Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Politics

The absurdity of banning Hasan Piker and Cenk Uygur from the UK

Published

on

The absurdity of banning Hasan Piker and Cenk Uygur from the UK
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Richard Gadd’s Half Man Has A Race Problem

Published

on

Richard Gadd stars in "Half Man."

This article contains spoilers for the final episode of Half Man.

Throughout its six-episode run, Richard Gadd’s new drama Half Man has proven itself to be one of this year’s most daring series.

Focusing on the toxic relationship between Niall Kennedy and his pseudo-stepbrother Ruben Pallister, the series takes risks while examining shame and queerness in a way that many shows shy away from. Niall and Ruben are drawn to each other, despite Niall’s shrewdness and Ruben’s penchant for violence, igniting between them a spark that quickly festers and begins to ruin each of their lives.

Richard Gadd, the show’s creator and star, who won Emmys for his Netflix series Baby Reindeer, is fascinated by how toxic masculinity impacts relationships between men. Yet, the show has a glaring problem that many series focusing on white queer characters do: Half Man doesn’t reckon with the intersection of race and toxic masculinity and how it impacts characters of color.

Advertisement

When Niall leaves for university, he meets Alby Safadi (played by both Bilal Hasna and Charlie De Melo at different stages of the character’s life), a gay student of colour who is one of the few people he can open up to.

Their relationship slowly becomes romantic, with Alby allowing Niall space to finally admit to himself that he likes men. Time and time again, Alby is a shoulder for Niall to cry on, often casting his own interests, and safety, to the side. Just when it appears that Niall has finally found a confidant in his tumultuous life, Alby’s encouragement for Niall to come out ends with Ruben interpreting this revelation as a personal attack, resulting in him brutally assaulting Alby.

It’s here that Half Man begins to ask its audience to dispel any disbelief that Ruben’s targeting of Alby has nothing to do with his race and everything to do with his queerness. Yes, the series centres on the tumultuous relationship between Niall and Ruben, but by making Alby a man of colour, Richard Gadd fails to engage with how Half Man is stilted by its precarious representation of race. (The show also never mentions his nationality or ethnicity.)

The assault results in Alby being put into a coma and left permanently disfigured, and also results in the collapse of Niall and Ruben’s already fraught relationship.

Advertisement
Richard Gadd stars in "Half Man."
Richard Gadd stars in “Half Man.”

Alby’s character is mostly thrown to the wayside, even throughout a trial in which Ruben claims the assault was the result of Alby groping him. The series is set from the late 1980s to the present day, so to say that Alby’s race is not a factor in how Ruben, his family and the justice system see him is laughable.

From here on, Alby’s presence in the show, despite being revealed to be Niall’s husband in present day, is one of a ghost. His existence has been irrevocably changed by the series narrative, yet it is never given the space or screen time to have any significant impact on the story.

Save for Heated Rivalry, Interview With The Vampire and a handful of other shows, the landscape of queer television has long focused on white characters or white ensembles, where queer characters of colour are often relegated to sidekick roles or the love interests of white protagonists, like Alby is.

The positioning of these characters as secondary to the plot isn’t necessarily the problem; it is instead the way in which they are treated within the narrative and by the writers who created them. Alby’s existence in Half Man is a pillar of the show’s conflict in the 1990s timeline, yet it is only Niall’s trauma from the assault that is allowed to be known.

Displayed to audiences through harsh breaths, moments of confusion and glances of horror toward Ruben, the impact of witnessing Alby’s assault consumes Niall. Alby’s reaction to his own assault is only ever clear through the physical scars we can see on his face, with no regard for how this attack impacted his schooling, his subsequent career and even his rekindled relationship with Niall.

Advertisement

Obviously, being attacked to the point that you end up in a coma is significant, but the trauma the sole character of colour in this series endures is never given the same amount of space as the other characters.

Charlie de Melo as Alby and Jamie Bell as Niall in Half Man.
Charlie de Melo as Alby and Jamie Bell as Niall in Half Man.

If Alby were to only exist in the past timeline, there really wouldn’t be a need for this to be explored. But, he and Niall get married in the present day, in which Ruben’s presence at their wedding causes both men to panic. The mental and physical scars on Alby clearly exist, so the diminishing of each feels like an ignorant dismissal. It follows a worrying and growing trend within queer television.

The series finale, instead of giving us any inkling that Alby and Niall’s relationship is as damaged or fascinating as Niall and Ruben’s, displays Alby as passive and nearly docile once again. Then, when he and Niall reunite after Ruben is sent to prison in the late 2000s, he tells his partner he should attempt to reconcile with the man who has destroyed both of their lives. In doing so, Gadd proves that Alby is nothing more than a pseudo-therapist for Niall, who since their university days has become a despondent addict entrenched in shame and obsession.

