Connect with us

Politics

Devolution in the UK – UK in a changing Europe

Published

on

Devolution in the UK - UK in a changing Europe

As part of our Policy Landscape 2026 report, Nicola McEwen considers the state of the political debate and the immediate and long-term challenges that need to be confronted when it comes to devolution in the UK.

Prime Minister Andy Burnham has made it his mission to “take power out of Westminster and carry it into every postcode in the country”. But it is not clear the ‘devolution revolution’ will extend beyond England’s borders.

Of course, one might think there is less need to progress devolution to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, because they already have far more autonomy from Westminster than English regions.  But Scotland and Wales are nations, not regions. And following the elections in May, the Prime Minister must now face three First Ministers from nationalist parties whose ultimate goal is political independence or, in the case of Sinn Fein’s Michelle O’Neil (whose responsibilities in office are shared with the DUP’s Deputy First Minister), to secure Irish unity.

Both the SNP and Plaid Cymru were elected on manifesto commitments to increase self-government. Both emerged triumphant in contests that witnessed Labour’s continued decline in Scotland and its decimation in Wales. Ignoring their calls for further powers whilst championing devolution in England risks destabilising the Union itself.

Advertisement

There have been long-standing calls, including from successive independent constitutional commissions, to devolve further competences to the Senedd, most notably over policing and justice. Plaid Cymru’s manifesto reiterated these calls, alongside the devolution of powers over the Crown Estate, rail, port regulation, Air Passenger Duty, social security and some aspects of energy policy.

The SNP manifesto called for the devolution of energy policy, employment law, further fiscal autonomy, a Scottish visa scheme, and legislative competence for an independence referendum. These calls have the backing of the Scottish Green Party, whose 15 MSPs join the 57 SNP MSPs in the largest pro-independence majority to date in the Scottish Parliament.

But the Westminster parliament is the legal custodian of the Scotland and Wales Acts and of the future of the Union. The Prime Minister has already informally rejected a second independence referendum. Neither he nor the Secretary of State for Scotland, Douglas Alexander – whose relationship with the Scottish Government can best be described as grim – have responded positively to the other devolution demands. Secretary of State for Wales, Stephen Kinnock, professed himself unconvinced of the need for further devolution, suggesting that devolution could destabilise policing and the Crown Estate.

Both the SNP and Plaid Cymru focused on the cost-of-living crisis in the May elections, reflecting voter priorities. Constitutional battles may thus be seen as an unwelcome distraction from an electorate who want their governments to work together to get things done. Nonetheless, championing devolution in England while snubbing calls for devolution in Scotland and Wales does not bode well for intergovernmental relations.

Advertisement

Labour entered office in 2024 with a commitment to respect devolution and ‘reset’ the UK government’s relationship with the devolved governments, following a deterioration of intergovernmental relations under the Conservatives against the backdrop of Brexit.

This included bringing forward a statutory review of the 2020 UK Internal Market Act, legislation enacted despite considerable opposition from, and without the consent of, the devolved legislatures. The Act was intended to facilitate frictionless trade across the UK after Brexit. Exclusions from its ‘Market Access Principles’ can be sought, without guarantee of being granted, bringing complexity and uncertainty to the legislative process. Without such exclusions, some rules drawn up by devolved governments would not apply to goods and services from other parts of the UK, making it more difficult to realise policy goals. The Act also allowed the UK government to spend directly in devolved policy areas, bypassing the established system of territorial finance and often bypassing the devolved governments. The statutory review committed to environmental and public health benefits being evaluated alongside the economic costs of regulatory divergence in weighing up exclusion requests. But this is unfinished business for the devolved institutions, and there remains a lack of clarity about how, and by whom, these additional criteria will be considered.

The Labour government also promised to restore the Sewel convention – the process of securing consent from the devolved legislatures before enacting legislation in the Westminster Parliament on devolved matters. Long a pragmatic tool for coordinating legislation across governments, this was an important symbol of the authority of the devolved institutions within a constitutional framework otherwise founded upon the undiluted sovereignty of the Westminster parliament. But that symbolism was somewhat undermined during the Brexit process when withheld consent was largely ignored by the UK parliament. It was further undermined when the UK Supreme Court confirmed that the Sewel Convention, which was written into the Scotland and Wales Acts, has no legal effect.

These outstanding issues should be in the Prime Minister’s in-tray. If not, he will surely confront them in intergovernmental forums. Meaningful discussions over further devolution to Scotland and Wales may also be hard to dismiss while championing devolution in England. Such discussions may come with pressure on devolved governments to devolve powers to Scottish and Welsh regions, but devolution within Scotland, Wales or indeed Northern Ireland would ultimately be a matter for the devolved institutions themselves. Over the longer term, simply rejecting calls for an independence referendum may not be enough, especially if support for independence increases. There is an opportunity now to consider, dispassionately, what would constitute and trigger a legitimate process for determining the future of these islands.

