Putting the food packaging items in the wrong bin could mean it isn’t collected

There has been a major change to recycling across England, as common food waste items do not need to be collected anymore. Households have been urged not to be caught out by the new bin rules when it comes to disposing items.

If you ignore the latest guidelines, your bin might not be collected. The UK’s Simpler Recycling reforms, under the Environment Act 2021, have enforced mandatory and consistent recycling for businesses and households in England.

There are now separate collections for food waste, paper and card, glass, metal and plastic. Local authorities need to provide clear information about what can and can’t be recycled, with some councils exempt until at least 2040.

It is important to check to see if the new rules apply where you live. Under the new rules, authorities now do not have to recycle a range of common food items.

Advertisement

Laminated foil

Items such as pet food pouches and coffee pouches now do not have to be collected as recycling by local authorities. Instead, you can dispose of these items in general household waste bins.

If you want to recycle the likes of baby food, pet food and detergent pouches, these can be taken to selected retailers. Recycle Now added: “Some coffee pouches are currently recyclable at plastic bags and wrapping collection points. Check the packet for recycling guidance.”

Small ‘compostable’ or ‘biodegradable’ items

Food that has come in plastic packaging that has been described as “compostable” and “biodegradable” do not need to be collected in recycling bins. These include coffee pods.

Recycle Now said: “Coffee, tea and hot chocolate pods are made of recyclable materials, but because they are too small for most sorting machinery and contain ‘organic’ material, they need to be collected separately to ensure they reach the correct recycling facility.”

Podback is a non-for-profit recycling service that has drop-off points at local authority recycling centres, supermarkets and coffee shops to recycle these items.

Food and drink cartons

Food and drink cartons that contain more than 5% plastic should be recycled along with the plastic waste, not with paper and cardboard. While they do contain paperboard, there is plastic in them.

These cartons are typically used for milk, juice and soup products. Check the back of the packaging to ensure you are recycling them in the correct bins, or your bin might not be collected.

Tea bags or ground coffee

The new rules mean local authorities do not have to collect tea bags or ground coffee for recycling. Instead, you can put these in your food waste bin or in your own compost heap at home.

The two-year-old male is settling into his new home in the Arboretum’s on-site Red Squirrel Enclosure, with his arrival marking the next phase of one of the UK’s most successful Red Squirrel breeding programmes.

A young Red Squirrel has arrived at the Castle Howard Arboretum – with visitors invited to help choose his name. (Image: Castle Howard Arboretum)

Since the programme started in 2023, 15 kits (baby squirrels) have been born and have gone on to partner breeding programmes, and into the wild at suitable locations in Wales.

The male, who has spent the first two years of his life at Peak Wildlife Park in Derbyshire, will gradually be introduced to females with the hope to see more kits born in Yorkshire in the coming years.

Visitors can see the new male from Monday, May 25, inside the Red Squirrel Enclosure.

A young Red Squirrel has arrived at the Castle Howard Arboretum – with visitors invited to help choose his name. (Image: Castle Howard Arboretum)

The enclosure was designed and built by Arboretum staff and volunteers, where the fence circles 2500m2 of ground, including a grove of oaks and other trees, in which the squirrels live natural lives.

Ben Paterson, Arborist and Red Squirrel Officer at the Castle Howard Arboretum Trust, said: ‘We are absolutely thrilled to welcome our new arrival, as we know how much joy he will bring to our staff, volunteers and visitors.

“He is also an essential next step in continuing our great work in protecting this beautiful native animal.

“The young male is spending some time in private, acclimatising in his new home, but should be more active and viewable to visitors from Monday, May 25, the first day of May half term. Visitors are also invited to help us give him a name, by taking part in our competition the Castle Howard and Arboretum social media accounts.”

Access to the Red Squirrel Enclosure is included in Arboretum admission tickets. Although Red Squirrels may be seen throughout the day, they tend to be most active in the morning and later afternoon.

For full booking information please see www.castlehoward.co.uk/arboretum For information about sponsoring a squirrel, or supporting the Castle Howard Arboretum Trust, see castlehowardarboretumtrust.org

Good Morning Britain presenter Ed Balls has opened up about his personal battle with a stammer while discussing the STAMMA charity campaign.

Advertisement

Presenter Ed Balls revealed his personal struggle during the most recent Good Morning Britain.

The ITV host was discussing with BBC Traitors participant Jessie Roux her participation in the campaign, Don’t Hang Up. Hang On.

Providing further details about the initiative, which is run by the charity STAMMA, Susanna Reid emphasised that call handlers frequently disconnect when there’s an extended silence on the line.

Jessie explained, “It is hard because I’ve had it where I have been hung up on, and ‘H’ is hard. Like,’ Hello’ on its own is a nightmare.”

Ed responded: “I can’t do H’s! From the autocue, every now and again, and there is one, it’s a nightmare!”

The BBC personality expressed her frustration when attempting to articulate her words over the phone and the other person disconnects, reports the Mirror.

She continued: “It is hard, it’d help if people would just wait, that is all any of us ask, just wait. We’ll get there eventually.”

Throughout the years, Ed has been candid about his stammer, admitting he wasn’t aware he had one until he was deep into his political career.

It wasn’t until 2009 that the broadcaster publicly acknowledged his struggle with a stammer, before becoming a patron for the British Stammering Association twelve months later.

Discussing presenting on Good Morning Britain back in 2021, he remarked: “Sometimes it goes wrong, but that’s fine, we all are a little bit in-fluent in our speaking in normal life.

