Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Politics

First war crimes complaint against UAE-backed Sudan paramilitary filed in Kenya

Published

on

Rapid Support Forces

Rapid Support Forces

The UAE-backed Rapid Support Forces (RSF) have been accused of genocide, massacres and sexual violence. Sudan’s civil war has raged for three years with the backing of foreign and regional powers. Now survivors have filed the first war crimes complaint in Kenya.

Twelve victims backed by a Swiss legal NGO urged Kenya’s chief of prosecution to pursue the case. Associated Press (AP) reported on 9 June:

It is the first attempt to prosecute members of the Rapid Support Forces, or RSF, the paramilitary group fighting against the Sudanese military for over three years, outside Sudan.

Adding that:

The group, which has been accused by rights organizations of committing atrocities amounting to war crimes and crimes against humanity, has ties with Kenya’s government.

AP said:

Advertisement

Kenyan President William Ruto has previously hosted RSF leader Gen. Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo for talks that he said were aimed at advancing peace efforts in Sudan, a move that sparked diplomatic tensions.

The twelve survivors are working with the Switzerland-based NGO Legal Action Worldwide. Their testimony details:

torture and sexual violence committed by RSF members at various locations in and around Khartoum between April 2023 and March 2025 when the Sudanese capital was controlled by the paramilitaries.

The charges against RSF included that their victims:

were held in inhumane conditions, with little or no food, limited access to water, and inadequate sanitation facilities. They allege that they were beaten, burned, suffocated, subjected to electric shocks, and sexually abused, including through rape.

Additionally:

Some were reportedly forced to transport dead bodies from detention facilities.

RSF is backed by the UAE but many other nations have made the war worse through active participation or through humanitarian inaction.

Advertisement

Rapid Support Forces and Sudan’s ongoing foreign-backed civil war

The RSF, backed by the UAE, is fighting the Sudanese government, with gold interests and regional influence at stake.

Numerous foreign actors, including the UK, have caused the war to fester through active participation and/or outright passivity. Israel, too, is a player in the war.

The war in Sudan is theoretically between the Arab-majority RSF and the Sudanese government. But foreign states pursuing their own interests are backing the combatants.

TurkeyEgypt and many more countries are pursuing their own interests in Sudan too. British military components have also shown up on the battlefield in RSF hands. The UK is a major arms supplier to UAE.

Advertisement

The RSF has killed Sudanese civilians in vast numbers. Some estimates say 150,000 people have died and more than 10 million civilians have been displaced by fighting.

Sources have also claimed the UK downgraded the situation in Sudan to avoid “pissing off the Emiratis”.

Drone war over Sudan

Drones have been a major feature of the war. Both RSF and Sudanese government forces have deployed them. On 9 June government forces engaged RSF drones over the capital Khartoum. The Sudan Tribune reported:

Military sources said a Rapid Support Forces (RSF) drone attempted to bomb military sites northwest of Omdurman before ground defences intercepted it and prevented it from reaching its targets.

The same sources said air defences also engaged strategic drones in East Nile, with no casualties reported.

Advertisement

A recent UN report said drones were a serious threat to life and limb in the war:

Drones caused more than 80 per cent of civilian deaths in Sudan’s war during the first four months of 2026, killing at least 880 people.

UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk condemned both sides for their use of unmanned aerial weapons:

Armed drones have now become by far and away the leading cause of civilian deaths.

And the Ayin investigative network reported that clashes between local people and RSF allies in Sudan’s south have resulted in a village being burned:

violence last month killed at least 61 civilians, including women and children, who were targeted during clashes between the [RSF-aligned] SPLM-N, led by Abdel Aziz al-Hilu and the Ottoro tribe in Kauda.

Part of the conflict is due to:

Advertisement

the Ottoro’s refusal to allow the SPLM-N-allied Rapid Support Forces (RSF) to mine in their area.

The submission of a first official war crimes complaint is a good sign. Yet lawyers say allegations are hard to corroborate in a country gripped by war and devastation. A semblance of peace and justice for Sudan in this foreign-backed war may still be a long way off.

Featured image via Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images

By Joe Glenton

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Rihanna Kelver facing felony charges shows ‘stand your ground’ is not for trans people

Published

on

rihanna kelver

rihanna kelver

Rihanna Kelver, a transgender woman in Wyoming, is facing felony charges for pulling a weapon to defend herself after being subject to homophobic and transphobic slurs. Slate magazine reported that Kelver was about to end a work shift when several men on the street began yelling slurs at her. Then:

Moments later, according to court testimony and surveillance footage, the man shoved Kelver to the ground hard enough to injure her tailbone.

Kelver responded by drawing a pistol from her bag, chambering a round, and pointing the weapon at the man who had pushed her. She kept the safety on and never fired. The man and his companions retreated.

However, the man who shoved Kelver and began the confrontation has not been charged. But, Kelver is now facing charges of aggravated assault and possession of a deadly weapon with unlawful intent. If found guilty, she could face up to 15 years in prison.