Advertisement

The Prime Minister is undoubtedly committed to devolution. He may well prove to have a transformative impact on the governance of England. But to be an effective Prime Minister of the United Kingdom requires understanding and carefully managing the complex set of territorial relationships and identities between the nations of these islands.

By Nicola McEwen, Professor of Public Policy and Governance, University of Glasgow Centre for Public Policy.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

What Does It Mean If The Bottom Of My Nail Turns Red?

Published

on

Non-reddened lunulae

We’ve written before at HuffPost UK about the surprising things your nails can tell you about your health.

Horizontal ridges, dark lines, and brittle or “spoon-shaped” talons can sometimes reveal conditions like uncontrolled diabetes and anaemia.

But researchers have reviewed another red flag that shows up on the lunulae (those half-moon-shaped white semi-circles at the base of your nails) first.

It “may reflect both systemic disease activity or local pathology such as subungual tumour,” the researchers say, though the cause remains “unclear”.

Advertisement

Red lunulae have been associated with a range of health conditions

A review of case studies, published in The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, has suggested that red lunulae could be a sign of various health conditions.

“The lunula, the half-moon-shaped visible portion of the distal matrix most apparent in the thumbs, is typically white in appearance and contributes to the shape of the nail plate. Abnormal coloration of the lunula may signify an underlying disease,” researchers wrote.

While “rare”, they added, red lunulae was first described in the 1950s and has since been spotted in other isolated cases.

Advertisement

When noticed, the symptom has been linked to a broad range of conditions, including:

  • rheumatoid arthritis,
  • liver cirrhosis,
  • heart failure,
  • alopecia areata (an autoimmune condition leading to patchy hair loss),
  • lupus,
  • dermatomyositis (a rare autoimmune disease linked to weaker muscles and skin rashes),
  • lymphoma,
  • psoriasis,
  • carbon monoxide poisoning,
  • twenty-nail dystrophy (a condition affecting all toenails and fingernails, making them appear brittle), and
  • lymphogranuloma venereum (an STI caused by strains of chlamydia bacteria).
Non-reddened lunulae

Zay Nyi Nyi via Getty Images

Non-reddened lunulae

Does that mean I definitely have one of these conditions if I have red lunulae?

The researchers said we still don’t know the mechanism behind the symptom. We’ve only found a link and not a cause.

Red lunulae have been associated with heart failure for decades, while other research suggests nail colour changes might be linked to connective tissue disorders too.

Advertisement

The paper reads: “Upon examination, if the clinician decides that a patient meets the criterion for presenting with true red lunulae, a general medical examination should be performed.

“It is important to keep in mind the possible systemic diseases previously seen tied to red lunulae while evaluating the patient.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Farage Would Stop Unions Funding Labour If Reform Forced To Hand Back Crypto Cash

Published

on

A Reform UK government could stop trade unions giving money to the Labour Party, Nigel Farage has warned.

He said he would be prepared to take the drastic step if the government forces Reform to hand back £72 million it has received from two crypto billionaired.

Ben Delo and Christopher Harborne gave the party £36m each at the weekend.

Delo has moved back to the UK from Hong Kong, while Thailand-based Harborne is now registered to vote in Hampshire.

Advertisement

But ministers want to toughen up a new law going through parliament so that donors previously based overseas must prove they are committed to living in the UK long-term.

If Delo and Harborne fall foul of the new rules, the cash they have given Reform would need to be repaid.

Writing in the Telegraph, Farage said he would look to retaliate by ending the unions’ historic funding of the Labour Party if he becomes prime minister.

He said: “The Unite union alone has given the Labour party over £50m over the course of the last few years. They’ve got the Employment Rights Act, not to mention big pay rises for bus drivers. If anybody is giving money to do political bidding, it’s the trade unions.

Advertisement

“So I would just warn the Labour party here and now: If you try and ban our donors, we in government would certainly ban funding from the trade unions. I don’t want to go down that route. But it’s something we would be prepared to do.

“Once again, let me be clear. Neither Ben Delo nor Christopher Harborne will be getting membership of the House of Lords. They won’t be getting favours, they won’t be influencing policy. It isn’t happening. Because unlike the uniparty we are not for sale.”

Business secretary Jonathan Reynolds hit back by insisting trade union donations are different to those from billionaires.

He said: “When we talk about union donations, that is not one entity. That is tens of thousands of ordinary people choosing to make that donation, and it’s banded up and given from the union. But it’s very easy to opt out of that.

