Politics
Gen Z Wants Matcha, Chokers And Sneakerinas For Their Wedding Day
We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI — prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.
Gone are the days of the same old wedding ceremony: traditional white dress for the bride, tuxedo for the groom, and style over comfort.
We might have had centuries of the same, but that’s all about to change now that Gen Z is entering the marriage market.
A new report by Bridebook reveals what to expect the generation to prioritise when it comes to their big day – and you’d get no prizes for guessing it’s not what you grandmother would’ve planned for them.
While previously, the run up to weddings is seen as the most stressful time in the couples’ lives, Gen Z is baking their obsession with wellness into the ceremony itself.
According to Bridebook, wedding parties of the happy couple should prepare themselves for starting the day with a guided breathwork session.
The ceremony itself will feature aura photography, or even energy readings, the report suggests, in a move away from traditional photoshoots with the couple and their families.
You might even have to take a day off work, as more than a third have moved to a weekday wedding to save costs, according to Bridebook.
But, don’t worry, there is still something about Gen Z weddings that would make your elders proud, as they’re 25% more likely to get married in a place of worship than previous generations.
Although, er, just don’t tell them that this could be more to do with their penchant for ‘dark romance’ and gothic cottagecore aesthetics than their devoutness.
Of course, this commitment to drama will also translate to their fashion, accessories, and drink options.
So to prepare you for your next guest experience, we’ve rounded up everything you’ll see at a Gen Z wedding.
Star-crossed lovers, unite! Gen Z is embracing the Juliet Cap in a big way to live up to the drama.
Gen Z is also leading the return of the chocker, with searches for ‘bridal choker necklaces’ up 344% year-on-year.
There’s no such thing as too much for Gen Z, so expect cascading, oversized veils encrusted with everything from diamonds to pearls.
Pearls don’t stop at the neck – Gen Z wants them over their gloves, too.
I mean, they’re not exactly subtle: Gen Z clasps at anything that gives ‘theatre’, such as these long lace gloves, which FYI, have become 1,319% more popular on search in the last year.
With all those dainty pearl and lace details knocking around, you need some edge in there, too. So of course, Gen Z is pairing their opera gloves with black sunnies on their big day.
You can’t tear us away from our sneakerinas, not even when we’re walking down the aisle. And you know what, fair enough, because it can’t exactly be the best day of your life if you’re not comfortable now, can it?
For those not quite bold enough to embrace the sneakerina, a simple mary jane is shoving heels aside for top wedding shoe spot.
And for the gentleman, a little pastel. White gets pretty boring, we have to admit, so it makes sense there’s a sudden move towards more saccharine shades like this aqua number.
Trying too hard is embarrasing, so baggy suits will be making their way to the altar.
We’ve moved past jewellery being reserved for women, so naturally men are donning brooches during their betrothal. This one will literally help you tie the knot. But if that’s not your style, opt for a rosette-shaped pin to award yourself for getting down the aisle, or this pearly number to match with your beloved.
Forget the champagne towers, Gen Z is all about wellness, so we could see matcha towers become the drink of choice at wedding receptions. Hey, maybe this blueberry one could count as your something blue?
No one can deny the appeal of a spicy margarita, which is tying with the Hugo Spritz for Gen Z’s favourite cocktail. But what about a spicy vodkarita, with this Tabasco-flavoured Absolut?
Transport workers from across rail, bus and the ferry sector will take part in a day of action against assaults across the country on Tuesday 28 April.
RMT activists will leaflet train stations, bus depots and ports. They’ll be highlighting the union’s national campaign demands to curb the rise in assaults and abuse and to make public transport a safer place.
The demands include safe staffing levels and an end to lone working. The union also wants to see proper funding for British Transport Police and an increased presence of officers. And it’s calling for legislation to make it a specific offence to assault a transport worker. The campaign also wants an end to outsourcing of security and enforcement staff.
In Scotland, the union has secured manifesto commitments from the SNP, Labour and Scottish Greens, to legislate to protect public transport workers.
This stands in stark contrast to the continued failure of the Westminster government to introduce a standalone offence for assaults on transport workers. This is despite repeated calls from RMT and the wider industry.
RMT general secretary Eddie Dempsey who will be joining activists in Glasgow, said:
Our day of action against assaults is a major part of our campaign to put pressure on employers and politicians across the UK, to take concrete steps to deliver for transport workers on this vital issue.
Our members will be calling on the public to support them in this campaign as there is a shared interest to see assaults, abuse and harassment curbed, so we can have a safer environment for travel on public transport.
The action on Tuesday will be a launchpad for further political and industrial campaigning until we secure improvements for our members.
