Connect with us

Politics

Comedian Russell Howard Announces Death Of His Baby Boy, Felix

Published

on

Comedian Russell Howard Announces Death Of His Baby Boy, Felix

Comedian Russell Howard has announced that his baby son, Felix, died earlier this year.

In an emotional social media post shared on Friday morning, Russell explained that he and his wife, Cerys, had suffered a devastating loss, which has now inspired them to help others in similar situations.

“Earlier this year, our family changed forever when our beautiful baby boy, Felix, died shortly after birth,” Russell wrote. “During the most devastating time of our lives, the hospital staff who cared for us showed extraordinary compassion, kindness and humanity. They helped us navigate an unimaginable heartache and gave us support when we needed it most.”

He explained: “We were assigned a bereavement midwife, Lauren, who had experienced a similar tragedy. After losing her own baby, Lauren retrained as a midwife so that she could help other families going through what she had been through. Her care meant more to us than we can ever put into words.

Advertisement

“During our time in hospital, Felix was placed in a cool cot, which meant that my wife and I were able to spend precious hours with our beautiful boy. We could hold him, talk to him and tell him just how much we loved him. Those hours are among the most precious memories we have of Felix.

“We were overwhelmed by the care we received, and we made a promise to each other: that we would try to help other families who find themselves facing the same devastating circumstances.”

As a result, the couple have launched a charity in their late son’s memory, named The Felix Foundation, which will endeavour to help families “affected by miscarriage premature birth, stillbirth, neonatal death or related bereavement”.

The Felix Foundation’s aims include “sSupporting the additional training of midwives in specialist bereavement care”, “funding resources to provide emotional support and practical assistance”, “providing or funding dedicated rooms, facilities, equipment and resources within hospitals, maternity units, neonatal units and other appropriate healthcare settings” and “raising awareness of late miscarriage, premature birth, stillbirth, neonatal loss and related bereavement”, as well as “the support needs of affected families”.

Advertisement

Russell noted: “The Felix Foundation is named after our beautiful son. We miss him dearly, every single day, but we take some comfort in knowing that his name will stand for kindness, compassion and laughter, and that his legacy may help other families through the darkest moments of their lives.”

In his post, Russell announced that a charity gala in aid of The Felix Foundation would take place at London’s O2 Arena on Monday 8 February, the line-up for which currently includes John Bishop, Jimmy Carr and Aisling Bea, among others.

The former Mock The Week panellist and his wife are also parents to a two-year-old son.

“I’ve never been happier or more tired than I’ve felt since becoming a dad,” he told The i last year. “The other day, my son came up to me and just put his head on my inner arm and relaxed into me. It gave me this cosmic feeling of otherworldly happiness. So simple and obvious. I thought, ‘Isn’t it amazing what we human beings can do for each other’.”

Advertisement

Help and support:

  • Sands works to support anyone affected by the death of a baby.
  • Tommy’s fund research into miscarriage, stillbirth and premature birth, and provide pregnancy health information to parents.
  • Saying Goodbye offers support for anyone who has suffered the loss of a baby during pregnancy, at birth or in infancy.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

September Gardening Jobs UK: What To Plant And Protect This Autumn

Published

on

September Gardening Jobs UK: What To Plant And Protect This Autumn

This time of year can feel like a fresh start for some, as the air clears of humidity and harsh hot temperatures. For gardeners, though, it can often feel like slowly letting go. Our gardens lose their flourish for a couple of seasons, leaving behind brown leaves and memories of a bold, bright summer.

However, it’s this ending of the season that can help us to look ahead. Planting in beddings and borders before heading into a quieter hibernation period is a reminder of hope. Whatever we have ahead of us in the next six months, we know there will be life flowering and flourishing at the other side of it.

Gardens teach us, if nothing else, that hope springs eternal.

Gardening jobs for September

Advertisement

What to plant for spring 2027

For those first spring flourishes, now is the time to sow hardy annuals such as cerinthes, cornflowers, marigolds and chrysanthemums. The Royal Horticultural Society (RHS) advises: “It should be noted that although these plants usually withstand frosty conditions without protection, some hardy annuals may need covering with biodegradable horticultural fleece
or a cloche when a heavy frost is forecast. Check the seed packets for full details.”

Gardeners’ World adds: “Plant spring bulbs in autumn, including crocuses, daffodils, hyacinths, bluebells and snake’s-head fritillaries in pots and borders.”

