Ephraim Mirvis, the UK’s Israel-fanatic chief rabbi and genocide-denier, has launched an attack on the Church of England. The Anglicans have offended Mirvis and his fellow Israel lobbyists.

The offence? Daring even to “hear” a document about Israel’s Gaza genocide and its colonialism.

‘Kairos II‘, officially titled, A Moment of Truth: ​Faith in a Time of Genocide, is authored by Palestinian Christians and examines their lived experience.

This powerful new document declares the reality in Palestine as genocide and ethnic cleansing, challenges Western silence, and introduces a theology of resistance linking faith with justice. It exposes internal crises and reshapes the role of Christians in the struggle for liberation.

The document, a sequel to the original 2009 Kairos report, is also clear that Israel is a colonial project — colonialism “built on genocide”.

Ephraim Mirvis and his tantrum

The Anglican church has a sorry history of collusion in that genocidal, colonial project — at least at its upper levels.

Its hounding, on behalf of the Israel lobby, of Anglican clergy who dare to speak out about genocide and apartheid is a scandal.

The shameful collusion of disgraced former Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, with Mirvis against Jeremy Corbyn in 2019, helped condemn millions to misery under the Boris Johnson government. It also condemned at least 137,000 to death.

Welby’s successor Sarah Mullaly has already scrambled to accommodate the Israel lobby’s hissy fit over the naming of its genocide. An original motion committed the church to “endorsing” Kairos II. The motion was amended simply to recommend Anglicans at all levels to “read” it. But even that is too far for Mirvis.

The Israel lobby demands complete compliance. Any deviation triggers demands for retraction, or else retribution without credit for past collaboration. And Mirvis is outraged that the C of E ignored his call for bishops to reject the Kairos report outright.

So now he is condemning the “shameful” vote even to “engage” with the Kairos report. In an Orwellian statement, he claims the report is full of lies and a “barrier” to to “understanding”, but is clearly most upset that it challenges “the very existence” of the murderous, ethno-supremacist colony.

He said:

This is a document full of falsehood, which openly rejects dialogue, uses extreme rhetoric to challenge the very existence of Israel and objects to existing peace agreements in the region.

Though it poses as a route to understanding, Kairos II in fact functions as an egregious barrier to it, reducing one of the world’s most complex conflicts to a single, warped narrative, which can only harm the cause of peace.

Advertisement

The Board of Deputies jumps in

The ‘Board of Deputies’, which says it exists to further Israel’s interests, of course joined in, and made it clear that Israel is at the centre of its own ‘outrage’.

Senior Masorti rabbi, Jonathan Wittenberg, also made the same “particular” point while spouting other Israeli talking points.

He said:

In particular, the Church of England’s response does not explicitly condemn the definition by Kairos II of Israel as a colonialist entity, or Kairos II’s failure to acknowledge the unbroken historical connection between the Jewish People and the Land of Israel. Nor does it condemn Kairos II’s failure to acknowledge the necessity for a Jewish homeland.

Mullaly still tried to placate the lobby, stating that the church doesn’t necessarily agree with everything in the report because it reads it. But of course, it wasn’t enough. The lobby requires complete endorsement of Israel’s right to expel millions of indigenous Palestinians for its colonial land-grab.

‘Racist’ rabbi

Ephraim Mirvis is lauded and rewarded by the establishment, but is a deeply problematic figure. His political attacks on Corbyn in 2019 and his enabling of the racist right by amplifying the ‘Labour antisemitism’ scam were just the beginning.

Mirvis denies that Israel is committing genocide. He also endorses further land-theft — euphemised as ‘settlement’. And he participates in Israel’s annual racist march, where ‘settlers’ chant “Death to Arabs” and other genocidal slogans. His links to the white-supremacist ‘settler’ right in Israel have led Jewish anti-Zionist activist, Tony Greenstein, to conclude, unequivocally, that Mirvis is a racist.

His outburst against the Anglicans for daring even to read about the suffering of the Palestinians under Israel’s colonisation and genocide does nothing to dispel that. And it does much to exemplify the sense of entitlement of an Israel lobby all too used to getting its own way.

As for the Church of England and its bishops, the overwhelming vote in favour of “reading” Palestinians’ experience doesn’t remove the stain of past collusion or the shame of not endorsing the report because of lobby pressure. It’s a tiny step in the right direction, but it’s time for the C of E and all churches to live up to their founder.