For a nation as heavily invested in stand-your-ground as the US, Rihanna’s fight in court has become one that shows the systemic homophobia and transphobia in the justice system.

Advertisement

Kelver and ‘stand your ground’

Kelve’s arrest seemingly contradicts the Wyoming “Stand your ground” law, permitting an individual the right to defend themselves. In spite of the evidence presented, the man who assaulted her, (referred to as Durham) hasn’t faced a single charge. Kelver has had to leave her job due to her charges and faces an arraignment on the 24th of June 2026.

Many LGBTQ+ news and advocacy platforms have reported on her case, highlighting the unfairness and hypocrisy of the situation. They point out the irony that in a nation so proud of it’s citizen’s ability to arm themselves, the moment a trans person uses it against bigotry, it is criminalized. As Slate concluded:

Kelver’s experience also fits a long and troubling history of transgender people being punished for their acts of survival.

Kelver’s case can be used as a clear example of the double standards applied to queer and specifically trans people in the justice system. And for the queer community it’s seen as evidence of how queer people are not protected by the law to the same standards as others.

The system is not broken

Kelver’s arrest is not a new phenomenon but instead just the latest in a repeated history of LGBTQ+ individuals being punished for defending themselves. In 2014 CeCe McDonald was arrested and almost faced 40 years in prison after defending herself against a group of white people screaming racist and transphobic remarks and then physically assaulting her. In 2011 Ky Peterson was arrested and convicted for murdering his rapist and was only released after 9 years of imprisonment. These two examples are also notable because they involved Black trans people. The US justice system is not only queerphobic and transphobic, but deeply racist and anti-Black.  There is a fundamental ideology within the justice system itself to not only punish marginalized individuals for protecting themselves, but actively working to criminalize those same communities.

Advertisement

Activist Peter Gelderloos wrote on Truthout:

When transgender or queer people defend themselves from such violence, the law usually steps in to pick up where the vigilantes left off… White people who attack people of color who are crossing borders or transgressing “socially accepted” ways of behavior are defending their “selves” as those selves exist within society (and there is no other kind of self). Heterosexual people and cis-gendered people are defending those white heteronormative persons’ sense of self.

Despite LGBTQ+ people and people of colour being far more vulnerable to violent acts of hate, we are routinely punished for defending ourselves. And that is by design.

This is due to these systems of ‘justice’ being built out of the very systems that perpetuate our communities marginalization. Institutionalized ‘justice’ becomes a means of preserving a white supremacist and queerphobic hierarchy. When most self-defense laws were formed amongst Western countries, they wasn’t made with the majority of the population in mind. Like many laws, they were made to benefit a small privileged group, whilst purposely criminalising minorities for defending themselves from attack.

This is the system working as intended.

Advertisement

The death of rainbow capitalism

The arrest of Rihanna Kelver and the perpetuation of queer and marginalized injustice adds to a growing sentiment within the queer community. As we reach the middle of Pride month, many in the community have pointed out a noticeable decrease in the typical corporate advertising and promoting. Whereas before, companies would share posts, change logos and create merchandise, it has been replaced by rather abrupt silence.

Corporations tendencies during pride were referred to as “rainbow capitalism”, and was commonly met with annoyance by the queer community. It was generally understood that these gestures weren’t actual indicators of support but a means to seem progressive in order to drive more profits. However whilst the dramatic absence of rainbow capitalism is celebrated by some, it is seen as a grim indicator by others.

Cases like Kelver’s and lack of corporate support during pride, for some in the community isn’t just an indicator of progressive stagnation but in fact a regression. Capitalism may not indicate morality but it can reflect our culture. And with the many recent events happening across the world, it is clear for queer communities that there is a resurgence in far-right ideology. Rolling back queer rights is rapidly gaining popularity.

Pride is resistance

Of course, none of this is to argue that corporations should engage in pinkwashing during pride month. Instead, the death of rainbow capitalism is a sign that neoliberal capitalism has found that it is no longer necessary to pay lip service to queer rights. That, in turn, can be explained by the vicious bigotry from both the UK and US administrations who have normalised the creeping rise of transphobia.

Advertisement

Despite Pride this year possibly highlighting the ways culture has started to regress, it also represents our perseverance as a community. The reason Pride month exists today is due to the fighting and resistance of our queer forebears. Just as Rihanna Kelver herself is still fighting the legal battle for her right to protect herself, we as community must keep fighting and uplifting each other against this bigoted system.

Featured image via Getty/Heather Diehl

By Olaitan Mos-Shogbamimu

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Jenrick’s Plan To Scrap NI Hike For British Workers Slammed

Published

on

Jenrick's Plan To Scrap NI Hike For British Workers Slammed

Robert Jenrick has been accused of “playing divisive identity politics” after announcing a Reform UK government would make it more expensive for bosses to employ foreign workers.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves increased employers’ National Insurance Contributions from 13.8% to 15% in her first Budget back in 2024.

Critics have labelled the policy a “jobs tax” which makes it more expensive for employers to hire staff.

