Former NBA player Malik Beasley has been indicted in the government’s sprawling investigation of illicit gambling on basketball games, accused of tailoring his 2024 performance with the Milwaukee Bucks to reward bettors and chip away at his own financial problems, authorities said Monday.

Beasley has been out of the NBA since playing with the Detroit Pistons in 2024-25. Another former NBA player, Ed Davis, was also charged in the indictment unsealed in Brooklyn federal court against six people.

U.S. Attorney Joseph Nocella Jr. said they “turned professional basketball into a criminal betting operation.”

The schemes, he added, “erode the integrity of American sports and victimize the sports-watching public.”

Nocella said hundreds of thousands of dollars were wagered through popular gambling sites. The indictment says Beasley had financial woes, including millions of dollars in gambling losses, and had relied on Davis, a former teammate, for help.

“Malik maintains his presumption of innocence throughout this two-year investigation,” Beasley’s attorney, Steve Haney, said. “We ask that people reserve judgment until all the facts are known.”

Feds say Beasley tipped others about his play

In return for fixing his performance, Beasley got paid by his money-winning co-conspirators and his debts to Davis were reduced or eliminated, the indictment alleges.

In one example, according to the court filing, Beasley informed Davis that he would try to outperform the 3.5 prop line bet for rebounds in Milwaukee’s game against the Los Angeles Clippers on March 10, 2024.

With a second left, and the Bucks ahead by seven points, any shot by the Clippers would not have affected the outcome. But Beasley challenged the shot and then dashed past four players to grab the rebound as the horn sounded.

Beasley finished with four rebounds that night — an overperformance and a winning prop bet, the indictment states.

“What’s funny is after he got it he had a big sigh of relief,” a co-conspirator said in a text message, according to the indictment.

In other games, Beasley told Davis that he would underperform certain statistics, the government alleges.

Beasley last played in the NBA for the Pistons in 2025, averaging 16 points per game. He is one of five players in NBA history with more than 300 3-pointers in a season, but he did not play in the league last season because of the investigation.

Beasley’s financial problems have been widely reported, including disputes with a Detroit landlord, a Milwaukee barber and a Minnesota dentist. In 2025, when the Pistons were in New York for a playoff game, he was served with a lawsuit from a local sports marketing agency, which subsequently got a $1 million default judgment against Beasley.

Davis’ attorney did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment. He was an NBA journeyman who was primarily a backup in a 12-year career that got him roughly $48 million in gross salary. Davis and Beasley were teammates in Minnesota in 2020-21.

Paolo Zamorano, a sports agent who formerly represented Davis, was also charged with placing bets based on Beasley’s information. Defense attorney Ken Breen said Zamorano denies wrongdoing and “looks forward to his day in court.”

Other NBA figures arrested in 2025

Authorities last fall announced a gambling sweep that led to the arrests of more than 30 people, including reputed mobsters and well-known basketball figures such as Chauncey Billups, a member of the Basketball Hall of Fame and coach of the Portland Trail Blazers at the time.

Billups is accused of conspiring to fix high-stakes card games tied to La Cosa Nostra organized crime families that cheated unsuspecting gamblers out of at least $7 million. He has pleaded not guilty.

In April, former NBA player Damon Jones, 49, became the first person to plead guilty. He was accused of defrauding major sportsbooks, including DraftKings and FanDuel, and filching millions of dollars from unwitting poker players.

Jones was charged with selling or attempting to sell insider information to bettors based on his relationships in the NBA.

Terry Rozier is accused of conspiring with friends to help them win bets on his performance during a 2023 game when he played for the Charlotte Hornets. He, too, has pleaded not guilty. He was on the Miami Heat when he was charged in 2025.

In 2024, former Toronto Raptors player Jontay Porter pleaded guilty in a separate gambling case. Porter, who had gambling debts, said he took himself out of games early so co-conspirators could win bets on his performance.

___

Associated Press writers Tim Reynolds in Miami and Michael R. Sisak in New York contributed to this report.

The limited-time sale comes as families prepare for the expensive return-to-school season, with experts warning that popular sizes often sell out well before the end of the holidays.

M&S says its uniforms are designed to last the entire school year, with anti-stain technology, fade-resistant fabrics and easy-iron finishes helping clothes stay looking smart for longer.

With multipacks starting from £7 before the discount, it’s one of the retailer’s biggest uniform promotions of the year. The full range is available here.