For your pots and borders, now is the time to plant wallflowers, pansies and forget-me-nots.

Advertisement

Don’t forget to also lift, divide and replant congested clumps of perennials once they have finished flowering, too.

Garden maintenance tasks for September

Now that autumn leaves are starting to fall, cover any ponds with netting to protect them from leaves falling in and rotting alongside any usual pond maintenance.

As we are expected to have a particularly windy autumn and winter period, ensure that tree ties and plant supports are in place and secure to avoid any harm during storms.

Advertisement

Finally, clean and disinfect bird feeders to protect birds from disease. If you have any remaining sunflower seeds, these may now be placed in your usual seed mixes for birds.

For those who have indoor plants, this is now the time to start winding down your watering schedule. The RHS advises: “In winter, houseplants can be left for a week or two without water as long as the room temperature is cool, but does not fall below the minimum tolerated.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Symptom Borrowing Meaning: Why Social Media Health Videos Trigger Health Anxiety

Published

on

Symptom Borrowing Meaning: Why Social Media Health Videos Trigger Health Anxiety

We have all done it. Watched a TikTok video about a health condition and thought to ourselves that, actually, we might have that too. In fact, during an average evening scroll through social media, I could probably diagnose myself with 3-5 conditions that I had never previously heard of before.

This is because, according to Josef Newton, founder of the health anxiety app Condri, our repeated exposure to rapid-form health content makes us reinterpret or even experience symptoms we hadn’t noticed before. This is called ‘symptom borrowing’.

What is symptom borrowing?

‘Symptom borrowing’ is a term used to describe an instance where frequent exposure to somebody else’s symptoms leads you to progressively notice, reinterpret or expect similar sensations and behaviours in yourself.

Advertisement

“This does not mean that a person is consciously copying, pretending or imagining an illness”, says Newton.

“The sensations may feel entirely real. Instead, attention, expectation and anxiety can amplify everyday physical feelings or behaviours that previously went unnoticed.”

Additionally, because of the intelligent nature of algorithms, it only takes a small number of interactions with a topic for it to fill your feed. This can make a relatively common diagnosis feel both familiar and personally relevant.

Newton urges: “The concern here is that few content creators are medical professionals and serve anecdotal evidence only”.

Advertisement

Research by the Canadian Journal of Psychiatry analysed 100 TikTok videos that centred around the topic of ADHD, finding that 52% were classified as misleading. 21% were categorised as useful, whilst the misleading videos were mostly uploaded by creators who are not healthcare professionals.

“Social media often provides valuable education, language and validation, but short-form videos don’t replicate clinical assessments”, says Newton.

“Of course, TikTok can be the reason a user recognises a genuine problem and seeks support, which is a positive. It becomes problematic when recognition evolves into monitoring. Once you have learnt a list of symptoms, your brain may begin to search for them.”

Signs you may be symptom borrowing from social media

Advertisement

The symptom was only visible once social media named it

One of the clearest and simplest warning signs is that you cannot remember being concerned about a symptom until you watched a video describing it.

You may watch a video, and after acknowledging a particular condition, consciously or subconsciously scan your body, memory or behaviour to obtain supporting evidence. For instance, a person who watches content about chronic shoulder pain may suddenly grow conscious of every change in their arms and shoulders. Someone watching videos about a short attention span may begin recording every occasion where they become distracted.

Such eventualities often align with selective attention. In other words, when the brain decides that a sensation or behaviour is important, it becomes easier to detect.

Advertisement

“A great example of this is if somebody asks you to notice how your tongue feels in your mouth; it suddenly becomes difficult to ignore”, Newton explains.

“The sensation was always there, but attention has made it prominent. Health videos can replicate a similar effect.”

Great, now I’m aware of my tongue all over again.

However, he urges: “This does not prove that a symptom is insignificant, but timing matters. Ask yourself whether it existed consistently before you encountered the content, whether other people had noticed it and whether it caused meaningful difficulty in your everyday life.”

Advertisement

Your condition evolves with your feed

A clear signal that you’re symptom borrowing is if your health concern regularly evolves or changes according to whatever symptoms are dominating your For You Page.

One week, tiredness and poor concentration may signal ADHD, whereas the next indicate burnout, long COVID, or low iron. Essentially, rather than beginning with a stable pattern of difficulties and seeking an explanation, the diagnosis arrives first, and your experiences are moulded around it.

