Connect with us

Politics

‘Burnham’s vibe is not establishment’ according to establishment Guardian journalist

Published

on

Burnham

Burnham

The ground is up, the sky is down, and Andy Burnham’s vibe just isn’t “establishment”, you know? That last bit’s according to Guardian columnist Johnathan Freedland. Though, of course, that statement makes almost as much sense as either of the other two.

Politics is about vibes – and Burnham is vibing

In his recent appearance on BBC’s Newsnight, Freedland opined that:

So much of politics in the 21st century is about vibes, and part of the vibe of Zack Polanski is …one of his messages that he’s the anti-establishment candidate on the left.

Freedland pronounces ‘vibe’ there like a recently acquired novelty from a foreign language, as opposed to – you know – common parlance for anyone aged 40 or below. Also, politics is a surface-level popularity contest now? What is the world coming to!

Freedland goes on:

Advertisement

That was easy when you’re running against Sir Kier Starmer, who looked like, even if it was more complicated, he looked like an establishment figure.

Andy Burnham’s vibe is not establishment in the same way – the Manchester, the outsider, the t-shirt under the jacket. Just, the vibe of him is different.

‘He can’t be the establishment – he’s from the North! AND he wears a t-shirt.’ Absolutely cracking political analysis right there, a credit to Newsnight for airing it. I bet Burnham doesn’t even pronounce ‘scone’ right, the bloody renegade.

#1 warm-up act for No.10

Then, we get to the crux of the matter:

It’s harder to run a left anti-establishment message against Andy Burnham than it was against Keir Starmer.

You know what, I’ve got to give Freedland that one. That’s hardly a complement though – it’s just that Starmer was a howling, soulless void in the shape of a man. Practically anyone would look like a mover-and-shaker following that act.

Advertisement

Not you, Wes Streeting. I said practically anyone.

Freedland then heaped praise on Burnham’s integrity, of all things:

And then in terms of substance, you’ve got a prime minister now who says that 40 years of neoliberalism was a terrible mistake – well that’s stealing a kind of Zack Polanski line, and trying to close off Gaza as an issue by saying ‘we got things wrong’.

Really demonstrating the point that politics is vibes-based there mate. Burnham may criticise neoliberalism, but his actions say another thing. As the Canary’s Cameron Baillie wrote:

Burnham says he would still obey Rachel Reeves’s fiscal rules. That means accepting the same Treasury constraints that have blocked serious public investment for decades. Can you really challenge neoliberalism while simultaneously reassuring bond markets, protecting fiscal rules, and refusing to confront financiers?

And don’t even get me started on how much ‘we got things wrong’ on Gaza doesn’t even begin to cover it. Call me when Burnham admits the UK is complicit in genocide, and then follows through and bloody does something about it.

Advertisement

‘Adolescent politics’

Freedland finished off his insightful ramble with two final bangers:

So he’s trying to eat into the Polanski base, and so far pollsters are saying that voters have shifted to Labour, they’ve actually come more from the Green side than the Reform side. So it’s Polanski, even in a way more than Farage, who has to worry about Burnham very specifically.

Again, Burnham is following Starmer’s premiership. It’s hardly the political shock of the century if some Labour voters who couldn’t bring themselves to vote for the centrist’s centrist have now returned to the fold.

Also, I just think Burnham’s kind of doing stuff shows up Polanski’s adolescent politics, the sort of protest gesture stuff, while Burnham is there in Downing Street – or in Number Ten North – actually able to affect change. Some voters on the left will look at that choice and think “we’d rather go with the guy who can actually do things, rather than just wear a slogan on a t-shirt.

It’s almost like one of them’s the prime minister and the other isn’t even an MP. But sure, Burnham’s the very spitting image of an anti-establishment figure.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not trying to claim Polanski’s a 100% political outsider by any stretch. The man was a Lib Dem – though of course, we all deserve second chances.

Advertisement

But next to Andy ‘I was in Blair’s cabinet during the Iraq war‘ Burnham? Why, Polanski’s practically popping off AND rizzed up, as the kids are saying.

