Connect with us

Politics

Politics Home | Supporting Air Ambulance Week and securing the future of hospital helipads

Published

on

Supporting Air Ambulance Week and securing the future of hospital helipads
Supporting Air Ambulance Week and securing the future of hospital helipads

Mike McGrath, CEO



Mike McGrath, CEO
| Air Ambulances UK

Advertisement

Support Air Ambulance Week, 7–13 September 2026, and celebrate the lifesaving work of air ambulance charities, while raising awareness of the vital hospital helipad infrastructure and policy improvements needed to support patients across the UK

Hospital helipads are a critical part of the emer­gency healthcare infrastructure supporting air ambulance operations across the UK. For patients requiring urgent specialist care, safeguarded 24/7 on-site helipad access is an important part of the journey from the scene of an emergency to definitive hospital care.

The APPG for Air Ambulances report, Critical Moments, Life- Saving Infrastructure: The Case for Safeguarded 24/7 On-Site Hospital Helipads at Major Trauma Centres and Specialist Hospitals, published in June 2026, sets out the need for a national policy framework for safeguarded 24/7 on-site hospital helipad access across the UK. The report was prepared with research and evidence contributions from Air Ambulances UK, the UK’s air ambulance charities, the HELP Appeal and the University of Liverpool’s Flight Science and Technology Group.

Advertisement

The report assessed 43 Major Trauma Centres and special­ist hospitals and found that more than half did not have 24/7 on-site helipad access at the time of publication. The findings highlight significant variation in helipad provision and the need for a more consistent approach across the UK.

This creates a wider challenge for the emergency care pathway. Air ambulance crews provide advanced pre-hospi­tal care at the scene of serious incidents, but many patients then require rapid transfer to specialist hospitals for defini­tive treatment.

Where an air ambulance cannot land directly at a hospi­tal, patients may need to land at a secondary off-site loca­tion before continuing by road. The report highlights that this can introduce additional delays and complexity into the patient journey, potentially affecting access to definitive care and contributing to longer hospital stays and more complex treatment pathways.

Advertisement

The report is not primarily about securing large-scale capital funding. Rather, it highlights the absence of a co-ordinated national, policy-led framework to enable safeguarded 24/7 on-site hospital helipad operations.

The report sets out six recommendations requiring action across three government departments, the NHS and the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), highlighting that delivering a fully operational network of safeguarded 24/7 on-site helipads requires a co-ordinated, cross-government framework. This includes the Department of Health and Social Care provid­ing national health policy, strategic provision and oversight; the Department for Transport supporting aviation policy and regulatory oversight through the CAA; and the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government ensuring 24/7 helipad access and safeguarding are properly reflected in the national and local planning system.

This work forms part of a wider effort to secure the future of air ambulance care. The UK’s 21 air ambulance charities work alongside the NHS to deliver lifesaving pre-hospital emergency care, collectively responding to an average of 137 missions every day.

Air Ambulance Week 2026, taking place from 7–13 September, will celebrate the people and communities who make these missions possible. This year’s theme, Every Mission Starts With You, recognises the donors, fundraisers, volunteers and supporters whose contributions help keep air ambulance services flying.

Advertisement

 Find out more at www.airambulancesuk.org


 Join us during Air Ambulance Week

Tuesday 8 September | 11am – 1pm | Room S, Portcullis House


Air Ambulances UK, in alignment with the APPG for Air Ambulances and the APPG for Aviation, invites you to meet the air ambulance and aviation community to hear about the lifesaving work taking place across the UK, and learn more about the policy priorities shaping the future of air ambulance and aviation services.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Kelly Clarkson Gives Damn Good Advice From Her Therapist In Final Show

Published

on

Kelly Clarkson Gives Damn Good Advice From Her Therapist In Final Show

Kelly Clarkson said goodbye for good from “The Kelly Clarkson Show” on Monday – and she made the moment count. (Watch the video below.)

As she closed out her seven-year run, the daytime host welcomed her son, Remington, 10, and daughter, River, 12, onstage one last time and gave helpful advice to her audience.

It came therapist-approved – from the singer’s own mental health professional, apparently.

“For seven years, I’ve ended each episode by saying, ‘Have a great day. And if it’s not, change it,’” Clarkson began. “I say that because, while we have to accept that life is totally out of our control, each moment, though, truly depends on how we choose to respond and react to it. ‘You don’t have to attend the negative party you were invited to,’ I’ve been told by a therapist. So there ya go.”

