Politics
‘5 Years On From Sarah Everard’s Murder, The Rapists Still Hold The Power’
When Sarah Everard was brutally murdered and raped, the UK was devastated. Every woman saw themselves in Sarah; she followed the rules, she trusted the police, she followed the law, and she was punished in the most unimaginable way.
Rallies, marches, and police investigations into how a police officer nicknamed ‘the rapist’ was a serving officer all ensued seemingly like an avalanche of retrospective justice. Police labelled Sarah’s rape and murder as abhorrent, and said that more needed to be done, and they turned their attention to vetting, to address how they had let a rapist into their ranks.
The police’s focus on working hard to paper over the cracks that Wayne Couzen highlighted in the police force completely missed what women and girls across the UK needed – and still do need – to see.
Action against everyday rape and violence.
Sarah Everard experienced every woman’s worst nightmare, and her ordeal was a reminder of just how prevalent and unavoidable violence against women and girls is. Couzen wasn’t the first person in power who used his role and his trust to manipulate and rape women; he is quite simply another one for the list.
It is ironic that at a time of reflection in the five years following Sarah’s death, we sit surrounded by reams of documents from a powerful man who trafficked and organised the rape of many girls, all by powerful men who continue to live life as they were. They are the ones with the power.
“we have very little to show for the repercussions of Sarah’s murder”
The VAWG strategy that was ushered out quickly ahead of Christmas, perhaps to cause minimal media attention, stated the intention for more police to deal with the ever-increasing incidents of rape and violence against women.
In a world where five in six women and seven in eight men who are raped do not report it, and less than 1% of rapes result in a conviction, more police is a complete cop out.
What we need is a radical response to a colossal problem. Nearly half a million (490,336) people are raped each year, and yet the government isn’t talking about how to stop rape from happening; instead, they are adding more police on the ground. The reality is that most victims (85%) are raped by someone that they know, someone that they trust, and someone that they fear the repercussions of – and it is getting worse.
It’s why I started Enough, which is centred on rape prevention and was born from the voice of survivors. We have created a safe place for victims to report rape anonymously and to collect DNA evidence through a self-test kit, which can be used as evidence. Research from our university trial at Bristol found that 70% of students surveyed say they felt Enough had prevented rape on campus. Eight thousand kits were given out to create a threat for rapists, and to give an Option 3 for survivors who would never report to the Police or NHS SARC. This is the type of radical response that we need to see.
The definition of madness is to keep doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. And five years on, we have very little to show for the repercussions of Sarah’s murder. we have very little to suggest anything might be different today.
We need to listen to survivors, we need to act on what they say, and we need to give them the tools they need to feel protected and report. When they have the power, rapists will not. More convictions will only happen if they system changes for survivors, not the other way around.
Survivors and society deserve nothing short of radical to make a serious dent in the VAWG epidemic. If not now, when?
Politics
Game Of Thrones Film ‘Confirmed’ To Be In The Works
One final chapter in the Game Of Thrones saga is coming to our screens – this time in the form of a feature-length film.
Almost seven years on from one of the most polarising finales in TV history, screenwriter Beau Willimon – best known for his work on House Of Cards and the Star Wars off-shoot Andor – is said to be writing the script for a new movie version of Game Of Thrones.
The news was first reported by Page Six, and later confirmed by The Hollywood Reporter.
Game Of Thrones came to an end in 2019, with a dramatic turn of events that saw Jon Snow offing Daenerys Targaryen, and Sansa Stark ending up on the Iron Throne.
While the last episodes of Game Of Thrones weren’t exactly well-received by fans at the time, that certainly hasn’t stopped the Westeros universe from expanding in the years since.
The popular prequel series House Of The Dragon, set two centuries before the events of Game Of Thrones, is expected to air its third season next year, with James Norton and Tom Cullen among those joining regulars Matt Smith, Emma D’Arcy, Olivia Cooke and Rhys Ifans. A fourth has already been commissioned by US broadcaster HBO.

Meanwhile, a spin-off of a very different nature premiered earlier this year, in the form of A Knight Of The Seven Kingdoms, based on Game Of Thrones author Tales Of Dunk And Egg books.
The series was notable in that it vastly differed tonally from other adaptations set in the Game Of Thrones universe, with much more emphasis on comedy than fans are probably used to – which split critics down the middle.
A spin-off centred around the hero Jon Snow was also heavily rumoured to be in the works, but this project was eventually shelved when Kit Harington pulled out.
Game Of Thrones, House Of The Dragon and A Knight Of The Seven Kingdoms are all streaming on Now and Sky in the UK.