Advertisement

“I honestly think to take these kind of mega, ultra crypto Reform donors and compare them to voluntary associations of working people choosing to give some money to the political system, I don’t think the two things are comparable.”

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Emmys 2026: Taylor Swift Pokes Fun At Herself In Comedy Sketch

Published

on

Taylor Swift hanging out with Tom Cruise on Monday night

Taylor Swift wasn’t even at this year’s Emmys, but she still managed to deliver one of the night’s stand-out moments.

At this year’s TV awards, the Grammy winner was actually nominated for five awards thanks to her Eras Tour special The Final Show.

In a nod to this, during the ceremony, host Mariska Hargitay and her Law & Order co-stars took part in a pre-recorded sketch, where they tried to decipher whether or not the I Knew You Were Trouble singer would be making an appearance on the night.

Towards the end of the segment, Taylor was able to show off her acting chops when she joined Mariska in the skit, playing up to her own reputation (see what we did there?) for scattering Easter eggs in all of her work by commenting: “Not everything is a clue.”

Advertisement

“It is to the Swifties,” Mariska fired back.

At the end of the skit, the team reasoned that Taylor would not be at the Emmys because her “husband has a work thing”.

This was, in fact, true, with Taylor missing Monday night’s ceremony to cheer on her husband Travis Kelce at the Kansas City Chiefs game at the Arrowhead Stadium.

Taylor Swift hanging out with Tom Cruise on Monday night
Taylor Swift hanging out with Tom Cruise on Monday night

Mariska and Taylor have crossed paths numerous times in the past, most notably in the singer’s 2015 music video for her hit Bad Blood.

One of Taylor’s cats is also named Olivia Benson, after Mariska’s long-standing Law & Order character (the feline even made a cameo in the comedy skit shown during the Emmys broadcast on Monday evening).

Advertisement

Widow’s Bay was the big winner at the 2026 Emmys, making history with its 14 wins, while the Eras Tour special failed to come out on top in any of its categories, losing out to the recent Muppet Show revival and Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl Halftime Show.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

‘Profoundly unhelpful’: Texas Republicans worry Bo French’s xenophobic posts make a tough year worse

Published

on

‘Profoundly unhelpful’: Texas Republicans worry Bo French’s xenophobic posts make a tough year worse

Texas Republicans were already fretting about slipping support with voters of color. Then Bo French got on X.

The Republican nominee for Texas Railroad Commissioner posted a photo of a crowd of University of Texas football fans, most of them people of color, saying, “The problem is now obviously far worse than anyone imagined.”The Sunday morning comments, which appeared to target South Asian students, sent Lone Star Republicans into a frenzy, worried about the impact the rhetoric could have on GOP candidates up and down the ballot, including Attorney General Ken Paxton’s high-profile Senate race and Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s reelection fight.

A number of Republican lawmakers, including some in tough races, quickly denounced the post as racist, as others squirmed with carefully worded statements. And GOP operatives winced at the potential electoral backlash — in a year that’s already looking tougher-than-normal for a party that has dominated the state for decades. Still, no one explicitly called for him to drop out of the race.

“His post on social media is profoundly unhelpful if his goal is to see Republicans win statewide races in a tough political environment in 50 days,” said Matt Mackowiak, an Austin-based GOP consultant who advised Sen. John Cornyn’s (R-Texas) unsuccessful primary campaign against Paxton.

Advertisement

Cornyn condemned the post, asking whether other GOP officials would “condemn the intolerance and racism, or look the other way while it becomes normalized.”

Rep. Monica De La Cruz (R-Texas), who is facing a tough reelection fight in a Hispanic-majority district, told POLITICO in a statement she’s willing to “condemn racism” wherever it comes from.

“All I see in that photograph is a group of kids celebrating a Longhorns win. What can be more Texan than that?” De La Cruz said, before taking a shot at her Democratic opponent, Bobby Pulido, for his past racial comments.

And Karl Rove, a longtime adviser to former President George W. Bush, called French a “bigot” at a private lunch event and said he’s voting for French’s Democratic opponent, The Texas Tribune reported. Meanwhile, state Rep. Jon Rosenthal, the Democrat running against French, said he had his best fundraising day of the cycle after French’s post.

Advertisement

French didn’t respond to requests for comment. He repeatedly stood by his comments since Sunday morning. During a local radio appearance Monday, he said he didn’t have any personal animosity against the students at the football game, but said that it is “not racist to point out that we should be favoring Texans over foreigners” and that his fellow Republicans are afraid of being called racist.

