Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Politics

Fight to end guga hunt intensifies as NatureScot receives 2026 licence application

Published

on

Gannets in flight NatureScot spending on guga hunt

Gannets in flight NatureScot spending on guga hunt

Pressure is mounting on Scotland’s nature agency after it confirmed a new licence application has been received for the guga hunt this year.

The guga hunt involves the annual killing of gannet seabird chicks in the Outer Hebrides. Now the controversial practice is once again under consideration for 2026 after an application was submitted by the 10-man hunting team based in Ness on the Isle of Lewis.

The hunt, which takes place on the remote island of Sula Sgeir, has been carried out for centuries and was once used for food during harsh winters. However, campaigners argue that young gannet flesh is now considered a delicacy – something they say is unnecessary, cruel, and increasingly incompatible with modern values.

The guga hunt has become one of Scotland’s most controversial wildlife issues, with a petition launched by wildlife photographer Rachel Bigsby calling for an end to the practice becoming the largest submitted to the last Scottish parliament.

Advertisement

Guga hunt allowed due to legal loophole

Killing wild birds is normally illegal, but the guga hunt continues under a specific exemption in the Wildlife and Countryside Act. The issue is now set to return to the Scottish parliament, where campaigners hope the exemption will finally be removed and the hunt outlawed.

High-profile protests against the hunt have continued to grow, including a rooftop occupation of NatureScot’s headquarters, where anti-guga hunt activists remained for two nights demanding an end to the licensing of the hunt.

Protect the Wild, one of the leading organisations campaigning against the hunt, said its own petition calling on NatureScot to stop licensing the hunt has attracted more than 183,000 signatures, making it the largest petition ever received by Scotland’s nature agency.

The group is calling on NatureScot to refuse this year’s licence. It says the agency is now the only thing standing between the colony and another year of “senseless slaughter”.

Advertisement

Devon Docherty, Scottish campaigns manager at Protect the Wild, said:

The guga hunt is one of the cruellest and most ecologically reckless wildlife practices left in Scotland – and NatureScot is the only thing standing between these birds and another year of senseless slaughter.

Every year, defenceless gannet chicks are beaten to death on a supposedly protected island – all for an outdated delicacy that nobody needs.

According to new polling commissioned by Protect the Wild, 77% of Scots who expressed a view said they support banning the guga hunt.

Docherty added:

Advertisement

The science is unambiguous: this is the only Special Protection Area for gannets in decline, and the hunt itself is suppressing the colony’s recovery. The vast majority of the public are against this practice and want to see wildlife being respected.

NatureScot has a choice to make: keep signing off a hunt that survives on tradition alone, or do the job its name implies and protect the nature in its care.

NatureScot said it will now meet with key stakeholders before bringing a final decision on the licence application to its board.

Featured image via John Ranson for the Canary

By The Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Online misogyny is normalising abuse for children as young as 13

Published

on

A girl looks at a mobile phone Online misogyny Barnardo's

A girl looks at a mobile phone Online misogyny Barnardo's

Online abuse and harassment are “constant, corrosive and deeply embedded” for young people across the country. That’s according to a Barnardo’s-commissioned poll of 4,000 young people in the UK about their experiences of online misogyny.

The results from thousands of 13 to 20-year-olds show how they experience misogyny online. Over a quarter (28%) of girls in Scotland said they’d been called degrading names online. And five in seven (72%) boys said they believed they are expected to “act tough and not show emotion”.

Online misogyny is having real world effects

The findings also highlight how online misogyny is having an impact on the offline lives of young people. More than a quarter (27%) of all young people in Scotland had seen a nude photo that had originally been sent privately and had been shared.

Just over one in seven (15%) 13 to 15-year-olds across the UK as a whole had been asked to share a nude photo of themselves. Meanwhile, 17% of respondents in Scotland reported having received repeated messages after asking the sender to stop or ignoring them.

Advertisement

At the same time, boys in the Scotland felt unable to challenge their peers. 18% said that their friends wouldn’t back them if they called out sexist comments. And about five in eight (62%) boys in Scotland said that people would think they are “boring” if they don’t join in with group “banter”.

18-year-old Olly (not his real name) said:

As a young man, I see online misogyny every day. It sets the tone for how boys treat girls and how boys treat each other. There is pressure to laugh it off or stay silent, even when it crosses a line.

Young men set the standard. Challenge it, shut it down, and back those who speak up. That is how we change what is accepted.

Sarah, a children’s services manager for a Barnardo’s Domestic Abuse & Sexual Violence service, says:

Advertisement

A girl we supported was referred to the service after digitally manipulated – deepfake – images of her were created and circulated online.

The images were shared through social media platforms, sometimes via fake accounts created to spread the abuse further. Incidents like this cause significant emotional impact including fear and distress.

A culture of victim blaming can also lead to girls being concerned about how others perceive them, rather than seeing themselves as a victim of serious sexual abuse.

This can sometimes leave them vulnerable to further abuse and exploitation – but with the right support, we do see girls begin to rebuild trust, confidence and find their voice.

Barnardo’s says the children and young people they support are increasingly feeling the impact of online misogyny. 29% of Barnardo’s frontline practitioners said they were seeing more children affected by misogynistic content online, compared to the year before. 29% also said they were seeing an increase in child-on-child sexual abuse and / or children displaying problematic or harmful sexual behaviour, compared to the year before.

Advertisement

Michele Janes, director of Barnardo’s Scotland, said:

Misogyny isn’t always loud or visible to many of us, but these findings show how constant, corrosive and deeply embedded it is in the lives of young people today both online and off. It shapes how boys and girls think about themselves, their worth and their relationships with others.

Young people are telling us that the result can be harmful on all sides, from humiliation and sexualised abuse to feelings of shame and isolation. This is not inevitable – it is learned, and it can be challenged.

That’s why we’re raising the alarm and we want young people’s experiences to be at the heart of conversations about how to tackle misogynistic content online.

