Politics
NHS plans to break up the national care for those with spinal cord injuries
It is estimated that each year there are 4,400 new cases of someone sustaining a spinal cord injury (SCI). For these people, it is crucial they receive specialist treatment not only when they are first injured, but also as they embark on their journey living with such complex disabilities.
Careful monitoring
Why SCI are such complex injuries is they involve damage to the spinal cord or nerves. This can often result in life-changing issues with a loss of sensory and motor function below their injury causing problems such as paralysis, breathing issues, and loss of bowel/bladder control.
This means such patients need careful monitoring from one of the 12 Spinal Cord Injuries Centres (SCIC) based across the country. These centres of excellence monitor SCI patients and can be accessed whenever there is a problem.
This is part of the NHS National Strategy for Spinal Cord Injuries:
The service provides care to people who have sustained an injury to the spinal cord as a result of injury or disease. It encompasses acute care following the injury, surgical or non-surgical stabilisation of the spine, rehabilitation and reintegration into the community, life-long follow-up of people living with spinal cord injury, and further admission if necessary for medical or surgical management. Ventilation is provided to people with higher level injuries.
The service provides a wide range of services to meet the special needs of people with spinal cord injury, including urology, respiratory, psychology, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, sexual and fertility advice, reintegration planning, and the management of spasticity, pressure ulcers and other complications.
‘Keep it together’
But this National Strategy is under threat, as the current plan is to move away from a national approach to local Integrated Care Boards (ICB) in 2027.
Such a move could lead to concerns about a postcode lottery and the loss of both specialist staff and centres. It is why, on Friday 15 May 2026, which is Spinal Cord Injury Awareness Day, the message was:
keep it together.
Cross-party MPs have also warned that these proposals by NHS England to move spinal cord injury services from national to local commissioning risks taking care “in the wrong direction”, directly contradicting recommendations from a major parliamentary inquiry.
Building a National SCI Strategy
The All-Party Parliamentary Group on Spinal Cord Injury raised the alarm in a meeting with Public Health Minister Sharon Hodgson MP, following publication of its report, From Fragmented to Coordinated: Building a National Spinal Cord Injury Strategy.
The report calls for greater national coordination, consistent standards, and long-term system reform. This is in direct contrast to the NHS proposals that would shift responsibility to Integrated Care Boards (ICBs).
The Spinal Injuries Association (SIA) have also sent an open letter signed by nearly 100 signatures, including 6 Spinal Cord Injury Centres to the (now former) Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Wes Streeting, urging the Department of Health and Social Care, NHS England and Parliament to ensure that spinal cord injury services remain within national specialised commissioning.
The immediate concern of moving from a national service to community services is patients are at risk of a ‘postcode lottery’. This is because those patients who already live in an area that has strong local services will fare much better than those living in more remote areas or where services have been depleted due to the harsh austerity years.
Kayles’ story
Kayles is one of those patients where her geographical area means there were no local specialist services available to her when she sustained her SCI due to a slipped disc. She lives in Tavistock, so attended her local hospital, where her pain was dismissed by doctors.
Fighting to get the right diagnosis of SCI took Kayles six long months with a further 16 months waiting to get referred to the SCIC in Salisbury.
Kayles said:
The fact is we don’t have that many hospitals down here that can deal with any spinal cord injured patients. This is the area we live in. We have cobblestones, no dentist, and after they shut half the hospitals, the hospitals are overwhelmed.
There is also concern about losing specialist doctors and nurses.
Shirley’s story
Shirley has been receiving specialist care through her nearest SCIC for degenerative cervical myelopathy. Shirley has valid concerns regarding the move from specialist care from the SCIC to being community based.
She said:
My worry is, if you bring it to a more community-based thing, you’re diluting knowledge. When you’ve got people in centres of excellence, they’ve got access to a huge multidisciplinary team. They’re geared up for anything that comes through the door.
Shirley thinks this level of collaboration will be lost if there’s a move to the community and that will be to the detriment of patients.
She said:
That’s why you need to hang on to the centres of excellence because you need them to actually set the standards for care that everyone in the NHS or Health & Social Care professions or private sector should all be following.
Shirley also argued that the lack of district nurses has had a knock-on impact on the quality of everyday nurses in the community. Such staff are more likely to be health care assistants or carers in the social care sector.
But if these plans go ahead, it will need specialist nurses who can look after patients with SCI otherwise there’s a danger they can ‘do more harm than good.’
Doing more harm than good
That phrase doing more harm than good will resonant with many of those who have SCI. Patients with a SCI who had been an in-patient of a local hospital, an environment not equipped for them, found the lack of knowledge left them exposed to poor care.