Politics
Rachel Reeves spring statement will make the rich richer
Chancellor Rachel Reeves has delivered the Office for Budget Responsibility’s (OBR) forecasts for the economy. While it predicts annual real household income growth of 0.6%, this figure is skewed by high earners. The actual economic outlook shows why the ideology of neoliberalism (austerity, privatisation and deregulation) is collapsing.
Rachel Reeves ignores income disparity
The incomes of low earning people at the bottom 20% versus the top earning 20% shows why the OBR isn’t providing a complete analysis. The OBR calculates real household income growth through dividing total income by the population.
But in 2022, for example, the lower earning 20% received just £13,218 in average annual income. That’s compared to the top 20%, which received £83,687 – over 12 times more.
The issue is compounded by the increased earnings of CEOs. The High Pay Centre calculated that median CEO pay increased by 6.8% in 2024/25 – far higher than the 0.6% average predicted for each year until 2029 in the forecast.
Median FTSE 100 CEO pay increased from £4.29m in 2023/24 to £4.58m in 2024/25, the highest it ever has been.
Inflation
The OBR predicts inflation will fall from 3% in January to 2% at the end of 2026. Inflation impacts the real earnings increases for households. But neoliberalism means the privatisation of essentials, which is highly inflationary. If water, energy and other utilities were brought into public ownership it would mean lower costs for every person and business.
Take the UK agriculture sector. 40% of a farm’s total costs can be attributed to energy. Since privatisation of electricity began in 1990, average prices have more than doubled from around 6p per kwh (14p in 2023 prices) to 30p per kwh in 2023, according to Ofgem and Hansard figures. Meanwhile, analysis shows that average gas prices increased by 143% between 1992 and 2022.
When it comes to the food we eat everyday, over 60% is produced in the UK. These statistics demonstrate that that there could be a significant reduction in food prices through the nationalisation of energy. On top of that, all businesses would benefit from the democratisation of essentials through cheaper running costs. In fact, the government could mandate a national price drop throughout the economy via such public ownership of utilities.
This is not the possible negative impacts of deflation. Businesses would be earning the same via a national price drop through essentials nationalisation – prices would just be cheaper at a sustained level.
The end of neoliberal ideology through such public ownership, for example, would tackle the skewed figures in the OBR forecast and bring material improvements to people’s lives.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
MP Slams Trumps Churchill Jibe At UK PM
A senior MP has delivered a withering slapdown to Donald Trump after he mocked Keir Starmer over his response to the US and Israel’s bombing of Iran.
The US president said “this is not Winston Churchill that we’re dealing with” after Starmer initially refused to let the US use British bases to launch their attacks amid concerns the strikes broke international law.
The PM eventually changed his mind after Iran began bombing countries across the Middle East, putting British lives at risk.
Trump’s comments were the latest salvo in an ongoing war of words between him and Starmer which have caused the biggest rupture in the so-called “special relationship” between the UK and America in living memory.
Downing Street officials have been reluctant to further stoke the row by reacting to Trump’s Churchill jibe.
But appearing on GB News this morning, Lib Dem deputy leader Daisy Cooper said: “Trump is no Franklin Roosevelt either, is he?
“We Liberal Democrats have had our criticisms of Keir Starmer, we’ve been repeatedly frustrated that Keir Starmer hasn’t been speaking up and standing up to Donald Trump.
“But let’s be really clear about this. It’s Donald Trump who is trashing the special relationship, it’s Donald Trump who’s making the cost of living harder for British people with his ridiculous tariff war.
“And it’s Donald Trump that’s causing death and chaos in the Middle East through his illegal actions. So he needs to take a hard look in the mirror and rein it in a bit, I think.”
Politics
Iran women’s national team refuse to sing national anthem
The Iran women’s national football team refused to sing the national anthem before their Asian Cup match against South Korea.
Iran’s women’s national football team refused to sing the anthem at the Asian Cup
Before the match against South Korea, the players did not perform the national anthem. The team stood in silence, while head coach Marzieh Jafari was seen smiling during its performance.
She… pic.twitter.com/KYUgFUwPyT
— NEXTA (@nexta_tv) March 3, 2026
The team are in Australia for the tournament, and stood silently as the speakers played ‘Mehr-e Khavaran’ around the stadium.
Only one day before the game, US-Israeli strikes murdered Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. He had ruled the country since 1989.
Iran lost 3-0, which is no surprise, given that the US and Israel are blowing their home country to smithereens.
Iran deserve respect
After the game, journalists questioned the players at the press conference. The team coach, Marziyeh Jafari, said:
We shouldn’t be talking about these issues at all now.