Jenrick, Reform’s Treasury spokesperson, announced on Monday that his party would reverse the NICs rise, but only for “British workers”.

Advertisement

He said the policy would be paid for by introducing a “Migrant Labour Levy”, which businesses would have to pay for every foreign worker they employ.

Jenrick said: “For more than 20 years now, we’ve had British workers coming second – undercut by cheap migrant labour, which drives down wages and our people’s quality of life.

“The experiment of letting in millions of low-wage migrants – as millions of Brits languish on benefits – has failed catastrophically. Reform will end it.”

He added: “If the migrant is hired, the taxman collects £7,000 in taxes, but ends up paying the British candidate not hired around £8,000 on universal credit.

Advertisement

“If the British worker was hired instead, the £7k in tax would still be paid. But the £8k in benefits would be saved.”

He claimed there are around 3.6 million non-EU workers in Britain – and the the levy would raise £10 billion from the non-EU migrants on PAYE alone.

Liberal Democrats’ Treasury spokesperson Daisy Cooper told HuffPost UK: “Instead of playing divisive identity politics and creating a bureaucratic anti-business nightmare, we should be focused on helping all our struggling local businesses to thrive.

“The Liberal Democrats have been clear from the start, the hike in employer National Insurance is a self-defeating jobs tax that hits high street shops, local pharmacies, GPs, and care homes hard. It needs to be scrapped for everyone.”

Advertisement

A Labour Party spokesperson said: “Nigel Farage’s latest half-baked plan would leave British businesses and British people worse off.

“Their proposals threaten to hike bills and leave working families paying the price.

“Reform is not on the side of working people and are simply making it up as they go along.

“Only Labour is making the fair choices to change our country, ease the cost of living, and improve our public services.

Advertisement

“We’ve already slashed migration by 69% since last year, our Immigration Skills Charge is funding more training for British workers, and we’re reforming the system to get people back into the work and out of the doom loop of joblessness which spiralled out of control under the Tories.”

“Another day, another uncosted policy to distract from Robert Kenyon’s sexist comments,” Labour MP Luke Charters also told HuffPost UK.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Client journalists defend Musk becoming a trillionaire

Published

on

Piers Morgan and Andrew Neil looking at images of Elon Musk becoming a trillionaire

Piers Morgan and Andrew Neil looking at images of Elon Musk becoming a trillionaire

Elon Musk — the seig-heiling owner of X — has become the world’s first trillionaire. As we’ll explain, he’s achieved this by leveraging his power, influence and shamelessness to prove that capitalism is every bit as rotten as we said it is.

However, if you ask one of the many thoughtless establishment journalists out there how he became so wealthy, they’ll tell you ‘Elon gets lots of money because he makes rockets good‘.

In turn, we’d like to congratulate Piers Morgan for fitting Musk’s entire boot in his mouth.

He got here by being the most hard-working suck-up in the entire Western media.

Salut, Piers! 👏👏

Musk games the market

First, we should explain how Elon Musk became a trillionaire.

Advertisement

Musk’s wealth just exploded because he’s taken SpaceX from a private company to a public one. By SpaceX, we mean the three companies that make up SpaceX, which are:

Of the three companies:

  • SpaceX is not profitable.
  • StarLink is profitable.
  • Grok AI is really not profitable.

SpaceX could be profitable in the future, as long as we keep finding new reasons to send thousands of rockets into space. StarLink could remain profitable, but the market for satellite internet is limited to customers who:

  • Can’t access broadband
  • Can pay for fancy satellite internet

Grok AI will probably never be profitable. OpenAI and Anthropic are both doing better than Grok, and it looks like they have no realistic path towards profitability either. The problem is AI costs so much to run that when you charge companies an honest price (instead of subsidising the cost with billionaire investor money) they abandon the product.

Advertisement

Musk and his company losses

Right, so SpaceX is not what you’d call a profitable company. In fact, it made a $4.9 billion loss last year. But despite this, when it went public, it achieved a valuation of $2 trillion.

This is the largest Initial Public Offering (IPO) of all time. On paper, it means SpaceX is more valuable than most companies which actually make money. If you’re confused that isn’t because you’re not getting it; it’s because it doesn’t make sense. It also gets worse.

To be fair to Musk, he does have a plan to make his company profitable, and that plan is data centres in space. The problem is that these data centres would almost certainly be more expensive than the terrestrial ones. They may also be physically impossible to build at scale.

Advertisement

Who could have guessed it would be less cost-effective to build something in space? Good lord.

And this isn’t the first time Musk has promised the impossible. There’s a site that tracks his broken promises called elonmusk.today. Examples include:

  • 1,645 days since Elon Musk said he would take carbon out of the air and use it for rocket fuel
  • 1,939 days since Elon Musk promised Starlink customers their speed would double by the end of 2021
  • 2,166 days since Elon Musk said that people who get brain surgery from him could pay for it with augmented brain powers
  • 2,327 days since Elon Musk advised consumers that Teslas can safely function as a boat for short periods of time
  • 2,611 days since Elon Musk said there will be a million fully autonomous Tesla robotaxis in a year
  • 2,714 days since Elon Musk said the new Roadster will use rocket technology that will allow it to fly
  • 2,824 days since Elon Musk said SpaceX would probably build a base on Mars by 2028

Why does Musk make such wild claims? Almost certainly because doing so draws attention away from the fact that his companies have been mostly unprofitable, and because the pie-in-the-sky promises cause the value of his companies to rise.