Half Man is a story about how toxic masculinity shapes and warps men and their relationships, yet there are so many cracks in the narrative.

There’s no denying that the series is one of the best of the year, but with it, Gadd has proved himself as a writer who has no desire to tackle how toxic masculinity is directly linked to both Ruben and Niall’s whiteness.

Advertisement

Since Alby’s assault, villainisation and subsequent reappearance, Half Man has forced me to question why Alby was cast as a man of colour if its creator didn’t explore how their violence directly impacts the lives of the men of colour around them.

By using Alby as a therapist for the show’s white protagonist — and as a punching bag for its white antagonist — the otherwise bold and tightly written series is softened by its disregard for racial politics, pointing to a larger problem that continues to grow in queer television.

All six episodes of Half Man are streaming on BBC iPlayer.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Why We Have To Put Tray Tables Up During Takeoff And Landing

Published

on

Why We Have To Put Tray Tables Up During Takeoff And Landing

We’ve written before at HuffPost UK about why airline staff ask us to keep the blinds shut during takeoff and landing and the surprisingly sensible reason some planes still have ashtrays, even though smoking’s banned on board.

So, what about those tray tables – the ones that fold down from the seat in front of you, which you’re always told to keep up and secured at the start and end of a flight?

As you might expect, it’s all about safety.

Why do I have to keep my tray up during takeoff and landing?

Advertisement

Flying in a commercial plane is statistically the safest way to travel. But takeoff and landing are by far the riskiest parts of a flight, Business Insider explained.

For instance, even though takeoff and the plane’s initial climb only account for 2% of the overall flight, over 14% of reported accidents happen in these short stages.

This is part of the reason why the tray rule was introduced, Captain Steve Schreiber, a former pilot who posts on social media under the name Captain Steeeve, said in a YouTube Short.

“If you have to get off the plane in an emergency and in a hurry, if your tray table is down, you might not get out of that plane in 90 seconds,” which is the maximum length many regulatory bodies require evacuations to last, he said.

Advertisement

Additionally, you might block or slow down the people behind you, causing a pile-up or delay.

Speaking to Travel + Leisure, ex-flight attendant Kelly Kincaid said the same thing: tray tables have to “be up for takeoff and landing so that [they] won’t block you from evacuating in the event of an emergency”.

And, she stated, folding up your tray table also means you have to put the things you had resting on it (like your laptop or coffee) away, meaning there could be fewer potentially dangerous projectiles in the event of an emergency.

That’s also why you can’t recline your seat during takeoff and landing

Advertisement

Keeping channels to emergency exits clear is key for passenger safety, especially during the parts of a flight most vulnerable to accidents.

Speaking to HuffPost UK previously, a spokesperson for the Royal Aeronautical Society’s Flight Operations Specialist Group explained: “There are two primary safety-related reasons why aircraft seats must be in the upright position for take-off and landing.

“The first is that the seat gives the occupant maximum impact protection when upright, and its structure locks into position accordingly… The second reason is that reclined seats reduce the space available in the row behind for occupants to escape quickly if an emergency evacuation is required.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Blow For Vladimir Putin As UK Forces Intercept Russian ‘Shadow’ Oil Tanker In Channel

Published

on

Blow For Vladimir Putin As UK Forces Intercept Russian 'Shadow' Oil Tanker In Channel

British armed forces delivered a major blow to Vladimir Putin’s war in Ukraine by intercepting a Russian “shadow fleet” oil tanker in the English Channel.

Royal Marine commandos and specially-trained law enforcement officers boarded the sanctioned vessel Smyrtos in the early hours of Sunday morning.

The operation was supported by RAF jets as well as HMS Sutherland and HMS Ledbury.

Shadow vessels carry sanctioned Russian oil, which is sold to raise funds to pay for the Kremlin’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine.

Advertisement

In a post on X, prime minister Keir Starmer said: “This operation delivers yet another blow to Russia and reminds those fuelling Putin’s war in Ukraine that they cannot hide.

“I want to pay tribute to all those involved, including our armed forces and law enforcement officers who keep this country safe 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.”

Defence secretary Dan Jarvis said: “Operations like this require skill, professionalism and courage. I pay tribute to our armed forces personnel and all those involved.

“Russia relies on its shadow fleet to fund their conflict in Ukraine and our interdiction delivers a blow to Putin’s illegal war.”

