Politics
Ken Burns on Trump’s America 250: ‘Washington needed no monuments’
Politics
Penelope Keith was a class apart
Penelope Keith, who has died at the age of 86, was no mere actress. She was an embodiment, an avatar, an archetype – a particular kind of woman, once instantly recognisable to British audiences, now as quaint as Ladybird books and private first-class railway compartments.
The two roles for which she was best known – Margo Leadbetter in The Good Life and Audrey fforbes-Hamilton in To the Manor Born – made her as recognisable and even adored as any character in sitcom. To the Manor Born regularly pulled audiences of over 20million, impressive figures even allowing for the fact the media landscape had not yet been fractured like a mirror ball. The series one finale pulled nearly 24million – the largest ratings of the decade for any non-live event.
The shows are still highly enjoyable, at least for those of us who saw them the first time around, the writing and performances still first class. But watching them now is closer to watching period drama than the topical and incisive satire they were 50 years ago. And Penelope Keith’s characters seem as fixed in a particular time and place as Jane Austen’s Mrs Bennet and William Thackeray’s Becky Sharp.
Perhaps this is unsurprising – perhaps what I find alarming is the fact that 50 years have run under my own bridge since they first aired. After all, the events depicted in the hugely popular Upstairs Downstairs, which ran between 1971 and 1975, were themselves set in a period roughly 50 years earlier. No one was surprised to see different etiquette observed therein. But somehow it is always a shock to realise that evolution, even at the social scale, is still going on.
If Margos and Audreys are hard to find now, so are Penelope Keiths. One reason for her extraordinarily convincing portrayals of women conscious to an exquisitely painful degree of their own social status appears to have been the bespoke nature of the roles, seemingly cut to fit her own persona. Watching her being interviewed on Parkinson or Wogan, one is struck by the realisation that, if anything, she had been dialling it down a bit to play Margo.
Not that she seems remotely cold, lacking a sense of humour or incapable of a basilisk stare toward an errant husband. But her poise, her manners and especially her accent and vocal tone seem all but implausible now, as vanished as the dialects of the Cherokee, Navaho or Sioux. It is like hearing a trained concert cellist in a room full of kazoos.
Somebody on X shared a snatch of dialogue from To the Manor Born, as follows:
Audrey: We were discussing your not going to church.
De Vere: Well, I’m not religious.
Audrey: Religion doesn’t come into it.
Play that in your head and it is as distinctive a voice as Coltrane’s sax, Brian May’s guitar or Oliver Hardy’s exasperated straight-to-camera silence.
This is not to suggest she was incapable of acting, of course – though I don’t think it would be too unkind to say that she had a limited range. It would have been as ridiculous to see her cast as a plucky housing-estate mum in a Willy Russell play, or an English Erin Brockovich, say, as it would be to cast Ray Winstone as a nebbish computer programmer or Kathy Burke as the Queen. To cast her as anything other than what she was, along the class axis at least, would be like trying to make a knight move diagonally. But doing what Pelelope did – I’m sorry, I don’t mean to be over-familiar, but I cannot simply refer to her as ‘Keith’ – and being who she was, she reigned supreme. And it is telling that it would be almost impossible to do so today.
The reason is, of course, the extinction – to all intents and purposes – of class. No doubt this was what the makers of Upstairs Downstairs thought had been largely achieved by the mid-Seventies, and what they thought they were allowing us to see through their distant mirror in Edwardian Belgravia: how such invisible strata, signals and shibboleths had once limited human horizons and exposed upstarts and parvenus for the charlatans they were. No doubt they flattered themselves, as I do now in 2026, that we have escaped such cruelty and scorn. No doubt there will be those who remain sceptical and think society still riddled with it.
But class, quite separate from the charmless ‘socio-economic status’, was for many years the main fault line and the mainspring of almost all British comedy. Not just the sitcom, but also comic novels, Carry On movies, stand-up and even kids’ comics. Some still attempt it – Amandaland plays with a modern equivalent of the ghastly social climber – but it is deluded, and painfully so, to pretend that this remains the great axis along which England is and will always be divided.
The genius of Penelope’s two roles was, of course, that while they were superficially similar and technically pitched at very similar altitudes, she had reached that pitch from two very different starting positions.
