Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Politics

Black Women Deserve Better Maternal Care, Safety And Support

Published

on

A baby picture of the author with her aunt

“Do you think I should consider freezing my eggs?”

I posed this question to my grandmother and aunt recently as the reality set in that I’m about to turn 30. According to medical science, the older I get, the fewer chances I have for pregnancy. But as we approach Black Maternal Health Week, I find myself returning to that question, and my age isn’t the only thing giving me pause.

Black women’s bodies have long been at the mercy of harsh surveillance, financial instability and health inequities. Because I have a Ph.D. in maternal and child health, I am well aware that maternal mortality among Black women has been a persistent inequity since the 1930s.

In 2023, for example, the maternal mortality rate among Black women was 50.3 deaths per 100,000 live births and significantly higher than rates for white, Hispanic and Asian women. And though there was a slight dip in 2024 (44.8 deaths per 100,000 live births), the statistics remain frighteningly high.

Advertisement

The higher rates of maternal deaths aren’t attributed to one singular thing. Black birthing people are dying, regardless of income or education, because of multiple factors, including structural and systemic racism, provider bias, quality of linguistic and culturally appropriate care, and cumulative stress and weathering.

I was taught to name these as the social-structural determinants of health, focusing on how multiple levels of influence (i.e., individual, interpersonal, community and societal) can impact an individual’s health outcomes. This knowledge has heightened my awareness and consideration of, well, everything.

Such rates should be enough to alarm us, but as each year passes and more Black women die, the numbers remind me yet again that this country, along with its medical systems, doesn’t prioritise me. So, even as I wrestle with my readiness to give life, it is painfully clear that my own life may not be protected.

Because I study maternal health, I also know my autonomy is at the mercy of my geography.

Advertisement

Reproductive rights have been under attack in recent years in the U.S. Abortion access is largely restricted in many places across the country. Currently, 41 states have abortion restrictions in effect, with 13 of these having total bans. This means my ZIP code literally determines the level of access I would have to reproductive care should I get pregnant. And my socioeconomic position would dictate the kind of care I ultimately receive.

As I flip over all this in my head, I collide with people and family all the time who express just how much they can’t wait for me to have a baby. To see what kind of mom I’ll be. To see what kind of children I’ll raise in this world.

A baby picture of the author with her aunt

Photo Courtesy Of Adia R. Louden

A baby picture of the author with her aunt

They make their hopes for me sound so simple. As if the mere desire for motherhood will shield me from the racism, pain and dismissal that my body may endure. As if my decision is just that — a personal decision.

In a country where reproduction is coupled with risk, options increasingly cease to exist and survival is a question mark, whether or not to choose motherhood is one of the most political decisions I can make.

Advertisement

I hope for a baby I’ll survive to greet, meet and hold against my chest. I hope for the long nights, ordinary days with extraordinary joy and stress. I hope to mother in a way that makes life a jubilant spectacle instead of an everyday terror.

But even my hope often feels riddled with fear.

Because I study maternal health, I’ve followed the political attacks against the vaccine recommendations by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, recommendations meant to protect birthing people during pregnancy and children during their fragile beginnings.

Since 2025, federal officials have launched major assaults on previously established vaccine policies and public health recommendations. As a result, I’m left with diminished trust in a government that I never fully trusted anyway.

Advertisement

Like gospel singer Tamela Mann said, truth is … I’m tired.

Tired of incessantly dreaming and wishing in a country that never wants to see me wake up. Tired of advocating for all the things at stake. Tired of being asked, “Are you ever gonna get married and have a baby?”

To which I’m forced yet again to shrug and say, “Maybe.”

With my 30th birthday less than three months away, that is still my answer. Because I don’t yet know whether I will become a mother. When I posed the question of egg-freezing to my grandmother and aunt a few months ago, they told me not to worry. That I have plenty of time. And perhaps they’re right.

Advertisement

I don’t know if I’ll actually broach the topic of freezing my eggs at my next well woman exam.

But I do know one thing: Black women’s maternal autonomy and health deserve more than slogans and commemorative weeks. We deserve care. We deserve safety. We deserve support – not martyrdom.

Adia R. Louden has a Ph.D. in maternal and child health from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and is a Public Voices Fellow of The OpEd Project in partnership with the National Black Child Development Institute.

