Columbia, Canada, on Tuesday, February 10.

The attack is the second-deadliest school shooting in Canadian history after 14 students were killed at Montreal’s L’Ecole Polytechnique in 1989.

A chilling photograph, shared by Australian news site news.com.au, shows Van Rootselaar smiling and holding a rifle. It is unclear how old Van Rootselaar was in the photograph.

Advertisement

Those killed at the school include three 12-year-old girls, two boys aged 12 and 13, and a 39-year-old female teacher, police said. Two others, a 39-year-old woman named Jennifer Strang and an 11-year-old boy were identified by police as Van Rootselaar’s mum and stepbrother. They were shot by Van Rootselaar before the attack on the school.

Authorities said Van Rootselaar, who identified as transgender and went by female pronouns, died by a self-inflicted gunshot on the school premises, bringing the death toll to nine.

Residents of Tumbler Ridge, a remote town of about 2,400 people in the foothills of the Rockies, were sent a text alert on Tuesday afternoon with instructions to shelter in place due to an active shooter. The Mirror reported that the alert described the suspect as a “female in a dress with brown hair”.

Officers entered the school to locate the threat and within found the shooter deceased. He said the suspect has been identified as Van Rootselaar, a resident of Tumbler Ridge.

Two firearms, a long gun and a modified handgun, were recovered.

Asked by reporters if Van Rootselaar was transgender, Deputy Commissioner McDonald said police were identifying the suspect “as they chose to be identified in public and in social media”.

“I can say that Jesse was born as a biological male who approximately six years ago began to transition to female and identified as female, both socially and publicly,” he added.

John Scanlon, chair of the Environmental Services Association, said: “We’ve seen a shift from people using small canisters to much larger ones holding 600, 700g of nitrous oxide, which become a ticking time bomb when they’re disposed of and find their way into our waste and recycling facilities.”

Healthcare workers have been told to stop discouraging first cousin marriages, as parents only have a “slightly increased” risk of having children with genetic disorders

The NHS has been instructed that medical professionals must not issue blanket warnings against marriages between first cousins.

The National Child Mortality Database (NCMD), a government-funded monitoring organisation, has advised healthcare workers against routinely discouraging such unions. They now assert that parents face only a “slightly increased” risk of having children with genetic disorders.

The guidance stated: “Action at community level may help people to understand and act on [our] advice; but this is only acceptable if information is balanced, non-stigmatising and non-directive.”

First cousin marriages remain legal across the UK, with no laws preventing cousins from marrying or having children together.

Consequently, under British law, they are not classified amongst the prohibited relationships for marriage but there have historically been concerns about a higher rate of birth defects.

Section 1 of the Marriage Act 1949 sets out that any marriages that take place within prohibited degrees of relationship are void. Under the legislation, prohibited degrees of relationship for marriage include marriages to a sibling, parent or child, but not marriages between first cousins.

Such marriages occur more commonly within the British-Pakistani community than amongst white British parents.

Operating from the University of Bristol, the NCMD has been allocated over £3.5m in taxpayer funding to collect and analyse data on child deaths. The document was published in 2023.

In 2024, Richard Holden, then a backbench MP and now shadow transport secretary, put forward proposals to ban first-cousin marriages.

Mr Holden told The Times: “Our NHS should stop taking the knee to damaging and oppressive cultural practices. This guidance turns basic public health into public harm.

“First cousin marriage carries far higher genetic risk, as well as damaging individual liberty and societal cohesion.

“Pretending otherwise helps no one, least of all the children born with avoidable conditions and those trapped in heavy-handed patriarchal power structures they can’t leave for fear of total ostracism.”

Cambridge City Council is considering introducing new charges on developers building in the city, in order to raise more money to be spent on infrastructure projects.

Developers building in Cambridge could face new charges to make sure they pay their “fair share” towards the city’s infrastructure. Cambridge City Council is considering introducing Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL), charges, which would see developers pay fixed amounts towards infrastructure in the city.