Advertisement

Clarkson reinforced her point as she savored the waning moments of her show.

“If you remind yourself once a day that you have that choice to respond [with] how you really want to be and who you really are inside, I promise that habit is gonna become a part of you, and your life will respond to you in return.”

Then it was truly time to say goodbye.

Advertisement

“I loved being in your homes each day,” Clarkson said, eventually pivoting to her signature ending one last time.

“Have a great day, and if it’s not – change it!” she said as audience members joined in.

Thanks for the rec, Kelly.

Clarkson announced the end of her show in February after a tumultuous 2025 in which Brandon Blackstock, her ex-husband and the father of River and Remington, died of cancer at 48.

Advertisement

The former “American Idol” champ can still be seen on TV as a coach on NBC’s “The Voice” starting Sept. 21.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

5 Small Changes To Eating Habits That Can Be Signs Of Dementia

Published

on

“A shift toward sweets is by far the most consistently reported change,” said Dr. Adam Mednick.

Once your parents, grandparents or other older adults in your life reach a certain age, it’s natural to become hypervigilant about their changing health, wanting to catch any potential issues as soon as possible. (Not to mention, it makes you more self-aware about your own signs of aging.) Certainly, that includes being aware of the early signs of dementia.

Though there is no cure for dementia (which is an umbrella term describing multiple forms of cognitive impairment, with Alzheimer’s disease being the most common type), there are treatments that can slow progression so those who have it can have a better quality of life for longer. While memory problems are the hallmark symptom of dementia that many people focus on, it’s not the only early sign of dementia. Certain changes in eating habits and mealtime can also be signs of dementia.

“As a neurologist who has spent decades studying brain health and memory, one of the most common questions I get from families is this: ‘My mother has started eating strangely. Does that mean she has Alzheimer’s?’” Dr. Majid Fotuhi, a neurologist, adjunct professor at Johns Hopkins University’s Mind/Brain Institute, and author of “The Invincible Brain,” told HuffPost.

“A shift toward sweets is by far the most consistently reported change,” said Dr. Adam Mednick.

Willowpix via Getty Images

“A shift toward sweets is by far the most consistently reported change,” said Dr. Adam Mednick.

Fotuhi explained that the answer is more nuanced than a simple yes-or-no, but there are specific changes that often serve as a tell. Below are five changes in eating habits that can be signs of dementia, according to neurologists.

Advertisement

Changes To Watch Out For

Futuhi emphasised that if someone you love develops new and unusual eating habits but their memory, judgment and daily functioning otherwise seem fine, that alone should not make you worry about Alzheimer’s. He explained that the changes could be an indication of something else, such as depression, anxiety, a side effect from medication or dental problems.

“This is exactly why a distinct and lasting change in eating behaviour deserves a proper medical evaluation rather than a guess,” Fotuhi said, adding that any changes in eating habits should be evaluated by a medical professional. With that in mind, below are five changes in eating habits to be on the lookout for.

1. Mealtime gets simpler

Advertisement

“One of the earliest changes families might describe is that their loved one who cooked elaborate meals for decades starts making simpler dishes, then stops cooking altogether,” said Dr. Joel Salinas, a clinical associate professor of neurology at New York University Langone Health and chief medical officer at Isaac Health. Salinas pointed out that complex meals require planning and sequencing, skills that dementia affects. Dr. Adam Mednick, a neurologist and the author of “Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: From Diagnosis to Treatment,” added that having trouble planning, shopping for and preparing meals can be early signs of dementia.

Just because someone stops cooking elaborate meals doesn’t mean they have dementia. But when accompanied by the other signs shared here, it’s something to be mindful of.

2. Losing interest in food

All three neurologists shared that losing interest in food is a common symptom of dementia, and there are several reasons why it happens. Fotuhi told HuffPost that changes in the brain can lead to loss of smell, which reduces the pleasure of eating, since much of what we experience as taste actually comes from smell. Salinas said this too, explaining, “Reduced smell strips much of the pleasure from food. Someone with dementia may describe meals as bland or flat.”

Advertisement

People with dementia are also at higher risk of experiencing depression, which Fotuhi said can blunt interest in activities, including mealtime. On top of that, all three experts point out that mealtime requires using utensils and maintaining conversations at the same time, which can feel stressful to someone with dementia. “A noisy, overstimulating, or unappealing setting makes this worse by making it harder to focus and engage,” Mednick added.