Do you have a compelling personal story you’d like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we’re looking for here and send us a pitch at pitch@huffpost.com.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Eurovision 2026: Bosses Address Israel Eurovision Song Contest Asia Reports

Published

on

Israel's Eurovision representative Noam Bettan rehearsing on Monday

Eurovision organisers have addressed recent reports in the press suggesting that Israel could leave the competition in the near future to compete in an upcoming version specifically for countries in Asia.

Current Eurovision rules state that any country whose national broadcaster is part of the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) can compete in the annual song contest, which is why Israel has been part of it since 1973, despite not being in Europe.

Back in March, the EBU announced it was putting together the Eurovision Song Contest Asia, which is due to take place in Thailand towards the end of 2026.

Following the announcement, the Israeli outlet Ynet claimed on Monday that discussions had recently taken place at the EBU about Israel being removed from its currently-held place in the competition moving forward, so that it can take part in Eurovision Asia instead.

Advertisement

The article cited “two sources” who claimed that after the idea was “raised and discussed”, it was met with “partial opposition” from countries who’ve already agreed to take part in Eurovision Asia.

Israel's Eurovision representative Noam Bettan rehearsing on Monday
Israel’s Eurovision representative Noam Bettan rehearsing on Monday

HANNIBAL HANSCHKE/EPA/Shutterstock

An EBU spokesperson said: “Discussions are ongoing with other broadcasters on joining the inaugural event in November.

“No broadcaster that takes part in the Eurovision Song Contest will be taking part in Eurovision Song Contest Asia.

“The event, like the Eurovision Song Contest, will be inclusive and celebrate being United by Music. Decisions on participation are taken by the organisers.”

Advertisement

Countries currently confirmed to be competing in Eurovision Asia in November are Bangladesh, Bhutan, Cambodia, Laos, Malaysia, Nepal, Philippines, South Korea, Thailand and Vietnam.

Last year, the rival competition Intervision was revived by Russia, which has been excluded from Eurovision since 2022 following its invasion of Ukraine, with 22 competing nations from around the world taking part, including China, Cuba, Egypt, Qatar, South Africa and the eventual winners, Vietnam.

Back in December, discussions took place among EBU members about whether Israel should be allowed to remain as part of Eurovision, with five nations withdrawing from this year’s contest after it was decided that Israel would be invited back in 2026.

Advertisement

Israeli representative Noam Bettan will perform in the first of the contest’s semi-finals in Basel, Austria on Tuesday night.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Labour In Chaos As Ministers Call For Keir Starmers Resignation

Published

on

Labour In Chaos As Ministers Call For Keir Starmers Resignation

The Labour Party has descended into open warfare as Keir Starmer comes under enormous pressure to quit as prime minister after less than two years in the job.

Supporters of rival candidates turned their fire on health secretary Wes Streeting, who is expected to throw his hat into the ring if the PM announces his resignation.

Starmer will chair his regular weekly meeting of the cabinet this morning, a day after four of them – Shabana Mahmood, Yvette Cooper, John Healey and David Lammy – told him he has to go following Labour’s drubbing in last week’s elections.

Energy secretary Ed Miliband is also understood to have communicated to No.10 that the PM should go.

Advertisement

But loyalists including Steve Reed, Pat McFadden and Richard Hermer have urged the PM not to give in, despite the fact that nearly 80 Labour MPs have also called on him to set out a timetable for his departure from No.10.

Starmer insisted in a make-or-break speech on Monday that he would not “walk away” from Downing Street.

He is understood to have spent last night discussing with key supporters whether he should battle on.

But one Labour source told HuffPost UK: “The game is up. It’ll happen today.”

Advertisement

Soft-left MPs want any contest to be delayed until later in the year to give Andy Burnham the chance to be re-elected and MP so he can take part in it.

They believe that a quick contest benefits Streeting, who they accuse of manufacturing the current crisis.

One told HuffPost UK: “It would be utterly shameless for Wes to plunge the party into chaos. It would prove to the whole country that the only person he is interested in is himself. Now is not the time for a contest.”

Another senior Labour figure said: “Wes has spent six months doing every thing he could to bring down the Labour government while publicly denying it. Now everyone can see him for what he is: a self interested lizard.”

Advertisement

Another Labour source warned that any new prime minister would have to call a general election within months.

