The ‘new’ right-wing Labour think-tank ‘Think Labour’ has launched with a claim that it’s not just a rebrand of Labour Together. Its CEO Alison Phillips told LabourList that:

ThinkLabour will be an open, collaborative organisation with no interest in factions.

Right.

Labour Together was – and, really, still is – the factional sabotage outfit that used the antisemitism scam and other manoeuvres to throw the 2019 general election and topple Jeremy Corbyn. To fund this, it used massive, undeclared donations from Israel lobbyists.

A ‘unique’ organisation?

In an X post, the group claims that it is:

a unique political organisation dedicated to helping Labour govern confidently, win elections, and deliver lasting change.

But the same thread notes that it is “built out of” Labour Together:

ThinkLabour is built out of Labour Together – but this is much more than a new logo or a change of name. We have a new leadership team, a renewed mission, and a fundamentally different approach. We are open, collaborative, and entirely outward-facing.

— ThinkLabour (@ThinkLabour) May 14, 2026

So it’s not that unique. Nor is it built very far. In fact, it’s exactly the same entity as before. Its website’s ‘privacy’ section hasn’t even been amended and still calls it “Labour Together”. It also notes that its company number is 09630980:

‘Clean skin’?

A search for “Think Labour” on Companies House returns no results. A search for the company number does, however – and it returns a company that is still called… “Labour Together”:

The entity is unchanged – literally, at least so far. What about the people? Boss Alison Phillips, for example. Phillips told LabourList that she was:

delighted to have been made the first CEO of ThinkLabour.

But she was chief executive of Labour Together before the rebrand, and even planned it, so she simply remained CEO rather than being ‘made’ anything – particularly as Think Labour is still, in every legal sense, still Labour Together.

Unlike previous Labour Together directors, Phillips has a relatively low profile regarding Israel – a ‘clean skin’. She’s not quite so clean, however, concerning Labour Together’s scandal of spying on and trying to discredit journalists who were investigating it.

Phillips took over after that scandal and claimed to be “horrified” at it. However, in the same breath, she then amplified claims that the previous management didn’t realise the company it paid to spy on journalists was going to spy on journalists:

As a former journalist and editor, it should come as no surprise that I was horrified that investigators hired by Labour Together would look into the background and sources of reporters even if I am assured that this was not the intention.

Not a ‘clean skin’

But if the CEO is a relatively clean skin on Israel and the antisemitism scam so loved by Labour Together, the same can’t remotely be said for its chair.

Nick Forbes is a former Newcastle council leader resoundingly deselected in 2022 by party members frustrated at rarely seeing him in the ward. His supporters painted the deselection as a “Muslim plot“.

Forbes is an ardent opponent of pro-Palestine protests and called for the police to “throw the book at” anti-apartheid demonstrators. The protesters had dared to call on Newcastle city council not to adopt the grossly unfit, so-called ‘IHRA definition’ of antisemitism. The ‘definition’ doesn’t define anything and is designed to prevent criticism of Israel – which is why Israel supporters demand it everywhere. Including Forbes.

And Forbes didn’t stop there. He was also – alongside Tom Watson and other right-wing, friends-of-Israel horrors – behind a move to make it easier to expel Labour members accused in the ‘Labour antisemitism’ scam.

Forbes’ record is at odds with the re-skinned group’s “no interest in factions” claims, too. In 2018, when the party was led by Corbyn, unions planned to democratise the party and give Labour’s overwhelmingly pro-Corbyn membership the power to elect their Labour council leaders, instead of councillors selecting them. Forbes, then also on Labour’s NEC, was among leading opponents of the plan. He dismissed it as “unworkable”, “possibly illegal” and guaranteed to spark “endless infighting”.

Infighting for factional control has been Labour Together’s reason for existence. That does not seem set to change.

Atlantic Council

Another of the ‘new’ group’s directors is Ed Owen. Owens is a ‘senior fellow’ at NATO front-group, the Atlantic Council, which is also closely linked with US intelligence.