Other councils in the area already have these charges, including in Huntingdonshire and East Cambridgeshire. Councillor Katie Thornburrow (Labour), cabinet member for planning and transport, said there is not currently enough money available to deliver “all the necessary transport improvements” the city needs.

She said: “Simply put, CIL is a fixed charge that developers must pay to build new homes or commercial spaces. The money raised is pooled together to fund essential infrastructure, such as transport and community facilities, that our growing city needs.

“Cambridge currently relies on Section 106 contributions, which are negotiated site by site. Moving to CIL will secure more funding and speed up the planning process.

“There is a funding gap for transport issues, the Greater Cambridge Partnership has identified it does not have enough funds to deliver all the necessary transport improvements. If we introduce CIL we will have a more reliable way to reduce that gap and ensure developers pay their fair share towards what the city needs.”

The proposed charges developers could face include £175 per square metre for offices and research and development projects; £60 per square metre for houses, flats, retirement homes, and student accommodation; £50 per square metre for shops, restaurants, financial and professional services, and hotels; and £35 per square metre for industrial buildings and data centres.

A report published by the city council said if these proposed charges are introduced, based on previous levels of growth, it could generate at least £25million over the next five years.

The city council’s cabinet agreed this week (February 10) to move forward with the plans by holding a four week public consultation about the proposals, which is due to take place between February 16, and March 16.

Councillor Anna Smith (Labour) said she was “very much in favour of holding developers to account and making sure they pay their fair share”.

Councillor Naomi Bennett (Green Party) highlighted that CIL was introduced as an option for planning authorities in 2010, she asked why the city council held off introducing it.

She also raised concerns that it could be “avoided” by developers and asked what steps the city council plans to take to prevent developers from avoiding the charges.

Cllr Thornburrow said the city council had considered introducing CIL charges in the past, but had paused this work to see if the national government would be replacing it with a different system.

She said the government had confirmed in 2024 that CIL would not be scrapped, which she explained had offered the authority the “opportunity to rethink”.

Stephen Kelly, joint director of Greater Cambridge Shared Planning and 3C Building Control, said there was actually “quite widespread avoidance through Section 106 regime”.

He explained that there are enforcement measures available under CIL, which he said included being able to stop developments if a developer has failed to pay any up front CIL charges required.

To get more breaking news and top stories delivered directly to your phone, join our new WhatsApp community. Click this link to receive your daily dose of CambridgeshireLive content.

We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don’t like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you’re curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves will face questions from the press during a visit on Thursday, while other Labour figures, including former deputy leader Angela Rayner and Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham, who both expressed support for the Prime Minister despite recent speculation about their own ambitions, will also attend a public-facing event in Liverpool.

It was the image that launched a cultural icon. In 1967, in the northern Californian woods, a seven foot tall, ape-like creature covered in black fur and walking upright was captured on camera, at one point turning around to look straight down the lens. The image is endlessly copied in popular culture – it’s even become an emoji. But what was it? A hoax? A bear? Or a real-life example of a mysterious species called the Bigfoot?

The film has been analysed and re-ananlysed countless times. Although most people believe it was some sort of hoax, there are some who argue that it’s never been definitively debunked. One group of people, dubbed Bigfooters, are so intrigued that they have taken to the forests of Washington, California, Oregon, Ohio, Florida and beyond to look for evidence of the mythical creature.

But why? That’s what sociologists Jamie Lewis and Andrew Bartlett wanted to uncover. They were itching to understand what prompts this community to spend valuable time and resources looking for a beast that is highly unlikely to even exist. During lockdown, Lewis started interviewing more than 130 Bigfooters (and a few academics) about their views, experiences and practices, culminating in the duo’s recent book Bigfooters and Scientific Inquiry: on the borderlands of legitimate science.

Here, we talk to them about their academic investigation.

What was it about the Bigfoot community that you found so intriguing?

Lewis: It started when I was watching either the Discovery Channel or Animal Planet and a show called Finding Bigfoot was advertised. I was really keen to know why this programme was being scheduled on what certainly at the time was a nominally serious and sober natural history channel. The initial plan was to do an analysis of these television programmes, but we felt that wasn’t enough. It was lockdown and my wife was pregnant and in bed a lot with sickness, so I needed to fill my time.

