Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Politics

Exclusive video: Ghada Karmi speaks outside British museum during Palestine protest

Published

on

British Museum

British Museum

Today, 25 April 2026, pro-Palestine protesters demonstrated outside the British Museum in London against the museum’s decision to remove reference to Palestine from some of its exhibits. The move came as the museum capitulated to notorious Israel lobby group ‘UK Lawyers for Israel’ (UKLFI).

Despite heavy-handed policing and attempts at incitement by a small pro-Israel counter-demonstration, the protest was peaceful and good-natured. Activist photographer ‘BetterThanReal’ captured some moments from the demonstration for Skwawkbox and the Canary:







He also spoke to well-known Palestinian academic, author and activist Ghada Kharmi, who was born in Palestine before the ‘Israeli’ occupation ever existed. Karmi said that the museum had become an “enemy” of the Palestinian people:

Demonstrators see the museum’s capitulation to Zionist lobbying as a discriminatory erasure of Palestinian history and culture that mirrors Israeli policy of eradicating Palestine on the ground. Placards and speeches referred to the museum’s censorship and cultural imperialism and its discarding of many centuries of established practice and tradition of referring to the region as ‘Palestine’.

Advertisement

Despite amplified heckling by a small contingent of far-right Zionist ‘auditors’ — including former Met officer Gill Levy, who was arrested on suspicion of assaulting a Muslim woman at the first protest outside the British Museum in February — the humanitarian demonstrators refused to respond to provocations and ignored the agitators.

As the weather warms, the British Museum and its surrounds are increasingly busy thousands of tourists. Unless the museum ends its cowardice, Londoners and tourists alike will continue to receive an education from the protesters.

Featured image via Andrea Domeniconi

By Skwawkbox

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

A Weekend in the Big Apple

Published

on

A Weekend in the Big Apple

Today’s newsletter comes to you live from New York City, where I’ve spent a couple of days before heading down to Washington DC on an Amtrak train a little later to cover the King’s State visit for LBC. My shows on Monday and Tuesday will be coming from Simon Marks’s FSN studios. Washington has always been one of my favourite cities in the world. It knocks spots of New York, which I have to admit I don’t really like. Anyone who thinks New York is superior to London in any way has a screw loose. The congestion is far worse. It’s dirtier. The architecture is awful. Admittedly, I didn’t feel unsake, but then again, I don’t in London. I guess it didn’t help that it rained the whole day yesterday.

We arrived on Friday lunchtime and things did not get off to a good start which the friend who I am traveling with was apprehended at immigration. He was marched off to be interrogated with people who were sitting there in handcuffs, some in tears. It turned out to be over an unpaid speeding ticket from 2019 and was informed that if he didn’t pay the outstanding $192 he would be arrested and detained. His credit card came our quicker than you can say Jack Daniels. He was then nearly sick in the yellow cab driving us from the airport to our hotel on Times Square.

We went out for an insanely expensive dinner at a steakhouse called Frankie and Johnnie’s, just off Times Square. It was a bit empty, but given the prices, I could understand why, even though the menu was superb and the food excellent. I had a steak so big, I couldn’t finish it.

To be honest we were both so knackered we just went back to the hotel and went to sleep.

Advertisement
 

Yesterday we went to Smithfield’s bar to watch West Ham v Everton with NYC Hammers, and was reunited with my friend of 34 years, Daniel Forrester. We met in 1992 when he was interning with Patrick Thompson, the Norwich North MP I worked for in 1980s. And we’ve been best friends ever since. I got a bit emotional! All was well, as West Ham scraped a valuable three points.

 

He then took us to Thomas Jefferson’s birthplace, which is a now a museum and we ended up in a store/restaurant called ‘Eately’ which sold all sorts of Italian food, and we wiled away the afternoon with some great conversation. We hadn’t seen each other for 14 years, so there was a lot of catching up to do, but we picked up as if the fourteen years hadn’t happened. That’s what true friends can do.

In the evening we went to see CHESS at the Imperial Theatre. It’s about the 12th time I’ve seen it, and I will do a review of it on there when I’ve got time during the week.

When we got back to the hotel I found out about the events at the White House Correspondents Dinner, an event which had I not gone to New York first, I might have been at! I did a love hit on LBC at 3.45am UK time with James Hansen.

Advertisement

I’m really looking forward to being back in Washington this evening and meeting up with my former Total Politics colleague and friend, TV’s Shane Greer tomorrow evening after the show.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Israel destroys solar panels supplying electric and water to Southern Lebanon

Published

on

Israel

Israel

Israel has destroyed solar panels which supply electricity to Debel, Lebanon, and power its water station.