Owen has something in common with notorious Labour Together alumnus Morgan McSweeney – they both thought it was a great idea to make Epstein pal Peter Mandelson ambassador to the US. In January 2025, Owen wrote for the Atlantic Council that “big, serious” Mandelson “brings a wealth of experience and expertise”, and was a “bold statement of intent from a British government”. The ‘slug’ for the article states that Mandelson might:

be just what the US-UK relationship needs at this moment.

Serial child-rapist Jeffrey Epstein first became a convicted paedophile in 2008. Mandelson’s continued close friendship with Epstein had been a matter of public record for years. It received no mention in Owen’s analysis.

Nothing but…

Other directors include a visiting fellow at the security-service aligned King’s College London; a former Bank of England monetary policy official who then moved to a capitalist consultancy; a former Big Finance and Big Pharma staffer who then worked for a right-wing Labour MP. Most worked at Labour Together before the rebrand.

None of this seems to align with the “fundamentally different” organisation to bring “radical” ideas that it’s supposed to be. Not in any good way, anyway. Alison Phillips claims that ‘Think Labour’ is not just a rebrand of Labour Together. Based on the evidence, it seems to be nothing but.

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Source link

Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi urged the BRICS countries to condemn the US-Israeli attack on his country.

The BRICS are a group of emerging ‘global south’ economies. In their own words:

The BRICS is a group formed by eleven countries: Brasil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, United Arab Emirates, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and Iran. It serves as a political and diplomatic coordination forum for countries from the Global South and for coordination in the most diverse areas.

Aragchi was speaking at a conference for the bloc in Delhi. Aragchi also called out the UAE for its own attack on Iran.

A tense meeting

The 14 May meeting was marked by considerable tension. Al Jazeera said this was the first time Iran and US-Israeli ally UAE had shared a room since the war began.

Aragchi told attendees Iran was a:

victim of illegal expansionism and warmongering.

He said:

Iran therefore calls upon BRICS member states and all responsible members of the international community to explicitly condemn violations of international law by the United States and Israel.

He also took a direct swipe at UAE, telling the conference that the Gulf state was:

directly involved in the aggression against my country.

The Guardian reported on UAE’s secret attacks on Iran on 12 May:

The UAE assault on Iran, which was undertaken as retaliation for Iranian attacks on its facilities, included a strike on Iran’s Lazan Island just before the 7 April ceasefire was announced.

US-Israel attacked Iran first on 28 February without provocation. Iran was offering unprecedented concessions in negotiations at the time. The Pentagon has since stated there was no imminent threat from Iran. And the UN’s atomic watchdog, the IAEA, has said there is no evidence Iran was developing a nuclear weapon.

The US has achieved none of its original war aims. Iran predictably closed the Straits of Hormuz, a vital oil channel, once attacked – creating a global energy crisis. Far from being defeated, Iran has said the war will continue until:

the enemy’s inevitable and permanent humiliation, disgrace, regret, and surrender.

Trump came to power on an anti-war ‘America First’ ticket. He now faces worldwide humiliation.

BRICS divided between empire and Iran

Al Jazeera reported that an Indian minister condemned a recent attack on shipping:

India’s Ministry of External Affairs also condemned an attack on an Indian-flagged ship off Oman on Wednesday as “unacceptable” – with all sailors rescued safely by Muscat.

The minister said:

We deplore the fact that commercial shipping and civilian mariners continue to be targeted.

The minister did not name the country or forces which attacked the ship.

In a separate media interview another Iranian foreign minister, Kazem Gharibabadi, appeared to criticise India. India is a close ally of Israel and the US and sources around half of its oil through the straits of Hormuz.

We want India’s BRICS chairship to be successful. It is not a good approach to send a signal to the world that the BRICS is divided.

The official theme of the meting was sustainability, cooperation and innovation. In reality, it was always likely to centre on the war – especially given several of the participants have close ties to the either Iran or the Trump-Netanyahu axis of empire. And none of the participants can ignore the reality that the failed US-Israel attack has re-ordered global energy politics.