Bartlett: One of the things that I worked on when Jamie and I shared an office in Cardiff was a sociological study of fringe physicists. These are people mostly outside of academic institutions trying to do science. I was interviewing these people, going to their conferences. And that led relatively smoothly into Bigfoot, but it was Jamie’s interest in Bigfoot that brought me to this field.

The Insights section is committed to high-quality longform journalism. Our editors work with academics from many different backgrounds who are tackling a wide range of societal and scientific challenges.

How big is this community?

Lewis: It’s very hard to put a number on it. There is certainly a divide between what are known as “apers”, who believe that Bigfoot is just a primate unknown to science, and those that are perhaps more derogatorily called “woo-woos”, who believe that Bigfoot is some sort of interdimensional traveller, an alien of sort. We’re talking in the thousands of people. But there are a couple of hundred really serious people of which I probably interviewed at least half.

Many people back them. A YouGov survey conducted as recently as November 2025, suggested that as many as one quarter of Americans believe that Bigfoot either definitely or probably exists.

Were the interviewees suspicious of your intentions?

Lewis: I think there was definitely a worry that they would be caricatured. And I was often asked, “Do I believe in Bigfoot?” I had a standard answer that Andy and I agreed on, which was that mainstream, institutional science says there is absolutely no compelling evidence that Bigfoot exists. We have no reason to dissent with that consensus. But as sociologists what does exist is a community (or communities) of Bigfooting, and that’s what interests us.

Bartlett: One of the things that at least a couple of people reacted to once the book was published was the way we phrased that. On the blurb on the back of the book we say something along the lines of “Bigfoot exists if not as a physical biological creature then certainly as an object around which hundreds of people organise their lives”. A couple of people took that to be some kind of slight against them. It wasn’t.

Do these people have any sort of shared personality traits or other things that connected them?

Lewis: The community is very white, male, rural and blue collar – often ex-military. I think Bigfooting is growing among the female population, but there’s a sense of the kind of ‘masculine hunter in the dark’ persona.

Bartlett: In America, you find a lot more veterans in the general population. But I think there’s also the issue of how they like to present themselves, because when you’re dealing with witness testimony, you’ve got to present yourself as credible. If you can say something like, “I was in the service” or “I was in the armed forces”, then at least you’re not likely to be spooked by a moose.

What surprised you the most about them, did they challenge any stereotypes?

Lewis: Some were very articulate, which did surprise me a little. I guess that’s my own prejudice. I was also very surprised about how open people were; I expected them to not tell me about their encounters. But a fair few of them did. Many of them wanted to be named in the book. I was also surprised about how much empirical data they collect and how much they attempt to try and analyse and make sense of it. And how they were willing to admit that a certain idea was bunk or a hoax. I expected them to be defending bad evidence.

Bartlett: There are extracts of this in our book, people saying “I was fooled by these tracks for ages. I thought they were real and then I found this and that and the other out about it and I revised my opinion.” So that did surprise me too.

If they collect empirical evidence, does that make what they do science?

Bartlett: When you’re working in institutional science you’re working to get grants, you’re working to get good quality publications. You might want your name associated with particular ideas, but you do that through peer-reviewed papers and by working with PhD students who go off to other labs. In Bigfooting, you’ve got self-published books, you’ve got Bigfoot conferences, you’ve got YouTube channels, you’ve got podcasts and things like this, and they’re not necessarily a good way of making and testing knowledge claims. This is an aspect where Bigfooting is quite different to mainstream science.

It was interesting to study the fringe physicists and seeing where the common deviation from science was. And that’s a focus on individualism; the idea that an individual alone can collect and assess evidence in some kind of asocial fashion. The physicists I studied were quite clear that ideas like consensus in science were dangerous, when in reality consensus, continuity and community are the basis of most of science.

What is the most common form of evidence in this community?