As a step in the right direction, we are calling on the government to turn Ofcom’s guidance for online services to improve the safety of women and girls online into a mandatory code of practice for tech companies to create safer digital platforms for all children and young people.

Advertisement

Featured image via Barnardo’s

By The Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Pro-Israel pressure group UKLFI demands UCU bins pro-Israel pressure motion

Published

on

UKLFI UCU

UKLFI UCU

Zionist bully-group UKLFI is at it again, despite the referral of its senior lawyers to their regulator for its bullying. The pro-Israel pressure group is upset that the University and College Union (UCU) conference will debate a motion on… pro-Israel pressure. You couldn’t make it up, and you don’t need to.

Motion 52 will call for academic freedom against “Zionist repression” and the “dangers posed by Zionist groups”. No one sensible who has been paying attention could possibly object, which of course means UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI) is very offended indeed. So much so that it has resorted to its usual tactics of threatening the union that its motion “could” expose UCU to “claims of unlawful discrimination and harassment under the Equality Act 2010”.

Antisemitic argument from UKLFI

To leap to this “could”, UKLFI resorts to the “usual Zionist pressure group” tactic of treating all Jewish people as though they are inherent supporters of the genocidal apartheid colony. Therefore, it argues, rejecting Zionism and its tactics is discriminatory against Jews. Being hostile to a racist, murderous, land-thieving ideology would be a “hostile environment” for Jews. It’s hard to see any way in which the whole argument is not antisemitic, but it’s about par for the course.

UCU’s ‘leadership’ is showing signs of caving to the Zionist pressure group and pulling the motion about Zionist pressure. A better course of action would be to point out that UKLFI’s ‘name’ barristers have been referred to the Bar Standards Board for undue use of their seniority to validate intimidation and ‘lawfare’.

Advertisement

UCU could also point out that UKLFI’s track record is littered with cases of blatant lawfare and intimidation against doctors and Muslim NHS staff, Palestinian children, artists and their art. Even media giant Netflix and – reportedly – the late far-right influencer Charlie Kirk when he was wavering on Israel just before his murder.

For good measure, it could add that UKLFI has also been referred to the Solicitors Regulation Authority and called one of two of the UK’s two main “apartheid apologist” groups.

And for good measure, they could remind the friends of genocide group that UCU humiliated their fellow Israel fanatic John Mann and others when they tried to smear the union as antisemitic. Tribunal judges found the case against UCU to be:

without substance … devoid of any merit … palpably groundless … untenable … obviously hopeless.

“Sorry saga” of political litigation

And the panel of judges had more to say about what they described as a “sorry saga” of an attempt to use litigation for

Advertisement

Lessons should be learned from this sorry saga. We greatly regret that the case was ever brought. At heart, it represents an impermissible attempt to achieve a political end by litigious means. It would be very unfortunate if an exercise of this sort were ever repeated.

UKLFI appears not to have learned. Will the UCU management have the courage to do the right thing and send the would-be intimidators away with a union-sized flea in their collective ear? Or will they make the craven mistake of so many before and capitulate to the – yep – “Zionist pressure”?

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Help the Hunt Sabs stop secret summer mink murder on our rivers

Published

on

In the background is an illegal hunt. It's a man wading through a river and he is wearing posh clothing and holding a long wooden otter pole. Behind him, he is being followed by a pack of hounds. In the foreground we have two British otters hugging. To their right is the Canary logo. Hunt Sabs

In the background is an illegal hunt. It's a man wading through a river and he is wearing posh clothing and holding a long wooden otter pole. Behind him, he is being followed by a pack of hounds. In the foreground we have two British otters hugging. To their right is the Canary logo. Hunt Sabs

Illegal mink and otter hunts are quietly decimating our river ecosystems all over the UK. And I cannot believe I just had to write that. Secretive, twisted bloodsport groups are currently exploiting the summer months to dodge public scrutiny. The Hunt Saboteurs Association (HSA) is issuing an urgent appeal to all of us to help expose and stop these disgusting underground networks. So, the Canary is calling on our readers to help the Hunt Sabs.

Terrorising our waterways

The summer hunting season runs from April to October, and it sees hunters taking to our waterways. Too impatient to wait until winter for the fox and hare hunts, these bloodthirsty toffs are now murdering otters and mink. Groups like the Three Counties Mink Hounds and the Northern Counties Mink Hunt are now out to massacre our semi-aquatic and frankly adorable wildlife. And they’re doing it along vulnerable riverbanks.

On foot, hunters are releasing up to 20 hounds onto our waterways. These usually consist of foxhounds and shaggy otterhounds to track scents. When an unsuspecting otter or mink is cornered, the pack chases it across land and water until it is ripped apart.

The North Counties Mink Hunt caught out. There's a huntsman in rich clothing in a river. He is carrying a long wooden otter pole and is being followed by a pack of hounds
Sabs caught the North Counties Mink Hunt illegally hunting

The violence is absolutely vile. It usually escalates when the poor fuzzy mammal tries to find safety. If a mink or otter manages to get to safety underground, that’s when the real disgusting stuff happens. Hunt terriermen then deploy terriers, spades and drainage rods to dig out the poor creature. And if it manages to climb a tree, hunters will use poles to violently shake it so it falls into the slavering jaws of the hounds. And then it’s ripped apart.

And it’s illegal. But this isn’t just about that. This is a full on assault on the fragile ecosystems of our riversides, where these stunning native animals breed. This is where the Hunt Sabs come in.

Advertisement

Secret networks of criminality

Thankfully, mink hunting is in decline. This disgusting bloodsport had it’s peak with over 20 packs in the 1980s. Now, only around half a dozen of them remain across the UK. But it’s because of this decline that these few remaining packs have become incredibly secretive. They’re relying on a tiny, very tight knit circle of supporters to keep this vile sport alive. Huntsman now lean on extreme secrecy to try to avoid direct action from the HSA.

To try to avoid detection, these packs have now abandoned their jumped-up public meets. To avoid confrontation, they alter dates and times for meeting. Huntsman now gather on field corners and whisper in country pubs to plan their assaults.