Margo was a social climber as excruciating in her way as Basil Fawlty, if less prone to escalating insanity. She was a woman who had been training all her life for a role as society hostess and was determined that Jerry should continue not only to fund that project but also play his own part with conviction and aplomb. She was on the up.
Audrey, on the other hand, had experienced reversals. Genuinely of what Julian Fellowes refers to as the ‘gratin’, she was as good as in the doghouse (technically the coach house), forced to endure the humiliation of seeing her own family seat in the hands of exactly the sort of parvenu that Mr Hudson and Mrs Bridges of Upstairs Downstairs knew all too well.
Both had poise and elegance but crucially – so crucially – a palpable vulnerability. This did not seem so strange at the time, that a woman should be so frosty and judgemental, and yet still tender and warm. Did we ourselves have a warmer and more flexible attitude to human foibles then, less inclined to enter them into the Excel spreadsheet of problematic human behaviour? Or was she simply a gifted communicator of the inner life between the lines?
Taken together, then, these two roles gave us both sides of the class coin in a single pressing. Or rather, something like a queen in a deck of cards, mirror images but one looking up and the other down.
Anyway, two near-as-dammit immortal roles, though for me, Margo shaded it. In a sitcom that was about as close to perfect as half an hour of muted suburban moss can be, with a perfect Jungian quartet of personality types, Margo basically stole every scene she was in. I don’t think this view is particularly controversial now. In scenes with three of the acknowledged masters of stage and screen, Margo Leadbetter was undefeated. Even when the others got the best lines, it was Margo’s reaction shot that landed the fish. Sure, The Good Life was ‘about’ Tom Good, the absurd garden-Ahab, and his long-suffering Barbara. But if it had been an American sitcom where the audience applauded their favourite actors when they made their first appearance? Well, it would have been interesting to see who was their second favourite.
Penelope Keith was magnificently out of sync, as if Nancy Mitford or some character from Upstairs Downstairs had somehow been cryogenically preserved and reawakened in the ghastliness of modern Britain – a possibility that all too many of us of a certain age feel would be the only explanation for our persistent state of bewilderment today.
Simon Evans is a spiked columnist and stand-up comedian. Tickets for his tour, Staring at the Sun, are on sale here.
Politics
The House Article | The next prime minister should tax wealth to bring down energy bills

4 min read
If the next prime minister is serious about cutting energy bills, the first step is simple: stop loading policy costs onto households and fund them fairly through progressive taxation instead.
This week’s Ofgem price cap rise will add £221 on average to people’s annual energy bills. While communities are struggling and parliament is distracted, fossil fuel giants and privatised energy companies are cashing in. This is rip-off Britain.
I know this will be another huge blow in what has been a bruising year for anyone trying to keep up with constant price rises. For the three out of ten adults in the UK already either in debt to their energy company or worried about falling behind, and for the one in three households in my constituency, Gorton and Denton, that are living in fuel poverty.
Behind these statistics are people. Elderly people worrying about the cost of running a fan in the heatwave; families that spent the winter trying to make a game out of huddling together against the cold; and people with disabilities trying to run life-saving equipment all year round.
Before I became an MP, I was a plumber. I spent my days going into people’s homes, and so many times I saw the problem right in front of me. I remember walking into a house where the air was so thick with damp that you could almost slice through it. This was not an issue of ventilation, as some might suggest: it was a working family trying to provide for their kids and being unable to afford the basics—a warm home that is not full of damp.
Burnham must break the link between the international gas market and domestic bill
I recently celebrated my first 100 days as an MP, and this is the one issue that has come up pretty much every single day I’ve done the job. In Westminster, however, the main topic of conversation seems to be when and how the Labour Party is going to replace its leader.
In the first month after the US and Israel’s initial strikes on Iran, the share value of just five North Sea oil and gas companies was boosted by £73bn in one month. As I said when I was elected, working hard used to get people a decent life; now it is more likely to line the pockets of billionaires and energy giants.
This cannot continue. That is why the Green Party is calling on Andy Burnham, if he becomes the next prime minister, to take immediate steps to cut bills before the winter.