Featured image via the Canary
By The Canary
The following public letter to the Green Party comes from two Jewish anti-Zionist organisations. Jewish Network for Palestine and International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network have written the letter in response to the suspension of Tony Greenstein from the party.
We reproduce the letter in full:
We are writing to the Green Party as members of two Jewish Anti-Zionist organisation operating in Britain – Jewish Network for Palestine (JNP) and International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network (IJAN), and representing many thousands of members and followers – protesting against the recent Green Party’s shameful decision to suspend the membership of Tony Greenstein, claiming a “history of antisemitism including court decisions” as the foundation for this action.
Tony Greenstein, a pro-Palestinian activist and Jewish Anti-Zionist Green Party Member has been active against Israeli racism, ethnic cleansing, Apartheid and genocide for many decades; he is a member of Jewish Network for Palestine and on its Steering Committee. He has been a fearless campaigner against Zionism and for the rights of the Palestinian people and the rule of international law. He has been given no information other than spurious claims without evidence or proof for this offensive claim. We are deeply concerned this could be part of a broader smear campaign against pro-Palestinians within the Green Party, along the lines of the Hasbara campaign against the Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn.
We were offered no information about the source of such accusations but believe the Party has been bullied into taking action without any basis in fact. No court decision anywhere has decreed Tony Greenstein is an antisemite, so there is no substance to this accusation, and the Party should have checked this before signing up to an accusation which itself is antisemitic. The claim that Tony has “a history of anti-Semitism” is false and especially infuriating as Tony is the author of a most detailed recent book about the links between Zionism and the Nazis during the period 1933-45, and is an authority about antisemitism himself; much more so than the people who accused him anonymously.
Like so many Jews, Tony comes from a family which suffered losses during the Holocaust, and the accusation, as well as the suspension from the Party, are hurtful, offensive and unjustified antisemitic acts by the Green Party.
So, we have some questions for Zack Polanski, for which we should have simple and truthful replies:
1. Is the Green Party now taking on the mantle of accusing Jews with antisemitism if they criticise Israel for its crimes – crimes the whole world is aware of and for which it is now under inquiry by the ICC and ICJ – the highest courts of humanity?
2. Has the party become an instrument of Israeli Hasbara? By acting like an inquisitorial court driven by Zionist accusations, without providing details to the accused, any pretence of justice seems to have been abandoned. Do you find this an acceptable way to treat your members, and are you committed to continue using this flawed approach?
3. Who has put such accusations against Tony Greenstein, and what is the evidential foundation of such scurrilous claims? Is it the practice of the Party to accept accusations and keep the identity of the accuser a secret, and not expose them to a simple procedure of a proper inquiry and cross-questioning?
4. What kind of process is being used by the party, in which no proof is necessary, no evidence is presented, no procedure is followed, and no justice can be seen, let alone done? Is the GP now open to any accusation of antisemitism against anti-Zionist Jews and others, not upholding an evidential procedure, requiring proof from named persons, and allowing the accused a process of self-defence, not to mention some information about the basis for the inquiry?
5. Does the Party believe it has the expertise, procedures, information and the moral authority to dictate to Jews, as well as non-Jews, committed to international law and the struggle against Israeli racist crimes and crimes against humanity – that they must support Zionism, in defying not only of their personal moral code, but that of the international legal authorities?
6. Will the Green Party act against those Jews, and others, who have supported, and continue to support the crimes of the Zionist state? Is the Party committed to ending the Racist Zionist Apartheid in Palestine? If so, will supporters of the Zionist crimes be ousted by the Party as opponents of both international Law and the Green Party positions?
Given that there were no clear or truthful grounds for the decision taken by the Committee, and no proper process followed, and hardly any information supplied by the deciding body, we call on the Green Party to immediately apologise to Tony Greenstein and annul the incorrect and shameful decision.
We also call upon the Party to clarify its rules, make then compatible with local and international law, and overhaul its faulty procedures so such decisions cannot be taken in such manner in the future.
We are convinced that the Green Party owes such clarity to its members, to the law-abiding Jewish community, and the Palestinians under the Zionist genocidal jackboot.
Signed for JNP and IJAN, David Cannon, Chair of JNP
Featured image via the Canary
By The Canary
!function(n){if(!window.cnx){window.cnx={},window.cnx.cmd=[];var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’);t.display=’none’,t.onload=function(){var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’);c.src=”//cd.connatix.com/connatix.player.js”,c.setAttribute(‘async’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c)},n.head.appendChild(t)}}(document);(new Image()).src=”https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″;cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({“playerId”:”19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″,”mediaId”:”5b195d5b-9d61-4777-966d-90f4630c7312″}).render(“69efa7bfe4b0f3a433cd385d”);});
The post In defence of boozy MPs appeared first on spiked.