Debel is the same Christian village where an Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) soldier destroyed a statue of Jesus, only last week.

Advertisement

Once again, the IOF claims it is investigating — but we all know what it means when Israel ‘investigates’ its own war crimes.

It’s also worth pointing out that the IOF wouldn’t even be pretending to investigate if it were a Muslim village.

No doubt that Israel is about to tell us that the solar panels were Hezbollah infrastructure. Were they using them to charge their phones and play Club Penguin?

Israel — the ethnic cleansing continues

Israel has repeatedly claimed that it does not target civilian infrastructure. Despite this, there is a clear and documented pattern of the IOF flattening railways, schools, hospitals, water desalination plants and electric supplies. Clearly, the IOF is attempting to make it impossible for the people of Gaza, and now Lebanon, to survive.

And there’s a word for that.

Now, Israel is systematically destroying parts of Southern Lebanon, no doubt as part of its goal to create a ‘Greater Israel’.

Advertisement

Israel’s ‘Greater Israel project’ was formally established in 1967. This was only one month after Israel illegally annexed the Gaza Strip, the Sinai Peninsula, the West Bank, and the Golan Heights in the Six-Day War.

According to Middle East Eye:

It is often understood as a vision of territorial expansion to encompass Palestine, Lebanon and Jordan, along with significant parts of Syria, Iraq, Egypt and Saudi Arabia.

This tells us that the current attacks on Lebanon are not some new attempt to disarm Hezbollah. They are part of a prolonged and systematic colonial attempt to invade and steal the land.

Advertisement

Ecocide

The IOF has already destroyed 90% of all solar panels in Gaza, leaving the power system in ruins and the people of Gaza with no stable supply of electricity. Now, it is committing similar crimes in Lebanon.

We are already in the middle of a global climate catastrophe; meanwhile, ‘God’s chosen people’ are destroying solar panels?

Israel claims to be a leader in environmental technology, but environmentalism without anti-zionism is simply gardening.

Additionally, what’s the good in claiming to be a leader in environmentalism whilst dropping 200,000 tonnes of explosives filled with toxic fumes on civilians? That’s the equivalent of six Hiroshimas.

Not to mention the continuous use of white phosphorus which unlawful under international law and the huge and lingering environmental impact of it.

By early 2024, Israel had already destroyed a huge part of Gaza’s farmland, wiping out orchards, greenhouses, and crops, which are all vital for survival in Gaza. It had decimated the majority of farms and orchards, with munitions and toxins now contaminating Gaza’s soil and groundwater.

Similarly, seawater is full of sewage and waste because Israel cut off electricity and destroyed water treatment plants.

Advertisement

It is clear that from the start, Israel has used environmental harm as a weapon of control and erasure. Now, it is a core feature of its settler-colonial terrorism.

Systematic destruction

It has become clear that destruction is so deeply embedded in the minds of Israeli’s that they didn’t even think to make use of the solar panels on the land they will no doubt attempt to occupy. So much for an ‘environmental leader’.

We have watched Israel systematically destroy electricity and water supplies throughout Gaza. Now, it’s doing the same in Southern Lebanon. People cannot survive without clean water or power, and that is exactly what the terrorists in Israel are counting on.

Advertisement

The fight for Palestinian and Lebanese freedom is inherently tied to the survival of the Earth and humanity. There cannot be one without the other.

Feature image via Heidi Pett/X

By HG

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Mothin Ali calls out Labour’s new plan to subvert democracy

Published

on

Labour

Labour

Anticipating heavy losses in the upcoming local elections, some Labour politicians are now calling for Keir Starmer to do another screeching u-turn.

What these MPs don’t seem to appreciate is that it’s the constant u-turns which tanked Labour’s popularity in the first place.

‘Unbelievable stuff’

As the Mail on Sunday reported:

Advertisement

One senior MP told The Mail on Sunday: ‘With the way opinion polls are going, it would be total madness to bring this in before 2029.’

He appealed to Local Government Secretary Steve Reed, who is overseeing the reform, to realise that ‘otherwise, we’re just giving Zack Polanski and the Greens more votes’.

What’s a ‘senior MP’ when they’re at home?

Sounds to us like this person is a minister, and they don’t want to admit that. Our suspicion is it’s Steve Reed himself, and he provided the quote to create a narrative for his future actions.