3. Forgetting to eat or that mealtime happened

Since dementia impacts memory, all three neurologists say that it can lead to forgetting to eat or forgetting that they’ve already eaten. Part of what makes this even more likely is that dementia impacts the body’s hunger and fullness cues.

“Dementia makes it difficult to interpret the body’s internal signals for hunger and fullness and to connect them to external cues, such as the time of day or the sight of food,” Mednick said. He explained that damage to the brain regions that regulate appetite can blunt the drive to eat, while memory loss can cause someone to forget to eat, forget they just ate, or no longer recognise or communicate that they are hungry. “The result can go either way, leading to eating too little or, in some cases, overeating,” he said.

Advertisement

4. Rigid food choices

Even for someone without dementia, answering the whole “what’s for dinner?” question can be challenging. As the doctors explained earlier, mealtime requires planning, shopping and preparation. This, they shared, is why it’s common for people with dementia to eat the same meals or foods repeatedly.

Eating the same food every day could be a sign that someone is struggling with making everyday decisions.

Sandor Mejias Brito via Getty Images

Eating the same food every day could be a sign that someone is struggling with making everyday decisions.

“When thinking becomes effortful, every decision has a cost, and eating the same meal removes one decision from the day. Familiar foods are also predictable, which can feel safer when so much else feels uncertain,” Salinas said.

Fotuhi agreed, explaining that the same rigidity often shows up in other areas of life at the same time, such as insisting on the same daily schedule or the same clothing.

Advertisement

5. Cravings for sweets

“A shift toward sweets is by far the most consistently reported change,” Mednick said, explaining that this change likely stems from damage to the brain’s reward and impulse-control circuits.

Fotuhi said that a newly developed sweet tooth is most common in those with frontotemporal dementia (FTD), which is a distinct group of brain disorders that damage the frontal and temporal lobes. “The frontal lobe normally helps us regulate impulses and food choices. When it is damaged, that regulation weakens, and a strong pull toward sweet and starchy foods often emerges, sometimes dramatically,” he explained.

Tips For Navigating Mealtime

Advertisement

If you are a caregiver or loved one to someone with dementia who is experiencing these changes in eating habits, confronting these new hurdles can feel overwhelming. But there are ways you can make mealtime less stressful and more enjoyable for everyone.

1. Avoid pressuring them to eat

Instead of pressuring your loved one to eat, Alison Neov, a registered dietitian specialising in geriatric nutrition, told HuffPost that it’s more effective to focus on creating a positive mealtime environment. You can do this by keeping meals on a consistent schedule and serving foods you know they like.

Neov said she finds it helpful to offer smaller meals and avoid overcrowding the plate with food. “A large meal can be overwhelming when your appetite is low,” she said. If using utensils is a struggle, Neov and Salinas both said that serving finger foods, like sliced chicken with a dipping sauce or a sandwich cut into fours, can be helpful.

Advertisement

If possible, Neov recommends eating meals together. “Sometimes a person with dementia may struggle with a familiar task like eating, and seeing someone else pick up a fork and start eating can remind them to do the same,” she said.

2. Only set the table at mealtime

A set table indicates that it’s time to eat. To avoid confusion, Neov told HuffPost that it’s best to keep the table set only at mealtime, something she said is especially helpful if someone is eating too frequently. Between mealtimes, keep the table cleared to signal that it’s not time to eat.

When it is time to eat, Neov recommends eliminating other distractions, such as having the TV on.

Advertisement
A set table indicates that it’s time to eat. To avoid confusion, it’s best to only keep the table set at mealtime.

Milky Way via Getty Images

A set table indicates that it’s time to eat. To avoid confusion, it’s best to only keep the table set at mealtime.

3. Pair sweet foods with nutrient-dense ones

As the neurologists explained earlier, one of the eating changes that often happens with dementia is a craving for sweet, carb-dense foods. “It’s also OK if your loved one is not eating perfectly. The emphasis at this time is on making sure that they are eating enough calories and maintaining their weight. If they are only willing to eat a few different foods, I would rather see them eating enough than worry about whether every food choice is perfectly nutritious,” Neov said.

Instead of taking away the foods they seem to be interested in Neov shared that it can be more effective to find ways to enhance them. “For example, you can make a delicious smoothie with nutrient-dense ingredients that tastes like a milkshake. My favourite combination is yogurt, frozen fruit, banana, nut butter, and a splash of milk or water,” she said.