The night I met my husband, we slunk into a faux denim sleeper sofa, a hand-me-down that resided in my parents’ basement for years, after too many PBRs and tequila shots. I insisted he watch several episodes of Scrubs, clumsily bringing my body closer to his on the squishy cushions, my limbs made limp by alcohol.
Only a few months later, after one half-hearted attempt of moving that metal more-machine-than-couch, we gave up and I accepted the loss of my deposit as I moved out of my favourite urban apartment with antique chevron pine floors and into his tiny suburban house with a red door, three minutes from my childhood home, shrinking back into a town I’d longed to grow out of.
In that house, a large overstuffed sofa covered in a nubby hunter green and white wide stripe greeted you just beyond the front door. It is where I sat, stoic, unable to look at the small white stick resting on the side of the bathroom sink, a blue plus sign quickly emerging — only four months after we met.
With the impending pregnancy, we had a garage sale and bought a house three streets north of where my parents live and where I had grown up. We sold that couch for $40 and bought another for $1,000. It was an overstuffed five-seater covered in a large golden-tan weave, perfect for hosting all-night nursing sessions, I anticipated.
We sat there now, on that couch, now 10 years old, the frame broken from nightly 3-year-old twin acrobatics. There were four kids now, and that night, we’d had plans for a date night, so my mom had taken them for a sleepover. We had mutually decided to abandon our plans in favour of staying home and enjoying the quiet house. He guzzled Budweiser, and I sipped some shitty red wine out of a stemless Ikea glass.
Our marriage, at that point, had moments of promise but consisted mostly of obligation, errands, chores and Lego battles. Our passion plagued by duty, our chemistry consumed by functionality.
For months after he left our family home, I’d reread our texts from the previous year.
“When will you be home?”
“You’re picking up the big kids, right?”
“Beckett’s basketball practice is canceled.”
“Are there bagels here?”
“Will you get bagels before you come home?”
“I need cumin. Can you stop?”
“Did you pay the phone bill?”
“Don’t eat the little bagels. They’re for lunches.”
Looking back, it’s impossible to un-see the unraveling. Little pieces of our former union crumbling, the mortar drying out with age and duty, inching toward a slow and dusty collapse.
Feeling the cabernet warmth in my cheeks, I set my glass on the antique NCR crate-turned-side-table as I tried to steady my inhales. I felt a truth brewing in my chest, one I’d wanted to tell him for eight years. I don’t know why I felt like I could say it right then; most likely it was just my low-level kids-free buzz.
We’d been having one of maybe three honest conversations we’d had in our entire relationship, the ones that were always induced by alcohol. I’d rehearsed this conversation in my mind countless times but, like letting someone say your name wrong for years because it felt like it was too late to correct them, I could never bring myself to mention it. If there was an opportunity, it was in the first few months we were dating. But not well into our 10th year of marriage.
“So, I have something to tell you. It’s kind of funny, actually,” I started, in an attempt to keep it light.
“Oh, uh, OK, um, it’s really weird. And don’t feel bad because I know it’s not your fault. It’s definitely my fault. Not your fault. I’m definitely the weird one, something is wrong with me. So, don’t feel bad. But, um, I’ve never orgasmed. With you. Or, maybe with anyone.”
I’d said it. And the relief was instant. Like releasing the need to perform to conceal the truth, night after night. And year after year.
His eyes widened at first and then he smirked a bit.
“What? Of course you have. I’ve seen it happen. That’s sort of ridiculous,” he said. He looked hurt, and I knew he’d already become defensive. Hardening the spots that were temporarily soft.
“No, well, I’m not saying I’m bored or I don’t like what you do.” I was and I didn’t. “I just don’t actually orgasm.” There, I’d said it again. No take-backs.
“That’s funny. Like, you always end up liking it. Even if you’re not in the mood at first. I’ve heard you, of course you do. Like, every time. Every single time. What are you even talking about?” He was scrambling. His pride had taken a hit.
I didn’t think I’d have to convince him of something I knew. At this point, I was merely looking for acknowledgement and maybe a vague plan of how to move forward. I had already concluded that maybe I was the faulty one. I wasn’t asking for a different performance or willing him to try harder. Honestly, “Oh, that sucks” would have felt pretty good.
I lost my virginity when I was a sophomore in high school to an impossibly kind redhead who liked me much more than I liked him. After months of having the kind of mediocre sex where pleasure wasn’t really involved, especially for the female, I had asked him an embarrassing question.