Lewis: Witness testimonies. Without those reported testimonies, Bigfooting would not exist. A large part of the work of a Bigfooter is to collect and make sense of these testimonies. They get upset when these testimonies don’t have much weight within institutional science. They’ll make the comparison to court and how testimonies alone can put someone on death row. So they don’t understand why testimonies don’t have much weight in science. Beyond the testimony, footprint evidence is probably the most famous and also the most pervasive sort of trace evidence.

Advertisement

Bartlett: One of the reasons footprints are so important is that there’s the legacy of the Yeti and footprint evidence which proved to be relatively persuasive, convincing some institutional scientists that there was something in the Himalayas. And then there was the fact that the sort of two major academic champions of Bigfoot were persuaded by the footprint evidence: the late Grover Krantz (around 1970) and Jeffrey Meldrum (in the 1990s).

Lewis: These days you also see camera traps, audio recorders even DNA testing of hairs and those sorts of things. They’re capturing anomalous sounds and often blurry images. Some believe that a Bigfoot communicates through infrasound, although that is certainly disputed within the community. So what you’re getting now is more and more different types of evidence.

How can you know whether an image or a sound really points to Bigfoot?

Bartlett: What they do is go out into the forest and record a sound, for example, and compare it to databases of birds and other animals. And they may find there is nothing that matches it. Is it something that doesn’t sound like a car or a person or a bear or a moose? In which case, there’s the space for Bigfoot. And it’s the same with images to some degree.

Would you say that this interpretation is the biggest weakness or contradiction in their evidence?

Lewis: It allows them to create space for Bigfoot. Because if you can’t match it to something else, what could it be? You have this absence and then from that absence you create a presence. They believe it’s a scientific argument. In fact, it’s kind of interesting how Bigfooters will always enrol other kinds of magical beasts to strengthen the case for Bigfoot. So, one sentence I hear quite a lot is “it ain’t no unicorn”.

What’s the hierarchy in this community? Who’s at the top?

Lewis: A-listers tend to be anyone associated with academia. So Andy’s already mentioned Jeff Meldrum, unfortunately he passed away very recently, but he was their route to contemporary academia. So in any conference, if Jeff Meldrum was speaking, he’d be last. Anyone who’s on TV, such as the Finding Bigfoot and the Expedition Bigfoot presenters would also be in the A-list category. And then you’ve got various different groups just below. For example, the Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization, which is probably the most well known group.

What could Bigfooters learn from scientists and vice versa?

Lewis: From reading books and from discussing it with people, there was a sense that Bigfooters are anti-science. We did not find that. What we argue in the book is that they’re not anti-science. In fact, I would say a lot of them are pro-science, but they’re counter establishment. I think academia should be thinking about these people as citizen scientists and what they’re doing as a kind of gateway into understanding your local area.

For example, they found an animal, I think it was a pine marten, on a camera trap that was not supposed to be in the area. So they are collecting lots of data. They are not irrational. It’s different from, for example, ghost hunting, because you don’t have to imagine there’s something entirely new in the world. It’s just an animal that exists out there that hasn’t been found. Implausible, yes. But not impossible. What they do lack, however, is academic discipline; anyone can be a Bigfooter.

Was there a specific encounter you heard about that was particularly compelling?**

Lewis: Did I get caught up in the moment? Sometimes, of course, you do, just as you do in a film. If you’re in the pitch dark night and you’re watching a horror film, you take it away with you for a while until you settle back down. I often went to bed buzzing, thinking I don’t know what I just heard; they were great stories at the end of the day. But I learned to separate the interview from my thoughts on the interview.

If you encountered Bigfoot in the woods, how would you go about convincing others?**

Lewis: A lot of Bigfooters would begin with qualifiers like, “My dad doesn’t believe in Bigfoot,” or “I have questioned myself for years thinking about this incident and what it was.” So, they would set themselves up as a rational, logical individual. That then created a connection between me and them. And of course, I’d probably be doing the same.

Bartlett: If I were to encounter Bigfoot, I would probably draw on all the techniques of proving that I’m a credible, hard-headed, rational person that we see in those witness encounters. I would expect to be disbelieved. And so therefore I would stress I was putting my credibility as an academic on the line here. So I’d deploy all those kinds of rhetorical techniques that are used by Bigfooters, aside from just the description of the encounter.

