Geraldine Coggins is the Green Party candidate for the Greater Manchester mayoral by-election (Alamy)

5 min read21 min

Geraldine Coggins will announce on Friday that she will seek to twin the Greater Manchester city-region with the Palestinian city of Ramallah in the West Bank if she is elected as mayor next week.

On 30 July, voters in Greater Manchester will head to the polls to elect a new regional mayor to replace Andy Burnham, who left the role to become the new prime minister of the United Kingdom.

The mayoral by-election is a hugely significant contest for the Labour Party, which wants to prove it can maintain its stronghold in the region, and Reform UK and the Green Party, which both made significant electoral gains in the local council elections in May and want to show they can challenge Labour on its home turf.

With Andy Burnham as the new Labour leader and prime minister, the Green Party are having to rethink their strategy to retain left-wing voters who have moved from Labour to support them during Keir Starmer’s premiership.

Asked by PoliticsHome how the party might have to change its campaign messaging to adapt to a Burnham premiership, Coggins said it would “depend on which version of Burnham we get” but insisted that the Greens had a clear dividing line with Labour over the war in Gaza, which the party believes resonates with voters in the Greater Manchester region.

“We’ve not seen the serious recognition of what is happening in Gaza, and a lot of people will not go back to Labour and really see Labour as morally bankrupt,” she said.

“That’s what we hear from people. That is not a thing that people just get over.

“We are still funding and fueling this war and sharing military intelligence. Our government is still complicit in that, and people are not just going to get over that because there’s a new prime minister at the front.”

The Greens included a pledge to partner with a Palestinian city in their mayoral election manifesto. The party has now chosen Ramallah as the proposed twin city because it has growing technology, creative, professional services, and education sectors which could create opportunities for collaboration between the cities.

Coggins will announce the pledge outside the Dar ul Uloom Mosque in Manchester’s Longsight District on Friday, where she is expected to say that Manchester has a “proud tradition of international solidarity, from the campaign against apartheid to welcoming refugees fleeing conflict”.

A Green Party source said: “People up and down the country have been outraged by Labour’s complicity in Israel’s genocide.

“It’s clear that this isn’t going to change now Andy Burnham has become Prime Minister. Greens will always stand up for human rights and international law. And, as mayor of Greater Manchester, Geraldine would continue to call out the government’s failings and show there is a different way.”

The Manchester mayoral by-election is shaping up to be less closely fought than was initially expected following Labour’s devastating losses in the region in the May local elections.

A YouGov poll on 17 July put Labour candidate Bev Craig at 62 per cent in the second round of the by-election voting, beating Reform UK’s Sian Astley on 38 per cent. The poll also showed Craig leading on 38 per cent on first preference votes, compared to Astley’s 24 per cent and the Greens in third on 17 per cent.

Nevertheless, the Greens say they are continuing to campaign hard after their former leader Caroline Lucas told PoliticsHome it was the party’s intention to “throw everything” at the contest.

Speaking to PoliticsHome in Manchester this week, Coggins criticised Burnham’s announcement to cut VAT on household electricity as a measure that would only save the average household less than a pound a week.

“That’s a continuation of the sort of incrementalism that we had under Starmer,” she said.

“It is not the wholesale change to the rip-off Britain model that we really need. I don’t think people are going to be fooled by that.”

Coggins highlighted suggestions that Burnham intends to continue drilling in the North Sea, and his failure to eradicate homelessness in Greater Manchester during his time as mayor, with the new PM now making the same pledge from Downing Street.

She also criticised Burnham’s approach to ‘Manchesterism’, arguing that the way housing development had been carried out in Manchester was seen primarily as an “investment opportunity for wealthy individuals and big corporations”.

In contrast, she said the Greens see housing as “bringing back homes for people” in Greater Manchester, with a pledge to create 20,000 “genuinely affordable” homes over 10 years.