Monitoring symptoms becomes a chore

Advertisement

Watching a video once may prompt useful reflection. Repeatedly checking yourself afterwards may serve as symptom borrowing.

This might involve monitoring your pulse, examining your skin, testing your memory, comparing your behaviour with online checklists or repeatedly asking friends whether they have noticed a particular trait. The NHS lists frequent body checking, seeking reassurance, and obsessively looking at health information among the behaviours associated with health anxiety.

“If you find yourself always checking your symptoms, make an effort to ask yourself what the checking is achieving and what is your objective,” Newton advises.

“If checking your symptoms or watching another video calms you for only a few minutes before you need to do it again, it is probably maintaining the fear rather than answering it.”

Advertisement

Labels become general

To hold the viewers’ attention, short-form health videos are designed for viewers to quickly recognise themselves. As a result, general and ultimately common experiences such as procrastinating, feeling awkward at parties or becoming tired after socialising may be positioned as symptoms of a certain condition.

Someone caught in a symptom-borrowing cycle may accumulate several possible diagnoses, even when those labels are based on disconnected traits rather than one clear clinical history. They may even begin rewriting ordinary memories through the lens of the content they have consumed.

“It’s important to recognise relatability Vs diagnostic accuracy”, says Newton.

Advertisement

“Content reels rarely provide context and instead focus solely on the result. Rather than asking how many online symptoms you can match, consider three things: how long they have been present, whether they appear in several areas of your life and whether they create significant impairment.”

The more content you watch, the more confused you become

Reliable health information should help you understand your options and decide whether to seek appropriate support. Symptom borrowing tends to do the opposite.

You may finish one video feeling reassured, only for the next to introduce a new symptom, exception or worst-case scenario. You save dozens of posts, read the comments for confirmation and continue scrolling because certainty always appears to be one more video away.

Advertisement

Newton advises: “Pay attention to how you feel after consuming the content. If you are more frightened, confused or compelled to keep searching, the videos are no longer functioning as useful health education.

“Set a clear boundary: write down the concern, step away from symptom content and consult an appropriate professional or reputable medical source. One qualified conversation is likely to be more useful than another hour of conflicting videos.”

What should you do if a social media video genuinely concerns you?

Symptom borrowing should never be used to dismiss a new, persistent or worsening health problem. Short-form content can sometimes help people recognise symptoms they had previously overlooked, particularly where a condition has historically been misunderstood.

Advertisement

However, social media should be treated as a prompt to seek reliable information, not as a diagnostic tool.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Labour Hits Back After Argentinian President’s Falklands Threat

Published

on

Labour Hits Back After Argentinian President's Falklands Threat

Ministers have hit back at Argentina after the country’s president Javier Milei renewed his country’s supposed claim over the Falkland Islands.

In an overnight national address, Milei alleged “winds of change favourable” to Argentina were “blowing around the world” after Donald Trump hinted he could reconsider the US’s position on the British overseas territory.

Argentina has long claimed sovereignty over the archipelago which it calls “Las Malvinas”, even though the Falkland population overwhelmingly voted to remain British in a 2013 referendum.

Milei also threatened to issue sanctions on oil companies near the south Atlantic islands, claiming they were working “under the British occupation”.

Advertisement

Production at the Sea Lion oilfield in the region, which is owned by an Israeli and a British firm, is due to begin in 2028.

But UK defence secretary Wes Streeting said on X: “Milei’s statement overnight tells us more about domestic politics in Argentina than it does about the Falkland Islands.

“The Falklands are British because Falkland Islanders choose to be British. Our commitment to the Falklands is absolute and unshakeable.”

Foreign secretary Ed Miliband said this week that the UK’s position was “unwavering”.

Advertisement

He added that the islands are “British and will remain so because that is the overwhelming position of the islanders.”

“Their right of self-determination is paramount, grounded in international law and we will resolutely uphold it,” Miliband said.

In a referendum in 2013, 99.8% of Falkland Islanders voted to remain British.

Labour MP and chair of the Foreign Affairs select committee, Emily Thornberry, also wrote on X: “President Trump would be well advised to put more thought and effort into a negotiated resolution of his war with Iran and less into trying to pick fights with one of America’s oldest and most loyal allies. #Falklands.”