First, he could take £150 off everyone’s bills by removing policy costs and the cost of servicing energy debt from energy bills and funding them via general taxation. Funding policy commitments like the Warm Homes Discount should be done progressively, and that’s exactly what adding them to taxation would do. A wealth tax could ensure this was placed even more firmly on those with the broadest shoulders.
If Burnham is really serious about changing course, then more must be done. He must break the link between the international gas market and domestic bills and go further to stamp out the profiteering in the energy market that allowed UK energy companies to make £30bn in pre-tax profits in 2024 alone.
He should also be looking to set out a fully funded and properly regulated local authority-led, national home insulation scheme, because, as I am painfully aware, our homes leak more heat than most places in Western Europe, and making people who are struggling pay for energy lost in seconds is appalling.
He also needs to move further and faster on renewables. New fossil fuel extraction will not bring down bills or improve the UK’s energy security, but renewables can. Since the start of the war in Iran, wind and solar have saved the UK £1.7bn in gas imports.
The public is clear that the affordability crisis is the issue that they want tackled. The next prime minister needs to act, and this time not in the interests of fossil fuel giants, but in the interests of the very people who trusted the government to make their lives more liveable.
Hannah Spencer MP is the Green Party MP for Gorton and Denton
Politics
Politics Home Article | Cross-Party Group Of MPs Call On PM To Sanction Netanyahu

75 MPs from a variety of parties have called on the government to sanction Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. (Alamy)
3 min read
A cross-party group of 75 MPs has called on Prime Minister Keir Starmer to sanction Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Minister of Justice Yariv Levin over the alleged torture of Palestinian civilians.
The letter to Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper, organised by Labour MP Neil Duncan-Jordan and shared with PoliticsHome, expresses “deep concern that the government has yet to sanction members of the Israeli government for the systematic torture and ill-treatment of Palestinian detainees”.
Citing a report by UN Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories, Francesca Albanese, MPs say responsibility for “well-documented torture of Palestinian civilians lies with the government of Israel, including Prime Minister Netanyahu”.
The letter also references the decision by Israel in March to drop charges against soldiers for the alleged rape of a Palestinian detainee, a decision praised by Netanyahu, and the interception of the Global Sumud Flotilla and Freedom Flotilla Coalition vessels in international waters by the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF).
The Israeli government and IDF have repeatedly denied allegations of torture and rape, and have defended the interception of multiple flotillas in international waters, accusing them of being sympathetic to terrorist organisation Hamas.
In the letter, cross-party MPs say that while they welcome sanctions against far-right ministers like Ben-Gvir and finance minister Bezalel Smotrich, more needs to be done.
“We write to express our deep concern that the government has yet to sanction members of the Israeli government for the systematic torture and ill-treatment of Palestinian detainees, including children, in Israeli detention,” the letter reads.
“Responsibility for the systematic and well-documented torture of Palestinian civilians lies with the government of Israel, including Prime Minister Netanyahu.
“While the sanctions announced in June 2025 against ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich remain welcome, they have done little to change the government of Israel’s approach to Palestinian detainees. Since the sanctions were announced, the systematic torture of Palestinians, including children, has escalated, with near total impunity.”
The UK government sanctioned Ben-Gvir and Smotrich in 2025 in response to the pair’s “repeated incitements of violence against Palestinian communities”, with then foreign secretary David Lammy in a statement accusing them of inciting “extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights”.
The letter from MPs also calls on the UK government to sanction both Netanyahu and Levin, arguing the government must end the “impunity” for Israel’s actions.
“We urge you to take further steps to help end this impunity by sanctioning the government of Israel’s Minister of Justice, Yariv Levin and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,” the letter reads.
MPs who have signed the letter include Labour MP Paula Barker, Your Party MP and former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, Liberal Democrat MP Manuela Perteghella, and Conservative MP Desmond Swayne.
The Foreign, Development and Commonwealth Office was approached for comment.
Politics
After primary flop, San Jose's mayor banks on World Cup bounce
Matt Mahan suffered a disappointing finish in California’s gubernatorial primary last month, but the World Cup has offered the mayor of Silicon Valley’s largest city the chance of an immediate remontada.
