Graham Stuart CON Matt Turmaine LAB David Chadwick LIB Alistair Carmichael LIB Danny Kruger REF Alison Bennett LIB Jerome Mayhew CON Helen Morgan LIB Melanie Onn LAB Will Forster LIB Rachael Maskell LAB Julia Buckley LAB Lola McEvoy LAB Lloyd Hatton LAB Susan Murray LIB

Source link

A Scottish father has been smeared online after he stood up to an anti-migration protest in his area. Among those smearing him is the notorious racist agitator Tommy Robinson:

Far right thug Tommy Robinson was one of the highest profile Twitter accounts who pushed this video, falsely accusing this innocent brown British man of filming children in a park and now making him fear for his life.

Any comment @elonmusk? Are you ok with this? https://t.co/d4pJot7tSC

— Mehdi Hasan (@mehdirhasan) July 14, 2026

Advertisement

Smear and loathing

The man Robinson and others smeared was the 43-year-old Quroum Beg – a fourth-generation Scotsman.

Beg staged an impromptu counter-demonstration against an anti-migration protest, which swept through his area. In response, the protesters targeted Beg with racist abuse.

As STV news reported:

Mr Beg said he was made aware of an approaching demonstration in the nearby streets while he was at the park with his family.

All of those in the park, including Mr Beg, left the area. After returning his children home, he then made his way back to the park to stage a counter-protest.

Beg told the protesters:

I’m not afraid of you, keep on walking

The police advised Beg not to engage with the protest, with the father subsequently walking away to sit on a swing. It was at this point the protesters began accusing Beg of filming children in the park, chanting “get him out”.

In other words, they didn’t like being challenged, and they resorted to the grimmest untruths to attack the man.

Robinson labelled the fourth-generation Beg an “invader”:

The tweet remains up at the time of writing, having gained 141k views. Robinson also has many other posts labelling people of colour “invaders”.

Beg has faced harassment since, telling STV:

These false narratives affect everything people do and their day-to-day lives.

It affects their families and everybody around them. People need to think if sharing these narratives online is something they are proud of.

Advertisement

I haven’t been able to sleep since then. People are sharing things all over the world, so I worry about people recognising me without seeing the full context of what happened around it.

Robinson

Robinson has form when it comes to smearing people of colour to further his fascist, far-right ideology.

Famously, Robinson lost a libel case after he told lies about a Syrian refugee – who was also a child no less, and who had suffered a vicious attack.

Robinson recently lied about his libel loss, which is what you’d expect, isn’t it, because the guy’s a f*cking liar, isn’t he:

Tommy Robinson was allowed to rewrite history completely unchallenged in a friendly interview.

While discussing his libel loss over the Syrian schoolboy, Tommy fired off a series of claims that simply don't stand up to scrutiny:

• Tommy says he merely suggested "there was… pic.twitter.com/7LkTQvewoS

— Gadget (@Gadget440) June 23, 2026

Advertisement

This isn’t even the only person of colour Robinson has smeared this week:

We know the woman in this video (who was rescuing the seagull). So we'd recommend you remove this post and apologise for your anti-Muslim, racist tirade.

* tirade means angry verbal outburst if your followers were wondering https://t.co/dEjOsMhqkT

Advertisement

— Canary (@TheCanaryUK) July 10, 2026

As Maddison Wheeldon reported for the Canary:

One of Britain’s self-styled “patriots” shared the video, with many claiming the woman was catching the bird to eat it – parroting the same racist theories that falsely accused immigrants in the US of eating pets.

However, Mubarak was actually doing a good deed in rescuing the seagull that had fallen from a roof. More footage shows her working with other locals – white locals, for the record – to reunite the gull with its mother.

Advertisement

Robinson also incited white riots earlier this year; the sort of thing these ‘anti-migrant protests’ inevitably turn into:

I wrote this – I think he’ll struggle to make a case for his income or reputation being damaged given that his income is reliant on him begging for money on the back of doing racist things https://t.co/qDEz7AnWt7

— Willem Moore (@willem_moore_uk) June 13, 2026

Problem

Tommy Robinson and the racist sh*theads he stirs up are a scourge on this country.