Advertisement

The rising tensions come after the US president suggested America would not support the UK in a future conflict over the Falklands.

He told GB News that Britain was “not there to help me” with the Iran conflict, referring to Keir Starmer’s refusal to send a warship to help America re-open the Strait of Hormuz.

Trump said earlier this week that he was “reviewing” America’s position on the Falklands, too.

Overnight, Milei said: “I want to be quite clear with everybody. The Falklands are Argentinian. Historically and legally.

Advertisement

“There can be no argument. They are part of the Argentine territory.

“The islanders on their usurped territory do not have a legitimate right to self-determination and any argument on any such self-determination is invalid.”

Milei said Trump and the US was “assessing their historical position in regard to the Falklands”.

“That is not empty words as they understand that Argentina is a reliable partner and a valuable ally for decades to come,” he said

Advertisement

“Our role and relevance as a country in the world has changed dramatically.

“The Falklands are our future – we need to recover these islands which are nationally relevant. There is no other path forward.

“It is the best way of paying tribute to those who sacrificed their lives for this cause. It is our obligation as a nation to honour their memory.”

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Politics Home Article | Energy security is national security

Published

on

Energy security is national security
Energy security is national security

Credit: Adobe Stock

Britain’s energy security can no longer be separated from its national security. Reinforcing Britain’s offshore wind fleet is critical to the UK’s strategic resilience

Advertisement

Britain’s energy security debate is evolving. Alongside the familiar trilemma of affordability, sustainability and security a fourth dimension has emerged: resilience in an age of geopolitical confrontation.

From suspected sabotage of subsea infrastructure in the Baltic Sea to cyberattacks on critical energy assets and growing concern over hostile activity in the North Sea, energy systems are no longer merely economic assets. They are critical national infrastructure.

For the UK, the answer is not simply to generate more clean electricity. It is to build an energy system that is more secure, more resilient and rooted in British industrial capability.

That makes offshore wind about much more than clean energy targets and net zero.

Advertisement

As the UK develops one of the world’s largest offshore wind sectors, its wind farms and associated infrastructure are becoming increasingly important national assets. Offshore wind farms are vast networks of sensors, communications systems, subsea cables and digital infrastructure operating across strategically significant waters. By their nature they are exposed to attack by hostile nations.

With the right levels of protection, that infrastructure could do more than generate electricity.

ORE Catapult’s soon-to-be-published report, the “Offshore Wind Energy Security, Protection and Resilience study”, demonstrates that the same systems that support offshore wind operations could help strengthen Britain’s defence capabilities. Distributed Acoustic Sensing systems with integrated fibre-optic cables could potentially support the detection of unusual vessel movements and threats to critical subsea infrastructure. Offshore substations could provide platforms for monitoring equipment, while operational data and sensor networks could contribute to a better understanding of activity across the air, surface and subsea domains.

Advertisement

The UK’s 2025 Strategic Defence Review signals a growing role for the Royal Navy in protecting critical undersea infrastructure and enhancing maritime surveillance. The opportunity now is to ensure offshore wind contributes to that mission. Policymakers must move beyond seeing renewables as solely part of energy and climate policy and recognise them as strategic infrastructure central to national resilience.

Building greater security into offshore wind infrastructure from the outset could create demand for precisely the high-value capabilities Britain needs more of; advanced manufacturing, digital technology, subsea engineering, autonomous systems and skilled technical jobs.

And crucially, these opportunities can generate investment and employment in the industrial towns, coastal communities and regional economies that will power Britain’s future economy.

But the benefits need not be confined to coastal areas. The security of offshore wind is a national industrial opportunity, with supply chains, technology companies and research organisations spread across the country. From Plymouth to Aberdeen groundwork is already being established.

Advertisement

The policy implications are clear; embed security-by-design into offshore wind developments; create stronger partnerships between industry, defence, government and regional leaders; and invest in the technologies and skills needed to protect critical national infrastructure. ORE Catapult’s work shows what that means in practice: adapting designs, strengthening operational processes, creating new partnerships and fundamentally rethinking the relationship between energy infrastructure and national security.

Energy security is national security, and both can define our future energy system, whilst simultaneously becoming engines of generational regional growth.