His home San Jose, riding a sports tourism surge, stands to gain more economically today as the U.S. national team opens knockout play in Santa Clara. Mahan told POLITICO on Friday that he had not yet attended a match in the bordering city, but had been soaking in the action at watch parties in San Jose, where attendees have been so numerous they’ve begun watching from the tops of nearby parking garages to get a better view.
A FIFA official watch party in downtown San Jose’s San Pedro Square is streaming all 104 games and has hosted more than 300,000 fans, by the city’s count.
“It’s been just an incredible experience,” Mahan said. “We’re on track to double, if not triple, the amount of attendance we expected.”
A shooting a block from the venue Sunday evening was a reminder of the security challenges posed by such large gatherings, but city officials said the deadly incident wasn’t connected to the event and didn’t occur while matches were being streamed. Watch parties resumed on Monday and are set to carry on through the tournament — with an additional screen to spread out the crowds.
The U.S. match against Bosnia and Herzegovina today will be the last of six tournament games played in the South Bay, capping a banner sports year in which the region hosted the Super Bowl and NCAA March Madness games. San Jose officials tweaked their plans for the lineup’s longest and only international competition based on how the other events went, adding TVs to watch parties and looking for ways to limit congestion, Mahan said.
“One of the things we learned during the NFL Super Bowl experience was that it got fairly congested in the middle of the action, and we want to spread people out a little bit more, and so we’ve, we’ve got multiple screens up there, very large screens, so there’s no reason to crowd up front,” Mahan said.
Local governments coordinated to plan for the string of high-profile events, and San Jose hired dedicated staff to prepare for them. The planning, overseen by former Olympic short track speed skater Tommy O’Hare, took two years, while the city became involved in seeking the U.S., Mexico and Canada’s joint bid to host the World Cup over a decade ago.
The city embarked on a marketing campaign to attract visitors to San Jose Mineta International Airport — a lesser-known hub than SFO but one just minutes driving from Levi’s Stadium. Mahan opted not to name names over security concerns, but he said “a ton” of foreign dignitaries have landed at SJC during the tournament.
Representatives from China, South Korea and a half-dozen other countries were set to attend an overlapping summit in San Jose on international innovation and investment this week, mingling with expected attendees from Bay Area tech giants including NVIDIA and Apple.
But the mayor — a Democrat who finished sixth in the state’s jungle primary for governor in June — said the focus during the tournament has been less on fostering international relationships than on the fan experience.
“Our North Star has been, you know, whether you can afford a ticket to the big game, we want you to be able to have a fun, accessible, and memorable World Cup experience in downtown San Jose,” Mahan said. “I think we’ve proven that we’re offering that.”
Politics
Why isn't Donald Trump at the US match against Bosnia?
Our White House correspondent Sophia Cai, a member of the Axel Springer Global Reporters Network, has been covering World Cup politics in regular video dispatches for our sister publication “Bild.”
Here’s her latest report explaining why President Donald Trump has yet to attend a World Cup match, and how he keeps up from the White House.
Politics
Summer 2026 edition of Order! Order! magazine published
The Association of Former Members of Parliament has published the latest edition of its official journal Order! Order!
Politics
The House | Remove private profit and use co-operatives to fix our social care system

Alex Sobel, Labour Co-op MP for Leeds Central and Headingley, at employee-owned social care provider Be Caring in Leeds
4 min read
When we arrive at Be Caring in Leeds, the young women who work there are shy about speaking to the camera.
The Co-op Party team is there to film as part of a video series shining a light on communities, businesses and public services doing things differently across the country. We’ve been brought to Be Caring by local MP Alex Sobel, who is clearly incredibly proud of the company and wants to highlight what they do. When we ask founder Sharon and her staff, many of them still in carer’s uniform having just come back from their morning rounds, to talk about their work, they completely come to life.
Be Caring is the UK’s largest employee-owned social care provider. Employee ownership means it is structured in a fundamentally different way to the vast majority of social care companies. Its employees are also owners, so they have a stake in the company’s success and a formal voice in how it is run. Any profit made is either reinvested into the service, often paying for things like regular uniform upgrades, or paid back to staff in bonus payments. This is the classic co-operative model – ownership, decision-making and profit shared.