The North Counties Mink Hunt caught out. There's huntsman in a field with a pack of dogs
North Counties Mink Hunt caught out again

When challenged by members of the public, hunters lie. They hide their murder, claim they’re just exercising the hounds, or hunting rats. Hunt sabs report this is nothing but an excuse. It’s a smokescreen to hide their illegal hunts. Drone operations from Hunt Sabs rumbled the Dove Valley Mink Hounds near Ramsey Brook. This quick response forced the hunt to abandon their meet and head back to the kennels.

Please help the Hunt Sabs to sound the alarm

Because these criminals operate in tiny circles and across huge rural stretches, the HSA needs our help. The public can look for specific warning signs and raise the alarm. If you’re out enjoying a nice walk in the country please keep an eye out for these rich weirdos. If you see groups with big wooden sticks (otter poles), or groups of suspicious vehicles near rivers, please take action. Same with if you hear a hunting horn or a pack of hounds.

The Hunt Sabs treats all tip-offs with 100% confidentiality. So if you hear any gossip in a pub, see social media posts or see suspicious activity, give them a call. Their direct tip off line is 07443 148426.

Advertisement

Please, help them to save minks and otters this summer.

Featured images via the Hunt Sabs Association & Pinterest 

By Antifabot

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Scottish MSPs demand another chance to free Scotland from Westminster

Published

on

Scottish referendum

Scottish referendum

Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) have voted to demand powers to hold another Scottish independence referendum. First Minister John Swinney described independence as a “golden opportunity” that would “put Scotland’s future in Scotland’s hands”.

Grasping Westminster running against Scottish interests

MSPs agreed: the motion passed by 72-55, with the support of the Greens enough to see off an unholy London-centric Labour, Reform, Tory and LibDem alliance. Keir Starmer said he would not give Scots what they want.

This is unsurprising.

Starmer is an Establishment tool through and through, who has always treated Scottish Labour like a Westminster satellite branch. He has also put peace in Northern Ireland at risk by refusing to grant the reunification vote required by the Good Friday Agreement now that the number of Republicans is realistically enough to carry the vote.

Advertisement

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Eid assault: Israel batters southern Lebanon with airstrikes and artillery

Published

on

Lebanon strike Israel

Lebanon strike Israel

Israel launched an intense bombardment across southern Lebanon on the eve of Eid. Over 100 airstrikes were accompanied by ferocious artillery bombardments across the south and in Bekaa. Targets included a Palestinian refugee camp. Multiple people were killed.

Middle East Eye reported:

Israel’s Channel 12 is reporting that the Israeli army has begun a ground operation in Lebanon, crossing the “Yellow Line” demarcation stipulated by the ceasefire deal.

According to Israeli Channel 14, Tel Aviv is expanding its military operation beyond the line in the Nabatieh area.

Journalist Hala Jaber described horrific scenes:

Advertisement

In just hours, Israel has unleashed more than 110 airstrikes across over 20 towns &villages in south Lebanon & the Western Bekaa, alongside relentless artillery shelling.

Entire residential blocks flattened. Families buried alive. Children pulled bloodied from rubble. Rescue workers ordered to halt searches while survivors are reportedly still trapped underneath collapsed homes.

And all this unfolding on the eve of Eid al-Adha.

Jaber added:

There is nothing “limited” or “defensive” about these strikes. We are witnessing collective devastation unleashed by a depraved entity at full force & with full impunity.

More attacks on first responders

The settler-colonial state’s forces also killed two first responders:

Advertisement

Lebanon’s ministry of public health stated:

…The ministry salutes the efforts of the heroic paramedics and their continuous sacrifices in the face of the barbarism of the Israeli enemy, who is not deterred by international humanitarian law or international resolutions and norms, and continues to apply the law of the jungle, which confirms its continuous attacks that he believes only in it.

One US-led, Israeli-linked ‘humanitarian’ organisation even ordered first responders to stop searches despite people still being missing:

Advertisement

Drop Site News said:

Advertisement

The International Monitoring and Implementation Mechanism — the U.S.-led committee comprising Israel, Lebanon, France, and UNIFIL tasked with overseeing the Lebanon ceasefire — has instructed emergency responders in Maarakeh, a town in southern Lebanon, just east of the coastal city of Tyre, to suspend rescue operations, despite confirmed reports that survivors are still alive beneath the rubble, journalists Hala Jaber and Courtney Bonneau report.

Adding:

At least 9 civilians have been killed in Maarakeh in the latest Israeli attack, with 4 injured and 4 still missing, according to Bonneau. Rescue operations have been suspended until tomorrow.

This figure has since risen to at least 12. The Israelis killed a father and his two young sons. They were among the first casualties to be named:

Israel: colonial ambitions in Lebanon

Here’s a breakdown of how we actually got here – usually missing from legacy media reporting.

Israel violated the US-brokered Lebanon 2024 ‘ceasefire’ over 15,400 times since it was signed. Must be a world record. Yet a short salvo from Hezbollah in early March 2026 was framed as a signal outrage by legacy media. That attack has been cited by the settler-colonial state as a pretext to invade.

Not satisfied with pulling the US and its allies into a runaway war with Iran, Israeli troops have pushed into Lebanon with airstrikes pummelling the capital Beirut.

Advertisement

The Canary reported the early moments of the new war here. You can read about the secretive Israel-US ‘side letter’ pact which gave Israel carte blanche to keep bombing through the ‘ceasefire’ here. And our extensive coverage of Israel’s ceasefire regular breaches here.

Developments on a peace deal have displeased Israeli hawks. Middle East Eye reported:

Reports over the weekend said the deal centres on a memorandum of understanding establishing a preliminary 60-day ceasefire, which reportedly does not address Iran’s nuclear programme.

The initial framework is also said to include ending wars “on all fronts”, including Lebanon.

And there are fears that Israeli influence with the Trump administration is waning:

Advertisement

The officials are now said to fear that a US-Iran agreement could place restrictions on Israel’s future military operations in Lebanon and Gaza.