“What’s an orgasm for a girl? I mean, I know what it is for a guy because you can see it. It’s obvious. But, how do I know if I’m having an orgasm?” I asked as I played with the button of my lilac sweater set.
He pulled me on top of him into the safest embrace and gave me the most damaging explanation of an orgasm a girl has ever heard.
“You know when it feels good?” he said. I nodded. “It’s just when it feels the best of when it’s feeling good. You get it?”
OK, I thought in my 16-year-old brain, which would become my 25-, 35- and now 38-year-old brain. Then only after we’d completed an act of intimacy, I thought, could I locate where my orgasm had happened. Because that’s the thing about “bests” ― you don’t know the best is happening until it’s over. You don’t know you’re on the highest part of the roller coaster until you start coming down. But, what if you never get to the top? Then, you’re left thinking this anticlimactic mid-part of the incline must have been the best. I guess that was my orgasm, I’d think, as I tiptoed to the bathroom for a post-sex pee.
I had used this logic for most of my adult life, even while every sexual partner had bored me. I’d spent over two decades letting my moans grow to screams, seizing my stomach muscles, biting my lip and yelling “Oh my god” anyway. My partner didn’t deserve a subpar experience due to a broken partner. I was not theirs to fix. This Midwestern, people-pleasing girl would give an unforgettable performance while slowly growing ever more resentful of the entire act.
I pictured my Mom announcing “I would never let this go to waste” as she choked down last night’s leftover, soggy salad, a slurry of dressing and condensation pooling in the bottom of the Tupperware container, sacrificing her own pleasure for the good of the team. It was, after all, our way to prioritize everyone else’s experience long before we considered our own.
I looked at my husband. Discomfort and sadness had left his face and all that was left was a slightly slurred condescending arrogance.
“I knew this would be a tough conversation. I’m sorry. I think it’s me,” I said again.
“I mean, a hilarious conversation. Remember when you put scratches on my back? Or when you do that thing like you can’t handle any more contact and your body shivers?” he asked.
I didn’t know if I was supposed to answer. It seemed deeply hurtful to explain that that was all part of a performance that I’d been rehearsing for decades. My gravely growls and arched back all part of the show and he, my unknowing co-star, running lines nightly. I was embarrassed to answer, for him and for me. So, I didn’t.
And maybe I should have. Maybe I should have repeated that I didn’t know if I was capable of orgasming. That it hadn’t happened with anyone, not even myself before I got discouraged and stopped trying. That I sometimes worried that there was something medically wrong with me. That I was too ashamed to talk about it, even with my very closest friends. That I’d secretly googled “How To Orgasm,” wanting to find a numbered guide with a no-fail guarantee. That I craved intimacy. But real intimacy required honesty, a complete opening of which neither one of us were capable. I probably should have asked, “Will you help me?”
But I didn’t. I decided instead to break off another small piece of me and let it get lost in the overstuffed cushions of our broken sofa. What’s one more? I let go of his calloused fingers, pushed myself off the fractured couch, took my glass and gently set it in the sink and walked up the stairs to bed.
“Good night,” I said as I passed the living room. “I love you.”
And we never talked about it again.
Two years, one inevitable divorce, and a handful of fruitless partners later, I experienced my first orgasm. I was 40 years old. It came at the hands (or um, battery) of a small pink vibrator called the Pebble that, as promised, delivered clit-sucking technology and required not a single shred of showmanship.
I was born nimble, bending to accommodate others’ comfort. If we bend beyond the point of reasonable compromise, over time we unknowingly create an alternative reality. One based predominantly on the comfort and desires of another. One that is no longer our own. By nature, living someone else’s truth is living your own lie. And lies create distrust and distance within a relationship, even within the one we have with ourselves.
The couch in my living room is still broken, the frame held up by an old 2×4, but I am fixing myself; resisting the urge to bend beyond breakage. I hope to tell you that I find an orgasm in the future, one from a real live human. But, at the very least, I promise that I will move through life in a more honest way, cultivating a truth that is genuinely mine — even if it is 20 years too late.
The author is writing under a pseudonym.
This piece was previously published on HuffPost and is being shared again as part of HuffPost Personal’s “Best Of” series.
Do you have a compelling personal story you’d like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we’re looking for here and send us a pitch at pitch@huffpost.com.
I don’t know whether it’s this sunshine, but I’ve been looking at the UK’s bank holiday schedule a lot recently.
We’ve already worked through three of the ones planned this year (New Year’s Day, Good Friday, and Easter Monday).
Here’s what’s next in England and Wales, as well as Scotland and Northern Ireland.
When’s the next UK bank holiday?
In England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and Scotland, the next bank holiday as of the time of writing (April 27) is May 4.