Advertisement

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Dreams Cosmopolitan Bed Review: This Bed Frame Comes Together Fast

Published

on

The frame comes together in four simple steps.

We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI — prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.

I will be the first to admit that furniture building is not my strong suit.

Despite following instructions, I just can’t quite seem to get it right – no matter how hard I try.

But the Dreams Cosmopolitan Quick-Build Bed has absolutely changed the game. Forget Allen Keys, forget small little screws, the bed comes together so quickly and so easily, it’s practically foolproof.

Advertisement

You simply unfold the frame (which comes flat-packed), insert the centre bar, attach the slats to the top, pop on the frame cover and you’ve mastered it in about 5-10 minutes – it’s wonderful.

If you want to get the job done fast, you can rope in a friend to help – but I think it’s certainly doable with one person (it might just take a little bit longer, although it’s still a far faster process than your usual flatpack furniture build).

The frame comes together in four simple steps.
The frame comes together in four simple steps.

Why does the right bed frame matter?

1. Overall health and sleep quality

Having the right bed frame can impact your overall health: if you don’t have a solid, sturdy frame, it can impact sleep quality, which can – in turn – impact physical and mental health.

Advertisement

2. Storage solutions

Bed frames can also act as a very handy storage solution. I don’t have many places to store things in my flat, so I went for one that can also hide my bits and bobs underneath. It’s been incredibly practical and I’d definitely recommend for people living in smaller homes where space, and therefore storage, is limited.

Why should I try this frame?

I can say for a fact that I feel completely supported when I’m sleeping. The bed is strong, sturdy and doesn’t move at all (and I have wooden flooring so I’ve experienced this issue before, it’s not fun).

Advertisement
The bed is perfect for anyone who doesn't love building furniture.
The bed is perfect for anyone who doesn’t love building furniture.

While it doesn’t come with a headboard (you’d need to purchase one separately), the Dreams Cosmopolitan Quick Build Bed is the ideal purchase for anyone who wants a quick-build bed that’s stylish, contemporary and has a decent amount of storage space.

At just £199, I think it’s absolutely worth the investment.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Lack of sanctions enable resilience of ‘Israel’ genocide economy

Published

on

People who describe themselves as patriots display US and Israel flags as they set up their counter protest ahead of the protest by CND at RAF Fairford on March 7, 2026 in Fairford, England.

People who describe themselves as patriots display US and Israel flags as they set up their counter protest ahead of the protest by CND at RAF Fairford on March 7, 2026 in Fairford, England.

The FT has authored a concerning article indicating that the apartheid settler-colony, known as ‘Israel’, has suffered limited economic damage despite three years of genocidal crimes in West Asia.

However, supporters of Palestine shouldn’t despair. The piece indicates that, in the event of meaningful sanctions by the likes of the EU, and a continued exodus of high skilled professionals, the ‘Israel’s’ finances could begin to really suffer.

In the meantime, columnists Mehul Srivastava and James Shotter describe how “restaurants are full” in the settler-colony. This is a grotesque scenario in the Zone of Interest beside the starvation of the Gaza extermination camp.

The pair highlight:

Advertisement

There have been three quarterly contractions during nearly three years of conflict, but growth has rebounded each time.

Amir Yaron, head of the land theft project’s central bank, boasts of a “trampoline under the Holy Land”. It would be easy to write this off as more hasbara nonsense, but at least in its news reporting, the FT doesn’t tend to bullshit.

Its business reporting is aimed at the world’s ruling class who want accurate information that enables them to maintain their dominance. Their readers don’t want propaganda intended to mislead the masses. That’s the job of the Daily Mail, the Sun and similar rags.

‘Israel’ Zionist militech tested on Palestinians

Independent data from the London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) supports the article’s claims. It shows real GDP in ‘Israel’ has continued to grow strongly after an initial hit post-7 October 2023. It has been similar to the growth present prior to that event.

The FT says:

Advertisement

The surprising resilience has been underpinned by a formidable military-industrial complex, a flexible workforce, a large natural gas supply — and two decades of growth that turned Israel into a relatively wealthy, if unequal, nation.

There’s no denying these points either. The Zionist entity is able to build up a successful military and surveillance industry thanks to having a captive population of Palestinians to experiment on.

Sometimes referred to as the ‘Palestine Laboratory‘, the Tel Aviv terror regime eavesdrops on Palestinians’ private phone calls, surveils them further through endless checkpoints and kills them with missiles and drones. These can then be exported as ‘battle-tested’ to any amoral states looking to suppress their own populations.