Retailers release their school uniform collections weeks before the end of term for one simple reason – the most popular sizes often sell out long before September.

M&S school uniform sale: best buys

Some of the standout deals include:

• 3-pack stain-resistant polo shirts from £7
• 2-pack school trousers from £11
• 2-pack pleated skirts from £10
• 2-pack school jumpers from £11
• 3-pack easy-iron school shirts from £10
• Leather school shoes from £28
• Backpacks, socks and school accessories also included

M&S uniforms feature StayNew technology to help colours stay brighter after repeated washing, while StainAway fabric helps repel everyday spills.

Many pieces also include adjustable waists, grow-with-me hems and crease-resistant fabrics to help children get more wear from each item.

M&S is giving early shoppers the chance to shop for school uniform for less (Image: M&S)

The 20% discount starts on July 2 for a limited time.

Aldi’s famous £5 school uniform bundle is back

If your priority is spending as little as possible, Aldi has once again brought back its hugely popular £5 School Uniform Bundle.

Available while stocks last, the bundle includes:

• Two polo shirts
• Sweatshirt or cardigan
• Trousers, skirt or shorts

The retailer also includes a 12-month satisfaction guarantee, making it one of the cheapest school uniform offers available anywhere on the high street.

Other Aldi highlights include:

• Leather school shoes — £7.99
• Football boots — £9.99
• Backpacks — £9.99
• Hair accessories — £1.99
• Lunch bags from £4.99

M&S red cardigans (Image: M&S)

Because Aldi uniforms are sold as Specialbuys, parents are being urged not to leave shopping until August, when many sizes disappear.

Lidl’s £5 bundle returns for a fifth year

Lidl has also relaunched its popular £5 school uniform bundle, matching Aldi on price.

The bundle includes:

• Two polo shirts
• Sweatshirt
• Choice of trousers, shorts or skirt

Individual items start from £1.50, with practical features including water-repellent fabrics, machine washable materials and tumble dryer-safe finishes designed to survive the school year.

The range is available in stores while stocks last.

M&S grey school skirts (Image: M&S)

Tu keeps prices frozen for a fourth year

Sainsbury’s Tu Clothing is taking a different approach by freezing prices for a fourth consecutive year.

Although its earlier 20% promotion has now ended, shoppers can still benefit from prices that have remained unchanged since 2022.

Highlights include:

• Uniform starting from £3
• Two complete uniforms from around £14
• Reinforced knee trousers
• Permanent pleats
• Non-iron shirts
• Scuff-resistant school shoes
• Easy Dressing range with pull-on trousers and touch-fastening clothing for younger children

For parents who missed recent discount events, Tu still remains one of the strongest value options available.

Which school uniform deal offers the best value?

Each retailer has a different strength depending on what you’re looking for.

M&S is ideal for parents wanting longer-lasting uniforms with premium features, especially with the new 20% discount.

Aldi offers the lowest upfront cost thanks to its famous £5 bundle, but shoppers will need to move quickly before stock disappears.

Lidl matches Aldi on headline price and offers practical everyday essentials from just £1.50.

Tu remains a solid all-round option thanks to its price freeze, durable fabrics and wide availability in Sainsbury’s stores.

Recommended reading:

Shop early to avoid the biggest problem parents face every summer

Parents who wait until the final weeks of the holidays can find fewer sizes available and may end up paying more elsewhere.

With M&S now launching its 20% sale alongside bargain bundles from Aldi and Lidl, early shoppers have the best chance of saving money before demand peaks later this summer.

What’s your best back-to-school tip? Tell us in the comments below.

Many drivers assume displaying a Blue Badge automatically allows them to park in a parent and child space at supermarkets and retail parks. In reality, the rules are very different – and getting it wrong could leave you facing a parking charge.

The confusion comes because Blue Badges are primarily designed for on-street parking and council-run car parks, while parent and child bays are usually located on private land, meaning different rules apply.

Can Blue Badge holders use parent and child spaces?

In many cases, no.

Parent and child spaces are intended for parents or guardians travelling with young children, typically under the age of 12. They are wider than standard bays to allow room for pushchairs, child seats and safely getting children in and out of vehicles.

If you’re a Blue Badge holder visiting a supermarket, shopping centre or retail park, you should normally use one of the designated disabled bays instead – unless signs tell you otherwise.

Why doesn’t my Blue Badge apply?