If you’re unfamiliar with Reed, he’s the unconvincing minister with zero posture who the Labour Party saw fit to sic on the Green Party:

Advertisement

Advertisement

Reed also oversees electoral matters, as Green Party deputy leader Mothin Ali noted:

This is unbelievable stuff. First Steve Reed tried to cancel elections he thought Labour would lose, now Labour MPs want to remove voting rights from young people because they’re scared they’ll vote Green. Instead of trying to cancel the voters, why doesn’t Labour start to focus on what really matters, the cost of living crisis, more affordable homes, and rent controls.

The Mail on Sunday added:

When the plans were first set out last year, Labour faced claims of trying to rig future elections on the grounds that younger people tended to vote for them over the Tories. But one survey appeared to show that the Greens, a threat in some Labour-held constituencies, could benefit even more.

An ITV Youth Tracker poll by Savanta published last November showed support for Labour among 18 to 25-year-olds had collapsed from 43 per cent in March last year to just 25 per cent. Backing for the Greens had soared from 16 to 32 per cent.

So, we’ve got bad news for Labour about demographics:

Advertisement

Labour — Dead end

At this point, if Labour wants to stand any chance of winning, it will have to ban everyone under 65 from voting. Additionally, it will have to ban everyone over 65, because those people have all turned to Reform UK.

Advertisement

This will mean the only people allowed to vote are Keir Starmer, Steve Reed, and that Sky News editor who’s still taking the PM at face value despite overwhelming evidence he’s a serial liar:

Advertisement

Featured image via Hugo Harvey (YouTube)

By Willem Moore

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Green Party’s Spencer says MPs are pissed on the job

Published

on

Green Party

Green Party

In a new interview with Politics JOE, Green Party’s Hannah Spencer has spoken out against the drinking culture among British MPs:

As Spencer notes, the way things are in Westminster is not “how the world works”.

Green Party vs Booze Britain

Hannah Spencer is the Green Party MP who won the Gorton & Denton by-election. As we reported at the time, Spencer didn’t just win; she massively exceeded the most favourable predictions:

Advertisement

This is what Spencer said in her victory speech:

I didn’t grow up wanting to be a politician. I’m a plumber. And two weeks ago, during all this, I also qualified as a plasterer. Because even in chaos, even under pressure, I get things done.

I am no different to every single person here in this constituency. I work hard. That is what we do.

For most people outside the Westminster bubble, ‘working hard’ means ‘working sober’. This is obviously why Spencer finds the vibes in Parliament so hard to gel with.

Advertisement

In the interview with Politics JOE, Spencer said:

I’m really uneasy about – and I noticed this the other day – when you can smell the alcohol, when people are in between votes and everyone’s going in to vote. Some people have been drinking in between.

There’s a room where I walk past and I’ve doubled my back and looked in because people are just sat having a drink.

But again, that’s a job. I can’t imagine if a cleaner did that or someone working in a bank had a few drinks and then went back to work a bit smelling of alcohol – that wouldn’t happen.

Funnily enough, I’m well placed to comment on this. Many years ago, I worked as a cleaner at the Stretford Jobcentre. One day, a lady who I worked with turned up shitfaced. Several of the Jobcentre staff noticed, and told our boss to send her home. So basically, exactly what you’d expect to happen happened.

Advertisement

While I’ve never been a banker, I have worked in multiple offices, including a stint at a defence contractor when I was much younger and didn’t know any better. While people weren’t just walking around pissed, it was definitely the case that you could have a boozy lunch every so often without turning any heads (with all of it charged to your American Express card, no questions asked).

So yeah, Spencer is half right.

It’s definitely the case that most jobs are sober by demand, but the closer you get to the heart of capital, the more leeway you get to disobey the rules.

Dangers

Spencer also said:

Advertisement

And I think there’s been so many cases recently of questionable and dangerous behaviour… allegedly from MPs, with staff, because this culture… of a really unprofessional and worrying setting where people can just drink alcohol… while they’re in work; it’s like life doesn’t work like that.

And when I say that that is what I find very out of touch about that place, it’s things like that that I mean, because I just think the vast majority of us that have come from backgrounds of like normal jobs – like that’s not how the world works, so why does it work in somewhere where arguably the most important decisions are getting made.

Labour List spokesperson Stella Tsantekidou took offence to what Spencer said, complaining:

Yeah no, sorry, MPs are often cooped up in Parliament for 15 hours a day, they will have a drink with journalists or colleagues and will still be discussing politics -their job, as Hannah says.

Tesco workers are “cooped up” — you wouldn’t be okay with them getting on the lash, would you? Although I suppose they’re actually doing important work; they’re not just running some silly, little country.

Tsantekidou also said:

Advertisement

I don’t like the blanket demonisation of MPs and Hannah should know better after she had already been accused of not taking the job seriously because she took part in that dancing event in Portcullis house.