Featured image via the Canary

By Grace

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Vile animal abuser is the true face of the far-right and bloodsports

Published

on

Far-right

Far-right

The far-right like to pass themselves off as noble people, waging heroic battles on behalf of “women and children” or against what they describe as the “evil” of Islam. Yet hideous animal torturer and racist Neil Pinkerton is just another example revealing the true face of this hateful movement.

Wildlife protection group Protect the Wild described Pinkerton as:

…notorious in Northern Ireland for his depraved animal cruelty.

They say he was:

…disgracefully allowed to keep a dog named Judy after using her for fox baiting, and subjecting the dog to the most horrific injuries.

The group rightly decry the courts’ leniency on Pinkerton, allowing him to escape punishment for his barbaric treatment of animals. However, Pinkerton is also enabled by the north of Ireland’s dire hunting laws. Sadists like him are permitted to pursue and kill wild animals with dogs, so long as “no unnecessary suffering” is inflicted, a standard the courts clearly fail to enforce. These are the kinds of people who flourish when bloodsports are legally allowed to continue.

Advertisement

Animal abuser graduated to far-right racist thug

Letting the dregs of humanity hone their cruelty against animals ultimately endangers people too, however. Pinkerton moved on to targeting migrants, and has been back in the spotlight for teaming up with loyalist bigots on trips to Scotland. He travelled to the country in late July, alongside notorious thugs Glen Kane and Mark Sinclair, aka ‘Freedom Dad’.

As pointed out by the Detail, Kane was:

…jailed for nine years for being part of a mob which killed a Cath­olic man dur­ing a sec­tarian riot in 1992.

Sinclair is an ex-Ulster Volunteer Force (UVF) member and armed bank robber, who now operates as a hate-spreading social media influencer. They are further examples of the type of people ‘defending our women and children’. The Detail found that:

Almost half those arrested for race hate disorder in Belfast [August 2024] had previously been reported to the PSNI for domestic abuse

The pair attended the Unite the Clans hate-fest at Glasgow Green on July 25, organised by the Scottish racists. There, the bigoted mob backed ethnic cleansing with chants of “remigration”, engaged in Nazi salutes and hurled “bottles and pieces of wood at police officers“. The cops arrested 15 people for:

Advertisement

…assault, possession of offensive weapons and other public order offences.

The fascists were massively outnumbered by anti-racist counter-demonstrators. The hatemongers were only able to muster a paltry 500, despite months of planning, yet were met by over 4000 people of conscience standing on the right side of history.

The invitation of Sinclair and Kane is another example of how loyalists getting away with ethnic cleansing in the north of Ireland is inspiring racist groups elsewhere. Pinkerton wasn’t present at the riot, due to bail conditions banning him from attending anti-migrant events. These stem from alleged offences in September 2025. As reported by Inside the Courtroom NI:

Pinkerton faces three charges of common assault, two counts of using disorderly behaviour at Connswater Retail Park and at McDonald’s fast-food outlet, trying to damage a car, harassment, possessing Class B cannabis and inciting hatred.

Shameful prosecution delay leaves Pinkerton free to spread hate

Pinkerton was allegedly “threatening and racially abusive” towards a delivery driver. Police say the reprobate also said “get out of our fucking country you cunt”. Shamefully, courts may soon withdraw the charges against this sickening man, due to “significant delays in his phone being examined“.

It represents a disgraceful failure by the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) and Public Prosecution Service to prioritise investigation of violent, racist offenders. This is a police service that is happy to expend resources sending officers to London to arrest Palestine supporters holding up bits of paper, but allows violent pogroms to happen three years in a row in the north of Ireland.

Advertisement

The delay is apparently the result of Pinkerton not surrendering passcodes to his phones. Police have taken evidence from one phone so far, however, and one would think that data, combined with witness statements and CCTV footage would be more than enough to put this dangerous racist behind bars.