In the community, it can be very scary when specialist treatment is required but the carers have sparse knowledge about SCI and how to carry out this care.
This lack of knowledge across the whole of the UK, with the need for services to remain nationally coordinated, is one of the reasons why the National Strategy of 2013 needs updating. The Spinal Injuries Association produced a National Strategy 2030 to give guidance to policy leaders in both the government and NHS. It can be read here.
But such a national strategy is at risk of being ignored if the move to ICB happens. The NHS argument is that transferring from national commissioning to local and regional ICBs in April 2027 is intended to support a better integration of NHS services within an area.
The SIA said:
We have serious concerns that transferring commissioning responsibility to ICBs could place Specialist Spinal Cord Injury Centres at further risk of underfunding if highly specialised SCI service deprioritised within local commissioning systems.
This concern from SIA about the underinvestment in the current specialist spinal centres is borne out from what patients have reported, such as a ‘slippage’ in standards, a lack of capacity, resulting in delays, and the decline in the general upkeep of these centres.
A backward step
It will be such a backward step to lose these centres of excellence and the national oversight of both the care of patients and patients themselves.
With concerns about a possible postcode lottery, losing specialist staff, and the underinvestment and demise of these spinal units, the major concern is what becomes of the care for these complex patients if the plans happen.
For patients now, they feel there is a system that ‘has their back’ to help them achieve what they want to achieve, safe in the knowledge they have this support, not just from their nearest SCIC, but a national strategy that underpins their care.
Losing this for such complex patients will put them at risk.
Featured image via the Canary
By Ruth Hunt
Politics
Pete Hegseth Called Absolute Bum Over NATO Remarks At D Day Event
Pete Hegseth has been condemned after he used a D-Day commemoration to accuse Nato countries of not doing enough to tackle illegal immigration.
The US defence secretary was branded “an absolute bum” after saying “European beaches are [being] stormed by different, dangerous ideologies”.
Critics said his comments, at the Normandy American Cemetery in north-west France on the 82nd anniversary of the D-Day landings, were disrespectful to the memory of those who died in the Second World War.
Nearly 4,500 Allied troops were killed attempting to liberate Nazi-occupied France on June 6, 1944.
Hegseth said: “Sadly, today, different European beaches are stormed by different, dangerous ideologies. Beaches in Spain, Italy, Greece and Bulgaria, boats and men arrive.
“When will European capitals do something about that invasion or is it too late? I pray not, and I believe not.”
But his comments sparked a furious backlash on social media.
Former Labour MP Jamie Reed said Hegseth was “a bum with wet hair and a suit that doesn’t fit”.
The row comes after US vice-president JD Vance sparked anger by blaming “the mass invasion of migrants” for Henry Nowak’s murder.
The 18-year-old was handcuffed and arrested by police as he lay dying after being wrongly accused of racism by his killer, Vickram Digwa.
Digwa, who is Sikh, was jailed for life with a minimum term of 21 years at Southampton Crown Court last Monday.
Responding to Vance’s comments, a No.10 spokesperson said: “In recent days we have seen people trying to interfere in our democracy and seeking to stir up division on our streets.
“The Nowak family are grieving after Henry’s horrific murder. They have said they do not want his death to be used to create further division, hatred or tension. We should be respecting their wishes.
“Our politics should bring people together even in the most terrible of circumstances. That is who we are as a country.”
Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
Should You Really Salt Aubergine Before Cooking It?
I love a good cooking hack, whether it’s the Gordon Ramsay-approved technique of removing the slimy middles of cucumbers for your salad or Mary Berry’s semolina coating for extra-crispy roast potatoes.
Which means that for years, I salted my aubergines before cooking them. I grew up hearing that it took that bitter taste from the veg and improved its texture.
But on Nigella Lawson’s site entry about her At My Table beef and aubergine fatteh recipe, the chef’s team recommended skipping the step.
After a deeper dive, I learned that everyone from Nigel Slater to Ottolenghi avoids pre-salting for the majority of aubergine dishes.
Do I need to salt aubergines before cooking?
There are a few reasons people do this, including:
- Removing their bitter flavour,
- Drawing out moisture for a crispier/less mushy result.
We’ll deal with these one by one.
Does salting aubergines make them less bitter?
Nigella’s site reads: “Some people recommend salting the aubergines before cooking, to draw out any bitter juices. However, most modern aubergines do not have this problem and are quite mild”.