 

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

The House Article | When Nigel Farage enters No 10, he will not fall into Whitehall’s trap

Published

on

When Nigel Farage enters No 10, he will not fall into Whitehall's trap
When Nigel Farage enters No 10, he will not fall into Whitehall's trap


6 min read

Britain’s Civil Service has evaded responsibility for the decline of the state for too long – it is time to restore the primacy of ministerial power, argues Danny Kruger

Advertisement

For decades, incoming British administrations have succumbed to a quiet, insidious delusion: the belief that winning a parliamentary majority translates automatically into the exercise of power. Political parties arrive in Whitehall expecting the ancient machinery of state to passively translate their democratic mandates into reality. Instead, they encounter a system engineered, above all, for its own self-preservation.

The modern Senior Civil Service is not an agile, neutral instrument awaiting an operator; it is a self-perpetuating administrative state, risk-averse, process-driven and structurally insulated from the consequences of failure. The historic compact between the British people and their elected representatives has broken down, replaced by bureaucrats that treat democratic mandates not as binding instructions but as temporary disruptions to be managed and absorbed.

This institutional decay lies at the very root of Britain’s national stagnation. Over generations, authority has systematically drained away from elected ministers and pooled in the dark corners of Whitehall, especially in the network of unaccountable quangos that have appeared in the last two decades. When public services deteriorate, infrastructure projects stall, or control of our border is lost, the civil servant who controlled the advice, managed the budget and operated the bureaucratic levers faces no sanction whatsoever. Meanwhile, the minister – with no practical ability to direct those levers or even choose their own staff – takes the blame.

Advertisement

This is not democratic stewardship; it is a profound abdication of governance that hollows out our civic institutions and breeds legitimate public cynicism toward the entire parliamentary system.

At Reform UK, we will confront this constitutional breakdown head on. As head of our ‘Preparing for Government’ team, I will ensure that when Nigel Farage enters No 10 we do not fall into the administrative trap that has ensnared successive governments. 

Reform is building a rigorous operational setup capable of executing systemic change from day one. We recognise that the window of opportunity for an incoming government to effect structural reform is brief, while the economic, social and cultural challenges facing Britain are monumental. When permanent secretaries meet our future ministers and their teams, they will not be expected to nod politely at vague political aspirations while quietly shunting them into administrative oblivion. They will be met with explicit, non-negotiable operational directives for transforming the state, grounded in the absolute principle that civil servants answer to ministers, ministers answer to Parliament, and Parliament answers to the sovereign British people.

The work of my team in the Preparing for Government unit is focused on the painstaking, unglamorous mechanics of institutional restoration. We will overhaul the Civil Service and ministerial code, establishing clear lines of accountability, and restoring the actual, rather than merely formal, responsibility of ministers for policy delivery. We will dismantle the Cabinet Office, the bloated centre where executive decision making goes to die. We will split the conflicted role of cabinet secretary into focused, functional parts: an agile political chief of staff to advise the PM, a chief secretary responsible for Cabinet governance, and a dedicated CEO responsible for the administration of the Civil Service.

Advertisement

Furthermore, we will give ministers the long-overdue power to appoint and dismiss their permanent secretaries and immediate advisory teams, ending the absurdity of a bureaucracy that effectively selects its own overseers. To address the problem of ‘posh generalists’ who float from department to department making policy without domain expertise, we will proactively identify proven talent from the private sector and civil society to enter the Senior Civil Service. We will streamline processes through the ambitious adoption of artificial intelligence, overhaul performance management to reward genuine capability, and eliminate the pervasive DEI industry in favour of a culture dedicated solely to public service.

Concurrently, the vast majority of quangos will be ruthlessly pruned or absorbed back into departments, returning public authority directly to accountable ministers.

Over generations, authority has systematically drained away from elected ministers and pooled in the dark corners of Whitehall

Advertisement

Contrast this comprehensive, constitutional approach with the Labour alternative under Andy Burnham. His recent machinery of government changes represent a textbook case of technocratic tinkering: shuffling organograms and changing executive titles while leaving the central engine of administrative power completely untouched. By scattering economic policy across competing institutional hubs in the Treasury, the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade and a glossy new ‘No 10 North’, Burnham’s administration has not decentralised power – it has merely multiplied institutional friction and created entirely avoidable structural conflict.