Right now, the team is in a very important competition that holds great rights for women … next question.
The Asian Football Confederation (AFC) is reportedly monitoring the situation and will offer support to the players if needed.
Iran will face Australia on Thursday night, again on the Gold Coast.
Australian player Amy Sayer told journalists that the Iranian squad deserve respect for carrying on and playing, while the bombing of their nation intensifies.
Our heart goes out to them and their families, it’s a difficult situation and it’s really brave of them to be able to be here and to perform.
They played (on Monday), and they put on a really strong performance, even with the political climate that’s going on and the struggles that they might be going through.
I think we’re excited and looking forward to the game on Thursday … the best we can do to contribute is to just give them the best game of football that we’re able and to show them the respect on the field.
The Iranian national team is showing up. And given how brutally the US and Israel are bombing Iran, just that is hugely courageous.
Donald Trump and Netanyahu want the Iranians silent and compliant – yet the team showing up to play and standing together during the national anthem shows that they refuse for everything to be business as usual.
Featured image via Guardian Football/YouTube
Politics
Newslinks for Wednesday 4th March 2026
Starmer is no Churchill, says Trump as tensions rise
“Donald Trump has launched a fresh assault on Sir Keir Starmer mocking the PM as no Winston Churchill. Speaking in the Oval Office the US President doubled down on his attacks on the PM over his blocking of the use the UK base in Diego Garcia to bomb Iran. Just hours after telling The Sun the Special Relationship was “not what it used to be”, Mr Trump told reporters: “I’m not happy with the UK.” And speaking in front of a bust Britain’s wartime hero, President Trump unleashed his latest withering assessment of the PM. Referencing Sir Keir’s botched attempts to giveaway the Chagos Islands, he added: “That island. He made a lease of the island. Somebody came and took it away from him.” Mr Trump added: “This is not the age of Churchill.. the UK has been very unhelpful, with that stupid island of theirs… what is that all about? They have ruined relationships – its a shame.” The US has withdrawn support for Labour’s deal over concerns they would lose access to the crucial airbase in the Indian Ocean that could have refuelled B2 bombers striking the Mullahs. The President added: “And it’s taken 3 or 4 days for us to work out where we can land. This is not Winston Churchill that we’re dealing with.” The latest attack came after Downing Street said the US is still a “staunch” ally after Donald Trump launched another broadside against Sir Keir Starmer over the Middle East war.” – The Sun
- Britain scrambles warship to Cyprus after France deploys aircraft carrier – Daily Telegraph
- Fears Gulf states will run out of anti-drone rockets in DAYS amid Dubai onslaught as Brits race to first UK evac flight – The Sun
- Who hates who in the Middle East: As a former British Nato commander warns we are on the brink of World War III – the definitive guide to who is backing Trump… and who is on the side of the Mullahs – Daily Mail
- US commander declares ‘We have just begun’ as 4 dead soldiers named – The Times
- British students mourn ‘beloved’ Ayatollah – Daily Telegraph
- Vigils at British mosques for ‘martyr’ Ayatollah Khamenei – The Times
Comment:
- Starmer undermining Trump has caused worst ever rift in Special Relationship… and all to appease the PM’s Labour critics – Harry Cole, The Sun
- I commanded Nato. I fear we’re living through the start of WWIII – Richard Shirreff, Daily Mail
- No PM since Suez has bungled the special relationship worse than Starmer – Philip Johnston, Daily Telegraph
- Under Starmer UK is an irrelevant 3rd-rate power squawking from sidelines about legal niceties & dithering over despots – Leo McKinstry, The Sun
- Is the ‘special relationship’ dead? Why Trump turned on Britain – Katy Balls, The Times
- What does victory in Iran look like? Here are three possible answers – Tobias Ellwood, Daily Telegraph
- Starmer’s Iran mess was shaped by Hermer – Daniel Finkelstein, The Times
- Trump is right. Starmer has humiliated the land of Churchill – Allison Pearson, Daily Telegraph
- Can Tehran find a leader from the chaos? – Roger Boyes, The Times
> Today:
Reeves raid pushes taxes to record high