The divide emerging among Texas Republicans over the social media post — and Democrats’ eagerness to capitalize on it — show just how precarious the party finds its position this cycle. Texas Republicans were already worrying about losing support from Hispanic and other minority voters amid a tough economic environment and President Donald Trump’s unpopular immigration agenda. They need to hold onto or improve the incremental gains they made over previous cycles with voters of color in a fast-changing state where non-Hispanic white people now only make up 37% of the population. The stakes are high this cycle: Most polls show Paxton slightly trailing in a Senate race that could determine control of the upper chamber; Abbott appears to be in the toughest of his four election fights; and the state is home to several key House races.

“I don’t think [French’s post] independently and universally sours voter sentiment. But it contributes to GOP declining numbers with Hispanic voters particularly in the South Texas congressional races which we hope to win,” said Alfredo Rodriguez, a Dallas-based Republican strategist, who called on French to “stop the petty political theatrics.”

The blast radius of French’s posts was wide enough to garner carefully worded responses from the top of the ticket. Abbott said in a Sunday statement that French’s post “is not my message,” before noting unity “doesn’t mean that Texas cannot also lead in having the toughest immigration laws of any state in America and freezing H1B visas at our universities.”

Advertisement

Two of the students in the photo told the Dallas Morning News that they’re U.S. citizens. Most UT students are Texans — state law requires that 90% of each freshman class come from in-state — and there is no evidence that the students in the photo French posted are foreigners.

Some Republicans weren’t thrilled about Abbott’s response.

“This had nothing to do with illegal immigrants,” said Anang Mittal, an Indian American national GOP strategist, of Abbott’s comments. “These were students at a college game. They’re not H-1B. If they’re students, they’re on a student visa. … It’s pretty damn disgusting of Greg Abbott to say, ‘I condemn racism, but also, like, we’re keeping all the Indians out.’ That’s essentially what that tweet read to me.”Democrat James Talarico called Paxton out on social media, asking if he would follow Cornyn’s lead in denouncing French’s post. The GOP nominee replied that he condemns “racism in all its forms” — and then claimed Talarico had a “history of dividing Texans by race.”

Spokespeople for Paxton and Abbott did not respond to requests for comment.

Advertisement

Other Republicans were less willing to fully denounce French’s comments.

“I don’t really know the guy. I heard he said some not so pleasant things,” said Rep. Troy Nehls (R-Texas), who said he hadn’t seen the posts — but launched into a criticism of immigration nonetheless. “I am concerned about the number of people living in this country, and we don’t even know who they really are,” he said. ”Shut the border down for 10 years, and then let’s try to figure out who we got in this country because we don’t even know.”

Sen. Andy Kim (D-N.J.), who campaigned with Talarico in Houston on Sunday, said French’s posts came up in conversations with every Asian American voter he met.

“Everyone was talking about it,” Kim said. “Every single Asian American that I was with yesterday raised this with me. They were saying this is an example of, ‘Not only are they not courting us or engaging with us, but they’re actively demonizing us, actively being xenophobic and racist towards us.’ We need leaders that stand up against this.”

Advertisement

The political damage could also extend — potentially for years — to Texas’ small but growing Indian American population, the demographic group French appeared to target in his posts. Both Dallas and Houston have significant Indian American populations. In 2019, an event at a Houston stadium headlined by Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi drew over 50,000 attendees.

French’s comments could alienate those same voters, said Brendan Steinhauser, a Republican consultant in Austin.

“He just irritated a bunch of people, many of whom could be supporters and could be Republicans,” said Steinhauser, a University of Texas graduate. “I’d be willing to bet a lot of those kids that he was posting a photo of are probably, you know, their parents might be Republicans, or they might be Republicans, or conservatives, or independent-leaning conservatives.”

If French is elected, he would sit on a commission that regulates Texas’ powerful oil, gas and mining industries — which has little to do with immigration or social issues. But French, a longtime provocateur in Texas political circles, has a history of incendiary statements. Just last year, Republicans were calling on French to resign as chair of the Tarrant County Republican Party after he published an online poll asking whether Muslims or Jews were “the bigger threat to America.” He deleted the post and said he regretted it, adding “antisemitism has no place in the Republican Party.” This spring, he unseated a well-financed Republican incumbent for Texas Railroad Commission.

Advertisement

French isn’t the only politician in Texas who has made singling out Muslims part of his political brand. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick has made “preventing Shariah law in Texas” one of his legislative priorities. Patrick didn’t respond to a request for comment. Abbott, Paxton and Cornyn have all called for investigations and other government action to stop development of a commercial and residential development being built by the East Plano Islamic Center, a mosque outside Dallas. And just last month, Abbott threatened to withhold funding from Dallas Fort Worth International Airport to block plans for ritual washing facilities for Muslim travelers in the airport’s terminals. There’s little difference between French’s attacks and the other politicians’ actions, said Yasir Qadhi, an Islamic scholar at the Islamic center.“It is the same mindset,” he said in an interview. “What we’re witnessing is really an unprecedented and increasingly brazen form of racism. It’s unfiltered, it’s unapologetic, it’s even stripped of even the pretense of political correctness. You know, this is a type of racism we’ve never seen in our lifetimes.”