Yet due to this failure, authorities allow Pinkerton to travel and party freely, spreading the Six Counties’ unique brand of loyalist hate to other territories. Anti-racist group End Deportations Belfast (EDB) have been tracking the activities of the far-right in the Six Counties, and their connections to similar hatemongers in Scotland. They assisted with this report, and told the Canary:

Pinkerton’s presence in Glasgow alongside other notorious far-right individuals suggests an ongoing willingness to move in violent far-right circles. The vigilante gang that Pinkerton fronted relentlessly harassed and intimidated migrant and people of colour communities on Belfast streets last year.

They decried Pinkerton’s freedom to:

…travel freely and network with known other far-right agitators, some of whom have violent sectarian and paramilitary histories.

EDB described delays prosecuting Pinkerton as a:

Advertisement

…damning indictment of policing and justice in the north of Ireland, which continues to allow violent extremism to flourish.

Featured image via BelfastTelegraph

By Robert Freeman

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Football fans call for Infantino’s resignation

Published

on

FIFA

FIFA

Pressure is mounting on FIFA President Gianni Infantino. Fan groups worldwide have launched a petition demanding his resignation and calling for broad reforms to FIFA’s management and decision-making processes.

This development follows growing controversy surrounding Infantino’s plan to secure private investment for a company managing the commercial rights to FIFA tournaments, most notably the Men’s and Women’s World Cups. The proposal has faced widespread criticism across the international football community.

Petition demanding Infantino’s departure

Fan groups launched the petition via Change.org, arguing that the attempt to introduce private investors to manage World Cup commercial rights constitutes a dangerous overreach of the FIFA president’s authority.

Proponents of the petition claim the plan was negotiated without input from FIFA members or the public, arguing that this indicates an excessive concentration of power in a single individual, undermining the principles of transparency and accountability within the governing body.

Advertisement

Supporters view the private investment controversy as merely the latest in a series of issues drawing criticism toward Infantino, including FIFA’s stance on the European Super League project and ticket pricing policies for recent World Cup tournaments.

Escalating disputes in international football

The petition emerges as Infantino faces increasing pressure from football organizations and continental federations, following accusations of “deception” from three continental bodies regarding how the private investment plan was prepared and presented.

UEFA maintains its refusal to collaborate with Infantino’s plans, citing a loss of confidence in the international federation’s leadership. Meanwhile, the FIFA president continues to receive support from other federations, particularly in Africa and South America.

This division complicates Infantino’s efforts to manage the crisis, as criticism is no longer confined to football associations but has extended to fan groups demanding a greater voice in shaping the game’s future.

Advertisement

Calls for FIFA governance reform

Ronan Evain, Executive Director of Football Supporters Europe and a signatory to the petition, confirmed that Infantino’s departure is a “necessary first step.” However, he stressed that resignation alone is insufficient without a comprehensive reform of the presidency and FIFA’s broader governance structure.

Evain noted that the concentration of such authority in one person reveals a fundamental flaw in the federation’s administrative system and called for a complete re-evaluation of how global football is governed.

The petition demands the formal inclusion of fans and various stakeholders in decision-making processes, as well as a review of the FIFA presidency structure, including the possibility of a rotating presidency.

Ultimately, the controversy surrounding the investment plan for FIFA tournament rights has cast a shadow over Infantino’s leadership, amid growing questions about the federation’s ability to remain cohesive as opposition to its president’s policies expands

Advertisement

Featured image via the Canary

By Alaa Shamali

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Sacked Ukrainian Defence Minister Calls For Wartime Election

Published

on

Sacked Ukrainian Defence Minister Calls For Wartime Election

The former Ukrainian defence minister has called for wartime elections in what appears to be a significant challenge to Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

Mykhailo Fedorov, who was sacked by the Ukrainian president last month after falling out with the army commander-in-chief Oleksandr Syrsksyi, said: “Democracy cannot be held hostage by Russia.”

Ukraine has been under martial law since Vladimir Putin launched his illegal invasion in February 2022, meaning elections are on hold.

Presidential elections were scheduled to take place in March or April 2024 but Zelenskyy has stayed on without a vote from the general public due to the ongoing war.