How does this keep happening?

As you can see, it’s both quantifiable and widely understood that Musk’s companies are valued way above their actual — you know — value.

Advertisement

So why do investors keep falling for it?

Advertisement

There are two things to bear in mind: the first is why wouldn’t they keep falling for it? In the short term, their stocks become more valuable. In the long term, well, nobody is thinking about the long term.

The other thing to be aware of is that a lot of this stuff is now algorithmic.

For example, the Chosun Daily reported:

Algorithmic trading programs that use automated pre-set trading instructions to execute orders have recently been blamed for the sharp fluctuations in global stock markets. While algorithmic trading programs offer the advantage of buying and selling assets without human intervention, they also have the drawback of triggering massive sell-offs whenever the set conditions are met, increasing market volatility.

This works in the opposite direction too. What this means is that when Musk promises the world’s first self-driving flying car, the algorithms auto-buy Tesla stock. As Chosun Daily added:

Advertisement

Investment bank Goldman Sachs estimated that algorithmic trading accounted for about 60% to 70% of all trades in the U.S. in 2016. Experts believe this figure has now risen to 70% to 80%.

We may not live in the Matrix, but we definitely live in matrix.

Client media

Now that we’ve explained what the establishment media is mostly ignoring, we can gawp at some of the wretched client journalists who are defending Musk’s ‘success’.

Andrew Neil led the charge on this front, asking “What difference does it make?” if one man’s wealth is higher than the GDP of most countries.

Advertisement

Imagine the worst person you know, and then imagine that they had more money to play around with than Israel spends in a year. Obviously, this would not end well.

And we’ve  seen what Musk uses his wealth to achieve.

Advertisement

The influence campaign didn’t stop there either, as the Canary reported, and many pointed out:

Advertisement

Musk also uses X to boost his ideological bedfellows (which include Nazis).

Advertisement

Human haemorrhoid, Neil, also did the meme:

Columnist and ex-prime minister, Boris Johnson, got in on the action too.

Advertisement

This is fine, if you’re idea of success is a series of obscenely overvalued companies that rely on government handouts while failing to deliver on most of their promises.

Advertisement

It’s not for nothing that Chinese electric vehicles are now more advanced and cheaper than Teslas. Those companies also benefit from state money, but said money is directed into research and development — not into inflating the ego of the world’s most insecure nerd.

Julia Hartley-Brewer had this to say:

The problem? Musk has never designed or built any of his products. He just profited from those who did.

We also don’t have to go back that far to see an example of space travel being pursued for the sake of exploration over ego.

Okay, so the space race did happen to boost America’s ego, but you get the point.

Perhaps the worst defence was this:

Advertisement

The great IPO swindle

There’s another way Musk has used his great wealth to disadvantage the broader public that we’ve not covered yet.

Advertisement

SpaceX isn’t just being listed on various stock exchanges; it’s being fast-tracked. What this means is that various stock-buying schemes like 401(k) retirement plans will automatically buy SpaceX stock.

Usually, a company has to be publicly available for a year to demonstrate its value is legitimate. SpaceX, however, will wait a mere five days in some instances.

In other words, Musk has used his influence to ensure as many ordinary people as possible buy shares in his unprofitable business. If the business remains unprofitable, these same ordinary people who will lose out.

Top to bottom misery

The other thing to note about Musk having so much money is that it doesn’t even make him happy.

Hasan Piker noted:

Advertisement

Elon Musk is a fucking failure and yet in spite of his failures, because he happened to be at the right place at the right time, he has failed upwards with his endless wealth. He’s a horrible person, an unbelievably insecure person, and yet he’s the richest person on the planet. We know he doesn’t fucking work hard because he Tweets all the goddamn time.

We live in a society that is based on wealth accumulation, and yet the man who’s accumulated more than anyone is the most miserable person on the planet.

Maybe it’s time to rethink this capitalism malarkey?

Featured image via Spencer Platt/ Hoda Davaine / Hollie Adams/ Getty Images

By Willem Moore

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

How synagogues became fair game for the Israelophobic mob

Published

on

How synagogues became fair game for the Israelophobic mob

It is remarkable how swiftly the unthinkable returns. How easily the guardrails of morality crumble to dust. That was my thought upon watching a seething mob besiege Edgware United Synagogue yesterday. They screamed abuse at Jews. They hollered for the destruction of the Jewish nation. Some were adorned in the inverted red triangle that signals support for the Jew killers of Hamas. And there you have it: Jews, once more, are being terrorised at their places of worship. What comes next?