The Blue Badge scheme mainly applies to parking on public roads and local authority car parks.

Government guidance makes clear that off-street car parks such as supermarkets, hospitals and shopping centres operate under their own rules, with operators deciding how disabled parking and parent and child bays are managed.

That means supermarkets are free to decide who can use their parent and child spaces and whether a Parking Charge Notice should be issued if the rules are broken.

Could you get fined?

You won’t usually receive a council Penalty Charge Notice because supermarket car parks are private land.

However, you could receive a Parking Charge Notice from the private parking company managing the site if you park in a parent and child bay without meeting the retailer’s conditions.

Individual retailers have different policies, so it’s always worth checking the signs before leaving your vehicle.

What can Blue Badge holders use?

A valid Blue Badge can provide a range of parking concessions, including:

• Parking in designated disabled bays.
• Free parking at many on-street pay-and-display bays – those on public roads administered by the council, not private companies.
• Parking on single or double yellow lines for up to three hours where loading restrictions do not apply – although check with your local council as this can vary.
• Access to council-operated disabled parking concessions, depending on local rules.

These concessions generally do not automatically extend to private supermarket or retail park car parks.

Blue Badge holders also need to remember…

The badge can only be used when the disabled person is travelling in the vehicle, or is being picked up or dropped off.

Allowing friends or relatives to use your badge when you are not present is a criminal offence and can result in the badge being confiscated and a fine of up to £1,000.

Expired badges, copied badges or badges belonging to someone who has died must also not be used.

Frustrated parents have taken to Mumsnet to complain about not being able to get a parent and child space, with one saying: “No matter where I go I struggle to get a parent and child space because they’re all taken up by idiots with no children.”

Another added: “The amount of times I had to just go home and try another day as there was no child parking free. I had twins and I NEEDED the bigger space to have any chance of getting both sides of the car open wide enough for both car seats.
It’s mostly single males that I’ve noticed parking there and they just hurl abuse if you dare question them.”

One poster responded that she had previously used the spaces when there were no disabled spaces free: “Irrelevant now as I have a baby and I’m pregnant but if the disabled were full (usually with no badges displayed) and I had my disabled husband with me I’d use them.”

Another agreed: “Only when no disabled bays left… which is often.. because those are taken up by able people with no blue badge.. it’s a vicious circle really..”

Many said they were abused by selfish drivers who were not disabled and had no children: “Most people I see using them without kids drive overpriced and oversized cars and exit them with a swagger of self importance and entitlement.”

Recommended reading:

Quick Q&A – blue badges and parent and child parking

Can I park in a parent and child bay if I have a Blue Badge?
Not automatically. Parent and child bays are usually on private land and are reserved for drivers travelling with young children.

Does a Blue Badge work in supermarket car parks?
Not necessarily. Supermarkets set their own parking rules, although most provide dedicated disabled parking bays for people with blue badges.

Can I get a parking ticket?
Yes, but not a council one. Private operators may issue a Parking Charge Notice if you use a parent and child bay contrary to the site’s rules.

Where does a Blue Badge apply?
Mainly on public roads and in local authority parking areas, subject to local restrictions and conditions

The former Nottingham Forest and Liverpool player responded with an impressive rant

Advertisement

As you’ve probably seen or heard, the FIFA 2026 World Cup is well and truly underway.

On Wednesday England face the Democratic Republic of Congo in their Round of 32 match, having won their group in the tournament, which is taking place across the USA, Canada and Mexico.

While the decision to expand football’s most prestigious tournament from 32 teams to 48 has proved controversial, perhaps the most notable change to play for this edition of the World Cup has been the inclusion of hydration breaks – effectively turning the game of two halves into a game of four quarters.

Click here to get the biggest stories straight to your inbox in our Daily Newsletter

This has not gone down well with many fans, who have taken to booing the hydration breaks, which many view as a chance to cram more adverts into the games.

And it is not just fans who are unhappy with the change. Former footballer Stan Collymore has taken to social media to express his annoyance with the change, which he said he viewed as unnecessary.

While Mr Collymore – who played for teams including Liverpool, Nottingham Forest, Aston Villa and Crystal Palace – may be a well known name to anyone who watched English football in the 1990s, his fame does not appear to be international.

Responding to his comments, one American user on X, formerly Twitter, decided to question his credentials on the subject.