At an LGBT hustings in Manchester’s Gay Village on Tuesday evening, Coggins was keen to draw a dividing line between the Greens and Labour on housing in particular. PoliticsHome previously revealed that the Greens were hoping to target unease about gentrification in the region to attack Labour in the contest.

“Unlike Bev, I can tell you what genuinely affordable means,” Coggins told the hustings. 

“That means that if you are on housing benefit, you will be able to afford to rent them.”

She described a system where housing benefit money was being “funnelled into big corporate landlords who own these shiny towers in other countries who aren’t even paying tax here” and said she wanted to “really radically change our housing”.

Craig responded by saying that Coggins’ comments got a “little bit personal”.

“If you want to know what I think genuinely affordable homes look like, you can look at the Manchester living rent,” the Labour candidate said.

“And you can look at the record numbers of council and social homes that we built last year, building more in the city than we’ve done in 25 years.”

The full list of Greater Manchester Mayoral Candidates:

Sian Astley (Reform UK)

Geraldine Coggins (The Green Party)

Bev Craig (Labour and Co-operative Party)

Phil Eckersley (The Conservative Party)

Marcus Farmer (Independent)

Richard Kilpatrick (Liberal Democrats)

Marlon West (Restore Britain)

5 min read10 min

“Andy’s Starmerite purge has created an incredibly powerful phalanx of skilled political operators who intimately know the government’s fiscal position,” one Labour MP told PoliticsHome. 

“Some sought assurances about the direction of travel before nominating Andy and have been alarmed at how quickly those assurances seem to have turned hollow.

“After the undoubted conference euphoria in Liverpool, the Autumn Budget will loom very large on the Horizon. That will be a big event,” they added.

While it was widely expected that Burnham would remove Starmer loyalists from ministerial positions after entering office, the scale of what is being described as a ‘purge’ has angered those close to the former prime minister, who argue it went too far.

Starmer allies David Lammy, Rachel Reeves, Darren Jones, Steve Reed and Jo Stevens were all removed from Cabinet, as were Lord Hermer, Nick Thomas-Symonds and Baroness Chapman, who were ministers who attended Cabinet.

Defenders of Burnham’s approach have stressed to PoliticsHome that the former Manchester mayor sold himself as a departure from the last Labour leadership, which inevitably means making significant changes to the team. Several key Burnham allies have secured jobs in the new ministry, including Lou Haigh, Anneliese Midgley and Angela Rayner.

“It’s not what Andy said he would do, which is a real shame,” said one Labour MP who Burnham sacked from Cabinet.

Another MP complained: “There is a large group of MPs who believe in whole-PLP [Parliamentary Labour Party] collective responsibility, who expressed disagreement privately but were publicly loyal to Keir Starmer. What they are seeing in Andy’s new team is punishment for anyone who showed loyalty and a reward for the disrupters.”

They added: “It feels like an early breach of trust for MPs who, for the sake of unity, gave their endorsements to Andy. We were promised an end to factionalism and recruitment based on merit.”

The treatment of Jones has become a particular source of frustration among Starmer’s supporters. 

Jones, former chief secretary to the prime minister, was encouraged by Starmer allies to challenge Burnham for the leadership but ultimately ruled out a run, saying that he decided against it after recieving reassurances from Burnham about his economic policies. He was not offered a ministerial role in the new government on Monday.

“It’s understandable after taking power in such a way to be insecure about those around you, but the new Prime Minister has shown naivety here. The purge has been far too obviously targeting those loyal to Keir Starmer,” a different Labour MP said. 

They warned: “It will cause problems for him in the future.”

Just hours after leaving government, Jones publicly criticised Burnham’s first cost-of-living announcement, posting on X that the new government’s plan to scrap digital ID and use the money to take VAT off energy bills was unfunded.

Several Labour MPs told PoliticsHome that Jones’ attack was a sign of things to come later in the year when Burnham sets out his spending plans.