What are the remaining 2026 bank holidays in England and Wales?
- 4 May (Monday) – Early May bank holiday
- 25 May (Monday) – Spring bank holiday
- 31 August (Monday) – Summer bank holiday
- 25 December (Friday) – Christmas Day
- 28 December (Monday) – Boxing Day (substitute day, i.e., because the day itself didn’t fall on a workday, they’re giving us one in lieu).
What are the remaining 2026 bank holidays in Scotland?
- 4 May (Monday) – Early May bank holiday
- 25 May (Monday) – Spring bank holiday
- 15 June (Monday) – World Cup bank holiday
- 3 August (Monday) – Summer bank holiday
- 30 November (Monday) – St Andrew’s Day
- 25 December (Friday) – Christmas Day
- 28 December (Monday) – Boxing Day (substitute day).
What are the remaining 2026 bank holidays in Northern Ireland?
- 4 May (Monday) – Early May bank holiday
- 25 May (Monday) – Spring bank holiday
- 13 July (Monday) – Battle of the Boyne (substitute day)
- 31 August (Monday) – Summer bank holiday
- 25 December (Friday) – Christmas Day
- 28 December (Monday) – Boxing Day (substitute day).
Why are they called bank holidays to begin with?
They were actually called St Lubbock’s Days originally, after the banker (Sir John Lubbock) who helped to bring bank holidays about.
In case you’re wondering what a random day in August has to do with the financial industry, though, I’m afraid you might be barking up the wrong tree.
Some say Lubbock planned the holidays around his local village’s cricket schedule.
According to the Trade Union Congress, if I’d been writing this list in Victorian times, I’d have had a much more laborious task.
“Prior to 1834, the Bank of England observed about thirty-three saints’ days and religious festivals as holidays, but in 1834, this was drastically reduced to just four: Good Friday, 1st May, 1st November, and Christmas Day,” they said.
The ’70s was the last time the TUC successfully campaigned for an extra bank holiday.
Rich Drake, CEO of Anduril, boasted to the British military’s in-house media about his firm’s role in enhancing troop lethality. Anduril, also used by the US, has ties with Israeli arms maker Rafael.
Drake told Forces New — the UK military’s own propaganda channel — that his products would streamline ‘kill chains.’ A kill chain is process by which targets are identified, prioritised, and hit, which you can read all about here.
In a brazen puff piece for the military firm, Forces News said:
The British Army wants to double its lethality by 2027 and triple it by 2030 – and one way it’s hoping to achieve this is by using something called Lattice.
This system joins up and integrates all the sensors and effectors the Army currently uses.
In other words, all the assets available to it, whether that be loitering munitions, attack drones or F-35s providing close air support, can all be monitored and tasked from one screen.
Drake told the outlet, which announced a new 10yr deal with the UK military on 24 April, that:
In the past, maybe two different companies had two different systems and you would have to transfer data from one to the other by writing it down, swivelling your chair across and typing it into another system.
And the beauty of software like Lattice means we can integrate those natively and speeding up decision cycles in what we call kill chains, again, to help the Army become more lethal.
Never have the words “beauty” and “lethality” sat so uncomfortably in a single sentence.
Fully autonomous options
Drake continued:
If we think of how Lattice is used, an operator may be looking for a Russian air defence system and have assets in the air, sensors in the air, such as radars or cameras to find it.
When those cameras find the air defence system, what Lattice can do is make the connection between the sensor to the effector, which may be a fighter in the air or a one-way drone ready to make that attack.
Lattice then makes that connection and creates a kill chain – and creates that kill chain at machine speed – computer machine speed rather than at human speed.
Truly “beautiful”…
Drakes stressed that while the killing could be carried out “fully autonomously”:
Right now, there is a rule of law around warfare and we completely support that at Anduril.
We support any rule of law or any way the military wish to use it… the human will always be involved.
Forces News said training on the systems would take place at a re-purposed RAF base in Wales.
Anduril’s dark reality
In 2024, Anduril partnered with Israel arms firm Rafael and AI firm Oracle to:
pair various command and control, sensor-to-shooter, intelligence operations, and expeditionary C4 platforms with the company’s cloud infrastructure.
And the US military signed a $20bn deal with Anduril in March 2026. The US has used Anduril technology in its illegal, unprovoked war with Iran. Anduril US chief Matthew Steckman confirmed this on 24 March 2026:
We’re heavy participants in the current conflict in the Middle East, mainly on the defensive side.
Adding:
So if you’ve read about the Shahed drone, as an example, we’re one of the principal systems to defend against that threat in the Middle East.