Featured image via Al Jazeera

By Joe Glenton

Source link

At the local elections this month, On Thursday afternoon, Labour MP Josh Simons announced that he would be “giving up” his Makerfield seat for Andy Burnham, the Labour Friends of Israel-veteran currently being paraded as the saviour of the party.

For decades, Westminster has overseen the managed decline of towns like mine. We have talked big, then acted small, stuck in a politics of incrementalism that cannot meet the moment. We have lost the trust of those our party was built to serve.

It is my unwavering belief that…

— Josh Simons MP (@joshsimonsmp) May 14, 2026

Simons was forced to resign from Keir Starmer’s cabinet after revelations that, whilst serving as a director of Labour Together, he ordered private investigators to go after journalists looking into Morgan McSweeney.

How Simons was selected for Makerfield

Before considering the democratic implications of an MP essentially attempting to donate their seat to the mayor of Greater Manchester, it is worth reminding ourselves of how Simons secured the Makerfield constituency in the first place.

At the time, Simons said that he was “honoured to be selected”, but no selection contest ever took place. Indeed, when local publication the Manchester Mill contacted Jenny Bullen, then the deputy mayor of Wigan council, her response was curt:

Makerfield constituents want a local candidate and have made that abundantly clear. Nothing else to say, bye bye.

No easy win for Burnham

Despite the desire for a quick coronation, Burnham will not face an easy ride in Makerfield.

At the 2024 general election, Reform UK increased their vote share by 18.7%.

Labour lost all 22 of the Wigan council seats they were defending at the local elections this month. Reform gained 24 seats.

At the last by-election in Greater Manchester, held in Gorton and Denton in February, Labour’s vote share dropped by 25.4%; they came third, behind the Green Party and Reform.

Simons’ links to the Israeli lobby

Like Burnham, Simons has his own links to the Israel lobby.

In February, it was revealed that he had failed to properly declare a donation from Trevor Chinn, the former Labour Together director and funder who, after being nominated by Labour Friends of Israel, received an Israeli Presidential Medal of Honor for “skills and work to the benefit of the State of Israel”.

In 2013, Chinn told an LFI meeting:

I’ve spent my entire life working for Israel, for a better image for Israel, for success for Israel.

At the 2024 conference of the Jewish Labour Movement, Simons spoke alongside former Israeli spy Assaf Kaplan at an event that promised to teach the audience “how to run a good campaign”.

Simons’ other funders

Last June, Simons received £5000 from Mike Craven, a former press officer for Tony Blair. Craven, still listed as a director of Labour Together Limited on Companies House, has previously attacked Jeremy Corbyn “and the far left” for not recognising the Israeli state’s “right to exist”.

In October, Simons received £30,000 from Francesca Perrin, a Labour Together donor who also served as a director until her resignation three weeks ago.

Simons is a member of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Israel, which states its purpose in the following terms:

To create a better understanding of Israel and to foster and promote links between the UK and Israel; to unite parliamentarians from across both Houses who are proud to be friends of Israel; and to make the case for Israel and for the UK’s bilateral relationship with the Jewish state.

The Israel APPG’s co-chair is Damian Egan, a vice-chair of the Labour Friends of Israel lobby group. Egan is married to Yossi Felberbaum, a former IOF soldier who used to recruit officers from the deadly Unit 8200.

Simons has previously mentioned having “friends and family in Israel” – a state with compulsory military service – and in a parliamentary debate with Conservative MP Kit Malthouse last June, he asserted his “right to claim citizenship in Israel”.

Two months later, Simons was part of a group of “Labour Friends of Israel-affiliated MPs” who confronted National Security Adviser Jonathan Powell in a “testy and emotionally charged conversation”, regarding the government’s decision to recognise a Palestinian state.