The new Prime Minister has faced questions over how he would fund his cost-of-living policies, which also include capping bus fares at £2 and a 20 per cent cut to business rates for some hospitality settings, but full details are not expected to be confirmed until his first fiscal event as PM.

Bev Craig, the Labour candidate looking to succeed Burnham as Greater Manchester mayor, told PoliticsHome that Jones might come to regret his public criticism. “I wonder if Darren will look back and regret making a bit of a barbed dig,” said Craig during an interview in Manchester earlier this week. 

While he may have angered Starmer loyalists, there are early signs that Burnham’s first few days in Downing Street have been well received by the public.

A More in Common survey published on Wednesday showed that the Prime Minister’s personal ratings had increased 10 per cent in the last week, rising from +3 to +13. The poll indicated that Burnham has started particularly strongly with 2024 Labour voters, with 57 per cent saying he’s doing a good job, and 8 per cent bad. 

Burnham also faces needing to reassure Labour MPs not in the north of England that his government will focus on all parts of the country.

Perron Moon, the Labour MP for Camborne and Redruth, told PoliticsHome that it was “troubling” to see what he described as a lack of regional representation in Cabinet. As PoliticsHome analysis illustrates, there are six MPs from seats in the northwest in Burnham’s Cabinet, compared to one from the southwest, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander.

“As the most southerly Labour MP in the UK with some of the highest levels of deprivation, I find the ongoing focus on the North of England troubling,” Moon said. 

“Devolution and industrial regeneration are as important here in Cornwall as any part of the UK, if not more so. But it feels like the current narrative is about a model that is imposed on us.

“Whilst I’ve heard many other towns, cities and regions mentioned by this new administration, I haven’t heard Cornwall mentioned once. Sadly, I think some carry with them outdated and inaccurate stereotypes of Cornwall. That needs to change, and I’m hopeful that working with colleagues we can help to unleash the Cornish Celtic tiger.”

Additional reporting by Zoë Crowther

4 min read9 min

Those of us who work in public health are not surprised. Infectious diseases do not respect borders. The current Ebola outbreak is now the fastest-growing on record, outpacing even the 2013-16 West Africa epidemic, with more than 2,000 confirmed cases and 750 deaths by mid-July.

An estimated 63,000 pregnant women are due to give birth in the outbreak zone, in a country that already has one of the world’s highest maternal mortality rates. Those rates are expected to rise even higher as women are too scared to go to hospital to give birth in case they contract Ebola.

The World Health Organisation (WHO) has warned that countries neighbouring the DRC are at high risk, and that the outbreak is still expanding into new areas. Diseases do not stop at borders.

Yet this week, in the middle of that outbreak, the Foreign Office published its annual report. Buried in its annexes are three years of planned cuts to bilateral aid, country by country. The DRC will receive £34 million less this year, a 29 per cent cut. UK bilateral aid to Africa as a whole is falling by £733 million this financial year compared with 2024-25, and by £875 million, more than half, by 2029. It is the largest cut facing any region in the world. 

Over the last two decades, we have shown again and again that major infectious disease threats can be contained, driven back, and in some cases defeated.

HIV is no longer the death sentence it once was for millions of people. Malaria deaths have been reduced substantially. Polio has been pushed almost to the brink of eradication. Previous Ebola outbreaks have been brought under control. And smallpox has been removed from the face of the earth.

None of this happened by chance. It happened through hard work, science, partnership and money.

You would not know it from the annual report. A year ago, the same document set out the UK’s global health work in detail, naming Gavi and the Global Fund and pointing to Britain’s role in helping vaccinate over half the world’s children. This year’s report contains none of that. The words malaria, HIV, tuberculosis and maternal health do not appear anywhere in its 264 pages.

The countries where British aid helped drive down deaths from these diseases, including Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique and Rwanda, will have their bilateral programmes all but ended, reduced to an influencing budget of £5 million a year.

Also, in recent months, the UK Government has cut critical global health funding for vaccines, for tackling AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria, for pandemic preparedness, and for reducing our defences against the risk of antimicrobial resistance. The Government’s own equality impact assessment states that its multilateral global health investments will fall by roughly a quarter.