It’s a model which stands in stark opposition to the rest of the social care sector, one increasingly defined by crisis and scandal. Adult social care faces persistent staffing problems, rooted in poor pay and working conditions, local authority funding crises, regional inequalities in accessing high-quality care and an ageing population steadily raising demand. The staff at Be Caring understand this, many of them having previously worked in privately-owned care companies. The difference, they say, is a service run in the interests of the people who rely on it most – staff and care recipients – rather than distant shareholders.
The Co-operative Party has today released a report on co-operative care, making the case for this model and its transformative potential in helping to fix an increasingly broken system. Most fundamentally, the report calls for the removal of private profit from adult social care and an end to the pervasive domination of private equity in the system.
We believe that the fight to fix adult social care can’t just be about finding more money, but must also be about the kind of social care system we want to build. Since responsibility for funding and commissioning of social care shifted from national to local government in the early 1980s, private provision has become the norm, and today 80 per cent of the largest care home providers in the UK are owned or backed by private equity firms. With private equity domination comes profit extraction. An estimated £1.5bn is now extracted as profit from the social care system every year. This degree of profit leakage inevitably leads to lower wages, less reinvestment in care quality and worse outcomes for care recipients.
We have the opportunity to change this. Last year, the Welsh government legislated to remove private profit from children’s homes, fostering and secure accommodation. It means that all providers must now operate not-for-profit, ensuring that every penny spent on care goes directly towards supporting vulnerable children. This approach can be replicated for adult social care. Co-operatives and other not-for-private-profit models already exist and thrive within the care sector, but they do so in spite of government policy, not because of it. Government could set a clear intention to incentivise this kind of care and phase out the private equity firms that have had such a poisonous impact.
Andy Burnham will soon be the first ever Labour and Co-operative Prime Minister. We believe that with this milestone comes the most significant opportunity our movement has ever had to fundamentally rewire our economy, our public services and our politics as a whole. We can transform the state from one of hoarding power to sharing it, but it’s a principle that we will need to apply everywhere, a lens through which we analyse all of the major problems our country faces. It’s why Burnham was right, in his first major intervention this week, to point to the Rochdale Pioneers, the founders of the modern co-operative movement who looked at a broken economic system and decided to do something to change it. We have done these things before and we can do them again.
Caitlin Prowle is Co-operative Party assistant general secretary
Politics
Sneeze When You Go Outside? Experts Explain Why You Do This When You Walk Outside
I don’t have hay fever, but based on how I react to walking outside on a hot day, I’d forgive you for believing I do.
For some reason, getting off the train into the sun, opening my door onto a ray-soaked street, and even leaving a tree’s shadow into a bright spot triggers a huge, eye-watering sneeze – and until now, I had no idea why.
But it turns out it might be my genes, per the Cleveland Clinic.
It sounds like I’m experiencing a “photic sneeze reflex,” also known as “autosomal dominant compelling helio-ophthalmic outburst syndrome” (ACHOO syndrome – teehee).
What is a “photic sneeze reflex” or ACHOO syndrome?
An extract from Medical Genetics Summaries says that “Affected individuals report a ‘prickling sensation’ or sneezing in response to a bright light.”
It’s elicited by going from a darker area to an area of brighter light (like stepping into sunlight from indoors), or simply having a bright light shown to you.
This can be “uncontrollable.”
How common is it to sneeze at bright lights?
“About one in four individuals who already have a prickling sensation in their nose will sneeze in response to sunlight, but ‘pure’ photic sneezing is far less common,” Medical Genetics Summaries shared.
If one parent has the condition, their child has a 50% chance of developing it.
But the Cleveland Clinic says we don’t know exactly how many people have the condition.
On average, they add, it seems to be about 15-30% of us: white people, especially white women, may be more likely to have the trait.
What causes sneezing on exposure to bright lights?
It’s a genetic issue, but we don’t know yet which genes are responsible.
It happens because of a misfiring in a facial nerve that goes from your eyes to your nose. The constriction of your pupils as your eyes adjust to the light triggers the sneeze.
Is sneezing at bright lights dangerous?
It can be if you’re operating heavy machinery or driving: “for example, exiting a road tunnel on a bright day.”
Pilots might need to be more cautious, too.
How can I stop sneezing at bright lights?