For Israeli leaders – insulated by unconditional US military support – it is loss of influence at court they fear most. By contrast, for the Lebanese there is a fear of a different order entirely: a fear of injury, of death and of permanent displacement from their homes. If nothing else, this perverse state of affairs captures the nature of this colonialist war.

Featured image via the Canary

By Joe Glenton

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

ICE agents attack protesters and Democrat senator supporting hunger striker at detention facility

Published

on

ICE NEw Jersey

ICE NEw Jersey

US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents have attacked protesters outside of the Delaney Hall detention facility in Newark, New Jersey. Meanwhile, detainees inside the facility have staged a hunger strike against the inhumane conditions they’re subjected to.

Attorneys have reported that around 300 detainees have joined the hunger-and-labor strike at Delaney Hall. The peaceful action began on 22 May, highlighting serious concerns including the spoiled food they’re expected to eat.

Selenia Destefani – CEO of Nova Law Group, representatives of the detainees – explained that:

The conditions are brutal. People just sleep on the floor – overcrowded rooms, cold showers, no food, extremely cold in the cells with no blankets. Not sound conditions to live in.

Democrat lawmakers barred from entry by ICE

Senator Andy Kim visited Delaney Hall on 23 May after hearing the allegations. Posting on social media, he reported seeing:

Advertisement

-Pregnant woman unable to get full OBGYN medical support

-Woman who had a miscarriage in the detention facility and left to manage all on her own[…]

-A carton with the milk inside congealed solid (expiration date is tomorrow)[…]

-A document showing next Tuesday’s court docket showing 74 cases before 1 judge in one day (averages about 5 min a case)

-man telling me ICE trying to deport him to DRC where there is active Ebola outbreak (he’s from South America originally) […]

Advertisement

-Numerous people who were arrested at scheduled interviews for green cards (trying to follow the formal process)

However, a DHS spokesperson flat-out denied Kim’s report:

This is nothing more than a political stunt by New Jersey sanctuary politicians for fundraising clicks. There is NO hunger strike at Delaney Hall. There are NO subprime conditions or abuse at the facility.

Soto Hernandez

Other Democrats, including New Jersey governor Mikie Sherrill, tried to visit over 24-25 May. Sherrill said:

The people inside Delaney Hall are fathers and mothers, sons and daughters and members of our community. In New Jersey, we believe in the rule of law and that everyone deserves to be treated with basic dignity. We have a duty to safeguard the rights, health, and well-being of everyone within our borders.

However, ICE barred the lawmakers’ entry to the facility. A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson claimed that, because of the protests outside:

Advertisement

Visitation has been suspended out of an abundance of caution.

On key aim of the protest outside the facility was the prevention of the transfer of detainee Soto Hernandez to another facility. ICE agents snatched Hernandez on 20 January whilst he was out buying diapers. He has since sought release on bond.

His wife, Gabriela, is currently looking after their two children alone, whilst 4-months pregnant. Nevertheless, she organised a rally on 22 May, which also served to announce the hunger strike. A lawyer representing Hernandez stated that Soto was served spoiled food infested with worms.

ICE attack protestors

Over the weekend, protesters formed a human chain to block the entry and exit of unmarked government vehicles. Footage from Freedom News TV showed masked ICE thugs using batons and tear gas against the demonstrators in the early hours of 25 May.

Agents also detained protesters, grabbing them from the crowd and even dragging them across the floor in at least one documented case. Senator Andy Kim, who joined the protest, was struck by tear gas during the ICE attack.

Advertisement

Sadly, ICE succeeded in transferring Hernandez to Elizabeth Contract Detention Center. There, agents placed him in isolation and prevented him from making phone calls. Soto’s attorney described him as weighing around 110lbs, stating that:

he’s skin and bones. I could blow him away.

‘Fighting for their human rights’

New Jersey senator Cory Booker raised serious concerns about conditions at the privately-owned Delaney Hall back in 2023, calling “it an insult to immigrant communities”. On 26 May, he posted that:

Immigrants at Delaney Hall are on a hunger strike because they are fighting for their human rights. […]

We’re working with our partners in the state to bring an end to this nightmare and I’ll be going to Delaney Hall again to conduct oversight.

Since Trump came to power for his second term, almost 50 detainees have died in ICE custody. This is, by far, the highest level of deaths in such US facilities over the last 20 years.

Advertisement

Featured image via screengrab

By Alex/Rose Cocker

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Tony Blair Slams Labour’s Direction Under Keir Starmer

Published

on

Tony Blair Slams Labour's Direction Under Keir Starmer

Tony Blair has warned Labour is “playing with fire over its future” following the latest efforts to oust Keir Starmer from office.

The comments mark the first major intervention from the former Labour prime minister, who won three general elections and sat in No.10 for a decade, since the party’s landslide victory in 2024.

The highly unusual warning comes after close to 100 Labour MPs publicly called for Starmer to resign in the wake of the party’s shocking defeat in the May elections in England, Wales and Scotland.

Wes Streeting resigned as health secretary days later and is now expected to challenge Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham for the leadership title, if the latter wins next month’s Makerfield by-election.

Advertisement

While the starting gun on any such contest is yet to be fired, there’s no doubt that Starmer’s future is hanging by a thread.

In a new essay, Blair urged the party to rethink its strategy altogether and avoid drifting further left.

He wrote: “The Labour Party is playing with fire; or, more accurately with its future, and that of the country.”

He said that the party has “an almost infinite capacity for self-delusion” and needs to reassess its approach to policy.

Advertisement

“Wes Streeting is a huge political talent and Andy Burnham was an outstanding member of my government,” Blair said.“But this leadership debate has an extraordinarily retro 20th-century feel to it.”

While also taking aim at Starmer for only winning the public over on the basis of not being the Conservatives, he said Westminster must distance itself from the “politics” bubble.

He said: “The world is turning on its axis and today’s politicians, living in a 24/7 pressure cooker, have barely time to recognise the turning let alone study it.

“These changes need long-term strategic thinking which is alien to the way most modern democracies function.”