UNAIDS estimates that the loss of previously US-supported HIV programmes could lead to an additional six million infections and four million deaths between now and 2029, including 300,000 children. The UK cuts continue to bite deeper.

Supporting health beyond our own shores as part of UK overseas aid is in our own interests. Think of it this way. Wouldn’t you want your next-door neighbours to have working smoke alarms? In the same way, we need our global partners to have strong and effective health systems and healthy populations.

Investing in global health is not a ‘forever project’. The past decades of successful international partnerships mean that most health services in low- and middle-income countries are now funded by those countries themselves. That has meant that the resources the UK provides are more focused on where it is most needed, where the risks are greatest, and where cuts and sudden policy changes do the most damage.

The right response to President Trump’s widespread USAID cuts would have been for the UK to step up: to help fill the gaps, smooth the transition, and act as a counterweight for countries negotiating new agreements with the United States.

Instead, in some areas, the UK has compounded the damage by cutting our own funding. This retreat is an abdication of responsibility by the current Government. The consequences were predictable, and they are already becoming apparent.

It is not too late to reverse these damaging cuts. Andy Burnham inherits this decision, but he is not bound by it. There could be no better moment for our new Prime Minister to show that the UK still understands that its own health security begins beyond its own borders.

Professor Timothy Hallett is Professor of Global Health in the School of Public Health at Imperial College London and an Affiliate Professor at the Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle.

Prime Minister Andy Burnham arrives to host his first Cabinet meeting at 10 Downing Street, 21 July 2026 (PA Images / Alamy)

10 min read10 min

Friends and supporters of Burnham have secured top jobs over recent days, while those closest to Keir Starmer have been jettisoned.

“When you take the lid off Labour factionalism, you can’t put it back on. They are storing up problems for the future,” warned one Starmer loyalist source. “This is far from a clean slate.”

Defenders of Burnham’s approach to ministerial appointments have stressed that he sold himself as a departure from the last leadership, which inevitably means making significant changes to the team.

They also point out that the retention of Emma Reynolds and Pat McFadden, among others, shows the Prime Minister has not shunned the Labour right.

Below Cabinet level, in the hires announced later in the week, Starmerites and non-Burnhamites have done better. Josh MacAlister and Jake Richards are among those who have held on to their ministerial jobs. The decision to make Dan Tomlinson a minister for growth is notable and a win for the Labour Growth Group.

On the Labour left, there is disappointment that Ed Miliband was not made chancellor and a view that John Healey’s appointment ends any chance of the Burnham premiership representing bold change as they see it. No Socialist Campaign Group MPs have been picked for roles so far.

The soft left are delighted, meanwhile, by their dominance in the new Cabinet – which has done much to reverse Starmer’s September 2025 reshuffle.

THE WINNERS

The Makerfield crew

Louise Haigh, who is now First Secretary of State and Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, and Anneliese Midgley, the new Chief Whip (The House reported in early June that she was interested in this position), were the two Labour MPs who ran Burnham’s Makerfield by-election bid as the political leads. In managing the campaign day-to-day, the pair established themselves as integral to the Burnham operation and have been promoted accordingly. 

Miatta Fahnbulleh, meanwhile, led on policy for Burnham, working from the South during the by-election in preparation for government – which came sooner than Burnham allies expected. Although she was thought to be interested in becoming housing secretary, she will instead head up the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, having worked as a minister there until Starmer’s September reshuffle. 

And despite being energy secretary at the time, Miliband also played a role in the Makerfield by-election, even advising on the minute details of how the campaign was run according to Labour sources. Ultimately, after much briefing and counter-briefing, he did not secure the coveted role of chancellor but did nab a ‘great office of state’ by being appointed the new Foreign Secretary.