Worse still, the Prime Minister has fallen victim to the Senior Civil Service’s favourite trick: allowing politicians to announce superficial reorganisations while the top mandarins quietly consolidate actual authority. Under Burnham’s watch, Cabinet Secretary Dame Antonia Romeo has successfully expanded her institutional grip, now commanding the Office of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, the Cabinet Office, ‘No 10 North’ and the Civil Service simultaneously. To reflect her supremely powerful position, she was promptly given a new office right next to the Prime Minister’s study. But be under no illusions: once Burnham’s star fades, she will move fast against her benefactor to defuse any changes that threaten the primacy of the Civil Service.

While Burnham shuffles the deck within the parameters permitted by Whitehall, Reform UK intends to change the rules of the game entirely. Restoring the British state cannot be achieved through management consultancy buzzwords or superficial departmental reshuffles. It requires a fundamental shift in political philosophy: a return to a Burkean understanding of institutional stewardship where democratic sovereignty is respected, executive power is properly accountable, and the administrative apparatus serves the public interest rather than its own institutional hegemony.

The work we are undertaking every day in the Preparing for Government team is the essential prerequisite for everything else we hope to achieve if we win office. A functional, accountable state machine will ensure that our promises on border security, economic growth and public services can be delivered quickly. In contrast, we can observe in real time how Burnham’s failure to prepare for the realities of power is proving to be his preparation for failure. 

Advertisement

We will not make the same mistake. When the British people grant us their mandate, we will be ready to govern, and ready to reform. 

Danny Kruger is the Reform UK MP for East Wiltshire

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

33 Cosy Autumn Home Decor Ideas: Blankets, Pumpkin Decorations, And Candles

Published

on

33 Cosy Autumn Home Decor Ideas: Blankets, Pumpkin Decorations, And Candles

It’s cosy season. Finally! After a long and hot summer, the collective urge for a little chill in the air has been palpable.

Instead of sweating through your daily commute, you’ll be wrapped in cosy argyle jumpers, sipping on autumn-inspired hot coffees, and bundling up in scarves and hats.

September might be the start to the school year, but who’s to say it can’t usher in a new mindset for adults too?

One of the best ways to embrace the new season – I think – is to decorate your home.

Advertisement

It’s where you’ll be spending most of your time for the foreseeable, so you might as well deck it out in the full works: browns and plaids, pumpkins, and fluffy textured blankets.

If you’re as ready to cuddle up on the sofa as I am, I’ve rounded up the best cosy and cute autumn home decorations – including candles, blankets, pumpkin trinket bowls, and an adorable hedgehog doorstop.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Nigel Farage Insists Reform Has Done ‘Nothing Wrong’ Amid Sting Operation

Published

on

Nigel Farage Insists Reform Has Done 'Nothing Wrong' Amid Sting Operation

Nigel Farage has insisted Reform UK has done “nothing wrong” after a sting operation raised questions over the party’s foreign donations.

Speaking just as Reform’s annual conference begins in Birmingham, the party leader tried to shrug off an explosive undercover report from Channel 4 News which has already caused two of his aides to step down.

Investigative journalists from Verbatim have accused the party of allegedly taking funding from a US company to commission three supposedly independent polls at £32,500 earlier this year.

Reform’s head of policy James Orr and Farage’s close aide Dan Jukes organised the donation. They were unaware the donors were actually undercover reporters from the investigative group Verbatim.

Advertisement

The journalists, posing as an American father and his British son “William Lockwood”, also suggested donating £500,000 to Reform UK.

British electoral law says political donations can only be made by someone eligible to vote in the UK or a UK-registered company.

Jukes allegedly proposed a way for them to work around the law by sending the US funds via the British son.

Farage spoke out for the first time about the investigation on Friday morning, telling LBC’s Nick Ferrari at Breakfast: “The party has broken no laws. The party has not taken any dodgy money or anything like that whatsoever.”

Advertisement

He accused the reporters of “entrapment” after getting “a couple of our contractors to say things that perhaps should not have been said”.

The Clacton MP admitted: “I’m not happy about it.”

He also defended the polls themselves, saying: “There’s no question of illegality over the polling whatsoever.

“Whilst the poll benefited Reform, it wasn’t commissioned by Reform. It had nothing to do with Reform.”

Advertisement

He also claimed “the polling is not even an issue”, adding: “The party has not done anything wrong, but entrapped conversations don’t look good, and that’s why we’ve taken the action we have.”