Culinary publication Food and Wine agrees. They write that aubergines date back to 50BC, when the plant was indeed very bitter. They argue that the practice of salting them may have started long, long ago (we don’t know who by), and passed down even though farmers have been growing select, less-bitter veg for generations now.
“Today, most eggplants available at the grocery store and farmer’s market are bred without bitterness,” the publication shared.
In case you needed any more convincing, chef Nigel Slater and cooking bible Larousse Gastronomique agree it doesn’t make the plant less bitter. “The process of degorging [salting] is no longer necessary as commercially cultivated aubergines are not as bitter as they used to be,” the iconic cooking book said.
Verdict: salting an aubergine is not likely to make it less bitter.
Does salting an aubergine make its texture better?
Salting very moisture-heavy veg, like courgettes, is undeniably useful when prepping them for e.g. fritters. Salt draws moisture out of the produce, which you can then squeeze through a muslin cloth for a drier, crispier fry; I did this just yesterday for some mucver.
Bitter or not, aubergine does not change the nature of osmosis. It’s true that salt always draws moisture from vegetables.
But the question of whether or not that actually makes it easier to crisp up is not as easy to answer as you might think. Food and Wine said that salting aubergines to dry them is a “double-edged sword for the ultra-absorbent” veg.
Drier aubergine may be less able to take on flavours, they say. On the plus side, it could, in theory, take on less fat when frying, which may make it crispier.
However, a Guardian journalist tried the method and said that while the salted version took up less oil at first, both salted and unsalted versions ended up absorbing the same amount of fat when they fried them. They also said the end results were basically identical, flavour and texture-wise.
Sara Jenkins, chef and owner of Porsena in New York City, said that she doesn’t bother when pan-frying aubergine. “I have rarely found an eggplant that is so bitter that it needs salting. I just cut it up, toss the pieces with olive oil, and start cooking,” she told Epicurious.
Her only exception is deep-frying.
A New York Times Cooking recipe shared another, salt-free way to stop fried aubergine from becoming mushy: “Eggplant is known to absorb liquid like a sponge, so here’s a trick: oil the slices (lightly) just before they hit the pan [instead of laying them in fat] to ensure that they are not oil-logged,” they wrote.
For roasting or baking, recipe tester Anna Theoktisto said it’s not worth the extra time, as aubergine that cooks for that long of a time inevitably breaks down anyway. Ottolenghi omits the step for his roasting recipes, too.
Verdict: Salting might make aubergine crispier when frying, though cooks have seen mixed results, and many chefs don’t bother. For roasting, grilling, baking, marinating, and stewing, lots of experts advise against salting.
Politics
A Tale of Two Interviews – Streeting v Burnham
Last night at around midnight I was flicking through Youtube and came across the latest Newsagents podcast, in which Lewis Goodall interviews Wes Streeting for 90 minutes. Wow. What an interview. Wes Streeting was in 100 per cent honest mode and gave Lewis so many newslines that I lost count. It was a perfect example of how the long form interview can be an utter revelation. Apart from giving some very blunt assessments of Keir Starmer’s capabilities (or lack of them), he laid out very clearly some of his priorities if he were to take over. You were left with the impression that he believes something and has a real grounding.
Contrast this with the (admittedly shorter) interview Andy Burnham did with Victoria Derbyshire on Thursday’s Newsnight. He was tetchy and failed to answer some pretty basic questions. Victoria was clearly frustrated by his constant failure to address any subject she asked him about. Deflect, prevaricate, ignore. He clearly didn’t even know what Rachel Reeves’ fiscal rules are. Admittedly, he is in a tricky position because he can’t go full tonto on wanting to be PM for fear of giving the impression that he is taking the voters of Makerfield for granted. Even so, it was a pretty poor show from Burnham. His basic trouble is similar to the one which afflicts Keir Starmer. He has no basic ideological grounding. He’s like a cushion that bears the impression of the last arse that sat on it. He will be whatever you want him to be, and have no qualms about saying the exact opposite to the next person that shows any sign of supporting him. His flip-flopping is legendary. This is the man who bangs on about the power of the state and seems perfectly happy to nationalise anything in sight, yet suffers memory loss when he is reminded of the fact that he is the only Health Secretary ever to launch a plan to privatise an NHS hospital – Hinchingbrooke, lest we forget. Andy Burnham is a nice bloke. He’s amiable and a good salesman. That gets you a long way in politics, but it is not the main qualification for the top job.
In my view, it is abundantly clear that if Labour party members have a choice of Streeting, Burnham and Starmer, and if they are voting with the country’s best interests at heart, then Wes Streeting is the best choice.
