Katie Price has left fans confused after appearing to backtrack on the travel ban imposed on her husband Lee Andrews, who is yet to leave Dubai and spend time in the UK

Katie Price has backtracked on her husband Lee Andrews’ travel ban. In recent days, the former glamour model has been left reeling after her fourth husband was due to arrive in the UK in order to appear live on Good Morning Britain.

Despite Andrews, a British national, sending a video to Katie and the ITV team the night before, stating he was at the airport, he failed to show up for the interview. A furious Katie explained that Lee missed his flight saying his businesses are based in the United Arab Emirates.

Andrews, who claims he’s a multi-millionaire, later told his social media followers he was in Muscat Airport, waiting for a flight – despite appearing to actually be in Terminal Two of Dubai International Airport.

Katie told GMB hosts Susanna Reid and Ed Balls that her husband didn’t have a travel ban – despite the programme informing her that a Foreign and Commonwealth Office spokesperson had confirmed they had offered assistance to a British man detained in the United Arab Emirates.

However, despite Katie saying Lee didn’t have a travel ban, she has backtracked on her comments from several weeks ago. Speaking on her podcast just four weeks ago, Katie was asked by her sister Sophie about Lee’s travel ban.

The former model said: “You can get a travel ban over anything in Dubai … a parking ticket, or if you owe a bill or something, electricity. You can get a travel ban after absolutely anything, like breathing the wrong way; they’re so strict.”

However, this week, Katie completely brushed off any concerns about Lee’s travel ban and instead, was hopeful that he will be in the United Kingdom next week. “I just want him here just to visit here and just to shut everyone up that he can get here that’s all,” she said on her podcast.

“So next week when we do the pod we’ll know if he’s come to England or not and see what is said. That’s all we need to say about Lee, there’s nothing really anymore I want to say about Lee. But yes, he’s made me look like a d******* and made himself look like a d*******. I was interrogated, which is fine, anyone can ask me questions, I can only answer the things I know.”

In the comment section, one fan said: “Surely, if there are zero issues, he’d jump on a plane, like the rest of us! The fact that he has lied about which airport he’s at and NOT arrived in the UK is proof enough that he’s using Kate.”

A second person wrote: “The roof on his video saying his in Muscat was the roof from Dubai airport!!” Another said: “Next week he still won’t be here! His travel ban won’t just vanish to shut everyone up.” Meanwhile, a fourth said: “Her sister is so wise to this b******t, Katie deserves so much more.”

Katie has since explained on social media that Lee would no longer be posting on his Instagram page. She wrote: “Due to all the madness of trolling, people’s speculation and media frenzy that as a married couple we have both decided @wesleeandrews is taking a break from social media and we are keeping things between us for now as it’s our life and marriage and are very happy.”

Like this story? For more of the latest showbiz news and gossip, follow Mirror Celebs on TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and Threads.

The wife of a U.S. Army sergeant has been released from federal immigration custody after a month-long detention, according to the office of U.S. Sen. Tammy Duckworth. Deisy Rivera Ortega’s release follows an intervention by the Illinois Democrat.

Her husband, Sgt. Jose Serrano, an active-duty soldier stationed in Texas who completed three tours in Afghanistan, had previously informed The Associated Press that immigration agents arrested Rivera Ortega on April 14. This occurred during an appointment with immigration services as she sought to advance her application for permanent residency.

Sen. Duckworth, a combat veteran herself, personally contacted Department of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin on Wednesday to advocate for Rivera Ortega’s release. She was subsequently freed on Thursday evening.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which oversees U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), confirmed her release. A spokesperson stated: “Rivera-Ortega has been released from ICE custody with a GPS tracking device, mandatory home visits, and ICE office check-ins. She will receive full due process.”

The family of Rivera Ortega did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Serrano, who is stationed in the Fort Bliss area, and Rivera Ortega have been married since 2022. According to the DHS, Rivera Ortega entered the U.S. illegally in 2016 and a judge issued a final order of removal for her in December 2019.

Rivera Ortega, who was employed by two hotels, held a military spouse ID card and a valid work permit, according to Duckworth’s office. She had been applying for the parole-in-place program designed to shield the immediate relatives of military family members from immigration enforcement as they took steps to adjust their legal status.