Neov shared that pairing not-so-healthy foods with healthier options (like fruit, vegetables, and nuts) is another way to add nutritional value to snacks that are nutritionally lacking.

Advertisement

Navigating changes in eating habits can be challenging, so don’t be afraid to reach out for help, either to your loved one’s healthcare provider or a registered dietitian specialising in geriatrics. “They can provide you with strategies to help keep mealtimes stress-free and also as nourishing as possible,” Neov said.

Changes in eating habits don’t mean that someone definitely has dementia, but they do deserve a medical evaluation. Before jumping to conclusions, the first step is making an appointment with a healthcare provider. That way, you’ll truly know how you can offer your support.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Putin Trying To Trigger Stress In Britain, BBC Expert Warns

Published

on

Putin Trying To Trigger Stress In Britain, BBC Expert Warns

Vladimir Putin is trying to “get Britain stressing” over the possibility Russia could target the UK, according to a BBC expert.

It comes after Germany confirmed Russia was responsible for last month’s drone attack at Leipzig airport in a worrying sign that Putin’s war in Ukraine was reaching into other countries.

The BBC’s Russia editor Steve Rosenberg suggested the Kremlin leader was now deliberately using “psychological pressure” to intimidate the UK over its support for Kyiv, too.

When asked by a journalist if military industrial facilities in the UK could become Russian targets – as Putin’s ally Andrei Fedorov said last week – Putin told the media on Tuesday: “That is classified. A military secret.”

Advertisement

Rosenberg told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme he could not say with “100%” accuracy what the Russian autocrat meant by those words.

But he added: “My impression is the aim of that short sentence was psychological pressure, to keep Britain guessing, to get Britain stressing, stressing out about Russia’s intentions, and maybe to encourage Britain to think twice before being such a staunch supporter of Ukraine.”

He pointed out that a Russian newspaper recently claimed Andy Burnham should see Putin not in his dreams but “in his nightmares”.

“It doesn’t mean that Russian missiles are about to come raining down on UK defence facilities,” Rosenberg said. “But having said that, yesterday we did hear Germany’s interior minister talking about the well-established pattern of Russian hybrid operations in Europe.

Advertisement

“There may well be concern in the UK that Russia could step up hybrid activity in Britain [like] hybrid attacks, sabotage, or covert operations.”

However, he noted: “Over the last four and a half years we have heard from Moscow to the west many warnings, many threats.

“We’ve witnessed much saber-rattling here.”

He added that Putin was even issuing threats to foreign nations on the day he invaded Ukraine, warning they would face intense consequences if they supported Kyiv.

Advertisement

So far, UK prime minister Burnham has shrugged off the heightened rhetoric coming from the Kremlin.

Moscow accused Burnham of adding “fuel to the fire” of the Ukraine war last week over the PM’s decision to give Kyiv key missile blueprints.

The PM replied: “Who started the fire? That’s the question, isn’t it.”

Putin has also deflected any blame over the drone attack at Germany’s Leipzig airport, claiming Berlin had planted evidence to blame Moscow.

Advertisement

He had no proof to back up his claim.

Rosenberg said: “Russia’s reaction is as you might expect: denial, and prolific finger-pointing the other way. In other words, Russia accusing the accuser.”

“We’ve seen this kind of reaction many times before whenever Russia is accused by something by western governments,” the specialist noted, pointing to Moscow’s reaction when accused over the Salisbury poisonings.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Politics Home | The St Leger turns 250. The partnership supporting racing must be protected

Published

on

The St Leger turns 250. The partnership supporting racing must be protected
The St Leger turns 250. The partnership supporting racing must be protected

Credit: Adobe Stock

As Parliament marks 250 years of the St Leger, Grainne Hurst of the Betting and Gaming Council and Martin Cruddace of Arena Racing Company argue that the future of British racing is closely tied to the health of the regulated betting industry, and warn that policies which weaken high street betting shops will be felt across the sport

Advertisement

In 1776, a small crowd gathered at Cantley Common outside Doncaster to watch a new horse race, won by a filly called Allabaculia.

Few of those watching that first running could have imagined they were witnessing the beginning of a sporting institution that would endure for a quarter of a millennium.

Later named after the man who conceived it, Colonel Anthony St Leger, the race predates the Derby by four years. Today, it is the world’s oldest Classic, the North’s only Classic and the final leg of the British Triple Crown.