“But the idea that I could be on Good Morning Britain, looking at the screen, reading the auto-cue and getting through a morning like this with all this noise in my ear. Twelve years ago, I would be in meltdown, and in fact today, loving it!”

The ITV presenter became emotional during the programme recently while discussing his stammer with Gareth Gates.

He expressed gratitude to the Pop Idol singer for motivating him to speak candidly about his own speech impediment. In 2024 he said: “You inspired me. I thought, ‘If Gareth Gates can do this, I can too.

“And if he can be public, I can be public too. It was really hard, but I did it because you showed me how to do it.”

As he became tearful, Gareth rose from his seat and pulled Ed into an embrace while Susanna remarked: “Nothing to be ashamed about, it’s part of your identity, isn’t it? He broke the ground for you, didn’t he, Ed?”

Good Morning Britain is available to watch weekdays on ITV from 6am.

“I think people who are articulating their dissatisfaction with the Prime Minister in private, they do have a responsibility to say that in public and directly to him, because this situation is unsustainable. It is now unstable and I think, therefore, we do need an expedient and orderly transition,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.

With almost every Brit signed up to supermarket and high street reward schemes, shoppers are being urged not to stockpile points for Christmas or large purchases because they may not be protected if a company goes bust.

The warning could affect customers using schemes linked to major retailers including supermarkets, pharmacies and fashion chains.

According to insolvency specialist Molly Monks from Parker Walsh, many consumers wrongly assume loyalty rewards are protected like cash savings – when legally they often are not.

The warning comes as high street retailers continue facing pressure from:

1. Rising wage costs
2. Higher energy bills
3. Increasing business rates
4. Weak consumer spending

Research from the Competition and Markets Authority found 97% of shoppers belong to at least one supermarket loyalty scheme.

Recommended reading:

But Monks warned those points may effectively become worthless if a retailer falls into administration or liquidation.

She explained: “Loyalty points and vouchers are essentially a liability on a retailer’s balance sheet, a promise to give you something in the future in exchange for your past spending.

“When a business enters administration or liquidation, that promise is not protected in the way most people assume.”

Why loyalty points may disappear

If a retailer enters administration:

• Stores may continue trading temporarily
• Administrators can refuse to accept vouchers or points

If a company enters liquidation:

• Assets are distributed in strict legal order
• Customers with vouchers rank as unsecured creditors
• Loyalty point holders are even lower down the queue

Monks warned shoppers are unlikely to recover anything.

“When a company collapses, the queue for its remaining money is long,” she said.

“Banks and secured lenders are at the front. Employees come next. Loyal customers with a points balance or a voucher saved up for Christmas are right at the back.”

Shoppers told not to ‘bank’ points for too long

The insolvency specialist urged consumers to stop treating loyalty points like savings accounts.

She said shoppers should:

1. Spend points little and often
2. Avoid stockpiling rewards for long periods
3. Check expiry dates on vouchers
4. Use rewards quickly if a retailer shows signs of financial trouble

“There’s a temptation to save up loyalty points for a big redemption,” Monks said.

“But the longer you leave them sitting there, the longer you are exposed to the risk that the business runs into trouble.”

Warning signs can include:

• Store closures
• Reports of financial losses
• Missed supplier payments
• Rescue talks
• Discounting or clearance sales

What happens to gift vouchers when a company goes into administration?

Gift vouchers with a cash value may offer slightly stronger protection than loyalty points, but shoppers could still lose money if a retailer fails.

Experts say many customers wrongly assume vouchers are automatically protected by law.

In reality, whether they are honoured often depends on decisions made by administrators after collapse.

Americans paid more for their groceries last month, but high gasoline prices resulting from the Iran war were only one of the reasons why.

Prices for food eaten at home rose 2.9% in April compared to the same month a year earlier, according to government figures released Tuesday. That was the highest year-over-year inflation rate for the category since August 2023.

Prices at restaurants, fast-food chains and other places to get prepared meals also increased, putting overall food prices up 3.2% in the last year, the Labor Department’s consumer price index showed.

Fuel prices have soared while the Iran war prevents cargo ships from passing through the Strait of Hormuz, a vital corridor for global oil supplies. Diesel fuel powers fishing boats, tractors and the trucks that ship 83% of U.S. agricultural products. As of Tuesday, the average price per gallon was up 61% from a year ago, according to AAA.

The meat, produce and dry goods vendors that supply Sparrow Market, a small independent grocer in Ann Arbor, Michigan, all added fuel surcharges to their deliveries in recent weeks, owner Raymond Campise said. Wholesale prices for meat, produce and some other products also have gone up, he said.

“For independent markets operating on narrow margins, even small increases can have a major impact,” Campise said.

The full impact of rising energy costs on food likely has not hit retail grocery prices yet in the U.S., according to Purdue University economists Ken Foster and Bernhard Dalheimer. Higher costs to produce, process, store and transport food can take three to six months to show up on supermarket shelves, where prices typically fall slowly once increased, they said.

“Most of what we’re seeing now in the food price chain probably predates the conflict,” Foster, a professor of agricultural economics, said. “We’re cautiously waiting to see what the June numbers and the May numbers might show as they come out in terms of … the extent to which energy shocks in the Strait of Hormuz and shipping blockades and so forth are going to impact food prices.”