“Labour’s stealth raid on workers will drive Britain’s tax burden up to a fresh record high, rising further and faster than previously forecast. Taxes will rake in £1.4tn per year by the start of the next decade, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), up from £1.2tn today. That is equivalent to 38.5pc of GDP, up from 36.3pc in this financial year and higher than the 38.3pc predicted by the OBR at the time of Rachel Reeves’s Budget in November. Critically, it is even further above the previous record tax burden of 37.2pc borne in 1948-49, when Britain was beginning to pay down the vast debts it accrued defeating the Nazis in the Second World War. “Rising income tax revenues account for nearly half of the rise in receipts as a share of GDP, reflecting the freezing of personal tax thresholds until the end of 2030-31,” said the OBR in its forecast on Tuesday. Ms Reeves’s decision in November to freeze income tax thresholds means that millions of workers will be pulled into paying tax for the first time or into higher bands as they receive pay rises, even if the spending power of their wages falls in real terms. This is a powerful stealth tax. The OBR estimates that by 2030-31, the freeze will rake in £67bn per year for the Treasury.” – Daily Telegraph
- Unemployment set to hit 5.3% this year amid ‘worrying’ rise in young jobless – The Guardian
- UK growth forecast downgraded and unemployment will peak this year, chancellor reveals – Sky News
- Taxes to hit highest levels since WW2 & welfare spending soars despite ‘in denial’ Reeves insisting she fixed UK economy – The Sun
- Rachel Reeves’s tax burden ‘could deter workers from trying to earn more – The Times
- A million more pensioners will be hit to help pay for Rachel Reeves’ benefits boom – Daily Mail
Comment:
- Unemployment is back with a vengeance. Nobody knows how bad it will get – Szu Ping Chan, Daily Telegraph
- The Iran crisis is the Chancellor’s greatest test. But there’s no sign she even recognises it – Alex Brummer, Daily Mail
- The Chancellor’s one priority was to save her job – Andrew Lilico, Daily Telegraph
- Reeves has no one to blame but herself for Britain’s economic mess – Tom Harris, Daily Telegraph
> Today:
> Yesterday:
Net zero is the answer to Middle East energy crisis, says Business Secretary
“Britain must “double down” on net zero after the Iran crisis sent energy prices soaring, the Business Secretary has said. Peter Kyle said building more renewables such as solar and wind would help reduce the country’s exposure to oil and gas coming from “parts of the world which are fundamentally unstable”. His comments came after the conflict in the Middle East sent the European gas price up 80pc and oil prices nearly 20pc as Iranian strikes on production facilities in the Gulf spooked markets and sparked fears of a supply crunch. If sustained, analysts have warned that the surge threatens to trigger a sharp rise in household bills and fuel costs comparable to that which followed the invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Mr Kyle said on Tuesday: “Doubling down on renewables is, yes, right for climate change, it’s, yes, right for jobs. It is also essential because we keep on seeing these lived examples of how instability, through regional instability, is creeping into our energy prices, for which the British Government has no agency.” The transition to green energy was “about sovereignty,” Mr Kyle added. Ministers have repeatedly blamed gas prices for high energy prices in Britain, where households and businesses pay some of the most expensive bills in the developed world. But energy suppliers recently pushed back against this narrative and warned that the biggest driver of bills over the next few years will be green levies and network charges, which are soaring, resulting from the Government’s net zero plans.” – Daily Telegraph
- UK energy bills: businesses and households face new price shock – Financial Times
- Energy bills could soar to £2,500 a year for Brits as Middle East war sends gas prices rocketing to three-year high – The Sun
- Britain’s vulnerability to the Gulf exposed as energy crisis unfolds – Daily Telegraph
- Gas prices nearly double as Europe braces for Iran war energy shocks – Euronews
- The nightmare Iran energy scenario is becoming reality – The Economist
Comment:
- Energy markets will force Trump to end his reckless war very soon – Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, Daily Telegraph
- An economic shock is coming. And Reeves isn’t ready – Hamish McRae, The i
> Today:
News in brief:
- Poll: Reform UK is most disliked party in Britain – Max Mitchell, UnHerd
- Britain has never needed an ‘Islamophobia’ definition less – Brendan O’Neill, The Spectator
- The choice before the Labour Party – David Miliband, The New Statesman
- A grooming gang whitewash – Katie Lam, The Critic
- We must protect the world’s oldest Christian country – Edward Leigh, CapX
Politics
Talarico won his primary. What happens next is outside his control.
James Talarico’s charmed political journey has broken his way at almost every juncture of his career, from “The Joe Rogan Experience” invite as he was weighing a Senate bid last summer to his star turn in Texas’ quorum break to a fundraising windfall over a spiked Stephen Colbert interview in the primary’s homestretch.
But as he gave his not-quite-victory speech late Tuesday night, Talarico faced a more uncertain future than he had hoped. The Associated Press eventually called the election for him hours later, though voting problems in Crockett’s home base of Dallas County delayed the result.
And suddenly, it looks like he could face a much tougher opponent than he’d banked on in the general election.