When French unleashed a string of inflammatory social media posts in 2025, several GOP officeholders — including Patrick, the lieutenant governor — called on him to resign as county GOP chair. But Republicans now refuse to tell French to drop out now “because that might mean that there would be a Democrat elected statewide,” said Glen Whitley, a Republican former Tarrant County judge. “That’s the bottom line.”

“That’s part of my frustration with the Republican Party altogether: They talk about being Christian, but they get up every morning to talk about who they hate,” said Whitley, who still identifies as Republican but endorsed Talarico for Senate.

Joey Fox contributed to this report.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Emmys 2026: Why Widow’s Bay Is Such A Hit With Critics And Viewers

Published

on

Kate O'Flynn, Matthew Rhys and Stephen Root all won Emmys for their work in Widow's Bay

With roughly 7,000 streaming services at your disposal, if you’re a regular TV fan, you might find you spend a surprisingly large amount of time politely smiling and nodding at friends, acquaintances and colleagues as they recommend whatever their latest telly obsession is.

“Oh, that’s going straight on my list,” you find yourself parroting back at them, with little to no intention of ever seeking the show in question out, or even making a note of it.

And that’s how, for many of us, we’re either checking out critically-acclaimed shows much later than the rest of the world, or having them pass us by completely.

That being said… if Widow’s Bay is one of those word-of-mouth series you’ve been putting off watching until now, let this year’s Emmys be your sign that you need to bump it up to prime position on your watchlist.

Advertisement

Believe us, we’d been umming and ahhing about whether the hype was actually worth it, too – and it was.

Kate O'Flynn, Matthew Rhys and Stephen Root all won Emmys for their work in Widow's Bay
Kate O’Flynn, Matthew Rhys and Stephen Root all won Emmys for their work in Widow’s Bay

On Monday night, Widow’s Bay made TV history when it came the most-decorated comedy show ever at the Emmys, with 14 wins overall, including recognition for cast members Kate O’Flynn, Stephen Root and Matthew Rhys (who set a new record as the first actor in history to ever win two leading acting Emmys in the same night, thanks to his work in both Widow’s Bay and The Beast In Me).

Set in an eerie fictional New England island town with a dark history, Widow’s Bay gets underway with a deluge of tourists suddenly arriving to the area, just as its mysterious and sinister past begins to repeat itself.

Matthew takes the lead as Widow’s Bay’s sceptical mayor Tom Loftis, initially reluctant to acknowledge that anything is amiss, with Kate and Stephen among the many absolute scene-stealers among the town’s kooky residents.

Billed as a comedy-horror, Widow’s Bay probably leans more into the comedic side of things – although it definitely delivers on chills and thrills too, so be prepared for a few jump scares along the way.

Advertisement
Kate O'Flynn as the complicated Patricia Moyer in Widow's Bay
Kate O’Flynn as the complicated Patricia Moyer in Widow’s Bay

Even before its runaway success at the Emmys, the show held an enviable 98% critical score on Rotten Tomatoes, with viewers seemingly just as enthralled, going off its audience score of 92%.

And don’t worry about feeling like you’ve missed the boat – Widow’s Bay has already been renewed for a second season by Apple TV+, so there’s plenty of time to catch up before the next run of episodes.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Politics Home Article | Getting people active: a national movement, powered locally

Published

on

Getting people active: a national movement, powered locally
Getting people active: a national movement, powered locally

Credit: Adobe Stock

Lisa Dodd-Mayne, Executive Director, Partnerships and Place



Lisa Dodd-Mayne, Executive Director, Partnerships and Place
| Sport England

Advertisement

As the government looks to shift power closer to communities, Lisa Dodd-Mayne, Executive Director of Partnerships and Place at Sport England, sets out how local knowledge and national investment can work together to get more people active — and why closing the physical activity gap depends on both

There are over 30 million active adults in England, but nearly 12 million are not active enough – and inactivity is more common in areas facing higher levels of social need.

Advertisement

To close the national physical activity gap, we need to think locally.

The people and organisations closest to communities understand their needs, have the relationships to engage people, and are best placed to shape solutions that work for them.

But local action to get more people active does not happen in a vacuum. The most effective approach combines local knowledge, relationships, and leadership with national evidence, expertise, investment, and support.