The consumer price index measures changes in what people in U.S. cities paid at retail stores for meat, bread, milk, produce and other grocery staples. Over the last 20 years, grocery prices increased an average of 2.6%, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Prices for perishable and refrigerated products tend to increase faster than prices for packaged goods when energy is an issue. Consumers paid 6.5% more for fresh fruit and vegetables in U.S. cities last month than they did in April 2025, and 8.8% more for meat, the Labor Department reported.

But U.S. trade policies and extreme weather also have weighed on U.S. food prices in the last year. In July 2025, the Trump administration imposed a 17% duty on fresh tomatoes imported from Mexico; consumer prices rose 40% in the 12 months before April.

Dry weather in the Western U.S. has been one of many factors pushing up beef prices, which in April were 15% higher year-over-year. Coffee prices were up 18.5%, partly due to drought and other weather conditions that have hurt global coffee production in recent years.

“Today’s CPI showed that food prices have been rising 3.2 percent in the past year, but the story behind that number is more complicated than just an energy shock,” said Dalheimer, an assistant professor of macroeconomics and trade in Purdue’s Department of Agricultural Economics.

Prices for some foods remained more or less flat or declined over 12 months. Milk and chicken dipped slightly. Butter cost 5.8% less in April than it did a year earlier. Egg prices fell 39% as farmers rebuilt flocks that were decimated by an ongoing bird flu outbreak.

Food prices and broader inflation are likely to feature prominently in November’s midterm elections. During his 2024 campaign, President Donald Trump often cited the prices of bacon, cereal, crackers and other groceries as reasons why voters should return him to the White House.

Some food producers say they’re struggling now because of higher fuel costs. The Southern Shrimp Alliance, which represents shrimpers in eight states, said some boats haven’t left the dock this spring because they can’t catch enough shrimp to compensate for the cost of diesel.

Fuel typically makes up 30% to 50% of the costs for U.S. shrimpers, but because they supply only 6% of the shrimp that Americans consume, they have limited ability to raise prices or add surcharges for fuel, the organization said.

Higher fuel prices may also be impacting food costs in other ways. Part of April’s 5% annual increase in prices for nonalcoholic beverages may be due to the petroleum derivative that goes into making plastic bottles, Foster said.

“It’s possible some of that’s starting to seep down the supply chain and get into those prices,” he said.

Over the next year or more, Americans could also see higher food prices due to spiking fertilizer costs, since around 30% of the world’s fertilizer travels through the Strait of Hormuz.

Fertilizer costs are less of an issue for U.S. farmers this year, since many already had fertilizer supplies in place before the war began, according to Foster. But the effects could become more noticeable next year if the war drags on, he said.

“I expect the Iran conflict to impact the coming years’ food prices through a couple of channels. One, the energy costs and transportation handling. The other would be through packaging costs,” Foster said. “If the conflict were to last longer, then we might see more coming online as fertilizer prices start to impact longer-term planting decisions and cropping decisions.”

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) — Iran’s grip on the Strait of Hormuz is throttling the world’s energy supplies and inflicting global economic pain, but the struggles of the Islamic Republic’s own economy are testing its ability to withstand the war and defy Washington’s demands.

Iranians have been hit by spiraling prices for food, medicine and other goods. At the same time, the country has seen mass job losses and business closures caused by strike damage to key industries and the government’s monthslong shutdown of the internet.

The economic cost of the war and the U.S. naval blockade “has been very substantial and unprecedented for Iran,” said Hadi Kahalzadeh, an Iranian economist and research fellow at Brandeis University.

But Iran has withstood decades of economic pressure and sanctions and its capacity to adapt has not been dismantled, Kahalzadeh said.

“Iran can probably avoid a complete economic collapse or total shortage of essential goods, but at a very high cost,” he said. “The main cost will be passed to ordinary Iranians through higher inflation, more poverty, weaker services and a much harder daily life.”

The International Monetary Fund has predicted the Iranian economy will shrink by about 6 percentage points in the next year. Iran’s official statistics center reported in mid-April that annual inflation was 53.7%, while inflation for food breached 115% compared with the same period last year.

Meanwhile, Iran’s rial currency has lost over half its value in the past year, falling to a record low of 1.9 million to the dollar at the end of last month. The economic woes helped fuel massive protests that spread across the country in January.

Steep prices on staples

Parked beneath an overpass in central Tehran, 56-year-old Hossein Farmani was idling alongside other taxi drivers waiting for customers. He popped open the trunk of his car to take out a kettle before pouring himself a glass of tea. He reflected on the wild price increases in the past year. Alongside items such as milk, the price of tea has risen over 50% since the war began.

“If things keep heading in this direction, we’re going to suffer a lot more,” Farmani said.

Prices had already climbed steadily over the past two years, but an Associated Press tour of grocery stores in Tehran found large jumps from February, before the war began: Chicken and lamb were up 45%, rice 31% and eggs 60%.

Iranian authorities have announced measures to help Iranians bear the crippling prices. But many of these policies — including a 60% hike in the minimum wage and coupon programs for essential goods — are stoking inflation, Taymur Rahmani, an economist at the University of Tehran, wrote recently in a leading business newspaper, Dunya-ye Eqtesad.

Since the war began, free bus and metro fares in the capital are also not helping the city’s struggling taxi drivers.

Another driver waiting nearby, Mohammad Deljoo, 73, said he was supporting his family of two children on a daily income of $4. He said there was no shortage of goods in shops and instead blamed the problem on “price gouging.”

