Connect with us

NewsBeat

Shav Taj MS: A life she never realised was building to this

Published

on

Wales Online

New Labour MS for Caerdydd Penarth Shavannah Taj has had a busy life but says being an elected politician had never been her goal

Advertisement

It was Mark Drakeford who first suggested to Shav (Shavannah) Taj that she should stand to become a Senedd member.

The Cardiff-born mum of two comes from family who worked to help those in difficulty in their community. She had a distinguished career in trade unions; she had worked in retail, in call centres, in hospitality and like doing even like door-to-door sales. But she had never held an elected political post.

She was working in what she calls her dream job, as general secretary of the TUC in Wales, when Mark Drakeford first told her he wouldn’t be standing again and he thought she should put her name forward to stand in the Caerdydd Penarth constituency.

She says it was the support of the unions that employed her, as well as the emergence of Reform UK, that helped make the decision.

Advertisement

Later this year she turns 50 (she says she is broadly fine about reaching the milestone figure) but says being an elected politician was never a long term goal.

“Some of the Labour affiliated unions started having a chat with me,” she says.

“All the polling was suggesting that we were going to have a significant number of Reform coming in and remember at a UK level by then they’d already voted down the employment rights legislation, they had started causing all kinds of problems and harms in councils that they were running. That in particular made the union movement very, very nervous,” she said.

“They said ‘we want a voice Shav, and it’s got to be someone who understands”.

Advertisement

“So for me to do this, I needed to know that I had their support and I had their blessing because coming into these spaces, you need to be remain connected to those values and sometimes you need a kick up your ass to be reminded. It’s a big thing and it’s a privilege. You’re in a very, very privileged position and I never want to forget that.”

Her life story gives her a different perspective to many of her new colleagues in the expanded Senedd.

Unions, and politics had always been part of family life. She remembers waiting while her dad, a steelworker firstly in Port Talbot and then in Cardiff, popped in to pay his union subs.

Advertisement

She also remembers her mum’s unofficial role in her Asian women’s fabric shop in Cathays as a sort of village elder – imparting her wisdom to those who came in for a metre or two of fabric but needed help with all manner of things in their lives.

Inequality was a common theme, she says. “They would be talking about the fact that their child has been excluded from the school and they want some help, or they would come in and be like, ‘my kids have this report, I’m not quite sure what this means’, and so I’d say ‘okay, let me have a look at it for you’ and I’m like 15, 16 years old, looking through this stuff,” she smiles.

At the same time her sister was, she says, rare in their community for going through divorce after a “very difficult” marriage. With two young children, but a family who stood by her, they were all involved in helping raise her sons, who see her more of a big sister than an aunt.

Those combined experiences, of personal adversities and being trusted members of their community, led to the creation of the Henna Foundation, a charity to help victims of honour-based violence and domestic abuse.

Advertisement

Firmly borne out of the role of the Taj women in the shop, they found people would come in, knowing about their family’s experiences and say they were going through domestic violence or issues themselves, and ask for advice. The charity no longer exists, but that early role of helping others, being a safe space is something that has stuck with her.

“The family was going through a lot and when it came to me sitting my GCSEs I was just like ‘what do I write down’ because I’d spent so much time off school because I had always caring responsibilities, helping keep her business alive at the same time, all while she was getting herself together and trying to get herself back on her feet.

“At that time I was going to London, to Bradford, to Manchester with my mum and dad and negotiating prices at 15 or 16 for the fabric that we were going to bring back to Cardiff”.

It meant she had to resit her exams at Cathays High School, and she found the school was sceptical she would return.

Advertisement

“There were some comments made to me at the time that, ‘well, we don’t know if you should stay at school and do your A-levels here because we have had many situations where Asian girls have started their A-levels and then their families have taken them back to Pakistan and they’ve had arranged marriages’ and I said, so ‘you’re writing my story for me based on other people’s experiences’.

“I thought ‘I’m going to show you’.”

She went on to do her A-levels in Coleg Glan Hafren but politics was ingrained in her formative years. She remembers the BNP starting a branch in Cathays and she was one of those campaigning against it in school, and there were events and campaigns when the HIV epidemic hit.

Looking at all that, the unofficial advice hub, the battles for equality, the social justice campaigning as a teenager, I ask how she had opened this interview by telling me she never planned to stand for elected politics. Everything she has said spells out the path of someone who had spent a lifetime training for the chance.

Advertisement

“Now thinking back, that would make sense, but politics always felt really far away still, and you know people like me from my background don’t end up in these spaces especially not in Wales, as a woman, Pakistani, Muslim,” she said.

Her professional life took her to London, and she spent over a decade there, working her way up from the bottom at the PCS union to becoming national organiser. In 2011, she returned to Wales, with her Nigerian husband and daughter (another would follow), after her mother became ill and passed away.

The desire to be near family led to their relocation, and while she initially split her time between London and Wales, a reorganisation saw her become general secretary of TUC Cymru just before the pandemic.

Advertisement

It was just five years ago Conservative Natasha Asghar was the first woman of colour elected and Ms Taj sent her a congratulatory message. Now she is the first for Labour.

“I happen to be the first again. It was like at the TUC, I was the first Muslim, minoritised woman to be in that position.”

“I was always really conscious of not being the only one,” she says, but her experiences have, understandably shaped her politics. In her early days in the Senedd she has already taken the opportunity to call out Reform UK for their language in a debate about the Nation of Sanctuary scheme.

Advertisement

As a Senedd Member she says she wants to talk about the issues that matter most to her constituents.

“I’m really conscious of the fact that it’s really important to talk about the things people care about,” she says. “Cost of living is still a thing. It hasn’t gone away. People are still working several jobs. People have got bills coming out of their ears, right?

“Everything’s going up constantly. People want to know what their average shopping basket is going to cost. But we don’t know, because you go into the supermarket and it doesn’t matter which supermarket you go in anymore, it’s all still crazy.

“There are people who are in work who are still relying on food banks, that hasn’t gone away. Those pressures are still there and what people don’t want is for yet more structures to be put in place and that becomes the reason why things don’t get done.

Advertisement

“People are impatient, but they’re impatient for a reason. And my purpose over the next four years is to constantly be reminding government that people are not patient and people will not forgive us.”

“It’s got to be about delivery, it’s about outcomes, because when I was still at the TUC, we used do some annual polling around asking people about devolution and powers.

“We always used to ask them, the question around do you believe in independence or not? There was always this split between the number of people who wanted independence versus ‘Actually, we’re quite happy because it’s just been one parliament’.

“If you look at all the the polling that’s done on a regular basis it’s almost an even split right between those who want independence and those who want this place to be abolished all together.

Advertisement

“The Senedd has just got bigger if we don’t prove to people that we are worth the money It will go in a different direction.

“There’s always another party waiting in the wings to be the next more radical one so we should spend our time very, very wisely and carefully consider the impact on the ground.”