Other Burnham allies

Heidi Alexander is among the survivors of Starmer’s Cabinet, remaining as Transport Secretary. It comes as little surprise considering she is a longtime supporter of Burnham’s leadership ambitions, having nominated him for the post on all three of his bids – in 2010, 2015 and 2026. She was also understood to have told Starmer to set a timetable for his departure.

Lisa Nandy, Burnham’s Wigan neighbour who called on the party to allow him to run as a parliamentary candidate, has again defied critics by staying in post as Culture Secretary, while Lucy Powell – the only officer on Labour’s ruling body to vote in favour of permitting Burnham to stand in Gorton and Denton – has been brought back to the Cabinet as Education Secretary. Angela Rayner is another ally who was always expected to make a return and has done so, going back to her old job of Housing Secretary.

Less well-known is former Unison official Alex Norris, the new Justice Secretary who represents a Nottingham seat but is originally from Altrincham. He was expected to be rewarded after being seen to have handled a tricky brief well in the Home Office, where he handled illegal migration – but it also helps that he is close to a tight-knit circle of people around Burnham. He is seen as a “people person” who, accordingly, has been given another difficult job where those skills will come into play.

Starmer rebels

Like Heidi Alexander, Yvette Cooper and Shabana Mahmood are known to have made clear to Starmer that his time was up. All three have stayed in Cabinet. 

Anas Sarwar, who as Scottish Labour leader publicly called on Starmer to go, is leaving his post in Holyrood to enter the Lords and become a trade minister.

Streeting and Healey, meanwhile, both resigned in Starmer’s final weeks, representing big blows to his authority – particularly in the case of the former defence secretary. Healey’s damning verdict on the ex-PM being “unable” and the Treasury “unwilling” to sufficiently increase defence spending was a final nail in the coffin for the Starmer era.

Vicky Foxcroft, who quit as a whip last year amid the welfare rebellion, has returned as a DCMS minister.

Losers of the September 2025 reshuffle

Many of the notable moves in the infamous September 2025 reshuffle triggered by Rayner’s resignation – now back in her old Cabinet job – have been reversed by Burnham. 

The top-level sackings at the time were Powell and Ian Murray; the former is the new Education Secretary while the latter (who was ultimately demoted rather than removed completely, following an outcry) has stayed under Burnham as a minister of state in DCMS.

Aside from Powell, it was notable that Jonathan Reynolds was also moved from business and trade secretary to chief whip in a switch that baffled Westminster. Under Burnham, he has been returned to his former position, to which he is widely thought to be far better-suited, and will lead a “beefed up” DBT.

In the ministerial ranks, Rayner ally Justin Madders was the most noteworthy sacking, being removed as employment rights minister. He has now returned as a transport minister.

Rayner ally Jim McMahon, similarly, was a local government minister until his September sacking, and will now return to the department.

The North West

The North of England has done well under Burnham – and the North West especially so. Powell, Rayner, Reynolds, Nandy, Midgley and Angela Eagle all hail from Burnham’s region. This is up from just two Cabinet members from the North West under Starmer. See the changes mapped out on PoliticsHome.

The Co-operative Party

Labour’s sister outfit, the affiliated Co-operative Party, has much to celebrate under Burnham, who is himself the first ever officially Co-op Prime Minister. 

Reynolds will be able to put Co-op priorities into action as head of the bolstered Department of Business, Innovation, Science and Trade. Fahnbulleh will have the same opportunity to do so in Desnz, building on Miliband’s ‘Local Power Plan’ developed in conjunction with Co-op.

The appointments of Co-op MPs Norris (husband of Emma Foody, a whip who was Co-op assistant general secretary before entering Parliament) and Powell are wins too. Douglas Alexander, who remains in Cabinet, is also Co-op.

While Rayner is not officially a Labour and Co-op MP, she is often regarded as “spiritually” Co-op in that she has worked with the affiliate and is particularly sympathetic to its aims.

With peers Baroness Smith also reappointed, a quarter of all ministers attending Cabinet under Burnham are Co-op, and there are 22 Co-op ministers in total across 15 departments – a historic high.