They must loudly condemn Israel’s genocide and UK government collaboration, and to strengthen the global humanitarian, anti-genocide movement.

Featured image via Hannah Mckay/ EPA

By Skwawkbox

Source link

The upcoming Clacton by-election on Thursday 13 August 2026 is somewhat of a circus. But that circus was meant to be a direct battleground for animal rights.

After Reform UK leader and human-earthworm-lookalike Nigel Farage resigned to trigger a vanity vote, most major parties decided to boycott the contest. Yet in doing this, they have opened the ring to a chaotic wave of novelty candidates. This includes a man dressed as a fish finger, and possibly the most laughable of them all, Laurence Fox.

Wanting to protect the integrity of British wildlife campaigning from becoming a political punchline, Protect the Wild founder Rob Pownall has officially rescinded his bid to stand.

Targeting the pro-hunting establishment

Pownall is a fearless campaigner and has dedicated his life to protecting animals. He founded Keep the Ban at the tender age of 16 to fight fox hunting. This later evolved into Protect the Wild – a powerhouse of animal protection. Rob has since used creative, eye-catching campaigns to reach millions of people.

He’s previously stood for Scottish parliament dressed as a gannet to campaign against the massacre of thousands of British seabirds. In the Makerfield by-election, he stood wearing a full fox suit to call attention to the trail hunting ban. And this time, Pownall was ready to run in Clacton to confront Farage directly over his vocal support for blood sports.

However, as the final candidate list emerged, it became even more glaringly obvious that the by-election was nothing more than a political farce. We all love Count Binface, and wish him the best. But when he was going to be sharing the stage with a literal bin, a fish finger and Laurence Fox, Pownall has quickly come to realise staying in the race is actively damaging the serious nature of his cause.

'My job is to demonstrate that British democracy is wonderful and unique in the entire Cosmos'

Count Binface told #BBCBreakfast why he plans to stand against Nigel Farage in the Clacton by-election – triggered by the resignation of the Reform UK leader who then plans to re-fight… pic.twitter.com/3o3RNSrirk

Advertisement

— BBC Breakfast (@BBCBreakfast) July 8, 2026

Not playing the performer

In a statement, Pownall has laid bare the seriousness of the situation:

Whatever chance there was of this being taken seriously has now gone… The more time that’s passed, the more this has looked less like a by-election and more like a circus, with people using Farage’s seat as a stage for their own attention, career or brand.

For Pownall, protecting animals is more than a punchline. He is refusing to let his campaign get swept up in a crappy media circus. Why do it, when it only serves to feed into Farage’s theatrical vanity project? Pownall added:

Being lumped in on a stage alongside a line-up of people treating this as a punchline isn’t the platform we set out to find. And I don’t think it’s the one that best serves the animals we’re trying to protect… Farage can be a ringleader of his new circus. We’re not here to be one of his performers.

The Makerfield and Edinburgh campaigns took place within serious, contested elections. Clacton, on the other hand, has been entirely abandoned by the political establishment. And let’s be honest, who the hell wants to stand next to Laurence Fox on a stage? Urgh.

Exposing the hunter-in-chief

Despite withdrawing, Protect the Wild has out-foxed them all. In the 24 hours leading up to Pownall’s decision, the campaign secured national front-page coverage. And in doing so, they have exposed Farage’s real record on blood sports. The Telegraph ran a piece smashing Farage, detailing his defence of hunting.

Pownall calls this a massive win:

That’s arguably the best coverage this campaign could have hoped for, achieving without ever having to stand on a stage at all… We set out to challenge Farage’s record on animals, and we have done exactly that.

The circus seems to have lost its fox – well, it’s only notable one. The Laurence one doesn’t count. But the ringleader remains, surrounded by his fish finger and his bin.

But the real, serious fight to protect British wildlife continues on the ground. And that is where the voices of vulnerable animals will never be treated as a joke.

Featured images via Protect The Wild 

By Antifabot

Source link

Unite general secretary Sharon Graham, who is trying to win re-election this summer, faces yet more alleged scandal. She has been accused by union insiders of collaborating with right-wing, friend-of-Israel MP Wes Streeting to write an attack piece on Ed Miliband.

The plan was to “boost” right-winger Streeting’s prospects under incoming PM Andy Burnham.