He wrote: “Have you ever played a sport for more than 45 minutes straight? Would your performance had been better with a short break to hydrate and rest? Do you think fans want to see athletes perform at their best?”

This may have been a mistake, as Collymore – with 287 appearances and 110 goals in his professional career and three England appearances – responded on Tuesday night. And the result was impressive.

He wrote: “Yes, I’ve played elite level sport where my particular job was running with a ball at feet at around 30kph+ multiple times a half. 6 ft 4, 95kg. The tactical information given to me through a 7 day, not 3 minute period sufficed, as did the occasional squirt of electrolyte water per half.

“My performance would not have been improved at all by a hydration or tactical break. Pretty much like 99% of players over a 150 year period playing the most popular and most played sport on the planet by far. So maybe you can tell me.

“When was the last time you put your f****g Doritos, big gulp and chicken wings down long enough to know what professional sportsmen need rather than advertising executives or couch potatoes who need to be told 6 times in 20 minutes to buy a Jeep Cherokee, Whopper or diabetes medication instead of just enjoying the sport?”

No need for a penalty shoot out to determine the winner in that exchange.

In January, it emerged that a Ministry of Defence analysis of the Strategic Defence Review calculated that £28billion of extra spending would be required to fund its recommendations and ensure the UK is prepared for a potential war with Russia as early as 2030.

What Starmer announced in yesterday’s Defence Investment Plan is woefully inadequate.

Despite his tub-thumping about ‘doing what it takes’ and ‘meeting the new world head-on’, the reality is that a huge shortfall is built into the defence budget. And it’s likely to get bigger – quickly.

Far from being given £28billion more, the Ministry of Defence will have to make do with just £15billion – of which nearly £4billion is money that was already allotted to other projects.

Yes, there were some eye-catching elements in the DIP package. Yesterday’s headlines focused on Britain’s ‘largest ever drone investment’, for example, with £5billion allotted to unmanned aerial systems. But the reality is that only 20 per cent of that figure is additional investment.

The MoD will also spend £500million on new tech for Special Forces, including the Royal Marine Commandos, and an extra £50million on attack drones equipped with cameras that give the operators a ‘first-person view’, as well as interceptor devices to bring down enemy drones.

There is £115million in the DIP to bolster our defences against the threats posed by artificial intelligence. And the plan includes jet-powered drones taking off from aircraft carriers, and six ‘common combat vessels’ (CCVs) as part of a ‘hybrid Royal Navy’.

General the Lord Dannatt, a former Chief of the General Staff, says it is a terrible mistake to assume warfare today relies entirely on new tech, as the old weaponry is not yet redundant

These will serve as control hubs for drones, meaning that when the Navy identifies a foreign vessel as a threat, such as a Russian ship, ‘they will do so with outriders, uncrewed ships above and below the surface,’ according to the PM. But this capability will come at a high cost, since that money could have been spent on upgrading our traditional fleet. Instead, the CCVs are expected to replace our Type 45 destroyers, which are currently a mainstay of our sea defences.

At the same time, the Royal Air Force will develop its own drones as well as autonomous ‘wingmen’ designed to fly alongside fighter jets such as Typhoons. Starmer claimed these aircraft, which are due to be ready for testing by 2030, would be ‘invisible to enemy detection’.

The PM also reiterated Britain’s commitment to the £8.6billion Global Combat Air Programme in partnership with Italy and Japan, based on sixth-generation Tempest fighter jets. These, he said, ‘will secure our skies for decades to come’.

All the above goes to show that warfare has become more complex than ever. But it is a terrible mistake to assume it now relies entirely on new tech. The old weaponry is not yet redundant. Britain needs destroyers and main battle tanks as well as drones. We are at real risk of neglecting the unglamorous but necessary parts of our fighting machine, while placing too much trust in the latest electronics.

And we will achieve the appropriate combination of weaponry only if we increase our defence budget.

At the Munich Security Conference last February, Starmer was telling our allies that Britain would be committing 3 per cent of its GDP to defence by 2029, up from about 2.3 per cent.

The reality revealed yesterday is that the actual figure will be nowhere near that – more like 2.7 per cent.

Worse, he also talked of hitting 3.5 per cent of GDP by the middle of the next decade. That target is already slipping away from us – and fast. By contrast, Germany is on target for 3.7 per cent of GDP by 2030 and Sweden is not far behind at 3.5 per cent. Meanwhile, Poland is already spending 4.8 per cent of its GDP on defence and is calling for Nato allies to up spending to 5 per cent by 2030.