That is not, however, how party members vote, as evidenced by Tory members voting for Liz Truss over Rishi Sunak.
Wes Streeting admitted to Lewis Goodall that he is the underdog, but as I remember only too well, the underdog sometimes prevails – remember David Cameron in 2005.
If Burnham wins the by-election and Starmer refuses to quit, we are in for a two month long leadership election, which will be great for people in my profession, because it will be two months where the frontrunner could well self combust. Burnham will be knackered by polling day in Makerfield. Starmer already is. Since his resignation, Streeting has had time to rejuvenate and energise himself. He’s lost weight, got fit and is clearly relishing the fight ahead.
If Labour wants to play safe it will stick with nurse for fear of worse. Both Streeting and Burnham shoot from the hip and have a tendency to overshare. Starmer will no doubt be hoping they both do just that.
As I write this, Andy Burnham looks as if he is the most likely to triumph, but many a slip twixt cup and lip.
Politics
Recycling Plastic Bags: All UK Rules And Bans
This year, the UK’s rules for recycling changed under the “Simpler Recycling” initiative.
That means we should now have four standard bins for collection across the UK, as opposed to the previous up to seven bin options provided by some councils.
As part of the new rules, the government explained on their site, “Plastic film packaging and plastic bags will need to be collected with plastic recycling from 31 March 2027”.
That’s because not all plastic bags can be recycled in all parts of the UK at the moment.
Which plastic bags can’t always be recycled?
“Generally, plastic film and carrier bags can’t be recycled at home, but some can be recycled at supermarket carrier bag collection points,” London Recycles shared.
That means that in some areas, thin, film-like plastic bags and colourful plastic might not be accepted by the council in your domestic waste. Others allow you to put supermarket carrier bags in your recycling, but say they won’t be processed.
And some bodies like York Council have said they don’t accept black or dark plastics as these can’t be recycled yet. “Stretchy plastics”, like bubble wrap or bread bags, aren’t recyclable in that area’s home waste either.
They also don’t recycle food or drink pouches.
These rules might change according to your local council’s rules, so check those before recycling. But across the board, compostable and biodegradable bags can’t be recycled.
“If they enter the recycling system can potentially cause quality issues in the recycled material. These should be placed in your home composting bin, if you have one,” said Recycle.
And dirty or sticky plastic bags or those that have food residue or grease on them can’t be recycled either.
Why aren’t all plastic bags accepted?
Not all types of plastic are as valuable as others to recycling plants. They don’t all cost the same to recycle, and there isn’t the same demand for different kinds of recycled plastic either.
Others need specialist recycling facilities, which the UK doesn’t have in large enough quantities yet.
Then, there are the bags themselves to consider.
“Plastic bags and film can… cause problems at recycling plants, clogging up the sorting equipment and potentially causing whole loads of recyclable waste to go to landfill”, said Zero Waste Scotland.
Kent County Council said plastic bags and soft plastics can wrap around their machines, slowing everything down.
Some supermarkets in the UK recycle plastic bags on-site. You can find signs on some carrier bags saying whether they can be recycled, and whether or not you need to do so in the store.
Politics
‘Bridgerton’ Baby Names Trend Rising In Popularity
If you’re a Bridgerton fan and have been noticing more Daphnes, Penelopes and Eloises on the playground and in baby announcements of late, you’re not imagining it.
New data from the Social Security Administration shows that several names of characters from the Netflix period drama Bridgerton are climbing the U.S. baby name charts.
“Ever since arriving in December of 2020, ‘Bridgerton’ baby names have been exactly what parents needed,” Abby Sandel, creator of the baby name blog Appellation Mountain, told HuffPost. “They’re vintage, elegant and fun, just like the Vitamin String Quartet-fuelled soundtrack.”
Between 2024 and 2025, both Eloise and Daphne jumped 15 spots to No. 49 and No. 178, respectively.
Benedict leapt 100 spots to No. 814, Penelope rose six spots to No. 22, Francesca gained eight spots to No. 307, Simon climbed 21 spots to No. 230, and Violet got a little bump from No. 15 to No. 13.
Even Hyacinth – perhaps the most distinctive name in the ‘Bridgerton’ universe – saw its numbers tick up, with 33 baby girls receiving the name in 2025, up from 28 in 2024 and 17 in 2023.
“The ‘Bridgerton’ names feel refined and aristocratic, but also emotionally warm,” said baby name consultant Taylor Humphrey.