That balance matters as the government looks to shift power closer to communities and ensure national funding works harder for them.

Advertisement

The opportunity is huge: create the conditions for places to lead, equip them with the support, learning and resources they need, and turn community action into meaningful impact – with the potential to drive national change.

Getting more people active cannot be achieved by one organisation alone. It depends on what happens in the places where people live: the opportunities available to them, how organisations work together and whether communities themselves have a meaningful role in shaping what happens.

That is why our place-based work starts with communities – but is supported nationally. Through National Lottery and Exchequer investment, we are working in partnership with communities across England where inactivity levels are highest, supporting our local partners to create the conditions for more people to get active where they live.

Advertisement

The starting point is understanding what life is like in each place.

Local people understand their communities better than anyone. They know what works, what does not, the resources that are available, which places feel welcoming and what gets in the way of being active. They also know the strengths that already exist – the people, organisations, spaces and relationships that can make a difference.

That insight cannot simply be delivered from the centre. It comes from listening to communities and understanding what shapes activity and inactivity in different places.

But local insight is most powerful when it is combined with evidence, learning and expertise from elsewhere, alongside the investment needed to turn it into action and impact.

Advertisement

Connecting places facing similar challenges and creating opportunities to learn from what is working elsewhere can help local partners build the confidence and capacity to develop approaches that work for their communities.

The result is a national movement powered by local action. And we can see how this approach works in practice.

In Doncaster, more than 2,500 residents have helped create a community-run “Friends of” group that now independently delivers physical activity events in local parks.

In Blackpool, a youth leadership programme, co-designed with 16- to 17-year-olds, has brought young people into leadership spaces to help shape decisions about activity in their community.

Advertisement

These examples look different because the places themselves are different. That is precisely the point.

Place-based working is not about taking the same programme everywhere. It is about understanding what needs to change in each place and giving partners the freedom and support to make it happen. The national role is not to prescribe the solution, but to create the conditions for those solutions to succeed.

That flexibility matters particularly in communities where inactivity is closely connected to wider inequalities.

Our Active Lives research shows that just 53.8 per cent of adults in the least affluent groups are active, compared with 73.2 per cent of the most affluent. There are also significant inequalities in activity levels among disabled people, older adults and some ethnic minority communities.

Advertisement

These differences cannot be explained by motivation alone. Cost, transport, safety, caring responsibilities, confidence and access to facilities and green spaces can all influence whether someone is active.

Local knowledge is essential to understanding those barriers. But tackling them also requires sustained investment, shared evidence, specialist expertise and the ability to learn across places.

There is, of course, a wider prize. Physical activity can improve health and wellbeing, strengthen social connections and help people feel more connected to where they live.  It can also make a significant contribution to reducing pressure on public services. Our research shows that active lifestyles could prevent more than 3.3m cases of chronic health conditions each year, including depression, back pain and type 2 diabetes, delivering an estimated £8bn in direct net savings to the healthcare system.

Realising those benefits requires more than providing opportunities to be active. It requires communities to bring knowledge, trust and lived experience; local organisations to bring relationships and leadership; and national organisations to bring evidence, expertise, investment, accountability and the ability to connect learning across the country.

Advertisement

Localism works best when places are empowered to lead, backed by a national system that helps them learn, invest and deliver – turning local action into national impact.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

The House Article | Mega donations will do more damage to public trust in politics

Published

on

Mega donations will do more damage to public trust in politics
Mega donations will do more damage to public trust in politics


3 min read

The two Reform mega donations, which saw the party receive an unprecedented £72m from two billionaires, have been a thunderclap moment for our democracy.

Advertisement

The sums dwarf any previous single donations to political parties and have opened up an urgent debate about the role money plays in our democracy. 

These massive donations haven’t happened in a vacuum; political parties have become increasingly reliant on wealthy donors in recent years. In 2023, Transparency International found that two-thirds of the £85m given to parties in private donations came from just 19 donors, the highest ever share from mega-donors at the time. This problem has become entrenched across the political spectrum.

The colossal Reform donations are of a different order of magnitude and mean we are entering a new epoch in the amounts of money flowing into politics.

This has profound implications for our democracy. The danger now is not just that ultra-wealthy individuals can influence political parties, but effectively buy them with vast donations. The UK is particularly exposed in this regard, in that it currently has no limits on how much individuals can give to political parties. This makes the UK something of an outlier, as countries as diverse as Canada, Australia, Ireland, and Spain all have curbs on political donations.

Advertisement

Huge donations also risk doing profound damage to trust in our democracy. When the public sees ultra-wealthy individuals giving gargantuan sums of money to political parties, they are left wondering what these donors expect in return. That has a corrosive effect on trust in politics, which the British Social Attitudes Survey shows is now at record lows.