Advertisement

Even so, his long premiership has become a major Kremlin talking point backed by US president Donald Trump who has supported the call for a presidential election.

Fedorov did not mention Zelenskyy by name in his video or say whether he wants to run against the president.

He claimed Ukraine is fighting Russia “precisely because we want to remain a free European state” and said it was time for a “legal, safe, and realistic mechanism that will allow Ukraine to restore a full democratic process even amidst a prolonged war”.

The former defence minister was highly popular with the public during his six months in the post and his surprise dismissal sparked nationwide protests.

Advertisement

He was praised for modernising Ukrainian warfare with drones and data, while also heading up a push to tackle corruption.

Fedorov was offered other government positions but he has insisted he would only return as defence minister.

His replacement, Yevhenii Khmara, was nominated to parliament as defence minister shortly before he posted his video.

His intervention comes as Ukraine continues to intensify its retaliatory attacks across Russia, using drones to target oil refineries and the warehouses of online retailers.

Advertisement

Moscow has picked a fight with the UK after British drones were used in these strikes.

Prime minister Andy Burnham has insisted Ukraine still has Britain’s full support after the Russian embassy in London told the government it must face “consequences” of its backing for Kyiv.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Hind Rajab’s mother speaks: Israel’s ‘investigation’ ploy is not justice

Published

on

Hind Rajab

Hind Rajab

Hind Rajab’s mother Wesam Hamada has spoken out after Israel announced a closed, military investigation into the 2024 murder of her 5-year-old daughter by Israeli troops. And she says that the occupation’s ploy is not justice:

Hind Rajab — ICC justice is the only justice

She is correct. The deliberate murder of little Hind, her six family members and two brave paramedics who tried to help cannot be whitewashed by Israel’s feeble mime of an investigation. Justice will not be served until the murderers — and all Israel’s war criminals — are on trial in the International Criminal Court.

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump’s Rwanda scheme? First 20 US deportees have arrived in Liberia

Published

on

Trump

Trump

The first 20 deportees from the US have arrived in Liberia. The Trump administration plans to send 1,200 people in total. The plans echo the UK’s failed Rwanda deportation scheme. Associated Press reported on 20 August:

The deportees arrived at the Roberts International Airport outside Monrovia. The Liberia-U.S. agreement is among the largest third-country deportations driven by the Trump administration’s crackdown on immigration.

It comes a day after the UK’s Conservative Party chairman Kevin Hollinrake tried to re-hash the Rwanda scheme. The scheme, which was widely seen as abhorrent, was scrapped by the incoming Labour government in 2024.

AP reported:

The 1,200 deportees will include African nationals and also nationals from North America, South America and the Caribbean, according to Liberian Information Minister Jerolinmek Piah.

Liberian Justice Minister Natu Oswald Tweh said in a briefing on 18 August:

Advertisement

that the majority of the deportees had committed migration-related violations and offenses, and that they could seek asylum in the West African country if they wished.

Liberian president Joseph Boakai has prioritised good relations with the Trump administration recently.

Trump administration — Secret deals to take deportees

The US deportations are part of the Trump administration’s violent — and sometimes deadly — crackdown on migration.

AP said Trump had cut shadowy deals with a number of countries to take deportees:

Under a series of often-secret agreements, the Trump administration has deported thousands of people to nearly two dozen countries that aren’t their own, advocates say, with about 10 of them in Africa.

One significant example is the deal the US President cut with El Salvador’s fascist president Nayib Bukele to deport immigrants to the country’s horrifying CECOT mega-prison.

Advertisement

According to AP:

Immigration lawyers have said the Trump administration uses deportations to third countries as a legal loophole to indirectly force asylum-seekers back to their home countries.

In many cases:

migrants are deported to countries they’ve never been to or where they face safety risks and are left with little choice other than to return to the home countries they were fleeing from.