She joined the Labour Party when Jeremy Corbyn became leader. “I’m a socialist, I always say to people I’m a progressive socialist, and till my dying day that will probably be who I am, that’s just intrinsically my go-to position,” she says.

What does she make of Andy Burnham? Does she think someone with experience of devolved politics outside of London could be good news for Wales?

“I think Burnham has a lot to offer. I think that he has been a good mayor,” she says, but when pushed she adds, “Let’s see what happens with that, because we don’t know who else could be in the running as well. Are we going to see Angela [Rayner] in the mix?”

One of the unknowns is Labour, can it rebuild? Can it do so before next year’s council elections. What’s her take on the party’s struggle in the Senedd election?

“Look, I was hoping, of course, that we were going to return more Labour MSs and bearing in mind, as you say, in my previous role I’ve worked with a lot of them.

Advertisement

“I knew a lot them. I know they were on a very personal level, really deeply committed to the work that they were doing and there were things that they we’re hoping that they would be in a position to be able to. We’re not in the driving seat anymore but we’re hoping that we’re able to use our influence to get the government to make good decisions.

“It was really sad and it was depressing. However, I was also very conscious of the fact that ultimately, people had voted for me and my responsibility, first and foremost, was to my constituents and what I could still do.”

But she doesn’t think her party, or the previous administrations got it all right.

“Welsh politics is going to be fascinating, but in order for us to have more powers, for the UK Government to take us seriously in terms of that as well, we equally have got to do the work.

“We’ve got to prove that we are a fighting force. And when it comes to devolution, when it comes to those points, are we using the powers that we’ve got already?

“Are we pushing things or are we too cautious? Probably. We have been way too cautious, I think. We should have pushed more for further devolution but also to use our powers better.”

What is it like, as that small group facing the numbers Reform UK and Plaid have?

Advertisement

“I’m used to firefighting, right, and I have to think on my feet a lot and that’s my natural go-to.

“I tend to be focused on problem-solving,” she said. The group is small, but tight, she says. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here

So what does Labour need to do?

“You’ve got to start listening, genuinely listening and when you listen, you’ve then got to give some consideration to what you’re going to do to solve that problem or to fix that issue and are there things you can do?

Advertisement

“Be more honest with people, be more transparent with people. Sometimes I think that even within government, when the last government was making decisions, they just didn’t communicate with people people didn’t even know that there were things in motion or there were things that were happening because you get so trapped in in the bubble of delivering in government you leave it to government to then communicate that message but from a party perspective, we weren’t necessarily telling people that by the way ‘Labour did that’.”

“The only time we were then talking about it was when the election was happening by which time people were like ‘where is this coming from?’

“As a whole Labour family, we still have Labour MPs, we still have Labour councillors, we have Labour MSs.

“We as a Cardiff Labour team need to be working better together as well and I think that for me that is absolutely critical and that’s how you demonstrate and you show your worth, you show your value., you show what the purposes of Labour, what are our principles, what are our values.

“I think we show that by doing it and it’s got to be things that people can feel that something has changed in their lives, I think that’s always the big thing for me”.

For me, it’s all new, and for me, it’s a case of, ‘yes, we didn’t do as well as we should’ve, as I’d hoped we would’ve’ but I always think that there’s opportunities in these situations, and you recalibrate, you rethink, you don’t take anything for granted, not everything is meant to be forever, I’m a great believer in that.

“We don’t have God-given rights to like govern Wales, it doesn’t work like that, but in order to come back, and to come back stronger, you’ve got to do the work, and I’m prepared to do work and I know for sure that the people who are with me in that team are prepared to do that work.

Advertisement

That has got to be the jump-off point. But I’m not here to waste my time. I’m here to not waste other people’s time, the people that voted for me or didn’t vote for me.

I was always, even as a trade union official I was very conscious of the fact that members are paying my wages. Like, this is individuals who are out there, They’re working. And they put into a pot that then pays my wages.

“This is not a joke. This isn’t like a circus for us to have fun in. This is serious business,” she says.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

NewsBeat

Naples earthquake rocks Italian hotspot destroying buildings and leaving ‘streets in debris’

Published

on

Daily Record

A 4.7 magnitude earthquake has struck the Naples region, centred on Pozzuoli in the Campi Flegrei volcanic zone

A major earthquake has rocked the Naples area, forcing terrified locals out onto the streets as buildings trembled throughout the Campi Flegrei volcanic region.

The 4.7-magnitude quake, among the strongest to hit the area in 40 years, struck at Pozzuoli, a community well-versed in seismic activity but seldom subjected to tremors of such ferocity.

Advertisement

Footage circulated by residents reveals streets strewn with rubble and chunks of stonework ripped from building fronts, while extensive electricity outages have left numerous districts without power. Authorities confirm at least four people have been injured, with the shaking experienced throughout Naples, Pozzuoli and neighbouring communities, the Express reports.

“I understand the concern and apprehension that can arise in these moments, especially among families. We immediately activated the Municipal Operations Center (COC) to coordinate all monitoring and assistance activities for the population,” said Pozzuoli mayor, Luigi Manzoni.

“We are in constant contact with the Vesuvius Observatory, the Civil Protection Department, and all the competent authorities to follow the evolution of the ongoing seismic swarm minute by minute.”

Advertisement

Further tremors of lesser strength are believed to have been detected. The National Institute of Geology and Volcanology reports that Campi Flegrei, an enormous super volcano situated close to Naples, Italy, has been undergoing an extended phase of instability marked by repeated earthquake clusters and substantial ground elevation, known as bradyseism.

From 2005 to today, a new phase of bradyseism has been underway which in April 2025 produced an uplift of about 144 centimeters, the INGV also said.

Content cannot be displayed without consent

Ensure our latest stories always appear at the top of your Google Search by making us a Preferred Source. Click here to activate or add us as your Preferred Source in your Google search settings.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

What does Andy Burnham’s devolution plan mean for London transport, jobs and housing?

Published

on

What does Andy Burnham's devolution plan mean for London transport, jobs and housing?

“To that end, while Burnham’s proposal to allow locally funded projects worth up to £500million is welcome, London’s infrastructure needs exceed this threshold. Even projects deemed relatively ‘cheap’ for the capital, such as the West London Orbital, are projected to need funding of at least double this figure.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Boy George breaks his silence after pulling out of Jesus Christ Superstar in the West End amid controversy following the release of pro-Israel song

Published

on

Boy George has broken his silence after pulling out of Jesus Christ Superstar in the West End just days before his stint was about to start amid controversy following the release of his pro-Israel song

Boy George has broken his silence after pulling out of Jesus Christ Superstar in the West End just days before his stint was about to start amid controversy following the release of his pro-Israel song.

The role of King Herod is being rotated among actors, with the singer having been set to star from August 3 to 15. 