Advertisement

Blair then called out the main reasons many Labour rebels want to depose Starmer, saying: “The government’s principal problem isn’t Keir’s personality. Or a failure to communicate ‘our achievements’. Or a need to assert more strongly Labour’s ‘values’.

“It is because we don’t have a worked-out, coherent plan for the country in a fast-changing world and are in the wrong political position from which we can devise one and win a second term.”

He warned that the government is governing from Labour’s “comfort zone”, the soft-left.

“Whether there is a leadership change or not is irrelevant if it doesn’t start with a policy debate,” he noted. “Trying to force the prime minister out before we know what policy direction we’re bringing in is not a serious way of conducting ourselves.”

Advertisement

He called on the party to reconsider its approach to economic growth for both prosperity and social justice, to reconsider how to meet the challenges of AI and how the foreign policy works in a changing world order.

Blair warned: “Governments which succeed don’t start with a personality contest. Or a political question – as in, how do we ‘save the country’ from Reform.

“They start with an idea, a project, a governing purpose, an analysis of what is wrong and a plan to put it right.”

The ex-prime minister urged Downing Street to support Donald Trump, too, even though the public have largely supported Starmer’s decision not to follow the US president into another war in the Middle East.

Advertisement

He suggested cutting benefits and abandoning Net Zero to move with the times.

The former Labour leader also took a jab at his one-time chancellor and successor, Gordon Brown, saying the party has “never fully recovered” from its move to the left in 2007 – when Blair left office.

Brown is notably working as Starmer’s special envoy on global finance and cooperation.

Blair tore into the prime minister’s indecision over its policy direction, and accused its economic approach of giving “headwinds not tailwinds to British business”.

Advertisement

Blair proposed Labour become the “radical centre”, where he claims elections can still be won.

“The centre is the place where policy comes first and politics second,” he said.

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Just 12 hours after murdering four medics in Lebanon, Israel targets and murders three more

Published

on

Lebanon

Lebanon

Sky News‘ Alex Crawford has reported on yet another targeted attack by Israel against paramedics in Lebanon, in turn emphasising the depths of sinister depravity which Israel is more than willing to sink to.

Showing camera footage which proves how the Zionist Israeli military intentionally kill Lebanese emergency workers, Crawford points out that this horrific murder came 12 hours after another Israeli strike killed four other medics.

The three medics in this video were responding to a father and his daughter who were injured in an Israeli strike, only for a trademark double-tap bomb to be dropped on them – subsequently murdering all three medics alongside the father, his young daughter and another Lebanese civilian.

Once again, Israel proves it has a bloodthirsty agenda against indigenous Arab civilians wherever they are – whilst it continues towards its colonialist, Zionist project of ‘Greater Israel’.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Crawford: “You can see the bomb hitting the front of the ambulance” in Lebanon

In her report for Sky News, Alex Crawford highlights the scale at which the Israeli military has killed medics in Lebanon under the direction of Israel’s occupying military. Despite a ceasefire deal in mid-April, Israel has continued to murder Arab people with impunity and, as Crawford says, “no one seems able to stop it”.

Nevertheless, it is worth pointing out this impunity is less about being politically able – and far more about a lack of political will to do anything about it.

Instead, Western leaders have pretty much given Israel a carte-blanche as it continues its genocidal campaigns in the Middle East.

Crawford described the targeted ‘double-tap’ attack captured on camera, saying:

Advertisement

They’re in neon jackets calling the second ambulance in after a father and his young daughter have been hit. As the crew arrives there’s another bomb. When slowed down you can see the bomb hitting the front of the ambulance. The moment of impact is captured by a second camera inside the arriving ambulance.

The two-man crew rushing to help their colleagues and those injured on the road somehow escape for their lives. But now they too are wounded.

All three of their colleagues outside on the street were killed, as well as the father, his young child and a civilian who’d stopped to help. The attacks are devastating the southern communities.

Referring to an 8-year-old child now left without his father, she told of the victims:

Among the three was a photojournalist as well as volunteer medic. His little girl unaware this was the final goodbye to the father killed doing two of the most dangerous jobs in Lebanon right now. The grief here is raw and unfiltered. They’ve had back-to-back funerals for days, and many are convinced the civil defence uniforms they now grip for comfort marked out their loved ones for attack.

Once again, Israel have sought to deny this was a deliberate and targeted attack, telling Crawford that they actually hit two motorbikes belonging to Hezbollah. Crawford, in contrast to most journalists in Western mainstream murder, refuted this baseless defence pointing out that the video directly contradicted their claims.

Advertisement

In response, the IDF is once again left adjudicating their own lawless conduct, stating that it is “examining the claims of uninvolved individuals being harmed”.

Murdered medics is what Israel does

Crawford spoke to local people, who told of their deep pain, suffering and trauma as a result of Israel’s continuous crimes against humanity. Crimes which continue to go on with absolute impunity under corrupted leaders in the West.

The anguish is deep, often inconsolable. But the resolve amongst this band of brothers runs far deeper.

Lebanese paramedic: “We lost like my best friend. Like we are like brothers together all the time together. Like 18 days together every day, every hour. We lost him. But we will say to him we will continue. We will continue.”

Underscoring how little control Lebanese people have over their own territory, freedoms and chance of any semblance of peace, Crawford continued:

Advertisement

To many here, the war has never stopped. The country’s future is now tied to an Iran-US-Israel deal. It’s an absolute insistence by negotiators in Tehran who support the armed group Hezbollah, which is firing rockets into northern Israel.

But historic talks between the Lebanese government and Israel have failed to bring any respite from the killings, and a ceasefire agreed mid-April hasn’t stopped the bombings.

Even graveyards aren’t safe in Lebanon, which are becoming increasingly full with more and more murdered daily:

Even as they’re putting someone to rest, you can see the remnants and the aftermath of what happened in an explosion yesterday. Half the cemetery covered. There are very few places now where people feel safe in South Lebanon.