Below Cabinet level, Co-op wins include Florence Eshalomi, who is leaving her Housing Committee chair role to go straight into MHCLG at ministerial level, Kirsty McNeill, promoted from junior Scottish minister to minister of state at the Foreign Office, Kate Dearden, bumped up from parliamentary under-secretary to become a minister of state at DBIST, and McMahon who has made a return to MHCLG. Luke Pollard, Stephen Doughty and Lord Coaker have also been reappointed.

Trade unions

There is some apprehension from those trade unions that lobby against net-zero over Fahnbulleh replacing Miliband as Energy Secretary – as a strong ally of his and an enthusiastic backer of decarbonisation, she is not generally expected to be less radical than her predecessor on the subject.

But unions have done well, overall, with Rayner, Midgley and Haigh in key roles and union-friendly Reynolds in DBIST.

The whips’ office, led by Midgley, is particularly good news for the unions, complete with GMB’s Laurence Turner and Usdaw’s Michael Wheeler being picked.

There was a call from the Prospect union last month for continuity around the government’s work on employment rights, with Mike Clancy writing for The House: “The Employment Rights Bill, as it once was, started with Angela Rayner, Jonathan Reynolds and Justin Madders in charge but was passed under Peter Kyle and Kate Dearden. 

“That personnel change caused delays, and I hope the new Prime Minister will reflect carefully on how they deliver continuity to this vital area of work. Minister Dearden in particular has skilfully conducted the various discussions needed to progress the consultation process.”

Dearden, formerly of Community union, now has a ‘future of work’ brief in the same department.

THE LOSERS

Starmer allies

The most notable losers from Burnham’s appointments are, of course, allies of Starmer, from David Lammy, Rachel Reeves, Darren Jones, Steve Reed and Jo Stevens being removed from Cabinet to Lord Hermer, Nick Thomas-Symonds and Baroness Chapman leaving as ministers who attended Cabinet.

Bridget Phillipson, who despite being briefed against during the Starmer era was kept in place by him as PM, was heavily demoted – losing her education brief and being left with the women and equalities role only, albeit remaining in Cabinet. A source said Burnham’s team were surprised she accepted the downgrade.

Neither Dan Jarvis nor James Murray, who stepped up to Cabinet roles when John Healey resigned as defence secretary and Streeting as health secretary, have been kept in Cabinet – though both have become ministers again.

Chris Ward, a former Starmer staffer before becoming an MP and perhaps his closest ally in the Parliamentary Labour Party, has left government as expected.

The Socialist Campaign Group 

On the other end of the Labour Party’s factional spectrum, the Socialist Campaign Group and other MPs on the Corbynite or ‘hard’ left are deeply disappointed – and some angry – to have been completely overlooked for ministerial roles. This is despite many having backed Burnham’s return and nominated him for the leadership.

“A lot of people are very unhappy,” one Labour left MP said. “So much for using all talents.” Although pleased about the cost of living policies announced, they added: “Everyone knows politics is brutal but this is just a big two fingers up to people.”

Londoners

Streeting and Fahnbulleh are the only full Cabinet members representing London seats under Burnham, whereas Starmer’s Cabinet had himself, Reed, Murray and David Lammy. The new PM does have Ellie Reeves and Matthew Pennycook as ministers attending Cabinet, however.

This shift away from London is defended by Burnham allies as a shift towards being more representative of the country.

YOU WIN SOME, YOU LOSE SOME

Blairites

Blairite Cabinet members Peter Kyle and Liz Kendall have both been sacked. The picture is mixed, however. McFadden remains Work and Pensions Secretary. Reynolds has been moved from Defra to become Chief Secretary to the Treasury. Streeting stays too, of course, though he is a unique case.

Among non-Cabinet ministers, some have been kept on – Baroness (Jacqui) Smith and Georgia Gould remain in post, and Alison McGovern has been moved sideways to health, for example – while others, like Sharon Hodgson, have not.