The pretext for the vile swarming of a synagogue in a heavily Jewish part of north-west London was that it was holding a Great Israeli Real Estate Event. It was an event for ‘those thinking of moving to Israel’, as the Guardian described it. These ‘thieves’ are selling off land that isn’t theirs to sell, wailed the wild-eyed Israelophobes. In their warped worldview, no Jew should be permitted to buy property in ‘Israhell’. ‘From the river to the sea!’, they chanted, giving voice to that fever dream of all bourgeois bigots: that the world would be a better place if the Jewish nation were annihilated.

Yet however much the hordes at the synagogue doors try to dress up their agitation in the finery of radical politics, there’s no escaping the truth: it is 2026 and Jews’ holy places are once more surrounded by snarling crowds. The mob accused the event organisers of hawking properties in the ‘occupied territories’ of the West Bank. But the organisers firmly deny this. In the words of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, to fume outside a synagogue on ‘false pretences’ looks like a desperate scrabble for any old ‘excuse’ to ‘harass and intimidate’ Jews.

Advertisement

It’s hard to disagree. I find it remarkable that not one member of this bristling pack of Israel-haters stopped to think: ‘Should we be doing this?’ They are so intoxicated by blind animus for the Jewish nation that even optics are no longer a factor in their thinking. It doesn’t even cross their Gaza-fried minds that they might come off like those gangs of Hitler Youth who gathered outside synagogues in 1930s Germany with placards saying ‘Die Juden sind unser Unglück’ – ‘The Jews are our misfortune’. Do the keffiyeh invaders of Edgware think their antics are better because they were only saying Zionists are our misfortune? You would think at some point in the ugly mayhem, one might have said to another, in the vein of that meme, ‘Are we the baddies?’.

Even as they were finally compelled to leave the area of the synagogue, they chanted: ‘Zionists, Zionists, watch your back / We will be coming back.’ I invite you to imagine the media storm that would rage if any other minority group were told to ‘watch their backs’. Imagine if an army of racists besieged a mosque and chanted: ‘Muslims, Muslims, watch your back…’ There would be outrage over such menacing, slippery threats, rightly so. Yet the Jews of Edgware can be taunted with seeming impunity. No condemnation from the PM. No expressions of concern from London’s chattering class.

Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Please wait…

Advertisement
Advertisement

In fact, the political class helped to whip up the anti-Zionist mob. The day before the Edgware event, London mayor Sadiq Khan tweeted: ‘I condemn any attempt to sell property in the settlements in the West Bank, be that in London or anywhere else in the world.’ Again, the organisers firmly deny that West Bank property was on sale. The mayor’s comment came off like incitement of the mob. He was making it clear that he, too, was morally repulsed by what was due to unfold in Edgware, effectively giving a green light to every wanker who wanted to rage about it. Let’s see if he now tweets: ‘I condemn anyone who tells London’s Jews to “watch their backs”.’ I won’t hold my breath.

There’s one thing the synagogue mob didn’t reckon with – the determination of Edgware’s Jews to defend their place of worship. Huge numbers of Jews and their friends gathered to tell the keffiyeh bigots that ‘They shall not pass’. It was like a mini-Cable Street, only this time ‘the left’ was firmly on the other side – not the side of Jews who only want to live free of harassment, but the side of that twisted Islamo-left nexus that has made a bloodsport of taunting ‘Zionists’. The Jews danced and sang and waved the Israeli flag and the Union flag: a display of genuine anti-fascism against the fake anti-fascists of the Jew-state haters.

Advertisement

The magnitude of these events cannot be overstated. The unthinkable is not just thinkable now – it is doable. In vile mimicry of those 1930s mobs that swarmed synagogues and boycotted Jewish goods, now ‘the righteous’ scream about Zionism at the doors of synagogues and boycott Jewish State goods. In Manhattan, keffiyeh gangs raged outside the Park East Synagogue, also on the pretext that it was hosting an Israeli real estate event. A Jewish girl had her hair violently yanked by a masked bigot. Placards featuring Jeffrey Epstein said: ‘Free America from Isra-hell.’ The synagogue mobs of the 1930s likewise looked upon the Jews as a paedophilic race from which Germany should be ‘freed’. There have also been synagogue protests in New Jersey, LA, Canada and France.

At the New Jersey protest, Jews were called ‘Zionist pigs’ and ‘baby killers’. At the Paris protest, hundreds of Jews were trapped inside their synagogue as stones rained down on the building. And now in Edgware, Jews are told by a frothing mob to ‘watch their backs’. Can we be real? These are not protests – they’re practice pogroms. We are witnessing the sinister resuscitation of the medieval belief that Jews are pigs who kill children and thus their ‘Synagogues of Satan’ are fair game for mob fury. Not content with making life harder for Jews in the West, now the keffiyeh army tells them they are forbidden from escaping to Israel. So where can they go? Don’t answer that.

It is a testament to the battering our civilisational values have taken since 7 October that 1930s-style mobbings have returned and no one in power seems to give a damn. Good on the Jews who stood up to the keffiyeh bigots in Edgware – next time I want to see many more non-Jews standing with them.