Even the dead aren’t left undisturbed, and many of these graves are fresh from attacks in the last few days, as well as where whole generations are buried.

Speaking to a Lebanese man visiting the graveyard, Crawford was able to grasp the scale of grief that has become synonymous with living alongside a hostile, murderous state such as Zionist Israel:

Advertisement

Crawford: Do you have anyone that you know around here?

Lebanese man: Grandpa.

Adding:

Grandma. My uncle. My uncle, my uncle, my uncle.

Where is the political will to stop Israel’s widespread murder?

Some Lebanese families are so aware of the high stakes and insecure futures facing their loved ones, as Crawford highlighted when she spoke to Hussein. Whilst sweeping the graves of his relatives, including his wife’s who died last year, he told how he has been a paramedic and worries for the lives of his four paramedic sons.

One of which was due to attend with the crew murdered yesterday:

Advertisement

Some days I don’t sleep. I lost my wife. We lived through the last war. We were displaced and left our home. But the boys stayed here. If one son stays, I don’t have too much of a problem.

But if four of them stay and a strike takes them all, it’s a disaster, a disaster.

Featured image via the Canary

By Maddison Wheeldon

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Mamdani promises housing ‘transformation’

Published

on

Mayor Zohran Mamdani announced his housing plan blueprint for New York City in Brooklyn on Tuesday.

Mayor Zohran Mamdani announced his housing plan blueprint for New York City in Brooklyn on Tuesday.

DAYS THE BUDGET IS LATE: 56

GETTING TO 200K: Mayor Zohran Mamdani released a wide-ranging housing plan today that he said will usher in the “largest municipal housing transformation this country has ever seen.”

The blueprint lays out how Mamdani plans to address the single biggest driver of the city’s affordability crisis, the central focus of the mayoral campaign that propelled him into City Hall.

While the plan lays out ambitious targets that would surpass past mayors if achieved — including the planned creation and preservation of a combined 400,000 affordable homes over a decade — it also illustrates how Mamdani is not reinventing the wheel on many housing issues, but rather leaning into or expanding policies pursued by his predecessors.

Advertisement

The plan seeks to tackle a range of coinciding crises: the severe shortage of available housing; a public housing system that’s crumbling and facing massive capital needs; and a rental housing stock that is experiencing growing distress as operating costs skyrocket.

“If the absence of good government created the conditions we now face, the presence of good government can build the solutions we now need,” Mamdani said in a speech announcing the plan in Brooklyn’s Gowanus section, where a city-led rezoning enacted nearly five years ago has spurred a residential building boom.

Mamdani is already encountering the limits of some of his campaign promises and moderating costly plans as his administration grapples with a strained municipal budget. On the campaign trail, the mayor said he would create 200,000 publicly-subsidized homes over a decade, tripling current rates of production. He is standing by that goal, while also pledging to preserve another 200,000 affordable homes.

“Scaling to these levels of affordable housing production will not be easy and cannot be done overnight,” the blueprint states. The administration is aiming to create some 14,000 affordable homes in fiscal year 2027, which starts July 1, while ramping up to 21,000 units per year by fiscal year 2031.

Advertisement

Under the blueprint released Tuesday, Mamdani’s housing department plans to finance 8,000 new affordable homes in fiscal years 2027 and 2028 — which would grow subsidized housing by more than 35 percent from the prior two years. But the plan does not spell out specifically how the administration will produce roughly 12,000 remaining units annually to get to Mamdani’s 200,000-unit goal.

Much of that additional affordable housing will rely on zoning, tax and other financing tools rather than direct city subsidies. And it would require the private sector to embrace those tools. — Janaki Chadha

From the Capitol

New York State Assemblymember Jeff Dinowitz said he voted in favor of the state budget bills due to favored changes for Tier VI.

‘BIG UGLY’ VOTE: The Legislature spent the better part of today plowing through votes on the budget’s “big ugly” bill, which contains most of the hot-button issues in this year’s spending plan.

“This bill has some really good stuff in it and some really bad stuff,” said Assemblymember Jeff Dinowitz, who cited Tier VI pension plan changes when speaking about his “yes” vote. “I look forward to seeing the positive impact it’s going to have on many, many state workers.”

Advertisement

That was the common theme that emerged among Democratic during today’s debate — they hate the rollbacks to the climate law, but they’re also supportive of the inclusion of what Republican Assemblymember Michael Fitzpatrick dubbed “the mother of all pension sweeteners” that they reluctantly voted yes. That line of reasoning appeared especially common from members who, like Dinowitz, have Democratic primaries in four weeks and stand to face attacks for being weak on the environment.

“This is not an easy vote for me,” said Assemblymember Grace Lee, who’s running for an open Senate seat and wound up backing the bill because of Tier VI.

“I am voting yes because I refuse to deny hardworking union members and retirees the retirement security they have worked years to achieve,” Assemblymember Jessica Gonzalez-Rojas said.

Gonzalez-Rojas also took time to slam the climate law changes.

Advertisement

“Communities like Jackson Heights, Corona, East Elmhurst, Elmhurst, LeFrak City have already experienced the consequences of environmental injustice,” she said. “Climate change is not theoretical for our communities. It is personal.”

That might be another indication of just how much budget season has blended into primary season. Not all of those neighborhoods fall within Gonzalez-Rojas’ district — but they’re a perfect description of the Senate district where she’s challenging fellow Democrat Jessica Ramos next month. — Bill Mahoney

FROM CITY HALL

Fans often gather around Madison Square Garden for watch parties during and after Knicks games.

MEANWHILE, IN KNICKS WORLD: Mamdani appeared to indicate today that watch parties will be back outside Madison Square Garden during next month’s NBA finals.

“They will be there,” Mamdani said with a laugh when asked at an unrelated press conference if the partying will resume outside the iconic arena next month when the Knicks play their first NBA finals in nearly three decades.

Advertisement

But a Mamdani spokesperson told Playbook that the mayor wasn’t referring to official watch parties. Rather, the spokesperson said he was talking about how Knicks fans inevitably gather outside the Garden during and after games to celebrate or mourn — oftentimes in rather raucous fashion.