To be clear, people aren’t wrong to feel like Britain is broken; they’re also not wrong to think that they’ve been shafted, or to acknowledge that their circumstances keep getting worse.

They are wrong to blame people of colour for the problems caused by the rich, though. And they’re especially wrong to spread lies as soon as they face any sort of pushback.

Featured image via the Canary

By Willem Moore

Source link

Further to Monday’s letter from the Deputy Chief Constable, we’ve submitted the following Freedom Of Information request to Police Scotland.

———————————————————————-

To: FOI

15 July 2026

Advertisement

This week I received a letter from DCC Stuart Houston. It notes in part:

“During this time, Police Scotland utilised financial investigators, financial analysts and a forensic accountant to fully investigate the circumstances surrounding reported irregularities. Consideration was given to other crime types, such as, but not limited to, those listed in your letter. 

These matters were also fully investigated, and all of the circumstances were reported to the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service for advice and guidance.”

As Police Scotland announced that Operation Branchform was closed on 26 May 2026 and is no longer a live investigation requiring confidentiality, and as the matter is of such great public interest – involving as it does the extremely grave matters of public confidence in the Scottish Government and the integrity and independence of Police Scotland and COPFS when investigating potential crimes committed by members of that government – the information I request is therefore as follows:

(1) What advice and guidance was received from the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service specifically regarding the initial complaint about the Scottish National Party’s suspected misappropriation of “ringfenced” fundraiser money (rather than the subsequent offence of embezzlement against the Party for which Peter Murrell was prosecuted and convicted)?

Advertisement

(2) On which date/s was this advice and guidance received?

(3) On which date (an approximate one, eg “August 2023” or “Spring 2022”, will suffice if a more precise one cannot be identified) did Police Scotland cease investigations into the original complaint of misappropriation of funds by the SNP (again as opposed to Peter Murrell’s subsequent embezzlement from the Party)?

(4) Did they do so on the grounds that (a) no crime was identified, or that (b) there had been a crime but the perpetrator/s could not be identified, or that (c) there had likely been a crime but evidence was insufficient for a prosecution, or for some other reason?

In the interests of transparency I can see no justifiable reason for these facts being withheld from the public.

Advertisement

The integrity of the government, police and prosecution service is not a matter of mere curiosity or prurience. It is vital to public faith in national institutions and I will pursue this matter with the Information Commissioner if necessary.

———————————————————————-

We’ll be sending a similar one to the Crown Office, and our solicitor will also be writing to Police Scotland separately. We’ll continue to keep you posted.

Source link

Spain are into the World Cup final after a controlled, clinical 2-0 win over France in Dallas.

The semi-final was billed as a meeting of the tournament’s two standout sides, but one which never caught fire for Didier Deschamps’ team. Goals in each half from Mikel Oyarzabal and Pedro Porro settled it, sending the European champions through to Sunday’s showpiece against either England or Argentina.

France arrived with the joint-top scorer Kylian Mbappé and the World Cup’s top assist-maker Michael Olise, but neither could influence a game Spain managed from the opening whistle.

Luis de la Fuente’s side, unbeaten in 37 matches across all competitions, were simply sharper, cleaner and more cohesive. France, by contrast, produced one of their poorest displays of the tournament at the worst possible moment.

Spain took control

The semi-final had been hyped as a heavyweight clash, but Spain settled quicker and imposed their rhythm. Their first breakthrough came at 22 minutes. Lucas Digne, attempting to clear inside his own box, caught Lamine Yamal. The contact was clear, the penalty awarded, and Oyarzabal stepped up to slam his finish past Mike Maignan.

It was a moment that underlined Spain’s composure. Even with France’s frontline on the pitch, Mbappé, Ousmane Dembele, Olise could not trouble Spain. Their midfield combinations were crisp, their press well-timed, and their wide players constantly stretching the game.

France’s response was minimal. William Saliba’s injury on the half-hour, forcing Maxence Lacroix into action, added to their problems.

Spain continued to create the cleaner chances. A slick move on 38 minutes saw Dani Olmo backheel into Yamal, whose cross found Fabian Ruiz. His effort was blocked just wide – another warning for France.