There is an old racing saying that the fastest horse wins the Guineas, the luckiest wins the Derby and the best horse wins the St Leger. Run over more than a mile and three-quarters, it is a test of speed, stamina, courage and class.

Advertisement

For 250 years, generations have returned, and Race Week has become woven into the life of Doncaster and Yorkshire, drawing huge crowds and producing champions whose names still echo through the sport. In 1970, Nijinsky became the last horse to complete the British Triple Crown.

Last night we marked that anniversary together in Parliament because the story of British racing cannot be told without recognising the vital role played by regulated betting.

BGC members contribute more than £350m every year to British horseracing through the Levy, media rights and sponsorship, supporting prize money, racecourses, trainers, breeders, jockeys, stable staff and horse welfare.

Advertisement

Racing supports around 85,000 livelihoods and generates roughly £4bn for the economy, much of it through the yards, haulage firms, feed merchants, vets, hotels, pubs and local businesses far beyond London.

The St Leger is one of racing’s great showcases. Last year, more than 52,000 people attended the four-day Festival, including more than 26,000 on St Leger Saturday, up 11 per cent and making it the best-attended British Classic of 2025. This year, we expect a crowd of more than 30,000 on St Leger Saturday alone.

The St Leger is a national sporting treasure, but it is not a museum piece. Its future depends on people continuing to watch it, work in it, invest in it and bet on it.

A substantial part of the money sustaining racing comes through one of the most frequently misunderstood parts of our industry: the high street betting shop.

Advertisement

Betting shops contribute around £140m a year to horseracing. They pay roughly £1bn in direct tax and a further £60m to councils in business rates. They are also racing’s shop window, where generations of fans have watched and enjoyed the sport.

Last month, the Government set out plans to give communities more say over what opens on their high streets, alongside tougher action against criminal operators. We support both principles.

But good policy must draw clear distinctions. A licensed betting shop, staffed by trained employees and operating under strict regulation, is not a rogue or criminal operator.

Betting shops are legitimate high street businesses which have made enormous progress in preventing gambling-related harm. They employ tens of thousands of people, contribute to local economies and operate under some of the toughest regulation anywhere in the world. Policy should recognise that reality rather than treating them as a problem to be managed out of our high streets.

Advertisement

Shop numbers have fallen by more than a third since 2019. Around 3,000 have closed and more than 15,000 jobs have been lost. The 37,500 people still working in them support local economies and bring footfall to neighbouring businesses.

For some customers, particularly older people, the local betting shop is also somewhere to see familiar faces, talk about racing and enjoy a shared interest. Racing is a sport enjoyed by people from every section of society, and it is proud to be so.

Respecting communities means respecting those choices too. An empty unit is not regeneration. A lost job is not renewal. A regulated business should not be stigmatised simply because some politicians dislike what it sells.

The Government says it wants thriving high streets with a diverse mix of businesses that serve their communities. We agree. But that should not mean politicians deciding that a licensed, regulated betting shop is somehow less worthy of a place on the high street than another vape shop, fried chicken takeaway, dingy barber, nail bar or coffee shop where the cost of two oat milk lattes would trigger an affordability check. People should be trusted to choose where they spend their money, without politicians passing judgement on one legal product but not another.

Advertisement

But there is a consequence here that has gone almost entirely unmentioned. The closure of 500 betting shops would cost racing around £20m. Every closed shop means a little less prize money, a little less investment in the sport and, ultimately, greater difficulty in exporting one of Britain’s great sporting products and attracting international investment.

Affordability checks pose another challenge. The Gambling Commission has confirmed that the checks will proceed, so what matters now is whether the promise that they will be genuinely frictionless is honoured.

If credit reference agency data is inconsistent, customers could still find themselves restricted or asked for payslips and bank statements simply to continue with a legal activity that 22.5 million adults enjoy safely every month.

Racing customers are particularly exposed because the sport is seasonal. Someone may bet very little for much of the year and then have several more bets during Cheltenham, Aintree, Royal Ascot or the St Leger. That is normal behaviour for a racing fan, not necessarily a sign of financial risk.

Advertisement

Our modelling suggests the proposed approach could reduce Levy receipts by around £13.2m a year and push more than 70,000 customers towards the illegal gambling market.

That market pays no British tax, buys no media rights, contributes nothing to the Levy and offers none of the protections of the regulated sector.

We are not asking for special treatment. We are asking for fair, proportionate policy based on evidence and an honest understanding of how closely racing, betting and local communities are connected.