Hatchet job

Miliband was tipped to become chancellor when Burnham takes over from lame duck Keir Starmer. However, Starmer’s team, which includes the same people who ran Starmer, is now said to have ‘blocked‘ the appointment.

The ‘Reunite the union’ page, run by figures close to the left-wing resistance inside Unite, wrote:

Unite reps are demanding answers from Sharon Graham as accusations surface claiming Graham has “colluded” with Wes Streeting in order to support his jockeying for position in the incoming Burnham government.

Reunite understands from multiple sources, both inside and beyond the union, that Wes Streeting’s team have openly claimed to have worked with Graham to write her recent attack lines deployed in The Times and elsewhere, in which Graham called Ed Miliband “a noose around the neck” of job creation.

The intention of this hit piece was to dissuade incoming Prime Minster Andy Burnham from making Milliband Chancellor. In doing so this bolstered the position of Wes Streeting.

Unite was contacted for comment about the allegations, but did not respond. The undenied allegations are ironic. Graham won election in 2021 on a pledge to disengage Unite from Westminster politics, as ‘Reunite’ elaborates:

Sharon Graham stood in 2021 on a promise of no longer playing Westminster games with Labour factions. An intervention of this sort would put Unite squarely in the middle of a political power play of the Labour Right.

It is well known within Unite that all political contact with Ministers and senior government figures is conducted through the General Secretary’s office. This makes Graham’s political interventions completely unaccountable to members, with scant information reported to the Executive Council after the event. This has led to a wild veering of our union’s political approach, from authorising ‘secret talks’ with Reform in Birmingham to now allegedly being used by the Labour Right for Westminster games.

Advertisement

Unite reps are demanding answers.

Graham must explain to members in our health sector what, if any, contact her and her team have had with Streeting and his people.

A senior Unite NHS rep told the site:

I’m outraged that Sharon appears to be backing Wes Streeting or has allowed our union to be used by his team for their own manoeuvring. Wes Streeting has been no friend of the NHS and should have no place in the leadership of the Labour party.

As health secretary, Streeting was the target of NHS strikes, notably NHS doctors. He put together a ‘slash and burn’ plan of NHS cuts and closures, appointing notorious health privatisers to oversee it. He is also an advocate of the involvement of hated spy-and-kill firm Palantir in the NHS.

According to ‘Reunite’, some of Unite’s biggest branches have already begun passing motions condemning Graham’s collaboration with one of the Labour right’s most notorious figures. The condemnation comes on top of a flood of outrage among members, officers and activists at Graham’s conduct since she took over the union.

Challenger

Graham faces a strong challenge to her re-election bid from Unite’s former international director Simon Dubbins. Dubbins is a consistent supporter of the Palestinians and opponent of Unite’s disastrous disengagement from politics under Graham.

During the nominations phase of the election, Dubbins gained huge wins in big Unite sectors Graham would previously have considered sewn up tightly. These include defence, air travel and construction. Dubbins is also set to win Unite’s ‘Community’ section — which Graham had planned to wind down if she wins a second term.

Dubbins also has standing among Unite’s anti-genocide activists. He refused Graham’s order to cancel a pro-Palestine fringe at Labour’s conference. Graham then suspended him.

During nominations, Graham hid from union branches and declined to debate Dubbins at any hustings event, angering many, including allies, by sending weak proxies instead. Last week, Dubbins publicly challenged Graham to stop hiding and face him in an open debate in front of members. So far she has not responded, let alone taken up the challenge.

Unite’s Anti-union union boss

Outrage among members and union activists toward Graham is widespread. Publicly, she has been almost invisible on the issue of Palestine and Israel’s genocide. She has, though, been highly visible advocating for a bigger UK arms industry — but still lost the defence sector to Dubbins.

Behind the scenes, meanwhile, she has been accused by disgusted members of blocking activists from supporting the anti-genocide and climate movements on behalf of Unite. Graham has also held ‘secret’ talks with far-right Reform. Her lack of political engagement and education has seen support for the far-right mushroom in the union.

Despite running a union, Graham has been accused of using appalling, anti-union tactics against workers employed by Unite, leading to repeated strikes. In many cases, these tactics have been seen as Unite’s attempts to protect her husband, Jack Clarke.