The “flexible workforce” could be taken two ways. Option one is that workers can be hired and fired easily, given ‘Israel’ operates under a deeply neoliberal business regime. This is especially true for the disposable workers the settler-colony brings in from abroad. They have replaced the “hundreds of thousands of Palestinians in low-skilled jobs” who had their work and entry permits cancelled by the Netanyahu regime.

Option two is that the flexibility lies in the apartheid pseudo-state’s ability to switch their land thieves seamlessly between committing war crimes in Gaza, and a standard 9-5 job. When the state calls up reservists to the Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF), it pays their salary by compensating the employer. IOF murderers are even given a bonus on top.

Advertisement

The FT says the fake-state:

…has become adept at sending its population to work one week and war the next, with its high-tech workers able to work from home when the country was shut down in periods of active combat.

US hand-outs let terror economy run on easy mode

The bloodthirsty expansionists can’t manage this perfectly, however. The IOF has at times called up over 50% of a “300-employee cyber security company”, leaving them unable to hit revenue targets.

As for the “large natural gas supply” mentioned by the FT, it helps when you can just steal such resources from the population you subject to apartheid, ethnic cleansing and genocide.

The business-focused media outlet also highlights how ‘Israel’ is “buoyed by US support”. That’s one way to put “receives massive handouts and military support from the world’s hegemon“.

Advertisement

Far from being some hub of innovative geniuses as hasbara tells us, the settler-colony benefits hugely from having a reliable sugar daddy in Washington. The constant torrent of funds from there means the murderers occupying historic Palestine can play the economy game on easy mode.

This certainly makes grim reading for anyone who wants to see the genocidal terrorists punished for their massive crimes. Saying that, The FT does highlight some glimpses of light.

At least 100,000 Israelis have left the country since October 7, mostly high-tech workers, medical professionals and engineers, according to a study by Tel Aviv University.

Al Jazeera puts the figure even higher, at 150,000.

The Financial Times’ journalists also mention the prospects for ‘Israel’ if the likes of Europe ever get serious about trading sanctions. Amnesty International and UN figures have called for the EU-Israel Trade Agreement to be suspended. They rightly argue that under a human rights clause in the contract, the EU must halt the deal.

Advertisement

BDS the only way to crush ‘Israeli’ economy

The Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign has seen successes, with Co-op supermarkets in Britain and Italy ceasing to stock apartheid goods. ‘Israeli’ products are increasingly off-putting to consumers worldwide.

It’s clear that, especially with ongoing US support, the Zionist entity will not suffer the economic pain required to deter it from ongoing aggression. Only concerted boycotting by people across the world, alongside meaningful sanctions by states, can ensure accountability for the criminal project of mass murder and theft.

Featured image via Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

By Robert Freeman

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

The House | “Capturing the essence of a deeply proud and dedicated industry”: Terry Jermy reviews Minette Batters’ ‘Harvest’

Published

on

'Capturing the essence of a deeply proud and dedicated industry': Terry Jermy reviews Minette Batters' 'Harvest'
'Capturing the essence of a deeply proud and dedicated industry': Terry Jermy reviews Minette Batters' 'Harvest'

2023: Minette Batters attends a No 10 summit | Image: © Tayfun Salci/ZUMA Press Wire / Alamy


3 min read

Baroness Batters’ enjoyable memoir is an insightful account of her time as head of the NFU and the challenges facing British farmers

Advertisement

This is the story of the emotional journey of a tenant farmer’s daughter who goes from frowned-upon female farm worker to the glass-ceiling-breaking first female president of the nation’s biggest farming organisation.

Offering a behind-the-scenes glimpse into the life of one of the UK’s most prominent farming advocates, Harvest reveals the everyday life struggles that intertwined with consequential moments in our nation’s history. It provides a fly-on-the-wall account of the conversations that shaped our food and farming industry for a generation.

A passionate firsthand account of her battles with self-confidence and gender stereotyping, Minette Batters provides a window into the soul of an industry that is often difficult to understand from the outside.

Advertisement

As the National Farmers’ Union (NFU) first female president, Batters broke down barriers, lifting up other women in the agricultural industry in the process. 

I particularly enjoyed learning about how she somewhat accidentally began her career with the NFU. She attended by chance a local NFU meeting and then with great trepidation progressed through various officer ranks until she ended up as its president.

This unplanned ascent came alongside one of the most consequential periods for British farming. Some may say it was fate: she was ideally qualified to head the organisation post-Brexit – when the farming community needed that strong and authentic leadership the most. 