Whether official watch parties — replete with massive screens showing the games — will be back outside the Garden during the finals, the Mamdani spokesperson wouldn’t say, adding that plans are still being finalized.

“It’s not a question of if there will be watch parties but where,” spokesperson Dora Pekec said.

The issue could become a bone of contention for Knicks fans.

Advertisement

Last week, the city pulled MSG’s permit to hold its usual large-scale parties outside the arena during Knicks games due to concerns from the NYPD about public drinking and other debauchery. During one of the Knicks’ Eastern Conference Finals games against the Cleveland Cavaliers last week, six people were arrested in connection with the outdoor watch party.

The NYPD’s decision to put the kibosh on the parties may infuriate Knicks fans who are ecstatic about their team making it to the NBA finals for the first time since 1999. Mamdani, an avid Knicks fan, is already facing tension with NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch over how to police this summer’s World Cup, as previously reported by POLITICO, and an MSG dispute could drive a further wedge.

With the outdoor party permit scrapped, MSG hosted a watch party at Radio City Music Hall for the Knicks’ clincher against the Cavs last night.

No matter what, Mamdani said at today’s press conference that Knicks fans will be able to cheer on their team at a variety of watch parties across the city during next month’s finals.

Advertisement

“We’re looking forward to making sure that it is a time for New Yorkers to celebrate, it’s a time that they’re also safe,” he said. “We’re going to have a number of different kinds of watch parties, and we’ll get back to you as we keep going through those plans.”

The Knicks will face either the San Antonio Spurs or Oklahoma City Thunder in the finals next month. The first game in the series is set for June 3. Chris Sommerfeldt

FROM THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL

Congressional primary debates will begin to take place in June, including the crowded NY-12 race for retiring Rep. Jerry Nadler.

DEBATE-A-PALOOZA: Got plans in June? How about a congressional primary debate — or six?

After forums galore across the city’s competitive primaries, a slew of televised debates are on the books ahead of the June 23 election: two each for the races to replace retiring Reps. Nydia Velázquez and Jerry Nadler, and another two for Rep. Dan Goldman’s primary challenge from former City Comptroller Brad Lander.

Advertisement

All debates will be live at 7 p.m., with the exception of the first NY-07 debate on June 3, which will be prerecorded earlier that day and air at 7 p.m. Here’s when to block off your schedule:

— June 1: Goldman and Lander will be facing off for their first televised debate, hosted by Spectrum News NY1. NY1’s Errol Louis and Courtney Gross will moderate the program.

Goldman’s campaign has frequently criticized Lander for not agreeing to partake in seven debates.

— June 3: State Assemblymember Claire Valdez, Brooklyn Borough President Antonio Reynoso and City Council member Julie Won will take the stage as they vie for Velázquez’s seat. The debate will be hosted by NY1 and moderated by Louis and Gross. Public defender Vichal Kumar is also on the ballot, though he did not qualify for the debate.

Advertisement

— June 4: The four leading candidates looking to succeed Nadler will meet in a PIX11 debate: state Assemblymembers Micah Lasher and Alex Bores, Kennedy scion Jack Schlossberg and anti-Trump commentator George Conway. It will be moderated by Dan Mannarino.

— June 9: Another NY-12 debate will be hosted by NY1 and WNYC. Louis and WNYC’s Brian Lehrer and Brigid Bergin will moderate. This debate is set to feature Bores, Conway, Lasher, Schlossberg and public health practitioner Nina Schwalbe.

Schwalbe, a progressive candidate who has struggled to break through in the crowded field, has frequently criticized media coverage and events for not including her. A handful of other lesser-known candidates are also on the ballot next month.

— June 10: Valdez, Reynoso and Won will partake in a PIX11 debate, with Mannarino moderating.

Advertisement

— June 15: PIX11 will host Goldman and Lander for another showdown, moderated by Mannarino.

Early voting starts June 13. Madison Fernandez

MUM-DANI: Mamdani is noncommittal about getting involved in the competitive race in what is now his home district.

When asked by PIX11’s Henry Rosoff who he’s voting for in the Democratic primary to succeed Nadler, Gracie Mansion’s newest resident laughed and said he hadn’t made a decision but is “following the race as a keen constituent.”

Advertisement

“At this time, I would say that I’ve focused on the two decisions I’ve made thus far,” Mamdani continued, referring to his endorsements for Lander and Valdez.

Bores recently said he would “love” to have Mamdani’s backing. Lasher, meanwhile, is getting campaign help from political strategist Morris Katz, an architect of Mamdani’s win last year. A recent Emerson College/PIX11 poll found that Mamdani has a strong approval rating, at 66 percent, among Democratic primary voters in the district. But a Mamdani endorsement could also turn off some Jewish voters — a prominent constituency in the district — who are not fans of the mayor.

“It was a pleasure to serve with both of them in Albany,” Mamdani said of Bores and Lasher. Madison Fernandez 

ENDORSEMENT CORNER: Abundance New York rolled out its voter guide on Tuesday, highlighting candidates in competitive races who the group’s executive director Catherine Vaughan said in a statement are “willing to actually build the things New York needs.”

Advertisement

They include Reynoso and Lander, as well as a dual-endorsement for Bores and Lasher. (The group said that between Bores and Lasher, it “cannot recommend one over the other at this time, but we may revisit as the race continues.”)

The endorsements aren’t exactly all glowing. In the rationale for Reynoso, it states that his “record has not always supported our agenda, but we have decided to take his evolution at face value and to commit to holding him to his word.”

The blurb about Lander acknowledged that the group has “concerns about [his] record and some of his current stances,” including opposing some rezonings during his time on the Council and supporting a ban on what the group described as “investor-owned ‘build-to-rent’ housing.” The guide also states that the group is “dismayed at his demand that Brooklyn Marine Terminal development be delayed; this is a NIMBY stance that seems cynically targeted at Goldman’s leadership on the issue.” Despite that, Abundance New York pointed to Lander’s “record on housing production, transit, and the local land-use machinery in this district” and said it thinks he “would prioritize the built environment issues that we champion more strongly.”