The British military finds itself in dubious company once again. Relying on Anduril’s technology ties the UK deeper into the US-Israeli colonial security framework. The firm claims it isn’t using fully autonomous killing systems yet, but has made clear that capacity exists. These rapid developments are outstripping international law’s ability to catch up — with dangerous implications for everyone.
Featured image via Anduril Industries/X/Twitter
By Joe Glenton
Demonstrating he has the thinnest skin of any politician, Donald Trump once again lost it at a journalist, while citing excerpts from the White House dinner shooter’s manifesto:
TRUMP LOST IT ON CBS REPORTER AFTER SHE READ SHOOTER MANIFESTO
"I am NOT a pedophile. You read that crap from some SICK person."
"Your friends on the other side of the plate are the ones who were involved with Epstein." "You shouldn't be reading that on 60 Minutes. You are a… pic.twitter.com/M2dtKSCLGQ
— Sulaiman Ahmed (@ShaykhSulaiman) April 26, 2026
Attempt #3
As we reported, an alleged gunman charged through security at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner. Trump initially used the event to promote his plans for a White House ballroom:
If I was a conspiracy theorist I would be certain that Trump staged all of this just to get people on board for him to build his illegal White House Ballroom, and save his floundering, all-time-low approval ratings. pic.twitter.com/b1oYCMcG4V
— Brian Krassenstein (@krassenstein) April 26, 2026
Trump actually spoke about the ballroom in the immediate aftermath of the shooting:
Donald Trump is trying to make the case for his ballroom after the incident at the White House Correspondents' Dinner.
You've got to be kidding me. pic.twitter.com/O7Kofd9yq7
— Art Candee
(@ArtCandee) April 26, 2026
Trump’s Department of Justice is now using the shooting to try to ensure there are no more legal delays preventing the ballroom from being built:
DOJ sends letter urging dismissal of lawsuit against Trump’s White House ballroom, citing last night’s events. pic.twitter.com/3iyfH1As8j
— Molly Ploofkins (@Mollyploofkins) April 26, 2026
“I’m not a paedophile”
In the clip at the top, the interviewer notes that the gunman’s:
so-called manifesto is a stunning thing to read, Mr. President. He appears to reference a motive in it. He writes… ‘administration officials, they are targets’. And he also wrote this: ‘I’m no longer willing to permit a paedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes’. What’s your reaction?
Trump responded:
Well, I was waiting for you to read that because I knew you would, because you’re horrible people, horrible people. Yeah, he did write that. I’m not a rapist. I didn’t rape anybody.
The interviewer then said:
Oh, you think he was referring to you?
We think she was protesting a little too much here; clearly the alleged gunman meant Trump (if the manifesto is genuine).
Trump continued:
I’m not a paedophile. You read that crap from some sick person. I got associated with stuff that has nothing to do with me. I was totally exonerated. Your friends on the other side of the plate are the ones that were involved with, let’s say, Epstein or other things. But I said to myself, you know, I’ll do this interview and they’ll probably… I read the manifesto. You know, he’s a sick person. But… You should be ashamed of yourself reading that because I’m not any of those things.
Contrary to Trump’s complaints, the Epstein Files did reveal what one congressperson described as “credible FBI receipts”:
CRAZY: "AG Pam Bondi lied under oath about this." pic.twitter.com/eZ4XEI3QeM
— Coinvo (@Coinvo) March 28, 2026
Congressman Goldman showed 'credible FBI receipts' that Trump "unzipped his pants, forced a 13-year-old’s head down, and when she bit his p*nis, he punched her and called her a b*tch!"
Inexplicability
It’s since come out that the White House may have been unusually lax with its security at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner:
Surprise! https://t.co/aGFe6FQfL2
— Mehdi Hasan (@mehdirhasan) April 26, 2026
This is feeding into the conspiracy theory that the authorities knew about the alleged gunman, and that they opted to make things as easy as possible for him.
It would obviously be bizarre if Trump allowed all this to happen for the sake of a ballroom. At the same time, the Strait of Hormuz is currently blocked because Trump saw some mysterious benefit to attacking Iran, so who knows with this guy?
Featured image via the Canary
By Willem Moore
On 27 April, Birmingham City Council leader John Cotton announced that an end is now in sight for the city’s 15-month-long bin strike saga. Meanwhile, Unite—the union representing the strikers—has claimed the councillor’s statement as vindication of the workers’ long struggle.
The strike itself began back in January 2025. Birmingham Council had indicated that it planned to abolish roles within its waste service, ostensibly to bring the department in line with other comparable local authorities. Quite unacceptably, the move could have resulted in some workers being up to £8,000 a year worse off.