On his top allies stepping down, Farage added: “The issue is when they talked about putting money in that might have come originally from America… But on the face of it, they said things that shouldn’t have been said.”

Reform UK has launched an internal investigation over the incident.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Miriam Margolyes’ Comments About Andi Peters’ Skin Colour Face Backlash

Published

on

Miriam Margolyes on This Morning earlier this week

Miriam Margolyes is facing criticism over comments she made to Andi Peters during her latest appearance on This Morning.

On Thursday morning, the Bafta was interviewed by Andi and co-host Christine Lampard live on the ITV daytime show about her new book Miriam’s Full English, in which she reflects on modern-day British culture.

During the conversation, Miriam began imitating Christine’s Northern Irish lilt, before turning to Andi and asking: “What accent would be normal for you? What are you?”

“What am I?” Andi responded, to which Miriam said: “Well, you’re a mix, aren’t you? You’ve got a Black daddy and a white mummy?”

Advertisement

“No, no, both my parents are Black,” he then clarified, with Miriam going on to comment more on his skin colour.

Making light of the situation, Andi questioned whether the show’s make-up team had made him a “lighter shade than normal”, before the Harry Potter star remarked: “I think you’re what I would call ‘high yella’. That’s what they call it in America when someone isn’t deeply Black.”

“High yellow” – described by Merriam Webster as a “dated” and “often offensive” term – was historically used to refer to Black people who had a lighter complexion.

When Andi commented that he “didn’t even know there were shades”, Miriam told him: “There are shades. And this is what we have to incorporate…”

Advertisement
Miriam Margolyes on This Morning earlier this week
Miriam Margolyes on This Morning earlier this week

Ken McKay/ITV/Shutterstock

Andi then interrupted to say that the producers in his earpiece were “getting nervous now”, but Miriam then said: “Don’t be nervous. We [in Britain] welcome everybody. And that’s what I want to write about in my book!”

This uncomfortable exchange didn’t sit well with many viewers, some of whom claimed that the exchange was removed from the conversation when the broadcast was made available to watch on ITV’s catch-up services.

HuffPost UK has contacted representatives for Miriam Margolyes, Andi Peters and This Morning for comment.

Over the years, Miriam has become known for candid and unfiltered approach in interviews.

However, this has led to controversy on some occasions, including back in 2024, when she, again, asked an interviewer “what are you?” while speaking live on an Australian panel show.

Advertisement

This Morning airs every weekday from 10am on ITV1 and ITVX.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Will There Be A Practical Magic 3? Sandra Bullock Already Has Ideas

Published

on

Will There Be A Practical Magic 3? Sandra Bullock Already Has Ideas

Practical Magic 2 hasn’t even hit cinemas yet, but Sandra Bullock already has an idea for a third instalment.

The cult classic film’s star alluded to the possibility of a Practical Magic 3 in a new interview with Vanity Fair.

“We’ll do a number three if this takes off,” Sandra said, claiming a third movie would “pass the torch to the girls”, referencing her on-screen daughters Joey King and Maisie Williams, who play Kylie and Antonia Owens in the upcoming sequel.

Practical Magic 2, the follow-up to the 1998 autumnal favourite, brings back Sandra and Nicole Kidman as the magical Owens sisters, with Stockard Channing and Dianne Wiest also returning as the guiding aunts who raised them.

Advertisement

However, this time around, Nicole and Sandra step into the role of advisers, with an official synopsis for the film teasing: “A multi-generational family of witches, cursed to be loveless for centuries, attempts to break the spell by confronting dark secrets and sacrificing for each other.”

Practical Magic 2 centres on Kylie and Antonia after they inherit the family’s magical legacy, unaware of the curse that comes with someone falling in love with them.

Sandra told People earlier this week that honouring generations of women inspired her and Nicole to return to the Owens’ family story.

“We forget that our mothers and grandmothers were young women with dreams and hopes and desires as well. And we never looked at them as human beings like that,” the Oscar winner explained.

Advertisement

“They were just Mom and Grandma. So in this, we get to look behind the curtain and go, ‘I didn’t know you felt that way, I didn’t know you were longing’.”

Sandra’s comments about any upcoming film focusing on the next generation come days after the original film’s Kylie Owens, Evan Rachel Wood, spoke out about being replaced by Joey King without being notified.