Last April, DHS eliminated a 2022 policy that considered military service of an immediate family member to be a “significant mitigating factor” in deciding whether or not to pursue immigration enforcement. The administration’s new policy states that “military service alone does not exempt aliens from the consequences of violating U.S. immigration laws.”

According to DHS, more than 100 immediate family members of military veterans have been placed into removal proceedings under the Trump administration’s mass deportation agenda.

Following public outcry and intervention from congressional leaders on both sides of the aisle, spouses of veterans and active duty U.S. soldiers have been released from federal immigration custody in some cases.

It was Saturday morning on May 2 when he mowed the lawn. Nothing unusual there – except it’s May – the month when we are not supposed to mow at all.

The annual No Mow May campaign, led by wildlife charity Plantlife, urges people to leave their mowers in the shed during May to allow grasses and wildflowers to flourish. I’m all for that – I will do almost anything to encourage nature. We’ve got wild areas all around the garden, birds nesting under our roof tiles, squirrels with their own feeding station, a wildlife pond, insect houses – you name it. But the lawn is another matter.

I like lawn to be lawn. Lush and green, preferably with stripes. Watching the Masters golf tournament at Augusta last month I stared longingly at the pristine, vibrant green acres. “Why can’t we have grass like that?” I asked my husband, before spending at least an hour Googling ‘lawn care’.

That resulted in a trip to Screwfix where I bought a raker and scarifier at a bargain price, with good reviews all round. After the mow it was put to use, de-mossing and raking. Then, on bank holiday Monday, we spiked it and scattered sharp sand before re-seeding.

I stare enviously at golf courses. (Image: Pixabay)

I worried for my sanity, after getting excited in shops, when faced with boxes covered in pictures of perfect lawns, accompanied by words such as ‘superior’, ‘thicker’ and ‘stunning’. Did I need Miracle-Gro? Of course. What about Speedy Speed? Definitely. Or Pure Green? By the time we left I felt quite light-headed.

Twenty years ago, before we moved to a house with a garden, I would have scoffed had anyone said I would become a lawn-obsessive. It’s something I have long associated with older men. My dad used to have conversations with passers-by about what setting he had the lawn mower on to keep his grass looking good. Now I am having similar chats with my neighbours.

One chap who lives nearby recently led me round the back of his house to reveal the most beautiful swathe of verdant grass. My jaw dropped. “What do you do to get this?” I asked, to be told it’s in the hands of professionals. I couldn’t wait to tell my husband. “Do you think we should get people in?” I asked him. He didn’t reply.

He isn’t on the same page as me regarding our lawn. He would be perfectly happy letting moss take over. “I like moss, and it’s a natural process,” he says. That’s all well and good, but I don’t want a moist, spongy, squelchy surface underfoot every time I walk across the grass, and aside from that, I genuinely like grass. I like the feel of it, it’s the perfect base on which to spread a rug or set up a picnic table. Moss isn’t.

So lawn it is, and it needed a cut. It’s not that I have completely disregarded No Mow May. Last year, against my wishes, we embraced it. We left the lawn unmown until June. When we finally got the mower out, it resembled the Serengeti. We needed a scythe. I also fretted about frogs and toads being hidden in the longer grass and mown over. With short grass at least we can see small creatures.

With its scarified patches, our lawn doesn’t look great at the moment, but I am sure it will be worth the effort and become the showpiece garden I dream of. I do worry for my sanity, however.

Lischinsky and Milgrim were leaving when the suspect fired 20 shots, killing them both, prosecutors allege. They were in a relationship and Lichinsky had bought an engagement ring, planning to propose to Milgrim on an upcoming trip to Israel, according to CBS News, the BBC’s media partner.

The capital’s key railway stations will close for three weeks this summer, spelling trickier travel through central London.

The UK’s massive and ageing rail network needs almost constant TLC, and most of it coincides with holiday seasons to avoid the brunt of disruption on commuters.

Upcoming major works will shut Charing Cross and Waterloo East stations next month for a chunk of 22 days.

Let’s take a look at what’s coming up and how you could best avoid the mayhem.

When are Charing Cross and Waterloo East closed?

The stations will be closed from Sunday, July 26 until Sunday, August 16, along with some weekends on either side, Network Rail said.

The closure has been planned during the summer holidays to minimise disruption.