Soon after her accession in 2021, Graham created a new Bargaining and Disputes Support Unit (BDSU). Outside of the union’s usual procedures, Clarke was appointed to run it despite being on a final warning for bullying and misogyny. Graham’s faction has staged counter-demonstrations against workers striking against Clarke and attacked their union reps.

Unite’s destruction of evidence against husband Clarke

Explosively, Unite’s lawyers admitted to Skwawkbox that the union had destroyed evidence that workers had gathered against him. This did not stop further complaints and strike action from workers in his new fiefdom, with almost all the women working under him quitting.

These and other issues have seen a flow of Graham’s former allies coming out in support of Dubbins, including some of her previously-closest supporters. The Community section’s long-time chair has also spoken out strongly, asking the section’s members to make sure to vote for Dubbins.

Against this backdrop and with voting now open in the election, the Streeting allegations will be a further blow to Graham’s hopes of clinging onto a position that many have accused her of abusing.

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Source link

A court has convicted the head of a genocidal UAE-backed Sudanese militia in absentia. Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, known as Hemedti, was found guilty on multiple counts of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.

Sudanese RSF verdict

Dagalo leads the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). RSF’s main backer in the three-year war with the Sudanese state is the UAE — a key UK ally.

The Sudan Tribune reported on 12 July:

A Sudanese counter-terrorism court on Sunday sentenced Rapid Support Forces (RSF) commander Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, known as Hemetti [SIC], to death in absentia along with his two brothers and 13 others over the assassination of a regional governor and wartime atrocities.

The report added that:

The 16 defendants were convicted under Sudan’s criminal code for crimes against humanity, genocide, war crimes against individuals, destruction of public property, and using prohibited methods of warfare.

The court ordered the confiscation of all RSF assets in favour of the Sudanese government and instructed the state to request Interpol notices to secure the extradition of the convicted individuals.

The charges centred on several atrocities including the genocidal siege of el-Geneina in 2023. Middle East Eye (MEE) reported:

Dagalo was convicted of co-organising the siege of el-Geneina, the civilian displacement, and the genocide of the Masalit.

Sudan’s forgotten war

With gold interests and regional influence at stake, numerous foreign actors, including the UK, have caused the war to fester through active participation and/or outright passivity. Israel, too, is a player in the war.

The war in Sudan is theoretically between the Arab-majority RSF and the Sudanese government. But foreign states pursuing their own interests are backing the combatants. Turkey, Egypt and many more countries are pursuing their own interests in Sudan too.

The RSF has killed Sudanese civilians in vast numbers. Some estimates put the death toll at 150,000 people have died, and more than 10 million civilians have been displaced by fighting.

The judge made clear there was no way out for those convicted:

These international crimes are not subject to any statute of limitations and cannot be subject to political pardons under Sudan’s international obligations.

While much of the focus has been on the role of the UAE in facilitating the killing, the Brits have been deeply involved too. As the Canary has reported repeatedly:

British military components have shown up on the battlefield in RSF hands. The UK is a major arms supplier to UAE.

Sources have also claimed the UK downgraded the humanitarian situation in Sudan to avoid “pissing off the Emiratis”.

The ruling comes weeks after the first war crimes claim had been lodged against RSF in Kenya. Twelve victims backed by a Swiss legal NGO urged Kenya’s chief of prosecution to pursue the case. Associated Press (AP) reported on 9 June:

It is the first attempt to prosecute members of the Rapid Support Forces, or RSF, the paramilitary group fighting against the Sudanese military for over three years, outside Sudan.

Adding that:

The group, which has been accused by rights organizations of committing atrocities amounting to war crimes and crimes against humanity, has ties with Kenya’s government.

The court’s finding is partial justice at best. Those named are still at large. Someone must turn RSF’s taps off as far as arms and material support are concerned.

Featured image via the Canary

By Joe Glenton

Source link

Reform UK has sparked outrage after putting forward plans which would criminalise election campaign materials in Gaelic and Scots. Another case of English supremacy within the Union…

The hard-right political party has endorsed plans to criminalise all political materials that are not written or spoken in English or Welsh. Nigel Farage‘s party has moved an amendment to a Westminster bill that would, if passed, make campaigning in other national languages illegal.

If Reform’s amendment to the Representation of the People Bill passes, those breaching the law could face  jail time for up to six months. Those prosecuted could also face unspecified fines.