Spencer didn’t demonise all MPs; she demonised the ones who were drinking. Unless of course every MP besides her is drinking, in which case this is a bigger problem than we realised.

Tsantekidou added:

I hate people getting too drunk in Westminster too and am sad I see so many people seemingly with alcoholic addiction or otherwise, but just like all other professions socialise so do we in politics and it is an absolute necessity that you do.

People are responsible for their own actions, of course, but they’re less in control of themselves once they start drinking – i.e. having a bar at work is a recipe for trouble. Also, note that Tsantekidou is using ‘socialising’ as a synonym for ‘drinking’. This is increasingly not how people think, with people of all ages now drinking less to one degree or another.

Tsantekidou additionally said:

Advertisement

Politics is based on human relationships, not on some machine button being pushed. What should MPs do take journalists to sit and chat for hours in an empty room?

If the thought of chatting with colleagues drives you to drink, you might actually have a problem. Saying that, we do appreciate some of the ‘colleagues’ in this instance may be Jess Phillips or Jacob Rees-Mogg.

Professionalism

Tsantekidou finished:

Of anything there should be MORE socialising in politics so that people can understand each other better.

If she’s using ‘socialising’ to mean ‘drinking’ again, then no — we don’t need more politicians getting pissed with journalists. Clearly, we need both professions to start acting like professionals and to literally just do the jobs they’re paid to do.

Featured image via UK House of Commons

Advertisement

By Willem Moore

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

The Most Common Issues Gen Xers Bring Up In Therapy

Published

on

For some Gen Xers, off-putting experiences with therapists in their childhood have made them hesitant to go back.

Millennials and Generation Z are often dubbed the “therapy generations,” known for prioritising mental health and seeking counselling when they need it.

Where does that leave Gen X? Is the demographic known for its independent streak and “whatever” attitude similarly blasé about getting a therapist?

Many Gen Xers – those born between about 1965 and 1980 – came of age in a time when seeking help wasn’t as normalised. For some, a “shadow of a stigma” still lingers, said Tracy Douglas, a therapist in Wisconsin who specialises in supporting Gen X clients.

Mental health wasn’t exactly a dinner table topic in the ’70s and ’80s, she said. Apart from a Woody Allen film – or the kind of urbane circles those movies depicted – it wasn’t really talked about at all.

Advertisement

“Therapy wasn’t seen as a proactive tool for healing and growth so much as it was an absolute last resort to turn to,” Douglas, who was born in 1970 herself, told HuffPost. “Because of that, many Gen Xers can still have a sense that they should be able to muscle through troubles on their own.”

For some Gen Xers, off-putting experiences with quirky ’70s- and ’80s-era therapists – or ones who felt overly performative – have made them hesitant to go back.

“I had one client tell me about a family session from his teens where a therapist forced the entire family to hold hands, look each other in the eye, and recite ‘I love you’ to each family member,” Douglas said. “It was so forced, awkward and profoundly disconnected from their actual family dynamic that they never went back.”

For some Gen Xers, off-putting experiences with therapists in their childhood have made them hesitant to go back.

Comstock via Getty Images

For some Gen Xers, off-putting experiences with therapists in their childhood have made them hesitant to go back.

Still, more members of the latchkey generation are starting to try therapy. In 2018, about 26% of Gen Xers said they’d sought therapy at some point, according to the American Psychological Association – and that number has only climbed since the Covid-19 pandemic kicked off a full-blown therapy boom, fuelled in part by the rise of telehealth.

Advertisement

“Once they’re actually in the room, Gen Xers are often some of the most committed clients I work with,” said Jennifer Chappell Marsh, a marriage and family therapist in San Diego, California.

Her Gen X clients are adaptable and genuinely want to understand what’s happening in their lives and what makes them tick.

“They respond really well when the work makes sense to them,” she told HuffPost. “When I can help a Gen X client see that the way they’ve been coping was a completely logical response to what they lived through, something shifts.”

What exactly are they discussing on therapists’ couches? Below, Marsh, Douglas and other therapists share the top issues they hear from Gen Xers.

Advertisement
When Gen Xers do seek help with a mental health professional, it's often a massive relief, though it can feel foreign or scary at first.

Johner Images via Getty Images

When Gen Xers do seek help with a mental health professional, it’s often a massive relief, though it can feel foreign or scary at first.

They have chronic stress with no blueprint for asking for help.

Raised to be self-reliant, many Gen Xers take a DIY approach to their personal problems. Marsh said a lot of her Gen X clients grew up in homes with divorced or two working parents, where emotional attunement was often lacking. The lesson they absorbed, she said, was simple: You get through things by handling them yourself.