Porro doubles the lead

Spain’s second goal arrived at 58 minutes and reflected the fluency they carried throughout. Porro exchanged passes with Olmo, broke into space, and finished low for 2-0. It was a simple, well-executed move, and it effectively ended the contest.

Three minutes later, Yamal thought he had added a third, bursting through and finishing, but he was narrowly offside. It didn’t matter. Spain were in complete control, and France had still not registered a shot on target.

Olise, who came into the match with five assists in the tournament, was substituted at 72 minutes. His output summed up France’s night. Just two chances created, no completed dribbles, and little influence.

Ferran Torres then headed wide for Spain as they hunted a third, while Unai Simon’s misjudged header gifted Désiré Doué a chance, but the France substitute shot straight at the scrambling keeper.

France’s first meaningful efforts on target didn’t arrive until stoppage time. By then, Spain were already cruising into the final.

Biggest test ends in defeat

Across this World Cup, France had looked complete. Their four-man frontline had been slick and decisive. Their defence had been solid, with clean sheets in all three knockout games before this one. Their depth was the envy of most nations.

Yet in Dallas, they were a shadow of that side. The first half was blunt, lacking tempo and invention.

Usually, France finds a second-half surge, but it never came. The air-conditioned stadium offered no lift, and Spain’s organisation denied them any rhythm.

The performance left France fans dejected. Bastille Day celebrations back home will have felt flat as supporters watched a team unable to produce their usual intensity. Spain were excellent, but this semi-final was defined just as much by France’s failure to fire.

France falls short

Didier Deschamps admitted his side were below their usual level. He pointed to technical errors, misplaced passes, and a lack of danger in attack. For a squad with such talent, it was a disappointing end and a subdued conclusion to his 14-year tenure.

France now head to Saturday’s third-place play-off, a fixture that will feel like a comedown after their ambitions of lifting the trophy.

Spain’s run continues

Spain’s consistency is remarkable. They beat France in the semi-finals of Euro 2024, and again in the Nations League semi-finals in 2025. This win makes it three straight knockout victories over Les Bleus. More importantly, it extends their unbeaten run to 37 matches – a joint-record for a European nation.

Huge praise must be given to Luis de la Fuente and his players, for their commitment, solidarity, talent, and how they make difficult tasks look simple.

This Spain side began this cycle with a clear idea and have stuck to it. The result is a team primed to repeat the Euros–World Cup double they achieved in 2010.

They will take some stopping in New York.

Key moments

• 22 mins – goal: Oyarzabal converts from the spot after Digne kicks Yamal.
• 30 mins – injury: Saliba forced off; Lacroix replaces him.
• 38 mins – close: Olmo’s backheel releases Yamal; Ruiz’s shot blocked wide.
• 58 mins – goal: Porro finishes after linking with Olmo.
• 61 mins – no goal: Yamal scores but is offside.
• 72 mins – sub: Olise withdrawn after ineffective display.
• 79 mins – miss: Torres heads wide.
• 81 mins – error: Simon’s poor header gives Doue a chance; he shoots at the keeper.

Spain sharper, France subdued

Spain’s control was total. Their midfield dictated, their wide players stretched France, and their defensive structure kept Mbappé quiet. Dembélé, Olise and the rest of France’s attack were blunted, unable to find space or combine with any fluency.

France’s technical errors were costly. Passes went astray, transitions broke down, and their usual second-half lift never materialised. Spain didn’t need to be spectacular either; they simply needed to maintain their level. They did exactly that.

What’s next

Spain move on to Sunday’s final, where they will face either England or Argentina. Both opponents present different challenges, but Spain’s form, cohesion and unbeaten run make them formidable.

France, meanwhile, must regroup for the third-place play-off. It is not the stage they expected to be on, and the performance in Dallas will linger.

Featured image via NBC News

By Faz Ali

Source link

Maine Democrats want to hold onto Graham Platner’s progressive base — but they can’t agree on who is best positioned to carry the torch.

That indecision is creating a fractured field heading into an unpredictable late July nominating convention for one of the most important Senate races on the 2026 map. Now, various candidates are rushing to prove they are the most aligned with Platner’s policies, without tying themselves too closely to the disgraced oysterman.