Deportations aren’t just a Trumpian issue, however. A 2024 CNN report found Trump’s Democrat predecessor Joe Biden hit the highest level of deportations since 2014:

US Immigration and Customs Enforcement deported 271,484 immigrants last fiscal year, marking the highest level of deportations since 2014, according to a newly released annual report.

That didn’t stop Trump claiming the Democrats were weak on immigration. In fact, he made aggressive deportations a cornerstone of his manifesto. ICE has enjoyed massive funding increases since Trump returned to power. The paramilitary force has clashed with locals – even killing some — in cities across the US.

Advertisement

Featured image via the Canary

By Joe Glenton

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Madonna Spends Birthday With Her Children And Boyfriend In Corfu

Published

on

Madonna Spends Birthday With Her Children And Boyfriend In Corfu

Madonna has taken fans behind the scenes of her recent birthday celebrations in her latest Instagram post.

Over the weekend, the Queen of Pop turned 68 in Corfu, where she, her children and her boyfriend Akeem Morris marked the occasion with a lavish bash in the small village of Kouramades.

Posting on her Instagram page on Tuesday evening, the Like A Prayer singer shared some candid pictures from the event, including snaps of her eldest son Rocco Ritchie and daughter Lourdes Leon engaging in some traditional dancing.

She was also seen striking a pose with Lourdes, Rocco and their sisters Mercy, Stella and Estere.

Advertisement

“It’s my birthday!” she enthused. “Eat, pray, love, drink, dance, break plates, feed Cats!! Thank you G*d!”

Besides her birthday, the Grammy winner has plenty to celebrate right now.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

What Does It Mean If I Dream About School Exams As An Adult?

Published

on

What Does It Mean If I Dream About School Exams As An Adult?

It happens at least once a week; I’m back in school, doing my Leaving Cert (the Irish equivalent of A-levels) exam year all over again.

Except this time, I’m in my 20s. I have not read a single textbook in years. I don’t remember quadratic equations or the Krebs cycle. All I know is that I’m about to fail the most important test of my life ― the inexplicable logic says my degree will be revoked, my bosses will banish me, and my life will be over.

We’ve already asked a dream interpreter, psychologist and sexologist what it really means when you dream about someone.

So, I thought I’d seek the wisdom of psychologist and founder of Clarity Therapy NYC, Dr Logan Jones; astrologer and psychic Ivana Naskova from spiritual guidance site Nebula; and psychotherapist and dream expert Brooke Sprowl, founder of My LA Therapy, about what it means when you dream of exams in adulthood.

Advertisement

What does it mean if I dream about exams as an adult?

All three experts say the panic-inducing scenario sounds like a typical stress dream – but Dr Jones says it might not be as straightforward as that.

“We make dreams by pulling from powerful memories and our conscious and unconscious emotions, fears, and stressors,” he explained.

“A neurological take would be that your hippocampus, which stores memories, especially stressful ones, recalls school as being a hard-wired memory symbolic of high-pressure times.”

Advertisement

Naskova was on a similar page, telling HuffPost UK: “If you are long out of college then a dream like this might point out that you have been going through a stressful period and have a subconscious fear of failure.”

She explains that this could come from a fear of displeasing other people, or an upcoming stressful event.

Sprowl, meanwhile, says that exams mean different things to different people. She stresses there’s “no one universal way to interpret dreams about resitting exams, nor any dream for that matter”.

“Most people may associate sitting exams with feeling unprepared for and anxious about an important task, but perhaps for a small few who relished examinations, a dream about resitting exams may bring them back to a time when they felt life’s challenges were surmountable and predictable,” she adds.

Advertisement

What can I do to stop these kinds of dreams?

Dr Jones says that though it can be hard to figure out exactly why dreams like these happen, “the good news is that these types of dreams about exams are common and it helps to see that they aren’t random”.

And while stressful, it’s better to approach the dream ― especially if it’s recurring ― with curiosity, rather than panic.

The psychologist says it helps to be reminded that the dream isn’t literally about an exam. But it can inspire helpful questions and affirmations.