“I really appreciated Joey King reaching out to me, because no one who worked on the original film did,” Evan said in an Instagram story earlier this week. “She’s a sweetheart.”

Director Susanne Bier told Variety at the premiere earlier this week that replacing Evan with Joey wasn’t “a personal thing”.

Advertisement

“It was that the kids in the story are right out of college, and so it wasn’t really a question, you know? We had to recast,” she explained.

Practical Magic 2 releases in cinemas on 11 September

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

How To Keep Spiders Away: Best Natural Spider Deterrents For Autumn

Published

on

Seeing more spiders? You’re not alone.

I don’t know about you but I’ve noticed a lot of spiders indoors of late – from the bulbous ones making Halloween-esque webs in my garage, to the smaller ones gracing each and every window frame, to the spindly lass who decided to have a billion babies in a suitcase under my bed (not a fun find).

Autumn is typically deemed peak spider season in the UK – that is, the time when spiders head indoors to find a mate and we see a lot more of them. But are there more this year? And did spider season happen upon us earlier than usual?

Professor Adam Hart, an ecologist, conservation scientist and entomologist at the University of Gloucestershire, told HuffPost UK: “There does seem to be a perception that ‘spider season’ has started slightly earlier this year, and anecdotally I’ve noticed house spiders appearing a little earlier myself.

“I’ve seen several over the last couple of weeks, whereas I’d normally expect them to become particularly noticeable around the beginning to middle of September.”

Advertisement

That said, he doesn’t think it’s “dramatically early” for them to be making an appearance in people’s homes.

“The spiders haven’t suddenly appeared or necessarily come into the house because autumn has arrived,” he added.

“Many house spiders live in and around our homes throughout the year. What changes in late summer and autumn is that adult males become much more mobile as they wander around looking for females, which is why we suddenly see these large spiders running across floors or becoming trapped in baths.”

We’ve also had a pretty hot summer which means windows will have been left open on repeat, giving spiders a free pass to head inside. Another reason why you might be seeing a lot more of them than usual.

Advertisement
Seeing more spiders? You’re not alone.
Seeing more spiders? You’re not alone.

How to keep spiders away from your home

Prof Hart noted preventing spiders is “much easier than trying to repel spiders once they’re inside”.

That said, he’s pretty sceptical of some of the more traditional spider deterrents (think conkers and peppermint oil) as there “isn’t convincing evidence that putting these around the home provides reliable protection against spiders”.

So, how can you prevent them from coming inside then? “If people really don’t want spiders entering the house, the most useful measures are physical ones: insect screens on open windows and doors, sealing obvious gaps around windows, doors and pipes, and using draught excluders where appropriate,” he said.

But it’s also worth remembering that spiders are beneficial predators. “They feed on flies and many of the other small invertebrates that share our homes, so if a spider is living unobtrusively somewhere, leaving it alone is often the easiest option,” he added.

Advertisement

The best way to get rid of spiders if they’re freaking you out

Not everyone is enthralled by the prospect of sharing their home with spiders, so if you do spot one, the best way to get it outside again is with a glass and a piece of card.

“Put a glass or other container gently over the spider, slide a piece of reasonably stiff card underneath and carry it somewhere suitable,” said Prof Hart.

“There are also some useful spider-removal products you can buy and their long handles often make them easier to use if you really aren’t keen on spiders.”

Advertisement

If you spot a big old house spider in your home, he suggests popping it in a shed, garage or other sheltered location “because these spiders are strongly associated with buildings and sheltered environments”.

And if you find one in your bath, it’s not necessarily because it’s climbed up your plughole Incy Wincy-style. “Spiders generally fall into baths and then can’t climb the smooth sides. You can remove it with a glass and card, or simply provide something such as a towel over the side that it can climb up,” added the expert.

If your home is particularly appealing to spiders, you might spot the odd egg sac knocking around too. “Firstly, don’t panic. An egg sac doesn’t necessarily mean you’re about to have hundreds of large spiders running around the house,” continued Prof Hart.

“Different species have very different reproductive cycles and the spiderlings that emerge are tiny and disperse.”

Advertisement

If the sac is somewhere unobtrusive, he suggests there’s no need to do anything with it. But if you genuinely don’t want it inside, he recommends “carefully moving it, ideally with the female if she is obviously guarding it, to a sheltered location such as a shed, garage or outbuilding, rather than destroying it”.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025