Labor organizations and the national progressive organizing group Our Revolution are backing former Maine Senate President Troy Jackson, who campaigned with Platner during the primary and got the endorsement of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) for his unsuccessful gubernatorial campaign earlier this year. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), a former Platner surrogate, is also behind Jackson, as are dozens of current and former state lawmakers.

But some state legislators and local activists who had backed Platner are flocking to Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, who similarly ran as a progressive in the gubernatorial primary. And former public health official Nirav Shah is touting more progressive policy positions than he did when he ran for governor in an attempt to break off some Platner supporters. Behind the scenes, he is also working to recruit former organizers from Platner’s campaign, according to two people familiar with the strategy and granted anonymity to discuss it.

The trio of former gubernatorial candidates are the leading figures in a crowded field aiming to win over a yet-to-be-selected group of 600 Democratic delegates. Part of that task is convincing Platner’s former supporters that they will carry on the progressive advocacy and fighting spirit that made his candidacy so popular — before he was forced to resign after POLITICO reported a woman said he had sexually assaulted her. Platner has denied the allegation.

Many of the candidates will make that pitch directly during a debate scheduled for Thursday night. And the stakes couldn’t be higher for national Democrats watching anxiously: Unseating Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) is an essential part of the party’s plan to take back control of the Senate this fall.

Platner convincingly won the Democratic Senate primary last month with nearly three quarters of the vote, and had a zealous base of support during the primary. But where his voters and core volunteers go next is unclear.

“People who were vocal supporters of Platner’s have moved to other candidates, and it doesn’t look to me like they moved in a block, that everyone agrees who’s the best next candidate from that movement,” said David Farmer, a Maine Democratic political strategist not involved with the Senate campaign. “And I think that in a truncated process like this, that’s to be expected.”

In just 11 days, Democrats will replace their nominee at a convention in Bangor. This weekend, they will select the delegates who will pick that candidate — a process playing out across all of the state’s 16 counties, with campaigns seeking to recruit and organize delegates who will vote in their favor.

Unions, who were a key Platner booster in his primary against Gov. Janet Mills, have largely gone to Jackson, a logger and longtime union member. The Maine AFL-CIO endorsed Jackson over the weekend, citing his support of workers’ issues in the Maine legislature, along with his track record of winning over rural and working-class voters.

Some of Platner’s biggest supporters in the state House are beginning to coalesce around Bellows, however. That includes state Rep. Valli Geiger, who had been floated by Platner as a potential replacement before she passed on a run. In a Facebook post, Geiger cited Bellows’ track record of standing up to President Donald Trump as secretary of state, along with the fact that she “did not declare as a candidate until after Graham Platner announced he was withdrawing from the race unlike the unseemly rush of so many ambitious men.”

Reached via text, Geiger declined to be interviewed about her support for Bellows.

State Rep. Gary Friedmann, who also previously endorsed Platner, said he is all-in for Bellows. While he agrees with Jackson’s stances and called his association with Sanders and Our Revolution “very compelling,” Friedmann hinted at something Democrats have voiced worry about behind the scenes: That Jackson struggles as a compelling public speaker.

“When it comes to standing up, if there’s a debate with Susan Collins, or the messaging that comes from both candidates, I think Shenna is extremely articulate and compelling,” Friedmann said.

He added: “I think that having a woman to voice that platform is gonna be very important.”

All of the candidates are still figuring out exactly how to capture Platner’s support without tying themselves too closely to him as an individual. A letter circulated by former Platner campaign volunteers that racked up hundreds of signatures as of Tuesday called for the candidate replacing him to adopt a string of progressive commitments on issues including health care, housing and ending “forever wars.” Both Jackson and Bellows signed onto the letter.

During a virtual rally hosted by Our Revolution on Monday, Jackson took time to “acknowledge what everyone on this call has been through” while asking Platner’s supporters to rally behind him, though he never mentioned the oysterman by name.

“I know that there’s real pain, anger, disappointment, and I’m not going to try and to minimize that,” Jackson said. “But look, this movement has always been bigger than one person. It’s about taking on a system rigged against working people.”

Joseph Geevarghese, who runs Our Revolution, called on the movement Platner emboldened to get involved in the delegate process outlined by the Maine Democratic Party.