Why are Charring Cross and Waterloo East closing over the summer?

The closure is part of £20 million railway upgrades being carried out by the South Eastern Railway.

Engineers will have to replace around 1.2 miles of tracks on the 36-year-old track, which sees heavy usage, and this can be done only without trains running.

They will also revamp sections of platforms at Charing Cross, and do structural repairs on the pedestrian bridge between Waterloo East and Waterloo stations.

Where are trains diverted to?

There will be no trains going to or departing from Charing Cross or Waterloo East, so passengers should plan ahead.

Southeastern services will be diverted to London Victoria, Cannon Street, and Blackfriars.

Scott Brightwell, the train services director on the South Eastern Railway, said: ‘By consolidating the work into 22‑day closure, supported by preparation and follow‑up weekends, we can complete the work more quickly and with less disruption overall than the alternative options of 60 weekend closures or four to five 9-day closures.  

‘We have planned the closure for the summer, when passenger numbers are around 20 per cent lower and schools are closed, to help manage the impact on customers.  

Is there other travel disruption in London this summer?

A sweeping Tube drivers’ strike is set to go ahead next week between Tuesday, May 19 and Friday, May 22.

Another strike by Tube drivers who are members of the RMT is planned between June 16 and June 19.

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.

For more stories like this, check our news page.

MORE: Plans unveiled for London Colosseum that will be able to seat 25,000

MORE: The ‘divine’ £13 wrap that Londoners are queuing two hours for

MORE: Spaghetti House closes all London branches after 70 years as it enters administration

The Scottish FA says referee John Beaton and his family “spent last night at home under police surveillance following a leak of personal details online”.

The association says that it is calling for “tolerance and perspective to prevent any further, unthinkable escalation”.

Beaton has faced criticism following the award of a late penalty, which was converted, in Celtic’s 3-2 win at Motherwell on Wednesday.

The incident at Fir Park, which involved VAR, was the latest in a series of controversial refereeing decisions as the Scottish Premiership title race reaches its conclusion.

Celtic’s win kept them within a point of leaders Hearts. Those two sides meet at Celtic Park in Saturday’s final top-six fixtures.

“The Scottish FA condemns in the strongest possible terms attempts to compromise the safety of match officials,” said the SFA, which organises refereeing in the SPFL.

“Such vigilantism, motivated by decisions perceived to be right or wrong on a field of play, is a scourge on our national game and we are grateful to Police Scotland for their swift intervention.

“As we approach what should be an exciting finale to the season, we ask those who have personalised and hyperbolised their opinions, those who have sought the easy way out by attributing defeats to perceived refereeing errors, and those who have approved incendiary statements and posts to reflect on their contribution to creating an environment of intimidation, fear and alarm.”

For more than two decades, I have studied a condition that shapes the lives of about 10-13% of women. This condition causes complex, wide-ranging symptoms such as irregular periods, excessive hair growth, weight gain, acne and difficulty getting pregnant.

Until a few days ago, I called it polycystic ovary syndrome, or PCOS. But from now on, I – along with my colleagues, doctors and patients – will call it something different: polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome, or PMOS.

The renaming was announced in a consensus paper just published in The Lancet. It is the result of a process that has taken over ten years, involved more than 22,000 people across six continents, and brought together 56 patients and professional organisations.

Some readers will see “PMOS” and wonder why scientists have spent so much energy on changing just three letters. As one of the researchers involved, I want to explain why this small change is, in fact, a very big one – and why we hope it will lead to better care for patients.

A name that didn’t fit

The old name was a historical accident.

When the doctors who first studied the condition examined affected ovaries under the microscope – and later by ultrasound – they saw clusters of small, fluid-filled sacs they thought were cysts. So the label “polycystic” stuck.

But those structures are not actually cysts. They’re immature egg follicles that have stalled at an early stage of development. Crucially, many people who are diagnosed with PCOS (now PMOS) do not even exhibit these abnormalities in their ovaries.

The name “PCOS” focused attention on a part of the body that, for many patients, is the least of their problems. And it implied the condition was solely a gynaecological issue. In reality, it’s a complex hormonal and metabolic disorder that begins early in life and lasts a lifetime.

Decades of research, including work done in my laboratory at Karolinska Institutet, has shown that the condition involves a range of interacting disturbances.