Advertisement

One we’re totally on board with is: “I don’t need to prove anything because I know I’m worthy and lovable just as I am.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Scottish government challenged over funding to Israel-linked weapons firms

Published

on

Scottish

Scottish

Files released to the Sunday National revealed that the Scottish Government recently handed millions in funding to weapons firms supplying Israel. The total funding, awarded last year, comes to over £5.5m.

Documents obtained under Freedom of Information (FOI) laws have exposed Scottish Enterprise, the government’s “economic development” agency. It gave more than £5,500,000 to Israel-linked arms firms in the year ending 31 March 2026, including multiple directly implicated in Gaza’s horrific genocide.

The £5.5m total represented two-thirds (around 67%) of all funding given to firms in the aerospace, defence, marine, and security (ADMS) sector in that financial year. These revelations severely undermine the Scottish Government’s progressive ‘humanitarian’ posturing, particularly on pro-Palestine issues.

Contrast the amount with £500,000 given to humanitarian aid in Palestine and £250,000 to Venezuela following two devastating earthquakes in June. The £500,000 announced in July for humanitarian aid is scarcely 10% of the vast £5.5m sum handed to weapons manufacturers implicated in war crimes which destroyed Gaza.

Advertisement

The timing of the funding in particular has raised eyebrows, as it apparently proceeded after a sanctions agreement between the SNP and Greens. First Minister John Swinney announced on 3 September 2025 that the Scottish Government would not give any new funding to arms firms who deal with Israel.

Swinney and the SNP extended this arms embargo to Israel and/or any nation

where there is plausible evidence of genocide.

Scottish Green MSP Patrick Harvie called on Swinney to explain whether any funding was allocated after the moral or humanitarian pause was announced. Harvie urged Swinney and the SNP leadership to

urgently confirm when these grants were awarded … [and] prove that not a penny was paid.

Advertisement

‘Darkest hour’: Scottish government sends aid to Palestine and Venezuela

New evidence of financial complicity

The files released exclusively to the Sunday National show us that in the 2025-26 financial year:

  • Raytheon Systems was given £710,000. Raytheon is one of the largest suppliers of weapons to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), providing the Phalanx close-in weapon system for warships, guided air-to-surface missiles, “bunker buster” bombs, and laser-guided bombs.

  • Thales UK was given £467,401. Thales operated a joint venture with Elbit Systems — Israel’s largest weapons firm — to produce the Watchkeeper drone. However, Elbit bought Thales out in January 2026.

  • BAE Systems was given two grants, one of £900,000 and one of £1.44m. BAE Systems constructs parts for the F-35 “Adir” jets which Israel has used in Gaza airstrikes. It also produces the M109 howitzer, which has been the IDF’s principal artillery system but is now being replaced.

  • Leonardo UK was given £648,568. Leonardo manufactures laser-targeting systems for the F-35 jets that Israel uses in Gaza, supplies naval guns fitted on Israeli warships, and provides radar components for Elbit’s Iron Fist system.

  • Chemring Energetics UK was given £1.2m. Chemring Group companies have held 19 UK export licences to Israel since 2008, and its Australian subsidiary supplies infrared countermeasures for the F-35 programme.

  • Rosyth Royal Dockyard — which is owned by Babcock Marine — was given £200,000. Babcock has applied for 12 UK arms export licences to Israel since 2008, and has worked with Elbit Systems and Rafael — a state-owned Israeli weapons firm. However, the company states it does not directly supply defence equipment to Israel.

The Sunday National‘s analysis concludes that:

In total in 2025-26, Scottish Enterprise gave £5,525,969 to the six firms listed above, out of £8,208,715 given to the ADMS sector overall.

A Scottish Enterprise spokesperson reportedly told the National that the ban on new awards to companies linked with Israel is certainly in place. They said that any grant payments made after the First Minister’s September 2025 announcement related to agreed contracts which “were in force” before that date.

Advertisement

One Scottish government spokesperson said the new rules were “not retrospective”.