‘A challenging and complex process’
Today, however, Labour council leader John Cotton announced that:
After months of frustration and delay, for the first time in over 12 months, a negotiated settlement to end the bin strike is now within sight.
This has been a challenging and complex process, but after months of hard work on the principles and parameters of a deal, I believe a new, improved offer can be made and terms can be put in place that addresses the ballpark issues discussed at Acas [dispute resolution service], that Unite members can agree in order to end the strike once and for all.
A deal that would be good for the workforce, represent good value for money and would not repeat the mistakes of the past and risk creating new structural equal pay liabilities.
I want our workforce to be able to return to work and help us deliver the quality refuse and recycling services the people of this city deserve. That’s why, throughout this dispute, I have resisted those who would dismiss the striking workers instead of negotiating.
I have instructed officers to move forward with negotiations so that we can bring this matter to a close.
Because of rules restricting political announcements in the run-up to the local elections, we won’t know the exact details of the deal until after May 7. Likewise, council members will have to finalise the details of the proposals, which will then be put to the workers themselves for their approval.
The rough outline
Unite lead officer Onay Kasab indicated that the proposed terms include a one-off compensatory payment of up to £16,000 for the wronged workers. Significantly, this deal now includes compensation for the drivers, which wasn’t previously the case.
Unite also gave a rough outline of further details:
- The deal mirrors that proposed by conciliation service Acas. This means that workers will receive a minimum of two years’ cushion from the impacts of the job evaluation process. This is four times the previous 6-month proposal.
- Striking agency workers who’ve been under contact for over a year will have a path to permanent employment.
- Issues of gross misconduct will be reviewed, and other disciplinary issues quashed.
- The dispute will be treated as an authorised absence for the purposes of the workers’ pensions.
- Both sides will end their respective legal actions.
In its 27 April press release, Unite struck a triumphant tone — and highlighted the meddling of unelected commissioners dragging out the process:
This move shows the power of workers and how that can be realised when they are backed by their union.
It is an absolute abhorrence that this deal has been blocked not just once but twice by unelected unaccountable commissioners and officers at Birmingham City Council, who enjoy eye watering pay packets and no consequence for their actions. […]
The reason the offer has not yet been completed and gone to our members is because at the eleventh hour the government backed commissioners attempted to stop it, which has led to today’s statement of intent by the leader of the council.
The union also thanked West Midlands mayor Richard Parker and trade-unionist-turned-life-peer Brenan Barber. Both individuals reportedly helped bring the negotiations to a close by recognising the reasonable nature of the proposed deal.
‘The workers come first’
Sharon Graham, Unite’s general secretary, said:
As I have said on many occasions, the workers come first and we will always do everything in our power to ensure that our members are treated with dignity and respect.
The move made today by the leader of the council is a vindication of the bin workers’ struggle for a decent deal.
Over the last few months, there have been intense negotiations to get the blocked “ballpark” deal back on the table, so that our members could vote on it.
Of course, even among the happy news, the union leader was clear on the guilty parties in this whole sorry mess:
The reason why we are not yet at that stage is purely down to the vindictive interference of the government backed commissioners who have attempted to block the deal again and clearly overstepped their remit.
Their lack of both experience and industrial relations competence has been a major factor in this dispute, and their malevolent game playing has been an absolute disgrace.
The commissioner model is a licence for a few unelected individuals to print money and play games.
They have let the workers down, the people of Birmingham down and the council down.
Salute to the workers
Graham signed off with one last salute to the workers, the negotiators, and the people of Birmingham:
I salute the fortitude of my members who have needlessly been forced to endure months of attacks and hardship to get us to this point.
I thank mayor Richard Parker and Lord Brendan Barber for the important roles both have played in getting us to this point.
And I thank the people of Birmingham for their continued patience and support.
Here, at the Canary, we’re thrilled to hear of an end in sight. Here’s to a swift resolution, and news of a win for the workers and their union!
Featured image via Unsplash/the Canary
Zack Polanski sat through several interviews on Monday to promote the Green Party’s local election campaign. The problem is that UK journalists don’t seem to understand what the ‘local’ in ‘local elections’ stands for.
.@ZackPolanski is asked, is it official green party policy to abolish the monarchy?
Sensible answer. pic.twitter.com/QWKMK9y8wy
— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) April 27, 2026
Yeah, abolishing the monarchy is what you would call a ‘national issue’.
Think monarchy, ask locally
Just so it’s clear to any BBC presenters reading, the ‘monarchy’ is another word for the ‘Royal Family’. The head of the family serves as the UK’s head of state, either as a king or queen. This is very much a national thing in that we only have one monarch, and said monarch is the head of state for every British citizen.