They said: “These turkeys are literally voting for a Christmas election. Good luck winning your seat in December Shabana, John, Yvette and Ed.”

A government insider added: “Message to rebels – if you break it you own it. Whatever comes next is their responsibility.”

Darren Jones, the chief secretary to the prime minister and one of Starmer’s key lieutenants, this morning dodged questions about whether he will quit.

Advertisement

He told Times Radio: “As any leader would, he’s talking and listening to those colleagues. I can’t get ahead of what the prime minister may or may not decide.”

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Ian McKellen: Alec Guinness Didn’t Want Me To Speak Out On Gay Rights

Published

on

Alec Guinness in character as one of his most famous roles, Star Wars' Obi-Wan Kenobi

Sir Ian McKellen has said that his decision to speak out on issues surrounding LGBTQ+ community rights wasn’t always met with the most positive of reactions from his peers in the entertainment industry.

During a recent interview with The Guardian, Sir Ian was asked about the “worst piece of advice” that he’d ever been given, and recalled a time around the late 1980s or early 1990s when the late Star Wars actor Sir Alec Guinness invited him out for dinner.

“We chatted about this and that until he brought up the real reason for his invitation,” the Lord Of The Rings star explained.

“He had heard about my work to establish Stonewall – a lobby group to present to the government and the world at large the case for treating UK lesbians and gays equally under the law with the rest of the population.”

Advertisement

Sir Ian continued: “He thought it somewhat unseemly for an actor to dabble in public or political affairs and advised me, sort of pleaded with me, to withdraw. Advice from an older generation, which I didn’t follow.”

Alec Guinness in character as one of his most famous roles, Star Wars' Obi-Wan Kenobi
Alec Guinness in character as one of his most famous roles, Star Wars’ Obi-Wan Kenobi

Lucasfilm/Fox/Kobal/Shutterstock

Following his death in August 2000, three different biographies alleged that Sir Alec was bisexual, but chose not to come out publicly in his lifetime.

Sir Ian admitted during his Guardian interview that he was reminded of his dinner with the late Oscar winner while watching a production of the show Two Halves Of Guinness, which he described as “a solo show which hints at Sir Alec’s latent bisexuality in a way that would have upset him, I suppose – Zeb Soanes’ immaculate impersonation notwithstanding”.

The six-time Olivier recipient – currently on the promo trail for his new movie The Christophers – came out as gay in 1994, and has continued to speak out on behalf of the LGBTQ+ community since.

Advertisement

In 2024, he told HuffPost UK of the current issues facing transgender people: “When society disregards a minority – and, worse than that, imposes laws and restrictions on their behaviour, which is really unfair – then that’s when society is going off the rails, and we have to attend to it.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

100 Labour MPs urge Starmer to steer party back to the left

Published

on

Labour MPs call for Starmer to move left

Labour MPs call for Starmer to move left

The Tribune Group of more than 100 Labour MPs have called for the prime minister to steer the party back to the left. Meanwhile, 81 MPs have demanded he stand down after Labour came third in the local elections when it comes to national vote share.

Suggested policies

Tribune Labour MPs have said Labour should:

  • Introduce free buses for under 25s and universal credit claimers
  • Raise capital gains tax
  • Proportional property tax instead of stamp duty
  • Reformed council tax
  • Change government’s fiscal constraints to enable more borrowing

These are generally progressive policies, but they lack the overall economic strategy to significantly change the UK.

Also, encouraging bus use is a greener approach to travel. But why support Labour’s current policy of more expensive fares for the majority of those over 25? Labour rose the Tories’ bus fare cap from £2 to £3.

Further, raising capital gains tax towards the rate for income tax is a positive step. Capital gains is passive income and it doesn’t make sense for it to be lower than taxes on people working. Labour did raise it in its October 2024 budget, but it’s still the lowest in the G7.

Advertisement

Onto the next suggestion, a proportional property tax means that households pay a yearly fixed percentage of their home’s ‘value’ in tax. That’s opposed to the current stamp duty, where people pay a percentage of between 2% and 12% when they are buying a house.

A more robust policy would be to stop treating houses as an asset and for the state to provide them at cost price to the taste of the person or household. Then, the person or household re-pays for the cost of building and designing in affordable monthly payments.

Next, there’s council tax. It isn’t related to income, meaning many households pay more despite earning less. Reforming this would be welcome.