Advertisement

Brendan O’Neill is spiked’s chief political writer and host of the spiked podcast, The Brendan O’Neill Show. Subscribe to the podcast here. His latest book – After the Pogrom: 7 October, Israel and the Crisis of Civilisation – is available to order on Amazon UK and Amazon US now. And find Brendan on Instagram: @burntoakboy.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Dan Jarvis Will Not Be Given Any More Money To Spend On Britain’s Armed Forces

Published

on

Dan Jarvis Will Not Be Given Any More Money To Spend On Britain's Armed Forces

Dan Jarvis will not be given any more money to spend on Britain’s armed forces, No.10 sources have confirmed.

Jarvis took over as defence secretary following John Healey’s dramatic resignation last week.

He said he was quitting because Keir Starmer was “unable” and Rachel Reeves was “unwilling” to provide enough cash to properly implement the government’s new Defence Investment Plan.

It is understood that the Treasury is only willing to release £13.5 billion – less than half what Healey had asked for.

Advertisement

At the weekend, Jarvis insisted he will make sure the UK’s armed forces get “precisely what they need”.

But No.10 sources confirmed on Monday that no extra money will be made available for the new defence secretary.

That is despite culture secretary Lisa Nandy suggesting that cabinet minister were being asked to come up with more cuts from their own budgets to spend on defence.

She told the BBC that Starmer had “been clear with every single one of us in the cabinet that we need to find more money for defence”.

Advertisement

Nandy said: “I can only tell you as somebody who is actively involved in these discussions that these discussions are happening in real time.

“We have a new defence secretary … and I know he wouldn’t have taken the job unless he felt that we could meet this moment, and we are working together constructively to achieve that.”

Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said the PM should resign if he cannot find more money to spend on defence.

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump fell asleep at White House UFC match

Published

on

Images of Trump at America 250 UFC fight, including one of him seemingly asleep

Images of Trump at America 250 UFC fight, including one of him seemingly asleep

On 14 June, the US celebrated its 250th anniversary with a UFC match organised by Donald Trump/ While this was a notably high-energy event, it clearly wasn’t high-energy-enough for Sleepy Don:

Advertisement

Trump corruption celebration

This is how the America 250 event described itself:

On July 4, 2026, our nation will commemorate and celebrate the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. The journey toward this historic milestone is an opportunity to pause and reflect on our nation’s past, honor the contributions of all Americans, and look ahead toward the future we want to create for the next generation and beyond.

As you’ll see, there wasn’t much ‘honourable reflection’ going on.

America 250 was a real ‘who’s who’ of ‘who’s in Trump’s rolodex’:

Advertisement

Over the past few days, Americans have been posting pictures of the Anniversary preparations in disbelief:

Advertisement

On the one hand, Donald Trump has definitely pushed what’s considered to be ‘normal’ presidential behaviour:

Advertisement

On the other, this circus is more in keeping with how the rest of the world views America.

The US is a violent and vulgar nation that gets off on its own displays of power. Speaking of which:

Advertisement

Goodness gracious, imagine an act of violence being committed in the United States of America!? Well I never, etc.

Advertisement

At the event itself, Trump and UFC CEO Dana White walked out of the Oval Office as part of their big entrance:

Advertisement

Trump already looked exhausted at this point. This isn’t that surprising, of course, because Trump is a very old man, and he holds what should be one of the most stressful jobs in the world. The fact that he’s awake for even part of the day is impressive.

None of this is to compliment to him, by the way. Really, we’re arguing that America should stop simply electing the oldest man who’s willing to run.

Crypto Land

The event itself included advertisements for Trump’s crypto coin:

Advertisement

If you’re considering investing in Trump Coin, we suggest you consult with a financial adviser:

Advertisement

Advertisement

Of course, if you fought at the event, you didn’t really have a choice:

Advertisement

If you’re feeling sorry for the fighters, be aware that you shouldn’t feel sorry for all of them:

Advertisement

Here’s the same guy a day beforehand stumbling around drunk and spitting up on himself:

Advertisement

You ready to start chanting “USA! USA!” yet?

Advertisement

Donald Trump wasn’t the only Trump generating controversy, anyway. His son Eric was exposed by a UFC fighter for asking if any of the fights were ‘rigged’:

Advertisement

Imagine having so much going for you and still relying on skullduggery to get ahead.

This is America

Americans need to understand something: the US isn’t a nation of violence and scammery because Trump is president – it’s the reverse. He is not the poison itself but the poison being drawn to the surface. And although you can vote him out in 2028, you’re only going to end up with someone far, far worse if you don’t address the underlying disparity which allows men like Trump to thrive.

Featured image via Pool (Getty Images)

By Willem Moore

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Whitehall Departments Facing More Cuts To Fund Defence Cash Boost, says Lisa Nandy

Published

on

New defence secretary Dan Jarvis leaves 10 Downing Street.
New defence secretary Dan Jarvis leaves 10 Downing Street.New defence secretary Dan Jarvis leaves 10 Downing Street.