However on Thursday it was revealed the star, 65, had pulled out of the role, with his management confirming that he would no longer be performing.

The news came amid controversy surrounding Boy George’s new pro-Israel song We Will Dance Again. There were fears a backlash from his song would overshadow the performance.

Advertisement

The title We Will Dance Again, has become a phrase used by Israelis to express hope after the October 7 attack.

After pulling out he has now broken his silence saying: ‘Sometimes, I realise that being an air sign I expect the world to understand me without having to explain myself.

Boy George has broken his silence after pulling out of Jesus Christ Superstar in the West End just days before his stint was about to start amid controversy following the release of his pro-Israel song

Advertisement

‘The suggestion that I feel no compassion for Palestinian’s is both untrue and absurd.

‘I am devastated for the loss of the innocent lives on both sides of this war and I call for peace.

‘I have read members of the press calling me a ‘genocide denier’ yet those who deny the suffering of Israelis are given a free pass.’

In a long statement he added, according to The Sun: ‘My song is pro peace and about the emotions I felt after visiting the Nova Exhibition and talking to Michael and Lisa Marlowe who had their son Jake taken from them. Murdered trying help others.

Advertisement

‘I also spent time talking to May Hayat who survived while her best friend was murdered. We took a picture standing in front all the people who were killed that day.

‘Everyone knows what happened to innocent women, kids, babies, sons and fathers on that day, innocent people who were at a festival celebrating life.

‘The Nova Festival is a mirror of my world as a DJ and I have played many such festivals, including in Israel so it resonated with me and I felt compelled to write something. I could have been there and we know that there were people from more than 40 countries who were. I felt these deep emotions and is wrote this song for them.

‘My personal opinion is that this is sadly a war, but not an attempt to wipe out Palestine. But I respect that everyone has their own opinions and believe we should all be allowed to have that right.

Advertisement

‘Look around and tell me one musician speaking out for the Jewish community, but you can absolutely guarantee they have made their living from working with a Jewish team member.

‘I understand that is uncomfortable to defend your friends when a war like this is raging but the woman who sells me bagels is not to blame, neither is my doctor or publicist, manager, ex boyfriend or my thousands of Jewish friends. This song is for them.

‘I come from a place of peace. I am a jew loving, trans hugging queer hippy and my mother would be proud of me.’

The title We Will Dance Again, has become a phrase used by Israelis to express hope after the October 7 attack and lyrics in the song include: ‘You say genocide, I say war/.

Advertisement
The role of King Herod is being rotated among actors, with the singer having been set to star from August 3 to 15. However on Thursday it was revealed the star, 65, had pulled out of the role (Sam Ryder pictured as Jesus in the show)

The role of King Herod is being rotated among actors, with the singer having been set to star from August 3 to 15. However on Thursday it was revealed the star, 65, had pulled out of the role (Sam Ryder pictured as Jesus in the show) 

Confirming Boy George would no longer be performing, his manager Paul Kemsley took to Instagram on Thursday

Confirming Boy George would no longer be performing, his manager Paul Kemsley took to Instagram on Thursday

‘When you’re attacked, that’s what the army’s for / Does it get ugly? You bet it does / When I know you wanna kill every last one of us.’

Confirming Boy George would no longer be performing, his manager Paul Kemsley took to Instagram as he wrote on Thursday: ‘After careful consideration, I have decided, in my capacity as Boy George’s manager, that he will no longer be appearing in Jesus Christ Superstar at the London Palladium.

Advertisement

‘The decision has been made with the utmost respect for the producers, the creative team and the entire company. We are grateful for the professionalism and understanding they have shown throughout and sincerely wish everyone involved every success with the production.’

Apologising to the fans who bought tickets specifically to see the star, he continued: ‘We also recognise that many people purchased tickets in the hope of seeing George perform. 

‘To those fans, we offer our sincere apologies for the disappointment this decision may cause, and we are deeply grateful for their continued loyalty and support.’

Addressing his new song, he added: ‘George has never been afraid to stand by his personal convictions, and I have always respected him for that. 

Advertisement

‘Equally, I believe it is my responsibility to make decisions that are in the best interests of my artist while also showing respect to others. 

‘In this instance, I felt it was right to step aside, allowing the production to remain the focus, while ensuring everyone involved can move forward with mutual respect and goodwill.’

The Andrew Lloyd Webber production is currently being performed at the London Palladium, with Sam Ryder taking on the titular religious leader in the rock opera, alongside Tyrone Huntley as Judas and Desmonda Cathabel as Mary Magdalene. 

A number of actors are stepping into the role of King Herod including Richard Armitage, Layton Williams, Julian Clary, Simon Russell Beale and Jesse Tyler Ferguson.  

Advertisement

The show is set to transfer to London’s Theatre Royal Drury Lane for a 12-week run in October due to popular demand, with Sam set to remain in the role for a nationwide tour next year.

Elsewhere in Boy George’s new song, he cites the Hamas attack on October 7 as he sings: ‘Young girls raped against trees/ Murdered brutally/ For the crime of dancing.’ 

The chorus follows: ‘There will be no war / But if you’re ever confused / I stand with the Jews / I don’t feel brave, I just need to behave like a human.’

Meanwhile back in April Boy George hit back at anti-Israel campaigners who criticised him for taking part in Eurovision after the song competition bosses refused to ban the country from competing.

Advertisement

Eurovision has been at the centre of controversy amid growing calls to prevent Israel from performing but bosses ruled in December that the country could compete.

And Boy George, who represented San Marino in this year’s competition, hit back at critics as he said: ‘I have many, many Jewish friends that I’ve had since I was 15 or 16 years old.

‘Are people asking me as a principled human being to turn my back on my Jewish friends? It’s not going to happen, it’s never going to happen.

‘From the beginning of my career I wore a Jewish star. Go back and look at pictures of Culture Club. I am so affiliated with Jewish people. I am not necessarily affiliated with Israel. I don’t really have an opinion on that.

Advertisement

‘But the job of music is to unite people.’

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Gianni Infantino’s World Cup plot is unravelling as senior advisor QUITS and Asian Federation join leading nations in opposing controversial plan – denying deluded FIFA boss a majority

Published

on

Gianni Infantino's controversial plan to sell off the World Cup appears to be dead in the water after the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) joined UEFA and CONCACAF in opposing the plot

Gianni Infantino’s divisive plan to sell stakes in the World Cup appears to be dead after the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) joined UEFA and CONCACAF in opposing the plot – while two senior FIFA figures turned against him.

Carlos Cordeiro, a retired American investment banker and senior adviser to Infantino, has resigned from his role at FIFA – becoming the first internal figure to do so.

It comes after UEFA, CONCACAF and the AFC all opposed FIFA’s plans to generate £3.1billion in private investment in FIFA tournaments.