On the government’s fiscal rules, public investment is cheaper than private investment for infrastructure. The private sector pays higher interest and would charge the state or people to make profit. More borrowing, failing the use of debt-free fiat currency, is a better longterm solution.

Advertisement

‘Move left’ isn’t much for Labour

Given Labour is basically a corporate party under its current tragectory, the Tribune Group’s call for a move left may not mean much. But there are some worthwhile policies suggested.

Labour so far cut the winter fuel payment for pensioners then U-turned.

The leadership suspended Labour MPs for voting against the two child benefit cap, then U-turned and reinstated the benefit. The party has administered a huge rise in energy bills.

Any move to the left would be welcome after that.

Advertisement

By James Wright

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

First Government Minister Resigns And Calls On Starmer To Quit

Published

on

First Government Minister Resigns And Calls On Starmer To Quit

A government minister has resigned and called on Keir Starmer to set out a timetable for his departure.

Miattah Fahnbulleh was the minister for devolution, faith and communities, and has now added to the growing calls for the prime minister to quit.

She told Starmer: “The public does not believe that you can lead this change – and nor do I.”

More than 80 Labour MPs have now called on the prime minister to step down following the party’s drubbing at the elections in England, Scotland and Wales last week.

Advertisement

The prime minister has insisted he will not “walk away” from his job in No.10, and even claimed at the weekend he wants a decade in power.

However, Fahnbulleh has become the first government minister to officially give Starmer the push.

In a letter to the prime minister shared on social media, she said: “We have not acted with the vision, pace and ambition that our mandate for change demands of us. Nor have we governed as Labour Party clear about our values and strong in our convictions.”

She added: “Our country faces enormous challenges and people are crying out for the scale of change that this requires.

Advertisement

“The public does not believe that you can lead this change – and nor do I.

“Therefore I urge you to do the right thing for the country and the Party and set a timetable for an orderly transition so that a new team can deliver the change we promised the country.”

It comes after several senior cabinet ministers reportedly told Starmer to resign in private.

This morning I sent my letter of resignation to the Prime Minister.

I urge the Prime Minister to do the right thing for the country and the Party and set a timetable for an orderly transition. pic.twitter.com/u5UArjv7uR

Advertisement

— Miatta Fahnbulleh (@Miatsf) May 12, 2026

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Photo Of Starmer On First Day As MP Stuns As It Resurfaces

Published

on

Photo Of Starmer On First Day As MP Stuns As It Resurfaces

A photo posted by Keir Starmer almost exactly 11 years ago has stunned political pundits after it was unearthed this week.

The prime minister’s job is hanging by a thread as more than 80 MPs call for him to quit following Labour’s drubbing at the elections in England, Scotland and Wales last week.

Catherine West, a former foreign office minister, helped to galvanise the campaign to push Starmer out.

She offered to be a “stalking horse” candidate in a leadership challenge to the prime minister, meaning she would stand against him just to tempt other rivals out of the blocks.

Advertisement

While her bid ultimately failed – as did her subsequent attempt at a no confidence letter – she helped get the ball rolling this week by encouraging MPs to publicly announce they had lost faith in Starmer.

Meanwhile, health secretary Wes Streeting is thought to be one of the frontrunners in the next potential leadership race.

He has made his ambitions to be the next prime minister clear over several months and many of his allies in the Commons have already urged Starmer to resign.

So social media users were stunned when they found a photo of Starmer, Streeting and West together on their first day in the Commons after winning their seats in the 2015 general election.

Advertisement

The now-prime minister shared an image of himself with West and Streeting along with the caption: “Taking our seats for the 1st time.”

The image attracted a huge amount of interest – with many noting just how cruel a game politics can clearly be…

this is like actually insane imagine showing them the newspaper from nearly exactly 10 years in the future 😭😭😭 https://t.co/YFoKoyeaZf

— autumn 💟 (@ambiguousdesire) May 11, 2026

Marcus Giunius Brutus and Gaius Cassius Longinus with Julius Caesar in 2015. https://t.co/0P28oDv12c

— Filippo Carrettoni 🇪🇺🇨🇦🇬🇧🇦🇺🇫🇷🇮🇹 (@fillycarre) May 11, 2026

Advertisement

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Hull City Tigers reach the play-off final

Published

on

Hull City AFC players hug one another in celebration on the pitch

Hull City AFC players hug one another in celebration on the pitch

Hull City finished the job at The Den, beating Millwall 2-0 in the second leg to win the tie 2-0 on aggregate and book a place in the championship play-off final.