There’s no cure for ACHOO syndrome, but you can make the journey from darker spots into lighter areas easier on the eyes.
Shielding your eyes with a hat or sunglasses might help.
And the Cleveland Clinic recommends we “Use the ‘transverse philtral pressure technique,’ which involves applying pressure to the area between your nose and your lips.
“If you’re doing it right, it should look like you’re giving yourself a moustache with your finger,” they said. This may interrupt the sneezing signal.
I’m learning so much more about myself than I expected today…
Politics
The Best Healthy, Protein-Heavy & Vegan Recipe Boxes And Meal Kits In 2026
We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI — prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.
I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again: having to decide what to eat three times a day is an impossible task.
It’s really indicative of us being in late stage capitalism (sorry Marx, you would’ve hated 2026) that even thinking about our meals is an exhausting endeavour, but unfortunately that’s not something we can cure.
What we can solve, though, is the effort required to simply make dinner at the end of the day.
Whether you’re a parent, living with a partner, or simply need to be able to get home and not worry that you’re going to get your intake of protein and fibre at the end of the day, I’ve made it my job to find the very best recipe boxes and meal kits on the market.
How we tested recipe boxes and meal kits
Until now, I’ve been quite fundamentally opposed to having someone else tell me how to cook. Call me a control freak, but I really do think I know better than a recipe what I will like.
So I’ve had high standards going in to this, and I’ve tested each box in the list to make sure I find the best options for people at each cooking level.
For each recipe box, I’ve considered how clear the included recipe cards were, the number and range of options, the packaging and storage, how easy they were to cook, the quality of the ingredients, the flavour of the end result, and who I thought each box would be best suited for.
Keep reading for a round up of my favourites.
Best meal kits and recipe boxes in 2026
Grubby: Best plant-based recipe box
- Packaging is recyclable
- Healthy and protein-heavy
- Plant-based
- Donates a meal to a child in need every time a box is ordered
- Easy to follow instructions
- Plant-based isn’t for everyone
When people hear the term ‘plant-based’ they immediately jump to the conclusion that it won’t be good.
Proving that you can make restaurant-quality plant-based food at home (and we mean the same quality as a regular restaurant, not a vegan one, before you shut off!) Grubby has created a recipe box that’s healthy and easy to follow.
You can choose a box for two or four people, and the options all state how much protein and fibre they include, making it easy to stay healthy.
What I loved most about this box is that everything about the packaging is great quality, not just because the paper is thicker than other flimsier recipe cards, but because most of it is recyclable and there’s minimal plastic.
As for the ingredients, you can tell they work with seasonal suppliers; that’s what makes Grubby a B-corp!
While the recipes were easy to follow, they might be for slightly more advanced chefs than other recipe boxes in this list – as in, one recipe called for making your own hummus in a blender. Personally, I enjoyed that, because I don’t like being treated like I don’t know how to boil a kettle.
And I have to say, every time, the overall end result was more delicious than any of the other boxes I tried. It was consistent, and even my meat-loving girlfriend enjoyed everything I made.
Grubby also makes ready meals, which are equally as tasty and can. be kept in your freezer for a rainy day.
Green Chef: Best for healthy meals with a range of diet options

Honey Jane Wyatt/ HuffPost
- Recipes are easy to follow, and you can double if you’re making a recipe for four
- Specialised diet options
- Ingredients are fresh
- The finished result is tasty
- Uses lots of little plastic packages
Unlike Grubby, Green Chef has options for every kind of dietary requirement. You can choose from keto, high-protein, calorie conscious, vegetarian, vegan, lower carb, pescatarian, or flexitarian meals, and the menu is updated every week.
It arrives neatly packaged so it’s easy to store in the fridge, however there were some random ingredients loosely packaged so I wasn’t sure which meal they correlated to.
As I’m pescatarian, I chose meals with a combination of fish and vegetables, and most of the recipes I chose had a lot of fibre.
Each recipe card includes photos, which makes it straightforward to follow, and although I was suspicious of the fact they use random ingredients I wouldn’t normally use, the overall flavour was very good.
You can also choose add-ons like mozzarella or soups to keep you going throughout the week, and I appreciated that the meals often take no more than half an hour to make – perfect for a mid-week dinner.