“They evoke scenes of handwritten letters, silk dresses, long walks through formal gardens, classical music, grand gestures and old-world beauty, all of which strongly aligns with the current appetite for ‘romanticised girlhood’ and coquette aesthetics.”
The timing is key to understanding why these names are resonating so strongly.
“I think ‘Bridgerton’ arrived at the perfect cultural moment for names like Daphne, Eloise, Francesca, Hyacinth, Violet and Penelope to flourish,” Humphrey said.
“Parents are increasingly drawn to names that feel romantic, literary, elegant and feminine without sounding overly modern or invented.”

Baby name consultant Jenn Ficarra sees the trend as part of a broader shift in naming culture.
“I think as we see a rise in gender neutral name choices for girls, we’re also seeing the pendulum swing in the opposite direction – feminine and sweet,” she said.
“The ‘Bridgerton’ names somehow feel like fresh discoveries, even if they’re a top 20 name like Violet, while also offering a playful, modern energy. These names are versatile – cute and playful for little girls while being elegant, strong names for adults. They feel grand and regal without being uppity or snobby.”
Sophie Kihm, the editor-in-chief of Nameberry, believes the rise of Bridgerton names follow her site’s “100 Year Rule.”
“Names cycle back into fashion every 100 years,” she explained. “Eloise and Violet, two of the biggest ‘Bridgerton’ hits, last peaked in the 1920s, so we’d expect them to be trending regardless. But a push from a major pop culture phenomenon like ‘Bridgerton’ helped propel each of them into the Top 50.”
While choices like Daphne and Penelope had more recent peaks, Kihm added that neither was ever endemically popular, “which prevented them from feeling too dated or fusty to revive”.
Part of what makes the Bridgerton effect so durable, experts say, is that these names were already on an upward trajectory long before the show debuted.
“Penelope and Violet, for example, were already quietly climbing before the show aired,” Humphrey noted.
“Daphne has been a staple on the Top 1,000 most popular baby names list since 1900. Francesca has been on the list since 1953. After a 65-year run, Eloise took a hiatus in 1965 and reentered the Top 1,000 in 2008 and has steadily climbed to No. 49 in the nearly two decades since. Shows like ‘Bridgerton’ don’t create naming trends out of thin air – they amplify names that were already culturally primed for revival.”
Undoubtedly, these names feel classic, rather than costume-y or overly tied to the show.
“Unlike Khaleesi and Renesmee, which will forever be tied to ‘Game of Thrones’ and ‘The Twilight Saga,’ ‘Bridgerton’ names feel unencumbered by this one television series,” Humphrey said.
“These names were standing on their own merits long before ‘Bridgerton’ came along. Most people aren’t going to meet a baby Daphne or Penelope and immediately say, ‘Oh, like the ‘Bridgerton’ character?’ the way they might with a more singular pop culture reference.”
Sandel traces the Bridgerton names’ appeal back even further to the books that inspired the show.
“When author Julia Quinn released the first ‘Bridgerton’ novel in the year 2000, names like Penelope and Benedict were obscure,” she said. “She tapped into the next wave of antique revivals and helped push choices like Eloise into the U.S. Top 100.”
For Ficarra, the enduring appeal of these names comes down to the way they strike a certain balance in our times.
“They represent a desire for a ‘safe’ and ‘normal’ name choice that still feels new and exciting without feeling overdone or tired,” she said.
Sandel offered one final reason why book and TV show characters make for such appealing choices in the first place.
“Real life figures can be complicated, but fictional characters offer naming inspiration without as much baggage,” she said. “We see the Bridgerton family names as the perfect blend of traditional and current – beautiful names for attractive people falling in love and behaving honourably, at least by the end of every season.”
Politics
David Lammy Tells JD Vance Immigration Not To Blame For Murder
David Lammy told JD Vance he was “wrong” to blame immigration for Henry Nowak’s murder.
Eighteen-year-old Henry was handcuffed and arrested by police as he lay dying after being wrongly accused of racism by his killer, Vickram Digwa.
Digwa, who is Sikh, was jailed for life with a minimum term of 21 years at Southampton Crown Court on Monday.
The case has sparked a furious political row, with Reform UK leader Nigel Farage being condemned by Keir Starmer and Kemi Badenoch for claiming it is proof of “two-tier policing” in the UK.
In a post on X on Friday, the US vice-president said: “Henry Nowak died the same way a civilisation dies: abandoned, handcuffed by authorities who neither trusted nor cared for him, and accused of hate crimes he did not commit.
“His murder is as tragic as it is enraging. He should still be alive today, and he would be if the last few generations of European elites had stood their ground against the politics of self-hatred and the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it.