Whitehall departments are facing further spending cuts to provide more cash for Britain’s armed forces, a cabinet minister has said.

Culture secretary Lisa Nandy said discussions between No.10 and ministers were happening “in real time” to find extra money for the government’s Defence Investment Plan (DIP).

Her comments came just days after John Healey quit as defence secretary, saying the £13.5 billion extra being given to his department was not enough to keep the country safe.

In a blistering resignation letter, he accused Keir Starmer of being “unable” to get more cash out of chancellor Rachel Reeves.

Healey has been replaced as defence secretary by former paratrooper Dan Jarvis, who told the Sunday Telegraph that he was determined to make sure that the armed forced get “precisely what they need”.

Advertisement

Speaking to the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg show, Nandy said the PM had “been clear with every single one of us in the cabinet that we need to find more money for defence”.

She said: “I last spoke to the prime minister about this on Friday. I’ve spoken to the chancellor this week as well. I’m having discussions with my own officials in my own department about the amount of funding that we make available.

“We’ve got a new defence secretary who is looking at the Defence Investment Plan in its current draft form and having those discussions with the chancellor and the prime minister as well.

“These discussions are ongoing, we are looking very carefully at how we achieve it.”

Advertisement

Kuenssberg said: “So John Healey resigned because he was told by Downing Street that the prime minister’s decision was final.

“You’re now telling us that there are conversations happening to find more money, to increase the amount that was designed to be in the Defence Investment Plan? So there will be more cash?”

Nandy replied: “Yeah. I can only tell you as somebody who is actively involved in these discussions that these discussions are happening in real time, we have a new defence secretary … and I know he wouldn’t have taken the job unless he felt that we could meet this moment, and we are working together constructively to achieve that.”

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Police chiefs face questions over decades of political policing as Spycops Inquiry resumes

Published

on

Banner outside Spycops Inquiry saying Undercover Is No Excuse For Abuse

Banner outside Spycops Inquiry saying Undercover Is No Excuse For Abuse

On Monday 15 June, the Spycops inquiry resumes and campaigners will be looking for answers. Tranche 3 Phase 3 of the Undercover Policing Inquiry (UCPI) is beginning. And it’ll be a crucial stage in the investigation into the Metropolitan police’s Special Demonstration Squad (SDS).

The Inquiry has heard evidence from former undercover officers and many of those whose groups, campaigns and personal lives they infiltrated. It’s now turning its attention to the senior officers and government departments who authorised, supervised and oversaw these operations.

For many of those affected, this phase goes to the heart of the Inquiry. The key question is no longer what spycops did. It’s who knew? Who approved? Who benefited from the intelligence on political campaigners and community organisations? And who helped conceal the truth?

Over the coming weeks the Inquiry will hear evidence from SDS managers, senior Special Branch officers and former Met leaders, including former commissioner Paul Condon.

Advertisement

Witnesses will be questioned about how undercover political policing was managed, what information was passed up the chain of command and why these operations were allowed to happen at all.

A spokesperson for the Campaign Opposing Police Surveillance said:

For years the public were told that undercover policing targeted serious criminals and threats to public safety. The evidence heard by this Inquiry has exposed a very different reality. Secret political policing units infiltrated environmental groups, anti-racist organisations, trade unions, anti-war movements and community organisations.

Officers stole the identities of dead children, formed deceptive intimate relationships, infiltrated grieving families seeking justice and gathered intelligence on thousands of people engaged in legitimate political activity.

This phase is about accountability. Who authorised these deployments and how the public and the courts were repeatedly misled about the true nature of these operations. Senior managers and commanders must finally explain how they allowed this system of political policing to continue for decades.

Advertisement

Spycops must come clean

A spokesperson for Police Spies Out of Lives said:

SDS managers can begin to restore public trust by giving open and honest evidence to the Inquiry. Most former officers have refused to do that, deepening the harm to those who were spied on. So far, there has been no real remorse for the abuses they enabled and oversaw.

Evidence so far has demonstrated that these operations weren’t just isolated misconduct by a few rogue officers. Instead, the Inquiry has revealed a system of abusive political policing which senior officers and government officials knew about and supported.

In his 2023 Interim Report, Spycops Inquiry chair John Mitting concluded that the SDS should have come to a rapid end in the early 1970s.

These hearings begin at a time when surveillance powers are once again expanding.

Advertisement

On 8 June, the government announced it was demanding Apple and Google to introduce what amounts to AI spyware able to monitor users’ messages and photos directly on smartphones and tablets, threatening legislation if the global tech giants do not comply.

Additionally the government launched PoliceAI, a national programme to accelerate the deployment of AI throughout policing in England and Wales.

These moves require urgent and robust democratic scrutiny.

A spokesperson for the Campaign Opposing Police Surveillance said:

Advertisement

The central lesson of the Spycops scandal is that surveillance powers are rarely used only for the purposes originally claimed.