For you: more from our Insights series:

To hear about new Insights articles, join the hundreds of thousands of people who value The Conversation’s evidence-based news. Subscribe to our newsletter.

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — The death toll from a crackdown over Iran’s nationwide protests last month has reached at least 7,002 people killed with many more still feared dead, activists said Thursday.

The slow rise in the number of dead from the demonstrations adds to the overall tensions facing Iran both inside the country and abroad as it tries to negotiate with the United States over its nuclear program. A second round of talks remains up in the air as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pressed his case directly with U.S. President Donald Trump to intensify his demands on Tehran in the negotiations.

“There was nothing definitive reached other than I insisted that negotiations with Iran continue to see whether or not a Deal can be consummated. If it can, I let the Prime Minister know that will be a preference,” Trump wrote afterward on his TruthSocial website.

“Last time Iran decided that they were better off not making a Deal, and they were hit. … That did not work well for them. Hopefully this time they will be more reasonable and responsible.”

Meanwhile, Iran at home faces still-simmering anger over its wide-ranging suppression of all dissent in the Islamic Republic. That rage may intensify in the coming days as families of the dead begin marking the traditional 40-day mourning for the loved ones.

Activists’ death toll slowly rises

The U.S.-based Human Rights Activists News Agency, which offered the latest figures, has been accurate in counting deaths during previous rounds of unrest in Iran and relies on a network of activists in Iran to verify deaths. The slow rise in the death toll has come as the agency slowly is able to crosscheck information as communication remains difficult with those inside of the Islamic Republic.

Iran’s government offered its only death toll on Jan. 21, saying 3,117 people were killed. Iran’s theocracy in the past has undercounted or not reported fatalities from past unrest.

The Associated Press has been unable to independently assess the death toll, given authorities have disrupted internet access and international calls in Iran.

The rise in the death toll comes as Iran tries to negotiate with the United States over its nuclear program.

Diplomacy over Iran continues

Senior Iranian security official Ali Larijani met Wednesday in Qatar with Foreign Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani. Qatar hosts a major U.S. military installation that Iran attacked in June, after the U.S. bombed Iranian nuclear sites during the 12-day Iran-Israel war in June. Larijani also met with officials of the Palestinian Hamas militant group, and in Oman with Tehran-backed Houthi rebels from Yemen on Tuesday.

Larijani told Qatar’s Al Jazeera satellite news network that Iran did not receive any specific proposal from the U.S. in Oman, but acknowledged that there was an “exchange of messages.”

Qatar has been a key negotiator in the past with Iran, with which it shares a massive offshore natural gas field in the Persian Gulf. Its state-run Qatar News Agency reported that ruling emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani spoke with Trump about “the current situation in the region and international efforts aimed at de-escalation and strengthening regional security and peace,” without elaborating.

The U.S. has moved the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln, ships and warplanes to the Middle East to pressure Iran into an agreement and have the firepower necessary to strike the Islamic Republic should Trump choose to do so.

Already, U.S. forces have shot down a drone they said got too close to the Lincoln and came to the aid of a U.S.-flagged ship that Iranian forces tried to stop in the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow mouth of the Persian Gulf.

Trump told the news website Axios that he was considering sending a second carrier to the region. “We have an armada that is heading there and another one might be going,” he said.

___

Associated Press writer Melanie Lidman in Washington contributed to this report.

Thirty five community groups and charities took part in the latest Volunteering Fair at the Dolphin Centre, in Darlington.

Seth Pearson, Director of Darlington Cares, which organizes the event, said: “Despite poor weather, it’s a great turnout that really showcases volunteering opportunities in the Darlington area. It’s a fantastic way for voluntary organisations to network and to recruit new volunteers.”

Julia Bean, trustee of Darlington Town Mission, which tackles isolation among elderly people, described the Volunteering Fair as “invaluable”.

“We recruited new volunteers last year and one of them was a retired accountant who went on to become our treasurer,” said Julia.