ICJ ruling: ‘Palestinian people are left with no choice but to exercise their inalienable right to self-defence’

Scottish Greens challenge the SNP

Regardless of whether the rules were “retrospective,” governments and politicians live and act in the present. That obliges them legally to operate now, according to international law — regardless of other considerations like corporate weapons contracts. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) makes this clear.

Advertisement

The ICJ’s historic 2024 ruling stated that obligations under the Genocide Convention compel states to act to prevent genocide. Any Convention party state is obliged to act

at the instant that the state learns of, or should normally have learned of, the existence of a serious risk that genocide will be committed.

Patrick Harvie, the Scottish Greens’ economy spokesperson, commented to the National:

It is almost a year since the Scottish Parliament voted for my motion on boycott, divestment and sanctions against Israel. Yet the Scottish Government has dragged its feet and failed to turn a clear parliamentary vote into action.

If a single penny was handed to any of these companies after Parliament’s vote, that would be a grave betrayal of what the First Minister promised and a direct breach of what MSPs voted for. We did not vote for empty words. We voted for action.

Tens of thousands of Palestinians have been killed while companies supplying the machinery of war continue to profit. The fact that the Scottish Government funded these companies in the first place is deeply shameful. Continuing to do so after Parliament voted for a boycott would be indefensible.

Advertisement

The First Minister must stop hiding behind warm words and come clean. He must urgently confirm when these grants were awarded, prove that not a penny was paid after Parliament’s vote, and set out exactly what he is doing to implement the decision.

Fake ‘fascist front’ party robbed Scottish Greens of another MSP

Explanations or just excuses?

Scottish Enterprise has responded to the National‘s revelations. Its spokesperson said:

Advertisement

Scottish Enterprise has implemented Scottish Government’s defence policy in full, in line with guidance set by Scottish Government, which applies to new grant awards from September 4, 2025 onwards.

Grant award payments made during 2025/26 include contractual obligations entered into prior to this date.

Likewise, a Scottish Government spokesperson told the National:

The Scottish Government has been a clear and consistent advocate for peace, justice and human rights in Gaza and other conflicts and we were one of the first governments to call for a ceasefire.

The measures announced by the First Minister in September 2025 in response to the worsening situation in Gaza were implemented immediately. The measures apply to new requests for funding and are not retrospective.

The funding for the companies identified relates to grants contractually agreed prior to September 2025. Since then, all requests for funding have been considered against the new policy.

Advertisement

We could rightly say that the Genocide Convention — itself “contractually agreed” — is of much greater significance than any outstanding private sector deal. But apparently that’s not “policy.”

Let’s hope the SNP sticks truthfully to its new rules. The world, and history, are watching.

Holocaust descendants doubt Ed Miliband will stop UK’s genocide complicity

Advertisement

Featured image via Scottish Government 

By Cameron Baillie

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

The Best Last-Minute Loveholidays European Budget Breaks

Published

on

The Best Last-Minute Loveholidays European Budget Breaks

Sometimes, you just get the urge. Summer is supposed to be the ‘most quiet’ time at work, but somehow, every August rolls around and I feel like I’ve been hit by a train.

If you too are feeling like you’ve barely had a second to breathe this summer, and you could really use that holiday you thought you didn’t, don’t worry. It’s not too late.

While you might think that booking a last-minute holiday will leave you thousands of pounds short of a breakdown, there are plenty of affordable holiday package deals available on Loveholidays.

Advertisement

From a five-star hotel in Turkey, to a beachside trip to the Algarve, you can book a holiday for as little £500 per person.

Of course, there are trips available for the whole family. But you might just want to book one when term time starts in September. (Sorry, grandparents!)

If you need an excuse to scratch your holiday itch, I’ve rounded up the best last-minute breaks to book now. It’s really that easy.

Best last minute holidays to book for September and October 2026

Advertisement

If you’re in pursuit of wellness and beauty treatments, this five star hotel in Turkey has all the makings of a romantic couples’ trip.

There are two freshwater swimming pools, as well as a sauna, steam bath, and spa centre offering hammam massages and a range of beauty treatments.