Advertisement

It provides a fly on the wall account of the conversations that shaped our food and farming industry for a generation

Harvest details how decades-long structural challenges collided with the unexpected withdrawal from the European Union and the removal of the Common Agricultural Policy safety net that masked many of the challenges facing British farming.

At the centre of this national debate on the future of farming sat Batters, navigating through the post-Brexit political turmoil, her deep commitment to farming and her practical approach enabling her to help chart a way forward for the industry.

Advertisement

It was not lost on me reading Harvest how there were similarities between Batter’s journey and my own. Having started as a local community activist and becoming a town councillor purely to serve the area where I was born and raised, I went on to stand in a general election and defeat a former British prime minister. It was therefore particularly amusing to read about the various interactions between Batters and my South West Norfolk constituency predecessor, Liz Truss.

Harvest book coverBatters shares how her upbringing and difficult relationship with her father shaped her values and commitment to rural life and the farming industry that she came to protect. Capturing the essence of a deeply proud and dedicated industry, Harvest is punctuated by fascinating profiles of the people that feed our nation every single day – revealing a constantly evolving industry, embracing innovation in the face of a changing world.

Scrap the expensive training courses – reading this book should be mandatory for every civil servant in Defra and any politician tasked with making decisions on behalf of the farming industry. For everyone else, this memoir will make you appreciate where our food comes from and the people that produce the harvest that sustains us.

Terry Jermy is Labour MP for South West Norfolk and chair of the Farming APPG

Harvest: A farmer’s story of heritage, home and hope

By: Minette Batters

Publisher: Ebury Press

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

7 Steps To Save Basil From Overwatering And Root Rot

Published

on

The supermarket basil at the start: growing, but with too much water, in the middle: later growth with fewer overwatering complications on the righr

This year, I decided it was time to start growing my own herbs. I’ve already written about my success with mint, which basically grows no matter what – but I’ve kept pretty quiet about my basil project.

That’s because I keep making mistakes. I don’t pinch the plant enough, so it’s grown tall and stringy instead of lush and bushy. While I divided and separated the roots of my supermarket plant, I still don’t think my pots are big enough for the job.

All of this, however, a basil plant can survive. My main issue was the one that can cause it to “rot” and sometimes die: I overwatered it, leading it to wilt and yellow in patches.

Thankfully, I’ve managed to save the affected plants since (though as you can see from the pictures below, I’m still doing a terrible job of pinching off leaves for bushy growth: I find it hard to let go of my growth!).

Advertisement
The supermarket basil at the start: growing, but with too much water, in the middle: later growth with fewer overwatering complications on the righr
The supermarket basil at the start: growing, but with too much water, in the middle: later growth with fewer overwatering complications on the righr

What happens if you overwater basil?

Per the RHS, overwatering seedlings can lead to fungal diseases, like fatal damping off.

For adult plants, Homes & Gardens added, too much water can lead to a condition called root rot.

This (as the name suggests) leads the roots to brown, become mushy, and partly decay.

As root rot gets worse, it endangers the plant because it stops it from being able to absorb the nutrients and water it needs to grow and stay alive.

Advertisement

What causes overwatering for basil?

Basil likes free-draining soil, which is why it needs drainage holes if stored in a plant pot. Letting it sit in moist soil spells disaster.

At first, I thought that meant I needed to apply smaller doses of water. I was only pouring a little into the saucer under my basil plants (always water them from below: watering basil plants’ leaves can cause fungal growth, too), but I was adding it every day.

Speaking to The Spruce, Jordan Mara, founder of Mind & Soil, explained that that’s about the worst watering mistake I could have made.

Advertisement

You’re far better off giving it deep and infrequent waterings rather than lighter applications of water more regularly, he said.

This not only keeps it hydrated for longer, but “trains the roots of the plant to search down more deeply for water, creating a larger root system,” too.

How often should I water basil?

A deep watering from the base about once a week should do if you’ve got an established plant, Mara said, though factors like the weather and whether your plant is potted or planted could affect that.

Advertisement

Martha Stewart’s site echoed the advice, suggesting about 2.5-5cm of water once a week unless the weather’s really hot.

Meanwhile, Southern Living recommends a more customised approach.

Plunge your finger into the soil, they advise, and only water if the first 5cm is dry.

What are the signs of overwatered basil?

Advertisement
  • A bad smell coming from your soil,
  • Yellow leaves, especially at the base or top of the plant,
  • Wilting stems,
  • Brown spots on leaves,
  • Droopy, dull leaves,
  • Mushy, weak, and/or discoloured roots.

What should I do if I’ve overwatered my basil plant?