Our allies have every right to accuse us of backsliding.

In the years since the end of the Second World War, Britain has been at the forefront of defending Europe, spearheading Nato in its role as the West’s peacekeeper.

As recently as 2022, when Russia invaded Ukraine, we took the lead in going to its defence. But we are no longer in that position. The potential cost of our failure is incalculable.

Last year, Starmer told our allies Britain would be committing 3 per cent of its GDP to defence by 2029. But it has since been revealed that the actual figure will be nowhere near that

In his ‘coronation’ speech in Manchester on Monday, Burnham made no mention of defence and only the briefest of references to national security, Lord Dannatt writes

Starmer would have been far less vulnerable to Andy Burnham’s coup if he had taken a strong, decisive stance on our national security. Instead, he failed to back his former defence secretary John Healey and former Armed Forces minister Al Carns, who quit in protest – the final death knell for his premiership.

The new Defence Secretary, Dan Jarvis, would surely not have taken the job without a guarantee that more money would be forthcoming. But the top-up was minimal.

Healey and Carns resigned because the increased spending in the DIP amounted to 0.08 per cent of GDP. That has now risen to 0.09 per cent.

Despite protests from Burnham’s team that Starmer had no right, in the dying days of his premiership, to be talking about future plans at all, the outgoing PM insisted on making the announcement. But we have no idea whether Burnham will honour it.

What we do know is that, during his ‘coronation’ speech in Manchester on Monday, Burnham made no mention of defence and only the briefest of references to national security.

He told us repeatedly that other things, such as devolution, were the ideals closest to his heart. The unwelcome inference is that he is not putting defence at the top of his agenda. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch highlighted this, declaring that if Burnham refuses to find the money to fund defence, he should call a General Election.

This isn’t purely a matter of money, though. It’s about restoring Britain’s role at the front line of Europe’s collective security.

We need to accept that we can no longer rely on the US to come to our aid when next we face attack. That means a readiness to fight a war in whatever form it takes and, as we have seen in Ukraine, that can mean the brutal realities of old-fashioned battlefield conflict as well as developing modern electronic and uncrewed weapons.

The Strategic Defence Review was not a starting point for negotiations and haggling. It identified the bare minimum that our Armed Forces require if we have any hope of keeping Britain safe. And what Starmer announced yesterday falls far short of securing that objective. We need £28billion; he conceded £15billion. We’re aiming for 3 per cent of GDP by 2030 and 3.5 per cent by 2035 but, as we have seen, we’re struggling to get to 2.7 per cent.

Military budgets are not about the cost of fighting a war. That’s incalculably higher, in human lives most of all, as we have seen in the daily tragedy of Ukraine’s struggle to hold back the Russian invasion.

The point of spending money on defence is so that we don’t have to fight a war. It’s about deterrence, not aggression.

Right now, Britain does not have the deterrent we desperately need. The price we could all pay for this failure is unthinkable as this underfunded settlement heightens the risk to our security.

Keir Starmer is a gambler in the last-chance saloon. Andy Burnham is calling ‘time’ – but will he do any better? Our enemies, our allies and our electorate are all watching.

General The Lord Dannatt is a former Chief of the General Staff

The land was previously used as a landfill site

A campaign group claims the site for a potential new train station could be on “toxic” land. While Cambridge South has just opened in Cambridge this week, there are plans for a potential fourth train station in the city.

Last year, East West Rail put forward plans for a Cambridge East station, which could be based near Cambridge Airport. The land where the station could be built has raised concerns from the Campaign to Protect Rural England – Cambridgeshire and Peterborough (CPRE).

The land was previously used as an industrial and domestic waste landfill site. The CPRE feels the land could still contain “toxic” materials.

CPRE spokesperson Ian Ralls said: “Because of the unconsolidated nature of the landfill’s contents, buildings cannot be placed directly on top of the former landfill. Any construction will require driving piles through the contents of the landfill to anchor them to the bedrock.

“Developing this site risks disturbing the contamination and causing harm to public health, the environment, groundwater and nearby watercourses. The unknown nature of the contaminants on site risks releasing a Pandora’s Box of toxic compounds into the wider surface and water environments.”

Ian believes the proposals could be a “dangerous project”. He added: “As little is known about what compounds are contained in the site, the authorities cannot plan in advance how to counter any potentially negative effects resulting from their release into the atmosphere.”