But if you want to venture outside (and, why wouldn’t you?) the village of Hisaronu is only five minutes away, while beaches and the Blue Lagoon are just 15 minutes by car.

Not sure whether you want beach vibes or a city holiday? This aparthotel is right next to the Santa Susanna beaches, dotted with bustling bars and restaurants.

But if you get bored, you can simply hop on an hour-long train to get into Barcelona for a day trip.

The hotel even has a kids’ menu so you won’t have to worry about fussy kids and tapas.

Advertisement

Whether you’re on a family holiday or solo trip, Santa Rosa is close to everything you could need for a restful getaway. Situated next to the Costa Teguise town centre, and a four minute drive from the beach, you can peruse shops or lounge about all day.

There are also pools and restaurants at the hotel. Plus, you can take a short day trip to a nearby golf course, waterpark, or aquarium, for fun for all the family.

This three-star hotel has all the ingredients for relaxing in the sun. It has a kids’ club, if you don’t want to worry about childcare, or they’ll have plenty to keep them occupied thanks to the kids’ pool and being just a short walk from the beach.

Golfers, rejoice, because Anfi Tauro Golf Course is only a 10 minute drive away, while the shopping centre and Amadores resort are within 10 minutes.

Don’t want to spend your holiday surrounded by families? Completely fair; this hotel is adult-only. The pool looks out over the beaches of Albufeira, while the old town is a mere three minute drive away.

During your stay, you’ll be able to choose from a set menu at the hotel, or wander through the cobbled streets of the town to choose from local bars and restaurants.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Zia Yusuf Launches Bizarre Attack On ‘Dishonourable’ Politicians

Published

on

Zia Yusuf Launches Bizarre Attack On 'Dishonourable' Politicians

Zia Yusuf has taken aim at anyone who has the “right honourable” title – the exact honorific style used by several of his Reform UK colleagues.

His attack comes shortly after Reform already suspended one of his most vocal critics, prominent Nigel Farage ally Tim Montgomerie.

Yusuf wrote on X: “Have you noticed the people with ‘Right Honourable’ in their titles are among the most dishonourable people in the country?”

Yusuf’s colleague, Reform’s Treasury spokesperson and Tory defector Robert Jenrick, holds that very title.

Advertisement

The Conservative Party’s official X account tagged Jenrick in a reply on social media, adding: “He means you mate.”

Suella Braverman, a former home secretary who was elected as a Tory MP in 2024 but defected earlier this year, is also a “Right Honourable”.

Other ex-Conservative ministers who defected to Reform but are no longer MPs – Nadhim Zahawi, Nadine Dorries and Jake Berry – would have been targeted by the same X post, too.

The style means someone was previously appointed to the Privy Council, an advisory body to the sovereign, on advice of the prime minister.

Advertisement

All cabinet ministers are, by custom, privy counsellors for life which is how Jenrick, Braverman, Zahawi, Dorries and Berry all received the title.

Many X users criticised Yusuf’s “dishonourable” attack, pointing out that he describes himself as the “Shadow home secretary”.

However, he is neither a peer nor an MP and Reform is not the official opposition.

Only the party with the second largest proportion of MPs – currently the Conservatives – is entitled to have a shadow cabinet.

Advertisement

Yusuf also suggested he was a victim of the media following the coverage of Montgomerie’s suspension from the party.

The political commentary, who defected from the Tories in 2024, told the Spectator on Tuesday that Yusuf needed to become a team player and should not act “like a child” in politics.

Montgomerie alleged Yusuf was also set on being Farage’s successor as the Reform leader.

It’s understood his suspension followed the podcast’s recording but came before the episode was published online.

Advertisement

Montgomerie has since alleged that Farage did not know about the decision to suspend him in a subsequent social media video, and revealed he intends to appeal the decision.

Yusuf did not address Montgomerie’s criticism directly but claimed on X last night: “The entire Tory client press is now out to get me because they’ve seen same the polling I have. I am a lethal electoral threat to their party.

“They know I am locked onto the target of making Nigel Farage Prime Minister. And I will not be deterred.”

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025