“This is the perfect opportunity for us to show the establishment that we can organize and win within the system that they created, the Democratic Party process,” he said on the call.

A person close to Bellows, granted anonymity to discuss internal strategy, also acknowledged this dilemma for candidates, calling it “a really delicate dance to walk.”

“It’s not like she’s trying to be Graham Platner or be someone she’s not,” the person said. “She is able to be herself, and I think she, ideologically, is a great bridge for people who were very disheartened by what happened with Platner, but still extremely pissed off about Susan Collins and the Senate majority, and what’s happening in Washington, D.C.”

While Shah’s campaign is recruiting former Platner supporters behind the scenes, the former public health official is also making the pitch explicit in public comments.

“I want all former Platner supporters to know: you have a place in this campaign,” Shah wrote on social media shortly after he launched his candidacy last week.

Maine politics was rocked on Monday by ICE agents’ shooting of a 26-year-old man in Biddeford, with potential Senate candidates rallying around getting the federal agency out of Maine. For many Democrats, it was also a reminder of the importance of supporting the party’s eventual nominee, regardless of who it is.

Democratic State Rep. Morgan Rielly, a former supporter of Platner’s, said he told Jackson that he would support him in the primary. But more important, he said, was the goal of defeating Collins this fall.

“[The Democratic nominee] will have my full support and I will be working hard to get them elected,” Rielly said in a text message. “It’s absolutely crucial we are united and Senator Collins loses on election day.”

Source link

Tech giant and genocide enabler Meta is accused of using AI software to target disabled people for layoffs in a new court case.

In May, Meta announced they would be sacking around 8,000 people. But a new lawsuit claims the company used a combination of AI tools which gathered data on employees’ performance. These include productivity and activity monitoring. Crucially, the scores of those who took more medical leave were reduced because they were at work less.

Meta uses AI to target disabled employees

Twenty-six employees filed the complaint anonymously on Monday, 13 July, in Oakland, California. The complaint explained:

Those tools draw on inputs… that, by design, cannot be accumulated by an employee who is on protected medical or family leave, or whose output is reduced by a disability.

Whilst Meta could’ve excluded those who took more leave on medical grounds from this, they chose not to:

Meta did not neutralize those inputs for protected leave; did not exclude protected-leave-takers or accommodation-seekers from the selection cohort; and did not pause the system for the individualized, leave- and accommodation-neutral review that the law requires.

This means that not only did Meta fail to protect those on protected leave from an AI that doesn’t understand, but they used that system to disproportionately target disabled people.

As the complaint explains:

The result was that employees who took protected leaves were disproportionately selected for layoff, based on scoring that not only failed to account for their protected leaves, but in effect penalized the employees for exercising their legal rights to these leaves.

The plaintiffs are understandably accusing Meta of violating federal and state laws that ban discrimination or retaliation against workers who have disabilities, take medical leave, or are pregnant. They also say Meta’s AI systems weren’t tested for bias, which would be in violation of recently adopted California and New York City laws.

Employees spied on

The lawsuit explains that Meta quietly launched the monitoring program, and naturally, employees had no option to consent:

The program was announced through a low-visibility internal post—made by an engineer rather than a senior leader, in a secondary group rather than Meta’s official employee-notice channel—with little notice and no consent or click-through acknowledgment; on at least some teams, employees received no consent or acknowledgment prompt at all, and, at least initially, there was no way to opt out.

As the Guardian reports, the twenty-six plaintiffs include a scientist who was on pregnancy leave and then parental leave. She found out she’d lost her job two days before she gave birth. Others include a manager who was let go 16 days into medical leave and an engineer who was given a lower score because of time off due to a work-related injury.

The complaint states:

Meta did not assemble the termination list through the considered judgment of managers who knew the work. Instead, Meta used a constellation of internal artificial-intelligence systems …. to score, rank, and select employees for inclusion on the list.

The thousands of layoffs are supposed to start happening on 22 July, but the plaintiffs are seeking a preliminary ruling from the court, which would block Meta from sacking them all while the case is active. They are also applying for relief that could include back pay and reinstatement of their jobs.