There is a clear solution here: the government needs to impose a donations cap that limits how much can be given to a party in a single year. This is something that is supported by the public, with a clear majority wanting a cap

We have also seen wide support for a donations cap among MPs as the Representation of the People Bill has made its way through Parliament. Two Labour MPs, Stella Creasy and Alex Sobel, proposed amendments for donations caps of £100,000 and £1m respectively. Even the Prime Minister has previously expressed support for a cap, saying he felt £500,000 was around the right amount. 

Advertisement

So it was disappointing that no proposals for a cap were added to the bill, although a taskforce has now been given the job of looking at the issue.

The case for a cap becomes even stronger in light of the government taking up the recommendation from Sir Philip Rycroft’s review to introduce an annual donations cap of £100,000 for overseas donors. Yet, without a domestic equivalent, we risk having a donations cap for donors based in every country bar the one that matters most, the UK.

The events of the last week show how urgent the matter has become and that action needs to be taken now. 

Our politics is currently dangerously exposed to being for sale to the highest bidder. Inertia would leave us heading towards a crisis of trust in our democracy.

Advertisement

At the heart of this debate there is a simple question: who is it that influences the politicians making decisions that affect all of us? A donations cap is a crucial step to ensuring the answer is always the voters, not wealthy donors.

 

Darren Hughes is Chief Executive of the Electoral Reform Society

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

All The A-List Photos You Need To See From The 2026 Emmys Red Carpet

Published

on

Zendaya, Jack Lowden, Nicole Kidman, Riz Ahmed and Allison Janney at the 2026 Emmys
Zendaya, Jack Lowden, Nicole Kidman, Riz Ahmed and Allison Janney at the 2026 EmmysZendaya, Jack Lowden, Nicole Kidman, Riz Ahmed and Allison Janney at the 2026 Emmys

The 2026 Emmy Awards took place in Los Angeles on Monday evening, drawing a crowd of some of the biggest A-listers from the world of TV all under one roof.

Between the nominees, presenters, performers and some other surprise names, this year’s Emmys guestlist proved to be one of the most star-studded of the year so far, with winners on the night including the stars of shows like Widow’s Bay, The Pitt, Hacks, Pluribus and more.

In other words – if scrolling through glitzy red carpet photos is your idea of a good time, you’re definitely in for a treat.

Here are all the photos you need to see from the 2026 Emmys red carpet…

Zendaya

Nicole Kidman

Ayo Edebiri

Kate O’Flynn

Jean Smart

Noah Wyle

Yahya Abdul-Mateen II

Jack Lowden

Megan Stalter

Alan Cumming

Quinta Brunson

Emma D’Arcy

Riz Ahmed

Charlie Hunnam

Matthew Rhys and Keri Russell

Rhea Seehorn

Colman Domingo

Allison Janney

Brenda Song and Macaulay Culkin

Katherine LaNasa

Hannah Einbinder

Janelle James

Paul W Downs

Oscar Isaac

Amy Poehler

Chase Infiniti

Rachel Sennott

Shailene Woodley

Dan Levy

Elle Fanning

Sally Field

Mariska Hargitay

Kaley Cuoco and Tom Pelphrey

Florence Pugh

Charles Melton 

Odessa A’zion

Lisa Kudrow

Michelle Pfeiffer

Harrison Ford and Calista Flockhart

Amanda Peet

Niecy Nash-Betts

Sarah Michelle Gellar and David Boreanaz

 Cynthia Nixon

Dale Dickey

Linda Cardellini

Claire Danes

Sterling K Brown

Carey Mulligan

Tyler James Williams

Carrie Coon

Gary Oldman

Sheryl Lee Ralph

Sunrise Coigney and Mark Ruffalo

Patrick Ball

Michael Urie

Jeff Hiller

Jessica Williams

Noah Beck

Stephen Root and Romy Rosemont

Steve Carell

Jason Segel

Marcello Hernández

Jon Hamm and Anna Osceola

Sarah Snook

Rufus Sewell

Chris Perfetti

Martin Short and Steve Martin

Julia Garner

David Harbour

Sepideh Moafi

Awkwafina

LL Cool J

Emmy Rossum

Kingston Rumi Southwick 

Karolina Wydra

Lisa Ann Walter

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Emmys 2026: 19 Awards Show Moments You Might Have Missed

Published

on

Every year, the Emmys gathers some of the biggest names from the small screen under one roof to celebrate the past year’s achievements in TV – and this year’s ceremony was especially jam-packed with stars.