“We only buy what’s absolutely necessary, things like bread and potatoes. Even eggs have become too expensive for us,” Deljoo said. He said the price for tires and other car parts rose fivefold in less than a year.

“One price today, another tomorrow. How is that possible?” he said.

Amid job losses, many Iranians are scrambling to find new ways to make money. Ali Asghar Nahardani, 32, said the ride-hailing app he works for had not paid him in over a month. He turned to street vending to cover his living expenses.

“We’re just living day by day, trying to get through this situation while the war conditions continue,” he said.

War contributes to collapse of Iranian middle class

The closure of the strait has hiked energy prices across the world. But in Iran, the war has marked another step in the ruin of a once large and prosperous middle class following decades of sanctions.

By 2019, Iran’s middle class had already shrunk to around 55% of the population, explained Mohammad Farzanegan, a professor of Middle Eastern economics at the University of Marburg. New rounds of sanctions as well as wars, corruption and economic mismanagement have further cut that number, he said.

The war will likely push several million Iranians below the poverty line, according to a report published by the U.N.’s development agency in late March.

A physical trainer who lives in downtown Tehran described the economic crisis as a mental health crisis for Iranian society. She said many of her clients could no longer afford her fees and training sessions. The few clients she has left have turned to discussing ways to handle signs of depression.

“The system is just collapsing. The layoffs are in factories, in companies, in startups, in whatever your work is,” she said in a voice note by Telegram. She spoke on condition of anonymity out of security fears.

The trainer said she had severely cut back on groceries.

“The last time I bought meat was about two months ago.” She has also given up paying for therapy sessions that she began after divorcing her spouse a year ago. “I am pursuing a master’s in psychology so it’s given me the tools to handle my anxieties,” she said.

A resident of Karaj, near the capital, said his insurance company had seen plummeting sales for car and home policies. Families are being dragged down into poverty, he said, also speaking on condition of anonymity out of fear of reprisal.

The Karaj resident, who joined the mass anti-government protests in January, blamed the yearslong decline on “severe systemic corruption” and the Islamic Republic’s costly support for militant groups in Lebanon, Yemen and Iraq.

“Most people blame the government and its ambitions,” he wrote by WhatsApp message.

Leaders urge public to endure

Iran’s leaders have been trying to shore up the homefront by showing sympathy while also urging the public to endure the economic pain for the sake of the war effort.

In a series of messages on his official Telegram channel Friday, the new supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, described the current phase of the conflict as an “economic battlefield” and asked employers to “avoid layoffs as much as possible.” Khamenei is believed to have been wounded early in the war by Israeli strikes and has yet to appear in public.

Parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf — who has emerged as a key player in the war effort and U.S. talks — urged Iranians to “be frugal” in their spending. He said on his official Telegram account that government administrators and the public “have a duty to help each other” to ease economic effects.

The U.S. blockade has restricted Iran’s critical Gulf trade. Over 90% of Iranian trade, particularly the oil exports that bring in billions of dollars, flows through its southern ports, Farzanegan estimated.

Farmani, the taxi driver, said he did not want to accept what he called a “humiliating” peace with the U.S. and Israel.

“A country that has sacrificed so many martyrs and has so many people willing to give their lives cannot simply let others from across the world dictate terms to us.”

___

Radjy reported from Cairo. Associated Press writer Nasser Karimi contributed to this report.

P&O Cruises has introduced a new sun lounger policy on its cruise ships, and passengers are divided over it

In the latest development in the sun lounger ‘wars’, P&O Cruises has introduced a new policy on beds to ensure that passengers don’t reserve them. It comes after a German tourist won a payout this month after he was unable to secure a sun lounger on holiday.

The man was on holiday in Greece in 2024 with his family and said he spent 20 minutes each day trying to find a bed, even waking up at 6am. He sued his tour operator for not enforcing a ban on reserving beds and judges in a district court in Hanover ruled in his favour, BBC news reports.

Judges ruled that his family were entitled to a refund of €986.70, despite an initial refund of €350 being paid by the tour operator. It was decided that the tour operator should have an obligation to make sure there was an organisational structure in place to better ensure guests can obtain a bed.

Click here to get the biggest stories straight to your inbox in our Daily Newsletter

Reserving beds has long been an issue for holidaymakers, with guests at many resorts across Europe rising at the crack of dawn to claim a sun lounger. Now P&O Cruises has made a move on the issue.

The British cruise line caters exclusively to British holidaymakers seeking both family-orientated and adults-only voyages, SurreyLive reports. The firm predominantly departs from Southampton towards sought-after locations including the Caribbean, Mediterranean and Norwegian Fjords.

On certain sunnier sailings, the operator has implemented a new regulation for passengers wishing to utilise the vessel’s sun loungers. One passenger posted an image of a P&O lounger featuring a fabric cover across the headrest bearing written instructions.

The message stated: “Loungers get lonely. Please don’t reserve. If left for more than 30 minutes, belongings will be moved to the lonely lounger pick up point.” The individual included the caption: “Is this move long overdue by PandO cruises or a bit over the top.”

Britons have endured considerable mockery regarding their tendency to claim sun loungers at daybreak by depositing a towel on the seat before returning to their accommodation. However, it appears this practice has transferred from coastal resorts or hotel pools to cruise liners over the years. The policy amendment has proved controversial amongst passengers, with numerous individuals declaring it had been a “long time coming”.

One passenger remarked: “We had our 1st cruise in December there was a group of about 7 or 8 older women who did this all the time on sea days! They were fuming when their stuff was removed, it was hilarious, so entitled!”