Talarico and Democrats had hoped for months that the preacher would get to face scandal-tarred Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, but Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), a less objectionable general-election foil, had outperformed expectations and fought him to a draw, forcing a runoff.
For the disciplined and studious Democrat who can commit scripture and prepared remarks to memory in a matter of minutes, and who is known by aides to linger over edits to social media posts and ads, the unknown outcome of the runoff is an unwelcome twist, the seemingly rare thing he cannot control.
Even with a 12-week head start on whomever voters select as his opponent in a brass-knuckled, dregs-scraping, cash-consuming GOP runoff, Talarico could still face a four-term incumbent with a long track record of big general-election wins.
Amid a legal dispute over voting precinct hours in Dallas County, Talarico did not quite declare victory in a short speech just after midnight local time, when he was leading the race but before the Associated Press called it.
“We are still waiting for an official call, but we are confident in this movement we’ve built together,” he said after lamenting what he called “voter suppression.”
“We are not just trying to win an election,” Talarico said at his rally in Austin. “We are trying to fundamentally change our politics, and it’s working.”
Earlier Tuesday, a district judge permitted the Dallas County Democratic Party to extend polling hours until 9 p.m. central, but the Texas Supreme Court granted Attorney General Ken Paxton’s request to set aside the votes of those people who were not in line by 7 p.m.
The polling problems are just the latest in a long history of voter suppression and voting rights battles in the state — ones that have particularly impacted Black and Hispanic voters. Crockett first gained national attention as a state representative battling against the Texas GOP’s move to pass a law that added new restrictions on voting, an issue once again in the spotlight as her Senate campaign came to a close.
In a statement earlier in the evening, Talarico’s campaign acknowledged that they were “deeply concerned about the reports of voters being turned away from the polls in Dallas and Williamson counties following the GOP’s implementation of precinct-specific voting locations for Election Day.”
Talarico ran well in heavily white and Hispanic areas on Tuesday, but has conceded he has work to do with Black voters if he’s going to win in November — an effort that could be complicated by the sour final note of voter confusion.
The final stretch of the contest pitted Talarico’s and Crockett’s supporters against each other in bitter feuds, often along racial lines, that played out on social media platforms like TikTok and X. Those debates focused on whether Democrats believed Crockett, a Black representative from Dallas, could be elected in a deep-red state — as well as over a claim made by a social media influencer that Talarico had described a former opponent as a “mediocre Black man,” comments he says were misconstrued.
Still, his strong performance against Crockett has jolted Democratic hopes of winning Texas for the first time in more than a generation, forging a wider than expected path to flipping the Senate — and out of the wilderness.
“I’d be very worried if I were the national Republican Party after tonight,” said Emily Cherniack, the founder and CEO of New Politics, and a longtime Talarico ally. “Strong turnout, especially among Latino voters, signals real dissatisfaction with Republicans in power. That’s a huge warning sign for November for them.”
Up until Tuesday, Senate Democrats had staked their chances of flipping the Republican-controlled Senate on just four states: North Carolina, Maine, Ohio and Alaska.
But now, some Democrats believe Talarico can cobble together a winning coalition in the most improbable of states — no Democrat has a Senate seat in Texas since 1988 — based on his class-focused message seeking to unite voters across parties.
“A perfect storm is lining up for Texas Democrats,” said Mark McKinnon, the former Texas media operative who started out advising Democrat Ann Richards on her gubernatorial campaigns before switching to Republican George W. Bush in 1997. “They have a nominee who can appeal to moderates and soft Republicans. Talarico could be Moses who leads the Lone Star Democrats out of the desert they’ve been in for 35 years.”
Public and private polls have mostly shown close races in either matchup; Talarico would start off with the edge over Paxton but trail Cornyn.
“It is still a massive mountain to climb, but this doesn’t hurt the effort,” one former staffer on Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign said of Talarico’s win.
Talarico has argued that he can beat either foe.
“I think both of them are extraordinarily weak,” Talarico said in an interview with POLITICO just days before Election Day. “Paxton and Cornyn, they’re different. Paxton was guilty of illegal corruption. That’s why my colleagues and I impeached him in the Texas House. But Cornyn is guilty of legalized corruption. He was the deciding vote on the Big, Ugly, Bill which kicked millions of Texas off their health care, took food out of the mouths of hungry Texas kids all to give tax breaks to his donors. Both of them are guilty of using their public offices to enrich their donors — Ken Paxton in an illegal way, but John Cornyn in a legal way. I look forward to prosecuting the case against either of them — whoever makes it out.”