Mohammed Belloumi opened the scoring midway through the second half and Joe Gelhardt added a second after coming off the bench to seal the victory.

Hull City AFC’s performance

The first leg was a major anticlimax finishing goalless, so the return leg was set for a winner to be decided at Millwall’s ground. Hull made the first breakthrough when Belloumi cut inside and curled a finish into the net.

That goal shifted momentum and Millwall’s plan as they were forced to chase the game. Just fifteen minutes later, Hull scored again with a swift counter that ended with Gelhardt striking low into the net, effectively ending Millwall’s hope.

Advertisement

The goals were the turning points in the game, each goal decisive not because of the quality but also the timings. Two different goals, but executed to perfection. The overall difference was Hull’s ability to land a killer blow whilst Millwall couldn’t find that cutting edge.

Tactical battle

Hull set up to be compact and aimed to be dangerous on the break. They ceded possession at times but organised in midfield to prevent any real danger for their defence.

Millwall tried to press and dominate territory, particularly in the first half, but struggled to make that control count by creating clear cut chances in front of Hull’s goal.

The introduction of the substitutions changed the game. Hull’s bench provided the spark, with Gelhardt’s immediate impact underlining the visitors’ game plan to use pace and power late in the game.

Advertisement

Bottom Line

Hull will now head to Wembley for the play-off final and are one match away from promotion to the Premier League after 16 years.

Their run this season to the play-off final has been notable as they finished sixth in the regular season and have become the first sixth-placed team in seven years to reach the final. A clear indication that form and momentum in May can outweigh league positions.

For Millwall, the season ends with near misses and questions about how to turn home advantage into the results that are needed in knockout scenarios.

Millwall will need to dust themselves off and begin to prepare for the same fight next season, getting to the play-off semi finals is a huge experience for a team that is hoping to reach the echelon of football in the Premier League.

Advertisement

Featured image via Hull Daily Mail

By Faz Ali

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Genocidal Israel drops white phosphorous on Lebanon AGAIN

Published

on

Claims emerge of Israel using white phosphorus in Lebanon

Claims emerge of Israel using white phosphorus in Lebanon

Israel has once again been caught dropping white phosphorus on civilian areas in Southern Lebanon — a blatant war crime — according to local and international human rights monitoring organisations.

Reuters reported on X that:

Plumes of thick smoke were seen rising from southern Lebanon, following a series of Israeli airstrikes.

It’s a shame we’ve reached the stage of journalism where corporate outlets are incapable of stating the facts.

‘Plumes of thick smoke’ are, in fact, white phosphorous — a deadly incendiary weapon.

Advertisement

Dangerous incendiary weapon

As the Canary previously reported, white phosphorus is a highly reactive chemical substance which ignites instantly upon contact with oxygen. It’s incredibly hard to extinguish and sticks to surfaces such as clothing and skin. White phosphorus is extremely harmful to people, no matter the route of exposure. It causes deep and severe burns – often down to the bone, breathing problems, and burning of the eyes and respiratory tract.

The human body can absorb the chemical, causing dysfunction in multiple organs, including the liver, kidneys, and heart.

It burns at more than 800 degrees Celsius — nearly 1,500 degrees Fahrenheit — high enough to melt metal.

Importantly though:

Advertisement

The incendiary effects of white phosphorous can cause death or cruel injuries that result in lifelong suffering.

The use of incendiary weapons in civilian areas is a war crime for exactly this reason. Generations of Lebanese people will now suffer the consequences of Israel’s indiscriminate and illegal attacks.

According to the World Health Organisation:

The use of white phosphorus may violate Protocol III (on the use of incendiary weapons) of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCCW) in one specific instance: if it is used, on purpose, as an incendiary weapon directly against humans in a civilian setting.

More war crimes

There is plenty of evidence of Israel’s unlawful use of white phosphorus as far back as 2009. Since October 7 alone, Israel has carried out over 1,000 illegal white phosphorus strikes in Gaza.