A second remarked: “Long overdue. I often am looking for a lounger by the pool to have one to dry off after a swim and I can never get one in the sun to dry my swimsuit enough to get back to the cabin usually I just take any empty one and by the time they come back I’m usually dry.”

A third individual noted: “This was on Britannia in January and was enforced. The staff went round and put a sticker warning on after 30 minutes, then 30 minutes after that, if the sticker was still there, the towels were removed.”

Another commented: “It’s a brilliant idea. What bemuses me is people leaving one empty sun lounger between them and other people. They do it in the theatre too. It means other couples have to sit apart – my husband prefers it that way as I can’t talk to him!”

Other passengers, nevertheless, questioned whether implementing a 30-minute restriction on the loungers was reasonable. One guest stated: “I’m definitely the minority here but personally, I think 30 minutes is unreasonable. I am absolutely fine with an hour and think it is unfair for people to ‘reserve’ sunbeds and head off for hours…BUT, I also think it should be ok for families to go in the pool, maybe grab a drink and queue at the snack bar then head back to the sunbeds…this can take more than 30 minutes!”

Another suggested: “An hour would be better, only so people could go grab lunch/food together. My husband and I would be happy taking it in turns if it meant we got a bed though.” A third commented: “If your nipping in for lunch maybe half hour is a bit mean.”

For more of today’s top stories, click here.

Jonathan Moreland will retire from Durham-based Swinburne Maddison on December 31, closing out 35 years with the firm.

He will be succeeded by Victoria Walton, current partner and head of commercial property, who will take on the role in January 2027.

Head of Commercial Property, Victoria Walton who will take over from the current managing partner, Jonathan Moreland, when he retires on December 31 (Image: LAUREN PETERS)

Mr Moreland joined the firm in 1991, then known as Swinburne Jackson and Moreland, where his late father served as senior partner.

He became a partner in 1995 and played a key role in the 1998 merger with Wilson Maddison, becoming one of the four founding partners of the modern Swinburne Maddison.

Mr Moreland said: “It has been an enormous privilege and honour to lead Swinburne Maddison.

“The role has been about far more than leadership alone – it has meant being part of a firm where people genuinely belong, care about one another and remain deeply committed to supporting our clients.”

He has emphasised the firm’s approach to succession planning, describing it as a carefully planned transition designed to ensure business as usual for all clients.

Since becoming managing partner in 2021, Mr Moreland has led the firm through a period of significant growth and achievement.

During his tenure, Swinburne Maddison was named Law Firm of the Year at the Northern Law Awards in 2023 and 2025.

It also delivered an ambitious three-year business plan, achieving a 38 per cent increase in turnover and expanding headcount by more than 35 per cent.

The firm also secured Silver Investors in People accreditation.

Mr Moreland also expressed strong support for his successor.

He said: “Victoria has played a major role in shaping our success and truly embodies Swinburne Maddison.

“I can think of no one better to lead the firm into its next chapter with confidence, integrity, honour and fresh energy.”

Ms Walton began her career at Swinburne Maddison as a trainee in 1999 and became a partner just seven years later.

As head of commercial property, she led the team to regional and national recognition, including being named Property Law Firm of the Year at the North East Insider Property Awards in 2023.

She is also individually ranked as a Leading Partner in The Legal 500.

Ms Walton said: “My priorities will be supporting our team to progress their careers while continuing to deliver exceptional service to our clients.

“By investing in our team of experts, recruiting for cultural fit and making sure all staff have a voice we will continue to expand within the region while retaining our reputation as Durham’s leading law firm.”

She has served on the firm’s management committee for six years, working closely with Mr Moreland on Swinburne Maddison’s strategic direction.

While taking on the role of managing partner, Ms Walton will continue her work in commercial property, acting for some of the region’s largest developers and property owners.

To support the next phase of the firm’s growth, new leadership roles will also take effect from January 1.

David Low will become head of dispute resolution, and Sharney Randhawa will be promoted to head of employment.

Both have worked closely with Mr Moreland and will continue the approach and client relationships he developed during his time with the firm.

While Mr Moreland’s retirement marks the end of an era, the appointment of Ms Walton signals a confident transition and a fresh chapter for Swinburne Maddison as it looks to the future.

There aren’t many good jokes about politicians, and fewer suitable for publication, but one doing the rounds in Westminster should provoke a wry smile. Goes like this: “A Blairite, a Brownite, and a Corbynite walk into a bar. The barman says: ‘What are you drinking, Andy?’”.

It’s funny because it’s true, as they say, and it gets directly to the essence of Andy Burnham’s great strength and his great weakness as a prospective replacement for Sir Keir Starmer. The attraction is that he is one of politics’ more flexible players, and his supporters can read what they will into current vague lefty vibes. The negative is that his record suggests he might not be any more devoted to principle than the openly pragmatic Keir Starmer.