“In attachment terms, we’d call this a dismissing style – self-reliant, uncomfortable with dependence, skilled at managing their own distress without letting anyone in,” she said. “When midlife hits and everything gets heavy, they don’t reach out, they just keep going.”

When they do seek help with a mental health professional, it’s often a massive relief, though it can feel foreign or scary at first.

Advertisement

“Therapy is often the first time a Gen X client has genuinely been invited to slow down and feel what’s been building for decades,” she said.

They’re questioning long-term marriages and relationships.

Douglas said there’s a “massive un-mooring” happening in Gen X partnerships today, especially among long-term straight couples. After decades of carrying the lion’s share of the mental and emotional load for their families, many Gen X women are looking at their marriages and realising they might actually prefer being alone, she said.

“They are choosing peace and ease by casting off the responsibilities of mental and emotional labour that has long been taken for granted,” she said. “Meanwhile, I see men are hitting a wall where being stoic and staying at a remove doesn’t work anymore.”

Advertisement

“Husbands are realising that to survive and thrive in this stage of life with their partners, they need to understand their and their partners’ emotional lives so they can connect on deep, meaningful levels,” Douglas said.

After decades of just getting by, many of these partners are either finding the courage to leave or finally speaking up about their emotions and needs in hopes of carving out the lives they actually want.

"Husbands are realising that to survive and thrive in this stage of life with their partners, they need to understand their and their partners’ emotional lives so they can connect on deep meaningful levels," said Tracy Douglas, a therapist in Wisconsin who specializes in Gen X clients.

MoMo Productions via Getty Images

“Husbands are realising that to survive and thrive in this stage of life with their partners, they need to understand their and their partners’ emotional lives so they can connect on deep meaningful levels,” said Tracy Douglas, a therapist in Wisconsin who specializes in Gen X clients.

They’re burnt out.

Gen X has collective strength and grit, but without self-care and community care, burnout sets in, said Jessika Fruchter, a marriage and family therapist in Oakland, California. When clients show up in her office, “they’re often exhausted from white-knuckling through it all.”

Advertisement

“At this point in midlife, many of them are both caregivers to kids and to ageing parents,” she said. “They also have careers, relationships and a long list of other responsibilities.”

Many in Gen X were latchkey kids, and Fruchter said it’s not uncommon to hear boasts like, “I basically raised myself.”

“Over time, though, that hyper-independence becomes a liability,” she said. “Much of the work here is about learning to ask for help and prioritise caring for ourselves, as we do others.”

They’re waiting for their adult children to grow up.

Advertisement

Many Gen Xers struggle with moving out of the parenting stage of their lives, said Kurt Smith, a therapist in Roseville, California, who specialises in counselling men. It’s not uncommon for adult children in their 30s and 40s to be living back at home.

“This can occur for understandable reasons, but some adult children never leave when they come back or even have a plan or desire to do so,” Smith said. “Their Gen X parents end up struggling to distinguish between whether they’re loving or enabling them. This is a problem that much fewer of their parents had.”

Some Gen X parents are experiencing adult children moving back home.
Some Gen X parents are experiencing adult children moving back home.

Gen X women are going through menopause.

When it comes to being transparent about perimenopause or menopause, Gen X women are pattern breakers, Fruchter said.

“Earlier generations rarely spoke out about how challenging this developmental stage actually is, and what a toll it can take on mental health,” she said. “Between hormonal shifts, identity shifts and difficult physical symptoms, Gen X women seek out a space for support. ”

Advertisement

They’re anxious over money.

Gen X is currently being flattened by an unprecedented “sandwich squeeze,” having to deal with the financial and emotional burden of supporting their aging parents and children who haven’t yet taken flight, financially speaking.

“A lot of Gen Xers find themselves worried about how to fund the launch of young adult children, who are facing a world way more expensive than the one they entered, while also realising that many of their aging parents didn’t have a Plan B for their long-term care,” Douglas said.

She said it’s a “financial and emotional pincer move” that’s left many Gen Xers feeling anxious about how they’re going to make ends meet, plus depressed from feeling like they just aren’t measuring up or doing enough.

Advertisement
"A lot of my Gen X clients are genuinely surprised to realize that what they're dealing with in their 40s or 50s has roots in something that happened in childhood," said Jennifer Chappell Marsh, a marriage and family therapist in San Diego, California.

Milan_Jovic via Getty Images

“A lot of my Gen X clients are genuinely surprised to realize that what they’re dealing with in their 40s or 50s has roots in something that happened in childhood,” said Jennifer Chappell Marsh, a marriage and family therapist in San Diego, California.