Featured image via the Canary

By Rachel Charlton-Dailey

Source link

Rupert Lowe has branded Manchester city centre and diverse cities across the UK, “third world shithole[s]”.

While this sort of talk is common from Restore, you’d think the party would have the sense to tone it down a bit while running for the Greater Manchester mayor position.

Go and look at that video of Restore Britain’s Greater Manchester mayoral candidate, Marlon West, walking around Piccadilly Gardens late at night. It’s just disgusting, honestly. What a vile place.

Let’s call it what it is.

Advertisement

A shithole.

A third world shithole.

And it’s not…

— Rupert Lowe MP (@RupertLowe10) July 14, 2026

Advertisement

Rupert Lowe: Who is he?

If you’re unfamiliar with Lowe, he’s the leader of Restore Britain. This breakaway party exists because Reform wasn’t far right enough and it’s had some success in taking voters away from Nigel Farage.

Lowe recently attracted controversy for lying about the victims of the Dunblane massacre, seemingly to curry favour with the Yanks.

16 children and a teacher died in Dunblane. But daddy's gun being taken away is more serious. Fuck rupert lowe https://t.co/WboflCqtHX

— BatesyBhoy (@BatesyBhoy1967) July 9, 2026

As the commenter alluded to, Lowe’s dad had his gun taken away, which must have been harrowing for him. Lowe still has some firearms, though, including the shotgun he had his groundskeeper execute his pet dog with.

Lowe didn’t just attack Manchester; he also said:

And it’s not just in the middle of Manchester.

It’s everywhere, absolutely everywhere.

Advertisement

London, Birmingham, Glasgow. Even places like Norwich, Exeter, Cardiff, Nottingham, Rochdale, Bristol, Reading, Newcastle. It is everywhere.

It’s become a common refrain for far-right politicians to say “Britain is broken”. We don’t disagree with this statement; we just differ on what the cause is.

In our opinion, Britain is in a sorry state of affairs because 40 years of neoliberalism stripped everything to the bone. This is the political ideology of flogging everything that isn’t nailed down and then renting it back from the greedy, no-good c*nts who fund Reform UK, the Tories, and yes, even Labour.

If you leave everything to the whims of the market, towns and cities will deteriorate because there’s no profit in maintaining them. When you’ve got worn down towns filled with worn down people, of course, the vibes won’t be uniformly pleasant.

Lowe then added, with casual xenophobia:

Nowhere is safe from the third worldification of Britain – absolutely nowhere.

It’s the same feel, the same scene. Young foreign men just loitering around. Deliveroo bikes skimming about, it stinks of weed, foreign languages fill the air.

Gig work

On top of neoliberalism, we’ve had the slow death of organised labour. With that comes the gig economy and the Deliveroo bikes Lowe complained about.

In Lowe’s mind, these foreign men brought the poverty, destitution and Deliveroo bikes with them. He thinks this because it’s politically beneficial for him to do so.

The reality is the private sector hollowed Britain out, and the people Lowe complains about are plugging the gaps. If we deported every gig economy worker who wasn’t born in the UK, Britain wouldn’t become a workers’ utopia; the poorest white people would just take their place.

Now, we’re not saying we need to encourage migration for the sake of Deliver-f*cking-roo. We think all work should be well paid and rewarding. What we are saying is Lowe and others like him are selling their voters a fairytale and they’re doing it for the benefit of the people who profit from Britain breaking.

Lowest of the Lowe

Lowe ended his hate screed as follows:

A Restore Britain Government will deport millions. We will make Britain safe again.

We will not allow our country to remain a third world shithole.

Advertisement

That I promise you.

Migration increased under the Tories despite the constant fear mongering against migrants. This happened because it was beneficial for everyone at the top. The migrants plugged employment gaps and protected the pension pot against our ageing population while also serving as a political target for constant scapegoating.

This situation couldn’t last, of course, because eventually voters started to ask: ‘If they’re so bad, why are the Tories letting them in?‘ This is why we now have politicians like Nigel Farage and Rupert Lowe.

Potentially, these men will pull the same trick as the Tories if they take power. Regardless, if we continue down this path, we will eventually end up with someone who’s deadly serious about following through on this violent ideology. And it never ends with deportations.