The CPRE claims the site could contain Chromium VI and Cyanide, which are both highly toxic chemical compounds.

Natalie Wheble, external affairs director for the East West Railway said the company is “aware” that the site in question was previously used for landfill and “extensive desktop studies and site investigations” had taken place to understand the conditions of the site.

She added: “Cambridge East has been identified as our preferred location for the proposed station because it best meets the project’s operational and engineering requirements. The safety of our workforce, future passengers, local communities and the environment is our absolute priority.

“We will only confirm this site as the location for the station if we are satisfied that there is a robust and feasible remediation strategy in place, and that approach has been accepted by both the Environment Agency and the relevant Environmental Health authority.”

Natalie said the company is working with specialist consultants who have previously “successfully remediating former landfill sites” and they are making “good progress towards identifying a solution that would allow the station to be delivered safely and responsibly”.

Natalie added: “If we are unable to demonstrate that the site can be remediated to the required standard, we will not proceed with it and will instead pursue an alternative location for the station. We expect to provide a further update on this work in the autumn.”

But for a half-chance that fell to Alexander Isak, Sweden were simply nowhere, and after Olise came close with two chances, the third duly arrived in delicious fashion when Mbappe played a superb one-two with the Bayern Munich star before lofting his second into the roof of the net.

A planning application has been submitted to East Riding of Yorkshire Council to convert a vacant retail unit – formerly The Refill Jar – into a golf-themed sports bar.

The proposed change of use application from a retail unit to a sports bar relates to Unit 24 at the Flemingate Shopping Centre in Beverley, where the applicant is seeking to transform the space into a leisure venue featuring golf simulators, a bar, dining facilities, and crazy golf on the first floor.

Recommended reading:

The plans, outlined in a supporting design and access statement, highlight the economic and social benefits the new venue could bring.

The statement said: “The development will contribute positively to the vitality of the shopping centre, enhance natural surveillance, and reinforce the active frontage character that is encouraged within town centre environments.”

Plans say the applicant believes the proposed change of use will increase footfall and strengthening the vitality and viability of Beverley town centre.

If approved, the ground floor would feature four golf simulator bays, a bar area, customer seating, a dining area, and an open commercial kitchen.

The first floor would house crazy golf facilities, staff offices, and ancillary space.

The scheme would create three full-time jobs and four part-time positions.

Planning documents included with the application said modern town centres increasingly rely upon a mix of retail, leisure, hospitality, and entertainment uses to remain vibrant and economically resilient.

The venue would offer an “inclusive and accessible destination for all users.”

The applicant argues that the use would complement existing businesses in the area, given the presence of other restaurants, bars, and leisure operators nearby.

The proposed operating hours are Monday to Saturday from 12pm to 10pm and Sundays from 12pm to 8pm.

The statement said: “The proposed hours are considered appropriate given the town centre location and the presence of existing restaurants, bars, and leisure operators within the surrounding area.”

A decision on the planning application is expected to be made by East Riding of Yorkshire Council in the coming weeks.

For Rachel, becoming a mum to son Jake at a young age wasn’t easy; it meant putting higher education on hold

After putting higher education on hold while raising her son Rachel Milliken was inspired to return to university having witnessed her father begin his own studies following a serious accident.

For Rachel, aged 39 and from the North Coast, becoming a mum to son Jake at a young age wasn’t easy; it meant putting her dreams on hold. But Jake became her whole world and best friend, as Rachel recalls: “We went through some very tough times together, and he was always there for me.”

Years later, Rachel’s father Jim experienced a serious motorbike accident which changed his life.

Remembering that difficult time, she reflects: “My dad worked hard all his life. He loved the gym and his motorbike until the day a terrible motorbike accident changed everything. He broke his back, and for a time we didn’t know if he would ever walk again.

“At surgery they had to insert titanium rods into his spine. He eventually recovered, but life as he knew it was gone. He could no longer work, and the depression hit hard.”

However, instead of letting the accident define him, Rachel’s dad used his experience to set himself a new challenge.

“My dad did something remarkable. He enrolled at Coleraine Northern Regional College to do an Access to Higher Education course and went on to earn a First-Class Honours degree from Ulster University,” Rachel said.

“He kept telling me to go and do it, that it would be the best thing I ever did, and not to wait any longer. But I was happy in my job and earning good money, so I never really took it seriously.