They have unprocessed early childhood wounds showing up in midlife.

As a collective, many Gen Xers grew up amid high divorce rates, latchkey childhoods, and a culture that prized toughness over tenderness, Marsh said. Decades later, her clients in this age group are often grappling with the long-term effects of early attachment wounds, especially emotional unavailability or loss that was never named or fully processed.

“Those things don’t just disappear; they’re stuffed down and resurface later in relationships, in parenting, in how someone responds when their partner gets upset or criticizes them,” she said.

“A lot of my Gen X clients are genuinely surprised to realize that what they’re dealing with in their 40s or 50s has roots in something that happened in childhood,” she added.

Advertisement

That’s where trauma-informed work like EMDR therapy can be game-changing, Marsh said. EMDR, or eye movement desensitization and reprocessing, therapy is a mental health treatment technique that involves moving your eyes a specific way while you process traumatic memories.

“When we do that, many clients find that they’re healing things they didn’t even know they were still carrying,” she said.

What Marsh most wants people to understand about Gen X in therapy is that beneath all that self-sufficiency is a generation that was never really given permission to need.

“For people who’ve spent their whole lives keeping it together with very little support, it’s pretty profound to feel safe enough to be known by another person,” she said.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Three Reform candidates exposed as ex-BNP

Published

on

Nigel Farage and three expelled Reform candidates

Nigel Farage and three expelled Reform candidates

Reform UK has been forced to expel three local election candidates. This time, it’s done so after investigators revealed that the three men were once part of the British National Party:

Advertisement

It’s good to see that the party has taken action — or that it’s done so in this case, at least. Because as we’ve reported, there are plenty of candidates with BNP-identical views that Reform has not expelled.

Reform and the BNP

Hope not Hate and the Mirror are responsible for this latest exposé. As Hope not Hate reported:

While now a shadow of its former self, the BNP was once Britain’s largest and most successful far-right party. Formed in 1982, the party was most successful under the leadership of Nick Griffin, but went into sharp decline following the 2010 general election. While it limps on, it is standing no candidates at the forthcoming elections.

The BNP’s membership peaked at 14,500 and since its collapse, activists and members have gravitated towards a range of radical and far right parties. Unsurprisingly, some have washed up in Reform UK, including as candidates.

The men Hope not Hate exposed are David Prior, George Parnell, and John Black:

Advertisement

Hope not Hate added:

Advertisement

Farage says ex-BNP activists “aren’t welcome” presumably because the BNP is seen as toxic and racist.

Farage has long walked a tightrope between far-right views and centre-right electability. This is now causing problems for him, because many of the far-right individuals who were drawn to Reform are abandoning the party for Rupert Lowe’s Restore Britain.

It’s also causing problems for the ethnic minority Reform candidates who take Farage at his word when he says he’s not a racist:

Farage himself will tell you he doesn’t want BNP types in his party, but as we’ve reported, he’s clearly comfortable with far-right candidates as long as they can tow the line:

BNP membership is seen as a red line for Farage, but we’re not confident that will always be the case. There is no real difference between an ex-BNP member and an ex-Tory who called for minority groups to be shot — no difference beyond the optics Farage currently considers important, anyway.

Should Reform become the party of government, we’ve no doubt PM Farage will stop pretending to care about many of these things.

Advertisement

The British far right

Britain First leader Paul Golding is another ex-BNP guy. As we recently reported, Golding wants the UK to descend into chaos for the benefit of his political platform:

Tommy Robinson is also an ex-BNP member. As we’ve reported, Reform candidate James Bembridge defended Robinson:

Advertisement

Make no mistake — despite their public disagreements, these people are all part of the same movement. And if you vote Reform UK, you might as well be voting for the BNP.

This is why the ex-BNP guys were drawn to it in the first place.

Advertisement

Featured image via Gage Skidmore (Flickr)

By Willem Moore

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Netanyahu’s new UK ambassador pick accused of sexual abuse

Published

on

Israeli

Israeli

Tzachi Braverman, a confidant of Benjamin Netanyahu and the wanted war criminal’s designated new ambassador to the UK, faces a sexual offences case in Israel. His alleged victim has notified Israeli police, supported by evidence and witness accounts. Braverman denies any wrongdoing and has claimed he was being blackmailed, though what he claims the blackmail was about if the allegations are untrue is unclear.

According to Haaretz, the accusations are “horrifying”:

The woman didn’t file a formal complaint and asked investigators not to open an investigation or use the information just yet for fear of retribution, according to police sources.