135 FIFA members are now publicly opposed to the FIFA Forward Enterprise, bringing the dissidents above the required 106 threshold to block the plans with dignitaries now joining the calls for Infantino to scrap his plans. 

Advertisement

Releasing a statement, Cordeiro – who served on the White House task force for the 2026 World Cup – distanced himself from Infantino’s plans and ripped into the proposals.

Cordeiro urged his now former FIFA colleagues to follow suit and speak out against the plans, which he describes as a bad deal for football. Infantino had promised member associations a £30million incentive to force the deal through. 

‘As a Senior Advisor to the FIFA President, a former banker, and a lifelong football fan, I cannot stand by while FIFA considers selling a stake in the World Cup,’ Cordeiro said.

‘Let me be clear: I had no involvement in this proposal, and I oppose it unequivocally. It is a bad deal for FIFA’s Member Associations, a bad deal for football, and a bad deal for the long-term future of the game.

Advertisement

‘It has been the privilege of a lifetime to serve FIFA for more than five years and to work alongside dedicated, principled people who care deeply about the game. I hope they, too, will speak up, because decisions of this magnitude should be made in the interests of football, not those who stand to profit from it.’ 

FIFA’s chief operating officer Kevin Lamour responded to Cordeiro’s call to action and publicly turned against Infantino. 

While Lamour stopped short of resigning as chief operating officer, a post he has held for two years, the Frenchman has put his job at risk by speaking out against FIFA’s chief.

In a statement to the Associated Press, Lamour said: ‘It is the project of one person. Not only must this project not go ahead, but the time has now come for football political leaders to ask themselves the right questions and make the right decisions.

Advertisement

‘If that means I lose my job, then so be it. I will understand and respect that decision. At least I’ll sleep well tonight.’

Overnight, FIFA issued a statement, doubling down on plans to sell £3.1 billion in shares for FIFA tournaments after UEFA announced a boycott of competitions and CONCACAF – the North, Central, American and Caribbean federation – opposed the plans.

But the AFC has now chosen to stand with their intercontinental counterparts, leaving Infantino’s project – and potentially his FIFA presidency – facing a terminal threat.

In a statement, the AFC said: ‘The AFC stands in solidarity with UEFA and CONCACAF in expressing serious concerns over FIFA’s proposal to introduce private investment into FIFA’s flagship competitions and the decision-making process around FFE. 

Advertisement

‘The fact that the situation has reached the point where the real possibility of a FIFA World Cup boycott has entered public discourse should concern everyone who cares about the future of our game. Football should never have been placed in such a position.

Gianni Infantino’s controversial plan to sell off the World Cup appears to be dead in the water after the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) joined UEFA and CONCACAF in opposing the plot

Infantino's senior adviser Carlos Cordeiro (right) has also now resigned in protest at the plans

Infantino’s senior adviser Carlos Cordeiro (right) has also now resigned in protest at the plans

Advertisement

‘Against this backdrop, and in light of the clear positions expressed by UEFA and CONCACAF, as well as the unprecedented divisions that have emerged across the football world, the AFC believes that the proposed FFE cannot realistically achieve the necessary broad consensus and unity required to move forward. 

Advertisement

‘The FIFA World Cup is the pinnacle of global football and derives its strength from the participation of all Confederations and the world’s leading football nations. 

‘Any proposal that risks undermining the unity and universal character of the competition must be reconsidered.

‘While the immediate debate centres on FFE, the AFC considers this issue extends far beyond a single proposal. 

‘Rather, it has exposed fundamental weaknesses in FIFA’s consultation and decision-making processes that must now be addressed. 

Advertisement

‘While the AFC notes FIFA’s latest clarification on the proposal, the central concerns surrounding governance, institutional process and meaningful consultation remain unanswered.

‘A proposal of such significance, with the potential to affect the commercial, sporting and strategic future of world football, must not emerge through processes that leave Confederations, Member Associations (MAs) and even FIFA’s own governing bodies, including the FIFA Council, feeling sidelined. 

‘The primary objective for world football must be to ensure that decisions of such magnitude are being developed through processes that are anchored on transparency and command the confidence of the football community.

‘This is not the first occasion where major stakeholders have been confronted with significant initiatives after the direction of travel appears to have already been determined. 

Advertisement

‘Such an approach undermines confidence in FIFA’s governance framework and diminishes the authority of its statutory bodies. 

Join the discussion

Should the World Cup ever be used as a tool for private profit, or does selling stakes betray the spirit of the game?

FIFA issued a late-night response to furious backlash over the controversial plan to sell World Cup stakes to private investors by blaming the media for the uproar

FIFA issued a late-night response to furious backlash over the controversial plan to sell World Cup stakes to private investors by blaming the media for the uproar

Advertisement

‘No subsequent consultation process, however well-intentioned, can replace early engagement with the appropriate FIFA bodies and the football family.

‘The AFC believes this moment must become a catalyst for strengthening institutional reform. While every FIFA MA must have the opportunity to consider and determine proposals affecting the future of world football, meaningful democracy is not measured solely by the opportunity to vote. 

‘It begins with transparent governance, timely consultation, informed deliberation and genuine participation throughout the decision-making process.

‘Accordingly, the AFC calls upon FIFA to undertake an urgent review of its governance and decision-making framework to ensure that proposals of global significance are developed through proper consultation, meaningful engagement and appropriate oversight by FIFA’s statutory bodies.

Advertisement

‘The FIFA World Cup, and the game itself, belong to the entire global football family. Their future must always be shaped collectively, through institutions that reflect the voices of all Confederations and MAs.’

The AFC’s statement criticises FIFA’s clarification of their proposals released on Friday morning, where they blamed the media for misconstruing their plans and made a dig at UEFA for holding FIFA to account.

FIFA said: ‘We have heard the feedback provided by the respective confederations in relation to the proposed establishment of FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE) and would like to address the issues that have surfaced since the initial media reporting on Tuesday.

‘We respect the feedback and concern aired in public and reaffirm our commitment to an open and democratic consultation.

Advertisement

⁠’Our planned consultation process was disrupted by incorrect media reports. We will proceed with this consultation process to ensure that each MA has the ability to express its vote based on facts.

‘FFE has been proposed solely to ensure that all FIFA Member Associations (MAs) have the opportunity to take meaningful ownership of the commercial opportunity of football in their respective countries, and that this does not come at the cost of either the spirit or the governance of FIFA or football itself.

Infantino has been widely criticised for his decision to put the World Cup 'up for sale'

Infantino has been widely criticised for his decision to put the World Cup ‘up for sale’

The core investor would be a New York investment firm created by Joshua Kushner (pictured earliere this month in California), the brother of Donald Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner

The core investor would be a New York investment firm created by Joshua Kushner (pictured earliere this month in California), the brother of Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner

Advertisement

‘Nobody is selling football. This is not something FIFA would ever entertain. 