Hello Chef: Best for beginner cooks

- Recipes are beginner-friendly
- They have an option for meal boxes for one
- Very family-friendly recipe options
- Again uses lots of different plastic sachets etc
- Uses creme fraiche in everything (why?!)
Whether you find cooking a drag or you’ve been told you’re not very good at it (kids and partners are cruel, I’m sorry) Hello Fresh creates a recipe box that takes all the thinking out of cooking and really leads you through it step by step.
There are plenty of recipe options for meat eaters and vegetarians, and it’s the only recipe box I know of that has an option for one. As someone who mostly cooks for herself, I really appreciated this detail – it also cuts down on waste!
However, Hello Fresh was the box I liked the least. Maybe I ordered the wrong recipes, but every single meal I made included creme fraiche, and by the end of the week my stomach was paying the price.
Plus, the taste just wasn’t as good as other recipes. I don’t know if it’s because it’s trying to be family friendly and include options kids and fussy eaters would approve of, but some of the recipes use creme fraiche and other ingredients seemingly for no reason.
Some of the instructions seemed anti-intuitive and unclear, and I’m not entirely convinced this will make you a better home cook.
There are also fewer options for dietary requirements, and less information about the nutritional value of each recipe than other boxes.
I’d say this is really best for absolute beginners or completely time-crunched families, as it leads you through things at a granular level and doesn’t require much thought.
COOK: Best for families or new parents
- Lots of dietary options available
- Can be kept in the freezer or fridge
- No need to chop or fry anything
- Tasty
- It offers seasonal menus
- Great employer
- You gotta turn the oven on
Sometimes you want to come home and not have to think about anything other than turning the oven on, and maybe boiling a few peas.
If there’s one thing that will save you trouble of an evening, it’s COOK.
These ready meals come in a whole smorgasbord of different cuisines, and there are options for all the family, from fish pie to tikka masala, and even canapés for a dinner party.
On the whole, the quality is really excellent, and I love that they have desserts.
However, whoever they work with for their delivery needs to figure it out because they often leave things at the wrong address – our deputy editor’s neighbour is well-fed, she reports.
If you’re ever looking for a gift for new parents, COOK is the one. They’ll be able to keep it in the freezer, and it even has a new parents bundle.
And, on a side note, COOK is an excellent employer – it has a RAW Talent scheme that employs people struggling to find work for various reasons. Big up COOK!
The benefits and drawbacks of using a recipe box or meal kit
Pros
We all lead busy lives, and whether you’re a Michelin-grade cook or complete newbie, deciding what to eat at the end of the day is a lot.
One thing I’ve loved about having recipe boxes is never having to go to the supermarket. Often, I find myself buying ingredients with lofty ideals of making a specific meal, only for it to expire before I have time to use it.
You’ll also never have to decide what you feel like eating, or figure out if you’re consuming a balanced diet because most boxes tell you about the nutritional value of each recipe.
Recipe boxes can also be a great way to learn new recipes, or at the very least get inspiration from.
Cons
However, you might not always want the meals you have in your fridge. Some recipe boxes come with tiny sachets of ingredients that somehow never get used, so they end up hanging around your fridge forever.
This might also mean more waste than if you went to the supermarket, because things can go off pretty quickly.
Final verdict
Overall, recipe boxes and meal kits can be a great way to save time, money, and energy.
Lots of the ones on this list have offers for first time buyers. The best one I tried was Grubby, as it’s healthy and plant-based. But, if you’re staunch about having some meat or protein in your diet, I’d go for Green Chef, as it has a ton of dietary options and the final result was consistently great.
Politics
Travellers Are Learning Why The London Underground Is Always So Warm Hot
Yesterday, parts of London’s Underground network reached a sweltering 33°C, The Standard reported.
That’s three degrees above the government’s upper limit for the safe transport of cattle.
According to Bloomberg UK, the network of underground trains can be 5°C hotter than the high temperature on the street.
To be honest, I hadn’t put much thought into why that might be. Hot day, little air con, and tonnes of people – a recipe for a sauna-level carriage, I reckoned.
But it turns out that a good chunk of that notorious heat comes from an unexpected source, which has nothing to do with either the air temperature or the mass of people.