No ‘redemption’ for Simons

Some have posited that Simons may be giving up his seat for Burnham as a way of seeking “redemption” for his actions at Labour Together. Perhaps there is also a desire to avoid the fallout from recently released Subject Access Requests from Labour Together, which relaunched with the new name “Think Labour” (but the same company number) this week.

On Thursday, former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn had his Subject Access Request, which came in at a whopping 583 pages, returned to him. We learn that in January 2024, whilst serving as a director of Labour Together, Josh Simons sent an e-mail to an unknown recipient:

I f***ing hate Jeremy Corbyn.

All in all, sounds like a lovely guy.

Featured image via Josh Simons

By Jody McIntyre

Source link

Zionists are losing their shit over a New York Times (NYT) article called “The Silence that Meets the Rape of Palestinians,” written by journalist Nicholas Kristof. As is commonplace with Zionists, a protest has broken out in New York where a group gathered outside the NYT’ Manhattan office not to condemn sexual violence against Palestinians, but to attack the newspaper that published an article detailing violence against Palestinians prisoners by Israeli settlers, soldiers, and prison guards.

A Times of Israel journalist posted a video of the protests outside the NYT’s office.

Several hundred demonstrators outside the New York Times to protest Kristof column pic.twitter.com/20K0KNzXTf

— Luke Tress (@luketress) May 14, 2026

Zionist butcher threatens to sue the NYT

The butcher of Gaza, Benjamin Netanyahu, also spoke up on the NYT article, saying he would take legal action over the article.

Netanyahu’s post said that he had instructed legal advisers to consider the “harshest legal action against The New York Times and Nicholas Kristof.” He blustered:

They defamed the soldiers of Israel and perpetuated a blood libel about rape, trying to create a false symmetry between the genocidal terrorists of Hamas and Israel’s valiant soldiers.

Under my leadership, Israel will not be silent. We will fight these lies in the court of public opinion and in the court of law. Truth will prevail.

Israel’s systematic rape of Palestinians is widely documented.

The ICC wanted-war criminal, who has previously threatened to sue the NYT wants truth to prevail. The NYT itself has its hands soaked in Palestinian blood. Just because it is now reporting on one of the Zionist entity’s vile crimes does not absolve it of the role it has played.

“As Israel now continues to carry out a uniquely horrific crime in Gaza with the firm backing of the global superpower (the US), Bret Stephens’s genocidal journalism [for the New York Times] is also uniquely horrific.”

— #AJOpinion by Belén Fernández https://t.co/mFBr0tIVFn

— Al Jazeera English (@AJEnglish) July 25, 2025

The organisation called Writers Against the War on Gaza recently published  a “dossier” which exposed the “material and ideological ties to occupation and apartheid held by many high-ranking editors, journalists, and executive officers at the Times.”

So, this tussle between Netanyahu and the NYT is no more than right-wing infighting.

Pattern of behaviour

In late July 2024 a similarly unbelievable protest broke out in Israel. The protest was to protect rapists. Hundreds of far-right Israeli demonstrators, including masked and armed soldiers from the IDF’s Force 100 unit, gathered outside the Beit Lid military base. They were demanding the release of ten of their colleagues who had been arrested on suspicion of raping a Palestinian detainee at the Sde Teiman military base.

According to Physicians for Human Rights  the victim had been hospitalised with severe injuries to his rectum.

These two protests reflect the attitude of Zionists and their perceived impunity from crimes of sexual violence against Palestinian detainees or hostages in Israeli prisons.

Palestinian testimonies reveal the use of sexual violence

The Canary has covered the extensive use of sexual violence against Palestinians in Israeli prisons:

More documented evidence of Israel’s use of sexual violence in Palestinian prisons

Palestinian testimonies reveal the use of sexual violence, including rape, as a means of torture inside Israeli prisons. @alaashamaly on @MiddleEastEye‘s investigation: https://t.co/a70HdbFOMO

Advertisement

— Canary (@TheCanaryUK) December 22, 2025

In testimonies published by Middle East Eye, two former Palestinian prisoners gave shocking accounts of sexual assault and physical and psychological torture inside Israeli detention centres.