‘Everyone has the right to express their opposition and to seek further clarification but no single entity can claim to represent all 211 MAs around the world. Each MA should be allowed to review the proposal and have a say in shaping their own future. These are the democratic principles of FIFA.’

They continued by outlining the plans, subject to consultation with member nations.

There is frustration across the international football landscape, however, that such proposals have been unilaterally developed – with proposed investors already lined up – in complete secrecy despite an eventual ‘consultation’. 

Advertisement

UEFA nations are boycotting all FIFA competitions so long as the proposals remain on the table. All 55 UEFA nations met virtually on Thursday, with more than 40 federations providing testimony.

Daily Mail Sport were told associations expressed ‘outrage’ on the call with ‘total unanimity’ against the proposal, before deciding to abstain from FIFA competitions.

Daily Mail Sport also understands there is growing opposition to Infantino’s presidency, with CONCACAF nations losing – or having already lost – confidence in the Swiss football administrator. 

UEFA and their member associations are yet to be drawn on that matter. Infantino is seeking a fourth term as FIFA president next year.

Advertisement

One international football insider told Daily Mail Sport: ‘UEFA’s response is at the nuclear button end of the spectrum, which is impressive. We thought Infantino would survive the Trump refereeing intervention – but he has overreached this time.’ 

In a statement, UEFA said: ‘UEFA and its 55 member associations stand as one. We unanimously and unequivocally reject FIFA’s proposal to transfer ownership interests in the World Cup and other FIFA competitions to private investors.

‘The World Cup cannot be treated as an investment product. It is one of football’s greatest sporting legacies. It has been built over generations by players, national teams and supporters across every continent. No part of it should ever be surrendered to private investors. The World Cup is not for sale.

‘It is both irresponsible and indefensible that a proposal of such significance for football was conceived in secret and brought to the brink of approval without any meaningful consultation with those entrusted with stewarding the game. This is not merely a profound failure of leadership, but an abdication of FIFA’s duty as the custodian of world football.

Advertisement

‘National associations around the world are now presented with an ultimatum: accept the irreversible capture of football’s greatest competitions or bear the consequences. This is not a ‘democratic decision’, but governance by intimidation – an act of coercion unworthy of an institution entrusted with the stewardship of the global game.

‘But our opposition goes far beyond process.

‘The moment external investors acquire ownership interests in FIFA competitions, football changes forever. Commercial return becomes a permanent obligation. Investor expectations become a daily pressure. From that moment onwards, every decision on the international calendar, every decision on competition formats and every decision shaping the future of football is no longer driven by what best serves the game, but by what best serves shareholders.

‘This model has no place in world football. Football’s future cannot be dictated by the expectations of those whose first duty is to maximise financial return. Nor can the interests of national associations, leagues, clubs, players and supporters become subordinate to investor returns. Football cannot mortgage its future for financial gain.

Advertisement

‘Europe’s position is clear. We will never lend this model our legitimacy. No one has the moral authority to sell what they merely hold in trust for the next generation.

‘As a result of today’s discussion, no UEFA national teams will participate in any FIFA competition for so long as these proposals remain alive, unless this proposal has been abandoned in its entirety and binding assurances have been given that FIFA will never again open its governance or competitions to private ownership.

‘Nobody should be in any doubt: UEFA and its national associations will oppose these plans with absolute determination.

‘There are moments when institutions are judged not by what they are prepared to accept, but by what they refuse to compromise. This is one of those moments.

Advertisement

‘Some things are simply too important to sell. The FIFA World Cup belongs to football. It always will. And so long as Europe has a voice, it will never be for sale.’

An FA spokeswoman added: ‘We stand shoulder to shoulder with our European colleagues and fully support the collective view. We oppose FIFA’s plans – the FIFA World Cup belongs to football and always will.’

Concacaf later added: ‘Concacaf is a confederation united by the love of our game, where football comes first. Guided by this philosophy over the past ten years we have built, from the ground up, an organisation founded on service, transparent governance, and the long-term stewardship of football.

‘History has shown FIFA and the football family what happens when the custodians of the game lose sight of these values.

Advertisement

‘With this in mind, Concacaf today convened a meeting of the presidents of its 41 Member Associations, together with its President, Council members, and its FIFA Council members, to discuss a proposal developed and presented by the FIFA President to establish ‘FIFA Forward Enterprise’ and sell interests in the FIFA World Cup to private investors.

‘During the meeting, the membership expressed deep concerns about the lack of due process surrounding the proposal, the artificially short deadline imposed, and the absence of any review or approval by the relevant FIFA governance bodies. In addition, the need for private equity investment to fund new and existing FIFA Forward programs following the most profitable FIFA World Cup in history was questioned.

‘The discussion reinforced the need for greater transparency and proper governance.

‘For these reasons, Concacaf and its 41 Member Associations have: Rejected the proposal; Tasked their FIFA Council Members with engaging FIFA to determine how existing FIFA reserves could be used to increase FIFA Forward funding for football development across our region; and Tasked their FIFA Council Members with instructing the FIFA President to ensure that any matter follows the proper governance processes via staff and FIFA Council, in accordance with the FIFA Statutes.

Advertisement

‘Through these actions, Concacaf reaffirms that football’s future – and its greatest asset – must remain in the hands of our football family.’

Sepp Blatter, the FIFA president before Infantino, took to social media to renew his attacks on his successor by writing on Friday evening: ‘The FIFA is not a private equity fund. It is an association with statutes, regulations, and a fiduciary responsibility to protect the global game. If you sell football’s crown jewels to private investors, you also sell part of the game – especially its soul. Money matters, but it must never become everything.’ 

And Prime Minister Andy Burnham added his voice to those condemning Infantino, telling GiveMeSport: ‘It’s a feeling I’ve had for a while and it’s clearly not a sustainable situation. When UEFA and CONCACAF can’t have confidence, that is a large chunk of world football saying that this is not acceptable.

‘I had some concerns about the 2022 World Cup, on the pitch and all the rest of it. It didn’t feel right. It hasn’t felt right. And after everything that FIFA have been through before, I was prepared to give his [Infantino’s] era the benefit of the doubt, and I did give it the benefit of the doubt until this point.’

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Trump Keeps Claiming Iran Is Desperate For A Deal Weeks After Telling The World Why It Is Not

Published

on

Trump Keeps Claiming Iran Is Desperate For A Deal Weeks After Telling The World Why It Is Not

WASHINGTON — While President Donald Trump continues to claim on a nearly daily basis that Iranian leaders are desperate to end the war he is waging against their country, the self-branded “dealmaker” explained to the world just weeks ago why they actually are not, and in fact continue to hold the upper hand.

“We’re talking right now. Their people, they wanted to talk,” Trump said on Monday en route to a taxpayer-funded political rally in Michigan.