I saved most of mine with six steps (and saved my sanity with a seventh):

1) Identify issues quickly

Kim Roman, instructor for Square Foot Gardening, told Martha Stewart: “At the first sign of yellowing leaves, you must immediately inspect for the disease as the spores are fast-moving”.

This, it turned out, was true. The basil plant I figured would work it out in the end has since gone to the great well-drained garden in the sky. Check your plants for signs of overwatering at least once every couple of days.

Advertisement

2) Stop watering immediately

It might sound obvious, but putting more water in your soil at this stage definitely won’t help, Food Gardening Network said.

3) Remove affected areas and clean the rest of the root system

I had some mild root rot, which I confirmed by lifting the soil out of the pot and looking at the roots. If that’s happened to you, shake off any excess soil, run the roots under lukewarm water, and cut off any affected areas (these will be weaker and discoloured).

Advertisement

4) Let the roots dry overnight and disinfect your plant pot

This can help to get rid of any remaining spores which could come back to haunt your basil.

5) Repot your basil in new, fresh soil

If your old pot doesn’t have drainage holes and/or your previous soil was heavy with clay, change them for more free-draining options (terracotta pots with good drainage and a saucer are generally better for basil). Don’t compact your soil, either, as that can cause it to hold onto more water.

Advertisement

6) Trim the leaves

If a lot of your roots have gone, much of your plant’s energy and water channels have been cut off too. You may want to remove some of your plant’s leaves after this process, especially if it’s a big plant.

7) Know when to accept defeat

Sadly, BBC Gardener’s World said, it can be tough to treat root rot in established plants. This is especially true if it’s already affected a lot fo your plant’s roots and leaves, as happened with one of my four plants.

Advertisement

Still, now you get the chance to start all over again. And depending on how long you’ve been growing your basil, odds are you’ve already got a decent return on investment for that sub-£2 supermarket plant.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

The House Opinion Article | The Professor Will See You Now: Tribal politics

Published

on

The Professor Will See You Now: Tribal politics
The Professor Will See You Now: Tribal politics

Illustration by Tracy Worrall


4 min read

Lessons in political science. This week: tribal politics

Advertisement

Ten years, huh? Turns out time really does fly when you’re having fun. There is no more fun way to mark – celebrate? commiserate? (delete as applicable) – the 10th anniversary of the Brexit referendum than by reading Sara Hobolt and James Tilley’s excellent new book, Tribal Politics: How Brexit Divided Britain. It’s a model of social science, packed with data, yet clearly written, and enlivened by a string of digs at the wackier side of the last decade: terrible Brexit novels, conspiracy theories about pencils at polling stations, that Cambridge economist who turned up for a departmental meeting naked – with “Brexit Leaves Britain Naked” written across her breasts – and much more.

The book charts how the process of Brexit – both the referendum and the years of joy that followed – created two distinct political tribes in Britain. These tribes did not exist in any meaningful form prior to 2016, yet the referendum forced people to pick a side, even people who might previously have been relatively lukewarm one way or the other, and then what we might euphemistically call the lack of plain sailing thereafter helped reinforce those identities, creating ingroups (us: clever, honest, open-minded) and outgroups (them: selfish, hypocritical, closed-minded).

Advertisement

For most of the period since the referendum, more people saw themselves as remainers or leavers than supporters of all the political parties combined. And while the extent of this identity has dipped a little recently, its intensity has not. To quote the example the authors give: while most Lib Dem supporters say their identity is “not very important” to them (you can insert your own joke here), those who see themselves as remainers and leavers say that identity is “very important”. Even 10 years on, majorities of remainers and leavers still say “we” when talking about their side.

We often think that Americans are politically divided, but discrimination by one Brexit tribe against the other is as, or more, widespread than partisan discrimination by Democrats and Republicans. Almost all of this is pretty symmetrical, by the way. Although there are some differences – remainers being slightly worse than leavers – these are outweighed by the similarities. For the most part, your lot are just as bad as their lot.

From a 200-plus-page data-heavy book, containing 30 tables and over 40 graphs, it’s difficult to pull out individual highlights, but if I have a favourite graph – and I am the sort of person to have a favourite graph – then it is Figure 7.5, which tracks people’s attitudes on the state of the economy. The beauty with this one is that it reports the attitudes held by the same people both before and after the referendum. From it, we know that back in 2014, 2015 and 2016 those individuals who went on to become leavers and remainers felt almost identically about how well the economy was doing. Yet as soon as the referendum result was announced, a gap opened up, largely as a result of remainers suddenly thinking everything was going to pot, and that gap has persisted since. The same thing is even true when people were talking about their own finances; after the referendum, remainers suddenly felt personally poorer, while leavers felt richer, even though at that point nothing very much had changed either way. Partisanship is, as the saying goes, a hell of a drug.