“Then came his graduation day. I stood there watching him – this man – my daddy, who was 54 surrounded by 21-year-olds, laughing and smiling as he collected his degree and I was overwhelmed with emotion and pride.”

Inspired by his example, Rachel began working towards a degree, a journey that has now culminated in her Doctor’s graduation. Dr Rachel Louise Milliken will graduate on Tuedsay with a Doctor of Philosophy from the School of Pharmacy at Queen’s University Belfast.

“In that moment, I knew two things: I wanted that feeling for myself, and I wanted him to feel that same pride for me. So, I applied to SERC Bangor, signed up for a part-time course, and over the next ten years I completed an Access to Higher Education course, a BSc in Biomedical Science, an MSc in Industrial Pharmaceutics, and a Doctor of Philosophy in Pharmacy at Queen’s!”

Rachel’s time at university has been a rewarding and enriching journey. The support and guidance she received from staff, mentors, and fellow students helped her overcome challenges, develop new skills, and grow both academically and personally.

She adds: “I have to mention Professor Dimitrios Lamprou. He was the Director of the MSc course when I first met him and later became my doctoral supervisor. I owe him an enormous amount. He saw something in me that I couldn’t yet see in myself.

“He pushed me when I felt like I wasn’t good enough, and he gave me opportunities that have shaped who I am in academia today. He gave me my chance, and I will be forever grateful.”

Rachel is currently working as a KTP Associate through the Knowledge Transfer Partnership (KTP) programme, which creates and supports collaborations between academic institutions such as Queen’s University Belfast and businesses.

Speaking on how much she enjoys the KTP experience, she says: “I feel genuinely grateful for this opportunity. I work as a formulation scientist with Provita an animal healthcare company, while simultaneously being supported by Professor David Jones at the School of Pharmacy at Queen’s.

“It feels like the best of both worlds; I’m learning to bridge the gap between academia and industry in a way that very few roles allow. Queen’s plays a vital part in making that possible. The University works with Innovate UK and companies to secure funding and create opportunities.”

Jake is now a second-year student himself at the University of Portsmouth.

Rachel adds: “We truly did life together. Now, at 39, being the mum of a 20-year-old feels incredible. We have the most amazing relationship, and he has been my biggest supporter throughout my entire university journey. Now he is off on his own life adventure at university in Portsmouth, and I feel like my life is only just beginning and so is his.”

Rachel hopes to inspire others who may feel like university is not be for them and speaking ahead of her graduation, she says: “I had always worried that being older would mean I would;n’t fit in but that couldn’t have been further from the truth. For the first time in my life, I truly felt like I belonged. I found my people, made incredible friends from all around the world, and created memories I will carry with me forever.

“I never in a million years dreamt that ten years later I would be where I am now or have achieved what I have achieved. I thought I would get an undergraduate degree, go work in industry as a scientist, and that would be it. But my story turned out to be something I could never have imagined, and I feel incredibly lucky.

“I hope that this story reaches even one person who thinks they are too old, not intelligent enough, or too afraid to take a chance on something new. Just go for it if I can do this, anyone can.”

For all the latest news, visit the Belfast Live homepage here and sign up to our daily newsletter here.

Often called “the village of churches,” it is the kind of place people describe as looking like it belongs on a biscuit tin — and it has the history and walks to match the view.

The village of three greens

Romaldkirk sits in the River Tees green valley, criss-crossed with drystone walls, roughly six miles from Barnard Castle.

Unlike many villages that have grown around a single main street, Romaldkirk is arranged around three separate village greens, each edged by stone cottages and farmhouses.

On the main green you will find the old village pump and a stone water trough, still in place, along with the original village stocks quietly facing the road.

Writers who visit tend to reach for the same language: “a fairly typical English village with a green,” “charming and picturesque,” “one of those rare places which have not really been affected by modern times.”

In an age of infill housing and modern extensions, the fact that most of Romaldkirk’s buildings still carry their original character is part of why it feels so timeless.

St Romald’s: the “Cathedral of the Dales”

The village takes its name from its church.

St Romald’s stands beside the main green and dominates views in every direction, earning the local nickname “Cathedral of the Dales” not because it is huge, but because of its presence.

It is a Grade I listed building, placing it among the most important historic structures in England, with surviving masonry that stretches back to Saxon times.