Featured image via the Canary

By Willem Moore

Source link

German police have violently arrested Greta Thunberg and more than 30 other activists for blocking the road to a German arms factory.

The Rheinmetall works produces ammunition for Israel’s military. Thunberg was also arrested in the UK for protesting against the Starmer regime’s proscription of anti-genocide group, Palestine Action.

The German state and police have been among the most brutal collaborators in Israel’s genocide in Gaza. Peaceful anti-genocide activists have been beaten, imprisoned and in some cases subjected to ‘civil death’, depriving them of employment, banking and official existence.

The Peacefully Against Genocide group is holding a series of demonstrations in Berlin in early July against “Germany’s complicity” in Israel’s genocide. The group will call for Rheinmetall to stop all deliveries to Israel and close the Berlin factory.

Greta Thunberg unbowed

In October 2025, Thunberg was among a group of humanitarian flotilla volunteers beaten and abused by Israeli guards. Clearly she is unbowed and unafraid of the genocide-enabling state thugs.

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Source link

Source link

(David Crausby / Alamy)

4 min read38 min

When the Inquiry into White Working Class Educational Outcomes started its work, few challenged the need to address the issue. Those working in education knew what the data told us, but years of effort and a myriad of initiatives had failed to solve the problem.

Advertisement

What marks out this research is that, alongside analysing the data, we listened to children and young people describe their experience of growing up in today’s education system. We heard parents talk about the hopes they have for their children, and listened to teachers, school leaders, employers and community organisations trying to make a difference in exceptionally challenging circumstances.

For much of the past three decades, education policy has rightly focused on narrowing gaps in attainment and expanding opportunity. We should recognise how much progress has been made. Outcomes have improved for many groups of children. More young people now leave education with opportunities that simply did not exist a generation ago.

But one uncomfortable truth remains. White working class children continue to experience some of the weakest educational outcomes in England. This isn’t a new problem, nor one that has been ignored. Schools, governments and charities have all tried to improve outcomes for disadvantaged children. Yet despite these efforts, progress for this particular group has remained frustratingly limited.

Advertisement

The temptation is to search for a single explanation. Some argue aspirations are too low, others point to poverty, while others blame schools or families. Our Inquiry suggests the reality is considerably more complicated. We found parents who cared deeply about their children’s education and wanted them to succeed. We found teachers working tirelessly on behalf of their pupils. We found children who wanted successful futures.

What we also found, though, was a growing disconnect between many white working class communities and the education system. Again and again, we heard families questioning whether education still offered the certainty of opportunity it once had. Many parents spoke about struggling to see how success at school connected to the lives their children were likely to lead. Many young people told us they found it difficult to understand why what they were learning mattered to their future.

This should concern us all. Not because any one political party or government is responsible, but because confidence in education is essential if families are to believe it can still improve their children’s lives.

Advertisement

That is why I hope our report is read as an invitation to think differently. This isn’t about ranking disadvantage or suggesting one group matters more than another. Poverty remains the greatest predictor of poor educational outcomes across every ethnic group. But good policymaking means paying attention to where disadvantage persists, understanding why, and responding accordingly.

Neither is this simply about exam results. Throughout the Inquiry we heard about belonging, confidence, relationships, transitions, careers guidance, local opportunity and helping young people see a future worth striving for. Educational success is about much more than qualifications alone.

Nor is this a criticism of schools. One of the most hopeful aspects of our work was visiting schools and colleges already achieving strong outcomes for white working class pupils. Their success reminds us that poor outcomes are not inevitable.

The recommendations we have published deliberately form a long-term agenda rather than a short-term programme. Some could be implemented relatively quickly, while others will require investment, structural reform and sustained commitment over many years. That is inevitable. Problems that have developed over generations cannot be solved overnight.

Advertisement

But if there is one lesson I hope politicians of every party take from this Inquiry, it is that improving outcomes for white working class children should not be a partisan cause. It should be a national one. Every child deserves to believe that education is for them, that their efforts matter, and that success is achievable regardless of where they grow up. That is an ambition surely worth uniting around.

Baroness Morris is a Labour peer and co-chair of the Independent Inquiry into White Working Class Educational Outcomes

Source link