A new paper in Political Behavior finds a similar pattern in the US with Tesla. Pre-2024, there was relatively little difference between the way Democrats and Republicans saw the car. Yet after Elon Musk threw in his lot with Donald Trump in 2024, and then led Doge, views began to diverge across different criteria: likelihood to buy, perceptions of quality, reputation, whether there was a buzz about it, and so on. The cars didn’t change, but how Americans saw them did, in ways that were overwhelmingly driven by their party loyalties. 

Advertisement

Further reading: S Hobolt and J Tilley, Tribal Politics: How Brexit Divided Britain (2026); K Endres et al, Tesla Takedown: Brand Politicization and Partisan Consumerism in the Trump Era, Political Behavior (2026)

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Mean Girls’ Amanda Seyfried And Lindsay Lohan Have Stayed Friends

Published

on

Lindsay Lohan and Amanda Seyfried with co-stars Rachel McAdams and co-star Lacey Chabert in 2004's Mean Girls

Long before we knew her for the likes of Mamma Mia!, Mank and The Dropout, Amanda Seyfried found international fame playing Karen in the 2004 teen comedy Mean Girls, and witnessed her co-star Lindsay Lohan’s struggles in the industry up close.

Opening up about her friendship with Lindsay in a new British GQ interview, Amanda recalled how, although they were the same age when they appeared together in the Tina Fey-penned movie, the level of attention they received was nowhere near equal.

“[I] wasn’t working at that level,” she said. “The spotlight was on her, no matter what she did.”

Amanda said she saw in real time how Lindsay went from being Hollywood’s hottest star to having the tabloids praying for her downfall.

Advertisement
Lindsay Lohan and Amanda Seyfried with co-stars Rachel McAdams and co-star Lacey Chabert in 2004's Mean Girls
Lindsay Lohan and Amanda Seyfried with co-stars Rachel McAdams and co-star Lacey Chabert in 2004’s Mean Girls

Michael Gibson/Paramount/Kobal/Shutterstock

“The outsized bashing is ugly,” said Amanda. “It’s like, a fear of mine. I would not want to be spotlit for being infamous in any way.”

During the same GQ article, Lindsay spoke fondly of the Oscar nominee, opening up about their continued friendship.

“We’ve stayed close because there’s genuine trust and respect between us,” the Freaky Friday actor claimed. “What started as shared experience has grown into a meaningful friendship over time.

“Now we talk more about life, motherhood and our families. She’s always someone I can rely on. That consistency is rare and something I really cherish.”

Advertisement
Lindsay Lohan

Although Amanda may have been mostly unscathed from the press during the era of paparazzi upskirting starlets and tabloids plotting the downfall of young women, it wasn’t because she didn’t go out clubbing.

“Did I find myself at Val Kilmer’s house one night at 1am with [Mean Girls co-stars] Daniel Franzese and Jonathan Bennett? Did I find myself there with them in the pool? I was 18 and I had just moved to LA and we had gone to a screening of Reefer Madness. I was at Val Kilmer’s house – I don’t even remember meeting him, but I was at his house,” she recalled about her “ridiculous” 20s.

On the red carpet of the 2024 Mean Girls musical adaptation, Lindsay also sang the praises of her 2004 co-stars Amanda and Lacey Chabert, who played Gretchen Wieners.

“I love Amanda and she’s done so well with her career,” Lindsay said. “She’s such a great actress and Lacey as well. We’re good friends and that’s what matters most.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Rihanna Kelver facing felony charges shows ‘stand your ground’ is not for trans people

Published

on

rihanna kelver

rihanna kelver

Rihanna Kelver, a transgender woman in Wyoming, is facing felony charges for pulling a weapon to defend herself after being subject to homophobic and transphobic slurs. Slate magazine reported that Kelver was about to end a work shift when several men on the street began yelling slurs at her. Then:

Moments later, according to court testimony and surveillance footage, the man shoved Kelver to the ground hard enough to injure her tailbone.

Kelver responded by drawing a pistol from her bag, chambering a round, and pointing the weapon at the man who had pushed her. She kept the safety on and never fired. The man and his companions retreated.

However, the man who shoved Kelver and began the confrontation has not been charged. But, Kelver is now facing charges of aggravated assault and possession of a deadly weapon with unlawful intent. If found guilty, she could face up to 15 years in prison.