This article in the Scottish Left Review (re-)frames that sordid history, especially that century’s Highland Clearances, in considered detail:

In the two centuries following unification, the Anglicised Scots of the lowlands would fit into the new imperial Britain built upon capitalism, expansionism, and Protestantism. In contrast, the Gaels of west Scotland’s Highlands and Islands would be violently eradicated, along with their clan-based way of life and Celtic Catholicism.

In their place, their ancestral lands would be monetised to serve the colonial centre, and the brutally depopulated islands and dells would be mythologised as gloriously empty get-away destinations for those seeking an escape from life at the centre of empire. This is a story we are more familiar with in Ireland, and the Gaelic peoples of Ireland and western Scotland are closely connected.

… a campaign of ethnic cleansing was carried out in the western Highlands and Islands. This began with the erasure of Gaelic identity. Clan tartans were banned, as was the playing of the bagpipes. Such policies were intended to destroy Gaelic identity, born of an inherent racism held among the English and Anglicised Scots towards the Gaelic way of life.

They also served the practical purpose of diminishing clan identity and, thus, destroying the clans as a political force. The collectivist farms were broken up, and replaced with capitalist land farming – an approach familiar in the lowlands, but incompatible with the clan system of the Highlands and Islands.

Advertisement

… Whilst the scale of the clearances is dwarfed by the racist excesses of the British colonial project elsewhere in the world, it ought to be considered among them.

… Like Ireland, the Scottish islands are among the only places in western Europe now home to less people than at the start of the eighteenth century. The Clearances were not only an act of genocide, but an extremely successful one.

Featured image via the Canary

By Cameron Baillie

Source link

The post No, Waitrose, men don’t have periods appeared first on spiked.

Source link

New Jersey Gov. Mikie Sherrill’s office says the Garden State should get a cut of the MetLife Stadium grass FIFA plans to sell to soccer fans.

Soccer’s global governing body, a Zurich-based nonprofit, is plotting to charge $450 for sod from this weekend’s World Cup final. But like a lot of the costs for hosting the World Cup, the pitch was subsidized by local hosts.

“New Jersey paid for the vast majority of the total expense for the pitch at MetLife stadium, so New Jersey taxpayers should share in any proceeds from this latest money grab,” Sherrill spokesperson Sean Higgins told New Jersey Playbook.

This is only the latest battlefield in the turf war between FIFA and Sherrill. FIFA did not immediately reply to a request for comment.

Source link

Source link

Source link

More than 80 MPs and peers have written publicly to foreign secretary Yvette Cooper, demanding immediate sanctions on Israel for its Gaza genocide.

Indefensible

Leeds East Labour MP published a copy of the letter. It reminds Cooper of her government’s “indefensible” failure to do anything meaningful to curb Israel’s arrogant impunity or fulfil the UK’s obligations under international law:

BREAKING: With @Imran_HussainMP and 80 other MPs and Lords, I have written to the Foreign Secretary calling for comprehensive sanctions on Israel.

The world’s top court is clear. Israel’s occupation of Palestine is illegal – and Governments must act now to end it! pic.twitter.com/bzRzwokgy5

— Richard Burgon MP (@RichardBurgon) July 14, 2026

Advertisement

In full, it reads:

14 July 2026

Dear Foreign Secretary,

Re: Two Years On – the Government Must Act in Line with the International Court of Justice’s Advisory Opinion on Israel

We write ahead of the second anniversary of the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) landmark Advisory Opinion on Israel’s occupation of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, issued on 19 July 2024. We urge the Government to impose sanctions and other concrete measures to uphold its legal obligations under this ruling and wider international law.

Advertisement

The world’s highest court, the ICJ, found that Israel’s continued presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) is unlawful. It called for Israel to end this presence “as rapidly as possible” and cease all new settlement activity.

Two years on, Israel has not only ignored the Court but deepened its illegal occupation. This includes recent orders by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for Israel’s army to seize large areas of the Gaza Strip, alongside intensified annexationist measures in the occupied West Bank, including the approval of plans to register land there as Israeli state property.

These examples underline how, without much bolder action, the Israeli Government will continue to simply ignore the words of condemnation from political leaders and governments and deepen its illegal occupation.

All States have an obligation to act.

Advertisement

The ICJ is clear that all States have an obligation not to recognise this illegal situation and “not to render aid or assistance in maintaining the situation created by Israel’s illegal presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.”