“It’s a very relaxed atmosphere with great footfall, so it’s a great opportunity to connect with people who want to do some volunteering but aren’t sure what type of charity they want to be part of. The Volunteering Fair gives a real flavour of what’s on offer.”

Rachel Parry, of Darlington Oxfam, cited the example of a man who came forward as a volunteer at last year’s event and has gone on to train as a PAT (Portable Appliance Testing) specialist.

He has now helped generate thousands of pounds in revenue by PAT testing a stockpile of electrical items donated to the charity.

“It’s a great example of the value of the event,” said Rachel.

Darlington Lions President, Denis Pinnegar, added: “The real value for us is being able to network with other local charities and learn from each other.”

A Belfast hospital is to be one of the first to trial an innovative new treatment for people with a common heart condition. The device uses electrical pulses to target and destroy heart tissue and stop irregular heart rhythms caused by atrial fibrillation (AF).

It is inserted into the heart in a minimally invasive procedure during which patients can remain awake rather than under general anaesthetic.

It is estimated that about 1.5 million people in the UK have AF, which can put patients at a higher risk of stroke. Some 15 hospitals will trial the Volt Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) System as part of the pilot, including Belfast’s Royal Victoria Hospital.

The device, developed by healthcare company Abbott, comprises a small catheter which uses high-energy electrical pulses to destroy targeted tissues in the heart to treat irregular rhythms.

Christopher Piorkowski, chief medical officer of Abbott’s electrophysiology business, said: “We heard the physician feedback that patients need an alternative to general anaesthesia during a PFA ablation procedure that doesn’t sacrifice strong outcomes.

“The Volt PFA System is an option for patients who prefer conscious sedation, which can also lead to faster recovery times and shorter procedures for millions of people who suffer from an abnormal heart rhythm across Europe.”

Ulster Unionist Health Spokesperson Alan Chambers welcomed the news, saying: “This is a hugely powerful reminder that Northern Ireland’s Health Service can lead from the front. Often, the narrative around our health system focuses solely on pressures and waiting lists. While those challenges are real, today’s announcement shows another side of the story – Northern Ireland’s expertise, innovation and ambition.

“Atrial fibrillation is a debilitating condition affecting 1.4 million people across the UK. It increases the risk of stroke and heart failure and can severely limit a person’s quality of life. The ability of our clinicians to adopt cutting-edge technology that delivers safer procedures, faster recovery times and same-day discharge is a major step forward for patient care.

“This new approach is not only good for patients, it is good for the system. Treating up to three patients per day instead of one, reducing reliance on anaesthetic support, and freeing up hospital beds demonstrates exactly the kind of smart reform we need: better outcomes and better use of resources.

“Credit must go to the dedicated clinical teams in Belfast who have delivered this UK-first. It also reflects the leadership and ambition of my Ulster Unionist colleague, Mike Nesbitt, as Health Minister. His focus on transformation, innovation and rebuilding confidence in our health service is beginning to bear fruit.

“Northern Ireland may be small, but we have the expertise and drive to compete with the very best. Our task now must be to build on this momentum and ensure patients across Northern Ireland benefit from a modern, forward-looking health service that delivers real results.”

Other hospitals among those to first use the device are Glenfield Hospital in Leicester, Leeds General Infirmary, the Royal Devon, Royal Papworth Hospital in Cambridge and University Hospital Southampton.

Stuart Crossland, 57, from Lincolnshire, was the first patient to undergo the procedure at Glenfield Hospital in Leicester.

He said: “I was going into atrial fibrillation around once a month, and each time it left me feeling exhausted and very unwell.

“On one occasion it was so bad that I went straight to the emergency department, which is when I was put on the waiting list for this procedure.

“I was happy to be the first person to have this new treatment, even though it was quite daunting knowing I would be conscious during the procedure rather than going under general anaesthetic.

“The team’s kindness and reassurance made all the difference.

“The procedure itself was quick, and I can’t thank the staff enough – from the nurses and cleaners on the wards to the team carrying out the treatment.