Historic England describes it as a parish church whose late 12th–early 13th century nave incorporates earlier Saxon work, with later aisles and transepts added in the 13th and 14th centuries and further alterations in the 15th, 18th and 19th.

Inside, you can still see sections of Anglo‑Saxon wall either side of the chancel arch, a late medieval rood stair, a 12th‑century font, and a stone tomb effigy of Hugh Fitz Henry, who died on campaign with Edward I in 1305, carved in chain mail.

The church has some stories attached. The most famous is the “Devil’s Door” — a blocked doorway in the north wall that local tradition says was sealed up in the Middle Ages to keep Satan out.

Whether you believe that or not, noticing the door and then the blocked arch beneath it is one of the small satisfactions of walking slowly around the building.

“Village of churches”

Romaldkirk’s unusual nickname — “the village of churches” — reflects just how central St Romald’s has been to the surrounding area for centuries.

Historically, this was not just a small parish chapel: Romaldkirk once sat at the heart of a very large medieval parish, with outlying chapels and responsibilities stretching across Teesdale.

The name itself comes from Old Norse and means “the church of St Romald,” pointing to its importance long before the current stone building took shape.

Today, the church is still very much alive, used by the Benefice of Lower Teesdale for regular services, weddings and community events, and open to visitors who want to step into what one writer called “somewhere calm and timeless” in the middle of the village.

Pubs, food and staying over

For a village with fewer than 200 residents, Romaldkirk is unusually well served for places to eat and stay.

The Rose & Crown, directly on the green, is an award‑winning country hotel with an emphasis on good food, local ales and walking breaks, and its bar and restaurant are open to non‑residents. The Kirk Inn, a short distance away, is a more traditional, old‑school village pub.

Holiday cottages in and around the village trade heavily on the setting: “one of those rare places which have not really been affected by modern times” is how one local cottage operator describes it, adding that the combination of church, green, stocks and pump is what makes it feel so special.

For visitors, that means you can eat well, sleep in characterful buildings and then step straight out into the kind of view normally reserved for calendars.

Walking from the village

Romaldkirk is one of the best bases in Teesdale for short and medium‑length walks.

From the front door of the Rose & Crown you can drop down to the River Tees and pick up the Teesdale Way, following the river to Cotherstone and back along the old disused railway line, now a footpath that continues through Mickleton towards Middleton‑in‑Teesdale.

A popular 2.5‑mile circular route, starting on the green between the Kirk Inn and the village trough, combines the village’s history with riverside scenery and open Teesdale views, visiting Low Garth Farm and the Fairy Cupboards caves along the way.

Longer circuits link Romaldkirk into routes that take in Hury and Grassholme reservoirs, Bowlees Visitor Centre, and the waterfalls at Low Force, High Force and Cauldron Snout, making it a natural overnight stop for walkers stringing several days together.

This is also classic cycling country, with lanes rising onto the surrounding fells and giving access to the North Pennines Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, Hamsterley Forest and, just over the county boundary, the Yorkshire Dales National Park.

Why it feels like a biscuit tin

Part of Romaldkirk’s appeal lies in how much history is concentrated into such a small, coherent space.

On a short wander around the greens you can see Saxon masonry, medieval effigies, original village stocks, an old pump, and a church that has watched over Teesdale for centuries, all within a few minutes’ walk of two pubs and a cluster of stone cottages.

Travel writers who come expecting “just another nice village” tend to come away surprised.

One described it simply as “quite picturesque,” another as “charming and well worth visiting,” and local tourism bodies emphasise that the surrounding valley, with its drystone walls and riverside paths, is as much part of the experience as the village itself.

Put together, it is exactly the sort of place you could imagine painted on a biscuit tin — but here, the scene is real, and you can walk through it

Getting there

Romaldkirk lies in Teesdale in the Pennines, within the historic North Riding of Yorkshire but administered by County Durham since 1974.

The village is around six miles west of Barnard Castle, which sits on the A688 and is easily reached from the A1(M) at Scotch Corner via the A66. From Barnard Castle, minor roads follow the Tees upstream to Romaldkirk, with signposted routes via Cotherstone and Mickleton.

There is roadside parking around the village greens (postcode DL12 9ED), used as the start point for several published walks.

The nearest railway stations are Darlington and Bishop Auckland, with bus services into Barnard Castle and onward local connections into Teesdale; always check current timetables before travelling, as rural routes can be infrequent.