The monarchy, then, isn’t relevant to the local elections. We don’t have local kings for councillors to abolish. Instead, councillors are tasked with abolishing things like potholes (we should be so lucky!).
Green Party policy
In the clip at the top, the BBC asked Polanski:
Abolishing the monarchy, is that a Green Party official policy?
Polanski responded:
Well, there’s a difference between what our members vote on and what a policy that is updated and reviewed. But just to answer the direct question, I don’t have any support for the monarchy. And I feel sorry for King Charles today that the prime minister sent him to be paraded for Donald Trump.
We don’t feel sorry for Charles, honestly. After all, our king gave his wretched, nonce brother Andrew over a million quid to silence his accuser, the late Virginia Giuffre.
Polanski continued:
But I don’t think that’s the number one issue at this local election. I think people are worried about their bills.
That’s correct, Zack.
This is a local election for local people; we’ll have no talk of your monarchy here. Or will we?
Cost of living
The BBC seemed pretty determined to keep it off topic, asking next:
So what you’re saying is that the Green Party would look again because it’s had quite an anti-monarchy stance in the past, but maybe relaxing that a bit?
It’s easy to see why the BBC would care so much about the Royal Family. After all, both institutions have a history of covering up for perverts. At the same time, this has absolutely nothing to do with the local elections.
Polanski answered:
Well, it wasn’t actually in the manifesto. So the party is definitely an anti-monarchy party. We don’t support the monarchy.
But also what goes in our manifesto, particularly at local elections, is what people are voting on in 10 days time. And really, that’s looking at reducing their rents, reducing the cost of living.
The monarchy isn’t part of that conversation.
As a wider question, though, no, we don’t support the monarchy.
The Westminster Broadcasting Corporation
The BBC is supposed to be a corporation that broadcasts on behalf of Britain. Too often, however, the station gets locked into issues which are primarily of concern to the Westminster bubble.
Don’t get us wrong, we understand there are citizens who will vote in the local elections based on which party is or isn’t pro-Royal. We just also understand it’s the BBC‘s job to explain to these voters why that’s a boneheaded thing to do.
Featured image via X/ Saul Staniforth
By Willem Moore
Bitcoin Bull Market Is HAPPENING NOW (Proof)
West & North Yorkshire Chamber heads to China and Hong Kong
Trent announces record date for its 1:2 bonus issue. Check details
Manchester United reach agreement with Casemiro over contract clause amid transfer speculation
US brings back mandatory military draft registration
Steven Gerrard disagrees with Gary Neville over ‘shock’ Chelsea and Arsenal claim | Football
-
Politics7 days agoGary Stevenson delivers timely reminder to register to vote as deadline TODAY
-
Fashion3 days agoWeekend Open Thread – Corporette.com
-
Crypto World2 days agoHyperliquid $HYPE Rally Builds Momentum as AI Sector Enters Prove-It Phase
-
Politics5 days agoMaking troops accountable for war crimes threatens US alliance, ex-SAS colonel warns
-
Politics5 days agoDisabled people challenge government SEND proposals over segregation concerns
-
Tech2 hours agoRegister Renaming | Hackaday
-
Business5 days agoRolls-Royce Voted UK’s Most Iconic Trade Mark as IPO Register Hits 150
-
Business4 days agoPatterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (PTEN) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript
-
Politics5 days agoZack Polanski responds to home secretary’s taser threat
-
Crypto World6 days agoFive Value Stocks with Recovery Potential in 2026: PayPal (PYPL), Nike (NKE), and More
-
Politics5 days agoStarmer handler McSweeney to be dragged from shadows by Foreign Affairs Committee
-
Sports1 day agoIPL 2026: Ruturaj Gaikwad registers slowest fifty of the season, enters all-time unwanted list | Cricket News
-
Politics5 days ago
Wings Over Scotland | How To Get Away With Crimes
-
Crypto World6 days agoNew York sues Coinbase, Gemini over prediction market offerings
-
Entertainment6 days ago
Sydney Sweeney cameo cut from “The Devil Wears Prada 2”, source explains why (exclusive)
-
Business6 days agoHCL Tech share price tank over 9% after weak Q4. JPMorgan, HSBC & 3 others cut target price
-
Politics5 days ago‘Iran is still a nuclear threat’
-
Sports5 days agoTim Bradley names the current best in the world: “Better than Inoue and Usyk”
-
Crypto World6 days agoCrypto’s great hope in Senate’s Clarity Act still has a path to survive tight calendar
-
NewsBeat1 day agoLK Bennett closes all stores after entering administration
You must be logged in to post a comment Login