“She’s afraid,” a person who knows her told Haaretz, adding, “Her descriptions are horrifying, and they are apparently backed up by evidence and things that people heard about the incident shortly after it happened.”

A police official said that officers met with the woman at her home on the same day Braverman was being questioned over possible obstruction of justice in the BibiLeaks case. However, they couldn’t convince her to change her mind.

Advertisement

In March 2026, the Green party demanded that the UK government block Braverman’s appointment. Despite his protestations of blackmail, Braverman has not filed a complaint with Israeli police.

The allegations are the latest in a long list of cases of Israeli sex offence and paedophilia scandals, including at the highest levels of government.

Israeli scandals

In April 2025 Shoshana Strook, the daughter of Israel’s far-right settlements minister fled to police and asked them to protect her, accusing both her parents and one of her brothers of raping her as a child, over a period of years, and filming the rapes.

Also in 2025, Israeli cyber-spy boss Tom Alexandrovich was allowed to escape to Israel after meetings with US federal agencies. He had been caught in a paedophile sting. The Netanyahu regime is currently ignoring well over 2,000 extradition requests for alleged and convicted paedophiles.

Advertisement

UK too

The issue also crosses into Labour party pro-Israel ranks in the UK. Former Hackney councillor Thomas Dewey received 150 hours of ‘community service’ for possession of sadistic child rape images. Sam Gould, a former aide to Starmer’s health secretary Wes Streeting, received a suspended sentence for flashing a child.

Former councillor Liron Velleman also escaped jail, despite committing sex offences with what he thought was a 13-year-old girl. Another former councillor, Conor McGrath, received only a suspended sentence even though he was convicted of possessing the most appalling categories of child-rape images.

Others are awaiting trial. Starmeroid MP Dan Norris has been arrestedtwice — for sex offences involving rape and child-sex offences, including abduction. And some Zionist alleged paedophiles seem to escape altogether. Ivor Caplin is no longer even on bail after being caught — on camera — turning up to meet what he thought was a child for sex.

Israeli psychotherapist and trauma expert Dr. Anat Gur, head of the Bar-Ilan University trauma therapy program, has said that she believes organised child rape in Israel is widespread:

Advertisement

Organized child rape is one of the most horrific things I’ve encountered. It’s likely much more widespread than we think. It’s happening in places we least expect.

Israel is a sick society.

Featured image via MiddleEastEye

By Skwawkbox

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Media target green candidate for ‘refusing to shake fascist’s hand’

Published

on

Green Party

Green Party

The rattled media’s campaign of attacks on Green party candidates has continued this week with a smear against a Cornwall council candidate who refused to shake hands with a far-right opponent.

Abigail Hubbucks lost the local election by just over a hundred votes to Reform UK’s Lyndon Harrison. After the results were announced, she told Harrison she wouldn’t be shaking hands with him. This was immediately spun up by the press and the far right as ‘woke leftie is a bad loser’. This spin was, of course, quickly pounced on by her far-right opponent, who called it “divisive and unprofessional”.

Yeah, right. Reform’s whole reason for existing is to incite division and hate. Harrison himself has posted a ‘call-sign’ acronym used by white-supremacist ‘QAnon’ supporters:

As a source close to Hubbucks said:

Not shaking hands with a fascist is just correct for someone with Abigail’s politics.

Green Party surge

In fact, the real story of the night was how close the Greens came to taking the seat, which was held by Reform until its incumbent died, triggering the by-election. When Kevin Towill won the seat for Reform in 2025, he received considerably more votes that Harrison did in the by-election to replace him. Not just in absolute numbers despite a considerably higher turnout in 2026, but in percentage terms too. The Green Party didn’t even feature in the results.

Harrison won only 30% of the vote compared to Towill’s 38% in 2025 — despite riding on the wave of sentiment generated by Towill’s untimely death from a brain tumour. From zero just a year ago, the Greens’ Hubbucks won 25%. This was yet another example of the Green surge — at Reform’s expense as well as Labour’s — that has rattled Farage and co.

Advertisement

The other big story of the night was another utter failure by Keir Starmer’s ‘Labour’. His hollowed-out shell of a party managed just six percent, despite all four of Labour’s Cornwall MPs campaigning intensively. It gets clearer by the day that the Greens are currently the only prospect for stopping the march of the fascists — and are increasingly showing how it’s done.

Featured image via CornwallGreenParty

By Skwawkbox

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Judicial investigation in Italy into allegations of match-fixing

Published

on

Serie A

Serie A

The Milan Public Prosecutor’s Office has opened an investigation into Gianluca Rocchi, the Italian Serie A head of referee appointments, on charges of complicity in sports corruption, following allegations of influencing refereeing decisions during the 2024–2025 season, according to Italian judicial and media sources.