Politics
Harry Styles Album Reviews: What Do Critics Think Of Kiss All The Time. Disco, Occasionally?
Almost four years on from the release of his Grammy-winning Harry’s House, Harry Styles fans’ patience is about to be rewarded.
On Friday, the chart-topping singer will unveil his fourth album, the curiously-titled Kiss All The Time. Disco, Occasionally.
In the run-up to the release, critics have been weighing in on Harry’s new material, with the reception so far – phew! – being varying levels of positive.
While the jury’s out on whether the album might represent a case of style over substance – and, indeed, whether that actually matters – many critics have also warned fans that the album might not quite be the collection of floor-fillers and club bangers they’ve been led to believe, but if they embrace Harry’s new sound and go with it, they’ll find themselves won over.
Here’s a selection of what critics are saying about Kiss All The Time. Disco, Occasionally…
“Painting everything in muted shades is a risk that intermittently pays off. On the plus side, it gives what’s here a unified atmosphere […] But there are points where it feels like it’s all mood and no material, where subtly lit songs pass by pleasantly enough, but don’t really linger in your memory afterwards.”
“Initially, fans may greet this album with confusion or hesitant enthusiasm, because it may not be what they were dreaming of or expecting. But do we really want the same birthday present every year?”

“There’s a lot going on. On his fourth album, Styles is clearly working through some major stuff […] As such, there’s little to compare with the straightforward joy of Watermelon Sugar, or the keening desire of As It Was – but Styles isn’t stupid enough to alienate his fanbase entirely.”
“Largely, Styles taking a new approach to things really works – ‘Kiss All The Time…’ feels like an album that you’ll really want to spend a lot of time with, letting all its layers envelope you. But, very occasionally, there are things that don’t quite hit the target. […] As Styles has shown us, though, even life’s blips have value, and these instances can’t stop his fourth album from feeling like a triumph.”
“The album is distinctly ‘Harry’, deliberately current, and undoubtedly Styles’s best album yet. [It is] Harry Styles doing what Harry Styles does best. Releasing a series of impeccably produced pop bangers, each better than the last.”
“That’s the appeal of this musically deep, lyrically shallow, curiously laid-back album: hanging out with pop’s Mr Easy.”

“With feather-light melodies, gauzy synths and sketchily oblique references to ‘perfect lighting’, sessions with ‘well-fed’ therapists, elegant hangovers and dining on ‘your favourite pastries’, it sometimes sounds like an episode of Emily In Paris set to sub bass and cool beats. Yet it is expected to land like Godzilla crushing everything in its path. Who needs substance when you have an abundance of style?”
“[Harry’s] new-found freedom that shapes the backbone of his excellent fourth album. It’s eclectic, impossible to pigeonhole and, ultimately, all the better for it.”
“Those expecting rowdy rave anthems should be wary, though. There are indeed several dance numbers, including recent single Aperture and the funky Dance No More. But on the whole, the mood on the 12 new songs that cocoon the listener in a wall of silky sound and supple vocals is subtle and restrained.”
“Styles fleshes out his introspection more inventively, weaving in acoustic instrumentation, jagged beats and bursts of feedback that thrive on the push and pull of delayed gratification. There is a fresh immediacy, even a hint of intensity, to some of these songs, if not necessarily the sense of release that the Billboard Hot 100-topping lead single Aperture foreshadowed.”
Politics
Cornyn did so well that Trump could finally endorse him
Sen. John Cornyn defied expectations in the Texas GOP primary on Tuesday. National Republicans believe his unexpectedly strong showing may be enough for President Donald Trump to endorse the embattled incumbent.
Trump has privately intimated that he will soon get involved in the Texas Senate race after rebuffing endorsement pleas from both candidates for months, according to a GOP strategist close to the White House who was granted anonymity to speak freely. For months, party leaders worried that Trump would back state Attorney General Ken Paxton, a longtime ally of the president, especially if he dominated in Tuesday’s primary.
Then came the results that had Cornyn neck-and-neck with Paxton. With that outcome, the strategist said, it would be “very surprising” if Trump backed Paxton.
The stakes are high for Republicans, who fear control of the Senate is hanging in the balance. The GOP hoped to avoid state Rep. James Talarico clinching the Democratic nomination because they see him as able to draw away moderate Republican voters.
Republicans “should take him seriously,” said another close Trump administration ally, granted anonymity to be candid. Talarico is a “big reason for Trump to get in for Cornyn and end this thing,” the ally said, especially to free up massive amounts of money that could be spent instead on competitive Senate races in Michigan and Georgia.