At a time when AI is being embedded throughout policing and ministers are demanding monitoring technology be built into personal devices, the public should remember the lessons of Britain’s political policing scandal.

The history being examined by this Inquiry is not simply about the past. It is a warning for the future.

Inquiry hearings begin on Monday 15 June and will continue throughout the summer.

A timetable of those due to give evidence is here.

Advertisement

Sessions are open to the public and will take place at the IDRC, St Paul’s Square, London EC4Y 1EU. Or you can follow live proceedings on YouTube (broadcast with a 15 minute delay for security reasons).

Featured image via Peter Macdiarmid / Getty Images

By The Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Starmer Accused Of Gambling With Young Lives Over Social Media Ban

Published

on

Starmer Accused Of Gambling With Young Lives Over Social Media Ban

The father of a teenager who took her own life after viewing harmful content online has accused Keir Starmer of “gambling with young people’s lives” over his plans for a social media ban for under-16s.

Ian Russell accused the prime minister of “playing politics” by rushing the announcement amid speculation about his future.

Starmer is expected to announce on Monday that the government plans to ban young people from using some social media platforms.

But Russell, whose daughter Molly died in 2017 aged 14, said the PM’s behaviour was “deplorable”.

Advertisement

Speaking to the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme, he said: “In opposition, Keir Starmer promised to tighten up the online safety world by regulating better.

“Early last year, father to father, I met with him briefly and he was very concerned – and he promised me he would look into effective solutions to deal with this problem.

“But as we sit here on the verge of this announcement, it seems that he’s not kept either of those promises.”

He said the prime minister had “promised a group of bereaved parents” an announcement could be expected by the summer recess, which falls in mid-July, “so he’s rushed that forward for some reason”.

Advertisement

“I can’t think of a reason other than a political reason… if he’s playing politics, what he’s doing is gambling with young people’s lives – and I find that deplorable,” he said.

Culture secretary Lisa Nandy told the same programme she “respectfully disagreed” with what Ian Russell had said.

She said: “There is an urgency to this because young people need help now and we cannot stand aside and not act when we see that very clearly.

“The tech companies have had more than enough time to get their own house in order and to be able to create products to keep children safe online. If they’re not prepared to do it, they lose the right to market their products towards children, and I don’t think the government should be neutral about that.”

Advertisement

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Gardeners Warned To Watch Out For A Cream ‘Dust’

Published

on

Gardeners Warned To Watch Out For A Cream 'Dust'

Not only are we entering peak bee swarming season, but James Higgins, Head of eCommerce at Grass247, said we’re about to be beset by woodworms too.

“Most people associate woodworm with lofts, floorboards, and old indoor furniture, but many don’t realise that wooden features in the garden can also be vulnerable,” he shared.

With recent wet, warm weather “and woodworm season underway, it’s a good time to check timber features around the garden for the early warning signs of damage,” he added.

This can include a dust-like substance called “frass”.

Advertisement

What are woodworms?

They’re the larvae of different species of wood-eating beetles.

Their peak season is usually from March to October.

Woodworms cause the most damage in their larval stage, when they gnaw through the cellulose, hemicellulose and nitrogen present in the wood. That can cause structural damage.

Advertisement

Additionally, the adult beetles tunnel their way out of the wood, leading to further tiny holes.

They usually have a pale body with a black head, but you probably won’t see them if you’ve got them – they hide deep in the wood.

Where are woodworms found?

They typically like older, softer, wetter materials. They can be found in joists, floorboards, lofts, and vintage furniture.

Advertisement

But they can be found in your garden, too.

“Woodworm tends to favour timber with higher moisture levels because it’s easier for larvae to feed and develop within the wood. That means everything from garden furniture and decking to timber sleepers, raised beds, and wooden lawn edging can be worth checking at this time of year,” Higgins shared.

“Damp conditions won’t suddenly create an infestation overnight, but they can make existing problems easier to spot and allow damage to worsen if it’s left untreated.”

What are the signs of woodworm?

Advertisement

One sign you’ve got an infestation is a substance that looks like dust at first glance.

“Fresh woodworm activity often leaves behind a fine, cream-coloured dust known as ‘frass’. It can collect beneath things like furniture legs, decking boards, timber edging, sleeper borders, and around the base of raised beds,” Higgins revealed.

“It looks very similar to sawdust, but if it keeps reappearing after being brushed away, it could indicate active woodworm.”

Other signs of woodworm include:

Advertisement
  • Soft, crumbling, or weakened timber,
  • Dead beetles around windows, sheds, or conservatories,
  • Tiny round holes (1-2mm) appearing in timber.

“Pay particular attention to garden sleepers, timber edging, pergolas, decking, and other wooden landscaping features that are exposed to the elements year-round or sit close to the soil” when looking for softer or crumbling wood, the expert continued.

Remember: beetles usually come out en masse from June to July, meaning you’ll benefit most from a keen bug watch, especially around sheds, conservatories, garages, and windows during those months.

If you think you might have woodworm, drying, ventilating, and treating the wood can help. If you’re not sure, it’s best to reach out to a professional.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025