According to Sky TG24, the investigation centres on a specific incident in the Serie A Udinese v Parma match on 1 March 2025, where video and audio recordings from the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) room are being scrutinised, amid suspicions of indirect interference in the decision to award a penalty to Udinese.

La Repubblica also reported that the investigation is based on footage showing a discussion within the VAR room regarding a possible handball, before the decision was changed and a review of the incident on the pitch was recommended, which resulted in a penalty being awarded.

Details of the incident are under investigation by the Serie A

According to La Repubblica, the VAR official Daniele Paterna was initially hesitant to award the penalty, before the on-field referee Fabio Maresca was asked to conduct an On-Field Review, which ultimately led to the penalty being awarded.

Advertisement

Accounts within the investigation file suggest the possibility of external influence within the VAR centre in Lissone, where Gianluca Rocchi is alleged to have made gestures intended to draw attention within the room, which the prosecution is examining under the hypothesis of “indirect influence on the refereeing decision”.

The course of the investigation and its expansion

According to Sky TG24, the investigation is not limited to this match alone, but extends to several matches from the 2024–2025 season, with a possible examination of other refereeing decisions suspected of having been influenced by organisational or administrative interference.

Other reports also indicate that the prosecution is examining the possibility of influence over the selection of referees for certain major matches, which broadens the scope of the case beyond the VAR incident.

Advertisement

Featured image via FootballItalia

By Alaa Shamali

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Trump blames White House shooting on ballroom construction delay

Published

on

Donald Trump at the dinner and the arrested shooter

Donald Trump at the dinner and the arrested shooter

On 25 April, a gunman at the White House fired a gun as Donald Trump hosted the annual Correspondents’ Dinner. This is now the third time a gunman has fired at the US President (or seemingly planned to do so).

By this point, Trump is so used to assassination attempts that he immediately began spouting propaganda. While some thought Trump would use the event to drum up support for his failing war on Iran, he chose to prioritise talking about the White House ballroom:

For those out of the loop, construction on Trump’s glitzy ballroom was recently paused following a court order, and could be put on hold again.

Ballroom blitz

According to the White House Correspondents’ Association, the annual Correspondents’ Dinner is:

our main source of revenue to finance all of our work, including support of the journalists working to cover the president, events and programs to educate the public about the value of the First Amendment and a free press, and scholarships to help the next generation of journalists.

Former president Barack Obama notoriously roasted then-businessman Trump at the 2011 Correspondents’ Dinner:

Advertisement

This moment is widely viewed as the key motivator behind Trump running for president and undoing Obama’s various policies.

Regarding the latest Correspondents’ Dinner, the BBC report that shots were heard at 20:35 ET (00:35 UK time). A C-SPAN video showed the moment when gunshots led to the president’s evacuation:

Advertisement

The shooting happened outside the function room itself, with the would-be attacker rushing through a security checkpoint. Another angle showed the evacuation from the viewpoint of those being evacuated:

Advertisement

Trump was posting about the shooting on Truth Social within an hour. He would later post the following:

Advertisement

Less than two hours later, Trump would hold a press conference alongside FBI chief Kash Patel. It was at this press conference that he said the following:

And we looked at all of the conditions that took place tonight, and I will say, you know, it’s not a particularly secure building. And I didn’t want to say this, but this is why we have to have all of the attributes of what we’re planning at the White House.

It’s actually a larger room, and it’s much more secure. It’s got — it’s drone-proof. It’s bulletproof glass. We need the ballroom.

Advertisement

That’s why Secret Service — that’s why the military are demanding it. They’ve wanted the ballroom for 150 years for lots of different reasons.

But today is a little bit different because today we need levels of security that probably nobody has ever seen before.

To be clear, Trump wants a big, fancy ballroom, because he likes big, fancy things, because he’s a big, fancy boy.

While we’re sure it will be very secure, there is no need for it to exist beyond Trump’s own personal desire to envelope himself in obscene levels of luxury.

Advertisement

It didn’t take long for Trump’s minions to to start repeating his message:

Advertisement

Some have suggested this means the event was staged, although this level of coordinated propaganda is fairly streamlined at this point:

At the same time, you really can’t put anything past these people:

Advertisement

Trump — ‘Shots fired’

Another strange moment was when Trump’s press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the following pre-shooting:

Advertisement

If Trump’s team did pre-plan the event, we’ll no doubt find out when it’s revealed an anonymous person bet a shooting would happen on the prediction markets:

Advertisement

Featured image via C-SPAN

By Willem Moore

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025