No one, however, doubts his ambition for the premiership, even though it has taken him on a circuitous route – via the North. In fact, it would not be the first time that the mayor of a big city went on to become head of their country’s government, though it’s unusual. Three US presidents have done so (Andrew Johnson, Grover Cleveland, Calvin Coolidge), and in Europe there are the highly notable examples of Chancellor Willy Brandt (graduating from West Berlin), and Jacques Chirac (Paris). Here, of course, we saw Boris Johnson perfecting his populist skills in London before, in due course, graduating to the premiership. The question for 2026 is whether Andy Burnham can make a similar journey from his mayoral HQ at the Tootal Building in Manchester to 10 Downing Street. The by-election in the usually safe Labour seat of Gorton, well inside Burnham’s northern fiefdom, opened up at least the possibility that Burnham might repeat Johnson’s feat. His candidature was, though, blocked by Labour’s National Executive Committee. The good reason was that he might not have won, and, even if he did, his candidature would trigger a by-election for the Greater Manchester mayoralty – and risk the loss of a powerful Labour fiefdom. The more tawdry cause for him being blocked was that Starmer was frightened of having such a rival or critic sitting on the benches behind him, or even around the cabinet table and an obvious replacement for him. Arguably, given that Burnham is still not an MP, and cannot replace Starmer until he is one, Starmer’s Stalinist tactic worked. On the other hand, perhaps Starmer’s Labour would be stronger now and there’d be no leadership crisis. Hypotheticals; but some kind of psychodrama developing in due course was likely.

Burnham, a minister in the Blair and Brown governments and who served in Ed Miliband and Jeremy Corbyn’s shadow cabinets, reborn as the mayor of Greater Manchester since 2017, has already been almost prime minister, you know. He may presently be the “King of the North”, enjoying marginally better ratings than the party nationally, but he could now be trying, for the third time, for a rather more exalted position – leader of the Labour Party, and with it, the premiership. It was a laughable proposition for almost the whole of Sir Keir Starmer’s period of previously unassailable dominance, but suddenly, before last autumn’s party conference, in a panicky mood, the Labour Party seemed to have caught what might be termed “the Tory disease” – the delusion that a change of leader can solve all its problems, coupled with an addiction to plotting. Burnham, away from Westminster for most of the past decade, seemed to be the nearest thing they have to a fresh start. Now that there has been a fresh outbreak of that disease, in a far more virulent variant, his name has become prominent in all the speculation once again.

Last time round, didn’t go that well for our Andy. He seemed to wilt under the heat of media attention, never quite managing to answer that perennial question “will you rule out becoming leader” – an impossible one, to be fair. Then, as now, he refuses to be drawn, a little too obviously torn between a certain vestigial preference for straight talking, his obvious ambition (having tried for the leadership twice before) and some genuine hesitation about the timing – not least because he he’s not an MP and there is no such thing as a safe Labour seat into which he can be dropped. Burnham might have built up some more momentum if he’d had anything more substantial than a sort of vague “soft left” agenda, summed up in the amorphous term “Manchesterism”, which hasn’t exactly caught on. Lucy Powell, fair to say a friend of his, beat Starmer ally Bridgette Philipson for the deputy leadership, which confirmed the membership’s preference for a tilt to the shoft left, but nothing much came of that after.

Last year, despite more government U-turns, more scandals and resignations and ever more dismal poll ratings over the autumn, there was a feeling that Labour had stared into the abyss of a leadership contest, and drawn back. The possible unprovoked attack on another leadership rival, Wes Streeting, by a rogue No 10 spinner seems to confirm that the picture of a leader surrounded by rivals willing to wound but afraid to kill. Neither Streeting nor Burnham, nor the latest party star, Shabana Mahmood, nor Angela Rayner have presented a convincing alternative to Starmer’s policies, and there’s no overwhelming evidence that they’d transform the party’s electoral prospects. Starmer is weak, but his enemies are divided.

That is still true, but they all seem to be much more in earnest these days. Burnham’s ally, Clive Lewis, has published a sort of manifesto making the case for more government borrowing. Given that no one’s taken any notice of it, it’s only fair to quote a key chunk about fiscal responsibility:

“Bond markets do not have ideological preferences. They have functional ones. They prefer clarity, credible revenue streams, productive investment, and a state with a plan. What they punish is not public ambition but incoherence. A properly designed productive state programme would not be a leap into fiscal fantasy. It would be an attempt to end the much costlier fantasy that Britain can keep borrowing to compensate for broken markets while refusing to repair them.”

In any case, this would surely be his final throw of the dice. Even Burnham must be tired of being Labour’s perennial “nearly man”. It feels distant now, but way back in 2015, after Ed Miliband had led Labour to a poor election result and quit the leadership, Burnham was the favourite to succeed him. Had some Labour MPs – who should have known better – not “lent” their nominations to put Jeremy Corbyn on the ballot, Burnham might well have won, beating Yvette Cooper and Liz Kendall. As it was, Burnham lost miserably to Corbyn – 19 per cent to 59 per cent. It was not much better than when he fought, and lost, the leadership election after the 2010 defeat when Gordon Brown stood down. He got 9 per cent and finished behind Ed Miliband, David Miliband, and Ed Balls, and only just ahead of Diane Abbott.

In 2010, Burnham was too young, but in the 2015 contest, his defeat was his own fault. A late tilt leftwards came too late to rescue him from the Corbynite wave, yet alienated some in his own camp. Then again, he was, and remains, an ill-defined proposition; “soft left” is such an amorphous concept, after all. Still, probably thanks to being vague, Burnham has spotted the opportunity presented by Starmer’s unpopularity in the country – Labour’s 16 per cent opinion poll rating is scarcely believable – and among parliamentarians.

It’s no accident that Burnham was one of the prominent voices in opposition to the government’s attempts to reform welfare, in stark contrast to Angela Rayner’s doomed attempt to strike a deal with the backbench rebels. Rayner, however – the once undisputed Queen of the North – is no longer a rival to Burnham’s ambitions. Burnham could have killed off the destabilising speculation about a leadership challenge last year with one simple, unequivocal statement. Instead he has dodged the question, just as he has so often in the past.