“Henry was far from the first to so needlessly lose his life, and I fear he won’t be the last. Each time a life like his is lost, the proper response—the only response—is righteous anger.”
Appearing on Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg on BBC1, Lammy – who is friends with Vance – said: “I spoke to him yesterday and I told him he was wrong. This has got nothing to do with mass migration.
“One, let’s be clear that since the early 2000s and post-Brexit, immigration has come down and murder has come down too in our country.
“And two, the you man who perpetrated this crime was a Brit, born and raised in this country. Nothing to do with mass migration.
“We had an agreeable conversation, but we disagreed. We’ve disagreed before on his perspective on western civilisation. I don’t recognise that perspective, and actually western civilisation has always been open to the world.”
I don’t agree with his caricature, he knows that, and we can have that debate and discussion.”
Asked if he thought Vance was being racist, Lammy said: “I reminded him that the family have called for calm. They don’t want division used on the back of Henry’s death.
“And I reminded him also of the online space and how toxic that can become. We had a robust conversation, a respectful conversation. We remain colleagues and friends, we’re able to do that, and he has strong-held views.”
Vance’s comments echoed those of Farage, who called for “pure, cold anger” in response to Henry’s death.
Hours later, police were pelted with missiles by protesters after violence erupted outside Southampton Police Station.
No.10 have also hit back at the vice-president, with a Downing Street spokesperson saying: “In recent days we have seen people trying to interfere in our democracy and seeking to stir up division on our streets.
“The Nowak family are grieving after Henry’s horrific murder. They have said they do not want his death to be used to create further division, hatred or tension. We should be respecting their wishes.
“Our politics should bring people together even in the most terrible of circumstances. That is who we are as a country.”
Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
The Best Post-Run Stretching Routine For Stronger Hips
Speaking to HuffPost UK previously, orthopaedic surgeon Dr Pamela Mehta of Resilience Orthopaedics said that “Two of the most common causes of runner’s knee are overuse and muscular imbalances”.
This includes weaker hips, which can lead some muscles further down the leg or closer to the small of your back to work harder to compensate.
Which is why some experts, like online run coach Ken Graham, reccomend runners in particular try the “Myrtl routine”.
In an Instagram Reel, Graham explained “It only takes five minutes but could save you weeks of injuries”.
What is the Myrtl routine?
It’s a series of body weight exercises devised by running coach Jay Johnson, SELF explained. These are designed to strengthen your hips and improve flexibility.
One study found that runners with greater hip strength and balance ran more economically. Another noted a link between weaker hip muscles and overuse injuries in recreational runners.
On his site, Johnson said: “I get asked all the time, ‘Why was it named Myrtl?’ Because Myrtl rhymed with ‘hip girdle.’ I had no idea that Myrtle is the common spelling”.
The hip girdle is sometimes also called the pelvic girdle and involves the hip bone.
What exercises are in the Myrtl routine?
Per Graham and SELF, these can include:
- Clamshells – 8-10 reps each side (we’ve written before about how great these are for your hips),
- Lateral leg raise – 10-15 reps each leg,
- Fire hydrants – 8-10 reps each leg,
- Donkey kicks – 8-10 reps each leg,
- Donkey whips – 5 reps each leg,
- Forward knee circles – 10 each leg,
- Reverse knee circles or hurdle trail legs – 10 each leg,
- Lateral leg swing – 10 each leg,
- Forward leg swing – 10 each leg,
- Bent knee leg swing – 10 each leg.
Should I do the Myrtl routine before or after running?
Graham advised doing the routine three times a week after your runs.
Writing for Runner’s World, Jay Johnson himself said it should be done after your run, too.
“This routine takes no more than five minutes once you’ve learned the exercises. Once you’ve done it a handful of times it will become an easy, gentle cool-down routine,” he shared.
Politics
Are There Any Dangerous Caterpillars In The UK?
The Government has issued a warning on oak processionary moth caterpillars “ahead of peak season”.
They have said it’s important for the public to “stay vigilant” as the “pest” begins to make its hairy way onto oak trees.
Not only can they harm the iconic trees, which The Tree Council has described as being “under threat” in the UK, but they can also cause irritation “and should not be touched under any circumstances”, the Government said.
What are oak processionary moth caterpillars?
They’re the caterpillar, or the younger stage, of the oak processionary moth.
The Forestry Commission’s Oak Processionary Moth Programme Manager, Dr Edward Straw, said we might see more of these than usual as “The warm weather in spring has led to oak processionary moth growing quicker than in previous years and we may see higher infestation levels”.