Our message to the Prime Minister, and indeed former prime ministers, is clear: please do not treat the betting shop as something you accidentally trod in. It is so much more than that, and it deserves respect.

Advertisement

Two hundred and fifty years ago, people came to Doncaster to watch a horse race. What began there became part of Yorkshire’s identity and Britain’s sporting heritage.

The St Leger is, fittingly, a race about staying power. After 250 years, few sporting institutions have shown more.

That legacy is worth protecting. As Parliament marks this extraordinary anniversary, public policy should create the conditions for racing to flourish and for the partnership that sustains it to remain strong.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Polanskis Strong Hint He Will Contest Crunch By Election

Published

on

Polanskis Strong Hint He Will Contest Crunch By Election

Zack Polanksi has dropped his heaviest hint yet that he will stand for the Greens in the crunch Holborn and St Pancras by-election.

The party’s leader said the contest – triggered by Keir Starmer’s resignation yesterday – would be “a referendum on ending rip-off Britain” as he launched a bitter attack on the former prime minister.

A Green Party spokesman on Tuesday refused to rule out Polanski would be a candidate, pointing out “he has always made it clear he would like to be a London MP”.

Speaking as he marked his first anniversary as Green leader, Polanksi said: “The Holborn and St Pancras by-election will be a referendum on ending rip-off Britain. Only the Greens have a real plan for real hope and change.

Advertisement

“We will announce our candidate in due course and they will set out an exciting agenda for the deep change our country needs.

“I am proud of what I have achieved in the first year of my leadership of the Green Party but it is just the start.

“I am very excited for the next chapter for myself, for the Greens and for people across the country.”

Taking aim at Starmer, Polanski attacked his decision to remove winter fuel payments from millions of pensioners, initially keeping the two-child benefit cap and trying to cut the welfare bill.

Advertisement

“He wanted people to honour him for being an international statesman but his pick for US ambassador was Peter Mandelson, friend and confidant to the world’s most notorious paedophile,” the Green leader said.

“He allowed Donald Trump to use air bases in the UK to wage his war on Iran, while cutting international aid to low-income countries.

“Worst of all, he said Israel had the right to cut off water and power to Gaza as part of his government’s ongoing support for the genocide of the Palestinian people.

“And back in the UK he made it a crime to oppose this genocide, locking up scores of peaceful protesters.

Advertisement

“This is not a legacy to be proud of, it is a legacy of shame. One that only the Greens can draw a line under and offer a real alternative.”

No date has been set yet for the by-election, although it is likely to take place at some point in the autumn.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Katie Lam: Britain is descending into anarcho-tyranny

Published

on

Katie Lam is the Shadow Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and the MP for Weald of Kent.

For far too many people in Britain today, the phrase ‘anarcho-tyranny’ is a frighteningly accurate description of day-to-day life.

In short, it describes a situation in which the law-abiding are punished, while rule-breakers get away with wrongdoing. Despite no longer having the will, or ability, to maintain control over rule breakers, the government compulsively creates new rules and new sanctions for the law-abiding, in order to maintain some semblance of authority. Sound familiar?

Though there are many contenders for the government department most guilty of imposing anarcho-tyranny, the Ministry for Housing, Local Government, and Communities must surely warrant a place on the podium. Few other departments are as guilty of making life harder for people who are just trying to do the right thing, while turning a blind eye to the most flagrant misconduct elsewhere.

Advertisement

On the one hand, young people who work hard and do the right thing are finding it harder and harder to move out and start building their own lives. Thanks to this Government’s Renters’ Rights Act, rents are rising, and landlords are busily offloading their properties – meaning fewer options for those looking for somewhere to live. At the same time, Labour have totally failed to tackle the problems in our planning system, and their tax hikes and red tape are just resulting in fewer new houses being built. That’s particularly true in Sadiq Khan’s London, where housing starts fell to their lowest ever level in 2024-25; construction began on just 4,170 new homes across the entire capital.

For people wanting to rent, to buy a new home, to make changes to their existing home, to build houses in the places that people want them, or to rent out property that they already own, the answer from this government has consistently been more regulations, more rules, and more restrictions.

That’s not to mention the rise in council tax, or the department’s absurd ‘Anti-Muslim Hostility’ definition, a rebranded version of their Islamophobia definition, a backdoor blasphemy law which will prevent public servants, including the police, from talking openly about difficult subjects like Islamist extremism or female genital mutilation.