4 min read3 min

There’s a lot of talking, not a lot of action. Now, in Clacton’s by-election, much of the national conversation has been reduced to a choice between Nigel Farage and Count Binface.

I understand why Binface has struck a chord. Humour works when politics has become absurd, and a vote for a man wearing a bin on his head can feel more honest than supporting politicians who make promises and then disappear. He gives people a way to express their frustration. But Clacton needs more than an expression of frustration. It needs someone who will still be here when the cameras have gone, bringing people together and doing the unglamorous work of getting things done.

That is why I am standing as an independent candidate.

Like Clacton, I grew up in an area that was forgotten. Deindustrialisation and tourism decline has led to fewer opportunities. It has felt like decades of little to no political interest has been paid to people like us.I grew up on a council estate in a single-parent family and relied on free school meals. 

Forty seven per cent of Clacton’s residents over 16 are classified as “economically inactive. One in five working-age adults have never held a traditional job. 

Later, as a young adult, I found myself in a similar position – struggling. After a divorce, I was left struggling to pay my bills resulting in me being in £24,000 worth of debt and was constantly trying to make ends meet. If anyone has lived like that you know how that fear changes you. It also gives you a very good understanding of the difference between political soundbites and everyday life. 

What has changed my life is education, but not the education that I got in school – but financial education. This is the education we should be getting – what is a mortgage, what is tax, what is compounded interest. This education taught me about budgeting, credit and how money actually works. That education helped me clear my debt – it gave me a future. 

Real life solutions are what I want to bring to Clacton. I’ll give you an example – the people of Clacton have told me about the need for a local dentist, at present, if you need an NHS dentist you need to travel up to Colchester. Why are we not empowering a local entrepreneur to fill this void?! This is remedied with financial education – and if I get in – and if I don’t – we’ll get to the solution. 

This is why financial education sits at the heart of my priorities. If a single lesson on budgeting and money could have saved me years of struggle, imagine what it could do for every child growing up right now. This shouldn’t be a privilege for the lucky few. It should be normal.

But education alone isn’t enough. I want to work with residents, small businesses, schools, community groups and public bodies to find paths to thrive. I wantto help local businesses grow and bring empty units back to life whilst making sure taxpayers’ money is spent wisely. I don’t want to see Clacton’s future in The Bin(face).

When this by-election was called, the choice on offer seemed to be Nigel Farage or a bin. 

Now, Count Binface offers clever commentary on a political system that has let people down. But I’m offering something a little different, providing real life skills, commitment and something beyond a protest vote. 

I won’t pretend to have every answer. But I will always listen, I will always work hard, and I will always put the people of Clacton first. I want the people to of Clacton to have a real choice – not between personalities and punchlines – but someone who can help Clacton thrive, and that’s me, Abi Hookway.

Abi Hookway is an independent candidate for Clacton

Jill Rutter takes stock of Andy Burnham’s first few days in government.

After a couple of weeks when Andy Burnham went underground with few sightings in public, this week he has shown what he meant by hitting the ground running.

He appointed a Cabinet – with a heavy Manchester representation (5 members represent seats in Greater Manchester, and there are seven from the North West when two Liverpudlians are added in). London’s representation in the full Cabinet is down to two.

He rewarded those who backed him early and helped usher Keir Starmer out of the door. He dispensed with the services of those who had been some of the most frequent spokespeople for the Starmer regime –Darren Jones and Peter Kyle.  Expect to hear far more Northern accents as close allies like Louise Haigh, Jonny Reynolds (back at his old business department) and Lucy Powell become the preferred voices of the government.

There is a huge amount of churn at Cabinet level. But one good decision Burnham has made is to eschew much change at junior ministerial level with a lot of people continuing in post, and others, like Dan Jarvis, who was briefly Defence Secretary after John Healey quit, returning to his old Security Minister beat.