How can I spot an oak processionary moth caterpillar?
They’re about 2-3cm-long caterpillars with a grey body and a dark head with lengthy, white hairs. They usually form a nose-to-tail formation in groups as they travel down oak trees.
They have nests which the Government has said are usually teardrop-shaped or dome-shaped and can range from the size of a 50p coin to that of a melon. These look white at first, but can turn brown later on.
Forest Research said that while the invasive oak processionary caterpillar looks like harmless native species – including the lackey moth and brown tail moth caterpillars – there are ways to distinguish the “pest” from the rest.
They said, ”(The) oak processionary moth feeds only on oak and produces large nests on oak trunks and large branches from May onwards. Hairy caterpillars which are not on oak or are not associated with a silk nest are almost certainly not (oak processionary moths)”.
Where are oak processionary moths found in the UK?
They’re usually found in the South-West of the UK.
Professor Nicola Spence, Defra Chief Plant Health Officer, said: “I would advise that members of the public living in the South East, Derbyshire and Dorset, avoid any contact with the caterpillar and its nests, as this can cause irritation”.
Why are oak processionary moths bad?
Firstly, they feed on the leaves of oak trees, which means they can hamper the trees’ growth. This can leave them more vulnerable to disease.
Secondly, the tiny hairs on the caterpillars’ bodies can “cause itchy rashes, eye and throat irritation and should not be touched under any circumstances,” said the Government.
What should I do if I see an oak processionary moth caterpillar?
Firstly, don’t touch them. Don’t even touch the nest, the government warned, as this could contain the irritating hairs.
Secondly, report any sightings so experts can keep track of the caterpillars.
“If you spot the pest, report the sighting via our TreeAlert portal. Alternatively, you can email opm@forestrycommission.gov.uk,” Dr Straw said.
The Royal Horticultural Society (RHS) also said that “Due to the irritant hairs, control of this insect should only be carried out by professional contractors”.
What if I touch an oak processionary moth?
The government previously said, “if you or someone in your care has a serious allergic reaction, get medical help. For less severe reactions, a pharmacist can provide advice on relief from skin or eye irritations.”
They also say that “if an animal in your care is seriously affected, get advice from a vet”, and warn to “Tell the medical person or vet you suspect it is due to OPM [oak processionary moth] contact.“
Politics
Reform’s Nadhim Zahawi Slammed Over ‘Disgraceful’ Defence Of Kemi Badenoch Attack Ad
Nadhim Zahawi has been condemned over his “disgraceful” attempts to defend a Reform UK ad attacking Kemi Badenoch which has been widely criticised as misleading.
The former Tory, who defected to Nigel Farage’s party earlier this year, insisted there was nothing wrong with the controversial social media post, which was produced following the jailing of Henry Nowak’s killed.
The 18-year-old was handcuffed and arrested by police as he lay dying after being wrongly accused of racism by his killer, Vickram Digwa.
Digwa, a British-born Sikh, was jailed for life with a minimum term of 21 years at Southampton Crown Court last Monday.
Farage has said the case is an example of “two-tier policing” and anti-white discrimination.
The Reform ad showed a quote from 2020 in which Badenoch said “black lives do matter”, alongside a partial quote she gave this week in which she said “I don’t care about white lives matter”.
However, her full quote, which she gave in an interview on ITV’s Good Morning Britain, was: “I don’t want to hear about Black Lives Matter. I don’t want to hear about White Lives Matter. Everyone matters.”
On Sky News on Sunday morning, presenter Trevor Phillips asked Zahawi if someone at Reform “is getting sacked” for the ad.
He replied: “In 2020, she said black lives do matter. In 2026, she says I don’t care about black lives matter or white lives matter. Why? Because she finds it hard to talk about a white boy who bled out on the street.”
But Phillips told him that was “clearly a misrepresentation of what she said”.
“Are you telling me that this is ok,” he asked in reference to the advert.
Zahawi said: “It’s her words, that’s what she said. Why is it so different when it’s a white boy, that we’re all so frightened of upsetting anyone?”
The presenter hit back: “This is not you at all. You’re doing what all the others do. You are inventing your own question and answering it.
“You’re not answering the question I asked you, which is ’is this a fair representation of what Kemi Badenoch said ir not?”
Zahawi said: “I would have more respect for Kemi Badenoch if she said ’by the way, in 2020 I was wrong.”
Social media users slammed the former Tory chancellor.
Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
Labour Minister Horrified By Pete Hegseths Europe Immigration Attack
A government minister says he was left “horrified” by Pete Hegseth after he used a D-Day commemoration to accuse Nato countries of not doing enough to tackle illegal immigration.
The US defence secretary said “European beaches are [being] stormed by different, dangerous ideologies” in a speech at the Normandy American Cemetery in north-west France.
Hegseth was speaking on the 82nd anniversary of the D-Day landings, when nearly 4,500 Allied troops were killed attempting to liberate Nazi-occupied France on June 6, 1944.
He said: “Sadly, today, different European beaches are stormed by different, dangerous ideologies. Beaches in Spain, Italy, Greece and Bulgaria, boats and men arrive.
“When will European capitals do something about that invasion or is it too late? I pray not, and I believe not.”
Speaking to LBC, justice minister Jake Richards hit out at Hegseth, in a further sign of the worsening relations between the UK government and Donald Trump’s administration.
Asked what he thought of the comments, he said: “I think it’s totally inappropriate and wrong. I’m actually horrified that someone would, at a moment that we’re there to remember those heroes who fell for all of us to enjoy the freedoms that we do today, you would launch some sort of political argument about illegal migration.
“Of course, illegal migration, the small boats crisis, is one of the biggest issues that come up in my constituency. It’s one that this government hs to get a grip of over the next few years.
“But when we’re discussing D-day and the history of those heroes, that’s not the moment for politics, it’s not the moment for those types of arguments, and I wish he hadn’t made them.
“I don’t think that was an appropriate remark and I hope he regrets it too.”
Meanwhile, deputy prime minister David Lammy also hit out at US vice-president JD Vance after he blamed the murder of Henry Nowak on the “mass invasion of migrants”.
Eighteen-year-old Henry was handcuffed and arrested by police as he lay dying after being wrongly accused of racism by his killer, Vickram Digwa.
Digwa, who is a British-born Sikh, was jailed for life with a minimum term of 21 years at Southampton Crown Court last Monday.
Appearing on Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg on BBC1, Lammy – who is friends with Vance – said: “I spoke to him yesterday and I told him he was wrong. This has got nothing to do with mass migration.”
Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
-
Fashion2 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Evereve – Corporette.com
-
Business6 days agoJade Biosciences, Inc. (JBIO) Discusses Positive Interim Results From JADE101 Phase I Healthy Volunteer Study and Development Plans Transcript
-
Crypto World2 days ago
Jensen Huang Approves Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron for NVIDIA (NVDA) HBM4 Memory Supply
-
Sports5 days agoFrench Open 2026 results: Alexander Zverev beats Rafael Jodar and will play Jakub Mensik in semi-finals
-
Tech5 days agoCryZENx Releases Fresh Playable Content Deep Inside Jabu-Jabu for His Ocarina of Time Remake
-
Business4 days agoTrump Taps Housing Chief Bill Pulte as Acting Intelligence Director After Gabbard Exit
-
Crypto World2 days ago
LBank Surpasses 25 Million Users Worldwide as AFA Partnership Continues to Drive Global Growth
-
NewsBeat5 days agoRepublicans balk at Trump’s attempt to appoint a MAGA enforcer to lead National Intelligence
-
Tech2 days agoRCS Messages Between iPhone and Android Get End-to-End Encryption With iOS 26.5
-
Crypto World5 days ago
Seagate (STX) Stock Surges to Record High on AI Boom and Legal Settlement
-
Tech2 days agoMicrosoft launches MXC, an OS-level sandbox for AI agents, with OpenAI and Nvidia already on board
-
Crypto World4 days agoEU AI Data Center Project Faces Delays as Funding Gaps Grow
-
Entertainment4 days agoDid The Mandalorian And Grogu Already Ruin The Next Star Wars Movie?
-
Business4 days agoAehr Test Systems Stock Soars 17% Amid Surging AI Demand and Conference Spotlight
-
Business5 days agoClaude AI Down Today Reason: Why Anthropic’s AI is not working today? What’s the latest quota update
-
Crypto World2 days ago
Merlin (MRLN) Stock Soars 32% on Major USSOCOM Autonomy Milestone
-
Tech5 days agoInstagram will stop bombarding teens with the same kind of obsessively unhealthy content
-
Business4 days agoRelay Therapeutics Shares Surge 20% on ASCO Momentum for Zovegalisib Breast Cancer Program
-
Tech2 days agoCredit card theft campaign abuses Stripe to host stolen payment info
-
Tech2 days agoMeta steals a tactic from Tesla and builds data centers in tents

You must be logged in to post a comment Login