At the same time, the department is a soft touch when it comes to rule-breakers.

Advertisement

A small minority of travellers are breaking the rules and being allowed to set up new caravan sites, without permission, causing massive disruption to the people living nearby. Far too many councillors openly pander to particular ethnic, religious, or racial groups in their campaigns, including through campaign materials in foreign languages. Some of the most expensive property in the country is being used as taxpayer-subsidised social housing, often for people who have come here from abroad – today, nearly half of London’s social housing goes to people born overseas.

And far too many people see local councils handing out dodgy contracts, or wasting taxpayer money, while failing to deliver basic services.

People are fed up, and rightly so. We all deserve to live in a country where people who work hard and do the right thing are rewarded. Those who work hard, and who want to, should be able to buy a new house, in the place that they want to live, without having to save up for several decades. They certainly shouldn’t have their hard-earned money spent on providing subsidised housing to foreign nationals, in some of the country’s most expensive properties. Nor should they have to put up with the disruption caused by those who break the rules, or with the religious and cultural separatism which has taken root in far too many of our towns and cities.

I’m so grateful to Kemi for asking me to hold the Government to account on all of this, as Shadow Secretary of State for Housing, Communities, and Local Government. James Cleverly has left big shoes to fill, and I look forward to following in his footsteps.

Advertisement

It’s also a real privilege to join so many talented colleagues in the Shadow Cabinet – both existing and newly-appointed. Kemi has put together a superb team, and I’m proud to be working alongside them. I can’t wait to start taking the fight to this Government.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Trump Under Fire For Iran War Position Flip

Published

on

Trump Under Fire For Iran War Position Flip

Donald Trump has been accused of “lying” after he shifted position once again on the war in Iran.

The US president said America now has “almost total control” of the Strait of Hormuz.

Posting on Truth Social, Trump said: “I’m not trying to force Iran to the bargaining table, as ABC Fake News reported. I couldn’t care less if they sign a worthless, to them, agreement.

“I like our position now much better, with almost total control of the Hormuz Strait, and their economy totally collapsing.”

Advertisement

But just two weeks ago, the president claimed that the US had “total control” over the economically-vital waterway.

In fact, he first claimed America controls the Strait in June.

Trump’s latest U-turn comes just days after he was mocked online for declaring “mission accomplished” in Iran.

Social media users were also quick to call out his flip-flopping on the Strait of Hormuz, which carried one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquified natural gas before the war began in February but which has been effectively closed ever since.

Advertisement

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Less Than A Fifth Of Brits Think Farage Looks Like A PM-In-Waiting

Published

on

Less Than A Fifth Of Brits Think Farage Looks Like A PM-In-Waiting

Fewer than a fifth of Brits think Nigel Farage looks like a prime minister-in-waiting, according to a new poll.

YouGov has found that just 19% believe the Reform UK leader is ready for No.10, a drop of seven points from just June.

In a further blow to Farage, two-thirds of the public – including more than a quarter of Reform voters – think he is not capable of doing the top job at all.

Farage’s net favourability has fallen down to -44 as well, having peaked at -27 last summer.

Advertisement

Support for his performance as Reform leader has also plummeted by a staggering 51 points from +18 this time last year to -33.

When YouGov asked the public to describe the Reform leader in three of their own words, the pollsters found the words “racist” (15%) and liar” (12%) came up most often.

A further 8% described him as dishonest, corrupt or crooked, untrustworthy or unreliable (7%), self-serving (6%) or sleazy or dodgy (5%).

Approximately 60% of Brits told YouGov they see the wider Reform party as untrustworthy, serving their own interests, prejudiced and extreme.

Advertisement

The findings came the Reform leader was sworn back into the Commons after winning the Clacton by-election against comedy candidate Count Binface.

Farage triggered the contest earlier in the summer by choosing to stand down as an MP amid heightened scrutiny over his finances.

His return means the parliamentary probe into the undeclared £5 million donation he received from crypto-billionaire Christopher Harborne before the 2024 general election will now resume.

The More in Common think tank also confirmed on Tuesday that Reform had slumped to third place behind Labour and the Tories.

Advertisement

The survey put Labour in the lead on 26%, three points ahead of the Conservatives, with Reform a point behind on 22%.