Levels of male hormones (androgens) are often elevated in those with the condition. The brain’s signalling to the ovaries is altered. The body’s response to insulin is blunted as well, which is why people with the condition have higher rates of type 2 diabetes, obesity, fatty liver and cardiovascular disease. There is also an increased risk of depression, anxiety, sleep apnoea and endometrial cancer.

That is why the new name has three parts.

“Polyendocrine” reflects the multiple hormonal systems involved. “Metabolic” recognises the lifelong risk of diabetes and heart disease. “Ovarian” maintains the link to ovulation problems and infertility, which remain core features.

The consensus process behind the change was unusually rigorous. Patients and doctors from every world region were surveyed in successive rounds, with their answers shaping the options offered in the next round’s survey. More than 14,000 people, over half of them living with the condition themselves, voted on candidate names. The final agreement was reached in February this year.

Why a name matters for care

A name is not just a name. It tells doctors where to look, tells researchers what to study, and tells people with PMOS what to expect.

Under the old label, many women were told their symptoms were a fertility issue or a weight issue. Diagnosis took, on average, more than two years – and up to 70% of patients reported initially being dismissed or misdiagnosed before finally getting a diagnosis.

Few were warned about their lifelong increased risk of metabolic disease. In many parts of the world, care was fragmented among gynaecologists, endocrinologists, dermatologists and mental-health professionals, with no one taking responsibility for the whole patient.

With PMOS, the multi-system nature of the condition is now recognised in the name. I hope this means general practitioners will check insulin, blood sugar, blood pressure and mental wellbeing when examining and diagnosing patients – not only looking at their menstrual periods.

I hope as well that the condition’s name change means teenage girls, who often show the earliest signs, will be identified and supported sooner. And that researchers find it easier to secure funding to study the metabolic, cardiovascular and neurological aspects of the disorder.

The name change may also empower women living with PMOS in seeking a diagnosis or treatment.

The diagnostic criteria for PMOS remain the same. If you already have a PCOS diagnosis, it will now be referred to as PMOS. You won’t need to undergo any new tests or attend new appointments.

The transition will be phased in over the next three years through updated clinical guidelines, medical education and international disease-coding systems.

We have not solved this condition. There is still no cure, and the first-line treatment is still lifestyle change – supported when needed by medications such as hormonal contraceptives, metformin (which can help control blood sugar) and, more recently, GLP-1 receptor agonists (which can help with managing blood sugar and may also lead to weight loss).

But getting the name right is the foundation that everything else rests on. After almost a century of mislabelling, we finally have a name that matches the science. I hope this name that will help the 170 million women living with this condition get the care they have always deserved.

The Teesside based team were activated at 2:48pm and arrived on scene in just 10 minutes.

The GNAAS critical care team, consisting of two paramedics and a doctor, worked alongside North East Ambulance Service to assess and treat a patient. They were taken to hospital by road, accompanied by the GNAAS team.

RECOMMENDED READING:

A spokesperson for GNAAS said: “Our critical care team was activated at 2.48pm to reports of a road traffic collision on the A171 near Scaling Dam.

“We had two paramedics and a doctor on board our aircraft and they arrived on scene at 2.58pm.

“Our team worked alongside the North East Ambulance Service (NEAS) to assess and treat a patient.

“The patient was taken to hospital by a NEAS road crew, accompanied by our team.”

The charity recently launched ‘Written in the Sky’, giving the general public the chance to have their name – or the name of someone special to them – displayed on one of their new helicopters. To find out more visit: https://gna.as/written2026

Higher gas prices, which have surged by about 52 percent since the start of the Iranwar, are draining demand for beer as American consumers continue to tighten discretionary spending, according to new data.

Beer, malt beverage and cider sales volumes fell 6.3 percent in the four weeks ending May 2, Nielsen reports. The steepest declines came from convenience stores and gas stations such as 7-Eleven, Wawa, Shell, and Exxon, where volumes are down about 9 percent year over year for the two weeks since April 26.

This is a clear step down from earlier in the year, when declines were only around 3 percent between November and mid-April, according to the data, as fuel costs weigh on impulse purchases.

“We find a negative correlation between the absolute price of gas in a given state today and the sequential change in beer/FMB/volume growth,” Bernstein analyst Nadine Sarwat told CNBC.