The Court also made clear that all States must “abstain from entering into economic or trade dealings with Israel concerning the Occupied Palestinian Territory or parts thereof which may entrench its unlawful presence in the territory” and “take steps to prevent trade or investment relations that assist in the maintenance of the illegal situation created by Israel in the OPT.”

Additionally, the ICJ reiterated the obligations of all State Parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention to ensure Israel’s compliance with international humanitarian law.

The Government’s Responsibilities

Advertisement

The ICJ’s Opinion identifies clear legal responsibilities on the Government. Yet, despite acknowledging the Court’s findings, two years on, the Government has still not formally responded or taken the steps required to meet its legal and moral obligations. Further delay is simply indefensible.

The Government knows what needs to be done. It has rightly imposed widespread sanctions on Russia for its illegal war on Ukraine. Yet there has been no such comprehensive response to Israel’s actions in Gaza and the rest of the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

We are clear that international law cannot be applied selectively. The Government must apply the same principles to Israel’s unlawful occupation as it does elsewhere.

In line with the ICJ’s Advisory Opinion and to uphold its legal obligations, we urge the Government to act without delay by:

Advertisement

• Banning all trade in goods and services with illegal Israeli settlements and taking action against companies profiting from or sustaining the illegal occupation.
• Imposing targeted sanctions, including travel bans and asset freezes, on all individuals and entities complicit in maintaining Israel’s unlawful presence in the OPT, including political leaders responsible for illegal settlement expansion and annexationist policies.
• Suspending the UK-Israel trade agreement until Israel complies with international law.
• Ending all arms transfers to Israel, including F-35 components and other equipment that may be used in violations of international humanitarian law.

If the Government wants to show that its stated commitment to international law and human rights is more than words, then it must act decisively and without further delay.

Yours sincerely,

Richard Burgon MP and Imran Hussain MP

The letter is co-signed by the following parliamentarians. If your MP has not signed, write to them and demand that they do:

Diane Abbott MP
Lorraine Beavers MP
Shockat Adam MP
Orfhlaith Begley MP
Lord John Alderdice
Apsana Begum MP
Tahir Ali MP
Sian Berry MP
Paula Barker MP
Lara Bird MP
Lee Barron MP
Olivia Blake MP
Baroness Christine Blower
Rachael Maskell MP
Ian Byrne MP
Paul Maskey MP
Ellie Chowns MP
Douglas McAllister MP
Jeremy Corbyn MP
Andy McDonald MP
Pat Cullen MP
John McDonnell MP
Ann Davies MP
Llinos Medi MP
Marsha De Cordova MP
Abtisam Mohamed MP
Carla Denyer MP
Iqbal Mohamed MP
Dave Doogan MP
Lord Shaffaq Mohammed
Lord Alf Dubs
Grahame Morris MP
Neil Duncan-Jordan MP
Brendan O’Hara MP
Colum Eastwood MP
Simon Opher MP
Sorcha Eastwood MP
Kate Osborne MP
Cat Eccles MP
Yasmin Qureshi MP
John Finucane MP
Adrian Ramsay MP
Mary Kelly Foy MP
Martin Rhodes MP
Andrew George MP
Marie Rimmer MP
Mary Glindon MP
Bell Ribeiro-Addy MP
Lord Peter Hain
Liz Saville-Roberts MP
Claire Hanna MP
Lord Prem Sikka
Chris Hazzard MP
Lord Indarjit Singh
Lord John Hendy
Cat Smith MP
Chris Hinchliff MP
Hannah Spencer MP
Daire Hughes MP
Zarah Sultana MP
Rupa HuqMP
Jon Trickett MP
Adnan Hussain MP
Baroness Pola Uddin
Baroness Meral Hussein-Ece
Baroness Sayeeda Warsi
Kim Johnson MP
Nadia Whittome MP
Afzal Khan MP
Steve Witherden MP
Ayoub Khan MP
Mohammad Yasin MP
Ben Lake MP
Peter Lamb MP
Ian Lavery MP
Chris Law MP
Brian Leishman MP
Clive Lewis MP
Baroness Ruth Lister
Cathal Mallaghan MP

Starmer’s government is about to end. New PM Andy Burnham has offered only mealy-mouthed words on Israel and Gaza so far. He must be made to listen and implement real change.

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Source link