They emphasised that what they experienced cannot be classified as isolated incidents, but rather part of a systematic policy practised against prisoners, especially during the initial phase of detention, known among detainees as the “welcome party.”

Euro-Med Monitor has also met with hundreds of Palestinians released from Israeli detention. The organisation recently said:

Their testimonies reveal at least 40 forms of torture and other cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment.

Eleven of those are

• stripped searches and forced nudity
• urinating and spitting on detainees
• breaking bones and teeth
• forcing detainees to imitate animal sounds
• humiliation by making detainees wear diapers
• rape and sexual assault
• threat of rape
• filming detainees and bringing Israeli civilians to watch their torture
• deprivation of sanitation pads for women
• deprivation of performing religious practices
• electric shocks

Over the past two years, Euro-Med Monitor has met hundreds of Palestinians released from Israeli detention.

Their testimonies reveal at least 40 forms of torture and other cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment.

In the thread, we highlight 11 of these practices pic.twitter.com/kYXmZJST5S

— Euro-Med Monitor (@EuroMedHR) May 14, 2026

Israelis are carrying out a systematic policy of sexual violence on detainees with impunity, enabled by a government that rallies around accused rapists rather than holding them accountable.

A tale of two protests reflects the attitude of Zionists and their perceived impunity from crimes of sexual violence against Palestinian detainees.

Featured image via X

By The Canary

Source link

The Labour Government’s proposed reforms to the water industry – via its Clean Water Bill, announced in the King’s Speech – have been met with widespread criticism from environmentalists and campaigners.

In his speech to parliament, written by Keir Starmer’s government, King Charles said: 

My Government will improve critical infrastructure with legislation to clean-up the water industry.

Alongside the speech, the government published much more detailed briefing notes explaining its plans for each area of planned legislation.

Uncertain plans

Challenges to Keir Starmer’s leadership, following Labour’s reckoning at the local elections earlier in May, mean that there is huge uncertainty over whether those plans will come to pass.

Regarding the Clean Water Bill, the notes said:

This once-in-a-generation Bill will shift the sector away from a system where water companies mark their own homework by putting in place stronger, active supervision and oversight through a powerful new regulator capable of integrated management of the water system.

They went on to say: 

The Bill will strengthen confidence in the water sector – restoring the public’s trust, giving investors the stability to back long-term upgrades, and providing the clarity needed to support economic growth. It will ensure the sector plays its full part in delivering clean water and a healthy environment.

The briefing also said that the Bill would:

put consumers firmly first with a new Water Ombudsman to ensure complaints are taken seriously and resolved quickly.

And it would:

create a new, independent and integrated water regulator by bringing together the relevant functions of Ofwat, the Drinking Water Inspectorate, the Environment Agency and Natural England.

Somewhat surprisingly, the government’s own notes acknowledge the failings of the water sector, which it linked to privatisation. 

The notes said: 

The water industry in England and Wales was privatised in 1989, water supply and sewerage are delivered by 16 private companies. However, unlike most markets, water companies are regional monopolies with limited competition. 

England and Wales are unusual in having a fully privatised water system, whereby companies own the assets, infrastructure, and operation of water services.

The water system, regulation and the regulators have failed customers and the environment. In the 37 years since privatisation the population has grown by 11M, climate change and aging infrastructure has created unprecedented demands on the water system and reform is now needed. 

Advertisement

This has been compounded by a failure of regulation, with a system that relied too heavily on water companies marking their own homework.

It added that:

water companies are not delivering what is expected of them, both by regulators and the public.

And said:

transformative change is therefore needed to secure a system that will work for the long-term. This Bill delivers that change.

The Bill was heavily criticised by democratic ownership campaigners, environmental non-governmental organisations and anti-sewage pollution activists.