California saw the biggest drop in beer sales in the country, with volumes falling 16 percent, according to Nielsen. The decline lines up with the state’s persistently high gas prices, which average about $6.147 per gallon, driven by higher taxes and stricter fuel rules requiring a special cleaner-burning blend.

Outside of California, Arizona and Texas also saw notable declines in beer sales, down about 10 percent and nearly 7 percent, respectively, over the same period.

At the same time, the Midwest is taking the brunt of soaring gas prices in the country amid the Iran-related oil shock, with Ohio leading the increase at roughly 72 percent since the conflict began 10 weeks ago, about double California’s rise, according to Bloomberg. Indiana, Illinois, Michigan and Wisconsin are also seeing steep jumps as fuel inflation spreads across the region.

Analysts say convenience stores are especially affected because they depend on commuter traffic and impulse purchases, both of which are slowing as average U.S. gas prices hover around $4.52 per gallon and have risen around 52 percent since the start of the Iran war, according to AAA data.

The surge in gas prices also comes at a time when younger generations are consuming less alcohol than their elders. A Gallup survey from August found only about 50 percent of adults ages 18 to 34 drink, down from 59 percent in 2023.

That decline is helping push the national drinking rate to a record-low 54 percent, with many respondents pointing to health concerns as a key reason for cutting back or avoiding alcohol.

For the first time in Gallup’s data, a majority of Americans, 53 percent, said moderate drinking is bad for health, up from 45 percent a year ago and 28 percent in 2018. Just 6 percent say it’s beneficial, while 37 percent say it makes no difference.

A small medical plane crashed in a mountainous region outside Ruidoso, New Mexico, before dawn on Thursday, killing all four individuals aboard and igniting a wildfire in the surrounding forest, officials confirmed.

The blaze quickly expanded to 35 acres amid dry, windy conditions by midday, according to Lincoln County Manager Jason Burns.

Burns expressed significant concern about the fire, noting that local agencies were collaborating with the U.S. Forest Service to contain it.

The cause of the crash remains unknown.

The aircraft was located between 8 a.m. and 9 a.m. Thursday in steep, rocky terrain within the Capitan Mountains, a site so challenging to access that crews had to hike the final half-mile to reach it, Burns stated.

The victims were identified as flight crew and medical personnel, though their names have not yet been released.

“Our hearts and prayers go out to the families, loved ones, friends and colleagues of those who lost their lives in this tragic incident,” Burns said at a news conference.

The flight, operated by Trans Aero MedEvac, had departed from Roswell Air Center and was en route to Sierra Blanca Regional Airport.

The company reported the plane overdue after communications and radar contact were lost during its medical transportation mission.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) will investigate the incident.

Trans Aero MedEvac has been operating in southeastern New Mexico and west Texas since 1966.

Ruidoso, a mountain town with a year-round population under 8,000, is situated at the base of south-central New Mexico’s Sierra Blanca range.

The surrounding area, including Lincoln National Forest, is heavily forested and rural. This incident echoes a previous tragedy in 2007, when five people died after a medical plane crashed in the Devil’s Canyon area of Lincoln National Forest shortly after departing Ruidoso Regional Airport for Albuquerque.

Nationally, NTSB records indicate 25 fatal medical plane crashes over the past 25 years, resulting in nearly 70 deaths.

Recent incidents include a jet crash in a Philadelphia neighborhood in January 2025, which killed eight people, and an August crash on the Navajo Nation in northern Arizona that claimed four lives.

In December, a Mexican Navy plane carrying a young patient and seven others crashed off the Texas coast in the Gulf.

Despite these incidents, aviation safety expert Jeff Guzzetti, a former NTSB and FAA crash investigator, asserts that medical evacuation plane flights are generally no more dangerous than other flights, as they operate between airports like any commercial aircraft.

He distinguishes this from medical helicopter flights, which he notes are more hazardous due to frequent landings on roads or improvised sites to quickly transport injured individuals.

A study covering a 20-year period ending in 2020 found that over 70% of air medical fatalities occurred on helicopters.

“Typically when an air medical air plane accident occurs, the reasons are usually the same as any other airplane accident. There’s not unique issues with the air medical mission,” Guzzetti explained.