Far from declaring his support for Starmer, Burnham has been busily building up his own support network, Mainstream, for “radical realists”. It’s a leftish version of the Starmerite Labour Together grouping, a Burnham fan club thinly disguised as a think tank or pressure group. Even more audaciously, Burnham virtually launched Lucy Powell’s campaign for the deputy leadership in a television interview shortly after Rayner resigned.

But it came to nought. The pattern in Burnham’s surprisingly long career is that he strikes to wound without thus far having had any success in finishing off his opponents. Even now, it is possible – there’s some wild speculation out there – that Ed Miliband, who could become leader immediately, could overtake him, or somehow recruit Burnham as an ally. The atmosphere is febrile, and memories of Ed’s doomed general election campaign in 2015 are fading. Maybe Ed still believes that “Hell yes, I’m tough enough”.

His two failed attempts to be Labour leader hurt Burnham, who has a peculiar quality of personal sensitivity that is rare in a front-rank politician, yet is allied to extraordinary resilience. It must be self-belief. He tried to put the best spin he could on being beaten by Corbyn a few years later, once he was safely ensconced in power as elected mayor of Greater Manchester: “It’s hard – especially being the frontrunner– but nothing is a given in politics, hence why I fell out of love with Westminster.

“The defeat was bruising; leadership elections always are. Getting rejected [by] people you know was tough, but it epitomised the shallowness of Westminster. I was always the loyal Labour person, a team player, and thought it would serve me well, but it didn’t come my way, and it exposed the fickleness of politics at a national level.”

After a brief spell as Corbyn’s shadow home secretary – this once-rising New Labour star (and now former Starmer loyalist) is ideologically flexible – he ran to be the first mayor of Greater Manchester: in effect, the voice of the North. It has plainly been the making, or at least the refashioning, of Andy Burnham.

Consciously or not, he looks different these days. In his diaries, Alastair Campbell wrote of a 38-year-old Burnham in 2008, shortly after he’d been promoted to Gordon Brown’s cabinet: “Andy seems so young. He needs to get himself some decent suits.” Burnham never looked particularly comfortable in any business wear, and he’s been transformed these days into a rather hip-looking Mancunian, all smart-casual with fashionable specs and the old monobrow neatly bifurcated. He still comes across as a bit needy and put upon, but it suits the new persona, and the new political dynamic, perfectly. If Oasis – Manchester’s favourite sons – can come back, why not Andy?

The impassioned speeches Burnham delivers also sound different from the old New Labour automaton – emotional but authentic, with a real political edge to them. It’s just as well he’s kept his accent. He found a ready audience for the message that his region was being cheated of its financial rights for the sake of a quibble with Boris Johnson over £5m. The North was not going to be picked off on the cheap by a government that was “grinding communities down through punishing negotiations”, nor its citizens “treated as the canaries in the coal mine for an experimental regional lockdown strategy”.

Having said that, Burnham was knocked sideways as Johnson demolished the red wall in the 2019 general election. There is as yet no clear reason to believe that Burnham will stop a similar assault by Nigel Farage and Reform UK, in the North or nationally.

Burnham understands populism, even if he’s not the best exponent of it. He carefully refers to those who work in pubs, and bookies, and drive taxis as “people too often forgotten by those in power”. He has skilfully forged a broad, if fragile, cross-party regional front against the prime minister. “The North, c’est moi” might sum up Burnham, so completely has he merged his identity (and interests) with those of 5 million disparate people in a disparate region.

Within what passes for the United Kingdom these days, only Sadiq Khan is a match for him in this new game of territorial politics. The reborn Baron Burnham is a national figure to be reckoned with. His future, whether regional or national, looks brighter these days. After all, Johnson proved his campaigning ability as a two-term mayor of London. As in the US and France, a mayoralty can be an enviable base for a politician on the make (provided Burnham can get a Westminster seat).

If Burnham wants to return to national politics, he now has the best chance he’s ever had – though the party and the government he seizes might be irreparably damaged by the resulting divisions. In the past, Burnham has complained about not being invited to address the Labour conference, and being left out of the 2019 election campaign. These days he has no difficulty finding a platform: he’s more box office, has some momentum, and is getting harder for the leadership to ignore.

He is a professional northerner, if not yet a master craftsman in the Geoffrey Boycott/Michael Parkinson/Peter Kay league. The placenames on the Burnham CV are evocative, though he’s never claimed, Rebecca Long-Bailey style, to have been born virtually on the pitch at Goodison Park (he’s a lifelong Evertonian). Maybe a racecourse, though: Andrew Murray Burnham was born in Aintree on 7 January 1970. The family lived in Formby, and his mum (a receptionist) and dad (a telephone engineer) met at Maghull phone exchange. They were Protestant and Catholic respectively, but sectarian doubts about Burnham’s father being a suitable husband were assuaged when his girlfriend’s dad realised they’d both been to support Everton against Blackburn.

Burnham was brought up a Catholic, and he holds to the faith – a surviving example of an older type of working-class Labour MP, often as not with Irish Catholic roots and a tendency to social conservatism. Burnham has sometimes been embroiled in controversies about LGBT+ rights. He says his political heroes are the late Paul Goggins (Catholic Labour) and David Blunkett, whose instincts were (and remain) very old-fashioned. There’s a contrast there, in Labour culture, between the metropolitan liberalism of Corbyn or Starmer and the more cautious approach of Blunkett or Burnham.