British Steel nationalisation shows water sector could be renationalised too – campaigner

We Own It lead campaigner Sophie Conquest told the Canary:

This government’s proposed reforms for the water industry are a gift to shareholders. 

The water white paper sets out plans for a ‘tailored approach’ for each water company, giving them even more scope to bend and break the rules for profit. Measures like ‘constrained discretion’ will give polluters more room to dodge fines.

Regulation of the water sector has been a decisive failure. Despite this government promising to be tough on polluters, the EA hasn’t completed a single prosecution for sewage dumping committed in the past 5 years.

The Labour Government has been in power since 2024, before which the Conservatives were in government from 2010. 

While our pockets empty and our rivers fill with sewage, this government is busy handing over even more power to the polluters. The public have had enough.

This government’s decision to bring legislation to nationalise British Steel shows that they absolutely can nationalise key infrastructure. And they can do it quickly.

They must now do the same for water. Under public ownership, we can ensure that households’ money is being used to fix infrastructure and lower bills.

Thames Water is already in breach of its licence, and has buried itself in a mountain of debt. It has wrought havoc on our seas and rivers, all while charging households eyewatering bills for the privilege. It’s outrageous that the utility has not yet returned to public hands.

This government should be acting in the interests of the 82% of us who want to see water in public hands, starting with the collapsing Thames Water.

Advertisement

Privatisation has ‘failed’ – campaigner

Windrush Against Sewage Pollution (WASP) founder Ash Smith told the Canary that the Clean Water Bill is based on a review whose independence he questioned, and said the Bill did nothing to address the evidence that privatisation of the water sector had “failed”.

Smith was portrayed by David Thewlis in Channel 4’s docudrama, Dirty Business. 

The Canary previously reported that the public responded to Dirty Business – which exposed the damage done by the sewage scandal – with “widespread praise”, whereas discussions on social media about water companies, the regulator and public bodies was “overwhelmingly negative”, according to the government’s own analysis.

Smith said: 

The water regulation changes proposed are based on the instantly accepted report from the Cunliffe Commission, which far from being the independent review it claimed to be, was designed, directed, administered, and reported on by Defra – the government department responsible for water industry regulation and its failure. Cleverly, in classic ‘Yes, Minister’ style, it investigated itself.

Its terms of reference directed Sir Jon Cunliffe to make regulation more attractive to shareholders and to dismiss taking water into public ownership, despite the compelling evidence that privatisation has failed.

We regard it as a massive retrograde step that, rather than addressing regulatory capture and corruption, makes compromise more likely with a single body. This vital aspect was ignored by the review, which was being steered by Defra into a forward-looking approach, thereby burying many serious issues that have arisen over the years, some of which were exposed in Dirty Business.

Smith added that the Bill proposes to make regulation of the sector “supervisory” which would mean that responsibility for “criminal pollution” by water companies will be for the regulators to resolve. 

He added: 

It is time people woke up before it is too late. Ironically and cynically, even contemptuously, one might say, the environmental champion, King Charles, has been made to usher it in, no doubt reassured by the major NGO’s usual weak challenges.

Bill is ‘an insult to every community impacted by sewage pollution’ – anti-sewage campaigner

Surfers Against Sewage CEO Giles Bristow said:

The government’s self-proclaimed ‘once-in-a-generation’ reforms will do little more than prop up a broken industry built on pollution for profit. The Clean Water Bill is an insult to every community impacted by sewage pollution and and every bill-payer forced to fund rising water bills while shareholders continue to profit.

The reality of this Bill is that the Government is choosing to keep the profit motive and ignoring alternative ownership models for the water industry. Regulation alone cannot fix a system that rewards pollution and failure. Only a fundamental reset of the water industry will. 

It’s clear from last week’s election results and the Prime Minister now fighting for his job that the same old tweaks around the edges of this broken system just don’t cut it.

This weekend, people across the country will take to beaches, rivers and lakes to demand better. The public mandate for bold action is undeniable.