According to the Euro-Med Monitor, in 40 minutes alone, the IDF launched 300 white phosphorus strikes on a packed residential square in the northern Gaza town of Beit Lahia.

Advertisement

Journalists reported other attacks in crowded areas of Gaza City, the Al-Shati refugee camp, west of Gaza, and the Jabalia town and camp in the Strip’s north.

Amnesty International first reported that the Israeli army was using white phosphorus in Lebanon in October 2023.

Human Rights Watch also verified Israel’s use of white phosphorus on two locations along the Israel-Lebanon border and over Gaza City’s port.

By April 2025, Israel had already committed over 1,000 attacks in Southern Lebanon using white phosphorous.

Since then, Israel has continued to launch white phosphorus over civilian areas of Lebanon.

Advertisement

US origins

As the Canary previously investigated, the US Army supplies Israel with white phosphorus-filled projectiles.

The chemical agent can be deployed through artillery shells, bombs, rockets or grenades.

The white phosphorus itself comes from Israel Chemicals Ltd (ICL), which has a chemical manufacturing plant in St. Louis.

The US government contracted ICL to produce white phosphorus for the US Army, for:

Advertisement

a 5-year, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity, fixed-price contract at $3,342,150.

ICL has 10 illegal quarries in the occupied West Bank, according to a report by the Israeli Ministry of Interior. Notably, ICL is also operating in the occupied Syrian Golan Heights.

Of course, it is no surprise that a country with a history steeped in colonialism is supplying incendiary weapons to a genocidal terrorist state.

Imagine the global outcry if Iran or Hezbollah were using white phosphorus on Israel? We would never hear the end of it. But because Israel is mainly terrorising Muslims, and the entire world is scared of Israel crying ‘antisemitism’, the world turns the other way.

Can Israel do anything within the bounds of international law?

Advertisement

Feature image via the Canary 

By HG

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

What Food And Drink Can I Bring On Board A Flight?

Published

on

What Food And Drink Can I Bring On Board A Flight?

We’ve already heard Ryanair CEO Michael O’Leary’s thoughts on the pre-flight pint (though he didn’t share any plans to stop selling booze on his airline).

But what about the food and drink you can bring on board yourself?

I love bringing a Diet Coke (which airline staff reportedly hate pouring mid-flight) and a duty-free sandwich on board if I can. But according to airlines like Jet2, TUI, and Ryanair, refreshments have to follow certain rules.

Here are five that some airlines have said they won’t permit on board:

Advertisement

1) Alcohol above 70%

easyJet said that as long as it’s not open, you can bring booze bought after security on board. But it can’t be 70% ABV or above, and the airline said, it’s “strictly forbidden to drink any alcohol that has not been purchased on board the aircraft”.

Ryanair also bans alcohol of more than 70% ABV on board, as do Jet2 (who allow drinks that “contain more than 24% but not more than 70% alcohol by volume”), British Airways (“Drinks above 70% alcohol volume are not permitted on board our aircraft in either checked baggage or hand baggage”), TUI, and more.

Airlines also routinely ban drinking your own alcohol on board.

Advertisement

2) Hot drinks without a lid

easyJet said that they allow hot drinks on board if they were bought in the airport, if they have a lid on.

Jet 2 and Ryanair have banned bringing outside hot drinks on board altogether.

3) Hot food

Advertisement

Jet2 said that “You can’t bring hot food or hot drinks onboard our planes for safety reasons” on their site.

And as we mentioned above, both they and Ryanair have banned hot drinks from the airport on board too.

4) Stinky cheese and other smelly food

Jet2 says on its site that it won’t allow items that “are fragile or perishable or which may affect the safety, health or comfort of other passengers or crew” on board, adding, “this may include hot or strong-smelling foods and drinks”.

Advertisement

In other words, it might be time to keep that tuna and onion sando at home.

5) More than 100ml of liquid food

easyJet said that though its 100ml limit doesn’t apply to baby food, milk, or sterilised water provided it doesn’t exceed two litres, for the rest, “There’s a 100ml limit for liquid food, like soup or custard. Different countries have different regulations about importing food and drink, so make sure you check the rules for your destination.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

‘The Greens are lunatic, deranged and evil’

Published

on

‘The Greens are lunatic, deranged and evil’

The post ‘The Greens are lunatic, deranged and evil’ appeared first on spiked.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025