He has moved quickly to reorganise government. The most eye-catching move is the creation of so-called No.10 North, a Manchester base that the new PM will work from (an interesting question is whether his successors with seats well away from Greater Manchester will find that so appealing) but the most important moves are the rebadging and beefing up of the policy secretariats in the Cabinet Office as a new Office of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, with the other, less central tasks hived off into a ‘Onegov’ agency.  That starts to address a longstanding weakness in the UK government – that we expect the Prime Minister to drive a programme for government, then refuse to give him or her adequate resources to do it and then wonder why the well resourced permanent Treasury expands to fill the vacuum.

The Prime Minister is also transferring lead responsibility for the central planks of his reform programme to his new Manchester operation. They will lead on devolution strategy (taken over from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government) – though it is not clear how far that stretches into local government reorganisation – and take over local economic growth from the Treasury. It will be interesting to see how that works with the Treasury’s interest in economic growth, Reynolds reassuming control of the modern industrial strategy he developed in his first outing as Business Secretary and Angela Rayner back to press on with the completion of the devolution map.

Burnham has followed the example of previous Prime Ministers and employed a loyal enforcer at the centre. But Louise Haigh is quite inexperienced compared to some of the earlier occupants of the role – she spent very little time as a minister before being forced to step down by Keir Starmer and the success of a lot of the changes will depend on her, and her ability to work well with the Cabinet Secretary.

The more surprising machinery of government changes are the dismemberment of Rishi Sunak’s Department of Science, Innovation and Technology. Science and innovation go to the ever changing business department, which gets renamed again; digital goes back to DCMS whence it came; and AI goes to the centre. This may, or may not, be a more sensible division of responsibilities than bundling these issues together. What is indubitable is that this sort of change creates distraction and disturbance, as the carve-up and reintegration take up the time and effort of senior leaders and usually end up with a price tag attached. The hope is that this change was much debated beforehand and the pros and cons were properly assessed before the changes were made.

Before taking office, Burnham promised a policy blitz. What has been notable is the nature of the policy announcements seen to date: Unpopular digital ID cards binned before even taking office on Sunday night; Tuesday morning, the decision to temporarily remove VAT (at 5%) from household electricity bills in England, Scotland and Wales; followed on Wednesday morning by taking the bus fares cap in England back to £2 in 2027.

The VAT cut (pending longer-term measures to create a ‘breathing space’ in cost of living pressures) was to be paid for by cancelling plans for digital ID cards: the problem for the government is that their predecessors had never identified how to pay for ID cards which were announced after the spending review was concluded. It’s not huge money in the scheme of things but it is a black mark against the civil service that they failed to stop the government falling into the trap of saying it would be paid for by the money saved by cancelling digital ID. This is a government – as the Prime Minister emphasised to the Cabinet – that needs to be seen to be reining in its potentially spendthrift inclinations.

The bus fare cap is also being funded out of a switch from international climate finance grants to loans. That against a backdrop where the UK aid budget is a fraction of what it once was, and presumably the money that now becomes repayable goes to poor countries saddled with a big climate adaptation or transition challenge.

Expect to see more of this, as what Burnham termed a “cost of living” government looks to subsidise household bills through “reprioritisation”. The rationale seems to be to reverse the experience of the Starmer government – which managed to squander any goodwill in a mess of badly landed policies, minor ethical transgressions and political tone deafness – by buying ‘breathing space’ to develop longer term plans with more promising paybacks. Reeves and Starmer seemed to think they needed to get the economics right, and the politics would follow (it didn’t help that they got the economics quite badly wrong at the Budget); Burnham will be hoping more attractive short-term politics will give time for the economics to come good.

The problem is that he, like Starmer and Reeves before him, faces a double bind of manifesto red lines at home and Trump-induced chaos abroad.  He has already pulled off one amazing transition – from barred by-election candidate to unopposed PM in less than six months: escaping that straitjacket would be a stunning second act.

By Jill Rutter, Senior Fellow, Institute for Government.