Frequently, Trump suggests that the country’s leaders or their emissaries are calling him directly. “They want to make a deal so badly. They called a little while ago. They want to make a deal so badly,” he told reporters traveling back to the United States with him from the NATO summit aboard the luxury 747 he solicited from Qatar.

Tuesday morning, Trump was pressed in a call-in interview with Fox News about who, exactly, Trump was speaking with in Iran. Trump evaded the question. “We’ve had some very good talks,” he said instead.

Advertisement

For Americans, the bottom line is that a full five months into a war that Trump said would last “four to five” weeks and which thus far has left 18 US service members dead and more than 600 injured, the public still has no reliable information about when it might end.

President Donald Trump speaks with reporters on Air Force One on July 27, 2026.

John Bolton, one of Trump’s national security advisers in his first term and a longtime proponent of attacking Iran, said the country no longer has a coherent government to negotiate with and, in any event, that Trump has no coherent strategy.

“The part of the regime that really matters, the IRGC [Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps], has zero interest in a deal,” Bolton said. “Trump has got himself in over his head and has no plan. He is just floundering around.”

(Bolton is among the Trump critics targeted for prosecution by his Justice Department and last month agreed to plead guilty to a single count of illegally retaining classified documents for a book he wrote. He will pay a fine of $2.25 million and serve 100 hours of community service.)

Advertisement

Trump’s White House did not respond to HuffPost queries about why the president believes Iran “badly” wants to “make a deal.”

Just six weeks ago, Trump told the whole world exactly why Iran, which controls high ground on three sides of the upside-down “V”-shaped Strait of Hormuz, still holds the upper hand in Trump’s war. Countries and oil companies the world over continue to eat through their reserves as tanker traffic through the strait has dropped to a trickle since Trump and Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu launched the war on Feb. 28.

“We run out of reserves in about four weeks,” Trump said at the close of the G7 summit in France on June 17. “There are reserves all over the world, and we would really run out, and there would be a time when you wouldn’t be able to get it. And you want to see bedlam?”

Trump added that if he had not signed a ceasefire agreement then, as he did, an economic depression would have followed. “The one president I did not want to be was the late, great Herbert Hoover,” he said.

Advertisement

“Iran has every reason to believe that either Trump or Israel or both will attack again in the future. Control of the strait, at least as long as it remains a vital waterway, remains Iran’s best deterrent.”

– Robert Kagan, State Department official during the Reagan administration

That agreement, ironically signed at Versailles, the same place where Germany formalized its surrender to end World War I, barely lasted a few weeks before Iran attacked ships that were using a channel in the Strait of Hormuz that Iran did not approve of. The ceasefire disintegrated further, and the US military hit Iranian targets for two straight weeks while Iran’s military — which Trump had repeatedly claimed had been eliminated — retaliated with strikes against US troops in the region.

A missile attack on Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan on July 17 killed three Army soldiers and injured dozens. Iran again launched missiles against bases hosting US troops in the region on Tuesday, and Trump on Wednesday vowed to retaliate.

Robert Kagan, a top State Department official during the Reagan administration, said Iran has no incentive to give up de facto control of the strait. “Folks need to remember that control of the strait is not a luxury for Iran. It’s not just a power grab. It’s a vital interest,” he said. “Iran has every reason to believe that either Trump or Israel or both will attack again in the future. Control of the strait, at least as long as it remains a vital waterway, remains Iran’s best deterrent.”

Advertisement

Claiming that Iran badly wants to “make a deal” with him is not new for Trump. He has been stating that — without any evidence — pretty much from the moment in May 2018 when he withdrew from the agreement negotiated by his predecessor Barack Obama that limited Iran’s ability to enrich uranium, which Iran had been abiding by.

In fact, all of the highly enriched uranium currently in Iran’s possession — which Trump, for reasons unclear, calls “nuclear dust” — was created after Trump’s withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as it was formally known.

During the reelection campaign he lost in 2020, Trump would tell his followers that Iran was eager to make a new agreement with him but was waiting for the start of his second term.

“You know, the first call I get ― after we win, the first call I get will be from Iran. They’re going to want to make a deal because their country has been devastated,” he told his audience at a rally in Tampa on Oct. 29, 2020.

Advertisement

“The first call I’m going to get are the people, the leaders in Iran: ‘Let’s make a deal, let’s make a deal,’” he said two days later in Reading, Pennsylvania.

It is unclear why Iran would insist on waiting until the start of a second term to make such a deal. Iran has never confirmed any such interest.

Regardless, Trump kept right on claiming Iran wanted to make a deal with him, even after his reelection loss and the failure of his Jan. 6, 2021, coup attempt.

“I would have had a deal. You know, Iran was broke when I was president. They wanted to make a deal,” he said on the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton talk radio show in May 2024.

Advertisement

The claims continued after Trump returned to office in January 2025. At times he asserted that negotiations were in their final stages.

“The Iran deal is coming along very well. We’re dealing at the highest levels of Iran, and I think they want to make a deal, and we want to make a deal,” he told reporters on Air Force One on April 28, 2025.

“They want to make a deal, but got to make a deal that’s meaningful,” he said in a Feb. 27 speech in Texas — just hours before he began his war against Iran.

Jim Townsend, a former Defense Department official in the Obama administration, said he also does not understand why Trump thinks Iran wants to negotiate with him.

Advertisement

“Over years of being under sanctions, their economy seems to work around U.S. sanctions and blockades. So that’s not enough pressure on them either. I just don’t see a pressure and pain campaign on Iran being sufficient to drive them to the table,” he said.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Ariana Grande raises concerns with alarmingly thin figure in Petal music video: ‘Her bones are popping out’

Published

on

Ariana Grande has continued to raise eyebrows with her shrinking frame following the release of her new music video, 'Petal'

Ariana Grande has continued to raise eyebrows with her shrinking frame following the release of her new music video, ‘Petal’.

The singer, 33, looks incredibly gaunt in the video, which was directed by Christian Breslauer.

In the bizarre clip, Grande plays the character of Pepper, an aspiring starlet who attends multiple auditions in a bid to become famous.

A group of studio bigwigs brand her ‘unmarketable’, ‘unattractive’, and ‘inauthentic,’ before accusing her of having a personality disorder.

Advertisement

‘We miss the old you,’ one tells her. ‘Maybe you could go out and find her and come back and give it another shot?’ 

Grande leaves, only to return moments later with a chainsaw, which she uses to violently dismember the men. 

Ariana Grande has continued to raise eyebrows with her shrinking frame following the release of her new music video, ‘Petal’

Advertisement
The singer, 33, looks incredibly gaunt in the video, which was directed by Christian Breslauer

The singer, 33, looks incredibly gaunt in the video, which was directed by Christian Breslauer

'I am actually so over us normalizing this and acting like this is okay,' wrote one fan

‘I am actually so over us normalizing this and acting like this is okay,’ wrote one fan

Now drenched in blood, she returns to the waiting room, only to receive a round of rapturous applause from the other female auditionees.