Advertisement

Concerns about independence of water commission, which ‘avoided’ underlying problems

River Action CEO James Wallace told the Canary: 

River Action welcomed the new Government’s decision to review the failing water industry and the performance of environmental regulators. However, we are deeply concerned that the Independent Water Commission has failed to be truly independent and has avoided addressing the underlying structural problems around water company ownership, governance and investment.

While we remain hopeful that the forthcoming Water Reform Bill will deliver a far more ambitious and effective regulatory regime, the Government continues to ignore the fundamental damage caused by a wholly privatised water industry.

Until water companies are owned and operated for public benefit and environmental protection, rather than shareholder profit, no amount of regulatory tinkering will stop polluters from continuing to pollute for profit. 

We are also concerned by the continued lack of meaningful action on agricultural pollution, which is one of the biggest sources of river pollution. Any serious attempt to restore our rivers must tackle not only sewage discharges, but also help farmers tackle the unchecked runoff of slurry, fertilisers and other agricultural waste into our waterways.

Advertisement

The chaos at the top of the Labour party makes it less likely that the government will be able to successfully pass all the bills it proposed in its King’s Speech, but public anger over the state of the country’s water companies is unlikely to subside any time soon. 

Featured image via the Canary

By Tom Pashby

Source link

Source link

The post Sorry, Andy, there’s no such thing as a Labour safe seat appeared first on spiked.

Source link

After three delightful seasons on the small screen, The Mandalorian is about to hit cinemas for the first time.

Later this month, Pedro Pascal and his right-hand man Grogu will be starring in the hit Star Wars spin-off’s first feature-length adventure, which had its world premiere in Los Angeles on Thursday night.

And it probably goes without saying that all eyes were on one man in particular at The Mandalorian And Grogu’s debut.

Yes, we’re obviously talking about Grogu.

Advertisement

The adorable alien was pictured stealing the show on the event’s red carpet, with video footage also showing striking a pose for photographers.

Naturally, it was all too much for some fans to take…

GROGU HES A MOVIE STAR NOW!!!!!!! THATS MY GROGOAT 🤩

— zach | ahsoka council ▫️🔶▫️ (@ZachDume) May 15, 2026

my big movie star!! make a heart 🫶

— white chocolate 🍫 (@Choco4White) May 15, 2026

Advertisement

he could’ve dressed up a little….

— jos (@josiahhughes) May 15, 2026

And if you liked that, you’ll love these dancing droids busting a move on the red carpet, too…

Disney’s official synopsis for the new movie in the Star Wars franchise teases: “The evil Empire has fallen, and Imperial warlords remain scattered throughout the galaxy.

“As the fledgling New Republic works to protect everything the Rebellion fought for, they have enlisted the help of legendary Mandalorian bounty hunter Din Djarin and his young apprentice Grogu.”

Advertisement

In addition to Pedro reprising his role as Din Djarin from the original TV series, The Mandalorian And Grogu will feature appearances from several Star Wars regulars, plus Sigourney Weaver as a new character, Ward, a former Rebel Alliance pilot.

Meanwhile, Emmy winner Jeremy Allen White will also be lending his voice to Rotta the Hutt, son of Jabba, with Jon Favreau – who previously helmed Iron Man and Disney’s Jungle Book and Lion King remakes – on writing and directing duties.

Originally, a fourth season of The Mandalorian was planned, but these plans were put on ice in favour of making a film.

Speaking to SFX magazine, Jon Favreau explained that he had to “start from scratch” when putting together The Mandalorian And Grogu, rather than adapting his planned scripts for season four.

“[Season four] would have heavily linked to Ahsoka season two,” he explained. “You can’t just take those scripts and turn them into a movie. There were a lot of characters, it assumed you’d watched the whole show, and it was teeing up what was happening moving into [season two of] Ahsoka.

Advertisement

“It was about Grand Admiral Thrawn and following the larger storyline [of this era of the Star Wars timeline]. This is a completely different medium. So I had to start from scratch, essentially.”