The group is also backing Drew Warshaw — the affordable housing nonprofit executive who’s one of two primary challengers to state Comptroller Tom DiNapoli — along with a handful of candidates in the state Legislature and City Council member Carl Wilson. Madison Fernandez

Advertisement

IN OTHER NEWS

THINGS GO SOUTH: Mamdani-backed congressional candidate Claire Valdez, who has called to abolish ICE, is facing scrutiny over her father’s work for a firm involved in Texas border projects. (New York Post)

WHAT’S IN A NAME: Internal renderings for the Penn Station overhaul project show a presidential seal featuring Donald Trump’s name alongside a redesigned train hall. (Gothamist)

ACROSS THE AISLE: Brooklyn’s Park Slope Food Co-op is split over a looming vote to boycott Israeli products from the socially conscious grocery store. (The New York Times)

Missed this morning’s New York Playbook? We forgive you. Read it here.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

What Gen Z needs most is economic growth

Published

on

What Gen Z needs most is economic growth

Britain is constantly told that young people have fallen out of love with capitalism. Apparently, they prefer ‘socialism’ and distrust profit-making enterprises. They want the state to do the heavy lifting. This story is neat and tidy. It’s also comforting and a little self-congratulatory for those who bought houses before the millennium. It’s also wrong.

For their entire adult lives, younger Britons have suffered under an economy that hasn’t grown, paid them well or provided decent careers. Young Brits have lived with a system that promises opportunity but quietly withholds it.

Freshwater Strategy and the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) recently released a report on British public attitudes towards growth that captures the mood. Younger voters are pessimistic to the point of cynicism, but they are certainly not anti-growth. Quite the opposite. They are desperate for it. They have just never experienced it.

Advertisement

Since 2008, UK productivity growth has averaged around half a per cent a year – barely a third of its pre-Global Financial Crisis growth rate. Real average earnings have risen by just 1.6 per cent over the same period. Had the pre-crisis trend continued, GDP per person would now be roughly £11,000 higher than it is. These aren’t abstract numbers. They show up in rents that swallow salaries, wages that are stalling, and the sense, which was repeatedly voiced in the IEA focus groups, that working hard no longer moves the dial. If work doesn’t pay, then why should young people work harder?

This context matters. Because when growth disappears, so does trust in the system.

In our research, younger participants overwhelmingly supported economic growth in principle, but struggled to articulate how it happens or why it matters. Not because they’re hostile to business or markets, but because growth has simply not been part of their lived reality. In one of our groups, a young man put it bluntly: ‘I don’t think I’ve ever seen real economic growth to know what it actually feels like or looks like.’

Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Advertisement

Please wait…

Advertisement

In that vacuum, suspicion rushes in. Large majorities of Brits believe that growth mainly benefits someone else, like the government, big corporations and high earners. Fewer believe growth can benefit them personally or their families. That belief is reinforced by a striking misunderstanding of business economics. The IEA research shows that many Brits are painfully out of touch with the realities of entrepreneurship. People dramatically overestimate corporate profit margins, particularly in politically sensitive sectors like energy and utilities. If you think firms are minting money already, then it’s easy to conclude that the system is rigged against you.

But scratch the surface and the instincts of young Brits are unmistakably pro-market. Indeed, younger voters repeatedly identify high energy costs (85 per cent), high taxes (75 per cent) and excessive regulation (74 per cent) as major barriers to growth. These are precisely the constraints that are most damaging for entry-level workers, for renters and early-stage start-ups. Nearly three-quarters of voters say that they support cutting taxes to grow the economy, and six in 10 say that they support reducing regulation. Eighty per cent of Brits say it’s important for the government to make it easier for people to start and grow a business, a sentiment that resonates especially strongly among under-35s.

Advertisement

Energy prices are a central economic fault line. Though decarbonisation is a fairly popular ambition at face value, when forced to choose, 78 per cent say that they prioritise affordable energy over Net Zero targets. Green ideology is clearly far less widespread among the public than in Westminster.

The supposed turn of Brits, particularly young ones, to socialism or to radical environmentalism looks very different when viewed through this lens.

In our focus groups, younger participants often described themselves as ‘socialist’. But, when pressed, their priorities were highly practical. Lower taxes on themselves, cheaper bills, less government waste and an easier pathway to get ahead were what they wanted.

Advertisement

One focus-group participant neatly summed up the tension, combining a deep distrust of government competence while seeing the state as the only actor big enough to fix a system that feels broken.

That contradiction runs through the research. People blame government and politics more than anything else for Britain’s stagnation, yet instinctively look to the government to solve it. It’s a symptom of leadership failure in a low-growth era.

The most important finding in the IEA research may be the simplest. Britain is not a ‘degrowth’ nation. When voters are confronted with how far the UK has slipped internationally, behind much of Western Europe, and behind every US state in terms of income per capita, the reaction was not indifference. It was shock, embarrassment and anger. Crucially, it also led to a greater openness to serious pro-market reform.

Advertisement

Young people are not rejecting capitalism. They are rejecting a country that promised opportunity, but which has so far delivered only hardship.

The behaviour of young Brits reflects this. They embrace side-hustles, flexible work and new technologies. They’re willing to invest, take risks, move towns and migrate abroad. These are not collectivist instincts. They are the behaviours of people trying to outrun an economy that no longer rewards hard work and risk-taking.

If Westminster takes the youthful ‘anti-capitalist’ rhetoric at face value, then politicians will misread the public mood. What young Britons actually want is not a bigger state managing decline ‘more kindly’. They want costs down, wages up, affordable energy, more homes and growth restored, so that any ambition they have no longer feels naive or wasted.

Advertisement

Capitalism and pro-growth policies aren’t unpopular with young Brits. Stagnation is. It’s time we had a government that grasped that distinction.

Dr Michael Turner is a pollster and strategist. He is also a director at Freshwater Strategy.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025