In due course, the family moved to Leigh, Greater Manchester – at the time a solid Labour seat, which Burnham would proudly represent in the Commons from 2001 to 2017. His first unpaid job was as a newspaper reporter on the Middleton Guardian. Grandad drove a lorry for Tate and Lyle.

His socialism was sparked early on, when he was only nine: “I remember very clearly going to Chester Zoo, not long after the 1979 election. There was a sticker on the car in front that said ‘Don’t blame me, I voted Labour’, and I asked my dad what it was. I remember him saying, ‘Well, there’s a woman called Maggie… ’.” By 14, Burnham had joined the Labour Party, just in time for the miners’ strike.

He says he got his ambition from his gran, who sounds a bit of a proto-Thatcherite: “She grew up in Great Mersey Street and worked for the brewery as a cleaner or in the kitchens. One day she walked over the fields, unbeknown to my grandad Jimmy, and put a deposit down on one of the new houses being built. He couldn’t believe what she had done.” Perhaps it wasn’t such a surprise that Burnham’s doomed 2015 leadership bid had the theme “aspirational socialism”.

He was certainly socially mobile, and has become quietly cosmopolitan. He met his Dutch wife, Marie-France van Heel, known as Frankie, when he was studying English at Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge. Married in 2000, they have three children.

Curiously, Burnham is unlike many of the Labour Party’s modern-day household names in that he can be described as a typical “professional politician”. He was a parliamentary researcher and special adviser before getting his seat and ministerial office. He worked for Tessa Jowell, Chris Smith, David Blunkett and Patricia Hewitt, and was a Treasury minister, culture secretary and health secretary under Gordon Brown. Although he often protests that he’s never been part of the Westminster in-crowd, he certainly gives the impression of it.

In an interview with The Spectator in 2006, after winning the magazine’s “Minister to Watch” award, he admitted to knowing the Miliband brothers, James Purnell, and other youthful outriders of the Blair cult, but tried to imply a certain distance when asked about cosy meals at their homes in Primrose Hill. “The thing that excites me at the moment is a chip shop I’ve found which sells both mushy peas and gravy,” he said. “That’s more me than Primrose Hill. And that is where I do not fit the archetypal New Labour mould.” Like I say, a professional northerner.

To be fair, though, in that same interview you can see how Burnham detected a mood swing in the North that was later to do so much damage to Labour, and urged his party to pause and reflect on people who had become “lost along the way”. Criticising David Cameron, he made a sensitive point about the coming culture wars: “Most of my constituents can’t afford wind turbines on their houses. I sense the metropolitan world being very much wooed. But the larger country is asking, ‘What the hell is this all about?’.”

When he was in government, in the course of quite a long and varied career, Burnham wasn’t too heavily tested. After he was booed at a 20th-anniversary commemoration of the Hillsborough disaster, he persuaded Brown to set up the inquiry that eventually led to justice for the 96. Now, after much lobbying and a change of government, Starmer is reportedly ready to introduce the Hillsborough Law, compelling a duty of candour on public officials. It’s the right thing to do, and partly a result of Burnham’s pressuring for it, but it does handily spike Burnham’s guns a bit.

As health secretary he was accused of failings in the Mid Staffs hospital scandal, but was never officially censured. His two leadership bids were disappointments. The capture of Labour by the Corbynites, the scale of which was aided by Burnham’s lacklustre campaign, left him isolated and at a dead end. Yet the Manchester job has turned out to be much more than some cushy early retirement gig. Weeks after he took over as mayor, he had to respond to the terror attack at the Manchester Arena, which he did in a dignified way, and his recent struggles with Whitehall have given him a national profile. No matter that Johnson just bypassed Burnham and dished out £60m directly to the individual boroughs in Burnham’s fiefdom, Burnham had the better of the politics of it all.

People say Burnham is a bit of a flip-flop, but to have survived anywhere near the top of Labour politics in the past couple of decades requires a degree of pragmatism, and Burnham has certainly been all over the place on Brexit – but who hasn’t? Burnham has enjoyed success in fighting Covid, and has done his best to secure better transport links for his region and the North more widely – the cancellation of the Northern extension portion of HS2 was a bitter disappointment. He has, though, taken the best innovative features of integrated public transport in London and applied them to Greater Manchester.

He is popular there, and continues to pursue a war on homelessness in his city region, in the past condemning the “top-down London-centric Labour Party” and banging on about converting the House of Lords into a PR-elected chamber. Rather late in the day, he has added his voice to those calling for a proper public inquiry into the rape gangs scandal.

Probably the best thing that ever happened to him was losing the Labour leadership in 2015 and avoiding the internal traumas of the past decade. At just 55 years of age, Burnham is younger than Starmer, let alone Farage, with whom he shares a certain “authentic” appeal. He’s fond of the band The Courteeners, and once, perhaps tellingly, tweeted the lyrics to their single “Take Over the World”: “I’m only a paperboy from the North West/ But I can scrub up well in my Sunday best.”

Having been a bit of an underperformer, could it at last be coming true for Our Andy? Yes, in a purely tactical sense. The real question remains – why would Burnham would necessarily do things better than Starmer? How would he fix the public finances? Make the economy grow faster? Reform social security? Stop the boats? Placate Trump? It’s time for Andy to once again speak up.