It’s still unclear whether The Mandalorian could get a fourth season, after its creator gave a rather cryptic answer when asked about it on the red carpet.

Source link

Source link

Keir Starmer’s premiership is hanging by a thread following Labour’s disastrous performance in the local elections.

A growing body of MPs are calling for the prime minister to resign, less than two years into the role, but Starmer is digging in.

With no clear successor putting their head above the parapet for the mutinous party to rally behind, MPs are in limbo.

So what might happen next? Here’s what you need to know.

Advertisement

How Did We Get To This Point?

Starmer became prime minister in July 2024 after Labour won a landslide victory in the general election.

But within weeks, his government was plunged into crisis by the decision to scrap winter fuel payments for 10 million pensioners and a row over free clothes and hospitality accepted by Starmer and other senior Labour figures.

A series of messy U-turns on things like the two-child benefit cap, digital ID and the farmers’ inheritance tax also led to the prime minister’s approval rating plummeting.

Advertisement

The controversy over his decision to make Peter Mandelson the UK’s ambassador to Washington also helped push the PM’s unpopularity to new depths.

In Labour’s biggest electoral test since the 2024 election last week, voters overwhelmingly rejected the party in England, Scotland and Wales – triggering further anger towards the PM from the party’s MPs.

More than 50 of then have called on Starmer to stand down following the devastating bloodbath.

What Might Happen Next?

Advertisement

It’s incredibly hard to predict exactly what happens next, especially Labour Party makes it difficult to oust the party’s leader.

But here are the options MPs are considering, as of Monday…

A Labour MP Challenges Starmer

Under the party’s rules, a challenger needs the backing of at least 20% of Labour MPs to trigger a leadership contest. That currently works out to 81 MPs.

Advertisement

Even then, the sitting leader would automatically be put on the ballot paper.

Former Foreign Office minister Catherine West stunned Westminster on Saturday by announcing she would challenge the PM if the cabinet did not choose someone to replace Starmer.

But by Monday she had backed down, instead calling for MPs to sign a letter urging Starmer to set out a timetable to allow him to be replaced by September.

Among others thought to be weighing up a leadership bid are former deputy prime minister Angela Rayner and health secretary Wes Streeting.

Advertisement

A Labour MP Stands Aside For Andy Burnham

Starmer’s other major opponent is the mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham.

However Burnham left Westminster in 2017 and would have to become an MP again in order to stand.

Labour’s ruling National Executive Committee (NEC), blocked him from running as the party’s candidate in the Gorton and Denton by-election in February – at the behest of Starmer.

On Thursday, Labour MP Josh Simons announced he agreed to stand down from his Makerfield seat to make way for the Greater Manchester mayor, less than two years after being elected.

Advertisement

However, there are no guarantees Burnham would win the subsequent by-election.

His decision to stand would also trigger a mayoral contest in Greater Manchester – which could give rival parties another chance to hammer Labour at the ballot box.

Wes Streeting mounts leadership challenge

Wes Streeting will definitely run in the upcoming Labour leadership contest, his allies have told HuffPost UK.

Advertisement

It is the first confirmation that he plans to mount a bid to replace Keir Starmer as prime minister.

Starmer Agrees To Step Down As MP Backlash Mounts

As the number of MPs calling on him to resign rises, the PM could decide he doesn’t need the hassle and announce he is quitting.

However, he has insisted he “won’t walk away” from the job, and in an interview with The Observer insisted he still planned to be prime minister for 10 years.

Advertisement

Starmer Clings On

With the PM’s opponents apparently racked with indecision about what to do next, there is a world in which he rides out his latest leadership crisis.

In his make-or-break speech on Monday setting out how he plans to turn around Labour’s fortunes, Starmer said: “I know that people are frustrated by the state of Britain, frustrated by politics, and some people – frustrated with me.

“I know I have my doubters and I know I need to prove them wrong, and I will.”

Advertisement

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link