For a nation as heavily invested in stand-your-ground as the US, Rihanna’s fight in court has become one that shows the systemic homophobia and transphobia in the justice system.

Advertisement

Kelver and ‘stand your ground’

Kelve’s arrest seemingly contradicts the Wyoming “Stand your ground” law, permitting an individual the right to defend themselves. In spite of the evidence presented, the man who assaulted her, (referred to as Durham) hasn’t faced a single charge. Kelver has had to leave her job due to her charges and faces an arraignment on the 24th of June 2026.

Many LGBTQ+ news and advocacy platforms have reported on her case, highlighting the unfairness and hypocrisy of the situation. They point out the irony that in a nation so proud of it’s citizen’s ability to arm themselves, the moment a trans person uses it against bigotry, it is criminalized. As Slate concluded:

Kelver’s experience also fits a long and troubling history of transgender people being punished for their acts of survival.

Kelver’s case can be used as a clear example of the double standards applied to queer and specifically trans people in the justice system. And for the queer community it’s seen as evidence of how queer people are not protected by the law to the same standards as others.

The system is not broken

Kelver’s arrest is not a new phenomenon but instead just the latest in a repeated history of LGBTQ+ individuals being punished for defending themselves. In 2014 CeCe McDonald was arrested and almost faced 40 years in prison after defending herself against a group of white people screaming racist and transphobic remarks and then physically assaulting her. In 2011 Ky Peterson was arrested and convicted for murdering his rapist and was only released after 9 years of imprisonment. These two examples are also notable because they involved Black trans people. The US justice system is not only queerphobic and transphobic, but deeply racist and anti-Black.  There is a fundamental ideology within the justice system itself to not only punish marginalized individuals for protecting themselves, but actively working to criminalize those same communities.

Advertisement

Activist Peter Gelderloos wrote on Truthout:

When transgender or queer people defend themselves from such violence, the law usually steps in to pick up where the vigilantes left off… White people who attack people of color who are crossing borders or transgressing “socially accepted” ways of behavior are defending their “selves” as those selves exist within society (and there is no other kind of self). Heterosexual people and cis-gendered people are defending those white heteronormative persons’ sense of self.

Despite LGBTQ+ people and people of colour being far more vulnerable to violent acts of hate, we are routinely punished for defending ourselves. And that is by design.

This is due to these systems of ‘justice’ being built out of the very systems that perpetuate our communities marginalization. Institutionalized ‘justice’ becomes a means of preserving a white supremacist and queerphobic hierarchy. When most self-defense laws were formed amongst Western countries, they wasn’t made with the majority of the population in mind. Like many laws, they were made to benefit a small privileged group, whilst purposely criminalising minorities for defending themselves from attack.

This is the system working as intended.

Advertisement

The death of rainbow capitalism

The arrest of Rihanna Kelver and the perpetuation of queer and marginalized injustice adds to a growing sentiment within the queer community. As we reach the middle of Pride month, many in the community have pointed out a noticeable decrease in the typical corporate advertising and promoting. Whereas before, companies would share posts, change logos and create merchandise, it has been replaced by rather abrupt silence.

Corporations tendencies during pride were referred to as “rainbow capitalism”, and was commonly met with annoyance by the queer community. It was generally understood that these gestures weren’t actual indicators of support but a means to seem progressive in order to drive more profits. However whilst the dramatic absence of rainbow capitalism is celebrated by some, it is seen as a grim indicator by others.

Cases like Kelver’s and lack of corporate support during pride, for some in the community isn’t just an indicator of progressive stagnation but in fact a regression. Capitalism may not indicate morality but it can reflect our culture. And with the many recent events happening across the world, it is clear for queer communities that there is a resurgence in far-right ideology. Rolling back queer rights is rapidly gaining popularity.

Pride is resistance

Of course, none of this is to argue that corporations should engage in pinkwashing during pride month. Instead, the death of rainbow capitalism is a sign that neoliberal capitalism has found that it is no longer necessary to pay lip service to queer rights. That, in turn, can be explained by the vicious bigotry from both the UK and US administrations who have normalised the creeping rise of transphobia.

Advertisement

Despite Pride this year possibly highlighting the ways culture has started to regress, it also represents our perseverance as a community. The reason Pride month exists today is due to the fighting and resistance of our queer forebears. Just as Rihanna Kelver herself is still fighting the legal battle for her right to protect herself, we as community must keep fighting and uplifting each other against this bigoted system.

Featured image via Getty/Heather Diehl

By Olaitan Mos-Shogbamimu

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025