National Republicans estimated they would have to spend $200 million to protect Cornyn in the runoff. But the GOP strategist shrugged off the price tag. “Look, it will probably cost some money,” the person said. “It’s just money, we have a lot of it.”
Tuesday’s results were the best-case scenario for establishment Republicans, who worried Cornyn would finish far enough behind Paxton that it would be a slog for him — and a tough sell for a president who hates to back losers.
The Texas GOP Senate primary has become a referendum on the future of the Republican Party, testing the strength of the conservative grassroots against the establishment wing. While the MAGA base kept the four-term incumbent — who nearly became Senate majority leader — from getting a majority of the primary vote, the results show the old Republican establishment isn’t quite dead yet.
Cornyn’s narrow lead over Paxton was powered by even performances across the state.
Even in the most heavily Republican counties where Paxton might have expected to benefit from a MAGA base, the incumbent senator largely held his own: Across more than 110 mostly rural counties that Trump won by at least 50 points in 2024 and were reporting complete results as of early Wednesday morning, Paxton built up only the narrowest of leads, 44 percent to just shy of 40 percent for Cornyn.
Meanwhile, Cornyn strengthened his advantage in the more traditional white-collar suburbs, leading by double digits in Travis and Dallas counties as results continued to come in early Wednesday morning.
The senator, speaking to reporters on Election Night in Austin, said Republican voters’ choice is “crystal clear.”
“I refuse to allow a flawed, self-centered, and shameless candidate like Ken Paxton risk everything we’ve worked so hard to build over these many years,” he said. “There is simply too much at stake.”
Republicans are well aware that overall control of the Senate may be at risk. Cornyn’s allies warn that scandal-plagued Paxton turns off general election voters, especially if Talarico is their opponent.
During Paxton’s decade as attorney general, he faced an impeachment by the GOP-led Texas state House, ethics complaints, a federal securities fraud investigation and a recent divorce complete with allegations of infidelity.
Now Paxton is facing another 12 weeks going up against the wrath — and war chest — of the Washington establishment.
“John Cornyn spent around $100 million trying to buy this seat,” Paxton told his supporters at a watch party after the race was called. “We spent around $5 million… We prove something they’ll never understand in Washington: Texas is not for sale.”
One question is which candidate the voters who backed Rep. Wesley Hunt, who finished a distant third place, will support now — or whether they turn out at all for the May runoff.
Lone Star Liberty, a pro-Paxton super PAC, in a memo circulated ahead of Tuesday’s election, shrugged off threats that Cornyn would succeed in the runoff by continuing to hammer the attorney general on his litany of scandals, arguing they had nothing new to offer.
“Cornyn’s talk of ‘unleashing’ new attacks’ in the runoff is bluster,” the memo states. “The truth is that from day one, his forces fired every bullet they had. There are no new attacks left — only more of the same, at ever-greater cost and with ever-diminishing returns.”
Senate Republican operatives – who had entered the night expecting the race to head to a runoff, but unsure of how Cornyn would track against Paxton – were exultant as the incumbent maintained a narrow lead well into the night.
A Republican working on Senate campaigns, granted anonymity to speak freely, said Cornyn “proved to be formidable” on Tuesday — bolstering the establishment GOP argument that he is “the most electable” as the party braces for a battle against Talarico.
Talarico’s lead “reaffirms the need to have Cornyn as the nominee. Can’t risk this to Paxton,” the GOP operative close to the White House said.
Yet some Republicans conceded Cornyn has a tricky path to navigate. He’ll have to square off again with the conservative primary voters who make up Paxton’s base.
“Runoffs are extremely unpredictable, and head-to-head it could be anyone’s ballgame,” said Republican strategist Jeff Burton.
Dasha Burns, Lisa Kashinsky, Alec Hernandez, Jessica Piper and Erin Doherty contributed reporting
Politics
Talarico defeats Crockett in Texas Senate Democratic primary
State Rep. James Talarico won the Texas Senate Democratic primary, defeating Rep. Jasmine Crockett and giving party leaders the candidate they had quietly seen as the stronger option to flip the ruby-red state.
The race was defined by questions of electability and simmering racial tensions, as Talarico and Crockett worked to reassemble the party’s fractured multiracial coalition. That carried over through Tuesday, with both candidates raising concerns that voters had been disenfranchised in Crockett’s home base of Dallas County, which includes a large number of Black voters.
The legal dispute over voting precincts in Dallas could cast a shadow over his victory. Crockett told her supporters not to expect a final call on election night.
Talarico, a progressive Seminarian, took a big-tent approach to his campaign by appealing to voters from both parties and independents. He will face off against either Sen. John Cornyn or Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who is mounting a right wing challenge to the four-term incumbent.