Despite the clever social commentary in the video, many fans were more distracted by Grande’s weight than anything else. 

Advertisement

‘This is like looking at Karen Carpenter and everyone was like [shrug],’ wrote one fan.

‘I am actually so over us normalizing this and acting like this is okay,’ wrote a second.

‘Shocking and heartbreaking,’ wrote a third, while a fourth added, ‘For the love of God, please eat something.’

Another wrote, ‘Her bones are literally popping out.’ 

Advertisement

Despite the concerned comments, other fans defended the singer and said that it was inappropriate to comment on her physical appearance. 

‘If y’all actually cared are her you wouldn’t be publicly making comments about her body,’ argued one.

Fans were shocked by the star's appearance, with many comparing her to the late singer Karen Carpenter

Fans were shocked by the star’s appearance, with many comparing her to the late singer Karen Carpenter 

Grande murders a group of businessmen with a chainsaw in the disturbing video

Grande murders a group of businessmen with a chainsaw in the disturbing video

Advertisement

‘The irony of all the girls over 200 pounds saying she’s “unhealthy”. You think being 200 pounds is healthy? Good lord, the jealousy is screaming from you guys!’ wrote another. 

Daily Mail has reached out to Grande’s management for comment. 

Grande released her eighth studio album, Petal, on Friday. 

The project was preceded be the lead single ‘Hate That I Made You Love Me’, which debuted at No. 1 on the Billboard Hot 100. 

Advertisement

The singer has addressed her weight multiples times over the years and has insisted that she’s healthy, despite the continued speculation around her shrinking frame. 

‘There’s a comfortability that people have commenting on that that I think is really dangerous,’ she told YouTuber Sally in a 2024 interview. 

‘I’ve been kind of doing this in front of the public and kind of been a specimen in a petri dish really since I was 16 or 17, so I have heard it all,’ she continued. 

‘I’ve heard every version of it — of what’s wrong with me. And then you fix it, and then it’s wrong for different reasons. But that’s everything from — even just the simplest thing — your appearance, you know?’ 

Advertisement

She added, ‘I think in today’s society, there is a comfortability that we shouldn’t have at all — commenting on others’ looks, appearance, what they think is going on behind the scenes or health or how they present themselves.’

Grande is pictured in 2018, which she claims was an 'unhealthy' time for her

Grande is pictured in 2018, which she claims was an ‘unhealthy’ time for her 

The Wicked star is pictured in 2020 and in her Petal music video

The Wicked star is pictured in 2020 (left) and in her Petal music video (right)

Advertisement

In a 2023 TikTok, Grande directly addressed concerns about her weight and explained that older photos of herself, where she wasn’t as thin, were actually taken during an unhealthy period in her life.

‘I was on a lot of antidepressants and drinking on them and eating poorly and at the lowest point of my life when I looked the way you consider my healthy, but that in fact wasn’t my healthy,’ she explained.

‘I know I shouldn’t have to explain that, but I do feel like having an openness and some sort of vulnerability here will [mean] something good might come from it. Healthy can look different.’

Last December, conservative commentator Megyn Kelly shockingly accused Grande of being ‘anorexic’.

Advertisement

‘Take a look at Ariana Grande right now, of the music industry and now also as an actress starring in Wicked. Let’s check in on how Ariana, who was raised on television, on Nickelodeon… is doing,’ Kelly began.

‘She is very clearly anorexic. If she’s 90 pounds, it’s a lot. She looks like you could snap her in two with your fingers.’

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Man charged after ‘shot fired’ outside York Mosque – police

Published

on

Arrest after alleged firearm 'discharge' outside York Mosque

North Yorkshire Police said there has been “no evidence uncovered” to suggest the alleged firing of the rifle in Bull Lane during the early hours of Thursday (July 30) was “motivated by anything ideological” or “hate-related”.

The force said there was also no evidence to suggest the alleged incident was “specifically targeted against the Muslim community in York”.

Police said a 44-year-old York man arrested in connection with the investigation has been charged with possessing a loaded air weapon, a .22 air rifle, in a public place.

He has been bailed with conditions, including to keep away from York Mosque, and is due to appear at York Magistrates’ Court on September 21, police said.

Advertisement

No one was injured during the alleged incident and the mosque has since resumed its daily prayers.

York Mosque in Bull Lane (Image: Dylan Connell)

Superintendent Ed Haywood-Noble, senior operational commander for York and Selby, said it had been a “worrying time for everyone connected to York Mosque”, but the police investigation “has not identified an intention to cause injuries or distress to people”.

He said high-visibility police patrols will continue around the mosque in the coming days “as life begins to return to normal in the area” to “provide added reassurance for everyone in the city”.

“I again thank York Mosque for their understanding and patience during this time, and also our community partners and residents who have given so much support to the intensive police investigation,” Supt Haywood-Noble said.

Advertisement

Recommended reading:


York Mosque’s president, Mohamad Douba, said the mosque has been “overwhelmed by the many messages of support we have received” after the alleged incident. “Once again, York has shown that our community stands together with kindness, resilience and unity,” he said.

Mr Douba said he did “not believe there is any further risk to those attending the mosque”, adding: “We remain hopeful that this will prove to be an isolated incident.

“York has always been a city built on mutual respect, friendship and understanding and we remain confident in the strength of our community to continue supporting one another.

Advertisement

“We would like to thank everyone for their patience, understanding and prayers, as well as North Yorkshire Police for their swift response and ongoing support.”

Police urge witnesses or anyone with information about the alleged incident to phone 101.

Information can be passed anonymously via Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.

Quote reference number 12260145924 when providing information to police or to Crimestoppers.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Joe Rogan Breaks With Trump On Important Policy Position

Published

on

Joe Rogan Breaks With Trump On Important Policy Position

Podcast host and comedian Joe Rogan broke with Donald Trump over the president’s position that Israel has not committed genocide in Gaza.

In 2024, the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Yoav Gallant for war crimes and crimes against humanity. Last year, a United Nations commission issued a report that concluded Israel had committed genocide in Gaza.

“Explicit statements by Israeli civilian and military authorities and the pattern of conduct of the Israeli security forces indicate that the genocidal acts were committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, Palestinians in the Gaza Strip as a group,” the UN commission wrote in its 2025 report.

On Wednesday, Rogan declared that in 20 years, this will be a “universally accepted opinion.” Rogan added that even when considering the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attacks, which killed 1,200 people and saw roughly 251 taken hostage, he couldn’t see how anyone would support Israel’s war in Gaza.

Advertisement

“How could anybody defend that? I don’t even know how many people are dead,” Rogan said to his guest, actor Tim Robbins. “You have a complete wipeout of a city, like 90% of Gaza is gone.”