Unfortunately, the Emmys is one of those few US awards shows that doesn’t actually air in the UK, meaning those of us on this side of the Atlantic often miss out on the fun (which is particularly disappointing in years like this one, when numerous homegrown stars are up on stage there winning prizes).

However, we’re happy to say that we’ve got you covered.

Advertisement

From the red carpet to the main event, here are all the key moments you might have missed from the 2026 Emmys, where Widow’s Bay, The Pitt, Pluribus and Hacks were among the evening’s most recognised shows…

Obviously, whenever Zendaya steps onto a red carpet, that’s going to be a moment

But some of our other favourite red carpet looks from the 2026 Emmys included Florence Pugh

Colman Domingo (who never misses, let’s be real)…

…and Selena Gomez, who dressed fittingly for the awards show in gold

Meanwhile, if ever there was a chance you’d forgotten what Monday night’s red carpet was for, Hacks star Megan Stalter was on hand to remind us

The night’s host Mariska Hargitay kicked things off with a pre-recorded musical number celebrating some of the year’s nominees, featuring cameos from HuffPost faves Jean Smart, Jennifer Coolidge and Jeff Hiller

Kate O’Flynn got the ceremony off to a great start as the first Brit of the night to win an award for Widow’s Bay

Her Widow’s Bay co-star Matthew Rhys then picked up his first award of the evening for The Beast In Me, briefly tapping into his character from the Netflix series before delivering his acceptance speech

Advertisement

Nicole Kidman heckled host Mariska Hargitay during a skit parodying her now-infamous AMC sketch

There was no mistaking how excited Sally Field was to win her award (the best part has to be when she praised ‘author Shelby Van Pelt… or whatever her name is… anyway, she knows what it is’)

Taylor Swift surprised everyone when she joined host Mariska Hargitay in a pre-taped sketch about whether or not she’d be at the Emmys (spoiler alert… she wasn’t because, as was said in the skit, ‘her husband has a work thing’)

Matthew Rhys then made Emmys history as the first actor to win two leading awards in the same night

As did Jean Smart – not only becoming the first actor to win an acting Emmy for every season of a show, but also matching the record for the most performance wins ever

Country icon Reba McIntyre’s tribute to three-time Emmy winner and ‘piece of America’s heart’ Dolly Parton had us totally choked up

And by the time it got to Macaulay Culkin and the Schitt’s Creek stars sharing their memories of Catherine O’Hara, we were a total mess

Advertisement

The Pitt went into the night as the most recognised show, and while it wasn’t exactly a clean sweep for the medical drama, it did pick up a couple of awards, including an acting win for Noah Wyle, making him another of the night’s double winners due to his work as a producer, too

Towards the end of the ceremony, Matthew McConaughey and Woody Harrelson piled on the charm to present Best Comedy Series

And – by this point, as if there was any doubt – Widow’s Bay rounded off the night with one last win

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Donald Trump Condemned For Dismissing AI Threats As Hoax

Published

on

Donald Trump Condemned For Dismissing AI Threats As Hoax

Donald Trump has been condemned after dismissing warnings that articifical intelligence could destroy humanity as “a hoax”.

The US president was accused of “gaslighting” the entire world after he said AI and the data centres that drive it “will be the greatest economic development engine in history”.

Trump himself is a keen user of AI, regularly posting bizarre slop videos and images on Truth Social.

Senior executives and staff at AI firms have called for greater regulation of the technology before it gets out of control.

Advertisement

But in a rambling post on Truth Social, Trump rejected those fears and said there were no need for new guardrails to tame the technology.

He said: “Concerning AI, when, in the History of Business, did anyone see the Leaders of an Industry call for Regulation that, if strongly implemented, will drive them into oblivion and bankruptcy?

“AI taking over the World, destroying Humanity, and all other things bad, is a HOAX, no different from RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA — UKRAINE, UKRAINE, UKRAINE — IMPEACHMENT HOAX #1 — IMPEACHMENT HOAX #2 — and all of the other HOAXES and SCAMS that America was forced to endure through the Destructionists’ and Deviants’ foul play and illegal conduct.”

Trump said President Xi of China “will be doing absolutely nothing to stand in the way of AI, or its future” and so America should follow suit.

Advertisement

He added: “AI, and Data Centers, will be the Greatest Economic Development Engine in History — Bigger than Oil, Gold, Diamonds, or even the Internet.”

But his comments drew widespread criticism online, with the president being branded “unfit for office” for gambling with the future of the planet.

Meanwhile, First Secretary of State Louise Haigh will today say the government must “heed the warnings” of AI experts about the dangers posed by technology.

Addressing the TUC congress in Brighton, she will say ministers are “ready to work with international partners” to prioritise public safety and national security.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025