“Six weeks on, I’m already back running 5k, and knowing this could stop my atrial fibrillation for years to come is incredible.”

Dr Riyaz Somani, a consultant cardiologist at the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, was one of the first electrophysiologists in the UK to use the Volt PFA system.

He said: “By providing a treatment option that doesn’t require general anaesthetic, we hope to be able to deliver atrial fibrillation ablation not only safely and effectively but also more efficiently, allowing us to treat more patients and help reduce our waiting lists.

“Our initial experience has been overwhelmingly positive, with all patients tolerating the procedure very well with excellent acute success rates.”

Don’t want to miss the latest from Belfast Live? Making us your preferred source on Google means you’ll get more of our exclusives, top stories and must-read content straight away. To add Belfast Live as a preferred source, simply click here.

Never been done before, it means new customers will be able to get all of the above streaming platforms, as well as HBO Max (which launches in the UK next month), in one package.

The newly announced entertainment bundle will be known as Sky Ultimate TV and will be available from £24 a month, starting April 1.

It’s designed for those who want a “never-ending supply of brilliant entertainment for the best value in the market” and offers more than 130 channels in total.

I believe after a decade we have come full circle. https://t.co/Qj7y3heGNi

— Scott Bryan (@scottygb) February 11, 2026

Sky customers to get ‘world-first’ Sky Ultimate TV package

Existing customers will get “easy access” as part of their Sky Ultimate TV subscription, with over £20 worth of streaming apps included each month, such as:  

• Disney+ Standard with Ads from March (date to be confirmed)
• HBO Max Basic with Ads from when it launches in the UK & Ireland on March 26
• Hayu from July, with a selection of top shows available from March

Additionally, current Sky Stream and Sky Glass customers with Sky Ultimate TV will get Disney+ Standard with Ads, HBO Max Basic With Ads and Hayu content added to their pack alongside Sky TV and Netflix.

Plus, existing Sky Q customers with Sky Signature, Sky Entertainment and other eligible packages will get Disney+ Standard with Ads, HBO Max Basic With Ads and Hayu content added to their pack alongside Sky TV. 

Sky Q customers with Sky Ultimate TV get all of these as well as Netflix.

Changes in TV Licence Fees Over the Years

Meanwhile, active Sky+ customers will have access to HBO Max Basic With Ads content and Hayu content alongside Sky TV.

Sky has also revealed that Disney+ Standard and Disney+ Premium customers can move their existing plans to Sky and save up to £5.99 a month on their bill (this may vary depending on their current subscription plan).

Sophia Ahmad, chief consumer officer at Sky shared that Sky Ultimate TV “marks a new era for Sky and NOW”.

Sophia explained: “Nowhere else offers this breadth of incredible entertainment in a fully integrated experience, with everything customers love watching side by side so viewers can jump from show to show with ease.

“Millions of existing customers will get easy access to this new line-up as standard at unbeatable value.

“All NOW Entertainment customers will get access to HBO Max, included at no extra cost, fully integrated within the NOW app.”

“We’re proud to continue Sky’s legacy of innovation, making it easier than ever for people to enjoy the very best entertainment and best experience, all in one place,” Sophia said.

Sky customers feel Sky Ultimate TV package is ‘too good to be true’

On Reddit , Sky customers have been sharing their thoughts on the entertainment giant’s latest move.

Someone wrote: “Holy cr*p that’s great.

Recommended reading:

“No doubt this sub will absolutely sh*t on this but honestly I think this is pretty decent that you get all that in a bundle. Content aggregation is exactly the way to go.”

Another posted: “This is a good deal, been thinking of getting Disney for a while but getting it for free soon is great!”

This person on X said: “£24 a month for basically every major streaming platform? I’m in… but can someone explain why I still feel like this is too good to be true?”

One user added: “That’s actually a serious bundle. Four major platforms under one subscription for £24 is going to turn a lot of heads convenience + value is a powerful combo. The streaming wars just took an interesting twist.”

Will you be buying the Sky Ultimate TV package when it launches? Let us know if you think it’s worth the price, by leaving a comment below.