According to data from the Gaza Health Ministry, over 75,000 people have been killed in Gaza since the Oct. 7 attacks.

Rogan is a stanch ally of Trump and even hosted Vice President JD Vance on his show earlier this month. However, he has occasionally made statements that run up against the administration’s policies and positions, particularly regarding Trump’s actions in the Middle East.

Rogan first broached the topic with Robbins, who said it was “nuts” that the agent of his ex-partner, actor Susan Sarandon, had cut ties with her after she criticized Israel. Robbins added that Sarandon had had trouble finding acting work since making the comments.

Advertisement

“I think the point of it is to make a show of it and to say, ‘See, we could do that to her, so we could do it to you, so shut the fuck up,’” Robbins said of Sarandon’s struggles.

Watch Rogan’s comments from Wednesday’s show here:

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Ex-deputy in prison for Sonya Massey shooting is denied medical release

Published

on

Ex-deputy in prison for Sonya Massey shooting is denied medical release

CHICAGO (AP) — A former Illinois sheriff’s deputy won’t get an early medical release from his two-decade prison sentence for killing Sonya Massey inside her home after the Black woman called 911 about a possible prowler, state officials decided Friday.

Sean Grayson had been diagnosed with colon cancer prior to the 2024 shooting, and his attorney noted in January that the cancer had advanced to his liver and lungs.

The three-member Illinois Prisoner Review Board voted unanimously Friday to deny Grayson’s application for early medical release, Liz Mitchell, a board spokesperson, said in an email.

Grayson, who is white, was convicted in October of second-degree murder for Massey’s killing, a case that sparked protests over systemic racism and a U.S. Department of Justice review.

Advertisement

Body camera footage showed Grayson and another deputy enter Massey’s home in Springfield, Illinois. Minutes later, Grayson shot the 36-year-old single mother in the face as she moved a pot of hot water from the stove and told him, “I rebuke you in the name of Jesus.”

Grayson was given the maximum possible sentence.

He filed for early release from prison in May, six months into his sentence, according to a copy of his application published by Capitol News Illinois. Grayson apologized for Massey’s death at his January sentencing but in the release application wrote she had “attacked me with a pot of boiling water.”

Daniel Fultz, an attorney who has represented Grayson, declined to comment Friday.

Advertisement

In a letter to the board opposing Grayson’s release, Sangamon County State’s Attorney John Milhiser said the former deputy’s medical condition was already considered at sentencing.

“To release Grayson under these circumstances would be a miscarriage of justice,” he wrote, “and an insult to Sonya Massey’s memory and family.”

Ben Crump and Antonio Romanucci, attorneys representing Massey’s family, said Friday that the board “made the right decision.”

“Today the board recognized what this family has said from the start,” they said in a statement. “No one is above accountability, and a badge does not provide an early way out.”

Advertisement

Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker said in a statement that Illinois law requires the Prisoner Review Board to consider medical release requests. He called Massey’s killing “a profound loss.”

“Sonya was innocent, unarmed, and calling law enforcement for help,” he said. “It was a painful reminder that too many innocent Black Americans have faced this kind of violence — and they deserve justice.”

Advertisement

___

Mayes-Osterman is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Key moments from Ards and North Down Borough Council in July

Published

on

Belfast Live

There was a sporting and cultural theme in July

July traditionally sees a winding down of business from elected representatives at Bangor Castle and Church Street Newtownards, despite council officials continuing to bear their steady load in the background.

Advertisement

But the business done in the few council meetings that were held had a decidedly sporty and cultural feel in July, though as usual controversy wasn’t too far away, this time over a “junket” down south.

Here is your latest round up of Ards and North Down Council matters so far this summer:

Petition against Bangor tennis club fails as floodlighting plan approved by council

A controversial plan for floodlights at a tennis club in Northern Ireland’s newest city was approved by the local council, despite significant opposition from locals.

Advertisement

76 letters of objection and a petition from 181 addresses were not enough to stop a plan to install new floodlights for three tennis courts at Bangor Lawn Tennis Club, beside Farnham Park. The original proposal comprised eight columns at a height of 10 metres, but was amended to six columns of 12 metres.

Elected representatives at the July meeting of the Ards and North Down Planning Committee by majority approved the planning application, from Bangor Lawn Tennis Club. Seven councillors voted in favour of the application, and two councillors abstained from voting.

Read more here

Plans for new BMX track and bike jump park in Bangor approved

Plans for a new BMX track and bike jump park in North Down were approved.

Elected representatives at the July meeting of the Ards and North Down Planning Committee unanimously approved a planning application by the council for the new facility, to be built at Bangor Sportsplex, 292 Old Belfast Road.

The proposal is for a BMX track, a bike jump park, as well as alterations to an existing spectator stand to facilitate the creation of a bicycle workshop and new shared space. The BMX track will be designed to national standard specification.

Read more here

Advertisement

Fleadh Cheoil na hÉireann to kick off in Bangor, not Belfast

A Bangor Fleadh Cheoil na hÉireann fringe programme, the planning of which caused controversy earlier this year, will kick off the huge Fleadh celebrations this weekend.

In an irony not lost on the people of Ards and North Down, the first ever Fleadh Ceoil to come to Belfast, and only the second ever to come to Northern Ireland, will be kicked off this weekend in Bangor.

As excitement builds for Fleadh Cheoil na hÉireann in Belfast, North Down is preparing to strike the first note with Bangor Beats and Rhythms, a vibrant celebration of Irish music, dance and culture taking place in the city centre on Saturday August 1 from 1pm to 9pm.

Advertisement

Read more here

NI council unveils USA 250 anniversary event line-up

Ards and North Down Borough Council revealed more details of the ongoing USA 250 celebrations in the borough.

While American Independence Day, the Fourth of July, has passed, from September to November 2026 Ards and North Down Council is highlighting a programme of commemorative activity continuing to mark the Semiquincentennial. This year the USA marks the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence when the US became an independent nation, overthrowing British rule.

Advertisement

The council says the programme will reflect the borough’s historic connections with the United States and align with existing borough events.

Read more here

DUP tries to block €50 council trip to conference in Wicklow

The DUP failed in an attempt to block a 50 euro council trip to a history conference in Wicklow, after a UUP Lord Mayor used a casting vote to back the trip down south.

Advertisement

Ards and North Down Borough Council had to go to a knife-edge vote at its full council meeting after officers received an invitation from Wicklow County Council to attend the 36th La Touche Legacy Seminar and 11th Festival of History, which will take place on Saturday September 19 at Greystones Golf Club, County Wicklow.

The seminar will feature presentations by Professor Frank Barry, David McCullagh of RTÉ and Stephen Collins, covering aspects of Ireland’s economic, political and social history.

Read more here

For all the latest news, visit the Belfast Live homepage here and sign up to our daily newsletter here.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025