Braking heats tube carriages up by more than you think
In 2007, a Rail Engineering report found that a lot of the heat comes from braking.
That’s because the friction created during the process is very intense, creating a lot of kinetic energy that gets converted into heat energy.
Forbes says braking is responsible for about half of the higher heat, while passengers account for 2% of the warmth. Rail magazine puts the combined effects of braking and train motion at 80% of heat input.
Then, there’s the ground into which the tube network was built.
It’s largely clay and chalk, both of which hold onto heat. This is particularly troublesome for deeper tube lines, which have less access to air.
This heat builds up – per Rail Magazine, the average tube temperature in 1900 was 14°C, compared to today’s 20-25°C.
Not all tube stations have adequate ventilation, either, meaning hot air has nowhere to escape. The heat simply builds and builds, and because extracted hot air often has nowhere to go, not even air conditioning will provide an adequate solution.
What can we do to make the tube cooler?
It’s no easy feat. London Underground’s Programme Director for Infrastructure, George McInulty, told Rail magazine: “We can increase the capacity of shafts, and we did this during the upgrade of the Victoria Line in 2011/12.
“But we were lucky that it was only built in the 1960s, with half an eye to improving ventilation at a later date and introducing a service of over 30 trains per hour. Elsewhere we’ve been less lucky, and have had to look at retrofitting stuff where we can.”
Air conditioning is simply not an option for tunnels that can’t let hot air out; it’ll simply heat some older, hotter lines up more.
Some solutions, like turning a lift in St Paul’s into a fan, have helped. In Victoria Station, water from a nearby river is circulated in pipes around the tunnels to keep them cool.
But these clever workarounds are not universally available.
McInulty said: “We can make gains from deceleration, and we are buying trains with regenerative braking, which produces electrical energy from braking rather than all that heat from friction.
“And there are other things that go unseen by the public that make a difference – we have put a thin film on the windows of Central Line trains, so they absorb less energy on the outside parts of the line which is then dumped underground. We’ve also made massive steps in using LED lights which give out less heat.”
Still, it’s hard to see how the tube will cool down significantly any time soon.
-
Fashion5 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Staud – Corporette.com
-
Politics6 days agoThe House | Manchesterism won’t survive the painful trade-offs unless it gets citizens on board
-
Crypto World2 days agoStrategy authorizes up to $1.25B in Bitcoin sales under new capital plan
-
Politics6 days agoPotential 2028er World Cup attendee leaderboard
-
Business6 days agoAsia stock markets slide as tech shares slump
-
News Videos3 days agoMAJOR BITCOIN & MARKET UPDATE!!!! (MUST WATCH ASAP!!!)
-
Tech6 days agoA Look At A Gaggle Of Transputer Boards
-
Crypto World6 days ago
Dell (DELL) Shares Tumble Over 5% Following Analyst Downgrade to Hold
-
Crypto World5 days agoCoinbase, Circle Deepen Crypto Stock Losses Despite Resilient S&P 500
-
Business2 days agoAustralia treasurer says alleged access of prime minister’s bank data ’incredibly concerning’
-
Crypto World5 days agoKraken's xStocks Opens Bending Spoons IPO Registration to EEA Retail
-
Sports5 days agoFIH Pro League: India defeat Pakistan 7-1, register biggest win of campaign | Other Sports News
-
Crypto World6 days agoBitcoin Sparks $600M Hourly Liquidations With $65,000 Set To Become Resistance
-
Tech4 days agoBluekit phishing kit adopts browser-in-the-middle for login theft
-
Tech2 days agoAnonymous researcher drops 0-day ‘exploitarium’ repo
-
Tech5 days agoRussian hackers now target Signal backup recovery keys
-
Crypto World6 days agoHyperliquid Named on Singapore MAS Investor Alert Register
-
Crypto World6 days agoRTX holders must register wallets before token distribution begins
-
Sports16 hours agoBroncos roster: OL Ben Powers (No. 74) entering final year of contract
-
Business2 days agoThe AI boom won’t burst all at once. It will pop in ‘rolling bubbles’: Macquarie

lead image




You must be logged in to post a comment Login