Texas Democrats have failed to win statewide in three decades, but they believe they have a rare opening to flip the Senate seat in November, due to backlash to the Trump administration’s mass deportation efforts and handling of the economy — especially if Paxton emerges from the GOP runoff.
There has been scant nonpartisan public polling in the general election, but a recent memo from the National Republican Senatorial Committee shows Cornyn ahead of Talarico by three points, while Talarico would lead Paxton by three points.
Politics
BBC Expert Condemns US Plan Post Iran Bombing
A BBC expert has condemned the “lack of clarity” coming from the White House on what happens after the US stops bombing Iran.
Jeremy Bowen, the corporation’s international affairs editor, said there were now “huge question marks” about what comes next as violence rips through the Middle East.
The US and Israel launched missile attacks on Iran at the weekend, killing the country’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and other senior regime officials.
Donald Trump initially suggested that the aim of the military action was to replace the regime, which has run Iran since the Islamic revolution in 1979, entirely.
But speaking on Radio 4′s Today programme, Bowen pointed out: “The regime is still there, it’s constructed to try to resist a moment like this. Will it survive? Well we’ll see in the next few weeks and months probably.
“Buildings are ruined, hundreds are dead – civilians as well as leaders – but I think what strikes me right now is the lack of clarity from the Americans about just what happens.
“There has been less talk in the last couple of days of replacing the regime out of Washington. They’re saying very little about what happens in Iran after they declare Iran is no longer a threat and they stop bombing.
“The current message appears to be that the day after is a matter for Iranians, not the Americans, whatever the consequences.
“This is how they seem to want to make it different from their interventions in, say, Iraq, where the mantra you heard all the time was if you break it, you’re responsible for it.
“Now they’re saying ‘it’s up to you. Iran is your country, we’re just going to do what we need to do to get rid of the people we see as threats’.
“So there are huge question marks about where this goes.”
Meanwhile, an ally of Trump has joined in the president’s criticism of Keir Starmer’s decision to initially block US fighter jets from using UK bases to launch its attacks.
The prime minister U-turned on Sunday night, saying America could use the bases to carry out “defensive” strikes on weapons storage depots and missile launch sites.
That has sparked a war of words between Trump and Starmer, with the president telling reporters: “This is not Winston Churchill that we’re dealing with.”
Robert Wilkie, a former US undersecretary of defence, in the first Trump administration told Today: “I think there’s a genuine sadness on the part of the senior military leadership of the Pentagon that Britain’s power has receded as dramatically as it has.”
-
Politics5 days agoITV enters Gaza with IDF amid ongoing genocide
-
Politics1 day agoAlan Cumming Brands Baftas Ceremony A ‘Triggering S**tshow’
-
Fashion5 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Iris Top
-
Tech3 days agoUnihertz’s Titan 2 Elite Arrives Just as Physical Keyboards Refuse to Fade Away
-
NewsBeat6 days agoCuba says its forces have killed four on US-registered speedboat | World News
-
Sports4 days ago
The Vikings Need a Duck
-
NewsBeat4 days agoDubai flights cancelled as Brit told airspace closed ’10 minutes after boarding’
-
NewsBeat6 days agoManchester Central Mosque issues statement as it imposes new measures ‘with immediate effect’ after armed men enter
-
NewsBeat3 days ago‘Significant’ damage to boarded-up Horden house after fire
-
NewsBeat4 days agoThe empty pub on busy Cambridge road that has been boarded up for years
-
NewsBeat4 days agoAbusive parents will now be treated like sex offenders and placed on a ‘child cruelty register’ | News UK
-
Business6 days agoDiscord Pushes Implementation of Global Age Checks to Second Half of 2026
-
Entertainment2 days agoBaby Gear Guide: Strollers, Car Seats
-
Business6 days agoOnly 4% of women globally reside in countries that offer almost complete legal equality
-
Tech5 days agoNASA Reveals Identity of Astronaut Who Suffered Medical Incident Aboard ISS
-
Politics3 days ago
FIFA hypocrisy after Israel murder over 400 Palestinian footballers
-
NewsBeat3 days agoEmirates confirms when flights will resume amid Dubai airport chaos
-
Crypto World5 days agoFrom Crypto Treasury to RWA: ETHZilla Retreats and Relaunches as Forum Markets on Nasdaq
-
NewsBeat2 days agoIs it acceptable to comment on the appearance of strangers in public? Readers discuss
-
Tech3 days agoViral ad shows aged Musk, Altman, and Bezos using jobless humans to power AI