It is Reform’s lowest vote share since January 2025, and the first time they have been behind the Tories in 18 months – a bleak result for the right-wing party shortly before their annual conference in Birmingham this weekend.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Birmingham’s fatwa on the England flag

Published

on

Birmingham’s fatwa on the England flag

The post Birmingham’s fatwa on the England flag appeared first on spiked.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Net Zero is leaving Britain defenceless

Published

on

Net Zero is leaving Britain defenceless

In a way, this has always been the case. In an attritional conflict, the ability to produce, replace and sustain military capability matters as much as the weapons a country starts with. Military power has always depended on productive force. It was Paul Kennedy who documented the relationship between economic power and military power across five centuries of great-power competition in his magnum opus, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers. In December 2024, John Bew, former chief foreign-policy adviser to No10, gave this logic a new name – ‘machinepolitik’. He argued we are returning to an era of ‘raw power’ in which the ability to harness productive force, from armaments to energy to technology, will increasingly determine which countries shape events.

The wars of the past four years have gone a long way towards vindicating both Kennedy and Bew’s analysis. As the Centre for Strategic International Studies has noted, Russia’s war in Ukraine has consumed extraordinary amounts of materiel, with both sides burning through artillery shells, precision-guided munitions, drones and other equipment at rates far beyond peacetime assumptions. In the case of drones, an estimated 10,000 are being used each day.


Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Please wait…

Advertisement
Advertisement

For people living in Britain and Europe, this should be deeply concerning. If the United States, the so-called arsenal of democracy, is already struggling to replenish critical munitions while confronting lesser adversaries like Iran, then the implications for a prolonged conflict with a peer competitor like China should be blindingly obvious.

The problem is even more acute in Europe. Unlike the United States, we enter this period of renewed great-power competition with some of the highest energy prices in the developed world and a much-diminished industrial base. Decades of poor policymaking have hollowed out foundational sectors such as virgin steel, chemicals and refining, all of which provide essential inputs into sustained military operations

Oil refining in Britain is a good example. There is a tendency among politicians and in the media to treat refinery closures as manageable because cars can be electrified and planes can eventually use sustainable aviation fuel. But military demand is very different. F-35s, tanks, ships and logistics fleets still depend overwhelmingly on conventional fuels. Domestic refining capacity cannot easily be substituted in a crisis.

Advertisement

As Dev Sanyal, chief executive of VaroPreem, whose refineries supply a tenth of Europe’s road fuels, told the Financial Times last week: ‘The reality is when you start thinking about F-35 jets and Leopard tanks they don’t run on hydrogen, they run on conventional energy.’ It is a similar argument to the one I made in the Telegraph in April.

Unfortunately, the national conversation about rearmament is still framed far too narrowly around defence budgets, procurement and headline spending commitments. Those things are necessary, but they are not sufficient. Rearmament ultimately requires reindustrialisation. For Britain and Europe, that means confronting the policies driving structurally high energy prices – in particular, the climate agenda that is eroding the competitiveness of energy-intensive industry.

Another major obstacle is the second ‘China Shock’. Europe is trying to rebuild domestic manufacturing while Chinese overcapacity is intensifying competition across sectors that matter to future economic and military strength, such as car manufacturing.

Advertisement

The problem is that this is not simply a question of commercial competition. Too many seem unaware of how the same industrial base that is undercutting European manufacturers is also helping to sustain Russia’s war economy. As experts at RUSI, the world’s oldest defence think-tank, and Policy Exchange’s Edward Stringer have argued, Chinese productive capacity is structurally embedded in Russia’s war effort. We rightly focus on Russia’s shadow fleet because it helps to directly finance the Kremlin’s war machine. But we are far less willing to confront the contradiction of deepening our own dependence on Chinese industries that are helping to sustain that same war effort.

That is worth remembering the next time Labour politicians such as Ed Miliband point to the alleged benefits of importing ever greater quantities of Chinese clean technologies in pursuit of Net Zero.

Advertisement

All of this points to a harder truth about UK defence and rearmament. It will require a break with assumptions that have shaped British policy for decades – namely, that a statutory Net Zero target can be pursued without weakening industrial capacity; that cheap imports from China are a cost-free substitute for domestic production; that Britain can safely dispense with its domestic oil and gas sector (or simply keep onshore and offshore resources in the ground); and that green industries can replace the strategic value of the heavy industries being lost.

Those assumptions were easier to sustain in a more benign international environment. They are much harder to defend today.

Maurice Cousins is campaign director for Net Zero Watch. Follow him on X: @MDC12345678.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025